Towards a World Brotherhood of Europeans

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, October 5, 2014

BrandenburgGate
Jared Taylor’s speech at the “forbidden” NPI conference.

Editor’s Note: This is Jared Taylor’s address to the National Policy Institute’s “Future of Europe” conference in Budapest, Hungary. The event was held despite persecution from the highest levels of the Hungarian government. Mr. Taylor’s comprehensive write-up of the conference is here.

It is a great honor to be speaking to you today and I would like to thank the sponsors and organizers for making this wonderful occasion possible.

I have many opportunities to speak to my American friends, so I would like to address my remarks to our European comrades.

I am grateful to be able to speak to you in my native language. We Americans are very bad at foreign languages, and I especially thank all of you in the audience who are making the effort to listen to me in what is for you a second or third language.

We are here to talk about the future of Europe. So why am I, an American, speaking to you?

Of course, it is because although I am a citizen of the United States I am a European. My country was founded by men who were, in every important respect, European. Their language, their religion, their culture, their institutions were all profoundly and exclusively European. Their blood was European. My own ancestors were mostly English but some were Scots, Dutch, and French Huguenot.

Europe is my ancestral home, my spiritual and cultural home.

It is also the ancestral home for millions of other sons and daughters of Europe who live thousands of miles away. They live in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa. Many people from those countries are with us in spirit this evening, because for them too, there is nothing more important than the future of Europe, for they too, in their far-off lands, have also created Europe.

Ladies and gentlemen, when I speak of Europe, I mean a priceless cultural achievement built over millennia by our ancestors, but I also mean an equally priceless genetic heritage. Our culture as Europeans cannot be separated from the distinct people that created it. We Europeans, all of us, are united at the most basic level by biology. We are of the same tribe. We, in this room, have a much closer physical kinship to each other than to anyone whose origins are outside of Europe.

I believe that in order to understand Europe, to love and to defend it, it is essential to realize that we are of one race. No other race of people could have built Europe, and no other race will defend it and carry its unique civilization forward in a meaningful way. In this sense, our people and our civilization are one and the same: Where you find our people, you find our civilization; where you find our civilization, you find our people.

Europe is our extended family, and it is natural for us to love our family and wish for it to prosper. Each of us will die, but each of us plays a tiny part in the history of Europe, and we hope and believe that this magnificent pageant of our people will never die.

Let me talk a little about race. It has become common for intellectuals to say that there is no such thing as race. Like so many forms of insanity, this one originated in the United States. The theory is that race is a sociological illusion, and that races are arbitrary categories. This idea is so wrong and so stupid that only very intelligent people can persuade themselves to believe it.

It should not be necessary to refute something that is obviously wrong. Just look at a Central-American Indian and a European. The differences are obviously real, obviously biological. Anyone who denies this must have ideological motives.

And racial differences can be unforgiving. We assume that a mother is more closely related to her child than to any other child on earth. This is not always true. Let us imagine a Danish woman who has a child with a Nigerian man. Danes and Nigerians are so genetically distant from each other that the Danish mother is actually genetically closer to any random Danish child than she is to her own half-Nigerian child.

Race is the product of tens of thousands of years of separate evolution that have produced not only racial differences in appearance but also in ability and temperament.

It is the unique characteristics of Europeans that explain why European societies are unmistakably similar, whether they are in Central Europe or on the other side of the earth in New Zealand.

But why am I talking about race, at a conference about the future of Europe? It is because there can be no Europe without Europeans. There can be no Europe without people like us. Only men of European stock could have built Europe on my continent, and only men of the same stock can preserve Europe on this continent.

The threat to Europe everywhere is very great. As you may know, in 1960, the population of the United States was 90 percent white. Until 1965 the United States had immigration laws that were designed to keep it European. Since that change in policy, non-white immigrants have poured into the United States, and now my country is only 62 or 63 percent white. Current projections are that in just 28 years, whites will be a minority.

My country is rapidly ceasing to be an outpost of Europe, and with catastrophic results. And yet, rather than recognize catastrophe or understand its cause, Americans are determined to believe that catastrophe is not catastrophe–that it is instead a blessing.

The official ideology of America is that “Diversity is our strength,” and by diversity is meant every possible mix of race, language, religion etc. Many people will tell you that “diversity is America’s greatest strength.”

Of course, diversity is a terrible weakness. It pits different groups against each other and destroys trust. In every part of the world, when peoples who are different in language, religion, or race try to share the same territory, there is conflict. This is virtually a law of nature, but American ideology attempts to rewrite the laws of nature.

The American worship of diversity is sometimes comical. At one time, General George Casey was in overall command of the American forces in Iraq. He said, and I quote, “I firmly believe that the strength of our army comes from our diversity.” He is saying that the US Army is strong, not because it has better equipment or better training, but because it has blacks and Mexicans and Filipinos in it. This is the sort of crazy thing Americans love say.

The American “diversity” ideology really means national suicide through immigration: the replacement of European people by non-Europeans.

I have written a book about what is happening in my country. I think you will find it instructive, because the American sickness is coming to this continent. In the long term you face exactly the same threat we do. In Britain, for example, the current projection is that whites will become a minority by 2066. France and Germany are moving in the same direction.

In 1900 the population of the continent of Europe was three times that of Africa; by 2050, just 150 years later, the population of Africa will be three times greater than that of Europe. Will those Africans want to stay in Africa? No, they will want to live here.

And throughout Europe, governments are permitting millions of aliens to flood into their countries. Our rulers do not understand that a nation has no more precious treasure than its culture and the distinctive genes that made that culture possible. These treasures must be protected by the most powerful means possible, and that is the state. The state is betraying its deepest obligations when it permits large numbers of aliens to settle in a country. From a cultural or genetic point of view, immigration is no different from armed invasion.

Immigration policy is a national policy of evolution. Immigration determines the future genetic makeup of the nation. If immigrants are from Somalia or Honduras, it means the host population has suddenly evolved in the direction of Somalia or Honduras.

This, of course, is why the idea that there is no such thing as race is so pernicious. It is a way of preparing people for their own extinction. It is a way of telling people, “No, no. You’re not being replaced by aliens and strangers. You are being replaced by yourselves.”

Only white people believe this nonsense. You can be sure that Japanese or Pakistanis do not think race is an illusion.

The theme of my talk today is the need for a world brotherhood of Europeans. We must think not in national terms but in terms of our common destiny as a people.

Please note that when I speak of a brotherhood of Europeans I am not saying that all European are the same. Not at all. Within Europe there are many nations, and within these nations there are many regions, each with its own beautiful and distinctive differences. I hope all these nations and regions will endure and prosper.

What I ask of you is to think of all whites anywhere in the world as your European brothers. We Americans and New Zealanders and Afrikaners do not live on the continent of Europe, but we are Europeans. We are part of your family. Needless to say, our governments do not speak for us, indeed our governments often try to silence us, and even though you may not always hear our voices we are there: You have brothers across the sea.

At the same time, I would urge you to think close to home and not only across the sea. It may be easier to think of an American like me as your brother than it is to think of your immediate neighbors as your brothers. And by this, I mean to say that I know what was done to Hungary by the Treaty of Trianon. I know that you have disputes with your neighbors, and grievances are hard to bear, decade after decade.

And yet, I propose to you that it is the survival of our common civilization that is the great prize, and sometimes in order to gain the great prize it may be necessary to give ground on smaller prizes. The central issue of our time is whether Europe and European man will survive. I hope you will not wait for the Algerians and the Chinese and the Africans to come among you to realize that your neighbors are your brothers after all.

Now, I know what some of you are thinking: “What can an American know of armed invasion and defeat in war? What can an American know of the humiliation of having one’s nation torn to pieces?”

Well, some of us do know something about that. All my male ancestors of military age served in the armed forces of the Confederate States of America. They had a nation, with a government, an army and navy, a national currency, and a postal service, and fierce sense of peoplehood. They fought bravely to defend their nation from invasion for four years, but they were utterly crushed, and their nation was destroyed.

When I was younger, I was angry at the North. I used to like to read about the victorious battles of the Confederacy, but now I don’t even like to read about our victories. Even the victories were tragedies. They were victories only because we were more successful at killing our brothers than our brothers were at killing us.

It is the same for the First and Second World Wars. These were the Peloponnesian Wars of our people. They were material and spiritual catastrophes, and many European nations still carry deep wounds from these wars.

The Confederates and their descendants eventually had to come to terms with defeat. I cannot predict how the wounds in Central Europe will heal, but I believe they will heal more quickly if we remember the greater threat that all Europeans face.

This is of urgent concern to me because I have not lost just one nation. After losing the Confederate States I am now losing the United States. I am losing it because my government, which once defended Europe and the genetic heritage of Europe, has opened the gates to invasion. My country is becoming a monstrous, unheard-of mix without an identity of any kind. America’s own rulers are piling up the bonfires that are destroying it.

And this, my brothers, you must not do.

Although the United States is destroying itself, it is still very powerful and influential, and it has the arrogance to think it has the right to impose its ways on the rest of the world. The United States is today the greatest enemy anywhere in the world of healthy, European nationalism and self preservation. If you wish to commit suicide, the United States will help you. If you wish to live, the United States will oppose you.

It is worth remembering the remarks of the American general, Wesley Clark, who was in charge of the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999. As he explained:

There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th-century idea, and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.

What he was saying is that France must not be French. Hungary must not be Hungarian. Italy must not be Italian. Every country must become a meaningless stew, just like America.

This is the insanity that has overtaken my country.

The greatest threat to all of Europe is this poisonous ideology of diversity that my country wants to force upon you. Western Europe has already swallowed an enormous dose of this poison. The United States and Western Europe will use their wealth to bribe you, to try to make you embrace diversity. The United States is also a source of much cultural poison in the form of movies, television, and music.

I believe the former members of the Warsaw Pact can hold the line, but it is a race against time. Will they establish themselves as culturally and racially confident nations before they are poisoned by the sicker but wealthier West? Or perhaps the healthier Central European nations will support Western identitarians and save all of Europe. I believe these are the questions on which the future of Europe will turn.

Let me conclude by reiterating the main themes of my talk this evening. First, Europe is wherever we find Europeans, whether they are on the continent of Europe or across the sea. Second, what we Europeans all hold in common is not merely a culture, a history, a way of being, but also the common kinship that we call race. Third, Europe, wherever it is found, is in a life-or-death struggle against displacement by aliens who will transform our societies in ways that would make them unrecognizable to our ancestors.

We must be, all of us, comrades in this great struggle for the defense of everything that we love, in this struggle for the defense of Europe.

Today, the lines are not so clearly drawn, the crisis is not so sharp, but for our generation, this is Thermopylae, this is Poitiers, this is the Siege of Malta, this is Blood River.

Men of Europe, my brothers, we must stand together. We must struggle together, so that together we will prevail.

Topics:

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • propagandaoftruth

    I could fell no more personally violated than the site of millions of hostile, substandard aliens ruining Europe at the invitation of treacherous European elites and academes drunk on the specter of American invincibility and example.

    Way to lay it all out point by point. JT.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Jared Taylor has nailed everything in this speech. No beating around the bush on the importance of race. All Culturally European lands are the creations of the Caucasian race. South American lands where Latin Caucasians from Southern Europe miscegenated with the Bronze race of natives no longer resemble Spain or Portugal. Race is the bedrock upon which cultures are built. European culture is only built and maintained by the Caucasian race.

  • Lagerstrom

    Excellent speech! What a shame that hardly anyone, particularly Europeans, even care.
    I’m a European down here in Australia and I can tell you that hardly anyone down here cares
    one jot about anything apart from sports.

    It is worth remembering the remarks of the American general, Wesley
    Clark, who was in charge of the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999. As he
    explained:
    “There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states.
    That’s a 19th-century idea, and we are trying to transition into the
    21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.”

    I’d never heard that one before. It actually made my hair stand on end.

    • thegodsofeden

      With regards to sports, it’s pretty much the same here in the USA. Constant and never ending the year round. Add to that the inane reality shows, and well…

      • Casper Flannigan

        The modern opiate of the masses. Go team! Have you seen Kim Kardashian’s new dress / show / jewelry / wedding?

        Avoid mass media like you would arsenic.

