The Islamization of Britain in 2013

Soeren Kern, Gatestone Institute, December 30, 2013

In May, new census data published by the British government showed that Islam is set to become the dominant religion in Britain within the next generation.

On being informed that the girl did not want to get married, Mohammed Shahid Akhtar, Imam of Birmingham’s Central Jamia Masjid Ghamkol Sharif Mosque, said, “She’s 14. By Sharia, grace of Allah, she’s legal to get married.”

The Muslim population of Britain topped 3.3 million by the end of 2013 to become around 5.2% of the overall population of 63 million, according to figures extrapolated from a recent study on the growth of the Muslim population in Europe.

At the same time, opinion surveys consistently show that voters in Britain view Islam and the question of Muslim immigration as a top-ranked public concern. The British public, it seems, is increasingly worried about the establishment of a parallel Muslim society there.

But government efforts to push back against the Islamization of Britain have been halting and half-hearted.

What follows is a chronological review of some of the main stories involving the rise of Islam in Britain during 2013.

In January, Muslim gangs were filmed loitering on streets in London and demanding that passersby conform to Islamic Sharia law. In a series of videos, the self-proclaimed vigilantes—who call themselves Muslim London Patrol—are seen abusing non-Muslim pedestrians and repeatedly shouting “this is a Muslim area.”

One video records the men shouting: “Allah is the greatest! Islam is here, whether you like it or not. We are here! We are here! What we need is Islam! What we need is Sharia!”

The video continues: “We are the Muslim Patrol. We are in north London, we are in south London, in east London and west London. We command good and forbid evil. Islam is here in London. [Prime Minister] David Cameron, Mr. Police Officer, whether you like it or not, we will command good and forbid evil. You will never get us. You can go to hell! This is not a Christian country. To hell with Christianity. Isa [Jesus] was a messenger of Allah. Muslim Patrol will never die. Allah is great! Allah is great! We are coming!”

In a January 23 interview with the online newspaper International Business Times, Anjem Choudary, a radical preacher who has long called for Sharia law to be implemented in Britain and other European countries, defended the gang, saying: “This is a wake-up call for society to ask, ‘where are we headed?’ There is a clash between Islam and liberal democracy in hotspot areas of London.”

Choudary has previously led a campaign, known as the Islamic Emirates Project, to turn twelve British cities—including what he calls “Londonistan”—into independent Islamic states. The so-called Islamic Emirates would function as autonomous enclaves, ruled by Sharia law and governed entirely outside British jurisprudence.

In February, Choudary was filmed urging his followers to quit their jobs and claim unemployment benefits so they have more time to plan holy war against non-Muslims.

Excerpts of the speech, published by the London-based newspaper The Sun on February 17, drew renewed attention to the growing problem of Muslims in Britain and elsewhere who are exploiting European welfare systems.

In the video, Choudary is recorded as saying that Muslims are justified in taking money from non-Muslims, whom he mocks for working in nine-to-five jobs their whole lives. He says: “You find people are busy working the whole of their life. They wake up at 7 o’clock. They go to work at 9 o’clock. They work for eight, nine hours a day. They come home at 7 o’clock, watch EastEnders [a British soap opera], sleep, and they do that for 40 years of their life. That is called slavery. . . .   What kind of life is that? That is the life of the kuffar [a non-Muslim].”

Choudary urges fellow Muslims to learn from revered figures in Islamic history who only worked one or two days a year. “The rest of the year they were busy with jihad [holy war] and things like that,” he says. “People will say, ‘Ah, but you are not working.’ But the normal situation is for you to take money from the kuffar. So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance.”


In March, the London-based newspaper The Independent reported that at least 100 British Muslims are currently active as jihadists fighting in Syria, which has replaced Afghanistan, Pakistan and Somalia as the main destination for militant Islamists seeking to obtain immediate combat experience with little or no official scrutiny.

Also in March, St. John’s Episcopal Church in Aberdeen, Scotland, became the first church in the United Kingdom to share its premises with Muslim worshippers. Church officials now welcome hundreds of Muslims praying five times a day in their building because the nearby mosque is filled to overcapacity and Muslim worshippers are forced to pray outside.


In April, a documentary secretly filmed inside several of the 85 Islamic Sharia Law courts operating in Britain exposed the systematic discrimination that many women are suffering at the hands of Muslim jurists.

The documentary, Secrets of Britain’s Sharia Courts, was filmed by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and was first aired on BBC Panorama, a long-running current affairs program, on April 8.

The undercover investigation proves what has long been suspected: namely, that Sharia courts, which operate in mosques and houses across Britain, routinely issue rulings on domestic and marital issues according to Islamic Sharia law that are at odds with British law. Although Sharia rulings are not legally binding, those subject to the rulings often feel obliged to obey them as a matter of religious belief, or because of pressure from family and community members to do so.

The documentary contends that the Sharia courts, run by Muslim judges known as qadi, are putting women at risk of violence from abusive husbands by pressuring them to stay in abusive marriages.

The documentary was partially filmed at the Leyton Sharia Council, which openly states on its website that it is preparing for the full recognition of Islamic Sharia law in Britain.

Also in April, British authorities promised to redouble their fight against the spiraling problem of female genital mutilation (FGM) after a weekly primetime television show broadcast by the BBC forced the previously “taboo” subject into mainstream debate.


Britain has the highest levels of FGM in Europe. According to a government-funded study published in 2007, at least 66,000 women and girls in Britain have had the procedure performed on them, and more than 20,000 girls under the age of 15 are currently at risk.

These figures, however, may be only the tip of the iceberg. A 2011 Department of Health policy paper warns that “it is possible that, due to population growth and immigration from practicing countries . . . FGM is significantly more prevalent than these figures suggest.”


Although the mainstream media in Britain and elsewhere routinely take pains to avoid any insinuation that FGM has anything to do with Islam, doctrinallyhistoricallygeographically and juridically, the practice is intrinsically linked to Islam. Critics of FGM say there is a reluctance to tackle the problem because doing so is perceived as attacking Islam.

In May, new census data published by the British government showed that Islam is set to become the dominant religion in Britain within the next generation.

The report, published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on May 16, shows that although Christianity is still the main religion in Britain—over 50% of the population describe themselves as such—nearly half of all Christians in Britain are over the age of 50, and, for the first time ever, fewer than half under the age of 25 describe themselves as Christian.

By contrast, the number of people under 25 who describe themselves as Muslim has doubled over the past ten years: one in ten under the age of 25 are Muslim, up from one in 20 in 2001.

