Crown Heights Murder Victim’s Brother Speaks Out Against Sharpton, Obama

Joel B. Pollak, Breitbart, May 2, 2012

Norman Rosenbaum has spoken out against MSNBC host Al Sharpton for his role in inciting the mob that murdered his brother, Jewish student Yankel Rosenbaum, in Crown Heights in 1991–and has criticized President Barack Obama for associating with Sharpton.

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News from Australia, Rosenbaum said:

Sharpton’s blatant lies, distortions and hypocrisy, particularly in regard to his role in the Crown Heights Riots, continue regretfully, in large part, to be condoned and/or ignored by the media, politicians and business (MSNBC) alike. As you are no doubt aware, twenty-eight of the mob that attacked and murdered my brother Yankel have never been brought to justice, and unlike Sharpton my family remains committed to ensuring that there is comprehensive Justice for Yankel, notwithstanding the passage of time.

Breitbart News reported late last week that Sharpton had denied his role in inciting the riots–an allegation instantly disputed by a spokesperson for the Rosenbaum family, who asked: “Why does MSNBC keep on compensating a racist like that?”

{snip}

Rosenbaum also had choice words for President Obama:

The fact that Sharpton is made welcome by President Obama is a disgrace and highlights a serious character flaw in the President.  The President is wrong for doing so and the message he sends in doing so is dangerous. Make no mistake about it–Al Sharpton is a racist, an old fashioned bigot, who craves the media limelight and will do and say anything to draw the attention of the media to him.

{snip} Sharpton in particular spun the issue as a racially-motivated killing, and has succeeded in driving that divisive–and thus far unsubstantiated–narrative through MSNBC and the mainstream media.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Unfortunately, until he got his “Resist We Much” Fest on MSNBC, he was also welcome on Fox News a lot.

    • Oil Can Harry

      Not only do Bill O’Reilly and Shaw Insanity have Rev. Sharlatan on their programs they also take him out to dinner.

      BTW beside Mr Rosenbaum the black mob on that night also snuffed an Italian-American whom they thought was Jewish.

      And predictably the Caribbean teen who killed Rosenbaum was acquitted by a “diverse” black and hispanic jury.

      •  Not quite: Vincent Graziosi was not killed on the same day as Rosenbaum but some time after (though still while the chaos was underway).

        I think he knows about the Graziosi murder, and the two used to always be mentioned side-by-side. However, the Graziosi family seems to shun attention. I have still never seen a single image of him online, for example.

    • redfeathers

      You’re right, he sure was very welcome on Fox.  O’Reilly recently talked about his dinner dates with Sharpton.  He got away with so much here in NYC;  including his agitating leading up to the Freddy’s Fashion Mart murders.  

  • Hunter Morrow

    Too little, too late. This is seemingly the only jew on planet Earth that seems to have a problem with that race hustler. There wasn’t one single jew at MSNBC that didn’t have a problem? Come on.

    Maybe Amren could have this guy speak at their next convention. I realize he isn’t a Rabbi, like was present at the first one, but still.

    “He looks White to me!”

    • Hunter, it is widely known but not advertised that only Jews have the right to pull the race card. Jews on the left or right all have these things in common; they support Israel over America, they claim to be the most persecuted people in the history of the world, they support the thousands of Jewish organizations around the world. 

      Abe proved this by  playing the victim/race card. Fact: The Jews created the NCAAP. Fact: The NCAAP did not have a black president until 1979, all previous Presidents were Jewish. Fact: The Jews were instrumental in the civil rights movement but not because they felt compassion for the blacks rather it was to create laws to that benefited Jewish interests. Jewish groups support and lobby for open borders. Their groups are behind multiculturalism, which only destroys a nation’s identity.

  • Church_of_Jed

    Why didn’t he say anything about the Jews who gave money and votes to Obama in 2008?

  • Mahound

    Why don’t all right-thinking jews go on the attack against ADL, Sourther Poverty Law Center, ect. These organizations are so dangerous to america and in the long run to jews themselves. What if jews would turn around and say enough is enough, let’s close these cabals down?

    Pamela Geller is doing it, Ezra Levant is doing it. Everyone ought to do it.

    • MartelC

      Don’t forget Paul Gottfried, Ron Unz funds the american conservative as well. 

  • IstvanIN

    Listen to Barbara Spectre’s own words on how she wants Europeans genocided out of existence.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Vq_e2Z1ug

    • This has no relevance to the post you’re replying to.

  • Oil Can Harry

    Ronald, Obama and Holder are indeed biased in favor of their people but won’t admit it.

    They continue to put on a pretense of impartiality.

  • The__Bobster

    Kerry is Jewish. Gore’s daughters married jews, as did Clinton’s. 

