Why They Call Us Names

Incredible. I had previously developed a very low opinion of John Engelman’s pathetic level of intelligence, but I am embarrassed to now have to admit that i didn’t assign him a score that accurately measured just how mind bogglingly stupid he truly is.

Look, Johnny boy. Let us examine the facts, circa 2013. A population of highly aggressive, virulently anti-white, and equally virulent racial supremacist minded people who, if we are to believe the official census figures (which I do not), supposedly only constitute a mere 2.5 to 3% of our entire nation’s total population have managed to:

1. Execute a near complete takeover of our entire mainstream media.

2. Execute a complete takeover of our entire banking and financial sectors.

3. Execute a complete takeover of our academia, book and news paper publishing sectors.

4. Execute a complete takeover of our Federal Government and almost every branch of that government.

5. Execute a placement of a dog collar on our entire U.S. Military and via that dog collar placement, now have our military soldiers stationed all over the world, risking their lives fighting the endless number of enemies of one specific nation in the middle east and aggressively bankrupting our nation in the process.

6. Executing what appears to be a final and revolutionary war inspiring effort to disarm the American public of our most effective and most efficient personal firearms for self defense against what is clearly and without question a totalitarian, out of control, criminal government.

This is a short and abbreviated list of the evil that a 2.5 to 3% of our nation’s population are doing to the founding White European stock of this nation. And, you have the gall to come on to a pro-White website and float the mentally insane idea that an Asian population of 4.7 % is something that Whites who have brains bigger than golf-balls should not be concerned about?

Let me guess. You flunked 8th grade Math class.

And, somehow never signed up for the class Race Realism 101.

Actually Asian support for President Obama means that, unlike most low income whites, they realize that the Republican Party exists to do nothing but advance the economic interests of the richest five to ten percent of the country.

Rich Jews and rich Orientals usually vote Democrat because they care about people who are not rich.

Jews and Orientals voted overwhelmingly for President Obama. Because he is likely to raise their taxes I doubt rich Jews and Orientals had selfish reasons for voting for him.

I also care about Israel. If you listened to the third debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney you should have realized that in the United States support for Israel is not a political issue. The only political issue is how best can we support Israel.

Yeah Tucker, heaven forbid that you face race replacement, racial genocide and theft without the beautific smile of Buddha. How dare you be angry about that. You must turn over the country that our fathers built to racial aliens, and do so with placid equaminity, or else you will lose to our smug, self-satisfied quisling leftist mascot. He is willing to occupy a subordinant position no doubt on all fours to our new overlords, why won’t you?

It’s not only about who is smarter. It’s about who sets the agenda for the society. While most Asians and Jews may share white-western values, they are not us. They can only mimic us and they will find ways, subtle as they may be, to change our white social order to their benefit.
In the end we are forced out and we lose.

When I lived in the San Francisco Bay area I was fascinated by t he Chinatowns of San Francisco and Oakland. I would have enjoyed living there.

When comparing various immigrant groups and the effects they have on the United States we should compare immigrant groups with higher average IQs than white Gentiles and lower rates of crime and illegitimacy, and immigrant groups with lower average IQs than white Gentiles and higher rates of crime and illegitimacy.

Mary Morrison has written several excellent articles for this website on the difficulty of teaching Hispanics.

http://www.amren.com/features/2012/04/white-teacher-in-an-la-school/

http://www.amren.com/features/2012/10/back-to-school-in-los-angeles/

http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/education-fraud-in-la-public-schools/

Ask her if she would rather teach Orientals.

Actually, nobody knows the percentage of actual Americans who are White. The census counts everyone living in the USA at the time of the census, foreign nationals living here are counted, people living here illegally are counted. Ironically, American citizens living abroad are NOT counted. The censue is NOT accurate. The census needs to count US citizens living abroad and it needs to differentiate between citizens and non-citizens. That would give a much better figure because foreigners living here and there are millions, are NOT Americans.

John Engleman.
You wrote, ” I would like to ask: how is competition a threat to America? ”

And I would like to answer that competition is a threat to any identifiable group living amongst other identifiable groups, vying for the same jobs, customers, resources, food, educational opportunities, etc.

When one of the groups gains a significant advantage in the dissemination of information and ideas, not to mention finance, all the other groups are at a disadvantage. When one group is highly supportive of members of their group and use their control in the dissemination of ideas to demonize another group from engaging in the same strategies, then competition becomes unfair or threatening. If you allow for the majority population to identify the country, then yes, competition is a threat to America.

