1 in 4 Swedish Women Will Be Raped as Sexual Assaults Increase 500%

Daniel Greenfield, Front Page Mag, January 29, 2013

Sweden has imported huge numbers of Muslim immigrants with catastrophic effect.

Sweden’s population grew from 9 million to 9.5 million in the years 2004-2012, mainly due to immigration from “countries like Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia”. 16 percent of all newborns have mothers born in non-Western countries. Employment rate among immigrants: 54 percent.

Sweden now has the second highest number of rapes in the world, after South Africa, which at 53.2 per 100,000 is six times higher than the United States. Statistics now suggest that 1 out of every 4 Swedish women will be raped.

In 2003, Sweden’s rape statistics were higher than average at 9.24, but in 2005 they shot up to 36.8 and by 2008 were up to 53.2. Now they are almost certainly even higher as Muslim immigrants continue forming a larger percentage of the population.

With Muslims represented in as many as 77 percent of the rape cases and a major increase in rape cases paralleling a major increase in Muslim immigration, the wages of Muslim immigration are proving to be a sexual assault epidemic by a misogynistic ideology.

The statistics are skewed by urban centers where the Islamic colonists cluster. In Stockholm this summer there was an average of 5 rapes a day. Stockholm has gone from a Swedish city to a city that is one-third immigrant and is between a fifth and a quarter Muslim.

{snip}

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • potato78

    They have been messing up our pure white matrix.

    God bless Sweden. Amen.

  • JohnEngelman

    Social Democracy only works in countries where nearly everyone is white. I hope Social Democrats learn that before it is too late.

    White liberals are too civilized for their own good. They have difficulty understanding the mentalities of those who are less evolved than they are.

    • Oil Can Harry

      I used to work with a Swede who has since retired. He often visited the land of his birth on vacation.
      He once told me that he was shocked by how many Muslims and Africans were on the dole over there, milking the system.

      • Non Humans

        It’s hard to be surprised at all by how many nonhumans or muslims ride social welfare programs. It’s like it is ingrained in their DNA.

    • David Ashton

      So what about “nearly everyone is white” for the USA and Canada?
      Those “darkies” may find Swedish blondes as desirable as you find Chinese girls.

    • RisingReich

      You’re right about the civilized part, that’s for sure.

    • Nate Miller

      True. Social democracy and true liberal values work best in nations inhabited by people of higher intelligence who follow a culture of reason and constructiveness. Predominantly white and some Asian societies would come under this norm. In the middle east region, Israel is the only exception – a beam of light & civilization in the otherwise primitive dark muslim world.

      In the west, whites, some Asians ( North east orientals and east Indians) & Jews along with a very small mix of assimilated & well educated blacks & hispanics (yes they DO exist) would be the ideal blend of healthy diversity.

      • JohnEngelman

        Nate Miller,

        The most fascinating friend I had in my life was a black college professor who taught at Howard University. Half the girls in his Freshman English class were infatuated with him. He had too much integrity to exploit that.

        Blacks like him belong in the “health diversity” you mention.

        • David Ashton

          You and your friends! Don’t you ever look at the big picture?
          You once quoted the Bible to justify “Jewish” occupation of the Middle East from the Mediterranean to not just the Jordan but to the Euphrates, but what about the Native Arabs in that area? Don’t white Americans, especially those of British and German descent, have a better and more recent claim to the USA? Better than China, Vietnam or Mexico at any rate.

          • JohnEngelman

            No.

            The Mexican War was a land grab against a weaker country. The United States took half of Mexico. If you want Mexican American citizens to be told they do not belong in that half, you tell them.

          • Luca

            At least tell a half-truth. There was a thing called the “Treaty of Guadalupe Hildalgo” In case you forgot, Mexico took that land from the Spanish, who took it from the Amer-indians. At least we paid for it.

          • Michael_C_Scott

            OK: I’ll do that. I always get the hard jobs.

      • seapeamp

        “…the ideal blend of healthy diversity.”

        Nate, you are ONE anti-white MoFo.
        Why do you hate white people?

  • Boereseun

    The Swedes assured South Africa that there’s nothing wrong with non-whites and non-white immigration. They even paid the ANC to blow us up to make sure we got their message.

    Eish! She is not werking! Roep die baas!

    • Piet pompies

      BoereSeun, waar bly jy? Is jy in RSA? Ek wonder maar net, want ek dog meeste wit mense hier is ge-brainwash! Dis goed om iemand normaal raak te loop.

      • Boereseun

        In die Kaap, meer as dit wil ek nie se nie. Die mense hier is ‘n bietjie opbef*k in die kop en ek is verseker jy verstaan wat ek se. Mees van hulle is ook liberale in verlief op Zille en haar swaat ‘tea lady’. Soms tyd vol dit as of ‘Amren’ die enigste plek waar ‘n mens soos ek kan sy mond oop maak en sy eie stem laat hoor.

        Goed om u te ontmoed ou pompies!

        • Piet Pompies

          Ek is ook in die Kaap. EK weet presies hoe jy voel!

          Voorspoed!

          • Boereseun

            Dankie ou maat en dieselfde aan jou! Lekker aand verder.

          • The__Bobster

            I am in Cape Town. I know exactly how you feel!

            Good luck!

        • The__Bobster

          In the Cape, more than that I would not say. People here a little opbef * k in the head and I’m sure you understand what I’m saying. Most of them are also liberal and love with Zille and her Swaat tea lady. Sometimes it feels as if Amren is the only place where a man like me can open his mouth and his own voice.

        • Michael_C_Scott

          Jetzt kann Ich Deutsch. Vergess dass nie!

          I want what you want.

      • The__Bobster

        Farmers Son, where are you? Are
        you in South Africa? I’m just wondering, because I thought most white people here has been brainwash! It’s good to have someone gets to
        walk normally.

        • Boereseun

          Not ‘walk normally’ but ‘to bump into’ or ‘to meet’.

    • Werdrix

      Its was the same prime minister that made Sweden multicultural(Olof Palme). He also did send money to ANC.

    • Laager

      Yes – this looks as if it is pay back time.
      Not only did the Swedes fund the ANC during “the struggle” in SA, but I believe Oliver Tambo mysteriously became a wealthy man, given that he arrived in the UK as an unemployed school teacher in the 60s.
      Not only does South Africa have the world’s highest / worst rape statistics but about 40,000 whites have been brutally slain since majority rule in 1994. This figure includes the almost 4,000 farmers that have been murdered.
      What we see here is the direct result of western / European liberalism in action.
      Of course they will deny it and claim that events in SA are the result of slavery, colonialism and apartheid. How they will rationalise the parallel violence in Sweden remains to be seen.
      Perhaps it is because the moon really is made out of cheese.

      Aan Boereseun en Piet Pompies – Hou die blink kant bo kerels. Aanhou wen!

      • For a couple of reasons. One is that some of the rapes are so “corrective rapes of lesbians trying to turn them straight. Two. A lot of babies and children are raped because the men believe that if they rape a virgin, that would cure them of AIDS. Not true but this is what they believe.

  • Well, we all know that white Westerners are always enriched by their contact with those from “vibrant” cultures, so there’s no reason to suppose that raped white women are any different. In the end, all cross- cultural interactions (however violent) serve the cause of diversity, and we all know that diversity is our strength.

    • Boereseun

      Yes, I totally agree. These women should thank these men that they were given the privilege of their diverse ‘enrichment’.

    • Non Humans

      Wow dude, I almost blew raging spicy chili out of my nose.
      .
      Very efficient use of sarcasm.

  • [Guest]

    Evidently, a whole lot of Westerners approve of the “catastrophic effect.” They’re suicidal.

  • Bard

    Deportation or Retaliation.

    • Boereseun

      Neither. Who will do what needs to be done?

  • Skincognito

    The “you-know-who’s” run Swedish politics. Not that Swedish men shouldn’t hang their heads in shame.

    • Pelagian

      I think the who-whos and the third-world masses BOTH would have blonde-haired blue-eyed Christian Sweden as Target No. 1 for destruction. It’s the genetic jewel of the white race’s crown, let’s face it.

  • ArmenianWN

    Another benefit of diversity.

  • Daisy

    It’s not clear whether the article is implying that the increase in the rate of rape is made up of mostly muslim-on-muslim or muslim-on-everyone assaults. Muslim women are probably much less likely to report to law enforcement, but it’s also unclear as to how the stats are being gathered.

    • MartelC

      they specifically target white women and pretty much leave their own kind alone. In some european cities, white women are wearing hajibs to avoid harassment.

      • Daisy

        Which cities have you heard this about? I’d want to know before traveling anywhere. I would have thought Sweden would be safe enough.

        • MartelC

          I would say offhand, just about any European city is unsafe now – i can’t think of any that haven’t been ‘enriched’ I hear, not surprisingly as it is the ‘capital’ of the EU (a failed country for a failed EU) Brussels is particularly bad.

          • Kblankenship7

            Have you been to Hamburg lately? Is anyone on here from Germany?

      • The__Bobster

        It’s difficult for them to rape their own kind when their women have to have a male accompany them when they go out in public.

    • Rag Narok

      Believe me, their prime target is White women. White women are one of the reasons they jump at the chance for immigration into White nations.

  • MartelC

    There was one swedish feminist who did speak of this outrage…. she spoke of the outrage that swedish men would dare say ‘defend our women’ because it was ‘sexist’

    another Swedish female marxist professor suggested swedish women have to start dressing less ‘provocatively’ because they live in a multicultural society….

    I honestly think that leftists would sooner see women in burkas then let anything get in the way of their agenda to destroy western society.

