Buchanan: Hispanic Influx from Immigration Bill Could Break US into ‘Two Countries’

Jeff Poor, Daily Caller, June 23, 2013

On Andrea Tantaros radio show last week, conservative columnist and author Pat Buchanan warned of an unintended consequence of the immigration reform bill, a bill which doesn’t place a high priority on assimilation.

According to Tantaros, her previous guest, former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey, said that the immigration legislation funnels money to so-called community organizing groups like La Raza with the idea of teaching immigrants “American history, the Constitution and civic participation.” {dnip}

Buchanan, author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”explained that when different cultures aren’t encouraged to assimilate, nations are susceptible to splitting apart, pointing to recent history as proof.

“With regard to the history and the teaching of it—this is one of the problems I’ve talked about when you have a single-culture single nation, you have basically a single culture,” Buchanan said. “If you indoctrinate or teach kids different views about what their country and how it began, what you get is a growing disintegration of the country, a fragmentation into different parts. And we see this happening all over the world. In the last few decades where ethnic groups and linguistic minorities and ethnic minorities, cultural minorities, given the pressures of ethno-nationalism, [they] are breaking up countries all over the world. It’s happening all over the Middle East. It happened in the Balkans where Yugoslavia broke up into seven countries. The Soviet Union broke up into 15 countries.”

{snip}

“You put 100 million Hispanic folks in the United States and, say, 70 million on the southwest border. That becomes as much as part of Mexico as it is the United States,” Buchanan continued. “If they have a different language, different culture, a different faith—basically you get two peoples. And two peoples eventually become two countries. This is what I see as the future of America—the Balkanization and the disintegration of a country which become one nation back around 1960 when all the immigrants who came from Eastern and Southern Europe, 1890-1920, had been assimilated and American-ized. We all had gone through the Depression together, heard radio together, went through World War II together and American television—that brought us all together. And now we’re coming apart.”

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Manaphy

    Hasn’t this been the goal of La Raza and other Hispanic Nationalist groups? Yet Liberals and some unbelievably stupid conservatives want more Immigration, namely Hispanic Immigration. If anyone still believes that Immigration isn’t a form of genocide, then they are fooling themselves.

    • David Ashton

      Fooling us or trying to.

      • Romulus

        UNLESS…..,THE GOAL IS TO HELP AMERICA CRACK APART. Think about that for a sec. If does balkanize(it already has in so many ways) and we can hang to the most important parts of our special freedoms in the constitutions amendments, think of the changes that could be made.

        • Steven Bannister

          A big part of my conversion from Liberal to Libertarian was the discovery of “right wing” sources like the John Birch Society and books like “None Dare Call it Conspiracy, Shadows of Power, etc”
          Yes indeed, there IS a bigger picture- the goal is WORLD GOVERNMENT run by a global elite.

          There are many possible routes to this finish line, one is the breakup of the United States but I don’t think the elites want that to happen. Balkanization creates too many “mini-states” for them to deal with.

          They prefer consolidation- as in the European Union, The North American Free Trade Agreement, the WTO, the United Nations, etc. The goal is to MERGE things, not break them apart. And THAT is why the European and American people must be subjected to non-stop multicultural brainwashing 24 hours a day, ala George Orwell.

          They are preparing us for- literally – a global society.

          • Romulus

            You are right about the MERGING aspect. It is more indicative of the direction economics will have to to proceed in lieu of massive population growth set to crest at 9.5 billion by 2045 at the far estimate. In order to fuel the expected growth. Inputs will be acquired through merging continents that are wealthy in resources but not in industrial infrastructure necessary to capitalize on them. Socially ,however, nations are already cracking apart on cultural and racial boundaries. The world will never make one race ,one people. That is not possible. The primary goal of the plutocratic elite is to make the transition smoother to a more sustainable population in lieu of a lack of fossil fuels necessary to scale growth for industrial societies. That is precisely what is focussed at the summits behind closed doors.

          • Steven Bannister

            Right – so they take the wealthy infrastructure of the West (with it’s declining population) and merge it with the human capital of the Third World (with it’s exploding population) and create the “best of both worlds” at least from an economic point of view.