If current trends continue—a Muslim population boom, combined with an aging Christian demographic and the increasing secularization of British natives—Islam is set to overtake Christianity in Britain within the next 20 years, according to demographers.

Also in May, a BBC documentary called “Married for a Minute” reported that an increasing number of Muslims in Britain are reviving the Islamic practice of temporary marriage.

Temporary marriage—a euphemism for religiously sanctioned prostitution—is an Islamic custom that unites a man and an unmarried woman as “husband and wife” for a limited period of time (sometimes for less than half an hour).

The proliferation of temporary marriages—combined with the spike in polygamous marriages—shows how Muslims in Britain are using Islamic Sharia law with impunity to establish parallel forms of “marriage” that are otherwise illegal for non-Muslims in the country.

Because of the informal nature of temporary marriage, there are no official statistics to show how many of these unions there are in Britain. But Islamic scholars interviewed by the BBC say the practice is widespread, and anecdotal evidence suggests it is especially popular among the younger generation of Muslims in England and Wales.

In June, the Central Criminal Court of England and Wales (aka the Old Bailey) sentenced seven members of a Muslim child grooming gang based in Oxford to at least 95 years in prison for raping, torturing and trafficking British girls as young as 11.

The high-profile trial, which ended on June 27, was the latest in a rapidly growing list of grooming cases that are forcing politically correct Britons to confront the previously taboo subject of endemic sexual abuse of children by predatory Muslim paedophile gangs.

The 18-week trial drew unwelcome attention to the sordid reality that police, social workers, teachers, neighbors, politicians and the media have for decades downplayed the severity of the crimes perpetrated against British children because they were afraid of being accused of “Islamophobia” or racism.

According to government estimates that are believed to be “just the tip of the iceberg,” at least 2,500 British children have so far been confirmed to be victims of grooming gangs, and another 20,000 children are at risk of sexual exploitation. At least 27 police forces are currently investigating 54 alleged child grooming gangs across England and Wales.

Also in June, a Muslim cab driver named Mohamed Hacene-Chaouch was jailed for seven years and three months after being found guilty of raping a female passenger in his unlicensed taxi. Hacene-Chaouch—an Algerian married father of five—assaulted the woman after she got lost in Soho, central London.

The case drew public attention to a wave of sex crimes involving predatory Muslim taxi drivers who are raping female passengers. The number of so-called taxi rapes is snowballing to such an extent that a British judge has issued a warning that no woman can expect to be safe while traveling in a cab.

Reliable statistics on taxi rapes nationwide are difficult to obtain, and Freedom of Information requests seeking accurate data on cab-related sexual assaults are routinely denied (here and here).

However, a much acclaimed report produced by the London Metropolitan Police Service estimates that on average there are a total of 1,125 sexual assaults, including rapes, each year involving taxi drivers just in London; this works out to approximately 22 sexual assaults against women by taxi drivers each week in the capital city of England alone.


In July, a House of Commons research report entitled “Prison Population Statistics“ showed that the number of Muslim inmates in England and Wales jumped to 11,248 in 2012, up from 3,681 in 1997. It was the first time that the number of Muslim convicts in British prisons has surpassed the 11,000 mark. Stated another way, the number of Muslims in British prisons has jumped by more than 200% over the past 15 years.

The rate of increase of Muslim inmates in British prisons is eight times faster than that of the overall prison population, and the numbers show a clear overrepresentation of Muslim convicts: Muslims, who make up roughly 5% of the British population as a whole, now make up 13% of the British prison population (compared to just 6% in 1997).


Writing in the July 2013 issue of the prisoner’s magazine, Inside Time, a “long serving prisoner” at the Long Lartin Prison in Worcestershire has this to say: “We are able to cook our own food here but if we attempt to cook pork in the communal kitchen it is deemed dangerous, even a threat to your life. The kitchen is usually occupied by 90% Muslims and we have been told if we cook pork we will be stabbed. There have been incidents here where people have been targeted and pressured and bullied into converting to Islam.”

He adds: “I am writing to inform people of these radical extremist views in this prison where I see no official steps being taken to combat them. Young Muslim men are being radicalized in here and one day they may commit acts of terrorism in this country. There seems to be nothing being done here to stop it and people are scared to speak out. I hope we get some feedback from this; it needs to be sorted out.”

In August, an Islamic television channel based in Birmingham was hit with a hefty fine after a Muslim hate preacher told viewers—live on air—that it was the duty of all Muslims to murder anyone who shows disrespect for the Prophet Mohammed.

Noor TV, a Satellite Television Channel that broadcasts programs about Islam throughout Europe, was fined £85,000 ($115,000) by the British broadcasting regulator known as Ofcom for inciting people to commit murder.

Ofcom said the fine imposed on August 21 was so large due to “the serious nature of the breaches of the Broadcasting Code.” It said young Muslims watching Noor TV could become “radicalized” and take “violent and criminal action as a result of watching videos of Muslims with extreme views.”

In a separate case, Ofcom ordered DM Digital Television to pay a fine of £85,000 ($115,000) after it broadcast a speech by an Islamic scholar who said Muslims had “a duty to kill” anyone who insulted the Prophet Mohammed.

The Manchester-based channel—which claims it has a worldwide audience of 30 million—describes itself as bringing “Asian and English cultures closer” by integrating its people, the cultural diversity, communities and the economy.


In September, the Birmingham Metropolitan College reversed a ban on Islamic veils after furious Muslim students complained of discrimination, and launched an online petition drive that gathered more than 8,000 signatures in just two days.

The college backed away from its ban on September 12, just hours before a mass demonstration by hundreds of Muslim students threatened to disrupt the normal functioning of the college.

The controversy began on September 9, the first day of the autumn term, when the college announced that students and employees would be ordered to remove any face coverings so that individuals are “easily identifiable at all times.”

The college’s ban on face-covering niqabs or the body-covering burqas—as well as caps, hoodies and other types of head covering—was billed as a security measure.

Tory MP for Kettering Philip Hollobone told the British newspaper The Independent that the college’s reversal was a shameful disgrace and argued for the urgent need for legislation to ban the niqab in all public spaces.

“People are frightened of standing up and speaking out in this discussion because of political correctness and the intolerant reaction from Muslim groups who jump up and down with fury whenever anyone says that it makes sense for people to go around with their faces perfectly visible to everyone else, which is the way human beings were created in the first place,” Hollobone said.

