NoRace 242

Why Are Europeans More Racially Aware?

Matthew Contessini, American Renaissance, July 31, 2013

One of the most perplexing differences between whites who are native English speakers—whom the French call Anglo-Saxons—and continental Europeans is their attitude toward white nationalism and the rights of whites.

In the United States, which is home to more whites than any other country, freedom of speech and association are constitutionally protected rights, but meetings of American Renaissance and other pro-white organizations are disrupted by people who hate us. Even traditional supporters of the First Amendment, such as the ACLU, libertarians, the Heritage Foundation, and Cato Institute take absolutely no interest in the trampling of our rights.

Protesters threaten violence outside the 2013 American Renaissance conference. The ACLU is silent.

Protesters threaten violence outside the 2013 American Renaissance conference. ACLU is silent.

In Britain as well, pro-white organizations are attacked by radicals, vilified by the media, and shunned by the mainstream. Canada and Australia are no different.

In continental Europe, on the other hand, pro-white organizations are thriving. In France, the National Front is an influential and popular party, while the Bloc Identitaire is a rising youth movement. In Holland, Austria, and Switzerland, the Party for Freedom, the Freedom Party, and the Swiss People’s Party, respectively, are very strong. In Greece and Hungary, ultranationalist pro-white parties are surging. Since these movements are supported by millions of people, attempts by fringe groups to silence them would not be tolerated.

Fabrice Robert, leader of Bloc Identitaire, spoke at the 2013 American Renaissance conference.

Fabrice Robert, leader of Bloc Identitaire, spoke at the 2013 AR conference.

Why are continental Europeans more racially aware and much more resistant to the destruction of their heritage than whites from countries that were founded by the British?

There are many differences between the two groups of nations that influence their views and behavior about race. The most obvious difference is geographic. Because Britain, North America, Australia and New Zealand are geographically isolated, they have not been the victims of conquest by alien invaders, whereas the history of continental Europe is the story of endless conquests, often by savage Asiatic and Middle-Eastern tribes such as the Huns, Mongols, Tatars, Arabs and Turks.

Conquest and oppression in Europe lasted throughout the 20th century. European ethnicities suffered endless turmoil that is forever etched in their collective memories, whereas the last successful invasion of an Anglo-Saxon nation was in 1066.

This scene from the Bayeux Tapestry depicts mounted Normans attacking Anglo-Saxon infantry at the Battle of Hastings.

In this scene from the Bayeux Tapestry, mounted Normans attack Anglo-Saxon infantry at the Battle of Hastings.

These different experiences resulted in different attitudes toward alien intruders. While Europeans are instinctively suspicious of foreigners that have brought them so much horror over the centuries, Anglo-Saxons, who did not experience the same fate—but were often conquerors themselves—have not developed that same defensive traits.

Continental Europeans have a profound knowledge of their neighbors, who are often traditional adversaries. Americans, who do not have a similar historical experience, have relatively little knowledge or interest in either Canadians or Mexican re-conquistadors.

Thus, when Americans see millions of Mexicans streaming across the border, the alarm does not go off, as it would for continental Europeans. White Americans see intruders as people who are “like us,” just looking for a better life. The invading Mexicans, on the other hand, see their misguided hosts as people who “stole” the Southwest from their fledgling nation in the 1840s. While Mexicans dream of recapturing the mythical Aztlan, their white hosts see no further than the fact that Mexicans do inexpensive yard work. For most whites that is all that matters.

The European nations that are the most ethnically aware are those that were most savagely conquered most recently, such as the Balkan nations that were victims of the Ottoman Empire, Mediterranean nations that were targeted by Arabs, and, of course, the Eastern Europeans, who were in the path of Asiatic hordes, the German war machine, and the brutal Soviet Union.

To this day, the Hagia Sophia stands as a symbol of Ottoman conquest.

Hagia Sophia stands as a symbol of Ottoman conquest.

There are other differences between Anglo-Saxons and continental Europeans. For example, land is plentiful in sparsely populated North America and Australia. White settlers took over vast tracts of land that they put to good economic use, but to which they had limited emotional attachment. Consequently, Americans respond to the influx of nonwhites into their neighborhoods and communities by moving to the suburbs, exurbs, countryside, or out of state. The territory they are giving up to alien races is not important to whites as long as they are able to find some other place where they can live in peace.

Europeans have a completely different attitude toward their ancestral lands, where families and communities may have lived for centuries. In densely populated parts of Europe, ownership of as little as a few acres of farmland meant the difference between surviving as a family and dying from starvation. Centuries of often bloody battles between indentured peasants and their feudal landlords forged emotional ties between white Europeans and their land. That’s why they have much lower tolerance for alien people who take treasured real estate that generations of their ancestors may have died to protect. Also, because many Americans move often during their lifetimes and live in several different states, this weakens the ties to their family roots.

Americans often do not know the names of their ancestors beyond their grandparents. Families often represent a mix of several European ethnicities, which complicates efforts to maintain family traditions. American family histories are often fuzzy, sugarcoated stories, often involving Ellis Island, and occasionally an elusive Indian princess. Not surprisingly, white Americans often have little interest in maintaining family traditions once their ancestral Irish, Polish, or Italian family ties weaken through assimilation.

We don't know how we got here, but the Statue of Liberty was probably involved.

We don’t know how we got here, but the Statue of Liberty was probably involved.

In Europe, ethnic and family roots run deep. In rural areas, families have often lived in the same communities for hundreds of years. Strong ethnic ties, forged over centuries of joint struggle for survival, have created a sense among continental Europeans that their ethnicity represents their extended family. That defensive mechanism, the strongest bulwark against alien encroachment, seems to have disappeared among white Americans, which makes the United States more vulnerable to alien invasion.

In Europe, property stays in the family, often for many generations. In Mediterranean nations it is not uncommon for families to live in the same stone houses for centuries. This tradition reinforces the sense of kinship and allegiance to the family, region, ethnicity, nation and race. Americans, on the other hand, seem much more interested in their share of the money from liquidating grandpa’s estate rather than keeping his pocket watch.

Recently, Jason Richwine was fired from his position at the Heritage Foundation because of his studies of group IQ differences and what they mean for immigration policy. The American public and their elected representatives are apparently not allowed to have an interest in the quality of their immigrant population, even though ignoring quality has catastrophic consequences.

Unlike Americans, continental Europeans have a keen interest in differences between races and ethnicities. Every European ethnicity has a well-deserved, widely-known reputation. Consequently, when German author Thilo Sarrazin published a book in 2011 which concluded that Turks and other nonwhite immigrants are “dumbing down” German society due to their low average IQ, he started a national dialog on the quality of immigrant population. While he was eventually forced to resign from his position at the Bundesbank, Mr. Sarazzin remains a popular, respected, and influential public figure in Germany.

Dr. Sarrazin's is the most popular German book on politics in over a decade.

Dr. Sarrazin wrote the most popular German book on politics in over a decade.

Several years ago, when Turkey was negotiating entry into the European Union, its bid was strongly supported by the governments of Britain and the United States. Germans, however, are painfully aware of the consequences of the Turkish presence in Germany and since Ottoman Turks have a horrible reputation among the Europeans that had a misfortune of interacting with them over the centuries, Turkey’s entry was effectively blocked.

American elites and many whites view the United States as a boarding house that is open to masses of Third-World immigrants. They apparently believe that this gigantic social experiment will somehow be successful despite all the evidence to the contrary.

For continental Europeans, the concept of a nation is inextricably tied to ethnicity. Even within a multiethnic nation such as Belgium, the ethnic lines are sharp. The idea that welcoming millions of nonwhite immigrants would somehow “strengthen” ethnically homogenous European nations, such as Poland, Slovakia or Finland, by fostering “diversity” would be considered completely preposterous.

In European nations that are exposed to massive third world immigration, such as Holland, Italy, Greece, and France there is a strong backlash against intruders among the native populations. Immigrants are not accepted and are instead confined to separate ethnic enclaves.

The United States gives citizenship to any child born on US soil, regardless of the citizenship or legal status of child’s parents. Pregnant Mexican women customarily sneak across the border to give birth, and there are organizations that bring pregnant Chinese women to the United States for the sole purpose of getting citizenship for their newborns.

In European countries, citizenship is not a birthright, but is tied to ethnicity. Italian-Americans and Irish-Americans can obtain citizenship from the countries that their ancestors came from, while children born to legal immigrants residing in these countries usually cannot.

White Americans seem to have no interest in protecting their own culture. In the current immigration debate, not a single politician highlighted the need to protect traditional American culture and heritage. The level of disdain that white Americans have toward their own heritage is demonstrated by the fact that US citizens can get ballots in many different languages. Los Angeles County, for example, was required to print ballots for the 2012 elections in Spanish, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Khmer, Thai and Hindi. How can someone who can’t even speak English be considered an American citizen?

In continental Europe, candidates for naturalization that have no ethnic ties to the nation have to pass extensive tests of their level of cultural assimilation. In Switzerland, this includes unannounced home visits by pedantic government officials who check, among other things, the level of cleanliness of the applicant’s bathroom. The Swiss do not believe in granting citizenship to applicants who cling to Third-World notions of hygiene. We can only imagine what would happen if someone suggested similar screening in the United States.

American policy-makers insist that Islam is no obstacle to assimilation, despite countless examples of Muslim hatred of America and Muslim violence against Americans. In continental European countries with large Muslim populations such as Holland and France, the Party for Freedom and National Front are fully aware of the irreconcilable differences between Christianity and Islam. They have made elimination of Muslim immigration a centerpiece of their respective platforms.

They do so despite laws that make it a crime to belittle Islam. Dutch politician Geert Wilders was put on trial for speech-crimes against Islam, but was acquitted in June 2011. Marine Le Pen was stripped of immunity in the European Parliament in July 2013 to open the way for her trial on charges of racism over comments she made comparing Muslim street prayers to an occupation of French territory.

Geert Wilders on trial for "hate speech."

Geert Wilders on trial for “hate speech.”

While courageous European dissident politicians are willing to risk their freedom by telling the truth, American politicians are neither dissidents, nor interested in telling the truth, let alone in saving White America—even though all of those things are perfectly legal in the United States!

To understand fully the differences between Anglo-Saxons and continental Europeans we must also analyze the differences in mentality, views, and behavior of ordinary people. The individualistic traits common among Anglo-Saxons generally foster multiculturalism and integration, while a greater community orientation among continental Europeans supports ethnocentrism and segregation. The differences in constitutions, electoral and court systems, and the level and protection of personal liberties also have racial ramifications.

These differences are also a promising area of study.

  • Spartacus

    “The United States gives citizenship to any child born on US soil,
    regardless of the citizenship or legal status of child’s parents.
    Pregnant Mexican women customarily sneak across the border to give
    birth, and there are organizations that bring pregnant Chinese women to
    the United States for the sole purpose of getting citizenship for their
    newborns.”

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Isn’t it about time you got rid of this stupid law ? What was your population when it was first implemented – only a few millions ? Now it’s well over 300 million, not to mention illegals…

    • exLibtard

      I fear we’re passed that point now. Harry Reid was right back in 1993 when he said that it was ridiculous for people to get citizenship simply for being born here. That was then and this is now. He was right then and his point still stands. The problem is that the scope of the illegal-born population has exploded. If we are to reform the criteria for who gets citizenship, it must be retroactive. All the mestizos in this country who were born to illegal parents have to have their citizenship revoked. Have fun doing that. They’ll burn down half of the southwest.

      • Spartacus

        “They’ll burn down half of the southwest.”

        ————————————————————————————————–

        Good. Those idiots who think it’s ok not to secure borders just because they’re too lazy to mow their own damn lawns deserve it.

        • Manaphy

          I wouldn’t say that. I’ve been to the American Southwest and I have met and talked to the people there. Many would agree with finally securing the border and deporting all of those parasitic non-whites. However the politicians in that region tend to be of the pro-amnesty and anti-white crop, probably because they are paid off and funded by Jews like Sheldon Adelson.

          • Spartacus

            Congrats on naming the jew, though your comment will probably be deleted soon, just like this one…

          • DerekaGrandon

            “However the politicians in that region tend to be of the pro-amnesty and anti-white crop,..”

            And who votes the politicians in?

            Spartacus is still right. The idiots deserve it.

      • Sick of it

        Once again, without the U.S. military barring our citizens, we could remove every foreigner from this country. We have lived in a tyranny backed by the military for generations now.

        • Spartacus

          Then to hell with the military, just get to work . Remember, for every one that ends up in a “nasty” situation, there’ll be at least a dozen jumping the fence back to their native hell-hole.

          • Sick of it

            We may need to move to Romania in order to have any freedom, judging from some of your posts. Everything we do here is watched. Every action can be considered a crime. The government forces can pick us up rather easily. They can frame us for ANY crime easily.

          • Spartacus

            When Sauron’s eye is on you, take a sword and poke it.

          • Sick of it

            When Gandalf shows up, most definitely.

          • 1proactive2

            I greatly fear you’re correct. The government has an agenda, and it’s not preserving our traditional values in any way, shape, or form.

    • Stentorian_Commentator

      Actually that’s not the law, even though you are correct that the effective rule is that any child born here is considered a citizen by a government dedicated to the replacement of whites
      The 14th amendment has two conditions for birthright citizenship: (1) to be born within the U.S. and (2) to be subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. The latter requirement has been ignored, even though it is unconstitutional to do so. Congress has been lax in making it clear what that means, although anyone who has given it any serious, honest thought has concluded that the children of people here illegally cannot be considered subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S., especially because they are usually by birth also citizens of other countries. If being born in the U.S. were sufficient to make one subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S., the additional phrase would be a nullity, and you cannot do that (or, at least, you are not supposed to do that) with the constitution.
      The current state of the “law” is actually a violation of the constitution.