        • thegodsofeden

          “Have you seen Kim Kardashian’s new…”, only on the cover of gossip mags when standing in line at the grocery store. Haven’t had TV in almost 20 years.

          • Alexandra1973

            I got rid of cable over two years ago. I don’t read newspapers (except very occasionally a local one online–and that’s to see what’s happening locally). As far as celebrities…I view them as just people who get paid to play make-believe. I also think they’re a bunch of nuts.

          • WR_the_realist

            I haven’t owned a television for my entire adult life. I’ve never understood the importance other people assign to those who are good at playing make believe. Or to those that are good at tossing a ball around.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Same here. TV has become such a disgusting display of magic Negroes and miscegenation that I can barely stand to watch.

          • Germanicus

            Way to go! I have never owned a TV. I have gone TV free for 39 years. The mind clears up with every passing day without that psychic poison.

          • B.A_2014

            I like to think I could but then I have watched so many great television. Do you ever watch DVD box sets or own a TV without a cable?

          • Germanicus

            I do have a DVD player for movies. I watch no sports even though I was a decent athlete and enjoyed playing. There is no reception by air and I have never had cable TV. I like internet where I do the hunting, selecting and interacting. I read and study very different stuff than this. I have started organizations. I organize small groups. You can to if you have the time available not absorbing poisonous memes from TV.

          • Christorchaos

            What great television? I’ve heard this from many quarters. Orson Welles- and Paul Henning-great?? Doubt that…

          • B.A_2014

            I was thinking more Breaking bad, The Sopranos and Boardwalk Empire. I’m also a Boxing and UFC junkie.

          • Christorchaos

            I find the TV series of the last 15 years to be trite and manipulative. Maybe it is an age thing…

          • Charles Martel

            You can get old black and white shows on DVDs

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            A DVD player on which to view interesting travelogues, movies that are worth watching, and documentaries is all I need. Nothing but garbage on the programmed tube. AmRen and Council of Conservative Citizens is where we should get our news, along with our local newspapers.

          • B.A_2014

            I wouldn’t endorse MSM but to watch it and deconstruct the propaganda can be funny sometimes. Watching them dance over the scalding coals of political correctness is very enjoyable.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          The opiate of the masses, and a vehicle for the brainwashing of the masses into accepting miscegenation and integration as normal instead of abhorrent. Whites cheer on Negro athletes on the football field, instead of finding this chance to engage in the barbarism that comes so naturally to them disgusting and abhorrent. Few are repulsed at the spectacle of Kim Kartrashian, miscegenating with a Negro.

      • MBlanc46

        Not only sports, but endless talking about sports. “Pregame” and “postgame” programs go on longer than the games themselves. The sports pages in the local paper get as much space as the business pages. Radio call-in programs drone on 24 hours a day. It must be the new opiate of the masses (as I see an earlier poster already has noted).

        • thegodsofeden

          Actually had a co-worker, just recently, ask me what I thought about a local pro team. When I replied that I no longer watched sports or television he looked at me like as if I’d just cursed his mother, instead of engaging with me in a conversation about why. The weirdest thing though, he won’t even speak to me now. Not even a hello. Mustn’t commit a sacrilege like that against one of the new modern religions I guess.

          • MBlanc46

            Heaven knows how he might have reacted if you’d said that at least part of the reason for giving up sports is that they’re black dominated.

          • thegodsofeden

            Shhhhhh! Nobody’s supposed to notice these things. LOL

          • anony

            I know too. He would have called him raciss!

    • Thorsted

      If you live in Australia you may have heard of Frank Salter. He has written some books on multiculturalism and human nature. There is 2.hours interview with him on the swedish net radio “Red Ice Radio” -it is on-line.

      • thegodsofeden

        Just looked him up and what I’ve found has piqued my interest. Also going to listen to his pod-casts. Thanks for the heads-up.

        • Thorsted

          Yes-it is really good. I have heard twice. He says that we won the cold war geographically -but lost it culturally. Marxism was also a war on human nature.

          • thegodsofeden

            Agreed. But the Cult-Marxist don’t call it “Marxism” any longer because of the stigma that word raises. Hence “Diversity” and “Multiculturalism”. Those are much more warm and fuzzy terms. Gives you ‘goosebumps’.

          • Thorsted

            Yes, but what marxism and what is happening today share is 1) That humans are just “black slates” where you can put your ideology into 2) Marxism was deeply egalitarian between individuals and could´t accept that nature was unfair. That egalitarian thinking is now between cultures.It is not just migration that makes is problematic but also thing like foreign policy where you think that you can export democracy to arabs that besides Islam also are a tribal culture based on kinship, shame and honor where there is no such thing as a common good for a larger society -because outside the tribe the is no society.

          • thegodsofeden

            Wish I could continue this discussion right now, but have a previous engagement to attend. Will bookmark it and come back to it later. Cheers.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            The problem is that egalitarianism gives “goosebumps” to Whites unfamiliar with the perils of diversity. Whites in places like Greater Minneapolis, where crime has traditionally been low and prosperity high due to racial/ethnic homogeneity, are most likely to buy into the lie that their area “needs more diversity”, and allow an influx of non-Whites who will create nothing but problems. Greater Minneapolis, for example, is allowing a massive influx of Somalians. They will destroy the sections of the city that they settle in, and will not react to White egalitarianism towards them by becoming hard working, responsible citizens. They will take advantage of hand-outs whenever possible, engage in violence as much as they please, and create Africa in our midst, as Jared Taylor so accurately points out.

          • Charles Martel

            People have to meet enough real life blacks to overcome the brainwashing of As Seen On Tv blacks.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Exactly. TV used to depict racial reality. Fred Sanford and George Jefferson were the milder end of Black reality. Resentful and irascible, but not likely to erupt into sudden violence. Now, TV is awash with magic Negroes, falsely selling the lie that Sydney Poitier and Denzel Washington are typical Blacks. Rappers are typical Blacks. Trayvon Martin was a typical Black. Racial reality is harsh, but is, above all, reality. Running away from reality is always a dangerous endeavor. How many knock-out game attacks need to occur before White Liberals simply admit that their Grandparents were not evil bigots, but simply sensible realists? Racial realism is not hate. It is seeing the facts about racial differences that enhance our ability, as Whites, to navigate the minefield that is racial diversity.

          • SentryattheGate

            Agree; the word “prejudice” means to “pre judge”/before facts are known.

          • SentryattheGate

            Plus some of these Somalians went back to be jihadists. One of the recent beheaders has an American accent! Many Hmong too were brought into the Minneapolis area (by Lutherans mostly)—and unlike other Asians, they are heavy welfare users.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Saw a TV special a while back on the gangs the Hmong have organized in the Twin Cities. Engelman should watch this. Orientals can be extremely violent when they choose to be. Any White Liberal who wanders into the crossfire of these Oriental gangs is sure to find out quite quickly. These guys are not spending their days making Fried Cheese Wontons and LoMein noodles. A race realist accurately thinks of The Khmer Rouge, canings and beheadings, and sexual trafficking in Southeast Asia upon seeing this. Only Whites create, maintain, and preserve European cultures. Orientals are of a higher quality racial stock than Negroes or Bronzes, but, in large numbers, they will also tear down Western Civilization.

      • Ian Thomas

        On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethnicity, and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration by Frank Salter is one of my personal favorites.

        • Thorsted

          I have just come across him recently but I will ask my library what publication of him there is in the danish research library and take it home. Matt Ridleys “The origins of virtue” and Steven Pinkers “Black slate” is the closest I have to things on human nature of critics of utopian thinking.

          • anony

            “Black slate” or blank slate?

          • Thorsted

            Sorry is “The blank slate”- I have corrected it. I am from Denmark so I make mistakes. My active skills in english are not as great as my passive skills. I read/understand better than I write.

          • anony

            No problem; I thought so but then thought maybe you were referring to something I was unaware of.

            I am from the U.S., so I make mistakes too! 🙂

          • Eagle_Eyed

            With the levels of African immigration, you may have been more correct than you know.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Indeed. Africa in our midst has never worked. Never will. Negroes have a different temperament from Whites, and will always clash with us. The North imposed their will on Dixie out of Civil War era enmity, and naiveté regarding what having Africa in our midst actually entails. The South had been dealing with Africa in their midst for generations.

          • Germanicus

            Aristotle and Aquinas. Much better than the Ridley and Pinker.

          • Thorsted

            In some ways you are right. I read a biography about the political realist “Hans Morgenthau” who as a german jew came to the US and found american liberals just a utopian as communists. He was very influenced by Nietzsche on his views on human nature. This was not accepted in the US and he teams up with Reinhold Neibur that was influenced by pessimism on human nature from Luther, Augustine and other classic writers. So, you can go back in history and find your anti-utopian thinkers of that time- there is no new human! What is important is that you have to be able to speak to the people of your time. That is the problem with old writers- the languages becomes to private for the current situation.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            The Blank Slate, or Tabula Rasa theories of human development are the primary fuel behind racial egalitarianism amongst Whites. All evidence points to Nature and Nurture both being of essential importance in human behavior. It is politicians who have latched onto, and pushed, the acceptance of Tabula Rasa theories by the masses. A politician who wants open borders, and Whites welcoming their own dispossession, pushes Tabula Rasa theories. A theory that pushes the notion that each newborn baby is a blank slate, and that all behavior is learned, leads Whites to believe that race doesn’t matter, unless experience tells them otherwise. Experiences around non-White minorities cause Whites to question the Leftist narrative of race being only skin deep. As Jared Taylor accurately pointed out in this speech, the differences races of humans have different basic temperaments. I learned this truth as a teenager, when my almost entirely White school experienced a large influx of Black students. As an adult, I’ve become even more certain that segregation is the only way when Whites and Blacks live in close proximity, as a result of dealing with Blacks in the workplace. Denying that the different races of humans need to remain separated, in order for world peace to prevail, has been the most lethal result of modern liberalism. As Jared Taylor accurately points out, this racial egalitarianism began in the United States. It began with Northerners, living in a racially homogenous society that had successfully melted together the nationalities of Europe into a cohesive and functional White America, failing to learn from their Southern Brethren. The South knew the behavioral traits of the Negro well, and knew how to best handle life with Africa in their midst. Segregation is the only way. The North, fueled by Civil War era grudges, pretended that Negroes were no different from a White ethnic group, and imposed their will on Dixie, as well as the North.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Just looked up Frank Salter. His writings hit the nail on the head. Here in the states, our safest and most prosperous cities and even rural areas are characterized by homogeneity. Areas with a large Negro population have the most problems with crime, and are where Liberals love most to accuse Whites of racism. Segregation is treated as if it is a profane concept by the Leftists these days. They are severely deluded. Segregation is the only way Whites can live with any dignity or peace, or maintain any semblance of our identity or culture when large non-White populations live nearby.

        • Thorsted

          The swedish “Red Ice Radio” have 2.programs with him in 3.hour total. You can get it by their website or youtube “Frank Salter”. I highly recommend it.

      • SentryattheGate

        I’m glad you reminded me of them! I’ll make it a point to listen to them again. Check out their interview with UC-Davis professor Darrell Hamamoto, re. the underlying motives behind the mass immigration of Asians and Hispanics; the new “servitors of empire”.

    • Nancy

      Australia is one of our “escape plans” in the event that the USA becomes completely untenable. Are there any large areas that are predominantly white still, like perhaps Perth?

      • Jack Burton

        Why would you want to escape to Australia? Their laws are as bad as Britain. Virtually total gun control and if you even verbally offend a non-white you can be arrested.

        • Nancy

          Really? I hadn’t heard that. My husband’s company is opening a branch there, so the option came up. Personally, I’d prefer New Zealand.

          • Jack Burton

            If you have business there I can see why, would be an easier transition. However, yes, the laws are very oppressive for any pro-white activist.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            That is tragic. Whenever I think of Australia, I think of the late Steve Irwin (Croc Hunter), or Paul Hogan as Crocodile Dundee. That “that’s not a knoyfe, this is a knoyfe” was a great moment of racial realism on the silver screen. I can’t picture Aussie country boys like good ole Paul Hogan without at least a decently ballsy knife in their pocket.

          • Bantu_Education

            If they ever re-make Crocodile Dundee the mugger in the “knife” scene would have to be a crazed whitey covered with swastika and other Nazi-style tattoos.

