Attenborough Criticises Food Aid

Yahoo! News, September 17, 2013

Sir David Attenborough has dismissed sending food aid to countries enduring famine as “barmy” as he urged for more debate about population control, it has been reported.

The natural history broadcaster warned that the world is “heading for disaster” and without action the “natural world will do something”, he told The Daily Telegraph.

He added that the natural world has been doing it “for a long time” and more discussion is needed.

“What are all these famines in Ethiopia, what are they about?” he said.

“They’re about too many people for too little land. That’s what it’s about. And we are blinding ourselves.

“We say, get the United Nations to send them bags of flour. That’s barmy.”

He cited “huge sensitivities” like the right to have children and the Catholic Church’s stance on contraception as barriers to talking about population control.

{snip}

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Spartacus

    Instead of letting dumb animals starve to death as they normally would, let’s feed them for a while so they breed even more . Genius !

  • Population of Ethiopia in 1985 when they were starving and we all went out and bought those We Are the World records: 26 million

    Eritrea seceded (!!!) from Ethiopia in 1993

    Combined population of Ethiopia and Eritrea today: 97 million

    • Spartacus

      What did you expect? Lesser forms of life often have explosive reproduction rates. Why do you think there aren’t any “Save the Rats” campaigns ?

      • Thaddeus Stevens

        Whites have outnumbered blacks throughout history, I believe. They certainly do so now. So are whites the ‘lesser form of life’ relative to blacks?

        • Spartacus

          Ours is not the lesser race. Re-read my post…

        • John Ulfsson

          That’s because whites are able to naturally sustain larger populations due to agriculture, different reproduction strategies and sophisticated infrastructures. Africans are just a mess artificially breeding out of their means because we’re enabling them.

        • me

          Troll a lol lol lol. STFU.

        • blight14

          Lets just say the term ‘white supremacy’ is redundant……….Are we clear?

        • Luca

          Africans have a high reproduction strategy but they have lower life expectancy due to bad habits, like not working, murder, genocide, human sacrifice, endless warfare, living in hostile environments, not caring for their young, cannibalism, witch doctors instead of medicine, too lazy or ignorant to cultivate the land etc.

        • BarnyL

          “Whites have outnumbered blacks throughout history” Really?

          • Until we foolishly shared our technology like antibiotics and the green revolution in food production. World in disarray when you turn your back on Nature.

        • Brian

          McDonald’s has sold more hamburgers than anyone else. Do they make the BEST burger?

    • Voice of Reason

      Just thinking of We Are the World. About time for another Live Aid II. Bono could put the package together. It should be held in Philly and London same as before. On this side of the pond we could have the useful tool Springsteen performing his tribute to Traygone, Miley Cyrus, the black cause country singer (whoever that is) and of course the line up of cRappers. I think it would be fun to see the libtards taking a lead shower. The same process would repeat in London.

      • me

        Bono is to be knighted by the ‘elite’ for his ‘humanitarian efforts’. Bono is a tool for the globalist agenda. Bono should stfu. So should all of the useful idiots in the ‘entertainment industry’, with not a brain to share between them. Boycott the MSM. Sending any type of assistance to Africa is perpetuating the evil that the Blacks do to themselves. Leave the Blacks alone, and let them work out their own systems of survival.

    • NM156

      This is comparable to the population of the NYC MSA transmogrifying into Mexico in 1.5 generations. What will happen as the rest of Africa’s population exceeds that of both China and India by midcentury? All that pressure will need relief, and the West will be targeted for even larger immigration quotas for Africa and even more useless aid from the US/EU et al., which, in a few decades, will be measured in the trillions.

  • WmarkW

    Western medicine has done a lot more to save lives than control births.
    The Nazis showed us the dangers of technology running ahead of morals.
    Africa shows the same thing, from the other direction.

    • mgs166

      The Nazis showed us other dangers as well.

      • Spartacus

        Yeah – the dangers of not fighting hard enough against communists .

        • alex

          Stalin would’ve done to blacks what he had done to Chechens.

        • alex

          Why you guys switched sides in 1944?

          • Spartacus

            Our traitorous “King” switched sides, and arrested Antonescu.

          • Sick of it

            Moscow should have been hit immediately.

          • alex

            Luftwaffe was dropping bombs on Moscow for months. It didn’t help.
            Those pesky Slavic untermensch.

          • rowingfool

            Even Lincoln knew, during the Civil War, that capturing the enemy’s Capitol wasn’t enough to win the War. In Grant he said that he had finally found a General who shared his view that the essential point was to smash the enemy’s troops in the field.

        • bilderbuster

          I wonder if what is left from “The Greatest Generation” has ever figured out that under “President for Life” FDR their greatest ally in the fight for freedom was Stalin.
          If WW1 was the war to make the world safe for democracy then WW2 was the war to make the world safe for communism.

          • alex

            Stalin would’ve swallowed Eastern Europe with or without FDR.
            In any case, nobody forced Hitler to invade Poland.

          • bilderbuster

            Poland did by refusing to negotiate with Germany on Danzig because of British & French war guarantees & abusing ethnic Germans there.

            Those war guarantees proved useless except to turn a German/Polish border dispute into a world war.

            If Stalin was going to take over E.Europe anyways then why the guarantees to Poland & the American aid to USSR in the first place?
            Stalin only had man power & without massive American war materials it’s doubtful the the USSR would have survived.

