France Laid Waste

Rémi Tremblay, American Renaissance, March 15, 2013

Immigration and crime in la belle France.

Laurent Obertone, La France Orange Mécanique, Ring, 2013, 350 pp., €18 (in French only)

La France Orange Mécanique (Clockwork Orange France) became an instant best seller in France, finding itself in the top-ten list on despite no advertising and a virtually unknown author. Even in a climate of reduced book sales, the publisher, Ring, has recently had an additional 18,000 copies printed. Some reviewers note that if this book—which describes the true face of crime in France—had been published before last year’s presidential elections, it might have had an impact on the outcome, swaying votes towards the Right.

La France Orange Mecanique

The book, whose title refers to the 1962 Anthony Burgess novel about “ultra-violence,” begins with an all-too-common event: a white woman is savagely beaten and raped almost to death by a foreigner. This gruesome rape is presented from the victim’s perspective, allowing the reader to grasp the horror of the situation—a horror that can be washed away in a sea of statistics: 7 percent of French women are raped at some point in their lives, and there are 13,000 thefts, 2,000 assaults and 200 rapes every day in France. Behind these statistics, there are personal dramas and shattered lives. For each crime, there is a life that will never be the same. This is what Laurent Obertone wants us to remember: Crime is not a matter of numbers; it is devastating trauma.

Beyond the crime statistics, many lives are ruined by daily harassment from immigrants, but victims get no support from society and resign themselves to their fate. They suffer from depression, fear, and even suicide, but they never appear in official reports: They will be forgotten and ignored.

In pointing out how heavily concentrated crime is among immigrants, Mr. Obertone breaks a major taboo. He is frank about the vast overrepresentation of Gypsies and North Africans in French prisons. In France, there are no official statistics about ethnicity and crime, but there are figures for the number of foreigners in the prison system (22 percent). These statistics are skewed because an Arab born in France is considered a Frenchman. Ironically, Mr. Obertone has to cite a study reported in the Washington Post to conclude that between 60 and 70 percent of the prison population is Muslim.

Mr. Obertone has also found local racial statistics on crime for some towns and cities, which confirm the overrepresentation of non-whites in prison. He shows that this not a uniquely French phenomenon; in European countries blacks and Arabs are always overrepresented in the criminal population. He makes an air-tight case for what everyone knows but dares not say: The explosion of crime is directly linked to immigration.

France is, indeed, becoming one of the most dangerous of all Western societies: 1,200 homicides each year and 1,000 attempted homicides. Crime now costs French citizens 115 billion Euros each year—twice the revenue generated from income taxes. Common criminals now confront police with automatic rifles and assault weapons, once used only by organized crime.

Police officers themselves are victims of harassment and open provocation by criminals, but receive no support from the media or authorities. When they enforce the law they are routinely accused of “racism.” Mr. Obertone reports that the police union now says offices are afraid to use force, for fear of racial consequences. Criminals therefore no longer fear the police, and their authority is further diminished when criminals get limited or no jail time. There are few deterrents to crime and criminals know it.

This undoubtedly explains why race riots in France are more frequent and violent than in any other European country. The authorities have surrendered to blackmail and have invested billions of Euros in some 700 “sensitive neighborhoods,” proving that the more you destroy, the more you are rewarded. Police rarely enter these neighborhoods for fear their mere presence could be a “provocation.” Mr. Obertone says that the media and politicians nevertheless blame the police for the high percentage of immigrants in jail. The only accepted explanations are discrimination and profiling.

The French judiciary system is like that of the United States in the 1960s and ’70s: the emphasis is on prevention and rehabilitation. For French sociologists and so-called experts, it is still the fashion to blame society exclusively for crime. The focus is thus on compassion for the culprit, with no regard for the victim. Basically, only recidivists are sentenced to prison, and prison terms are often suspended.

In France, 2,250 women have been raped by recidivists. According to Mr. Obertone, the real number is considerably higher, because some rapists are never caught and because some rapes are classified as “sexual assaults” and are therefore not counted as rape.

Even with low incarceration rates, prisons are at 117 percent of capacity. Socialist politicians block the construction of new jails, which they would see as an admission that society is failing. Only in the 1980s and 1990s did Americans come to realize that long prison terms are what keep a society safe.

The media hide the reality of crime in France, using euphemisms to talk about the few events they dare to mention. Criminals are “youths,” even if they are in their twenties, and savagery is sanitized with such terms as “aggravated assault” and “sexual assault.”

The government helps cover things up, launching campaigns for traffic safety and condemning domestic violence against women, although these phenomena are statistically insignificant. These campaigns detract from the real problems, and suggest a lack of political will to solve them. On the political front, everyone is silent. The Right is afraid of the Left, and the Left is afraid of the truth.

And yet, there are crimes the media and politicians are happy to discuss: those against certain minorities. Fighting anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and homophobia are important priorities, and the government spends a great deal of money trying to eradicate these evils. However, Mr. Obertone notes that only 0.03 percent of the Muslims, 0.06 percent of the Jews, and 0.007 percent of homosexuals are reported victimized each year. Why single them out, when a far larger percentage—0.7 percent—of French natives are victimized each year? Despite what the media and politicians say, it is safer to be a Jew, a Muslim, or a homosexual than to be an ordinary Frenchman. Needless to say, minor acts committed against minorities are huge stories, while luridly racist crimes committed against whites are downplayed or ignored.

Mr. Obertone writes that most of the French seem to have fallen asleep in front of their TV sets and shut themselves off from what is happening in their country. Even when they realize something is wrong, they are afraid to speak up, afraid of being called a racist and thus risking their livelihoods. As it is everywhere in the West, anyone accused of racism is guilty until proven innocent.

In France there is a myriad of antiracist groups that play the role of “thought police,” and ensure that no one questions the system. These groups, generously subsidized by the government, target only one type of racism and are completely blind towards anti-white racism—even though today, one French native in ten considers himself a victim of racism.

In his discussion about the cause of crime, Mr. Obertone refers to IQ without explicitly mentioning race. He explains that the average unskilled worker has an IQ of 92, and that the great majority of Arabs are working class. Thus, we cannot expect the same results from them as from French natives. His logic is a simple way of implying racial differences without stating them bluntly. Candor on these matters can bring criminal charges.

Despite the serious nature of the topic of this book, the tone is sometimes humorous. The author is not overly academic or sensationalist, and the book is easy to read despite its liberal use of statistics. Mr. Obertone does not make utopian promises about stopping crime; he simply presents a realistic portrait of a situation deliberately ignored by the media and politicians. But the mere appearance of a book of this kind and the reception it has received are grounds for celebration.

Topics: , , , , , , ,

Share This

Rémi Tremblay
Mr. Tremblay is an activist for Fédération des Québécois de Souche and writes for Le Harfang.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • If the walls surrounding our cells broke down, everything would mix together and we would die. Life, as we know it, would not even have come into being without cell walls separating what is inside from what is outside, what is the cell and what isn’t. But hey, I’m sure that one of the very basic mechanisms of life cannot be extrapolated out to be of any importance to much larger structures, such as cities, countries and even entire civilizations.

  • Tyrone Ooks

    These things destroy whole continents. Go to any negroid city and you will find lawlessness and destruction. I can’t say much for the latinos either. They don’t seem to want to partake in the a new countries laws or social structure. And if not provided for will turn to lawlessness.

    • vladdy1

      We are importing only Third World people now, those who are used to and expect corruption and vice in their government and businesses — so they get it………

      • Gerónimo Anónimo

        When are we going to rise up in support for the Boers? We should be bombarding the State Department to offer asylum to these people who are being murdered and raped and mutilated daily. Where is the outrage? Then again where was the outrage over Wichita and Knoxville, to name only two of hundreds and perhaps thousands of similar incidents?

        • Defoe

          The outrage is still sitting in front of the tv watching “March madness” or some other inane show. As has been stated above and many times on this site, things will have to get much worse before “outrage” gets up off of his fat a** and wakes up to the fact that his house (our country) is now fully engaged in total destruction of his race. “Outrage” is still fat, dumb, and happy with the “bread and circuses” being fed to him by the Total State.

    • Vyncennt

      The Latinos do not destroy societies as the blacks do. They simply replace them with vaguely livable ones. The lesser of two great evils, but a great evil nonetheless.

      • Anonymous #3

        Arabs will turn you palefaces from Islamaphobes to Islam supporters. Just wait!

      • Dómari

        Have to draw a distinction between “white Hispanics” and the indigenous peoples, blacks, and mixed-race “Hispanics.” Those of pure European descent have similar mean IQs as other whites, but the other “Hispanics” fall well below the mean white IQ (100) down to as low as the mean black IQ (85). The nonsensical “Hispanic” group across all races commit crimes at a higher rate than whites, but that is likely due to the “black Hispanics,” mixed-race, and indigenous groups that commit crimes at a rate similar to non-Hispanic non-whites.

    • Anonymous #3

      We’re not talking about blacks in this article, we’re talking about Arabs. They want to destroy whites just like every other race in the world. I often wonder why whites are the most hated race in the world.

      What could your people have done to make people hate you so much? Hmmm……

    • andronmtl

      at least most of the Latinos have some degree of European blood in them, so they’re more civilized than blacks.

      • tgb

        I have to disagree with you from a womans perspective anyway.Mexican men are absolutely disgusting, as any woman who’s been in a grocery store lately could tell you. Blacks will look at your chest or back end, Mexicans will stare at your “personal area” for prolonged amounts of time and they never avert their eyes.I have had to leave stores because I felt so icky like I needed a shower. They also don’t seem to care how old you are,They have done this to my daughters also when they were as young as 11. Does anyone know why they always grocery shop in packs?There is no place safe for white women…

        • I agree with you in regards to Mexicans, and that’s who you see most of the time in the States. However if you take such Latin American countries as Argentina, Chili and Uruguay – they are overwhelmingly white (over 80%).

          My point is not every Spanish speaking country is like Mexico, as many Americans might think

        • AZN8V

          That’s a cultural thing though. The females of that society are taught from an early age that they are to be sexy and alluring to the males. Watch any TV station that caters to that group and you will see the female role displayed prominently. They are basically a Christian culture, though, and can be taught civility. I don’t think they are intrinsically different like some cultures are.

      • Dómari

        The “white Hispanics” of more purely European descent make the group as a whole look better, but the “black Hispanics,” indigenous people, and mixed-race are just as bad as other non-whites in terms of lower IQ and crime rate.

  • JustaWhiteMom

    “7 percent of French women are raped at some point in their lives, and there are 13,000 thefts, 2,000 assaults and 200 rapes every day in France. Behind these statistics, there are personal dramas and shattered lives. For each crime, there is a life that will never be the same. This is what Laurent Obertone wants us to remember: Crime is not a matter of numbers; it is devastating trauma. . .

    Beyond the crime statistics, many lives are ruined by daily harassment from immigrants, but victims get no support from society and resign themselves to their fate. They suffer from depression, fear, and even suicide, but they never appear in official reports: They will be forgotten and ignored.”

    Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as

    …any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; ✓
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; ✓
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    Article 3 defines the crimes that can be punished under the convention:

    (a) Genocide;
    (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
    (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
    (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
    (e) Complicity in genocide. ✓

    • pcmustgo

      “French Women” include African French and Muslim French women. A good chunk of those 7% raped are from those groups.

      • JustaWhiteMom

        Irrelevant. A party is not intended to the benefit of any doubt that arises from their failure to keep records. A duty to keep records concerning who is raping whom is implied in the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. A government cannot prevent or punish a genocide that it does not know is happening because of its own failure to keep records. Having abetted the invasion of their country by foreigners, using weaponized history to guilt the native population into submission and thereby inciting hatred against them, the government is duty-bound to track interracial crime and respond appropriately. All of the rape victims should be assumed to be White as long as the government continues to ignore its legal duties under the Convention.

      • JustaWhiteMom

        A party is not entitled to the benefit of any doubt created by its own failure to keep records. That the government of France has a duty to keep records concerning interracial violence is implied in the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. You cannot prevent or punish a genocide that you don’t know is happening or may happen.
        The government has deliberately created multiracial conditions and used weaponized history to guilt the native population into submission. This weaponized history in turn incites hatred against the natives among the foreign settlers. Having deliberately subjected the native population to genocidal risk factors, the government is duty-bound to keep detailed records concerning who is robbing, raping, and murdering whom.
        Because they are not doing that, all inferences must be drawn against them. All victims must be assumed to be White unless and until the government meets its obligations under international law.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        According to what?

  • KenelmDigby

    The irony is that throughout America’s racial nervous breakdown of the 1950s and 60s, the French just loved to loftily pontificate on just how horrible White Americans were.
    – Now they are getting a taste of the same medicine themselves.

    • vladdy1

      Problem is, ours have progressed to mere riots to random attacks on whites (which, I know, happens in France, too; just sayin’ all civilized countries are in the same, leaky boat when it comes to this.).