      • TheCogitator

        You are absolutely correct. The intention was to make citizens of the freed black slaves. It did not make citizens of the American Indians. So how can children born of Mexicans who illegally cross the border be citizens? They cannot be unless you have a rogue court system that interprets the laws as it sees fit.

        We also ignore the “natural born citizen” requirement for being President. No matter where Obama was born, he is not a “natural born citizen” because his father (or at least the one he claims) was a British subject because he was born in Kenya.

        • Sick of it

          Yep. Natural born citizens were traditionally described as those descended from two American parents or at least an American father. Not popular with modern feminists I’m sure, but those were the rules.

    • Alexandra1973

      They use the 14th Amendment.
      First off, the 14th was never really ratified, so out it goes.
      Secondly, even if it WERE valid, the writers of that amendment specifically stated that it wasn’t meant to give citizenship to what’s now known as anchor babies. So anchor babies are not, nor ever have been, US citizens.

  • sbuffalonative

    While Mexicans dream of recapturing the mythical Aztlan, their white hosts see no further than the fact that Mexicans do inexpensive yard work. For most whites that is all that matters.

    Some years back before my umpteenth ban from FreeRepublic a woman said she loved the fact that she could hire Mexicans to do the house and yard work so she could spend more time with her kids.

    I let her know that in the future, those Mexicans would be a financial burden and threat to her children when they became adults. Her short sightedness was infuriating.

    Unfortunately, Americans, because of importing black workers and contact with Native Americans and Native Mexicans, have grown up accustomed to different races. They were accepted as different and allowed to interact so long as they didn’t cause trouble.

    The future will be different.

    The Grievance Industry and the professional race-money hustlers are becoming bolder and more demanding. They insist on bringing in non-whites to further suppress white numbers.

    As the cost of supporting these usurpers increases, whites will have fewer children.

    European whites, the traditional and RIGHTFUL owners of their own countries know an invasion when they see it. We in the US have the experience with non-whites and therefore are blind (and brainwashed) to the obvious threat.

    Something is going to have to give. I don’t know how long it will take or what the impetus will be but whites will be pushed too hard.

    Will the have the means and the will to fight? As I can’t predict the future and won’t be around to see it, I can only hope they can win.

    One other thing to keep in mind.

    In a few decades, it’s going to the 100 anniversary of WWII. I fear that the resurrection of events is going to be an opportunity to hammer whites for a second time.
    Future white nationalists need to be prepared or they will be crushed.

    • Oil Can Harry

      The elites aren’t waiting until 2039 to pour on the white guilt. They’ve been doing it every day since the war ended.

      • sbuffalonative

        While I agree with you, anniversaries, especially 100 year anniversaries, are generally a big deal and I have no doubt that certain people will take full advantage of this to drive home their message of just how evil white people really are.

        If white self-preservation isn’t a driving force in 30 years, this anniversary could be the knockout punch.

    • kjh64

      “Some years back before my umpteenth ban from FreeRepublic a woman said she loved the fact that she could hire Mexicans to do the house and yard work so she could spend more time with her kids.”

      No, she hired these Mexicans for the cheap labor. If she wanted to hire someone to clean her home or do yard work so she “could spend more time with her kids” , she could have hired Americans from reputable housecleaning and yard services companies, ie. Merry Maids. However, that would cost more. Notice that people like her always try to frame their desire for cheap labor in a way to make themselves look good. Instead of just saying she wants the cheap labor, she spouts loftily that it’s “for the kids”, yeah right.

      • Sick of it

        “No, they say nothing because they want their Nike’s cheaper, though they
        don’t realize that their Nike’s aren’t cheaper because of price
        inflation here in the US in order for the big execs to make even greater
        profits.”

        Absolutely right. That price inflation is also a means of subsidizing cheaper goods in foreign markets. They charge Americans more so they can charge Africans, Asians, and Latin Americans less. We eat up the R&D costs.

  • sbuffalonative

    ‘…and Cato Institute take absolutely no interest in the trampling of our rights.

    I absolutely detest this ‘free market’ group.

    They had a large panel discussion on c-span and their support of open borders and importing more ‘human capital’ to stimulate the economy is frightening.

    It seems there is no problem that can’t be solved with more people and any problems will be small and manageable.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      The only “right” Cato thinks really exists anymore is the “right” for people to hire who they want from wherever in the world they are as cheaply as possible. Yeah, maybe once in awhile they’ll cover other and generally more superficial issues, all the while we’re not supposed to notice they want to swing the borders wide open so that no longer a white country such that none of the other superficial issues will matter anymore.

      Big donor to Cato? The Koch Brothers.

      • Romulus

        Nuff said !!!! Pop quiz Who only totals 13 mil. In the world, but controls
        2/3 of the planets wealth!!!!

    • anew

      This libertarian streak is another area that differentiates us Anglo-Saxons from the Continentals, and is of course detrimental to ethnonationalist efforts.

      • Nathanwartooth

        No true libertarian could be for open borders when you see that immigrants want bigger government and less freedoms.

    • DerekaGrandon

      The Cato I. is nothing but a repugnant vulture-capitalistic organization which cares absolutely nothing about the White plight.

      I haven’t researched who really runs it but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was run by you-know-who.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        A big part of its funding at the present comes from the Koch Bros., mainly as a power play for open borders.

  • JackKrak

    I agree with the author on most of his points but I think he has left out something that I rarely see mentioned in similar discussions of why the Anglo-sphere doesn’t have more backbone on this issue.

    It’s because we’re too concerned with being nice.

    That’s it & it’s a cornerstone of the Anglo personality.You don’t notice it if you never have a chance to get a frame of reference but it defines us as much as any other aspect of our heritage. We instinctively observe limits on what can and cannot be said so as not to hurt anyone’s feelings. It’s not about what’s true & what’s not or what’s appropriate & what’s not, just avoiding confrontation at all costs.

    This is why we so often witness the sad but comic spectacle of legions of otherwise smart people who claim to be mystified by a problem and its causes no matter how obvious it is because identifying the problem will hurt someone’s feelings. My own favorite example is the “mystery” of the education gap between races. Even dim-witted actors in this drama know the truth, but to say it would invite ridicule and requisite two minutes of hate so they keep staring at the floor and mumbling about class sizes, funding, etc. The problem will never get fixed, but hey, at least no one was offended……
    Same with immigration & just about every other “divisive” issue out there. One side handcuffs itself and worries about stepping on toes and the other just keeps on doing what it’s doing in disbelief that those white idiots aren’t saying a word about it.

    • Stiv44

      “It’s because we’re too concerned with being nice.”

      Believe it or not, that’s also the problem with the deep South of the U.S. Despite their history, they’re too concerned with being kind and nice to people. Especially since they consider blacks to be a people in need still. They think that way even though some white Southerners are among the poor(er)people in the U.S.

      The South is also far too worried about it’s image.

      • Non Humans

        I have to disagree. I don’t think that you can make a generalization like that about the South. I’ve lived in the South my whole life and simply cannot agree with your statement.
        .
        A generalization like that may have been practical 50-100+ years ago, but with the internet and other social technologies, we’re not lagging behind technologically, socially, educationally, or politically. The South maintained the hardest push against the Civil Rights movement from the start because as having the highest concentration of nonhumans throughout our nations history, we fully understand their shortcomings and tendencies.
        .
        The catalysts for the civil war and the civil rights movement were that of Yankee disdain (Libtardism) for Southern control of the nonhumans (Slavery/Jim Crow) because they had a far weaker understanding of nonhuman tendencies at those times. This was due mostly to a serious lack of a nonhuman presence in the North. Thus the lack of affection most Southerners have for Yankees, judging our methods and ways without understanding the nonhumans the way that we always have.
        .
        While we do still have the highest concentrations of nonhumans in the nation, whether they will admit it or not, most southerners know what a nonhuman presence means, and know to avoid nonhuman areas. When nonhumans invade nice white areas, their effect is the same wherever they go, North or South, and no matter how libtarded the areas that they invade happen to be, the pattern holds: Crime, Flight, then Blight.
        .
        Kindly, I think that your assessment of the South is incorrect. “Pathologic Niceness” is a nationwide epidemic, and not specific to the South.

    • sbuffalonative

      Yes, Mr. Taylor has written about our fatal flaw. Far from being evil, we’re simply too nice.

    • FrontPorchGeezer

      We may be too nice, but we’re more concerned about being fired and/or blacklisted.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Continental Europeans are more racially aware because they are more ethnically self-aware. That and because the political cultures in continental Europe lend themselves to multiple political parties, people can form, work for and vote for an ethnonationalist party and not think their vote was wasted.

    In America, the most racially aware whites are also the most ethnically aware whites, white people who think of themselves in ethnic terms, making the logical jump to racial awareness. It is no accident that the best immigration patriots these days have noticeably ethnic surnames or heritages.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      I don’t know. Sessions, King, Hunter, Taylor, Sailer, Coulter, Beck (not Glenn). Kobach is a German name in a state which has many leading me to believe it’s his American identity more than his ethnic background which drives his immigration views.

  • Puggg

    Thus, when Americans see millions of Mexicans streaming across the border, the alarm does not go off, as it would for continental Europeans.

    I don’t agree that there’s no alarm going off. It’s just that manifesting that “alarmism” onto the political process is tricky, because you have one political party in complete agreement with the invasion for its own partisan well being, and the other party has a leadership that’s responding to its big money donors by trying to con its mostly populist nose-to-the-ground base into accepting it.

    Speaking of, the August recess is upon us, and Congresscreeps are going to be holding town halls. I’m going to keep my floppy ears to the ground to see when and where and if mine, Ann Wagner, is going to, so I can go there and make my feelings clear.

  • David Ashton

    England is an overcrowded section of a small island, unlike north America or (on the map) Australia. Population density is a factor in opposition to continuous immigration.

    England differs from some other countries in Europe because of its Commonwealth attachments which include(d) coloured colonies that spoke our language, once mostly had the same monarch and fought with us in WW2.

    England and America share a (hitherto) universal language which “anglifies” non-whites. German, Polish and Greek are different.

    True, we do not have much of an anti-Muslim memory as eastern and south-eastern Europeans, but we are getting one now all right, and that is what matters. There is no public enthusiasm for Turkish entry into the EU.

    Because of the UK-US link and language, “American” cultural values, including black entertainment, and military policy, have affected Britain more than other countries, France especially resenting this subordination and so-called “Anglo” free-trade. Britons like travelling and living in France because, paradoxically, it reminds them of the balanced green and pleasant land of their own forefathers.

    The current EU administration is not an expression of European character or wishes, but a threat to them. The English nevertheless need to recognize their own Saxon, Norman and even Roman historical roots.

    In my crudely summarised view, white people in general should show solidarity in protecting the civilization their ancestors created against external danger and “enemies within”, and ensure that we have enough biological descendants, especially among the productive elites. The national identities in the white world should “unite in variety”. Each of us now needs not the destruction of patriotism but its extension to neighbours and related peoples.

    Speaking for myself I feel more comfortable in Paris than in Peckham. Returning from a town-twin holiday in northern Germany my wife, who doesn’t speak the language, said: “They are just like us.” This is not the instinctive feeling we get when we see the pyjamas and beards emerge from the mosques which are growing like toadstools across our land.

    • Sean

      Lol, whites only segregated multiculturalism.

      I like it.

  • WmarkW

    It’s a real serious omission that an article on this subject doesn’t deal with the treatment of ethnic Africans until c. 1960. It was wrong, but the effect it has on our race issues today isn’t right, either. If AmRen wants to taken seriously as an opinion-leading organization among anyone but its allies, it needs to articulate what to do about race issues from the black perspective. Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Carole Swain, and until late Elizabeth Wright, have useful suggestions.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Moderator

      We don’t feel we need permission from non-whites either to advocate for our own racial interests or to be able to tell the truth about non-white groups.

      • David Ashton

        Absolutely correct re “permission”.

        But we should not look a gift horse in the mouth when some thoughtful blacks occasionally say some things helpful to us – common courtesy need not be segregated by pigment.

    • Evette Coutier

      Blacks already have a host of people discussing their perspective. Almost every college and university has degrees in black studies, for example. What we do not have is a credible and factual representation of white culture outside of forums such as amren. Moreover, your suggestion that discussion of the black experience to give credibility is hollow. Academics across America teach and preach the black experience with nary a word of white perspective, and yet they are treated with credibility. This is a place of honesty. It stands on fact, on analysis, and it is a forum for white culture. It is not a place for multicultural debate and politically correct pseudo-intellectualism.

    • Sean

      VDare was 100% correct in the article about how whites have no moral authority. At least sites like Amren one refuse the current paradigm in favor of the opposition (as ragtag as it may be currently).

  • ravitchn

    THIS individual IGNORES THE FACT THAT EUROPEANS OVER THE LAST THREE DECADES HAVE ALLOWED MUSLIMS INTO THEIR COUNTRIES MORE PROMISCUOUSLY THAN AMERICANS. Still let’s get together and send ALL MUSLIMS BACK TO THE Sands of Arabia.

  • Evette Coutier

    Most Europeans are no longer God fearing.

    • Spartacus

      They’re not even logic-fearing…

  • Funruffian

    As a white American I sometimes have felt the pressure to be accepting and egalitarian to foreigners and others of different races. At times I have extended my good charm and goodwill to break racial and social boundaries to reveal myself as an accepting person. But when these intentions are not reciprocated or met by other races or foreigners it makes me resentful and angry. Why should I help them if they are not going to help me? This questions aches at me and forces me to become prejudice. Perhaps my expectations from others is too great. But why should I extend and reward to those who are willing to disenfranchise me without any moral reservations?

