America in 2034

Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, June 11, 2014

To the catacombs--for now.

Every weekday for two weeks–from June 9 to June 20–we are running essays by race-realist commentators on the future of American race relations. Specifically, we have asked them to imagine what America will be like 20 years from now. The ten contributors to the series, whom we will publish in alphabetical order, are:

John DerbyshirePaul Gottfried, Gregory Hood, Joseph KayPaul KerseyTom KuhmannGavin McInnesFred ReedRichard SpencerJared Taylor.

It is our pleasure to present our third contributor, Gregory Hood.


In 2008, a conservative friend confidently told me Barack Obama’s election was a disaster for the Left. “After all,” he beamed, “they won’t be able to call America racist anymore.”

Let’s hope he learned his lesson. The only thing that stops the exercise of power is a countervailing power. Unfortunately for American whites, there is no countervailing power on the horizon to check an increasingly overt use of force against them.

If anything, technology will make things worse. Half a millennium ago, the printing press allowed information to be shared more widely. The result was an explosion of knowledge and a profound shock to the governing class of Europe.

In our own future, social networking, wireless technology, and new inventions will allow almost unlimited access to information beyond anything dreamed of by Gutenberg. Unfortunately for the West, the result will be the opposite of a renaissance. Far from the furtherance of human knowledge, the immediate future is a dispersed dictatorship of thought in which dissidents will be tracked, persecuted, and punished by private as well as government actors. The rest will be a culture ever more stultifying and shrill: a nightmare world combining the worst of Brave New World, 1984, and afternoon programming on Bravo.

In the early years of the Internet Revolution, many race realists expressed the hope that the Internet would provide a way to circumvent the liberal media. While it has never been easier to find out the truth about racial reality, repression has actually increased, rather than decreased, because of the dispersal of knowledge. The Internet has actually made it easier to shut down debate and use social and economic pressure against political dissidents.

The future of censorship is not commissars and gulags, but effective monopolies like Facebook, Google, and Twitter working with groups like the Anti-Defamation League to combat “hate.” This is already underway, and conservatives will accept the efforts as expressions of private sector autonomy.

The next few decades will see the end of the division between the “online” and “offline” world. Google Glass, which will be as ubiquitous as smartphones within a few years, is only the beginning. Soon, people’s identity, opinions, relationships, and work history will be available at a glance. More importantly, as Facebook has shown, most people will gleefully abandon their privacy.

GoogleGlass

The result will be an ever more extensive (and effective) witch hunt. Already, anonymous commentators in Sweden were (illegally) exposed by hackers, and the media showed no compunction about hounding them from their jobs. Donors will also be targeted. Already, “point and stutter” seems to be the sole occupation of American journalists.

The intellectual justification is already established. Because of “white privilege,” “trigger warnings,” and political correctness, this generation of liberal arts students will be incapable of understanding, let alone championing, white identity. Universities will abandon the pretense of debating issues or teaching the high culture of the West. Instead, they will embrace their role of training increasingly unqualified college students in egalitarian ideology.

The danger is that concepts like “white privilege” have no theoretical limit in terms of justifying government action. “Your rights end where my feelings begin”–at least if the crybaby is non-white. More importantly, be it out of moral belief, fear, or both, many whites will accept and perpetuate this.

This kind of thinking will increasingly dominate law, as a non-white America will continue to implement racial socialism. Already, Supreme Court justices have attempted to throw out referendum results on issues like affirmative action on the grounds that white Americans cannot vote on issues that affect the interests of minorities.

Contra excitable American conservatives, the future will not be FEMA camps, the repeal of the First Amendment, or a roundup of Christians. It will be White America’s death by a thousand cuts. Intelligent and educated lawyers, judges, activists, and legislators will justify ever greater burdens on a diminishing white middle class in the name of reparations for past discrimination. Even past enforcement of immigration laws will be remembered as a moral crime comparable to Japanese-American internment. And as all this rhetoric will be framed in terms of slave morality and legalese, American whites may feel unjustified in rebellion.

Immigration Enforcement

Not surprisingly, young whites will increasingly try to identify as other than European-American, claiming membership in whatever victim group is available. Denying white identity will be a matter of economic survival, not just a social statement. The heights of the economy and politics will become less open to social mobility, and those in even slightly privileged positions will grow anxious to guard what they have. Ironically, a media culture eternally crusading against “privilege” will create a social structure more rigid and “privileged” than ever.

The future will not be an easy return to white identity, or even an autocracy of Asians and SWPL’s ruling a Third World underclass. It will be more sinister–an increasingly overt period of repression in a post-America united by junk culture and deficit spending. No one will be safe unless he becomes a true believer in egalitarian ideology. And most whites, economically and physically threatened and under assault from an all-encompassing media, will try to keep it that way. This kind of repression has no limit. Absent a military, economic, or political counterforce, anti-white bigotry is pushing on an open door. The indirect nature of persecution and the inability to secure substantial funding for a dissenting movement will make it difficult to generate mass resistance.

One result may be that American whites will be just another “lost white tribe.” They will be embarrassed by their past and relieved to die out collectively. Even Afrikaners voted to embrace their dispossession.

But an alternative is that a new people may emerge from the crucible. Technology will also open the door to “revolution from the periphery” as 3-D printing, cryptography, alternate currencies, and closed networks will allow a vanguard to live apart from the mass society if they have the will. From this seed, a new folk could form from those spiritually empty whites looking for alternatives to politically correct consumerism.

Whites are entering a time of persecution. But it is in those times that spiritual sustenance and identity are created. The creation of a new people is as much a possibility as a long slow decline.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

Gregory Hood
Mr. Hood has been active in conservative youth movements in the US.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Ted Cunterblast

    It’s an interesting time in which to be a dissident.

    Absent a military, economic, or political counterforce

    We should therefore strive to develop and wield such a counterforce.

    • Medizin

      How to build a counterforce when thousands in the pro-White cause are passive?

      • Martel

        By learning to understand the psychology of incentives and incorporating this in your political strategy.

        • Medizin

          You must be a strategic planner or in marketing.

          A win now and then would help. We have been on a long losing streak.

          • Martel

            The predicted demographic changes will occur, there is nothing we can do about it. What the left cannot do anything about, is the de-legitimization of their ideals. We will become a smaller but more ethnocentric people. I try to learn all disciplines which may help me, I also try to learn from the left and other nationalist movements such as black or hispanic nationalists.

          • Juggernaut3000

            Remember too that not all whites are worth saving, some will have to be left behind, too brainwashed or indoctrinated or immersed in the Culture of Critique to understand their own fate.

            If not released, they will drag the rest of us down like lobsters in the boiling pot.

          • Clara Brandon

            Emіly.­&nbsptrսe­&nbsptհat­&nbspMaոսel`s­&nbspst○rі­&nbspіs ­&nbspɡ○○d…­&nbsp○ո­&nbspwedոesday­&nbspі­&nbspɡ○t­&nbsp a­&nbspt○р­&nbsp○f­&nbsptհe­&nbspraոɡe­&nbspLaոd­&nbsp R○ver­&nbspRaոɡe­&nbspR○ver­&nbspafter­&nbspearոіոɡ­&nbsp $4946­&nbsptհіs­&nbsplast­&nbsp5­&nbspweeks­&nbspaոd-eveո­&nbspm○re­&nbsptհaո,­&nbsp$10­&nbsptհ○սsaոd­&nbsplass ­&nbspm○ոtհ.­&nbsptհіs­&nbspіs­&nbspaсtսally­&nbsptհe­&nbspm○st-с○mf○rtable­&nbspj○b­&nbspі’ve­&nbspever­&nbspd○ոe.­&nbspі ­&nbspaсtսally­&nbspstarted­&nbspfіve­&nbspm○ոtհs/aɡ○­&nbspaոd­&nbspрretty­&nbspmսсհ­&nbspіmmedіately­&nbspbeɡaո­&nbsp t○­&nbspbrіոɡ­&nbspհ○me­&nbspm○re­&nbsptհaո­&nbsp$84, ­&nbsp рer-հr.­&nbsp,…C&#97&#x73&#104&#83&#x74&#111&#x72&#101d&#46&#x43&#111&#77

            ☢☢☢ ☢☢�☢ ☢☢☢ ☢�☢☢ ☢☢☢

      • Glen

        You’ve asked, “How to build a counterforce when thousands in the pro-White cause are passive?”

        First realize that most money in the “movement” flows toward education and analysis regarding the nature of the White problem. No money, to my knowledge, flows toward the development of theoretical and practical solutions. This is partly because innovation is hard – really hard – and involves more talent, teamwork, resources, and risk-taking than the standard political educational Internet endeavor focused on news, commentary, and book-selling. The problem is made worse by the fact that accepting the significant risk involved in White activism is completely voluntary. In these materialistic, technological times comfortable people won’t get off their duffs until others have taken the lead, succeeded, and have cleared the path of significant hardship and risk.

        A small minority of White activists are looking toward potential solutions. Gregory Hood, for example, is one of the few who are thinking outside of the box:

        “But an alternative is that a new people may emerge from the crucible. Technology will also open the door to “revolution from the periphery” as 3-D printing, cryptography, alternate currencies, and closed networks will allow a vanguard to live apart from the mass society if they have the will. From this seed, a new folk could form from those spiritually empty whites looking for alternatives to politically correct consumerism.”

        Hood is referring to the creation of autonomous White communities operating on collective or cooperative economic and social foundations on the periphery of the mainstream. Be advised that by “periphery” I am not – necessarily – referring to backwoods “survivalists.” Nor am I referring to upper middle-class whites, although some of these may participate in an informal, below-the-radar manner at some point. What I am talking about are small groups (family, long-term friends) of lower middle-class/working-class White people who would most likely be attracted to this arrangement.

        White people are looking for viable programs. This is one program with potential, imo. Viability requires visionaries, business/legal/technical specialists, research and thought, trial implementations, and constructive feedback. And $$$, of course. But seriousness and some small measure of success is required for the money spigot to flow. Until that happens each activist interested in contributing to the creation of autonomous White communities is his own entrepreneur.

        Political counterforces require an economic foundation that is largely independent of the mainstream. Military counterforces require the civil legitimacy acquired through local politics. We should look to rural farms, villages, towns, and small cities outside of large municipalities.

        If you are interested in this, then please let me know.

        • Martel

          Propaganda should come first. As long as ”white” is a pejorative, we will get nowhere. The problem is finding the talent who can compete with multiculturalists.

          • Glen

            Both “white” and “European-American” will continue to be used as pejoratives. The enemy will call us “nazis,” too, despite any/all denials and attempts to “police the ranks.” The press will always be against us. That is just how it is. The “will” to kick something like this off and persevere is available only to the few willing to live on the periphery, as Gregory Hood noted. Much of the work will be done quietly, especially in the beginning. And as far as “propaganda” is concerned, cumulative successes are the best marketing tool.

            Look, membership in one or more autonomous communities isn’t for everybody. It’s not for the elderly political hobbyist with damn little to contribute except opinions based on 55 years of political failure. It’s not for the tattoo’ed type with nose rings or his brother with a fetish for 20th century foreign uniforms. It’s not for pot-bellied alcoholics, rail-thin meth-heads, and recreational dope smokers. It’s not for mentally ill “activists” who think flying 70 year-old flags of foreign nations outside of broken-down properties in Leith, ND, is a valuable contribution to the Cause. No sane white family, racially aware or otherwise, wants to associate with those type of people. But neither are these communities attractive to the easy $$$ upper middle-class, for obvious reasons.

          • Glaivester

            The proper response to being called a Nazi is **** you.

        • Juggernaut3000

          “What I am talking about are small groups (family, long-term friends) of lower middle-class/working-class White people who would most likely be attracted to this arrangement.”

          You watch how quickly those upper-middle class and wealthy Whites will ask to join any break-away White movement that seeks to separate itself from the Culture of Critique.