Yes, as Engelman said elsewhere of China, that’s a lot of people, or words to that effect.

Obviously, this is an area where Jared Taylor and I feel differently.

I welcomed the Vietnamese immigration to downtown San Jose, California. They built up a blighted part of the city. I was fascinated by their restaurants and shops. I often went back to visit after I moved out.

Vietnamese who worked in those restaurants and shops sometimes told me that I was the first white person to patronize them. I was obviously not the last.

In the San Francisco Bay area I also enjoyed visiting Japan Town in northern San Jose, as well as the China towns in San Francisco and Oakland.

But the ADL “monitors” these actual or potential offences only if they are suspected of Gentile opponents of immigration, etc.

Do you have a link to that debate? During a brief look on the internet I could not find it. i am sure I will agree with John Derbyshire. As long as no one is pressured to marry a person of another sex I do not see what the problem is.

Any way, John Derbyshire will be speaking at the next American Renaissance conference.

I still have not found a formal debate between Jared Taylor and John Derbyshire on interracial marriage. However, here is an essay where John Derbyshire expressed his support for interracial marriage (which he has engaged in by the way):

http://www.vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-on-immigration-liberty-and-mating-choices

and here is an essay by Jared Taylor in which he comments on John Derbyshire’s essay and explains his opposition to interracial marriage:

http://www.vdare.com/articles/race-purists-are-they-slightly-nuts-jared-taylor-responds-to-john-derbyshire

This is the kind of debate that irritates me because each side amounts to saying, “I like it because,” or, “I dislike it because.” I like debates where facts and logic matter and where decisive victories are possible.

After reading both essays I am still in favor of interracial marriage, although not because of anything that John Derbyshire said. I like interracial marriage because I like Oriental women. Unlike Mr. Derbyshire I am not fortunate enough to be married to one, but I have been attracted to Oriental females ever since I was about seven years old and learned that they existed. Until then I only knew about blacks and whites.

I can’t remember the situation, but I was probably watching a television documentary about children in Japan or Taiwan. I do remember thinking, “With white girls some are pretty and some are not. With Oriental girls all of them are pretty.”

A debate over interracial marriage is about as pointless as a debate over the relative merits of classical music and hard rock music. Now I have been attracted to classical music even before I knew that Oriental girls existed, and I have disliked hard rock music ever since I knew it existed. No one who prefers hard rock music can change my opinion on the subject, nor can I change his.

Emotions can have wisdom behind them. I have always disliked the sexual revolution. I have always hated Playboy magazine even when the testosterone was thicker in my blood stream, and when it was chic to find some value in it.

In this case I can bring facts to a debate with someone who feels differently about the topic. When sex outside of marriage become more common illegitimacy and divorce become more common.

Now a growing body of evidence does exist to show that children raised to adulthood by both biological parents living together in matrimony tend to do much better in life than children raised in other circumstances, even when other conditions are held constant.

If there are any tangible disadvantages in a white – Asian marriage, please hasten to tell me what they are.

Indeed, “White-Asian couples who married had the highest median income, nearly $71,000. Behind them were the following race combinations: Asian-Asian ($62,000), white-white ($60,000), white-Hispanic ($57,900), white-black ($53,187), black-black ($47,700) and Hispanic-Hispanic (nearly $36,000).”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46409832/ns/us_news-life/t/interracial-marriage-us-hits-new-high/#.UPynTB1EG3k

It may well be the case that children from interracial marriages turn out better on the average than children from marriages where both partners are of the same race.

I do not base my argument on that possibility however. I base my argument on the basic value assumption that those who love each other enough to get married should get married, and that, “Those whom God hath joined together let no man put asunder.”

That is not something that can be measured. That is just the way you feel about it. Well, I feel differently.

As far as my identity is concerned, I am quite sure of who I am, and agree with Eric Hoffer that, “The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause.”

In the video that begins this thread Jared Taylor spoke of a freshman at Bard College at Simon’s Rock who asked for five advantages of diversity other than ethnic food. Instead of answers he got insults.

I have already said in this thread that there is a difference between allowing diversity to happen through individual choice and achievement and requiring it with policies that reduce intellectual requirements for blacks and Hispanics and physical requirement for women.

American corporations and government agencies benefit from hiring the most intelligent employees they can attract. These will be disproportionally Oriental and Jewish. Many will have been born in other countries. That is the kind of diversity I approve of. American corporations and government agencies do not benefit from hiring less intelligent blacks and Hispanics in order to make hiring quotas. That is the kind of diversity I disapprove of.

