Rubio’s Amnesty: A Path to Oblivion for the GOP

Ann Coulter, January 30, 2013

{snip}

{snip} The Democrats came roaring back in 2006 and again in 2008. There’s no reason Republicans can’t do the same, unburdened by having to run against an incumbent in 2016.

Unless Marco Rubio has his way.

The Democrats never change their ideas; they change the voters. For decades, Democrats have been working feverishly to create more Democrats by encouraging divorce (another Democratic voter!), illegitimacy (another Democratic voter!) and Third World immigration (another Democratic voter!).

Strangely, some Republicans seem determined to create more Democratic voters, too. That will be the primary result of Sen. Marco Rubio’s amnesty plan.

{snip}

Rubio’s bill is nothing but amnesty. It isn’t even “amnesty thinly disguised as border enforcement.” This is a wolf in wolf’s clothing.

Despite all the blather about how Rubio demands “Enforcement First!” the very first thing his proposal does is make illegal aliens legal. (Don’t call them “illegal aliens”!)

The ability to live and work legally in America is the most valuable commodity in the world; it’s the Hope Diamond of the universe. {snip}

Step One of Marco Rubio’s plan is: Grant illegal aliens the right to live and work in America legally. (Rubio’s first move in poker: Fold.)

People who have broken our laws will thus leap ahead of millions of foreigners dying to immigrate here, but—unwilling to enter illegally—waiting patiently in their own countries.

The only thing the newly legalized illegal immigrants won’t get immediately is citizenship. Rubio claims that under his plan, they won’t be able to vote or go on welfare. But in practice, they’ll have to wait only until the ACLU finds a judge to say otherwise.

Even under Rubio’s scheme, all the children born to the 11 million newly legalized illegals will be instant citizens, able to collect welfare for their whole families and vote as soon as they are old enough.

Which won’t be long: The vast majority of illegal aliens are Hispanic, and Hispanics have a higher teen birthrate than any other ethnic group. In California, a majority of all Hispanic births are illegitimate. That’s a lot of Democratic voters coming.

And look how great that’s turned out! With Hispanics on track to become the largest ethnic group in California this year, the state that gave us Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan is incapable of electing any Republican statewide anymore. Taxes keep going up, and there’s no one left to pay the bill.

That will be our entire country if Republicans fall for Rubio’s phony “Enforcement First!” plan. Perplexingly, some Republicans seem determined to turn the whole nation into California, in the foolish hope of winning one last election.

{snip}

So when exactly does the enforcement part of Rubio’s “Enforcement First!” plan kick in? Answer: Never.

Or rather, enforcement becomes both impossible—because nothing will stop them if legalization is the lure—and irrelevant—because there’s no penalty for leaving the border wide open.

Even if enforcement “fails,” are the 11 million illegals already legalized by Rubio going to be asked to leave? Of course not.

{snip}

Topics: , , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Okay, I’ll eat the crow-flavored humble pie. Just this once.

    But, I have two problems in this otherwise great and concise full body blow against Rubio’s amnesty bill:

    1. AC seems to be more concerned about the health of the Republican Party than the health of white America

    2. She trusts Ted Cruz too much too soon. Yeah, so far so good, but I trust nobody with that much Indo blood in him any farther than I can throw him, especially after Rubio. The difference is, Rubio already had a bad record from being Speaker of the Florida House on immigration, while the few times Cruz had to deal with immig while SG of Texas, he did good. But still, I’ll never fully trust anyone as identifiably Indo as he (Cruz), I will only be happy if he keeps voting correctly. But I do not want him to be President of the United States, full stop.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      3. She prattled on about how unfair this policy is for legal immigrants without mentioning the interests of the native born citizenry.

      But Ann is better than 99% of em out there, so it’s tough to complain too much.

      • And I should be fumed about that most of all for the obvious personal reasons. Even not counting the fact that permanent employment in my field of education is virtually denied to me because of Asians slinging H-xB visas flooding the market with cheap labor, many “illegal aliens” aren’t border jumpers, but instead legal immigrant visa over-stayers.

        • Joseph

          Fun Fact: We had a Chinese post-doc who threatened to our director of research when he determined that her services in Materials Science were no longer needed. She would apparently have to return to wherever in Cathay she hailed from and was not pleased to go back, J. Engleman’s admiration for the land notwithstanding.

      • The__Bobster

        Legal immigrants look largely like the illegal ones. I don’t want to be fair to them either.

      • Unperson

        I don’t know if this should be #4 or #3(a), but I was a little bothered by this:

        People who have broken our laws will thus leap ahead of millions of foreigners dying to immigrate here, but—unwilling to enter illegally—waiting patiently in their own countries.

