Why We Profile

Those Who Can See, August 6, 2013

In the outcry following the recent acquittal of Floridian George Zimmerman in the shooting death of an Afro teenager, many in the black community have voiced their displeasure. Canadian graduate student Matthew Simmermon-Gomes is one:

What I do know is what it’s like to be a Trayvon Martin. To be suspect. I do know what it’s like to be followed by staff in a nice clothing store; to be stopped by police for walking down the street; to endure the thousand micro-aggressions and the hundred fearful looks, the patronising astonishment coupled with quiet indignation at my education or erudition. I know, in other words, what it is to be a person of colour in a world that privileges whiteness.

While we must take this nearly Euro-looking young man from Ottawa at his word, we are left a bit bemused that despite his ‘education’ and ‘erudition,’ he is flatly unaware of basic statistics and probability.

We all live our lives based on probabilities. This gentleman’s Afro father, for example, got itchy feet and decided to abandon life in beautiful but tiny Antigua (then under British rule). Though he had the choice of over thirty Afro-run countries to emigrate to, he opted to take his chances in chilly white-run Canada. Why? Easy: Statistically speaking, Euro-governed countries provide a better quality of life in nearly every way–rule of law, lack of corruption, solid infrastructure, plentiful white-collar jobs, generous welfare state, a cornucopia of material comforts. Mr Gomes took a chance–and was right. Can we fault him that?

We can’t speak for Canada, but chance is also the reason U.S. Whites lock their car doors, clutch their purses, and cross the street in the presence of Blacks. There is a folk knowledge culled from 400 years of disproportionate black crime in North America. It can be seen in the statistics, in the anecdotes, in the earliest colonial writings.

Statistical probability is the wellspring of stereotypes. It is what pushes us to avoid snakes, spiders, and scorpions; it is why Swiss clocks, German cars, and Jewish lawyers are so sought after; it is why the global South continually tries to emigrate to the global North. Past performance is no guarantee of future success, warn the experts, but from our experience, we know it usually is.

So in response to Mr. Matthew Simmermon-Gomes, ‘Why are Afros profiled everywhere they go?’ is a question that has concrete answers. Here they are.

I. The disproportionality of Afro-American crime

‘Why are we profiled? Our crime is not higher than any other group.’

Though they are widely available on the internet, the U.S. government’s records on Afro criminality are still like a magical taboo, to be danced around but not named.

The plain fact is that for as long as Afros and Euros have co-existed on North American soil, the criminality of the former has been markedly higher than the latter.

Records from colonial times are sparse. But from the Census’s first incarceration data and throughout the post-Civil War era, in every region, the difference has been stark:






(See also Steve Sailer’s compilation of this data for 1997, in graph form and map form.)

National numbers for the 20th century tell a similar story:


(Data Source: National prison census data for 1926-1986, 1990, 1995,
2000, 2005, 2010, also 1979 and 1984)

(Curiously, we see that as institutional racism fell away, Afro crime did not in fact diminish, but increase.)

After fifty years of Civil Rights enforcement and affirmative action, when black crime should be falling to the levels of white crime, this is what we find:

Diverse crimes, all races:



How much more likely Whites are to be victimized by Blacks than to victimize them:


What the relation is between your city’s crime rate and its Afro + Hispanic population:


(Source: ‘Color of Crime‘)

Having seen its ubiquity in the United States, let us consider high Afro criminality elsewhere.

II. The omnipresence of Afro crime

‘Why are we profiled? Our crime may be higher, but that’s because slavery and colonialism made us act this way.’

1) Black criminality should be decreasing, not increasing

The common argument that ‘your oppression of us makes us act out in this way‘ is not tenable. As slavery and Jim Crow recede further into the past, Afro criminality is going up, not down. Put another way, according to the ‘oppression-causes-crime’ theory, this is how black and white criminality should look over the 20th century:


In reality, it looked like this:


One is hard-pressed, looking at the empirical data, to find evidence for this theory.

2) Afro migrants to other countries commit more crimes

It is also belied by the fact that to wherever Afros migrate in the word, including countries that never enslaved and/or colonized them, their crime rate is markedly higher than the host population.


Hugues Lagrange found that in the same socioeconomic class, “teens brought up in families from Sub-Saharan Africa commit crimes at three to four times the rate of native French teens.”

A 1999 study, the most thorough, showed that 40% of [French] prisoners had a foreign father…There are 2.7 times as many Sub-Saharan Africans in prison as their proportion of the general population.


(Native French/Europeans = 85% of the population; Black African = 3.5%)


In 2010 for the first time was a statistic published which listed delinquency by nationality (based on 2009 data). To avoid distortions due to demographic structure, only the male population aged between 18 and 34 was considered for each group.

Eight of the top ten crime-committing immigrant countries are Afro-populated:


As we can see, in this country whose colonizing and enslaving activities amounted to roughly zero, Afros are still mysteriously pushed to commit more crimes.


Sudanese and Somali-born Victorians are about five times more likely to commit crimes than the wider community, a trend that must be addressed to prevent […] social unrest, police warn.

The most common crimes committed by Somali and Sudanese-born Victorians are assault and robbery, illustrating the trend towards increasingly violent robberies by disaffected African youths.



Sudanese and Somali-born Victorians are about five times more likely to commit crimes than the wider community, a trend that must be addressed to prevent […] social unrest, police warn.

The most common crimes committed by Somali and Sudanese-born Victorians are assault and robbery, illustrating the trend towards increasingly violent robberies by disaffected African youths.

While a great many of these criminals are Jamaican, and may thus argue ‘slavery made us do it,’ it is to be noted that a large number are also Nigerian, and thus more likely descended from those who sold others into slavery.

London, England:

The most immigrant-inundated country in Western Europe has begun to take stock of the results:

Chart16While a great many of these criminals are Jamaican, and may thus argue ‘slavery made us do it,’ it is to be noted that a large number are also Nigerian, and thus more likely descended from those who sold others into slavery.


Neither slaver nor colonizer, the Great White North has nonetheless struggled with an inscrutable Afro crime problem:


3) Afro-run countries are places of high crime

Unfortunately, our Afro brethren’s organizational skills do not always allow them to produce reliable statistics on their societies. When looking for information about crime in Afro-run countries, then, it is wise to ask the question to those who cannot afford to lie: The U.S. State Department Bureau of Diplomatic Security. The price to pay for blithely sending an ambassador off to a violent death in the streets of a foreign capital is high; we can thus count on this agency to tell us the truth. What do they say?