          • rowingfool

            People forget all about the way Germany was (gleefully) carved up by the French and British after WW1. They lack the capacity for empathy and can’t imagine how they themselves would feel if the same had happened to their country. They still mistakenly believe that Germany “started” WW1. They don’t know that we didn’t “beat” the Germans in WW1 and that instead the war ended in an Armistice, a laying down of arms on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month. And that the victorious Powers treacherously imposed harsh conditions on the Germans only after the Germans had voluntarily laid down their arms.

            Far easier and more emotionally gratifying to engage in black/white, good/evil scapegoating–less headache-inducing thinking involved as well.

          • alex

            Hitler had set in motion a chain of events that allowed Stalin to swallow Eastern Europe.

          • bilderbuster

            Danzig & the Polish Corridor were populated with ethnic Germans & had been German for centuries until after WW1.
            Czechoslovakia was an artificial country created after WW1 & a large portion was German & populated by Germans who wanted to return to the Reich.
            The false country dissolved as soon as communism fell.
            Had Poland negotiated in good faith without false promises from England, France & America then Germany & the USSR would never have shared a border.
            England & France declared war on Germany not the other way around.

          • alex

            Insolent Poles! How dare they not to submit to their Arian Overlords!
            Czechoslovakia gave in to Hitler demands. We all know what happen next.
            Hitler had set in motion a chain of events that allowed Stalin to swallow Eastern Europe.

          • Whitetrashgang

            Also muliticulturalism, feminism, illegal immigration, sexual revolution and every other garbage idea. How do WW2 vets sleep at night? Go against Hitler and fight for Stalin, stupid is like stupid does

      • blight14

        Excuse me? They were magnificent!

  • cecilhenry

    Don’t feed the bears.

    Leave them alone and make them control their populations.

    Don’t feed the bears.

    • sbuffalonative

      ‘You’re making an analogy of people to animals? Are you proposing we allow children to starve? Hitler would be proud of you!’

      Unless an western leader emerges with the stomach to make tough choices and the political will to stand such charges, I don’t see anything changing.

      • kjh64

        Of course they are not animals. However, leaving them alone would be more humane in the long run. As their populations explode, there will be much more suffering and starvation. Africans were often better off before Western aid. They had lower populations and were able to sustain themselves. The only aid should be birth control.

        • blight14

          Indeed, spay and neuter!

      • disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

        So what’s the solution, feed them so those starving “little children” can reproduce in 12 years and set the stage for an even bigger humanitarian disaster the next time drought hits? Aid may make you feel good but in the end it will cause even more misery.

      • Luca

        You should be lecturing the Africans. They are making their children starve by bringing too many of them into a world without the slightest resources or intelligence capable of supporting them into adulthood.

        Once you feed the children they will grow up to have 10 and 12 offspring and who will feed them?

        Using math exponentially we come to a point where the prevailing model is unsustainable. To try and sustain it is madness although it may sound warm and fuzzy.

        The tough choice would be to fund sterilization procedures for the women.

        • watling

          As Africa’s population increases exponentially so will the number of African migrants hoping to make it to civilisation – i.e. Europe.

        • rowingfool

          “They are making their children starve by bringing too many of them into a world without the slightest resources or intelligence capable of supporting them into adulthood……..who will feed them?”

          If they revived cannibalism, they could both have their cake (i.e. screw all they want) and eat it to.

          • GeneticsareDestiny

            I don’t think Africans ever stopped the practice of cannibalism, though it might be down in recent years.

          • rowingfool

            Okay, okay, I’m speaking tongue in cheek. But, if we take the Diversicrats at their word, and acknowledge that all humans are born a blank slate and that only social habit impresses structure on the mind, then what or who is to say that cannibalism is a priori, taboo?

            They are the ones, after all, who espouse tolerance for alternate lifestyles and yet I am relatively certain that they would recoil in shock at the suggestion that cannibalism is an elegant solution to Africa’s intractable problems of overpopulation and malnourishment. They are tolerant of “diversity” as long as it doesn’t deviate from their (innate or acquired?) unexamined, preconceived notions of respectability.

            Of course, I doubt that even one of them would take this criticism seriously, though it is accurate for all that. I would wager that most of them would argue that cannibalism is inherently “against human nature” or some such. In other words, a complete repudiation of their assumptions about humans as blank slates.

      • Sue

        German cities were incinerated during the war. All the air sucked out of the streets. Children’s bodies and their parents were melded to the pavement. Britain and the US did that. Are you aware of what happened to Germany after the war? The population and their children were purposely starved. More German soldiers were killed after the war then during. A great example is Eisenhower with his death camps and we made him president! The US did that too. Our “ally” Russia raped and murdered throughout the country. We knew it and closed our eyes. Perhaps one of our presidents can be proud of you for learning it’s always the one who loses that gets the rap!

        • TheAntidote

          Eisenhower didn’t have death camps. He handed the German POWs over to France and they killed them all. Yes, the Russians brought in Tatars and other barbarians to rape anything female age 6 to 85.

          • 1proactive2

            You’re absolutely correct. Russians are culturally firm believers of payback, and that, in greater intensity than that they suffered.

            The Germans burned eastern Russia down, flattening the landscape, and during the devastation, they also killed all inhabitants of every village in their path. The slaughter was complete. The Russians reminded every soldier their “duty” to exact revenge, and man, did they ever.

          • newscomments70

            “The Germans burned eastern Russia down, flattening the landscape, and during the devastation, they also killed all inhabitants of every village in their path. The slaughter was complete.” That is propaganda and a lie. You have no idea what you are talking about. They did not kill nor even imprison everyone. Some of the inhabitants even benefited from German occupation. If a German soldier raped a women in occupied territory, the penalty was death. Even petty thievery was punishable by death. An acquiantence of mine was in the Wehrmacht and involved in the invasion of Leningrad. Along the way he dated some Russian girls. They even wrote to him after the war. Invading someone else’s country is never pleasant, but it wasn’t as bad as what the marxist history books report.