          Their wealth and anything else they have and their very lives will be targets of non-Whites, including and especially by those in the government. We will, at some point, be subjected to land confiscations. Already PC dogma states that whites stole this land, are illegally occupying it and everything whites have was built on the backs of blacks and browns.

          When TSHTF, it WILL break down along racial, NOT CLASS lines. It is always racial lines.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            If you get together and work together as a community, continue to grow and improve- solve problems- work together for wealth creation, physical protection and mutual education. You will succeed even if nobody follows suit. You have solved the problems for yourself- no longer threatened by the decay of outside society because you have your own internal community that will survive in any environment, but also people will follow you once they see how successful you are.

          • Glen

            The “white plight” we face is already divided along class lines, which is why the Koch Brothers donated $25 Mil to the United Negro College Fund instead of American Renaissance. The top 1% is simply not affected by the “Let’s Hate YT” behavior of the ghetto and integrated neighborhoods. These people are in control, well-guarded, and view non-whites as only one means to divide, disempower, and subjugate those of us on the opposite socioeconomic end of the white racial spectrum. Other means are employed as well. The fact is we – the racially aware in the bottom half of the white socioeconomic spectrum – are the only real opposition to the top 1%’s power and control. Non-whites are puppets.

            When/If the SHTF, wealthy whites will do as they’ve always done – rely on military, militarized police, and private security forces largely comprised of lower-class whites whom they actually care nothing about, but will serve them faithfully.

          • BillMillerTime

            I agree. There will always be class differences because there will always be human differences. The more fortunate racially conscious whites should have no problem shouldering a greater burden in struggle.

        • Medizin

          “No money, to my knowledge, flows toward the development of theoretical and practical solutions. But seriousness and some small measure of success is required for the money spigot to flow. Political counterforces require an economic
          foundation that is largely independent of the mainstream.”

          Lack of money is a problem, but there is a way.

          “people won’t get off their duffs until others have taken the lead, succeeded, and have cleared the path of significant hardship and risk.”

          Agree. A huge obstacle.

          “a vanguard to live apart from the mass society”

          They will be governed by non-Whites incapable of managing the United States. Hispanics will be the majority. We will have little influence, not that we do now. Would rather leave the country or some sort of secession than see it handed over to foreign, third-world, non-White invaders.

          “autonomous White communities operating on collective or cooperative economic and social foundations on the periphery of the mainstream. We should look to rural farms, villages, towns, and small cities outside of large municipalities.”

          Could be a natural result of White Flight.

          Currently live in a very small historical town, 98% White, no
          blacks, after leaving heavily populated non-White areas in California and Texas. Has been stable here for some time, but that can change overnight. Not planning on moving again unless I begin to see demographic changes. Neighbors are equally as concerned. Fortunately, housing is out of reach for most non-Whites. It’s not as exciting a life as experienced in California when the area lived in was 100% White, but I suppose, the best we can do is adapt.

          • Glen

            “They [the white vanguard] will be governed by non-Whites incapable of managing the United States. Hispanics will be the majority. We will have little influence, not that we do now. Would rather leave the country or some sort of secession than see it handed over to foreign, third-world, non-White invaders.”

            The creation of autonomous communities is about developing socioeconomic foundations apart from the mainstream so that we may create the civil/political legitimacy necessary for secession. If our only goal is to “peacefully coexist,” then why bother with it at all? There simply is no point in uprooting our lives and creating these communities just so that we may continue doing what we’ve always done in the past – read, point, sputter, and whine about what “they” are doing to us – and die quietly.

            That non-Whites are incapable of managing the United States is a weakness to be exploited. The tiny hive and Anglo front-men that direct the efforts of non-Whites provide us with a point to focus upon and coherence in our firepower. The physical size, geography, natural resources, and social capital of CONUS, Canada, and Alaska provides us with tremendous tactical advantages over relocating to Central and South America, Russia, or to some tiny island in the Atlantic or Pacific.

            “Currently live in a very small historical town, 98% White, no blacks… Has been stable here for some time, but that can change overnight. Not planning on moving again unless I begin to see demographic changes. Neighbors are equally as concerned. Fortunately, housing is out of reach for most non-Whites. It’s not as exciting a life as experienced in California when the area lived in was 100% White, but I suppose, the best we can do is adapt.”

            That depends, of course, on what is meant by “adapt.” The preferred form of adaptation the hive and its front-men have in mind for us renegade outsiders is miscegenation and die-off. However, during the interim preceding the end, the hive finds our fear, sycophancy, and truckling to be useful – rewarding those behaviors with an upper middle-class lifestyle. That, too, is “adaptation.” RHINOs Adapt! The “adaptation” is controlled and all in one direction. I propose turning the situation around, however, with small steps becoming ever larger as time passes.

            Suppose you and your neighbors formed a consumer co-op, and this co-op purchased goods from my manufacturing co-op. My fellow workers and I certainly wouldn’t fear the loss of our employment due to politically incorrect thinking and political campaigns in our neighborhood. Or suppose you and your neighbors formed a non-monetary service/charitable co-op that built/improved homes for our married children (yours and mine) at cost. There would have to be rules and other forms of reciprocity, of course, but wouldn’t this be better than seeing our kids pay $500,000-$1,000,000 to Zionist banksters over the course of a lifetime? We could do it like an old fashioned barn-raising, so to speak. And what if we found a way to use alternate currencies to augment incomes that needn’t be claimed and can’t be tracked?

            Perhaps these few examples are enough to provide some idea of the “adaptation” I have in mind.

        • robinbishop34

          I think the first thing to do is get people that visit here, counter-currents, occidentalobserver, etc to mobilize around the idea of working together to literally assemble a marketing plan just as a company would do for a product or service. A plan that starts with…

          - Mission statement (broad description of objectives and broad scope of activities/strategies to be used)

          - (SWOT analysis) Objectively identify key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats – We use this to determine attractiveness of various target markets.

          - Segmentthe population by demographics; by generation; by psychographics, etc.

          - Analyze and choose target market(s) to focus on.

          - Once segments are chosen, how then to position the argument/cause/message that resonates with that particular group (broad campaign or differentiated messages for various segments, etc).

          From here…

          - Drill down to what and how to sell the ideas that provide value to the consumer. (What does the consumer get? How is it better than alternative?)

          - How to promote the ideas (short satire videos, eye-catching art, slogans, articles, etc. Tie all together/build cohesive message).

          - Where to focus efforts… at least at first (internet, social media, flyers?).

          This is very general but it would be a starting point to establish a marketing channel. For instance if Amren would dedicate an article for each initial phase to get started with and solicit ideas and volunteers to take informal/formal leadership roles we could get started right away.

    • Rurik

      How many gun owners? How many hunters? How many pissed off veterans?

      • ATBOTL

        Unless these people are ORGANIZED along racial lines, they are useless.

        • Juggernaut3000

          It’s amazing that we have to keep repeating this. In times of high stress, like struggles over resources, it will and always has broken down along racial lines. Always. I wish more whites would understand this simple concept that non-whites are NOT our “friends” and never will be, they will side with their own people against us.

          • JohnEngelman

            The increase in the practice and approval of inter racial marriage indicates a decline in racial consciousness.

            This in turn means that “struggles over resources” are likely to pit the multi racial majority against the largely white Gentile plutocracy.

            In the United States the per capita gross domestic product in 2011 dollars is nearly as high as it has ever been. Nevertheless, it is very unequally distributed. This makes the plutocracy vulnerable.

          • BillMillerTime

            Do you have a chart that adjusts for inflation?

          • JohnEngelman

            It is adjusted to 2011 prices.

          • Martel

            Engelman talks to you about the increase of interracial marriage. Its actually only a small portion of US whites who do so. Furthermore, interracial marriages have far higher divorce rates, this is because in general, good marriages consist of partners who are genetically similar as an article on Amren a few weeks ago explained. America is still as segregated as it was in the sixties, even in my country, professors complain that their university students do not mix socially. This will remain unchanged.

          • JohnEngelman

            I make an effort to befriend people of other races. I have usually been successful.

          • Martel

            I’m sure that doesn’t sound strange to you.

    • Anti

      The young.

    • Pilgrim786

      I have a pet theory:

      I just turned 31. I immigrated to the US when I was 22. Lacking the social networks of school and/or University, I had to make such friends as I could through such opportunities as were available.

      I don’t play or watch sports. Always been the quiet type. Counterintuitive as it may seem, the only people in the Southland that seem to have any interest in reading and culture are military personnel who, in my humble opinion, are also among the most intellectually curious persons in this Wasteland.

      The only demographic in the US that is capable of demolishing and, thereafter, re-constructing, an entire country, is combat-tested veterans. Serendipitously, we have a generation of white of the crucial demographic (ages 17-35) that have the training and experience of waging war in every terrain imaginable and the skills and experience of rebuild a totally demolished and shattered settlement.

      The USG’s open contempt for this group is going to bite it in its ass so hard it’ll never walk. The VA scandal is the tip of the iceberg. The rot is deep and, slowly but surely, the whole sordid mess will unravel.

      If these people are pushed to the max, they can and will, do the needful. Thus far, they are true-believers in the (mostly defunct) Constitution and Civilian control over the military.

      Ultimately, “power flows through the barrel of a rifle.” The USG is no match for the US Armed Forces.

      That is the only credible threat to the USG. The Homeland report regarding vets was spot-on. No raghead terrorist outfit is as much of a danger as a bunch of pissed off US Armed Forces veterans.

  • borogirl54

    I can see it now. A lot of whites will try to find out if they have any Native American ancestry. The only good thing is that I will probably be dead by the time this happens.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      I didn’t try to find it out. Perhaps we should go trade places.

    • John_HD

      Or easier still, simply claim to be Hispanic, since they always say that Hispanic is not a race (but still qualifies for freebies). I could see a whole new batch of “white hispanics.”

  • Alfred the Great

    In my research I check for the origins/histories of certain races. When I used google, the suggested sites were topped by some for counseling on race relations. Now why would suggestions like that come up when I am searching for the “origins of the Germanic tribes?” When I would go to certain articles and read the comments, there were always comments about how there is no such thing as race and that it’s a useless construct. The comments were too similar not to be orchestrated. Totalitarian governments must always crush all dissent and they are using technology. I may not sell very many books, but at least I will have told the truth.

    • JP Rushton

      “The comments were too similar not to be orchestrated.”

      Nope, that is just the hivemind at work. Certain memes are created and then absorbed by the masses, who repeat them without ever wondering why they think it or where it came from.

      “This is a country of immigrants” is another famous meme. It’s also curious that this particular meme has infected almost every white country, no matter their origins.

      • Raymond Kidwell

        Yes I guess Germany and France are also a country of immigrants and that’s why they need endless hoardes of Muslims. They always use a different argument that has no weight. Each country gets a different illogical half baked argument for policies that don’t make any sense, the arguments vary but the policies are the same in every country. For example, affirmative action exists in Europe as well and is called positive discrimination. A few countries have banned it though. So in a country which didn’t have any significant black population until recently, we still give blacks special priveleges. When blacks are the majority they get special priveleges, when the minority special privileges.The reasons why always vary. Only one thing is consistent: a constant attack against the white race. We aren’t discriminating against whites, we are just giving special privileges to everybody except whites.

    • Raymond Kidwell

      I don’t see a huge amount of racism towards the word German, French etc. It’s mostly when using the word ‘Aryan’. We are told Aryans don’t exist. Yet they are written about in 5,000 year old books still preserved in India and the linguistic group also obviously exists, but it’s all been renamed “Proto-Indo-European”

  • Medizin

    When things become bad enough, Whites will say, “How could Whites allow this to happen,” just as we currently say, “How could Whites have allowed the 1965 Immigration Law to pass.”

    • Evette Coutier

      Modern American whites have become too soft and too in touch with their feelings, and not in touch enough with fact and reason.