        I too don’t want to be too hard on Ann, as I generally like her stuff, and am happy to see her speaking more forthrightly on issues of identity and ethnicity like she’s been doing lately. But this passage creates the impression that the entire world has some sort of right to move to the US, but should do so according to the rules and on a manageable timetable. Now, maybe Ann would deny this and say I’ve misinterpreted, but it seems to me it could be read that way.

        In any case, this misplaced focus on the huddled masses righteously awaiting a (legit, non-forged) Green Card implies that mass immigration is fine as long as it’s done by the books. No. The US — and every other white country, for that matter — have been absolutely gorging on foreigners for decades, and its past time to give this reckless, nation-destroying habit a good, long rest. Mass immigration needs to be severely curtailed. Like a 10-year moratorium for starters. After a decade of NOBODY getting in, we would assess the situation and decide if the moratorium should be extended; or if we want to go back to it on a limited basis; or enact policies restricting immigration to Europeans only, etc.

        Those wretched millions (billions?) “waiting patiently in their own countries” need to be told not to pin their hopes on being admitted to First World countries. If they want upward mobility they should instead dedicate themselves to uplifting and enriching their own countries rather than flooding into ours.

      • Tucker

        Its a real shame that Coulter didn’t find herself a good looking WHITE guy and have two or three children, so those fine looking genes would have been passed down. The fact that she has no children, I suspect, reduces her ability to look ahead and see the horrific future that will be in store for her progeny.

        Incidentally, many have noted that the White Nationalist / White race realist community has an over abundance of single White men, and most of those men have not been given the opportunity to become fathers – due to the rejection they have had to endure from white women as a result of their perfectly healthy views on racial issues. Despite this rejection, most of these men refuse to race mix or change their views on racial issues – and wind up spending their lives alone and without a female companion and are denied the chance to have children.

        These men are making a sacrifice for the children of their fellow Whites, and I often find myself wondering if those Whites who have been lucky enough to marry and have children ever stop to think about such White men and do they appreciate their contributions in trying to help other whites see the light on racial survival issues?

        • Bill

          I don’t buy the claim that unmarried white men are sacrificing for our people. They’re either too picky or not trying hard enough. In my experience, often women over time adopt the views of their men. Just marry a conservative woman and I think she’ll come around on the race issue if not already there. I even know conservative men married to liberal women. That didn’t stop them from having a family together or getting along.

          • Joseph

            Yeah, but from what I’ve seen, where conservative men are married to a liberal woman, the wife is usually dominant and raises their kids to be liberals and perpetuate the error which is worse than not marrying at all.

            They get along -as long as the men do what they are told where the children are concerned.

    • Anonymous

      Cruz and Rubio are not Indian if that is what you refer to as “indo” blood. They are of spaniard descent, that is european, not mestizo indians like the majority of mexicans. Spanish is only a language. All races speak it.

      • Maybe not purely Indian (feather, not dot), but Rubi-No is certainly enough such that he politically feels his tribe. Cruz also has the look, and whether he eventually starts feeling his tribe or keeps on voting right, only time will tell.

    • Tucker

      An excellent common sense attitude to have and hold on to! Make no mistake, people. This is an openly declared race war to determine who will be the dominant owners and proprietors of OUR historic and native homelands.

      As has been noted before by others, Hispanics or Latinos or Mestizos or Chicanos or whatever they call themselves this week or month or year – occupy, own, and have full and unchallenged dominance and control of every square inch of dirt from the southern edge of the US-Mexican border all the way down to the remote tip of South America. That geographic land mass is far greater than the land mass that constitutes the continental USA. This piece of land, i.e., North America – is the birthright and the inheritance of the White European descendants of our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers – and we are now being openly challenged by non-European invaders who want to claim our land for themselves and become the dominant majority and who think they have the right to subjugate Whites to being ruled over by what clearly amounts to a motley collection of anti-white, hate filled, third world real estate thieves.

      This Rubio character, and so is Bobby Jindal – are race hustlers and racial con-artists, as well as racial hypocrites. Both of these guys lecture and scold White conservatives about being concerned about the perfectly legitimate ethnic specific interests of White European people and for basing their opposition to being invaded and dispossessed by non-whites from the Third World – but, at the very same time these hucksters are chiding Whites, they are openly and unapologetically working to allow more of THEIR racial kind to flood into America, in order to boost their percentage of our population and to increase their political power and influence?

