RNC vs. DNC: “Ocean of Whiteness” vs. Star Wars Cantina

Paul Kersey, VDARE, September 9, 2012

Two scenes in George Lucas’ first Star Wars movie beautifully encapsulated the emotions I felt while attending both the GOP Convention in Tampa and the DNC Convention in Charlotte:

Indeed, an “Ocean of Whiteness” was exactly how black Republican consultant Raynard Jackson described the Republican Convention in a front-page banner headline of the black newspaper The Richmond Times. He was right—although I would say the Main Stream Media, massively present and mingling with the delegates, was even whiter.

It’s been reported that only two percent of the delegates at the GOP were Black. Conversely, reportedly 26 percent of the delegates at the DNC were Black, though I’d wager that at least 50 percent of those in attendance at Charlotte’s Time Warner Cable Arena in Charlotte were—all dressed in their most impressive Sunday attire to pay homage to their Commander in Chief. Whites, many of them homosexual, the men tall good-looking Nordics, the women Ladies Professional Golf Association caricatures, seemed to be about a quarter (although this included the MSM). Hispanics and particularly Asians were somewhat surprisingly less well represented, in that order.

But beneath this diversity there was one commonality at the DNC: the atheists, blacks, Hispanics, “good” white liberals, homosexuals,Amerindians, and other NAMs in attendance – despite their ultimately political interests—were totally united in their belief that the historic majority population of the United States, what VDARE.com calls the “historic American nation,” must be deposed and that the culture this hated majority created must be subverted at all costs.

In a bid to fit in, I made sure to purchase an Obama-Biden button to wear the entire time I was at the DNC. (The hilarious “Once You Vote Black You Never Go Back” Obama-Biden button was a hard souvenir to find).

It was a surreal sight to see white liberals, Blacks, Hispanics, and other NAMs swoon over such illustrious individuals as Jesse Jackson, Rep. John Lewis, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews (as he waddled through the concourse to the media suites), all making a living by promoting an agenda that must frankly be described as anti-white.

I fitted in more easily at the GOP Convention. But  it was painfully obvious that Conservatism Inc. has already capitulated to the idea that that a majority-minority America is an inevitability, and that the Republicans must appease it—and certainly that it dare not implement what VDARE.com calls the “Sailer Strategy” and appeal to its own (white) base.

Pathetically, the Beltway-friendly Daily Caller complained thatMSNBC cut-away from showing the speeches of some of the non-white speakers at the GOP Convention. But the plain fact is that the Republicans would have gladly showcased a complete non-white lineup of speakers if they could have fielded one.

It was impossible to watch the speeches of Condoleezza Rice, congressional candidate Mia Love and former Democratic Alabama Congressman Artur Davis at the GOP Convention, and to see the Obama-exceeding homage with which they were greeted, without realizing that they were there addressing the “Ocean of Whiteness” precisely because they were seen as an olive branch to the non-white community that might erase virtual monolithic support President Obama has among his people:

…Obama continues to lead Romney among key parts of his political base, including African Americans (94 percent to 0 percent), Latinos (by a 2-to-1 margin), voters under 35-years-old (52 percent to 41 percent) and women (51 percent to 41 percent).

Romney is ahead with whites (53 percent to 40 percent), rural voters (47 percent to 38 percent) and seniors (49 percent to 41 percent). [NBC/WSJ poll: Heading into conventions, Obama has four-point lead, NBC, August 21, 2012]

At the Tampa Bay Times Forum, where police, National Guardsmen,Secret Service officers, and other security forces seemed to outnumber those employees who work downtown 10-1, I had the dubious honor of watching Conservatism Inc.’s last stand: the nomination of Gov. Mitt Romney and Rep. Paul Ryan, both candidates gleefully supported by the nexus of non-profits in Washington D.C. and their supporting cast of Beltway wonks anxious to fill a Romney White House.

In contrast, watching Vice President Joe Biden deliver an incredibly populist speech at the DNC a week later—much of which I found myself agreeing with, appreciating that he was making an appeal to the white working class—I realized that Romney and Ryan had both avoided mentioning Attorney General Eric “My People” Holder, Fast and Furious, and immigration, following the accommodating preferences of the Beltway Right and Conservatism Inc.

