Notes for Revolutionaries

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, February 21, 2014

Sunrise
Why the regime must fall.

James Kalb, Against Inclusiveness: How the Diversity Regime is Flattening America and the West and What to Do About It, Angelico Press, 2013, 203 pp., $19.95 (soft cover).

Against Inclusiveness, by independent scholar James Kalb, is one of the most quietly subversive books to be published in many years. It is perhaps most remarkable for what it takes for granted: Of course race, nation, family, sex, erotic orientation, and religion are fundamental aspects of human identity, and of course healthy people discriminate. The “inclusivist” orthodoxy of our times, which commands us to pretend these things do not matter, is therefore inhuman and tyrannical.

AgainstInclusiveness

I have spent 25 years patiently establishing the factual and moral bases for discrimination and can only admire the serenity with which Mr. Kalb dispenses with justifications. In this book, he accepts the natural order, dissects the horrors that result from denying it, and speculates on how the current madness will end. Against Inclusiveness is rich in insights and arresting formulations.

Mr. Kalb is Catholic, and this colors his views. His arguments therefore leave room for religion, but they almost never require it, so this book can be read profitably by anyone.

The natural order

Until very recently what is called “sexism,” “homophobia,” or “racism” was simple common sense. Our rulers invented these words as a way to force us to ignore essential distinctions. Mr. Kalb explains why this is wrong:

Sex roles, ethnicity, religious distinctions, and the like are less oppressive than liberating. They free us from formlessness and enable us to live with other people in a definite and functional manner that is, as much as possible, in accordance with our innate and acquired characteristics.

Left to themselves, people associate with those who suit them best. Mr. Kalb calls discrimination of this kind “clearly rational,” arguing that government interference in our choices is always oppressive. If there were no laws against discrimination, people who want to work or live together would find each other, and everyone would be happier.

Gummies

Mr. Kalb points out that traditional identities are not usually based on exclusion but on appreciation for traits we like or that we share with others. Discrimination is not “fear” and “hatred” as the regime so loves to claim. If you prefer Chinese to Italian food, it is unlikely that you fear or hate lasagna.

Often, respect for boundaries is mutual, and often the best solution for people or groups that do not get along is to avoid each other. The most vocal advocates of inclusion do this all the time. In his book The Big Sort, Bill Bishop wrote about a professor at UT, Austin who could not understand how George W. Bush could have been elected, since he didn’t know a single person who had voted for him.

It may happen that you are excluded by a group you would like to join, but that is the natural consequence of free choice that you, yourself, have and should be happy others have. If one group won’t have you, another probably will.

Mr. Kalb is frank about where this leads: “To criticize inclusiveness means favoring exclusion.” Nor does he say that exclusion can never be abusive; some people will be hurt by it. But the inclusivist solution—which could be called “multiculturalism,” “tolerance,” or “human rights;” they all mean the same thing—forbids the most basic, natural arrangements that enrich our lives. As Mr. Kalb points out, we cannot escape danger by destroying what makes life meaningful.

RacialOrgs

The inclusivist crusade even leads to policies that ignore the fact that we are men and women:

Military experience can count in employment decisions and the like, but not the experience of being raised a man rather than a woman, or even the consequences of hundreds of millions of years of sexual dimorphism.

Sex differences and sex roles are fundamental to human life, and society pays a heavy price when we are forced to blur or ignore them:

[R]elations between the sexes will lose form and functionality, people will not reproduce, children will be brought up badly, and men and women will be perpetually at odds with each other.

Evil consequences

The inclusivist regime does not forbid all discriminations; only the most basic ones. It permits and even encourages enormous differences in power and privilege, so long as they are based on “wealth, bureaucratic position, political outlook, and formal certification.”

WalkingBy

But why destroy the age-old and inevitable discriminations? Mr. Kalb writes that the regime wants to fit all people into the appropriate slots in its vast machinery of production, consumption, and governance. The only permitted distinctions are therefore those that arise from commerce or bureaucracy, and each of us is allowed an antiseptically functional identity stripped of organic or spiritual loyalties. Our roles may be those of accountant or bureaucrat or even millionaire, but we must never act publicly as a white man or a heterosexual or a Baptist.

In Mr. Kalb’s view, inclusiveness tries to turn us into “components distinguished only by reference to the demands of the machine and otherwise treated as interchangeable:”

Such a conception is destructive, since human life is not mechanical. We conduct it through relationships that operate in a variety of ways corresponding to the diversity of human needs, functions, and concerns. Such relationships are not easily rationalized and they always involve inequalities, since organization involves inclusion, exclusion, and hierarchy.

But the goal of inclusiveness is not just to make us all pliant cogs in the machine. As Mr. Kalb himself notes, the regime takes savage pleasure in crushing dissent. The moral thrill our rulers get from “fighting bigotry” is surely more important to them than the possible efficiencies of running a society of robots rather than people. The regime’s highest psychic reward is self righteousness.

The trouble is that the forms of exclusion and hierarchy the regime forbids are founded on real differences; there are reasons why “marginal” groups are marginal. Once the regime has decided that differences don’t matter—or are “social constructs”—it denies reality:

Any flaws in the groups promoted from the margin to the center are whitewashed, the more glaring the flaws, the thicker the coating. AIDS has sanctified homosexuality, Muslim terrorism has made Islamophobia a horrendous sin, and black dysfunction has led to the insistence on the hipness and nobility of blacks, the stupidity and tackiness of ordinary whites, and the sterility and oppressiveness of white society.

Terrorism

When reality conflicts with ideology, ideology wins. If high standards exclude blacks or women, they cease to be standards and instead become acts of oppression. Education means “closing the gaps,” because all groups are equal.

Mr. Kalb reminds us of how Army Chief of Staff George Casey reacted to Nidal Malik Hassan’s Fort Hood massacre: “As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” The Army investigation of the shooting never even mentioned that Hassan was a Muslim. As Mr. Kalb notes, “Stupidity is thus a necessary consequence of taking their fundamental commitments seriously,” because:

Thought depends on recognizing and applying patterns. Relating individual cases to patterns means discrimination and prejudice, so inclusiveness requires suppression of the habits of mind that make thought possible.

Avoiding stereotypes–refusing to recognize patterns–means deliberately ignoring similarities and differences that are basic to human life, and this becomes “a recipe for cynicism, hypocrisy, irrationality, and fanaticism.” Ironically, sensitivity training is supposed to make us “culturally sensitive,” and therefore involves recognizing stereotypes. However, these stereotypes always require accommodation by the majority rather than by minorities.

Inclusiveness exacerbates the problems it is trying to solve by forcing incompatible people together. At the same time, it eliminates common, unifying myths and traditions, because these things are usually particular to a culture or ethnicity. As Mr. Kalb notes:

No culture or religion can matter more than any other, so none can matter at all. . . . A truly diverse, inclusive, multicultural, and multi-faith society would have too few common habits, loyalties, and understandings to function except under mixed impulses of anarchy and tyranny.

Flag

The nation pays a price for this breakdown:

The post-1960s moral order, of which inclusiveness is a natural expression, has turned millions of people into criminals, drug addicts, crime victims, divorced and unwed mothers, abused and neglected children, homosexuals dead of AIDS, boys without fathers, and girls abused by their mothers’ boyfriends. Should such people, those still alive, at any rate, be grateful for it?

War on Human Nature

As Mr. Kalb points out, the inclusivist enterprise “tries to control everything for the sake of goals that are at odds with human nature.” Americans naturally resisted calls to blind themselves to meaningful differences so they had to be coerced. Outlawing segregation and discrimination did not produce equality, so the regime imposed busing and racial preferences. These did not work either, and since our rulers refuse to accept the most starkly obvious facts about group differences, we are now several decades into a perpetual hunt for all forms of the “hidden bigotry” that causes different outcomes. This is war not only on biology but on normal behavior: “There are always new fronts on which to prosecute a battle that can never be won against an evil that is intrinsic to social life.”

Once a society accepts inclusiveness, it means control even of our thoughts. There must be special training for everything, because whatever comes naturally is abhorrent. The result is a totalitarian system Robespierre would have recognized.

ThoughtPolice

Those who refuse to have their humanity beaten out of them are stupid, malicious, or mentally disturbed—and can be reviled with impunity. Avoiding hurt or offense is one of inclusion’s goals, but only for marginal groups. Inclusivists have their own official negative stereotypes: white people, gun owners, Southerners, Republicans, rural whites, fundamentalist Christians, Sarah Palin supporters, etc. Hating them is an essential exercise in self-righteousness. Mr. Kalb calls it “the pleasure of licensed abuse of dissenters in a world grown terminally sensitive, caring, and dull.”

As Mr. Kalb explains, since our rulers see deviations from inclusiveness as the cause of all that is wrong with society, “the attempt to identify evil with some one principle, so that it can be extirpated, leads to an uncomprehending extremism that itself becomes a principle of evil.” Inclusiveness demands total submission.

The search for bigotry stretches into the past. Every person who lived before the reign of inclusiveness was a brute, so our elites can safely look down on everyone who is dead. Aside from formerly “marginalized” groups that are now America’s special pets, history has nothing for us to admire; only gradations of benightedness. As Mr. Kalb notes, “The conviction of our ruling class that they are by far the most intelligent and enlightened people who ever lived is itself a sign of stupidity, or at least of ignorance and narcissism.”

Maintaining orthodoxy requires a huge effort of suppression. Mr. Kalb writes that the popularity of The Bell Curve seems to have been the signal to force race and genetics underground, and constant indoctrination has the desired effect:

The more intelligent and highly educated people are today, the more they believe what they are supposed to believe. The less intelligent absorb less of what they are told and retain more of their original way of thinking, but they are inarticulate and increasingly nonfunctional, so they pose no threat to the regime so long as they are disarmed.

Still not common knowledge.

Still not common knowledge.

Even smart people begin to ignore the evidence of their senses, and ordinary people who happen to blurt out something obviously true find themselves shamed and vilified. People therefore hold their tongues, but that is no solution. As Mr. Kalb points out, “topics that are prudent for each of us to avoid individually may be disastrous to avoid as a society.”

Religion

Inclusiveness behaves like a state religion, but pretends to be something else. Our rulers think of themselves as supremely rational, but they are not capable of rational disagreement:

If you reject it [their view] you are “extremist” or “divisive.” They use these terms instead of “heretical” or “schismatic,” but they mean the same thing, the upshot being that you have to be shut up.

Inclusiveness claims to be tolerant but brooks no opposition. For that reason, anything that calls itself a religion had better accommodate itself to inclusiveness, which functions as a state religion because anyone who seeks public office must be a believer.

Inclusiveness has quasi-spiritual goals for the nation as a whole: “A world without outsiders and without borders, one in which there is no ‘they,’ but only ‘we.’ . . . The goal of our national existence becomes self-transcendence through self-abolition.”

Liturgical music for the Church of Inclusiveness.

Liturgical music for the Church of Inclusiveness.

Almost all Protestants have aligned themselves with the regime, and have turned their Christianity into a kind of mystical liberalism. Catholics have not yet been completely denatured; they still refuse to ordain women or fawn over homosexuals.

Liberals love to make the Apostle Paul sound like an early inclusivist by quoting Galatians 3:28:

There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free; there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Mr. Kalb explains that Paul was expressing the unity of Christianity by pointing out that it transcends even the most fundamental and enduring human differences. As Mr. Kalb notes:

One could also say that in Christ Jesus there is neither professor nor janitor, neither Supreme Court justice nor used car salesman. That would not mean that these distinctions are illegitimate, only that they are not ultimate . . . .

Mr. Kalb also points out that in the Bible charity begins at home; certainly not in South Sudan. He quotes Thomas Aquinas:

Man is debtor chiefly to his parents and his country, after God. . . . The worship due to our parents includes the worship given to all our kindred, since our kinsfolk are those who descend from the same parents . . . .

The Second Vatican Council noted that “rightful differences exist between men,” and the Catholic catechism states: “Society ensures social justice when it provides the conditions that allow associations or individuals to obtain what is their due, according to their nature and vocation.”

This helps explain why the regime is so suspicious of the Catholic Church and insults it at every opportunity.

The state

Some of the distinctive traits of the inclusivist state are its belief in the infallibility of experts, its contempt for ordinary people, and its love of “education” and “training.” Professional managers run everything, while citizens get the sop of an occasional vote to keep up the façade of legitimacy. As Mr. Kalb notes, “The result is a supposedly democratic regime in which the views of most actual people on basic issues like immigration, affirmative action, and the place of religion in public life are excluded as illegitimate and irrelevant.” The people’s opinion on the death penalty, “gay” marriage, and government handouts don’t matter either.

