Nicholas Wade Takes on the Regime

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, March 2, 2014

DavidGoliath
The troublesome persistence of genes and race.

Nicholas Wade, A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race, and Human History, Penguin Press, 2014, 266 pp., $27.95.

TroublesomeInheritance

“Human evolution has been recent, copious, and regional.” With these heroic words, New York Times science writer Nicholas Wade opens fire on two of the obligatory myths of our time: that there is no such thing as race, and that human evolution stopped in the Stone Age.

It is gratifying to see someone firmly planted in the mainstream poke the regime in the eye, and the regime’s reaction will be a diverting spectacle. Bravo Mr. Wade, and we wish him a thick skin—though we wish he had not been quite so circumspect on certain matters.

 Race is real

Mr. Wade notes that the early peddlers of race-is-a-myth, such as Ashley Montagu (the stylish name British-born Israel Ehrenberg chose for himself), were clearly trying to distort science for political purposes, and that more recent peddlers, such as Jared Diamond and Steven Jay Gould have done the same thing.

The physical differences we see in human groups reflect separate evolutionary paths that led to unmistakably biological differences. Hunter-gatherers left Africa about 50,000 years ago, and once they wandered into all of earth’s habitable spaces, they stayed put and bred with their neighbors. DNA testing shows there was essentially no crossing until the modern era. For tens of thousands of years, independently breeding populations developed distinct genetic patterns.

Mr. Wade explains that the physical traits of populations are dramatically and consistently different even though there are very few alleles, or gene variants, that occur exclusively in only one group. This is because most traits are influenced by many genes. Norwegians, for example, need have only a preponderance of Norwegian-style alleles in their genes in order to give birth exclusively to Norwegians—and never to Malays or Pakistanis. As Mr. Wade puts it, “The fact that genes work in combination explains how there can be so much variation in the human population and yet so few fixed differences between populations.”

Mr. Wade also spends a few pages batting down some of the other side’s silly arguments. He patiently explains that, yes, there are mixed-race people but they do not disprove race. There can be mixed-race people only because there are races. He also explains that disagreement about the number of races does not disprove their existence either. Different people just draw lines at different places.

Most importantly, Mr. Wade points out that “brain genes do not lie in some special category exempt from natural selection. They are as much under evolutionary pressure as any other category of gene.” And since human evolution is “recent and copious,” the brains of different populations function differently. This is the book’s main heresy: After the races separated, they evolved different mental patterns that gave rise to different social patterns.

 Social behavior evolved

The idea that human races have been evolving right up until the present is not new. The 10,000 Year Explosion, written in 2009 by Henry Harpending and Gregory Cochran, is the best introduction to this subject, and explains why evolution has been roaring along 100 times faster during that last several thousand years than it did during the Stone Age.

Mr. Wade goes over some of the same ground, pointing out how dramatic a change it was for our ancestors to switch from nomadic hunting to settled agriculture. For the first time, something more than bare subsistence became possible. This led to trade, wealth and poverty, government, taxes, con men, priests, etc.—an evolutionary environment completely different from the African savannah. As Mr. Wade notes, new circumstances produced new people:

As soon as the mode of subsistence changes, a society will develop new institutions to exploit its environment more effectively. The individuals whose social behavior is better attuned to such institutions will prosper and leave more children.

Some old habits were no longer useful. Farmers had to think ahead and save seed corn, whereas hunters immediately gorged themselves on kills that would rot in a few days. Smash-and-grab made sense for fast-moving nomads but not for city-dwellers who had to live with neighbors. As a rule, the longer a population has been farmers, the more the hunter has been bred out of it. The last 10,000 years has therefore seen the domestication of what had been the equivalent of a wild animal.

Not all groups are equally domesticated. Tribes that have been nomads into modern times do not adapt well to settled life. The Kalahari Bushmen think of animals only as game, not as livestock, so if someone gives them goats to tend, they eat them. Australian aborigines have not adapted well, either.

Kalahari Bushmen

Kalahari Bushmen

The Yanomano of the Amazon are notoriously violent, not just against outsiders but among themselves. According to one anthropologist, Yanomamo men who have killed someone in battle have 2.5 more children than those who have not. The means the Yamomano are evolving towards more violence, not less.

Mr. Wade emphasizes that behavior of this kind is influenced by genes, although only a few alleles that affect social behavior have been found. One is MAO-A, the “warrior gene,” variants of which are clearly associated with a hair-trigger temper and violence. Maoris, for example, are warlike and crime prone—and they have a high incidence of this variant.

This, in fact, is Mr. Wade’s boldest assertion: that different races behave differently because they are genetically different and genetic differences give rise to differences in social institutions. He is at pains to argue that the genetic differences are small—so small that they are almost undetectable at the individual level—but that once a group has been nudged even slightly in a particular genetic direction it may be receptive to institutions that completely change the nature of society.

Mr. Wade cites one study that estimates fully 14 percent of the human genome has been under evolutionary pressure since the races separated, and that substantial differences are therefore inevitable. DNA studies show that Tibetans split off from Han Chinese only 3,000 years ago, so it must be only since then that Sherpas evolved their ability to function so well at high altitudes. Indeed, there are more than 30 lung- and circulation-related gene variants that are more common in Tibetans than in Chinese. Mr. Wade also notes that American blacks may already be less likely than Africans to have sickle cell anemia—because they live on a continent without malaria where there are no benefits to sickle cell alleles. Evolution is constant.

Mr. Wade makes the crucial point that what is known as “national character” is undoubtedly genetic, and that is why group behavior is consistent. Jews prosper everywhere they go. So do overseas Chinese. If the Malays and Indonesians envy the success of their Chinese minorities, why don’t they just copy their good habits? Mr. Wade argues that they can’t; they don’t have the genetic predisposition to act Chinese.

Africans likewise cannot maintain government institutions. Their colonial masters wrote nifty constitutions for them, showed them how elections work, and explained the importance of an independent judiciary. That all ended up in the ditch once Africans took over.

Gene3

Mr. Wade repeatedly emphasizes the importance of public trust—the ability to deal fairly with people who are not kin or fellow tribesmen. If a race has not evolved this level of trust it will not get beyond tribalism. That is why Americans can’t get Iraqis or Afghans to behave like good democrats no matter how many of them we shoot. Middle Easterners don’t have the genetic capacity for republican government, so it is just as crazy to try to force our ways on them as it would be to try to turn Americans into tribalistic, cousin-marrying Afghans.

Europe

One of Mr. Wade’s lesser breaches of good manners is to note that Europe made crucial breakthroughs in civilization that many groups have yet to adopt: “Europeans, probably for reasons of both evolution and history, have been able to create open and innovative societies, starkly different from the default human arrangements of tribalism or autocracy.”

Academics have long chased their tails trying to explain why some countries are rich and others poor. Mr. Wade points out that their fatal blunder is to assume that all populations are interchangeable. He uses findings by the economic historian Gregory Clark to suggest that in Britain, where records go back far enough to make such studies possible, there was steady evolution towards the qualities crucial to the Industrial Revolution.