It’s “all-in” move by a desperate Republican Party hoping to avoid all mention of social issues and win on a platform of… of… of… what exactly?

The reason the United States of America is in so much trouble is because one of its political parties—the “Generic American Party” that that the historic American majority believes defends its interests—has decided the noblest goal imaginable is promoting every non-white to positions of influence who professes a belief in tax-cuts for millionaires and the “invade the world, invite the world”mentality.

This is the result of the two-party oligopoly that we live under: both Democrats and Republicans seem united in ensuring that every community, school, city, and state resembles the Star Wars Bar Scene—while the history of the United States is more akin to the movie’s triumphal homogeneous ending.

America may not be better off after four years of Barack Obama. But more importantly, it won’t be better off, as a nation, four years from now—regardless if Obama or Romney is elected.

The Democratic Party is happy sheltering the disparate groups united in their hatred of the majority race, although at any moment (and in the end inevitably) the various groups could engage in huge bar brawl.

On the other hand, the Conservatism Inc. stewards of the GOP, although funded by money that pours in from elderly white people who remember the near-homogenous country of their youth, have completely surrendered to the notion that America is destined to become a second Brazil.

For the historic American nation, both agendas are the equivalent of the Death Star.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • extragirl666

    Well I look at it this way. Whites have this work ethic and avoid being dependent on such things as welfare and other government programs which promote dependence which results into a kind of slavery. We are just born that way. 

    • Defiant White

      I don’t think so.  It’s not about being born that way.  It’s about being lucky enough to be born into a culture that began on the shores of the Mediterranean over 3,000 years ago and has steadily moved westward, conquering and civilizing everything in its path.

      Our work ethic comes from the Protestant Reformation . . . which despite all the criticisms from whites who hate Christianity and want to bring back Odin,  is still the most successful social organizing doctrine known to man. 

      When you add what evolution has bred us to be with powerful social doctrines, you develop a magnificent culture . . . and it’s that culture that we’re lucky enough to be born into.

      That’s why the whigger is WORSE than the ***ger.  Because he fails to pass on the culture to his descendants.

      That’s what too many whites don’t get . . . this isn’t a racial war . . . it’s a culture war.  The culture war includes both a inter-racial war component and an intra-racial war component.

      Whites aren’t just at war with non-whites . . . thanks to judeo-marxist influence . . . we’re at war with ourselves.

  • WmarkW

    This is correct as far as it goes, but — I don’t actually LIKE the Republican platform to any extent beyond being better than the Democrats’.  Who’s talking about making jobs for the middle class the #1 priority, instead of believing it will be the inevitable result of other economic theories?

    The Republicans think Time began in 2009, and nothing before that counts against them.   They are running headlong into losing an election that they should have had in the bag.  They’ll have no one but themselves to blame for it; and we’ll all suffer for their incompetence.

    • My problem with the Republicans is the pandering to the religious nuts that now make up the party. I agree with smaller government but when they talk about wanting to take away women’s reproductive rights and against marriage equality, they no longer have my vote. I am not too hip on the Democrats for their support of illegal immigrants. I have debated  just leaving the choice for president blank when I cast my vote.

      •  I’m Celestial Time, and I approve this message.

      • jeffaral

        The religious nuts are the same NUTS who claim that Mexican and African immigrants share conservative values and are hard working.   These NUTS are even more dangerous than the so called liberals; they even elected a blackman as their religious leader- well done Baptist Southern Convention!    The Republicans belong to the dustbin of history. 

      • anonymous_amren

        I’m an atheist and I don’t approve this message. I agree that pandering to religious nuts is a terrible idea. But you are wrong to think that women’s reproductive rights and marriage equality are about religious superstition vs. rationality. Religious people oppose those things largely for secular reasons and non-religious people support those things because of their religion (political correctness).

        Rationally, abortion is a grey area.
        And homosexuals are obviously very different from straight people in regards to everything that marriage is about.

        And “small government” is a terrible idea. Third world countries have small government because they are too stupid, impulsive, violent, etc. to be able to organise anything. Successful countries have big governments. But big government only works when the people and the government share the same culture and values (and race).