            Their goal may be a “workable world” but I fear the loss of freedoms, national culture and human diversity that will most likely be sacrificed in that pursuit.

            One thing is certain: Whites WILL have to start speaking and organizing as a distinct racial group if they are to have a place at the table in this “New World Order.”

          • David Ashton

            Notwithstanding my previous qualification about NWO objectives, this is an important goal whatever the case.

          • Romulus

            Absolutely.

          • David Ashton

            The “global elite” here are not Chinese, Arabs, Indians or Africans.
            The Rockefeller dynasty and its associates are not going to subject themselves to alien cultures. The “Bilderbergers” do not want an Islamic Caliphate or a Chinese Communist world. We need to qualify our analysis, since life isn’t (unfortunately) as simple as we might think.

        • The Final Solution

          Like the changes that happened after the civil war?

          • Romulus

            Just like that. I truly don’t want another repeat performance of the fratricide of the civil war or white wars 1&2.

    • The__Bobster

      No, The Race wants the whole damn country.

      The libtards will be in for a rude awakening when the ugly brown squat monsters remove them from power, using violence if necessary.

      • Romulus

        We can only hope so.

        • Triarius

          This. I don’t care if the people that want to destroy my country, my family, my race, and very possibly my entire being get a few machetes to the necks. In fact, I would prefer it.

      • NO, the white libtards will simply move on over to the Republican Party, lie about being conservative, and white people won’t know any better.

        • kjh64

          What Republican Party? There will not be enough Whites left to have a Republican Party or any other party. There will be THE PARTY.

        • Romulus

          Just like Specter and others. Very crafty survival technique.

    • saxonsun

      I still can’t understand why anyone would want more squatties here. They are exactly like locusts. I’m outraged and stumped.

  • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

    “In the late twentieth century, developments occurred that, if continued, could change America into a culturally bifurcated Anglo-Hispanic society with two national languages . . . The driving force behind the trend toward cultural bifurcation . . . has been immigration from Latin America and especially from Mexico. Mexican immigration is leading toward the demographic ‘reconquista’ of areas Americans took from Mexico by force in the 1830s and 1840s . . .” (WHO ARE WE? The Challenge to America’s Identity by Samuel P. Huntington, 2004)

  • sbuffalonative

    ‘Progressive’-liberals and conservatives should come together to agree to separate. We can’t just get along. All we do is end up with compromises that neither side is happy with.
    I wish ‘progressive’-liberals would let us go so they can build their Utopia.

    Abortion on demand to underage girls without parental notification or consent. Welfare to anyone who asks. A living wage. Open borders. Freedom from religion. No guns.

    Dismantling the ‘prison industrial complex’. Unlimited funding to teachers and schools to turn every student into a genius.

    They could have all this and more if only they would let us go…

    • Sick of it

      A peaceful approach like this would make the most sense, BUT the other side requires money from conservatives in order for their welfare programs to survive AND they are dedicated to pushing their ideology onto every nation and tribe on the face of the earth, no matter the consequences. It’s a zero-sum game for them.

    • Why should they turn the sheep loose?

    • brengunn

      I can’t see why anyone would disagree with paying someone enough to live on. What’s wrong with that?

      Look at all these huge international companies that pay their staff a pittance and expect the federal government to pick up the slack. Take Walmart, for example, the six heirs to the Walmart fortune have more money than the bottom 43% of Americans, yet they can’t even pay them enough to feed their children and live a decent life, the government have to top up their wages. You agree with that?

      • RisingReich

        You need to understand WHY – which you aren’t interested in putting effort into. The reason WHY those wages are so low is directly related to immigration. Economics and simple supply and demand curves explain it all.

        • brengunn

          How do you KNOW what I’m interested or not interested in KNOWING? Jesus!

      • Nathanwartooth

        It’s called labor shortages. If we created them, Walmart would be forced to pay 20 dollars an hour. Just look at what labor shortages have done to North Dakota.

  • Hal K

    Really? In South Africa they don’t want to let the whites have their own country. I wonder why …

    • Erasmus

      That’s because they know what “great” engineers, physicians, farmers, teachers and scientists bantus make.