    • Salarino

      When I lived in Montreal there were a few French expats who lived in my buiding. One had that attitude in his youth, but he told me that after he spent some time in the States in the 70s (got robbed by black guys, saw some black slums etc.) he realized that we weren’t treating blacks like that for nothing. Needless to say he was a big National Front supporter. You are absolutely right though; that high-faluting attitude has come to bite them in the rear-end, hard.

      • Gerónimo Anónimo

        “You are absolutely right though; that high-faluting attitude has come to bite them in the rear-end, hard.
        I agree but without Schandenfreude. I hope that they’ll join us in what I hope will become a universal cause for all White people.

        • Albert8184

          That high highfalutin’ attitude comes from Marxism and Progressive Leftist culture. I’d be willing to bet the Frenchman from Montreal is still a socialist. He’s just more of a fascist Leftist now.

          • Salarino

            Sounds about right. He didn’t think too highly of Gerard Depardieu leaving France for tax purposes. I can’t see into the guy’s head, but your assessment didn’t sound far off.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            That’s okay, really, because in order for whites to survive, they are going to have to help one another in a manner closer to socialism than like individualistic capitalists, out for profit no matter the cost.

          • Albert8184

            No. I think you need to rethink that. Your assumption is ludicrous on a number of levels, whether thinking like a capitalist OR a collectivist.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Your reply is a perfect example of USELESSNESS. If you feel my statement is wrong, simply gainsaying helps nothing. Lucirous, you say? Tell me why?

            As I pointed out in another post here, further down, I lived in Former Yugoslavia and have known many Russian and Ukrainian families here. They have close family ties and a sense of nationalism we whites in the West lack. Those were people in or from former Marxist states. The problem has to do with Western Liberalism, not necessarily Marxism or Socialism. It is about culture. But I would say that capitalism does more to damage friendships and turn people against one another than socialism does, by far.

            Now, why don’t you write something back that shows some thought and even intelligence?

          • Albert8184

            Another such statement. Originally, I asserted that your statement about collectivism being the best chance of survival for white people is ludicrous. Now, I will say that you are ludicrous because you don’t understand America, what’s going wrong with America or really even what capitalism is. But, I don’t really want to waste the time to “show some thought”, because I don’t see much of it coming from you.

          • Salarino

            You know brother I don’t mean to chime in on this, but I agree with you entirely about socialism. I read a lot of Solzhenitsyn and he really opened my eyes to a lot of the inherent weaknesses about socialism in practice and how corrosive it is.

          • Albert8184

            Please chime in. Yes, Solzhenitsyn, and many other dissidents. But many blind people in our time do NOT understand that socialism is much, much more than just an economic system. It is an all-embracing worldview that very closely resembles a religious cult in its tenets and practices. It is QUITE possible, for instance, for a man like Bill Gates to be both a capitalist extraordinaire AND a Leftist at the same time. But people don’t understand this. This has been the biggest failure of the right wing in the West – to educate people about what is happening to them that is remarkably different from the Revolution that Solzhenitsyn experienced in Russia, and in the Cold War era.

          • Salarino

            Socialism is definitely not just an economic worldview and has changed our way of life and without a doubt many here in the States now completely worship the state and are utterly dependent on it. McCarthy was right.
            In my mind, this is where Solzhenitsyn’s thoughts come in hand as he was a dedicated socialist who transformed into a devout Christian who saw God’s hand in what had happened (in the sense of the chaos and misery caused when man forgets God). Things will have to fall much farther down before most people would even care about what has happened imo. A lot of people thought McCarthy and the John Birch Society were nuts, even though they were right on the money. Then it seems like we can start to rebuild our civilization by returning to our Christian roots.
            I’m guessing you’ve probably already seen it, but if not you might enjoy the G. Edward Griffin interview with Yuri Bezmenov (KGB defector to the US) who details the mechanics of the Soviet ideological subversion of America.

          • Albert8184

            I have seen it, and other defectors as well. Keep fighting the good fight. Glad to have you as a “comrade” in arms.

          • Salarino

            Likewise brother.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I probably don’t consider myself a Westerner? Is this the best you can do? I am the very expression of what a Westerner is and ought to be, while you represent absolutism that will tolerate no variation in thought or creed. Flat earth, book bans, restrictions on thought and free speech? These appear to be your set of Western influences and values. The success of the West has been due to philosophy, not religion and NOT Christianity. It is philosophy that encompasses the notion of free, critical thought and that includes investigation of ideas, and importantly the physical world. I was merely suggesting that there are useful mechanisms in the Socialist model that will be (and have historically been) useful to any group survival, including whites (in the supposed coming upheaval). It was practiced by the first Christians (Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire). If collecting a few fishes and loaves of bread and redistributing them to a larger mass of people isn’t communist collectivism, what is? Contrast that to the “every man for himself” scenario you seem to be espousing. This will result in WHITE neighbor killing WHITE neighbor, just like blacks do now.

            Do you realize that national socialism as espoused by Hitler and
            practiced in Germany during the Third Reich depended upon SOCIALISM
            using collectivism to lift Germany out of its depression? Or do you
            think that only whites making over $200,000.00 a year and in the private
            sector are the only truly WHITE Westerners in existence?

            I’ve been posting on this forum Since Hurricane Katrina at least and my views, are well demonstrated over time. I’ve identified myself as one of Norman descent able to trace my ancestry to the Battle of Hastings. I’m a blue eyed, rosy cheeked white man steeped in Western history and practice. I often challenge the stuck in gear views of the typical conservative because we must be innovative as whites if we’re going to have a chance in the deluge that is coming. You’re just another “Johnny come lately” that wants to pick fights with other white race realists in order to make yourself feel more important, not thinking at all, just reacting and making huge assumptions that disqualify you as a rational mind in a productive conversation. You rely on personal attack to pretend to make a point. You make sweeping statements like “socialism is the antithesis of what it means to be white in the Western sense. This is YOUR opinion. You are writing in the most recognizable style of the ignoramus.

            You don’t even seem to realize that Socialism was a construct formed by the effects and events of history in the West. Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto in Brussels, Belguim, not China or even Russia. And he was influenced by the working conditions of most of the WHITE people in Germany and similarly in France, when he visited Paris and saw the poverty WHITE workers lived under there. Then, England and next the U.S., which all had the same thing going on. I wonder if you’d enjoy working 16 hour days, live in a dorm room and have the food you eat and the rent you pay taken out of your miserable paycheck? And when you get injured, chucked out the door, literally, bleeding and even dying? How would you like to see your 6 year old children working like that? This is what was going on in the 19th century in the West and like it or not, it was thinkers like Marx whose risks and influence gave YOU the 8 hour work week and other worker’s rights, without which there would not have been very many WHITE people left by now. But capitalism has been effecting that seemingly right under your proud, Western WHITE nose!

            IF you really understood American history and for example the Industrial Revolution, you’d understand why pure capitalism is undesirable and the why and how of what caused Marxism and Socialism to come about. Both lead to rule by a few with no consideration for the average person OR what race they are; however, both have useful features. The intelligent thing to do is learn from both what is most useful and employ them intelligently.

            I hope this isn’t too much of a strain on your reactionary, intellectual capacity or reading comprehension.

          • Albert8184

            Another long essay. You lost me on the second sentence. Since what you said has no application to me, I assumed you were talking to someone else. Hope you don’t get carpal tunnel syndrome.

            You aren’t a Westerner. You are a Marxist. (And yes, I know Marx lived in London and was from Germany, and was a Jew).

          • Glen

            Whiteplight: You’re right, of course. Many here are fresh out of the GOP’s Town Hall of classical liberal “conservatism.” They’ve uncritically swallowed Ayn Rand’s (Alice Rosenbaum) creed of hyper-individualism masquerading as “ethics,” consider organized workers to be little more than bars of pig iron, call stay-at-home moms and children “useless eaters.” They believe wage slavery to be entirely appropriate for others (not them), unemployment to be a voluntary condition and deserved in accordance with the “Austrian” School of internationalist business propaganda, and label anything that neo-CONs don’t like “Quisling,” “anti-Semitic,” “Neo-Nazi,” “socialist,” “Marxist,” or “collectivist.”

          • Room101

            The idea of collectivism is deeply repugnant to me on a personal level, but maybe it’s time I take another look at that, in the mere interest of self-preservation and my family…

            The Government Schools are forcing White “students” in 2013(!) to wear wristbands that identify the White kids as “racists”, not far removed from a plantation owner and overseer wielding a bullwhip

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Albert and his ilk are stuck chasing their tails in a reactionary funk, larger minds will recognize useful tools and put them to use. If Albert is a splinter example of the sort of cooperation and coordination whites can look forward to, what I see is a bunch of whites killing each other over religious and other phony ideas that have no practical use.

        • Salarino

          I didn’t mean for it to come across like I am glad at what is happeming there. My wife is French and I see them as strong allies as well.

          • Gunrunner1

            Viva La France! Viva La Blancs!

        • MBlanc46

          Indeed, and the British and all the other northern and western Europeans, as well.

      • andronmtl

        Sometimes I don’t feel bad for the Europeans since they created this mess themselves. In addition, there’s still a solution to this woe – like voting for “Front Nationale” if you’re Frenchman, or voting for Party for Freedom if you’re Dutch.

        Yet, most of the whites continue with their sheepish behaviors and attitudes.

        • Room101

          Could it be that every White person born since, say 20 April, 1889, be guilty of the original Sin of “white privilege”?

          No wonder we bombed the crap out of Germany in the 2nd World War.
          Adolf shot himself, but “liberals” found out a social theory to hang EVERY White person born since 1889 with Hitler’s crimes and those of his regime/Regierung.

          It’s taught in all the lavish government schools showered with endless tax money.

    • Vyncennt

      Soon the white French may realize an ally in their white brother and sisters across the sea. Pray our petty differences are drowned in this flood of common enemies.

      • JustaWhiteMom

        So true. Our enemies like to gloat about “globalization” but then we can make that work for us. Whiteness is going global too.

        • Anonymous #3

          ” ‘Anti-raciste est un mot de code pour l’anti-blanc’ est juste une phrase code créé par les Blancs racistes pour justifier leur haine raciale”


      • Guest

        Whites who are Leftist in orientation are not white. They are reverse Oreos. White on the outside. Colored on the inside.

        • pcmustgo

          No, they’re people like you and me who just haven’t had the dozens of horrible incidents with blacks and other non-whites yet.

          • MBlanc46

            Yes, and who are perhaps still resisting the notion that there are biological foundations for racial differences in behavior. But the evidence is mounting in favor of this idea, and more and more people will accept it in the end.

      • Albert8184

        Petty differences? Secular humanist socialists and traditional theistic conservatives have much more than petty differences separating them..

        • Fr. John+

          That’s correct. Christian conservatives are the heirs of Christendom, and Europe itself. Secular humanists can only point to Trotsky, Marx, and Freud- a decidedly ‘non-European’ ethnos…

          • Albert8184

            Excellent. Please join me and go forth and education. Here’s an excellent website for you to consider, if you will:

          • MBlanc46

            Only Trotsky, Marx, and Freud. Not Hume, Diderot, Russell, and Darwin?

          • Please, study European history

            No. There wasn’t any secular humanism prior to 1840 (false). Duh. The secular humanistic elements in the French Revolution were a fluke.

          • MBlanc46

            Says you. Hume, of course, had nothing to do with the French Revolution. You need to take your user name seriously.

        • Vyncennt

          Those “secular humanist socialist” French are doing quite a bit more to preserve themselves than our “theistic conservatives” in the US are….

          I also must add: Debating religious mindsets, or the lack thereof, does nothing but siphon resources from an already dwindling pool. Google up planet wide demographics and perhaps you won’t be so willing to throw away the white French…..

          • Albert8184

            But, I don’t need to get caught up in your false dichotomy. Some French ARE theistic conservaties. And not all French are in agreement about what constitutes “preservation”, socialist or otherwise.

            It’s not a matter of “throwing away” anyone. It’s a matter of unity within a worldview.

          • Vyncennt

            “Petty differences? Secular humanist socialists and traditional theistic

            conservatives have much more than petty differences separating them..”

            ” Some French ARE theistic conservaties.”

            You’re the one that labeled them all secular human humanists in your first response. Not I. I merely stated a desire to unite with them.

            “And not all French are in agreement about what constitutes “preservation”, socialist or otherwise.”

            So until all French subscribe to whatever version of “theistic conservatism” you do, they’re useless as allies? Not all American “theist conservatives” agree about what constitutes “preservation.”

          • Albert8184

            No, I didn’t label ALL of anybody as secular humanists. I merely pointed out that theists have more than petty differences with those who are.

      • Aelfgar

        “Although our arms may weary of ripping, slashing, cleaving blows, we face an endless host of foes”

        How Heavy This Axe
        THE SWORD

      • MBlanc46

        Indeed. Americans and Frenchman have fought too many battles together (American Revolution, the World Wars) to not ultimately face this enemy together.