Hollobone presented a bill in the British Parliament on September 6 that would make it illegal to wear clothing obscuring the face in public; the bill will be considered on February 28, 2014.


Also in September, a taxpayer-funded Muslim school in England inflamed public anger after it emerged that the institution was operating according to Islamic Sharia law.

Islamic fundamentalists running the Al-Madinah School in Derby, an industrial city in central England, had ordered all female teachers—including those who are not Muslim—to cover their heads and shoulders with a hijab, an Islamic scarf.

In addition to the strict dress code, pupils were banned from singing songs, playing musical instruments, or reading fairy tales, activities deemed to be “un-Islamic,” according to non-Muslim staff members at the school.

Critics say the school—which originally marketed itself as an “inter-faith” school in order to qualify for taxpayer monies—promised that at least 50% of its students would be non-Muslim. But after it obtained £1.4 million (€1.7 million; $2.25 million) in government financing, the administrators of Al-Madinah were accused of switching gears by operating the school according to Islamic law, apparently to ensure that the school will eventually be 100% Muslim.

Also in September, the British Department of Education revealed that it is recruiting former agents of the British secret service (MI5) to investigate the alleged infiltration of British schools by Islamic extremists.

The agents will form part of a new counter-extremism unit, established to investigate schools in which radical activity has been suspected. Speaking to the Sunday Times on September 29, Education Secretary Michael Gove said some schools are being “taken over” by Muslim hardliners in the hope of radicalizing pupils and staff. He also said he was determined to “weed out” schools whose practices do not conform to British values.

survey published by the BBC on September 25 revealed that more than a quarter of young British people distrust Muslims and feel Britain would be better off if there were fewer of them in the country. Of the 1,000 young people questioned in the survey conducted by ComRes, a leading market research agency, 27% of 18-to-24-year-olds said they did not trust Muslims, while 28% said Britain would be better off with fewer Muslims. It also emerged that 60% thought the British public had a negative image of Muslims, and 44% said Muslims do not have the same values as the rest of the population.

A separate survey published by Lord Ashcroft Polls on September 1, showed that six in ten Britons thought immigration had produced more disadvantages than advantages for their country; only 17% thought the pros outweighed the cons. The biggest concerns were about migrants claiming benefits or using public services without having contributed in return.

In London, a judge on September 16 ordered a Muslim defendant to take off her full-face veil to give evidence in court. But—in a case that made legal history—he said the woman could retain the veil for all other parts of her trial.

Judge Peter Murphy said the court should recognize “freedom of religious expression,” but that allowing her to retain the niqab during her evidence, as she wanted, would “drive a coach and horses through justice administered in England and Wales for centuries.” Murphy said he hoped that “Parliament or a higher court will provide a definite answer to the issue soon” to avoid “judicial anarchy.”

Also in September, the British Ministry of Justice confirmed that a total of 186 Muslim inmates at three different prisons are suing the British government, claiming their human rights were violated after tests confirmed that halal food being served to them contained pork meat.


In October, more than a dozen Muslim clerics at some of the biggest mosques in Britain were caught on camera agreeing to marry off girls as young as 14.

Undercover reporters filming a documentary about the prevalence of forced and underage marriage in Britain for the television program ITV Exposure secretly recorded 18 Muslim imams agreeing to perform an Islamic marriage, known as a nikah, between a 14-year-old girl and an older man.

Although the legal age for marriage in Britain is 16, according to Sharia law girls can marry once they reach puberty. The imams who agreed to marry the girl openly mocked the legitimacy of British law, reflecting the rise of a parallel Islamic legal system in Britain.


Also in October, the London Stock Exchange said it would be launching a new Islamic bond index in an effort to establish the City of London as one of the world’s leading centers of Islamic finance.

Britain also plans to become the first non-Muslim country to issue sovereign Islamic bonds, known as sukuk, beginning as early as 2014.

British Prime Minister David Cameron announced the plans during a keynote speech at the ninth World Islamic Economic Forum, which was held in London from October 29-31, the first time the event has ever been held outside the Muslim world.

“Already London is the biggest center for Islamic finance outside the Islamic world,” Cameron told the audience of more than 1,800 international political and business leaders from over 115 countries.

“And today our ambition is to go further still. Because I don’t just want London to be a great capital of Islamic finance in the Western world, I want London to stand alongside Dubai and Kuala Lumpur as one of the great capitals of Islamic finance anywhere in the world.”


In Scotland, meanwhile, the largest-ever immunization program was halted on October 2 after Muslim parents complained that the so-called Fluenz vaccine contained pork gelatin. The roll-out of the flu vaccine in Glasgow was postponed after parents at Glendale Primary in Pollokshields—which has a large number of Muslim pupils who cannot consume pig products for religious reasons—became aware of the ingredients and complained.

The National Health Service of Greater Glasgow and Clyde, an area that contains the overwhelming majority of the Muslims in Scotland, said that 100 Islamic scholars had agreed that pork gelatin was permissible within a vaccine, but it had postponed the vaccinations anyway “following concerns raised by a small number of parents.”

similar vaccination program in Leicestershire, England, was halted in September after the same flu vaccine was deemed to be “insensitive” to Muslims.

In November it emerged that Choukri Ellekhlifi, a British man who was killed fighting alongside al Qaeda-linked extremists in Syria, funded his trip by mugging people in an affluent area of London.


Also in November, the head of MI5 (British domestic intelligence), Andrew Parker, told the British Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee that there are thousands of people living in Britain today who support al Qaida; and the head of MI6 (British foreign intelligence), Sir John Sawers, warned that the threat of terrorist attacks against Britain is increasing. Parker said that British intelligence had foiled 34 terrorist plots since the July 7 London bombings in 2005.

In December, two Islamists, Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, were found guilty of the murder of British soldier Lee Rigby outside the Woolwich Barracks in southeast London on May 22, 2013. The crime shocked the country and has drawn nationwide attention to the rise of radical Islam in Britain.

Adebolajo, 28, and Adebowale, 22, were each accused of attacking the 25-year-old Rigby by running him over from behind with a car and then attempting to decapitate his motionless body with a meat cleaver and kitchen knives.

Both men were born in Britain and raised as Christians before converting to Islam as teenagers.

During the trial, Adebolajo said there was an ongoing “war between the Muslims and the British people” and that he was a “soldier of Allah.”


Also in December, Marks & Spencer, the biggest clothing retailer in Britain, backed down after facing a boycott from thousands of angry customers who were furious at the store’s decision to allow Muslim staff to refuse to serve customers buying alcohol or pork products during the Christmas shopping season.