According to Professor Clark, who teaches at UC Davis, from 1200 to 1800, the British became less violent, more literate, more inclined to save, and more reliable workers. Prof. Clark’s ingenious studies also show that the rich, who were more likely to have these useful traits, had more children than the poor, many of whom were erased from the gene pool. This naturally occurring eugenics program laid the foundation for the Industrial Revolution.

BritishEmpire

Mr. Wade points out that most European populations had been evolving similarly, so were quickly able to industrialize as well. So, it turned out, were East Asians, with the Japanese first, followed by Koreans and Chinese.

Mr. Wade argues that science and industry did not first arise in China partly because of millennia of conformist pressure. Chinese were relatively meritocratic, with the Mandarinate open to anyone, but the examinations mainly tested rote memorization. Mr. Wade points also out that Chinese rulers showed an utterly un-European lack of interest in science and exploration, and argues that this reflected long-bred traits of conformity and submission to authority. Even today, Chinese have been unable to adopt one of the cornerstones of Western Civilization: the rule of law. Communists, just like emperors, routinely violate laws they force on others.

Mr. Wade concludes with this heresy:

It seems a fortunate outcome that the world’s dominant military power has turned out to be the West, with a system of international trade and law that offers benefits to all participants, and not a purely predatory and militaristic state like that of the Mongols or Ottomans, as might have been expected, or even a civilized but autocratic one like that of China.

Timidity

This is all very fine, even courageous stuff. Any assault on dogma is welcome and laudable, and Mr. Wade will certainly take a beating for it. However, there is much waffling in this book, which was no doubt meant to ward off beatings but that, at least to undeceived readers, rings of timidity.

Mr. Wade has a whole chapter on the evils done in the name of race and genetics. We learn that the Comte de Gobineau, Herbert Spencer, and Madison Grant were rotten people, and that even the genius Francis Galton led us down “a dangerous path, to the proposal that human populations could be improved by controlling breeding, just like those of domestic animals.” There is also the obligatory salaam to the memory of the Holocaust.

None of this belongs in a book about science. It is a clearly an attempt to demonstrate virtue and avoid beatings, but it won’t work.

Even Mr. Wade’s angle of attack—social behavior—is a curious one. It is undoubtedly true that genes influence time preference, radius of trust, lack of aggression, and all the other qualities that make civilization possible, but these characteristics are not well studied and we don’t know much about the relevant genes.

Mr. Wade almost completely ignores the psychological trait that has been studied the most: intelligence. He goes into details about the codons and base triplets that result in interesting but peripheral racial differences in hair texture, ear wax consistency, and type of sweat glands, but completely ignores the genetics of intelligence. He even writes that no genes for intelligence have been found, but that is not true. In 2005, Mr. Wade himself wrote about the discovery of genes that are implicated in brain development, and researchers recently isolated a gene that appears to account for 0.5 percent of human variation in intelligence.

Mr. Wade includes a chapter on the superior intelligence of Jews—this is something people can write about without losing their jobs—but skips over the question of black intelligence. He has a very superficial account of the debate over the genetic contribution to black-white IQ differences, but then scuttles off to safer territory: “That issue needn’t be resolved here.” Does he really think he can write that Africa is stuck with tribalism for genetic reasons, but avoid a spanking because he refuses to commit himself on IQ?

Mr. Wade’s discussion of the MAO-A gene is even more contortionist. He concedes that American blacks are no less than 50 times more likely than whites to carry the variant most closely tied to violence, but says we must draw no conclusions. Why? Whites might have different, as yet undiscovered, alleles that would make them just as violent as blacks.

In his discussion of the evolution of racial differences, Mr. Wade notes that light skin may have spread rapidly through northern populations, in part because it was considered sexually attractive. But he can’t bear to stop there and risk leaving the wrong impression. Without one word about the millions of dollars Asians and Africans spend on skin lighteners or about the clear preference even of American blacks—the widespread preference for light skin—he suggests that tanning salons prove that dark skin is inherently more attractive.

Mr. Wade also assures us that whites will keep their scientific and creative lead over the Chinese for “many generations, barring some major setback.” This is because we are genetically less conformist and more open to new ideas. And yet there is no mental plague in China that even approaches the conformity and closed-mindedness Mr. Wade is trying to combat with this book. The ease with which our rulers have driven common sense about race, sex, and nation underground shows how cowardly and conformist the heirs to the Industrial Revolution have become. If the Chinese succeed in widespread embryo selection—an openly eugenic practice that terrifies Westerners—they will outstrip us in one generation. Meanwhile, the West is filling up with the very people Mr. Wade tells us are genetically limited—Amerindians and Middle Easterners—while China remains resolutely Chinese.

China

 Whistling past the graveyard

Mr. Wade writes that his book is an attempt “to dispel the fear of racism that overhangs discussion of human group differences and to begin to explore the far reaching implications of the discovery that human evolution has been recent, copious and regional.”

That’s not possible. If human differences have “far reaching implications” there is no way to “dispel the fear” of what goes by the name of “racism.” What, to begin with, are these far reaching implications? Mr. Wade himself manages to propose exactly one: that foreign aid is probably wasted because poor countries are not genetically prepared for the institutions necessary for wealth.

Mr. Wade even criticizes Steven Pinker of Harvard for thinking about implications. Mr. Wade accuses him of dishonestly running away from the idea of race differences because, in Professor Pinker’s words, “it could have the incendiary implication that aboriginal and immigrant populations are less biologically adapted to the demands of modern life than populations that have lived in literate societies for millennia.” That is exactly what Mr. Wade implies—but does not say.

The liberal façade is all of a piece. It cannot be punctured only in a few safe and convenient spots. That is why its guardians plug every chink with such bloodthirsty zeal. To accept what dissidents call human biodiversity would open the door to everything the regime most piously hates: immigration control, inequality, self-segregation, nationalism, mono-culturalism. Whether he knows it or not, and no matter how hard he denies it, Mr. Wade has lit a match to the entire liberal/modern world view. The next thing you know, someone might say the Civil Rights Act of 1964 should be repealed or that women have no business on submarines.

That is why the reaction to this book, which goes on sale on May 6, will be so interesting. Lefties will not be placated by the back-cover assertion that “Wade believes deeply in the fundamental equality of all human peoples.” They will realize that a very respectable figure is blowing a raspberry at their religion.

The smartest thing they could do is ignore A Troublesome Inheritance. The next-smartest thing would be to have truckling scientists calmly “refute” it by peeing on it from a very great height. Raging about “racism” would be stupid, and prove only that lefties are believers rather than thinkers.

Alas, it may make no difference what they do. As I wrote 20 years ago about a book that goaded the stooges into a record-breaking rage, “Unfortunately, the United States is probably capable of weathering a 90-day lather over The Bell Curve that leaves the country exactly as it was before.”

Tank

No one knows when sanity will return. Can this book break the logjam? Probably not. But all praise to Nicholas Wade and his publisher, Penguin Press, for trying.

