Tag Archives: Racial Preferences in Education

Can the Trump Court End Affirmative Action?

One originalist appointment may not be enough.


No Campus for White Men

New book explains the mentality that led to the Milo Yiannopoulos riot at Berkeley.

Reviewed by F. Roger Devlin

Dropping standards led to an 84 percent increase in black enrollment.

How Blacks Changed Our School

A once-vital Catholic school is now is steep decline.


Why Affirmative Action for Hispanics and American Indians?

An example of chance and irrationality in American history.


Admission standards are “already about as low as you can go.”

In one state, the boards even “measure lip size, hair texture and nose width.”

Blacks feel alienated at schools for which they are not qualified.

More goofy white people.

A White Teacher Speaks Out, AR Classic Article

What is it like to teach black students?

“Diverse” law schools won’t guarantee 75 percent of graduates will pass the bar.

Discrimination Against Whites Still Legal

Supreme Court renders a murky but unsurprising ruling.


“Conservatives” still blame black failure on poor teachers.

Majority says “diversity” is more important than equal protection.

Hiring more whites would increase “diversity.”

Raoul Wallenberg High School wanted a Hispanic.

The government pushes top UK schools to admit poor people and non-whites.

Another prodigy.

Guess the race and sex.

As the concept of “white privilege” spreads, some whites are pushing back.

Non-whites hope the data will boost their calls for more non-white staff.

Asians do well academically, but many admissions officers think their personalities are flat.

America’s Balkan Values, National Review

The absurdities of liberal views of race.

He hopes to give fifty $2,500 grants.

Ron Unz is hoping to influence the Harvard admissions process.

One that boosted enrollment of blacks and Hispanics at U of M by 24 percent in one year.

Good sense, as usual, from Walter Williams.

The truth slips briefly into print.

Race Preferences at the Supreme Court

Our court watcher predicts there will be no change in “affirmative action.”


Researcher: A non-racial approach to affirmative action would reduce blacks in college by 50 percent.

At “diverse” colleges students self-segregate.

Heresy at National Review.

The Asian argument for racial preferences.

They cite “mismatch” theory and even question the value of diversity.

Diversity undermines trust, making us second-guess our peers.

John Roberts wants to know when racial preferences will no longer be necessary.

Non-whites perform poorly, then take it out on the university.

Foolishness from the secretary of education.

One woman and one non-white must be among the final candidates.

Several Yalies cried during speech opposing racial preferences.

They don’t want to “disenfranchise other communities of color.”

It’s only for blacks and Hispanics.

Racial preferences lead to a “mismatch effect” for blacks.

The principal withheld the results because too many winners were white.

They have a lot; they want more.

Share of black teachers actually declining.

Can whites even apply?

That is, the “climate” for blacks at Berkeley.

Most underrepresented groups are “white Christians, Christians, white Republicans, and Republicans.”

Indians fight back against affirmative action.