      • Hal K

        That’s what I had in mind, but come to think of it, it must also be about control. They don’t want whites to have anything, basically, including their own piece of the country.

    • brengunn

      It seems to me like it would be a fine solution to a huge mess. Let the whites take a share of land that is equal to their percentage of the population, on the condition that there are no blacks allowed. It would be a small country but I imagine it would be a safe one, a prosperous one. Free from most of the problems that plague any black country, administration, council or school system.

      I would just love to see it from an anthropological point of view. Really, are we all equal?

      • Hal K

        Another scenario would be a partition of the country only to find the pieces beset by the same problems as the original. Most mainstream conservatives refuse to see the racial dimension of things, which is why they are so lost.

        • brengunn

          Well, that’s why you’d have to have a racial purity law in the constitution of the new country. But that is about as likely as an African Einstein.

  • The__Bobster

    It’s infuriating that the Congressquislings are debating amnesty when they should be discussing massive deportation of the enemies within our borders.

    • RisingReich

      Enemies within our borders – I can think of 535 fine candidates that meet the description.

  • Erasmus

    According to Tantaros, her previous guest, former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey, said that the immigration legislation funnels money to so-called community organizing groups like La Raza with the idea of teaching immigrants “American history, the Constitution and civic participation.”

    Right. And, Bill Clinton did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky, and George W. Bush has been clean and sober for the last 20 years.

  • IstvanIN

    Give them southern California and we’ll keep the rest.

    • Epiminondas

      Give them ALL of California. Most of the liberals are in the Bay Area.

      • Triarius

        Throw in Portland, too.

      • NM156

        No f**king way will those rodents get Big Sur, Sequoia/King’s Canyon NP, Yosemite NP, Death Valley NP, Joshua Tree NP, Redwood NP, N. Coast of CA, 20 Nat’l Forests, etc., etc., ad nauseam. Pen them up in the Bay Area, LA County, and the San Juaqin Valley. No way in hell do we give them America’s most precious natural treasures. They’d be chopping down 350 ft. redwoods for cookin’ up pork rinds.

    • Greg Thomas

      For the most part, they already have it.

  • dave

    when we had immigrants come here from different european countries they came here and invented and cured diseases. now you will have mexicans coming over illegally who cant and wont speak english. this is all being done by the tribe who has one plan to destroy this nation from within.

    • kjh64

      The truth is, in earlier days, Whites from one particular country were not allowed in in large numbers as people then had the common sense to realize that letting anyone in from one country in too large a number would simply recreate that country in yours. Even if Mexicans were White, it would be foolish to let them in in the same numbers.

      • dave

        i know about the irish need not apply. mexicans are not white and they dont contribute to society as the whites did and do. unless you think cutting lawns and sending the money home and not paying taxes. none of the europeans immigrants came here and went of welfare. they worked and learned the language and wanted to become americans. different immigrants,different races,different morals and values. period.

        • Erasmus

          i know about the irish need not apply…

          Some far-seeing Yankee patriot saw the Kennedies in his mind’s eye.

        • kjh64

          Of course it is far worse if migrants are a different race and speak a different language. However, the point is that allowing huge amounts of immigration, even if the people are of your race, is foolish. Letting huge amounts of those not your race is doubly foolish.

  • Romulus

    Pat is very wrong about a particular eastern “European” group.

    • truthteller

      Ya those gypsies, right? 😉

      • Romulus

        Sshhhhhhh! lol!!
        Its true that it wouldn’t be fair to say that some didn’t assimilate,but looking over the course of two thousand years its hard not take a critical look. The impact was and still is disproportionate to the positive benefits .

        • evilsandmich

          2000 years? Those gypsies have stories about not assimilating that go back much further than that! I think that they may have even formed a religion of some sort around it.

          • Romulus

            Lmao! Yes,…. You’ve got A point there.

  • Another Republican anti-white blabbering about ASSIMILATION can you say genocide. I do not see any reason for this, or any other, Republican to be complaining this is what they have been working for. For the past 70 years they’ve working for this.

    • Steven Bannister

      I would NOT call Patrick Buchanan an “anti-white” Republican by any stretch of the imagination. He’s one of the very few mainstream voices that regularly defends white interests. In fact, he got fired from MSNBC for appearing on the pro-white radio show “Political Cesspool.”