        • Vyncennt

          I have a few Irish friends who I preach the same message to. I predict that by the time my time here on Earth comes to an end, the English and Irish will have found a much deadlier enemy in common.

          • Epiminondas

            The Irish will never admit the existence of such an enemy.

    • AnalogMan

      Sounds a lot like South Africa’s experience vis-a-vis Americans twenty years later.

    • Le Gaulois

      Wrong. The irony is that the “French” you are referring to are the same career politicians, Jews, and leftist intelligentsia who are still hiding the truth to the French population just like they are to us in the US. Last time I checked liberalism and the civil rights movement originated here and had way more supporters than in France, so enough with that same old hypocritical projection every time an article about France is linked on Amren. Get it through your head: the indigenous French people never cared about blacks in America, and certainly never asked for their country to be invaded by Arabs just like we’re invaded by Mexicans, OK ?

      I’m sorry to say, but you’re perspective about French people is just as brainwashed as liberals about “diversity”.

      • Paleoconn

        I agree, we are all bombarded with information that the French population supports this invasion. You never hear about Generation Identitaire or the huge popularity of LePen and her party, or even slightly off-topic the millions who march in pro-life rallies.

        • Room101

          The only time I see stuff about France in American government-media is when France should be castigated for “racism” and the government should crack down harder on its subjects/taxpayers/victims.

          • Paleoconn

            Really, rather I see the country portrayed as willing inviters and welcomers of the brown invasion. In other words, everything harmony between the natives and aliens. Also, the only negative news item regarding a foreigner was when that arab killed some people at a Jewish school.

      • Albert8184


      • KenelmDigby

        What about that group of worthless French pseudo-intellectuals who named a road after an equally useless, worthless black murderer, Mumia Abu Jamal, who murdered an American police officer, Daniel Faulkner?

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

          Looks to me as if you’re being petty. In the bigger picture, ethnic French and white Americans have the basics in common.

        • Paleoconn

          That’s the elites, not the public at large

    • cadmium

      Though a lot of that attitude may have come from urban ”elites” and leftist ”intellectuals” etc. I’m thinking the average frenchman, certainly the rural ones, would have have had some idea about the realities of africans, especially given france was a colonial nation.

      Anyway, what I’d like to see is some super rich whites with racial/civilisational pride pumping some huge sums into exposure/translation/book tours/advertising for ANY books fighting back against this social destruction. Publishers will only tread carefully and tend to invest elsewhere anyway and the media is a known leftist machine. But you can get through the gauntlet with private money. If bieber can be rammed down youth’s throats, why can’t material like this be rammed down the throats of urbanites? Obviously you can’t expect the same conversion %, but some of it will stick. There are a hell of a lot of ”swing” thinkers out there, but they have to be able to FIND the material.

      Surely Trump is just one smashed limo away from full conversion…

    • TheAntidote

      Yeah, you’re right. Emmett Till was elevated to sainthood in France. But whatever else you can say about the French negrophiles, they weren’t hypocrites. They really believed all that poo about equality, and they drank down gallon after gallon of koolaid. As the Irish in Chicago say, “they brung it all upon themselves”.

  • a multiracial individual

    The French (and many other Europeans) wanted a Europe that was free of Christianity. Well, they got what they wanted.

    Are secular people so guilt ridden and insane that they would rather die than deal with violent people accordingly?

    I fear that Europe will never wake up to this. They are like the frog that is placed in a cool pot of water and the temperature is increased very slowly. They relax until it is too late. If Islam ever completely infects Europe they will eventually look for new territory to infiltrate. I would pay money to be able to see the looks on their faces when they realize that “cultural relativism” is not in the Chinese language.

    • a multiracial individual

      The more I think about liberal foolishness regarding third world immigration, the more perverse and deliberate I think it is. They must know that bringing all of those people here is going to cause Western wealth and prosperity to drop. If this is true, then this suicidal madness is a way for there to be more parity in the world. “Hey we tried to bring them up, so now we need to do the noble thing and knock ourselves down.” I guess to them, it is better if everyone is poor as opposed to rich and poor.

      • Bobby

        You better believe it’s deliberate. It’s deliberate in every Western Nation, and all of them have zombie like citizens, that cannot seem to deal with their so called leadership.

      • Defoe

        The elites liked things as they were during the time of Serfs in Europe. They want to return to the way things were then. Serfdom was nothing more than slavery. The elites see all people as existing ONLY to serve them.

      • Defoe

        The meek shall not inherit the earth; the psychopaths and sociopaths will.

    • Kronolog

      Given the fact that the churches – catholic and protestant alike – are as zealously pro immigration as the lefty and liberal atheists, I doubt that the problem stems from a lack of Christianity.

      Without a doubt there will come a day when Europeans (and Americans too) will wake up and face the problem, as will anyone who is pushed beyond his or her limit. The question is simply “when”, and if the preferred solution will be apartheid, mass expulsions or death camps.

      • New wave christianity is a weak spineless religion. This new religion is consistently on the defensive whilst the other ideologies that attack it are always on the offensive. Human’s do not side with losers by nature they side with winners. Also humans like to side with “the underdog” christianity has been painted as some kind of GIANT, genocidal, omnipotent force of nature. Whilst other ideologies like Islam, Judaism, New wave marxism have been self promoted as the little guy. The guy that gets beaten up and oppressed by the “white christian hegemony.” Of course you know that in the modern world this is all bullshit, but you also know that the average lemming has the political intelligence of a termite. Their thoughts are not their own and they basically believe anything an authority figure tells them. They have also been conditioned to view authority figures as people who fight for “human rights” and other liberal bullshit that cloaks the true ulterior motives. As long as these idiots remain in their perpetual intellectual slumber we will continue the plunge into decadence, dysfunction, racial denial, and the normalizing of stupidity. The standards have been lowered across the board and there isn’t a damn thing we can do about it.

        • A change can occur.

        • Christianity may force people to tell the truth and to see things as they really are.

          • Defoe

            How can Christianity cause people to “see things as they really are” when accepting Christianity causes one to believe all kinds of things on faith alone??

      • JustaWhiteMom

        It is entirely possible that if there are to be mass expulsions or death camps, Whites will be the victims.

      • pcmustgo

        PUSHED BEYOND THE LIMIT… that’s how I feel.

      • Defoe

        Look at the big picure; Whites are a small minority in the world.

    • BonusGift

      Actually, they have Muslims, they are called Uighurs (i.e., the main group is called that or something close to that name) and they are a protected minority that is allowed to have more than one baby per family. No, the Chinese don’t all sit around reading Sun Tzu and only doing rational strategic things (e.g., the “Cultural Revolution” and Marxism more
      specifically); and, furthermore, they are more likely to copy our silliness than reject it outright. There is a reason why they waited about two centuries to industrialize and it’s not because of inherently making good decisions.

  • a multiracial individual

    Is the left ever going to grow a pair and properly defend the ideals they hold so dear (gender equality, acceptance of gays, etc.). Islam hates everything liberals fight for, yet liberals embrace Islam with open arms.

    • joesolargenius

      That’s because Islam is financially supporting the same political party as the left and each group believes that someday they will be in control and can then get rid of the others .

      • magician

        Islam is not supporting anything…. For example is Saudi Arabia or Egypt sending money to some political parties in Europe or North America? No

        The only reason the liberals support islam is because it is non-white and non-Christian.

        • JustaWhiteMom

          You’re naive. I’d bet by last dollar Leftist parties and officials are getting paid.

          • Anon

            No…YOU are the one who is naive. Greedy people can be bargained with under terms of mutual self-interest. The left is motivated by one thing and one thing only….the desire for white genocide. Such people cannot be bought, by neither muslims nor sane whites. The ONLY appropriate and effective response to them is a swift hanging. These people are psychopaths, limited in what they are doing only by their cowardice.

            And you better figure that out and soon. Every white country on the planet is morphing into something very much like the old soviet union. Once that happens, there will be small groups terrorizing and murdering the larger population in large numbers….and no effective resistance because of all the liberal snitches and collaborators. Literally, the russians were enslaved by a tiny alien minority because too many of them were itching to see horrible things happen to their neighbors….even though they knew they were next.

            THAT is how crazy and anti-life the liberals are.

          • Exoplanet Finder

            Anon, every time you write my ears perk up. If Amren is truth in relation to all the other news sites, your commentary is that in relation to the rest. Keep it going. We need you. It is us against the monsters wearing many disguises.

          • JustaWhiteMom

            I hear ya. The New Left is an inherently genocidal movement insofar as it demands the destruction of the nation to facilitate class consciousness and revolution.
            While true anti-White Genocidal Leftists are spearheading White genocide, I suspect they are cooperating with Muslims and using oil$$$ to pay off their less ideologically committed colleagues.

          • Persona Non Grovel

   The New World order, regardless of religious affiliation, is transnational, cross-continental and really only follows the path of mammon. Wealth, greed, injustice, lack of caring or empathy for others, etc… These are a few earmarks of a psychopath. Anon is correct in this observation. These “leaders” (if you want to say that with a straight face) have sold the hard-working family- oriented middle class European and American people down the river for riches.

            The Reaganites on through the Bush family to Clinton to Obama all have an obligation. And this goes for incompetent Tony Blair and the French left and even Sarkoczy. That obligation is to flood their countries with cheap and disposable labor, which kowtows to the neocons, under the guise of human rights which kowtows to the liberals. And despite what some on this site might claim, in America we are getting the shaft by BOTH major political parties. It will take a grassroots effort by the blue collar class to get some semblance of power back.

            Many on here have a strong disdain for organized labor. But they had some excellent issues at one time that were addressed a generation or two or three in the past. The decline of America’s middle class (and from what I’ve read, Western Europe, too) has a strong correlation to the breakdown financially, morally and spiritually throughout her communities. The super rich don’t care about you. And the super poor, especially low IQ testosterone driven undertow of society, only see you as an easy mark.

          • joesolargenius

            The White Homosexuals in power are not after white Genocide but instead seek to dismantle white heterosexual families because they don’t want them to have that which they perceive to be unavailable to them .

          • Albert8184

            More than that, the sodomites are Marxists. And to dismantle the traditional Western family structure is all part of fulfilling a primary plank of the Manifesto: abolish marriage, abolish the family, abolish parental authority.

          • a multiracial individual

            I really don’t get this hang up on sexual orientation. Acceptance of gays is a white thing. In fact same sex coupling is most accepted in the whitest nations on Earth. If all non- whites disappeared today, every society on Earth would eventually make gay marriage legal.

          • Albert8184

            Well then, if you don’t get this “hang up”, why don’t you ask the non-whites what the problem is? Perhaps they can provide the enlightenment you seek.

            I understand where it is coming from in the West. And I also understand it is a common feature in many non-European countries as well. Religion has something to do with it, wouldn’t you say?

          • Nathanwartooth

            Just because liberals support gay “rights” (Whatever “rights” means. Outside of gay marriage what more do you want?) and so many gays support liberals because of that don’t confuse homosexuality with the same destructive force that is liberalism.

            The only gays who hate heterosexuals and their families are the militant gays, usually militant lesbian feminists. They truly hate heteros because in their twisted minds the “male hetero patriarchy” is all that is wrong with the world.

            Here are some things you should consider:

            1. There has always been homosexuals
            2. There will always be homosexuals

            There will always be about 5% homosexuals in the population. When you attack homosexuality you aren’t just attacking the homosexuals but their families as well. They take that kind of personally. So that makes it at least 10% of the population you are attacking.

            Homosexuals could be an easy ally since so many non White groups hate them.

          • Albert8184

            They hate the male hetero patriarchy because they are Marxists. Outside of that, I don’t know why you’re telling me this. Perhaps you meant to respond to the original poster? I was only answering his question.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I have a copy of T.E. Lawrence’s rare book, The Seven Pillars of Wisdom. He reported in it that the Arab men in the field often resorted to one another for the satisfactions of their “passion” rather than engage in sex with the Arab women who he said were often repulsive (unattractive, poor hygiene). It might have been due to the conditions at the time of the Arab Revolt, but it proves that even Muslim Arabs engage in homosexual behavior.

          • Just another white man

            Joeso and Albert: project much?

          • Albert8184

            No. Not much.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I lived in former Yugoslavia and have know many Russian and Ukrainian families here. They have really tight family ties and don’t divorce at the rate Westerners, especially English speaking countries do. It’s not about being Marxist, it’s about something specifically to do with Western Liberalism. It is important to get the details right or else you’ll spend all your time shooting at non-existent targets, which is what a lot of people are doing here. It is more important to stop b$tching, at least so sloppily and get prepared for what’s coming.

          • Albert8184

            You don’t understand what’s going on in America. It makes me wonder how much you really understand about Marx and his dialectics. What you are seeing in the West is NOT the same kind of socialist revolution you experienced in the former Soviet regions. This isn’t Marxist-Leninism or Bolshevism.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I know the differences. You sure make a lot of assumptions. Yugoslavia was not part of the Russian Revolution or Bolshevist, but a union of Southern Slavic states that were never part of the Soviet Union. It came into being AFTER WW2. Tito is famous for his Non-Aligned Nations Movement (know anything about that?) and he was a master at taking advantages (and money) from both the U.S. and the U.S.S.R, playing one against the other. That is why he was a hero to the Yugoslavs (aside from his leadership in WW2). There is nothing better than living somewhere like that for a couple years to make definitions clearer. Yours seem to be coming singly out of your own mind.