      So, its okay for Rubio and Jindal to want to import more of their racial stock into a nation which does not belong to them, but not okay for Whites to oppose being dispossessed and have our dominance and influence decreased inside a nation that their ancestors founded and bequeathed to them as their posterity?

      These two guys should be selling used cars to rubes on a parking lot somewhere instead of being allowed to hold political office.

    • Tucker

      An excellent common sense attitude to have and hold on to! Make no mistake, people. This is an openly declared race war to determine who will be the dominant owners and proprietors of OUR historic and native homelands.

      As has been noted before by others, Hispanics or Latinos or Mestizos or Chicanos or whatever they call themselves this week or month or year – occupy, own, and have full and unchallenged dominance and control of every square inch of dirt from the southern edge of the US-Mexican border all the way down to the remote tip of South America. That geographic land mass is far greater than the land mass that constitutes the continental USA. This piece of land, i.e., North America – is the birthright and the inheritance of the White European descendants of our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers – and we are now being openly challenged by non-European invaders who want to claim our land for themselves and become the dominant majority and who think they have the right to subjugate Whites to being ruled over by what clearly amounts to a motley collection of anti-white, hate filled, third world real estate thieves.

      This Rubio character, and so is Bobby Jindal – are race hustlers and racial con-artists, as well as racial hypocrites. Both of these guys lecture and scold White conservatives about being concerned about the perfectly legitimate ethnic specific interests of White European people and for basing their opposition to being invaded and dispossessed by non-whites from the Third World – but, at the very same time these hucksters are chiding Whites, they are openly and unapologetically working to allow more of THEIR racial kind to flood into America, in order to boost their percentage of our population and to increase their political power and influence?

      So, its okay for Rubio and Jindal to want to import more of their racial stock into a nation which does not belong to them, but not okay for Whites to oppose being dispossessed and have our dominance and influence decreased inside a nation that their ancestors founded and bequeathed to them as their posterity?

      These two guys should be selling used cars to rubes on a parking lot somewhere instead of being allowed to hold political office.

      • First off, I thought you’d be happier with my response to you on that survivialist-prepper question of yesterday or the day before.

        When I see Piyush Jindal, I see what swarms in and out of the St. Louis installations of The Big Four.

      • MarcusTrajanus

        Latin America is not as homogenous as you imagine it is. There are majority White countries like Uruguay and Argentina, there are countries with substantial White minorities, countries with small White minorities that still form the ruling class, or at least the wealthiest segment of the population. The way I see it North American and the Southern Cone of South America ought to be undisputed White Man’s land, and the mestizos can have the middle (for now) .

  • John

    When I read the daily horror stories in the leftist media (now the mainstream) with titles such as “Hispanics Will Soon Dominate California Population” [1], it strongly smacks of wartime news bulletins that heralded imminent victory over the Japanese.

    The leftist self-loathers are so gleeful that Whites are rapidly on the way out that can barely contain themselves, despite the fact that they are overwhelmingly White! They don’t have a clue that Hispanics, Blacks, and Muslims would just as soon kill them as look at them.

    Has a plurality of any race ever openly decided to engage in self-suicide? White leftists relenetlessly insist that all Whites must quickly die out! What kind of mental illness causes this mass insanity for millions to desire auto-dispossesion and auto-genecide? It defies all logic! It’s all very sick, appalling, and disgusting!

    1. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/31/hispanic-california-population-immigration/1881407/

  • bigone4u

    Rubio loves Hispanics? Wants to cut them a good deal at the expense of white Amerika (that’s the way I’m spelling it from now on)? Wake up! HE is Hispanic. What did you expect?

    • The__Bobster

      http://www.vdare.com/letters/a-reader-has-questions-about-rubio

      The Miami-based group Citizens Of Dade United (of which I am vice president) has backed Florida state immigration enforcement bills for many years. But the Hispanic Caucus legislators have blocked them all.

      Central to this unAmerican activity: Marco Rubio. In 2008, when he was Florida House Speaker, Rubio told his appointed Rules Chairman Rep. David Rivera and six Chairmen with bills in their committees to stall all six until the session ended.

      All Chairmen followed Rubio’s orders. The session ended, killing the six House Bills, also killing 4 Senate Bills.[

    • George White

      Exactly, no surprise here.

    • MarcusTrajanus

      I’m Hispanic, and if I was in Rubio’s place I would advocate putting a wall on the Mexican border and deporting every last illegal.

      • Gee, with a name like marcus Trajanus I thought you were Italian. Oh, the Romans conquered the Spanish or the Iberians.

        • MarcusTrajanus

          I’m part Italian, and Trajan was born in Spain.