          • 1proactive2

            Wow. Looks like I’ll have to see if I can find my high school history teacher and slap her for misleading me. Then there are those documentary producers who also led me astray over the years. Then there are those history books I’ve read about German troops leveling entire Russian villages.

            The only problem I find in your comment was that if the German invasion was so beneficial to the populace, one may think they would be welcomed to stay with the locals giving them a hand in fighting the Bolsheviks. Never heard of that happening, however.

            Just a side note, French and Dutch women also “dated” German invaders into their country while the latter was killing the males of those countries, wholesale. Some of these women also bore children by them. Toward the end of the war the liberated citizens brought the ladies out for punishment. Then again, what do I know?

          • newscomments70

            You should actually talk with war veterans on both sides, as well as civilians. (although so many are gone now) That is the real history. ” Looks like I’ll have to see if I can find my high school history teacher and slap her for misleading me. Then there are those documentary producers who also led me astray over the years. ” Liberal media and liberal professors lying and exaggerating?…nah, couldn’t be.

          • Luca

            Those who win, write the history books and they never portray their defeated enemies as being angels.

            There are two sides to every story, somewhere in the middle lies the truth. If you are going to rely on teachers and documentaries you should be aware who controls academia and Hollywood. They are the bastions of liberal revisionists.

          • David Ashton

            Many German soldiers were initially welcomed, and Russian soldiers surrendered en masse. Even during the latter part of the war many Russians joined the anti-Soviet liberation army under General Vlasov. The problem was the combination of German wartime needs for resources with brutal Nazi racial policies. There were “faults” on all sides between 1939 and 1946. What we need now is to learn from the acmistakes (not mutual propaganda exaggerations) of the Second White World Bruderkrieg, and ensure that whites everywhere maintain solidarity and friendship.

          • 1proactive2

            Interesting, and something I didn’t know. I agree fully regarding solidarity among our race. We’re an endangered group now in the U.S., and it seems to be getting worse.

            I think if was Thomas Sowell who said that the only acceptable prejudice left in this country is that against straight, white, Christian males. So true.

          • alex

            You don’t know what you are talking about. My relatives fought in WWII. I knew people who lived in Belorussia during German occupation. German soldiers would barge into their houses and take whatever the wanted.
            “Some of the inhabitants even benefited from German occupation”
            Some of the people in Germany benefited from Soviet occupation.
            Women in Russia and Poland were forced into brothels. Rapes by Wehrmacht weren’t uncommon. Death for rape and petty thievery? It was in Military Code. It doesn’t mean It was enforced. May be in Western Europe.
            German propaganda can be as bad as Soviet propaganda.

          • bilderbuster

            Eisenhower kept the German troops out in open fields with no shelter or latrines on starvation diets during one of the coldest winters on record.
            Any German civilians who tried to feed them were to be shot on sight.

          • blight14

            May Eisenhower rot in the bowels of Hades………

        • alex

          As if Germans wasn’t committing war crimes.

          • bilderbuster

            The USSR never signed the Geneva Conventions so that should tell anyone all they need to know about how Stalin felt about the treatment of Soviet POWs & Soviet treatment of German POWs.
            During the war the Red Cross offered to Stalin to send aid through them to the Soviet POWs but Stalin refused.
            British & American POWs were treated according to the rules of the Geneva Conventions.

          • alex

            As if signing of the Geneva Conventions by USSR would’ve changed Hitler’s attitude…
            Germans had signed it. According to Article 82 they were obligated to treat all prisoners, from any state with humanity.
            Captain Finselberg told his troops to take no prisoners, as they were “useless consumers of food and anyway a race whose extermination would be a step in the right direction.”
            How about Commissar Order given by Hitler? Did Great Britain and USA governments have responsibility to feed their countrymen in German POW camps?
            “The Red Army soldier must be looked upon not as soldier but as an ideological enemy…and must be treated accordingly”
            General Edwin Reinecke, the Reich officer responsible for treatment of POW

          • curri

            Links are held in moderation. Below are mainstream sources cited at ihr (dot) org:

            Stalin’s War Against His Own Troops

            The Tragic Fate of Soviet Prisoners of War in German Captivity

            (…)
            During the war, the Germans made repeated attempts through neutral countries and the International Committee of the Red Cross to reach mutual agreement on the treatment of prisoners by Germany and the USSR. As British historian Robert Conquest explains in his book Stalin: Breaker of Nations, the Soviets adamantly refused to cooperate:

            “When the Germans approached the Soviets, through Sweden, to negotiate observance of the provisions of the Geneva Convention on prisoners of war, Stalin refused. The Soviet soldiers in German hands were thus unprotected even in theory. Millions of them died in captivity, through malnutrition or maltreatment. If Stalin had adhered to the convention (to which the USSR had not been a party) would the Germans have behaved better? To judge by their treatment of other ‘Slav submen’ POWs (like the Poles, even surrendering after the [1944] Warsaw Rising), the answer seems to be yes. (Stalin’s own behavior to [Polish] prisoners captured by the Red Army had already been demonstrated at Katyn and elsewhere [where they were shot].”

            Another historian, Nikolai Tolstoy, affirms in The Secret Betrayal:

            “Hitler himself urged Red Cross inspection of [German] camps [holding Soviet prisoners of war]. But an appeal to Stalin for prisoners’ postal services received a reply that clinched the matter: ‘There are no Soviet prisoners of war. The Soviet soldier fights on till death. If he chooses to become a prisoner, he is automatically excluded from the Russian community. We are not interested in a postal service only for Germans’.”