First, the oldest independent Afro republic in the world: Haiti threw off the shackles of colonialism just a few years after the U.S. did, so by all rights it should be a model for the Afro world, a sort of ‘blacktopia.’ DOS 2012:


The United States government (USG) rates Haiti as CRITICAL in the threat categories of crime and political violence. … The most frequently reported crimes against Americans in Port-au-Prince are carjackings, kidnappings, and robberies. …. Anyone visiting or residing in Port-au-Prince for more than a few days is likely to hear gunfire at some point during their stay. …

The Regional Security Office at the U.S. Embassy recommends against walking or jogging on any street in Port-au-Prince… Embassy policy prohibits the use of any public transportation in Haiti for U.S. government employees. […]

We may also observe large, relatively prosperous regional hubs such as, in the west, Nigeria:

The U.S. Department of State considers the threat from criminal elements to be“Critical.” Crime is a risk throughout the country. U.S. visitors and residents experienced armed muggings, assaults, burglaries, carjackings, rapes, kidnappings, and extortion.

U.S. citizens, as well as Nigerians and other expatriates, have been victims of armed robbery at banks and grocery stores and on airport roads during both daylight and evening hours. Law enforcement authorities usually respond slowly or not at all…Vehicular accidents remain common and frequently draw large, confrontational crowds….Public transportation is unsafe and discouraged.

In the east, we have Kenya:

Kenya remains critically rated for both Crime and Transnational Terrorism. …  The most common crime in Kenya’s major cities, and in particular Nairobi, is car-jacking. In virtually every instance, criminals use weapons to hijack a vehicle. Victims are sometimes tied up and put in the back seat or trunk of their own car. Criminals who commit these crimes will not hesitate to shoot a victim who is the least bit uncooperative …

Violent and sometimes fatal criminal attacks, including armed carjackings, home invasions/burglaries, and kidnappings can occur at any time and in any location,…Street crime is a serious problem … Walking alone is not advisable especially downtown, public parks, beach areas, and other poorly lit areas…

In the south, we have regional giant South Africa: Low-crime and orderly under apartheid, it has now thrown off white rule and basked in Afro governance for almost twenty years:

The Department of State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security rates Pretoria, Johannesburg, Durban, and Cape Town as “Critical” crime threat posts. …Violent, confrontational crime is a major concern. Such crimes include home invasion robberies, burglaries, carjackings, street muggings, smash-and-grabs…

Regardless of the type of crime being committed, what distinguishes the crime in South African is 1) the level of violence associated with these crimes, as criminals are not hesitant to use lethal weapons, and 2) that crimes permeate the entire country, regardless of the socio-economic status of a particular neighborhood.

We also have Afro countries that have never known the yoke of Euro colonialism, such as Liberia:

Monrovia is rated a high threat post for crime… The vast majority of crime that occurs in Monrovia is “crimes of opportunity” like pick pocketing, snatch-and-grabs, and scams. Travelers are cautioned when visiting the areas of greater Monrovia known as Red Light, Waterside, Congo Town, ELWA Junction, and all market areas. These areas are extremely crowded with a lot of petty crime …

Corruption hinders the development of the police, as bribes and extortion are frequent. Many criminal incidents are unsuccessfully investigated, removing any hope of an arrest or recovery of property.

…or Ethiopia:

Pick-pocketing, “snatch and run” thefts on foot and from occupied vehicles, and other petty crimes are common in Addis Ababa. … Public transport is unregulated and unsafe; if travelers do use public transport, they should use taxis, not minibuses or large buses, and ensure they are the only passengers in the vehicle.

…There have been reports of highway robbery, including carjacking, by armed bandits outside urban areas. Some incidents have been accompanied by violence. Travelers are cautioned to limit road travel outside major towns or cities to daylight hours and travel in convoys, if possible.

…we shall stop there.

Matthew Simmermon-Gomes’s ‘thousand micro-aggressions’ and ‘hundred fearful looks’ may seem, in light of the above, if not pleasant to live through, at least not wholly unfounded. On Planet Earth, Afro crime is high. Period. It is high in their homeland, Africa. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were colonizers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were not colonizers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were slavers. It is high in countries to which they migrate that were not slavers. It is high nearly everywhere they are found on this third rock from the sun. Idang Alibi, a Nigerian, states it plainly:

Anywhere in the world today where you have a concentration of black people among other races, the poorest, the least educated, the least achieving, and the most violent group among those races will be the blacks. When indices of underdevelopment are given, black people and countries are sure to occupy the bottom of the ladder.

God himself must be frustrated with his black children. They must be an embarrassment to him. He has given us everything he has given to other of his children; why are his black children not manifesting their own gift?

Afro crime is very high relative to other groups. This is why we profile.

Topics: , , , , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Whitetrashgang

    Well why don’t we just name blacks as the best race ever, they won now can they all go home? You won could you please go home, please.

    • Truthseeker

      Yes, go back to Africa so we poor whites can be impoverished without your enriching presence. We deserve it. It’s the cross we must bear for being a uniquely evil race. Let us be punished with an all-white society that has no diversity to strengthen us. Oh, it would be hell.

      But seriously, we deserve it. Just go, blacks. Leave us alone. Maybe one day we can hope to be as good as you. We don’t deserve to have you propping us up though. As nice as your help would be, it would just be another thing we stole from you. Let us suffer on our own. We shouldn’t burden you with our problems.

      • watling

        Yes, when the black diaspora returns to Africa – fresh with the knowledge of how not to run countries which they learned in backward places run by dumb whites like the USA, Germany, France, Australia, UK, Netherlands, Canada, etc. – it will create the best civilisation the world has ever known.

        I expect that within a decade the only world superpower will be Africa. I mean, how could it not be?

        By then, white countries, lacking the civilising black influence, will no doubt have regressed to some anarchic pre-industrial chaos. That will teach us unsophisticated whites a lesson. Why are we so useless?

    • A Freespeechzone

      Unfortunately, they want YOUR home….take it from you.

      Their ‘victimization’ reinforces White guilt with the liberals and those in power–it will NEVER stop until it’s forced to stop.

  • Puggg

    Then they’ll run out the excuse, “black people only seem more criminal because the cops are deliberately picking on us.”

    Sorry, but this gap and disparity is present in too many places, including a lot of white liberal places free of “white racism,” for that excuse to hold its salt. We also know that the Justice Department randomly surveys people and asks them about crime committed against them and by who to make sure cops aren’t picking on a particular race, and what they’ve found is that cops aren’t picking on any race of people in particular, because race arrest stats and crime victim reported race perp stats are pretty much the same year in and year out.

  • Luca

    More stunning than these self-evident statistics are the mind-boggling mental contortions of their Liberal excuse makers.

  • David Ashton

    I was stopped by police twice in England. The first time carrying a milk bottle home from my girl-friend’s house and changing pockets just as two cops came in view. The other time walking to my digs in early morning darkness in a university town when students were expected to behave themselves. Stereotyping? Yes, I was then a “young person”. It’s something well-behaved blacks will have to live with so long as black people are feared or suspected disproportionately for crime.