      You should really learn about someone first before you go publicly slagging them.

      • RisingReich

        I thought it was because his book had a chapter in it called “The death of White America”

        • Steven Bannister

          Yes, that too. Buchanan’s book “Suicide of a Superpower” had a chapter called “The Death of White America” in which he bemoaned the decline of white Christian America.

          Buchanan was promoting the book by doing various radio shows, one of which was the Political Cesspool. The ADL and a left-wing organization called “Color of Change” called attention to this and demanded that MSNBC fire Buchanan – which they did.

          For years, Pat Buchanan has spoken out against illegal immigration, multiculturalism, affirmative action, corporate globalism and of course, America’s slavish allegiance to Israel.

          For someone to call him “anti-white” is ridiculous.

          • David Ashton

            Quite so. He does sterling work. Of course, he is a Roman Catholic of the old school, but so what? We must stop attacking our friends and focus solely on our enemies.

          • Wethepeople

            Hooooah! These are refreshing words, not spoken enough.

  • Bossman

    Mexico will indeed become a powerful country in the future and there’s not too much that the USA can do about that. It is all about location, location, location.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Mexico wil never be powerful; too many low IQ, low education, low values people… they will only drag us down to third world status. Mexico has and has had the single most valuable piece of real estate for almost 200 years since it’s inception and they have accomplished… nothing but overpopulation. And wreaking havoc on the United States.

      Genetics is destiny. Imagine The Japanese or The Dutch or The Norwegians having that territory of Mexico the last 200 years, with all those oil and mineral resources, arable land, beautiful coastlines on two oceans and temperate weather most of the year… “Mexico” would then have been a powerful country. Mexico loaded with Mexicans has them all wanting to head to “El Norte”, they don’t even want to be there.

      It’s the people that matter and the people of Mexico, as a culture and as a genetic group simply aren’t up to anything but what you get wherever they are in large numbers… a sub-civilization dump.

      • Romulus

        It shouldn’t be the case if the “spaniards” are still running the show. There aren’t anymore Cortez’s,Balboa’s or Pizarro’s anymore.

        • Bossman

          Cortez, Balboa and Pizarro couldn’t resist the charms of the native women. That is why they and their descendants disappeared.

          • Romulus

            I guess it would be hard to resist naked savages running around all over the place.

      • Bossman

        Have you bothered to do some research on Mexico? It is an important country right now. Its economy is in the top 15 and in the next 100 years will be in the top 10. It is bigger than most European countries and it is right next door to the United States so that gives it an enormous advantage. It can form economic and political unions with other Latin American countries to give it even more power.

        • robinbishop34

          If their economy is so strong, why are they pouring into the U.S. by the millions to ‘seek a better life?’

          • Bossman

            Because they can. North America is being slowly integrated and sometime in the future, they won’t have to do that any more.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            Your right, but not because you thought about it correctly. They won’t have to sneak up north and lie, cheat and steal anymore because they will have already destroyed what is left of the US without Mexicans so a) America will be just like crummy Mexico and b) there won’t be any social services, schools, jobs, economy or “better life” to come for, it will all just be Mexico style, awful.

            You sound like a Mexican. Nobody else would possibly ever think anything that optimistic from anyone emotionally removed from it.

          • Bossman

            You sound as if you don’t know that the rest of the world exists. North America is the center of gravity of the world’s trading system. If North America were to disintegrate, then Russia, Europe, China and Japan would quickly step in but that is not going to happen. There is no reason to believe that such a scenario is probable.

        • DudeWheresMyCountry?

          I’ve been to Mexico literally hundreds of times. All over the north, the south, the west… I have spent entire summers on a ranch in northern Mexico, Chihuahua area… nobody needs to tell me anything about that country.

          First off, it only has an economy because of oil exports, tourism and drug trafficking. For it’s size in area and population it’s GDP is a joke. Next door to the US gives it an advantage? Nice try, it is just a parasite that must cheat and feed off of a neighboring country, and because they are so weak, stupid and pathetic in not only the here and now but historically as well we have to let them run rampant… can’t say the retard is a retard when he breaks everything. You see, if Mexico was a nation of intelligent, cultured people we would never have let them colonize us.