The policy was revealed after customers trying to buy pork or alcohol from a Muslim cashier at an M&S store in central London were told that because of her religion, they would have to use another checkout lane.

Critics of M&S’s policy of accommodation said it was just another example of how British law and practice is giving way to Islamic Sharia law and practice.

Topics: , , , , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Spartacus

    But the brits aren’t worried about all this. They’re concerned about keeping Romanians, Poles and Bulgarians out of Britain…

    • Long Live Dixie

      That is better than not caring at all. At any rate, they’re not keeping the eastern Europeans out of England, despite their wishes because that issue is decided by the treasonous government.

      • Long Live Dixie

        But the brits aren’t worried about all this.

        Actually, they are worried about this. They’re just too polite and too brainwashed by the fundamentals of liberalism to take action to change things. That might change as their country descends further into the Third World.

        • JustJeff


        • NeanderthalDNA

          “They’re just too polite”

          When they break into my house and I blow their heads off I promise to politely apologize to them as well.

          Then have a snack and take a nap. Conscience clear!

    • skara_brae


    • NeanderthalDNA

      Yeah…see, you guys are White and have some ‘nads left, and we all know that White = EVIL.

      Like in Appalachia. 98% White, poorest region of my country, but 2/3 the crime rate of the country as a whole and 1/3 the violent crime rate. Stupid, inbred redneck hillbillies! No no no! far preferable blacks and browns, eh?

      Seems like the questionably “White” nature of the gypsies would give them a pass in the quasi-Marxist liblefty elite’s eyes, so perhaps you should only send your gypsies to the UK.

      I bet, Sparty, that your poor inbred redneck Romanian/Bulgarian/Polish hillbillies have crime rates similar to our poor inbred redneck hillbillies.

      They would be better advised in my opinion to stay put and stay “poor” in the hills than emigrate to where Sharia law is about to be implemented and White genocide brought to fruition.

      Been thinking about getting a tattoo, which surprises me no end. Somewhere I can cover it up. Any suggestions? I was thinking about something like this…

      • Spartacus

        If you’re thinking about a tatoo, tatoo Channon Christian’s name. It’ll be a good reminder of why we can’t afford to lose .

        • NeanderthalDNA

          We need a memorial wall somewhere with the names of all White victims of the genocide known as diversity.

          Think the Chinese would mind us using that wall of theirs? That’s about the scale I’m imagining for this.

          Probably won’t follow through, but I’d kind of like to have a little something to remind me of who I am. A fasces garnished with a Celtic cross and a hammer of Thor? Nah, getting too much here. I know what the fasces means and could explain it away if needed better than some form of Swastika.

  • sbuffalonative

    The British public, it seems, is increasingly worried about the establishment of a parallel Muslim society there.

    At first parallel, then it merges, then it dominates.

  • Pro_Whitey

    So, why did the Brits fight so hard in WWI and WWII? To allow themselves to be replaced by Muslim scum? Round up the moo-slimes and get them the hell out of the U.K. Or kill them, whatever works. The same for the U.S., Canada, Australia, heck why not the rest of non-muslim Europe, too!

    • Long Live Dixie

      So, why did the Brits fight so hard in WWI and WWII?

      So they wouldn’t be speaking German, of course. That would have been a much worse fate than speaking Urdu.

      • bilderbuster

        Germany didn’t want war with the British or the French.
        Germans never even considered making any country speak German & if you don’t believe me then ask the French.

        • Long Live Dixie

          It was sarcasm.

    • Spartacus


      • Alexandra1973

        Pretty funny considering the royal family is GERMAN.

        • Long Live Dixie

          Only distantly. They have intermarried with the English for more than 100 years. Any other family that has been there that length of time would be considered English by now.

          • Alexandra1973

            Not that distantly The Queen’s grandmother was German, Mary von Teck. Her great-grandfather Edward VII was of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Then Prince Philip has the German ancestry going, looking at my family tree file I see German great-grandparents.

            Then they’ve intermarried so much it isn’t funny. Philip’s descended from the Romanovs as well.

            I was just pointing out the irony. I have German and English ancestry myself. 🙂 More English, though.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I stand corrected. I had thought the line originated with Victoria in the 1800s and that her descendants had mostly married Englanders ever since.

          • Alexandra1973

            It’s okay. 🙂

            If my information is correct I’m descended from Edward III. That’s why they’re all in my family tree file.

          • Lagerstrom

            They changed their name to ‘Windsor’ to avoid the obvious quandry of a British people at war with the Germans wondering why the hell their rulers names are ‘Saxe-Coburg-Gotha’!

          • saxonsun

            Philip has Danish ancestry.

        • John Ulfsson

          Don’t be a liberal. Two closely related western european ethnicities vs. sub-saharan Africans.

          • Alexandra1973

            Don’t worry, I’m not a liberal.

        • Bantu_Education

          They basically disowned their German heritage when they changed their family name to “Windsor” (from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha). Ant-German feeling was so strong in WW1 that if they hadn’t they might have been deposed.

  • Katherine McChesney

    Muslims are filth. And the people responsible for bringing them into White countries are filth. We are in danger. Blacks, Muslims and Mexicans. This is so depressing.

    • Luca

      Most Muslims have a considerable amount of sub-Saharan DNA. Around 10 to 20%. That explains a lot.

      • Truth Teller

        I have seen the DNA results of someone of an elite Christian family from Bethlehem. The professional analyzing it placed this person in Cyprus, and Crete was also listed as another possibility. I don’t understand why the light skinned Christians are lumped as the same race as the dark skinned Muslims.

    • Irishgirl

      And they sure seem to be fixated on sex – with young girls, with “temporary” wives, with cab fares, with any woman who is showing anything more than her eyes. Just as long as the girl’s genitals are mutilated first. Perverts.

      • bilderbuster

        Jewish people have been sexually mutilating the male infant’s penis for thousands of years. The Rabbi does it & the parents invite their friends over to watch.

    • Long Live Dixie

      What’s really depressing is the almost total lack of resistance from the English. Besides the drunkards and rowdies in the EDL, the English are just taking it on the chin and going on about their lives. A people that passive can’t survive long-term. They will have some tough choices in the future.

  • bigone4u

    Dirty filthy muzzies hate man’s best friend, the dog. Brits love dogs. If the Brits allow the muzzies to win, they’re going to have to stand by and witness an outbreak of dog cruelty the likes of which the West has never seen before. If you Brits won’t stand up for yourselves, then dammnit, stand up for your best friends, the canines.