  • MekongDelta69

    It’s so ‘heartwarming’ to see that Matthew Simmermon-Gomes – another self-loathing, guilt-ridden, feminist hyphenated three name, spineless, clueless, mentally deranged white leftist – is ‘down wif da bros’.

    Nahmeen? Nahmsayin’?

    • IstvanIN

      White? Take a closer look, colored if you ask me.

      • Jefferson

        He is mixed race.

        • IstvanIN

          Like I said…..

        • Romulus

          He’s a mulatto black. One drop!!!… One drop.

    • The Bogeyman

      I think the ones with the hyphenated last names are those lucky enough to narrow down who the father is to two possibilities.

    • blight14


  • DLRisVH

    Well Matt, when the rest of your species learns to behave like civilized human beings maybe we can do away with profiling, until then I’m keeping my eyes open.

  • The crime rate/percent black-Hispanic rate state by state correlation of R=0.81 is notable. Anything above 0.8 in the field of social science might as well be perfect correlation. I think it would be even higher if you plotted the crime rate against the percent of the state’s population that are black and hispanic men between young ages x and y.

    By comparison, the famous Sailer Correlation is R=0.88, the Sailer Correlation is plotting the combined factors of total fertility rate per white woman slash the average number of years that white women are married from 18 to 45 against the percent Republican vote for President on a a state by state basis, that being a fancy way of saying that the Republican Party in Presidential politics is the party of adults involved in traditional nuclear families, the Democrat Party being the party of everyone else.

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      A few years back I computed the Pearson’s correlation for blacks in about 300 US cities, comparing their US Census population proportion with the violent crime ranking provided by Morgan Quitno press. I found R=0.78 correlation between violent crime and the percent of a city that is black.

      • The only reason it wasn’t higher and over the crucial 0.8 line is because you were studying a straight numerical ordinal variable as the dependent variable. Straight crime rates as the dependent variable, x per 100k people, are exact, because if a city has a murder rate of 4 per 100k, it means it’s exactly four times as murderous as a city that has a murder rate of 1 per 100k. However, it’s not as if ordinal rankings of cities and how dangerous they are is so neat. We know that the #1 ranked city has the worst crime rate and the #300 ranked city has the least bad crime rate of the 300 you studied. It’s not as if there’s a perfect gradation going from 1 to 2 to 3 and so on. For there to be, there would have to be exactly a one-third of one percent decrease multiplied by (crime rate of #1 ranking city minus crime rate of #300 ranking city) as you go down each place in rank.

        And yes, I know the peanut gallery in the back has already fallen asleep. “Why bother with any of this? We already know that blacks are violent!,” I can hear them screaming.

        • leftists are delusional

          Nothing wrong with letting your inner geek out.

  • Spartacus

    “Anywhere in the world today where you have a
    concentration of black people among other races, the poorest, the least
    educated, the least achieving, and the most violent group among those
    races will be the blacks. When indices of underdevelopment are given,
    black people and countries are sure to occupy the bottom of the ladder.

    God himself must be frustrated with his black children. They must be
    an embarrassment to him. He has given us everything he has given to
    other of his children; why are his black children not manifesting their
    own gift?”


    Hey! This groid thinks the same as I do !

    • Luca

      You need to change the picture of “Black People Today.” That mud hut should now have sacks of US aid packages piled up in front of it..

      • Jesse James

        This picture of a Somolia refugee camp fits the ticket.

    • Alfred the Great

      That just about sums it up!

    • CoweringCoward

      That “Black people 2000 years ago” is not accurate, they NEVER wove fabric in antiquity or today. Were those clothes not imported they would not be there today. Not to mention the spun metal cookware and such.

    • Whitetrashgang

      If there is a God then black people are devils,well that and the tribe.

      • JohnEngelman

        Why should one particular tribe at the time of Moses, living in the same environment as other nomadic and agricultural peoples of the Middle East, have already evolved elevated intelligence when the others did not?

        At this point, I take sanctuary in my remaining hypothesis, uniquely parsimonious and happily irrefutable. The Jews are God’s chosen people.

        – Charles Murray, from “Jewish Genius”

        • Anna Tree

          Well not only they could be a lot of other explanations but that explanation has a huge hole: European Jews do have an average of 115 iq but the others have an average below 100. Why would god do that to his chose people lol ?! Seriously, it does prove that the ashkanaz iq is not originally the iq of the Jews and comes from European mixture as much as the iq of the Arabic Jews comes from an Arabic mixture.

          My explanation is most ashkanaz are ancient Spanish or Italian, so Mediterranean whites, haplogroup
          J. Can’t help but see ressemblance between Mark Zuckerberg and the

          Whites are Nordic, Alpine, Mediterraneans and Slavs. Judaism is a religion, some ashkanaz are as German in their dna than Germans but it is logic than most Jews are Mediterranean whites. Although those from the far east have strong mixture with non-Caucasians and Ethiopians are negroids. After all Judaism is a religion, you can also find Christian negroids or Nordic muslims.

          I think the askanaz IQ is not Jewish, it is European or Mediteranean European (of before the forced admixture with the muslim Moors and other North Africans, as it could be that Jews may have mixed less than Christians, notably by fleeing from the muslims or not mating as much with slaves).

          • JohnEngelman

            Ashkenazi Jews have DNA markers that point to Israel three thousand years ago, Italy two thousand years ago, and the European countries they have lived in since.

            Their superior intelligence has been attributed to Christian persecution that forbade them to own land and practice most trades. At the same time, Christians were not allowed to become money lenders, so that was the field Jews entered. It was intellectually demanding. Jews who could not learn the necessary skills did not have children, or they left the faith.

            Occasional pogroms also favored Jews who were resourceful enough to establish themselves in new countries and learn new languages.

            Unfortunately, money lending perpetuated antisemitism after religious persecution weakened. People do not like to have to borrow money. They do not like to have to pay it back.

            Currently the superior intelligence and prosperity of the Ashkenazim provokes the resentment of those who are less successful in life.

          • Anna Tree

            But Jews living in Arabic countries were also discriminated against by muslims and worse. Why their IQ didn’t increase?

            It is possible that unlike the Ashakanaz they didn’t turn bankers as loans are forbiden in islam and muslims beside that interest interdiction are allowed to be bankers. But unless just that one fact/skill was the key to increase the Ashakanaz iq in less than 2000 years, there must be a more important factor, or a mix of many factors. Especially that I presume never all the Jews or even a majority or big minority of Jews were bankers (maybe you can tell me if you know what was the percentage of money lenders in the Jewish European population?), most were shoemakers and such.