  • Defiant White

    I have a sneaky suspicion that a lot of this may be a fad.  I remember when disco started.  You couldn’t find a non-disco bar and the skinny, homosexual types ruled the dance floor and got the women.  (Though God-knows what they did with them.)

    But eventually, the Natural Order Of Things prevailed.

    Liberalism envisions America as the dance scene from The Matrix 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OrXdBYojBQ) .

    But maintaining that vision takes a corrupt judicial system, political correctness, domination of the media and universities and domination of the gubmint.

    But that all takes MONEY . . . and they’ve they’ve bakrupted the country.  There is no more money and without it, you can’t sustain the fantasy.  The Natural Order Of Things will once again prevail.

  • Ulick

    Greedo (the alien) tried to kill Han Solo (the white man) in that cantina scene, but Solo was too smart and too armed and he prevailed over the alien.

    Also at the cantina, a walrus looking alien and another ugly alien expressed anti-white sentiment toward Luke Skywalker and tried to attack Luke and Obi Wan Kenobi.  Obi Wan, the wise old white man that he is, used even greater force on the aliens to end the confrontation.

    Let’s be like Han and Obi Wan.

    • Enar_Larsson

      I was thinking along the same lines…the cantina scene does a good job of showing what diversity is really like. There are prostitutes, drug dealers, smugglers (even if they are white), racists (both anti-white and anti-droid), extortioners, etc. There is also a great deal of conflict, murder, and even dismemberment. As you recall, when Han shoots
      Gweedo and when Obi Wan cuts off the alien’s arm, the music stops for a minute,
      every one laughs, and the music starts up again. The very diverse scene at
      Jabba’s palace in “Return of the Jedi” is pretty similar, as is the bar scene
      in “Attack of the Clones”.

  • This is what political classes think. But-historia magistra vitae est- time and again, unfolding of events has exposed such predictions as false and shallow. Who during 1910. knew that Great War would wipe out 4 great empires & establish a completely new form of government, Communism ?

    Put not your trust in princes.

  • When there are more people taking than producing, the system will collapse. What happens after that is anyones guess.

    • Policies they believe are driven by hope will have unforeseen consequences and those consequences will need totalitarian solutions.

    • Ed_NY

      Mob rule, every man for himself.  Chaos and anarchy.  It won’t be pretty.  Hope for the best but prepare for the worst.

  • I read this article before and found the Star Wars cantina reference funny and spot on.

  • MikeofAges

    Just keep one thought in mind. The complexion of both of these conventions is a reflection of the political choices made the minority rank and file. They are welcome at the Republican convention, but inclusion is  not their goal. With the help of the compliant media they play the blame game, saying that the  principles of Americanism and American social conservatism exclude them. The truth  is the other way around.

    The dead hand of the KGB is still at work here. The chaos  it planted in the 1970s lives on.

    • robinbishop34

      Yep. This guy tells how it was done…

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMZGGQ0ERk

  • bubo

    Western Civilization was lost at the Battle of Stalingrad.   I don’t know who originally said it but to me it rings true.  

      • TeutonicKnight67

        Yes, but not due to his Nationalism. Au contraire, it was his SOCIALISM with its attendant totalitarianism the was problem. It reduced Germany to being merely the flip side of the coin to Stalin.

        • Listen … let’s be serious.

          Hitler’s racial policy aimed at enslavement & then extermination of Slavic peoples. His “grand plan” was, geopolitically, this one: http://www.obersalzberg.de/utopie-grossgermanisches-reich.html?&L=1
          That would mean killing & ethnic cleansing of Russians beyond the Urals. Also, extermination of Poles in due time, and Ukrainians & White Russians would follow suit.

          In practice, systematic destruction of monuments of Russian culture was implemented: composer Tchaikovsky’s grave desecrated, poet Pushkin’s historical museum destroyed, with the sole intention of damnatio memoriae. Also, he intended to annihilate French culture & nation: Nancy would have been, in some future, renamed into Nantzig, with other lunatic ideas to follow.