Topics: , , , , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Diana Moon Glampers

    Good for him going slightly out on a limb. In some ways it is much better for those who can write something influential to keep it mostly in bounds. If you can convince more people to move slightly toward reason, it has a greater effect than convincing a smaller number of people to change their beliefs more radically.

    • Brian

      True. My own conversion was gradual– if I’d had too much medicine all at once, I would have vomited it. I see the seeming cowardice/conciliation/hedging to be useful, regardless of motivation, in shifting the Overton Window. Wade may not have hit it out of the park, but it’s a solid double.

    • Luke N

      Just curious but how did amren get the book? It is not out yet, did they get early access or something?

    • http://www.presstitutes.org/ ms_anthro

      I agree with your post, but it’s terrifying that “going slightly out on a limb” is all it takes to be intellectually and professionally crucified these days. Meekness is just blood in the water for the sharks on the Left. This is why we must all go big or go home. They will hate truth-tellers no matter what, so we might as well tell the whole truth, every time.

      • Diana Moon Glampers

        And in my life I unflinchingly speak the truth and damn the consequences, but I am not writing books. The problem is that if you don’t go gently, the true believers will dismiss you, and the power mongers will tar and feather you. If you can produce something that stays at least parallel to the party line, you have a better chance of moving some people a little closer to rational. Most conversions to reality are gradual, and there really does need to be gentle nudges for a great many people. The indoctrination of lies has been gradual. If someone told my grandfather in 1950 that he needs to embrace affirmative action, gay marriage rights, an unqualified black leader gutting the economy and military while openly professing socialist ideals etc… He would have simply rejected it and scoffed. Gradual. It’s frustrating for those of us who can see, but if the day comes that we will all have to go big, every lemming we can peel from the herd will be needed.

        But yes, the fact that one must tread this lightly is infuriating

  • Tom Smith

    Looking forward to this.

    “Mr. Ward” = Mr. Wade

  • Erasmus

    Prof. Clark’s ingenious studies also show that the rich, who were more likely to have these useful traits,[being less violent, more literate, more inclined to save] had more children than the poor, many of whom were erased from the gene pool.

    Ironically, today our “compassionate” policies, (WIC, housing vouchers, AFDC, EITC), make dysfunctional behavior profitable and are making these genes commoner in our modern world. So, I would conclude that genes for compassion untempered by wisdom have their dark side.

    • WhiteGuyInJapan

      “So, I would conclude that genes for compassion untempered by wisdom have their dark side.”
      Within a homogeneous eco-system of a specific culture, compassion and high-trust values are very adaptive. When perpetual altruists live among freeloaders (low-trust, high-context), it becomes maladaptive.
      The Japanese appear to understand this, while the Scandinavians do not.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        The inverse of this is also true:

        “So, I would conclude that genes for wisdom untempered by compassion have their dark side.”

        This would describe that sub-population (who shall never be named or criticized) who believe ‘Diversity is for thee, but not for me’.

    • MikeofAges

      I have friend, and he is not kidding, who responds to any and all of these issues by saying, “That’s why we need nuclear war.

      “Throw everything up in the stratosphere and see how it comes down.” That his mantra.

      Too radical for almost everyone, but probably true. Another spin on it is rebooting history, and seeing how it plays out. Some say history has rebooted once or more than once already. Inevitably, it will reboot again. Just a question of whether it is slow or fast and whether in the near future or the far.

  • Spartacus

    “If the Chinese succeed in widespread embryo selection—an openly eugenic
    practice that terrifies Westerners—they will outstrip us in one generation. ”

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Well, that’s probably an exaggeration, but not far away from the truth . China has bigger issues besides technological backwardness, including their catastrophic demographic situation (there are places in China where the birth rate is less than a third of the replacement rate , and that is catastrophic in the long term, no matter how smart you are) , but with time, the yellow race will overtake us if we don’t wake up soon .

    • BonV.Vant

      The Chinese have gone been under the Once child” policy now for nearly two generations. IT is a decided dysgenic program. There were some peasants that were allowed to have two children.City dwellers, and therefore the educated and most likely the brighter chinese, only had one child. Tens of millions of males will never find a mate as there are not enough females. If anything, they have set themselves BACK.

      • Diana Moon Glampers

        That still seems less dysgenic than having a violent and stupid underclass literally paid to breed.

        • BonV.Vant

          True.

        • IstvanIN

          The violent Chinese are dispatched.

          • gene hayhoe

            By the violent Chinese govt.

            ‘Power over others – what else matters?’

        • gene hayhoe

          Violent and stupid ‘overclasses’ are incredibly dysfunctional as well.

      • Spartacus

        Just because someone lives on a farm, outside of a city, and doesn’t have a college education, doesn’t automatically make them less intelligent . Tim Wise has a college degree, and I’d bet anything that 99% of all farmers in China are smarter than him .

        • BonV.Vant

          China has a policy of advancing the brightest to schools in the cities. This is the way it has been there for thousands of years Many rural people in China are illiterate, even if the government says otherwise.

        • Geo1metric

          You are correct; I live in a rural area of Pennsylvania which is 99% White (German, Scotch/Irish). I am constantly amazed at the number of nuclear, electronic, and civil engineers that come out of these “hollers”.

          It gives me hope!

          • BonV.Vant

            My belief is that white genetics carries the potential for high intelligence. The west is different than asia.

          • Pro_Whitey

            I likes hope!

          • Geo1metric

            Well, as “the general” said, “son, hope is not a strategy”.

          • saxonsun

            Nothing amazing about it–that’s normal for us.

          • Geo1metric

            Spartacus posted:
            “Just because someone lives on a farm, outside of a city, and doesn’t have a college education, doesn’t automatically make them less intelligent .”

            I was agreeing with him. In addition, my observations refute the “city mouse/country mouse” idea that is rampant, probably throughout the world, that urban folks are somehow “smarter” than rural folks.

        • Jerrybear

          Certainly, Tim Wise is intelligent. He’s able to debate Mr. Taylor adeptly. He is enslaved to an unscientific and fanatical ideology which leads him to idiotic conclusions.

          • Spartacus

            I’ve listened to his debate with JT… He’s about as intelligent as a dead dog . He kept denying obvious facts without any shame, that’s the only thing that he’s capable of .

          • Jerrybear

            That’s what his ideology dictates. We have countless academics who have intelligence but zero wisdom. Wisdom comes from the lessons learned throughout history. The left disregards all historical wisdom because they feel the current generation is the most righteous and enlightened people who have ever lived. All generations that came before them are immoral because they weren’t ‘tolerant’ egalitarians like themselves.

          • Pro_Whitey

            One of the main arrows in the leftist quiver has always been the willingness to lie shamelessly, long, and loud. I’ve known it for years, and still it takes me aback at times. The other main arrow is a capacity for pure brutality toward other human beings that would make Hitler blush.

          • JohnEngelman

            The fact that Tim Wise is able to make a living denying obvious facts indicates considerable intelligence.