            If it was because they studied (Judaism) a lot, then why not the Arabic Jews got an increased IQ too, they also studied and read and write Jewish books too. Same about a lot being doctors or scientists, Arabic Jews were known in those fields too. If it is because of music, why the gypsies didn’t increase their IQ? Arabic Jews who couldn’t pay the jiziyah (tax forced upon Jews and Christians under islam as a punishment to not convert) were forced to leave the faith, so in muslim countries too, only the most intelligent or smart Jews could survive. And Arabic Jews also were resourceful enough to establish themselves in new countries and learn new languages. Again, why their IQs didn’t increase?

            Your explanations don’t hold in my opinion, there must be other factors or one more important factor. Especially that I don’t believe in god or in supernatural/magic qualities popping with no rational reason, everything for me has a evolutionary reason.

            I wish you would have refute my points in my previous post, I am ready to change my mind with new information. But instead you relisted your points that I think I kind of refuted: when you said “Why should one particular tribe at the time of Moses, living in the same
            environment as other nomadic and agricultural peoples of the Middle
            East, have already evolved elevated intelligence when the others did
            not?”, I say the Arabic Jews are from the same ‘tribe’ etc, but their IQ is 15 or more points below Ashkanaz IQ. How come? This contradicts your hypothesis.

            I still wonder if the Ashkanaze Jews IQ is not in fact correlated with the Mediterranean IQ of ancient Portuguese, Spanish, Italians, Greeks, before those people DNA were transformed during their civiization peaks (miscegenation with slaves and people conquered), and, subsequently, their civilization declines (miscegenation by those who conquered them etc).

            Also, the future will tell as Ashakanaze and Arabic Jews are mixed now in Israel… In your explanation, Israel IQ should grow towards 115, but I think it will go to 100. That’s a pity, Ashakanaz Jews indeed enrich mankind with their science and art. Although their liberalism, wishful thinking and guilt is hurtful for Israel in Israel, and for the white race in our Western countries, where it is same with the liberalism, wishful thinking and guilt of other intellectual whites.

          • Anna Tree

            I still wonder if the Ashkanaze Jews IQ is not in fact the Mediterranean IQ of ancient Portuguese, Spanish, Italians, Greeks, before those people DNA were transformed during their civiization peaks (miscegenation with slaves and people conquered), and, subsequently, their civilization declines (miscegenation by those who conquered them etc).

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews were allowed to practice more trades in Islamic countries. It was only after the Second World War when persecution of Jews in Islamic countries became more severe than in Christian countries.

          • Anna Tree

            I beg to disagree. Persecution of Jews (and of all other non-muslims) in islamic countries has been going on since “prophet” mohamed moved to Medinah. It has been always severe, proportionally to the amount of islam followed by the powers, that is mostly a lot and all the time, even when some of those countries were colonized.

            We know more about the persecution of Jews in Christian countries for the same reason we know more of the persecutions of any other minorities in Christian countries: because Christians or their descendants have come to denounce their past crimes. Actually they are the only people on earth to have denounce their past crimes when every people on earth have done crimes.

            Not only muslims never denounced any of the many crimes they have done in the last 1400 years, but they are still doing many of these crimes today (included slavery, misogyny, pedophily, genital mutilations, genocide, terrorism, harsh if not deadly punishments for any dissidence that be political, moral, religious etc) and will continue to do them as long as political correctness, moral relativism and other dangerous dogmas of our days/western governments continue to be. Heck, not only it’s not allowed to criticize them about FGM, child brides, slavery and systematic harsh punitions or executions, but we even praise islam as a religion of peace and give it special rights in many forms like forbiding islamophobia for example (it’s the only religion to be defended although islamophobia is not a phobia as fears of islam are completely rational). Worse the UN gives those monsters to chair Women or Human Rights councils!

            John, contrary to some on Amren, I don’t mind you see Jews as whites. I think Ashkenaz Jews are definitively whites. But when you are not logic I will point to it:

            1) I think there is no rationality behind your claim that Jews have higher IQs because they are god’s chosen people, not only because there are no proves for god’s existence or preference for Jews (they have been persecuted and genocided a lot after all) but because Sepharadic and Mizarahi (I think it’s how all the other Non-European and Non-North African Jews are called) Jews don’t have a high IQ, actually they have a lower, and even low for the latter, IQ.

            2) To claim that the Ashakanaz higher IQ is from banking, you will have to show for example how long Jews have been bankers, statistics about Ashakanaz who happen to be bankers or IQ of Non-jewish bankers families, European and Non-European, included North East Asians.

          • Fak_Zakaix

            Yes, “anti-Semitism is the socialism of the fools” 😉
            If your analysis has some connection to reality explain then why Sephardim are less intelligent than Ashkenazim.
            You also claimed on another site that Ashkenazim are White… So after all you know the truth.

          • JohnEngelman

            Ashkenazi Jews were placed in a situation where they were not allowed to own land or practice most trades. They lived as money lenders. This requires intelligence. Jews who could not learn the skills left the faith or did not have children.

            Sephardim were able to practice more traces, so they were not selected so rigorously.

          • Fak_Zakaix

            You seem to know quit a lot about Jews. An expert. Like those “experts” who once they understood an evolutionary argument they “explain” every human behavioural fact with evolutionary explanations. “It’s simple, think about it,…”

            And they continue: “Look with such rubbish I, Prof. Kevin Macdonald, was given tenure, you can do it too, but don’t tell others ;-).”

            1. Explain me something then. Ashkenazim were the Jews of historical Poland. Jews in Poland were not exclusively money lenders. Prove me wrong.

            Sephardim were the Jews of Western Europe. Spinoza, David Ricardo, Disraeli, Niels Bohr, Franco Modigliani, etc. were Sephardim. In the West Jews were associated (stereotyped in fact) with money lending (Shylock). In the Eastern Europe, in Romania at least, they were stereotyped as inn keepers or pub owners. That is contrary to your argument.

            2. “They lived as money lenders. This requires intelligence.”

            Really? In may country money sharks are illiterate bullies. Why do you think it requires so much intelligence. We are not talking of modern finance, stock market speculations and options trading. Do you think what you write?

            3. “Jews who could not learn the skills left the faith or did not have children.”
            Really? And they obeyed? What faith is this? In the Middle Ages faith was very important to people. It was a life and death matter. Or maybe you wanted to say euphemistically, “killed themselves”. But even that people don’t do easily. Again, do you think what you write?

          • Anna Tree

            Very sensible points. But JohnEngelman is not answering them, like he didn’t answer mine, only reposting some hypothesis from Murray, Cochran and Harpending.

            Indeed Jews weren’t only money lenders and indeed Non-jewish money lenders families don’t have the 110 IQs.