          • Jack Burton

            Since 2000, movies and especially TV are full on interracial propaganda, mandatory. It’s extremely rare that a TV show doesn’t have a black or non-white in every scene or every other scene.

            Recently watched the first episode of The Flash, black female friend/love interest and her black father all through the show. Danielle Panabaker is a knockout, but no, he wants the mulatto.

          • Jack Burton

            Irwin was a bit of a liberal. He sympathized with the Aboriginals and he gave his daughter an Aboriginal name.

      • thegodsofeden

        I’m looking into small enclaves in Alaska. Lease up to a two acre parcel of land for 50 yrs @ $1 dollar a year. Plus no property tax and a small yearly stipend from the state of Alaska from a permanent fund. Of course you would have to not mind the cold and wilderness living. I’m that kind of person though, so it suits me.

        • anony

          Can you lease more than a two-acre parcel of contiguous land? For example, can you lease 100 acres of contiguous land?

          • thegodsofeden

            I’m not sure about that. I know you can purchase large tracts of land from the state, I believe at raw land prices. What I’ve been looking into though are what are called intentional communities. That’s where individuals form a community based on shared values and life outlooks. You are able to visit and meet the people that already reside there. After a specified time period, all parties involved decide if it’s a good fit or not. They have them all over the country, not just Alaska. I can find the link to the hosting website if you’d like it.

          • Bantu_Education

            Orania (see article this day) is another “intentional community” – the only one in South Africa as far as I am aware. However most such communities are too small and fragile or full of elderly new-age hippies. I think the future for whites lies in the concept of “Charter Cities” as espoused by Paul Romer and exemplified in his motto “lets have one thousand Hong Kongs”. I believe some of the smaller countries in Central or South America could be amenable to the concept of long-leasing some of their under-utilised territory.

          • thegodsofeden

            Very interesting. Have to look into Orania and ‘Charter Cities’. It is true that many ‘Intentional Communities’ do not survive for very long. I plan to visit those that interest me, and see if any of them may be to my liking or if they are just wishful thinking. As for Central and South America I like Belize (though now very expensive), Costa Rica, and Ecuador. Oh and almost forgot, Chile. While Chile does have a reputation for quakes, it also has beautiful and fairly inexpensive under-utilized farm land.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Too darn remote and cold!! My wife and I are moving South to good old West by God Virginia when we retire. To me, the outdoors is meant to be enjoyed in a pair of shorts, not long johns, LOL!! I’ve had enough cold here in the Midwest.

          • thegodsofeden

            Beautiful area in ‘West by God Virginia’. Have family in Tennessee, Kentucky and Indiana. That being said, too close to the “Knuckle-Heads” in D.C. for my taste. Hope you enjoy the outdoor life there when you arrive. PS – I really love my long johns. Like pajamas without the stigma. 🙂

        • Charles Martel

          If the US falls would your community be able to survive? I saw that people can have semi underground greenhouses to grow food in winter time with rocket mass heaters under the grow beds.

          • thegodsofeden

            There are some communities that I’ve looked into that are using the exact technology that you speak of. When you say, ‘If the US falls’, do you mean from foreign invasion or just a complete meltdown from within? The reason I ask, is that I think those things have already happened. It’s just a matter of time before the results fully show themselves. Whether that occurs next week or years after I’m dead and gone doesn’t much matter to me, because when the full event happens, I’m not sure there will be much of anywhere that’ll be completely immune.

          • Charles Martel

            Do you count 3rd world benefit seekers as foreign invaders?

          • thegodsofeden

            Most definitely. They have come to understand that they do not have to assimilate. No need to: 1) learning the dominant language, 2) culture or 3) ways of thinking. Just by showing up they will be allowed in, no questions asked.

      • Ian Thomas

        My “escape plan” would be Estonia. It’s one of the most racially solid countries in Europe, Estonians still have pride in their culture and people, it’s mainly because Estonia hasn’t been bombarded with constant third world immigration. However I feel a little uneasy learning a new language, plus forcing my euro mutt self to be accepted as an “Estonian citizen” when I have no ethnic ties to Estonia.

        • newscomments70

          Estonia is on the list for mass immigration. I imagine it has already happened, to some extent. Don’t waste your time learning Estonian, it will have the same multicultural horrors as Western Europe soon. Iceland was a homeland, now even they have their first mosque. There is no where to escape. We must stand our ground and push back.

          • Alexandra1973

            Iceland’s letting those people in?

            I wouldn’t have minded Iceland. I wouldn’t have minded the weather, and English is at least one of the languages there…people would at least be able to understand me while I learned Icelandic.

            So much for that pipe dream.

          • newscomments70

            yes, the tourist pamphlets brag about the wonderful new diversity in Iceland. Iceland and Ireland were spared for awhile, but entrance into the EU forced them to accept third world immigrants. I shudder when I hear how badly Eastern European countries are trying to enter the union….such a desecration.

          • Ian Thomas

            I’m not that pessimistic when it comes to Eastern Europe’s future, they’ve held their own pretty well in regards to mass immigration. Even Russians don’t tolerate it. I was watching a video recently of a festival in Estonia with thousands of people, there was not a single non white face in the crowd. I watched a similar video but with a festival in Sweden, noticed at least 34 non white faces.

          • newscomments70

            I hope you’re right about Eastern Europe. And yes, I watch videos and read articles about Sweden. There was one video about a school in Stockholm. They kept panning to the same white child, to give us the illusiion that there are still white children left in the school system. There was only one what child in that school, the rest were Muslim/Middle Eastern. On the Local (dot )se, they typically display white women with darker skinned males. The only Swedish males that they display look like homosexuals.

          • Alexandra1973

            Why am I not surprised.

          • Ian Thomas

            Eastern Europe has immigration issues, but most Eastern Europeans don’t like what’s happening in their countries and they actually do something about it.

            I was watching a documentary recently about black people in Russia where the majority of them go there to study. The black people in Russia don’t stay for long because they’re too scared, and most who want to go there are thinking twice about it. Russian youths take to the streets and beat up foreigners any chance they get. Basically the same story in Latvia and Poland. It’s pretty brutal over there.

            From what I’ve seen Slavic/Baltic people are more proud of their people and culture, and more protective of their countries and traditions.

            Northern Europeans need to grow a spine and fight back, the problem is they’re too nice for their own good.

          • Logan Smith

            Maybe the Swedish Democrats will turn that around.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Where is the Viking warrior spirit?? It makes me sick to read this about Sweden. My ancestry is a quarter Swedish. My one Grandfather, a full blooded Swede, had a fierce temper, but was slow to boil, and almost overly fair minded. He had never dealt with Blacks, but withheld judgment of them to far too high a degree, and was a lifelong democrat. My other Grandfather, a full blooded German, was also slow to boil and fair minded, but had a keen bull crap detector. He had dealt with Blacks as a supervisor at a factory, and was a full bore racial realist who voted for both Strom Thurmond and George Wallace. He always told me that my Swedish Grandfather was too nice, and that the Swedes tended toward this. Both men have been gone for years now, but I remember well the difference in their bull crap detectors.

          • Logan Smith

            How are we supposed to push back if our brothers seemingly don’t care? Are they waking up?

          • newscomments70

            People do care and are pushing back. Up to 30% of the voters in Europe are voting “far right”. In the Unitied States, the militia movement has increased over 1000% since Obama was elected. Not enough people are aware though. There are too many drunken sport fans. That has to change.

          • Logan Smith

            They always try to beat around the race issue, though. I hate watching Fox News, because of this. Fox News is pushing conservatives to the Left, by saying “It’s not all immigration, it’s illegal immigration” “we should elect a black man as president, so we’re not racist” “we should try to be more inclusive”. It sticks to the conservatives, and they start repeating what they hear on the supposedly Right leaning news. I don’t understand why other people can’t see through the BS. I feel as if I’m the only one who can see through their propaganda. It’s true what they say, Conservatives are just Liberals who are 20 years behind.

            I almost want to say the only hope we have is economic collapse or revolution.

          • newscomments70

            You are right; Foxnews is carefully orchestrated propganda. They are trying to sway white conservatives, slowly and steadily. It is owned by Rupert Murdoch who is overtly liberal; he is quite vocal about increasing African immigration to Australia. Conservatives in Europe are beta males and lap dogs to the liberal cause. The former Soviet East Germany is an interesting parallel to today’s West. They did have political parties alternative to the communist party. They even had “conservatives”, the traditional German CDU. The conservatives were allowed to exist in name, but were forced to tow the party line, under threat of imprisonment. Walter Ulbricht, dictactor stated, “We give them the illusion of democracy, but we are in charge.” Today In Western countries, we have a very similar situation. i.e. if a “Conservative” Tory in the UK criticizes immigration, he will be arrested for a hate crime . (In the US, he would lose his job and pension)

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            Rupert Murdoch owns Fox, but he also owns newspapers all over the world, and most of them are leftist. His primary interest is $$, not ideology, except for those policies which will increase his $$. More workers, lower wages, more demand, more bodies, higher rents – elites love the cash, the country be d-mned. Fox saw an opening on the right in the news world and took it, but it was pure opportunism.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            What you say about Conservatives is very true. When I talk to younger Republicans, they are Leftist Libtards, usually, on race and social issues. Most White racial realists are independents these days, but were Democrats at one time. My Grandfather, who voted for Strom Thurmond and George Wallace, had been a Democrat until the Dems started supporting integration.

          • Logan Smith

            I hate how “conservatives” are becoming social Liberals.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            We racial realists are too smart for the Dempublicans and Republicrats. We have been for years. Just hoping to see push back in the voting booth in 2016 from a lot more Whites. Hopefully, the Zimmerman trial and Ferguson have woken up a lot of Whites. We need another George Wallace who stands up for the interests of working Whites. A3P had the right idea in 2012, but Merlin Miller is not quite a George Corley Wallace.

    • Jack Burton

      Of course what he really meant is multi-racial, third world immigration. European countries are already somewhat multi-ethnic within European ethnics.

    • Jack Burton

      You’ve got white Australians now doing the haka dance at sports games, disgraceful IMO.

    • WR_the_realist

      Yes, it made me ask myself, “When does the United States invade Iceland?”

    • bilderbuster

      “I am the oldest son, of the oldest son, of the oldest son – at least five generations, and they were all rabbis.”
      Gen. Wesley Clark revels in his Jewish roots speaking to students at a Brooklyn yeshiva 1999. (Ron Kampeas, The Jewish Telegraphic Agency)
      His ancestors were not just Jews, but members of the priestly caste of Kohens and he should never be confused with a European nor feel any kinship with them.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        He is hiding behind a very Anglo-Celtic sounding last name. Clark surely is not an Ashkenazi name. Another Gentile hating Ashkenazi Leftist. How does he think Jewish culture will survive surrounded by non-Caucasian barbarians, and Islamists who want every Jew on this planet dead? If he prefers life in Israel, which is basically a militarized enclave surrounded by Islamic hordes to the United States, he should have moved there, and taken the rest of his Gentile hating brethren with him.

    • Calufrax

      Yes, the sports cult is amazingly stupid. Many men seem to care about nothing else, not world events, politics ,religion,science- nothing. And many stupid conservatives like Ann Coulter actually call any opposition to this moronic cult “liberal”. Afro-ball, whether the fall or winter variety, has to be one of the biggest wastes of time and attention ever invented.

    • TL2014

      Sadly, people who don’t care have their extinction coming. No sympathy if you are unaware and/or in denial.

    • Michael Mason

      You’d think Clark is an Anglo Saxon by his surname. Turns out he’s a filthy Semite fiend.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      I don’t remember that one either. Ethnically pure states have the highest quality of life. The Anglo-Celtic culture of Great Britain is what made The British Isles great. An unsavory stew of Negroes and Arab Islamists does not belong in Great Britain. They have only created Africa and the Middle East in Great Britain’s midst. Only other Europeans, such as Polish immigrants, have assimilated to the Anglo-Celtic culture. Race is the reason for this, as Jared Taylor so accurately points out. Race was what caused the Pan-European melting pot to work so well in the U. S. in the Northern States until Negroes moved North, and made a mess. Negroes and Hispanics clash with Whites because they have a different temperament from us. When the American melting pot was one of Europeans, all members of the Caucasian race, adapting to the founding Anglo-Celtic culture, we built a land that was the pride of the Western World.