Mr. Kalb summarizes our “democracy:”

Those who rule try to make their lives easier by accommodating popular concerns, but their guiding principle is less the will of the people than staying in power and running things in accordance with their own interests and understandings, which mostly have to do with turning society into an efficient machine with themselves on top. . . . Representative institutions . . . become a way of registering the public’s approval of decisions arrived at in other ways.

A constituent shares his feelings on immigration with Sen. John McCain.

A frustrated constituent at a town hall meeting with Sen. John McCain.

Government expands its powers by weakening every competitor. It denounces most traditional communities as forms of oppression and exclusion, and once they are destroyed the state is the only focus of group identity. No community can include everyone, so the quest for inclusiveness becomes the enemy of community.

Public-spiritedness requires deeply shared common values, but when the state is the only community, there are no such values. Public life becomes sterile, people stop volunteering, and citizens refuse to vote. Even liberals such as Robert Putnam of Harvard now realize that public spirit thrives in coherent, homogeneous societies. As common values disappear, public life becomes dominated by ambition, greed, and manipulation.

At the same time, experts and managers think they know what is good for us, and try to regulate our lives. Laws run to hundreds of pages and regulations to thousands, but as Mr. Kalb points out: “Life is too complex for experts to master, the result being that, when they run the world, they end up deciding issues arbitrarily or avoiding them altogether.”

Mr. Kalb summarizes the principles of the inclusivist state:

Freedom means comprehensive control of human relations, so we do not oppress each other.

Equality means rule by irresponsible and unrepresentative elites who keep us equal by keeping us powerless.

Reason means submission of mind and will to the authority of experts.

Diversity and inclusiveness mean distinctions cannot be allowed to matter, so they have to be neutered or destroyed.

Tolerance means demonization of those attached to nonliberal principles as bigots and fundamentalists.

The result is the “soft, smothering tyranny” under which we now live.

How will it end?

Mr. Kalb is confident that although inclusiveness is powerfully entrenched now, no system so at odds with human nature can survive. But how will it fall and how can we help bring it down? He notes that inhuman systems sometimes collapse into the very opposite of what they claimed to be: “Russian socialism ended in the reign of lawless greed, and Western multiculturalism will very likely end in a radically divided society shot through with hatred and violence.”

Muzzies

In the short term, the regime will probably permit more and more deviations from its rules: home schooling, private schools, religious communities, and ethnic enclaves—at least for non-whites. Self-segregation violates its principles, but as Mr. Kalb notes, “ideology often averts its gaze from what is actually happening.” Just as small-scale private enterprise made life tolerable under the Soviets, organic ties based on exclusion help society function, so these will be quietly left alone. Mr. Kalb makes the following prediction:

It is likely, then, that the current regime will become less effective and consistent, while maintaining its official ideology. It will very likely tend towards a pattern common in ethnically diverse parts of the Third World: a radically divided society with little public life and a government that combines democratic and inclusive rhetoric with tyranny, weakness, corruption, nepotism, and crony capitalism. Liberal inclusiveness would reign officially, but below the surface the real life of the society would be carried on through kinship, ethnic, religious, and criminal networks.

In other words, although we are supposed to be bringing America to the Middle East, America is becoming the Middle East, where there is no public trust, and government is everyone’s enemy. At least Arabs have a fanatical religion to hold them together; we do not even have that.

In the mean time, dissidents must understand that “the liberal system is knit together so closely that questioning one part undermines all the others.” It aims to govern all aspect of our lives, so it is impossible to reject just one part of it. Mr. Kalb notes that our rulers are right to suspect anyone who is skeptical of “gay rights,” for example, of being “racist” and “sexist;” by all rights, he should be. This means piecemeal opposition cannot succeed. “Conservatives” who implicitly accept inclusiveness and equality cannot hope to fight only those aspects of it they find most odious. Unless they reject the entire system they are defeated from the outset.

Not a winning strategy.

Not a winning strategy.

As Mr. Kalb explains, “To oppose inclusiveness, therefore, requires a view of how the world works that is wholly at odds with current assumptions,” adding, “Our goal is to present, in every possible setting, views that are better and more adequate than liberalism in terms others can understand:”

Opposing inclusiveness is not bigotry. Rather, it is support for what is normal and human, and we should be confident that the need for a normally functioning society can eventually be made evident to men of good will generally.

In stating his case, Mr. Kalb notes that “provocation is sometimes useful, but it is usually better to find common ground and to show that what we propose is implicit in what others already believe.” This is especially useful advice when approaching “conservatives.” Anyone who despises even part of the system already has a foot in our camp.

The regime could crumble more quickly than any of us think because “basic issues cannot be suppressed forever and can reassert themselves very quickly when the wind changes.” For the time being, Mr. Kalb urges the creation of small communities, in which normal human relations can thrive. He suspects these communities will be tied together by religion.

Science

If there is anything to criticize in this book, it would be Mr. Kalb’s view of science. He accuses the regime of “scientism,” or the attempt to explain beauty and meaning in rational terms, but I do not believe even the most blinkered bureaucrats think science plumbs all mysteries.

Science is an enemy of the regime. Our rulers don’t yet seem to know it, but the John Watson/B. F. Skinner view of infinite human malleability has been completely discredited. (One of Skinner’s statements could be the regime’s motto: “We must delegate control of the population as a whole to specialists.”)

Almost every day, there are new discoveries that prove there is such a thing as human nature, and that there is no such thing as equality. Although no one should expect science to answer teleological questions, science is helping destroy inclusivist ideology. But this is a small quibble over a book that is as illuminating as it is far reaching.

Near the end of Against Inclusiveness, Mr. Kalb writes that “those who see the current order as destructive need to clarify their own goals,” but says his own prescriptions “will have to await another occasion.” I certainly look forward to that occasion.

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • AndrewInterrupted

    Mr. Kalb is confident that although inclusiveness is powerfully entrenched now, no system so at odds with human nature can survive.

    After seeing the dystopian nightmare that America has become, that torch has been lit in places like Switzerland and Norway. Let’s hope that fire burns bright and conflagrates.

  • William Allingham

    good luck that i found this article before any comments, anyway i agree with everything but i couldn’t refrain myself from saying that, COME ON! we all know 9-11 was perpetrated by the government, its not my crazy imagination, only in cartoons would a building collapse like that without controlled explosions. it all has the mark of apple juice

    • jackryanvb

      This comment violates Amren’s comment guidelines prohibiting wild, crazy, conspiracy theories.

      Arab Muslims let in to our country on student visas high jacked our airplanes, murdered the pilots and crashed the planes in to the World Trade Center murdering ~3,000 people including 300 White FDNY Fireman.

      That was a bad thing, very bad.

      A healthy White society controls immigration to keep out nasty Muslim terrorists, rapists, HIV + savages.

      Switzerland, Israel, now Australia understand basic, common sense immigration restrictions to keep out Islamic terrorists or just, nasty, ugly hateful Muslims from Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan all these “stan” countries.

      All healthy, SANE White people resist the Muslim immigration invasions of our nations. why? because we don’t want to be SLAVES to Muslim Turks or have our daughters sexually groomed by Pakistani rapists.

      OK, so I’m telling you in no uncertain terms to sop posting these 9-11-01 Conspiracy kook stuff and stop making excuses for nasty Muslims murdering our people.

      The Arab Muslim Moors’s 700 year occupation of Spain wasn’t a false flag operation.

      Shut up.

    • jackryanvb

      Also, your Hitler Icon is not appropriate for American Renaissance. We’re mainstream, educated White Americans – we do not parade around in Nazi Uniforms.

      Clean up your act, or better yet take this act somewhere else.

  • pcmustgo

    I used to not discriminate. It left with me a lifetime of negative experiences and now memories. I now discriminate to protect my own fragile mental health and psychological well being. I want to limit my interaction with people who view me as a racial enemy.

    • Geo1metric

      Sorry about your negative experiences, but understand that we ALL have negative experiences in life. The important thing is that you have obviously learned from your experiences. You have overcome, and you can live a prosperous life from now on. Celebrate!

    • Nancy Thomas

      I had the very same revelation from exposure to diversity. I don’t “hate” anybody, but my trust level is much lower now and I’m wary.

  • 1stworlder

    The problem with statist science is data they don’t like gets ignored/hidden/altered. They even believe their own lies, 2 global warming research ships stuck in summer ice since Al “Jazeera” Gore last said the poles would be meleted by 2013 anyone?

  • Geo1metric

    This book sounds like an affirmation of common sense. Some of us have known all along that Mother Nature prevails in the long run. The ultimate outcome is the Natural Order of things.

    Excellent review, as usual, Mr. Taylor.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      It is–and as usual. But, I’m trying to buy the book without J. Bozo from Amazon getting a dime out of it. That guy has his tentacles into everything. Even Angelica Press is linked to the Bozo man.

    • https://politicallogical.wordpress.com/ WideBridge

      “Mother Nature prevails in the long run.”
      That’s what the global warming alarmists also tell us. It shows how hard it is to know the truth. Nevertheless, the human psyche is probably far more complex than the physical nature of the planet, and the group human psyche may be equally or more complex than the individual’s. However, our conscious knowledge of this complexity of the psyche is currently almost nil.

      What is certain, is that today’s prevalent social ideology has intruded a “million” times more virulently and totally, and with attempted absoluteness, into all group human psyche than human activity has intruded into the planet’s physical life.
      And you think the Fukushima meltdown is problematic.

      • Geo1metric

        In other words, the truth will out.

        I didn’t mention Fukushima. And I’m not a global warming alarmist; far from it.

  • Garrett Brown

    That flag looks hideous.

    • Mike Lane

      I would argue that a truly diverse world is one that respects the homogeneity of all nations. the modern “Multicult” is the very antithesis to diversity. If anything, Amren is one of the most pro-diversity sites I know of.

      • Nancy Thomas

        Good point. Multicult is anti-white and anti-Christian, a cauldron of hateful bigotry. The idea that the Rainbow Coalition loves us and wants to include us is laughable.

      • Guy Forget

        Well said Mike, I also believe a TRULY DIVERSE WORLD is one that RESPECTS the homogeneity of all nations, races, colors. I don’t like this forceful “push” that these inclusivists are oppressing us with. Forcefully promoting multiculturalism and almost seemingly making those who are not multicultural somehow backwards, narrow-minded, unsophisticated, unmodern, unprogressive, discriminatory xenophobic people. Branding those who don’t fully embrace this “project” of multiculturalism as bad people is just wrong. The irony behind their whole DIVERSITY campaign is that once ethnicities and cultures intermix, become blurred, fuse into non-distinctive characteristic/cultural traits, and just sort of form into this formless, cultureless, blob of melting pot onenness, we actually LOSE diversity. It’s much easier for the people of the world to be controlled and governed if they do not have distinctions. If they are all just the same bits and pieces of the the whole, then it’s much easier to rule over them economically, and systematically. Our current diversity and distinction of ethnicities, cultures, histories, is actually what makes interdependence and integration a good thing right now, but if all of this becomes assimilated, what beauty will be left behind other than that we will all be the same (no distinctions, no cultures, just the same physical appearances, the same culture, the same rulers and government to control us). Have people not see Star Trek and what the “BORG” philosophy can lead to? We must value our distinctions and diversities, not promote the destruction of it via miscegenation.

        • Mike Lane

          I love the Borg reference. Every time I watch First Contact I can’t help but see the eerie similarities (though Next Generation was a socialist show)

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    1. One could make the case that Catholics have turned themselves over to the regime in more crucial ways than Protestants. The current Pope and most American Catholic leadership are for amnesty and open borders, a majority of low Protestants in the pews are solidly against it.

    I consider matters of race, ethnicity, culture, tribe and peoplehood to be more crucial to us and crucial to our enemies than the questions of women priests and homosexuality. I’d rather have a church have women preachers and be pro-gay and be ethnonationalist than a church like the Catholic church that is ethnouniversalist but against women priests and in opposition to homosexuality.

    2. My favorite response to Christian universalists and critics of Christianity who trot out the “neither Jew nor Greek” line is to trot out the “give unto Caesar” line and the Tower of Babel parable.

    3. Karl Marx once called civil rights “a revolution in permanence.” This is why you have to oppose all the -isms and -phobias. That and the leftist coalition is only held together by KKKrazy Glue, because they have so many differences with each other.

    4. I could interpret that sign as a reason to reject Martin Luther King’s “dream,” even though the sign’s creator probably and foolishly believes that Barack Obama is somehow a deviation from King’s dream. Even though it’s a fulfillment of that dream.

    5. I think the small communities that the author thinks we need to form until the regime fall down go boom are just as likely to be bound by something other as they are religion.