    • Truth Teller

      Oh you are against British people having Islamism imposed but you are OK with Islamism controlling Afghanistan. You seem to be fine with secular families having to be forced into Islamic rule just because it’s another country.

      • Long Live Dixie

        What? Who cares about Afghanistan?

        • Truth Teller

          Islamism is the new communism and should be fought just like the Cold War.

          • Long Live Dixie

            You’re welcome to take off to Afghanistan to save the illiterate goat herders from Islam, but I prefer to focus on the problems of my people and kindred folk.

          • Truth Teller

            I’m not here to save the illiterate goat herders but the elites that are trapped and surrounded by idiots.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Bon voyage.

          • Garrett Brown

            He’s looney and anti white, ignore him.

          • Alexandra1973

            I couldn’t care less what another nation does within its own borders. They want Islam, they can suffer the consequences. Just don’t send them over here.

  • king and slave

    The young, white generation of Brits are largely non-Christian, hence their inability to stop the Muslim advance! Duh. If England can’t get its head out of its a$$, it deserves what it gets!

    • Long Live Dixie

      The young, white generation of Brits are largely non-Christian, hence their inability to stop the Muslim advance!

      The churches are actively supporting the Islamic invaders, so your comment makes no sense at all. The idea that one must be a Christian to be a patriot is unhelpful. In Western Europe, there are more non-Christian nationalists than there are Christian ones. The issue of religion should not be used as a way to divide Western nations from within.

      • rightrightright

        The Progressives filched much of their doctrine from Christianity and the creed of progressivism has itself become a religion with vicious penalties upon dissident heretics. They regard Christianity as an eviscerated husk, now that they have possession of its innards. The Church, notably the Church of England seems to think so too.

    • Lagerstrom

      Young MTV Hip-hop idiot Brits most likely think that these moo-slims are cool!

      • king and slave

        They can continue thinking that through their sobs and tears as their being uphill-gardened.

  • MBlanc46

    The British (and the French) know Muslims considerably better than most Americans do. One can hope that their awakening will help us to avoid the path that they have unfortunately taken.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      It’s obvious the trap the French set for themselves by hanging on to Algeria too long; much like America hanging on to Puerto Rico too long.

      But, how did the Brits manage to shoot themselves in the proverbial arse?

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        One wonders if the French elite wish they simply wiped out the native population, let alone barred their emigration to France.

    • WR_the_realist

      We knew blacks better than the Europeans did. Did our awakening help Europe avoid the path it has unfortunately taken?

      • bilderbuster

        You have it in reverse.
        The founders were well aware of the Blacks & their destructive nature. It was only later that this nation lost it’s way.
        Our falling asleep at the switch in the post war era should have set an example for Europe of what they could expect.

  • bilderbuster

    Never in the history of the world…
    Why do they have a Monarchy & a Church of England if the royals sip tea & talk to their plants when the nation’s been invaded.
    The Archbishop of Canterbury?
    God Damn the Queen!

    • Long Live Dixie

      The Archbishop of Canterbury?
      God Damn the Queen!

      Who’s the worse traitor? It’s almost a toss up. At least the archbishop is nearly irrelevant. Regular church attendance is nearly to the single digits.

      • bilderbuster

        One would think that fact alone might spur his lazy arse into action.

  • Anglo

    I don’t believe for a minute that the Islamization of Britain and Europe has happened by accident. There is something supremely evil driving this madness.
    This is a quote from the Tony Blair Faith Foundation:
    “The links between the religious, economic and political forces shaping our world are too rarely explored or explained. The Tony Blair Faith Foundation intends to help put this right. The Foundation will work with some of the world’s most respected scholars and leaders to develop a deep understanding of how politics, economics, and faith can come together in the 21st century for the good of humanity.”

    It’s all coming together now.

    • rightrightright

      A global economy, political system, statehood and religion.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      The cosmopolitan elites want a one-world government where they can realize their dreams of universal human equality. The EU and NAFTA represent the formative stages of a superstate that will one day cover the entire earth’s surface. Hence, the saying of Lord Lothian, which has been embraced by the EU parliamentarians: “National sovereignty is the root cause of most of the evils of our times. The only final remedy for this supreme and catastrophic evil is a federal union of the peoples.” They must first destroy each and every white nation in the process to achieve this dream, since whites are the only ones capable of mounting effective resistance to globalism, multiculturalism and massive third world immigration.

    • bilderbuster

      As the Germans of the past used to say in polite society “It’s the the Cosmopolitans who are responsible”.

  • rightrightright

    Yet in spite of full knowledge of the above narrative, our leaders remain overwhelmingly concerned about “Islamophobia”, punishments for which are severe. We are being islamised and the orders come from the top. Cameron conducts himself with more finesse than Obama, different methodology, but the goal is the same.

  • rightrightright

    They are not idiots, V. They are cunning, patient, persistent and devoted to their cause. Never belittle the enemy. Know him.

    • Lagerstrom

      Most of these ‘idiots’ don’t know how ‘useful’ they are. A lot of them a naive do-gooders. The ground-troops of course.

  • Eagle_Eyed


  • Lagerstrom

    Deary Me. The so-called ‘Muslim London Patrol’ could be stamped on as if it were a bug if the authorities had any nuts. Instead it is considered a threat!
    No wonder mooslims think Europeans are a joke. They are. The only species that welcomes the enemy into the nest, then wonders what the hell is going on when it all goes spare!

  • This looks to be a very comprehensive article covering a whole range of aspects that the importation and expansion of Muslims bring. It is a very good collection of actual and provable things, without need for having to exaggerate.

    Towards the top, it states “government efforts to push back against the Islamisation of Britain have been halting and half-hearted.”……

    You can say that again.

    If the Labour or Conservative governments were serious about getting on top of some of these issues, then they would have stopped ALL Muslim immigration to Britain. After all, how can you mop up a floor when the roof is still heavily leaking and the hole is getting worse?

    The answer is, you cannot. To mix metaphors, the train carriage has become decoupled and is now hurtling towards us under its own steam. The ‘government’ can not save us, not that they even want to do so. They are more interested in courting the votes of the “new British”.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      It’s the ugly side of democracy in America as well. When there are enough dissimilar cultures present, the race to the bottom commences, and unholy alliances begin to form.
      All western countries should adopt European minimums. All immigration from non-Europeans should halt automatically when those minimums are reached.