If I had been a student at Bard College at Simon’s Rock that would have been my response to the freshman’s question.

From Jared Taylor’s talk it seems that few or none of those at Bard College at Simon’s Rock even gave that response.

From 1958 to 2011 approval of interracial marriage between whites and blacks climbed from 4 percent to 86 percent.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/149390/record-high-approve-black-white-marriages.aspx

I am confident that approval of marriage between whites and Orientals is even higher.

According to the Pew Research Center, “About 15% of all new marriages in the United States in 2010 were between spouses of a different race or ethnicity from one another, more than double the share in 1980 (6.7%).”
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/1/

The reason for the increase in the approval and the practice of inter racial marriage is not a conspiracy by “cultural Marxists.” The reason is that those who ask, “What are the disadvantages of inter racial marriage?” get the same answer as the 17 year old freshman at Bard College at Simon’s Rock.

They get no answer. That is because there are no disadvantages to inter racial marriage, other than the fact that a dwindling minority of Americans disapprove of it.

On at least one occasion on this website I have said that I generally agree with Jared Taylor’s reality perceptions, while disagreeing with some of his likes and dislikes.

Although Jared Taylor agrees with me that Orientals and whites get along well in the United States he seems to regret their presence in this country. I am glad they are here. Although he is not in favor of laws against interracial marriage he disapproves of it. Like the vast majority of Americans I do not see any problem with it.

‘One can have Asian girls for some fun, but not to create children.’

Are you referring to the fact that sex among Asians is ‘exotic’ (pornographic)? There is also sexual abuse, pedophilia, sex slavery rampant among Asians. This is the main reason I see White men prefer the compliant Asian woman.

Those who dislike something can always find disadvantages to it. The only disadvantage I can see to inter racial marriage is that others, especially one’s relatives, might disapprove. As approval for interracial marriage has become the vast majority of Americans, this is fading as a disadvantage.

The basic theme of Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer” is that political or religious fanaticism is usually a compensation for a lack or a loss of self confidence.

The first time I read “The True Believer” was when I was investigating the Socialist Workers’ Party through what it billed as “the socialist summer school.”

This was in 1970. The Socialist Workers’ Party was a Trotskyist organization.The youth affiliate of the Socialist Workers’ Party was called the Young Socialist Alliance.

At the time the Young Socialist Alliance was growing because the Students for a Democratic Society was dividing into even more irrelevant factions, and because the War in Vietnam made Marxism popular among many college students.

For most of those in the Young Socialist Alliance their membership was a passing phase that they outgrew. The older members of the Socialist Workers’ Party had been in the organization for years. I noticed that nearly all of them had failed to achieve their goals in one of the professions. They were the kind of people Eric Hoffer was writing about.

Eric Hoffer’s book kept me from making a bad mistake in my life. For several years after reading it I continued to feel like a Marxist, but I was no longer able to think like one.

This is the essence of the book: The basic theme of Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer” is that political or religious fanaticism is usually a compensation for a lack or a loss of self confidence.

That depends on what the definition of “basic essence” is.

Eric Hoffer was writing mainly about mass movements, but a mass movement that is not totalitarian, and which has tangible and achievable goals is not fanatical. I am thinking here of the women’s suffrage movement, the labor movement, the civil rights movement, and the anti war movement during the War in Vietnam.

Also, Eric Hoffer pointed out that Hitler created the Nazi Party after failing as an artist and an architect. I believe Joseph Goebbels failed as a novelist. I do not think Benito Mussolini failed at something before turning to politics. Vladimir Lenin was a lawyer. He did well at law school, and could have made a good career in law. Leon Trotsky could have succeeded as a writer.

Eric Hoffer over states his case, but he is right that political or religious fanaticism is usually the result of a loss or lack of self confidence, or perhaps lack of opportunities. Most terrorists now are Islamic terrorists. They live in countries with high birth rates. This means that many young men enter job markets with little use for them.

How would you characterize the basic essence of “The True Believer?”

Unlike Mr. Derbyshire I am not fortunate enough to be married to one, but I have been attracted to Oriental females ever since I was about seven years old and learned that they existed.

Hm…become a fringe Mormon & you can satisfy your lust for Asian females.

That is true. The result of a marriage between whites and Orientals would result in children with average intelligence higher than whites.

How can you dislike something before you even knew it existed?

Byron Roth is also worth hearing – especially for his opinion on the origins and effects of “political correctness” upon western educational and political institutions (but, so far as I know, he is not married to a Chinese).