          Had Hitler succeeded partially in establishing his Reich, i.e. had he temporarily won the war, the result would be, motivated by common hatred of all things German & powered by Russian war machine in Siberia, universal uprising of enslaved peoples and,very likely, genocide over German people in which a major part of Germans would have vanished, and that people reduced to insignificant tribes or folklore groups. Tragedy that befell Germans in 1944-1945 (13 M expelled; 25% of pre-war Germany chopped off) would have paled in comparison with what the ultimate revenge would have accomplished.

          So, relatively quick defeat of Hitler’s Germany was the best thing that has happened- to the German people.

      • 5n4k33y3s

        Hitler hurt white civilization bad. Europe was significantly depopulated. European Jews needed some resistance, but Hitler’s response was insane, disproportionate and beyond the pale.

        As it turns out, the disproportionate geopolitical influence of the Jewish diaspora is diminishing as a result information technology leveling the field. Anyone who is paranoid about the grand conspiracy of the Jewish elders might as well get a prescription for Xanax.

        Hitler’s neuroses must have been based on an inferiority complex combined with chronic social anxiety, leading towards debilitating paranoia. Everything was crisis to him.

        And look at the consequences of alienating the Jews so badly they’ve been guilt-tripping gentile white society for decades. The guilt tripping caused Europeans to import far more diversity than the Jews ever represented in Europe.

        The Russians are the only ones who have not internalized the guilt trip, and now Russia is the best example of a healthy, predominantly white nation.

        I am sick of the values espoused by progressive secular Jews. Orthodox Jews should be held in higher regard, and the degenerate ideology of the secular progressives should be dismissed.

        Secular progressive Jews are usually neurotic, tending to despise gentile whites, promoting Feminism, yet they also tend to be less warmongering. Conservative Jews don’t spend all their waking hours despising gentile whites, unfortunately they tend drag America into war with Arabs.

        All that is required not to be paranoid about Jews is to know their society well enough, you are not surprised when they stick together, and you do not mistake their affinity for one another as some kind of grand conspiracy. Paranoia about Jews becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy for the paranoid.

        Anyway, the anti-white Jews have used up their last reserves of holocaust guilt. A huge number of gentile white killed and were killed in defense of the Jews of Europe.

        Likewise, a huge number of gentile whites killed and were killed on behalf of the American negro during the Civil War, but there is no detectable gratitude in either case.

        The whole guilt trip of the past five decades, laid down by progressive Jews, blacks, and Feminists against white men, was entirely scurrilous and without merit.

        Women have had nothing significant to complain about. Feminists have eviscerated the Constitution and even the Magna Carta. Men have no civil rights in the Western society.

        America is still the land of freedom and opportunity for women, but America has become like the USSR for men.

        Romney wants to piss our money away on foreign wars (on behalf of Israel), which impoverishes us while generating bad will towards whites and men.

        Obama wants to give our money to women, blacks, unemployed, and especially unemployed black single mothers, enhance immigration, which impoverishes us and generates no goodwill, while subsidizing the criminal class.

        The unfavorable trends are going to continue until they exhaust the economy, I suppose. What ever favorable trends there are, they have nothing to do with government. It’s kind of pointless to vote for either one, as far as I can tell.

        Obama does not deserve a second term. If Romney wins, he should probably be impeached as soon as he bombs Iran. (Fat chance). Bush ought to have been impeached. But we should not have any incumbents reelected except for Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich.

        I’d be surprised if Americans have the collective self-awareness to reject all incumbents, but that would be the best strategy.

        Otherwise, we can only wait for the global economic collapse, which may not happen until the ecological collapse is well under way. And perhaps then, a few of these brain-dead politicians might see the writing on the wall.

      • 5n4k33y3s

        Hitler hurt white civilization bad. Europe was significantly depopulated. European Jews needed some resistance, but Hitler’s response was insane, disproportionate and beyond the pale.

        As it turns out, the disproportionate geopolitical influence of the Jewish diaspora is diminishing as a result information technology leveling the field. Anyone who is paranoid about the grand conspiracy of the Jewish elders might as well get a prescription for Xanax.

        Hitler’s neuroses must have been based on an inferiority complex combined with chronic social anxiety, leading towards debilitating paranoia. Everything was crisis to him.

        And look at the consequences of alienating the Jews so badly they’ve been guilt-tripping gentile white society for decades. The guilt tripping caused Europeans to import far more diversity than the Jews ever represented in Europe.