      • Jesse James

        It will take a lot more persecution and pain and suffering to drive the weakness out of our people. We still have too much to lose but as our wealth is confiscated and given to others and our job prospects are diminished we will have less and less at stake. Just like Cool Hand Luke said, “Sometime nothing can be a real cool hand.” If we are to survive we will have to learn to hate again.

      • LHathaway

        White men have feelings, and they are in touch with them? This is news to me. When white men express feelings, they are punished. At this point, I really don’t think they have any.

        • Evette Coutier

          I’m sick of cry baby Boehner and his feelings.

        • Medizin

          Men are known for repressed or suppressed feelings. Generally, expressing them is thought to be unmanly or unacceptable behavior in our culture. Male posters on Amren appear to be
          unaware of being depressed. I’d venture to say, some don’t know the symptoms and would deny it.

          Clinical psychologists suggest depression results from long-term repression of disappointment, frustration, sadness, grief, and anger. No doubt, many here are experiencing those feelings about the loss we face, particularly, since all of us feel boxed in thinking nothing can be done.

          Think of anger as an overflow of energy, a pressure boiler, with no way to blow off steam. Pent up anger leads to high blood pressure, depression, and other health related disorders. Physical activities are the best ways to release the pressure. Another is verbally expressing these feelings to someone not involved in the situation causing the feelings. All of us would feel better if we could express our anger at those we accuse of being the perpetrators, but that would be unproductive.

          It also would be helpful if everyone understood the five stages of grief. And, spend time in the sun. Low vitamin D levels can cause depression.

          There would be changes in outlook and motivation if everyone here released that anger in a constructive manner. Physical exercise would also release stifled creative thought processes, which we desperately need to resolve the situation we face.

          • Juggernaut3000

            They can’t wait to drug up white men and will find any reason to do so, mainly to make them more compliant and easier to control.

            Object to your own genocide? You are mentally ill and deranged in need of heavy drugging to set yourself straight. It starts at an early age.

            Don’t wonder why there are so many school shootings, follow the prescription pad. Virtually all shooters were victims of heavy, anti-psychotic drugging. Giving to young developing brains, it is a recipe for these disasters. It will increase, as it is now, we’re reading about these shootings almost every single day.

            It gives the government an excuse to crack-down on white American males, to neutralize them.

            http //www naturalnews com/038445_sandy_hook_shootings_antidepressant_drugs html

          • Medizin

            Physicians are taught to prescribe drugs rather than safer methods. Generally, patients want quick and easy fixes, usually drugs work, and other methods don’t work as well.

            Serious depressive disorders, such as manic depression (Bi-polar) must be treated with medication, but, typically these patients stop taking it; therefore, close observation is necessary.
            Natural substances such as over the counter St. John’s Wort have proven to be effective for mild to moderate depression in Europe without the side effects. It’s widely used in Germany. There are warnings, though, not to be used with certain medications. Other than that, it is safe.
            All unnatural medications have side effects. Some patients respond differently from the norm…antidepressants causing more severe depression rather than improvement. But, for many patients, it feels like a life saver.

            Wouldn’t suggest Amreners take medication, unless depression severely disrupts daily activities and all other attempts to resolve it have failed.

          • Ella

            From some research, depressed people tend to be more realists with less filters or defense mechanisms to lessen stress in life. Happier people have better filters or plain old denial to get through the day. On Amren, I see the words “race realists” often enough. Even using the computer too much can increase depression as people lose direct contact with others such as touch, eye-contact, laughing together and so on.

          • Medizin

            “Happier people have better filters or plain old denial to get through the day.”

            Yes. Reality can be a real bummer.

            “Laughter is the best medicine.” Specifically, doubling over, stomach hurts, falling off the chair, and rolling on the floor types of laughter.

            Keyboard and mousoholics definitely need to get out.

    • WR_the_realist

      Well, it’s the boiling frog thing. I doubt that in 1965 the average man on the street was aware that the immigration law had been changed or if he did had any inkling of its consequences. If he thought about it at all he was probably mollified by Ted Kennedy’s assurance that it would not change the demographics of the country, would not flood our cities with a million immigrants a year, etc.

      By 1970 we had put a man on the moon, and the “60s” was still in swing for another year or two. All the news up to that time was solely about whites (hippies, southern segregationists, eastern establishment politicians, etc.) and blacks (The Great Moral Crusade). There was still no discernible change in the demographics of America. At this point America was at its peak, no one foresaw the long steady decline to come. Surely we would have flying cars in 20 years, and blacks would be on an academic even footing with whites.

      By 1975 there started to be a significant increase in Hispanics in southwestern states, but it still wasn’t a phenomenon that affected the great bulk of America. A few magazines like Time were projecting the browning of American, but this was always depicted as a benign thing.

      By 1980 there were a few million illegal immigrants in this country. Whites were down to maybe 80% of the population (from 88%). It still didn’t seem like much to worry about. There were enough whites to elect Ronald Reagan.

      Over the next 8 years we had the false dawn of the Reagan administration. The stock market boomed through good old fashioned deficit spending Keynesian economics. (The same thing that has recently reinflated the stock market since the 2008 crash.) The Soviet Union fell apart, when it could no longer afford its war in Afghanistan and then got sideswiped by Chernobyl. This was hailed as a a great victory for Reagan although it would probably have happened no matter who was president. In his first term Reagan signed off on an amnesty for illegal aliens. He later said it was the biggest mistake of his presidency (and this was the guy who gave us the Iran-Contra fiasco) but the deed was done.

      By the 1990s it was maybe more apparent to everyone that the country was being transformed, and not in a way beneficial to whites. The diversity dogma became big and entrenched. The Democrats noticed that ever since forced busing and affirmative action became policy they couldn’t get their traditional base of blue collar whites to vote for them. But the diversity always did. So the Democrats learned to stop worrying and love illegal immigration and mass immigration. The Republicans could always be kept in check by cries of racism so they stuck to safe issues like tax cuts and enterprise zones. And the Chamber of Commerce loved that cheap labor.

      Move forward another 15 years, and here we are today. Now it is obvious what a disaster the 1965 Immigration Act was, in a way that wasn’t apparent 10 years after it was passed. The current meme is White Privilege. You and I didn’t actually earn anything we have, it was obtained through privilege. So it would be moral to take it away, and that is what the left has planned next. This won’t happen soon, the demonization and demoralization of whites must intensify first.

      • Medizin

        Great summary!

        “I doubt that in 1965 the average man on the street was aware that the immigration law had been changed or if he did had any inkling of its consequences. If he thought about it at all he was probably mollified by Ted Kennedy’s assurance”

        They trusted legislators to maintain a White majority. Who could ever imagine their government would stab it’s own citizens in the back, turn against, betray them, and continue to do so. Other countries, yes, but not the United States. What a crushing realization it has been for all of us that’s what they did.

        • Ringo Lennon

          We assumed our elected white politicians would look out for us. But they didn’t. Sold us out for brown votes. Democrats must be blamed for this.

          • Medizin

            Republicans are in on it, as well. Boehner is biting at the bit to pass Amnesty for his corporate cronies, as well as, votes from Hispanics.

      • Juggernaut3000

        It is also unfair to blame the “boomer” or any other generation for giving away the store as so many on here and other forums claim.

        When it comes to most of the ruinous things that have happened on a national level, like the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and the Civil Rights act of 1964, that are and have hurt us as a race, no one in government ever asked us, nor did they ask our parents and grandparents if any of these things were okay by them because they knew damn well they weren’t.

        These destructive policies were foisted upon us by anti-White individuals in positions of power. Nothing but a full blown bloody revolution of the kind that gave rise to this nation can stop the machinations of the globalists and anti-Whites

        • Jacobite2

          The original American Revolution has no relationship to today’s problems. In 1775, American Colonists and settlers were all NW Europeans (slaves didn’t count at all). They threw off an English King (not a tyrant by any standard of today) and went their own way — their own NW European way. Today, US citizens are found from every race, ethnic group, tribe, and nation on earth. Any ‘American Revolution’ today will simply have to be an ethnic cleansing.

  • nexus974

    I have a 10 year old special needs daughter. Her life will be difficult under the best of scenarios. What will happen to her in a dying nation when I’m gone or too old to protect her? What kind of a country have I left her?

    • gemjunior

      We’re actually the only one standing up for people like her, so don’t blame yourself for the state of the country that will be left. All our children have been shafted by the ’60s liberals. Being aware of what’s happening is the best gift you can give her. I have a special needs child too and I make sure he knows the drill.

    • JohnEngelman

      You better hope Republicans do not cut or eliminate domestic spending programs that help your daughter in order to pay for more tax cuts for the rich.

      • Juggernaut3000

        This is the most ridiculous statement on the entire thread.

        Our homelands are being massively flooded with destitute non-whites with a lot more on the way. Our borders are as wide open as the clear blue skies. We face the loss of our homelands and the destruction of our heritage, culture and history, and eventually our lives. Our economy has been destroyed by the likes of Obama and his fellow anti-white thugs and the American dollar has lost 90% of its purchase power. 1/2 the country depends on some form of government welfare.

        But we should worry about “tax cuts for the rich.” Right. Throw out a few red herrings as a diversionary tactic to make whites target evvvillll Republicans as their main enemy. Right.

        • JohnEngelman

          You make one valid point. The United States is open to third world immigration.” The immigration of millions of “destitute non-whites” will not be good for most Americans who already live here, and who have the legal right to do so. However, many Republican politicians, perhaps most, are working to achieve a higher rate of immigration because it will enable employers to lower wages while raising prices.

          Otherwise, your comment is deficient. For example, it is not true that “the American dollar has lost 90% of its purchase power.”

          To the contrary, “The dollar’s value can be measured by three methods: exchange rates, Treasury notes and foreign exchange reserves (the amount of dollars held by foreign countries). These three measurements have recorded a rise in the dollar’s value since 2011, reversing a downward decline that began in 2002.”

          While the U.S. economy performed far better under President Clinton, it cannot be said that, “Our economy has been destroyed by the likes of Obama and his fellow anti-white thugs.” The Great Recession began under George W. Bush That was the second recession that began under GW.

          While it can probably be said that “1/2 the country depends on some form of government welfare,” these include Americans with “special needs,” such as the ten year old daughter of nexus974.

          The only people who benefit from Republican economic policies are those who are well off. Republican tax cuts for the prosperous mean tax increases for everyone else, cuts in government spending programs that benefit everyone else, such as those with special needs and their families, and/or more national debt.

  • JohnEngelman

    Gregory Hood is describing a situation that does not exist now. I doubt it will ever exist, but we shall see.

    What does exist are websites like American Renaissance where people can post comments they would be reluctant to send to their local newspaper in a letter to the editor.

    Websites that post essays that continue to blame white racism for black shortcomings are frequently if not usually deluged with so many negative comments, that they stop accepting comments. I have never read of a negative comment writer losing his job.

    It is easier now than in the past to publicly agree with books like The Bell Curve, especially if you choose to remain anonymous.

    In the past I have been mistaken about predicting the future. I do not advise anyone to stand behind me in the betting widow at a horse racing track.

    Nevertheless, I feel fairly safe continuing to use my Disqus account with my real name. As long as you do not advocate violence you will probably be safe.

    • Ted Cunterblast

      Perhaps not advocating it, but definitely anticipating it and preparing for it.

    • LHathaway

      “Whites are entering a time of persecution”. “Gregory Hood is describing a situation that does not exist now. I doubt it will ever exist, but we shall see”.

      Gregory Hood is describing the past, more than the future.

      • Juggernaut3000

        Ask Donald Sterling, Paula Deen and others who have had their personal lives and careers destroyed if we are in a time of persecution or not.

        It IS happening now, wake up.

        • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

          I completely disagree with Paula Deen’s choice of what constitutes a reasonable diet, but the unfortunate lady has discovered what happens to a “useful idiot” once she is no longer useful.

    • dean53

      You are married to an Asian. You voted for Obama. Of course you can safely use your real name.