            Given this situation, the German leaders resolved to treat Soviet prisoners no better than the Soviet leaders were treating the German soldiers they held. As can be imagined, Soviet treatment of German prisoners was harsh. Of an estimated three million German soldiers who fell into Soviet hands, more than two million perished in captivity. Of the 91,000 German troops captured in the Battle of Stalingrad, fewer than 6,000 ever returned to Germany.

            (…)

          • alex

            Nikolai Tolstoy is a committed monarchist. His objectivity is questionable.

          • David Ashton

            His book on Stalin’s War needs some revision solely in the light of new research, but his study of the “Victims of Yalta” remains a remarkable work of careful pioneer research.

          • Luca

            Whenever a Soviet POW escaped and returned to the USSR he was shot as a traitor. If Soviet soldiers retreated or tried to surrender they were shot by their own troops.

          • bilderbuster

            When they were POWs their wives were sent to the gulags & the POWs were shot when they returned after the war & Eisenhower & the Brits returned them knowing this.

          • alex

            Not everybody was shot or sent to Gulag. Don’t believe everything David Duke tells you.

          • alex

            Not everybody was shot or sent to Gulag.

          • alex

            Not everybody was shot and sent to Gulag.

          • alex

            Not everybody was shot or sent to Gulag. Don’t believe everything David Duke tells you.

          • alex

            Don’t believe everything you find on ihr website.
            Retreated soldiers were shot? Desperate times require desperate measures.

          • David Ashton

            You don’t need to read the IHR website or David Duke to get the relevant facts. Soviet archives themselves are adding to what was already uncovered by for example honest Jewish historians and exiled leftwingers.

          • Sue

            What “crime” did Germany commit that all don’t know about? Some gravely unfounded. My point in bringing it up is to say there is 2 sides to every story and the German side is well hidden.

          • David Ashton

            Both sides committed crimes. WW2 was a tragedy. Let historians debate honestly the events over half-a-century ago. Let Britons, Germans, Russians, Poles, Americans etc. seek a new solidarity in a changed world.

        • saxonsun

          And guess what? When England asked this nation for food to feed ITS hungry children, the American response was fine, but first we want your empire.

        • watling

          The bombing of German cities was payback. The Germans did it first. e.g. Coventry, after which the new German verb “koventrieren” was created, meaning “to completely destroy”.

          During the Dresden payback raid some American planes accidentally bombed Prague.

          • Sue

            Nope. I’ll repeat a comment I just made:

            The English were bombing Germany for 3 months before Germany retaliated. Between
            1940 and 1945, sixty-one German cities with a total population of 25
            millions were destroyed or devastated in a bombing campaign initiated by
            the British government. Destruction on this scale had no other purpose
            than the indiscriminate mass murder of as many German people as possible
            quite regardless of their civilian status. It led to retaliatory
            bombing resulting in 60,000 British dead and 86,000 injured.

            Hidden from the public

            ‘It is one of the greatest triumphs of
            modern emotional engineering that, in spite of the plain facts of the
            case which could never be disguised or even materially distorted, the
            British public, throughout the Blitz Period (1940-1941), remained
            convinced that the entire responsibility for their sufferings rested on
            the German leaders.’ Advance to Barbarism, F.J.P. Veale.

          • Mike Conrad

            Have to admit… it took decades of (admittedly casual) study before I learned that simple fact: the infamous “blitz” over London followed British bombing of civilian targets in Germany–it did not precede it. You can still look this up online and 98% of sources will elide this simple truth. It bears repeating: winners write the history.

            “The voice of reason is small, but persistent.”

          • David Ashton

            “The attack on the Ruhr…was an informal invitation to the Luftwaffe to bomb London.” – Dennis Richards, “The Royal Air Force 1939 to 1945”, vol.1, p.122. The first “area bombing” was on Mannheim in December 1940.

        • skara_brae

          Read “Soldaten’ (copyright 2011, Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt) and note the glee and excitement in the transcripts of German pilots describing intentionally bombing and strafing schools, fairgrounds, high streets, churches etc. Then get back to me.

          • Sue

            Yes, it’s a great book of propaganda.

      • HJ11

        Yup. Non-interference. Just butt out of the destinies of non-Whites. Let nature work its ways.

      • bilderbuster

        Hitler didn’t starve Africans.
        That was Churchill.
        Hitler loved animals.

    • newscomments70

      I believe in certian forms of humanitarian AID: free food and housing, but only if they allow themselves to be sterilzied. We should do the same in this country.

  • sbuffalonative

    Common sense has been replaced with ‘moral obligations’. Even the smallest step to correct this problem will be denounced as genocide driven by ‘Nazi’ ideology. Just imagine the reaction if one western leader talked about cutting or scaling back aid to Africa. Every other western leader would denounce them and pledge to increase their support.
    Liberalism is the means by which this cancer is spread.

  • mgs166

    Attenborough seems to be losing it anymore.

    • blight14

      He’s 100% correct………it SHOULD have been stated/implemented 50 years ago……..granted, its never too late……..

  • David Ashton

    Instead send them bags of — condoms.

    Apparently RC nuns get black men to put them on by showing their wives (or whomsoever) how to put them on with their mouths.

    • Puggg

      So they give condoms to black Africans, show them how to use them using a banana for demonstration. So what will black African man do? Put the condom on a banana literally then go and have sex.