    • IstvanIN

      There is no reason for you to accept them, they need to accept YOU, they are in your country. When in Rome.

    • saxonsun

      Do not help them–help only our own.

  • JohnEngelman

    Since the standard of living for Europeans has approximated or surpassed our own, few Europeans want to move the the United States. They are dissuaded by our high crime rates, and our low safety net.

    The people who move to the United States come from countries where the per capita gross domestic product is much lower. These include Latin America, India, and China.

    Americans think people come to the United States for “freedom.” For Americans on the right “freedom” often means little more than low taxes and few gun control laws. From the beginning of our history the vast majority of immigrants to the United States or the pre Revolutionary colonies came here for a higher standard of living.

    • ricpic

      We have a low safety net, Engelman? You’re beyond parody.

      • JohnEngelman

        It is quite a bit lower than in Europe. Europeans think it is amazing that we have gone so long without universal health coverage.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          Europe’s average GDP devoted to transfer payments is only slightly higher than America’s. 21.3% to 20%. The main difference is twofold: One, America has more non-white lifer-moochers than Europe, and two, because of that, Europe can afford to spread the “gravy,” so to speak, wider.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            This, of course, is changing year-by-year. The parasites are bleeding us dry over here, too.

          • Romulus

            Is J. E. Completely unaware that America IS the anchor of the global economy. Two thirds of the entire planets economies are dependent upon american consumerism,technology, foreign aid packages etc. for their very existence . For example; America has given at least 90 billion dollars to the dark continent since 1950 and nothing has changed!

        • kjh64

          “They are dissuaded by our high crime rates, and our low safety net. ”

          The USA spends huge amounts on a social safety net providing free food(EBT), medical care(Medicaid) and free housing(section 8), not to mention free cell phones, low cost utilities and daycare. However, most of this goes to Blacks and Mexicans. Europe doesn’t have these two big parasite groups. They have parasites but not as many as us. If they did, their welfare state would sink faster than the titanic. As far as crime in the US, as long as you’re not in a Black/Mexican neighborhood or around large numbers of Blacks, the crime rates are low.

        • Luca

          Are they also amazed at how much we spent bailing them out of two World Wars and our membership in NATO?

          They should be in awe of us for the blood and treasure we have spent to save Europe from itself.

          • JohnEngelman

            The United States is the only country that benefited economically from the two world wars.

            The First World War changed the United States from being a debtor country to a creditor country.

            During the Second World War military spending and employment, which let us remember is government spending and employment, reduced the unemployment rate to 1.2 percent by 1944.

            The Second World War destroyed the factories of our trade rivals while leaving outs intact. This gave American manufacturers a buyers’ market for natural resources, and a sellers’ market for what their factories produced.

            Strong labor unions forced American employers to share their profits with their employees.

          • WR_the_realist

            The Cold War and the numerous Middle Eastern escapades of the neocons have helped to bankrupt the United States. But another major factor bankrupting the United States is our vast entitlement system, which somehow you think is never big enough. Obamacare is such a disaster that already congress is trying to figure out how to exempt itself from it, and the Democrats are trying to delay some of the implementation so that the worst effects won’t kick in until after they are safely reelected.

            All of those European countries with huge safety nets have enormous unpayable debts. Greece, Italy, and Spain aren’t in the crisis they’re in because of their vast military expenditures. They’re in their current mess because their politicians have promised people benefits that can’t be afforded. The U.S. is following their lead. Military expenditures could be cut to zero and the United States government would still have a big deficit.

  • Sick of it

    The sheer number of Hispanics flooding our country is disturbing, however.

  • JohnEngelman

    In the United States, which is home to more whites than any other country, freedom of speech and association are constitutionally protected rights, but meetings of American Renaissance and other pro-white organizations are disrupted by people who hate us. Even traditional supporters of the First Amendment, such as the ACLU, libertarians, the Heritage Foundation, and Cato Institute take absolutely no interest in the trampling of our rights.

    – Matthew Contessini, American Renaissance, July 31, 2013

    The ACLU makes a big show of defending the rights of unpopular organizations like the Klu Klux Klan and the American Nazi Party. It refuses to defend American Renaissance because AR has compelling messages, achievable goals, and might have an effect on public policy.

    The Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute are uninterested in any organization not working to increase the wealth and power of the business community and the plutocracy.

    • Antipodean WN

      AR certainly has a compelling message, but its goals will never be achievable unless we name the real enemy who is enabling our genocide.

      I don’t understand why Jared refuses to name the enemy. After all the antis will call you a Nazi regardless.

    • JohnEngelman

      Moderator, thank you for removing the comment beneath this one.

    • George

      This is one of your best posts of all time, John.
      Cato refuses to support AmRen because Cato is in favour of open-doors immigration. Full Stop.
      Cato refuses to recognise inherent racial differences, even though P.J. O’Rourke, one of its most ardent and illustrious members has repeatedly reported on racial differences in his writings. He has documented how Fairmont, Calif. is successful, whereas Bangladesh (with similar population density, climate, etc.) is an abject failure. His first person views on Somalia would make even some of us blush with racist shame.
      As much as I like Cato’s take on most issues, they fail to recognise that races differ. Libertarianism is a philosophy that functions only when a society’s members are white, ethical and rational. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of immigrants to white homelands these days are none of these things.
      The Klan is moribund. It exists only as a chance to scare moderate whites, provide fund-raising copy to the SPLC and serve as a shorthand dismissal of whites’ legitimate fears, concerns, needs & demands. (Well, it also gives about 200 FBI agents a chance to play undercover infiltrator, but I digress). ACLU support for the KKK allows them to appear even-handed as they seek to dismantle America.

  • Antipodean WN

    Having a lot of European friends, I largely agree with the author. However white nationalism per se does not seem to have much traction on the old continent. Their form of nationalism has more the air of protecting the family heirloom, and religious traditions (against Islam) rather than a wider interest in the white race. In fact some are almost as down on migrants from other European countries as they are on blacks and Muslims – the late Jorge Haider is a case in point – he railed against East European migrants.

    So yes, I think there is a traditionalist anti-immigrant, anti-Islam movement in Europe that is not mirrored in the Anglo Saxon countries. However I believe that in terms of racial awareness and white nationalism, the Anglo Saxon countries are perhaps still streets ahead, and this is most obviously seen in attitudes to interracial marriage. Australians, and I believe Americans on average are much more disgusted over black males with white women than are say French, and even Italians.

    French women have few qualms about cohabitating with blacks and Arabs, and this from as far back as WWI.

    I think that it is without question that on the whole white nationalism and appreciation of the biological unity of the white race has been stronger in the Anglosphere, and perhaps still is.

    • Kronolog

      Yes, white nationalism is at its core an American phenomenon; In Europe there is still some level of distrust betwteen the various nationalities. For example, I know from experience that a not inconsiderable amount of Swedes view non-gypsy eastern Europeans with as much distrust as they view Arabs, partly because of historical animosity and partly because they have a disproprtionate high participation in organized crime.

      However, there’s even some amount of friction between immigrant Swedes and native Norweigians and vice verse in towns on both sides of the Swedish-Norweigian border, despite our cultural similarity and more or less peacefull history.

      • IstvanIN

        The US, over the last 130 years, has become a pan-European country, Europe still has nations states. Thus we need “white” or “European-American” unity. Europe needs French, German, Dutch, etc. unity. Europe’s peoples should remain distinct and separate while supporting each other as Europeans and avoding fratricidal conflict.

      • saxonsun

        And I can’t blame them on the Eastern Europeans.

    • saxonsun

      I can’t tell you how many white woman/black male pairings we see here in NYC. Just a few yrs. back it wasn’t this bad.

      • Massinissa

        That’s because the social stigma associated to this kind of behavior has completely vanished.

  • KenelmDigby

    I wish things were so simple as the authir suggests – but they are not.
    Ergo, Spain a continental European nation that suffered Arabic domination for 700 years, until very recently had the most ridiculous immigrationist policy of virtually any nation on Earth. Look at the statistics, the number of immigrants who entered Spain in the last two decades was absolutely astronomical.
    Italy, too a nation that suffered Arab raiding and foreign domination for centuries operates an absurd immigrationist policy – Italy rather than Britain is modern Europe’s main destination and home for darkies.
    I am afriad the characterisation of the British as not being especially hostile to foreigners – dark foreigners in particular – is dead wrong. Traditionally, the British have always been racially aware and had an instinctive horror of the daker races of mankind, an instinctive horror that was greater than most continental nations posessed, possibly equal to eastern European horror of darkies. During the vast immigration period of 1945 onwards, this horror manifested itself in popular anger, support for Enoch Powell and the National Front etc.
    The real question is how the political classes of Britain and continental Europe managed to push through such overwhelmingly unpopular policies in the teeth of so much public oppostion and anger – and get away with it.
    In Britain at least, it seems like they over-played their hand, and it sems that UKIP have changed the face of British politics for good. At last the anti-immigration voice of the British people has found a credible spokesman.

    • watling

      “The real question is how the political classes of Britain and continental Europe managed to push through such overwhelmingly unpopular policies in the teeth of so much public opposition and anger – and get away with it.”

      That’s always puzzled me too. How can it be possible for those whose views are least representative of the general public to get into positions of power such that they can implement policy based on their minority views?

      All it would take to prevent this insanity is for people to make the right choice on their ballot papers. I can only assume that the general public almost all suffer some kind of mass hypnosis in the privacy of the polling booth.

      “must vote libtard … must vote libtard … must vote libtard …”

      • IstvanIN

        Universal suffrage, as opposed to democracy, has been a disaster.

      • Sick of it

        I can explain – It was their military. When a state has the backing of a powerful military which has been turned upon the people and that will turn upon the people at the behest of the state, people are more apt to fall in line with things they otherwise would revolt over.

  • KenelmDigby

    This is a good point.
    The Italian left, (who are the immigrationists responsible for flooding Italy with the Third World), are even more lunatic than the British left, if you thought that possible.
    How many so-called ‘amnesties’ have the Italians had in the past 20 years?, how many untold *millions* of darkies from Bangladesh to Morocco have taken advantage of this rank stupidity?
    No British government not even the dastardly nation-wrecking b*stards of New Labour would ever dare uphold a blanket ‘amnesty’ of illegal immigrants. If they did they would be literally slaughtered by the right-wing press and popular opinion. They would probably be out of office for decades, (which, incidentally, seems the likely fate of the Labour Party now).
    Lest we forget Italy had the biggest communist party in the free world.

    • IstvanIN

      For some reason, perhaps the same reason Russia and the US have so many commies, Italy has been trending Communist, which is a pro-mulitculticultural, anti-Christian hogwash. From the end of the war when they had a crooked election, (which the US supported) to overthrow the Savoys, to 1984 when official Catholicsim ended, Italy has been trending towards dissolution. Regardless of what Americans may think, tradition matters and rituals matter.

    • saxonsun

      I despair of any group in England doing anything about the immigration problems there. I wish.

    • Romulus

      Bear in mind that much of the supposed “Italian ” people after the 1100’s (ESP. In the Southern half) are more Arab than Roman. The commie party was not created by Germans, but by EASTERN European you know who’s who migrated in after Rome and Greece collapsed. The bolshi.

      • Sick of it

        Arab is one term for it :p

        • Romulus

          Specifically the sicilians.

        • Massinissa

          Well, the historical term is the Moors. Who were Arab/Berber.
          Their descendants are currently the inhabitants of North Africa. Who look Sicilian, incidently.

  • KenelmDigby

    The strongest correlations between the percentage of third world immigrants in any European nation are probably linked to the political dominance of the nation’s left party, the virulence of that party and to EU membership, the correlations being in that order. One would think that a history of colonialism would have the strongest correlation, but that cannot explain the madness of immigration into Sweden or Norway, for example.
    Dissolution of the nation state, the ‘brotherhood of man’ ignoring national boundaries and dsitinctions of nationality and citizenship – these are all leftist notions, in fact coming from the pen of Karl Marx himself. This is *the* crucial factor explaining third world immigration into Europe, it is the one Marxist policy that slipped through the net and marxist adherents once esconced in ruling left parties implemented the ideology. Remember mass third world immigration into Europe is ideology driven by a political elite, (that has hijacked the levers of power), and nothing else.
    In Europe, to a greater or lesser degree the rightist political parties carry some mild vestige of nationalism and so are not so dead keen o mass immigration than the lefties.
    This cannot be said about the American Republicans, however, who are subordinated to ‘free market, open borders’ dogma.

  • KenelmDigby

    Also Mr. Contessini neglects to mention that prior to 1965, immigration to the USA from the third world was to, all intents and purposes, forbidden. The Immigration Act of 1924 was highly racially restrictive, to the point of being nordicist.
    Similarly, Australia as late as the 1970s, forbade non-White immigration.
    The various British colonies in Africa and elsewhere, (eg Rhodesia), had racially aware laws and regulations.
    To say that ‘Anglo-Saxons’ weren’t ‘race conscious’ is just wrong. It is the presente era which is an historical anomaly.

    • IstvanIN

      The immigration act of 1924 was probably one of the most sensible things our government ever did, aside from the Chinese Exclusion Act, the banning of slave importation, and our original Constitution.

    • Sick of it

      South Africa, Great Britain, and the United States all had a certain foreign element which pushed the new immigration policies. Said element basically fled South Africa after Apartheid. Not sure if they have similarly influenced Australia and New Zealand or to what extent they have influenced Canada.

