When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?

Ann Coulter, May 22, 2013

{snip}

For decades, Mexicans have been about 30 percent of all legal immigrants to the United States, while only a smidgen more than 1 percent come from Great Britain. Is that fair? Granted, their food is better, but why is it the norm to have nearly 30 times as many Mexican as British immigrants?

We have been taking in more immigrants from Guatemala, the Dominican Republic and Colombia, individually, than from England, our mother country. There are nearly twice as many immigrants from El Salvador as from Canada, and 10 times as many as from Australia.

Why can’t the country be more or less the ethnic composition that it always was? The 50-1 Latin American-to-European ratio isn’t a natural phenomenon that might result from, say, Europeans losing interest in coming here and poor Latin Americans providing some unique skill desperately needed in our modern, technology-based economy.

To the contrary, it’s result of an insane government policy. Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act was designed to artificially inflate the number of immigrants from the Third World, while making it virtually impossible for anyone from the nations that historically provided our immigrants to come here.

Pre-1965 immigrants were what made this country what it was for a reason: They were the pre-welfare state immigrants. From around 1630 to 1966, immigrants sank or swam. About a third of them couldn’t make it in America and went home–and those are the ones who weren’t rejected right off the boat for being sick, crippled or idiots.

That’s why corny stories of someone’s ancestors coming here a half-century ago are completely irrelevant. If their ancestors hadn’t succeeded, their great-grandchildren wouldn’t be here to tell the story because no one was given food stamps, free medical care and housing to stay. (And vote Democrat.)

Now we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel by holding ourselves out as the welfare ward of the world and specifically rejecting skilled immigrants.

{snip}

It should not come as a surprise that a majority of recent immigrants are following a path that’s the exact opposite of earlier immigrants. The immigrant story of lore is that the first generation is poor but works hard, then the second, third and fourth generations soar up the socioeconomic ladder.

But innumerable studies have shown that Mexican first-generation immigrants work like maniacs–and then the second, third and fourth generations plunge headlong into the underclass.

By now, Mexicans are the largest immigrant group in America, with about 50 million Hispanics living here legally.

Marco Rubio’s amnesty bill will soon make it 80 million. First, there are at least 11 million illegal immigrants, a majority from Mexico, who will be instantly legalized. Then we’ll get their entire extended families under our chain migration system.

I wouldn’t want that many Japanese! I wouldn’t want that many Dutch (not that there are that many Dutch)! Why do we have to become a different country? Was there a vote when the country decided to turn itself into Mexico? No other country has ever just decided to turn itself into another country like this.

The nation’s plutocrats are lined up with the Democratic Party in a short-term bid to get themselves cheap labor (subsidized by the rest of us), which will give the Democratic Party a permanent majority. If Rubio’s amnesty goes through, the Republican Party is finished. It will be the “Nancy Pelosi Democratic Party” versus the “Chuck Schumer Republican Party.”

{snip}

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • The__Bobster

    We didn’t vote to become Mexico. The usual suspects voted for us.

    If voting mattered, it would declared illegal. After all, did we vote for desegregation or affirmative action?

    • Morris LeChat

      democracy has been discredited. It is time for something else.

      • David Ashton

        You’ve got something else already, only it’s called “democracy”.

        • Morris LeChat

          touche

          • Anon

            I’m not sure either of you understand the implications of that.

            We have a carefully crafted illusion of democracy, created by a media more controlled than anything ever imagined in stalinist russia or even the book, 1984.

            In reality, a small group of perhaps a thousand, make all of the decisions, most of them not only unpopular but directly against the interest of most people. They are specifically anti-white, anti-man and anti-Christian. And genocidal in scope.

            It would be nothing to simply kill the thousand that are the puppet masters, were awareness of who they are, what they are doing, and most importantly, where each specific one is (and the fact that they hardly live in bunkers surrounded by armed guards) become common. They act smugly, out in the open and exposed…..relying purely on ignorance and brainwashing to protect them.

            Specifically, through a careful divide and conquer strategy, they have everyone believing that the “other half” of people are responsible for all the problems by virtue of who they vote for. It appears that millions of people are diametrically opposed to millions of people, when the reality is 99% are essentially neutral and will do whatever they are told and even believe whatever they are told (barely anyone is in the way of we ourselves being the ones to do the telling, if you understand my meaning). The reality is, it is this relatively small group of people who personally make all the decisions while all of our votes go straight in the garbage can in completely rigged elections and increasingly ridiculous staged political theatre. “They” have gotten it into their heads that it no longer matters if “we” catch them at it.

            That is a spectacularly bad decision for a vulnerable minority to make when surrounded by an increasingly angry, heavily armed population like ours. Why….anything could happen.

            And it will, eventually. It always happens this way. It’s a repeating pattern in white history for some reason. Why doesn’t matter much. The issue is to be aware that, one day, mobs of enraged people will hang these people from the nearest high object and the current system will collapse.

            What comes next will depend heavily on who understands what is coming and is prepared for it. Specifically, anyone who, in any way, provides for others and/or protects others will become the new elite class of leaders. It’s the “golden dawn” strategy. One I highly recommend whites in every nation adopt.

      • IanJMacDonald

        Democracy: one parasite, one vote.

      • Michael P

        We’re not a democracy

        • Bossman

          We are not a democracy. We are a representative democratic Republic.

          • MadMike

            I always thought the USA was a Constitutional Republic, where in the Constitution is Democracy mentioned???

          • SFLBIB

            Democracy is majority rule, so wherever it mentions a required majority, be it 50%+1 or two thirds or three quarters.

          • MadMike

            The majority cannot vote to eliminate free speech for example but that’s not stopping the Liberals from trying.

          • SFLBIB

            That’s true, but it is not what you asked.

          • Rocky Mountain

            Another Poly Sci 101 student.

      • Tucker

        Something else is an exclusively White Ethnostate which has as its fundamental and unbreakable foundation, a new system of government that places the preservation of White European people as its #1, non-negotiable, most important criteria.

        And, which prohibits residency of race treasonous white cockroaches like Juan McCain, Lindsey Graham, the entire despicably evil Bush family, the equally race traitorous Paul family, and every other one of these RINOs and Neo-Cons who’ve been supporting open borders immigration policies and the deliberate, genocidal, race replacement policies of the multi-cultural enemy, who’s identity we all are so keenly aware of, but are not supposed to ever name.

        Oh, and Mr. Engelman is also included on the list of prohibited residency applicants.

      • [Guest]

        Part of the problem is that voting should be restricted … much the way it used to be.

    • Erasmus

      I will not say how the usual suspects should be dealt with for their treason. I’m sure you’re capable of imagining how without my help.

      • edie

        they sold us out for filthy money!!

        • Non Humans

          They Terk Owrr Jerrrrbs!!!