    6. The author’s view of scientism is based on a definition of “science” that is really a veneer of respect for science that the regime has. They cherry pick science that they support, whine about the “anti-science” attitudes of those that doubt their cherry picked (pseudo) science, then turn around and reject science that their religion-cult of equality rebukes. Example: In order to be a modern evolutionist, you have to think that evolution always has, does and always will apply to all living organisms, except for human brains which mysteriously stopped evolving 50-100 kya.

    • WR_the_realist

      I think you’ll find that the majority of Catholics in the pews are against illegal alien amnesty too. So the situation with Protestants and Catholics is much more the same than different . Christianity has always been a universalist religion, in that Christians believe that all people should find salvation through Jesus Christ. But until the past 50 years or so no Christian thought that meant there were no important distinctions between men and women, heterosexuals and homosexuals, blacks and whites, Irish and Italians, etc.

      I can believe that we should avoid causing unnecessary pain or misery to other sentient beings without believing that there are no important distinctions between cows and people.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        Can’t remember where I saw the poll, or the news about the poll, but white Catholics were only slightly less opposed to amnesty and open borders than white evangelical low Protestants. Both groups were more opposed than in support.

      • jeffaral

        How can “Catholics in the pews” be against amnesty if these Catholics themselves are mostly illegals??!! Catholicism is basically a non-White also anti-White religion.

    • Erasmus

      Although most of the American Catholic leadership is for amnesty, most of the people sitting in the pews are not. If amnesty passes, I know many Catholics who’ll vote with their wallets and say “Ta-ta!” Let the diversity pay for the upkeep of the parish.

      • tlk244182

        Instead of supporting Cardinal Dolan’s annual appeal (for $ support of the Archdiocese of Greater New York,) I sent the money to Stormfront. I estimate that more than half of Catholic clergy are homosexuals who are actually trying to destroy the Church from within. I like my priest, but every time I accidentally pick up the Spanish missal, I like him a little less. I forgive him because he’s young. When I was his age, I was even more naive than he.

    • Kathy M

      I agree with you and against the author on the issue of Protestants. While it is true that there are some wacked out offshoots within Protestantism, public opinion polls continue to show that mainstream Protestants are among the most traditionally conservative groups in the country.

      • TheAntidote

        Episcopalian? Presbyterian? Lutheran? United Church of Christ? Sorry ma’am, I just don’t see any conservatism there; I see multikultui; I see social gospel; I see outreach; I see feminazim and faggotry.

        • dmxinc

          The denominations are a minority of the Protestant religion.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      In fact the Galatians passage inherently affirms the division of Jew and Greek as real. If it weren’t, why would Paul be using it as an example to showcase the power Christ’s work?

  • dd121

    “Inclusiveness claims to be tolerant but brooks no opposition.” You can test this hypothesis by going to any liberal web site that has Discus and post something with which the editors disagree. Not “abusive” just disagreeing. Set your stopwatch and see how long it takes before your comment is deleted.

    • Jerrybear

      I used to comment on that rag Huffpost because I enjoyed outraging liberals. They’ve clamped down so hardcore on the comment section that you can no longer comment unless you sync it an authorized Facebook account where they require your name and phone number. Screw that.

      • dd121

        CNN now has Discus. I’d encourage you to continue posting. Your post may not stay up long but even at 15 or 20 minutes it will be seen by a lot of people. It does slowly start to influence some.

        • LACountyRedneck

          Well said. Our comments are contagious and plant a seed. Keep spreading the word.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I guess that’s the upside to a heavily trafficked site full of one-liners, but probably the only upside. You can’t post pictures at those sites either.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        You should try saying anything sounding like it came from an American on the various PBS blogs. You know that PBS, the one we taxpayers pay for? Yeah, that one. If you look at Moyers various blogs they’re all Liberal potpourri and puppy’s breath. It’s sickening. I tried criticizing that hit piece Moyers did on NC politics. My comments didn’t survive.

      • LHathaway

        I gave you a positive vote. .but to be honest. . some of these conservative comments that appear sound so inhuman I’m glad sometimes they delete them.

        Look at what they’ve made us become. . . ! And they certainly have.

  • jackryanvb

    “There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free; there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

    St. Paul , the former Jewish Pharisee high priest Saul of Tarsus is pushing some extremely deceitful nonsense here – of course there are differences between Grreks and Jews, men and women. Could anyone honestly argue that there are no differences between Israel Jews and various Arabs in this same area now?

    St. Paul /Pharisee Saul of Tarsus might best be thought of as the first “Neo Conservative” , who supposedly “saw the light” on the Road to Damascus, he supposedly left the bad side, came over to our side, whereupon he takes it upon himself to takeover our side and preaches race denying nonsense.

    Yeah St. Paul might as well be writing for the Weekly Standards, National Review, demanding open borders immigration to the USA (not Israel) from the editorial page of the a Wall Street Journal, and this is all somehow “Christian”, “Conservative” good for Greeks, good for Whites, good for….

    The entire world!

    Too bad the Romans didn’t throw this guy to the lions sooner than they did.

  • jackryanvb

    And that John Lennon quote from “imagine” is as horrible as anything St. Paul /Pharisee Saul, of Karl Marx ever said.

    Yeah, like we’re supposed to imagine that there are no countries and North Korea and South Korea, Haiti and Somalia are “one” with us.

    Fortunately John Lennon got away from this Communist BS by the last 1970s, he admitted that he knew nothing about world politics and decided to just make bread and take care of his son.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      It makes me wonder how serious Lennon ever was with those stupid lyrics. I bet he just penned and sung a song just to make a boat load of money off of leftist Marxist egalitarian dopes.

      Meanwhile, Yoko Ono and Phil Spector co-produced that song’s recording along with Lennon. To this day, Yoko Ono is still in court with Capitol Records over her late husband’s royalties, and Spector never exactly was hurting for money to pay a bill, that is, until he generated some legal expenses of his own. Strange behavior for people supposedly not concerned about possessions.

      • Jerrybear

        It would be funny if that was his intention with ‘imagine’. It’s not even a particularly good song. I think he was so drugged up at the time that he probably believed that nonsense.

      • Sick of it

        He was hopped up on drugs, so don’t think too much about it. He certainly didn’t.

      • Oil Can Harry

        Lennon was indeed serious about “Imagine” because in the early ’70s he was flirting with Marxism and the radical left.

        Around the time he died in 1980 he had become more conservative and expressed some embarassment over his previous leftwing activism.

        • David Ashton

          If so, he has some resemblance to so many other leftists who make a major fortunate from doing damage and then a minor fortune from regretting (though not undoing) it. Marxism-Lennonism, “Red Bohemia” lives on in endless guises from Seeger to Cyrus.

      • Geo1metric

        Isn’t Spector the guy who blew the brains out of some c-rated “actress” who was dumb enough to go home with him?

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Yeah, but Yoko is just fighting to get out of the multi-millionaire club and into baby Zuckerbird’s neighborhood.

        A lot of the bizarre songs were reactions to the Cold War and the Vietnam experience. Bob Dylan had a couple odd ones, too.

    • Alexandra1973

      The first time I heard that song was this past New Year’s Eve, was watching the celebration in Times Square.

      I listened to it closely. Yep, a pro-NWO song.

      I was also wondering who the heck the butch was in Times Square–was it a masculine-looking woman or an effeminate guy? That’s when I found out what Melissa Etheridge looks like!

    • newscomments70

      “he admitted that he knew nothing about world politics and decided to just make bread and take care of his son.” Yeah, he cared for one son, and abandonded the other (the white one).

    • DaveMed

      Much to the shock of almost all my acquaintances, I’ve never been into the rock-and-roll world, and I don’t enjoy the Beatles’ music. My tastes have always run more toward the classical music genre.

      Seeing that quote from Lennon makes me very glad that I’ve avoided his trash.

    • Brian

      I don’t think it’s bad to dream like that; who wouldn’t want a utopian brotherhood of man living in peace and prosperity? But we cannot be naive about the limits of human nature– we are stuck between the ape and the angel…so I’d like to keep some distance from Haiti, thank you very much! ‘Utopia’ literally means ‘nowhere’. If we can carve out a better existence for our own kin, tribe, and neighborhood, I’ll be satisfied.

  • Spartacus

    “Mr. Kalb reminds us of how Army Chief of Staff George Casey reacted to
    Nidal Malik Hassan’s Fort Hood massacre: “As horrific as this tragedy
    was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” ”

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yeah, talk about jumping through Cultural Marxist
      hoops for your diversity cookie..!

  • David Ashton

    Often “antisexist” rubbish crops up in the British press – for example, a ministerial request that toyshops should not make gender distinctions because we need more female engineers in 20 years time – I frequently write in just to say that males and females are units of human reproduction, not simply or primarily units of industrial production. Not one such letter has ever been published.

  • Erasmus

    Mr. Kalb is confident that although inclusiveness is powerfully entrenched now, no system so at odds with human nature can survive.

    This is why socialist societies ultimately fail. But the truly sad part is that innocent people suffer when the adolescent dreams of our “elites,” cobbled together as undergraduates over warm beer and bad pizza, collapse.

    Trying to bring heaven down to earth usually succeeds only in bringing hell up.

  • jeffaral

    Anyone like Mr Kalb who espouses a universalistic, messianic middle eastern religion is definitely not on our side. “Catholic medieval theology is the grandmother of Bolshevism (Oswad Spengler, The Hour of Decision). If we want to survive, both Marxism and Christianity must go.

  • Kathy M

    I look forward to reading this book.

    “To criticize inclusiveness means favoring exclusion.” Nor does he say that exclusion can never be abusive; some people will be hurt by it.

    Of course that is true but look how many are hurt by inclusion. Exclusion can often be a matter of life and death.

    • HamletsGhost

      Actually, exclusion is ALWAYS a matter of life and death. The only reason you or anyone else is alive today is because your body rejects all foreign microbes that try to invade it. Your white blood cells are the stormtroopers that ruthlessly devour any bacteria that enter your bloodstream from the odd cut. If the body wasn’t so intolerant, it would simply melt into a formless blob of protoplasm, a banquet for all and sundry to feast upon.

  • Lt_Greyman_NVA

    Wonderful. What a shock to see White Nationalism and wanting to be around your own kind expressed as normal. I hope this guy is careful. Latest from Farrakhan is that he wants blacks to “up” their game in the “Knock Out Game”. He wants blacks to instead slice the faces of Whites to humble them. In effect, he wants blacks to Count Coup.

    Moderator, I want to buy the book so Amren gets a slice (a little white humor there).

    • http://www.amren.com/ Moderator

      Okay, I’ll give you a raise in your allowance.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        No, seriously. I’m cutting the cord with Amazone. They mistreat right-wing writers. I honestly want to buy this book without seeing ‘powered by Amazone’ while I’m doing it. Even Angelica Press is hogtied to that outfit. Where can I go to make sure J. Bozo doesn’t get a cent?

        • HamletsGhost

          Don’t worry so much about putting a few coins into Bozo’s pockets. Amazon is a largely profitless company with a puffed up market cap. Just use it as a mostly free book exchange to propagate works until it implodes.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            My problem with them is how they have their tentacles into everything, not whether they made two cents a share or three cents a share.

            They are showing a bias against right leaning authors by not cleaning up the spammer reviews over there. Agents are creating phony cut&paste reviews–outwardly admitting in some cases that they neither bought or READ the book. And J. Bozo ignores the complaints because it’s his Marxist buddies doing the spamming.

            Books they don’t like also suddenly become “unavailable”. Which must put some people to sleep, but if you know how the new publishing machinery works, you would know that they have a ‘print on demand’ capacity. Meaning no book in that category is ever “unavailable’ unless someone makes the conscious decision to make it unavailable. That is called censorship.

            Bozo has his own little ‘Digital Kristallnacht’ system in operation.

          • https://politicallogical.wordpress.com/ WideBridge

            Thanks for the valuable info.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      By the way, you excerpted (I think) some dialogue of a post-America/Chinese coup. Was that your material or from a book? Or is it rough copy for a book? It had a nice creepy feel to it.

      • Lt_Greyman_NVA

        Naw, I wrote it. I am working on a couple of short stories based on the Northwest American Republic Universe as found in the Convington Novels.(“Freedom’s Sons” and “The Brigade”). Fun stuff. It’s my therapy while I watch this wonderful Country implode. Before the depression I was a Commercial Real Estate Agent.

        Glad you liked it. :o)

  • JohnEngelman

    The trouble is that the forms of exclusion and hierarchy the regime forbids are founded on real differences; there are reasons why “marginal” groups are marginal. Once the regime has decided that differences don’t matter—or are “social constructs”—it denies reality:

    Any flaws in the groups promoted from the margin to the center are whitewashed, the more glaring the flaws, the thicker the coating. AIDS has sanctified homosexuality, Muslim terrorism has made Islamophobia a horrendous sin, and black dysfunction has led to the insistence on the hipness and nobility of blacks.

    - Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, February 21, 2014

    Yes of course. But, what about Jews and Orientals? Shouldn’t they be admired for their superior average intelligence? Don’t they deserve the prosperity it earns them? Shouldn’t they be welcome in the United States?

    • Alexandra1973

      No. They can use their intelligence for *their* nations.

      • JohnEngelman

        The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for giving to Mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection, should demean themselves as good citizens.

        May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.

        - George Washington

        • Martel

          And from this you infer Washington wanted the USA to become flooded with Asians?

          • JohnEngelman

            Asians and Jews are not flooding the U.S.A. Orientals and Jews are dominating the best universities and the best corporations. They are not doing that because of affirmative action, but by superior merit.

          • Martel

            More so because of parents who are so different from you, bound to traditions, loyal to the interests of their people and therefore they produce children who do not puff away their talents. Obviously, their loyalty is with their own people on a geopolitical level too,exemplified by the 80/20 initiative and numerous Asian student associations all across the United States.

            From the sudden spike in New York Asians alone, I can see they are flooding the US. Does even the slightest loyalty towards non-whites require dishonesty?

            It seems so.

          • IstvanIN

            Or clever manipulation.

          • JohnEngelman

            The employers of Jews and Orientals don’t think so.

          • Martel

            They clearly are flooding the USA. Flushing,NY is a prime example. I doubt the superior merit, their parents are not infected with the idea that they should first serve others before guaranteeing the future of their own children. You have also voted to protect affirmative action and “Multicultural Education”in which whites are made to feel like the odd one out, harming the prospects of whites.

          • JohnEngelman

            The Democratic Party I like is the one that existed from 1933 to 1963. The Republican Party I like has not really existed since the presidency of Teddy Roosevelt.

          • David Ashton

            Teddy was a “racist”.

            I quite liked the England and America between 1945 and 1960, but what you and I want or like is of no concern to the millions from Asia, Africa and “Latin” America who would like to live in our formerly “Anglo” countries.

          • LHathaway

            Teddy Roosevelt was a racist? That’s crazy. It’s only true in the sense that he cared about whites, and their futures, something that is off limits these days?

          • David Ashton

            You may appreciate the sanity, nuance and significance of the quotation marks I put around the word “racist” by reading Thomas G. Dyer, “Theodore Roosevelt and the Idea of Race”, (1992) and J. W. Jamieson, “Theodore Roosevelt on Race, Riots, Immigration and Crime” (2011). Or just put “Theodore Roosevelt’s Racial Opinions” in the Google Search engine (sorry, Spartacus) and look up the first two dozen entries.

          • David Ashton

            I have replied to this but Disqus swallowed it. Please look up my name on the Disqus archive and find it there, if I cannot get it to pop up again here.

          • LHathaway

            Probably true. . but there is anti-white male propaganda inside all these learning institutions from K – doctorate. Stop this hateful propaganda and eliminate all ‘affirmative action’ and then see how well whites do? It’s only fair to allow them to live up to their full potential, unharried and unhindered, and unharnessed, whatever that potential may be?

          • Nancy Thomas

            Haha. Whites have a zillion more high IQ people, just by sheer numbers. Reread The Bell Curve. Non-whites are insanely over- represented at the elite schools, while whites are insanely underrepresented. It’s not about “merit” sir.

          • Jotun Hunter

            then let them have their superior merit in their own countries – you will find the asians (excepting the Japanese) idea of ‘flourishing’ quite different from ours. Jews, I’m less sure about, but overall don’t think much good will come of them, they are too concerned about money.

          • JohnEngelman

            American white Gentiles are among the most money conscious in the world.

          • Geo1metric

            Can you point to the Wikipedia article that substantiates that assertion?

          • Geo1metric

            You have said many times that you never post anything on this site that you do not have proof for.

            Well, where is the proof for the above statement I again ask?

        • David Ashton

          “UNDER” protection so long as those already in the land “merit” as “good citizens” the good will of others.

          Some other quotes:
          1. “God has chosen you to be a special people…ABOVE all others on the earth” (Deut. 7.6).

          2. “Emma Lazarus was not so sure about the huddled masses of Jews from Russia….another place, not America, should be found for that unappealing ‘mass of semi-Orientals, Kabbalists, and Hassidim’” (Lindemann, “Esau’s Tears”, p.377).

          3. “The Jews have produced a large number of the leading combatants against [anti-black] racism. It is no accident that Franz Boas, probably the man who did more than any other to lay the ghost of racism in scientific disciplines, was a Jew” (Gossett, “Race: The History of an Idea in America”, pp.449-50).

          4. “Our Founding Fathers were not men who shared the stock, the language, the culture, mentality or identity of Confucius, Empress Cixi, Mao Tse-tung or Vincent Wu” (private letter from a WASP in the Catskills where the “New Beijing” is being planned).

          Even you could profit from the on-line article, “Jews, Communism and Espionage” by Alex Joffe, “Jewish Ideas Daily”, June 29, 2011, and the “political autism” of several comments.

          • JohnEngelman

            Why should one particular tribe at the time of Moses, living in the same environment as other nomadic and agricultural peoples of the Middle East, have already evolved elevated intelligence when the others did not?

            At this point, I take sanctuary in my remaining hypothesis, uniquely parsimonious and happily irrefutable. The Jews are God’s chosen people.

            - Charles Murray, from “Jewish Genius”

          • David Ashton

            Maybe some initial culling helped (e.g. Exodus 32.27), but cleverness itself is not a moral quality (e.g. Isaiah 1.4) and, if it aggravates misbehaviour, has its downsides (e.g. Jeremiah 29.18) including significant consequences (e.g. Amos 8.12).

          • JohnEngelman

            I think Jews are God’s chosen people too. That is one of the reasons I love them.

          • David Ashton

            So each and every one of them must be distinguished on that singular account from all their fellow-citizens in the USA as “one class” from the others, irrespective of their behaviour as individuals or as groups, even those among them who are anti-religious? Is that what George Washington had in mind? Is that what even “Saint John” or Saint Paul had in mind?

            As you all know, I am not a “racial” anti-Semite, as you are apparently a “racial” philo-Semite, for no-one can help how they are born, but I doubt if “loveability” would have been the foremost characteristic that Gentiles have accorded the Jews, whenever or wherever they have resided, with the notable exception perhaps of some modern comedians and movie stars.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am a Christian Zionist. I have read the Bible from cover to cover including the Apocrypha in several different English translations. I see Jesus and his followers as Jews in a Jewish setting.

          • David Ashton

            You’ve told us that before, several times. What is your answer to my first question?

            Given your Washington quote, what is your opinion of the Bible in its different translations, or even the original Greek, at John 7.39-44 and I Thessalonians 1.14-16? What is your answer to this question?

            Are you aware that Israeli politicians, because of the convenient commitment of Christian Zionists to Israel, have played down the attribution of The Holocaust by Jewish writers to the New Testament account of the crucifixion? What is your answer to this question?

          • Martel

            This sounds incredibly creepy.

          • Jotun Hunter

            as far as I understand it those were the sephardic jews who do not betray the elevated intelligence of the whiter-looking ashkanazi who are originally ethnically khazars. Jews are great at commerce and pulling strings in business but not great adventurers, inventors, and make terrible artists.

          • JohnEngelman

            Shephardic Jews have higher IQ averages than the Gentiles they live with. Jews excel in every field that requires high intelligence and creativity.

          • Jotun Hunter

            then why are the jews under-respresented on the list of top 100 mathematicians of all time? surely there can be no greater evidence of true genius? The people that went to the moon were all wasps and ex-nazis. I don’t think you find many jews in engineering and exploration. Why is it you have this incredible homo-sexual erection for them?

          • Geo1metric

            Indeed. They are known the world over as great builders of civilizations.

          • JohnEngelman

            They have certainly contributed to American civilization. They dominate every field that requires superior intelligence. They earn their wealth, power, and prestige.

    • Sick of it

      Superior average intelligence? Average is mediocre. Above average is mediocre. This world has been ruled by mediocre men for far too many years now. Look at what they’ve done.

      • JohnEngelman

        What I meant was that their average intelligence is above average for the country.

        • Geo1metric

          “…for the country.” I assume you mean he U.S. in which case if the numbers for latinos/hispanics/blacks were removed, the “average” for the U.S. would be significantly higher.

        • Nancy Thomas

          Yes, some Jewish people have high intelligence, although the Sephardics tend to have lower IQ scores. Koreans are right up there by the way. But like I said before, the NUMBER of white geniuses faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar outstrip the number of Jewish geniuses. Whites are being kept out of the elite schools due to simple reverse discrimination.

          • JohnEngelman

            That sounds like blacks blaming their poverty on white racism.

            During the first half of the twentieth century elite universities had quotas to limit the number of Jews in the student body.

          • Nancy Thomas

            And we should return to that system of quotas, because as I mentioned before (and it can’t be refuted) there are legions more high IQ whites than Jews, and clearly Jews are displacing whites in the elite schools. Take a look at Ron Unz work. You rant about “white supremacism” when we’re actually talking about Jewish supremacism. I think the cat is out of the bag John, at least here on this site people have some awareness of what is really going on.

          • JohnEngelman

            Excuse me. Quotas kept Jews out of Ivy League universities who were better qualified than white Gentiles who got in. I am opposed to quotas. I am opposed to affirmative action.

          • Nancy Thomas

            I think the situation has reversed now. I’m aware of the systems used in the past. There can be no doubt (as I read the recent work on the topic) that whites are getting the shaft, and I don’t think that historical grudges justify the current discrimination against whites. Seems to me that every single group has a gripe against the white people living today who did nothing to harm anybody, yet are persecuted at every turn and expected to PAY for historical grievances, most of which are imaginary.

          • ThomasER916

            The truth will be deleted. Welcome to Amren.

    • IstvanIN

      The descendents of the people who founded the country, largely British but with a minority of Dutch, Germans and Swedes, and even a case could be made for the descendents of slaves, should not have to be subsumed by a tide of Jews and Asians. To each nation his own country. Jews in Israel, Chinese in China.

      • JohnEngelman

        Intelligent people in the United States. The United States is not based on white supremacy, but competition.

        • Geo1metric

          “white supremacy” is not the issue. White separatism is.

          • JohnEngelman

            If you want to move to a neighborhood where everyone or nearly everyone is a white Gentile you ought to be able to find one. With a little luck you can find an neighborhood with no out of the closet homosexuals.

            Secession and a white ethno state are idle fantasies, like the classless society Marxists used to dream of, back in the day when there were Marxists. .

          • Geo1metric

            I have found one and I love being surrounded by my kith and kin. When I want to have some diversity, which is rare, I travel.

            As one who has worked and lived around the world, my diversity bank is pretty well full. That work/travel has confirmed for me that “my people” are just that.

          • Geo1metric

            “Secession and a white ethno state are idle fantasies,…”

            That statement reminds me of the Army-Air Force general who, learning of the German-invented jet engine, declared that “the jet engine would never be commercially viable”.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            False analogy. There have been many secession movements throughout history, many of them successful. There has never, ever been a classless society.

          • HamletsGhost

            The United States was a pro-white ethnostate until 1965. It was no fantasy.

          • IstvanIN

            The government is actively destroying white neighborhoods through forced integration. Here in NJ the state regime has decreed that all new housing developments have “low income” housing mixed in with the market houses. Previously the low income housing was separate sections from the market rate properties. Towns could pay other communities to take their share of low income housing, they are trying to do away with that. They are trying to use housing assistance to place “disadvantaged families”, aka black and hispanic, into good towns and neighborhoods. Both Republicans and Democrats want this. We are running out of places to run.

          • LHathaway

            The government doesn’t need to ‘act’ to destroy white neighborhoods. ‘Blacks’ in particular would rather ‘integrate’ a poor white neighborhood than move into even a middle income ‘white’ neighborhood. There are no ‘poor white neighborhoods’. The same can’t be said for blacks, hispanics, asians. Hell, there are ethnocentric or exclusive neighborhoods in this country for people like Somalis or Thais, who manage to travel 3,000 miles across the entire globe into this equal melting pot and somehow end up in the exact same neighborhood. Coincidence tho and not ethnocentrism or hatred. . . Certainly not something to stamp out or be ashamed of as ‘white neighborhoods’ who must end this shameful segregation – let alone comment on – other than being proud.

          • Jotun Hunter

            it’s true, it’s quite possible the entirety of the U.S. is lost, thanks to fantasists and liberal peter puffers like you.

          • JohnEngelman

            The U.S. of white male supremacy that you desire is lost. Good riddance.