  • kjh64

    I think here in America(also Canada, Australia), we have so much land, that people can easily move or get away. Also, because American(also Canada/Australia) are relatively new countries and have not had centuries of invasions, it’s not in the White psyche here. The prevailing attitude has been of the “melting pot”. That is not the situation in most continental European countries. If White Americans could not get away and had to live with the consequences of our politician’s actions more, things would change.

  • http://radicalamericancentrist.blogspot.com/ PLUTOCRATS FEAR POPULISM

    Matthew Contessini wrote:
    “Why Are Europeans More Racially Aware?”
    =====================

    A
    number of reasons, but the real reasons for this difference between
    american and euro-whites were not even mentioned by you. Luckily for
    everyone here, I am about to explain everything to you. Today’s your
    lucky day!

    Matthew Contessini wrote:
    In the United States,
    which is home to more whites than any other country, freedom of speech
    and association are constitutionally protected rights,
    ======================

    The
    word ‘constitution’ means nothing. Your use of that word so prominently
    clues me in to the fact that you are ignorant and are about to spout
    some nonsense. First off, the constitution is INTERPRETED by the federal
    judges. So the constitution only means what they THINK it means. If the
    supreme court believes x means y, then x means y. Period. The
    constitution may say ‘x’, but if 5 of 9 ivy league, never had a real job
    in their lives judges say the constitution says ‘y’, then it DOES say
    ‘y’. Do you now have some inkling of what I am talking about? The WORDS
    MEAN NOTHING. The interpretation means everything. WHO DOES THE
    INTERPRETATION? That is key.

    The other white western nations, the
    western euro nations, canada, austral, etc, are PARLIAMENTARIAN
    DEMOCRACIES. That means that the power of the governments in those
    nations is held by politicians elected from small, relatively
    homogeneous districts. In America, power is spread between different
    branches, making it hard for the majority to control the govt. The
    Supreme ct is composed of elite members of society who are unelected and
    never held a real job in their lives. That means a lot. NONE of these
    western euro nations put the power of the govt into the hands of some
    elite, never had a real job in their lives unelected judges. In those
    nations the power is in the hands of politicians elected from small
    districts, politicians who are subject to election every couple of
    years.

    The western euros whites know this. So they know they have
    some power. Most americans also realize they have NO POWER. Or very
    little.

    But back to the subject at hand.

    Matthew Contessini wrote:
    but meetings of American Renaissance and other pro-white organizations are disrupted by people who hate us.
    =============

    but
    WHY do they hate us? Because of cultural indoctrination. How does
    cultural indoctrination take place? Through the educational system and
    the entertainment system. The larger, more centralized and the more
    pervasive education and entertainment systems are, the more they are
    controlled by the elite, the rich, the corporations. The corporations
    put ideas into young, impressionable white minds. These ideas are the
    genesis of white race guilt, white self-hatred.

    This is where
    your understanding of what is happening comes up short. You fail to
    understand that the war on whites is a war of class, of the elite and
    their corporations on the working class majority, which is to say,
    whites. The corporations vs the white majority. That is the real
    struggle. And the corporations are the primary tool, the front, for the
    upper class. The war on whites is a war of corporations on the
    majority, which is whites.

    One major reason why eurowhites are
    more race aware, more anti-multiculti, less self-loathing, and more
    anti-immigration than american whites is because eurowhites have less
    exposure to formal education than do american whites.
    For example,
    in most euro nations, school stops at 16 years of age. That is beginning
    to change now, but societal inertia means change comes slowly. As the
    white euros are forced by globalization into the educational system,
    they too will become more culturally indoctrinated. ALso, the american
    educational system has been around longer and is therefore more
    centralized. Centralization means more control by the elite. Less
    centralized means less control by elites.

    Formal education via
    centralized means is a tool of ideology dissemination for the upper
    class. Same goes for entertainment industry–another tool, a mechanism
    for the upper class to send ideas,their ideas, into the minds of the
    working class. This is not a conspiracy. This is the way that the
    natural ecosystem of human society works. It’s nature as translated into
    sociology. You have seen nature documentaries explain how the animal
    kingdom works, no doubt. I am now explaining to you how the human
    ecosytem works.

    Why do the upper class and their corporations
    wage war on whites? Why does the upper class want diversity and
    multiculti and political correctness and mass immigration? I am going to
    tell you now, so listen carefully. To begin, you need to understand the
    principle of ‘divide et impera.’ Divide et impera is the underlying
    principle of the USA and other similar pseudo-democracies. It means
    ‘divide and rule.’ James Madison, evil plutocrat and father of the
    constitution wrote to jefferson that divide et impera was how they would
    rule america. Madison went on to explain how divide et impera would
    allow the rich to rule america. His writings, primarily found in the
    certain of the federalist papers and madison’s notes on the
    constitutional convention, explain how divide et impera works.

    The
    elite divide and rule by increasing factions in political districts.
    The more factions, the less unified the majority. The less unified the
    majority, the less the majority can control the govt. That means the
    elite can better control the govt. Controlling the govt is what it is
    all about. Eurowhites know they have some control. American whites know
    they have little.

    Madison wrote that by creation of a federal
    govt through a federal constitution, the voting districts would be
    enlarged and would therefore include more population and would therefore
    include more factions therein. MOre factions == less unity.

    Madison
    wrote that thus divided, the majority would not be able to unite to
    control the govt. Thus, madison wrote, the fed govt would be the tool to
    preserve wealth inequality and thereby ‘protect the minority of the
    opulent against the majority.’
    That is what the USA and its
    constitution is all about: protecting the rich by keeping the majority
    from controlling the govt. That is what the founding fathers got rid of
    the articles of confederation and installed the constitution–to prevent
    democracy and thereby control the govt. Larger federal voting districts
    means more population, means more factions, means less unity. That is
    why the elite created the USA and why they created the EU. The EU still
    has less power than the fed govt, which is one reason why the eurowhites
    still have a chance.

    So how does this related to diversity, multiculti, PC, mass immigration, and white self-hatred?

    The
    more heterogeneous, aka the more ‘diverse’ the population of a nation, a
    state, a city, a neighborhood, a workplace, then the more DIVIDED that
    city, nation, state etc.

    Immigration, racial integration,
    multiculti etc, these ideas mean more diversity, which means more
    factions. Racial faction, cultural factions, factions of national origin
    etc.

    That is one big reason why the corporations push
    multiculti and mass immigration: more factions==less united==the less
    the majority can control the nation, state, city, neighborhood,
    workplace.

    DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH…for the corporations. But diversity is weakness for the workers.

    Also,
    mass immigration increases the supply of labor faster than it increases
    the demand for labor, thus decreasing wages and increasing corporate
    profits.

    Another reason that american whites are more under
    the control of corporate PC-multiculti propaganda is because the
    all-pervasive educational/entertaiment industrial complex has sold, has
    pushed a certain narrative, a myth, a story of america onto the white
    populace. That narrative, the myth of america, tells white americans
    that they are guilty of the horrors of slavery. But that is a lie told
    by the corporations. The 1860 census showed that about 1.5% of all white
    americans owned slaves. And in those days a slave cost more than a
    year’s wages. No credit without collateral. So slaveowning was mostly
    confined to the upper class.

    But the pc multiculti lie is used to induce race guilt in whites.

    In
    truth most american whites are descended from white slaves who were
    forced to come to america and sold at auction to be worked to death.
    Indentured servants, they call them now. But they were called slaves
    back then.

    This lie is pushed on american whites to help the
    corporations induce white race guilt, which helps factionalize america
    via ‘civil rights,’ racial integration and mass immigration.

    One
    reason the eurowhites are able to fight back more is that they have a
    lower percentage of nonwhites in their nations than america. Most euro
    nations are around 90% or more white. America is only about 65% white.

    Thus,
    the white populace of the euro nations have more power. Also, of
    course, their parliamentarian democracies naturally give the people far
    more than the american governmental structure, aka the pseudo-democratic
    ‘republic,’ which is a strong checks and balances, seperation of powers
    govt. America is a pseudo-democracy. The other white nations are
    democracies, parliamentarian democracies.

    Well, enough for today, kids. More on my blog.

    Please
    forgive any curtness or rudeness on my part. I am an old man, and as
    the years draw on I become less tolerant of ignorance.

    If you have questions, please be specific.

  • http://www.praag.co.za/ Dan Roodt

    This is an interesting article full of speculative insights that may not ultimatly survive scrutiny, but does point to some elements undermining Western/European culture and others supporting it.

    I think Anglo-Saxon culture is to some extent a victim of its own success. Many people learn English and Third Worlders especially are attracted to it as a source of power and economic success. British colonialism anglicised India and most of Africa.

    Here in South Africa you have a laboratory of white survival with white South Africans equally discriminated against by the government system and attacked by black criminals. Yet English-speaking whites mostly see a solution in “better law enforcement”, “better education” and “making multiculturalism work”. The same goes for those Afrikaners who live in mostly English-speakinig areas, some of whom send their children to English private schools (although this phenomenon is also declining). Afrikaners who remain true to their language and traditions see separatism, the pursuit of a so-called “volkstaat” or ethnic state as the sole solution to the problems of whites. Over the past two years or so, most Afrikaner organisations, sometimes meeting secretly, have endorsed the pursuit of self-determination as the only viable survival strategy.

    It seems that, ultimately, having a universal culture beamed to the whole world via Hollywood and global corporations, becomes a handicap as it creates the impression that you are a master of your own destiney whereas in fact you are not. To some extent, English in South Africa has become a black language because all English institutions such as universities, state schools, media, etc., have been taken over by blacks. Despite twenty years of affirmative action, forced integration, and so on, there are still many Afrikaans state schools that are 95% white, to the frustration of the authorities. Ironically, liberal whites are more hostile to these schools than blacks and are trying their utmost to have them declared illegal.

    The point about kinship is important too. A few months ago, a columnist for the London Financial Times, Simon Kuper, wrote scathingly about his sojourn as a child in South Africa. He also referred to a bus trip somewhere among Afrikaner children “with their handful of surnames”. We have kept our Dutch and French surnames that have been Afrikanerised over the centuries and we can tell immediately by surname if someone is “one of us” or not. That makes us a “white tribe”.

    On Thursday night I attended a poetry reading at my children’s high school. It breaks one’s heart to see all those talented, clever children emerging into adulthood, able to write, to compose, to think, to reason, but who have one handicap: they are white in a black world. What will become of them?

    In think Southern identity in the US has the same potential to unite at least some Americans around an ideal. Often defeat, as during the Civil War or our Anglo-Boer War, leads to loss of territory but can create a more enduring sense of identity even stronger and more valuable than territory which depends so much on demography and military power. I think as white populations decline world-wide, we have to accept that we are going to lose vast tracts of land to others. The trick will be to keep our sense of who we are and where we come from.

    Not that territory is unimportant, but this is as much a struggle for identity as it is for anything else.

    • IstvanIN

      We may have to contract and pull out of Africa, the non-white Commonwealth nations, Australia and New Zealand and concentrate on Europe and North America.

  • Alexandra1973

    My history’s rather interesting.
    On my mother’s side, my ancestors came here and colonized. One of my ancestors (Butler family) helped found the city of Hartford, Connecticut, he and his son were deacons. And yeah I actually do have Amerind ancestry…no more recent than 200 years ago, though. So on that side it’s primarily English and Scottish (Clan Rose), with German thrown in, and a dash of Cherokee. And some French (if my information is correct I’m descended from the Capetians–from WAY back when).
    On my birth father’s side (my mother was never married to him)…my great-grandparents came here from Eastern Europe, three were from Poland, the fourth from Belarus. And yeah they came through Ellis Island. I found records online. Looking at census records, I could see that they had Anglicized their names.
    My husband is primarily German, with Irish and Welsh (his mother is descended from Welsh Quakers). He had an Irish ancestor who “procured” horses for General Washington, crossed the Delaware with him, and spent that winter in Valley Forge.
    I bet our ancestors would be spinning in their graves to know what’s become of this nation.
    I for one am getting tired of seeing los mexicanos at Walmart or wherever. Tired of hearing Spanish when I visit a “larger” city in the area (I live in what’s basically a village, 98% white). And this is northeastern Ohio, people…quite a distance from the southern border! Near Amish country!

    • Luca

      If you have that many Mexicans in Ohio, just imagine (if you can) how it is here in S. Cal. There are entire small cities and large towns whose population is 99% hispanic and most of those are Spanish speaking, meaning illegal.

      If this vast sea of illiterate peasants, nubering in the tens of millions is allowed to stay here in one way or another it is the end of America and the beginning of Amexica. Just one more banana republic that migrated north like an unabated invasive species.

      The acceptance of non-assimilating, illegal, law breakers is a reprehensible form of collective suicide on its face. If amnesty is passed, we will become a full-blown socialist state within two decades. Any politician saying otherwise is intellectually dishonest and insulting.

      Your ancestors were men of honor who helped found this country. That is the problem today, almost all politicians are self serving criminals.

      • jeffaral

        The other day here in Germany I was speaking with a Christian conservative woman from Sacramento, Mexifornia, who was with her german father. She had a small child and, not surprisingly, with her was a Mexican babysitter, servant. Are this conservative people too lazy or too arrogant that they can’t live without their immigrant slave labour? Go pick your own tomatoes and mown the lawn yourselves you lazy bastards!

        • Luca

          If you lived here, you would realize it is the hypocritical liberal elite who don’t like to get their hands dirty and who far outnumber conservatives in California, who not only employ these people but encourage them to come here illegally and allow them to stay here through their political activity.

          By the way, how’s that influx of Turks and other dregs working out in Germany and the rest of Europe?