    • Jefferson

      But who voted the gang of 8 into office ? The dumb American masses, that’s who. You overestimate how intelligent the average American voter is.

      • David Ashton

        James Fenimore Cooper and H L Mencken are worth re-reading today.

        • Romulus

          Absolutely!! An american renaissance in our literature wouldnt hurt either. Lawrence,poe,melville,hawthorne,whitman,etc.

          • David Ashton

            Brilliant – and we old gits in Britain would happily share these authors with you (though I would personally swap Poe for Pound).

          • Romulus

            Lol. Thank you kind sir. I spend countless hours in the library of Congress studying history.paying particular attention to north and western Europe. Im building a wonderful library of as much of history and literature as I can.

          • Rocky Mountain

            You’d actually give me a pound for Poe?

    • WDIK

      Actually affirmative action was voted upon a few years back…i am hesitant to say it was proposition 170 because that may not be correct…however,california voters voted it down…but an activist judge claimed it was unconstitutional and threw the vote out…i believe they also voted on another proposition that would deny free public education to illegals…another activist judge over-ruled that vote too.

      • California

        Proposition 209 (also known as the California Civil Rights Initiative) banned AA in California. It had some effect but the courts and schools figured out ways to use other non-race factors as a proxy for race and work around it. For example, they could give preference to someone who grew up in a bad neighborhood. There aren’t any white neighborhoods that are as bad as normal black neighborhoods.

        The other proposition you mention was:

        California Proposition 187 (also known as the Save Our State (SOS) initiative) was a 1994 ballot initiative to establish a state-run citizenship screening system and prohibit illegal aliens from using health care, public education, and other social services in the U.S. State of California. Voters passed the proposed law as a referendum in November 1994; it was the first time that a state had passed legislation related to immigration, customarily an issue for federal policies and programs. The law was challenged in a legal suit and found unconstitutional by a federal court. In 1999, Governor Gray Davis halted state appeals against the ruling.

        That proposition was the absolute last desperate attempt by whites to save the state. Already by the late 90s, Reagan’s amnesty had done irreversible damage, and the Latino-backed public sector unions elected Gray Davis. He wasn’t good and got himself totally recalled. I assume that Prop 187 would have been found unconstitutional no matter what, or it would been not enforced.

        Truly, folks, elections have consequences and we are on the verge of doing to the rest of the US what has been done to California.

        • ZeitTrash

          Elections don’t have conseqences when the courts void those election results. Repeatedly. American courts are nothing but the enforcers of American progressivism. They are as much an enemy of the people as anything.

          California would be nowhere near the disaster it is today if Prop 187 had been allowed to stand.

          • WDIK

            Agreed.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            Funny how California penal code “187” means murder.

        • WDIK

          Thank-you very much for taking the time to clarify…very much appreciated.

    • Dr. X

      Didn’t the Voting Rights Act of 1965 outlaw poll taxes and thus guarantee illiterates the right to vote? Voting DOES matter — but the opposite of the way you’d like it to.

  • a multiracial individual

    The greatest threat to the US is Latin American immigration, the greatest threat to Europe is Islam. Anyone wasting any effort on some other cultural issue is a fool.

    • Mr. E

      The Milwaukee County Sheriff, David Clarke, just said that the federal government is a far greater threat to Americans than terrorists and is perhaps the greatest threat to Americans. When you consider that the federal government is what is responsible for allowing massive Third World immigration, the federal government is responsible for sending thugs into white communities via Section 9 housing, the federal government is responsible for promoting minorities over whites via affirmative action, and so on…. the good sheriff might have a point about who the true greatest threat is to true Americans.

      http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/sheriff-david-clarke-federal-government-greater-threat-than-terrorists-b9917408z1-208645631.html

      • Fr. John+

        “the federal government is a far greater threat to Americans than terrorists and is perhaps the greatest threat to Americans.”

        Another group of people said the same thing. The South. They got the War Between the States, abolition of private property, theft of private property, inability to vote their own candidates, lack of habeas corpus, and villification for being ‘rebels’ and ‘patriots.’ The more things change, the more they stay the same. Except this time, sons of slaves are the Massas, on the plantation called FEDGOV.

    • Diversity is BAD

      The greatest threat to the US and Europe is non-White immigration, period.

      Anyone wasting any effort on American Renaissance for selective diversity is the fool here…

      • Tucker

        Ditto that. The sad but ugly truth is that Whites have no real allies within any of the non-white ethnic groups.

        Remember, the ‘model minority’ (Asians) voted 72% to return a virulently anti-White racist and a hard core, avowed Communist and Marxist to rule over the USA for another 4 horrible years.

        • Hage

          I’m surprised by the ignorance here, of course Whites have allies from non-Whites, just read HBD blogs to see that.

          East-Asians are highly ethnocentric and would prefer Whites over the latter, despite their voting patterns. Asians are only a minority in this country and they don’t have a sizable number of migrants/citizens to vote.

      • bluffcreek1967

        Great point, I completely agree!

    • DelmarJackson

      immigration and immigrants are not the problem, they are a symptom. The threat is fellow Americans that do not see america as a phsical place , but merely an ” idea’ that they can tinker with to make it more to their liking without having to live with the consequences of their social experimenting.
      Immigrants did not pass the 1965 immigration Act or the Amnesty in 1986. Immigrants are not the people in charge in the media or academia or the US chamber of commerce, or in leadership positions in the GOP or democrat party or heading up environmental groups like the sierra club, nor are they the billionaire Globalist CEOs or the leaders of all the major religions in our country, all of whom are on board for increasing more and more 3rd world immigration- against the wishes of the majority of native born Americans for the last 40 years!
      Join Numbersusa
      read vdare every day
      and vote the washington weasels out of both parties while we still have any chance left of saving our country.

    • OlderWoman

      Islam is a threat to the US and it’s going to get worse. And our government will do as Britain is doing and they’ll pander to them. We’ll be more marginalized than ever thanks to the Jesuits and the Muslims.

  • Homo_Occidentalis

    I’ve got an answer for you Ann. It happened way back in 1965.

    • dmxinc

      She mentions the Immigration Act of 1965, but only with figurehead Ted Kennedy’s name on it. No mention of the two guys who had been pushing for that travesty for decades – Emanuel Celler and Jacob Javits.

      • Greg Thomas

        Totally correct, but at least she’s talking about it. She may be the only one. It’s a start.

        • François

          She is brave.

        • Tucker

          The incredibly repulsive Michelle Bachmann, neo-con on steroids, dared to bring up the subject of the success of the pre-1965 immigration policy we had during one of the GOP presidential debates.

          Naturally, she steered clear of any mention of Celler or Javits, but the fact that this woman broached the subject at all suggested to me that she and perhaps a larger number of her fellow political elites are aware of the White Genocide Project of one certain group of
          virulently anti-white Cultural Marxists.