  • ncpride

    I’ve never seen anything like it either. We always say blacks in the U.S. are their own worst enemies, but that holds true for Whites as well. No one attacks a realist or WN trying to protect and preserve our own more viciously than other Whites. It’s beyond disturbing, and the only explanation I can come up with is decades of propaganda and brainwashing that starts in childhood from our own public schools, and then there’s the all powerful media. I do see a light at the end of the tunnel though……Comments sections on articles about black crime and immigration are beginning to mirror what we have said all along as our country continues to devolve into chaos and madness.

    • Martel

      You can find white nationalists all over the web attacking the EDL, Jared Taylor, probably even Kevin Macdonald. There is nothing wrong with pointing out flaws, but the viciousness with which many WN’s guard ideological purity is often shocking.

      Our job is to make the transition to white nationalism easier, not put additional pressures on people who are already battling Goliath single-handedly.

  • NoMosqueHere

    “People are frightened of standing up and speaking out in this discussion because of political correctness and the intolerant reaction from Muslim groups who jump up and down with fury whenever anyone says that it makes sense for people to go around with their faces perfectly visible to everyone else, which is the way human beings were created in the first place,” Hollobone said.

    Let’s call a spade a spade, shall we? People are scared of muslims and their proclivity to address criticism with violence.

    And, simply put, Islam is inconsistent with western democracy. It is an evil death cult, founded by a demented, mass murdering, pedophile warlord. The only solution is an end to all immigration from muslim countries and forced expulsions of jihadists and their sympathizers. It is not a human rights violation to tell muslims to stay in their own countries, all 65 of them.

    • Long Live Dixie

      And, simply put, Islam is inconsistent with western democracy.

      Some would argue that Western democracy is inconsistent with Western survival.

      • NoMosqueHere

        If the western nations were at least 90 percent white with sane immigration policies, then their democratic values would serve them well.

        • Long Live Dixie

          Western democracy is a system based on equality.

          Some type of limited democracy might work if we lived in a homogenous and small city state, like in ancient Greece. I don’t think it could ever work in a large country with a large population, even if that population were homogenous.

          In the future, I would like my people governed by people who reject equality and democracy and who accept hierarchy, inequality, and romantic nationalism.

          America’s founding fathers are less than role models for me. They were heavily influenced by Enlightenment liberalism and they are the one who created the damnable union with strangers in the first place.

          • Bantu_Education

            Originally the vote was restricted to a minority, but now that everyone over a certain age has exactly the same single vote how do you improve on that except by lowering the voting age until small children can vote? And then what? Everything worth having should have the potential for improvement, whether it be our health, our lifespans, our physical looks, our brains, our quality of life, our cities, our food, our transportation, our institutions, etc. There should be no argument about any of that. So it seems to me there must be something inherently wrong with any system which has apparently reached such a stage of “perfection” that it can no longer no longer be “improved”. My view is that “democracy” as practiced is fundamentally and inherently flawed, a false ideal, and a one-way dead-end street.

            We need a system not of “one man one vote” but “some men many votes” – the extra votes gained by various forms of merit – exactly which merits can be discussed and different places can place different values on the merits. But none of this of course cannot ever be achieved under the existing dispensation, since turkeys will never vote for Christmas. This in itself should be a cause for alarm.

            Thus the only possible solution to our problems is to create brand-new meritorious societies built from the ground up.

      • Singingbird1

        Is lamb inconsistent with pork?

  • Long Live Dixie

    The EDL is a pro-Jewish and pro-homosexual organisation of football hooligans. They have a “LBGT Division” and have the support of a prominent Zionist rabbi. Just because they say a few things that are accurate does not mean that they are beyond criticism, much less on the same side as me. There is no excuse for their liberal worldview or their hooligan behaviour. Conducting themselves the way they do in public tarnishes all nationalists. A good nationalist movement needs to show discipline. There are several examples of high quality nationalist organisations in Europe. The EDL is not one of them, though I am sure there are good members within the EDL.

    • We could afford your mentality if we were in the significant majority. But we’re far from a real tangible political majority, so we sometimes have to make alliances with people who aren’t with us on everything to get more crucial priorities taken care of.

      Any gay Zionist Jew who doesn’t want England flooded with any more nasty filthy troublesome terrorist Muslims is fine with me on that issue.

      Remember, Pim Fortuyn was gay.

      • Long Live Dixie

        Allying with a clown show like the EDL will set back serious nationalists. It will make serious nationalists look like clowns by association. If you want to remain as a political minority, then the surest way to achieve that is to stand with an organisation that no one has any respect for.

        • We can pick our enemies, but not our friends.

        • Martel

          A clown show like the EDL. I consider brand of white nationalists who spit on everyone who doesn’t agree with their exact political views a clown show. The EDL did more for white identity, white people and to open the discussion about Islam and immigration then you or your fellow clowns ever did.

          Does it make me cringe when some of them claim diversity is a good thing, or when they are unwilling to see that there is a one sided ethnic conflict being waged against whites with Jewish intellectuals leading the charge?

          Yes. But when people are taking immense personal risks, standing up for white interests(even not all interests) and having the BBC and every other media corporation at their throats I will respect them.

          Let me rephrase what I said before:
          There are Jewish and Black nationalist movements which are not as “refined” or radical as the most radically committed racial movements among Jews and Blacks, but I never see the core movements mock and ridicule those other nationalist movements. That’s why they rule and why we are picking up the crumbs. The lack of strategic insight is pathetic and appalling. I can remember when I was younger, I was openly a white nationalist but was turned off by each and every white nationalist website because how bitter and self-isolating they appeared.

    • bilderbuster

      Anyone who doesn’t smell a rat when there’s Jewish involvement or any other non White involvement in a White Nationalist movement is a fool. Add in the pro homosexual/ anti family/ drunken football hooligan aspect & it becomes so obviously a front that even a blind man can see it.

  • Hans Schneider

    everybody gets what they deserve !

  • Singingbird1

    Islam better than beef?

    • Bantu_Education


  • WR_the_realist

    Muslims openly state that Islam is incompatible with liberal democracy.
    Liberal democrats open state that opposition to Islam is racist.

    Is it any surprise who is winning the war?

    • Singingbird1

      Is lamb better than pork?

  • captainc

    you mean 9/11? that was done by someone else, the chosen tribe. how could all events in that day comfortably lead to success of the attack, not to mention the way of the buildings(more than one) fell.