          Political correctness is the best Mexican army of all time.

          You speak of power but Mexico is weak, a laughing stalk. This is a nation that has old fishing boats in their so called Navy. No matter how many Latin American countries they have to trade with they still will be weak and incompetent.

          Remember these are the remnants of tribal people. They had nothing to do with Western Civilization, aka the modern world and never contributed to it; to believe a primitive people will somehow take another civilization, far more advanced than they ever came close to and will utilize it better than the nations that have been doing it for 2,500 years… all with a population with an average education of a seventh grader and average IQ far below even marginally smart… is well emotional and foolish.

          Hey Bossman hint hint… it’s the people, that matters. Your teachers lied to you so they dumb kids wouldn’t cry.

          • Bossman

            I got some news for you: If China, Russia or Japan were to try to conquer Mexico, the USA would go to war with those countries the same day. Mexico and Canada don’t have big navies and air force because they know that big brother USA is ready to defend them at any time.

        • evilsandmich

          Meh, sounds like a variation of the ol’ “China argument”. People talk about how rich China is now even though most of the country is dirt poor (if not actual dirt farmers). It looks good on paper, but in practice, not so much. For as bad as Chicago is, I don’t have to worry (yet) about reading stories about police finding mass graves of beheaded bodies.

    • brengunn

      Wat about the human capital though? I’m not as certain that Mexicans will always be incapable of a highly ordered technological civilisation as some others here are but I don’t believe they will be able to compete with Europeans in that department.

      Having said that, as capable as us Europeans are, we have been sold down the river by our elites who choose profit over patriotism, civic responsibility, racial solidarity, whatever you want to call it. The few at the top have shown their true colours by being loyal to nothing but the bottom line. That is one of the reasons I could never be a white nationalist, because our leaders, our white leaders do more harm to us than any and all other ethnic groups combined.

      • Bossman

        What you guys don’t seem to realize is that Mexico is a country in the Americas and it can do the same things that the USA and Canada does. It can invite the best and the brightest from all over the world to come and settle into the country. Every country in the Americas is made up of immigrants from all over the world. If Mexico were to open her doors to European immigrants, in no time at all the country would be flooded with European immigrants. North America is the premier region of the world and Mexico is in North America. When North America becomes integrated, Mexico will be the premier region of North America but that won’t happen for maybe another 100 years. Mexico’s future is very bright.

        • DudeWheresMyCountry?

          Do you need to take one of your pills?

          • Bossman

            You’re hopelessly naive and don’t understand how the world works. Money from all over the world is pouring into Mexico and Central America every day. The Chinese are going to spend billions to build a second canal in Nicaragua. These are countries of the future.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            You don’t know anything about the world and based on your comments on this site trust me nobody here thinks your IQ tops even 90. You are out of your league here, go find a pro Mexican site to relay your delusions to others with sub-standard IQ levels… like yourself.

          • Bossman

            On the contrary, judging from all the stupid responses that I get from my posts, I feel like a giant among a bunch of dwarfs.

        • rightrightright

          North America is the premier region of the world because Europeans made it so. Success didn’t seep out of the ground all by itself simply because the ground was North American.

          If Mexicans were capable of creating a civilisation they didn’t want to run away from, they would have done so already. They didn’t and in my view, they can’t.

          • Bossman

            North America was a virgin continent when the Europeans arrived. A virgin with tremendous potential. Mexican civilization is North American civilization. They are Latin North Americans.

        • Erasmus

          No. A nation’s culture determines what its outcome is. Mexico’s biggest problem is that it’s full of Mexicans. People of a culture whose ancestors found no better use for the wheel other than decorating temples dedicated to human sacrifice will always be just a dirty loincloth removed from the Stone Age.

          That you think humans and cultures are fungible shows that you’re really a leftist.

          • Toms18

            Wrong. It is the people who make the culture, not the other way around. Hence why you have Africa as it is.

          • Bossman

            “fungible”??? What kind of a stupid word is that? What is a Mexican? A race or a nationality? Their Indian ancestors were indeed savages who practiced human sacrifice and ritual cannibalism but they are not doing that anymore.