    • Boereseun

      Funny, when a police officer in Canada suggested they dress less provocatively he was called a you know what…

    • starlight

      Do you mean professor Unni Wikan from Norway who said “Native Norwegian women must realize that they live in a multicultural society and adopt themselves to it”

      Dr. Wilkan isn’t marxist. I did some research on her and she also taught at Harvard for a couple of years. And after a bit of a research I noticed that it is not that she is actively on non-white immigrants’ side, but it is that she notices men have very few resources where they can receive medical or psychiatric assistance compared to the supports that women receive.

      • MartelC

        you’re correct she is norwegian… here is the quote
        The article quoted a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo (note: her name is Unni Wikan) as saying that “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”

        she’s a professor of anthropology – which has been thoroughly marxist since Franz Boas’s disciples took over.

        But I don’t care if she was a ‘neoconservative’ that quote is outrageous

        • brengunn

          That quote makes me want to weep. This is the problem with unrestricted immigration, the population will be so radically changed that our Western values will have to be butchered to accommodate backward Arab/Muslim values.

          BTW, I’m not against all immigration into Western countries. But we have to restrict the numbers so immigrants naturalise and assimilate rather than create these third world colonies.

          • seapeamp

            “BTW, I’m not against all immigration into Western countries.”

            I am!
            Africa for the Africans.
            Asia for the Asians.
            White countries for White people!
            Nice and simple, nothing more complicated then that.

            Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

          • JohnEngelman

            America for the American Indians.

          • seapeamp

            haha… Diggleberryman if you are anything, you are consistent.

            Just remember my friend, anti-racist IS a code word for anti-white.
            End White GeNOcide!

          • JohnEngelman

            The only Americans who have the right to complain about genocide and race displacement are American Indians.

            What you call “genocide” is nothing more than competing with high IQ Orientals and Jews.

          • seapeamp

            WoW Diggleberryman! Does your mother know you are pro-White-GeNOcide?

          • This is what your high IQ minority has planned for white nations:

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA7Ymki71fM

          • Joseph

            How about the Solutreans who came here from Europe 5000 years in advance of the Asians; do their kin have a right to complain?

          • seapeamp

            heh, don’t fret over Diggleberryman… he just hates White people.

          • Joseph

            No, whites, Asians and Jews are all equal; it’s simply that Asians and Jews are more equal than whites.

          • seapeamp

            That must be why millions of Whites are flocking to live amongst Asians and Jews! Oops, hold on. That’s not right. Noooo it’s the INVERSE of that.

            Thanks for playing sucksliberals. It’s good to know your anti-White tendencies haven’t completely deserted you.

          • Joseph

            Well you see, that’s what we call a facetious statement. I was paraphrasing the pig in “Animal Farm”.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are projecting your hatred on to me. I hate no race. I do love Jews and Orientals, especially Chinese.

          • Big Bill

            You are right, John. Hate is wasted effort. Love for your own people is what matters. Ask the Chinese. Ask the Jews. Ask the American Indians. This love of their people is bred into them at an early age. They don’t fall for this silly we are all brothers. stuff.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have never noticed hostility against white Gentiles among the Jews and Orientals I have known and liked.

            Some of the posters here seem to be primarily motivated by hostility toward anyone who is not a white Gentile or European origins.

          • JohnEngelman

            I “don’t fall for this silly we are all brothers stuff” either. My “brothers” are those I choose to like. Many of them happen to be Jews and Orientals. Some are blacks.

          • Boereseun

            John is right, throw off the shackles of white guilt, no more Hitler shaming. Hitler was not genociding the Jews, he was competing with them and winning. It is right and just to defend yourself and your lands, this is war and invasion.

            Fight back!

          • george00

            We stole it fair and square.

          • JohnEngelman

            Bullets against flint arrow heads are not what I consider to be fair.

          • Bill

            Warfare isn’t meant to be fair. Duh. Nor were the american indians much concerned about egalitarianism. There were just as concerned about expanding their territorial claims over other tribes as anybody. We were more effective in our expansion. If that troubles you, you could always emigrate to Asia or Israel and be with those you seem to be more fond of than your own countrymen. Ya know?

          • Joseph

            Well, blame the Chinese. They first invented gunpowder.

          • Daisy

            1,000+ years of stealing from white europeans is not what I consider fair either.

          • Bill

            If you feel that way, deport yourself. I’m staying.

          • JohnEngelman

            Fortunately the Orientals and Jews are staying too. They have as much right to be here as you do.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            I have no problems with European Jews who identify as White and aren’t hostile to non-Jewish Whites and their interests. I don’t see any reason to admit wast numbers of Orientals, though. They have their own countries, and they would not like it if Whites came into their countries in the kind of numbers that they are flooding into ours.

          • gemjunior

            Oh no they do NOT. You’re insane.

          • Michael_C_Scott

            Really?

          • al

            fuk if they do..

          • David Ashton

            America for the Native Americans, and the Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans, Japanese, Israelis, Hispanics….

          • Triarius

            America for the Europeans; Solutrians were here first and Europeans built America. Am Indians can walk back to Mongolia.

          • kerrysmith

            Now John, would you call that a wise allocation of resources?

          • IanJMacDonald

            The American Indians had an open-border immigration policy, and look what happened to them.

          • Big BIll

            Nah. Indians are too weak. They will never take America back from us. Then again, if you Indians could work together, maybe you could. I would think this is not the place to work out your Reconquista, however. I would recommend the La Raza folks. Good luck, John! I respect a worthy adversary.

          • Guest

            You know, it was like that hundred years ago. Why couldn’t the ancestors
            send their best minds to study other lands and their people instead of
            sending an army? I guess peace is overrated and boring; there’s no money
            in it.

        • gemjunior

          These crazy liberal bitches are beyond help. Their humanity is GONE, replaced by pretend “anthropology” reports, studies and fantasies of racial equality and guilt over socioeconomic realities that have nothing to do with them. In their heads only they give themselves way too much power and are disgustingly self-important. I wouldn’t mind if the fantasies were meaningful but they are NOT – they are irresponsible and ridiculous and they hurt decent people who have never done anything to anyone. Worst of all they are betraying their own racial kin for total strangers. If there is any justice, people like Unni that cow should receive the benefits of diversity with a diverse rape, by these wonderfully diverse citizens. And it needs to be accompanied by the same beating that poor girl on the front of the newspaper who was beaten bloody. Because otherwise she will forget. And it’s something I would NEVER wish on anybody. But when people like her can be so reckless with the safety of other women’s bodies, and can make breezy statements about “Norwegian women must bear some responsibility for the rapes by the way they dress” she needs to get it good. It’s true, 100% true.

      • Kblankenship7

        Did she really say that? Where? Not arguing, just curious.

        • Daisy

          I would also like to know if she actually did say the first quote verbatim:”Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes.” The second quote,”Norwegian women must realize that we live in a multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.” ” is disturbing but *could* be interpreted as some sort of pragmatic edict, as sick as it still is. The first is purely deranged and I’m wondering if there is a link to verify it.

          • Daisy

            http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2007/04/norway-professor-unni-wikan-on-rape.html

            With just a simple search on google, the above was the second or third link that came up. Wikan claims she never said the first quote. Her views are far more nuanced and complex. Ironically she has said that Norwegian culture is too indulgent of these arab immigrants overall with respect to welfare, etc., and has been accused by the left of being ‘racist’ of course.

            Resident misogynists might want to do their research better. Wikan has problems for sure, but her overall posture is nowhere near as extreme as you’re claiming, which doesn’t mean I personally agree with her.

    • [Guest]

      >>>I honestly think that leftists would sooner see women in burkas then let anything get in the way of their agenda to destroy western society.

      This article proves that they would just as soon see them raped.

    • Liberalsuck

      What was the last name of the professor? That will tell you alot. Guess what ‘tribe’ it was that pushed feminism onto white women? Guess which ‘tribe’ it was that has been instrumental in bringing millions of nonwhite into white nations? Guess which ‘tribe’ it was that emasculates white men and encourages white fertile females to mate with blacks and other nonwhite men?

      • K..

        Would that be the tribe of moronic conspiracy theorists who assign the blame for everything to the secret Jewish plot that controls the world?

        • gemjunior

          Yeah – I totally agree, it’s such a moronic “theory” to imagine Jews attempting to displace and disenfranchise White Europe and everywhere they spread out. All that crazy talk about Freud, Bernays, Boas, New School For Social Research! And all those legal decisions gutting our formerly Christian-influenced institutions – like removing the Ten Commandments from Courtrooms and “under God” from the pledge…so ridiculous to consider that Jews had a hand in that. It’s nearly as moronic as imagining that silliness about Hollywood being under Jewish control! Those crazy gentiles! IF and it’s a big IF – they had brains they’d be dangerous – they must wanttokillsixmillionjews…. LMFAO

    • NeanderthalDNA

      Yeah, not disputing the fact that real rape rates have shot up due to Muslim and black immigration, but…

      Read up on the Julian Assange case. It seemed to me that the Swedish definition of rape is pretty broad. Therefore I would predict a higher rate of rape in the country even without rape prone immigrants.

      Again, not to debunk the theory that immigrants are more prone to rape than natives, but the draconian standards of rape that are a direct result of the ultra lib-lefty PC tyranny in the country must also be taken into accout.

      • Daisy

        According to some on here, white women can’t be ‘really’ raped to begin with so I don’t know what they’re in an uproar for. I experienced a serious sexual assault in college from a classmate who was a WASP but who had grown up in Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately the Jesuits in control of that school didn’t have a problem with his arab-influenced woman-hating, so it was a reflection on them just as much as on the arabs. The southerners add their own dimension. The oil-moneyed Texans and Oklahomans or even wanna-be’s might as well be arabs in their attitudes towards women anyway and they were the worst element of the perfect storm of misogyny that the school presented. Oh, add onto that black men menacing fair haired females all over the neighborhood…

        Will look up Assange’s case, but so far I see no problem with defining rape as any ultimate violation wherein consent was lacking.