    • Nevsky

      No wonder if you consider his ethnicity and upbringing. Look him up on Wikipedia.

    • Nevsky

      No wonder if you consider his ethnicity. He might look white but…

    • Jacobite2

      Well, pop culture is where most people live. When was the last time you heard any politician of any party make a straight-out appeal for white votes? I mean white votes in opposition to the parties representing non-white. Political Correctness really boils down to just one rule — whites have no rights and whites have no interests that non-whites are obliged to respect. Just the opposite of the situation in 1859.

  • rebecca

    Blah, blah, all I hear is “hate anyone who isn’t white”.

    • propagandaoftruth

      Are you referring to the commentary or the article?

      If you are anti-White you are not welcome here although if you are “White curious” and polite perhaps you can ask questions and I or someone else can attempt to answer.

      Ask me about my opinion of the word and concept of “hate” for example.

      Ask the moderator.

    • JohnEngelman

      Immigrants who engage in acts of terrorism and crime deserve to be hated.

    • 1G25

      “… all I want to hear is ‘hate anyone who isn’t white’ .”

      Fixed it for you.

    • anony

      If that’s all you hear, then you are not listening. Alternatively, you simply cannot understand the issues (I’m trying to be polite).

      • propagandaoftruth

        You have try. Self discipline and all. Plus agitprop loves to agitate.

        It’s real simple. Dole out the rope, pour some tea for two, have a polite discussion while enemy hangs self.

        The ideal, you know?

  • JohnEngelman

    In 1900 the population of the continent of Europe was three times that of Africa; by 2050, just 150 years later, the population of Africa will be three times greater than that of Europe. Will those Africans want to stay in Africa? No, they will want to live here.

    – Jared Taylor

    Third world peoples escape the dysfunctions of the societies they create, and bring their dysfunctions with them.

    • Homo_Occidentalis

      So true. Whenever I debate lefties about immigration, I tell them simply to look at the societies whites create, and to look at the societies non-whites create. “Which would you prefer to inhabit?”, I then ask. At this point they usually start calling me a racist.

      • Ian Thomas

        I always get the same response “You’re racist!”. “You’re racist!” = Emotional response. These people are not logical and rely on nothing but emotions. Look at it this way, every time someone calls you a “racist” in a debate, it just means you’re winning.

        • Logan Smith

          But we really lose in the end, because without the masses on our side, we have no future.

      • WR_the_realist

        At that point you’ve won the argument. The only tool the multi-culties have at their disposal is to call their opponents nasty names. So when they’ve done that, you know they’re out of ammunition.

      • bilderbuster

        At that point you should point out that the non-Whites agree with you and risk their lives fleeing their nations and flock to “racist” White nations.
        Of course the response will be that the White nations made the Third World nations into the hell holes that they are.

      • JohnEngelman

        “You’re a racist,” means, “I can’t answer your argument about the existence and important of genetic racial differences.”

    • Cecil Broomsted

      Also true in the case of Islam. The “anti-racists” never can make that vital connection because to do so would require acknowledging racial differences as a problem.

      • bilderbuster

        The Muslim nations wouldn’t permit hoards of White Muslims into their nations.

      • JohnEngelman

        Everything “anti-racists” hate about the religious right and the Bible Belt is far more true of Muslims, and Muslim society.

        • Logan Smith

          I wonder if we should start calling Christian-haters “racists”, since apparently religion is considered a race now.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Ironic indeed. You and I know that Islam is not a race, but that Islam creates a culture which is at complete odds with White Christian culture. Arabs are technically Caucasian, but this means very little. There is a strong Negroid admixture in many Arabs, especially in the North African countries. For an example of this, check out Cathy Lee and Hoda on their morning show. Hoda is Egyptian descent. She looks to be at least a quadroon. Her facial features are distinctly Negroid to the racially aware White person. Arab Caucasians are also of a much lower quality racial stock than White Europeans, just as the Bronze race is much lower quality than the Red race. Arabs have always produced distinctly inferior societies as compared to White Europeans.

    • Alexandra1973

      Right now I’m watching a video ad at the Sims 3 online store.

      Backstory: Instead of paying for “SimPoints” which is what you use to buy stuff for your game, I watch the ads. You get 5 points for each ad viewed (or at least played to the end LOL) and I’m patiently building up points. 200 30-second to 3-minute videos will get me a nice set….

      At any rate, this video features a girl who takes donated clothes and donates them to “at-risk” teen girls around the country. And the video shows her helping black girls pick out stuff. Supposed to be really empowering.

      I wonder if the media will cover it if a whole bunch of them hijack her trailer and make off with everything.

      And it seems no one bothers to ask why they’re “at risk.” At risk of what?

    • Jack Whistler

      “Third world peoples escape the dysfunctions of the societies they create, and bring their dysfunctions with them.”

      -So much the above.

      I often try to explain to people, that if a country is a shit-hole, it is a shit-hole because of the people who live there; and bringing those people to one’s own nation will do nothing but turn one’s own nation into a shit-hole.

      Sad that so many people have trouble understanding this.

      • Charles Martel

        Mexican President Calderon said “where there is Mexicans there is Mexico” and boy was he right looking at the littering and crime.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Exactly. They certainly have produced Mexico in our midst where they have settled in large numbers. They have turned certain formerly White Chicago neighborhoods into violent, gang controlled no-go zones.

  • anony

    Excellent as usual, Mr. Taylor. One more for my files.

  • KenelmDigby

    Excellent speech by Jared.
    One of the best and most powerful he’s ever delivered. In fact it rates in greatness right up there with Enoch Powell’s iconoclastic so-called ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech made in 1968.
    Jared’s speech must be thought of more in terms of a prescient warning more than anything else. Jared is not saying ‘I think’ in this speech, but ‘I know’. It is this fact that must somehow sink into the psyches of people from Central Europe.

    • Mary

      ‘I know’ vs. ‘I think’. Excellent point. This is not merely speculation. This is going to happen, barring a cataclysmic game-changer. The implications are chilling, yet most are either oblivious or welcoming to the impending disaster.

  • Lord Sandwich

    It is undeniable that every race other than whites inhabit vast areas of the globe where they live as a racial group. Yet, third world immigrants cannot pour into our countries fast enough. Why shouldn’t we think that we somehow create a culture and a society that is desirable to live in and worth preserving? Isn’t it self evident from the massive flow of immigrants into Europe, The US, and Australia? You can argue that we should or should not welcome them, but you can’t argue that there is something better about living in countries built by whites. Since this is obviously true, Mr. Taylor’s position cannot be dismissed out of hand without willful blindness to the truth.

  • Chasmania

    Speaking from my experience as a pest control operator, I can tell you this. Pests, like the cockroach ( and 3rd world immigrant ), infest a structure because of a series of conditions called ‘Conducive Elements’. Food, water, shelter, etc… provide them with the means to survive and thrive. Eliminating those elements is key to getting rid of the pests, and I dare say the same is true for human vermin that are infesting our countries.
    Simply removing the means by which they live here is going to be the most effective way of removing them, i.e. “self deport”.

  • fellist99

    This is for Taylor a backtracking, where he previously said these kinds
    of arguments about genetic relatedness were not a useful focus (in the
    Amren review of Salter, ON GENETIC INTERESTS, for example. The part
    about Danish/Nigerian offspring seems almost lifted from OGI). And he
    never before proposed a racial and genetic conception of ‘Whiteness’,
    previously it was: if they look White to me and I like them and they fund my work.

  • Uncle Bob

    If the white race and culture manages to survive this century, I hope Jared’s speeches are praised and remembered by our future historians writing on these dark days facing Western Civilization. There is no amount praise worthy of honoring Mr.Taylor for his devotion to our people – the only thing we can do to properly honor him is to stand up and proudly defend our race the way he does and fight tooth and nail to shame and silence the anti-whites who wish to destroy us. We need to let those who would attack Jared know that we are all Jared Taylor and they can’t silence us all. Viva Europa!

    • Mack0

      If it falls, he will have been the canary in the coal mine. Either way, he will be remember for being right.

      • Shadow

        “he will be remember for being right.”

        Just like Enoch Powell.

        • Bobbala

          … If any countries with libraries survive.

          More likely, the witchdoctors will be chanting, “Rack sein Obama Mmm, mmm, mmmmm”.

  • Mack0

    What an amazing and prescient speech and an example of the superb statesmanship we’ve come to expect from Mr. Taylor.

  • Epiminondas

    Very moving, Mr. Taylor. I’ll be distributing this to all my friends.

    • Homo_Occidentalis

      Is your avatar Walter Huston, by any chance?

      • Epiminondas

        Gabby Hayes

  • EpiphanyStrachan

    Wonderful speech by a brilliant man.
    I wonder about my species sometimes…I prefer species to race because I feel it’s more appropriate:) Can you think of another species on the planet so full of apathy and self hatred? (Except those of us at amren of course;) Whales will occasionally beach themselves- but I don’t know their personal reasons- I strongly doubt it’s because of apathy and self- hatred or guilt and altruism- the curse of all “good” christians. The most basic of organisms fight to survive! If you step back and look at us it’s almost comical- a people responsible for the greatest civilizations on earth have to secretly scour the globe begging these same people to defend themselves and their progeny- and who are we defending ourselves from? Us! It wasn’t brown people who shut the program down; it was white Hungarians. What the hell is wrong with us? If you have to convince a species to defend itself is it worth living?

    • anony

      ” It wasn’t brown people who shut the program down; it was white Hungarians. ”

      Not quite; it was the “elites” of Hungary, the ones who control the government. I am certain that the regular, everyday Hungarian, like the everyday White American, have plenty of racial awareness. We simply have no voice! Remember the “great, silent majority”? We’re still silent; we have no way to make our voice heard. The “elites” do not allow it.

      That is our real enemy.

      • Christorchaos

        “Not quite”, indeed. Read Michael Jones: “The Revolutionary Jew and Its Impact On World History”. It’s the irreplaceable paradigm that explains our whole situation, never really understood until Jones book was released in 2008. If more people read it and fathomed its thesis, there would at least be a better understanding of the causes of the European’s plight, if not all-agreement on the solutions.

        • anony

          You miss my point entirely. The White people of America have never voted or approved, for example, the open southern border. Why is open? The White people of America never voted for the immigration act of 1965. Why, did it become law? etc, etc., etc.,

          Those things happened in America because the “elites” wanted it so. Get it?

          • Christorchaos

            No I got your point. But to call out “voting” or “the elites” is only the first-level analysis.

          • anony

            I eagerly await your in-depth analysis.

          • Christorchaos

            I will give you a hint: if people voted to destroy our civilization would that make it any better?Sometimes the elites choose to protect and foster Western civilization. Does that mean protecting and fostering Western civilization is wrong because the elites do it??

          • anony

            The point I was trying to make initially is that “we”, that is most Whites in America, have little to say about national policy. Nor did the majority of Hungarians in their country.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            Actually it is an elite behind the elite, a small group of ethnic aliens that manipulates the elite.

          • anony

            I didn’t define the “elite”. I think we’re all tip-toeing through the tulips. 🙂

      • EpiphanyStrachan

        I understand- I didn’t want to go in depth into our enemies. No matter how rich and controlling or brown and violent an enemy is we as a people should not be so easily manipulated and controlled- that’s what angers me. My cowardice is the perfect example- I know my enemy, like many of us here at amren, but we remain silent. Silent not because of weakness necessarily but because our comments will be moderated and removed. That’s power. Power given to the enemy by my own people. Again. It’s a vicious cycle that the smartest and bravest white men I know can’t break.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          It is a weakness. What does it matter if your comments are removed? That’s just an excuse. The power is given to your enemy by you when you think that having a comment edited or removed is a good reason to stop trying.

          • EpiphanyStrachan

            It doesn’t stop me- I learned early on amren moderators don’t like 2 words in particular, jews and balls. It doesn’t keep me from posting them. My point is my white posts are moderated and deleted by white people. And it’s for one simple reason- they’re afraid of jews and their liberal white lackeys. Only the jew could have this site shut down and they know that. We all know this- this is what frustrates me, we know this and yet we do nothing. You will always know the enemy- he’s the one you can’t talk about.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Thank you for explaining further.