  • mobilebay

    Why wouldn’t Rubio have an amnesty plan? He’s Hispanic, isn’t he? The rest of the gang of 8 are very pro-illegal, so we couldn’t count on them to do anything else. Guess no one’s told them we don’t need immigration reform…we need immigration enforcement. I’m for all immigration being stopped dead until our country gets back on track. Then the numbers and type of immigrants need to be carefully screened before they can be admitted. And since Mexicans make up approx. 75% of illegals, they should lose their turn for 25 years.

    • Torshammar

      mexicans should lose their turn for 25 years. no.

      Two or three generations of whites cranking out babies, then if we want immigrants, they come from northern Europe, white South Africa.

      • MarcusTrajanus

        “then if we want immigrants, they come from northern Europe” Will they bring their beloved Somali and Afghan pets?

  • The__Bobster

    It seems that the female conservatives have the greatest testicular fortitude on this issue. Most of the male mouthpieces have suddenly turned mealy-mouthed.

    • Xerxes22

      Ann doesn’t work for Fox or the owners of AM radio, so she is not depended on you know who for her paycheck. She makes her living writing simple overpriced books and giving speeches for a nice fee.Saying something like this actually drums up buisness. With Ann, it”s all about the money.

      • Luca

        She’s making money while saying what needs to be said. No crime there.

        • Non Humans

          I’m currently reading through her latest book (Mugged) and have to admit that I like nearly everything that I’ve read so far (halfway through).
          .
          She plainly and often aggressively calls out the libtards and the MSM for their shameless manipulations of many events in recent history, and the outcomes/aftermaths of their actions. It is very interesting to say the least. Plus, I love how she shamelessly bashes J. Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakahn, etc for all of their lies and classic non-human activities and attitudes.

          • Problem though: She almost always genuflects to egalitarian presumptions and ideological underpinnings.

          • Put Put

            Plus, she is also very friendly with Blacks like Marc Lamont Hill, Goldie Taylor, Van Jones and Michael Dyson.

          • Non Humans

            That is true, but regardless of her personal beliefs (which she also seems to express candidly), she is saying what needs to be said about the media, libtards, and non-humans alot more openly than most of those within the MSM, its’ fringes, or other independent news sources ever would.
            .
            I’m not saying that I wholly endorse everything that she says or her beliefs, but she has at least a realistic view of the problems and is not afraid to speak it loudly.
            .
            It does indeed help our cause. Every river starts as a stream, my friend.

    • Tucker

      You’re right. I listened to a clip yesterday of Rush Scumbaugh interviewing this RINO Rubio, and while I do understand the need and importance of maintaining civility – a trait that the left certainly never adheres to – I was completely disgusted with how feeble Rush sounded when questioning Rubio on this latest amnesty con-job. Rush pretty much let Rubio shovel a couple of truck loads of RINO manure, and didn’t really lay a glove on him.

      Coulter, on the other hand, would have eaten Rubio’s lunch.

      • revolt

        Limbaugh is anti immigration pro TP you ignorant moron and has carried the water for the liberal GOP all along.

        • Tucker

          You must be a newbie poster to AmRen, pal. Anyone who has read more than a half a dozen of my comments knows full well that I hold Rush Scumbaugh in complete contempt.

          Also, aside from your insulting comments directed at yours truly – your comment makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You contradict yourself an amazing number of times and wind up sounding as if you’re as clueless as you are incoherent.

          Rush is ‘anti-Immigration’ and pro-Tea Party? We’re talking about the same White Tea party race wimps who soiled their pants every time the anti-White media or some minority race hustler pulled the race card on them because of the Whiteness of their movement? The same Tea Party white wimps who fell over backwards trying to say they ‘welcomed’ having America flooded with hundreds of millions of non-whites and thought nothing of having Whites reduced to a subjugated minority inside our native homelands – as long as these invading colonizers invaded us legally?

          As for Rush carrying the water for RINOs and neo-con Trotskyite Communists, I would certainly agree with that in principle – but neither of those two groups are anti-third world invasion of the USA – so, Rush can’t be both of the things you claim.

          I’d label Rush as a typical GOP elitist snob who puts his own financial interests ahead of his racial interests. He’s all for non-white cheap labor if it boosts the profits in his stock portfolio – but, like all of these kinds of elitist snobs – he fails to comprehend the bigger and more important consequence of demographics and destiny.

          He’s made the grave mistake of drinking the kool-aid on this neo-con invented insanity of a propositional nation, when no such thing can ever exist in the real world. Blood and soil and homogeneity are the factors that create nations and make them strong – not some vague shared sense of values that seldom ever manage to cross racial lines. Diversity is NOT a strength – and anyone who pushes that idea has white genocide on their agenda.