            What I was speaking of transcends Marxism or the modern Western form of it as produced by influences by the Frankfurt School and the acknowledged leader of the New Left, Herbert Marcuse, who wrote Critical Theory and Eros and Civilization. I know about him and Emanuel Cellar, do you?

            What I was referring to and it went RIGHT OVER YOUR HEAD was that a deeper culture was still functioning there, something that has been lost in the English speaking West. The ultimate difference was that the ethnic groups, Slovenes, Croats, Serbs, Bosnians, Bosnian Serbs, all had strong cultural identities. I found the Slovenes for example, incredibly proud to be Slovene, nationalistic to a fault (really ridiculous). I realized that this is what it took for an ethnic group of two million people to survive. The problem NOW is that Western Socialism is creeping and in a place where there were NO blacks at all, blacks have shown up. I don’t necessarily see the fall of East Germany or the USSR or Yugoslavia as a bad thing. Life if far more dangerous now in Russia and former Soviet states and former Yugoslavia then before and they now have Africans and others showing up, doing what they do in Africa and the West.

            I know the actual differences between Western and Eastern Socialism better than you do because I lived in it and observed history being made, with all the subtleties involved. You seem to be doing little more than attempting to bash egos with me because you make no clear references and resort to personal attacks as the introduction in your posts.

          • Albert8184

            You’re not telling me anything I don’t know. And you’re also starting a conversation of your own, that has nothing to do with what I said about what’s happening in America. I think you’re more into brinksmanship, than anything. I think it is an ego thing with you. Can’t we just have a coherent conversation that gradually develops these other ideas? Rather than just jumping from one pools of thought to another, to avoid swimming in deep water?

          • Bobby

            I could not agree more with your entire post, ESPECIALLY the light it throws on the nature of the left, a group of individuals and a philosophy that has so damaged the Western World as to even put its continued existence in the future into question.

          • Bruce Whitmer

            I would like to know the reasons western governments are hell bent on importing 3rd world people on such a massive scale. I know it is deliberate, I know it is planned, but it seems to be a suicide pack to literally destroy the world. Do these white elite’s think that once the rest of us whites are gone, they can rule the world with total impunity. Without us they have no money to spend. They can print like they do now, but eventually that will not be enough. Are they just plain stupid ? Are they brainwashed beyond help? Has the liberal mindset gotten to the point that they can’t comphrehend cause and effect. Do they honestly think once WE are gone , the day to day tasks of society will magically work and everyone will live in harmony. Only gone beyond help liberals can believe this crap. And yes a great many of them do.

            That they purposely cover up the crimes tells me either they know the course they have taken is totally out of control or they cover it up to keep it going a little longer. But why ? Why ? It is better to destroy the world, destroy your country, destroy your countrymen, destroy your future generations, or destroy your race because horrors of all horrors you are called a racist. As long as the world has people, we will have racism. It cannot be eradicated ever, nor should it be. Racism has been around since time began. It is survival of the fittest. The strong, the smart, the resourceful deserve and have earned the right to perpetuate humankind. Not the other way around. We are all racist, you can’t help it. It is in your DNA. Don’t feel bad about it, I certainly don’t. Blacks are perhaps the most racist people in history, they discriminate against their own kind based on their level of blackness or browness skintone. Do whites do that to that degree… if at all. Asians are bigoted towards other asians. That will never change either.

            Is the pull of communist totalitarianism so strong an influence in our government leaders and moneyed elite that this is the reason ? Is the desire of power so strong that our leaders are willing to sacrifice the future of humanity for a few extra dollars or pounds, or francs or yen ? Is it worth having innocent people raped, killed, or bankrupted just so they can feel better, just so they can have more power, just so they can control more of the….. one and only life you have. Do you deserve this? I certainly don’t. Why then do we put up with this?

            In college (1970’s ) I made a comment that to a friend that in the future the United States would resemble the then current day communist USSR and the USSR would become more like then present day free and capitolist America. Damn I wish I was wrong on that one. I am not only one who saw this coming 40-50 years ago. The rise of liberalism is the root cause of the worlds problems. Liberalism perpetuates proverty and yes unbridled and unhealthy, bad racism. Todays liberalism is just a cloaked version of communist totalitarianism. Americans, Europeans, Canadians, Austrailians, Brits, and yes especially South Africans it is your duty and destiny to future mankind to stop this destruction and reverse this course before we don’t have the numbers to save all humanity from itself.

            Shall we start now?

          • Albert8184

            They’re doing it to bring down Western Civilization. From the inside out. Western Civilization is founded on principles that are antithetical to Marxism. And these people are Marxists. What kind of Marxists, I’m not entirely sure. But they are Marxists.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            You’re full of nonsense. If God was “God” it wouldn’t be possible to “eliminate” him.

            Even China has embraced capitalism and has been beating the West at the game for some time now. They’re smart enough to know that if they killed the system, they’d go down, too. This is the very balance game that is going on right now. Of course, it will all collapse because the capitalist model requires continued expansion and limitless expansion is not possible. The farther we push the finite limits, such as population capacity, geography, biological integrity and resources, the harder the correction will be. It’s a mathematical formula, a well established biological model of growth and decay in any closed system. The planet is such a closed biological system. The correction will come. No need for your apocalyptic Christian religion to pretend to it.

            You seem intent on the invention and maintenance of your own little psychological territory, shouting “Marxist” at everything that threatens your comfort. It’s going to take a lot of whites stretching out of their comfort zones both intellectually and physically for any to survive.

          • Albert8184

            You’re taking me out of context. Why? Interesting, by the way, that you claim “whites” need to stretch out a bit. Sounds like you’ve been studying some critical theory, my boy. And if you’re so concerned about finite limits, maybe you could question Marx’ theories a bit more. You have to keep baking pies in order to share pies. Which means you have to produce ingredients.

          • ms_anthro

            As someone who is culturally Christian and wavering between agnosticism and belief, it’s hard to look at what the elites are doing to the planet and see anything less than the machinations of something vast, dark, and inhuman. This is beyond mere human greed. We are dealing with something very old and completely evil.

            Would the elites destroy the world to enrich themselves? Of course, if such destruction were demanded by the dogma and ritual of their true religion.

          • rebelcelt

            It is to destroy Christianity and Christian values.The White world is nominally Christian.But, this has been happening for decades.Destroy ehite Christian values.

          • Nathanwartooth

            As an atheist I have come to believe that the masses will either believe in the main religion, in this case Christianity or they will look to the state for their beliefs. Which in this case is liberalism.

            That is why there is Atheistcult (the cult like adherence to liberal beliefs) and Atheist+ (which is an atheist group that works for “social justice”). People need something to believe in and when you take away religion they look to other things to make sacred.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            A bit of thought provides a path; if you toss the trash that holds us back, I think you end up without religious belief because it misleads, but our spirituality can come cleanly from a reverence for our ancestors and being proud of who we are and where we came from.

            Lo! Do I there see my father!

            Lo! Do I there see my

            Lo! Do I there see my

            and my sisters.

            Lo! Do I there see my

            back to the

            They beckon me to

            Where the brave may
            live forever!

          • andronmtl

            I hold sacred the European people, culture, achievements and its survival.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Great, and if we add the very viable idea of the reverence of ancestors (which includes investigating and knowing one’s specific lineage) then we have a good model for a racial spirituality, devoid of the manipulations of religions like Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

          • Albert8184

            Why not hold sacred this concept: That human rights come from something that transcends human decision? That human rights transcend human morality based on the convenience of the moment, and are rooted instead in a respect for values put in place by the Creator, in order to “promote the common good and ensure the survival of man in a way that enhances his life, rather than just lets him get by”? That society is based on the individual, who comes from a child, that is produced within a family unit uniquely. And that society is only as good or as bad as the sum total of its individual parts? That humans must balance individual freedom along with the necessity to have as healthy and stable a society as possible.

            But none of this is possible without the acceptance of some transcendant authority to which every king and every ruler is subordinate.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            What are white Christian values? How do they differ from black Christian values or Hispanic? Please provide scriptures from the New Testament that provide for white exclusivity.

          • rebelcelt

            I did not write white christian values. I said ” It is to destroy Christianity and Christian values. The White world is nominally Christian”.
            I emphantsized CHRISTIAN. The white was White world is christian at least by name (nominally). Whites cultures are usually christian cultures. Percentage wise there are very few muslim, buddhist animists, hindu, pagan/wiccan whites.I
            f you want to destroy Christian culture you pretty much have to destroy white culture.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            You need look no further than the power and greed motivation, and the limits of human frailty.

            Religion, at least the big three, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, motivate by fear. Are you a man, or are you a sheep? That is the question. If we are truly free Western people, are we to be sheep? You ought to read up on the actual history of Christianity. The Christians killed more white Europeans asserting itself and caused more death via religious civil war in Europe than all the Muslims killing non-believers have by far (so far). It was only the moderating forces caused by the revival of Classic Western values (philosophy, science, reason) that ended this, even though it continued into the 19th century (even in the U.S.) and still simmers in Northern Ireland. No one can speak with any authority on the subject of Western civilization without reading Gibbon’s “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.” The first three volumes (of six) can be had in paperback for not too much at online booksellers. The next book I would recommend to anyone who wants to understand how the New Testament was written ought to read theologian Bart Ehrman’s books, particularly, “Misquoting Jesus.” Studying the Albigensian Crusade is a great introduction into the foundation and activities of the Inquisition and the heretic and witch trials in general. The epic of the 14th century Black Plague was a defining event as well.

            Then, at last, you may come to realize that the true Western culture, the one that gave white Europeans the means to grow and prosper and become the envied elites of all on earth was the Western tradition of philosophy.

          • BonusGift

            The elite tribe members hate us with a blinding evil that is beyond our comprehension, by definition. In a sense, you not being able to understand it is a good thing, just don’t let it blind you to the truth. Watch what they do and not what they say or hide in their controlled media (again, “by their fruits ye shall now them.”).

          • andronmtl

            When I was young my father (an Eastern European communist in heart) used to tell me that the only reason USA enjoyed such prosperity was the existence of the Soviet Union.

            Then he told me that since USSR collapsed, things in the US will worsen. I didn’t believe him at a time. Now I see he was right. Its like if you never see color black, you might not know what color white is.

          • kjh64

            Things in the US have worsened but not because of the collapse of the USSR, it’s because of the way our leaders (Congress etc.) have been running it as well as greedy “Big Business” outsourcing jobs and mass immigration

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I agree, but only partly. There is a still a large contingent in the U.S. Congress that recognizes and supports ongoing U.S. wars (count up the few years that we haven’t been in a war somewhere). This is because the general Military/Industrial Complex is still in place and members of both parties realize that if it was dismantled, they’d be caught flatfooted as we were (pretty much) in WW2. It also provides a huge amount of jobs to people who would likely never find a place in the private sector.

            I also recall how most the country continued to cut education funding, or destroyed them by insisting on integration, busing blacks into white schools, whites into black neighborhoods, etc. Education became indoctrination instead of learning. Education in “liberal arts” (the basic required education before a major or post grad work was allowed), colleges began eliminating it in favor of fast-tracking graduates into their respective fields. This was a major turning point in the U.S. Education system. Arguments to justify it such as that it was a waste of time to study the writings of “Old Dead White Men,” come to mind. Professor Alan Bloom wrote about this and it’s likely result in his 1987 book, “The Closing of the American Mind.” The result hasn’t been just the loss of the study of philosophy in ethics but the deeper cultural influences that defined Western culture for centuries. The American graduate became not an intellectual capable of depth in reasoning and critical thought, but a specialist. But specialists are more easily trained and so every sort of specialist, from the farm worker to the medical specialist, as been more easily replaced by cheap imported “specialists.” (I met a white couple in Washington State that tried to get a job picking apples and were told that they were not qualified by the Mexican foreman. I know that engineers in the Silicon Valley have been laid off because they are white, English speakers).

            But this was as much due to conservatives as liberals. Both took part in destroying the U.S. educational system as a cultural vessel.

          • Albert8184

            Things have worsened in the US because the same sort of philosophy that prevailed for 70 years in the USSR is now coming to ascendancy in the USA. Because fools are deluded into believing that government can better manage a man’s life than the man himself can.

          • Defoe

            “If the devil didn’t exist, he would have to be invented”. Someone smarter than myself said that, but I think that’s essentially what your father was saying. People need something bigger than themselves to believe in. They need something threatening to work against.

            “War is the health of the State”. Someone else smarter than I am said that too. The two quotes kind of fit together.

            “Perpetual war for perpetual peace”. Someone else…well, you get the picture.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            The quote is; “If God didn’t exist, it would be necessary to invent him.”