      • IstvanIN

        I emphathize, NJ looks like a sewer has overflowed, the color of the residents has changed so much over the last 25 years.

    • saxonsun

      Sometimes we hear more Spanish than English–evil pouring into the ear.

    • Bossman

      So you’re a typical white American with some native Indian in your family tree. Since Mexicans are mostly either Native Indian or partly Native Indian, it means that they too can be assimilated to become like you at some distant date. Personally, I find that white women with a slight touch of the native in their backgrounds are usually more attractive than average.

      • Massinissa

        From what I understood, she’s like 1/36 Indian, whereas most Mexicans are at least half-Native.
        That’s not the same.

        If your great-grandfather is Black, and the rest of your ancestors are White, then you’re White. If you’re only 1/16th Black, then there’s probably nothing black about you anymore. Let alone your kids.

  • YourMOMA

    Affirmative Action is compensation for their “slavery” days. If America is such a horrible place why do Africans apply for asylum. Blacks can’t rule themselves and it’s evident in America and on the continent of Africa.

  • jeffaral

    The drug cartels in Mexico, gaining a foothold in the exploding mexican population in the USA is far more dangerous than the Islamists. The USA are the real evil power invading their countries and killing their men, women and children.

  • Spartacus

    The article is mostly right, except for this part :

    “In Greece and Hungary, ultranationalist pro-white parties are surging.”

    The Hungarian group Jobbik is not pro-white, in fact they don’t even consider Hungarians to be white, but of the “Turanic” race.

    • Antipodean WN

      Yeah –I heard that Jobbik identifies quite strongly with Asians and Turks.

      These nationalisms we see in Europe are more about continuing and celebrating old national myths —its more like defending the family or clan, than real white nationalism. From my own experience, most Europeans can’t get their heads around white nationalism.

      Non-white men literally feast on white women in Europe —to a much greater extent than the US and Australia.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        From my own experience, most Europeans can’t get their heads around white nationalism.

        That’s because people more readily identify with their ethnicity than their race. White nationalism per se will motivate nobody. The winning ticket is various white ethnonationalist movements that pledge to get along with other white ethnonationalist movements and not allow their own ethnonationalism to tread on other ethnonationalisms.

        Consider what is called “black nationalism.” What it really is is black American nationalism, not every black-ish person, from western Africans to eastern Africans to southern Africans to black-ish Latin Americans uniting. When American blacks fret about the lack of blacks in baseball, that there are Spanish-speaking Latin American black or mulatto men in the major leagues does not impress them or satisfy them. What they want are more black Americans in the major leagues, because for black Americans, their tribe is black American, i.e. western African blacks forcibly transported from west Africa to the British colonies on the North American continent that eventually seceded from the British Empire and won its war for independence.

      • IstvanIN

        The Hungarian ethnic myth is very tied up with Attila the Hun and the great warriors who conquered Eurasia. Attila is still a very popular boys name.

    • Antipodean WN

      I also have doubts about whether the current Greeks can be considered truly ‘white’. There IQ level is at the level of Hispanics in the US, and here in Australia we call them ‘wogs’. They are mentally, temperamentally, and emotionally non-white. That’s just my honest two cents worth.

      • watling

        That begs the question: are today’s Greeks racially the same as the ancient Greeks? If you think of ancient Greek mathematicians (e.g. Pythagorus), scientists (e.g. Archimedes) and philosophers (e.g. Socrates, Aristotle, Epicurus) it’s clear that there were some very clever ancient Greeks.

        • Antipodean WN

          Well the answer to your question is obvious. Of course not. Greece now compared to what Greece was back then, is analogous to the US 50 years hence (if the current rate of Hispanicization continues unabated) compared to the US of 50 years ago. There will still be country called the US, but the original American nation will be close to vanishing.

          Greeks and Turks are genetically similar, refer Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi & Piazza (1996, p.268). Their similar national IQs reflect this (Greece, 92, Turkey, 90).

          • Spartacus

            IQ levels don’t necessarily reflect that much genetic variation. After all, the Irish have about the same IQ as Greeks. Also, keep in mind many eastern and southern European nations have large populations of non-whites, like my country with gypsies, or the Greeks with the large influx of non-whites from Africa, Pakistan , Turkey and Arab countries, so that drags the averages down.

          • Antipodean WN

            Come on….Britain, France, the US have far higher proportions of non-white foreigners than Greece, but at the same time, IQ levels are still way higher than that of Greece. The problem is in the Greek people themselves, who are obviously not of the same stock as those who produced Pythagoras and Socrates —-and you have admitted to as such yourself.

          • Spartacus

            Greeks might have a slightly lower IQ than the US founding stock (Northern Europeans) which might explain the difference, but I assure you they are the descendants of Socrates, and the fact that they have the most well-organized and ideologically sound nationalist party in Europe proves it .

            Also, you’re forgetting one thing – non-whites aren’t all the same . The US and Britain are also getting tons of qualified and intelligent non-whites, like Asians and Brahmin Indians, but in Greece virtually all non-whites are the lowest of the low – east Africans, Pakistanis, Afghans and Arabs, precisely because Greece is a poorer country, and non-whites with higher intelligence and skill go to western Europe, while the ones who go to Greece just go there because it’s easier to get into than other European countries.

          • Antipodean WN

            Come on Spartacus, again you evade the obvious. Asian immigration is a drop compared to mass HIspanic immigration. Anglo Americans have rarely toppped 90% of the population over the past 100 years. Only 5.8% of the population in the US is Asian, and these include not only high achievers like Chinese and Koreans, but also South East Asians and Pacific Islanders —a different kettle of fish.

            In fact if you consider the white + NE Asian + Brahmin Indians component in the US, percentage would be around 70%. That is 70% of the US is of high IQ groups.

            Now consider Greece. Greece, according to the data I have looked up, is still 93 or 94% Greek, and furthermore many of the migrants are high IQ Eastern Europeans. Yet the average IQ is at the level of Hispanics in the US, and way lower than that of the US overall.

            Case closed.

          • Spartacus

            Greece is 93% Greek only if you count the citizens+legal aliens. But if you count the illegal aliens, who are at least 1.000.000 by most counts, it falls to 83% . If the more “liberal” figures regarding illegal immigration are true, then ethnic Greeks might be just a little over 75% of the people in Greece.

            And no, there are no high-IQ eastern Europeans flooding to Greece, they’re just poor people going to be waitresses and busboys a few months a year. All high-IQ professionals (Engineers, doctors, etc.) go to Western Europe .

          • Antipodean WN

            Spartacus —I have presented scientific information from the foremost race realist scientist today that Greeks are low IQ, genetically the same as Turks, as well as my own personal experience of them in Australia.

            You say that ethnic Greeks constitute around 75% of the population of Greece. I don’t believe that at all. Greece is one of the more ethnically homogeneous nations in Europe.

            But you can prove your point by substantiating it with some actual data and links verifying same data. Can you do so please?

          • Spartacus

            Would’ve posted earlier if Amren would let us post links…

            “Greek Interior Minister Evripidis Stylianidis stated that figures for
            legal and illegal immigrants in Greece range between 1,300,000 and
            1,500,000 people. He participated in the one-day-lecture entitled “Dual
            Challenge: Financial Crisis and Immigration” which was held by the
            Constantinos Karamanlis Institute for Democracy.

            According to Mr Stylianidis, this evaluation follows some data
            released in 2001, that illegal and legal immigrants hovered at 762,000.
            In 2005 and 2007, following some migration laws that legalized another
            500,000 people, this number may have increased while almost half a
            million illegal immigrants have been arrested, even more than once,
            since 2005.”

            http://greece(dot)greekreporter(dot)com/2012/07/19/about-1-5-million-immigrants-live-in-greece/

          • Antipodean WN

            Get real Spartacus. If Lynn’s data was tainted by results for ‘Greek’ Bangladeshis and Gypsies, he would have said so.

            Go to his article which mentions Greek IQ. He posits that Greek IQ is not unexpected because Greeks have a close genetic affinity to Turks.

          • Spartacus

            I told you before – IQ doesn’t automatically mean anything . The Irish have a lot in common genetically with the English, Scots and Welsh, but they have a lower average IQ than those other 3 groups . That doesn’t mean they’re not white, or not genetically related to the aforementioned groups.

            What you’re also forgetting is that Ireland, just like Greece, has historically had waves of “brain-drain”, where people with high IQs and good skills have left for other countries, like the US .

          • Antipodean WN

            For heaven’s sake Spartacus, you are ducking and weaving more than Joe Frazier ever did.

            First you say that the low IQ of Greece is due to foreigners dragging down the average. Now I have successfully rebutted you on that point, you say that the Greeks in Greece are white anyway —its just they are the low IQ residue from historic ‘brain drains’

            But that is absolutely ridiculous. Greece has nowhere near the huge diaspora populations of say Germany, England, Italy, and Spain has ——yet all these countries, all with higher low IQ migrant populations than Greece, nevertheless outperform Greece decisively on average national IQ.

            And of course low IQ by itself does not prove a population is non-white, but low IQ is part of the convergence of evidence, including laziness, low ability to delay gratification, resemblance to non-white Turks, inability to assimilate into Anglo societies ala Australia, loyalty to the home country above the host country (unlike the small German population in Australia which is completely assimilated), all this converges on my hypothesis that Greeks are not whites.

            And then the hypothesis, which admittedly based only on the observations listed above could still have been wrong, actually finds PROOF in the human genetic research of Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi, and Piazza (1994) in their genetic linkage tree, in which Greeks are shown to be more closely related to Iranians and other southwest Asian peoples than to Italians, Danes, and English.

            Now of course it also depends on how you define “white”.

            If you happy to accept near Eastern people like Turks and Iranians and Lebanese as “white” then Greeks are also “white”. In fact the White Australia policy did admit Lebanese, and Syrians, and Greeks into the country as ‘white’.

            However if you hold, as I do, that neither Near Eastern Caucasoids, nor North African Caucasoids are “white” in the commonly understood Amren sense, then logically Greeks are also not white.

          • Antipodean WN

            I kind of understand now where you are coming from Spartacus. Questioning the ‘whiteness’ of Greece is perhaps getting a bit too close to home for you. Romanians after all are not standout performers on IQ tests, beating the Greeks by just 2 points (94 compared to 92). But for the sake of amity and continued civilised discussion we won’t go there……although Richard Lynn does in his 2006 work.

            I’m a race realist. I go where the facts lead me, and not where emotion does.

          • Spartacus

            1. Romania is not that close to Greece, you should take a look at a map.

            2.You’re forgetting something – Romania has the same problems as Greece, but on a bigger scale and with the added effect of several consecutive generations of chronicle starvation under communism – After you brave anglos sold us to the judeo-russian empire…

            3. In the past 100 years alone, Romania has given more to humanity than almost any other country, including insulin, the jet engine, the vaccine for cholera, the anti-aircraft cannon, ejection seats and so forth, so don’t worry about our intellectual capacities, I can assure you we’re not lacking. If you count out the 2.000.000 gypsies in country, the vast majority of whom can’t even read or write, we’re very good.

            4.At the International Mathematics Olympiad, the all-time number of awards puts Romania on 6th place, ahead of countries like Germany, the UK and Japan, who have much bigger populations. You Australian Übermensch come in at 21 :

            http://www(dot)imo-official(dot)org/results_country.aspx?column=awards&order=desc

          • Antipodean WN

            Now you are trying to separate yourself from the Greeks eh? What a fair weather friend you are!

            “After you brave anglos sold us to the judeo-russian empire.”

            Yes, and recent polls have shown a majority of Romanians wish for a return to the ‘good old days’. Not surprising because socialism and communism appeal more to lazier, darker complected populations. Independent people of rugged individualism eschew socialism – I’m talking of North Western Europeans here, the cowboys who opened up the American West, the swagmen of the Australian outback.

            “At the International Mathematics Olympiad, the all-time number of awards puts Romania on 6th place”

            So? What don’t you understand about the word ‘average’.

          • Spartacus

            They don’t want communism back, they just want the situation Romania is in now to be changed, and communism is the only thing apart from this that they know . You try living in a country where the government is actively trying to sabotage the economy, and see how much you prosper …

          • Antipodean WN

            Well. I do! Governments in all of the Anglo Saxon countries are J#$ tool governments who care naught for the average white man.

            But that does not mean we go out and vote communist, for heaven’s sake. Whereas polls have shown well over a half of Romanians want the return of communism. Pathetic.

          • Spartacus

            They don’t want “Jewish Bolshevism” . After Ceausescu came into power, he adopted a policy of National-Communism which was very different from what was before, and what was in almost any other communist country .

          • Antipodean WN

            Ah….so we have here a non-white, pro-Ceausecu, ‘national communist’ ‘white nationalist’! Interesting!

            I’m sick of arguing with you, you non-white turd, you turkic mongrel. Stay in your own toilet of a country, and don’t ever come to mine. If you do me and my mates will greet you with some romper stomper style entertainment.

          • Spartacus

            You mean like you entertain all the lebs that are turning your women into their toilets ? Sounds frightening….

            https://muslimrapewave(dot)wordpress(dot)com/aussie-pig-you-deserve-it-because-youre-australian/

          • Antipodean WN

            when we were doing the ‘entertaining’ at Cronulla, we were smashing any wog, lebs, greeks or whatever. A wog is a wog is a wog. I’ll bet some of them still carry the imprint of my steel caps behind their wog ears. And do you think the average real aussie is going to distinguish between you and a leb?

            Don’t try and separate yourself from the lebs. You look like one, and are just as morally depraved, greasy, and disgusting as all wogs are.