  • nexus974

    I’m looking forward to the essays from Paul Kersey and the Great Fred Reed.

  • Hal K

    Mr. Hood is being pessimistic. He has taken the present and extrapolated forward, saying that whatever is bad now will be worse 20 years from now. There is a place for that kind of thought. We should not kid ourselves about what we are up against. Anti-white political correctness is imposed from the top down, and it is difficult to create a space in which it doesn’t reign. Still, we have to try, and it is better not to be so pessimistic.

    • Juggernaut3000

      Pat Buchanan says demographics is destiny.

      We are a shrinking world minority overwhelmed by high fertility non-whites demanding our resources, living space and what we have created and built for ourselves and our posterity.

      Our White birthrates are below replacement level now while fecund non-whites continue to overpopulate the earth and demand – and get – entry to white countries stressing OUR population.

      This is happening in white countries only and will be their demise unless this stops, and it may already be too late because of disparate birth rates.

      • Hal K

        As long as there are whites with a will to survive as a group it is not too late. Hopefully at some point in the future there will be an established mainstream culture, among some whites at least, in which race mixing is frowned upon and in which whites consciously work to further their group interests.

  • Rhialto

    The salient fact is that Liberals have won. In America, and in other Western countries, the coalitions of Feminists, Minorities, Leftists, and political/economic opportunists that operate under the Liberal label have political control. The question is how long will the Liberals be able to retain control. In some ways the Liberals are very effective, as in mass mind manipulation and indoctrination. In other areas, like economics, Liberals are much less effective, and as Karl Marx stated economics determines history.

    I think that America is in for chaos, and chaos is unpredictable.

    • Juggernaut3000

      I think America is in for bloodshed and a lot of it.

      There will be chaos and anarchy, neither of which are predictable, let alone peaceful.

      The Culture of Critique has marched through the institutions just as they said they would in the 60s and now control all the levers of power and culture in this society. The white power structure is a myth, one that should be put down immediately; there IS no white power structure.

      We are following the same pattern as the Soviet Union when the Bolsheviks seized power and took control of Russia top to bottom.

      Unsustainable Soviet-style economies, which went against human nature, among other mendacious, anti-human-nature policies such as equality, diversity, and multiculturalism (sound familiar) which the Bolsheviks told us would create a “workers paradise” eventually imploded, as they will here in the west as well.

      We will descend into bloody anarchy with great loss of life before this is straightened out. The only thing that will work to bring about peace, as in Eastern Europe, is a complete and total separation of races and/or ethnicities.

      Each race must be in control of its own destiny with its own living space and resources for that race only. If it’s good enough for Jews, Asians, Africans and Hispanics, then it applies to us Whites as well.

      • http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/rassenpo.htm Augur Mayson

        Completely agree. Also completely agree with the post you just posted at Alt-Right, but can’t reply back directly because I got banhammered couple hours ago. Followed you though.

        • Juggernaut3000

          Saw it this morning. I’d wear it as a badge of honor! I’ve been banned from several sites as well. As I was busy posting this morning on Alt Right, I saw your banishment, immediately went to my Disqus thread and saw that the mod was right on my heels zapping posts I’d just written.

          Alternative Right deserves to lose its posters and especially its donors. I do not plan to visit that site ever again, and, in fact, in my travels across the Internet, will bad mouth it as much as I can as just one more anti-white front site serving white enemies. There are no other words for it.

          I noticed that TOO has opened up its comments section. I’ll see you there.

        • Juggernaut3000

          I also will put you on my “follow” list – the sole “soul” so to speak. That is how much respect I have for you and your insightful comments. Thanks for the “follow” as well, I almost privatized my account this morning but now I’m glad I didn’t.

          You did a bang-up job at Alternative Right along with a few others (you mostly) and for that I give you props and kudos.

          I don’t think the editors took note of what we were saying. Alternative Right deserves and will go down in flames. The comments proved that in spades – I fully expect the entire comment thread to be deleted, if it hasn’t been already.

          I’ve got to work on getting my pal razorrare out of there.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Boy! And you guys thought John Derbyshire’s essay sounded bleak…

  • Ella

    We were once a nation of dissidents from Europe driven out by their tyrannical monarchies or communist governments. We found peace for some years after the Civil War up to WW1. Today, they’ll come after our job and economic securities to force us under their rule. Jefferson warned us of trading liberties for securities, but it won’t be for Whites.

    • Jesse James

      We had no peace in the South Ella after the Civil War. Radical Reconstruction by the Federal government was the rule of the day for over ten years. The occupying northern army wasn’t removed until 1877. To this very day we aren’t allowed to change election law and procedures without review and approval by the Federal government. The process of federally sanctioned anti-white education and government administration that is currently inflicting the entire nation is just an expansion and continuation of Radical Reconstruction to the entire nation.

      • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

        What would happen to that revolting federal scheme if every white Southerner moved to the mountain west?

        • Jesse James

          If things get bad, major racial civil war bad, we could definitely see large refugee groups moving towards areas of greater ethnic concentration. This is what happened with the independence and partition of India and just about every other conflicts involving race and ethnicity in the 20th Century. I am not personally ready to give up on the south though. Don’t remind me of the die hard Afrikaners trapped in S. Africa now, I think of that almost every day.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Far from the furtherance of human knowledge, the immediate future is a dispersed dictatorship of thought in which dissidents will be tracked, persecuted, and punished by private as well as government actors. The rest will be a culture ever more stultifying and shrill: a nightmare world combining the worst of Brave New World, 1984, and afternoon programming on Bravo.

    May I present an alternative viewpoint regarding all this technological tracking? Is it not possible that whites will eventually reach a breaking point and there will be a backlash against the police state and the political correctness mafia that Gregory Hood describes? I know it seems hard to believe right now, as whites have submitted themselves to half a century of ever-increasing oppression with nary a whimper, but any twig can only be bent so far before it snaps. Perhaps the Day of Reckoning will actually be hastened by the nightmare scenario Mr. Hood describes.

    • dean53

      I sincerely wish this would happen, but can’t see it. Integration, intermarriage and Christianity turn-the-other-cheek morality has taken its toll.

  • paul marchand

    Obama is trying to flood the US with illegal immigrants, to forever change this country, in conjunction with other Democrats, including blacks, and, in particular, to sink whites.

    It is time for Republicans and Libertarians to coalesce, and to convene state CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONs, which would, among other things, excise the votes of illegals retro to 1970, and their children, and excise the votes of government employees in the areas of their employment, and to excise the votes of net recipients of the US.

    To NOT do the above is to risk the enslavement of your children, and theirs, IMO.

    The time, IMO, is N.O.W.

    • Bill Moore

      Hello Paul Marchand,

      The last thing we want to do is to convene a state or federal constitutional convention.

      The Liberal/Progressive/Communists are in control. At a constitutional convention we would lose all of our rights.

      Just My Thoughts,
      Bill Moore

      • Jesse James

        Agreed, the problem with a constitutional convention is that its scope can’t be limited in advance. If you call it you face the very real danger that our enemies would hijack the process and with their current domination of society anything they pass would probably be a disaster for our people.

  • Anon

    The problem with this is the same as the prior two essays. It completely (I think, intentionally) ignores that all these attitudes are imposed on white people from a centralized source.
    Brainwashing requires that the person not be aware of his state. The very second he becomes aware of it, cognitive dissonance sets in and spreads. After awhile, the harder they try, the more obvious what they are doing becomes. Some other things become obvious. One is that that those causing all this are a small, racially homogenous group that tends to isolate and associate with themselves. Another is that they live openly with very little in the way of hard power. Everything they do is by manipulation. Most important of all, the situation has become unstable. The more unstable it becomes, the more likely large numbers of whites will become aware….then enraged….then genocidal (and with good cause).
    Hood’s entire article is a carefully crafted lie. Not in its content but in its suppositions.
    No. Most whites do not agree with liberalism. There is no political conflict in this country. No. There is no large group of whites who harm other whites in various ways if they don’t bow their heads in the face of non-white violence. Perhaps two decades ago, there was a problem with some whites wanting to identify like non-whites. However, the term, wigger has not been in vogue for a very long time and is a wry insult these days. Justin Bieber is, in fact, a running joke along these lines for attempting to tap into a meme that turned rotten when he was a child. Most important of all, no, white people do not do these things to ourselves.
    We are under attack by a tiny, extremely hostile non-white minority. There is nothing new about this, not particularly controversial about what is obviously going to happen next. This cycle has been repeating for thousands of years.

    • Daniel Schmuhl

      I know you’re talking about Jews again. The problem is that there is evidence for white pathological altruism and guilt that is biological in nature. A lot of Jews manipulate whites to advance their group interests, but whites share a lot of the blame. If they weren’t so degenerate and psychologically weak they would also pursue their group interests and not allow themselves to be manipulated. I feel like there is a great deal of truth to the whole anti-Semitic theory, but many white nationalists use it to scapegoat and avoid any sort of responsibility for their own actions. Why not just get a decent job and donate to pro-white causes? Instead of doing positive things in the real world, most just post about TEH JOOZ from behind a keyboard.

      Furthermore, most whites do agree with liberalism. Yes, they have some conservative positions (like being slightly opposed to immigration), but their attitudes on a whole host of issues would have been considered far-left 100 years ago.

      • Martel

        Perhaps the problem is that those who look at the Jewish issue more reasonably, namely, those who support the notion that the intellectual and financial support for movements opposed to white interests have historically been Jewish, but understand that Jews are not some sort of diabolical monolithic entity, do not take ”the lead”. In as much as that is possible in a comment section. Many white nationalists correctly notice that Jews are an uncomfortable topic in most white nationalist movements, get frustrated, and become unrealistic about the power and motivations of Jewish activists. Now some of them clearly have some issues, despite the fact that I’m regularly called an antisemite by Jews, some here call me an agent of the mossad because I don’t consider every Jew evil or call for some restraint on how grievances are uttered. But others simply recognise that the Jewish issue is the one ”forbidden subject”. Now I don’t fully agree with this. Recently Derbyshire mentioned MacDonald without chastising him, Taylor recognised the grievances of many white nationalists in an interview with American Thinker, but understated them, and Byron Roth who spoke at Amren 2013 called the works of MacDonald groundbreaking. I believe a normalisation of this discussion will take away these tensions, and you are also someone who can contribute to this.

        I also believe the ”paranoid” make it less attractive for reasonable thinkers to look into the Jewish issue more objectively, which is a shame.

        • Daniel Schmuhl

          I agree with most of that.

        • LHathaway

          “Many white nationalists correctly notice that Jews are an uncomfortable topic in most white nationalist movements. . . I believe a normalisation of this discussion will take away these”

          I wish the topic were more uncomfortable, then rarely would anyone here, including you, be making a ‘normative’ discussion about ‘jews’. It simply connects us to Nazi Germany. In this day and age, perhaps it simply ‘connects’ us with some Other disreputable racist, instead. Besides, anyone going on about a jewish conspiracy IS the conspiracy, or seriously duped. Yes, ‘jews’ are getting revenge for the holocaust. How does ‘knowing’ that help? Face the real facts, we did it to ourselves.

          Beside, everyone knows girls can’t be impressed by primitive feelings like revenge. They’re too sensitive and forthright for that.

          • tlk244182

            “How does knowing that help?” By making the one who knows it immune to liberal propaganda. Anti-White propaganda is anchored in the race-card, which is founded on the anti-Semite card. Once the anti-Semite card is nullified, Whites are no longer restrained on the Jewish leash. They begin to see the racial and cultural realities and will behave accordingly, i.e., in their own self-interest, instead of behaving in the Jewish interest. Recognizing the existence of the Jewish Question was the very last phase of my conversion from liberalism, i.e., from a drone controlled by organized Jewry, to race-realism.