          • Jotun Hunter

            good riddance? to the group that you (supposedly) belong and whom are responsible for every aspect of the country and its foundation, establishment, laws, precepts, outlook, religion, inventions, etc? And why indeed would that be ‘good ridance?’ In your view it would have been better founded by chinese, who would have made something even more spectacular with their SAT scores, something utterly unlike….china? You don’t even know my full affiliations, what type of government I would advocate, as I have only hinted at them , and not poured my heart out like you.

          • JohnEngelman

            You want white male Gentiles to be discriminated in favor of. I am opposed to racial discrimination, affirmative action, and quotas.

          • Geo1metric

            If you indeed oppose racial discrimination, why would you say “good riddance” to White male “supremacy”? White male supremacy actually never existed. It is imagination in a fevered liberal mind.

            But you know full well that White males have been systematically discriminated against for the last fifty plus years in the US, and you say “good riddance”, and claim to be against racial discrimination?

            What incredible duplicity.

          • JohnEngelman

            White male supremacy existed in the United States until the civil rights movement and the women’s movement ended it during the 1960′s. For perhaps two generations after President Wilson instituted Jim Crow practices in government hiring blacks were not hired by the federal government for professional positions regardless of qualifications. Corporations had similar policies.

            State universities in southern and border states refused to admit blacks, even though black taxes supported those universities.

            News paper want adds were divided into “Help Wanted, Men,” and “Help Wanted, Women.”

            Since the 1960′s the United States has gone too far in the other direction with affirmative action policies that I oppose. Nevertheless, until the 1960′s white men in the United States had opportunities denied others regardless of the qualifications those others possessed.

          • Geo1metric

            What you describe is not “White male supremacy”. It is simply how a White society works. As it turns out, Those exclusionary laws were based on solid foundations.

          • JohnEngelman

            What are the “solid foundations” for excluding a black person with excellent qualifications?

            Two black economists attended my father’s wake. One had a PhD. from Berkeley. The other had a PhD. from the University of Chicago. Those are two of the best universities in the world. They got those PhD’s before affirmative actions policies were instituted, so they earned them.

            Those black economists told me that they were the first two blacks hired by my father’s department in the U.S. government, that Dad hired them, and that he mentored them.

            Why did they not deserve to be hired by the U.S. government?

            Orientals and Jews usually have better qualifications than white Gentiles. Do you think they should not be hired for professional positions?

          • Geo1metric

            How many better qualified Whites were passed over? It wasn’t necessary for AA to be in place; Many progressive Whites were discriminating in favor of minorities well before AA.

        • Sick of it

          What competition exists in a rigged game? Affirmative Action alone kills any real competition.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews and Orientals do not benefit from affirmative action programs. They do not need to.

          • Sick of it

            Sorry to tell you this, but in entire regions of this country, you don’t find nearly as many Jews and Orientals as you do blacks and Hispanics.

          • Nancy Thomas

            John John John….are you saying that money and gifts and connections have nothing to do with it? C’mon.
            Ron Unz did an intensive study of this topic and disagrees with you.

          • Geo1metric

            You need, desperately, to read up on the skewed entrance practices of the Ivy League universities if you think it’s meritocratic.

          • Geo1metric

            If that is so, how do you explain the proportion of Jews and Orientals in the elite universities far in excess of their proportion of the overall population of the US?

          • JohnEngelman

            The higher average IQ’s of Jews and Orientals push their IQ bell curves to the right, and mean that a higher percentage of each group are above 130.

          • Nancy Thomas

            AA is a zero sum game that does untold harm to whites while elevating non-whites to positions where they are bound to fail.

        • Nancy Thomas

          Uh…not exactly. Up until 1924 we had a white ethnostate with reasonable quotas, but a certain group couldn’t stand it….

      • DaveMed

        Purely demographically-speaking, Jews do not represent an actual threat to America. As long as their control of entertainment, media, politics, etc. are dialed down to proportionate levels (along with a resurgence of White identity and consequent Jewish retreat from the liberal agenda), there is not the same threat as that from, say, Latinos.

        • NoMosqueHere

          Jews are inter-marrying with white gentiles at very high rate. Based on a major study of jewish marriage trends appearing in the NY Times recently, 71% of secular or reform jews (the lion’s share of all american jews) marry outside their faith. So if you want to get rid of the jews (i.e., deport or kill them all), you will need to include their non jewish families as well, which amounts to many millions of dead or deported people. Of course, it’s all an absurd nazi fantasy.

          The real threat to whites are the nazis. No group has done more harm to the white self image than the genocidal hitlerites. No normal person, white or otherwise, would affiliate with such maniacs.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Are you smoking crack? “The Nazis?” What Nazis? Where? Are you talking about the three or four remaining members of the KKK?

        • Nancy Thomas

          Oh boy….are you out of the loop. I’m afraid to blurt out a long analysis for fear of it being deleted. Read The Culture of Critique.

    • newscomments70

      If they really were conservative and pro-white, i would consider your statement. Approximately 78% of Asians voted for Obama. How could that be positive for whites? I remember visiting Little Saigon, a (Vietnamese community in SoCal) 15 years ago. It was convervative and pro-American. I saw American flags and South Vietnamese flags being flown everywhere. It was a remnant of South Vietnamese solidarity with US military. Communists were their enemy and democrats were our version of communists. Most were Republican, for that reason. I drove through there last week. Most of the pro-American zeal had faded. Little Saigon is now indistinguishable from the Mexican area. All of the flags are down and it Little Saigon is Obama-land. It reminds me of how most blacks used to vote Republican. That was a remnant of civil war era loyalties . Eventually they all faded into the socialist, anti-white party. This is equilibrium for most non-whites, even the more intelligent ones.

      • JohnEngelman

        I voted for Obama too. The only people who benefit from Republican economic policies are those in the upper ten percent of the economic distribution.

        Lower income whites who vote Republican are voting for higher taxes for themselves, more national debt, and/or cuts in programs that benefit them.

        • Martel

          You voted for Obama knowing how much discrimination and racism he would unleash against Whites, and even your precious Asians, but still you voted for him.

          Even if it was because of your lack of understanding concerning economic theory. Republicans protect the rich according to MSNBC, but the rich protect Obama. I wonder why.

          • JohnEngelman

            As long as the present system of legal bribery continues, the Democrats will have to get their campaign contributions where they find them.

          • David Ashton

            Including Soros and the Hollyweirds. See David Horowitz’s pro-Israel Frontpage.mag on how the Democrats get their funds.

        • newscomments70

          You voted for an anti-white regime because you disagree with Republicans? That doesn’t make any sense. I would understand your voting for a third party, but why would you vote for your own genocide? Democrats want to double third world immigration and they have increased our debt to a record high. My health care now costs 10X what it used to cost. How does any of that benefit the working class?

          • JohnEngelman

            Obviously, I do not consider the Democrats to be anti-white. Bill Clinton signed both the Omnibus Crime Bill of 1994 and the Welfare Reform Act of 1996.

          • newscomments70

            That’s possible, but we’re not talking about Bill Clinton. You voted for Obama. Obama is overtly anti-white.

          • LACountyRedneck

            Engleman knows that. He’s anti-White. That’s why he voted for him.

          • newscomments70

            He pushes his usual agendas down our throats, then leaves the discussion when he can’t answer our simple questions. It’s an endless cycle.

          • David Ashton

            We used to have little speaking robots like that at some of our postwar seasides in Olde England. You put money in and they said the same old thing over and over again, while we rolled about with laughter.

          • HamletsGhost

            And to think that AmRen actually allowed him to write an article for them.

          • JohnEngelman

            Democrat and Republican politicians both want to increase immigration.

            The debt problem began with Ronald Reagan’s false promise that tax cuts would balance the budget.

          • newscomments70

            Neo-cons / Rhinos aren’t much better than democrats. Generally speaking though, Democrats are much worse than Republicans. We still have Republicans that are against amnesty and an increase in immigration. All prominent Democrats are virulently supporting mass immigration and white genocide.

          • JohnEngelman

            Republican politicians know that in order to be elected they sometimes need to take stands at variance with the concerns of the business community they serve. Nevertheless, when they are elected they pursue policies that advance the interests of that business community.

            The Immigration reform act of 1965 and the Immigration Reform and Control Act signed in 1986 by Ronald Reagan had broad bi partisan support in Congress,

          • WR_the_realist

            I think a lot of Republicans, including Ronald Reagan, were fooled into thinking that the enforcement provisions of the Immigration and Control Act would actually be carried out. The question is, how many Republicans are dumb enough to be fooled again? Unfortunately I suspect the answer is “many”.

            But I also know that every damn Democrat in the Senate, every one, voted for that traitorous new immigration bill. There would be no chance of it not becoming law if Democrats had a majority in the House.

            And the last time the Dems controlled both houses of congress they reamed us good and hard with Obamacare.

          • WR_the_realist

            Much as I despise 95% of Republicans, there are no Democrats I can vote for. Every single damn one of them wants more immigration, and nearly all support illegal alien amnesty.

          • Nancy Thomas

            It’s only the sellout GOP leadership that wants amnesty, the rank and file GOP do NOT want amnesty. I’m on the phones with them every single day.

          • JohnEngelman

            Regardless of what Republican politicians say on the campaign trail to win elections, once they win they nearly follow the dictates of the business community.

            There is nothing new about this. The business community has dominated the Republican Party since it was formed in 1854.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Uh…Bill Clinton killed Glass-Stegal, the post Depression law that used to separate commercial and investment banking. He did this on the bad advice of Robert Rubin, Treasury Secretary who then went on to make millions profiting from the loose atmosphere that he himself ushered in. Then Emperor Obama continued seamlessly the bankster bailouts that Bush started, and upped the ante by the Fed printing around a hundred billion dollars a month(they claim it was less, they lied) from 2008 until now as nothing more than handouts to the very banking scum who ruined the world’s economy. Truth is, it doesn’t really matter which “side” is in power, because the Fed is the Wizard of Oz running the show behind the curtain. The idea that the Dims are “for the working man” is ludicrous when you consider that every single one of them voted for the Senate amnesty bill without exception, while just a few GOP sellouts went along after being given bags of money. The idea that the amnesty bill is “bipartisan” is a joke, because only a few of the GOP voted for the bill, and not remotely a majority, just a tiny minority. Regardless of what the Dems say on the campaign trail regarding “uniting” the country, once they win they tear the country apart with polarizing race baiting, attacks on free speech, attacks on gun rights, taxpayer funded abortion, massive third world immigration, idiotic feminism and gay rights lunacy, etc.etc.etc., it gives me a headache just thinking about it.

          • LHathaway

            Actually, The national dept was incredibly high when Reagan took office. It did increase, the national dept was even greater when Reagan left office. The same has been true of Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush and Obama.

          • JohnEngelman

            From the presidencies of Harry Truman to that of Jimmy Carter the national debt declined as a percentage of gross domestic product. During the past three years of the Clinton administration the national debt declined absolutely.

            Unfortunately Republicans cannot understand the contradiction between desiring “low taxes,” and “a strong national defense.” They exaggerate the cost of programs they do not like, such as foreign aid and welfare.

          • Jotun Hunter

            you’re all over this message board like a plague with your weak ideas and persistant, undeserved self-confidence – how or why you never get banned I’ll never know

          • JohnEngelman

            It probably has something to do with the fact that I do not flame other posters, and that my arguments are fact based and rational.

          • Jotun Hunter

            you flame quite a lot of people, for the reason that your endless SAT-waving is indeed irrational, also you are like a monotonous machine. This idea you have of yourself as this perfectly rational and civilized gentleman who has ‘figured it all out’ is precisely the problem with you – as it is so obviously false and your attitudes precisely part of the problem people come here to combat. Your woodenly presented, unchanging routine bulldozes it’s childish ideas into the conversation in precisely the sort of way a wise, gentleman benfactor would not do. You have endless time for posting, and you seem to have a kind of limitless (unwarranted) ego. All your ideas are based on modern stats on corporate CEOs, school exam scores and iq/crime stats. History is a meaningless fable to you. You are deeply, suicidally irrational. That is if you really are of European descent at all.

          • JohnEngelman

            I find it easy to document my assertions by quoting material I have found on this website.

            My other sources for facts are equally credible.

            Strong feelings unsupported by intelligence, learning, and insight are only facts about the person with the feelings. I like facts and insights.

          • Jotun Hunter

            this is the type of thing you endlessly repeat – then you get roped into listing inventions, for which you’ll make some weak comment about pending patents in japan and I’ll request you list white inventions (of all kinds) alongside asian and you’ll avoid that for obvious reasons and start rambling about the past being meaningless in some kind of jew/chinese manifest destiny.

            you also seem very naive about facts, if it was said by rushton then it is a fact to you. you have no concept of bias (which taints everything) — as a liberal you should be more intimately acquainted with relativism.

          • JohnEngelman

            What Professor Rushton said is easy to document with ample evidence, and personal experience.