            But he did thumb one of my post up, where I quoted that some 10% of the Roman Empire converted to Judaism. Where I pointed out that gypsies were also persecuted but didn’t go to more intellectual professions. Where I asked him for the IQs of Non-jewish money lenders family members. It does take time to change one’s mind and new information. So let’s see how he thinks over this.

            As it’s not only those arguments against the writers he quotes. Human intelligence as ‘magical’ (god’s chosen) or so fast to improved without complete genetic isolation is not rational, it has a physical base like everything else in existence: I wish to check the DNA of the nobel prized Ashakanaze Jews with the DNA of the intellectual stars of the Ancient Greeks and Romans.

            “During Greco-Roman times, recorded mass conversions led to 6 million people practicing Judaism in Roman times or up to 10% of the population of the Roman Empire. Thus, the genetic proximity of these European/Syrian Jewish populations, including Ashkenazi Jews, to each other and to French, Northern Italian, and Sardinian populations favors the idea of non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestry in the formation of the European/ Syrian Jewish groups and is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs. The genetic proximity of Ashkenazi Jews to southern European populations has been observed in several other recent

          • Fak_Zakaix

            I don’t know what to say. I am better at criticising things than at producing something positive.
            Yes, I find the theory that Ashkenazim are super-intelligent because during the Middle Ages they practiced exclusively usury, trade and medicine to be rubbish.
            Firstly, the most famous bankers of the Middle Age were Christians: the Templiers, the Genoese, the Florentine Peruzzis and de Medicis, the Fuggers. That shows that Christians were allowed to practice usury too.
            Secondly, intelligence is transmitted genetically and not through the, once popular but wrong, Lamarckian inheritance. (Btw, Lamarckian inheritance was popular with the left).
            Furthermore, I am sorry to be blunt, but only in men intelligence is sexually selected. THEY say that women are as intelligent as men, however, at least among Europeans, women show strong sexual dimorphisms.
            Who do you think the Russian soldiers raped during their march to Berlin? The more comely or the more intelligent? Of course some of the comely were also intelligent but all of them would have had a low level of testosterone (psychoticism, apud Eysenck). Similarly, some of the rapists were intelligent too but all of them would have had a high level of psychoticism (testosterone). And this is how things would have happened naturally but for the constraints of social custom and religion. Nature would have (sexually) selected the docile nubile women (yum-yum) and the aggressive (bad) physically strong and intelligent men, intelligent not so much because women find it sexy but because it helps in the fighting with the rivals (remember Davis and Goliath?).
            Btw, my guess is that there is a positive correlation between the level of testosterone and intelligence. The bimbos are stupid by definition after all… (But don’t tell this to the unfeminine feminists). What about Blacks? They are supposed to have a high level of testosterone. Maybe they have a low intelligence IN SPITE OF their high testosterone. Who knows?
            What about the level of testosterone/psychoticism of the Ashkenazim? We should ask our guy, Mr. Copy&Paste 😉

        • Fak_Zakaix

          You said elsewhere that Jews became intelligent during the Middle Ages in Europe.

          BTW, what “God’s chosen people” achieved on their own? European civilisation is based on the Greco-Roman heritage. Greeks and Romans who considered Jews inferior creatures.

      • Fak_Zakaix

        Jews should also be considered “Devil’s children” for their malice.

        • JohnEngelman

          What about your malice?

          • Fak_Zakaix

            Do you think that I was born a “Jew hater” or I became one?
            If the latter shouldn’t you should ask why?
            If the former… so be it. “Become what you are”.
            So I was not born an innocent like all children, like the Jewish children who died in Holocaust, like Anne Frank… I was born evil because I encountered Jews in my own, White majority country, and I learned who they REALLY are. I, the victim, am the evil one.

    • IstvanIN

      You remind me of Rev. Manning.

    • Franklin_Ryckaert

      “…He (God) has given us everything he has given to other of his children ; why are his black children not manifesting their own gift?…

      Perhaps that gift was never given. Replace “God” with “evolution”, and you can understand why.

      • Mike Conrad

        Evolution is racist.

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          Yes, like the whole rest of reality.

        • watling

          IQ tests are racist.
          Nobel prizes are racist.
          Chess ratings are racist.
          University entrance exams are racist.
          Law school entrance exams are racist.
          Medical school entrance exams are racist.
          Swimming is racist.
          The now barren soil of former white-run Zimbabwean farms is racist.

  • disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

    Facts are like rain drops on a ducks back to a deluded egalitarian. They have no effect what so ever.

  • Funruffian

    The US will eventually become a police state as long as Blacks are riding the primrose path of self-entitlement. Crime will persist and will concurrently grow with the Black population increase. We are left to hope that the other factors can help curb their multiplying numbers, but as far I see the rates of current trends it will be very hard to ignore Black crime.

    • Alfred the Great

      We already live in a police state and it’s to keep the whites in line. If anybody sticks his head up to revolt, the feds will swoop in and kill him. It’s great being a slave.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        That cannot continue indefinitely, as the blacks and the Tribe who really controls the police state ratchet up the pressure on us, we will reach a point where armed revolution is inevitable because we will have no other choice. However, that will backfire mightily on the blacks and on the Tribe, who knows firsthand what Slavs like me will do to them and their families when we get our hands on them. They are fools thinking they can ride the back of an enraged tiger without ending up in his belly. I personally think whites are going to exact a fearsome revenge on both, and I live for that day.

  • WASP

    Within my lifetime I can name a minimum of seven suburban communities of the major city I live close to which have fallen to urban blight and crime; and they were all perfectly decent, low-crime communities to live in; nothing was wrong with any of the schools either. The communities deteriorated only when Blacks started moving in, and Whites were forced to flee elsewhere. The name of the game is called “chasing Whitey.” Blacks move in, Whites flee and it all starts over again. One day it will be game over.

    • Alfred the Great

      I just moved/fled a neighborhood (the west side of Fort Worth, the Greatest State of Texas) that was okay when I moved into it. However, in seven short years, it was going into the crapper. I had no idea that it could happen that fast.

      • Jesse James

        Atlanta is ringed by a succession of ruined suburban communities. Once places like suburban Dekalb County, Panola Road for those who know the geography of I20 near Atlanta, was a great place to live with nice houses and schools. These early suburbs were over run and quality of life plummeted forcing whites into the ex-burbs like Rockdale County. I lived there for eight years and watched as they built new malls and apartments buildings and then the demographics completely changed. I knew we were lost when they hired a black former assistant superintendent to head the Rockdale County school systems, “to help us transition to a more diverse population.” Thankfully my last child has graduated out of that school system. I used to joke that at some point the whites from Augusta fleeing west along I-20 would run into the whites fleeing east from Atlanta and we would have to stand back to back and circle the SUVs.

        • borogirl54

          I guess Forsyth County is still the only predominately white county in the Atlanta area.