  • captainc

    you enemy is foremost the elites, your leaders, your democracy, you think you are free and have a choice, but the choices are controlled and pre-selected, before they get to you. muslims are the side-effects only.

    • Long Live Dixie

      That’s true, but Muslims are a very visible and dangerous side effect.

      • captainc

        i understand, but if you keep treating cancer with pain killer then it will not go away. if you want to change it, you have to be politician yourself.

  • Enoch_Power

    I wonder when those chinless, white, self-hating, stroky-beard, liberal Useful Idiots will be beheaded and have their women folk raped and sodomised?

    Perhaps they may stop “celebrating” diversity then?

    • Bantu_Education

      haha – good pseudonym..!!

  • Martel

    In three years they accomplished a lot, forcing city councils to finally pursue a pakistani-rape gang epidemic, gaining 160K likes on facebook(in a country where you can get arrested for joking about Mandela) and being a constant item in the news, while constantly organization demo’s all over the country. Its quite an accomplishment for a working class organization facing those odds, and instead of disparaging them we should get the middleclass to own up to their responsibilities. Anyone who thinks the EDL is overrun with delusional ethno-masochists who dream about multiculturalism has no idea what they are talking about, they are mostly working class people, many of them talented, all of them brave, who were dealt a bad hand and tried to reason themselves back to reality through the fog of political correctness.

    Ever noticed how black intellectuals treat black rapists, black drugdealers and black murderers?

    They treat them better then the self appointed white nationalist elite treats organizations such as the EDL.

  • Long Live Dixie

    We’ll have to agree to disagree. They promote homosexuality in their country, they promote Israel’s interests, they fly the Israeli flag above the English flag, and they superimpose the Star of David onto the English flag.

    I do not consider them nationalists by any standard.
    Who said anything about turning the other cheek? When I said they should act with discipline, that does not mean that I think they should moderate their message or become passive. In fact, they should radicalise their message (they can start by ditching the Jews), but they should do so without acting like drunkards. Street brawlers versus a sophisticated system that seeks the eradication of the West. Sorry, but it’s clear who will win that battle.

    . . . the quality nationalist organisations in Europe have not cracked it yet.

    Golden Dawn is the third most popular party in Greece. If I were to model a Western party after anyone from our day, it would be them. They are disciplined, they are serious, they are sober, and they are radically nationalistic.

  • Long Live Dixie

    You’re free to support an organisation that wants England to be more submissive than it already is to world Jewry, but don’t denounce me for not sharing your enthusiasm. England deserves far better.

    Also, I am not a white nationalist, I am a Southern nationalist.

    • Martel

      There is even a single individual in the EDL who WANTS England to be more submissive?

      England deserves better?
      The ones in England who deserve better are those who stand up against anti-white racism, confront the leftist establishment and do what they can to protect their people and their country. I’m not going to fault them for not understanding all the variables involved, incredibly difficult as it is to see through the lies which everyone is exposed to from daycare to the deathbed.

      How proud you are to be a Southern Nationalist instead of a White Nationalist, another worthless brand no politician gives a damn about. You clearly have no interest in doing what is best for whites, sticking to a formula of exclusivity which has failed for so long.

      • Long Live Dixie

        There is even a single individual in the EDL who WANTS England to be more submissive?

        What else can I assume from their display of Jewish symbols in a position of superiority to English symbols?

        . . . not understanding all the variables involved . . ..

        Neither am I. But this isn’t just any variable. This is the variable. And they miss the mark 100%.

        . . . another worthless brand no politician gives a damn about.

        I don’t decide my worldview based on what politicians care about.

        You clearly have no interest in doing what is best for whites . . ..

        There’s a lot of drama at this place. In only a few days of posting here I’ve already been denounced more than once as being disloyal to whites by people who do not know me and who can’t quote me saying anything against whites. What’s really funny is that I said the English should be more radically nationalistic – yet now you say I care nothing about the interests of whites.

        • Martel

          They live in a country where the mainstream media is highly supportive of Palestinians and exceptionally critical of Israel to the point of ridiculousness. They also notice islamic jew-hatred and the media trivializing it, so they don’t see any further then the hypocrisy of the left and the dangers of Islam. This doesn’t take anything away from their work in exposing the anti-white policies of the leftist establishment. I hate seeing pro-white advocates being dismissed because they haven’t figured out the game completely, or like Taylor, understand certain issues are greater or more palpable then others.

          • Long Live Dixie

            It is not because they haven’t figured out the game completely. I have never denounced anyone for that. What I am saying is:

            1) They support making the English more under the heel of Jewry. England is far less Zionist than America is; the EDL’s Zionism is not in the mainstream in England so they can not claim they are just trying to attract more mainstream members. The EDL wants to make the English people into ardent Zionists.

            2) They take a position that is more pro-homosexual than the average Englander. They link the cause of English nationalism and Westernism in general with perverse deviancy. Unfortunately, this is a common trait in western European anti-Islamist parties; they have bought into the post-1945 rot and now they defend that rot as their own.

            3) They are now the public face of the “white resistance” (so-called) in England. With that comes a great deal of responsibility. Instead, they choose to behave in ways that make people look at them and all other nationalists by association as being loudmouths, drunks, and rowdies. Image is essential in this war of words with the system. The resistance needs sturdy, smart, and serious people behind it, not just people who want to shout obscenities at Muslims.

            Let me again say that I think there are good individual members within the EDL and that hopefully some faction will break off and start a more viable and genuinely nationalistic party for England.

          • Martel

            1. They do support Israel(as do I, albeit differently) and stand up against Muslim anti-semitism. Allowing Israeli flags on demonstrations was an attempt to convince the media that they were not linked with neo-nazis. Which turned out to be a great strategy as too often EDL demonstrators pulled out a sieg heil. There is nothing sinister about it, some national socialists even claimed Zionists where paying the EDL, which is a foolish assertion as the EDL is flat broke and always has been. I don’t see how any of their activities would increase Zionist influence over England.

            2. They do, although very few support gay marriage and this isn’t demanded of EDL followers.

            3. There are plenty of those in the EDL, the BBC will point the camera at the more rowdy ones though. I have seen many interviews with regular EDL people who intelligently conveyed their issues. I have no problems with the rowdy ones either, I want every rowdy Englishmen there is to be on my side. The EDL were effective, more so then any other anti-islam movement, clearly. Could they have been more effective at their stage of development… they where 2/3 years in, with zero funding..