          • Jotun Hunter

            like the way you deny them? no it merely indicates ‘chutzpah’ – expressing intelligent thoughts indicates intelligence. speaking the truth and altering your opinion with evidence indicates something we call ‘honour’

          • JohnEngelman

            What facts do I deny? List several.

          • Jotun Hunter

            Where do I start? Primarily the fact that modern SAT scores and IQ stats are not equivalent to a history of proven creativity, invention, and general dominance artistically, philosophically, militarily etc. Modern white men are bent low currently precisely via modernity and attitudes such as yours, which parrot naive assumptions. Asiatics did not come up with cars, planes, submarines, phones, cell phones, satellites, computers, pragmatic uses of gunpowder or printing presses, the novel, the encylclopedia, the screw, the periodic table I’m not going to list everything in the world for you again. They have the odd confucious but no comparison for Magellan, Shakespeare, Beethoven, Plato, Davinci, etc etc etc. While the Levantines have the odd Kubrick, they are (as can be seen from the above article) responsible for much more destruction and trouble than gain.

            Please don’t respond with a post about ‘patents’

          • gemjunior

            “Asiatics did not come up with cars, planes, submarines, phones, cell phones, satellites, computers, pragmatic uses of gunpowder or printing presses, the novel, the encylclopedia, the screw, the periodic table I’m not going to list everything in the world for you again. They have the odd confucious but no comparison for Magellan, Shakespeare, Beethoven, Plato, Davinci, etc etc etc. While the Levantines have the odd Kubrick, they are (as can be seen from the above article) responsible for much more destruction and trouble than gain.” Perfect, short but sweet, Jotun Hunter.
            And for John Engelman:
            Refer to the above whenever you feel like you are about to type the words “Jews and Orientals have superior intelligence and whites are just jealous of them”. You got served Engelman.

          • Jotun Hunter

            if only it or anything else could put an end to his relentless shenanigans

          • gene hayhoe

            The first novel? Try Japan, 11th century, Tale of the Genji.

            Of course, ‘there’s always the Bible.’

          • gemjunior

            “Asiatics did not come up with cars, planes, submarines, phones, cell phones, satellites, computers, pragmatic uses of gunpowder or printing presses, the novel, the encylclopedia, the screw, the periodic table I’m not going to list everything in the world for you again. They have the odd confucious but no comparison for Magellan, Shakespeare, Beethoven, Plato, Davinci, etc etc etc. While the Levantines have the odd Kubrick, they are (as can be seen from the above article) responsible for much more destruction and trouble than gain.”

          • Gesamtzusammenhang

            Here’s the problem I notice: So many of these discussions on Amren devolve into Jewspiracy nonsense.
            Among the weird people of the Internet, I have read the following stated: Jews started WWII, the Bolshevik revolution was a Jewish revolution, Jews started the French revolution, the American revolution, they “own” the Federal Reserve, Christianity is a Jewish plot, and (my favorite) whoever disagrees or refutes any of it is a Jew themselves… The list goes on.

            And people are surprised that racialism isn’t taken more seriously when in nearly every respectable article by Jared Taylor, the comments section reflects a weird basement-dwelling people that belong to this absolutely kooky demographic. If I didn’t know any better, I would suspect that a certain number of the anti-Jewish agitators here are actually anti-racists that try to hamper racialism.

            For the record, and risking the possibility that I will be labeled a ‘rabbi’ by a bunch of Internet thugs, I would like to point out that many of the above Western inventions were Jewish inventions. Cellular technology was invented by Israelis, satellites/GPS/etc. use not only Einstein’s understanding of gravity in order to operate but they use technology developed by various Jewish technicians. Communications satellites were invented by Harold Rosen. Jews have discovered many elements to add to that periodic table. William Rankine invented sonar and radar.

            Airplanes? Airplanes were not invented by Jews, but David Schwarz
            (1852-1897) is the pioneer of aviation. He is responsible for flying machines, such as the Zeppelin, from years before the Wright brothers had success at Kitty Hawk.

            Phones? It’s worth looking into one of the most prolific American inventors in history: Jerome H. Lemelson. His inventions made possible the cordless phone, walkmans, camcorders, VHS, and industrial robots.

            Computers? Michael Rabin invented magnetic disk memory, along with many other things (like optical character recognition). Jacob Ziv, an Israeli electrical engineer, is responsible for data compression and the algorithms associated with that. Are you ever impressed by small devices holding vast amounts of information, and the fact that computers aren’t the size of buildings anymore? Thank Ziv.
            But speaking of the early, giant computers, Max Newman designed the first one, called ‘Colossus.’ John von Neumann, another Jew, is responsible for the architecture and basic structure of the modern computer. The subject of computers is a difficult thing to address in a single comment, because Jews–more than any other group–are responsible for them. So it’s quite ironic that it is now one of today’s more popular means of creating anti-Jewish kooks. But I’ll move on…

            Instant messaging wasn’t invented by AOL, they merely secured rights to it. It was invented by Israeli company Mirabilis in 1996. As far as computers go, Jews remain on the cutting edge of science, such as Lumio (an Israeli corporation) creating laser keyboards and such. And Waze (Israeli) creating GPS-route systems, which were purchased by Google in 2008. And quantum computing by Benioff, Feynman, and Deutsch.

            To be as marginal as some of the commentators here are, and to be as reductionist in their view of (“all”) Jews–of which mainly a loud minority are subversive– you have to live in something of a black hole (black hole entropy being something that was, interestingly, formulated by Jacob Bekenstein).

            But don’t blame the Jews when you find that kookiness marginalizes you from normal White America, who would otherwise be sympathetic to the positions on blacks, or be more likely to oppose race-mixing than hate Jews.
            To give you an idea of how marginalizing it is… David Duke ran in politics on a platform of denying all his ‘Zionist’ conspiracies and Jew hatred, and said that was something of his silly past–and that is how he won the majority of the Southern White vote. Because Southern Whites were sympathetic to his views, save the kooky Jewspiracy ones. Today, Duke is back to his old, corrupt and perverse, shenanigans and will never again be able to win in an election.
            But for the rest of us ‘normal’ racialists out there, what he had to do to win the election should tell us something about the non-mentally disturbed, God-fearing, charity giving, and good intelligent and creative White people out there that are responsible for this great nation–people who aren’t going on Jewish computers every day to complain about how Jews are terrible and made them sit through “Schindler’s List,” or whatever unimportant problem these fringers seem to have.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Trust me, Jotun, Rabbi Engelman is verrrrry slow on the uptake in the ‘honor’ department. I’m thinking about maybe trying flashcards for him in that area. He’s perpetuating his tribes’ stereotype.

            “…If you lie, cheat, and steal–and don’t get caught–you have a high IQ… Honor?? Huh??…”

          • Jotun Hunter

            What I find most pernicious about the rabbi is how he goes back and deletes his comments whenever he is suitably exposed, leaving it impossible to follow the thread of his unraveling. Then he’s back the next day with the same old talk.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yes, he is a skipping record. He conflates IQ with other traits he does not possess. He’s a western European wanna-bee.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews do not need to cheat. They win by superior intelligence.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            And so the record skips.