          • Jesse James

            Some interesting things are going on in Atlanta. One is the creation of new white majority areas like Brookhaven (60% white) in December 2012 as an incorporated new city within Dekalb County. The county as a whole has a strong black majority of 54% and only 33% white. It is the most diverse county in Georgia with large Hispanic (9%) and Asian (4%) minority population groups. The City of Brookhaven in Dekalb County and the proposed secession of Northern Fulton County to create a new white majority in the resurrected Milton County are attempts by whites to try and gain some control over their own tax money by installing more competent and responsive governments.

        • FransSusan

          When I first moved to the Atlanta metro area 24 years ago, Clayton County (adjacent Fulton county, south of Atlanta) was a lovely place to live, mostly white, good schools, etc. Within 10 years it was destroyed by blacks moving in. I believe it was because “the projects” in downtown Atlanta were demolished, and many of the low-rent black residents descended on Clayton County. I don’t live there, never have, so I’m not certain about the cause, but I’m well aware of the results. Didn’t know that Rockdale county was also on the road to destruction, too.

          • Jesse James

            I worked in Clayton County for eight years and commuted from Rockdale County. Clayton County was a multi-cultural disfunctional nightmare. The schools were ridiculously bad, so bad that they were the first High Schools in our state to lose accreditation. It was the place where when they finally elected a black sheriff he fired most of the white deputies and had them carried home in vans usually used to transport prisoners. He had the whole shameful operation over watched by black police snipers. A woman I used to work with a few years ago told me that her and her boyfriend had to quit going to the local mall and the movie theater because of flagrant black sexual harassment. So I commuted just under 3 hours each day so my kids didn’t have to go to school in that environment, imagine how sick I felt when I saw the whole process of civilizational destruction begin in Rockdale County.

      • HamletsGhost

        The section 8-ball rolls mighty fast.

        • me

          I see what you did there. LOL!

      • ShermanTMcCoy

        Been there (North Dallas), done that (moved to Germany).

        Trouble is, we see more africans every day.

      • Keep Honkin I’m Reloading

        You can cross Mesquite off the list too.

      • Strider73

        Sounds like either White Settlement (too bad the demographics don’t match the name) or Benbrook. I understand the Bantus have ruined the once-beautiful Hulen Mall.

        • Alfred the Great

          It was White Settlement before It and Fort Worth changed the boundary line for the two cities. That was before I moved there. There was an initiative to change the name of White Settlement, which got its name because it was where the White People settled.

  • Is there a violent crime category where black people are not vastly overrepresented?

    • watling

      My guess is suicide bombing where they’ve shown some promise but are outclassed by Arabs/Pakistanis/Iraqis.

  • Spartacus
    • Alfred the Great

      I wonder why my web browser didn’t autocomplete the website address. Not really.

  • JohnEngelman

    Even Jesse Jackson practices race profiling: “There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved…. After all we have been through. Just to think we can’t walk down our own streets, how humiliating.”

    Remarks at a meeting of Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993). Quoted in “Crime: New Frontier – Jesse Jackson Calls It Top Civil-Rights Issue” by Mary A. Johnson, 29 November 1993, Chicago Sun-Times (ellipsis in original). Partially quoted in US News & World Report (10 March 1996)

    White liberals still thrill to the oratory of Martin Luther King, Jr., but they know better than to walk along Martin Luther King Blvd. after dark.

    • Jefferson

      Martin Luther King Jr. streets are not even safe places to venture into during the day, let alone at night.

      • borogirl54

        In fact, MLK Blvds in most cities are in the crime ridden neighborhoods.

    • Katherine McChesney

      The same goes for Rosa Parks Blvd.

      • me

        Naming these streets is a pretty good alert system, if you ask me. If the street is named after a Bantu of dubious historical significance, go another route. A happy accident, but it helps Whites.

  • John R

    Such a good article I’ll save it, and share it with some of my difficult to convince friends and family.

  • borogirl54

    Junior needs to face reality. These shopkeepers know that blacks are more likely to shoplift than other people. The police also know that young black men are also more likely to be up to no good so that is why the police stop them. If he does not believe that, I would suggest going to the emergency room of any big city hospital trauma center where the majority of shooting victims are young black men shot by other young black men.

    • Strider73

      It would be nice if in those instances the black shooters had better aim. Then the other blacks would be in the morgue instead of the ER

  • RebelliousTreecko

    The egalitarian notion that every group of people commits the same percentages of crime relative to their population is absurd.

    • Liberal radio host Bill Press – immediately after the 1992 Los Angeles riots – stated that “everyone was equally involved”.

      I literally felt my conversion from liberal to ultra-conservative occur when he told that whopper.

      • JohnEngelman

        Liberals are often myopic about blacks. That does not mean that tax cuts for the rich are a good idea. I liked Bill Press’s columns about George W. Bush.

        • Why is it right to take money from someone who earned it (Whites) and give it to someone who didn’t (blacks)?

          Liberalism is the mechanism that enables blacks to reach unmerited stations.

      • borogirl54

        There is some truth to that. I remember during the 1992 riots when the crowd went after the local police station, there were some whites and Asians in the crowd. I saw this on tv.

        • I observed “all races” engaging in civilized, peaceful protests.

          I also saw blacks being violent, Hispanics looting, Asians defending their property & Whites fleeing for their lives.

          Bill Press is a moral idiot who refuses to believe his own lying eyes.

  • Dave4088

    Facts and hard evidence of black criminality will not convince non-whites and ultra left wing ideologues. They usually deny the facts, then if you get them to concede they will counter that “white supremacy” has created inequalities and injustices that lead blacks to be so violent or some other lefty psychobabble.

    They’re just like little wind up toys who do and say the same thing over and over.

  • Erasmus

    Profiling saves lives.

    I have no doubt that the parents of Kristopher Kime, Autumn Pasquale and Jonathon Foster, Channon Christian, Christopher Newsom and Christopher Lane wish they had taught their children to profile.

    When 55% of the US’s violent crime is committed by 5-6% of the population, smart people profile.

    • Luca

      Profiling saves lives…and political correctness kills.

      • me

        We need to make that into a public service announcement bumper sticker.

  • Blacks wouldn’t be forced to commit more crime if Whites had done more for Civil Rights and eliminated unearned racist White privilege sooner.

    Now that Civil Rights is the purpose of our Federal Government, and White privilege is becoming extinct, black crime is about to drop precipitously.

    Progress takes time, but we are almost there.

    • CoweringCoward

      Oh yeah! Utopia is just one more federal program or “Justice for Trayvon®” attack away!

    • Franklin_Ryckaert

      Yes it takes time, evolutionary time. That means at least some 100,000 years.

    • Mike Conrad

      Amen, brother! Keep Hope Alive!
      We almost to the Promised Land!