    • Texan1st

      A large percentage of Jews live in the northeast. In other words, as far away from the southwest as humanly possible while remaining in the United States. Just as with other liberals and progressives in the ‘enlightened’ northeast, it’s pretty easy to advocate for illegal immigration when you are far removed from ground zero. That said, 52% seemed high at first, but when you consider the fact that they are not asking for mass deportation but rather for immigration reform and a pathway to citizenship, I suspect that 52% is pretty much in line with non-Jewish liberals. Liberals and progressives, whether Jewish or not, want non-white CITIZENS. And lots of’em.

  • Djinn42

     You said it right, when a black stands up for their own they are applauded whereas when Whites stand up for our people we are instant racists, bigots, haters, the list goes on.
    But it would seem times are a changin’.

  • Obama IS A RACIST
    what’s to discuss?

  • Periapsis

    They certainly failed to learn another lesson from history. That is don’t massacre millions of people, then expect them not to return the favor later against all of them, not just the perpretrators. That was what the Bolsheviks did to the kulaks and others in Ukraine, which then led to Ukrainians not only welcoming the Nazis as conquering heroes, but their joining in the Nazi slaughter against the Jews. The Bolsheviks were dominated by Jews, but for their actions, Jews who had nothing to do with them perished along with the ones who committed atrocities against my ancestors, such as the Holodomor of 1932 and 1933 which killed at least 7 million Ukrainians in one year.

    The upshot is, the actions of a few does lead to condemnation then violence against an entire ethnic group. When people watch their children starve to death in front of them because of hostile aliens, they are not going to distinguish between the guilty and the innocent. All of them are collectively guilty when you are the one in this sort of situation.

  • Jews in Israel & Jews in the US are, despite mutual dependence, worlds apart in social behavior.

  •  What group has been more apologetic and sympathetic to blacks than
    liberal Jews, yet it is exactly liberal Jews that blacks hate the most.

    That’s the M.O. of our favorite well-tanned lumpenproletariat, no matter where in the world they are.  The more you like them and do for them, the more they hate you.  That’s because they know you can be had and are easy pickings if you’re compassionate towards them.

  • anarchyst

    This will probably get “flagged”, but here goes . . .
    There is one “group”, “race”, “culture”, “political movement” (which is it??) that has been promoting “multiculturalism” and “diversity” FOR EVERYONE ELSE BUT THEMSELVES. 
    They were in the forefront of the so-called “civil rights (for some)” movement in the 1950’s and 1960’s, actively pushing their “equality” mantra and STILL push their “multiculturalism” and “diversity” message on those of us who are not considered “chosen”.
    Let a “chosen” woman bring home a black boyfriend and see what happens.  The result is almost always complete ostracization or outright disownment.  “Multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” . . . is the order of the day.
    It would appear that the above “group”, “race”, “culture”, “political movement” (which is it??) is hell-bent on destroying homogenous societies throughout the world.  Every country where they have taken up residence, they push their “multiculturalism” and “diversity” crap on everyone who is not “chosen”.   It is no secret that much of the (misplaced) hatred that exists for this “chosen” people is based upon their behavior in their “host” countries as they consider themselves “chosen” first and then members of their prespective “societies” second.  Their “double standard” (when it comes to racial homogeneity) does nothing to endear them to those who are not “chosen”.  .  . not all “chosen” people subscribe to the “multiculturalism” and “diversity” parade, but a small, powerful “subset” of the “chosen” are instrumental in pushing for the destruction of the white race . . .

  • anarchyst

    I guess the truth hurts.  I expected better from Amren . . . I welcome intelligent refutation and alternate points of view to what I have stated . . . If anything I have stated is false or misleading, please feel free to “educate” me. . .
    This will probably get “flagged”, (again) but here goes . . .
    There is one “group”, “race”, “culture”, “political movement” (which is it??) that has been promoting “multiculturalism” and “diversity” FOR EVERYONE ELSE BUT THEMSELVES. 
    They were in the forefront of the so-called “civil rights (for some)” movement in the 1950’s and 1960’s, actively pushing their “equality” mantra and STILL push their “multiculturalism” and “diversity” message on those of us who are not considered “chosen”.
    Let a “chosen” woman bring home a black boyfriend and see what happens.  The result is almost always complete ostracization or outright disownment.  “Multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” . . . is the order of the day.
    It would appear that the above “group”, “race”, “culture”, “political movement” (which is it??) is hell-bent on destroying homogenous societies throughout the world.  Every country where they have taken up residence, they push their “multiculturalism” and “diversity” crap on everyone who is not “chosen”.   It is no secret that much of the (misplaced) hatred that exists for this “chosen” people is based upon their behavior in their “host” countries as they consider themselves “chosen” first and then members of their prespective “societies” second.  Their “double standard” (when it comes to racial homogeneity) does nothing to endear them to those who are not “chosen”.  .  . not all “chosen” people subscribe to the “multiculturalism” and “diversity” parade, but a small, powerful “subset” of the “chosen” are instrumental in pushing for the destruction of the white race . . .

  • Their actions and behavior require no courage at all. It is pure selfishness. 

  • bluffcreek1967

    These were very good points, and I completely agree with them! Thank you for keeping a level head on these issues.