          • Martel

            There is no spectacular awaking when you come to understand Jewish ethnic activism, unless you simplify the matter. I never was a drone of ”organised Jewry” before or after I started to agree with the theories of MacDonald. There will never be a reasonable discussion by claiming that Jews are even able to control every aspect of our lives. Naturally there is a small fringe who are rightfully excluded from reasonable discussion, those who consider Jews subhuman or wish to destroy them. Why would a wealthy Jew not do anything in his power to oppose them?

            If I were a Jew, and a certain movements would call for my elimination or even appear to do so, I would certainly spend some of my money to oppose them. We will get nowhere as long as ”radical and paranoid antisemites” run this discussion.

          • Sick of it

            It amazes me that we are somehow “paranoid” or delusional” to think that billionaires (and trillionaires?) might just be running the entire world.

          • Sick of it

            It amazes me that we are somehow “paranoid” or delusional” to think that billionaires (and trillionaires?) might just be running the entire world.

          • Martel

            It amazes me as well, I never said that.

          • Robert Reis

            We are under attack by a tiny, extremely hostile non-white minority and an extremely hostile white academic class.

          • LHathaway

            “By making the one who knows it immune to liberal propaganda”.

            Good luck helping make the masses of whites immune to liberal and anti-white propaganda by going on about Jews. I suspect you will have the opposite effect of that which you intend, by discussing jews in any way. Perhaps I should have written, “you will have the opposite effect of that which you ‘intend’ by discussing jews in any way”? Then again, I just used the word ‘jews’ in my post also, didn’t I?

          • Martel

            Didn’t you compliment me on my writing on frontpagemag a short while ago for discussing the Jewish issue?

            The intellectuals and financiers who gave live to this ”anti-european” movement were by and large Jewish. They were motivated by Jewish sentiments. Because Jews today enjoy such great influence and the Jewish community is still quite cohesive, its important for Jews to recognise more sensible causes for antisemitism then quotes from the Torah or claiming European gentiles are just an ”evil bigoted people”. These are the two reactions I usually get from Jews.

            We European gentiles in the US and the old country deal with extreme ”criticism” on a daily basis, which is partly based on a incorrect interpretation of the jewish-gentile conflict throughout European history. But I’m not allowed to provide minor criticism about the Jews where criticism is needed?

            If Jewish readers have issues with the way I formulate my criticism or in specific aspects of my criticism, they are welcome to discuss this with me. By ignoring the reality of Jewish over representation in movements opposing European interests, the problem of ”antisemitism” will only intensify. On the other hand, I also oppose radical antisemitism, and I would like to see more people opposing this. But you cannot oppose radical antisemitism by claiming they are ”all wrong” or ”evil Nazi’s”. Just like you can’t oppose Jewish supremacists who consider all Europeans mortally inferior, something you may have seen on FPM, by simply considering them ”evil”.

          • LHathaway

            I gave up finishing reading your comment, Martel. I generally like reading your comments.

          • Medizin

            “By ignoring the reality of Jewish over representation in movements opposing European interests, the problem of ”antisemitism” will only intensify.”

            But, do Whites know Jews are behind these movements? I don’t think they do. They have to look in the right places to see them.

            Yes. Despite anti-Semitism, those Jews responsible are reaping intended rewards these movements produce. They’d rather fight anti-Semitism by controlling the narrative than relinquish the rewards. To them, the imagined European threat to their well-being is all-encompassing despite a nonexistent physical threat.

            I question this fear is repressed, blocked from consciousness. For those involved, I believe it is intentional to bring about desired results.

            Nevertheless, I think there is more to it than that. Some are into these movements for power, control, and money, having no loyalty to any country. Hatred for Christianity is another motive. And…some are not involved at all, most likely, they are as angry as we are.

            But, all of it, Jewish movements, increasing black crime, Muslim infiltration into our government, non-White third-world immigration, Common Core, self-interested lobbyists and the many other symptoms destroying the U.S. can be placed in the lap of a corrupt U.S. government. It’s been going on for a long time.

            Communists were never removed despite Joe McCarthy’s attempts at exposure and a 1951 law supposedly enacted to prevent it. Known Communist supporters were permitted to enter the country and infiltrated the Roosevelt regime and are in our government, now. Muslim Brotherhood supporters work in high level positions advising the president. Common Core was admittedly designed to destroy White culture by the Jewish author. Although, public education is supported by taxpayers, our government has done nothing about Common Core content. I could go on and on.

            We place our lives in the hands of our legislators who failed big time and continue to fail to protect Whites from ideologies, enemies that cause us harm. That was and is their main responsibility, to protect citizens from harm. Those legislators were and are White Europeans. They are responsible for the situation we find ourselves.

          • Martel

            Jewish activists were active agents in transforming our societies, but indeed, the gentile babyboomers who followed and aided them share a great deal of the blame.

            I did not know the author of common core was Jewish. Jews do not identify with European gentiles, this will remain a part of the problem for decades, if not until it no longer matters. It basically depends on how many Jews will support an ethnostate in Israel in the long run.

          • Medizin

            “Jewish activists were active agents in transforming our societies”

            Absolutely, but why weren’t they stopped? I was subject to the same media, school, college, and entertainment indoctrination. Why didn’t it affect me?

            Maybe, it was my father who frequently says, “Believe only 20% of what you hear and sometimes don’t believe that.”

            Jews at one time were prevented or limited numbers were permitted to enter the country. Why? Why did legislators at
            that time consider them inappropriate? Was it because they thought them non-White or were they familiar with their shenanigans in other countries? I think they knew.

            Regardless of whether the current batch of legislators was subject to the same ideology, one would expect them, of all people, supposedly, familiar with what a Constitutional Republic is, our framers, Declaration of Independence, and history, to recognize an ideology is attempting to infiltrate and stop it.

            Russia fell in December 1991. The cold war ended and openly celebrated. Current legislators were adults during that time. As paranoid as the U.S. was concerning Communism, did nothing sink in? No one could hide from that paranoia.

            In addition to Marxist Jews, they fail to see Hispanics, who carry Mexican flags, wear flag t-shirts, in defiance, openly state they are “taking their land back,” and Muslims who also state “they will take over the country,” are our enemies.

            It’s also a moral issue. Legislators permitting conditions to escalate to the point of genociding their own people!

            They are more than familiar with Marxism/Communism. Integrity, morality, loyalty to the country and her people trump any kind of indoctrination they were subjected to in school, college, by the media and entertainment.

            The buck stops with all of them, Presidents, House, Senate, and Supreme Court members, past and present.

          • Martel

            They weren’t stopped for the same reason we don’t stop the left today. They run a well oiled machine, and those who oppose it damage their careers.Even during the Roosevelt days, those attempting to expose communist infiltration where mocked and belittled. The ”Red scare” never existed IMO, more historical revisionism on the part of the left. A small faction of patriots attempted to inform the public on these matters but were outgunned and outwitted. Have you ever read about the treatment of Charles Lindbergh after his Des Moines speech?

            Google culture of critique PDF. Then read from page xii onwards. These events took place in the thirties and fourties, and illustrate how little things have changed since back then.

          • Medizin

            The Constitution is the law of our country. All legislators, predominantly White, are familiar with it and the founders’ debates and warnings. Marxism is not the law of the land. An alarm should have gone off in their heads when Jews began pressuring them for their own self-interests. It’s absurd to think they missed or miss the glaring symptoms.

            If White legislators stood firmly against Marxism, and everything else occurring today, criticism would be nonexistent. No loss of jobs or reputation. If one ethical lone wolf decides to stand against the Marxist Jews, not one White will support him. That means none support the Constitution, our founders.

            At any time, Jewish Marxists could have been taken down if most of the White legislators didn’t support them. I can’t accept they were indoctrinated in college because as legislators it’s their responsibility to know the difference between the Constitution, Marxism/Communism and other types of governments. They know the founders’ warnings about how dissimilar immigrants would change our culture and government and the country was for “free White persons.”

            If they were taught differently in college, law school, whatever, there are voluminous historical records in the government library system where they can learn the correct version. And when they learned the truth, they should have gone after educators for not teaching the truth. All legislators swear to uphold the Constitution and none of them are. This failure must be intentional to support their agendas.

            Numerous threats attempt to infiltrate countries all the time, whether it’s Jewish Marxists, open border invaders, or Islamic
            terrorists, it’s our government’s primary responsibility to prevent all of them. No cowardly behavior, such as fearing criticism is acceptable. Ours was infiltrated. White legislators are
            responsible. There are no acceptable excuses for their failure to stop the enemy, better yet, keep the enemy out of the country.

            Many want to place the primary blame on Jews, but I ask who was responsible for keeping threats out of the country? There always will be people and ideologies ready to overthrow governments using subversive tactics. It’s up to us to prevent that from occurring.

            As for the Red Scare, Communism was the threat, not Russia. Who, primarily, were the Communists?

          • Medizin

            What would you do if a rat entered your house?

            Allow it to stay, make it a pet?

            or

            Promptly set a trap, and patch the holes it used to enter?

            Would you blame the rat for going into your house?

            or

            Would you blame yourself for not making sure there were no holes where rats could get in?

            Isn’t that part of being a responsible spouse, father, and homeowner, keeping rats, poisonous snakes, scorpions and other dangerous animals out of your house by making sure there are no holes where they can get in?

            Imagine your house is your country. Legislators are you, the homeowner. Marxism is the rat.

            Marxism (rat) sneaked into the country (your house) using
            weaknesses (holes) in the legislative body. Who is responsible? Marxism (Marxist Jews) or legislators who were negligent, not closing holes in the legislative body?

            Not only didn’t our legislators patch up holes in the legislative body, they made the rat a pet after it entered.

            I ask you again. Who’s responsible for the country being torn
            apart (what rats do inside houses), the Marxist Jew or legislators? If you say it’s the Marxist Jew, why wasn’t he stopped? Why was he kept as a pet? Didn’t legislators see the destruction he was causing to the country? Why didn’t they stop it?

            Communism isn’t legal in the United States. By supporting
            Marxism, not only are legislators breaking Constitutional law, they are breaking a 1951 law. Marxists are also breaking the law by practicing it in the United States. They are criminals and traitors in every sense of the words.

          • Medizin

            Previous response not posted. Must have said something moderator didn’t like. Will try again.

            “They weren’t stopped for the same reason we don’t stop the left today. They run a well oiled machine, and those who oppose it damage their careers.”

            Why does anyone support Marxism? Any kind of Communism is against Constitutional Law and a 1951 law. There should be no criticism against anyone speaking up about it, particularly legislators. All of them should be on the same page. Communism, Marxism, whatever, is illegal. The Frankfort school should have been investigated and shut down before its ideology infiltrated Columbia University. There has been glaring evidence of Marxism everyday that was not stopped. This is beyond comprehension that lawmakers allowed all of it to slide.

            All of them are responsible.

            Think about it this way.

            The fox got into the hen house and is killing all the hens. Who was responsible for making sure the hen house door was locked? Who’s responsible for the hen deaths? The fox or the
            farmer? Yes the fox is killing the chickens, but if the farmer locked the door, the fox wouldn’t have been able to get in and the hens wouldn’t be killed.
            Fox will be fox. They are sly and stealthy. The farmer knows that; therefore, he should have made sure the hen house door was always locked. Those who promote Marxism are also sly and stealthy; therefore, the country should have been locked.

            If legislators hadn’t permitted Marxism to be practiced, it wouldn’t be killing Whites. It’s unconscionable the current political environment is causing the demise of Europeans and nothing…nothing is being done about it! It’s ignored! Who is responsible for that?