    • JohnEngelman

      If most white racial moderates had known in 1964 that 49 years later blacks would still have a rat of violent crime that is eight times the white rate I doubt that the civil rights legislation would have been signed.

      Jim Crow legislation was based on the assumption that the Negro race was intrinsically inferior and dangerous, and that it was dangerous to treat Negroes like white people.

      • Luca

        Don’t worry, it would have been signed and they would do it all again today. LBJ and company knew full well the nature of the beast. It is told that LBJ was fond of saying “I’ll have those ‘ni**ers’ voting Democratic for the next 200 years”.

        It’s part of the plan: Divide and Conquer. Keep them at each other’s throats while our hands are in their pockets.

        Even today they make excuses for negroes in the media, they falsely portray them as heroes in Hollywood while portraying Whites as the criminal race.

        You were right about Jim Crow, but I would add that the Southern realists knew the races were not compatible and thought it best for everyone’s sake to just separate them. Negroes had their own facilities exclusive to them where Whites were not allowed. You wouldn’t see Whites trying to drink from “Colored” water fountains nor would you see them complaining about it either. Jim Crow reduced racial tensions for blacks as well, but it was northern agitators, liberals, communists and the delusional goody-two-shoes who bused down and organized all these events. MLK didn’t do all those things all by his lonesome. He had outside help from the usual suspects who wrote his speeches, gave him front page headlines, organized and financed events and played on public sympathies turning him into a saint and then a martyr.

      • me

        And we should go back to segregation policies. We could sell it as ‘for the children!’. At least this would actually be the truth.

      • Dangerous blacks are the front lines in the War on Criminalized White privilege.

        Even though Brittny Watts “just embraced all different kinds of people,” Nkosi Thwandi still found her guilty of White privilege and executed her on the spot.

    • Romulus

      What the F are you talking about? Being poor or a former slave, does not give one license to commit crime!!! All peoples of every race ,creed and color have been enslaved at one time or other.

    • Romulus

      It occured to me ( hopefully) that your comment may have been in jest.
      If so, disregard earlier comment.

      • Strider73

        Sarcasm all too often does not translate well into print, since there are no non-verbal cues (voice, facial expression, body language, etc.) to reveal it. As a result, bloggers are increasingly using the “sarcasm tags” such as “[sarc] [/sarc]”.

  • HamletsGhost

    I’d never seen those graphs before. What’s noteworthy is how much lower the incarceration rate is for both whites and blacks in the southern states compared to the more liberal northern states. Seems like chain gangs and yes, even the occasional lynching did a lot to keep crime at a minimum.

  • JohnEngelman

    When I lived in the San Francisco Bay area I dated a recent immigrant from China. Her family owned a Chinese book and gift store in Oakland’s Chinatown. When a black teenager entered the store she watched the teenager closely, and did not relax until the black teenager left. When we drove somewhere in her car, if she saw a young black man on the sidewalk she would push buttons to raise the windows and lock the doors.

    I promise I did not teach her to do that. In the few years she had been in the United States she had learned by herself.

    • Franklin_Ryckaert

      Yellow fever is a disease.

      • JohnEngelman

        Your resentment for superior races is a mental disorder.

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          Worship of the higher IQ of others (real or imaginary) betrays an inferiority complex and probably low IQ of the worshipper himself.

          • JohnEngelman

            That’s one way to look at it. However, if you were comfortable with your capabilities you would not be looking for right wing hate targets.

            Political extremism is the result of unhappiness caused by personal dissatisfaction. Where one directs the anger caused by this unhappiness determines whether one will be drawn to the extreme right or the extreme left.

            Those who direct their anger at rich people, the business community, and so on become left wing extremists. Those who direct their anger at non whites, Jews, and white liberals (who are seen as “race traitors”) become right wing extremists.

            By saying of my open admiration of Orientals, “Yellow fever is a disease,” you reveal that you are a right wing extremist. The mere fact that you feel the need to hate anyone, and particularly those who have done nothing to harm you, exposes bad things about your character.

            Eric Hoffer wrote a book about extremism that is entitled, “The True Believer.” In it he wrote, “The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause.”

            I am often flamed here, not because I say anything bad about white Gentiles – I don’t – but because I freely express my admiration for Jews and Orientals. What is more, I find it easy to explain my admiration by quoting Jared Taylor, Professor J. Philippe Rushton, and articles I have found on American Renaissance. My ability to do that makes the haters even angrier, while it amuses me.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            Your ideas seem to come directly from a handbook of the ADL or the SPLC, complete with cheap psychologizing : not wanting your people to disappear from the face of the earth is “extremism”, which is fuelled by “hate”, caused by “personal dissatisfaction”. You might consider the possibility that political convictions are not based on personal frustrations but on real social and political circumstances. If the desire for collective survival is a “disease” then the whole world suffers from it (especially the Jews!). Unfortunately Whites suffer far too little from it. And claiming excellence for one’s own people is called “ethnic pride” which occurs among all peoples of the world, both civilized and uncivilized.

  • JohnEngelman

    Fig. 9 and Fig. 10 demonstrate that Asians have lower crime rates than whites.

  • Romulus

    Homo rectus uses it’s gifts everyday of the week!…. To complain, rob,rape, murder death kill.
    Thanks to certain “intelligent” social scientists and traitors who posited blacks our equals instead of the truth, we we will continue to have this problem. They are further down the evolutionary ladder, period.

  • Stentorian_Commentator

    What are to him micro-aggressions are to us micro-protections, the myriad ways in which we seek to avoid becoming victims of black dysfunction. But of course I should be empathetic to the poor dears, so I propose, for the cost of renouncing their U.S. citizenship, that I will pay taxes to pay for their passage back to the African nation of their choice that will have them, and pay them a modest stipend for about 10 years following their emigration. I know many of them will die after the stipend stops, if they don’t die before then, but at this point it’s either them or me, and I’m for me.

    • WASP

      All Blacks (of whatever shade) back to Africa. Now, that’s something I could really get behind and support!

  • Erasmus

    Bottom line: We profile to stay alive.
    I don’t give a toss how many of the brothers become uncomfortable by our profiling. Because it saves lives, it’s worth it.

  • JohnEngelman

    I am here because I enjoy political arguments.

    I also agree with race realism. That is not a movement or a cause. It is a scientific theory.

    This in brief is what race realism asserts, and what I believe: race is an important biological classification; the races differ significantly in average ability levels and behavior; these differences are innate, and the result of thousands of years of evolution in response to different population pressures.

    Pointing out that Orientals have rates of crime and illegitimacy than whites, and higher average IQ’s is the essence of race realism.

    • Franklin_Ryckaert

      “I am here because I enjoy political arguments.”

      Euphemism for : “I’m a troll.”