          It might even be possible that Bachmann and many others are reading AmRen and getting the education of their lives, based on the excellent information that regular posters often provide in the comments section.

        • OnGuard

          I spoke to Coulter about 8 years ago, after her speech to Univ.of Florida. She didn’t even mention immigration, legal or illegal; said it was not really a problem!!! I had asked her why she hadn’t mentioned it.

          • François

            Is she THAT clueless??

        • JD

          We live in a sad world when the only leaders, of white men, are minorites and women.

      • David Ashton

        Yes, half a matzo is better than none.

      • Big InLA

        Exactly. It’s safe to mention Ted because he was merely the last second sponsor. No mention at all of the ADL which had been pushing the legislation since the 1920’s. An old joke is that they pulled Ted aside to a dark room, showed him the Zapruder film, and told him that if he was smart, he’d step up and help Emanuel and Jacob push through their stealth legislation.

        This is why we have news stories telling us terrorist acts are not terrorist acts, news stories about crime with no mention of race, news stories presenting the swarms of non-white immigrants to the US as something natural, unstoppable. The biggest racists are those who always preach tolerance, as they are the most intolerant of all groups outside their own, especially towards whites, who are, in their own words, their only competition. Some of them are openly happy any time they see or read or story of whites as victims of non-whites. The hypocrisy is sickening, as sickening as watching gutless “leaders” afraid to point their fingers at the obvious.

    • Morris LeChat

      Then round about 1970 or 71 we let the arab countries seize the oil fields we created and start to gouge us. Don’t ell me there wasn’t some person in power that wasn’t paid a lot of money to let that one go down . At one point Nixon was considering declaring war and invading, don’t tell me some advisor wasn’t on the saudi gravy train and advised against this.

      • NYB

        Such was the global uncertainty around 1970, countries were looking at pulling their gold out of storage in U.S. vaults. France sent warships to New York to get its gold. The U.S. handed it over.

        The response was swift. The fractional reserve system was discarded and the immigration floodgates were thrown open. The last four decades have been an inflationary wealth bubble which is coming to a rapid end.

        Amnesty for Mexicans is just a part of the many ultimately futile gimmicks to keep the Ponzi scheme going.

        • Morris LeChat

          Hmmm, thank you for this angle. So , are you saying that when discarded the fractional reserve system, the government was desperate for the economy to grow in order to support it’s inflation, and that to grow the economy they wanted millions of immigrants? But we spend more on welfare for the immigrants than they add to the system. How does this work?

          • Bill

            It’s not about the money. It’s about the POWER. The elites don’t care if they rule over a third world country – they HAVE their millions. What they WANT is power and permanent rule. It’s what they have always sought after once we bought the lie of democracy versus a Constitutional Republic. As to that, any form of Constitutional Republic was destroyed once and for all by Ape Lincoln’s war.

          • 4saken

            Its also about money…when corporate America started leaving America for cheaper labor overseas thousands of retailers and other businesses like home construction and food manufacturers needed a way to replace the money in sales lost…so bring over third worlders with no skills who immediately go on welfare/foodstamps which is paid by those who are working by being forced to pay higher taxes and these corporate entitys bask in the profits…plus it creates jobs and construction in the penal system,it gives doctors plenty of work…crime/violence/drive-by-shootings and creates jobs for teachers and construction of new schools…the people who suffer the most from all this is the middle class…what caused the crash in 2008 will soon happen again,for the federal govt is supposedly threatening banks once again to give loans to these third world losers to buy homes that they dont qualify for.Welfare is good for corporate bussiness but bad for every day joe six pack who goes to work everyday to see most of his wages being eaten up by welfare/education programs for the poor third worlders who dont belong here in the first place.

          • George White

            No…..the tribe started introducing bills to change the ethnic makeup of this country starting in the early 1900’s! The dreadful Act of 1965 was the culmination of many many years of lobbying.

        • OnGuard

          There has been a North American Union in the works for over a decade, where the US, Canada and Mexico would become one, as the European nations have joined with the EU, despite the wishes of the citizens. Then they were flooded with Third World immigrants, bringing with them high crime and welfare rates. These are steps toward a One World government c/o the unelected, unaccountable UN. http://thenewamerican.com/world-news/north-america/item/10615-another-step-toward-north-american-union?

          Call your representative to co-sponsor HR 75 to get US out of the UN.

      • Romulus

        I posted the pertinent sources on the previous post stockholm burns but it dissappeared. So i will attempt again.
        The three biggest names in predicting the global oil production peak:
        M. King hubbert,kenneth s. Deffeyes,princeton univ; colin j. Campbell,retired of texaco and BP.

        THE LONG EMERGENCY by james howard kunstler
        The end of oil by paul roberts
        The prize, the epic quest for oil,money and power by Daniel yergin

        http://Www.globaloilpeak.com link to ” life after the oil crash”

        DVDs
        1)a crude awakening, the oil crash
        2)mega disasters:oil apocalypse from the history channel
        3)prophets of doom from the history channel
        Magazines
        National geographic jan2011 to sept 2011, consequences of 7 billion. People on earth.
        These are a good start. Brevity prevents me listing so much more.

      • Tucker

        There is nothing that would be sweeter or make me happier, than to wake up one day and see a headline that announced that the entire Bush family had been arrested and thrown in jail, charged with High Treason and War Profiteering and a host of other crimes that these evil degenerates have committed against the native White European founding stock of America and against the millions of brown skinned people around the world.

        • Morris LeChat

          Just the Bush family? There are other guilty parties/families.

  • Greg Thomas

    We don’t need any more “skilled” immigrants either.

    • NM156

      Mexicans invade from the working-class bottom, and Asians invade from the middle-class top. That’s the plan to destroy America.

      • Bossman

        It doesn’t have to be that way at all. Migration can be properly managed. Mexico is in North America and every president since Reagan has been committed to expanded trade and commerce with Mexico. We cannot shut Mexico out but we can severely limit Asian immigration.

        • NM156

          We need not one single immigrant,at this point, and the removal of the 20,000,000 illegals will greatly improve the prospects of countless working Americans and taxpayers. They are a net drain, serving no one but business and ethnic interests. Yes, we can shut Mexico out, and we will shut Mexico out.

          • MadMike

            If The Nazis were able to round-up 6 million + Jews and others.
            we could deport 20 Illegal Immigrants, If there is a will there is a way…
            Marxist Rubio is the last person I would trust, I think he wants to be the next Vicente Fox.

    • François

      Quite right. You have qualified people with American degrees who are jobless. Imagine…

      • Non Humans

        They Terrk Owrrr Jerrrbs!!!

        • Martel

          Thats funny but that is how it works, you cannot expect an endless amount of jobs for the white and black lowerclass, and then have an enormous influx of low iq unskilled workers without creating major difficulties on the job market.