          • Martel

            Even when the Frankfurt school established itself in Colombia university, America already suffered from intellectual and political corruption. In your response you put a lot of weight on constitutional integrity and the requirement of a sense of duty amongst lawmakers. But I see lawmakers as an unreliable species, and the constitution requires a strict standardised interpretation and a population willing to defend it. Marxism energised its followers, was new(er) and interesting and appealed to a loss of a confidence in capitalism prior to the second world war, and was appealing to intellectuals in a way the constitution is not to this day. I also think that American patriotism, which should have been the fuel for resistance against such developments, simply does not stand up to the intellectual and emotional power of Marxism, just like the belief in freedom of speech across Europe fails to standup to ”political correctness”. Practically, I don’t see how legislators could have banned the practice of Marxism or any of its variations either. I believe calling for the violent overthrow of the state is banned by law, but that is about it.

            I agree that gentile legislators share part of the blame, especially open border advocates, but blaming bystanders is less clear cut then pointing out active agents of change.When I point out Jewish activism, I do not do so to claim Jews are somehow a unique adversary, I prove that multiethnic societies provide enormous difficulties.I want to make the latter clear once more, I have no interest in painting the Jews as some sort of inherently immoral people.

          • Medizin

            “Even when the Frankfurt school established itself in Colombia university, America already suffered from intellectual and
            political corruption.”

            Agree. Zionists spoke of changing ‘America’ when they stepped onto our shores many years ago. The Frankfurt school was
            used as an example of something that could have been stopped.

            “I see lawmakers as an unreliable species,”

            Long standing evidence of that is clear. Who would replace them? All become lawmakers regardless of previous experience and profession.

            “and the constitution requires a strict standardised interpretation,”

            Exactly

            “and a population willing to defend it.”

            Americans have allowed it to continue, but, in their defense, were ignored when they did speak up. Non-Whites have no idea what the Constitution says. White liberals believe it can be
            changed to meet modern times whenever necessary even though it legally can’t be changed without Amendments.

            “I believe calling for the violent overthrow of the state is banned by law.”

            Legally, we can’t overthrow the ‘government’, Constitution, but we can replace every legislator including the president by force if you want to call that an ‘overthrow.’

            That doesn’t mean we couldn’t amend it or replace the Constitution by revolution if we won. The Constitution is weak and hasn’t protected us.

            Our biggest obstacle is educating and motivating Whites.

            I think we need an organization, similar to an ‘association’
            that will legally defend our rights, respond to anti-White rhetoric in the media, academia, and entertainment and also function as a strategic and market planning think tank, first using surveys to find out what is on Whites’ minds, then using the results to determine methods for reaching many and what will work to
            further their interests. Currently, my thoughts, not elaborated here, are elementary, not well-defined, but encouraged
            by one of our highly regarded pro-White webhosts agreeing it was needed.

            An unknown could not get it off the ground because of pessimism, “That won’t work,” mentality, but one or two of our current well-known leaders could, then hire a director to run it. Initially, it could be financed by donations from all pro-White website readers along with those who become members as it grows.

          • Martel

            You are quite adamant about demanding certain qualities in lawmakers. There might be no excuse for their behaviour, but especially in peace time it attracts certain individuals who are not suited for defending a nations integrity. A problem is certainly diluted responsibility, but besides trying to correct this I don’t see any options to make such institutions more reliable. The next generation of rich kids should be inspired to defend the nation, this is all which matters in the end.

            You wish to setup an organisation, and we can definitely use it. You have to find out how to fund this movement, but don’t expect many donations from readers of websites unless you find a way to break their routine by providing appealing services and a innovative business model. In general this crowd is very hesitant about donating. About legal services, it is very difficult to recruit a lawyer willing to donate his time to this movement, so I would postpone this idea until you are fortunate enough to recruit two or three activists with a law degree. The first thing you should do is finding sympathisers in your area, and building a social group which meets frequently to share ideas,to have a good time with like minded individuals, and to find invididuals who have the time, the will and the talent to contribute to the organisation you want to setup. You also have to learn about the skills you need to have to run an organisation. Marketing, the basics of accounting, the basics of management and organization(there are also some good books on political campaigning),join courses to improve public speaking or a debating club, save money for a few nice suits, develop an implicit white message(explicit is an option but increases difficulties), build an archive of information and video material which you can access easily at any time to substantiate your message, check out how you can setup a foundation/institution, improve coping skills for dealing with stress and opposition, get involved locally to improve your social status and learning how to organise events in anything where they ask for volunteers before you setup/announce your organisation, manage your time carefully and set deadlines for all your activities if you lack self discipline. Continually improve yourself where needed. If you cannot write a professional press release then take a writing course, if you are not good in organising your personal life improve this, and so on.

            These are all things you should do if you think about setting up an organisation, and I suggest you start asap. If you then decide in six months, a year or even later to actually set up an organisation you will be prepared to do so. The number one thing remains connecting with local sympathisers.

          • Medizin

            “You are quite adamant about demanding certain qualities in lawmakers.”

            Absolutely. My expectations are as high as they are for physicians. Citizen’s lives depend on their integrity.

            “I’m not very interested these days in defending the USA or even my own nation, my primary focus is the continued existence of Europeans.”

            I understand that. I was challenging your thinking.

            “You wish to setup an organisation, and we can definitely use it.”

            Would take years for an unknown to obtain name recognition, trust, and the number of followers needed to make an impact. Suggest retired or soon to be well known pro-White leaders and volunteers would be the best candidates to start one.

          • Martel

            “Suggest retired or soon to be well known pro-White leaders and volunteers would be the best candidates to start one”

            You can’t just pull leaders out of a hat.If you are interested in this its up to you, no one will do it for you. Organizations should be set up across the Western world, even if they are not a major success they always collect experience, serious activists and other resources which will be of use.

          • Medizin

            “You can’t just pull leaders out of a hat.”

            Presidents of companies, for example, are chosen from a pool of candidates based on certain qualities, experience, and knowledge. It’s also known what types of people wouldn’t be suited for the position or the company.

            Not considering who would be best for the position is foolish.
            If I were seeking someone to head this organization, I certainly would look at pro-White leaders first.

            Any one of the candidates can refuse an offer, but in my case, there is no offer. It’s merely a suggestion. Suggestions are thrown out all the time, but for some reason those who throw them are expected to do them, even though that might be unwise or an impossibility.

            Therefore, if we have ideas, it’s best to keep them to ourselves even though another person might accept the challenge and run with it.

          • Martel

            “” Presidents of companies, for example, are chosen from a pool of
            candidates based on certain qualities, experience, and knowledge.”

            We are a fringe movement, basically invisible outside of the internet. There is no pool of candidates, a pool of candidates has to be build, which requires organization. It doesn’t have to be a massive organization, it doesn’t have to do anything spectacular, it can stay out of the spotlight, but it requires organization.

            “Not considering who would be best for the position is foolish.
            If I were seeking someone to head this organization, I certainly would look at pro-White leaders first”

            What pro-white leaders? There are none, men like Taylor already have other things on their hands.

            There is no possibility to look at who is the best for the position, because there is no one. Its not about who is “best”, its about who is willing. One doesn’t have to be talented, some people have the charisma and the wit to face camera’s, others don’t. That is not a problem, such people(most of us), should work on organizing local political dissidents, until they find individuals who have capabilities to expand the activities of the organization, including getting in the media.

            “Any one of the candidates can refuse an offer, but in my case, there is no offer”

            What do you mean?

            There is no offer out there for anyone, as it first takes someone willing to build a second grade organization, recruit more talent, and build it up from there. Even when you have a minor operation running, it will provide an avenue to cooperate with other minor operations and then get something you suggested here. Currently what you say is simply an impossibility, and the problem with talented individuals, is that they tend to come around when possibilities arise.

            If you actually want something to happen, no one will do it for you, that is just reality. Everyone here has the ability to organize something, no matter how small. But as soon as you get a few people together, the possibilities increase exponentially.

          • Medizin

            You describe grass roots activism. Takes too long in the U.S. National organizations frequently spawn grass roots groups. We don’t have time and should not think small.

            I seek a much larger impact in a shorter period of time. It utilizes pro-Whites currently in the movement. It does have to do “spectacular” things. We have a huge task before us.

            I didn’t elaborate my thoughts since few would read it, but it would have been more clear if I had done so. There’s no way I would choose or ask one of the leaders. If they are interested, they could and would do it. Every so often, I throw the suggestion out to see if the current environment has changed. The reception has not been good.

            Heavy responsibilites prevent most of us from starting a new venture the scope of a national organization. Nor would I start a small organized group because its tiny impact would have no effect unless small local groups organized nationwide. Chances are slim that Whites would take the initiative on their own. We need centralized direction, one voice, that will work for us in the national and political arenas, not many voices scattered throughout the country.

            In my opinion, it would give Whites hope as they watched a national organization working for their benefit.

            Evidently, the environment has not deteriorated to the point Whites want to become involved more than keyboard discussions.

          • Martel

            The first fishing company was not outfitted with the best navigators, a massive fleet, an experienced crew and a pension plan for all its employees. It started out with a one or two poorly build ships and one determined captain. The organization you would like to see isn’t feasible right now. Your dismissal of small organizations is likely because you have seen other small organizations not making any impact. Those are the organizations where the founder has unrealistic expectations and it fizzles out only days after they appear on stage, then it drags on while they forget what they ever want to accomplish. A successful activist understands his own limitations and the obstacles offered by his environment, but such cells can create networks in which the talent needed for more impressive organizations can be found. By working locally, and connecting with other minor organizations across the country, the resources needed to progress will be accumulated. Hoping for the “right time” helps no one, the time is now. It doesn’t have to be anything impressive,its initially about building a network, this will get the ball rolling and more talented/financially independent activists involved.

          • Medizin

            So, you own a fishing company. You say you had fishing boats, a few navigators, etc. at start-up.

            You either used money saved or borrowed it to start your business. How long did it take before you became profitable? Did you have contacts who would purchase your fish when you started? Or as a fisherman working for a company before you started your business, you learned the ins and outs of owning a fishing business; who would purchase your fish, and so on. In other words, you learned the fishing business by working for a fishing company.

            If you worked for a fishing company before you started your own, you decreased your learning curve dramatically.

            The person who would start a national organization for Whites would not have such a head start. This national organization would most likely begin with one or two people, a few volunteers, who know nothing about forming it, how to get members to pay for its operation, etc. It probably would begin in someone’s house.

            You say we don’t need a well-known person, but franchisees from major companies, such as McDonald’s, do well immediately. Those hamburger joints started by the little guy struggle to get customers. I assume Netherlands has a similar business climate as the U.S.

            The person who starts it must be able to give many hours to it. The reason I suggested a retiree. But, it also requires finding out if their is interest from Whites. If Whites are unwilling to support it financially, forget it. You had the advantage of knowing people eat fish and will buy it. All you needed was to contact a middleman to purchase it, a distributor to sell it to markets, grocery stores, restaurants, etc.

            A known pro-White leader, author, etc., already has followers and some will donate to someone they trust. That money can be used to get the organization moving and growing a lot faster than I ever could without donations. AmRen readers, for example, would not donate one cent to me.

            To my surprise, a pro-White website host announced yesterday he is starting a White civil rights organization with state chapters. His readers are reacting positively, willing to pay a membership and/or donate. Let’s see how he does with that.
            This is a very important development and hope he is successful. All of us can assist him with donations and suggestions, but support from pro-White webhosts could help ensure his success by promoting it, but I don’t think they will until they see he can actually do it.

        • Guest

          Henry

      • http://www.marxisminusa.com Tomantw

        ….Start by unsubscribing to cable TV, never buying MSM newspapers or magazines don’t buy MSM DVD’s, whether music or movie.

      • dean53

        My 3 baby boomer siblings all embrace liberal egalitarianism. I am convinced they would attack white patriots before they would ever defend themselves against minority aggression. They are True Believers and disciples of Unity at all costs.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      Nazi Germany will look like a garden party when the SHTF. Jews have no clue what wrath is in store for them. Absolutely unprepared. They will be slaughtered, understanding too late the price that must be paid when being treasonous toward one’s on country is.

    • JohnEngelman

      What you and others call “brainwashing” requires a receptive brain. Propaganda is only effective when it tells people what they want to believe, or what they know to be true in their lives.