        • MarcusTrajanus

          “According to some on here, white women can’t be ‘really’ raped to begin with so I don’t know what they’re in an uproar for.” I’ve seen plenty of insane misogynism around here, but I hadn’t seen that one. What was the “reasoning” behind that?

          • Daisy

            Unfortunately Boerseun claimed, with no information to back it up, that my claim to have experienced sexual assault was just my inability to handle rejection by a male. It’s under the article posted in the last couple of days about american universities’ sports programs for the disabled.

            This in spite of the fact that one occurred at 14 (one year before menarche), when I was abducted by an older sister’s friend who was the son of an imprisoned mafiosa. Not rape but forced molestation, by that I mean dragged onto and held down on a bed. Fast forward to the ‘minefield of sexual assault’ that was the jesuit-run fairly well-known college in DC, and if you read below you’ll hear why the other factors as to what made it so. I also reference another assault by a Saudi-raised classmate whom I was most certainly not friends with but who had asked to come into my apt. to study. Without going into further detail, I will state that the notion that a woman cannot be raped or sexually assaulted by a male she knows is misogynist. None of my experiences occurred on dates or in situations that could be in any way construed as a ‘hook up.’ Did I encounter a streak of psychos? Sure but they were licensed by this attitude that rape occurs only between strangers.

            Sorry to belabor this but I truly believe misogyny is crippling, if not fully disabling, to the pro-white movement.

          • Boereseun

            Eh, you see, I have no evidence of your rape. I state something and your attempt at a debate is “I was raped so I speak the truth and you don’t!”. What do you expect someone to say?

            The only attempt at saying it was rejection by males is that you kept at it without letting up.

          • Boereseun

            You cannot decide what is and what isn’t misogyny, you are not a moral arbiter. If by merely saying something that you may not agree with makes me something, how do you suppose anyone can have a debate?

        • Boereseun

          Are you throwing your toys out the cot again?

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Problematic.

          Here’s something that makes me wonder…

          On 18 November 2010, the Stockholm District Court ordered Assange detained in absentia, on request by prosecutor Marianne Ny. As basis for the ruling, the court stated Julian Assange to besuspected on reasonable grounds to have committed våldtäkt,[25][26][27][28] olaga tvång, and two cases of sexuellt ofredande— which has been variously translated as “sexual molestation”,[29]”sexual assault”,[30] “sexual misconduct”, “sexual annoyance”, “sexual unfreedom”, “sexual misdemeanour”, and “sexual harassment”.[22][26][27][31][32]

          http://tinyurl.com/swedefinerape

          Well, it took some digging, but I finally found some details of the allegations…

          http://tinyurl.com/assangerapedetails

          After reading the above, I still think part of the upswing in rapes in Sweden is a direct result of draconian rape legislation. All of what I read has a very “he said/she said” feel to it and that always makes me uneasy in these matters.

          It seems to me that the Swedish anti-rape laws are a potential gold mine for jilted female stalkers and such..

          • Boereseun

            Yeah, we tried explaining this to her on another thread. Just turned out that we were evil misogynist bastards.

            When you describe almost every interaction between men and women where the women felt jilted as rape. Rape becomes a misused term. That’s exactly where she gets the idea that we think women should be legally allowed to be raped.

          • Daisy

            When you describe almost every interaction between men and women where the men felt jilted and decided to rape as sex, then rape becomes a very under-used term. I, unlike you and your ilk, recognize there can be problems on both sides of the equation. But that is just common sense for most non-woman-haters, male or female.

          • Boereseun

            I fear being falsely accused of a crime I didn’t commit, that’s why I speak out strongly against current rape laws. So, in the interest of hearing your side, Daisy. Please provide a way for this man to have defended himself from the barrage of false accusations he received that destroyed his life for good.

            http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/time_to_pay_up_tawana_VNfKyp8kwALfSZZE4DdAQI

            Notice, he had sex with absolutely no one involved in the case yet his life was destroyed completely and utterly.

            Actually I open this question up to the Amren moderators too, who seem to have a problem with me bringing up these issues. What would you advise in a situation like this? To merely shut up about it?

          • Daisy

            I’ve noticed they only delete your rants when they contain vulgar and crude references to women’s anatomy, ie, telling some female poster to “calm your t***” and complaining about your lack of access to some mythical ‘V***** City.’

          • Boereseun

            There’s nothing vulgar about tits or vagina? What’s your problem?

            Calm your tits is simply asking you to calm down. Why the beef about it? You wished I commit suicide, which is rather a big deal compared to a few naughty words.

            As for rants, you labeled practically the whole of the Southern States of America as a bunch of no good Arab wannabes.

          • Daisy

            You stated that death might be better than living with females and I merely asked if that was a promise. So vulgarity is okay, addressing a woman by her sex parts is too, but sarcasm and facetiousness is not. Whatever.

          • Boereseun

            No I stated that paying massive amounts of medical expenditure to live longer, only to spend those years being nagged by women, isn’t worth it. I didn’t advocate suicide at all. You still wished that I committed it.

          • Get a room, you two.

          • Boereseun

            Okay, you want to put this issue to rest. I will admit that a woman can sure be raped by a stranger she doesn’t know. I will just add that I didn’t think that was the issue at all. I was dealing with rape laws, not actual rape. I’m against rape.

            What I would like Daisy to see though, is how fearful a lot of us men are about false accusations and the damage they can cause. We are fearful of this issue because there really isn’t a defense against it at all. So yes, I’m angry about it but I don’t actually hate women like she seems to think.

          • tails

            If only casual sex wasn’t the norm..

          • Daisy

            One way to provide a way for this man to defend himself is to spend less time bashing women and more time promoting the rights of white people. Brawley’s and Sharpton’s accusations didn’t even get past a grand jury, which if you don’t know is step one to even being indicted. So he won a defamation case against Brawley, as well he should have. I’d love love love to see him go after Sharpton.

            The only reason he suffered was because the MSM ran the *race* element of it; had Brawley (or Sharpton) not fabricated that part no one would have even heard of the whole thing. It’s not clear it ruined his life the way actual rape *can;* Pagones’ name suffered because of the anti-white dimension.

          • Boereseun

            Feminists got on the bandwagon too.

            You will not see this from a male perspective. You won’t meet us half way. This man did NOTHING. Do you get that?! His entire involvement was getting on the witness stand and giving an alibi for a fellow officer who committed suicide. Yet his life was destroyed by the ability of both race baiters and feminists to use the courts and media to stifle opposition.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Daisy claims to be pro-white but she spends most of her time here arguing with men. IF white women and DAISY in particular really want to support whites, they MUST begin by supporting “empowering” white men again. And they can stop trying to run things and instead try to find good white men, marry them, have children with them and BE LOYAL, and raise the children to be proud of who and what they are. PERIOD – DAISY.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Yeah, looks like to me the laws in Sweden set up a situation which can be abused by fatal attraction types. Ever heard the Henry Rollins spoken word thing about how he was targeted?

            Sounds to me like an unenforceable approach. Sounds like he said/she said. How does one prove one told another to use a condom and the other did not?

            Perhaps she should have made it clear to him that there would be no sex involved, but apparently she did want some form of sex. Who knows? Sounds ultra fishy to me.

            “Hey Swedish woman who slept with Julian Assange! We’re with the US government. Do you like money?”

          • Boereseun

            In the long run feminists are merely shooting themselves in the foot. The boy that cried wolf and all that. And realise proving it doesn’t need to really be done. The accusation is more than enough to destroy the livelihood of the man it is used on.

          • Daisy

            Well I had a nice long post I lost. i’d heard that the charges against Assange were lame. Those being, @ to your second link, not using a condom and imposing unwanted sexual contact on a woman. Is refusing or needing to be nagged to wear a condom being construed as rape? No, you are being paranoid.

            As for the second charge, isn’t it obvious the whole thing is politically motivated? The second accuser claims Assange rubbed up against her after some consensual sex. And yes, it’s obvious these two accusers likely got together in outrage more about the ‘infidelity’ than the actual, uh, condom issue. I’m of the opinion that even if he did rub up against her it was not clear whether it was assault at all. No feminists are defending these two tools. The notion that you think this is some fake false accusation story causes me to question your equanimity on the whole issue. No reasonable person would call either charge rape, and the second is so questionable in the overall context much less the micro-dynamics that it’s no wonder only the US government is making an issue of it (and forcing the Swedish one to also).

            My question is: how come misogynists cannot fathom that some men simply rape some women because the woman rejected the man? Why is it not obvious that a man cannot just jump some woman he’s never been intimate with and who isn’t even on a date of any kind with? Misogynists should be able to apply the basic common sense that I employ above to male-female relations, but they cannot or will not and that’s why they’re misogynists.

      • Jeff

        This is a very good point. From some of what was written about the charges brought against Assange, it is not much hyperbole to say a man in Sweden can becharged with rape if he merely sneezes in the presence of a woman. If I recall correctly, the law is so loony and “mouse trap” that men will take to wearing concealed tape recorders or even small cameras “just in case”. Laws so fuzzy can vastly inflate crime stats.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Yeah, look at the attempts to even translate the offense. So what if a condom slips off accidentally? Is is accidental rape? How does one prove anything?

          Yeah, when I see an ASTOUNDING and SHOCKING statistic like 1/4 of Swedish women being raped…I gotta start asking questions. Vast majority of the time one finds some combination of histrionic cause advocacy and sensationalist media. In this case I find the laws of Sweden to be at least partly to blame.