            “Si Dieu n’existait pas, il faudrait l’inventer.” – Voltaire.

            Plugging in different nouns by preference has rendered the quote a recognized highly abused cliche’.

            It was part of a larger argument that says that people need their delusions. Nietzche said that this was true for the mediocre mind, but the uberman, the elite were those destined to rule, who saw through such human weakness.

            “War is peace.” George Orwell, “1984”

            “We’re not waging war, we’re waging peace.” G.W. Bush

          • Defoe

            The phrase “perpetual war for perpetual peace” was the title of a book by Gore Vidal and he was using a phrase attributed to the historian Charles Beard. Also, Harry Elmer Barnes wrote a book with the same title as Vidal but earlier. Dostoevsky wrote: “If God does not exist, everything is permissible”. I have heard the one I quoted above about the devil most of my adult life and have no idea where it came from.

          • Defoe

            “War is the health of the State”. Randolph Bourne, writer.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            That’s because the Cold War drove the West, in particular the U.S. Military and all the industries that supported the arms race and military build-up had to be greatly reduced when the Cold War effectively ended. It’s why it was necessary for us to beat them to the moon, etc. The ironic part was that we became more like them with a huge number of civilian employees supporting the military. Conservatives in those days were motivated to support larger government and spending because most of their jobs depended upon it. This is why Reagan and both Bush’s were so hawkish. The all volunteer military that was established in 1976 has become in effect, a Social State within the U.S. Blatant misrule and its consequences are still with us today and gave and gives the Left a huge amount of meat to chew on. The power vacuum it produced allowed the Civil Rights Movement and the Feminist Movement to grab ground and establish themselves as political determiners and become the direct enemy of whites and white males in particular.

            IF you are interested in what happened in that time, get a copy of the historical expose’ “Acid Dreams, the Complete Social History of the CIA, the Sixties and Beyond.” I was based on the classified CIA documents that were released in 1976 and is well indexed.

          • Albert8184

            No. He made a lucky guess. Actually, the USA would have been infinitely more prosperous if it hadn’t had to waste and squander so much treasure on fighting the Cold War. It also would have advanced the human condition far more. We’d be on Mars by now.

            A better question is: Why couldn’t the USSR manage to produce prosperity, instead of wasting time on a failed ideology from the 19th century that caused the deaths of more people around the world in the 20th century than any other ideology in the history of the world combined.

          • The point is when USSR existed, Americans saw in them all the things they despised and resented: centrally planned economy, totalitarian ideology, lack of personal freedoms. And it made American values more clear in contrast. Americans knew who they WERE NOT.

            Now, since USSR collapsed and Cold War was over, America started drifting more toward the very socialism it fought against.

        • And because deep down the elite know the white population despises the islamic people. The thin veil of “tolerance” has always been a pathetic facade of a minstrel show. More Islamic extremism=more sympathy for the Zionist cause and Americas perpetual wars in the middle east. It’s almost as if the elite are just tugging on the loose fabric that holds society together just itching for a civil/ethnic conflict.

        • Vyncennt

          ” For example is Saudi Arabia or Egypt sending money to some political parties in Europe or North America?”

          There is Saudi money lining the pockets of our politicians, lobbyists, and corporations. This information is no secret and can be found readily in many public venues. To believe this amount of finance has no effect on our, or others, political systems would be naive.

          • Saudi interests are invested in a significant percentage of News Corporation, aka Murdoch, aka the Fox News Channel.

          • Defoe

            One then wonders why Faux News is oh so pro Israel.

        • iberianpride

          Very true.Islam is a non-western, (mainly)nonwhite, third world religion. Most white leftists would prefer to have an arm amputated, then to ever dare question or criticize a nonwhite race/religion/or culture

        • joesolargenius

          In 2008 the Democrats received fifty million dollars in campaign contributions from muslim countries ,if that’s not support then I don’ know what is !

        • rightrightright

          I think we will discover in the future that Saudi has been bribing politicians of all major parties across the West. Egypt is not an oil state and is typically third-world broke – huge and ever increasing population, no jobs, can’t feed all those mouths so is in no state to fund the West’s political traitor caste.

        • Robert Marchenoir

          Yes they do. Before France’s socialist president François Hollande was elected, Qatar let it be known that it was willing to finance his campaign. Hollande refused, but Qatari money is still all over the place.

          Former president Sarkozy offered Qatari investors a custom tax exemption on capital gains from real-estate. No French investor benefits from such an exemption.

          French leaders are very involved with Qatar, Morocco and other Muslim countries. Corruption is almost obvious.

      • a multiracial individual

        We all give these sick people money. Forget the hippie environmentalists, I can think of no greater energy issue than working to establish clean energy. Our thirst for jihad juice (oil) makes some very vile families in Arabia very wealthy. These wealthy families usually makes generous donations to…….you guessed it! Terrorists organizations. Insane.

    • Paleoconn

      Nope, power is more important to them and the Muzzie bring them tons new votes, while not losing their traditional base of feminists and homosexuals. Plus they think that they can all eventually live in peach together. Feminists vs. Muzzies vs. Homos? Pass the popcorn! I’m not missing this!

      • Luca

        It will work because they have a common enemy: White, heterosexual, Christian males.

        We were allied with the Russians in WW2 even though we had no use for communism. We had a common enemy, the Nazis.

        Cortez could only conquer Mexico with the aid of Indian tribes who had a common enemy, the Aztecs.

        And so the saying goes: “The enemy of my enemy, is my friend.”

        Liberals are whores without morals, who will take all comers who want to conquer the common enemy.

        • Paleoconn

          I can’t believe we were stupid or evil enough to collaborate with the Soviets.

          • Defoe

            Well, after the revolution of 1933, we were more like the Soviets than most people would like to believe.

          • Paleoconn

            True, FDR idolized Uncle Joe. And his concentration of power into the presidency was unprecedented since Lincoln.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            What a piece of junk!

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            The Soviets didn’t have submarines off our coast sinking ships within sight of land. We also had Nazi spies on land. The Soviets did what they did within their own borders. It wasn’t nice, but Russia was better off under them than Russia is today.

          • Paleoconn

            A load of fatuous nonsense. IF the Germans did all this (and with our history of WMD and Gulf of Tonkin and Saddam-911, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was all fabricated), they did it cause we were at war against Japan and them by our own doing. When the Soviets took over half of Europe they raped and pillaged like no German did when they conquered a country. And Russia was better then than today? You are insane.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            When I read posts and replies like this, that show how barren the historical knowledge of so many whites has become, it proves to me how little hope there is for the white race and it really depresses me. The proof of what I said is as near as any history book or even any one of the many well sourced documentaries on WW2. The Germans were doing this BEFORE they allied with Japan and before December 7, 1941. We were sending food and supplies to England who WAS at war with Germany and they were sinking our merchant marine ships all along the Atlantic coast. To head off you next reactionary response, we were supplying Britain because Germany had invaded Poland and was threatening Britain with us next. German spies were at work in many major cities and subversive plots discovered – all well before the alliance was made with Japan.

            You accuse me of insanity, but your entire statement lacks any cohesive fact or logic. If you project backwards retrospectively, then anything can be justified. Applying later history as a justification for previous history is the most flawed argument method there is. I don’t agree with our misrule and misdeeds and have commented on it often on this very posting board over the years, but they do not justify past atrocity or aggression. You need to also understand the concept of historical epochs. The most celebrated 20th century historian (Carrol Quiqley) defined the 20th century as actually beginning in 1945 when the Atomic Age arrived. The historical epoch caused by that (The Cold War) has a separate history. Can you grasp the idea that WW1 and WW2 had causes that were all dependent results 19th century and previous era causes?

            What the Nazi led Germans did in Eastern Europe and in Russia is well documented and this argument that Russians did worse than the Germans is a rotten lie with no historical evidence to support it, while piles of evidence prove the former. These are Neo-Nazi myths that no one, not even conservative historians buy. Must I remind you that Poland was invaded by Germany and that Russia (USSR) was invaded by Germany? Any history book would also inform you that the Allies would not have
            won without the sacrifices of the Russians. In WW2 50 million people
            died. One in three was a Russian. Germans killed them, no one else.
            They wouldn’t have won without our supplying them, but historians agree
            that The Battle of Stalingrad was the main determiner of who won WW2 in
            Europe. At that time, the Soviets were completely on their own.

            Take a look at what Russia is like today. Even Russians advise people not to vacation there. It is a mess and violence is random and continuous; whites assaulting whites, crimes of all sorts, etc. But I was also referring to the fact that Africans and Muslims are present in Russia and other former Soviet Block nations now when they weren’t during the Soviet period or during Yugoslavia’s time and that is a threat to white survival in general. Russia was better off as a white nation with nationalism in place. I met one Russian woman at a crafts fair once selling amber jewelry. She said that today, Russia needs another Stalin. I was appalled. She said that every other Russian on the street in Moscow should be shot dead, meaning that was the ratio of criminals now there. It took me a while to understand why she would feel this way, but after seeing the Russian mafia at work in the Balkans, their involvement in bringing heroin into Europe, their brutal work as sex slavery of their own female children, etc., I understood what she meant. Stalin was awful, but after he cleaned up the country, law and order was established and the remaining people were safe. The same goes for Tito, who didn’t have to be brutal at all.

            Whites like you are useless. What the “H” do you think you are preserving? And carrying on the old political hatred of other white nations! With no knowledge of history and just an insistence on misinformed political mythology there is eventually no culture to preserve because lies are not culture. White ignorance of their own history and fabricating excuses for mistakes is just as suicidal as marrying non-whites or being a Tim Wise/SPLC supporter.

          • Paleoconn

            You’re a retard, man. Insanity was too generous a term, as there sometimes is a fine line between that state of mind and genius, of which, you are clearly not in the the same galaxy as, let alone ballpark.

            I didn’t read through your nonsense but I did see ‘law and order’ and ‘safe’ alongside Stalin. Ladies and gentlemen! Stalin wasn’t such a bad guy after all! There was law and order and safety, dontcha know!

            One more thing, as I have no use for you besides entertainment: you are the guy who chased another commenter from this site due to your Christianity-banishing. You clearly have an ax to grind with people like us.

        • Integration Anxiety

          Yes but when White, heterosexual, Christian males only make up 8-10 % of the global population, eventually when that group is gone, they will have to start massive infighting. Cultural cannibalism is the only sport that will be left to “enjoy”. Or maybe the White man will still hold them hostage with his “oppressive legacy.” In a way we will never die because they will always be obsessed with us. That’s like haunting them at every turn. Spiritually we will have to be happy with that.

        • connorhus

          And the only reason we are vulnerable as a race is because of Feminism. Even where once we were strong they have managed to split us in two taking almost half of our race with them to liberalism. Even a large share of the White men follow the Feminist Harpies to their muddy water grave.

          • kjh64

            Oh for heaven’s sake, “feminism” isn’t the cause of vulnerability as a race. It has nothing to do with racial vulnerability. Men are not for mass immigration because they are ” following” some “feminists” a term that really has been ridiculously distorted. I mean of course women do support having equal opportunity, who doesn’t? What does that have to do with changing the race of a country, especially when the muzzies are about as anti-woman as you can get and it’s the men in power that are doing it because they want the cheap labor and votes.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Ever heard the term, “Useful Idiots?”

            Nothing has been exaggerated or distorted. The main Feminist organization NOW made public addresses to women in the late 70s and 80s that white men were the cause of all evil in the world and that no white woman should bear the children of a white man. This has become generalized over time and re-enforced in the media and pop-culture. It’s to the point now that many young women view dating and marrying non-white men as not only something normal to do, but an obligation if they want to be “in.” Lindsay Vonn is now dating Tiger Woods, a black (mix) with a terrible record as a serious partner likely because she sees herself as the next Heidi Klum. But in both cases, the two together are an aesthetic and genetic sin.

            “Equal rights” for everybody? Where do you draw the line? Immigrants love coming here because they become instantly equal, maybe even “more equal” (see Orwells’ “Animal Farm”). Women got the vote and then voted in Prohibition (Volstead Act) that had the effect of helping establish the Mafia as the first truly organized crime syndicate in the U.S. As women “marched forward” miscegenation increased orphans and abortions increased. Some could argue that women were never meant to have “equal rights.” If you are a Christian, it’s in your Bible, Eve is the one that brought the end of paradise on earth and women are “cursed.” Even though I am not a believer, the myth seems to have a great deal of truth to it.

            “Equal Opportunity” is a program that was established as part of The Great Society reforms first announced by LBJ in the 1960s. EOE meant in practice that quotas of non-white men had to be fulfilled when anyone was being hired at any government or government contracted job. This was challenged but the way it was done was changed a little, not its effect. EO is a plan that is Marxist in its form because it represents a forced system with position given by political identity, not merit. Not only has it hurt the white population in the U.S., but its influence has spread all over the West. One of the ways that Feminist leaders saw a way to destroy white men is to support immigration. This was done before the huge flood began. Since then, new terms like “Diversity” and “Multiculturalism” have been invented for the coercive effect of asserting a non-white America or even West. To deny that Feminism is innocent of this is simply incorrect.