        The Russians are the only ones who have not internalized the guilt trip, and now Russia is the best example of a healthy, predominantly white nation.

        I am sick of the values espoused by progressive secular Jews. Orthodox Jews should be held in higher regard, and the degenerate ideology of the secular progressives should be dismissed.

        Secular progressive Jews are usually neurotic, tending to despise gentile whites, promoting Feminism, yet they also tend to be less warmongering. Conservative Jews don’t spend all their waking hours despising gentile whites, unfortunately they tend drag America into war with Arabs.

        All that is required not to be paranoid about Jews is to know their society well enough, you are not surprised when they stick together, and you do not mistake their affinity for one another as some kind of grand conspiracy. Paranoia about Jews becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy for the paranoid.

        Anyway, the anti-white Jews have used up their last reserves of holocaust guilt. A huge number of gentile white killed and were killed in defense of the Jews of Europe.

        Likewise, a huge number of gentile whites killed and were killed on behalf of the American negro during the Civil War, but there is no detectable gratitude in either case.

        The whole guilt trip of the past five decades, laid down by progressive Jews, blacks, and Feminists against white men, was entirely scurrilous and without merit.

        Women have had nothing significant to complain about. Feminists have eviscerated the Constitution and even the Magna Carta. Men have no civil rights in the Western society.

        America is still the land of freedom and opportunity for women, but America has become like the USSR for men.

        Romney wants to piss our money away on foreign wars (on behalf of Israel), which impoverishes us while generating bad will towards whites and men.

        Obama wants to give our money to women, blacks, unemployed, and especially unemployed black single mothers, enhance immigration, which impoverishes us and generates no goodwill, while subsidizing the criminal class.

        The unfavorable trends are going to continue until they exhaust the economy, I suppose. What ever favorable trends there are, they have nothing to do with government. It’s kind of pointless to vote for either one, as far as I can tell.

        Obama does not deserve a second term. If Romney wins, he should probably be impeached as soon as he bombs Iran. (Fat chance). Bush ought to have been impeached. But we should not have any incumbents reelected except for Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich.

        I’d be surprised if Americans have the collective self-awareness to reject all incumbents, but that would be the best strategy.

        Otherwise, we can only wait for the global economic collapse, which may not happen until the ecological collapse is well under way. And perhaps then, a few of these brain-dead politicians might see the writing on the wall.

    • jeffaral

      Germany has always being a bulwark against the invading asiatic hordes from the East.    Is Germany’s defeat the White man’s last stand ?

  • LaSantaHermandad

    What has really pissed me off is that the Repubs. haven’t said one word about the increase in lawlessness in this society especially the Shabazz call for Genocide/Infanticide against whites with NO consequences vis a vis our DOJ. The Rs don’t even have to mention Blacks. WE’ll all get the message. Isn’t there anyone out there who shares my belief that the racial situation is every bit as important an issue as the economy and jobs? 
    We pretend that all the B/W crime doesn’t exist at least if we don’t think about it. When or if the economy improves will the murder, rape, assault, robbery, “youth” flash mobs cease? That’s another question to which we already have the answer.

  • MikeofAges

     Not under disparate impact, aka affirmative action. Under dispaparate impact, antitrust law is applied to whites en masse. Whites are treated as a monopoly entity  subject to onerous sanctions. Those whites who cooperate with the disparate impact system are given favorable treatment compared to other white, while those who do are persecuted.

    A parallel situation exists as regard religion. Christianity, especially Protestant Christianity is treated as a monopoly religion subject to legal persecution and a loosening of the American constitutional and international treaty protections accorded other religions.

    Here is another issue that no one wants to account for. If you want to treat Christianity as a monopoly religion you have to treat Islam as likewise a monopoly religion. Both have similar characteristics — a worldwide mass base and claims to universality.

    In an American secular context, if whites are a monopoly demographic then Hispanics and Chinese are due the same treatment in that they share the Anglo or anglicized white an impetus toward believing their culture to be a legitimate universal culture.

    See how far you get promoting these ideas.

  • 5n4k33y3s

     Vale, one must not “ask” to be “granted” the status one seeks. One must simply embody that, and ruthlessly crush those who deny it.