          But Daisy has a point, above. No need fighting the gender war while others make racial war on us all. And real rape is repugnant, of course. Bogus, inflated, statistics which do not accurately reflect reality, and serve to forward agendas, however, only hurt the cause in the big picture.

  • Boereseun

    “Another problem is the change in sexual offenses Act of 2005 because of the change many crimes classified before as “sexual coercion” were included in particular and are today classified as rape.”

    Do take that into account though. Changing laws always increases the amount of criminals.

  • Not surprizing. Muslim men have no respect for women. Since their women are closed to them until they are married, they end up raping everybody else. Why aren’t these folks deported back to their country of origin since I hope that rape is still considered a crime there.

    • JohnEngelman

      Los Angeles Times November 16, 2007

      A Saudi court sentenced a woman who was gang raped to six months in jail and 200 lashes.
      http://articles.latimes.com/2007/nov/16/world/fg-briefs16.s1

      • Michael_C_Scott

        Good for them. As much as our blood enemies hate being human, I’m amazed they didn’t burn her for “witchcraft”.

    • JohnEngelman

      A sixteen-year-old Palestinian girl became pregnant after being raped by her younger brother. Once her condition became known, her family encouraged her older brother to kill her to remove the blemish from their honor. Her brothers, the rapist and the murderer, were exonerated. The girl was blamed. “She made a mistake,” said one of her male cousins. “She had to pay for it.”
      http://www.worldandi.com/newhome/public/2003/may/clpub.asp

    • eonic

      Only if there are four male witnesses to testify in the woman’s favour is it considered rape: if there are fewer or no male witnesses she is treated as an adulteress.

  • Werdrix

    There was a study in Norway on rapes and 100% of the rapes for the last 5 years were commited by non-western immigrants.

  • veritas_lux_mea

    In a sane country, an epidemic of any crime would be met with harsher punishments. Obviously, if more and more people think the reward is worth the risk, you need to increase the risk. They need to start chemically castrating and/or hanging these animals. But there are no sane Western countries. The Swedes will probably again blame their own “racism” and “white privilege” for the raping of their women by the poor, underprivileged immigrants. Just as it is in every Western country, the only part of society third-world immigrants contribute to is the crime rate.

    • liberalsuck

      When will white men be men again? What the EFF will it take???

      • Boereseun

        When they stop having the masculinity removed from them at a young age. These Nordic countries have done everything to remove differences between the sexes. There’s no pride in being a man, it’s something to be looked down upon.

  • Werdrix

    What is happening to my country. How can ANYONE in sweden think we are on the right track. So sad when a country labeled one of the safest countries on the planet makes this kind of transformation to a third-world ghetto like South Africa or Detriot.

    • Skincognito

      Having defended White womanhood myself through, ahem, less than legal methods, I’ll tell ya it ain’t easy or pretty. But when reading crime stats and articles like this, it makes my indignation righteous. Swedish men also need to start marrying and breeding younger, thus rehabilitating a society that must make Gustav Adolph turn in his grave.
      My wife would sooner swallow glass or be picked apart alive by vultures than so much as touched by a racial alien. Die Revolution beginnt zu Hause.
      In order to avoid a dangerous misunderstanding, my contention that married, racially loyal wives and mothers are less susceptible to muzzie rape must not be construed as blaming the victims of any sexual assault. All rapists should be executed.

    • 48224

      I wonder if 20 years from now Anders Breivik will be released from prison and become the next Nelson Mandela? Stranger things have happened. Not that I endorse what Breivick did but I do agree that third world immigration will destroy the civilized world.

      Detroit is the future of the entire world.

    • 48224

      I wonder if 20 years from now Anders Breivik will be released from prison and become the next Nelson Mandela? Stranger things have happened. Not that I endorse what Breivick did but I do agree that third world immigration will destroy the civilized world.

      Detroit is the future of the entire world.

      • Josey Wales

        No it ain’t, not yet, cause we ain’t been able to play cowboys and africans. But soon! Very soon.

    • Sloppo

      I expect this lady called Saga to become more and more popular. Do you know of her?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjr81A6Al9c

      • Werdrix

        I know who she is. She is a singer.

        • Sloppo

          She sings about the plight of Sweden and the rest of western civilization. I usually think about her music when I read about what is happening to scandinavia. I admire her for her courage.

          • Daisy

            Thanks for the link, I’d never heard of her. The video brings me to tears.

  • We know all about these Muslim gangs etc. Just, in this particular case, I have an objection: Sweden has a very strange definition of rape. Therefore, I’m a bit skeptical about the whole stuff (not denying idiocy of Muslim & non- White immigration policy).

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19592372

    • Werdrix

      This is true. I dont believe for a second we are up there with South Africa for example. The statistics are still bad comparing to our neighboring countries(with less immigration).

  • bubo

    Just look at the video where a crowd of Swedes gathers around Jesse Jackson as he explains to them that Sweden must become multi-ethnic and welcome those less fortunate. The crowd applauds their own displacement. I don’t see much hope for them in the long run.

    • Werdrix

      I know, its so sick. This is exactly what he said “The death of the swedish people should not be seen as something negative” AND CROWD APPLAUDS.

      Now Is there any question that Anti-racist=Anti-white. Jesse Jackson is antiwhite. If he said “the death of the jewish people should be not be seen as something negative” the would be anti-semitic.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jg-Es2PNUg

    • Liberalsuck

      They will have a change of tune as their country becomes more multi ethnic. Brits, Germans, Swedes, French and others called White Americans racists when they were almost 100% white, but now that their countries have 10% nonwhite and over, they are changing their tune.

    • Joseph

      A self-destructive race will be replaced by one that is more self-serving.

  • The rapes and destruction will continue because “progressives” will never admit they wrong about human nature.

    • JohnEngelman

      …until they become crime victims.

      • Blaak Obongo

        I wouldn’t be so certain that they’d wise up even then. More likely they’d make public penance about “forgiving” their nonWhite attackers, and start wailing about how they want to “understand” them and answer their “cry for help.”

        So-called “progressives” value their illusions over everything — including their own survival.

        • JohnEngelman

          In my case it took one armed robbery by two black teenagers to change me from a typical white liberal Democrat to a law & order traditional Democrat who hated criminals, wanted them to suffer, and began to recognize the truth about the Negro race.

          • Nate Miller

            John here is what I don’t get. If you are a awakened conservative or at least some one who has rejected liberalism, how on earth do you still vote Democrat & support President Obama or for that matter even the liberal.Clintons? The far right GOP would be ideal for you!

          • JohnEngelman

            The Republican Party is the party for the rich. I am not rich. I do not benefit from policies that benefit rich people.

            This is what I have to say about “the far right GOP,” “There’s a hatred inside of you that burns in a way that scares normal people.”
            http://samuel-warde.com/2012/11/cry-babies-and-sore-losers/

          • liberalsuck

            Well, that’s true that the RP is not a friend of the white race, but the Democratic Party has made it clearer and clearer they want racial division and socialism and gun control. I’m sorry, but I will never vote for the Democrats. They want higher taxes, welfare, racial hatred against whites, socialism, gun control, supression of free speech, etc. Sorry, not for me. That’s not to say the RP is perfect and I’m not voting for the RP again considering they can’t get their act together lately, but I am NOT ever going to vote for the Democrats.

          • David Ashton

            The Democrats want to transfer money from the wealthy minority to the welfare minorities. Since he is a Zionist you may be interested in the research of David Horowitz into how the Democratic Left is funded by rich people.

          • JohnEngelman

            The amount of government money going to “welfare minorities” is much less than the amount going to elderly Tea Party activists.

          • jane johnson

            Are you really thay obtuse? The difference, John, is that the vast majority of elderly Tea Party activists are retired WORKERS who have paid into the system for many years. The “welfare minorities”, on the other hand, have only taken and taken, and then demanded more. They are a burden and a scourge. Get it?

          • JohnEngelman

            jane johnson,

            There are two problems with your argument. The first is that Social Security and Medicare payments do not come from money in the bank, or a collection of gold somewhere. They are transfer payments from people who pay taxes. Any serious effort to reduce government spending will require deep cuts in Social Security and Medicare.

            David Stockman, who was Ronald Reagan’s Director of the Office of Management and Budget made that clear in his book, “The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed.” In effect, David Stockman said that the “Reagan Revolution” failed because it was essentially fraudulent.

            This is the second problem with your argument: “The two largest welfare programs for the poor, AFDC and food stamps, each take up only 1 percent of the combined government budgets.”
            http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-runawaywelfare.htm

            Those whose primary political motive is hatred of taxes invariably overestimate the cost of programs they dislike, while underestimating their dependency on the government.

            Frequently they overestimate the amount of money they pay in taxes.

            ———

            “Tuesday’s Tea Party crowd, however, thought that federal taxes were almost three times as high as they actually are. The average response was 42% of GDP and the median 40%. The highest figure recorded in all of American history was half those figures: 20.9% at the peak of World War II in 1944.”

            – Bruce Bartlett, from “The Misinformed Tea Party Movement,” from Forbes, “the capitalist tool”
            http://www.forbes.com/2010/03/18/tea-party-ignorant-taxes-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html

          • jane johnson

            My point stands; most people receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits have paid into the system, and are therefore entitled to collect when they retire. The fact that the government has spent the money that should have been invested to fund these programs is irrelevent to my argument, as is the % of the budget that they represent. While it is true that the taxes collected from current workers are what fund S.S. and Medicare, it is also true that the beneficiaries of those programs paid taxes for many years, unlike most welfare recipients. I think it is disingenuous to lump all these programs together under the banner of “entitlements”. Who decided that people who refuse to take responsibility for their own lives and contribute nothing to society are entitled to live off of hardworking taxpayers? Oh, I remember now; it was LBJ.