            But what I see is committed feminists like Hilary Clinton opining that groups like Muslims can be changed. The conceit and limited vision of groups like the feminists have always existed. The Leftists in Europe were sure that they could bring in non-Whites and they’d become Europeans by culture at least, never realizing that they were facing a force greater than their own. The first modern American Feminist writer Betty Friedan, who wrote The Feminine Mystique in the 1950s was later trying to halt the late 60s and 70s Feminists because she said that it was not at all what she intended. I know of a number of older feminists from that period that are now old and lonely, bemoaning that there has been no man in their lives (for very long). I actually found an article on that issue a while back. And ironically, if you look at her bio and those of leading fems like Gloria Steinem, Jane Fonda, etc., they are typically women with father issues, especially Friedan and Steinem (who were also Jews). I have noticed that the majority of outspoken early feminist were Jewish. When you see those photos of Gloria Steinem and Angela Davis withe their fists raised and all that hate on their faces, (Davis was a famous black activist) then you can begin to imagine the level of anti-male energy they represented and fostered back then.

            If you want to be a white race realist and support the white race, then you must start by supporting white men being white men. You should believe in the basics of survival of any culture, that the men and women have roles to fulfill. The modern “equal” Western world has progressed to its potential for self-annihilation and Feminism has been a major causative feature of that.

          • Defoe

            “Divide and conquer”. Someone smarter than I am said that.

    • JohnEngelman

      According to a Pew Research study released December 2, 2010 84 percent of Muslims in Egypt, 86 percent of Muslims in Jordan, and 76 percent of Muslims in Pakistan favor the death penalty for anyone leaving the Muslim faith.

      Everything secular liberals hate about the religious right and the Bible Belt is far more true of Muslims.

      • Albert8184

        True, but Islam is the religious version of Marxism. And that’s all that matters. Marx believed that religion is the opiate of the masses, but Marx wanted the state to be the opium dealer.

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

          Wrong again! Islam is a religion based on the idea of commerce, as in slave trading. The very word, “Islam” means “submission.” Mohammad was a merchant (capitalist) and he invented a religion that would represent/justify a slave trading empire. This is why they did not destroy the cities or populations they conquered during the Arab Expansion. I don’t see how this makes Islam the religious expression of Marxism. Do you really just apply “Marxist” to everything you are against?

          However, Christianity IS an expression of Marxism and Marx used Christian principles in his ideas. If you knew the history of the early Church you would know that they practiced socialism before anyone else. Only Jewish aesthetic groups like the Essenes practiced communism before them. It’s well documented in Edward Gibbon’s “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.” In its early days Christians absolutely expected the world to end at any moment. Rich as poor were converting in droves. The wealth of the rich was redistributed to the poorer converts. This ended up driving the conversion rate for quite a while. Later on, when the Egyptian monastic system took over, the Church began to collect from their flock and distribute among themselves. As I wrote you earlier, if Jesus collecting a few fishes and loaves of bread and redistributing them to a larger mass of people isn’t the very description of collectivism/Marxism, then give me your best example. That’s it, in it’s simplest form.

          • Albert8184

            No. I apply Marxist to anything that is in alignment with Marx’ philosophical worldview, embracing one or more of any relevant sphere. I do NOT apply Marxist to anything I don’t like, in the way that Leftist mis-apply “Fascist” to anything they don’t like.

            Marxism is diametrically opposed to Christianity. And yes, I’m prepared to refute whatever shallow points you wish to throw against the wall. Loaves and fishes? Sure, you can conflate Jesus’ miracle to communism, but there’s only one problem: Karl Marx didn’t believe in Jesus, and didn’t believe in miracles. And YOU definitely don’t have the power to turn a little boy’s lunch box into a banquet for 5000 people.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      That’s because ultimately, the leaders of any political party or group respond as all power holders tend to; they employ useful idiots as long as they are useful and often (as we were for example in Afghanistan in the 1980s) ultimately to their own harm and demise. There was never equality between the leaders in the USSR and “the people.” Same goes for China or even Yugoslavia. I was able to study that case close up. Tito really lived like an emperor.

  • Parisian blacks (and maybe some Arabs, too) invented the Car-B-Que.

    My city, named after the only canonized French King (Louis IX), has blacks that invented and introduced the world to Knockout Martin Luther King.

    • pcmustgo

      Native Americans invented the Barbeque style of cooking meat.

      • Salarino

        American blacks in the projects (in Chicago, at least) like to flip their fridges on their backs and barbeque chicken and rib tips in them in their apartments.

    • Anonymous #3

      You idiot, it’s arabs that cause the problems in Paris. How stupid are you?

      • Except every time I turn around and see videos of the Car-B-Ques from France, it’s almost always black faces running around.

      • rightrightright

        It’s North Africans rather than racial Arabs. Many are more African than “North”.

  • Robert

    The government helps cover things up, launching campaigns for traffic safety and condemning domestic violence against women, although these phenomena are statistically insignificant. These campaigns detract from the real problems, and suggest a lack of political will to solve them.

    Cool, that’s like our government is hyperventilating over AR-15s, which are almost never used in crime, while it can’t breath a word about the endless bloodbath of crimes committed by our millions of Trayvons. Our government also is on a jihad against domestic violence in cases where the perpetrator is a white male, even in situations where it was a light touch with no damage, or a shouting match, while it lets Kimanis back on the street with no consequences after committing all kinds of crimes.

    Glad to see the US isn’t the only country that will do anything and everything to whites rather than confront reality. Also glad to see we’re importing boatloads more of Somalis and Haitians, because to not import them is to admit that there’s some reason we might not want them here.

  • PBL

    Voila’ tout! Race realists need only name and frame to capture public attention and sway minds. We can name our friends and foes, then frame the relation between them. We as narrators are behind the scene, not drawing attention to ourselves. This is how we can deflect the MSM’s bias–make THEM defend OUR enemies. As there is no defense for self evident malice the media would be presented a dilemna: Do we defend cruelty, or ignore sympathetic victims? The facts are so overwhelmingly on our side that any attempt to lie and deny their way out of this by the PC would, at length, be doomed to the crying wolf response.

    • The media has shifted gears though. Instead of trying to defend the criminal actions they attempt to humanize them. They make it seem as if it’s in actuality the government’s fault for constant malcontent(they do this in order to make it seem as if we need a more powerful system) oh the irony.

      • Room101

        The more Government fails, the more money it must extract at gunpoint from the taxpayers to reward its failures and create more bureaucracies to “fix” the problems government itself created.

        The “anti-racists” infesting all the institutions of society throughout the West seem to be using a Bizarro World mirror image copy of Mein Kampf to guide their thoughts as to how to achieve World Order.
        Government is the obvious instrument/murder weapon to enforce nihilism; only Government has the legal monopoly on the use of force.

  • New Rise

    “Mr. Obertone notes that only 0.03 percent of the Muslims, 0.06 percent of the Jews, and 0.007 percent of homosexuals are reported victimized each year. Why single them out, when a far larger percentage—0.7 percent—of French natives are victimized each year?”

    That seems hard to believe. How are Muslims less likely to be victimized than French natives? They live in much worse neighborhoods and one would think that, like the blacks here, they commit crime against each other most often. How are homosexuals a hundred times less likely to be victimized than normal frenchmen?

    • JustaWhiteMom

      Homos are wealthier and can afford self segregation.

      • gemjunior

        And when one gets maltreated or murdered, a whole movement is ignighted with their faces plastered on pins and billboards everywhere, candle light vigils, schoolchildren write reports on “hate”, and everyone drowns in sympathy because the victim was more important than people like Channon & Christian for example. Was Mathew Shepard a better person than either of them? More important? Is the life of a homosexual, a Jew, a crime-prone Negro shot by the police of such value to libs — while white kids set on fire are NOBODY? I’m sorry to say the answer looks like it is a big fat yes. No billboards or buttons for them. The gays are certainly wealthy – just look at their lobby. And yes, they can afford the very best neighborhoods with the trendiest of everything and nary a black person in sight. Or one who comes in on the bus to clean their house and leaves for the ghetto on the 4 o’clock bus. You know, I’m just a white mom too, and I would say that the homos at this point in our history, are seen as more important than we are because after all, we are only raising the next generation of white hillbilly racists.

        • IstvanIN

          The “homos”, as you say, can afford to live in better areas because they are not supporting a family, not paying Catholic school tuition, etc. or are DINKS (double income, no kids). That being said not all gays are rich, Mathew Sheppard wasn’t rich from my recollection. Now, let’s be realistic here, the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Gay groups, black groups, Hispanic groups, Jewish groups get together and protest. Whites do not stick together and do not complain when injustice is done. Instead we post messages on AMREN about when Jesse or Rev. Al will make a comment about a white being killed by a black. Why should they, we are not their issue. We are our issue.

          • jtkayLA

            Another thing to consider is that the majority of the population under 50 has been trained to react with outrage to any attack or perceived discrimination against a specific handful of groups–women, blacks, gays, Latinos, etc. The core brainwashing has been done by the Leftist academics in the universities. When I was in college 20 years ago the politicization of this university culture was well underway. Now political correctness has fully metastasized and spread to society as a whole. It is the air these people breathe, and many of them don’t know anything different.

            When I look around online I’m dumbstruck by what these people consider racism, homophobia, sexism, transphobia, this-phobia, that-phobia. The slightest perceived offense can set them off. And I’m stunned by how hysterical and emotionally violent their reactions are. But the reactions go beyond angry online rants. I’ve heard that SJWs (Social Justice Warriors) on Tumblr track people down for these imagined offenses, hack their accounts to get their personal information, and then use that info to try to destroy them however they can. They are the shock troops of the Left, and in their own way they’re as ruthlessly and violently sociopathic as the Khmer Rouge.

            We don’t have anything remotely like that going on. One simple thing to try is to go to sites like YouTube and find users that promote radical agendas or sites that attack people like us–race realists, anti-Leftists, etc. Then go to their videos and click on the flag icon to report them as offensive. It’s a small thing, but it can distract and disrupt them temporarily.

          • IstvanIN

            You have an excellent point. If my simplify: anti-white crimes do not evoke outrage, no matter how awful, we have been brainwashed in to accepting second class citizenship.

        • whiteyyyyy

          That last paragraph was gold. I never thought of it like that before but its the truth.

    • Vyncennt

      ” How are Muslims less likely to be victimized than French natives? ”

      You are projecting black behaviors on Muslims. Blacks attack anything and everything, including themselves. Muslims attack anything and everything not Muslim. The few cases of Muslim on Muslim violence are quickly buried in their secretive society. It matters little, though, as both pose a nearly equal threat to any white in relatively close proximity.

      “How are homosexuals a hundred times less likely to be victimized than normal frenchmen?”

      Homosexuals generally live it upper class white areas, safe from would be aggressors. Homosexuals are under no delusion that they would be treated decently in a majority black and/or Muslim area. Have no doubts about it…when there are no longer white neighborhoods to safely hide in, the homosexuals will find their lives a living h*ll…at least for the short time they will be allowed to draw breath.

      • Actually a lot of ‘wildings’, to use 1980’s expressions, are quite common in ‘Boystown’ Chicago.

      • Integration Anxiety

        This may be true in certain smaller enclaves in Europe. But Muslim on Muslim violence has been going on for hundreds of years. Shiites killed by Sunni and vice versa. These killings reached their peak in the US invasion of Iraq. Yes they hate infidels aka, nonbelievers, and will take every opportunity to victimize them. But they also exploit things which would be seen as an insult to the Quran, such as drug dealing, pandering prostitution, making of pornographic films, fornicating with infidel women, and selling alcohol. They are big hypocrites but that unfortunately is a human trademark which is difficult to remove. I believe MORE faith is needed by Americans to overcome our challenges. I have nothing against atheists. My father is one, and I love him dearly. But a large percentage of people need to reach out to a higher power in their lives. The trick is to get these people to reach out in the good times and be grateful, as well as in bad times, when they are in need.

        • Vyncennt

          “This may be true in certain smaller enclaves in Europe”

          I believe we were only speaking of Muslims in Europe, France to be specific….? =)

      • pcmustgo

        Nope, quite a few of the rapes Muslims do in France are Muslims raping muslim women who dare not wear the veil.

        Also, Gays are known in America for being “the first whites” to move into a dangerous neighborhood and make it all hip and trendy. I’m not sure I would give gays this distinction, but more like artist types. I suppose it depends. I did hear real estate speculators literally “follow the gays” in terms of figuring out where the next hip neighborhood is.

    • ATBOTL

      Muslims in Europe target infidels for crime and generally leave other Muslims alone. They are not at all like American blacks in that regard.

      • There was a writer from Paris who was arab and of a muslim background. She wrote a book about the community she was from and called it something like “Gang rape Hell”. Muslim females are under a lot of strain as well. Honor killings are a nightmare to endure I guess.