      • jane johnson

        Or the Italian/Irish/Polish version…We no have organ; put on piano instead.

      • Unperson

        African recipients of free condoms from the West have also had the gall to complain that they are unusable due to being “too small” for them.
        Any excuse under the sun not to use them. Or any other form of conception-prevention. Or to think ahead at all.
        Similarly, their women can’t seem to remember to take the birth-control pills we send. Too much work, apparently. You have to look at a calendar occasionally. And that’s just not their style at all.
        So instead, African men and women alike just carry on with their traditional approach to the subject: everybody having unprotected, unmarried sex with everybody else, all the time… leading to the twin scourges of overpopulation and AIDS.
        These people can’t be fixed. They can only be contained in their Stone Age natural habitat.

  • bigone4u

    Obviously, the mental midgets of the world are breeding like flies and will overwhelm us if we don’t enforce population control on them. Camp of the Saints, anyone? It’s good to see an old liberal like Attenborough acknowledge the truth. Now, if only the US Congress would do the same. No more food aid. Grow your own or die. It’s natural law.

    • Spartacus

      Liberals are one of the main causes of our problems to begin with, sometimes they admit it, but always after their vile deeds are done…

      • LIBERTYSINCURSION

        Just a quick question for you Spartacus, if of course you have the time. In the image you included with this comment it says that the DailyMail paragraph you have quoted there was written by Peter Hitchens. Would you happen to know if that’s the brother of recently dead Christopher Hitchens?

        Thanks friend?

        • Spartacus

          “Peter Hitchens, right, describes his relationship with his late brother
          Christopher, left, as ‘complex’ but adds the pair got on better in the
          last few months than they had in 50 years”

          http://www(DOT)dailymail(DOT)co(DOT)uk/debate/article-2075133/Christopher-Hitchens-death-In-Memoriam-courageous-sibling-Peter-Hitchens(DOT)html

          • LIBERTYSINCURSION

            Thank you for the response Spartacus. You know, that’s who I thought it was but I wasn’t completely sure. So this Liberal tool, Peter Hitchens. Has actually admitted that mass immigration in to Britain has been disastrous for his fellow citizens?

            Now if we could just get the rest of Britain’s Loopy Liberals to notice the obvious, there just might be hope for Britain after all. However, due to the fact that I know the mental make up of the Massive Suicide Cult known as Liberalism all to well. I for one, most certainly, will not be getting my hopes up any time soon.

    • WmarkW

      When I was a kid, limiting population growth was liberal’s #1 geopolitical priority.
      What happened to that?

      • Libs are We Todd Ed

        They only want to limit European population growth.

      • NM156

        Population control is racist.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        The only population growth they want to control, then reverse is the population of whites. The runaway expansion of the African, Asian and other non-white populations is fine and dandy with them.

  • Libs are We Todd Ed

    Africa’s problem is not lack of natural resources it is lack of intellectual resources. However a well designed eugenics program to let only the most intelligent and most civilized breed would be the most logical solution.

    • Spartacus

      No. The most logical solution would be to stop feeding the wretches, then after they revert to pre-colonial numbers, sterilize them all for the good of all real humans.

    • Guest

      nnnnn

  • NorthernWind

    Of course we’re heading for disaster but the people in charge are still stuck in fantasy land. What are the libs going to do when the West is too broken by internal fighting to feed and provide medicine to Africa? If anything, we are more kind to the Africans. We say let nature take it course now instead of in 20 years when the suffering will me magnitudes worse.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    The darker races will keep breeding like vermin until there is no more resources to sustain them, then they will repay that by invading our lands. That is why sending any sort of food aid is anti-white, and just plain crazy. Indeed, it is evil how we are being forced to pay for our own displacement then extermination. The more they are fed, the more dangerous they become. They are almost like the talking, blood thirsty plant in the musical, “Little Shop of Horrors.”

    • LIBERTYSINCURSION

      Ha! “Little Shop of Horrors” ( A Classic! )
      Feed me Seymour! Feed me all night long!

      [AUDREY II – From “Lil Shop’a Homeys”]

      And if you wanna be profound
      If you really gotta justify
      Take a breath and look around
      A lot of Whiteys deserve to die

      If you want a rationale
      It isn’t very hard to see
      Stop and think it over, pal
      The White Man sure looks like Groid food to me

      • TheAntidote

        I think I see where you’re heading with this. The Eloi will be herded into the cannibal stalls for the Morlocks’ sustenance and enjoyment. Perhaps Bono and Geldof will lead the parade to the harvest of nourishment. Perhaps with a diving board they will enter the immense cannibal pot….willingly, gladly.

        • LIBERTYSINCURSION

          While I appreciate your take on that comment my friend, I have to admit that I really wasn’t headed anywhere. In fact, those are just the lyrics to the movie “Little Shop Of Horrors” theme song, Feed Me! And the only reason I made that comment was in response to a comment left by Zaporizhian Sich in which he referenced the film. However it looks like he for whatever reason has since deleted that comment. But here’s how the lyrics normally go, I just changed a few words to make them apply to Whitey.

          [AUDREY II – ]

          And if you wanna be profound

          If you really gotta justify

          Take a breath and look around

          A lot of folks deserve to die

          If you want a rationale

          It isn’t very hard to see

          Stop and think it over, pal

          The guy sure looks like plant food to me.
          ______________________________________________________
          You Do Know Of That Movie, Little Shop Of Horrors, Right?

  • LIBERTYSINCURSION

    Population Control – I like the way this guy thinks!

  • MekongDelta69

    Can you send IQ Points to Africa?