          • Geo1metric

            “My other sources for facts are equally credible. ”

            Wikipedia is not necessarily a “credible” source. Neither is “THE TEN THOUSAND YEAR LEAP”.

          • Geo1metric

            The “debt” problem began when the federal reserve was established.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Clinton is INSANELY anti-white! He’s a total nutcase ethnomasochist! Go back and look at his 90′s speech where he gleefully spouts that whites are going to become a minority in 2042, and he was obviously THRILLED to inform us of our demise!

          • Martel

            Bill Clinton is close to Aponte and Gutierrez. He also stated he wanted to finish of European cultural hegemony in America. If he is not anti white then who is.

          • Sick of it

            Wasn’t he our first black President?

          • Nancy Thomas

            He is/was CRAZY anti-white!

          • LHathaway

            I certainly remember Clinton holding a nation ‘day of apology’ for Japanese Americans held in Internment camps during WWII. I don’t remember him apologizing or even making note of German and Italian Americans also held in internment camps during WWII.

          • Geo1metric

            Good soldiers are respected by other good soldiers regardless of origins. Most German soldiers were not affiliated with the National Socialists party; they were simply soldiers defending home and hearth.

          • Peter Connor

            Only after being blackmailed into it, and that was 20 years ago.

          • Nancy Thomas

            You’re kidding us….right? Seriously? The Dems are not anti-white? Let’s see….feminism/abortion, affirmative action, massive third world immigration, multiculturalism…..I could go on and on. You can’t REALLY claim that the Dems are not anti-white when clearly every single move they make is anti-white!

          • ThomasER916

            No he’s not. Read any of his posts and you’ll discover he’s anti-White.

          • Nancy Thomas

            You just summarized The Culture Of Critique.

          • ThomasER916

            You’re correct. I discovered MacDonald long (about twenty years) after I studied Marxist revolutions. There are no coincidences.

          • Nancy Thomas

            You know what? I don’t mind being challenged at all, because it helps me to defend the things I know to be true.

          • Nancy Thomas

            And he gutted Glass-Stegal, and signed NAFTA!

          • JohnEngelman

            Over turning Glass-Stegal and signing NAFTA were mistakes. Nevertheless, Congressional Republicans were more likely to support each move than Congressional Democrats.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
            Wags say that Bill Clinton was one of the best Republican Presidents we’ve ever had!

          • Geo1metric

            Clinton, by his own admission, was the “first black president”.

        • DaveMed

          This was incredibly foolish. I can’t really say anything about McCain with certainty, but I can damn well guarantee you that Romney would have been far better on immigration and the border.

          • ThomasER916

            This was incredibly Jewish.

            Fixed it for you.

        • Geo1metric

          It’s not just about economics and it’s not about IQ.

    • David Ashton

      Zionists want Olim for Israel, and the population of China, Mongolia and Korea is far greater than that of the USA. The more the merrier?

      • LACountyRedneck

        Why do we pay his Asian any attention? He comes here and plays the same tune. If everyone ignored him, he’d shrivel up.

        • Geo1metric

          I, for one, find his “one-trick pony” remarks amusing.

          • LACountyRedneck

            I come here to get away from the PC liberal clowns. The site is beyond refreshing for me. I want to be able to go to a site where we don’t have to deal with non-White garbage. Especially some clown that appears to newcomers to be somewhat for Whites, but after a while you realize he is for Asians first, followed by Jews. His priorities are nowhere near for the benefit of Whites. He is just another cancer. I guess every site allows their token…(insert race here). Can’t believe the number of members here that kiss his rear by agreeing with his comments. Not suggesting you have. He is an anti-White troll.

          • Martel

            I have much more respect for the actual Asians who post here, they have a sane reason to support their own kind, Engelman is just an odd version of Tim Wise.He despises whites but recognizes certain aspects of human biological diversity when it suits his Asian fetish.

    • Dave4088

      No, no more than they would welcome us for our high intelligence and ability to create and sustain civilizations.

    • LHathaway

      Um, the quote “any flaws in the groups. . . ” That’s a quote from the book and not of Mr. Taylor, isn’t it? Or am I wrong?

      • ThomasER916

        Superior indeed.

    • HamletsGhost

      I suppose that if a fleet of extraterrestrial spacecraft invaded the earth, blasting everything with their death rays, you would be the first to welcome them for their superior intelligence. (Face palm).

      Even the lowest animals have enough sense to fight with all the resources at their disposal against their destroyers. A cornered rat will put up more of a fight than you would against those who hunt you.

    • Jotun Hunter

      what will you do Engelman now that you realize your idol Jared Taylor doesn’t share your inclusive fantasies? Why do whites not have a right to survival/self-determination, within countries that maintain laws to ensure they stay majority white? Most asians are essentially 3rd worlders in every respect with an odd penchant for calculus. They will bring corruption, gangs, decay, cruelty…besides not being desirable in western countries to begin with for the simple reason of not being white.

      • JohnEngelman

        I have never pretended to agree with Jared Taylor about everything. Nevertheless, it is easy for me to quote him when explaining my admiration for Orientals.

        Other people I like to quote in expressing my admiration for Orientals and Jews are people who have spoken at American Renaissance conferences.

        • Jotun Hunter

          you mean — the holy conference apostles of ineffable opinion?

          and why can’t you admire jews and orientals from afar? why do they need to be in countries founded by and made great by and belonging to whites? keep in mind there is no europe or other white homeland free from the joys of diversity and other whites of your deluded aspect.

          • JohnEngelman

            No country can have too many people with high IQ’s. Jews and Orientals benefit every country the live in. I am please that they are prospering in the United States.

          • Geo1metric

            They could prosper as well in their own countries.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am glad they are here. I am delighted with their prosperity. They earn their high incomes.

          • BonV.Vant

            The bolsheviks did not benefit the ukrainian Kulaks, they did not benefit the USSR.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are assuming that the Bolsheviks had high IQ’s.

        • Geo1metric

          Many of us on this site admire accomplishment also, but that does not mean we welcome the demise of White culture.

          • JohnEngelman

            White culture is not in “demise.” American culture is spreading throughout the world.

            Have you ever wondered why in 1492 civilizations in the Old World were more advanced than civilizations in the New World? Civilizations advance faster when they learn from each other.

          • Geo1metric

            “American culture” is not White culture.

            I fully understand “cross fertilization” of cultures and the benefits. That is very different from cultural dilution. Surely you understand the difference.

          • WR_the_realist

            There are two aspects of American “culture” that are spreading all over the world. First, the products of Hollywood, which glorify blacks, always make the bad guys white, and push every culturally degenerate idea that ever comes along. I don’t think it’s fair to equate Hollywood with “white culture”. Second, the brands and products of globalist corporations that happen to be incorporated in Delaware. They are no more “American” than oil tankers are Liberian, both operate under flags of convenience, and have no loyalty to any nation.

      • Geo1metric

        And they relish having Rover for dinner.

    • BonV.Vant

      NO!

  • Alexandra1973

    About religion: I attend an independent, fundamentalist Baptist church. Totally against women preachers and the like. Doesn’t bother me at all.

    I’m not convinced any “mainstream” churches (or Catholicism for that matter) believe any word of the Bible.

    Sadly, even in IFB churches there’s a bit of the egalitarian brainwashing. I simply ignore it. The church I currently attend is all White.

    • Sick of it

      It does amaze me to hear the garbage some of these people believe when one can easily refute every word of it with biblical verses. Preachers today are the worst.

      “But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.” Matthew 23:8-10

      “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

      Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” Matthew 7:15-20

      “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

      Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

      And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:21-23

    • HamletsGhost

      What about your churches attitude toward Israel and the auto-Chosen?

    • ThomasER916

      I believe the Catholic Church became an anti-Christian institution hundreds of years ago, around the same time it was becoming anti-White. Celibate priests, celibate nuns, celibate monks… it’s a perversion that will inevitably lead to a revulsion of family, ancestry and heredity as they futilely attempt to divorce themselves from biology.

      My only problem with Protestant churches are they lack a central doctrine based on our history as Europeans. Of course, this is THE problem with Christianity as it pertains to us. It doesn’t give us both a sense of racial unity and identity while simultaneously preserving our ethnicities, languages, and cultures.

  • Nightmare

    There will never be a truly secular society in the sense that worship will cease to exist. We will all have things we worship, whether they be natural or supernatural. We once lived in a society where there was belief in the supernatural, but this is eroding, and at an astounding pace. This does not mean there are no more dogmas, however. The new doctrine of the day is Cultural Marxism, and it is not to be questioned. Look at the groups today suppressing scientific studies relating to truths on race: it is not the church.

  • Sick of it

    “The conviction of our ruling class that they are by far the most
    intelligent and enlightened people who ever lived is itself a sign of
    stupidity, or at least of ignorance and narcissism.”

    One should not expect more of people who, at best, possess slightly above average intelligence. They do not understand their own lack of ability nor can they understand the much greater ability of others.

    • HamletsGhost

      The difficult part about it is, that most of our ruling elite actually have very high intelligence. Most of them would score very high in any I.Q. tests.

      Modern liberals are governed by the need to see themselves as the anointed elect. Liberalism today is basically Christianity with the religious parts removed.

      • Sick of it

        I’ve never personally met a liberal who has a genius level IQ. Over here, they tend to be highly dysfunctional people with rather low IQs. At best, slightly above average.

        • Max

          I think you make a good point. The raging liberals are people who are at *best* somewhat above average which is why their “advanced” degrees are almost always in some fraudulent discipline like “feminist studies” or possibly up to some soft science. The really bright people I’ve known may tilt to the left, but they generally don’t go too far because they are possessed of enough genuine curiosity and real data to prevent them from being completely sucked in by the baseless propaganda. I probably know more people with terminal degrees than without so I have some basis of comparison.

          • ThomasER916

            That’s why censorship codes are key. The best way I’ve been able to describe is as such:

            Money is the medium of exchanging commodities. Control the money and you control every commodity.

            Language is the medium of exchanging ideas. Control the language and you control every idea.

            I’ve never heard anyone say this before, but to me it’s quite simple.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      It’s a sign of psychopathy and outright evil being the norm for our self-anointed, elites who have a Messianic view of themselves. And yes, they are extreme narcissists too. They underestimate men like me, who are going to be the ones who will annihilate them from below the way a torpedo sinks a ship by breaking it in half.

  • Martel

    “If there were no laws against discrimination, people who want to work
    or live together would find each other, and everyone would be happier.”

    A simple truth. The same goes for immigration. Once you import a certain amount of immigrants, the native population will react both positively and negatively, but these two don’t cancel each other out. If 60% of the natives are neutral, and only 20% of the natives detests immigration, while 20% applaud it, then the latter will grow increasingly hostile towards the natives who protest immigration. Now 40% of the native population has developed negative feelings towards a significant portion of the population of this hypothetical nation. The same applies for the new immigrants, even though they will show little to no reaction to their fellow immigrants if they develop negative feelings towards the natives.

  • JohnEngelman

    “Discriminating” used to be a good word. If one had discriminating tastes, that was held in his favor. Now, if an employer requires job applicants to pass a mental aptitude test, and if he refuses to hire those with felony convictions he is condemned for discriminating against blacks.

    • Geo1metric

      I still like and use the word “discrimination” and its variants. One of the things I have refused to concede to the cultural marxists is the use of my native tongue, English. Homosexuals are homosexuals, chairman is still chairman, mankind is still mankind, etc.

      • David Ashton

        And Engelman is still….Engelman.

        • Geo1metric

          While I understand the malleability, over time, of language, some things are immutable. :)

      • IstvanIN

        Why would gay, chairwoman and humankind upset you so? Humankind is sort of clunky, I agree, but the other two have been around, I bet, for a hundred years. Langauge, at least English, tends to evolve to simpler terms from the longer and bulkier terms. That is why “African-American”, from my observation, is a term used by mainly white liberals and a few black psudeo-intellectuals, and not the general public. You are not going to bring back Afro-American (a term with a brief life-span), colored, which was popular when I was a kid, or Negro, a more “scientifically” accurate term, especially in light of all the blue-black Indians and Pakistanis we are allowing in.

        As a side note even Negro was used in the 60s. In music class we sang songs called Negro Spirituals, many of which would be banned these days. They were considered truly American songs, or so we were taught because the music style originated here in the US.

        Take a term like “cool”. Someone or something being “cool” must be from the late 50s and the beatniks before it became common in the late 60s. Should we force everyone to use cool to mean exclusively a temperature not warm but not quite cold?

        I will admit that there are a number of terms that aggravate me, mostly the ones that neuter the language, such as doing away with actor and actress in all but awards ceremonies. I am saddened that we are not supposed to use terms that indicate the sex of the person being spoken about. Or the use of he/she, or even just “she” in place of “he”, or even alternating between “he” and “she” in an article, for instance, when referring to people of both sexes. When I was in school we were taught to use “he” for both referring to males or both males and females. In cases like that we do need consistency because it can become confusing.