          • Spartacus

            You sound like a tough guy… Bet you’re just some random mud trolling around .

          • Antipodean WN

            I hate wogs. Pure and simple. They are almost as bad as the Asiatic menace we have over here. And at least the Asiatics find it more difficult to fly under the radar. Wogs are filth.

          • NM156

            Please, show us some evidence that Romanians want a return to Ceucescu’s rule during the Communist Era. I’d love to have a good laugh right about now.

          • Antipodean WN

            Don’t you know how to Google?

            “More than 53 percent of Romanians last month told the Public Affairs polling agency that they would prefer to live once again under the regime of Nicolae Ceausescu.”

            Struggling Romanians yearn for communism

            Also Google Romanians and Communism.

          • NM156

            Right. And monkies will fly out of my butt.

          • George

            Insulin is a Canadian contribution to the world.

          • Spartacus
          • NM156

            No Eastern European nation has anything remotely close to a large non-white population, unless Russia, the former empire of the USSR is included as Eastern European. You could drive from Prague to Warsaw, onward to Belgrade and Budapest, through Vilnius and Riga, en route to Kiev, and never see an African or Arab face.

        • Spartacus

          The Greeks themselves are still racially the same, they’re just not ethnically the same. Greeks have had a large influx of other white, particularly Slavs, hence they’re not the exact same genetically they were thousands of years ago. But they’re still White for God’s sake…

          • Antipodean WN

            This has brought about a mixing of Turkish and European genes with the result that contemporary Turks and Greeks are genetically quite similar.
            This has been shown by Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi, and Piazza (1994) in their genetic linkage tree, in which Greeks are shown to be more closely related to Iranians and other southwest Asian peoples than to Italians, Danes, and English. This genetic similarity is also apparent for intelligence, for which the IQ of 90 in Turkey is closely similar to those in the range of 90 to 94 in Greece……
            from Richard Lynn, 2006

            It should be completely obvious that the people currently inhabiting Greece, are not the same as the original Greeks, who by the way also lived in Anatolia as well as the current land area that constitutes Greece.

            You do not get a Socrates, Archimedes, and Pythagorus from a population with a mean IQ of 92. Normal distribution theory shows that it is well nigh impossible.

          • Spartacus

            You’re not getting it… Look, the thing most people don’t know is that most of those places you refer to used to be white. Asia Minor, the Middle East, Persia, most of North Africa, Afghanistan – Until around 1500 years ago, most of these were white lands, and it wasn’t until Arabs (who were also white) converted to islam and started importing huge amounts of slaves from Africa and later the Mongolian invasions that these places became tainted .

            But most of the people living there today still have more white DNA than of any other race, even if, obviously they are impure now impure, and therefore not part of our race anymore.

            So that’s what Greeks have in in common with those places genetically, it’s not that the Greeks are non-white it’s that those lands used to be white, and that still shows in their DNA, even if that’s not the case anymore.

          • saxonsun

            Then the same goes for the Italians. They created two great civilizations but they’re not all that bright today.

          • Antipodean WN

            Wrong. Italians are brighter than Greeks. Italians have an IQ of around 100 (Southern Italians a lot lower).

            Greeks have an average IQ of 92 – in the same ballpark as Hispanics.

          • Massinissa

            Southern Italians have a lot of Moor blood (today inhabitants of North Africa).

          • Anonymous White

            Northern Italians are still racially distinct from Southern Italians. Most historical Italian geniuses were Northern Italian (Da Vinci, Vivaldi, etc).

            Those two great civilizations (Rome and Renaissance era Europe) were both started by Northern Italians, who are still bright today.

        • IstvanIN

          The Greeks spent a great deal of time under Ottoman rule and are no doubt genetically not the same as their great forebears. Australia should have stuck with British/Northern European immigrants, exept Irish Catholics. People who could easily assimilate to British-Australian culture.

          • saxonsun

            I’m half Greek. And you are telling me that I’m not white enough. You tell that to my relatives, most of who were fair.

          • IstvanIN

            No I am not. Indeed people of Hungarian decent are frequently excluded as being “not quite white”, but I am saying that there is a huge probability that many Greeks are not genetically the same as the Greeks of 2000 years ago. Being in close contact with another race inevitability leads to cross breeding, like it or not.

          • Antipodean WN

            I’m not telling you. I’m just presenting the genetic evidence produced by some of the foremost scientists in the field today. Greeks are closely related to Turks. Greeks are more closely related to Turks and Iranians than they are to Germans and Danes. Read the evidence and sources I provided. If you disagree, then say why you disagree.

            Your response, based purely on emotion, and not reason nor fact, is in fact typical of non-whites.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Asplund/1212542247 David Asplund

            Maybe if the English had of left the Irish Catholics to their own devices there would not be as hostility to them, to refresh your memory Irish monks kept alive learning and the written language after the fall of Rome and were a driving force in the re education of western Europe with many nobles sending their sons to Irish monarastries

          • IstvanIN

            Living in the past does no one any good. If you want to see English and Protestant society destroyed because of something that happened long before any of us was born, so be it. I prefer to live in the here and now. The fact that Australia took out pledging allegiance to the Queen from the citizenship oath has as much to do with Irish immigration a sit does with Southern European immigration. I have seen the damage Irish Catholic politicians, who usually side with Jewish and Black politicians, have done to the US, a country that has treated them pretty darn well, and had nothing to do with the English conquest of Ireland. And yes, I resent it.

          • Antipodean WN

            Sorry, I can’t agree with you about the Irish. Australia is an Anglo-Saxon-Celtic country, and the Irish have been there right from the beginning – Ned Kelly was Irish, and I myself have more Irish ancestry than anything else. Irish Australians were among the strongest proponents of White Australia. Labor leader Arthur Calwell was catholic and Irish and one of our greatest pro-white Australians.

            The mistake we made was opening up the country to lebs and other mediterraneans such as Greeks and Italians. These wogs bring a totally different cultural feel to Australia, and they show more loyalty to their home countries than to Australia.

            By opening the door to wogs, and considering them ‘white’, this led eventually to the complete abandonment of the great White Australia policy.

          • IstvanIN

            The argument shouldn’t revolve around “you”, but what is best in general. That being said I will defer to your expertise. It sounds as if you guys went from forging a “New Britain” in the Pacific to attempting a US in the Pacific, probably not a good idea. Immigration, among settler countries such as Australia, the US, Canada and New Zealand, should be limited to the most assimilable immigrants.

          • Antipodean WN

            Our identity is uniquely Anglo-Saxon-Celtic. Or it was, and that is the way it should have remained. By first allowing in semi-whites such as lebs, greeks and other wog types, this eventually opened the way for completely unambiguous non-white immigration.

          • IstvanIN

            I agree wholeheartedly.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            You do a great disservice to millions of white Americans by painting Irish Catholics with such a broad brush. As an American of Irish/German/Catholic extraction I too have observed with dismay the damages wrought by LibLeftist Irish. In some cases their collusion with the Bolshevik Culture Destroyer has been inexcusable. We should not however discount the millions of patriotic, race-realist Irish Americans who have more in common politically with Buchanan than Ted Kennedy.

          • Iron Helm

            That Irish monk thing is a whole lot of politically correct driven historical revisionism.

            Australia and America would have been great if the Irish had never got there too. America was at its greatest before the 1840s.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Asplund/1212542247 David Asplund

            Guess what? Ireland would have been a great place too if the English had never got there.

          • Iron Helm

            Hardly. They’d still be killing each other’s children as practical jokes and molesting their cattle.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Asplund/1212542247 David Asplund

            Arsehole.

          • Iron Helm

            Dear moderater:

            I’m sorry you felt the need to delete my post, but I’m sick of the historical inaccuracy about Ireland and England I see on these pages. My post was completely accurate.

        • Bossman

          These ancient Greeks could have been mixtures of Germans, Arabs, Egyptians, Persians, etc. In those far off times, anyone who spoke Greek was considered a Greek. Some mathematicians claim that Pythagoras was a Phoenician. Euclid was an Egyptian or a Jew. No one knows the true identity of Euclid. He operated from Alexandria Egypt.

          • David Ashton

            Could have been?

            See e.g. (1) Benjamin Isaac, “The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity” (2006), (2) Ronald H. Fritze, “Invented Knowledge” (2009), pp.221f, (3) H.F.K. Guenther, “Racial Elements of European History” (1927).

      • Spartacus

        I have no idea what you’re talking about. Greeks are white, Cavalli-Sforza’s test proves that, apart from Italy and Finland, all the rest of Europe is pretty much the same genetically. So Irishman, German, Romanian, Swede, Spaniard, Englishman, we’re all pretty much the same genetically. Greeks, like many other southern and eastern Europeans, are just more aggressive by nature. Remember, this part of the world has been historically the world’s greatest slaughterhouse, so it’s only natural people are more aggressive by nature.

        As for the Turks having genetic similarity, yes , that’s true, but you got the causality wrong – Asia Minor(Currently Turkey) has historically been inhabited by White people, mostly Greeks, Thracians and other smaller groups, who were then assimilated forcefully by the Turkish invaders, hence the genetic similarities.

        • Antipodean WN

          Well, as you admit the obvious, that Greeks overlap with Turks genetically, then are you going to consider Turks as white also?

          I’ve been to Greece —it is a third world cesspool. OK, some parts of Eastern Europe are also pretty run down – but they suffered the yoke of Jewish Bolshevism for decades. Greece has no such excuse –they were lavished with aid by the US after WWII, and the EU since, and still they turn their country into a toilet, with levels of corruption worse than even Turkey, and on a par with Mexico. Third world people = Third world country.

          Here in Australia they clearly dislike Anglos, and have their own radio stations, newspapers, and soccer teams. In 2006 the Socceroos played Greece in Melbourne. The Greek team was given a rapturous welcome at the airport – it was like a home game for the Greek team.

          • Spartacus

            You don’t get it – the Turks are a mongrel nation, and they have lots of white DNA, among asian and arabic and so forth. But the Greeks themselves are white. I don’t know why you’d think it’s a cesspool, it’s still a very civilized country, precisely because it’s such a white country.

            About Eastern Europe being run down – yes, most of it is, but there you can clearly see the differences between whites and the other races – I live in one of Bucuresti’s poorest neighborhoods, but it’s also on of the whitest as well. The result – In the nearly 6 years since I moved here, there hasn’t been a single murder, a single rape, not even a single mugging .

            And the same is similar for Greece – many parts of the country are dirt-poor, but you can still walk the streets at night with no fear, and you’re very unlikely to meet someone who can’t read and write, as opposed to Detroit, which has a higher GDP per capita than any place in Eastern Europe.

            The fact that they don’t like Anglos doesn’t make them non-white…

          • Antipodean WN

            Spartacus, I generally like what you write, and you seem like a good guy. However in this argument you are evading the facts and providing an argument clouded by subjectivity, emotion, and strawman attacking.

            Like I said before, Eastern Europe is behind Western Europe because of communism – Eastern Europeans by and large are white. No argument from me at all about this Similarly I trust your information on murder rates in Bucharest and Greece.

            And while Greece is an essentially non-violent country,that in itself does not provide it is non-white. For example its murder rate is still higher than that of most North African countries.

            And white countries ala Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia can also have very high murder rates.

            It is ridiculous to say that a population is white simply because it has a lower murder rate than Detroit, the city with the highest murder rate in all of the US.

            And then there are Asian countries, as well as white countries, that are just as safe as Greece, if not more so, but have not made a complete basket case of the economy. The Greeks had everything handed to them on a plate since WWII, and they have completely trashed it.

            And corruption levels in Greece are now worse than in many South American countries and Asian countries (including China) – that is saying something.

            To my mind a corruption free society is the one measure that separates white nations from non-white nations (more so than crime rates). Corruption free societies are almost exclusively North Western European and their derivatives in NZ, Australia, Canada, and the US.

          • Spartacus

            You do realize corruption is measured by perception, not by actual convictions ? Because if it were measured by actual facts, then top of the list would be the US, where there’s institutionalized corruption and cronyism from the top down, and the government openly breaks the law, with nobody getting convicted (See Fast’n Furious, the Snowden Scandal, Bloomberg and other mayors “cooking” the books to look like their cities have less crime, etc.)

            Also, keep in mind most white countries are full of corruption as well. Are you saying Russians aren’t white ? Or Pols ? Or Czechs ? Or Romanians ? Or Spaniards ? Because those countries are just as corrupt as Greece , if not more .

            As for the crime rate :

            “Official statistics show that immigrants are responsible for about half of the criminal activity in Greece.”

            From “Crime in Greece” on Wikipedia .

          • Bossman

            The Nazis didn’t think Russians and other Slavs were truly white. That is why Hitler attack Russia with such brutal violence.

          • Spartacus

            Actually they did, proof that they had a program to select babies with Aryan features from Poland and other Slavic countries, and take them to Germany. They would not have done this if they thought they were Untermenschen .

          • Bossman

            So they had to select babies with Aryan features? Well then it means that such babies were not so common.

          • Spartacus

            What they meant by Aryan features was blond hair/blue eyes .

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            If that is the case, then they were retards. Hitler wanted land, and to destroy the Communists. Saving some of the Aryan-looking Russians and Ukrainians seems to me to just be paying lip-service to the racial dogmatists in the Nazi party but (and I could be wrong), he was willing to trample anyone who was not German and got in his way.

          • saxonsun

            Why argue with these people? I’m half Greek. I know I’m white. Greeks are white and know it. These people don’t believe someone who isn’t Anglo-Saxon is white. You’re talking to morons who can’t see. And they’re dangerous because they divide the white race against itself. You are Greek, I presume. Don’t argue with those beneath you.