    • Tucker

      Absolutely on the mark, Greg. Ted Cruz, who as I said the other day, is good on some issues like the 2nd Amendment and he appears to be opposed to amnesty, but he is a huge proponent of drastically increasing the number of H-1B visas so these cheap skate, anti-White Corporate CEOs can fire and replace White Americans in high tech jobs and replace them with foreigners who work for scale and zero benefits.

      So, no skilled immigrants and no unskilled immigrants – that is the recipe we want to see put in place. For America to survive, we have to grow our own talent and stop relying on the practice of stealing what little talent the third world has and adding more anti-White, lifetime Democrat Communists to the electorate.

  • Why can’t the country be more or less the ethnic composition that it always was?

    The tricky question for Ann is whether or not she believes English/European to be an ethnic composition comprised exclusively of the White race. The answer would be obvious to most self-described pro-White people, but you really have to keep an eye on the semantics involved when Republican mouthpieces start yapping about America, a Party, immigration and assimilation.

    • Morris LeChat

      true, the republicrats have proven to be a treacherous bunch of liars

      • Bill

        They are politicians just like the Democraps. They see the whole political thing as a career, not as a service. Therein lay the seeds of our destruction – allowing it to become that.

        • DudeWheresMyCountry?

          We have a bunch of Roman senators from the late period of The Roman Empire. The destruction of classical Rome and the end of the empire in was the result then… as it will be in our times.

  • These white indoctrinated young liberals, who just graduated college this week, need to ponder Ann’s points. These Obama drones are swimming in student loan debt, and will be affirmative actioned away from the middle class for the foreseeable future.

    • Erasmus

      And we need to be shouting Ann’s message from the roof tops.

      Cato the Elder used to end all his speeches before the Roman Senate with “Carthago delenda est!” (Carthage must be destroyed) It is time for conservatives to start saying something similar: “Sod diversity!” and “Secure the borders!”

      • François

        Or “Rule of law!”.

    • Tucker

      Oh, and one other rude awakening that awaits these heavily indebted, recent and starry eyed, young, mostly white liberals upon graduation.

      While they were busy putting themselves and probably their parents catastrophically deep into debt, in order to make those tuition payments, the treasonous rats in our US Congress and subsequent White House administrations have been busy passing treasonous and destructive ‘free trade’ policies like NAFTA and others, which have facilitated massive outsourcing of millions of good paying middle class jobs and off-shoring of the industries which once provided those jobs. They’ve also been busy adding sneaky little changes to the tax code, which make it even more lucrative and profitable for greedy business owners and corporate CEOs to engage in outsourcing and off-shoring. But, that treason was not enough to satisfy the greasy rats in blue suits who occupy the sewers of D.C. No, they want to go even further!

      To make sure that all these heavily indebted college grads can’t find any decent paying jobs here in America – so they can start to pay off those student loans, our Congress and guys like Ted Cruz want to drastically increase the number of H-1B Visas so these companies can import foreign labor who can be hired to take what few decent paying jobs might be left inside America, and guess what? These H-1B Visa foreigners will work for scale and no benefits, which drives down the salaries for high tech jobs across the entire nation.

      Think back to Karl Marx, folks. Think back and remember what you’ve read and learned about Communism and it’s goals and objectives. Destroying the middle class is an essential objective of every Communist. Marx clearly stated that Communism could never successfully be imposed upon a nation that had a strong and vibrant middle class.

      This is what is going on now and it has been going on for at least the last 30 or 40 years. And, BOTH of the mainstream political parties have participated in what amounts to a tag team war being waged against the middle class.

      This is the sort of end result we get when we allow an alien and hostile ruling elite class to rise to the top and have total power and control over a nation of people who these aliens hate and wish to destroy.

  • Morris LeChat

    The military should frag all of their officers and generals and take over washington, arrest, try and execute the traitors, jail the lawyers, media, wall streeters, suspend all banking activity for a period, establish martial law, and take back the country. The majority of white people would be behind them.

    • Bill

      And once all that is accomplished……who will lead? The military? Great plan. THAT’S always worked out well. In 1775 it was the PEOPLE who rose up and only after the rebellion had been established was an real army formed and a general appointed. For a while, this country never forgot who started it, who fought it, and who a government was to be formed to serve. Then along came Lincoln………

    • bigone4u

      I gave you an up arrow to reward your anger, but the military is pretty heavily nonwhite, so where military control would lead is unclear. There would have to be a strong committment to the restoration of the original Constitutional values to leave us in a better place.

      • Sherman_McCoy

        Wow, that must have been some comment, before it was deleted.

      • Tucker

        Might I point out that the ‘original Constitution’ did absolutely nothing that prevented us from winding up in our present nightmarish situation?

        I made a comment the other day about this same subject on some other article. I pointed out that, as brilliant as our Founding Fathers most certainly were, they made one major mistake when they wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Their mistake, which is looking like a fatal one, was their naivete in assuming that (a) America would always remain a White majority, White European dominated and controlled nation, and (b) America’s future political leaders would voluntarily agree to obey, respect, adhere to and protect the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

        So, in essence, our Founders could not imagine that a disease as deadly as race treason could ever spread so widely and become so toxic that our ruling elites would deliberately import millions of incompatible and indigestible and openly hostile non-whites into our nation and as a result, bring about the destruction of White Western Civilization. They also could not imagine that future political leaders would simply ignore the Constitution and engage in behavior that demonstrated their contempt for the principles that were outlined within the Constitution.

        So, as we have seen – we have tried the ‘honor’ system, and it has been a miserable failure. This means, that to prevent this from ever happening again, any new Constitution that we someday will write for our new and exclusive White Ethnostate – there must be harsh and severe penalties added to the Constitution that will mandate swift capital punishment of any politician who violates any part of the Constitution or their oath of office.

        Time to put some teeth into the Constitution. I advocate that any new Constitution should also have a provision that includes the creation of a citizens Watch Dog commission, who’s primary task will be to serve as the oath of office enforcement branch. The rule should be: You violate the Constitution and you will be awarded a one way ticket to Forrest Lawn.

        And, let’s make it happen, within 48 hours of the violation.

        I guarantee that this will put a permanent stop to any references to the new Constitution as just a ‘G-d%$# piece of paper’.

        • Bossman

          The Constitution was about Personal Liberty and Political Freedom for all men. The Founders knew that there were lots of Indians on the frontiers who needed to be civilized and made into Americans. They also knew that Blacks could not be slaves forever.

        • bluffcreek1967

          Tucker, I think your post gets the prize for the most insightful of the comments today. I’m not so sure about executing within 48 hours any politician who violates the Constitution, but I certainly understand and empathize where you’re coming from. Perhaps extreme measures such as this would have prevented all the Constitutional violations we regularly see in our day?