            I don’t believe it. The Hooligan Protecting the Herd concept was appreciated by many regular people who felt safe from antifa and muslim hordes, and it allowed city centres to be swamped by supporters in large numbers forcing the media to talk about them.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I suppose this boils down to priorities. I don’t want England to support or bow down to Jews. The West has had enough of the Jews and needs to tell them to go straight to Hell.

            Of course, I realise that’s illegal under current English law, so they could at least not pick sides and just ignore the issue as much as possible. Their use of Jewish symbolism in a position of superiority to English symbolism is something I find especially offensive.

            Those who don’t consider Jewry to be a big problem naturally won’t see the EDL’s Zionism as a big problem.

  • Long Live Dixie

    The founding fathers were ethnonationalists.

    Which ones? Four of the five men on the committee to draft the US Declaration of Independence were either abolitionists or abolitionist-sympathisers. The only one who was not was Jefferson. Franklin was not just any abolitionist; Franklin was the president of this oddly-named organisation: “The Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, and for the Relief of Free Negroes Unlawfully Held in Bondage, and for Improving the Condition of the African Race”.

    Writing racialism into their documents was not unnecessary due to common sense at all. Their age was an age of radicalism – everywhere, the old was being thrown out for the new. In the Northern states, the Quakers and others had been lobbying hard to break down racial barriers. Quaker influence found success in Pennsylvania when the state’s anti-miscegenation laws were repealed in 1780. A few years later, the French of Saint Domingo (Haiti) were slaughtered. Race and revolution were very much issues of the day and white rule and racial integrity were certainly not set in stone or agreed upon by everyone.

    Their thoughts on race aren’t the full issue, though. In nearly every respect the US founding fathers proposed a type of government and society that is influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment and is therefore at odds with my romantic nationalist worldview.

    Robert Barnwell Rhett stated quite well the most fundamental flaw of the American union and its constitution:

    “The Constitution of the United States was an experiment. The experiment consisted in uniting under one Government different peoples, living in different climates, and having different pursuits of industry and institutions.”

  • Long Live Dixie

    Acting like Gandhi, etc., won’t work for the English. The anti-colonisalists who battled the English were fighting a people who were already corrupted by liberalism and physically exhausted from two world wars. In addition, their government was all too eager to sell them out. No such handicaps exist amongst the Muslim invaders.

  • wattyler23

    The reason why Great Britain is being overrun by Muslims and other TRASH is this======
    The House of Commons and The House of Lords are full of members [The overwhelming number] who belong to the [Friends of Israel] society, now does that not speak volumes.
    There is no [Friends of England] society or [ Friends of Wales ] society or [ Friends of Irish ]
    society or [ Friends of Scotland ] society, just [Friends of Israel ] as I have said before.
    Be warned you Americans.

  • Bantu_Education

    “Choudary has previously led a campaign, known as the Islamic Emirates Project, to turn twelve British cities—including what he calls “Londonistan”—into independent Islamic states. The so-called Islamic Emirates would function as autonomous enclaves, ruled by Sharia law and governed entirely outside British jurisprudence.”

    You know what – I actually agree with him, but only 2 enclaves not 12 – perhaps Bradfordistan and Lutonistan. The ghettoes would be encircled with a high double electric fence with only one entrance/exit. All muslims would then be given 3 options -1) apostate, 2) emigrate 3) move to the ghetto “stans”. In the rest of Britain, Ispig would then be declared an illegal death cult and all mosques demolished or turned into pubs or just public latrines. Stir well and leave for 20 years. Bingo, problem solved..!

  • Truth Teller

    I recently watched all 23 episodes of The Tudors on Netflix. I wonder what the present head of the Church of England plans to do about this.

  • Truth Teller

    If anyone cares, the present royal family are descended from Henry 7 and his wife Elizabeth of York both descended from Edward 1,11 and 111.. As oldest daughter (no surviving boys) of Edward 4, Elizabeth had a far stronger claim to the throne, but she and her loyalists did not have an army of 40,000 German, Dutch, Flemish, Breton and French troops funded and organized by the King of France.
    Henry and Elizabeth’s daughter Margaret became Queen of Scotland. Her Grand?daughter Mary’s son became King James 1 of England and Scotland (UK). His daughter married the prince of Hanover. Their great great? grandson became King of England George 1 upon the death of Queen Anne, grand daughter of James 1 through his son, James 11.
    Should be noted that the line of descent went through 50 heirs with a more direct connection to the Stuart Queen Anne before the English selected number 51, George of Hanover.
    George never did learn English, which suited the great lords just fine. He spent 5 months of the year in Hanover and 2 months traveling back and forth. His descendents did not speak English as a first language until the 1920’s when the children of Mary Of Teck and George 5 were hastily tutored. Mary spoke with a heavy German accent all her life.
    George 6, the father of the present Queen had a sight German accent because even during and after WW1 the royal family spoke German amongst themselves. He was also retarded and mentally ill. He did not have a heavy stammer. That was spread about by the royal family’s handlers to cover up his retardation and inability to function in public.
    The present Queen’s Mother the wife of George 6 was the first English person to marry an English sovereign or heir since Anne Hyde wife of James 2 and Mother of Queen Anne.
    Queen Victoria regarded England as a spoils system for numerous German remote relatives who needed money and titles. She ran a sort of German immigration service for relatives with titles but no money or land especially after the unification of Germany.
    Katherine Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge is a descendent of Catherine the daughter of Mary Boleyn and Henry 8
    About 70 million people are descendents of Edward 111.,including most of the English and a lot of Welsh, Scots, Irish, Americans, Canadians and even Caribbean blacks.
    James 11 was the last English sovereign who ruled. William and Mary, Queen Anne and the rest have been nothing more than actors who learn their lines, make their marks, wear their costumes and do what the are told.

  • Truth Teller

    Long Live Dixie
    Is there any proof that the EDL is actually drunks, rowdies and hooligans? Any actual proof of drunken rowdy behavior? Or do you just believe anti White liberal propaganda? As far as the gay component goes, who cares? It’s better than American gays who are a big part of the American liberal anti White coalition. I applaud English gay men who are aware of the discrimination against Whites. I despise the American gay men who although aware that as Whites they are discriminated against every where they are still are part of the anti White liberal coalition.

  • Truth Teller

    I hope everyone reads Martel’s post and ignores Long Live Dixie’s. Methinks Dixie is a troll.
    There are plenty of anti gay and anti Zionist sites Dixie, best go there.

  • Don’tspyonme

    Coming to us soon