        • kjh64

          No, all of the countries in the Americas have a very small amount of immigrants. Only the USA and Canada take in huge numbers. Mexico would never allow her country to be flooded by anyone because Mexicans and other non-Whites know that allowing huge numbers of foreigners in would be detrimental to their nations.

          • Bossman

            In the case of the Mexicans, they have had a very bad experience with that. They invited the Anglo-Americans into Texas and we all know what happened after that.

          • kjh64

            Ok that is true. So why should White people want to have large numbers of Mexicans when we have bad experiences with that?

        • Greg Thomas

          I guess you have never read Mexico’s constitution. Mexico is for mexicans and they intend to keep it that way. The La Razas will never “open any door” to large scale, non-mexican immigration.

          • Bossman

            But it has the option and can do it anytime. Regardless of what you think, Mexico has cast her lot with the rest of North America through free trade and there’s no turning back.

          • Greg Thomas

            It doesn’t matter what I think. Mexico’s constitution spells it out in black and white. I can read. Mexicans are too ethnocentric to ever exercise that “option.” Most are racist to the core, which is why they do not belong here. Too bad the US is not more like Mexico in that respect. Good luck with your fairy tale.

          • Bossman

            Did you forget that one time the Mexicans invited the white Anglo-Americans to come in and settle in Texas? Did you know what happened after they did that? The Americans began to piss on the Mexicans. They tried to re-institute slavery and all other types of wicked things and finally they took Texas away from Mexico. So naturally, the Mexicans are leery of inviting foreigners to their county.

          • kjh64

            Mexico took Texas from Spain. Yes, what happened highlights the fact that if you let racial and ethnic aliens into your nation in large numbers, it’s bad. Also,the white settlers Mexico invited didn’t try to re-institute slavery as they were not part of the USA at that time. However, they saw themselves and Mexico saw them as a different peoples which is why they rebelled and split into a separate country called Texas. When you get two or more of different races, this is what happens.

            Today, large numbers of Mexicans are doing all kinds of wicked things to Whites and pissing on White people. We’ve had numerous Whites, raped, killed and a group of hostile people disrespecting our culture and laws. We want the same as Mexico. Large numbers of foreigners from Mexico and elsewhere is hurtful to Whites and will result in the same thing that happened when Mexico invited Whites, it will balkanize and split us up. It hurts White Americans.

    • Steven Bannister

      Frankly, I hope Mexico DOES become a rich and powerful country. In fact, I wish success to ALL Third World nations because their populations will be LESS likely to move here if they are prospering….

    • Erasmus

      “Mexico will indeed become a powerful country in the future and there’s not too much that the USA can do about that.”

      You foresee a global demand for Mexican maids, pool boys, janitors and gardeners? Just as no one can design a car like the Germans, no one can scrub a toilet like a Mexican?

  • brengunn

    I think this is a serious idea which hasn’t been given due attention by the media or politicians. I’m thinking of the VP saying that Latinos (Mexicans) are the future of America, when in fact a much more likely future will be a breaking up of the US into an Anglo/European country and a Mexican based country or even a joining of the South Western states to Mexico, though that seems less likely.

    What will it mean for the Northern states if immigration continues to the point where Latinos become a majority there too?

    I’m not too sure about how the bulk of Mexican immigrants feel about white Americans but I have already heard some separatist sentiments from some, some expressing their feelings that they and not the whites own the land. This is s very serious situation, which hasn’t been given the due attention it should.

    In England, the situation is no where near as serious but you still see some towns and cities where the immigrants begrudge the whites who live amongst them. I’m sure this is the case in other European cities, too. Unlike America, there really is no case for a separation as the ethnic enclaves are simply too small and not concentrated in one specific region. Though there is still cause for concern, from the lack of cohesion and rivalry of different groups. Should Europe’s economy continue to shrink, and resources become more scarce, such rivalries could become violent.

    The coming century will be fascinating for the reason that we are likely to see an increased economic emigration from Europe to places in Asia and even Africa, as Europe contracts. I wonder will they be so obliging as we have to them? I don’t think that is likely.