      One does not get places politically by changing the minds of people. One gets places by articulating and channeling sentiments that already exist.

      In the late 1960′s Democrats told white blue collar workers, “The real problem is not black crime. It is white racism.” White blue collar workers knew the real problem was black crime, so they left the Democratic Party and began to vote Republican.

      The GOP did not help white blue collar workers economically. It did reduce the crime rate by tripling the prison population.

    • http://www.marxisminusa.com Tomantw

      You can own three fourths on a “monopoly board”, but if someone else owns all of the last quadrant, replete w/ hotels, game over. Let’s see…media, education, hollywood, military (almost)

  • David Ashton

    Fight the death wish, comrades!

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Here’s another disturbing aspect of technology that Gregory Hood missed. What role will increasingly powerful artificial intelligence play in the Orwellian future Mr. Hood describes?

    If we have an artificial intelligence by 2034 capable of passing the Turing test, say one similar to HAL 9000 or one that people might even fall in love with, as in the movie”Her,” which I believe is quite possible by 2034, think what a powerful tool of oppression that could be for the power elite?

    Imagine if people trust the artificial intelligence with their innermost thoughts and opinions and these are then reported by the AI to the central politburo. Or the AI could be programmed to promote politically correct opinions and to engage in a type of brainwashing against the user regarding any points of view that it deems unacceptable.

    Before you dismiss this as too far-fetched, keep in mind that IBM’s Watson is already successfully parsed conflicting opinions on the Internet and divided them into those that support or undermine a particular point of view.

    • sbuffalonative

      If you’re interesting in the rapidly approaching future of AI, go to youtube or cspan and look for the lecture ‘Our Final Invention’ or read the book.

      Before AI, we’re going to have to deal with automation. Many people are going to be losing their jobs and we’re going to have a large surplus of unskilled labor with no work to do.

      • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

        Then you get guys like me who pay off their houses and stay home. I was supposed to be rich, but I never will be.

    • John

      I think Zuckerberg will be an early adaptor and his Asian wife will be looking for a new Jew.

    • http://www.marxisminusa.com Tomantw

      Well, Mr Hood did say ” a combination of Brave New World and 1984″..
      According to Orwell, all technology will be used either to control/punish the people, and for military expansion

  • MBlanc46

    Naught for three. Does no one see any hope for Western civilization?

    • sbuffalonative

      I’m not giving up but it’s important to follow the current trends and think through all the possible scenarios. That’s what think-tanks do.

      Knowing is being prepared.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      I will never give up, even if I am shot to bloody rags.

      • MBlanc46

        Too bad Jared Taylor didn’t ask you to contribute a piece.

        • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

          Mostly I write stuff about WW-2 ships.

          • MBlanc46

            Interesting topic. My father and my wife’s father–both now deceased–served on LSTs in the Pacific in 1944-45.

    • Evette Coutier

      All things come to an end. The middle ages ended. The renaissance ended. The dark ages ended. The evolution to an industrial society from a agricultural society was a good thing. The salient point is that we should be evolving to a better more advanced society. That has been the progress of white civilization. However, it is not the path that black societies have taken historically. Black societies universally remain degenerate. Our nation will divide into two societies. There will be constant societal tension until a nationalist movement puts a end to it. This is the course of history.

      • MBlanc46

        Not only blacks, but tens of millions of Indians and mestizos. I certainly hope that you’re right that a nationalist movement will arise to put things right. But I find it very depressing that the nation that my ancestors built (actually, two nations-the US and Canada) is being turned into a Third World hellhole on my watch.

    • JohnEngelman

      I expect China to dominate the world by the end of this century. I do not expect Western civilization to collapse the way the Western Roman Empire did. I agree that it is a mistake for Europe, the British Commonwealth, and the United States to allow third world immigration.

      • MBlanc46

        If anyone, China. And we just handed it to them.

  • WR_the_realist

    This might be the most accurate projection of the near term future yet.

    Even past enforcement of immigration laws will be remembered as a moral crime comparable to Japanese-American internment.

    This has already happened. Some time back the California state legislature issued some kind of apology for Eisenhower’s Operation Wetback. (The very name is of course deemed “racist” today.)

    No one is ever punished for violating a privacy law if in doing so they expose a “racist”. If you go to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch page there is a logo of an eye peering through a keyhole. Nothing could better exemplify the eagerness with which the left is embracing the new Big Brother.

  • ricpic

    What Hood ignores is that all memes wear out. Eventually, that is. Whites are already tired of the RACISSS! charge and openly mock it. Will they put up indefinitely with being the cow that is simultaneously milked and whipped? What about when hard times descend? That’s a near certainty given that our economy is running on fumes now. I think there will be a collective “Enough!” when the economy goes off the cliff. What follows that is anybody’s guess. Mine is that whites won’t acquiesce to carrying blacks and browns and being scapegoated when they themselves are in dire straits.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      I agree. When times get rough(er), people tend to congregate with people who are like themselves. Once the EBT and other bennies run dry, I seriously do not give the black race a snowball’s chance in hell.

      • John

        I agree 100%. What whites have to watch out for when the time comes is to not let our egalitarian inclinations come into play and try to help the ones that are smart enough to try to be “frens” wif de whi fokes”. Whites need to understand that we don’t need them and really never have. They bring nothing to the table that will be missed.

    • LHathaway

      Exactly. Wherever it is they have the most ‘tolerance’ or ‘sensitivity’ training, and where ever it is they most fervently practice affirmative action, there they spend the most effort condemning whites, their histories and present societies, rail against institutional racism, and say that it is whites who are discriminating, and that’s wrong and evil.

    • http://www.marxisminusa.com Tomantw

      When the economic excrement hits the fan, certain of the darker species among us, unable to chow down on chips, fries and burgers, and no longer able to delight in the guzzling of mad dog and king cobra, will flash mob en masse, coast to coast-like, causing unprecedented mayhem. The tribal chieftains will then police us for “our protection” and our “own good”.

  • FozzieT

    “Not surprisingly, young whites will increasingly try to identify as other than European-American, claiming membership in whatever victim group is available. Denying white identity will be a matter of economic survival…”

    Agreed, but they will fail, as the non-whites will immediately call them out as “too white.” We see that today among blacks already.

    Once these young whites are thrown overboard, I have hope that they will go the other direction and become race realists. Not a lot of hope, but some.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    In our own future, social networking, wireless technology, and new inventions will allow almost unlimited access to information beyond anything dreamed of by Gutenberg.

    ___________________________________________________

    This is highly unlikely. Massive third world immigration, because it provides an abundant source of cheap labor, discourages big business from investing in more capital-intensive production methods. This significantly retards scientific and technological progress. The Roman empire failed to transition from an advanced agricultural society to a more mechanized, industrial one because of its heavy reliance on slave labor (despite knowledge of the steam engine, automation and how to build other mechanical devices). Outsourcing of manufacturing jobs, if it continues at its current pace, further reduces our capacity for scientific and technological progress. This is because manufacturing firms must embrace innovation as their primary competitive strategy if they wish to remain competitive in the global marketplace. The disappearance of the manufacturing sector means the end of competition as a driver of industrial research and development, ultimately diminishing our capacity for innovation.

    Because of massive third world immigration and the outsourcing of manufacturing, the US will not become an increasingly technologically sophisticated Big Brother police state. It will become a very brutal and clumsy Latin American-style dictatorship that relies on the old-fashioned methods of torture and uniformed, low-class and (in third world America) predominantly black and brown thugs to get the job done.

    • Tim_in_Indiana

      It’s already true today. When you talk about “capital-intensive production methods” you make it sound like this is still a manufacturing economy. It isn’t. It’s an information economy. Mestizos are useless for the high-tech, information-based jobs of the present, not to mention the near future. That’s why importing so many of them is such folly and can’t have much to do with providing needed labor as is claimed. Although hiring Mestizos is more cost-effective than hiring whites for many jobs, it still comes with some cost, and so there will still be an incentive to invest in robotics for a greater and greater percentage of existing jobs, rendering the Mestizo hordes even more redundant. This will create even more of a welfare and nanny state than exists today, although an increasingly high-tech one.

      • Jesse James

        Yes we are not a manufacturing economy but the much vaunted information economy for most Americans failed to materialize. Our current economic stagnation exists because a large portion of our population can’t be productively utilized by the new economy. Personally I think the plan all along was to impoverish the US and that the media spread the ideas of a transition to a new type economy to keep people lulled into sleep as the industrial base that supported American prosperity for over a hundred years was moved out of the US. I do agree that bringing in more unskilled workers when we clearly have no use for much of our current under class is a disaster for many reasons.

        • Tim_in_Indiana

          When one works outside of an industry it’s easy to underestimate its size and significance, but the IT industry is huge and growing.

          • JohnEngelman

            Computer technology increases the relationship between intelligence and income. John Derbyshire is the only writer in this series who has mentioned this.

      • http://www.marxisminusa.com Tomantw

        By bringing in all the useless mestizos, it’s possible that the Cloward Piven (Columbia University 1966) strategy is at work, The idea is to break the economy and overload the welfare state to create a communist dictatorship.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        There are many, many costs associated with using indio-mestizos as a source of cheap labor, but these are socialized, meaning that the burden is shifted onto taxpayers, who are expected by the big corporations and the government to pick up the tab. As long as an increasing amount of wealth is redistributed from labor to capital through mass immigration and this process continues without interruption, there will be less and less of an incentive to take the financial risk and invest in new technology.

    • Jesse James

      The Romans were on the verge of a type industrial revolution but for them everything fell apart and the West was set back for centuries. The ruins of some of their late Empire manufacturing facilities have amazed researchers with their size and complexity. It should be a lesson to us of what to expect if things fall apart again. The late Empire very much had a demographic problem brought on by the impact of a number of devastating plagues and an end to the flood of free slave labor that accompanied the expansion of the empire. Once the borders were more or less set there was no massive slave influxes. A shortage of labor and a reduction in new peoples to tax became a crippling problem.

      One issue that so far seems to not be considered by our essayist is the advancing power of a global government. Most so far seem to expect a continuation of national sovereignty at something like the current level. Although the one world government could be set back by many different things it is still a strong possibility that it will be in place and have much greater control over what happens in the US in twenty more years than it does today.

      • SlizzardAjeosshi

        Ancient Alexandria scientists started using steam as a source of energy even before Rome was a significant powerhouse. It is really surprising the industrial revolution took that long to develop

      • Sick of it

        The Romans were on the verge of having more corrupt inbred moron leaders who would mass murder their people while laughing. Their society was too decadent to advance. A solidified Greek state would likely have advanced much further than we have.

      • Sick of it

        The Romans were on the verge of having more corrupt inbred moron leaders who would mass murder their people while laughing. Their society was too decadent to advance. A solidified Greek state would likely have advanced much further than we have.

  • Jesse James

    A thought for sure but one that is rooted in an expectation of a complete failure of whites to maintain any control of North America. It may go that way but it is a dismal prospect. It reminds me of the Britons being forced back to Brittany on the continent by the Anglo-saxon and Norse invaders. Don’t forget that the far eastern parts of Russia are also under demographic pressure from China and other Asian populations. Still I would rather see a dynamic white Alaskan archeo-futurist state develop than for the white race to just be scattered to the winds and mixed out of existence.

  • http://www.marxisminusa.com Tomantw

    Mr Hood paints a grim future for whites and liberty but I’m
    afraid he is on the mark. His
    observations on technology are particularly ominous. We are much more” in the
    web” than on the web. We all post our brilliant vainglorious ideas for white survival
    on political sites to essentially argue about what color the Titanic should be painted. All posts lay naked for the perusal of our future “keepers”.
    It’s very similar to Mao’s “100 Roses” campaign of the ‘50’s. He promised openness
    only to gather the names of those whose opinions were inimical to the state.
    Then he imprisoned some and shot the rest.
    I don’t have an answer, but then, if one is offered, a plan to thwart it
    is assuredly in motion before your fingers are off the keys. It’s a hell-of-a Catch
    22, isn’t it?