          Rush is slowly beginning to figure that out, as he studies the November 6th election results as broken down by race. But, once again, I am convinced that with Rush it is always about money. He is worrying that a minority controlled government will be free to jack up his taxes to 80 percent or more and there will be nothing he or the GOP can do to stop them.

          That’s the price of not placing loyalty to one’s race at the top of your list of what’s important. Had he and the entire GOP done so, instead of betraying their White base repeatedly for the last 50 years, Whites like Rush would not have to worry about being eaten alive by minority parasites.

        • Tucker

          You must be a newbie poster to AmRen, pal. Anyone who has read more than a half a dozen of my comments knows full well that I hold Rush Scumbaugh in complete contempt.

          Also, aside from your insulting comments directed at yours truly – your comment makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You contradict yourself an amazing number of times and wind up sounding as if you’re as clueless as you are incoherent.

          Rush is ‘anti-Immigration’ and pro-Tea Party? We’re talking about the same White Tea party race wimps who soiled their pants every time the anti-White media or some minority race hustler pulled the race card on them because of the Whiteness of their movement? The same Tea Party white wimps who fell over backwards trying to say they ‘welcomed’ having America flooded with hundreds of millions of non-whites and thought nothing of having Whites reduced to a subjugated minority inside our native homelands – as long as these invading colonizers invaded us legally?

          As for Rush carrying the water for RINOs and neo-con Trotskyite Communists, I would certainly agree with that in principle – but neither of those two groups are anti-third world invasion of the USA – so, Rush can’t be both of the things you claim.

          I’d label Rush as a typical GOP elitist snob who puts his own financial interests ahead of his racial interests. He’s all for non-white cheap labor if it boosts the profits in his stock portfolio – but, like all of these kinds of elitist snobs – he fails to comprehend the bigger and more important consequence of demographics and destiny.

          He’s made the grave mistake of drinking the kool-aid on this neo-con invented insanity of a propositional nation, when no such thing can ever exist in the real world. Blood and soil and homogeneity are the factors that create nations and make them strong – not some vague shared sense of values that seldom ever manage to cross racial lines. Diversity is NOT a strength – and anyone who pushes that idea has white genocide on their agenda.

          Rush is slowly beginning to figure that out, as he studies the November 6th election results as broken down by race. But, once again, I am convinced that with Rush it is always about money. He is worrying that a minority controlled government will be free to jack up his taxes to 80 percent or more and there will be nothing he or the GOP can do to stop them.

          That’s the price of not placing loyalty to one’s race at the top of your list of what’s important. Had he and the entire GOP done so, instead of betraying their White base repeatedly for the last 50 years, Whites like Rush would not have to worry about being eaten alive by minorities.

          • Want to know the most amazing part?

            This is one of those things I can ever say how I know, so you’ll have to take my word for it.

            Most of the Limbaughs and various relatives by other surnames know better, and would be perfectly at home posting here at AR. It’s just that Rush (the talk radio host) and many of the Limbaughs that serve as Federal judges are on the “left” side of the spectrum by the family’s own standards, mostly for expedience.

      • Joseph

        Has Bay Buchanan checked in on this yet?

      • ATBOTL

        I remember him lashing out at callers who tried to bring up illegal immigration during the first Bush term. His take then was “who cares, they are doing jobs Americans won’t do.”

        I’ve been told that Limbaugh attacked the Israel lobby early in his career. Imagine that. He is just an opportunist who will say anything.

  • What happened to control the border first before any immigration plan is put in place?

    • MobyWhite

      Border control is a racist construct.

      • So are personal responsibility and the need for an education.

        (sarcasm off)

  • Dave4088

    Read orphan Annie’s comments very carefully before jumping up and down with glee and concluding that she’s a racialist. Like nearly all Con-servatives, she only has a beef with illegal aliens, but the 1.2 million mostly non-white, third world “legal” immigrants that arrive annually are just fine and dandy. Further, the conservatives fervently believe that we should be a permanent immigrant nation with the annual number of “legal” immigrants controlled and regulated to foster assimilation and dittoheadism.

    Both major parties are offering up white dispossession and genocide through inundation although the Republicans will see to it that your executioners at least speak English. If some form of amnesty passes Annie will probably be writing columns claiming that Pancho Villa and Che Guevera were conservative Republicans.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      She’s not really pro legal-immigration either but still can’t find ways to articulate that the phrase “we are a nation of immigrants” is an utter lie.