          • JohnEngelman

            My point stands that it is not possible to cut government spending to any significant degree without making deep cuts in Social Security and Medicare. I agree with most Americans that the cuts should not be made.

          • Luca

            It is patently unfair to take 35% from a person who labors and invests and give it to a dysfunctional adult who smokes, drinks, procreates, occasionally aborts, contributes nothing positive to society and then whines about discrimination, the neighborhood being under-served, profiling, etc.

            Rewarding failures and punishing successful people is a recipe for disaster.

            In the late 1700’s many of our fore-fathers got tired of being taxed to pay for England’s insatiable requirements. They staked their lives and fortunes on overthrowing tyranny.They were called patriots.

            There were at the same time a larger number of elites who were not willing to sacrifice, they were scared, or were receiving commissions, contracts and favors from the King. They thought it was just dandy to be taxed at the whim of English politicians and royalty, so long as they were in relative comfort. They made excuses for the oppression. They were called Torys. Today we call them liberals.

          • JohnEngelman

            Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Food Stamps, and Section 8 housing payments could be ended entirely, and there would still be a huge budget deficit. Foreign aid, and earmarks – which increased dramatically from 2001 to 2007 when Republicans controlled the White House and both houses of Congress – could also be ended entirely. There would still be a huge deficit.

            It has never been possible to cut taxes, raise defense spending, preserve Social Security and Medicare at their present level, and pay off the national debt. This is why Republican economic policies have been dishonest since the presidential campaign of 1980.

            The enduring legacy of Ronald Reagan was to leave most white voters with the delusion that they can have the government they want without paying for it.

          • JohnEngelman

            Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Food Stamps, and Section 8 housing payments could be ended entirely, and there would still be a huge budget deficit. Foreign aid, and earmarks – which increased dramatically from 2001 to 2007 when Republicans controlled the White House and both houses of Congress – could also be ended entirely. There would still be a huge deficit.

            It has never been possible to cut taxes, raise defense spending, preserve Social Security and Medicare at their present level, and pay off the national debt. This is why Republican economic policies have been dishonest since the presidential campaign of 1980.

            The enduring legacy of Ronald Reagan was to leave most white voters with the delusion that they can have the government they want without paying for it.

          • Luca

            Your response has nothing to do with my comment. I’m sure you have a good reason for changing the subject.

          • JohnEngelman

            How did I change the subject? You are implying that vast sums of tax money are being spent on government spending programs that are unpopular with the voters. That is not true.

            In his book, “The Triumph of Politics,” David Stockman made it clear that, contrary to what Ronald Reagan said in 1980, it was never possible to cut taxes, raise defense spending, and pay off the national debt without cutting or eliminating domestic spending programs that the vast majority of the voters, including at least a large minority of Republican voters, would have insisted on preserving. These would have included Social Security, Medicare, military pensions, business subsidies, and farm subsidies.

            Now Luca you may be in favor of eliminating or sharply reducing payments for those programs. Be aware that there is very little support for those reductions.

            Most Americans may say that they are in favor of limited government “in principle.” As soon as Republican politicians get beyond vague generalities in their campaign speeches about making the government live within its means and all that and begin to make specific spending reductions they run into a solid wall of popular resistance.

            It is unfortunate that Republican politicians have to learn this every one or two decades.

          • Luca

            Read it again. I was talking about the unfairness of taxation. Who makes the money? The rich and the middle class. The politicians spend it as they see fit. The more you make, the more you are taxed. Is that fair when others pay nothing? That is the question.

          • JohnEngelman

            Very few people pay no taxes. The bottom 20 percent pay on the average 16 percent of their income. The top 1 percent average 30.8 percent.

            http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

            Mitt Romney almost certainly paid much less than that.

            Since 1980 real after tax income for over half of the American population has declined. Real after tax income for the upper 20 percent has increased. Real after tax income for the top one percent has increased dramatically.

            http://investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=971&mn=389436&pt=msg&mid=10153698

            You probably think that’s fair. I don’t.

            During the Eisenhower administration the top tax rate never got below 91 percent.

            http://www.data360.org/dataset.aspx?Data_Set_Id=857&transpose=row

            For most Americans those were good years.

          • Luca

            We’ve had this discussion before. You’re cherry picking the statistics that appear to support your agenda but they don’t. The fact is: “About 46 percent of U.S. households paid no federal income tax in 2011, according to the Tax Policy Center, a centrist think tank in Washington, D.C.”

            http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/18/us-factbox-americans-income-idUSBRE88H0ZN20120918

            Mitt Romney paid the exact same percentage anyone else paid who has income from investments, when he was a wage or salary earner he paid a much higher rate, not to mention that he donated tens of millions of dollars to charity and church.

            I use to moonlight as a tax-preparer decades ago. During the Eisenhower years virtually no one paid the top bracket because there was a tsunami of deductions that don’t exist today. It doesn’t matter what the rate is, what matters is what you end up paying.

            Therefore, if 46% are paying no income tax, that is patently unfair to the other 53% who support them. There is no refuting that fact.

          • Luca

            We’ve had this discussion before. You’re cherry picking the statistics that appear to support your agenda but they don’t. The fact is: “About 46 percent of U.S. households paid no federal income tax in 2011, according to the Tax Policy Center, a centrist think tank in Washington, D.C.”

            http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/18/us-factbox-americans-income-idUSBRE88H0ZN20120918

            Mitt Romney paid the exact same percentage anyone else paid who has income from investments, when he was a wage or salary earner he paid a much higher rate, not to mention that he donated tens of millions of dollars to charity and church.

            I use to moonlight as a tax-preparer decades ago. During the Eisenhower years virtually no one paid the top bracket because there was a tsunami of deductions that don’t exist today. It doesn’t matter what the rate is, what matters is what you end up paying.

            Therefore, if 46% are paying no income tax, that is patently unfair to the other 53% who support them. There is no refuting that fact.

          • JohnEngelman

            Fairness is a subjective concept. One either feels a certain way or one does not. I think the enormous amount of inequality in gross income in the United States is unfair. You don’t. We will have to agree to disagree on that. What can be debated is the nature of objective reality.

          • JohnEngelman

            Fairness is a subjective concept. One either feels a certain way or one does not. I think the enormous amount of inequality in gross income in the United States is unfair. You don’t. We will have to agree to disagree on that. What can be debated is the nature of objective reality.

          • Luca

            How about the “Reasonable Man Standard” of reality? I’ll even take it to the reasonable 5th-grader standard.

            I tell three 10-years olds the following: “If you rake and mow my front yard I’ll pay you $5, if you do the back yard you get $10 and if you do both you get $15.” Johnny does the front so I pay him $5, Jimmy does the back so I pay him $10, Jameel sits on his rear and says he deserves at least $3 because there is an inequality of income and he is less fortunate. So I take $1 back from Johnny, $2 back from Jimmy and give $3 to Jameel. Do you think Jimmy and Johnny are being subjective or reasonable when they say such an arrangement is unfair? There is a reasonable level of right and wrong that is almost universal.

            The story ends where Jameel gets his $3, knocks up his girlfriend, smokes a joint, then breaks into my house and steals my TV.

            That gross inequality you speak of, will always be with us. There is no country in the world that is perfect and without rich and poor. Most countries are far more corrupt then we are, many have no middle class at all. I have been on both sides of the economic fence and I know from personal experience that anyone in this country has an equal opportunity to succeed or fail. The problem here is that government is telling failures “It’s not your fault and I will take from people who succeed and give it to you (for your vote of course).”

            I believe in voluntary charity and diversity. I was born into poverty and worked my way out, I realize others have stolen to get where they are, but is fair to have the government tell me they are seizing my property for the benefit of illegal invaders, lazy drug addicts, alcoholics, and prisoners?

            If we didn’t give to these kinds of people we would be able to better focus on the truly needy. The very young, the very old and the disabled.

            Almost all government spending involves waste, fraud and corruption. I worked in city government Supply Chain for many years and I had a front row seat.

            My final note is that taking from 47% of the people and taking nothing from 53% pf the people is a blatantly unfair situation by any reasonable standard, metric or measure.

            We are all entitled to our opinions, but I tend to lose respect for someone who speaks so eloquently and yet uses such little logic and common sense when trying to convince others that what they say represents reality. This is a site dedicated to “Realism”, not subjective opinion.

          • JohnEngelman

            Realism consists of recognizing facts that can be proven. For example, the clear majority of the American people favor higher taxes on the rich and no cuts to Social Security and Medicare.

            http://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=poll+%2B+taxes+%2B+rich+%2B+%22Social+Security%22+%2B+Medicare&oq=poll+%2B+taxes+%2B+rich+%2B+%22Social+Security%22+%2B+Medicare&gs_l=hp.3…11693.34612.0.35410.70.65.5.0.0.0.215.7132.7j56j2.65.0.les%3B..7.0…1c.1.2.hp.WtQ8AiRMBF8&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41867550,d.dmQ&fp=ed37b7f9496e4d03&biw=600&bih=518

            That matters more than your opposition to a steeply progressive tax system, which, as I have also documented, has historically correlated with steady improvement in the average standard of living.

          • Luca

            Again, and for the last time, because you are deflecting and changing the discussion. Majority rule (democracy) is not a good standard for what is fair or unfair. It’s just an indication of what a majority thinks and what they wish for since they have the numbers to make it happen. Was slavery fair in Alabama in 1860? Well, if you took a poll in 1860 I’m sure the majority of Alabamans would have said yes. Does that make it fair because a majority said so? Successful people, rich people etc. do not have sufficient numbers, so any poll is already working against them no matter the question

            It really is blatantly unfair to take the fruit of one mans labor by force and give it to another who doesn’t work for it, doesn’t deserve it or isn’t truly needy. It is done only to gain votes. it promotes entitlement mentality, an addiction to “free money”, and it destroys our society.