          • Spartacus

            Actually, I’m Romanian…

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            My wife is originally from Chisinau, ethnically Russian/Ukrainian. It appears to me whenever I visit Moldova, that most of the really white folks have moved on to the West, leaving the ethnically Romanian folks (by and large, a short, dark, mestizo-looking bunch) behind to make it in the poorest country in Europe. Then, there are the gypsies . . .

            There are tall, blond, attractive Romanians, and I would consider them white. But gypsies and other squat monsters, not so much.

          • Spartacus

            So anybody who’s not blond and blue-eyed is a gypsy or a mestizo ? Hooray for Nordicism…

            BTW, you should know that Basarabia(Republic of Moldova as it’s called today) is an ancient historical Romanian land, and most of the slavs there aren’t actually slavs but rusified Romanians. If you’re wife goes down her family tree a couple of generations, she’ll probably find she’s Romanian (or part Romanian).

          • Antipodean WN

            Spartacus —-I don’t know what you look like, but if you have the swarthy complexion typical of people from your part of the world, and I saw you in Oz, me and my mates would refer to you as a ‘wog’.

            To add some levity to the discussion, in Australia, we call soccer “wogball” (the most popular sports among the anglo-saxon-celtic population being the more manly games of rugby league and aussie rules).

          • Spartacus

            Actually, my skin is as pale as cheese . And even if it were olive-skinned as most Greeks and Italians – still wouldn’t make me non-white.

          • Antipodean WN

            Well sorry, just cause you say you are not non-white does not mean that aren’t. I submit to the clear genetic evidence.

            If you were really confident that you were white, you would not go round desperately trying to prove it. You would simply say “we wogs are white, and you anglos are non-whites”

            How come I never feel the need to prove my ‘whiteness’? If a wog such as yourself called me, or any other Anglo-Saxon-Celt, a non-white that would be patently absurd, and everyone would just laugh it off.

            But when I suggest that you may not be white, you get all desperate and write a thesis to try and prove me wrong.

            However, I’m willing to compromise. You are not a non-white. OK?

            You are a semi-white. Almost there. But not quite. Happy now?

          • Spartacus

            Nordicist moron…

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            Ah, Sparty, I knew I was going to get into trouble with that comment just as soon as I made it. I apologize for painting with too broad a brush, as that wasn’t my intent.

            I hope you’ll forgive me for that, as you are one of my favorite posters.

            Our neighbors are Romanians, very nice attractive people, somewhat swarthy, but certainly NOT squat monsters, though I do run into quite a few of those whenever I am Moldova.

            Yes, I am very familiar with the history of Moldova, and am a particular fan of Ștefan cel Mare (Stephen the Great) who fought off the Ottoman Empire so successfully.

            In parting, though, let me mention that my wife i ethnically Russian/Ukrainian, with no Romanian ancestors. As you can probably guess, her family was forcibly moved to Moldova by Stalin as part of his Russification efforts. As you also probably know, there is considerable animosity between many Romanian Moldovans and the ethnically Russian/Ukrainian folks there.

            Again, my friend, I truly apologize for giving the impression that I believe that all Romanians are no better that mestizos. I certainly do not.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            (Hope this isn’t a double post)

            Ah, Sparty, I knew I was going to get into trouble with that comment just as soon as I made it. I apologize for painting with too broad a brush, as that wasn’t my intent. I hope you’ll forgive me for that, as you are one of my favorite posters. I truly deserved the down arrow.

            I SHOULD have said, “MANY Romanians I have met IN MOLDOVA.” As you are probably well aware, most young, intelligent, and attractive Moldovans (Romanian AND Russian) left the country to work in the West, though far too many of the girls have found themselves in sexual slavery to muslim scum, or in bordellos in the EU.

            Our neighbors are Romanians, very nice attractive people, somewhat swarthy, but certainly NOT squat monsters, though I do run into quite a few of those whenever I am in Moldova.

            Yes, I am very familiar with the history of Moldova, and am a particular fan of Ștefan cel Mare (Stephen the Great) who fought off the Ottoman Empire so successfully.

            In parting, though, let me mention that my wife is ethnically Russian/Ukrainian, with no Romanian ancestors. As you can probably guess, her family was forcibly moved to Moldova by Stalin as part of his Russification efforts. As you also probably know, there is considerable animosity between many Romanian Moldovans and the ethnically Russian/Ukrainian folks there.

            Again, my friend, I truly apologize for giving the impression that I believe that all Romanians are no better that mestizos. I certainly do not.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            (Hope this isn’t a double post)

            Ah, Sparty, I knew I was going to get into trouble with that comment just as soon as I made it. I apologize for painting with too broad a brush, as that wasn’t my intent. I hope you’ll forgive me for that, as you are one of my favorite posters. I truly deserved the down arrow.

            I SHOULD have said, “MANY Romanians I have met IN MOLDOVA.” As you are probably well aware, most young, intelligent, and attractive Moldovans (Romanian AND Russian) left the country to work in the West, though far too many of the girls have found themselves in sexual slavery to muslim scum, or in bordellos in the EU. And I only mentioned blond hair as it is consider to normally be a white trait. Obviously white people have all colors of hair and variations of skin tone.

            Our neighbors are Romanians, very nice attractive people, somewhat swarthy, but certainly NOT squat monsters, though I do run into quite a few of those whenever I am in Moldova.

            Yes, I am very familiar with the history of Moldova, and am a particular fan of Ștefan cel Mare (Stephen the Great) who fought off the Ottoman Empire so successfully.

            In parting, though, let me mention that my wife is ethnically Russian/Ukrainian, with no Romanian ancestors. As you can probably guess, her family was forcibly moved to Moldova by Stalin as part of his Russification efforts. As you also probably know, there is considerable animosity between many Romanian Moldovans and the ethnically Russian/Ukrainian folks there.

            Again, my friend, I truly apologize for giving the impression that I believe that all Romanians are no better that mestizos. I certainly do not.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            (Hope this isn’t a double post)

            Ah, Sparty, I knew I was going to get into trouble with that comment just as soon as I made it. I apologize for painting with too broad a brush, as that wasn’t my intent. I hope you’ll forgive me for that, as you are one of my favorite posters. I truly deserved the down arrow.

            I SHOULD have said, “MANY Romanians I have met IN MOLDOVA.” As you are probably well aware, most young, intelligent, and attractive Moldovans (Romanian AND Russian) left the country to work in the West, though far too many of the girls have found themselves in sexual slavery to muslim scum, or in bordellos in the EU. And I only mentioned blond hair as it is consider to normally be a white trait. Obviously white people have all colors of hair and variations of skin tone.

            Our neighbors are Romanians, very nice attractive people, somewhat swarthy, but certainly NOT squat monsters, though I do run into quite a few of those whenever I am in Moldova.

            Yes, I am very familiar with the history of Moldova, and am a particular fan of Ștefan cel Mare (Stephen the Great) who fought off the Ottoman Empire so successfully.

            In parting, though, let me mention that my wife is ethnically Russian/Ukrainian, with no Romanian ancestors. As you can probably guess, her family was forcibly moved to Moldova by Stalin as part of his Russification efforts. As you also probably know, there is considerable animosity between many Romanian Moldovans and the ethnically Russian/Ukrainian folks there.

            Again, my friend, I truly apologize for giving the impression that I believe that all Romanians are no better that mestizos. I certainly do not.

          • Ella

            Most Americans have not been to Greece or Italy. I think much immigration of Italians in some Northern USA States were Sicilian and tend to be darker group overall -more olive skin-tone with black wavy hair. Greeks and Italians are White to me but there is always a few swarthy types due to historic invasions or trading- even a rarity may look Turkish/Moorish. Most Greeks and Italian are average, medium complexion. People are judging by the extreme.

          • saxonsun

            Greeks have a right to a strong expression of their cultural heritage. They’re Greek.

  • YourMOMA

    Being racially aware is a way of life in most U.S. cities. White flight is a result of black crime and black run government. Just Google “Top 25 Most Dangerous Neighborhoods in America” and you’ll see that whites don’t live in black neighborhoods. Blacks don’t make good neighbors and their children don’t make good students. For every 1 intelligent black, there’s 1000 Trayvons running around the streets.

    • watling

      I’m sure the same applies here in the UK. I would not knowingly move to a neighbourhood where I would be a minority but another factor to consider is the proportion of blacks.

      A neighbourhood that is 70% white, 20% non-Muslim Indian, 5% Chinese and 5% Turkish, for example, would be infinitely preferable to one that is 85% white, 15% black.

      As it is, my neighbourhood is something like 96% white, 3% Indian and 1% others. Hardly any blacks at all. That’s because the high cost of housing here keeps them out. We don’t really have a black middle class in the UK capable of moving en masse to expensive areas so, as long as you have a little money, you can avoid them.

      I gather that in the US affirmative action programs have given public sector jobs to blacks who are then able to ascend to middle class status and therefore live in more expensive (i.e. white) areas. We don’t have that happening here. We have no affluent black neighbourhoods.

      • Antipodean WN

        Watling: I would prefer a 100% white neighbourhood.

        Those Chinese and Indian kids will take the university places in prestige occupations like medicine and engineering from your kids —those same universities established and developed by white folk.

        A non-white is a non-white.

  • http://radicalamericancentrist.blogspot.com/ PLUTOCRATS FEAR POPULISM

    what about the english defense league demonstration just a couple weeks ago in britain? That was a blatantly pro-white gathering that had 1000s of whites there. The same thing could not happen here in america because the GOP (which amren supports) helps the corporations squelch pro-white politics.

    Amren, vdare, taki et al all keep the white political power from growing by associating pro-white politics with the anti-white GOP.

  • YourMOMA

    “I’m going to fundamentally change Italy”

    This woman is from one of the poorest nation’s in Africa and she wants to fundamentally change Italy and that will change Europe as we know it. Mass migration of illegal Africans will not stop, it will only intensify the problem Europe is experiencing with immigrants that have no skills and no desire to be valuable citizens. When these Italian born Africans start running around with their EU passports, committing crimes and destroying Europe as we know maybe Europeans will start paying attention to what’s going on around them. The only way to fight “racism” in Italy is to send Africans back to Africa together with Cécile Kyenge and she can start fighting racism from her home-base.

    • IstvanIN

      Remaking Italy in the image of the Congo would be a step up!

    • Romulus

      There is ANOTHER way!!

    • George

      Time to (re)read Camp of the Saints, Guest.

  • Fredrik_H

    There’s an ocean between you and those guys, but there’s 600 million latinos south of the border who can simply jump the fence.

    Islam and muslims is mainly a european problem, because in Europe they can easily travel the continent by land. They’ll go to Turkey and from there they pay a smuggler to take them into the EU, from there on it is smooth sailing. To get to the US, you have to fly. To fly you need documents and cash.

  • Fredrik_H

    Europe is our ancestral lands. That’s one of the problems with the US, there will always be the “but the injuns!!!”-problematique. Europe is ours by birthright. That’s undeniable and we have a moral right to remove any non-europeans from our countries if we so please.

    • IstvanIN

      With all due respect I rebute that argument by pointing out that we built the United States, primarily those of British and Northern European desent. The British did not colonize an existing civilization in the manner the Spanairds did in Latin America. There was no nation or empire, so to speak, in North America.

      • Romulus

        That’s exactly right about America.

      • DerekaGrandon

        I agree that “…we built the United States, primarily those of British and Northern European descent.”

        But, to call the aborigines of Central and South America “…an existing civilization.” because they built several pyramids where they performed human sacrifices on a grand scale it’s a generous claim and attribute that we unwittingly repeat. I think it was bestowed upon savages probably influenced by the babblings of Rousseau’s screed, Discourses, hence the mythical Noble Savage.

        There were aborigines in the three Americas before the White man came and they had diverse skills and accomplishments but all were uncivilized. I never accepted the term ‘civilization’ for savages devoid of a written history in a written language and written laws.

    • Romulus

      According to one of the stories on Fridays list, Europe is our because of at least 100,000 yrs of evolutionary biology and anthropology.

      • DudeWheresMyCountry?

        North America and Australia are ours too. What about the hapless inguns and aborigines?

        • Romulus

          What about them? Are you suggesting that I feel sympathy for them? Don’t believe some clever revisionist history or some Kevin costner movie about the injuns. The noble savage horse sh*t doesn’t work on me. I feel more for the buffalo than the redskins. The killing of those animals was indeed a tragedy.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            No, I am agreeing with you. The “poor Indian” garbage narrative is something I always make sure to topple whenever it comes up.

            I call them “people of the dirt” and if you ever go to a reservation you will understand why. They are incapable of accumulating anything other than dirt; even with endless money, technology and sympathy from the “round eyes”.

            I lived in Phoenix for two years and got to know several Navajo Indians, or “Dine” (Di-nay) as they call themselves and not only are they not particularly smart, they proudly point out that they are their own “nation” but also that the US owes them forever.

            If you press them about the state of their nation they will humbly admit that it is just open land with a few dilapidated buildings that stopped being maintained the day the White guys who built them finished and left.

          • Romulus

            Oh, i misunderstood your comment. My apologies.

          • Greg Thomas

            They are no different than any other minority who belives the White man owes them.

    • newscomments70

      If the U.S. were still a real country, we could have invaded modern Sweden (and similar), send their foreigners home, and install a pro-Swedish government. Their arrogant, pro-Muslim liberals would be prosecuted for treason. That would have been a war worth fighting, instead of our endless battles in the Middle East.