          • JohnEngelman

            Your posts resemble a broken record expressing repetitions of hatred.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Speaking the truth always makes a person an anti-Semite, John.
            Isn’t that the drill?

          • JohnEngelman

            The truth about Jews is that they tend to be more intelligent than Gentiles, they tend to be more prosperous, and some Gentiles hate them as a result. Hatred of Jews is a right wing form of the politics of envy.

          • Jotun Hunter

            You mean it’s impossible to mistrust them for any reason whatsoever, and anyone who does so is ‘jealous’ and ‘committing hate’? Therefore any one who notices the likes of Israel Ehrenberg from this article is merely a jealous hatemonger

          • Geo1metric

            Given the small number of Jews in the world, there are obviously more Gentile geniuses in the world than Jewish geniuses.

          • JohnEngelman

            Of course. That is why four out of five Nobel Prizes go to Gentiles. The rest go to Jews.

          • Jotun Hunter

            nobel prizes in literature for ‘my adopted mullato boy has two transgender dads’

          • Geo1metric

            Given the fact that there are more smart non Jews in America than smart Jews, how does one explain the huge numbers of Jews at the elite universities? There must be some kind of bias in favor of Jews being accepted over better qualified or equally qualified Whites.

          • Martel

            No its the politics of self-defence. It has been too long since the Jewish community organized to destroy Lindbergh after the Des Moines speech, and still today, a white European cannot decide in the best interest of his own people.

          • Geo1metric

            “Hatred of Jews is a right wing form of the politics of envy.”

            Please! Where are you from to come up with this nonsense?

            It is common knowledge that the vast majority of anti-semitism, at least in the US, comes from the Left, especially the college campuses and more specifically, the faculties.

          • SoulInvictus

            Sadly, that is the truth of it. There is probably much more Jewish support among the religous right that they deride than in the pro-Palestinian, anti-1% left.

          • silviosilver

            The vast majority of what an Engelman type would call “antisemitism” has no relation at all to envy. People are upset by what they regard as hypocrisy and double standards and are often so angry they are determined to hit back. One would be hard-pressed to detect any hint that these people feel “inferior” to Jews – typically, it’s quite the opposite.

          • Geo1metric

            I have read that Jews have been banished from practically every country in Europe at least once. Is that true? If so, it makes one wonder about the exodus from Egypt. Perhaps it was not a voluntary exodus at all, but a banishment.

          • silviosilver

            Who knows? It’s quite possible, you figure. A wit once joked that a thousand years from now their historiography will remember them having been enslaved in New York.

            That said, without knowing very much about the particulars, I’ve always felt that banishment was an unduly harsh punishment. So some Jew ripped off some peasant on a liquor deal – that really requires kicking out the entire bunch? It’s not as if banishment was predicated on the Jewish presence being a dire threat to racial integrity; people didn’t really think in such terms back then. So it was more than a bit harsh is my impression.

          • JohnEngelman

            When Jews were banished from England and France because of religious bigotry they were welcome in the Holy Roman Empire. That is why Yiddish is a combination of Hebrew and German.

          • Jotun Hunter

            oh no! the BIGOTRRYYYY!!! WAAAAAH!

          • Jotun Hunter

            There are very few places they aren’t generally reviled and mistrusted, from Russia to North Africa. Does it not seem curious? The only place they find engelman-worshippers is in the nations where they have almost total media (and thereby academia) control.

          • JohnEngelman

            Those are merely excuses.

          • Luca

            Why is there no equal universal hate for the intelligence and wealth of Asians?

            Could it have something to do with negative behavior that outweighs the qualities of intelligence? Could it be a superiority complex, arrogance, attempts at corrupting and controlling the host countries, virtual control of Hollywood, the media, academia, etc? Could it be stereotypes like greed, shyster lawyers, greed, nepotism, tribalism to the exclusion of others? Could it be Zionism, and they are pushing a dominance agenda by destroying the White-Euro, Christian, male power base?

            Could these things have anything to do with it John, or are these just malicious fairy tales unjustly created by jealous anti-semites?

            Just wondering.

          • SoulInvictus

            I’ve made that point before in other places. That even after a recent and bitter war that began with a murderous attack on Pearl Harbor and ended with Dos Nukes, there is not a rabid hatred of Japs in supposedly super racist America. Yet contempt for the tribe isn’t hard to find.
            If any group was going to evidence a zeitgeist of mindless hate, it would be for the Japanese. They look different, and they killed a lot of our fathers. Yet even among elderly vets I’ve met that isn’t the case.
            That fact alone demonstrates that racially based condemnations here are usually rooted in a cause not irrationality.

          • JohnEngelman

            Hatred of Jews is the socialism of the sewer.

          • Jotun Hunter

            chant that at your wailing wall. what about your hatred of blacks?

          • JohnEngelman

            My parents raised me not to hate blacks. What I feel for them is disappointment and personal betrayal. In many respects blacks have substantiated arguments I argued against as a child and teenager.

            Nevertheless, I like every black person I know. One of the most fascinating friends I ever had was a black college professor who taught at Howard University.

          • Jotun Hunter

            well that’s heart-warming engelman, but your blinders don’t let you see that virtually everyone here has that same experience, with blacks, jews, asians, gays — all of them. That doesn’t change the fact that a harder, Nietzschean view is not required in order to survive. Treating people at the individual level is nice, but as we see we must never lose sight of the flip side of the coin, that is how groups are likely to behave on the whole, or what we sacrifice in choosing ‘non-judgementalism’. The world is not made of buttercups and vietnamese restaurants. That each group exists, and by the law of nature has a unique purpose or agenda and ability set, is a simple fact of life modernism attempts to hide away in a box, to the detriment of one group only (currently), ours. White men, who built the concept of civilization and the best parts within it.

          • JohnEngelman

            White men, who built the concept of civilization

            - John Hunter

            You define “white” as “European Gentile.” Civilization began in the Nile Delta and in the Tigris Euphrates river valley. It was started by people I would define as white, but you probably would not. They were not Nordics.

          • Jotun Hunter

            Yes Engelman, I know that. But what were they exactly? Who can say – some Egyptian pharaoh mummies from the old period have ‘red’ hair – and as you know they were the descendants of Ptolemy after Alexander. For me ‘The West’ truly begins with Greece.

          • Geo1metric

            We can all come up with anecdotes about people of other races who were our friends. In my case it was a black man in boot camp. We still correspond after many decades.

            The fact of nature is that the races of men are in a long-term competition with each other to dominate the resources of the earth.

            I choose to be with my people in that competition. That’s all that needs to be said and understood about this entire matter.

          • Geo1metric

            I’ve noticed no “hatred of Jews” here. I certainly don’t hate them. Where do you see hatred? I see some criticism, but not hatred.

          • Jotun Hunter

            the Japanese are frankly excellent – almost on par with whites

          • gene hayhoe

            LOL, Luca, ‘you’ve never heard of Protestants?’