          Regardless, I think you’re right that our Founding Fathers did not know that future whites would be so damn stupid as to intentionally commit racial suicide or that we would advocate importing hordes of unskilled third-world immigrants into our nation to racially replace us! How could have ever seriously imagined such things?

          I think if our Founding Fathers were to see what we’ve done to the nation they established, they would be beside themselves, utterly shocked at how dangerously stupid we’ve become. They would have disowned us, I think.

  • Roger Williams

    It’s very clear Ann reads Vdare. Her points are practically identical to those posted early and often on Vdare. Since Jared Taylor often posts there, I’m sure she’s read AmRen too.

    • Groovy!

      Hi, Ann! I like White people and think America(or whatever is left of it after balkanization) should implement a strict policy that keeps America at a 90%+ White threshold. How about you?

      • Bad_Mr_Frosty

        That would limit her potential mates. She only beds non-Whites.

  • bigone4u

    As a Mexican would say, Ann has “cajones” for condemning the Mexicanization of America. Are there any other ladies with big ones? In her case she’s already so hated and demonized by libtards, this won’t matter. How about Greta? Greta, you got big ones?

  • DailyKenn

    Q: When did we vote to become Mexico
    A: 2008

    • Morris LeChat

      score one for you!

      • DailyKenn

        🙂

    • Greg Thomas

      1986.

      • Morris LeChat

        was that the first amnesty?

        • Greg Thomas

          It was the first one in my life time, and the one that set the wheels in motion for the 30 million illlegal invading mexicans, now squatting on our soil, demanding another one.

      • pimp in the whitehouse

        We? Who is We? Not me …

        Speak for yourself..

        • Greg Thomas

          What are you talking about? I do speak for myself. I didn’t vote for this garbage.

    • Ernest

      Sorry but George Bush did everything but scream all in all in free when he was the big dog. This has been going on for decades.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Really it was in 1965 and in 1986.

  • I vacationed in Mexico many times in the 70’s and 80’s. I always had a good time but the best part was LEAVING and coming home to America.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Now when you leave Mexico and come back to America your coming back to Mexico too.

  • Gwynn Ap Nudd

    Anne has come to the door of White Nationalism. Will she come in? I doubt it. The price is high. Pat Buchanan has lingered in the doorway for years. And Anne likes being a “personality”, being on Fox, etc. She’ll lose all that exposure and money if she persists in telling the Truth.

    • NYB

      It matters not if people don’t declare themselves to be ‘white nationalist’, as long as they champion ideas which are conservative and nationalist.

      We can make common cause with environmentalists, constitutionalists, and Wall Street occupiers as long as we share some common goals.

      • Freey’all

        Environmentalists and Wall Street occupiers are not conservative.

        We need to broaden our tent ideologically, and even moreso pragmatically, to work with anyone who shares some of the same common goals. Even groups who further our efforts or help and enable them with in some ways conflicting goals must be tolerated and at times supported.

        Right now there are various organizations, both far left and far right, fighting the Patriot Act’s fascism. We must draw from all sides of the spectrum and stop being afraid of American left circles; not all are without their uses to us.

    • François

      She is not getting any younger, and the price, would not be as high, as if she were still at the beginning of her carreer. We can hope.

    • George White

      Hey, give the lady some credit;she speaks the TRUTH.

      • François

        Yes, but there are certain elements of the truth that she doesn’t say. And for Whites to wake up, the whole truth must be said in as many media as possible.

    • heretic

      I don’t think Coulter is really all that close to white nationalism. She is not opposed to white replacement. She just wants immigrants who are skilled and productive regardless of race. As long as the newcomers believe in democracy and free trade she doesn’t care what race they are. Coulter just wants them to be makers and not takers. She has never given any indication that she has a problem with white replacement. She cares more about free markets and “equality” than she cares about her own people.

      • François

        So she is a neo-con?

  • Dave4088

    Of course we didn’t vote to become Mexico and if it were put to an honest vote there would be an end to Mexican immigration, both legal and illegal. In case anyone hasn’t noticed America doesn’t work anymore for the average white person and our government is a hybrid kleptocracy and multiracial mobocracy. The latter because blacks and browns threaten protests, violence and riots if they don’t get what they want.

    Our political elites respond only to the most powerful financial special interests and the organized, howling mobs of non-whites. Why else are they considering amnesty?

  • jtree

    If a miracle were to happen and we became a super-majority white country then Ann Coulter might have a harder time finding someone to date. Did you think about that Ann?
    I kid of course.

    • Bossman

      I don’t think a black man or Latin man would date Ann. She is much too skinny and shapeless.

      • OlderWoman

        She’s much too intelligent to date a black or Latino. Furthermore, I think she’d pass you over.

        • unadorned

          She dates/dated Jimmie Walker—as black as they come. Ugly too.

    • George White

      Why do you people keep blabbing this dumb gossip? The woman wrote a BRILLIANT piece, period. Why are you so petty?

  • panjoomby

    sad that we congratulate media types for actually talking about (or tip-toeing around) things we’ve been talking about for decades. if media types & political types weren’t such wussies this & HBD facts would all be out in the open & we’d be able to use our real !#$! names on these posts.

  • guest

    I know AC isn’t loved around here but sometimes she just nails it:

    Why can’t the country be more or less the ethnic composition that it always was? The 50-1 Latin American-to-European ratio isn’t a natural phenomenon that might result from, say, Europeans losing interest in coming here and poor Latin Americans providing some unique skill desperately needed in our modern, technology-based economy.

    Actually poor Latin Americans do possess one unique skill which is desperately needed. Well, a cluster of skills: high numbers of babies, high government dependence, and a lack of understanding about the true nature of “free stuff”. This results in their ability to give Democrats unassailable an unassailable majority. These Latin Americans are here do to a job Americans don’t want, which is voting Socialist.

  • Correct me if I am wrong, but in the following elections:
    1960
    1964
    1976
    1980
    1984
    1988
    1992
    1996
    2000
    2004
    2008
    2012

  • edie

    this 11 million number is so skewed it is ridiculous……….

    how about 40-50 million illegals in what used to be ‘our’ country…

  • Hal K

    This is a step in the right direction for Ann Coulter. She is explicitly advancing the interests of whites, although just barely. I wonder if she realizes that this is “racist” and that therefore she is now a bad person unless she rejects the notion that “racism” is wrong.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      It isn’t an issue if racism is wrong; more that the true racists try to perpetuate the idea that they can’t be racist… only you can. With each passing day more and more people wake up to the true racism in America, the fervent anti-White bigotry, jealousy and racism enjoyed by countless non-Whites.