  • Trevor Pilsbury

    The key to Jared’s remarks in my view is that we must never lose sight of who we are racially. If that is forgotten or ignored then our nations are primed for being destroyed. Another important point is that whilst there are Germans, English, and French, each in their own nations and having various differences, but they are all of the same race. That is important. That is why I feel a certain kinship with all Europeans and why I am just as concerned with the future of Germany or Britain as I am with Sweden or America. People who are not racially aware do not seem to understand these things.

    Well said, Jared. These aspects of racial awareness that you have spoken about form the message I hope will spread among all white (European) peoples.

    • Cecil Broomsted

      I agree. The only real way we can shake off this “diversity is our strength” nonsense is through a keen awareness of racial reality. All men are from the human species but the subspecies form the different races of men. These subspecies have evolved along different paths and differ biologically. This was intended by nature. Nature abhors the genetic mixture of all life forms and strives to produce and isolate each kind after its own kind. The rose and tulip are both flowers but are different kinds of flowers distinct from each other. The same is true for animals and humans. Trying to force their mixture destroys both and produces a hybrid having the unique qualities of neither parent.

      Whatever the intended reasons for the massive immigration of racially dissimilar people into the West may be, the consequences will ultimately be the destruction of Europeans and their homelands.

      • Dwight

        What makes Europe Europe are Europeans. If they perish their unique civilizations will perish right along with them. The same is true for Australia or America. A simple fact that leftists do not understand. Whites built Europe and America not Arabs, Africans, or Mexicans. Flood any country with large numbers of racial aliens and that country will take on the characteristics of the alien. Those who like living in white countries should be very concerned about immigration and keeping the country overwhelmingly white.

        • Cecil Broomsted

          That would require an IQ above 90.

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          The visible proof is California, which is now rapidly becoming Mexico del Norte.

      • bilderbuster

        Homelands can be rebuilt as long as the racial stock of the people who built them survive to rebuild them.
        Hiroshima and Berlin being the perfect examples.
        If Europeans are destroyed there will never be anything like Europe ever again and it will be only a place on the map.

    • italian guy

      I’m glad there are people like you and Mr. Taylor, sometimes i feel alone, there are way too many “nationalists” that don’t give a crap about race, but at the same time push division among Europeans.
      When i read the news on this site, i feel bad for what happens around us, but i feel hope too when i read the comments and believe me, it’s really reassuring.

    • bilderbuster

      There is a group that is very aware and very much understands these things and are the ones who are priming our peoples and nations for destruction.

  • Alexandra1973

    Not only that but people of mixed race have divided loyalties. That hypothetical Nigerian-Danish child…will its loyalty be to Denmark or to Nigeria?

    • anony

      It will be to other brown people. Look at B. H. O. .

      • Sparky

        Barack Obola’s allegiances do seem to be elsewhere. He has little in common with traditional white Americans.

        • Paws

          Barack Ebola

          • Waldemar Daninsky

            That’s about as appropriate as the “political” cartoons showing W as a monkey. And about as funny.

        • bilderbuster

          His mother didn’t have much in common with White Americans either.

      • Alexandra1973

        If you’re talking to a liberal about this, you start at that point. I thought about that after I posted it and you’re right.

        They’d have either divided loyalties or no loyalty to Whites.

        I have a tiny bit of Amerind, but my loyalty is to my White ancestry, since it’s almost 97% of my genetic makeup (as far as I know). I just wish I was 100% one way or the other at times. Well, can’t help what my ancestors did, and I have plenty of German ancestry. 🙂

        • anony

          I read somewhere recently that American Indians have some White ancestry somewhere way, way back. Can’t remember where I read that.

          • Alexandra1973

            That’d be interesting to look into. One of my hobbies is genealogy. I like to know where I came from.

          • anony

            Have you tried one of those gene tracing companies?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            There was a recent article here on AmRen on that subject. It described the Red race of North American Natives, such as the Cherokee and David Yeagley’s Comanche ancestors, as compared to the Bronze race of South American natives. The Solutrean Hypothesis, of the North American tribes having originally journeyed across the frozen North Atlantic to North America, was mentioned. The Spanish certainly didn’t encounter tribes who taught them to plant corn, and sat down to Thanksgiving dinner with them, as the English had in North America.

        • Ian Thomas

          In most white racialist circles you would be shunned and labeled a mongrel for admitting you have a small percentage of Native ancestry, and your children would be “tainted”. I personally believe this type of thinking is ignorant.

          If you are white or at least appear to be close, you are alright. As far as 1/64 or 1/128 Amerind goes, that would be hardly visible. With sheer numbers, white genes can breed out the mud from the blood. Non white ancestry doesn’t stay forever. Only 50 percent of your genes get passed on each generation, killing the non white genes forever.

          • Alexandra1973

            I’m not about to lie about it. You don’t have to have *any* White ancestry to be a realist. Fortunately I’m not interested in joining any groups or clubs. I’m not “proud” or “ashamed” of any part of my ancestry; I am simply a realist and that’s that. It’s just interesting to see what part of my ancestry influences what part of my personality and my traits.

            I’m maybe 1/32 at most, which makes my son 1/64 at most, since his father, as far as I know, is 100% NW European (German, Irish, English, Welsh). With me, you only notice it in my eyes. With my mom…she’s probably 1/16 but looks like she has more.

          • Ian Thomas

            “I’m not interested in joining any groups or clubs. I’m not “proud” or “ashamed” of any part of my ancestry; I am simply a realist and that’s that.”

            Well said.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I would be shunned as well. I had a single Great Grandparent who was Ashkenazi descent. Her parents had immigrated from Germany, became baptized into the Lutheran Church once in America. My Grandmother, half German/half Ashkenazi descent, considered herself German first and foremost. She never set foot in a synagogue in her life. To me, the key point is that She was 100% Caucasian, and was culturally 100% White as well. She was against integration of Blacks and Whites, and felt Negroes should not be allowed to move to the Northern states, as they were creating too many problems. Stormfront would not want a good White Patriot like her, though, as they would be obsessed with her having had Jewish Grandparents. They would miss the big picture, that She was a White racial realist with Jewish forebears, not a Gentile hating Leftist.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Your smidge of AmerIndian is the Red Race, though, and some of the North American tribes, such as the Cherokee, built pretty advanced civilizations. David Yeagley was half Comanche, half German. He was a brilliant and wonderful man, a real ambassador for the preservation of the White race and culture worldwide. Compare Yeagley to Obongo, half Negro and half Irish. Other than having a little stronger verbal ability than the average Negro, his White genes are not even noticeable. My own ancestry in an eighth Ashkenazi, the rest Teutonic. My one Grandma, who was half Ashkenazi/half German descent, had never even been in a synagogue, and thought of herself as German first and foremost.

    • Paws

      It will be anti-white for sure.

    • Ian Thomas

      There’s many biracial people (half black half white) who grow up hating their dark side.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        That I have never encountered. I’ve had to work with a number of Mulattoes at my job. Every one of them is loyal to the Blacks first and foremost. They tend to be a little smarter than most Negroes, less violent and generally better behaved. In short, they do act more White, and fit into White culture a little better. None of them, though, seem to prefer our company to that of their fellow Negroes, and are Negroes first and foremost. Obongo is a good example of this. He is better spoken and more socially adjusted than most Blacks. As far as his loyalties, though, everything is about race. The Negro race.

    • bilderbuster

      It will oppose the White people of Denmark and the world.

  • Jessica Lee

    Great speech.

  • Ian Thomas

    Fantastic speech Mr. Taylor.

  • B.E.L.

    What I want to know is, what can the average guy like me do about this? I’m just a guy with a family living in California. Because of my job, I cannot be too outspoken, but even if I could be outspoken, I can run around chanting these ideologies all day long, but as I said, I am in California, so who would listen anyway?

    I plan to leave California upon retirement and move to a place where there are more people of my culture, but in the meantime, I ask again, What can the average guy do?

    • B.E.L.

      I want to add……I would love to see a book or website devoted to what steps and actions, people such as myself can take to further our cause.

      I have to imagine that a big step would be to vote for policies and politicians that support the European heritage. Where I live, those are hard to find, if they even exist at all.

      I would also imagine that voting for anti-immigration laws would be important. But other than voting or becoming politically active (which is not my or many people’s thing) what else can we do?

      Is there a book or website out there that gives this kind of direction? I would be interested to check something like that out.

      • Ian Thomas

        Read “The Ethnostate” by Wilmot Robertson. I also read a blog a while back, it had something like “15 steps for whites to survive in a multicultural society”, I tried to look for it again but unfortunately I couldn’t find it.

  • LesBaer1911

    What I would very much like to know is who is pushing this multiculturalism on white
    nations. I know the governments in each white country is mandating it but there
    has to be some people behind the sheets ordering or dictating the annihilation
    of white countries. Are our elected politicians taking their orders from someone or
    something else? If they are, then it is treason of a nation.

    • Garrett Brown

      Starts with a J.

      • KevinPhillipsBong

        Stop blaming everything on the Jamaicans. ❇;-)

      • DaveMed

        Your point has merit. However, such suicidal tendencies could not have been foisted on a less prosperous race.

        It’s my opinion that an equal or greater contributor is European wealth. Kind of like a trust fund child who sinks into sloppy habits and self-destructive behavior because he has nothing more to which to aspire.

        • Garrett Brown

          Research who has European wealth. There are evil anti whites who are European as well, I’m answering who started it.

          • LesBaer1911

            My point is why are our elected officials who work to serve the
            people & protect one country taking orders from those who are
            most likely not American, unless dual, and are not elected. For
            the most part the intruders are just strangers. To serve such
            is a type of mutiny.

          • anony

            $$$$.

          • bilderbuster

            They’ve held many passports during the last 4000 years and still do.
            A nation among nations.

          • LesBaer1911

            If only General Patton would have lived!

          • EpiphanyStrachan

            I didn’t get to read the deleted comment, but I know the tribe it mentioned. It’s funny, the moderators here must be Hungarian.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Hungary has always had a large Ashkenazi population. Remember, Hungary sided with the Axis Powers in WWII. It seems highly likely that Gentile hating tribe members are behind the kind of insidious anti-White attacks such as what Jared Taylor was subjected to.

    • Warmagus .

      A lot of it comes out of Harvard.

  • Garrett Brown

    Well done as always Mr.Taylor.

  • DaveMed

    Bookmarked.

    I found the following particularly powerful:

    _____________________________________________________________________

    I used to like to read about the victorious battles of the Confederacy, but now I don’t even like to read about our victories. Even the victories were tragedies. They were victories only because we were more successful at killing our brothers than our brothers were at killing us.

    _____________________________________________________________________

    I recently watched Gods and Generals. On the one hand, being a Northerner, I expect that in the past, I would have rooted for the North in the battle scenes. On the other, with my increasing disgust with the U.S., I might have expected myself to now root for the South.

    But all I felt was sadness. As Jared said – it was brother against brother, and there is no victory in such a fight.

    Above all, it is imperative that Europeans and European-Americans have more children. We may not think that we can afford 4-6 children per family, but we can. We might not have our luxuries, but in today’s redistributionist society, our children will not starve.

    • Chasmania

      I fully agree. The Civil War as well as WW1 and WW2 saw the life blood of the white race poured out, and the veritable cream of the crop cut down.

      We are a much poorer people and world for the loss of so much potential. One might even speculate that the weakening of our people may well be the genesis of our current plight.

      • bilderbuster

        Between and after the wars the Bolsheviks made sure to liquidate millions of the best and brightest as that was their goal.

    • anony

      Ask yourself why the poorest people on earth can have so many children. In the recent past, American families were much larger yet those families were much poorer.

      • DaveMed

        As we grow richer, we begin to think that happiness lies in luxuries and the easy life.

        • anony

          The wise disabuse themselves of that notion. If they don’t, they become unhappy in their old age.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          I totally agree with you, DaveMed. I’ll go even further, it is not just comfort or luxury, but freedom from chance. Our softness includes intolerance to risk, even if the net outcome is positive.

          There is also the r/K distinction.

          I can have 10 kids, but they are all going to be thoughtful, careful, ponderous creatures that will finally be fully formed at 30-something. The kidult phenomenon is not entirely cultural. I’d encourage that, too. I would rather have my adolescent children reading Thucydides so as to be able to understand Jared Taylor’s speeches than out stealing lunch money or breeding like rabbits.