          • Jotun Hunter

            ‘hatred’ engelman? Say it isn’t so that you are also a purveyor of these meaningless modern buzzwords?

          • Katherine McChesney

            You use that ‘hatred’ card very liberally. I’ve heard it before and it’s boring. I think you use it because you are at a loss of words.

          • gemjunior

            No John, his posts don’t express repetitions of hatred at all; he points out the truth which is that Jews use whatever intelligence they have to band together and cheat non-Jews. They’ve done it for millennia, and were even well known in the middle east for eons back in prehistory as Hibiru (Hebrew if you say it fast) a pack of ancient marauding Hells Angels who laid waste to any innocent person they could exploit. And they haven’t changed.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is a repulsive lie.

            There are only three characteristics that differentiate Jews from Gentiles. They have a different religions. They tend to be more intelligent. They tend to earn more money as a result.

            I respect their religion. I admire their intelligence. I am delighted with their prosperity.

          • Jotun Hunter

            what do they win? they degrade polite society, aesthetics, and cohesion and befoul their own nests with modern art, bolshevism, feminism, etc?

          • JohnEngelman

            You are degrading this website with your antisemitism. Those who hate blacks can document negative facts about blacks. Those who hate Jews reveal negative facts about themselves. Antisemitism is founded on envy and resentment of a superior people because they are superior.

          • silviosilver

            While many would find this behavior infuriating, I believe your posts should not be deleted. It can be instructive for readers to observe the behavior of a devout anti-white a–hole.

          • JohnEngelman

            My comments are fact based, logical, and civil.

            What you are is obvious to any decent person who reads your posts.

          • silviosilver

            I hope it is obvious that I am not an evasive, duplicitous anti-white a–hole. The same cannot be said for you.

          • JohnEngelman

            Just because I admire Jews and Orientals does not mean that I am anti white Gentile.

            I am anti affirmative action. I do not want white male Gentiles to be hired or promoted instead of more qualified people of other races or sex.

          • silviosilver

            It is not your position on Jews for which I call you an anti-white a–hole. Your clumsy insinuation that is is only further evidence of evasive, duplicitous mentality.

            No, you are a fundamentally anti-white a–hole because you categorically deny whites any right to a racial future. You demand white extinction yet, at times, perhaps when you think no one’s looking, you pretend that it isn’t occurring and is not the ultimate outcome of your designs.

          • Geo1metric

            So all other races can have, and benefit from, racial solidarity except White males. Typical.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I love how he goes around upvoting his own comments – or perhaps it’s some compatriot on the Soros/Wise payroll

          • silviosilver

            I didn’t know you could upvote your own comments, unless you mean he’s operating separate accounts. I wouldn’t put it past him. That he’s on some kind of personal mission to discredit existential racial concerns is clear. It’s certainly interesting that of all the upvotes he gets virtually no one seems willing to step up and defend him when he’s under fire for his misrepresentations. As for being on someone’s payroll, well, I know this is only a comments thread, but I would warn you not to develop a habit of jumping to conspiratorial conclusions – whether you’re right or not it just sounds weird to anyone reading (or, irl face-to-face, listening).

          • Jotun Hunter

            most of his upvotes are from ‘guests’ – though I suppose somehow he does have the odd fan. Probably asians or jews, of course. I don’t know how wild a conspiracy that might be, in light of groups like pussy riot etc. – I do believe he has a kind of agenda, paid or not. He is just such a monotonous machine, it’s not like a normal discourse, even if you try to be civil with IT.

          • Geo1metric

            I cannot tell whether that poster is a male or female. I cannot tell what race that person is.

          • Jotun Hunter

            your comments are based on personal bias, they are largely illogical, and civil if you think endlessly droning an unshakable and insufferable opinion like a robot, without wit or charm or adequate rhetoric is polite conversation.

          • JohnEngelman

            Just because I expose your prejudices with facts and logic does not mean that what you say about me is true.

            If my opinions are illogical, what are the fallacies I commit? List them.

          • Jotun Hunter

            my prejudices? nobody here uses the word ‘superior’ more than you. I have said the same thing to you several times now, I’ll say it once more – your evidence for your claims lies soley with SAT scores and IQ score and contemporary crime stats. From this youve deduced this ridiculous utopian vision which does not include any record of the past, for which I will not list for you for the nth time the vast superiority of white european achievement. Moon landings, modern medicine, you cannot discount these things away with your spurious arguments (which arent arguments at all, just repetition) Penicillin alone should give you a twinge of doubt. How about the entire practice of biology or chemistry? We created everything in the world, yet you think youre a genius for endlessly prating about patents.

          • Geo1metric

            Calling some” antisemitic” is not “fact based, logical, and civil”.

          • David Ashton

            His simple-minded single-cause view of “antisemitism” is not all that prominent among that many Jewish writers on the subject, though my old friend Nathaniel Weyl (Gentile mother, Jewish father) was quite fond of it. I don’t desire AmRen to turn into an obsessive anti-Jewish website, but I must say that it is quite ridiculous to imply that Jews are the only people about whom no “negative” facts can possibly be documented.

          • silviosilver

            Engelman doesn’t merely imply it; he states it outright. He did a fine job pretending to be a friend of amren’s cause for a long time, but now that his duplicity has been exposed I can see no purpose in permitting him to post here and derail threads.

          • David Ashton

            I don’t wish to cast “aspergions” but I have had the impression that his tedious repetitions indicate something other than “duplicity”, but keeping robots of the road, so to speak, is a matter for the moderator or “minder”.

          • silviosilver

            I used to think the same thing but his most recent series of replies to me (here and elsewhere) suggest something else.

          • Geo1metric

            “Robotic” certainly fits.

          • Geo1metric

            To present criticism about a person or a group of people does not imply “hatred” and also does not merit the pejorative “anti-semite”, although that seems to be the case in the West these days.

            A certain poster here also seems to like to throw around the word “hate” and “anti-semite” whenever criticism of a certain group is launched.

            The practice is loathsome and anti-intellectual.

          • Martel

            Europeans can document plenty of negative facts about Jews, Kevin Macdonald performed interesting research on this subject. I have no issue with any rich Jew because he is rich, I’m not a socialist hence I am not envious, something which possibly explains your faulty conclusions. I have never even seen a wealthy jew, my problem is that I’m fed anti-European history since i learned how to tie my shoes, and this has led to the destruction of my country.

            You know this, but because you are so infatuated with Jews, as Tim Wise is with blacks, you are blind to the fact that all ethnic groups err.

          • JohnEngelman

            It is easy for me to document negative facts about blacks by posting links to several websites containing data compiled by credible sources. They tend to be less intelligent than whites and Orientals. They tend to have higher rates of crime and illegitimacy.

            It is not possible to do this with Jews. It is easy to document that they tend to be more intelligent and prosperous than white Gentiles.