      • JohnEngelman

        A troll is one who angers people. I anger fools by exposing their prejudices with facts and logical reasoning.

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          Which is still deliberate angering and thus trolling according to your own definition.

          • JohnEngelman

            I present my opinions in a calm and rational manner, documenting my factual assertions. Those who become angry at me do so because of their ignorance, fear, and hatred.

          • JohnEngelman

            I say to you, “I do not care if you think I am a troll,” just as I say to others, “I do not care if you think I am a racist.”

            Both terms are used to suppress controversial discussions of issues that need to be discussed.

  • watling

    Someone once posed this question:

    Late at night you are walking alone down a quiet, dark city street. Coming towards you is a group of teenagers. Would you prefer them to be Chinese or black?

    • theotherguest

      I would prefer them to be WHITE! Why do you put “chinese” in the equation anyway?

      • me

        Chinese math velly hard, say “Confusious”.

      • watling

        It wasn’t my question.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    I have had numerous occasions where I was about to shoot someone who was a threat to me or my loved ones. All but two of them were because of blacks or Hispanics, which is why I avoid both, especially in numbers. They are so cowardly that a graying middle aged Slav like me is SOOOO threatening to them. I do not want to be around either, so I act accordingly.

  • After several years of collecting bookmarks, I learnt that for some things you’re really better off saving a copy to disk. You never know what will happen, and whether the info will sink into the internet abyss. On the other hand, you will end up like me, with some 8,000 saved pages, lol. Mine was for a project I had planned, but seriously, I think that some things are worth saving just to be sure. Keep the bookmark too.

    • Strider73

      There are browser extensions that allow the user to save a Web page as a PDF. I use it quite often, especially for pages like this one.

  • WASP

    definitely Black.

  • The Final Solution

    Imagine a world without blacks. Just soak in that thought. Soon it will be illegal to have such a thought.

    • me

      Big Brother has declared such ideas and fantasies as Thought Crimes. Go to your local NSA office immediately!

  • FransSusan

    Just not accurate, JohnEngleman. President Johnson didn’t do anything because he thought it was the morally right thing to do. Everything about the civil rights crap was political, nothing more.

  • libertarian1234

    “What I do know is what it’s like to be a Trayvon Martin. To be suspect. I do know what it’s like to be followed by staff in a nice clothing store;”

    Sounds like paranoia. They feel similarly about many things, like thinking whites blew up the levees in N.O. to drown all the blacks there. Or that whites introduced aids and drugs into their neighborhoods to kill them off. That whites so named Devil’s Food Cake and Angel Food Cake to denote that blacks are bad and whites are good. That an outer space phenomenon was racially deemed a “black hole in space” as a denigration of black people.

    Too, they pass along to one another that blacks were the original creators of ancient civilizations that were the first to give mankind enlightenment, like Egypt, but had it all stolen or credit for it all suppressed by whites throughout history, like the Greeks who they claim stole their philosophy, science, and culture that they developed in Egypt.

    And they say oppression and cover-up of all their greatness has been the white man’s work all throughout history, like the time the French shot the nose off the Sphinx, because it was broad and flat, verifying that the Egyptians were black.

    It never stops. Their view of the Trayvon Martin incident is typical of the aforementioned myths in that a lie is told, then passed along as if it were an irrefutable truth: “Zimmerman was hunted down like a dog, then murdered because he was walking while black,” is along the same lines as their claims of being creators of great, advanced civilizations, but are not given credit for them due to white racism.

    “….. to endure the thousand micro-aggressions and the hundred fearful looks, the patronising astonishment coupled with quiet indignation at my education or erudition.”


    Is this more black paranoia or what? Coupled with an arrogant view of his non-existent assets and abilities that only he can recognize.

    These people are paranoid to be sure, but they’re either mentally deranged as well with other mental aberrations or they’re so stupid they can’t understand the world around them or the people in it.

    “I know, in other words, what it is to be a person of colour in a world that privileges whiteness.”

    If he relocated to Africa, he wouldn’t have to worry about it.

    Or he could relocate to China, Japan, or Korea, but if he did he’d be whining uncontrollably about black racism and “Asian privilege,” because he couldn’t compete in those countries either. He’d have the same song and dance routine but a different audience and a different scape goat to blame his incompetence on.

    • drattastic

      China, Japan or Korea aren’t stupid enough to let the primitives live in their countries in great numbers.

    • me

      What do you expect, when the average IQ of a Bantu is around 85?

  • Luca

    Johnson flipped to whichever cause would win him votes. There is plenty of documentation on his historical record, he was on both sides of the issue.

    Civil rights legislation and action was started under Eisenhower and continued with Kennedy. He knew which way the winds of change were blowing, he wasn’t about to reverse it.

    I have very little regard for the man, but he was a shrewd politician.

  • Strider73

    I just saved that graphic under the file name “racial math.” It’s almost as good as the Detroit-vs.-Hiroshima comparisons.

  • me

    An enlightened Nigerian man, embarrassed by his own race. I feel sorry for him. He is probably hated for his truth-telling, as well.

    • Sick of it

      Most likely a Nigerian Christian who actually believes. I’ve met a few.

  • me

    ‘President’ Johnson was an ambitious shill. Period. He had no morals to speak of.

  • Sick of it

    Portuguese? Brazilian? Something like that…and obviously mixed.

  • Excellent article. As far as actions are concerned I think that things will eventually move towards a separation. Apartheid if you will, to use a racist, totally discredited, yet accurate, term.

    I think that random acts of cruelty or violence or retribution are worthless. Such acts would only get people’s backs up and prove irritating and unpopular. Rather than the petty revenges of the fustrated people in the South, starting in 1865, imagine if we were nice to the blacks. Fill their pockets with quarter eagles ($2.50 gold pieces) and transport them back to Liberia (country in Africa established 1840 for returning blacks back there) in the latter 19th century. They’d spend the gold coins but we’d now have a country without them. A small price to pay.

    Eventually when civilization degrades, there will no longer be the resources to support billions of people in Africa & other places. There will be a great die off as numbers [populations] return to pre-modern levels. I imagine some nuclear exchanges over water or other resources in the next 40 years.

    A primarily white civilization should be established which doesn’t permit unrestricted immigration of non-working freeloaders, yet which doesn’t stagnate. In these times I imagine dwl (Disingenuous White Libralism) will be dead as a concept and illegal immigration attempts will be simply be deterred with lethal force.

  • Franklin_Ryckaert

    They are apt to create human “ant colonies”.

  • Brutus

    I support reparations for slavery. Send them back to Africa and demand a refund.

  • Fak_Zakaix

    If you want me to reply to your comments you should stop reporting or deleting mine. Are you the moderator? There is nothing offensive in my comments only a stimulating sarcasm.