    No? Oh well – never mind…

    • Franklin_Ryckaert

      Yes, as a form of “affirmative action” that is possible.

  • White Mom in WDC

    If you cannot clothe and feed ’em, don’t breed em

  • White Mom in WDC

    The Catholic Church is run by a group of demented, delusion f$gs who just want a bunch of tax slaves. Same with the insane Western governments. Thinking white people need to disengage from the system and go underground. Hide. Time and Mother Nature will kill off the African weeds. Where do these Ethiopians get off pumping out 80 trillion kids? Pure narcissism.

  • HJ11

    Pathological altruist and neurotic Great White Mothers and Great White fathers bound off to Africa to mother and father darker humans as though they’re pets. Then, they feel all warm and cozy and, ah, Christian, because they’re helped those who are less fortunate.

    These creeps will run right over poor Whites to help Blacks. These sicko Whites are disgusting. They hide their neuroses behind a wall of helping others. What they’re really doing is getting shots of dopamine to make them feel as though their meaningless lives have meaning and purpose. Their lives don’t. They are weak seed whites and they are not my kind. You’ve seen photos of these neurotic Whites with those big “I’m so swell,” smiles as they are surrounded by Blacks.

    Whites need to learn to practice non-interference in the destinies of non-Whites. Let them die or live as nature dictates.

    • me

      A very astute observation on pathological, self-hating Whites.

  • WASP

    All the more imperative to cut off all third-world immigration to the US. I’ve never believed having children is a right; it’s a privilege of the responsible. I’ve never had a problem with birth control or sterilization. Nature’s final solution is much more unkind.

  • Daniel Schmuhl

    I don’t necessarily agree with Attenborough’s Maulthusian views but he’s right in this case.

  • MBlanc46

    So, is Attenborough important enough that someone might even take what he says seriously for a second or two, or has he, like James Watson, dynamited his career?

  • alex

    They should be collectively adapted by Angelina Jolie, Madonna and Sandra Bullock.

    • me

      LOL! All three of those ‘Hollywood Hussies’ should take their undeserved wealth and live in an African country, since they’re so ‘dedicated’ to promoting globalist propaganda.

  • NM156

    The left has abandoned population control as a racist concern and, instead, advocates for mass immigration from the Third World to the First to relieve population pressures.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      No, that is not their intent, they intend to create population pressures that lead to the extinction of whites everywhere. If that happens, then the darkies will starve in such numbers that the whole planet will revert to cannibalism. THAT is the sort of nightmare scenario the Left wing tyrants are creating. They want to kill off all but a few hundred million people so they can rule the globe unchallenged.

  • Sloppo

    Maybe Sally Struthers should have mentioned that our donations would be used indirectly to destroy our nations when she was begging for food for those poor African children.

    • newscomments70

      I believe that the Sally Struthers money went to fund the seven figure salaries of the adminstrators at the so-called charity organizations. Only a few cents to the dollar went to buy food to feed the starving children.

  • John Ulfsson

    Secular Humanism and modern egalitarian viewpoints are dangerous. I’ve heard a surprising amount of smart, young white people decide not to have kids because ‘there’s too many people in the world.’ Yeah, not the right kind of people to further the human species, unfortunately.

    • me

      They’re not so smart after all….

      • John Ulfsson

        Most people don’t have access to the information that causes you to drift to the right.

        • PouponMarks

          They do, JU, they just are too lazy to reach for it. And like a mirror, it would show themselves to themselves for the fools and knaves they are.

  • jackryanvb

    Birth control Si.

    Illegal alien amnesty no!

  • benvad

    Whites should only adopt whites period. I’m married to a Japanese, for the life of me, they’re always bewildered about all this Altruism to Bantus. We should just let them perish and eat each other. Shoot asylum seekers, and deport the masses from muslim/african/third worlders. Period

    • Sick of it

      The Japanese get to enjoy their relatively homogeneous homeland in peace. The enemy will never afford us similar consideration.

    • newscomments70

      “Shoot asylum seekers, and deport the masses from muslim/african/third worlders.” It is sad to kill anyone, but eventually, the situation will explode and this will be the consequence. The politicians have turned their deaf ears to us for decades, now we are at the brink of civil war.

    • PouponMarks

      The only way to save Africa would be to recolonize it, for profit. The people at the bottom would be lifted up from where they are now. Shoot illegal invaders with rubber bullets and make them spend 2 years in building a WALL, not a fence. Muslims to be declared agents provacateurs, like parolees, to be monitored and report in on regular intervals.

  • Garrett Brown

    If we continue to defy nature, we will all be gone, high IQ or not. You cannot continue to let every child be fed and every parent be able to support six to ten children(blacks in Africa), that’s insanity. This world cannot support another seven billion people.

  • 1proactive2

    Continuing to “help” distressed nations only serves to perpetuate the misery and remove any incentive for learning and change. It’s called “pathological altruism”, and there is a book by that name available at Amazon. I read it, and it covers exactly the insane move of sustaining willful poverty. It’s a “must read” for any adult to wants to understand why our social and world welfare systems are disastrous.

  • DonReynolds

    Don’t forget Malthus. There WILL be population control, no matter how much food you send to Afrika. Sooner or later, the checks on population grown will kick in. Just make sure none of them escape Afrika to start a new tribe elsewhere.

    • dd121

      It’s called the USA. The libs will bring them here in their millions, and you’ll pay for it.