            The top one percent (of which I am not one) pay more than the bottom 95% and yet, you and others like you, roll out all kinds of rhetoric to say the rich need to pay more.

            http://taxfoundation.org/blog/tax-burden-top-1-now-exceeds-bottom-95

            Give me a break.

          • Joseph

            Not only is the entire communist federal “progressive tax” scheme unjust, we also have S.S. tax (really about twice what is shown) unemployment, Medicare, then a percentile state income tax stacked on top with some of the similar state auxiliary taxes, city “employment tax” and if you are daring enough to “own” real-estate, thousands in property taxes. We even have a state tax if you have “direct-deposit” of your pay to a financial institution! None of these are paid by the people on the dole whom you cite. When all is said and done, a third of your year was spent paying these taxes while others were watching TV, hatching illegitimate kids, drinking, getting tattoos, playing video-games, shooting their dealer over $30 or whatever. Then, with the 2/3 or less that is left, literally thousands of other fed, state and local taxes when you spend what the gummint has in their benificence allowed you. THEN to add insult to injury, there are all of these calls to “give back to the community”! This REALLY torques me every time I hear it -as if the people actually GIVING something are the ones who got it from “the community” to begin with. Everything is flipping backwards in this bedlam called government aided by their illegitimate offspring, the mainstream press.

            Every liberal I’ve challenged on this thinks that “the rich” is anyone who makes a few $k more than they do. And in MY income peer-group anyway, they are the stingiest of people. They think if they give $10/month to some liberal cause like Sierra Club or threw a $5 into the Salvation Army bucket this year, that they are responsible for saving the planet. This is probably why they so fervently believe that people must be forced at gunpoint to support all of the various nanny programs -because everyone is as selfish as they are and some unenlightened souls may not value Project Head Start enough to fund it voluntarily.

          • Luca

            And now, because I have an employer provided health benefit, I will get taxed on that. That was not in my contract when I started but thanks to Obama and company, I and others like me, get screwed. There will also be a tax on “Tanning Parlors”, how racist is that? Let’s have a tax on skin bleaching and hair straightening and see how far that goes.

            This all sounds like “taxation without representation.” Remember that?

          • Kblankenship7

            Why do you think GOP is far right? Focus on what is done, not on what is said.

          • JohnEngelman

            What the Republican Party has done is to flatten the tax system as gross income becomes increasingly unequal. Democrats like to point out that President Reagan raised taxes eleven times. Nevertheless, he reduced the top tax rate from 70 percent to 28 percent. Our taxes went up. Taxes for the rich went down.

            Since 1980 real after tax income for over half the American population has declined. For the richest 20 percent it has risen. For the richest one percent it has risen dramatically.

            This is what the GOP has done:

            http://investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=971&mn=389436&pt=msg&mid=10153698

          • Joseph

            …and there are NO ultra-rich Democrats to be found

          • The richest major party Presidential nominee in my lifetime: John Forbes Kerry. He and his ketchup widow wife were probably worth close to a gigabuck combined in 2004.

          • David Ashton

            Limousine liberals, Hollywood celebs, Soros….etc.

          • Daisy

            For me, arguing with misogynists who claim to be pro-white is dispiriting, mind-boggling, and draining. Arguing with JohnE simply seems like a night out at Theater of the Absurd.

          • David Ashton

            If you ignore JE he still won’t shut up.
            Making him look absurd to third parties is something I prefer to washing up or watching old movie repeats from the Home of the Brave.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am always willing to read a good argument. I am usually willing to read a bad one. A bad argument gives me insight into the mentality and the psychology of the person who composes it.

            I love facts that can be documented, and logical reasoning. Unfortunately, most people allow their likes and dislikes to determine their judgement of what is true and false. They believe what they want to believe and are incapable of ratiocination.

            Insults and name calling are the last resort of those who lose arguments.

          • anonymous_amren

            Then we should argue with you more. It’s good that your morale for arguing PC nonsense drops when surrounded by gender-realist arguments. That shows there is hope for you yet.

          • Daisy

            It’s bad that you don’t notice that the pro-white movement can never, and to date has never, won even one battle against the anti-white status quo while expressing such aggression towards half of it’s own theoretical or purported ‘constituents.’ You can wage battle in an echo chamber but at least recognize that’s all it is: a virtual victory and nothing more. I personally desire real change, real victories, and nothing will undermine my morale for accomplishing that.

          • Joseph

            What IS Gore worth these days, anyway, or Buffett, or Gates?

          • Kblankenship7

            So some citation regarding taxation rates equals being far right? Do you therefore think Libertarians are far-right?

          • JohnEngelman

            Libertarians are reactionaries who want to restore the economic status quo of the the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The voters rejected that for good reasons.

            Here is the top tax rate from 1916 to the present:

            http://www.data360.org/dataset.aspx?Data_Set_Id=857&transpose=row

            Here are income tax receipts beginning with 1934:

            http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=203

            This website lists fluctuations in the per capita gross domestic product from 1920 to 2002:

            http://www.singularity.com/charts/page99.html

            This lists unemployment rates from 1920 to 2010:

            http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104719.html

            This compares jobs created per year from the presidencies of Harry Truman to George W. Bush.

            http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/

            Draw your own conclusion. My conclusion on the basis of all this data is that most Americans have benefited from a steeply progressive tax system.

          • JohnEngelman

            Libertarians are reactionaries who want to restore the economic status quo of the the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The voters rejected that for good reasons.

            Here is the top tax rate from 1916 to the present:

            http://www.data360.org/dataset.aspx?Data_Set_Id=857&transpose=row

            Here are income tax receipts beginning with 1934:

            http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=203

            This website lists fluctuations in the per capita gross domestic product from 1920 to 2002:

            http://www.singularity.com/charts/page99.html

            This lists unemployment rates from 1920 to 2010:

            http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104719.html

            This compares jobs created per year from the presidencies of Harry Truman to George W. Bush.

            http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/

            Draw your own conclusion. My conclusion on the basis of all this data is that most Americans have benefited from a steeply progressive tax system.

          • Xerxes22

            The Republican party doesn’t support Whites so why should we vote for it?

          • JohnEngelman

            The Republican Party supports the rich plutocracy that gets richer while nearly everyone else gets poorer.

          • David Ashton

            Your comments are almost always subjective and self-centered. What will it take to change you from a race-revanchist to a serious Euro-American patriot?

          • JohnEngelman

            Would being “a serious Euro-American patriot” require me to stop loving Jews and Orientals?

          • David Ashton

            Look, there are Blacks, Jews and Chinese I know or have known, whom I have LIKED as individuals. But I am an Englishman and I love my country, its heritage and the people, my people, who created it, and who are threatened by alien colonization. My view is widely shared.

          • JohnEngelman

            If you want to spend time with white Englishmen that is fine with me. I enjoy the presence of people of other cultures. I can see problems created by blacks and Moslems, but not with Jews, Orientals, and people from India.

          • Cheri Rodriguez

            250,000 Chinese Triad members would agree on the Oriental part.

          • David Ashton

            My family, neighbors and friends share my nationality, race and language. The problem in England is the occupation and transformation of entire areas which had an English character into foreign areas, virtually no-go areas in some Muslim and Black neighborhoods. Indians form a large minority and many of them are Anglophile; I had a good Brahmin colleague who loved cricket, spoke English perfectly and opposed the official compulsory multiculturalism, but if I wanted to live among Indians I would prefer to revisit Bombay (for all its poverty, and the pervasive smell of cow-dung and cinnamon) rather than Southall. I can appreciate Hindu architecture while finding the religion ideologically unacceptable and intrinsically non-western.
            I am being autobiographical only to answer your direct point, but what matters is the fate of nations, not the cosmopolitan preferences of a Nordic Gentile Christian Zionist in “love” with the Chinese, etc.

          • JohnEngelman

            As far as I am concerned there are good immigrant groups and bad immigrant groups. We are agreed about which are the bad immigrant groups. We will need to agree to disagree about the good immigrant groups.

          • kerrysmith

            But even as regards the good immigrant groups, John, do you agree that some sort of numerical limits are necessary? for example, if it were proposed to add (whether all at once or over time) 200,000,000 decent, upright, responsible Chinese to the US population, would you support that? or would you have any qualms about taking a step that would permanently, radically alter the composition of the American people?

          • JohnEngelman

            I am in favor of more restrictions on immigration than currently exist. I am certainly opposed to easing restrictions. That seems likely to happen, because leaders of both parties favor it.

            Where I differ from some of the posters on this website is that I like immigrants and enjoy the diversity they provide. I particularly like Orientals. Thus, my position on immigration is more nuanced than the American Renaissance consensus.

        • Exactly. Regardless of how bad it gets, they’ll blame themselves and challenge themselves to do even more; like bring in more immigrants.

          Just look at what happens with blacks. Regardless of how many programs they ask of us and how often their ‘sure-fire’ programs fail, they just keep telling us ‘we have to do more’.

        • Anders

          I agree. Would a ‘progressive’ pro-immigration politician ever admit they were wrong?

        • liberalsuck

          For the most part, these whites will wake up, but there are exceptions like Reginald Denny. Got his head smashed in by blacks, and especially blacks who targeted him only because he was white, yet he still felt sorry for them. I’m sorry, but if anyone of any race attacked me or my family, I would hate them and want justice. Some guy stole a car of mine ten years ago and I didn’t feel the least bit sorry for him. Didn’t feel sorry he’d have to go to prison for that. The car I had was something I inherited from a deceased family member and I was without that car for half a year and that POS destroyed everything in my car.

          • kerrysmith

            I am committed by my faith to admire and emulate Reginald Denny, but I admit that I’m just not up to it. My instinctive reaction is that something must have jarred loose in his head.