  • enough already

    We were never asked to vote on this third world atrocity, just like the obamacare,abortion,etc.This is tryanny, trying to make us a third world hellhole.This immigration must be stopped.How many more people do we need here?As it is our roads are jammed and were not meant for this influx.What happened to 2 kids per family they were pushing back in the 70’s.So it is ok for the brown people to have huge families,but not us.The hypocrisy is sickening.

  • Vonhauer

    The money quote:

    And look how great that’s turned out! With Hispanics on track to become the largest ethnic group in California this year, the state that gave us Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan is incapable of electing any Republican statewide anymore.

    Now apply that at the national level and whites are on track to losing control of their government first, their nation after that.

  • MobyWhite

    The Question you will never hear a White MSM reporter ask LatinoRubio:
    If America were swarmed by 11,000,000 blonde haired, blue eyed, undocument German workers, would you be pushing for Amnesty?

    • If they were German workers swarming across the border, most would have much more than just a 6th grade education and none would have 4-6 illegitimate babies in tow.

    • MarcusTrajanus

      He wouldn’t be pushing for amnesty if it was 10 million coal-black Haitians. He thinks the millions of indios and mestizos will vote for him because they share some phony “Hispanic” identity. The fact is that they see him as just another whitey, and a ruling class whitey at that. They will never vote for him, just like the Peruvian indios and mestizos preferred to vote for a Alberto Fujimori (Japanese) than for the Mario Vargas Llosa (White).

    • Joseph

      Better yet, would Rubio approve if Cuba were swarmed by say, 11 M Romani demanding drivers licenses and medical, legal and educational services in their own language?

  • wattylersrevolt

    Just as 9/11 would never have occured if America had in place a National Origins Immigration Policy in place since 1965 that completely excluded muslims…if there was a National Origins Immigration Policy since 1959 that completely excluded cubans…well, there would not have been a cuban colonization of South Florida, and as a consequence, Marco Rubio wouldn’t be here agitating for the race-replacement of the Native Born White American Majority.

    I want the cubans out of our America!!!!..I don’t recognize any of them as being both American and White.

    Don’t forget:cuban foriegner George Borjas’ worthless econometric research was used during congressional testimony about Ronnie Reagan’s 1986 amnesty-back in 1986-to make an economic case for the 1986 amnesty. George Borjas should never have been allowed into our America.

    South Florida is a hispanic septic tank.

  • jay11

    I wonder how rank and files will react in the heartland, small towns, hollers of kentucky, and other out of the way places when, in 20 years, latinos start showing up by the TRUCKLOAD taking over whole towns left and right, ‘looking for a better life’ because CA, TX, FL, NY and other places turned to blight.

    Think about that for a minute. Most white Americans have not yet been faced with their town turning brown in the space of a few years. I can’t see Cousin Zeke, Amos, Bobbie Lou or other flyover type Americans going along with this. Liberal elites on the coasts sold out the cities to foreigners, but the heartland is still mostly intact.

    • V-Dare awhile back had an article about Hispanics who left Southern California for Lexington, Kentucky, because they said that California “has too many Mexicans.” So soon will Lexington. The magnet I’m sure is the University of Kentucky and the fact that universities like to outsource their grounds and lawn maintenance work to third party outfits like Top Care that hire Hispanics big time.

      • KYTim89

        There are also a lot of horse farmers and trainers in that area that could provide ample employment for illegal migrants.

        • fuzzypook

          I live in Lexington. I grew up here and have lived here for 53 years. I can tell you that the illegals are indeed becoming more numerous. The horse industry is another example of hispanics taking jobs from blacks. It used to be that barn workers, exercise riders, grooms, etc. were mostly black. They have been pushed out by illegals. My husband works in the horse industry. He told me about one of the few blacks left working in the barns that he knows personally. The man told him that one of the female illegals (a fat ugly one at that) accused him of sexual improprieties. He denied it and the farm manager knew it was a lie as this man has been working with horses at this farm for 30+ years. He had NEVER been accused of such a thing before. They knew the woman was trying to get rid of him so one of her own could have his job.

  • TheCogitator

    Some Republicans want Rubio as their Presidential candidate in 2016. Like Obama, he is not a “natural born citizen.” To be a natural born citizen, a person must be the child of parents who are both citizens. Obama did not meet this standard, no matter where he was born. Rubio does not either, although he will claim the Obama exception.

  • Anon

    This might have been true 40 years ago. Today, it’s a joke. There are no political factions in this country based on representation of various people, issues or platforms. There is sometimes (increasingly less) lip service over various issues but neither party follows through with what they say and the same pattern (an decidedly anti-white pattern) of behavior is implemented no matter who is in charge, no matter how radically different the “ideology”.