      • Hal K

        No. That is wrongheaded. If a country created by a particular race buys into the notion that it is wrong to be “racist” then it causes them to feel morally obligated to turn the country over to people from different races. Also, it is logically impossible not to be “racist” one way or another, since different races have different innate abilities and tendencies.

        I have talked about this many times in comments. Look for my other comments if you want a more detailed explanation.

        • George White

          The label “racist” is a Frankfurt School term that the tribe uses to make people shutup and stop speaking the truth. The truth is that anti-white bigotry is the REAL racism and must be stamped out, the easy way or the hard way.

          • Hal K

            I don’t quite agree with everything you wrote. The term “racist” is meaningless, so there is no such thing as “the REAL racism.” It is impossible not to be racist one way or another. It is all bogus.

            By saying that anti-white bigotry is “the REAL racism” you are implying that it is wrong to be “racist,” and that keeps whites from waking up about the need for white identity politics.

      • George White

        Perfectly stated sir.

  • Brian

    The great unspoken truth of far left activism. Despite all of the rhetoric about democracy, some things are simply too important to be left up to the people.

  • Athling

    Ann, I believe you’ve got it!

    • Charles Edward Lincoln III

      I am 1000% in agreement with you! Every white South African should be entitled to immigrate without any further qualification than the South African passport (and I guess some sort of certificate that he or she isn’t at this very moment, currently a fleeing felon, although I suspect we’d all have sympathy for SOME of the White South Africans who might be currently fleeing felons as defined by the dastardly regime they live under).

      Our doors should be open to Whites born in Rhodesia, Kenya, or elsewhere in the Dark Continent as well. They are our kinfolk, heirs to the same British Anglo-Germanic heritage as ours, and (because we destabilized their own Nationalist regime by sanctions), I’d say we ABSOLUTELY OWE it to them.

      In addition, I have often wondered whether we shouldn’t also give complete forgiveness of all debts (including release from criminal liability) to any of our American Blacks who’re willing to emigrate TO South Africa. It has a climate in every way as pleasant as California, only much richer.

      I can envision an emigration from the U.S. Incentive Program for them which would even include “swaptions” on the property of South African Whites. Money and land are great, but they’ll be worth nothing to the S.A. Whites if they’re dead. We need to find PRACTICAL and FAIR ways to create incentives for “the right thing” to happen. An exchange of American Blacks for South African Whites could even be structured in such a way as to please liberals by simultaneously “atoning” for Colonialism AND Slavery.

      http://charleslincoln3.com

      • DudeWheresMyCountry?

        And in breaking news it has been confirmed that no Black has ever or will ever voluntarily leave The US for Africa.

      • Actually, those white Africans did it to themselves. They should either fight for their nation, or leave Africa to the blacks. However, that means white nations should remain majority Caucasian.

        • Bossman

          They should’ve encouraged mass immigration from European countries in the same way that Australia did. But I don’t think that they did that. They wanted to remain a small white tribe and many of them were anti-British.

          • Charles Edward Lincoln III

            I happen to know that is absolutely untrue. The White government of South Africa was actively recruiting and encouraging European immigrants FROM ALL PARTS OF EUROPE throughout the 1970s and even the 1980s. They granted easy asylum to refugees from Communist block countries in particular.

            I know this because one of my aunts was a founding member of the old group “Friends of Rhodesia” in Dallas, Texas . She had traveled to Africa and supported Ian Smith in particular and she had stacks of immigration booklets promoting both Rhodesia and South Africa. And I can recall South African pamphlets written in Czech, Danish, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Hungarian, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, Russian, Swedish, and Ukrainian. There were land grants and home loans available to white people to immigrate to South Africa—but the world wide prejudice and campaign against them was immense.

            Remember James A. Michener’s book “the Covenant” about the South African Voortrekkers? It starts out with a mythologized version of a South African politician studying Naziism practically at Hitler’s and Goebbels’ feet in pre-War Germany. Of course, Jim Michener was one of the original “pop culture” advocates of Racial Intermixing and Miscegenation…… Tales of the South Pacific and all that…. married to Mari Michener…. anyhow…

            You are wrong: South Africa and Rhodesia both tried to encourage immigration, but with the whole world predicting an imminent collapse of the system, how could they successfully promote a mass immigration?

            After 1994 the emigrants from South Africa I’ve met reflected that diversity: Boers and Anglos, of course, but also Greeks and Swedes and Germans and Poles and French. It’s a great tragedy what happened just above and below the Tropic of Capricorn….

            http://charleslincoln3.com

        • George White

          You are terribly misinformed. They didn’t do it to themselves at all. Our government (and others) ganged up on them and forced them out of power. Our financial companies (run by you know who) forced divestment and forced whites out of power.

          • Charles Edward Lincoln III

            There was never a more disgusting sight than the protests on Harvard Yard when I was there in graduate school in the 1980s and at other Universities around the country demanding divestment from South Africa. I was beyond humiliated.

            On the one hand, it was a pointless symbolic gesture—it didn’t really matter whether Harvard’s endowment owned stock in South African businesses or not by way of investment—stock owners can’t do much to help or hurt the businesses whose equities they buy unless they are in management or “control” volumes of shares. But it was a disgraceful attack by students at the oldest college in the United States (and hence one of the symbols of American Civilization everywhere) against the oldest and most civilized white nation in Africa. Talk about hypocrisy and hatred all getting mixed up and merging together—well, that’s a Harvard tradition I guess.

            But yes, our government in the United States CLEARLY exercised great pressure (as did the Government of the United Kingdom) and so forced first Ian Smith’s Rhodesia in 1980 (to the greater infamy and ultimate damnation of Jimmy Carter, who as a native Southerner whose ancestors’ cousins fled to Brazil in 1865 REALLY should have known better) and then FW DeKerk’s South Africa in 1994 (to the greater infamy and ultimate damnation of William Jefferson Clinton) to surrender. Now F.W. DeKlerk, unlike Ian Smith, might have had some inclination to surrender on his own, but he never would have done so if the international economic sanctions and political pressure had not been enormous.

            http://charleslincoln3.com

      • Gomez_Addams

        Yes and any white person born on the African-Continent who becomes a US citizen, can be referred to as “African-American”. Oh boy, I can hear Al and Jesse screaming right now!

    • Bad_Mr_Frosty

      No way, if we want to make reparations to White South Africans, it should be paid in guns and ammo. SA was built by Whites and they have a right to keep what they built.

    • George White

      Great idea! We SHOULD be doing everything possible to help those poor people. The slaughter of whites there is blacked out in our media and needs to be given far more attention.

  • Talltrees

    Some of you might remember my quote from a Democrat Senator in response to a letter regarding legal immigration of non-White Third-World immigrants.

    You won’t be surprised when you read an excerpt from a letter received from my Republican Senator. The entire form letter was the exact wording.