    • Steven Bannister

      Hmmm… With regards to England and America, I see things oppositely. America is a very large nation with lots of space. Whites still have some relatively white areas to live in, so the urge to “separate” will be delayed for another decade or so. In England, things are very close together and I think tensions are growing more rapidly. I could be wrong, that’s just my impression.

  • kjh64

    One of two things will happen to the USA in he future. It will split apart into two separate countries or the Mexicans will take it over and it will become Mexico. Whenever you have two or more large groups of peoples of different races, cultures, languages in the same territory, they will fight with each other over whose runs the country, who politics and laws and culture prevails.

    • Vonhauer

      Gause’s law, also known as the Competitive Exclusion Principle, applies to all living organisms.

      Gause’s law states that when two differing species or differing subspecies within the same species compete for the same critical resources within the same geographic boundaries, one of them will eventually outcompete and displace the other. The displaced species may become locally extinct, by either migration out of the area or by death, or it may adapt to a sufficiently distinct niche within the environment so that it continues to coexist noncompetitively with the displacing species.

      • Athling

        You seem to have stolen my thunder. Carry on my friend…

        • Vonhauer

          Well you have been a good teacher. Also consider, suppose we have a scale of genetic relatedness. At one end of the scale we have two people who share the minimum amount of DNA, an African and a European. On the other end of the scale we have two people who share the maximum amount of DNA, identical twins.

          The identical twins share so much common DNA that they are able to complete each other’s sentences, have the same likes and dislikes, etc. Assimilation between two groups of people on this end of the scale is effortless.

          On the other end you have racial opposites. They clash in nearly everything. Assimilation is highly unlikely under normal conditions.

          The Leftbots following their cult of Equality don’t get this either.

  • borogirl54

    Not just Southern Europeans but Japanese Americans also volunteered and fought in WWII in segregated units. Blacks did as well. Mexican Americans were placed with white troops. My question, will this current crop of new immigrants if they become legalized, will fight for the US if necessary? The Dreamers will but the rest of them I do not think so.

  • populism101

    America breaking up into as many different nations as possible is the best thing that could happen to the white majority. The smaller the nation, the more democratic it is….

  • Dave4088

    Pat is wrong. He holds a fervent belief in the powers of assimilation regardless of racial antecedents, but most non-whites either can’t or steadfastly refuse to assimilate. He’s basically saying that if we emphasize assimilation then tens of millions of unskilled, uneducated mestizos will become law abiding, flag waving dittoheads and suburban couch potatoes. Ain’t gonna happen. Ever.

    If this is the kind of prescriptions white people put their faith in then whites are truly finished. Every race, save for whites, sees life as a no holds barred contest for dominance over the other and works to that end while idiot whites seek to achieve an impossible interracial amity.

    I’m beginning to think that Nature has selected the white man and his silly abstractions for the dustbin of history.

  • Epiminondas

    The Yankees have never been comfortable with the Mexican War. I think they want to give it back to assuage their guilt. Losing California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Texas will definitely have consequences. And they won’t be pleasant.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      I have no problem with it and in fact I am very proud my ancestors took land from the backwards Mexican government that had nothing to do with the American Southwest; the Spaniards are the colonizers of the US Southwest, Mexicans had nothing to do with it and would have never been able to hold it and control it.

      Mexico is lucky it even exists; the US could have annexed it or even split it up into puppet states like Central America. Also, with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and The Gadsen Purchase Mexico was de facto guaranteed no further loss of territory and for that they are fortunate because even now Mexico has no business controlling the northern areas of the country, and they really don’t control it anyways… the cartels of the north do. So The Mexican-American War in some ways ensured Mexico’s long term existence as without that war it is entirely possible Mexico would now be a dozen or so small Central American countries.

      Mexico should be a small, low population country with a territory no larger than 50 square miles around Mexico City. It being a large nation with 150 million people is a joke, and a nightmare to civilized nations in the vicinity.

  • Rhialto

    Only two countries? At the rate immigrants are flooding into the U.S. from India, China, Mideast, Africa, as well as Spanish-America, America may break up into more than 2 countries.

    Also in a realignment, Canada will become part of the conquered territory. Mideast Muslims have established beachhead colonies in eastern Canada, as Chinese have in western Canada. The old white borders will mean nothing to the new North Americans.