    No, the republicans are not finished. They are not finished because their power does not rest on “we the people”. No one in this country really decides on who gets to wear the mask of government. We’ve been here before, remember? We’ve had our conservative revolution…remember (no you don’t). If anything, it resulted in much more radical anti-white behavior by our government than ever before.

    Here is what is going to happen. Either, our increasingly sick elites will become bored with pretending anymore and we will have ourselves a nice civil war, sparked by Obama’s gun grab. Or, we will have yet another flushing out of the “liberals”. The economy will magically recover (since its problems are artificially created to begin with). We’ll have another 20 year cycle of decent times trying to numb down Americans and get them to forget about our racial problems.

    Don’t forget. Non-whites make terrible slaves. Whites are hard working, capable, and most of all, obedient. Why would our owners want troublesome, lazy, dangerous blacks or slovenly, dependent mexicans instead of us? These things destroy their wealth and base of power (which is completely dependent on whites). The current racial problems they are fomenting isn’t based on greed, or a desire to gain power. It’s counterproductive to those goals. It’s an indulgence in weakness and dysfunction. However, these people have been in power for many generations. Do you really think they will give that up for ANY degenerate social experimentation no matter how fashionable? That is unlikely. Instead, whatever adds to their power, their wealth and their control is what they will do. After they’ve gotten bored with humiliating whites with a negro president and making us smile about it.

  • Ken P.

    I predict that Ann’s appearances on FOX will decrease.

    • Extropico

      The Neocons will still allow occasional reference to be made to actual illegal immigration as long as the orator never becomes a pro-White patriot in the land we built. It is nothing but a bait and switch as they want all migration to simply be termed as “legal.”

  • Vonhauer

    When a majority of the white vote has no effect on who gets elected, you’ve got an immigrant/nonwhite problem. Big time.

  • Jeff

    AC’s article is a reasonable start, but she still dances around the issue.

    She keeps saying the problem with amnesty is it’s going to allow a lot of single young mothers to vote, and they vote Democratic.

    That’s true, but dangerously misleading. It’s dangerous because the logical solution is to prevent single motherhood and then they will all start voting like whites. No, it won’t work that way. They are voting Democratic not because they are single mothers, but because they are Hispanic. They are single mothers also because they are Hispanic.

    I could also write an article that talks about how hair weave salons are dangerous because they correlate with high crime rates. That would be dancing around the issue. Hair weave salons are not dangerous, but they are linked to a group of people who are dangerous.

    AC should have said straight out, “yo, the only people in the world who hold conservative views are Northern European whites, so we’re going to become yet another failed socialist experiment if we get flooded with anyone other than Northern European whites.” But she can’t say that and has to keep pretending it’s a difference in culture, values, behavior, something other than race.

    • MarcusTrajanus

      ‘AC should have said straight out, “yo, the only people in the world who
      hold conservative views are Northern European whites”‘

      Yes, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, bastions of conservatism.
      Do you actually believe that, or are you joking?

      • Jeff

        No I actually believe it. I know that the Scandinavian countries are socialism gone wild, but the only voters in America who have conservative views are voters who descend from those same Scandinavians, Germans and Brits. Maybe the immigration process self-selected people from those countries who wanted more self-reliance. Whatever the reasons are, the bulk of conservative voters in the US are people descended from Scandinavians, British, German, etc. AC should come out and say that that is the group the GOP needs to win.

  • cassanovafrankenstien

    America has a Madhouse for a capital now -God help us.

  • s shadow

    If you listen to any financial programs with the usual conservatives opining about the government cutting spending, you will not hear about the welfare budget going over 1 trillion$ recently, and the expectation of it being 2 t$ in a very few years. They talk about means testing entitlements eg. SS and MC, which productive citizens have paid into. They never mention one word about the welfare budget. Move out the illegals and repeal the 65 immigration bill and the welfare budget, now the largest segment of the total budget, will contract dramatically.
    If Rubio wasn’t disingenuous (fancy word for lying) he would have said that illegals would be summarily deported if they didn’t sign up for his complex naturalization process. Truth be known, the illegals will keep buying false SS numbers and keep on welfare as they do now. They are low IQ and have much difficulty in complex jobs, except for a small proportion, so they will need handouts and will keep voting democratic.

  • CommonSense80

    Perhaps I am naive but at this point I see no option other than radically transforming our voting system and I recommend as much with a heavy heart. Instant run off elections and “range voting” would at least give us a fighting chance in this two party scam struggle. Leftist idiots have agitated for the Borda count, Bucklin voting and concorolat method for years. As I see it we ought to encourage this “enlightened” change.