          • Joseph

            If Denny was sincere, then good for him he’s a strong man but I always suspected that there was something more tangible than a good feeling in it for him.

      • K..

        Nope. A Swedish politician whose own daughter was urdered by an African “refugee” whom he invited to live in his home remains just as “progressive” today as he ever was. The vast majority of Swedish leftists continue to be just as strident in supporting third-world immigration and screaming “Racist!” at anyone who disagrees with or challenges them as they ever were. They are sociopaths without morals or conscience.

        • David Ashton

          Their suppressed sense of racial superiority in looks and achievements makes them feel guilty and they deal with it by fawning on other races.

        • minted

          Jeez! That’s awful. What’s the name of this fool?

      • eonic
    • seapeamp

      You aren’t foolish enough to think they believe the rhetoric they foist on the public, are you?

      anti-white: “We all bleed red!”, “We are all from Africa!”, “Race is a social construct!”, “We are all Gods children!” the list of BS goes on and on. The anti-whites will say anything to justify their actions.

      The wave after wave of violence directed at Whites is TERROR! And terror is what the anti-whites want. It’s no “accident”, it’s no “mistake”, they KNOW this will be the result when you flood White countries with non-whites. It’s all part of THE PLAN.

      It’s anti-white terrorism.
      It’s White geNOcide.

      • No, I don’t believe they believe their rhetoric. It’s only used to soften us up, beat us down, and buy time until they can foist their next ‘progressive’ theory of equality on us.

        My point was only that they’re going to hold to their talking point regardless of what the facts are.

        • seapeamp

          “their talking point”… Yes, they will hold on to their anti-White terminology (i.e. talking points). It took them years to get that anti-White terminology in-place so they aren’t going to give it up easily.

          That anti-White terminology is what has allowed them to push their anti-White ideology (White geNOcide). That’s why we need to be pushing pro-White terminology. Terminology proceeds Ideology. So if we want to discuss our pro-White ideologies in the open we need to lay the groundwork with our pro-White terminology.

          Let’s start with calling the “anti-racists” what they really are… anti-White.

          • Daisy

            This is why I think pro-whites might want to reconsider their terminology. Sometimes it just seems to invite projections and enable anti-white apologetics. On today’s thread regarding the black male who shot three white females, it’s once again been noted that at least a friend of the murdered family claims to love diversity. How are these atrocities continuing to happen without racial indignation from the victims? We must be playing a role in making liberals’ defamation of us too easy…

  • Werdrix

    “Sweden has imported huge numbers of Muslim immigrants with catastrophic effect.”

    This has very little do do with muslims. The reason for this behavior is genes and culture. Christian arabs/blacks behave in the same fashion as Muslim arabs/blacks. Muslims from Bosnia(white country) DO NOT.
    I believe that Genes and culture are the important factors not religion.

    • bubo

      That extra dose of entitlement known as Islam contributes greatly to their attitudes about Swedish women. As in England they consider non-Muslim white women and girls to be whores.

      • Daisy

        When I was in college I went to a Halloween ‘celebration’ in downtown Georgetown, DC that became taken over by a largely arab third world mob. In the midst of it an arab man literally tried to dig a hole in my crotch through what were loose-fitting, black silk pants (he failed). I had long red hair and my Muslim turkish friend next to me had beautiful long black hair yet she sailed through unmolested. We were with a co-ed group of around seven people; I was the only blonde or redheaded female. Perhaps by having fair hair I was seen to have been somehow asking for it, even as I was dressed modestly and had white men with me. Black men were awful in that neighborhood too and largely targeted fair haired white girls.

        • Jackryanvb

          Thanks for sharing that rough story. how about dating, marrying a white guy and instruct hi to defend your person and your honor at all times from Arbs, Muslims, Blacks etc.

        • saxonsun

          Nothing odd in that. It’s always been thus. The Vikings used to sell English and Irish girls to the Moors for their harems. Talk about race traitors.

        • kerrysmith

          See, I wouldn’t call what happened to you there ‘misogyny’ – I would call it just a case of Muslims doing what Muslims do, Africans doing what Africans do. Not every one, obviously, but enough to make an admitted generalization stick.

    • A lot of the non Muslims from the Middle East do have different culture and genes than the Muslims. I bet you my life you would force a couple apart just because one is 1/4 Levantine. Am I correct?

  • Canadian Seer

    After having smug white people tell me how horrid and racist I was for the last 20 years when I told them I was proud of my racial roots and disagreed with flooding white countries with foreigners I have little pity left for the average white person. Let them continue to be enriched. That, according to them, is their greatest blessing.

    • John L.

      True, I continue endure ostracism, cold shoulders, etc, just for making mildly “Racist” comments in the 80’s. These PC, liberal types were unforgiving as well when I became PC from the 90’s on. Once a “Racist” always a “racist”. I speak My mind now.

      • Liberalsuck

        Whites supporting diversity, until they have to live with it. Whites support government run healtcare, until they realize they have to pay for it out of their own blood and sweat. Sweden, for example, blamed black people’s problems on white racism, yet they are having a change of tune as these same “diverse peoples” have flooded their beautiful country with rapes and third-world crime.

  • bigone4u

    Sweden is waking up.

    Taxes and the cost of living is very high in Sweden. These third worlders could not afford to live there if not for free housing and such provided by the Swedish government. I read the Swedish press on a recurring basis: http://www.thelocal.se/

    As I type these words, the top story on that website has a subheading that reads:
    Immigration is growing in importance to Swedish voters, according to a new study that revealed most voters think the far-right Sweden Democrats are the party with the best immigration policies.

    • Daisy

      In my twenties I considered emigrating to Sweden but their national website portrayed it as very difficult to do. It even threatened to deport CEO’s who had not followed official protocol to come into the country. I am a tall fair-haired ‘nordic’ person and was scared to try to mix in ‘illegally.’ How the heck are these arabs just barging in?

      • bigone4u

        I think they are being recruited by the Swedish government, based on what criteria I don’t know.
        I too had dreams of moving to another country some time back, but they don’t make it easy. You need a couple of million bucks in the bank to get into New Zealand. I have no idea how the third worlders are getting in there.

        • Neil

          I live in Auckland and my area is being overtaken by Indians,mostly Sikhs.They appear to be bringing in large numbers of relatives from the old country using ‘family reunification’ provisions.Many look like grandparents. Many over priced houses in the most favoured suburbs are being snapped up by wealthy Chinese,forcing middle income whites into affordable suburbs like mine.At least I now have new white neighbours!

  • jay11

    Funny thing is that liberal, leftist swedish women are saying NOTHING against this and its causes (and remedies, i.e. deportation of all third worlders). Recently I watched a video interview of some liberal swedish woman personality on a talk show (it was translated) talking about the rise in rapes and the basic gist from both her and the female talk show host was that it was the fault of swedish men (not foreigners) and that women should have the right to dress as they wish and not be raped. That was it – 20 minutes and THAT’S the conclusion? Scandanavian women often represent some of the most beautiful of all white women, and dark men cannot resist. The end of Sweden is, however, a leftist fantasy they are bringing to pass.

    • dhs

      A posting on this site stated that a feminist college teacher stated that feminists were concentrating on white men. When the white man problem was solved, the feminists would focus on other types of men. I can’t think of a better explanation for much of the strange feminist behavior.

      • Kblankenship7

        So anti-European politics trumps the concern of European women to maintain their bodily integrity?

      • Daisy

        I don’t think that post portrayed the feminist very accurately, although I still think she sounds nuts. I’m wondering if some of the extreme misogyny even that has been expressed recently on this site by certain white males may shed light into the bizarro logic of the anti-white feminists. Feminists usually erect white men as the ultimate oppressors and therefore wind up bending over backwards to indulge non-white males. Feminism tended to be inherently classist and hateful towards white women of the lower class.

        I’ve seen a lot of anti-white hatred – including of white women and white rape survivors – in jewish feminists (although not all), mixed-race feminists (like a 1/2 polish 1/2 hispanic semi-famous one I was very briefly friendly with), and in general in non-northern european feminists. Some of the mediterranean ones may be partially reacting to the more patriarchal cultures they come from; they are often also not as targeted by anti-white hatecrimes as northern euro females. I’m sort of surprised to hear how a ‘nordic’ one backs into justifying muslim male violence against nordic women. She’s likely the elite lefty who has never had to contend with the violence she does seem to sort of justify.

        Some white men unfortunately make it way too easy for feminists to vilify them. Maybe in their own hearts being betrayed by men of their own race embitters them to an irrational extreme. There are likely various reasons…and sure, some feminists are just egomaniacal nuts.

  • brengunn

    Can someone explain this to me, they say, one in four women likely to be raped but also quote the figure, 53.2 per 100,000. If one out of every four were raped that figure would be 25,000 per 100,000.

    I don’t believe it. No way is Sweden comparable to the Aids swamp that is South Africa.

    • NM156

      Lifetime rape probability based on current rates?

  • a multiracial individual

    Muslim males represent 2.5% of Swedens’ population……..yet they account for 77% of the rapes. I really don’t understand how a liberal can look at such a statistic and not throw multiculturalism over the nearest cliff.

    • [Guest]

      I don’t understand it either. The only answer I can come up with is that evidently, in a mind corrupted by left-wing thinking, rape is something to be endured (if not welcomed as penance) for the sake of the cause.

      • Torshammar

        Death is too. See, South Africa.

        We must do something.

    • bigone4u

      If white men were raping Muslim women in Sweden, the stuff would hit the fan. As it is, the committment to “diversity” (I hate that word) overrides every natural normal instinct, such as the survival of a people.