  • NM156

    Um…Los Angeles perhaps?

  • kjh64

    I live in Texas and we are already a state split in half.

  • Bossman

    No! Some of the best minds in the USA have come to the same conclusions. You seem to not know that Mexico is in North America. The Mexicans are sitting on a very valuable piece of real estate. We are moving towards North American integration and nothing will stop that.

  • Bossman

    Mexico is a very lucky place. Big brother USA will do any thing to defend them from invasion from outside. Have you ever thought why this is so?

  • Wethepeople

    Hopefully they’ll think that by joining the new United Mexican Confederation they’ll be able to stick it to YT for good, and rape them some of his women too. Then while our new national borders are secure by fervent patriots with clear firing lanes, the ‘new Americans’ will butcher them, to protect their own women.

  • Steven Bannister

    David Ashton and LaSantaHermandad both bring up a good point.

    This plan for a “New World Order” goes waaay back and it was originally envisioned and planned by a group of men long since passed away. These men lived in a time when whites made up 25% of the world’s population and if they envisioned a global society, they most certainly envisioned a “white-centric” world that would be ruled from the West. I don’t think they could have anticipated the cultural revolution that occurred in the 1960’s and probably never thought that whites would one day make up only 8% of the world’s population.

    The power elite has traditionally been dominated by WASPS, although the Rothchilds, the Jewish banking family of Europe have been a central player from the beginning and many say they control the whole show. It could be that the original vision of the WASPS (a white-centric global government) has been compromised and gradually transformed into a more multiracial version as envisioned by Jewish elites who have now taken the leadership role.

    Of course it’s impossible to say for certain, because none of us are on “the inside.”

  • Alexandra1973

    Time to apply for Mexifornia driver’s licenses!

    (Run a Google image search on Mexifornia for the lulz)

  • jeffaral

    Some people , even if they come directly from Europe, can hardly be considered White. One example: Sicilians.

    • shmo123

      They may have various shades of olive skin, but for the most part Sicilians are culturally, religiously and for the most part genetically European. The current residents have nothing to do with the fact that their island was overrun so many times by so many different people. History can be ugly.

      • David Ashton

        The important thing is for the existing white American and European peoples to maximise their procreation; they should not need permanent settlers from other cultural or racial zones.

  • jeffaral

    California is good represented in the Knesset by Dianne Feinsten and Barbara Boxer.

  • Bossman

    Can you give me some examples of Mestizos? Do you know the difference between an Indian and a Mestizo. In case you didn’t know it, Mestizos are all around you. More often than not,they are the good-looking people that you pay to watch in the movies.

  • Bossman

    Canada and the USA used to be majority Indians countries too until they were flooded with immigrants from Europe. When Mexico is properly integrated into North America, its population will become whiter.

    • kjh64

      “Canada and the USA used to be majority Indians countries too until they were flooded with immigrants from Europe”
      Much of Canada and the USA were empty wilderness that weren’t owned or occupied by anyone. Every place on earth was populated by some other group at sometime. It has nothing to do with immigration today..

  • RisingReich

    I’m essentially saying that immigration is ruining this Country for working Whites everywhere.

  • Bossman

    Thank you for mentioning that. The posters in this forum think only Canada and the USA attract European immigrants which is not true at all.

  • Paleoconn

    Pat Buchanan is the best President we never had, better than Goldwater even. Enoch Powell is the best Prime Minister Britain never had.

  • David Ashton

    The originators of a “world order” as described, for example, by Carroll Quigley were largely Anglo-Saxons.
    Western “guilt” about racial self-preservation after WW2 was the result partly of anti-nazi propaganda and of cultural marxist revolutionary agitation, in which persons of Jewish heritage were involved. But it is not a Jewish or Israeli interest to “kill off the White race”, especially in comparison to the escalating Arab demographic. The “liberalism” that is “the ideology of western suicide” (James Burnham) and the “tyranny of guilt” (Pascal Bruckner) are multiracial in origin, aggravated today by the myopic hedonism of white couples who forego reproduction and of mainly white capitalists, Gentiles and Jews, who want to import cheap labor.