  • pcmustgo

    Easy answer, BECAUSE THERE IS NO DENYING EUROPE BELONGS TO EUROPEANS, while it’s easy to say America is based on “diversity” and immigration and once belonged to Native Americans… Americans have much more reason to have white guilt than Europeans… although they shouldn’t, but yeah.

    • Antipodean WN

      You only have guilt if you think you have to be the good guy.

      Why does one have to be the good guy? Its all comes down to by right of conquest.

      I don’t believe that whites are the ‘good’ guys of history, whatever that means. I don’t care. I only care that our kind survives and flourishes. That is certainly the way most whites thought up until just prior to WWII.

      • pcmustgo

        You only have guilt until you experience racial animus over and over and over and over again from non-whites. And over again. You only have guilt until you experience the races (many whites never do) and realize, hey, most __________ are really like that. Nothing wrong with admitting it. In fact, there’s something wrong with lying about what most blacks or asians are like. And being honest about “what they’re really like” isn’t hating them per se. It’s not wanting to have to deal with their hatred towards you.

  • pcmustgo

    Also, idk, some Europeans I meet seem strongly anti-immigrant, while some are the most clueless white liberal socialist types on earth. I feel they can go either way, but are mostly a bunch of white liberals. Then again, I mostly know young ones. Russians aren’t PC…

  • Romulus

    It seems as if he just wrote a compilation piece of the vast wealth of knowledge and opinion found here on amren. What was obvious by it’s omission was who now runs Amerika on both sides. How the great nations of Europe and America we’re fighting global fratricide at the behest of a small minority. Articles such as this ,almost always just scratch the surface. The smaller the nation ,the easier it is to see an invasion. The more plugged into an artificial electronic medium, the easier it is to stupefy the masses.

    There are would be agitators that would like nothing more than to rid the world of the Anglo-saxons. I am not one of them. All have the right to exist.
    The idiots in the above photos have been socially conditioned to hate their very ancestral bloodlines, if of course of northern European stock. The rest just plain hate. Somehow their righteous hate is justified and tolerated by organizations created to respect all. The vast majority of Americans will not ever “get it”, until there marched off to the slaughterhouses (( nursing facilities for old folks, murder, rape, miscegenation for the young)

  • Michael Ervin

    It takes more than 2 generations for immigrants to assimilate ,providing they start when they get here and not have everything handed to them on a platter through entitlements, there is no incentive if they don’t work and contribute and at least learn the language. There is a parable of sorts in the Christian bible about the tower of Babel and the confounding of languages to make its building fall apart,Also the story of a culture or civilization built on an iron and clay feet platform would never be compatible and crumble ,not that I’m religious but it seems that like the Bible, which I believe to be a recorded history of the day 2 thousand plus years ago, that it was tried then and didn’t work and it was tried many times throughout the ancient history of the planet with disasterous results for more than one empire from outside influence or attempted assimilation of different cultures to the point of killing each other off back and forth for all time.Well it seems that the US has confounded our languages so that a key aspect of business( communication)is getting harder every day and the mixing of iron and clay(incompatible cultures and uneducated mongrel peoples) will finish off or destroy our country the rest of the way. The proper way of Immigration is to find potential immigrants who wish to be part of us not form their own civilization within and consume our host country and unleash a hell of sorts on the American public through higher crime rates and lowering the bar on living conditions with an “everything goes” mentality

  • Antipodean WN

    Mr Contessini calls the movements ‘pro-white’. Yet few have any problem with that ethnic group that is masterminding the destruction of our people. So I don’t consider them ‘pro-white’ at all. For example, Geert Wilders is anything but pro-white, he lavishes praise on a particular mid-East country and considers them a full part of Western civilization. That is not pro-white.

    • watling

      I don’t buy into that theory about that particular group. That particular middle eastern country is the west’s first line of defence against Islam and, as such, I would agree with Wilders. I don’t see how you can call him anti-white, though.

      I haven’t visited that particular country but I would expect the standard of living there to be the equal of any western country, and to be in stark contrast to the surrounding Muslim dust-bowl countries, whose leaders find the continuing existence of that particular country a real pain in their behinds. Good. Long may that be the case.

      • Antipodean WN

        Watling — anyone who minimizes Jewish supremacism is no friend of ours, and in fact is an enemy who supports our genocide.

        Even Mr Taylor more or less agrees, saying that the aggregate impact of Jews on Western society is decidedly negative, but that he avoids the issue not so much because he disagrees with the existence of a real Jewish problem, but to improve Amren’s marketability. I see this as completely wrongheaded.

      • Antipodean WN

        The moderator deleted my original comment. It seems that when the JQ is touched upon here, the post disappears as quickly as a post on racial differences in IQ would disappear from a MSNBC blog.

        • RisingReich

          Yup. Usually anyway.

      • Antipodean WN

        Anyone who purposefully covers up, or facilitates, or supports the Jewish tribalism that dominates America, is an enemy of our people. The Jewish power over us is the ultimate source of our genocide.

        Any Jew or any Gentile, no matter what he preaches on any individual subject, is an enemy of our people if he defends the Jewish tribalists, and Jewish organizations that control so much of our society. He is an enemy if he minimizes it.

  • Antipodean WN

    I also disagree with the article. Particularly from seeing just the sheer amount of black and Arab men with white women in countries such as France – and no one seems to give it a second thought. Even Asian men date French women (virtually non-existent in Australia). At least in many parts of Australia, such couples would still be made to feel uncomfortable, and perhaps even more so in parts of the US. There is also a huge industry of German men with Thai wives. Again no one there gives it a second thought.

    The idea that Europeans are more pro-white than Anglo Saxons is simply baloney. Anti-Islam is not the same as pro-white. There is more to it than that.

  • http://radicalamericancentrist.blogspot.com/ PLUTOCRATS FEAR POPULISM

    the column above is mostly nonsense.

    One reason america white politics is never going to be up to the standard of european white politics is because the american white political movement is crippled by its association with the GOP and its anti-worker, pro-corporation stance.

  • Scott894398

    My personal theory on this is that the Brits’ raison d’etre since 1783 has been to destroy America. The irony now is that Britain itself is being destroyed. Our advantage here is we have land–lots of it. The Brits don’t. How sad for them.

    • saxonsun

      Ridiculous. It was America that deliberately and blatantly helped to destroy the British Empire–study up on Roosevelt and his henchmen.

    • Iron Helm

      Irish are you? It would explain the direction of your dishonesty.

      America has continued to receive huge numbers of British migrants, more than Irish migrants in every decade except the 1840s who have blended in without the self pity of other groups.

      Many histories refer to close Anglo-American friendships at many times in the 19th and 20th century, and British governments offered much help to the Americans.

      The British policy of appeasement was first used in relation to aggressive American overtures because the British didn’t want to disturb American progress.

  • IstvanIN

    How can a person have any hope if they don’t believe in something above them? No wonder they live for today with no tought towards the future.

  • IstvanIN

    Many of my forebears were farmers as well.

  • saxonsun

    Richard Burton described Italy as a nation of cowards. He was correct, even if they had two great civilizations–Rome and the Renaissance.

    • Romulus

      The Romans we’re anything but cowards! The Italians had their ass handed to them if you recall last century. The commie trash tried to stage a take over and the ultra nationalists tried to reclaim a new pax romana. Geuss who made certain that was never to be?! Yup, you guessed it!! The good ‘ol US of A. Pop quiz!! Guess who has destroyed every nation they’ve ever gone to!!!

    • Sick of it

      Rommel thought the Italians were terrible with navies, armor, their air force, etc. but always praised the bravery of Italian infantrymen. They had been a brave people for many centuries and I’m not even pro-Italian/Roman.

  • Romulus

    The catholic church is looking to them not just because the “usual deceivers” have destroyed christianity amongst our people, but for the 10% Let’s not BS each other here. Let’s not forget the protestant reformation wherein the former Anglo/ nordic pagans rejected catholicism in favor of their own version. At Americas founding up till the great catholic wave, America had about 15 different sects of Yeshua worship.

    • Sick of it

      The Protestant Reformation could also, mostly, be correlated to ancestral culture. In Northern Europe, we had an ancient culture of freedom…of our people being treated as free men. Of nearly unimpeded trade. One could trace America’s freedom from the old Nordic system to the Magna Carta and Common Law to the Constitution.

  • ShermanTMcCoy

    Catholicism and mainstream Protestant religions are indeed finished in Western Europe. It looks quite a bit different in the East, where Orthodoxy, Catholicism, and missions-sourced Evangelicism are doing much better. I attend either a Russian Orthodox liturgy, or worship with a fundamentalist congregation, but either is at least an hour’s drive.

    It encourages me to see Putin (whether because he has embraced his ancestral religion, or because of political expedience) governing like a Russian Orthodox adherent.

  • http://radicalamericancentrist.blogspot.com/ PLUTOCRATS FEAR POPULISM

    this is just more pro-GOP, pro-constitution propaganda. Whites have been subjugated because of the constitution. Governmental structure is what matters, not written words. Written words are interpreted by the elite, whereas governmental structure cannot be.

    The european whites have more power because their governments in europe are parliamentarian democracies. American whites have less power because we have republican pseudo-democracy where the constitution is interpreted by elites who never had a real job in their lives.

    Quit deleting my posts.

    • Anonymous White

      In the name of Europe, no one delete this post.

  • KenelmDigby

    Just because of the Reagan/Thatcher political victories in the 1980s, some silly journo types tried to label Friedmanite economics as being ‘Anglo-Saxon’. Unfortunately, this label has stuck and a meme has been born.
    As a matter of fact, the USA hasn’t been run by ‘Anglo-Saxons’ for a damn long time. (Reagan is, of course, an Irish name).
    As for the UK, the UK was the home and birthplace of parliamentary socialism and the modern welfare state. Socialist parties throughout the World modelled themselves on the Labour Party which has, since the 1920s, been one of the two ruling political parties in Britain.
    I wish all serious and deep thinkers and writers wuld cease and desist from using that lazy journalistic conceit of labelling a brand of economics as ‘Anglo-Saxon’ – it is a sheer meaningless nonsense making as much sense as calling a a brand of jurisprudence as ‘Celtic’. It’s the sort of stupid little conceit the second-rate fools who write for ‘The Economist’ magazine do. Good enough for those tossers and their journalese and sloganning, (in place of serious analysis), but not good enough for an Amren article.

  • Sick of it

    They’re preparing to bring more Sicilians into Italy. Nothing to worry about.

  • ShermanTMcCoy

    Quadruple Post

    Disqus has got some major bugs . . .

  • Bardon Kaldian

    It boils down to difference between ancient Greek and Romans. In sum- it’s ethnic vs. civic nationalism. Blood & soil vs. citizenship. Results ? Greeks still exist (although transformed by history and religion); Romans- not. The latter dissolved into Italians, French, Spaniards, Romanians, …

  • Bardon Kaldian

    The English, as a people, have been shaped by Norman invasion 1066. Everything else (Celts, Romans, Saxons,..) is something like “national prehistory”.

  • 1proactive2

    Going against even so called “conservative” media will bring the latter’s forces to bear against anyone who suggests saving white culture from extinction.

    The author of the article is correct when he writes that Whites end up moving to areas where they are safe. I moved to an area that is very safe, and very White. Some native Americans, or as they choose to be called, “Indians”, live nearby on their reservations, and they cause no problems at all.

    It appears White people are resigned to talk softly about their fears of being overrun by races who have no interest in peaceful assimilation, who commit crime wholesale, and who choose to live off the productive. The voices will one day have to rise up, and make themselves heard. If not, it will be our end.

  • Antipodean WN

    Anyone who purposefully covers up, or facilitates, or supports the Jewish tribalism that dominates America, is an enemy of our people. The Jewish power over us is the ultimate source of our genocide.

    Any Jew or any Gentile, no matter what he preaches on any individual subject, is an enemy of our people if he defends the Jewish tribalists, and Jewish organizations that control so much of our society. He is an enemy if he minimizes it.

    Where do YOU stand. Are you pro-white or anti-white? Wilders is an anti-white, mongrel, who colludes with those who wish to destroy us.

  • zanegray

    The ‘Blood and Soil’ concept means a lot in continental Europe.

    It’s obvious that the EU leadership don’t know how the hell to deal with it.

    Interesting times lie ahead.

  • Greg Thomas

    Illegal invading mexicans are not immigrants. They do not have the minset of an immigrant, but one of an invader, here to pilage and take what ever they can get their hands on. They have zero respect for our laws or people. They have a entitlement mentality, are arrogant, as well as militant. We have plenty to be fearful of, especially since our government is willing to aid and abet this invasion.

  • David Ashton

    What them as well as the Democrats, the “Arab Spring”, Global Drugs Legalization, &c, &c, &c?

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    My understanding of the US election system is that a small 5% party would be unlikely to get any political representation at all

    It’s rare that American political parties not in the duopoly even get 5%, precisely because voting for that party is fruitless. The reason that the 5% parties in Europe get even 5% is because of proportional representation systems of one sort or another that means that those votes aren’t wasted and affect the composition of the legislature or board for which the election is held.

    Basically, the old parties in Europe have adopted two radically different strategies to deal with nationalist parties.

    Circling the wagons and cooption. I didn’t even read what you wrote after that to know. There is another strategy, especially in England: Staged phony arrests of the leaders or activists of smaller parties to drum up bad publicity, then magically all the charges are dropped after election day.

  • WR_the_realist

    If the priest’s only hope for Christianity is African people, then he’s basically admitting that only a people with an average IQ of 70 can accept the claims of Christianity. I sure hope for the sake of Christianity that he is wrong.

  • dd121

    When I visited Hagia Sophia you see graffiti carved into the stone railings by the Vikings. They came via Russia and the inland waterways.