      • LIBERTYSINCURSION

        And best of all is the fact that the feds will dump them in your quiet small town by the thousands. Without even bothering to ask the residents nor local government if they are okay with that. Just like they did with all the Somali’s across Minnesota. Next thing you know you got Somali teenapers video taping themselves assaulting the communities senior citizens. Laughing hysterically the entire time while doing it and ultimately putting it up on YouTube for the rest of their tribes enjoyment. I guess we can considered the neighborhood in which that happened to be thoroughly diversified, culturally enriched and socially vibrant.

        – ( Ready Or Not, Or Even Willing Or Not, Here Comes Diversity America ) –

        • Mike Conrad

          Oddly, when the MSM shows photos of immigrants it’s about 95% women and children, with the occasional geriatric thrown in. Odd huh.

      • jackryanvb

        The League of the South is protesting the mass immigrant invasion of Somalian Muslims in to Middle Tennessee. The activism will be on and around Oct 12th.

  • blight14

    What an utterly sane idea! ALL food/aid/etc. starting today should be tied to mandatory spay/neuter programs…..and not just in Africa….

  • blight14

    And not JUST in Africa!

  • The Final Solution

    The book Dead Aid explains everything. Written by an African.

  • Luca

    You forgot about Korea,only 5 years later. Where do you think those North Korean Migs and antiaircraft batteries came from?

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    To send them food aid is madness, because they will overwhelm their own nation’s resources, then invade ours. That is already happening, and to show their gratitude they will displace and if given the chance, exterminate the native populations of every western country they flood into. They are of course not doing this on their own, a certain group of treacherous people has made that possible. Let them learn how to stabilize their own populations and countries in their own way.

    • ms_anthro

      The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail should be required reading. Buy a few copies and pass them around among your awake and almost-awake friends. A few people in my circle have come fully around to race realism after reading that book. It’s a wake-up call and he doesn’t mince words or try to gloss over the full horror of what awaits us if we don’t stop the globalists.

      • jackryanvb

        Agreed. My favorite book. But, now read “The Brigade”, in this novel our side wins.

  • watling

    At 87, and with a long career behind him, Sir David Attenborough no longer needs to prostrate himself at the altar of political correctness and he can therefore be more candid than a younger person.

    He wouldn’t have said this 20 years ago even though the sentiment was as applicable then as it is now.

  • capnmorgan5150

    Agreed. I think a few people missed his point entirely.

  • ms_anthro

    Attenborough, unlike many champagne socialists of his circles, has actually spent much time among primitive peoples around the world. I have no doubt that his experiences with them off-camera profoundly shaped his views about subsidizing their out-of-control breeding.

  • ms_anthro

    He is a staunch leftist but he loves animals and nature far more than he loves humans and human subspecies.

  • jackryanvb

    Try a different approach: African and Muslim abuse of animals, women.

  • David Ashton

    Hitchens is a puritan and a pessimist, incidentally partly of Jewish descent, but on balance writes excellent criticisms of what the political class and “liberalism” have done to Britain. If a man is known by his enemies, he is an ally.

  • bilderbuster

    Not true.
    That honor goes to Jewish/Bolshevism & their fellow tribesmen in the west.
    Even if that were true it doesn’t excuse Black on White rapes & murders.
    There were no Blacks in Europe & the National Socialists had no policy against them except race mixing wasn’t allowed.
    Jessie Owens said the best time he ever had was his stay in Berlin during the 1936 Olympics.

  • Sue

    You may think whatever you want and I know what blitzkrieg means. The English were bombing Germany for 3 months before Germany retaliated. Between
    1940 and 1945, sixty-one German cities with a total population of 25
    millions were destroyed or devastated in a bombing campaign initiated by
    the British government. Destruction on this scale had no other purpose
    than the indiscriminate mass murder of as many German people as possible
    quite regardless of their civilian status. It led to retaliatory
    bombing resulting in 60,000 British dead and 86,000 injured.

    Hidden from the public

    ‘It is one of the greatest triumphs of
    modern emotional engineering that, in spite of the plain facts of the
    case which could never be disguised or even materially distorted, the
    British public, throughout the Blitz Period (1940-1941), remained
    convinced that the entire responsibility for their sufferings rested on
    the German leaders.’ Advance to Barbarism, F.J.P. Veale.

  • Sue

    It’s amazing when simply putting up history, you’re attack. We plug on in hope that even one person learns and absorbs the reality, it’s worth it.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    That was what my grandparents did, they fled Ukraine to Germany, then Argentina. They knew then Soviets would have killed them sooner or later.

  • Mike Conrad

    I’m surprised no one has mentioned the Gates Foundation. They’re doing more than anyone to ensure that ultra-high African & Asian birthrates are supported with food and medical aid from the West. The upshot will be even more misery down the road.

  • David Ashton

    My father was a Plymothian and we had an illustrated book on the devastated city. But the people of Hamburg as much as Dresden had as much horror to contend with. Dad fought the Germans in WW2 but always respected and liked them, even though the front door of our house was blown in during the bombing. The Hitler-Churchill combat was a tragedy for both nations, still more for our common European civilization; I think Hitler shares the greater responsibility, but there were ruthless actions and strategic misjudgments on all sides. Keep to objective analysis over past history, but make sure that white nations do not fight one another again.

  • Sue

    Glad you brought this up, thanks!

    The United States has yet to sign a peace treaty with Germany in all these years. They have yet to have their own government back. My question then is why and why don’t more people know about it?