  • rubio is a white liberal

    Didnt MIA Bush, the admitted original American Idol Marxist Lincoln worshiper, open the flood gates to gush 20 million reds into America with his neocons for the American Dream of homeownership for the redliners, to do jobs “noone else would do” building 15 million new homes that big banks to use derivatives to finance that ended up being foreclosed destroying the economy although real estate was a bubble ?

    As Dr Phil would say “How did that work for you” ?

    And why would Rubio who is the offspring of white capitalist Batista Cubans fleeing the commie Castro regime in 1960 who were puppeted by the USSR who split up and reverted back to capitalism with Russia heading the list along with the muslims forming their own nations to create problems?

    Is Rubio confused? Does his liberal public school education brainwash him into believing that white European race Cubans and red Asian race Mexican peasants are the same? Clearly a white liberal in the white liberal mold.

  • anonymous

    “There’s no reason Republicans can’t do the same [come roaring back], unburdened by having to run against an incumbent in 2016.”

    Wishful thinking, I’m afraid. The “minority”-based Democrat coalition will just keep growing while the GOP continues to shrink. The Republican base is dying off and the Stupid Party will probably become totally irrelevant in national elections a lot sooner than anyone thinks–no matter what they do about immigration.

    “The ability to live and work legally in America is the most valuable
    commodity in the world; it’s the Hope Diamond of the universe. {snip}”

    Doubtful. The U.S. is no longer Number One in anything except the size of its military, the venal incompetence of its “leaders” and the capacity of its citizens for self-delusion. For all practical purposes, America hardly exists anymore. It might be the Hope Diamond compared, to say, Mexico or Zimbabwe, but the U.S. appears to be devolving into a slightly more prosperous version of East Germany before the wall came down.

  • SintiriNikos

    Rubio doesn’t care what’s good for White GOP. This is his way of winning the GOP nomination. he will get a lot of the hispanic vote, I assure you. He might be president, even, if enough stupid Whites vote for him thinking he’s any better than Hillary.

  • odious liberal

    Rubios is one of “them”. La raza trumps all else.

    • MarcusTrajanus

      Rubio isn’t “La raza”, he’s a White Cuban. “La raza” is the “cosmic race” of White/indian/a-little-bit-of-black hybrids.

      • IstvanIN

        He is La Raza!

  • Rush is ‘anti-Immigration’ and pro-Tea Party? We’re talking about the same White Tea party race wimps who soiled their pants every time the anti-White media or some minority race hustler pulled the race card on them because of the Whiteness of their movement? The same Tea Party white wimps who fell over backwards trying to say they ‘welcomed’ having America flooded with hundreds of millions of non-whites and thought nothing of having Whites reduced to a subjugated minority inside our I agree with yout there, the Tea Party as the left said is mainly interested in tax cuts for folks with high incomes. The rank and file don’t like the illegals but they allow business to hire them but not making it much of an issue. California suffered because of Raygun’s IRCA even White Democratics voted for 187 years ago. And when the aerospace industry was laid off in the early 1990’s a lot of Republican and moderate Democratic whites that dislike the illegal immirgation left.

  • I forgot that Trajan was born in Spain.

  • Bush Crime Family Effect

    Limbaugh was 100% until the Rubio deal who seems to misunderstand his European Spanish white heritage as offspring of Batista Cubans who fled Castro communist regime in 1960 to get political asylum.
    What association do Batista white Cubans with US citizenship have with the 30 million illegal peasant scumbag Mexicans citizens to do jobs noone else would do like build the 15 million foreclosed homes, who flooded the borders after fellow Yale alum and Taylor’s former hero Lincolnite Bush fucked up everything with his American Dream and the neocon derivatives that fucked up the economy and allowed the entrance of the mutt messiah Obama pos that has been worse than the mistake of African slavery 500 yrs ago?

    Isnt it true that Bush is the REAL cause of all this and why he is laying low MIA although we know crybaby Daddy wimp paid his way into the WH with his neocons? A big a scumbag as gore was he would never have allowed the spics across the border and was a true southerner like even liberal Clinton who never allowed spics across the border. Neither Clinton or Gore would have invaded Iraq to appease the neocons either and at least they were white liberals but southerners and never in a million years would the Obama pos would have been in office had it not been for Bush the liberal Lincolnite like Taylor and now Limbaugh.

  • Jane Lek

    I cannot find any photos of Rubio’s parents on the internet. I do see that his father, Pedro Victor Garcia, was an illegal alien. Unless I see photos of his parents and siblings in which they all appear White, I will assume that Rubio is a mixed-race person.