    “Our immigration system should also be open to newcomers who want to work hard and contribute to our communities and economy like my grandparents and so many other immigrants over the centuries.”

    He is Irish/Portuguese, an interesting combination and possibly why he is for amnesty of Hispanics. Fortunate for him, his grandparents were born in the Azores, or he’d have to edit the Democrat/Republican form letter. Maybe not. I expect all of them use the same letter regardless of whether their grandparents were immigrants or born here.

  • Frank Wheeler

    Too little too late. This country is done. The US was a noble experiment but it ultimately died from suicide.

  • George White

    The tribe changed our immigration laws to disempower us. Fact.

  • MOHAMED AHkBAR SALAKIM moojooh

    what are those black tar spots on obamas face? did he do roofing before becoming pres? HAVE A BLESS DAY.

  • MOHAMED AHkBAR SALAKIM moojooh

    MOHAMED AHkBAR SALAKIM moojooh

    in a few seconds

    what are those black tar spots on obamas face? did he do roofing before becoming pres? HAVE A BLESS DAY.

  • Andrea Tothe Infinitepower

    When did we vote for America to become USrael?

  • sshadow

    “Now we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel by holding ourselves out as the welfare ward of the world and specifically rejecting skilled immigrants.”

    Also Boehner said immigration bill is DOA.

    Ann really picked up on the 65 Suicide Act. That is the most serious impediment to the survival of the US as we know it. It must be repealed ASAP. Then large scale deportation needs somehow to follow. The more savage it is in Stockholm and London, the better. Whites have not seen enough reality from Islamics beause of news media being less than forthcoming, but these new dramatic events are casting an unforgiving light on the real benefits of diversity. Write your legislators again. Demand action.

    • George White

      You are a mind reader. This is my new mantra; REPEAL THE IMMIGRATION ACT OF 1965.

  • odious liberal

    All illegal aliens are criminal who need deportation, hard labor and surrender of the money they have stolen during their stay.

  • mobilebay

    If we’re so badly in need of workers (not), then why not bring in those who’ve applied correctly and are waiting to get the okay? Instead, the traitors in Washington will do everything in their power to make sure this country is filled with third world inhabitants who will work for lower wages and vote for the party who hands out the most goodies. As for the Rinos, they won’t get the votes, but perhaps there are some sort of “benefits” somewere for them. The only “reform” we need is to have every illegal alien and visa overstayer out of our country.

  • european native americans

    This whole revisionism is predicated on ignorance and the pagan liberal pc lie about white Europeans aka real latino hispanics coming here 500 years ago bringing disease and wiping out the heathen pagan native Americans stealing their entire western hemisphere when in fact that is low information uneducated idiocy after archaeologists prove the natives were red yellow race mongoloids from Asia who crossed the Bering land bridge 1500 yrs ago and set up shop.

    Furthermore these mongoloids are not and never were native Americans because America was not even named America until 1512 when a European Italian white explorer named Amerigo Vespucci was honored with the naming since he first advised Europe that this was not India but a new hemisphere even though there is also proof that Europeans came first anyway. Europeans are the real native Americans.

    Call it a neutral land owned by neither Asians or Europeans who fought a war 500 yrs ago won by the Conquistadors in the south and Anglicans in the north eventually thus by all accounts of historical documentation the winner takes all and whites own the land even though many Asian mongoloid migrants have been granted their independence.

    We know the European also won the new neutral land because only European languages are spoken such as Spanish and English plus white man religion is the major belief system with everything being westernized in the northern and southern parts of the hemisphere and islands. There are exceptions like Haiti where a slave revolt occured in 1800 and the nation was reverted back to voodoo Africanism as a fly in the ointment.

  • Bossman

    Ann Coulter doesn’t know much about geography. If there are more Hispanics coming in, it is because their countries are much closer to the United States than Europe. Shouldn’t we have friendly relations with the rest of the Americas? What does Ann want? An apartheid state like the old South Africa? Geography can’t be ignored. And another thing, in the old days, it appears that nobody paid any attention to so-called Hispanics and Mexicans because everybody thought of them as white.

    • You sound like an extremely troubled individual. Since when does a friendly relationship with my neighbor mean they have a right to walk in my home and eat whatever they want, take whatever they want, take my kids clothes, have me pay for it all, invite all of their family and friends, and then call me a bigot and hater because I decide I want to lock my doors and tell them I have my own family and friends that I prefer over them?

      Mexicans were NEVER thought of as White. Hispanics—as in SPANISH/PORTUGUESE—are White, even if they are found in Mexico or any other country in the Americas. Mestizo and indigenous tribes in Latin and South America are NOT WHITE. The only ones that were accepted as White were generally those with higher degrees of the Spanish admixture. There was a small blend of culture in the states bordering Mexico, but at no point in American history was the United States of America a hodgepodge of Mexicans and non-Whites removing the European foundation and stock that the USA was built upon and replacing it with whatever banana republic culture decided to show up at our door.

      Amerindian(mostly the tribes of the eastern half of the USA) were only accepted into the culture after fully assimilating to a European standard. Again, there was a blend of culture as this happened, but it was never the European-American standards or stock that was changed to accommodate the new Americans. It was always the immigrants who conformed. Even the European immigrants were looked down upon if they were perceived as cultural interlopers and didn’t Americanize themselves.

      • Bossman

        When law enforcement people are looking for a Mexican or other Hispanics, they are always described as white—even now. Can you explain that? What is a higher degree of Spanish admixture? Is it mere appearance? The USA has always been a hodgepodge of people from day one. In the old days, light-skinned people would get to pass as white if they were white enough.

        • George White

          Lying again. I have close friends in law enforcement. I ride in the choppers at night. Browns are not described as white. You are smoking crack and a bigtime liar.

          • Bossman

            The Miami Herald sometimes carry an insert of people wanted by the police. Hispanics are always described as white even when they look very Mexican. I would sometimes get a good laugh out of that.

          • edie

            yes, it’s a real knee slapper…….

        • Law enforcement always describes Mexicans,Latin and South Americans as Hispanic male or female when they give descriptions and reports. The only time shades of Hispanic/Mestizo/Amerindian are lumped in with White people is when it comes time for a demographics breakdown of listing perpetrators by race. Blacks, Asians/Pacific Islander, White/Caucasian, Amerindian, and other. Some of the reports don’t even go that far, reporting only offenders as White, Black, Other, or Unknown. Unless the FBI and DOJ have recently changed the way they manipulate statistics, then you can go look at their crime reports and see for yourself.