  • M&S

    The problems as I see them are these:
    1. We know that billions will not be allowed to die without intervention. Some bleeding
    heart pathological altruist will refuse to admit that they were wrong all along and having
    to watch a billion or more humans die is the hardest lesson they must learn on the road
    to survival wisdome. S/he will then turn to their corporate sector buddy and with
    heartfelt guilt or zealots glee for what the POPs say this will do for their
    numbers, demand that the smarter man ‘fix it!’. And that will be the point at which
    things go pear-shaped for those of us who were never asked if we wanted Dow
    Chemical or Monsanto to save another race with our money. And we will do nothing
    because the perception will be that it’s illegal to intervene in the federal rescue effort
    and socially unconscionable to want to.
    2. At least until 2075 or thereabouts, India, not Africa (3.2 billion vs. 2.7 billion) will lead
    the population M-bomb race. India doesn’t have convenient shutdown points as the
    Sinai and Negev Deserts and Saudi Arabia to population migratory behaviors. And
    you face a domino effect of local population displacements (due to aridification as well
    as flood induced famines) will create regional ethnic violence as those who have not
    been drinking fluoride by the gallon and eating and soy tainted hamburgers by the
    1,000 ton day, fight back with the fury of masculine spite. This will lead to bleed over
    into OUR lands, particularly in an NWO environment where everyone assumes
    responsibility for everyone else’ problems rather than allowing them to use modern
    firepower to settle the issue outright.
    3. Whites will be caught up in this and whites will be the first to go because they have no
    allegiances to indigenous pops who see they have no solutions and who have their
    own ethnic/caste` hatreds as an easy means to psychologically engage in population
    management. Zulu hate Xhosa and so whites live on the sidelines in SA for instance.
    High Cast Brahmins watch the increasing militancy of various Sikh, Hindu and Islamic
    elements in India and do nothing because _non alignment_ is how you remain a small
    target. In this, it is critical that we understand the way you stop Le Camp des Saints is
    at the boarding ramp in the harbors. No enroute. Not over here. Sink the ships,
    figuratively, as reason for the exodus and you don’t create the stampede psychology
    by which one yell of ‘FIRE!’ is all it takes and the rest of us are stuck with the liberal,
    bleeding heart, consequences to boat people.
    Africa is a hole. But so was Kansas until we killed all the buffalo, stabilized the soil under agro and brought in artificial irrigation.
    If you want to keep -them- /there/, then you need to consider what to do to make Africa look like Kansas.
    Cheap desal (solar off the uninhabited west coasts with their desert barriers) and utter slaughter of the large game herds (as disease incubators) under a ‘humans first’ condition would be the first step.
    Corporate agro to include management of very large herds of cattle and ENORMOUS grain crops to feed them would be another.
    We may well be looking at a condition where feeding the world where they live or at least -from where the land is open- is the difference between having them stay in place. And having them show up at our door as wolves who know how to turn knobs.
    Let us also not forget that the world is getting warmer. You need only look at the glaciers to see this. As it warms, the seas will rise, coastal regions will be inundanted and populations compressed. The combination of those two factors brings pathogenic plagues into real consideration as prime killers who have continental and even oceanic spanning legs.
    The big question of course is oil. When we finally make the transition to electric society and how much ‘improvement’ we can do, given the paucity of some metals like copper and lithium. But where there are people, we will either make money through slaughter or through support.
    And support has longer term profits because as the population of the helpless eaters grows, so too will the number of options to keep them forever infantilized through support networks grow with them.
    Something to consider when you look at the money mad planet and who controls it. Where there be money to be made being ‘humanist’ there will the soulless exploiters of the success story that is white culture go. Our checkbook in their back pocket.

  • Sue

    I’m glad you don’t think we’re adversaries because that is not the case. The point is people know quite well of the blitz but most don’t know what was done in Germany.
    The town of Emden was I believe the first city to be bombed.: The town centre was almost completely wiped out as a result of Allied bombing raids during the Second World War, destroying nearly all historic buildings. The RAF first bombed Emden on 31 March 1940. Understand that these towns were basically bombed to the ground. Uninhabitable.
    Blitz: started 7 September 1940. As you can see there was quite a difference in time.
    As for Poland there was a large German population encapsulated within Poland because the land was given to Poland after the first WW. The German populace was being slaughtered and they begged Germany to help them. (personally I believe they were taunting Hitler into war) Please look up Bloody Sunday 1939.

    David Irving an author and historian who very thoroughly established Germany did not wish to go to war with Britain. I think they would still have their empire today had they simply said no.

    Everything about the German side is basically covered up or called propaganda. One side can’t always be wrong or evil. In the end though we all are truly suffering the effects of all those Europeans obliterated. I learn every day from differing opinions, yours included. I hope you will take the time to look at the other side and realize it’s not that cut and dried.

  • Observer

    I love Attenborough, and always have. As one with a strong Catholic upbringing ( no longer practicing ), and someone who cherishes Christian civilization, it never the less has always disturbed me how church leaders keep promoting policies that foster overpopulation and thereby the destruction of our planet….as well as the invasion of beings from inferior cultures into Western society. But let us be honest about slavery, as Theodore Roosevelt was. We brought the products of an inferior race to North America; and as Southern whites well knew and in fact fostered, they keep breeding. My Facebook name is ” Son of Stephen Levano”, people here need to network.

  • Thaddeus Stevens

    That’s a ridiculous comment. If we consider numbers of non-blacks vs blacks, then non-blacks overwhelmingly outnumber blacks, more than non-whites outnumber whites.

    Even the Chinese are a minority population in the world.

    The main point is whites are the second largest race, population wise, in the world after East Asians (1.2 and 1.4 billion respectively).

    That’s far far more than Australian Aborigines, Polynesians, American Indians, and Pygmies. I’d be worried about the survival of these races well before the survival of whites.