    • Jackryanvb

      Please make flyers with photos of pretty, but not slutty Swedish women and photos of scary Muslim immigrant me n and just use this quote:

      “Muslims are 2.5 percent of the Swedish population, yet commit 77 percent of the rapes.”

      What is your source for these stats?

      • a multiracial individual

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Sweden

        500,000/2= 250,000 Muslim males
        10,000,000 people in Sweden.

        • Torshammar

          Remember, these instantaneous snapshots of population percentages are not as crucial as the trend over time.

          Sweden is gone. Holger is not rising.

      • minted

        It is now 5.6% Muslims who rule an entire nations assault rape statistics.

  • Exoplanet Finder

    There was an episode of the old Star Trek series from the 1960s, where the away team went to a planet where an intercontinental war went on for so long that they figured, “Let’s just spare the bombing and every so often bring in X number of enemy combatants (our own people picked by lottery) to a gas chamber like place, and end them there. On the other continent they were doing the same thing, and this would constitute reciprocity. The infrastructure would go on, and if you were not picked to die in the ‘battle’, you would do just fine. They got used to it. It was insane, but it was no more insane then how we get used to women being raped and both men and women being murdered, day in and day out, by the colored elements brought in by purposeful mass immigration. It is time for the navyman’s boot to step onto the island of the Lord of the Flies, for our governors are those boys. It is time to end the reign of the perpetual moron.

    • Exoplanet Finder

      That man on the horse in the ad to the right, Eugene Terre’Blanche, made some mistakes, but was a good, good man. For us, and for our future, he lived. The best of us will do the same until we become strong enough to reimpose suzerainty. That is the difficult task ahead, but who said the white didn’t need a little invigoration now and then?

  • Katherine McChesney

    There’s an Shia muslim from Iran in my building. He was fired from Vanderbilt Univ. for sexual abuse of a student. He grabbed a woman’s breasts in our laundry room, but the woman was too scared to report it to the manager or the police. This guy is too friendly with women. He’s even attended our Bible classes pretending he worships the same God. He tried to strike up a conversation with me on the elevator. I told him to stay the hell away from me. Nipped that in the bud.

    I don’t like multi-culturalism in my building.

    • bigone4u

      There was a Nigerian student at my university who approached every white girl on campus at one time or another. His greeting was a bit more sophisticated than your breast grabbing muslim. His Mr. Cool line was “Hey Baby, what’s shakin'” Someone should introduce your muslim to a Nigerian buffoon. And you need to exercise caution and maybe think about arming yourself with a gun, knife, or pepper spray.

  • Werdrix

    Jesse Jackson is celebrating “The death of the swedish people should not be seen as something negative”.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jg-Es2PNUg
    The antiwhites of the world are winning.

    • Diamond_Lil

      For now, but not for long.

      • Werdrix

        Lets hope so. Nationalist parties are winning all across Europe so there is some hope.

        • David Ashton

          Nationalist or not, they should get together to combat the suicide shown in the Jackson clip.

  • John R

    Black on White rape. Muslim on Swedish rape. Why isn’t it obvious to more people? There are just certain races of people that are more physically attractive than others. And beauty, like money, is just something that you must defend. If you have something worth defending, you must exclude others from trying to take it away. Problem is, countries like Sweden, with the most wealth, and the most beautiful women, are also now the most passive societies in the world. A very dangerous combination. We White people must unite and defend all that is ours, period! Racism is no longer a convenient choice; it is a matter of survival.

  • Yaw

    Gee. I would never have imagined that inviting African and Arabian Satan worshipers into your country would increase crime.

  • Vanessa

    After reading this, how can anyone not consider the Swedish government an accomplice to rape? How can anyone not consider the government of Sweden and others like it evil in every sense of the word? This is coming to America soon. Is this what our governments are doing to us now? Raping us? It wasn’t good enough they were raping us with taxes and economic deprivation, they want to rape us physically now? Is this what we deserve for simply being “stubborly white” ? You might not subscribe to a supernatural idea of evil. But one definition of evil is simply the absence of good. Insofar as I don’t see much good coming from our US government either…well you can draw your own conclusion there. When you stop and consider what the Western governments like UK and the US are doing to ITS OWN white citizens, no other word except evil can fully encompass it.

  • David Brims

    Do you ever get the feeling that you’re living through the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire ?

  • Pelagian

    Does anybody else find that the Moderator is applying an extra-heavy hand to this thread for some reason?. I had at least 2 posts removed.

    • Yes, I’ve noticed that. Must be for all the blatant misogyny that seems to present when AR does these kinds of stories.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        And as the “wicked” in so many of these stories, it’s never me doing this. Why do you suppose this might be?

  • Rag Narok

    This is a result of politicians allowing non-White, third world immigration. Most politicians in Europa are traitors, and we all know what the penalty for treason is.

  • Luca

    “With Muslims represented in as many as 77 percent of the rape cases ”

    Hmm…. ONLY 77 percent by Muslims? I guess the other 23 percent was by sub-Saharan atheists, pagans and baboon worshipers.

    • MarcusTrajanus

      There are virtually no sub-Saharan atheists.

  • dd121

    How do the leftist elites convince so may people that this isn’t an alarming developmental?

    • Luca

      They tell a big lie and repeat it often through media, academia and politics.

      • dd121

        It was a rhetorical question.

  • The Final Solution

    What use does Sweden have for Muslims?

    • Torshammar

      The welfare state must be paid for.

      The Swedes decided not to have babies. So they imported them.

      They did so from cultures one-hundred-and-eighty degrees out of phase with Western traditions and values.

      My phrase: The Triumvirate of Destruction.

      The welfare state. Demographics. Immigration.

  • The Final Solution

    There was a fascinating article recently about how homogeneity was Sweden’s greatest economic strength. It will be interesting to see how the country’s global competitiveness declines as it becomes more multicultural.

    http://www.newgeography.com/content/003086-what-look-for-nordic-model

    • David Ashton

      Important. Homogeneity plus high average IQ. Get this message across.

  • shaunantijihad

    It is terrible and harsh to say this, but most if not all these women probably voted for parties that promised exactly mass Muslim and African immigration, because the secular religion of political correctness said so. And like so many in the West, they feared being called a racist more than they feared the logical consequences of suicidal altruism, Had any Swedish Enoch Powell stood up against it, it is mostly these women who would be after his neck and weeping over poor Mohammad and Aisha’s deportation with their 10 kids.

  • K..

    And yet the normally strident Swedish “feminists” continue to ignore this issue, because staying in politically-correct ideological lockstep with leftist doctrine that regards immigration as an absolute good is more important to them than the safety and lives of their “sisters.” Besides, the majority of victims are middle and lower middle class women who cannot afford to move from immigrant-heavy areas, and the Swedish left is just as hostile to and contemptuous of the indigenous working class as the rest of the hypocritical European Left.

    I have seen reliable figures which indicate that the risk of an average Swedish woman experiencing rape in her lifetime is actually around 60%. Given that the Swedish government is actually significantly increasing the rate of Muslim immigration due to new “family reunification” rules, the rape epidemic will only continue to worsen.

  • Joseph

    Rape is just another penalty for white privilege.

  • SintiriNikos

    It used to be common parlance that everything is rape in Sweden. Didn’t put a coaster under your cold drink on a hot summer day? That’s rape in Sweden. A message to Swedish ladies: now you know what rape is. You invited these people into your country, and they taught you there are worse things than water rings on teak coffee tables.

  • StillModerated

    There was a joke 30 years ago: EuroHeaven featured English policemen, French cooks, German mechanics, Italian lovers and Swiss administrators. EuroHell was German police, French mechanics, English cooks, Swiss lovers and Italian administrators.

    Now let’s talk about GloboHell: Jewish financial criminals, Black police and judges, Chinese cooks, Mexican drug pushers, Moslem security guards, Pakistani doctors, and White farmers and cannon fodder. Oh wait! We’re already there. We should stop feeding the rest of the useless scum.

  • 5n4k33y35

    “Diversity enrichment”. (Thanks Marxist-Feminists.)

  • cat cait

    NORWAY — In our neighborhood, both the authorities and the journalists have a completely different approach to the truth than their Swedish counterparts. We know from experience that all perpetrators of assault rapes in Oslo the last five years of non-western background. Now, new figures confirming the trend. Also in connection with street robberies,

    http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/category/sexual-assault/

  • Guest

    If there was the death penalty for rape, there would be no rape.

  • potato78

    Ok, so we’ve had plenty of doll-like Internet celebrities featured on Oddity Central, but Yohio,
    a Japanese visual kei singer is pushing the envelope even further, as
    he’s actually a 16-year-old Swedish bot who looks like an anime girl.

    http://www.odditycentral.com/news/yohio-the-japanese-doll-like-rock-star-whos-actually-a-swedish-boy.html

  • potato78
  • relmih

    why do we have to share white societies,take africa for example,say tunisia,if whites inhabited that area,they would have built irrigation canals and what is today thousands of miles of barren desert,would be transformed into lush inhabitable areas.instead they choose to immigrate to france and live on welfare,in the best parts of france too,paris,i cannot afford to live in paris,but if i was an immigrant,i would get free housing.they are turning into a big problem muslims in generel,sometimes i think france would have been better off in the hands of the nazi party,at least everyone would be white and european and could all share that common bond of pride,instead of a mulicultural nightmare of arguments and squabblingover who gets what who owes who what,whites have been hogtied by unfair and bias laws in their own countries for too long.do yo know asian countries dont allow immigrants,yet they pour into every white society complaining and whining and causing problems with organized crime and of course islam,they seem to go hand in hand.its hard to hate individuals but easier to hate the whole group,thats how you have to look at it,just because there are a few nice ones,dont let that deter the final goal of cleansing europe,or die.