          • Martel

            Kevin Macdonald somehow managed. Intelligence is influenced partly by the educational appetite of the parents, something which has been lost among Europeans, I’m sure the difference would be negligible if the effects of postmodernism would subside. The world agrees with me, Jews are increasingly unpopular. I don’t want this, all I ask for is for Jews to no longer consider Europeans their moral inferiors because they have falsified history to protect their image.

            Even you admitted that morality isn’t necessarily linked to intelligence, unless you seriously believe someone like Tim Wise is motivated not by his selfish desire to come across saintly, no matter the costs for the white children who are beaten to a pulp every cinco de mayo,but by some twisted form or morality.

          • Luca

            If you have a disproportionate control of media, you can censor your critics and glorify your image.

            Google: Who Controls America or realjewnews

          • JohnEngelman

            No one controls America. Increasingly America is dominated by a cognitive elite of individuals with genius level IQ’s and professional degrees from elite universities. Those members are increasingly Jewish and Oriental because they tend to be more intelligent than white Gentiles.

          • Luca

            Genius level IQ’s? You mean like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi?

          • Geo1metric

            Read some H. Belloc and some Disraeli.

          • David Ashton

            I don’t think he will. He “knows the truth” and that’s it. There are plenty of pro-Israel and anti-anti-Semitic writers we can all profit from reading, but our Sinophile Nordic Episcopalian could broaden his own mind by actually reading relevant scholarly works by Albert Lindemann, Kevin MacDonald, Otto Weininger, Jerry Muller and Stephen Sizer just for starters.

          • Geo1metric

            Thanks for the reading list! I am familiar with Lindemann and Muller.

          • David Ashton

            I wish our Sino-Zionist would read outside his metallic box.

          • Jotun Hunter

            you are degrading it with your endless self-centered propagandizing. It’s at this stage that your rambling about superiors really waddles into mentally disturbed territory. At least I only post here occasionally, you’re all over every article – annoying people here is your life.

          • Brian

            A true believer in HBD does not lightly toss around value-laden terms like ‘superior’ without qualification. Whites, compared to blacks, have superior intelligence, but inferior sprinting speed. Didn’t you say something recently about how making careful distinctions is a mark of intelligence?

          • tetrapod

            I agree with you that this may be true in some cases. And yet, when you subtract that element, there is still plenty of room to question whether Jewish behavior has not been inimical to western institutions and traditions.

          • JohnEngelman

            How has Jewish behavior been inimical to western institutions and traditions?

          • tetrapod

            I’m not necessarily saying that it has. However, one should be able to entertain that as a working hypothesis, which seems reasonable given the long history of enmity between Jews and Europeans.

            In any event, envy of the Jews is no argument against that hypothesis.

          • JohnEngelman

            Initially Jews were hated because of their religion. After they were allowed to compete intellectually and financially with Gentiles were were resented by those who could not compete with them.

          • tetrapod

            I think it’s possible that the “hatred because of their religion” argument is a canard. It assumes people act on principle, when most of the time they do not. How likely is it that dirt poor common folk during the middle ages were actually impelled to murder Jews based solely on the notion that Jews were Christ killers? Isn’t it equally possible the Jews were perceived as a hostile elite, and the common folk simply erupted in rage at their oppressors? Is it not possible the “hatred because of religion” argument mistakes cause for effect? In other words, they were not hated because they were Jews, they were “Jews” because they were hated?

            This line of reasoning seems entirely plausible, based on a lifetime of observing human nature, and also based on the behavior of certain contemporary Jews.

            Mark Zuckerburg, for example. His is fabulously wealthy and is utterly dominant in the newly emergent realm of social media. And he uses his wealth and power in the relentless pursuit of open borders, regardless of what that entails for the white founders of this country.

            Another example: The collusion of Abe Foxman and Phil Griffin to sllence Pat Buchanan, whose only “crime” was to simply observe that whites were soon to be a minority in the US. Mr Griffin decided to fire Buchanan because “such thoughts” were not “suitable” in contemporary America.

            And Diane Feinstein, who has been quoted as saying “someday we’ll have all their guns”, in a direct attack on the 2nd amendment rights held dear by middle American common folk.

            The list goes on and on …Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, Daniel Ellsberg, S. J. Gould …

            Truly … is there not a pattern here?

          • Jotun Hunter

            I can’t believe how close you are to weeping

          • Geo1metric

            You impute “hatred” to those who disagree with your position.

            I have yet to see “hatred” displayed by any poster on this site.

            I do not hate anyone, blacks, Jews, or orientals.

            I simply want to be left alone for my people to be left alone. How do translate that wish into hatred of any other peoples?

          • JohnEngelman

            When you say that you want your people to be left alone do you mean that you do not want your employer to hire qualified people of other races?

          • Geo1metric

            I believe that racially homogeneous societies are most conducive to harmonious relationships and therefore to productive and wealthy countries.

          • JohnEngelman

            Countries where nearly everyone is white and of European ancestry, or Oriental have responded well to national traumas. It only took Germany and Japan one generation to recover from the devastation of World War II.

            Orientals and Jews perform and behave well in the United States.

            I do not think we should be admitting third world peoples. I think the United States would be a far better country if the slave trade had never existed.

            Now that they are here I want all careers to be open to talent, regardless of race. I am opposed to affirmative action.

          • Jotun Hunter

            ‘now that they are here…’ — they are still coming

          • JohnEngelman

            If you had read my comment you would have read this, “I do not think we should be admitting third world peoples. “

          • Jotun Hunter

            we don’t need more asians or jews either

          • JohnEngelman

            Every country needs people with high IQ’s.

          • Jotun Hunter

            we have that – we have super genius iq levels asians cannot reach – bringing them in will only bring tension, strife, rivalry, societal decay. Not that it’s not already too late for that. Bring in enough chinese and you get china.

          • Geo1metric

            Once again, it’s not about IQ, we have enough of that in our race; it’s about race!!

          • Geo1metric

            I am opposed to multi-cultural “societies”. They do not work well.

          • Jotun Hunter

            it is a simple and painfully obvious fact

          • David Ashton

            Is seems impossible to get the Nordic Episcopalian Human Gramophone to agree that high IQs and even material prosperity are not the only relevant criteria for AmRen, and that some Jews and some Orientals (like Mexicans or Arabs) may have ethnic agendas of their own, reinforced by their intelligence and success, but which do not harmonize readily with those of “native white Anglo Gentiles” – whose own “anti-defamation” activity or defensive resistance is attacked as “racism”.

            Even those many Americans who support Israel, for whatever reasons, can hardly deny the impact of organized Zionist lobbying and funding out of all proportion to the population percentage of Jews in the USA, or the fact that Israel is technically a foreign power. Nor can those who welcome the brains of Chinese men and the beauty of Chinese girls seriously deny that the presence of large and influential “Oriental” communities within US borders could affect foreign policy beyond US borders.