        • JohnEngelman

          In some areas, a Palestinian woman is required to have a male relative accompany her whenever she leaves the home. Unfortunately, her male “guardian”–father, brother, uncle, or cousin–may be a sexual predator who rapes her. Should she become pregnant, he will publicly condemn her for dishonoring the family after killing both her and their unborn child.

          Last year, seventeen-year-old Afaf Younes was killed by her father, who had allegedly been sexually molesting her. Afaf had tried to escape his sexual abuse by running away, but she was caught and returned to her father. He then shot her in the name of honor.

          A sixteen-year-old Palestinian girl became pregnant after being raped by her younger brother. Once her condition became known, her family encouraged her older brother to kill her to remove the blemish from their honor. Her brothers, the rapist and the murderer, were exonerated.

      • JohnEngelman

        They are more evolved than blacks, but less evolved than white Europeans.

    • elitist

      his stats are GARBAGE, he is LYING:

      Musim anti-semitic violence in France & in Europe is epidemic, and ecveryone here knows it (I am writing from Germany).

      The torture-murder of Ilan Halimi

      and the Toulouse school shooting one of many

      are just the top of the iceberg.

      Jews are fleeing Sweden, Holland, France and other European countries in thousands.

      • America First

        Where are they going?

        • JustaWhiteMom

          God help us!

      • They were busy marching around with the muslims in the 1980’s fighting Le Pen for a more perfect France. I hate to say it, but so many jews are knee jerk liberals and have been in immense effort to change America for the better. They are an enormous part of the problem.

      • whiteyyyyy

        Really, after creating the mess they leave. Where will they create their next multi-cult colony? All out of tears for these good people.

      • paul

        Please supply some proof that his stats are wrong. Jews are nearly always too wealthy to be in areas where they will be attacked.. Where are they going? Israel?

  • sbuffalonative

    I thought I was reading about “youths” in the US.
    As I say, black behavior is universal.

    • Arabic terrorist

      Arabs are not black, you retard.

      • Luca

        Most Arabs have a percentage of sub-Saharan DNA (average 10%), and Europeans have none. Name calling only means you have no other resources to prove a point and you are losing your argument. Be civil.

  • Wow France has some quasi WN I’m surprised. I thought France was just a rotting white corpse by now.

    • Have you ever heard of Jean Marie Le Pen and Marine Le Pen?

      • Well yea I have but I thought him and his daughter were considered fringe lunatics by the lame stream political discourse. I’m surprised that this book is actually selling.

        • Mb91

          Europe is the future, we have Front National, Lega Nord, Golden Dawn, Jobbik, FPO, Geert Wilders, NVA, Sweden democrats, True finns, Danish peoples party etcetcetc

          • They are dubbed as ‘fascist’. I should say CLUBBED as ‘fascist’, when in fact it’s the globalists and the squids on the left that are the fascist ones.

        • Of course the lamestream will consider anyone sane to be “fringe lunatics.” Do you expect Ronald McDonald to disavow burgers in favor of tacos?

          The point I’m making and ATBOTL made right here is that thanks to the multi-partisan political cultures found in continental European countries, and too that almost all European countries are at least in theory indicative of a given ethnicity (an ethnostate), white nationalist politics or ethnopolitics are far closer to carrying the day and solving the problems in continental Europe than they are here, even though the problem seems more far gone in countries like France. Then again, that’s a reason in itself — Patterson’s First Axiom.

    • ATBOTL

      What is with these Americans who make shockingly ignorant comments about Europe? Are they trying to make themselves look foolish?

      France has a nationalist political party that wins about 20% of the vote and many other nationalist groups that have the support of a large share of the French people. America has virtually nothing. We are the rotting corpse. Europe is moving in the right direction politically America is the country where the “right” is pushing to amnesty illegals and flood the country with 3rd world “guest workers.” Our country is by far the most degenerate Western country.

      • gemjunior

        I think many Americans, even race realists, got caught up in the anti-French thing that was around when all the Fox News and “Conservative” morons like O’Reilly and Hannity were calling French Fries “freedom fries”. It was really embarrassing. It’s not like we’re ever told the real story about what’s going on in other places. In fact, for a long time our media has tried very hard to put blinders on us so they can keep pouring “Freedom freedom freedom” koolaid into our mouths. It is actually a very obnoxiously UNFREE society these days, if you stroll around any city in Europe it’s not half as monitored as we are here. Excepting Britain, of course where every lip movement and iris are recorded and scanned. You can hardly light cigarettes in fanatically liberal NY anywhere without dirty looks almost as bad as the ones given to racists. I gave up smoking a long time ago, but never got used to people acting like cops about cigarettes – when I was growing up both my parents smoked, I think all the parents on my block smoked. Sure it was bad for health, but they shouldn’t be treated like an axe murderer. Smoking pot is of course, admirable. Mother Nature, you know. What about this martinet of a mayor we have here? He doesn’t care about violent boons destroying historic Brooklyn because he’s busy worrying about 16 ounces of soda servings. What in the world is up with these dictators?

        • The left in France had for years played on traditional French arrogance at a time France had very low self-esteem. The just pulverized the French people with anti-America this and anti-America that. France is waking up. Google ‘Generation Identiare’, they are waking up and fast.

      • Salarino

        God bless the National Front and Golden Dawn!!!!!

      • I agree, but more and more people are seeing through, albeit a little late. I have spoken to many and they are no longer clueless, still very afraid, but not clueless.

      • kjh64

        Comparing muslims in Europe to Mexicans in the USA is like comparing apples and oranges. The situation is very different in many ways. The problem in the USA is that Mexicans are not nearly as bad as muslims, as a matter of fact, Mexicans are far better than muslims. As such, they are not nearly the threat to Americans that muslims are to europeans. Muslims are completely and totally different from europeans, both racially, culturally, religiously and in the way they govern. Muslims are also very militant and target european. Mexicans, on the other hand, being of mixed european(Spaniard) culture, are much more similar to Americans/Europeans. Mexicans are christian and celebrate christmas/easter etc. There is little religious extremism among Mexicans nor is “religious terrorism” a problem with them. Mexico is democracy that has freedom of religion and speech and separation of church/state. Mexicans are racially a european/amerind mix and speak a european language. Mexicans don’t have more than one wife, things like Sharia law, don’t believe in women wearing burqas or have the extreme attitudes towards women that muslims have. Mexicans blend in much better with much less disruption than muslims, as such, Americans don’t have the urgency to form nationalist parties like europeans do. Don’t get me wrong, even though Mexican immigration absolutely should be stopped and reversed and Americans need to rise up and do this, the situation with muslims is far worse.

    • Just a tip here.
      I was anti Twitter (social media) for the longest time until just recently.
      I saw it as being similar to Facebook, you know people who you have sometimes the weakest (or outdated ) connection to, trying to be funny (when they’re not), trying to make the mundane aspects of life sound interesting (when they’re not), or they try to project out ‘pop philosophy’ type of advice (when their own lives are an empty mess demonstrated by how much time they spend on FB), or reinforcing a hive mind mentality with the spoon fed social & political stories of the day etc. etc.

      But now I’ve finally clicked to Twitter’s potential, for instances as a unilingual guy myself I can follow people such as:
      Marine Le Pen (French speaking)

      Dan Roodt (Afrikaans & English) or

      Claude Theriault (French)

      Geert Wilders (Dutch)

      Then in Google chrome (I appreciate there are privacy/tracking issues), you just right click and “translate to English”, then you’re part of the conversation, it’s pretty cool.

      Also all the other Right Wing sites that most Amreners frequently mention (Vdare, Taki mag, Alt Right, RT news etc…and then the individual authors too), instead of tweeting useless platitudes, link URL’s to fresh articles or news stories that the MSM ignores.

      • Bad_Mr_Frosty

        Yes, Nationalists need to use technology to our advantage. Network, reach out, let other people know they are not alone and they are not “racist”. The internet and the breakdown of centralized media has been the best thing for us. Use the new media to kill the old media!

  • Michael Mason

    It’s only a matter of time until the the National Front has the same amount of support as Golden Dawn does in Greece. As Thomas Jefferson once said, “Every generation needs a new revolution.” The next European revolution will be one in which the darker races are cast out. It may not happen even in our lifetime, but it will happen.

    • Vyncennt

      National Front and Golden Dawn deserve our support. They seem to have initiated what our country has failed to even consider.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        Really true. They at least have parties and take political risks. We haven’t been doing anything but criticizing them for their Frenchness, or something and argue among ourselves here.

        • Vyncennt

          “We haven’t been doing anything but criticizing them for their Frenchness, or something and argue among ourselves here.”

          I wholeheartedly agree. The tiresome rhetoric about the cowardly French and/or Canadians grows monotonous, does it not? Is it any wonder we cannot seem to unite and stand with each other? We are busy counting each others pimples as our enemies count our graves. Priceless.

    • I believe it will happen in our life time. Times are moving much quicker.

      • Samuel

        The thing is that we need to act and we can’t wait until somebody else does the job!

      • Dock Jones

        Your head will get smashed, Terence.

        “You want a vision of the future, Terence? Imagine a boot, stomping on your face….FOREVER!!!!”

    • Anonymous #3

      You’ll lose, Michael. Trust me, your race will lose. And if it does occur in your lifetime, you’ll be the first to die, Michael.

    • andronmtl

      I’m sure it will happen in our lifetimes, Britain and France will be the first ones

  • Paleoconn

    It’s their penance for colonizing Maghreb and other African regions. Invade the world invite the world. France should never have been a country of immigrants, much less immigrants who are hostile to their hosts. French liberals love talking about the multiculturalism of places like Marseille and Paris, but in reality those places are just bicultural: the native French and North Africans. And as much as they rave about these places, they are only good for visiting, and would never want their own backyard to become like this.

    • JustaWhiteMom

      You are parrotting anti-white excuses for White Genocide. By your logic European colonialism itself was paybac for the partially successful attempted conquest of Europe. Whites will never get anywhere if we ourselves spread enemy propaganda will we?

      • Sherman_McCoy

        I think Paleo is right. Of course, the US is a little different. We Invade the World, Invite the World, and are In HOCK to the world. We’d all be better off had we left the blacks and muzzies to their own (self-destructive) devices.

      • Paleoconn

        I should have been clearer, ‘penance’ is the rationale they use. We are absolving ourselves of the sins of our fathers by opening our doors to the brown ones.

        And essentially I agree with Sherman, we should have just left them all alone, not that reaching out to them afterwards as a faux penance is the answer either.

        • JustaWhiteMom

          Fair enough.

      • Room101

        I don’t think Paleoconn is defending the nihilistic “anti-racists” that are busily tearing down Western Civilization, but is sarcastically throwing out their shopworn phrases seen in every newspaper/website explaining why it’s a good idea for Government to make all the White kids wear “white-privilege” wristbands.

  • JohnEngelman

    Jared Taylor has provided the same service with his book “Paved with Good Intentions,” and his essay “The Color of Crime.” These can be found on the internet here:

    and here:

  • dj2

    France first needs to start collecting better statistics. Then they will have more information and will know what is going on. They need to start to document race.

    The second thing is obvious which is to stop the flow of Africans and Middle Easterners into the country. This is harder, because of all of the backlash that it would ensue.

    Before any of this happens, though, the Euro and possibly even the European Union will have to be replaced.

    Tough times lie ahead for France, no doubt. Britain has it better as they are an island, and Italy and Germany because of their culture and history.

    As for America, the only thing going for it is space and resources. America is possibly the most deluded of the bunch.

    • I agree. I lived in Germany twice and I saw very little love for the turks there. Many Europeans are awake now and are just biding their time. They have evil governments as we do and they are not armed.

    • Fredrik_H

      The thing is, even collecting data can be seen as an act of treason against multiculturalism by the powers-that-be.

      Here in Sweden for example it is illegal to record crime by ethnicity. That the insides of our jail system is starting to look more like an inverted Sweden with whites in the minority is only told in whispers by those who work in that same system. All of course in order to obfuscate the truth and dismissing allegations of immigrant crime rates spiralling out of control with charges of rascism and xenophobia.

  • Madmax

    France as seen by russian tv channel:

  • It’s really time to political correctness into le tiolette.

  • I meant that it’s time THROW political correctness into the $hit drain.

  • libertarian 1234

    Radical leftist dogma is so much a part of the system in France, as it is here, the only way to dislodge it is to defund most government agencies. And the only way they can be defunded is for economic collapse to occur where all government is so weakened by a lack of revenue it can do nothing better than to sustain itself in areas of vital necessity.

    In the process of all that, social programs will fall by the side as well, creating mass uprisings by third world hordes, which will cause repercussions by the white majority. And any attempt by the government to intervene will be met with overwhelming forces who have lost most everything and have nothing else to lose.

    Then they’ll go looking for the self-appointed fools who caused it all.