          Jared’s speech is an ode to Western Civilization, which requires a K breeding pattern. If we were to start breeding like the 3rd worlders (which you can’t just do, like flipping a switch) we would become them.

          But do not despair! I am confident that with racial solidarity we can maintain our civilization. Japan is a good model.

          • EpiphanyStrachan

            Yes. I am often questioned here why I only have one child- I want to respond because I’m not a third world whore. But I refrain:) There is a lot of psychology in birth order, I don’t think we need to be throwing out babies like a crap shoot. We had the majority when obama was elected and re-elected. Quality matters, not quantity. 1-2 is healthy. I have a son. He’s 24, beautiful, strong, smart and very pro-white. My sister, conservative, had 3 children- the oldest girl is already “aware” at 16, the other 2…crap shoot:)

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Glad to hear form you again, ES!

            Maybe white men can reproduce like men of other races, but white women can’t, for evolutionary reasons (menarche and gestation periods are different by race). Dudes round here seem to forget that race is real sometimes when they get all conservative-y. The low white birthrate is not all cultural. The browbeating is not only tiresome but useless.

            I was a bit of a child at 14 and not fit for motherhood because my being contains the seed of things like Notre Dame and Bach’s Matthew. Lupe? stick a fork in her at her quinceanera, she’s done. Ready to go, all there, what you see is all there is. And white men can be sperm donors in their teens, but they aren’t ready to RAISE families, either.

            Glad to finally agree with someone here! Thanks, ES, you made my day. I’m glad your sister has three children, though. No amount of effort can change the mathematical implications of a replacement rate. Asking you why you have only one child is damned rude.

          • EpiphanyStrachan

            Good to hear from you. I love my nieces and nephew and will do my best to steer them on the right “path”…I look forward to your posts….

          • M.

            “Maybe white men can reproduce like men of other races, but white women can’t, for evolutionary reasons (menarche and gestation periods are different by race). Dudes round here seem to forget that race is real sometimes when they get all conservative-y. The low white birthrate is not all cultural.”

            The natural increase of the German population in southern Brazil is marvelous. As a rule they rear from ten to fifteen children in each family. Blumenau, a colony which was settled by the Germans over fifty years ago, more than doubles itself every ten years. Southern Brazil is now called ‘Greater Germany’, and the Germans exercise there a commercial and financial supremacy.The Monroe Doctrine, T. B. Edgington

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Brazilian#Overview

            It is very much cultural, and very much a choice.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            That was a century ago. 5 generations. Not all adaptation happens genetically, I should add. This world is much more complex than the Brazilian outback in 1824. Youngsters have much more to process with their developing plastic brains.

          • anony

            Life is a crap shoot! Having more children does not make you a 3rd world whore.

            Numbers don’t lie. It takes 2.4 children (meaning three) to, at a minimum, replace the parents.

            With these attitudes here, it is no wonder the White race is dying off.

          • EpiphanyStrachan

            I know my opinion on child birth isn’t accepted here- especially since the majority of viewers are men, but I have done too much research on race, demographics, physiology and psychology behind birth order to change my opinion of 1 to 2 children per couple. Some white people shouldn’t reproduce at all. Reason and logic is what differentiates us from the brown peoples- the ability to think and plan BEFORE child birth. The white race is dying off because of apathy and weakness and the inability to defend the children we have now from third world invaders. Until we do this it won’t matter how many children we have.

          • anony

            It matters greatly how many children a parent-pair have.

            I repeat, it takes 2.4 off-spring to replace parents.

            Whites are a dying race.

          • EpiphanyStrachan

            I know our numbers are decreasing, but I think our greatest threat is our integrity. I don’t think large numbers of white idiots is the answer- they elected our president. On the other hand, the middle east, sub-Saharan Africa, southeast asia and latin America all have birth rates above 2.0- so that must be the right way.

          • anony

            Why do you suggest that more Whites would include “large numbers of idiots”?

            As to why “we” elected Oblabla, even twice, has more to do with media than White “idiots”.

            How do you think America will be run when Whites become a distinct minority? Do you think that will be good for us? I don’t think it will be at all good. For example, do you think that there will be affirmative action for Whites? Not on your life!

          • anony

            “If we were to start breeding like the 3rd worlders (which you can’t just do, like flipping a switch) we would become them.”

            That is utterly false! Our genes will not change from having many children.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            To breed like an r-selected population, you have to BE an r-selected population. No?

          • anony

            Look, we, Whites, used to have many more children per parent-pair. That period of higher breeding did not make us 3rd-worlders.

            Why would it change our population to 3rd world status if we began having more children per parent-pair now?

          • Usually Much Calmer

            How many children do you recommend, anony?

            If you want parents to have three kids instead of 2 or 2 kids instead of none at all, sure. But the average white parent-pair cannot have children as early and as frequently with as little investment as a non-white parent-pair.

            White children require more parenting resources than the children of K-populations, even before birth. Race is real and deep. Other populations are profoundly and subtly different. You know this. You cannot look at the birthing patterns of other races and ask why white families do not do the same without forgetting it.

          • anony

            “White children require more parenting resources than the children of K-populations, even before birth. ”

            I think the statistics describing the “cost” of rearing a child in America are wrong; sadly, those erroneous statistics discourage many couples from having children. American materialism is greatly responsible for the “cost” of rearing children.

            We are, as a people, deciding to have more “stuff” instead of having more children. Our race is on the verge of disappearing as a result.

            I and my wife have reared four wonderful, successful people and my wife home-schooled them. We are comfortable, but are not wealthy. We are not materialists either. We enjoy intellectual and outdoor activities instead of pop-culture activities. We do not see “shopping” as a recreational activity, for example.

            My point is that most people could afford to have more children if they could unplug from the matrix of materialism.

            Given that our society is built on encouraging materialism in all its forms, I realize that it’s difficult to unplug, but it can be done as I and my wife have proven.

            I reject your premise that White children require more resources than children of K-populations. Dedicated White parents have all the “resources” they need right between their ears. They simply need to change their focus.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I applaud you and your wife and I agree with you about materialism but the breeding rate, maturity rate and resource requirements are definitional to the distinction.

            And I KEEP screwing up the r and the K. Apologies.

          • anony

            My impression is that the r/K theory has more relevance to mice and fruit flies than to humans.

            As I see it, we trying to be successful as a race. If we want more in the 2nd sigma and above, we need more people, no?

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Sorry for the delay.

            I think your hunch is right that in the academic realm proper the r/K distinction is used only when comparing one species with another but there has been informed commentary outside orthodoxy that applies that spectrum (and it is a spectrum- giraffes are way more ‘K’ than humans and oh, many fish more ‘r’ than turtles) to subspecies. Indeed, applying the way of thinking to human populations occurred to me immediately when I first learned of r/K in college biology and I do think it is a useful distinction.

            As far as the hard properties go: I do not have a background in biology and my curiosity and the data that crosses my desk has not conspired for me to know anything about the birthing traits of all subspecies but I do know that black females reach menarche earlier, black fetuses spend less time in gestation and the forebrains of black children develop faster and stop developing sooner than white counterparts. This is not cultural. And it *does* represent lesser parental investment.

            I would not be surprised to learn that the average protein content of the gametes or the nutritional makeup of placentas differed, either. Do we know? Who would gather that data? How would you get the funding? Can you imagine? A friend of mine told me about a study where they traveled to different parts of the world performing game theory tests locally- so you go to Papua New Guinea and trial the Prisoner’s Dilemma or the Ultimatum and see how much trust or reciprocity people have in different. . . cultures. Cultures. Not races. Cultures. Race itself is never studied unless you are trying to get approval for a drug and clear statistical anomalies turn up in your sample data.

            Black women in America do not breast feed, the NIH spends money encouraging them to. Should they? I wish no ill on black children, but I’m not sure this is a ‘problem’. I suspect that the NIH people are applying a lesson gathered from whites to a different population. All mammals nurse, sure. But we are acting on the measured difference in outcome and it is likely measured in a wholly different population. Science is race blind except where it absolutely cannot be. This is a bias.

            Race is quite, quite real. It is not social or political or cultural. We are not playing basketball against the shirts here. Anthropologists can identify bone *fragments* by race because there are differences in density.

            I would also not be surprised if the rate of c-section and birth complications were quite different. You and your wife have 4 kids. I assume that you were there for some of the births, if not that you trust her first hand account.

            The story of a 15 year old Shaniqua ‘not knowing she was pregnant’ going into the restroom at the homecoming dance, giving birth, smothering the child, wrapping it in paper towels, discarding it in a dumpster, and returning to the dance floor inside of 25 minutes to dance the night away is commonplace. You have heard of several, I’m sure. It became a ‘crisis’ and safe haven laws were enacted in many states as a result (to what avail I do not know).

            Tell me. . . was the birth of any of your children that easy? My mother was in labor with me for 16 hours. That ‘investment’ is not a choice. Is not a decadence that you can lay at the feet of mass consumerism or feminism. It is essentially biological.

            The question is your post, about 2 sigma, I will interpret in the context of your back and forth with ES above.

            I agree with you that life is a crap shoot and parents are culturally raising their children to be too precious, by the way.

            Unless we practice eugenics in some form or another (selective breeding and income inequality are organic methods), more breeding just gives you more of pretty much everybody. We already have too many of some people according to both you and ES, dumb voters and proles whose jobs are being vanished by automation (not offshoring manufacturing) who cannot be repurposed.

            So, to get more 2-sigmas without eugenics, you have to be willing to cull socially after people are born and nurtured and educated to development. Do we have the will to do that? Hell no. Even if we did, it both more cruel and more wasteful than letting organic eugenics run its course.

            End welfare and affirmative action. You get less breeding among the unfit populations and we don’t hobble our survivors with not only taxes but the stresses of looking after their children and stewarding them into the increasingly (and artificially) competitive places that ensure *their* development and therefore whatever success they may *merit*. And they don’t have to compete artificially and out institutions are not eroded from within by artificial personnel decisions.

            Automation doing away with a lot of work and the futurist’s imagining they will mind meld with machines and live forever are two different things. The flying shuttle (a weaving advance, not a jetson’s reference) did away with a lot of work too.

            Oh, and please excuse any rough edges in tone, anony, I am tired but rather than wait to edit with a clearer mind, I feel I owe you a reply after oh 3 days at this point. Thank you for your patience.

            I will probably edit it in the morning.

          • anony

            “So, to get more 2-sigmas without eugenics, you have to be willing to cull socially after people are born and nurtured and educated to development.”

            That would be one way, but there is a much more humane way. Simply encourage high IQs to procreate with more frequency while simultaneously discouraging low IQs. This can be done through taxation, for example, in one form or another.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            That is eugenics.

            Why would you cobble a patch on our tax system rather than end welfare?

          • anony

            I was not thinking of giving tax breaks to stop people from having children but to encourage high IQ people to have more. There may be other ways to encourage those people to have more children but that one came immediately to mind.

            I am all for ending welfare. Forced charity is not.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            You’ve lost me, friend.

            Forced charity is not. . .what? What am I missing?

            Encouraging people with a desired trait to breed at a higher rate than the general population is as much eugenics as discouraging people with an undesired trait from breeding.

            What we have here is, I am afraid, a failure to communicate. Let’s rectify?

          • anony

            “Forced charity is not. . .what? What am I missing?”

            Forced charity, that is, welfare, is not charity. My point is that I am all for ending welfare which encourages low-information voters to procreate at high levels, but the same systems can be used, in some form, to encourage high-information voters to have more children, n’est pas?

            I am not a member of the group that thinks all eugenics is bad. For example, the Chinese, as I understand it, are engaged in a form of eugenics to produce high-information “voters”. One hundred years from now, they won’t have to send their people to our universities, except perhaps as a form “visiting the zoo”. Glad I’ll be gone, but then there are the progeny.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Ah, thank you. I am not against eugenics writ large either.

          • anony

            I am so relieved that we are not at odds! 🙂

          • anony

            Japan does a good job of maintaining their racial homogeneity, for now. Nevertheless, they are dwindling in numbers. Their answer seems to be to “fill the gap” with robots. That will not work in the long term.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            What’s wrong with robots?