          The best it gets is when they might list one as White (Hispanic). East Indians and Middle Eastern/Asiatic, all find their way lumped into the WHITE category, with maybe a parenthesis indicating that they are not physically resembling of the European/Caucasian race. If statistic bureaus were being honest, then they would classify them for what they really are, which is Other or Mixed. Do you really think that if I told you to meet a guy at a mall, and all I told you was that he was a White guy, what are the odds that you wouldn’t be looking for these “White” guys?

          http://thumbs.mugshots.com/gallery/images/2/41/04/Merced_Cambero_Jr_mugshot.400×800.jpg

          http://cbsdallas.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/eduardo-ravelo-1.jpg

        • OlderWoman

          I’ve lived in New Mexico among white Spaniards. I’ve also been to Mexico. The two groups are entirely different. Mexicans are brown.

        • Jefferson

          So Hispanics are a “White” ethnic group because law enforcement says they are ?

          By your retarded logic, Osama Bin Laden is a “White” man because the FBI and the CIA put “White” under his race in wanted ad mugshot pictures of him.

          Most of the Hispanic criminals that law enforcement classifies as “White” can not even pass for a Sicilian, let alone pass for a Swede.

          I have seen many so-called “White” Hispanic criminals who look like they have came straight out of an Amerindian tribe in Peru.

    • George White

      You must be lying, or at least you’re totally misinformed. The Immigration Act of 1965 excludes whites and opens the door to massive third world immigration. This is what the tribe WANTED and fought for. It had nothing to do with geography and everything to do with displacing whites. It was ENGINEERED.

    • Jefferson

      If Hispanics are a “White” ethnic group just like the Polish for example, than why do Hispanics qualify for affirmative action when they are “White” and there for have “White Privilege”.

      I thought affirmative action was only meant for groups who do not have “White Privilege”.

      Someone should tell The National Council Of La Raza that they all have “White Privilege” and there for should stop referring to themselves as Nonwhite.

    • edie

      they aren’t hispanics as much as they are natives from old stock indians from south of the border………
      used to be called aztecs, mayans, inca’s and the like ———— they were soundly defeated 500 years ago and now they return to bring montezuma’s true revenge, not the little stomach ache you believed before.

  • John Smith

    It’s all a big joke to these people until the dollar finally crashes due to decades of massive deficit spending on war and welfare in a jobless “free” trade economy. Then the U.S. becomes zombie land. A Great Depression on a level the U.S. has never before experienced. A hundred million people’s welfare runs out. Cannibalism. Great tragedies are wrought by little actions compounded over a long period of time. As Solomon once penned, “the little foxes ruin the vines.”

    • Bossman

      The Dollar is not going to crash because too many foreigners want it and honor it.
      Why do you think all these people from over the borders want to come to the USA if not for the mighty Dollar?

      • John Smith

        The Chinese yuan is on track to become a global currency and if present trends continue will eventually replace the declining U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency, experts say.

        China is opening its financial markets to foreign investors, moving to create Asian stock and investment markets to supplant Western ones, and encouraging its currency to be used more in international trade.

        Countries that have substantial trade with China, such as Australia, are among the first to base their trade settlements on the yuan, also called the renminbi, since it lowers their transaction costs.

        International payments in the yuan jumped 24 percent in November from October, reaching a record 0.56 percent of the global total, CNBC reports, citing data from SWIFT, a transactions services organization. It’s all just the beginning. When Asia is ready, they will dump the dollar for the Yuan.

        The vast majority of the poor think only in the present. They come here to get welfare, social services, free education, free medical care, etc… and earn what little money under the table they can. When the ability to fund the welfare, social services, free education, free medical care, etc… ceases: they will stop coming. And that is definitely going to happen when the dollar finally crumbles due to the combination of massive deficit spending into enormous national indebtedness and external currency competition in the form of the Yuan.

      • OlderWoman

        When they fail the USD, we’ll have the Amero.

        • Bossman

          The Amero would be even more powerful and attractive than the mighty US Dollar.

  • WhiteGayMale

    Go Ann! I’m so glad somebody who is somewhat mainstream media is making the statements she is making.

    • Bossman

      Are you really a gay white male? I’ve always thought that you guys were the champions of diversity. The new immigration bill makes no allowance for gays to bring in their friends from overseas to become same-sex couples.

      • WhiteGayMale

        Number one: Gays don’t all think alike. I’m certainly not a champion of diversity, at least as it applies to non-European whites.

        Second: I’m glad the Leahy amendment was rejected. Until same-sex marriage is formally recognized by the federal government, there should be no special rights for same-sex couples to bring their “friends” in from other countries.

        • Freey’all

          Why do you need the M word? Why can’t you be happy strengthening and equalizing legally the civil unions?

          I am for gay rights as long as they don’t conflict with our constitutional ones and I take the separation of church and state quite seriously.

          • WhiteGayMale

            I don’t need the M word. I’m pretty agnostic on same-sex marriage marriage. I see both pros and cons to it. But of course, I only speak for myself. I don’t speak on behalf of all of the homosexuals of America. You’ll have to interview a lot more of us in order to make a sweeping generalization. 🙂

          • You’ve just proven Sailer’s axiom, that gay men don’t think they’re speaking for anyone but themselves as individuals, while lesbian women think they speak for all women of all orientations everywhere.

          • Bossman

            Lesbians appear to be more freedom-loving than male homosexuals.
            That is why it is easy to believe that many of the German Nazis were gay.

  • George White

    I keep rereading this great piece. This is really a manifesto to CHANGE the damaging immigration laws to favor WHITES, and everyone here should be active in getting these changes made.

  • And throw them all into the prisons, the bad prisons; the prisons where weak inmates spend long nights in the shower stalls with the strong and the cruel; and this will introduce the criminal political leaders to the sweet fruits of their labors, to the sweet fruits of diversity!

  • Guest

    Ann, please. Voting is absolute nonsense. It might possibly have a point in Mayberry, podunk county or some other tiny hamlet, but not when it comes to big elections which are what I call LEGALLY RIGGED. Lately however, I’ve noticed that even in the smallest towns, if the issue is too important or actually might make a difference, the ACLU, LA RAZA, The SPLC, or some other communist group comes in and changes the results of the “election”. Most Americans go through the motions never realizing how little effect they really have on anything, when they continue to work through the “normal” channels.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Personally, I think traditional English food is better than Mexican. Also, once I had enough of the problems that the overwhelming number of them caused me personally (and that took years (as waking up usually does)), I won’t even go into a Mexican restaurant. I’m not supporting them in any way, no exceptions.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    …”I wouldn’t want that many Dutch,”…. Okay, except that Dutch culture is the second oft he two main founding cultures of America aside from English. Some of you might remember that New York City was first named New Amersterdam and the big farms that became counties in New York State had once been Dutch aristocratic styled with a basic feudal system of tenant farmers and workers during the time of the American Colonies. Our first American folk tale is “Rip Van Winkle” (or Rumple Stilskin). obviously of Dutch origin. I’d gladly trade 60% of the American population for Dutch (real Dutch) replacements.