        I am always amused when someone srgues that Hispanic should only be used to refer to someone from Spain. Well, that may have been the origin of the term, but in 21st century America it refers to invaders from south of the border, regardless of the origin of the term.

        We are not going to be speaking the language of the founders of the country or the language of King James anytime soon. It is simply evolution.

        I am in favor of not using course, crude or insulting terms because I believe that lowers the quality of the discourse and make a person sound ignorant. But overall we have to

        • Max

          And MUCH of that change has been TO coarse, crude, and insulting language in places where it is inappropriate, say, “homophobe” for example. They offer darkness for light.

          The left has done their utmost to hijack the language and define the terms of every social topic which we just have to go along with since they largely, almost exclusively control the media and educational systems.

          I am rather in favor of Geo1metric’s atavism in this regard.

          • Geo1metric

            Atavism may be a bit strong, but I am surely a traditionalist when it comes to my culture (manners and language being a subset). I also believe that “those who control the language control the debate”. We traditionalists have not absorbed that lesson, I fear.

        • Geo1metric

          I fully understand, and accept, changing language over time as I stated above. My objection is with the changes that have come primarily from “political correctness” such as chairwoman, congressperson, humankind, etc. Mankind is a perfectly useful collective noun, and in no way disparages to fairer sex.

          • IstvanIN

            I use terms like sex (as in male or female rather than “gender”) and illegitimate (rather “out of wedlock”) for the same effect.

  • Funruffian

    Any flaws in the groups promoted from the margin to the center are whitewashed, the more glaring the flaws, the thicker the coating. AIDS has sanctified homosexuality, Muslim terrorism has made Islamophobia a horrendous sin, and black dysfunction has led to the insistence on the hipness and nobility of blacks, the stupidity and tackiness of ordinary whites, and the sterility and oppressiveness of white society.

    This is very familiar to me in my everyday life.

  • Brian

    Mr. Taylor and Mr. Kalb both have my sincere gratitude for their efforts in this struggle.

  • Lagerstrom

    Great article!

  • LHathaway

    “Conservatives” who implicitly accept inclusiveness and equality cannot hope to fight only those aspects of it they find most odious”

    This reminds me of what a poster wrote on here some time ago. He said if you are presenting a politically incorrect opinion about one subject, say global warming disbelief, in an article or essay, you must make take your politically incorrect statement and smother it inside of 5 politically correct statements that go along with it, agreeing with every other point of the day. The poster called this ‘the Wilson rule’, I think.

    So is the author, Mr Kaleb, contradicting himself a little here? (first he says you must reject the entire agenda) then he says if you can find one common cause of disagreement in which to attack the system (implying you should be silent on most everything else – which is probably a good idea), you can help get allies to your cause. Maybe this all just points out how tough it will to crack the nut (presented by those who are left) here and get them over to our side of the issue.

    Personally, at my age, I just hear whatever it is he media is attempting to tell me and whatever it is I know the opposite surely must be true. But the trick is, not to let people know I feel this way. . . I’m not completely sold on Mr Kalb’s ideology presented here.

    Another way in which I disagree with his diagnosis (and he points it out himself some) ethnocentrism, racism, exclusion, discrimination are all being actively encouraged. . . but it is only people of color who are paid and promoted when engaging in this ethnocentrism, ‘pride’ building and segregation.

    My way of looking at it all is this, sure, I suspect the powers that be, public ‘leaders’, publishers, experts, have always lied to us, manipulating us into going along to where ever they were taking us, and even our beliefs too, but only in the last 50 years have they’ve gone completely ‘crazy’ leading the public to believe, in almost every case, in that which is the polar opposite of the truth.

    My own opinion is that the beginning and end of it has been about getting white women to sleep with men of color. Nothing else is on the agenda. They have had to develop a sort of ideology that kind of ‘reverses everything that is true’ while ignore all that is true’ in order to accommodate it. Anything else is just about importing enough goods into the country to make things go smoothly, and also to make sure, perhaps, to keep white men ignorant or at least pandering to ‘equality’ or perhaps even having them feel they are lucky or ‘pivileged’ enough so that they don’t revolt against it. Perhaps other than not revolting, white men aren’t needed to do anything in this equation and so they are not so much the targets of all this ‘enlightenment’ at all?

    To insure this one-sided breeding and dating continues. . . they’ve had to import millions of men of color from all corners of the globe into our nation for the last 20 years or so. And of course, to go on making everyone else angry and white men held up as lucky and privileged, should their condition ever become something to consider.

    Hell, I think AmRen’s in on it. This is just a safety valve where the most disturbed of us can blow off some steam while even this media outlet and it’s posts are controlled. Must. . . Control. . . All. . . Information. . . Creating. . ‘Better’ World. AmRen didn’t spring from nowhere. They can control the world banks, the major networks, world conflicts. . but not AmRen and the posts herein.

    As I mentioned I don’t necessarily agree with the way Mr Kalb way sees things, but this sounds like an interesting critique of the system and I enjoyed reading it. Wonder if any comments or content on this post board influenced this book?

    What was the book Mr. Taylor reviewed that came out of Australia a few years ago? It was also an ‘anti-egalitarian’ work of at least some sort. It was written by a young man who was a communist or socialist but he also disagreed with multiculturalism. It was written from a completely leftist view, if I remember from the review. Anyone remember the young man or the review? Perhaps the review was structured a little bit similar to this one or at least both authors appeared to Mr Taylor to be mavericks of a similar sort. .

    • Geo1metric

      “My own opinion is that the beginning and end of it has been about getting white women to sleep with men of color.”

      You are onto something there. I remember a black writer from the 60′s who said, and I paraphrase…” the black man will never be completely free until he can “make it” with the White woman.”

  • LHathaway

    I don’t know about John Lennon, or really care to try and disparage him over the songs he wrote. . . as appealing as that would make me sound. . . but it is said the Kinks song ‘Mr. Big’ is about John Lennon and members of the Beatles. Listening to it, I had guessed it might be about Mick Jagger.

    ‘Mr. Big’ is a song that disparages the subject of the song. I’d read somewhere a few years ago that Ray Davies had claimed the song was about John Lennon and the Beatles.

  • DaveMed

    Unfortunately, I think Kalb and Taylor are being overly optimistic. All social signs point to Whites being far less racially-aware as time goes on. Particularly the children.

    For instance, I post on a forum with members in the medical profession. I do my best to bring some of our concerns to the table, but I am met with anything from the usual name-calling to utter bewilderment at the very idea of White identity.

    • LHathaway

      Perhaps they’re both wrong or at least partially wrong in their ‘anti-egalitarian’ stance? To change the subject, I remember a right wing radio talk show host, just a local one, say something like, “I see what’s going on, everything that is good in this world is being made out to be bad” (he may have said the converse, everything bad in this world is being made out to be good) before going to commercial. It does seem that everything that is good in this world is somehow tied to ‘bigotry’ or more correctly to ‘racism’ on the way to stamping it out. There was an article in Time magazine recently tying those who insist on the importance of ‘culture’ to racists. Funny thing about the article, on the way to denying the importance of ‘culture’ the author was unwittingly promoting racism.

      I’m not sure the ‘conservative’ answer to this should be to actually promote bigotry and racism as a good thing. Or to try and ‘reclaim’ these words. Nor should it be to simply promote ‘freedom’ as the end all.

      • DaveMed

        Well, when someone calls me a “racist”, my response is a challenge to define that word.
        The result is either a lack of follow-up or a slew of different definitions for that term, which only serves to inform observers of its uselessness.

        • ThomasER916

          What most people fail to understand is one simple rule – logic is based on knowledge. And in today’s world, everything is a lie. It’s not an exaggeration either. There isn’t a popular opinion played in the media today you can think of that isn’t a lie. When you understand that then it should come as no surprise that all “logic” is wrong. Knowing this you try something different.

          My response is no response. What you don’t understand is these Useful Idiots are indoctrinated to hate you. They’re trained to attack you. What you need to do is never answer them. What will happen is they will keep attacking and expose themselves in the process. They will become vile, frothing, monsters. Their ethno-masochism comes out, then you have something to comment on. They will give you an obnoxious sounding board to beat. The beauty of the internet is they have to write something, which means you have something to quote over and over again. Their attacks are indefensible and our goal is just to make them look ugly. This is VERY important to remember – they’re trained to attack and they have no defense. The more you critique them the worse they look.

          Watch old videos of Andrew Breitbart confronting these mobs. I’m not the only one to discover this. Like him, I’ve read and studied the Left. Unlike him, I’m not afraid to hold a specific ethnic group accountable.

        • Geo1metric

          I have used that ploy many times also; asking one of these idiots to define “racist” or “racism” will often open a door for you to drive a semi through.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      White racial consciousness hasn’t decreased, it has been driven underground by government intimidation and brainwashing. White people will always prefer the company of those who are most genetically similar to themselves. Like male-female differences in visuospatial ability or the black-white gap in IQ, the ethnocentric tendency is an intractable one; it will never be eradicated by social engineering. When given the chance, whites would rather flee from diversity and mass 3rd world immigration than celebrate its supposed “benefits”. The only whites who get stuck with diversity are those who lack the means or the good health to escape it.

      What appears to be a “lessening” of white racial consciousness will reverse itself in due time. The multiculturalists are fanatics, just like their ideological cousins, the Soviets. They will eventually reach the limits of human nature and when they do, nature will fight back, “red in tooth and claw”.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        Driven underground, for now. But like crude oil under pressure, our enemies are going to unwitting provide an outlet for it to surge to the surface like a blowout at an oil well.

        • Laura Dilworth

          like in the Turner Diaries

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            It will be far worse, more like the violence the Bolsheviks provoked against them in Eastern Europe. The kind when a lot of them hung together literally.

          • Laura Dilworth

            yep

    • Max

      I share your prognosis for the “educated” classes, though I find that plenty of the working literate class are getting fed up with the propaganda and obvious polarity of the media and edutocracy. There are undoubtedly true believers among the intelligensia but I really suspect that the majority simply take the path of least resistance; it costs them nothing to support the orthodoxy since they can well afford to stay away from the fray. The concerns of the unwashen masses i.e. you and me, have no impact on them and they well may lose status among the real social architects of this genocide and thereby their socioeconomic network. I have worked among them for a very long time and know well the gaming and politics involved.

      A claim of “racism” can never be erased. Who with much to lose would take the chance? The emperor’s fine new clothes, as it were.

    • JohnEngelman

      A lot of people who know better, like those in the medical profession, do not want to believe that genes matter. The more fact based and logical argument is, the angrier they get.

      • DaveMed

        There is also the fact that those in the medical profession tend to be people who are more or less civilized and intelligent. So, when you have a bunch of driven Indians in your class (as well as a few Blacks), it’s easy to make the mistake of thinking that their co-ethnics are all like them.

  • NoMosqueHere

    Discrimination, as it was practiced in the US prior to the mid 1960s, was a creative process of sorts. The out of favor groups had to adapt in order to survive. And they did.

    For example, Irish and Italian Catholics built their own institutions, including the jesuit university, parochial school, and hospital systems. Jews, who were refused professional work at protestant firms and elsewhere, built their own firms, and they basically built hollywood. All of society benefited from their creativity. Necessity was and is the mother of invention.

    Blacks and spaniards, however, believe government programs and utilizing the anti discrimination laws are the best way to get ahead. It’s no surprise their creative efforts in business and education etc. have been minimal.

    • DaveMed

      It is crucial to not use “Hispanics/Latinos” and “Spaniards” interchangeably.

      They are very different groups.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        Indeed, Spaniards are white Europeans, Hispanics are a mongrel race……some of whom are repulsive in ever way imaginable.

  • libertarian1234

    Unless I missed it I didn’t see where economic conditions could well spell disaster for the existing regime’s manipulations, and there is NO QUESTION it is a looming threat, not just in this country but throughout the world.

    As the economy goes so goes society, especially a multicultural one with a black faction that fights with all other groups and operates constantly in a state of paranoia and rage, fed mostly by their own stupidity.

    All of the propaganda, scheming and manipulations by the state, academia and organs of communication and entertainment could well be for naught even if nothing is done to oppose them directly, and they probably will.

  • Jon

    Inclusiveness is multiculturalism and shows his true nature but does not shock me since a lot of churches have been communized. Nature demands exclusion so the breed can grow and does not tolerate anything else. I am glad some countries are waking up and hope others will to.

    • Anglo

      The churches, indeed, are full of marxist theology. They’ve become part of the destruction of this country.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        Indeed, and many of them are spreading other very dangerous ideologies such as Christian Zionism. I cannot attend in good conscience most churches, except a Russian or Ukrainian Orthodox church. In my part of the country, those are few and far between.