            A reply to you other is in the works, btw.

          • anony

            Robots in and of themselves are fine, but they are not human.

            I don’t yet subscribe to the idea that if we simply add enough switches to a robot “brain”, it will be “smarter” than humans, and thus be able to “replace” us.

    • WR_the_realist

      On one hand I take some comfort in knowing that the left wing elites often take pride in having one or no children. On the other hand I see that there are many intelligent people among the left, and that thanks to feminism, and it’s particular appeal to white college educated women, intelligence is being bred out of the white population.

      • Charles Martel

        The problem is Common Core preaches white privilege for 8 hours a day for k-12 grade.

  • proud white

    “If immigrants are from Somalia or Honduras, it means the host population has suddenly evolved in the direction of Somalia or Honduras”

    That sums it up nicely, brilliant Mr. Taylor

    • Alexandra1973

      Where you have Somalians, you have Somalia. All too true.

  • Julius Caesar

    I can’t thank you enough for this, Mr. Taylor. You took the words right out of my mouth. Thank you, Mr. Taylor. Thank you.

  • HJ11

    Genes are us.

  • anony

    Years ago I read a book, IMPERIUM, by Francis Parker Yockey. It was well worth the read. You may enjoy it.

  • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

    Superb!

    A note on Taylor’s observation: ” Like so many forms of insanity, this one [that there is no such thing as race] originated in the United States.”

    And the cure for this insanity, in its most compact and prestigious form, Nicholas Wade’s A Troublesome Inheritance, has also originated in the United States. Wade describes the source of the insanity Taylor identifies on pp 68-69. Summarizing his remarks:

    The politically-driven distortion of scientific views about race had its origins in a sustained campaign from the 50s onward led by anthropologist Ashley Montagu. Montagu, a Jew, experienced anti-Semitism growing up in London. He studied anthropology under Franz Boaz, a champion of racial equality and the belief that culture alone shapes human behavior. Of race, wrote Montagu, “It is the contemporary myth, humankind’s most dangerous myth, America’s original sin.”

    In the post-WWII years, with the horror of the Holocaust weighing on people’s minds, Montagu found ready acceptance of his views. Racism, imperialism, anti-Semitism, were driven by notions of race, he believe, and could be undermined by showing races do not exist. Montagu’s ambitious goals included suppressing the very word “race.” “The word race itself is racist,” he said.

    was remarkably successful at imposing his ideology on the Western world.

    • Christorchaos

      “Racism, imperialism, anti-Semitism, were driven by notions of race, he believe, and could be undermined by showing races do not exist.”
      Not to be a Johnny-one-note, but this is what Jones’ book disproves, in 1000 meticulously-documented pages, about anti-semitism. What’s often called racial anti-semitism is really Anti-Judaism, if you survey the Church’s response during the time that it had the power to interdict Jewish behavior.

      • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

        I don’t have time to read all comments so I missed your other posts on “Jones’ book.” What’s the book?

        • Christorchaos

          “The Revolutionary Jew and its Impact on World History.” Available from Culture Wars.

    • bilderbuster

      Montagu and Boaz didn’t believe a word of the ideological scam they and their cohorts were pulling on western anthropology.

  • Chris R

    I honestly think the US is lost to us. But Europe still has a fighting chance. They are far more nationalistic than Americans and will fight for their own.

  • Caucasoid88

    You have brothers across the sea.

  • Franklin_Ryckaert

    “At one time, General George Casey was in overall command of the
    American forces in Iraq. He said, and I quote, “I firmly believe that
    the strength of our army comes from our diversity.” He is saying that
    the US Army is strong, not because it has better equipment or better
    training, but because it has blacks and Mexicans and Filipinos in it.
    This is the sort of crazy thing Americans love say.”

    Keep in mind that he was saying that in Iraq, a country “blessed by diversity” of its quarrelling Kurds, Sunnis and Shias. Diversity obviously is not working in Iraq, so why does he believe it will be working in the US?

    • Mary

      The paradox of White civilization being no “better” than third world cultures, yet Whites being held to a much higher standard. All cultures are theoretically equal, yet only Whites have to make concessions for the “other.” Sometimes pondering the absurdity of their thinking gives me a headache.

      • Franklin_Ryckaert

        That is because lies always contradict reality. The whole anti-White policy is based on lies, therefore it is full of contradictions.

        If all cultures are equal then why do Third Worlders want to immigrate into the First World and not the other way round?

        And don’t get me started on the idea that race doesn’t exist, but that non-Whites deserve special treatment…because of their race!

      • Evette Coutier

        Perfectly stated.

  • DiverCity

    Excellent speech/essay!

  • Good Read…

  • Calufrax

    Thank you, Jared Taylor. This is exactly the kind of wisdom and sanity that our race needs to hear, not the sick lunacy that Jobbik, Dugin, and the Guenonists peddle.
    Regarding the General Wesley Clark statement- this is why no European should ever serve in the U.S. armed forces. You will be helping to destroy your own people if you do.

  • What about the conflict between Ukraine and Russia? Europe has never been united by racial kinship. Nations have largely and overwhelmingly warred based on ethno-nationalist beliefs.

    • Logan Smith

      This is why I think that each ethno-nation should leave other ethno-nations alone, while simultaneously supporting each other as one Europe against invaders. Each ethno-nation should have their own laws, culture, language, and ways of doing things; but what connects us is our shared European blood.

      • There’s a contradiction there. Support of another nation, takes away from one’s own nation. Why not let each nation be and free to sort its own problems.

        • Logan Smith

          That was my point.

          We would join each other to stop invaders (immigration), but besides that, we would all keep to our own business.

  • phorning

    “I believe the former members of the Warsaw Pact can hold the line, but it is a race against time.”

    The experience the Future of Europe conference had in Hungary would make me that they have no interest in holding the line.

  • Logan Smith

    Jared Taylor would be a great asset to Southern Nationalism.

    • Wouldn’t the correct term be regionalism? The South is a part of the U.S. yet has its own culture and social mores. Perhaps the better term would be Southern regionalism.

      • Logan Smith

        That takes away the impact of us being a different people, a separate nation.

        • but the South isn’t. Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas and Tennessee are apart of the United States.

  • WR_the_realist

    There are two exceptions to that U.N. principle. Crimeans, apparently, are not permitted to decide that their cultural loyalty lies with Russia. And whites generally are not allowed to determine their own destiny.

  • Evette Coutier

    Dear Jared and my fellow genetic realists, Jareds words are elegant. I hate to be the descending voice here. Normally I enjoy being the rebel, but not this time. I hate it with all my heart. However, we need to get to the nut of the matter. It is evident that whites are not genetically disposed to tribalism as other ethnic groups. Appeals to brotherhood will not work for us. For the appeal to brotherhood to work with whites, we must live in small communities where there is communal bonds. Even then we don’t establish the group think that other ethnicities naturally develop. In many respects, religion was the cultural cement that held white identity for centuries; however, like it or not that day is gone. There is no evidence that religion will recover white identity. In fact the evidence is the opposite. Throughout Europe and America, religion is waning among whites, and churches are actively supporting Hispanic immigration to bolster church membership. Our messages must be marketed using scientific marketing principles, study and, analysis. Our edge in this arena is fact. But a fact we tend to overlook is that we have been out marketed. Labeling genetic realists as haters was brilliant. The multiculturalist who did this were very intelligent and we must respect how dangerous they are, but it’s now our time to turn this around. We have the smarts. Let’s use them to our advantage.

    • EpiphanyStrachan

      Good point, whites tend to be independent and individualistic- we don’t have the fealty other tribes have, especially the chosen tribe. I myself am Italian, German, Scotch, Irish with a splash of Blackfoot Indian- I was destined for a liver transplant:) I am proud of all of my heritage- but only consider myself “white” and defend “whites” as best I can. Another problem “whites” have is we work, and unfortunately we treasure our “stuff”. Not a very revolutionary crowd- maybe if they start to take our cars and cellphones we’ll fight back. It’s as if we are not affected unless we see the threat at our front door- which it happens to be, yet, nothing. We are too smart and too strong to be destroyed so easily. I’ve thought of a pyramid scheme for survival- pick a few like- minded friends and share with them your knowledge and the reality of what’s going on and encourage them to do the same- for their children’s sake.

      • Evette Coutier

        Look, I think attacking materialism is the wrong approach. I personally am a capitalist. I’m a proud capitalist. I like being successful, and I see nothing wrong with doing well in life. Suggesting that we should give up the good life is not going to attract people, it’s going to chase them away. I think we need to market just the opposite. Given a choice, would you rather have your future be the joys of a diverse community like Detroit, or an upscale white suburbia? We as whites offer a better more prosperous life, safe from violence, filled with rich culture, and a better tomorrow for our kids. No black community in the entire world can make that claim. They offer Detroit.

        • EpiphanyStrachan

          I’m not suggesting we give up the good stuff!:) I have just been wondering what it would take for white people to start to defend themselves.

          • Evette Coutier

            People in general are more motivated by loss than gain. Start talking to them about what they are going to lose, their health care, their money, their future. Talk about their bankrupt retirement accounts, their lost social security, or if they are young their college debt having to be paid off by working at McDonalds all to feed the minority welfare state. Speak to the lost ability to go downtown shopping because of crime. The alternative we can point to is the security and prosperity of white societies. I always point out that there is not a single city in America, or a nation in the world, that is black that is not a crime ridden, corrupt he!! Hole in economic poverty and cultural decay. Not a single one in the entire world. I challenge every liberal I ever speak with to name one. They can’t. Then they come up with all the liberal excuses of racism. Be ready to ask them to explain all the racism in Africa. The excuse doesn’t wash in countries that are 95 percent black. I find being empathetic helps. I show genuine sympathy for blacks. They can’t help being less intelligent, but we can’t allow that to destroy our lives. Being callous can put folks off who are on the fence. Share their frustrations. But show them the terrible price they are paying for diversity. Make it very simple and very personal. Over time they will come to accept the truth.

      • Not to be rude or insulting, but you are of indigenous Native ancestry. Wouldn’t that make you non-white? I fear I’m opening a Pandora’s box, but I thought only those with pure white ancestry can claim White Nationalism.

        • EpiphanyStrachan

          I’ve read your posts, so I know you’re here to open Pandora’s box:) I look white and only know I’m Indian because I was told so. But most importantly, I AM white- in my mind and heart this is who I identify with- I just feel comfortable around white people. I can’t help who my great grandpa banged! I’m also very proud of my Indian heritage- but I don’t identify with Indian peoples or feel comfortable in their environment. All I want is the right to be with my people in a safe environment for my child and progeny and for the life of me can’t figure out why so many find this bad.

          • I never said it was bad, I was just asking for clarification. You can live anywhere you like.

      • M.

        We must also resume making more babies. Part of what drove the liberal immigration policies of Western nations these last decades was the catastrophic and sudden drop in birthrates.

        If we make our demographic growth ourselves, the pro-business folks will be less inclined to push for more immigration, as, to them, humans are interchangeable.

        It seems that Western countries are set to grow (some double, like the U.S.) in numbers by 2100, along with their economies, before stagnating. And it’s gonna be with or without us.

        If this Welsh man could father and take care of his 16 children without accepting benefits, then I think we can do at least the third of what he did. (Google “dailymail terry harvey”)

        I, myself, am planning for 6, at least. But for now, I’m just putting 80% of each paycheck in the bank, hoping to keep my well-paying job for a long time.

        • Evette Coutier

          First things first. We need to stop paying for their babies for them.

          • M.

            If you mean reducing benefits, yes, we could try to do that. But we have a slim chance to see that happening as we’re being outvoted.

            Chances are, the immigration flow won’t stop, or even slow down, and the safety net will stay at least as strong, as the working class (whites included) is liking it.

            We can both augment our fertility and try to do those things. As the things you’re suggesting only require voting, which one can do whether one has many children or not.

            Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

          • Evette Coutier

            You are right, of course.

          • Charles Martel

            If the EBT foodstamps card shuts down for just a few days there wouldn’t be a white liberal left near die verse city. The viral videos of chimp outs from 10-12-13 when it went down for just 8 hours in 16 states keep getting taken off you tube.