  • William Allingham

    yes, France is waking up! after liberal drunkness the hangover will be hard but with some initiative from young people she can start a recovery towards mental sanity.

  • Zackersman

    Clockwork Orange is an interesting movie, and I think worth watching for white advocates. Stanley Kubrick, the films director, was right about one thing. The world would become more violent and not less violent.

    To sum up the movie (and in my opinion it is more a parable, or it tells a hidden story more than anything else). In the movie ‘Alex’ the main character in the film, behaves badly, pillaging and plundering. The authorities in the movie decide ‘alex’ needs to be cured, so he’s forced to watch Nazi war atrocities on a movie screen while being recondition. After Alex is ‘cured’ and he’s made to be anti-violent he’s then horribly abused by each party he had done wrong to in the past, and he’s unable to defend himself from them.

    The story in the film sounds a bit like the people in France in the article who are unable to speak up for themselves or find their voice. That’s exactly what the film meant to portray, in my opinion.

    There was a literary work from the 1960’s, a Sci Fi story titled, With the Bentfin Boomer Boys on Little Old New Alabama. It was about a war between a colony of whites on New Alabama at war with a colony of blacks on New Haiti. The Haitians in the story called the whites ‘Blancs’ kind of like a racial slur. I was never sure, before reading the story above, where the word came from. I don’t speak French.

    • Fredrik_H

      That’s certainly an interesting perspective. I think I’ll have to re-watch it some day.

  • Zackersman

    “It is entirely possible that if there are to be mass expulsions or death camps, Whites will be the victims”.

    As in the film Clockwork Orange, they expect us to do ourselves in. I guess girls really must be impressed by primitive hatreds like ‘revenge’.

  • ConcernedYoungAmerican

    Ironically, Greece, with all of its financial woes, would be my primary destination for European travel. Why? Because Golden Dawn is out patrolling the streets for the safety of whites and grows larger by the day.

  • Bobby

    It is incredible, almost surreal to think how fanatically some French fought against Germany in WW2, a nation with a population certainly much closer to Frenchmen, than the huge number of Moslems they have allowed into the nation by the millions, without any apparent problem.

    • jackryanvb

      The reality is that the White French fought fanatically against Arab Muslims in French Algeria in the 1950s, killed close to one million Arabs, got down and dirty, used torture against FLN Arab terrorists. Read the great tell all book The Battle the Casbah by the French General directing counter terrorism in Algiers. Even the pro Arab terrorist movie The Battle of Algiers is pretty fair, show a french military being ruthless in this race war.

      • In reguards to France’s over 700 ‘sensitive urban areas’, i.e. no go zones for non-muslims and whites, the French are going to have to throw away the foi gras and find a mean pair of balls.

      • guest003

        it is not an excuse to destroy France now.

    • paul

      The French did not fight fanatically against Germany. They surrendered. And most of the so called partisans were cowardly commies and foreigners.

  • Mike Lane

    The problem that all of the West is facing today is that we have become complacent. We have gotten used to literally living better than kings- just like the Romans. While there is nothing wrong with living like kings in and of itself, it has a major setback that needs to be looked after.

    We lose the healthy stress vital for keeping us on guard.

  • David Brims

    The two worst dates in history 1789 and 1917, the French and Russian revolutions with their utopian fantasy of equality has led millions to their deaths.

    • Defoe

      Perhaps you’re right, but I would add 1913 as the date the US was enslaved.

  • kjh64

    i hear Obama is allowing more muslims into the US. I’ve seen more around lately and I live in Texas. We have a lot of hispanics also. One thing for sure, if we ever get a lot of muslims here in Texas and they try raping hispanic women like they they rape in Europe, the Mexican men will stick a knife in them. Mexicans won’t put up with that like weenie Whites will. I have to admire Mexicans for that, they’ll stand up for their own, they don’t have this sick polticial correctness one bit when it comes to race like Whites do.

  • europia

    Whites are forced to be racist in order to survive. This all started 500 yrs ago when the western slave traders went to Africa financed by the Rothschild family in Europe took what eventually was 1000s of large ships and bought up tens of millions of slave rejects off the tribal chiefs to be shipped west and auctions after processed at RI ports.Oddly enough the only European nation not plagued by the African problem is Russia and other former USSR nations.

  • Deep in History

    What Negroes are now, the Irish were. One hundred fifty years ago, the criminal, drugged ethnicity that all Native Americans despised – not excluding the slaves themselves – where the millions of fugitive Irish fleeing the greatest famine the English speaking peoples have ever known, Yet, the Irish became useful, law abiding members of society, and saw one of their own, John Kennedy, become their own. The Negroes were once law abiding, useful members of society who have become a criminal, drugged class that Native Americans dislike – even if they don’t say so. I put it too you that the Great Society and its metastasis is the cause. This is not how Liberalism started, but it is all that is left of it now.Lyndon Johnson conceived, and Nixon executed, the plan which rewarded vice, and punished virtue. The cure consists in reversing the incentives. Stupid people are not necessary immoral, and any person can acquire moral sense. The opposite seems more likely – the intellectual elites seems to be our new tyrants. Morals are no more a function of intellect that Physics is of religious/ethnic origin. This criticism of Black behavior is, I suggest, more accurate and damning than race base explanation. People are not born evil, but they ca be encouraged to it. So it happened here.

    • paul

      If you believe the Irish are like the negroes you should find another site.

    • alex

      Irish proved their detractors wrong. Negroes haven’t and never will.

    • Defoe

      There has been no “Great Society” program in sub-Saharan Africa. And don’t blame colonialism; the only thing it did in that part of the world was to build a few railroads. If not for colonialism, black Africa would be utterly devoid of technology.

      Please go deeper into history.

  • Michael Ryan

    i sent away for one of the generation identare sweatshirts and where it proudly

  • LeftistsHater

    Hello everyone. I’m French. An american friend on facebook gave me this link. I can relate that everything written here is true and actually reality is even worse that what u can imagine reading this article. I miss the words to say how much the majority of French people are zombified with the jewish-leftist politically correct one-track-thinking. So I really think there are only two solutions:

    1. France will disapear in about 30 years (or less) and be replaced by an islamic republic.

    2. A major economical crisis will occur within the next 6 years and the zombies we call French people will wake up once they have no money left.

    I hope the second hypothesis will happen. The future will tell.

    • pcmustgo

      I am half jewish and am amren , so don’t blame all jews. Jews are the most opposed to Islam… Also, I spoke to a French man who lives here in NYC on these topics… he responded rather automatically to my question about muslim immigration with “Well, we colonized their countries”. This is the attitude. France must open it’s gates to all the countries it colonized. Everything is about payback and punishment with Liberals. Until they themselves receive the punishment for being white, the hatred many whites have for them, they go around wishing it on other whites. I would know, I once was a white liberal.

    • ArturoPendriago

      What happens when the Muslims seize your nuclear weapons?

      • Room101

        Then the media throughout the West runs huge headlines blaming White people for why the Diverse people are entitled to hate and kill.

        And the governments will get busy creating more bureaucracies to reward themselves for their failures to even justify their raison d’etre.


      You should have let the Germans stay. There is no way the Nazis would have allowed this to happen.

    • Room101

      The whole world is awash in “money”, created by governments.
      “Money”, if divorced from what it is supposed to represent, actual wealth whether in the form of market-directed productivity, commodities, stuff people are willing to exchange as barter, the Government paper will become just another wallpaper design.

      France the territory isn’t going to become an islamic caliphate in the next 30 years.
      France the Government will be swept away along with the rest because Western governments have no wealth and are actively prohibiting the creation thereof.

  • Alexandra

    Or rather, not-so-belle France.

    Its problem, beaucoup diversity.

  • CMLiu

    Multiculturalism is peaceful genocide of the majority. No other way about it.

    Speaking as a minority, I would have no problem going back to China if it means multiculturalism never touches my ancestral homeland.

    • Room101

      “Multiculturalism” is another clever Leftist oxymoron. Multiculturalism is the obviating of culture, of society, of the conditions necessary for human survival itself, for everyone of every race.

      Ideals dreamed up in the privileged ivory towers of academia have little bearing in the real world until those academics begin steering Government and the means by which Government disseminates its “anti-racist” orders and regulations.

      Be not deceived.

  • pcmustgo

    “Mr. Obertone writes that most of the French seem to have fallen asleep in front of their TV sets and shut themselves off from what is happening in their country. ”

    Like Americans haven’t, with their reality tv, sports, and celebrities.

  • LHathaway

    “it’s hard to look at what the elites are doing to the planet and see anything less than the machinations of something vast, dark, and inhuman”.

    I get that you are invoking the devil. I was kinda thinking space aliens. .

    Feminists vs ‘muzzies’ vs gays. . .? Feminists are Marrying Muslims. I guess that leaves us to be the gays. We’re outnumbered 2 to 1.

  • rightrightright

    The French, like the rest of us in Europe, vote for the preservation of their handouts, which the Left takes care to promise the electorate. The French last year voted for the socialist, Hollande, in the full knowledge that he favoured more and more third world migration. They weighed it up – French identity and integrity versus welfare goodies. The goodies won. They sold their country to the third world for thirty pieces of silver. The third worlders of course vote for socialism/handouts/perpetual special (victim) status.

    This is not going to end well. I am about 2/3rds through Mr Tailor’s excellent book “White Identity”. Why are we doing this to ourselves?

  • andronmtl

    Times of India Film Awards in Vancouver asked for a ‘no brown people’ hiring policy to weed out ‘star struck’ fans

  • J. Reed

    This is a war, as much so as when the Germans invaded in 1940. The problem is if you don’t know it is a war or can not say it’s a war it is difficult to fight.

  • Defoe

    Notice how the tactics used by these leftists in France are identical to those used in the US.

  • God help us…this is going on all over the world…why? I don’t understand. What can be done? What is an answer? I do believe that most whites recognize the behavior of blacks but do nothing. In addition to the book a documentary should be done to help educate people.

  • All White nations – European as well as Colonies, need to realise what is occurring globally – the European Race and culture is being steadily demonised and bred out of existence. We absolutely have put aside our petty differences, stand together, regain our pride and cleanse our Nations of non-European immigrants.

    This is not racist, but our chance at long-term survival. EDUCATE YOUR CHILDREN, for they are our future, and they have a massive task on their hands !

  • Read the book “Erectus Walks Amongst Us” by Raymond D. Fuerle – a courageous author not afraid to state the truth.

  • George

    Poor guy was crucified and called a racist by this horde of liberals.
    What a disgrace.

  • guest003

    white people are naive, they prefer to stay quiet.

    Please watch:

    You have to wake up people. You have to educate every white person you know who do not know the true nature of black and arab people.
    There are people who live in ideal- romantic view of the world, they either know or do not know what other races are like but they are the ones who destroy Europe intentionally or not.
    Last and not least, prepare for war. It is not us, white people who will start the war, we will want to remove these people peacefully, but they have nothing at stake and will start murdering us no matter if we leave them alone ( South Africa and Zimbabwe are the best examples), accept them or try to kick out. Be aware that you might need to defend yourself at some point in your life, it has already become a reality for thousands of people all over Europe.

  • LHathaway

    “One then wonders why Faux News is oh so pro Israel”.

    Jews deserve their own homeland and Israel deserves the right to exist. Whites deserve their own homeland. . .

  • Dave6034

    Fascism (until 1945): We must make our nation strong, so that we may conquer and enslave inferior peoples.

    Anti-fascism (since 1945): We must make our nation weak, so that inferior peoples may conquer and enslave us.

    In most cases, the exact opposite of a stupid idea is also stupid idea.

  • The French were, are, and will always be gutless. Any respect for them can be summed up in their 6 week defeat at the hands of the Nazis and the traitorous Vichy. They made their own bed. This time, it will take a lot more than the British and the United States stepping in to save them. They are on their own. They are the Country sized version of our Detroit.

  • Angie

    A few days ago, the Louvre Museum had to be closed for the day leaving an average of 30,000 daily visitors from all over the world very disappointed. The closure was motivated by a strike of the staff to protest against the harassment they have to endure at the hands of young gypsy thieves loitering in the galleries and mugging visitors. Best thing is though that these thugs are getting into the museum free of charge, courtesy of the French government which provides free entry to people under the age of 18. It has become a sad and common sight on French streets to see gypsy women begging with toddlers in their arms by freezing cold.

  • Samuel

    About this book, a few days ago, on April 17th, was the deadline for any complaint against the book. No one complained and no one sued the author, which means that the book is not considered “racist” and that all the assertions in the book are bullet proof!

  • leforteelise

    i want this book! the time may have finally arrived when Whites all o er the world will stop fighting each other over false politics and religions and band together as a unified Rasse and drive our enemies before us! read George Lincoln Rockwell’s “White Power a Nationalist Perspective” and Ben Klassen’s “Nature’s Eternal Religion” and “The White Man’s Bible” and the collected works of Savitri Devi. we shall become united and strong! also read “March of the Titans a History of the White Race”.

  • Bernadette Sava

    It is the same in thr US