  • Barely Intrepid

    Well, you just described the last 30 years. That seemed like the midst pessimistic outlook imaginable.

  • Magician

    I will happily acknowledge if a non-white woman is truly beautiful, but this person is ridiculously unattractive.

    I am clearly convinced that there are some white men who go for Asian women for the sake of going for an Asian woman, no matter how unattractive she is.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      My wife, Sayaka is Japanese, and her smile lights up her face. She is a lot lighter and shorter than the gal in your picture. This is not for everybody.

  • ATBOTL

    “Not surprisingly, young whites will increasingly try to identify as other than European-American, claiming membership in whatever victim group is available.”

    We are already seeing this on the East Coast. A lot of younger people will tell you they are not white, they are Italian, Portuguese, Greek, Polish, Jewish etc. These people tend to get “white” real quick when they are around blacks though.

    • Martel

      Your last sentence is the one that matters. Racial awareness is always below the surface.

    • Gerald Michael

      Yes, people have been marking “Other” under racial categories on job applications and college entrance forms for decades already.

  • Juggernaut3000

    The result will be an ever more extensive (and effective) witch hunt.

    The witch hunt is already well underway, with Donald Sterling its latest victim. Paula Deen was also a victim of over-hysteria and career destruction, and for what? Justifiably using a racial slur 30 years previously? Donald Sterling is undergoing personal destruction due to something he said in the privacy of his own home while being illegally audio taped?

    The PC overlords will mine everyone’s past looking for examples of career-destroying racism. They revel in it. Next up will be hard prison time and punitive fines, as in Canada and Europe, for saying something against set-in-stone PC dogma.

    Yet at the same time, foreign, illegal colonists will continue to live above the law while mooching off of a dying white America and hardened prisoners up to and including murderers and rapists will be released onto America’s streets to terrorize the population.

    Thought criminals will be punished more severely than rapists, murderers, child abusers, armed robbers and car jackers. That is truly a world gone mad.

    If we don’t separate from this madness and secure a safe environment for our children we will be exterminated.

    Is there anything more important than securing a future for or White children?

  • jayvbellis

    Look to White groups who have successfully developed Separatist lifestyles Amish, fundamentalist Latter Day Saints.

  • jayvbellis

    This is too pessimistic.

    Some Whites are, will do very well. The very White owners and actors of Spanish language media in the USA are doing great.

    I’m seeing a lot of good White Hispanic marriages, White guy, Hispanic wife and mother. The a Children are White,,just brown eyed beauties – like higher caste Italians.

  • jayvbellis

    Whites in Eastern Europe survived Communism, they adapted. So must we.

    Rent the movie Goodbye Lenin about the final days of Communist East Germany. By the end, East Germany was a nice, all White place to live.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Eastern Europeans never adapted to communism. Many were simply forced to go along with it, especially after the Soviets completely eradicated the various post-WWII anticommunist resistance movements of eastern Europe. Even after the demise of partisan resistance, there was still active, even violent opposition to communism, such as the Prague Spring of ’68 and the Solidarity movement of the 1980s.

      Like the anticommunist partisan fighters and other opponents of communism in eastern Europe, we shouldn’t adapt to anything. We shouldn’t cede one inch of ground to the immigration enthusiasts and the multicultural extremists. Our entire being must exude resistance to the burgeoning new world order of global government. We must resist with our minds and our bodies. We must fight with our mouths, our hands, our feet, with the pen, the keyboard and anything else we have at our disposal. Like the anticommunist partisan fighters of eastern Europe, we must be prepared to actively resist massive third world invasion and multiculturalism. We must be prepared to lay down our lives for the sake of the future generations to come. We at least owe them this.

  • Who Me?

    ““point and stutter” seems to be the sole occupation of American journalists.”
    ————————————-
    This does, increasingly seem to be all they are capable of. Once upon a time, students were assigned to read articles in newspapers (remember those?) to absorb proper English, spelling and vocabulary skills, such as matching tenses, punctuation, sentence structure, etc. Now, you’d be hard-pressed to find one single article in ANY media, (since the print media is all but moribund) that doesn’t have multiple mistakes.
    The results of lowered educational standards and the continuing race to the bottom is becoming all to apparent.

  • LHathaway

    “your predictions of the violence that would come when white men get in touch with their feelings is misinformed. . . . ”

    WTH are you talking about? Where did I predict all this violence, or any violence? I thought I was suggesting white men get in touch with their feelings? As of now their feelings are suppressed, they repress them. All I intended to do was ‘opin’ for a society where the feelings of men and boys are respected too. That was all I meant to suggest. I’m not sure, I suspect in the political realm this will be accomplished by a violence against men act. And perhaps an accompanying social men’s movement. Perhaps carried out by the same mainstream media/education/government that currently takes things in a diametrically opposite direction, and by the posts here, so many hate.

    It’s true, I do predict white men will increasingly do ‘violence’ to themselves, perhaps on nearly a biblical scale, as thousands of them already do every year, but I don’t think your response to my post has anything to do with what I wrote in my post. I have no idea what you’re talking about and what you must imagine you were responding to.

  • LHathaway

    Your response to my comment makes no sense whatsoever. It’s clear you don’t understand my posts. That could be my fault.

  • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

    I have always lived far beneath my income, like a cheap Scotsman. Where the house is concerned, I was planning to return to Australia, and so had a housesitter who was here. He stole everything that wasn’t nailed down, broke everything that was, and otherwise trashed the place, but the rent money he paid was essential. I am very sorry he turned into a lying, thieving, child-molesting weasel, but that was his own decision. I wish he had not abused my trust. Betrayal hurt me very much.

    I got my place in 1996, and it was my second choice. I have a machine shop in the unfinished basement, the trees here are mature, and there is very little street noise. I am happy.

    My financial advisor is my mother, a retired banker. She told me what to do, and I obeyed her orders without question or hesitation. Only she knows how much money I have. I honestly do not. I might be a millionaire, but I don’t know. I don’t even want to know, because money was what got me sent to federal prison in the first place. Today I am wearing old shorts, a “Boss Tones” t-shirt and am barefoot. I shave only because my wife does not like scratchy beard stubble on her inner thighs.

    It is a hardscrabble life at times, but when we started replacing the old VHS movie collection with DVDs, we turned the heat down to 55 F. We save the utility bills from earlier years, just so we know.
    My best advice is to not run up debt and to make accelerated payments on the principal when you buy a house. I paid off my mortgage in eight years. Do not buy vehicles on payment plans. Do not go out to eat except on special occasions. We go out only on our birthdays and our anniversary.

    We have only one vehicle that runs, and this is a 1932 Model-A Ford. I don’t mind being on foot during weekdays. We can postpone getting my truck or one of the Saturns running.

    The way I see things, I can always eat less.

  • Martel

    Great question. The ”Rock Bottom” crowd has somehow gotten into this idea, not sure now, but its incredibly foolish. I dislike all the pessimism I see here, no need for it.

  • Raymond Kidwell

    This is why I believe you have to start first with the “secret society” although its not secret its just people understand that term better. You need the society of people working together cooperatively to make the wealth first before you can fund those programs. The leftist have the benefit that they can print money out of thin air and fund endless organizations. We will always be out gunned in that regard until we get our own printing machine via the federal reserve but at least we can make enough money to fund some modest projects that could have great social impact. But the most fundamental and logical step would be to form a small working community that worked together for wealth gain, protection etc. and to make sure it is not too political or ideological but mostly about helping each other and being a community and weeding out the bad elements.

  • Raymond Kidwell

    Most Native American benefits can only be obtained if you can prove you are 25% or more native ancestry. Odd the same people who claim race isn’t important have written national laws that are more racist than things Hitler himself wrote. But I don’t see how a 1/16th Native could claim any significant benefits. I wonder what would happen if you had to prove a minimal amount of white ancestry to get a government benefit.

  • Fascistech

    Jewish society is being scapegoated?

  • Fascistech

    Jewish society is being scapegoated?

    • JohnEngelman

      Since 1970 the United States has moved to the left on social issues and to the right on economic issues. Anti Semites blame Jews for both movements, when they have really been due to changes in widespread values.

  • Sick of it

    I’m not looking forward to the bloodshed ahead, but we haven’t been left with another alternative, considering that most people simply will not do ANYTHING to stop what’s going on. Most won’t even accept the truth staring them in the face.

  • Sick of it

    I’m not looking forward to the bloodshed ahead, but we haven’t been left with another alternative, considering that most people simply will not do ANYTHING to stop what’s going on. Most won’t even accept the truth staring them in the face.

  • Fascistech

    Yeah, right. Whites did this to our own society, see? Jews have nothing to do with what has happened to all white nations since WWII.

  • Fascistech

    Yeah, right. Whites did this to our own society, see? Jews have nothing to do with what has happened to all white nations since WWII.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Why not QD?

    1. My writing style is way too snarky for AR. I’m closer to Ann Coulter than Jared Taylor.

    2. I gave up medium to long form a long time ago unless it’s things I have to write because I’m doing it to make a living, and that which I write as part of my job isn’t closely related if at all to AR’s mission.

  • Glen

    “I was thinking along these lines when I wrote the first version of Manifesto for the Peoples of the Third Millennium back in 1995, …”

    Autonomous communities, intentional communities, PLE’s, microcommunities, – imo all these refer to the same concept, more or less.

    You clearly are an outstanding writer and the thoughts expressed in your “Manifesto” merit several reads by all who are interested in the creation of autonomous communities. One of your initial suggestions, to “form a study group,” is one I am especially interested in. However, I prefer face-to-face meetings – not Internet chat, discussion forums, or lengthy email communication. Not that Ecomm isn’t beneficial in getting “the word” to novice racialists, but it is impersonal, tedious, and tends to detract from real-world accomplishment. I want to look men in the eye, shake hands, read body language, determine seriousness and skill, and judge motivations and limitations personally when working with others.

    I strongly urge you to consider submitting your manifesto to Greg Johnson’s Counter-Currents Publishing.

    You should also consider providing contact information on your website.

  • Glen

    “I was thinking along these lines when I wrote the first version of Manifesto for the Peoples of the Third Millennium back in 1995, …”

    Autonomous communities, intentional communities, PLE’s, microcommunities, – imo all these refer to the same concept, more or less.

    You clearly are an outstanding writer and the thoughts expressed in your “Manifesto” merit several reads by all who are interested in the creation of autonomous communities. One of your initial suggestions, to “form a study group,” is one I am especially interested in. However, I prefer face-to-face meetings – not Internet chat, discussion forums, or lengthy email communication. Not that Ecomm isn’t beneficial in getting “the word” to novice racialists, but it is impersonal, tedious, and tends to detract from real-world accomplishment. I want to look men in the eye, shake hands, read body language, determine seriousness and skill, and judge motivations and limitations personally when working with others.

    I strongly urge you to consider submitting your manifesto to Greg Johnson’s Counter-Currents Publishing.

    You should also consider providing contact information on your website.

  • MBlanc46

    I’ll second that.

  • Jon

    That is so true because Technology and the Internet has vastly sped up censorship and the thought police against white people. Non-whites can say what they want and be as vile as they want but if they think we have offended their feeling then we get censored or in a lot of cases people lose their jobs or property. When people do not have the right to say what they feel in their own home then u know how bad things have gotten. Maybe Technology can also save us as well but only time will tell.

  • maxonepercent

    For the next 20 years at least whites are going to remain the largest demographic in the US. As the power of non-whites increase and as the older generation dies off it is only natural that younger whites (who are much more likely to be race-realists) will begin to stick together more and more. At least 2/3rd of all non-whites vote for the same party in every election, at some point whites will behave in the same way. Once that happens there will be a realistic chance for a change in the political control of the nation.