    • newscomments70

      Do what a salesman does: pound the pavement. Spread the word with facts and statistics…every chance you have. The internet reaches millions…billions actually. I combine old fashioned conversation with modern technology. It’s especially gratifying to convert older hippie liberals. I have converted George Mcgovern, Jerry Brown type liberals into race realists. I love it, it’s like a sport to me. Enemies can turn into friends. It’s such a warm feeling!

      • Evette Coutier

        That is outstanding. I was just speaking to the message that I think is most marketable.

  • Ellis Kurtz

    All my male ancestors of military age served in the armed forces of the Confederate States of America. They had a nation, with a government, an army and navy, a national currency, and a postal service, and fierce sense of peoplehood. They fought bravely to defend their nation from invasion for four years, but they were utterly crushed, and their nation was destroyed.

    When I was younger, I was angry at the North…..

    But the rest of us have reason to be angry at the South, since it was they who brought blacks into the US in huge numbers to labor in their plantations. I recognize that the North owes the South an apology for prosecuting and illegitimate war against it; but the South owes the rest of the US an apology for bringing unassimilable and ineducable Africans into our continent.

    • kjh64

      Not true. A large portion of Blacks were brought in by Northerners, mostly in New England and New York. The first slaves came to Massachuesetts, brought by slave traders there. In the mid-1700’s , New York City had large numbers of slaves.

      • newscomments70

        I recall reading the transcripts of the Salem witch trials. There were black African slaves in Massachusetts.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Bravo, Jared Taylor!!! You are our spokesman. Everything you say is 100% true. Only the Caucasian race will perpetuate our European culture. Look at South America. Latin Caucasians brought their European culture, but miscegenated with the Bronze Race of natives, expecting to Europeanize those natives through converting them to Christianity and introducing them to European culture. The result is violent, impoverished third world lands with no more than a vague resemblance to Spain and Portugal. Miscegenation spells death for any European culture anywhere on this planet. Racial purity is what made the U. S. the pride of the Western World. Integration and Miscegenation are our number one enemies.

  • Shadrach

    JT your words are truly inspiring. May God Bless You In your endeavors and may your words win more over to our cause.

  • Augustus3709

    A stirring and elegant presentation. Many good points in well polished portions. You could show this article to anybody.

    It successfully talks about the importance of race without being “off-putting”. Believe me, enemy forces fear this approach the most. Their typical strategy is to ignore reasonable sounding racial conversations and hope nobody hears about it. They hate the idea of White racial awareness because it frustrates their agenda to ransack our nations and resources.

    We must indeed put White in-fighting aside, as emotionally difficult as it may be for some. Stop hating your neighbors you dolts. Globalism necessitates racialism, else we will disappear as legitimate agents of self-determination, and be relegated to isolated pockets of pathetic and broken nomads.

  • libertarian1234

    Pretty good speech.

    It was hard-hitting, truthful, but without rancor or racism. It told it just exactly as it is.

    And if anybody can take away from that that Western people and culture aren’t under dire threat, then they weren’t listening.

  • kjh64

    I disagree that America is 63% White. Nobody knows the percentage of White Americans are because, as I’ve said before, the census counts everyone living on US soil as being part of “America”. The census counts the millions of illegal aliens as well as legal foreign residents, including foreigners here temporarily, as “American”. They are not, they are foreign nationals living on US soil .Only American citizens are Americans. An accurate racial breakdown won’t be known unless the census makes that distinction

    • America is 62.8% non-Hispanic white, and that number is projected to dive to 61% sometime in 2015.

  • JR Kipling

    Excellent. A back slap of the Clinton sock puppet Wesley Clark. Why is that our generals only get to the top on the basis of how proficient they parrot PC slogans.? Note General Petraeus proposing that a country called “:North America” be formed. The higher you rise in the military the more spineless you are. That’s the new definition of “courage” in the upside down world we live in.

  • EpiphanyStrachan

    “Whore” might have been a little harsh- but that’s my humor:) My comment is based solely on my values and beliefs. I think “third world” is not just a socioeconomic status but also a behavior or character. I don’t think much of religions that encourage propagation for propagation’s sake. I feel humans are overpopulating- especially the not so good ones, but I don’t feel obligated to try and “catch up.” I raise the one I have the best I can and encourage him to raise one or two the best he can. We are the only animal that is able to propagate beyond our means and habitat- I feel it’s irresponsible. I just hope that the women having all these babies make good ones, because all the white baby- making we’ve had so far has gotten us into a heap of trouble! If you have or want a lot of babies I wish you all the best and hope they are healthy and happy:)

    • Christorchaos

      “We are the only animal that is able to propagate beyond our means and habitat- ”
      Source, please?

      • EpiphanyStrachan

        Epiphanystrachan and mother nature- 2 excellent sources in my opinion!:) We have beaten death at childbirth- for both mother and child. We have immunized ourselves and beaten previously deadly diseases. We have life- saving medicines and surgeries. With welfare and social support, peoples have more surviving children. In fact baby-making can be prosperous for some. We spread and build without regard for the environment, destroying land and other species in our wake. We are horribly obese eating more than our share and eating unhealthily- yet we still survive. We pollute, exponentially. Every other creature is kept in check by nature. Even with our self-destructive behavior (war/ violence) we still prosper. (I am speaking of humans in general.) I consider myself more of a pagan- my earth and my people are very important to me. I consider anyone who threatens either the enemy. I know not everyone agrees and thinks we need to have more babies and need to throw numbers at the problem. But I disagree. I don’t know if they have looked around but a lot of these “numbers”, OUR numbers, are fighting against us , fighting against their own race. That’s a worthless number in my opinion. I think most of us here have children, and I’m sure some of these children don’t end up the people we hoped for- maybe we have siblings we feel that way about…we all have that one. Well I don’t. I have one son, I gave him no option but to care for his earth and his people. I was able to focus on him because he was my only one. He is worth 4 of the average white man- at least the ones I’ve met. He is worth 1000 trayvon martins. I have always been a quality not quantity kinda’ girl- except when it comes to bullets:)

        • EpiphanyStrachan

          I want to add that no amount of anyone or anything is worth my child to me, I’m speaking in terms of character, strength and intelligence when I make the comparison above. Also, I didn’t mention fertility drugs or erectile dysfunction drugs.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Very evident indeed. I’ve never been to Buenos Aires, but it appears to be quite a beautiful city. In short, it resembles Lisbon, Portugal, or Barcelona, Spain because the racial stock is the same as those cities. Mexico City, by comparison, is violent, drug infested, and impoverished. Latin Europeans miscegenated away their genetic inheritance in places like Mexico City. Is it any surprise that Mexico City bears little resemblance to the glorious cities of Spain and Portugal?? It should not be to a sensible person. As you and I realize, race is the underlying bedrock of human behavior. Whites build Buenos Aires and Barcelona. Bronzes build Mexico City and Miami.

    • Jacobite2

      The dominant ethnic group in Argentina is Italian.

      • Northern American-Nationalist

        The dominant ETHNIC group in Argentina is Argentine, but Italian is likely to be their largest ancestral group.

        We need to get our terms right if we’re going to save the hearts and minds of our brethren.

        • Jacobite2

          ‘Ethnic’ — Relating to races, or groups of races, classed according to common traits, customs, etc. ‘Ancestral group’ is a PC/BS neologism to avoid the use of the real-world word ‘race’. I don’t have a NEWSPEAK dictionary; I still use the English one.

    • Northern American-Nationalist

      Contemporary Miami was built by the upper classes of Latin America; most especially, those from Cuba of course. White (actual White) Hispanics still make up most of the population of Miami; hence, why most of the metropolitan area is as successful (by various indicators) as it is relative to most other Latin American dominated locales…well that and the Gringo infrastructure goes without saying!

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    A certain amount of territory has been foolishy handed over to the non-White hordes. Rather than spill precious blood reclaiming places like Detroit or Atlanta for Whites, we need to keep the areas that are still White homelands for our people, and not cede anymore of our homelands to our enemies.

  • ViktorNN

    One of the best pieces of pro-white political writing I’ve ever read.

    It can be difficult to find the right time and place to “wake up” fellow white friends and family – but when you do get a chance this is a perfect essay to pass along. It sums up our position so clearly and persuasively.

    Thanks Mr. Taylor for this article, and may you write many more!

  • Mary

    In the modern world, there are a lot of good reasons to have very few children, or none at all. And there is a lot to be said for quality over quantity. It’s quite unfortunate that our responsible breeding patterns are contributing greatly to our demise. If we don’t produce the numbers, we are going to die out. It will likely happen regardless. But with such paltry numbers, our virtual extinction is all but assured.

  • ricpic

    This is a heartbreaking speech. What will wake whites to the catastrophe of their dwindling percentage of the population here in the United States? It will have to be something horrific, much more horrific than sporadic barbarism by blacks and browns. Nothing less than an economic implosion with all that follows, including race war, stands a chance of waking whites to the enmity that surrounds them. And even then will there be a trek by whites (a la the Boers) to that part of the former United States, primarily the great plains and mountain west, that can be established as a white nation and then effectively defended? Well, there is no answer possible to that question. But failing the establishment of such a fortress nation, what hope is there?

    • I remember when a million white man march was held this past spring and it was unsuccessful. It makes me wonder what will cause the spark to cause a great awakening so to speak.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Indeed!! Deutscheland Weltmeisters!!

  • guest

    I knew I had some distant relatives I never see — for example, an Uncle Sam and an Aunt Zeituni — but I never knew my family was this big.

  • Jon

    I agree 100% and was a great speech but I said that the Easter and Central Europeans will become the future of Europe along with Russia because the West has already committed suicide and is just a matter time before it happens. Another General believes that ebola will hasten the death of America and Canada because if Ebola spreads to central and south America then the flood of infected 3rd world people can not be stopped. I am pulling for Central and Eastern Europe because if they fail then Europe is doomed. Would be nice to meet an Eastern or Central European woman or even a Western European woman who cares about her race and family. Stay strong Europe.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    The Tennessee mountains is one of my favorite areas. Few Negroes, and a solid White Identity grounded in the Southern Mountain culture. The Pacific Northwest has the right demographics, yes, but far too many White Leftists who do not appreciate what they have. Southern Appalachia and The Ozarks are my favorite areas. They have a strong spirit of racial realism, along with a strong local Anglo-Celtic culture and identity. These areas also have a better climate. Longer growing season, weather where one can enjoy the outdoors most of the year. The PLE actitivites in Kalispell, Montana are exemplary, but that area has an extremely harsh climate, and there is also a lot of resistance from local Whites. Southern Whites are already mostly racial realists. The Pacific Northwest was settled by New Englanders and Scandinavians.

    • EpiphanyStrachan

      I have family in the Ozarks and have considered there…thank you for your input!

    • anony

      The mountains of WVA, VA, Tennessee, and Georgia/Alabama, Pennsylvania, and to some extent, NY, are all White areas for the most part. I love the Mountain White culture. So practical.

  • dd121

    Yeah white people!

    • I love being a ‘breed and passing for white.

    • Erikxyz

      Good looking guy! I find it interesting that the top 4 guys in Nazi Germany; Hitler, Goering, Himmler and Goebels, were all ugly and obviously genetically inferior. None of them fit the Aryan ideal. Mussolini was kind of a pig too.

  • RealisticGuy

    This should never leave the front page completely.

  • margotdarby

    Nice work, Jared. Your use of the Confederacy was particularly deft (I had ancestors on both sides and grew up during an era, not so long ago, when both sides were honored). And the appearance on French TV was superb.

  • kikz2

    beautiful.. and the ‘brotherhood’ needs to work on the children as they are our future… you must instill these ideals of cultural pride at a young age, my children’s education began with their Southern heritage. i’d worried that my Southern upbringing would taint my children in regards to race, but in their early years came to understand the differences in races as I had, w/no interference from me. the evidence of those differences presented itself as object lesson over and over again. as these truths became self evident to my girls, my real work with their level of awareness and abilities in internalizing and explaining these lessons and extrapolating on the intangible concepts of what it means to be of European extraction in the grand scheme of the evolution of our species, began in earnest. We continue to refine their abilities to counter, mentally and rhetorically the anti-White anti-European propaganda slung at them, at almost every instance in their daily existence by media, government, academia, and pop culture. They’re not going down w/o a fight, and neither am I.