        • Jon

          White people need a new religion and one that is based on marriage and family above all because that is the most important thing. Unless we unite then the Diversity cult will win.

  • Nancy Thomas

    Great stuff. You can summarize all of it by stating simply that everything the left does and says is against human nature, anti-white, anti-Christian, evil and perverse.

  • Nancy Thomas

    But Paul is just as bad.

  • Nancy Thomas

    Yes, thank you, I was pretty sure I remembered KM’s review of that book. Sort of throws a bit of cold water on the “merit” case.

  • Bernie Grey

    Harold Ramis died. I pointed out the anti-white themes in some of his films (i.e. WASP’s are always portrayed as evil) in the National Post comments on the story and received the usual vitriolic comments back accusing me of hate crimes. But this illustrates the fact that these films work to turn white people against themselves, believing anyone who declares their whiteness must be evil.

    • ThomasER916

      You’ll get the same here at Amren with their so-called Moderators.

    • jackryanvb

      Yeah, a bit anti WASP, but not as bad as a weinstein brothers Django Unchained.

      • Bernie Grey

        Can’t wait for those two to take a dirt nap too

      • Geo1metric

        That movie is designed to further inflame the minorities.

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    “In other words, although we are supposed to be bringing America to the Middle East, America is becoming the Middle East, where there is no public trust, and government is everyone’s enemy. ”

    It’s becoming more apparent to me that the US is being culturally terraformed into something approximating the ancestral homeland of our rulers.

    • ThomasER916

      Worse. America is destroying our Ancestral homelands with the help of the Culture of Critique. The US State Department is working with Israel to destroy the demographics of places like Sweden.

      What’s even worse is here on Amren, when you’re explicit and you name people your posts get deleted. THAT is our problem.

      • LHathaway

        Anyone going on about ‘Jews’ is part of the conspiracy. . . . Which sounds about par for the course on these far right journals? There’s a conspiracy to want people to believe that. . . .

        Whether ‘Jews’ are acting to get revenge on ‘whites’ for the holocaust, I do not know. I doubt it though. Stupid girls could never be impressed by the ignorance and evil of revenge. . .

        • ThomasER916

          “Their predisposition towards innocents and goodness is genetic.”

          George Soros
          Noel Ignatiev
          Joe Slovo
          Tim Wise
          Francis Fox Piven
          Susan Sontag
          Mikey Weinstein
          Gloria Steinem
          $PLC

          Let’s go back in time before the Holocaust and remember the Holodomor and Boer Genocide:
          Benjamin Disraeli
          Lazar Kaganovich
          Genrikh Yagoda
          Lenin
          Trotsky

          Those are short lists. I could type dozens and dozens.

        • curri

          It’s likely over your head, but try to read Kevin MacDonald’s book, The Culture of Critique. For something easier, try Wilmot Robertson’s The Dispossessed Majority. Robertson places a great deal of emphasis on the weaknesses of Notrthern Europeans that led to their fall.

        • Geo1metric

          “Their predisposition towards innocents (sic) and goodness is genetic.”

          Have you read the Old Testament?

        • Einsatzgrenadier

          It’s not about “blaming Jews”. The Jews have played a disproportionate role in the destruction of the United States. Jews and white liberals are the primary architects of the downfall of western civilization in America. This is a well-established fact.

      • Carney3

        Because while Jews lean left including on PC issues and thus some criticism of them is legitimate, it’s crackpottery to blame them for Sweden’s problems. Sweden has almost no Jews at all – Swedes are PC all on their own. And the idea that Israel has any interest in Islamifying or Africanizing Sweden is not merely false but insane.

        The single greatest problem that racial realism and pro-white advocacy has is that a solid portion if not a majority of race realists and pro-whites are crackpot Judeo-obsessive anti-Semites, mesmerized by phantom conspiracies, soft on Islamism today and Nazi-ism in the past, and totally unable to earn, and unworthy of earning, the respect and trust of their fellow whites as a result.

        To the extent that moderators on AR must cull the weeds of anti-Semitic kookery lest it overwhelm the site, and pull some of the most noxious weeds as well, it’s a necessary task.

        • ThomasER916

          If you had a modicum of intelligence you could use Google and search for relevant articles. Take for example:

          Eritreans Sweden Haaretz

          Don’t worry, I’m sure everyone and everything will gain the magical quality of “crackpot” and “insane.” Interesting that’s the exact same diction and treatment used to describe race realists and White identity. It’s all one big coincidence.

        • curri

          Sweden (like all of Western Europe) has been part of the American Empire since 1945. Since then the culture has been steadily Americanized. Find an honest Swede over 70 and he’ll admit this.

          http://conswede(DOT) blogspot(DOT) com/2008/07/social-paradigms-shift-eg-our-view-on.html

          …To illustrate what I talk about. Louis Armstrong visited Sweden in 1933. In all the news papers he was describe as something monkey-like let loose from the jungle. All across the line! And in the reviews by the most serious music critics.
          Who would have imagined in 1933, that twelve years later Western Europe would undergo an America-led cultural revolution which would lead to the common belief that there are no differences between races?

          Translation of two of the quotes:

          Knut Bäck in Göteborgs-Posten, November 1933:
          “This world is strange… No protests are raised against how the jungle is let loose into the society. Armstrong and his band are allowed to freely wreak destruction.”

          Sten Broman in Sydsvenskan, November 1933:
          “Dare I say that he at times had something monkey-like about him and sometimes reminded of, according to our perceptions, a mentally disturbed person, when he pouted with his mouth or gaped it to its widest open and roared like a hoarse animal from a primeval forest.”

          The third quote compares the concert with a natural disaster, and Armstrong’s trumpet with a hell machine. The only good thing coming out of it, he says, is that it solves to old dispute of whether monkeys have a language.

          This is what Europe looked like, up until 1945. And since some people will live under the misconception that this was a phenomenon of the ’30s, I here provide a quote from the Swedish Encyclopedia, Nordisk Familjebok, the 1876-1899 edition (here and here).

          “Psychologically the negro can be said be on the level of a child, with vivid fantasy, lack of endurance, … can be said to lack morality rather than being immoral … etc.”

        • curri

          Sweden (along with the rest of Western Europe) has been part of the American Empire since 1945. The culture has undergone a steady process of Americanization since then.

          http://conswede(DOT) blogspot (DOT) com/2008/07/social-paradigms-shift-eg-our-view-on.html

          …To illustrate what I talk about. Louis Armstrong visited Sweden in 1933. In all the news papers he was describe as something monkey-like let loose from the jungle. All across the line! And in the reviews by the most serious music critics.
          Who would have imagined in 1933, that twelve years later Western Europe would undergo an America-led cultural revolution which would lead to the common belief that there are no differences between races?

          Translation of two of the quotes:

          Knut Bäck in Göteborgs-Posten, November 1933:
          “This world is strange… No protests are raised against how the jungle is let loose into the society. Armstrong and his band are allowed to freely wreak destruction.”

          Sten Broman in Sydsvenskan, November 1933:
          “Dare I say that he at times had something monkey-like about him and sometimes reminded of, according to our perceptions, a mentally disturbed person, when he pouted with his mouth or gaped it to its widest open and roared like a hoarse animal from a primeval forest.”

          The third quote compares the concert with a natural disaster, and Armstrong’s trumpet with a hell machine. The only good thing coming out of it, he says, is that it solves to old dispute of whether monkeys have a language.

          This is what Europe looked like, up until 1945. And since some people will live under the misconception that this was a phenomenon of the ’30s, I here provide a quote from the Swedish Encyclopedia, Nordisk Familjebok, the 1876-1899 edition (here and here).

          “Psychologically the negro can be said be on the level of a child, with vivid fantasy, lack of endurance, … can be said to lack morality rather than being immoral … etc.”

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          The Jews killed tens of millions of my father’s and grandmother’s people in Eastern Europe. That is a fact, and people like you are clearly not the sort I would want having my back in the coming wars that will be fought in EVERY white nation.

      • Anglo

        I wish that nothing was deleted. I want to read what everyone really thinks. Let people put it out there; I can take it. If I don’t wish to read anymore, I don’t have to.

        • Geo1metric

          It is interesting how widespread and accepted censorship is these days.

  • Nancy Thomas

    I have to say Mr. Taylor, that was a VERY good book review. Salter talks about some of the same things in reference to the lack of social trust caused by multiculturalism. The Frankfurt School turned all of our normal survival instincts and normal discrimination mechanisms into pathology, and 70 years of brainwashing has turned the western brain into fearful mush.

  • David Ashton

    The biological melding of the Mongolid race and White people another “great leap forward” (an unfortunate choice of phrase)? I refer you to my quote from Jonathan Mirsky on another thread. For the Whites of North America to be absorbed into the huge population of East Asia, if either side desired it as much as you apparently do, would mean racial and cultural suicide for our western peoples.

  • Rogoraeck

    There’s no hope for the white race to survive. Unless we extirpate & terminate with extreme prejudice all the white renegades & traitors within our race first! Then the future of our race will be assured & only if we will be vigilant to any future traitor/renegade & terminate them quickly! Then they will be hope. Only then! Now I only despair when I hear some so called academics at universities advocating the genocide of the white people, & then they get a “standing ovation” from the white students, instead of being strung up from the nearest lamp post!
    So do you understand my concern now?

  • Geo1metric

    You are so right! I often lament the fact that the left seems to monopolize “late night” comedy. A virtual gold mine of propaganda thinly disguised as “comedy”.

  • ThomasER916

    Ethno-masochism, elitism, and a naked hatred of whites. That’s what makes them tick. They’re cut from the same cloth as white Conservatives who cheer “diversity”. I’ve found the white Zionists are just as evil, just as vile as any white Liberal. They just do it while waving an American flag.

  • Geo1metric

    Again your information is dated.

    • JohnEngelman

      The biological superiority of the Jews and Orientals does not go out of date.

      • Geo1metric

        It does when a majority of American Jews are mixing with others.

  • BonV.Vant

    AWESOME!!! I have posted about the end of “modernism”. I think “inclusiveness” is the nut of modernism .

    • Geo1metric

      Exclusionary inclusiveness. The usual inherent contradiction in all things Left.

      That’s what happens when everything one espouses is a lie.

  • Anon

    Our rulers invented these words as a way to force us to ignore essential distinctions
    And already out of the gate, this book is lolfail. Perhaps there is some merit to it (but I doubt it….like most works of its kind it focuses on logical arguments to people who are ONLY impressed by power and effectiveness). It fails right out of the gate by using the euphemism, “our rulers”. No….we do not have rulers, elites, smart people, rich people and certainly no longer have kings (much to our loss and weakness), alpha males or anyone “of us” who make these decisions. If we did, a quick beheading and replacement of same would instantly solve the problem. Why does that not happen?
    For two reasons. The first is that authors like Kalb, who often know exactly who….able to name names, are to blame would never name them….either because they overtly serve them or simply fear them (and there is much to fear). Naming names invites a real, immediate and effective solution. Naming names leads to war. And in wars, people suffer, especially those first into the breach. So, instead, we talk about who is responsible in vague, nebulous terms. And those specific people who don’t quite hold us at the end of a leash, nod and continue their evil work secure in the knowledge that a modern day “terror” won’t come for them today…..if ever.
    The second is those responsible are not of us. They are not white. Oh, they’ve been parasitically attached to us for over a thousand years….periodically expelled. And what they do would not be possible without treason done by other whites. But it is their separateness and most of all, their conspiracy that prevents white values from simply convincing them from one generation to the next to cut the crap out. Further, it is the inability of white people to look on this hostile, alien, extremely anti-white genocidal freakshow of a race and identify them as outsiders that prevents modern day whites from dealing with them, if in no other way than by ceasing to cooperate with them.
    They do not rule us. They trick us. And most of the reason they are able to do that is people like Kalb will not name them, either through collusion (as any good white supremacist knows, half those at the meetings work for the feds, lol), fear or even stupidity. Today’s ultra-conservative would be considered a liberal a generation ago. And no one seems to notice the slow brainwashing of those around them.

  • DonReynolds

    Preferences are not based on fear or hate.
    I am a patriot because I love my own country, not because I hate or fear any other country.
    I prefer my own people because I love my own people, not because I hate or fear any other people. The Liberal Leftists would like to tell me that what I love does not matter or what I love is wrong. They will fail.
    My affection extends beyond the blood ties and common language to include all people who share my culture, my values, and my purposes……admittedly, that is not everybody.

  • DonReynolds

    Simplicity and sameness always seems to use a broad brush, assuming away all the details and complexity and history. You are correct, it does not take a mental or intellectual giant to ignore what you can easily see.