          • SoulInvictus

            “Those who hate Jews reveal negative facts …”
            about history.
            There, fixed it for you. Some of the wonderful things we can thank the tribe for:
            Usury, Communism (and all the deaths that resulted from it), the Holomodor, Nukes, Rothschilds, the Fed, and undermining all 3 of the greatest white nationalist states of history (UK, Germany, and the US).
            What’s not to love…

          • SoulInvictus

            Who in the hell would upvote that garbage on this site? And if so, why are you even here other than to troll.

            The only thing the success of jews demonstrates is that when you take European genes and some of its culture, then severely consolidate wealth among a diminished (and so increasingly tribally loyal) population, then they have drivers and means to facilitate success.
            The jews you likely idealize, do not look like middle eastern people do they? (Einstein looked like a kraut not Arafat).
            They are a bastardized European genetic subset augmented by a strong cultural identity (which they have discouraged among every actual European group that they’ve infiltrated), which means, not an exception to the rule. And certainly not superior in any way derived from their own ancestry or culture.

            To drive home this point, ancient world Hebrews pioneered nothing new.
            Not writing, not architecture, not technology, not art, not government, none of the hallmarks of a superior society. Even their faith is an amalgam of other older religions in the region. They are similar to the Japanese in that they originate little, but adapt well.

            The only possible exception to that would be in honed argumentative debate developed through religious traditions (which did not even come close to the philosophical minds of Greece and Rome). That goes a long way to explain their success as comedians and lawyers, the latter of which in modern society exercise a disproportionate power than would otherwise be afforded them in better days.
            Their greatest area of success, finance, being an arena left to them because Europeans thought it distasteful and rightfully that usury was immoral. Being an immoral culture that had no such ethical qualms about endeavoring in the business of screwing outsiders, then yeah, they were able to prey in that field well. And continued on to the present day.
            If your idea of superior intelligence, is one of guileful bickering and deceit, then sure that skillset will do well in the cesspit of modern life when honor, duals, and even a straightforward punch in the mouth have long been legislated out of the toolbox for correcting a wayward sociopath.

          • LACountyRedneck

            And Blacks win races because they can run fast. I believe our society would do better without their involvement.

          • https://politicallogical.wordpress.com/ WideBridge

            We right-wing Whites have major parts of the big answer but maybe not all. Pride goeth before a fall. We are taken with our altruism and intelligence. Maybe there are other traits, embarrassing for us, but necessary for group survival. Maybe we are woefully lacking, suicidally lacking, in recognition of some these. (Hint: three letter word spelled e-g-o.)

          • Jotun Hunter

            if we are woefully lacking it has only been so since the 1960′s, we were strong until then. That’s not that long ago to pass judegement and give up. There are those of us that will never give up. And woe betide the world if we do, as it will then be cast in darkness. Literally.

          • Geo1metric

            Or lack thereof in his audiences. Or incredible ignorance of his audiences.

            For example knowing what I know about the “race” issue, I would never invite and pay T. Wise to speak. I wonder why anyone else would pay him to spew his tripe.

          • JohnEngelman

            You mistake your strong opinions for intelligence. I am confident that most if not virtually all of those who pay for Tim Wise’s appearances are college students and college graduates.

          • Jotun Hunter

            therefore they are geniuses? I’d say therefore they are marxists

          • JohnEngelman

            If you knew more about political trends you would know that Marxism is a dying ideology. It is becoming a word that Republican mothers use to scare their naughty children with.

          • Jotun Hunter

            if you knew anything other than what your sociopathic repeat button instructs your robot brain you would have heard of terms like ‘cultural marxism’ which is very much not on the wane – you should know since you are one

          • JohnEngelman

            Cultural Marxism is not a self conscious movement by those who call themselves “Cultural Marxists.” It is a derogatory term like “racist.” Neither of those terms should be used in a rational debate because they are appeals to emotion.

            As far as I have been able to understand “cultural Marxist” is a derogatory term for social liberal. I am socially conservative. I have always disliked the sexual revolution. I hate criminals and favor a harsh criminal justice system. I am pessimistic about human nature and human potential. I think there is often wisdom in tradition.

            I have also studied the writings of Karl Marx. Like any political thinker he should be read for insight rather than doctrine. Marx had valid insights and made critical mistakes.

          • Jotun Hunter

            then you have failed to understand it – like so many other things

          • silviosilver

            I would be wary of assuming Engelman is ignorant. Far safer to assume he is being thoroughly disingenuous.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I would be inclined to agree – I notice the recent accusation of not being European did not warrant any rebuff. He will probably attempt now that I am saying this. If however he is not a troll as he appears, then he does have some kind of mental blockage.

          • JohnEngelman

            dis·in·gen·u·ous
            ˌdisinˈjenyo͞oəs/
            adjective
            1. not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.
            synonyms:insincere, dishonest, untruthful, false, deceitful, duplicitous, lying,mendacious;

            ——-

            What am I dishonest about?

          • Jotun Hunter

            if you are not dishonestly trolling you should be sincerely embarrassed

          • Geo1metric

            Well, there’s also insincere, deceitful, duplicitous, and mendacious.

          • David Ashton

            I have stopped bothering to reply to the Nordic Episcopalian who likes Chinese girls and loves Israelis of both genders, because as shown again on this thread he just repeats again and again the same utterances “confident” that they meet the points raised by others.

            For example, high IQ does not guarantee morally or socially desirable behavior: it might just make it more harmful, insidious and harder to detect or punish. The comparative success of a distinct ethnic community might be the result of high IQ AND intra-ethnic co-operation.

            His comments on antisemitism strike me as rather simplistic, even jejune, and ignorant of any in-depth research. But he just recites them oblivious to any criticism. Any acquaintance with Jewish literature shows how Jews often get together to advance their own perceived interests. There is nothing surprising about this. Whether it is good or bad for other people rather depends on the results. The prominence of intelligent Jews in science and medicine is good, whereas their prominence in financial racketeering or pornography promotion is not.

          • Geo1metric

            I’ll see your Nordic Episcopalian and raise you one mixed-race Jewish/Asian.

          • David Ashton

            He is a busted flush who won’t leave the table.

          • Martel

            Well put.

          • David Ashton

            If you present data or counter-argument he usually ignores it, and then repeats himself later as if nothing has happened. I don’t think there is a single sentence in this previous reply that he has not uttered VERBATIM at least once, mostly several times, before.

            If you present documentation on, for example, “Cultural Marxism”, by scholars like Dennis Dworkin, he will respond either by saying there are books with opposite views or by expecting you to summarize the contents here – what he won’t do is check his own views by reading something else. As for “Cultural Marxism” its own exponents call(ed) their position the New Left or Critical Studies, but Marxism was a component in their drive to control the cultural superstructure rather than the economic base of western society. We have been over all this before, and I have provided short relevant reading lists – futile in the case of the Nordic Episcopalian – which is why I avoid “debating” directly within him.

          • silviosilver

            He seems genuinely offended that those who take exception to the activities of the New Left would attach a rude label like “cultural marxism” to their enemies, likening it to the use of the label “racist.” In case Engelman hasn’t noticed “racist!” has been a stunning success, just as has “ugly antisemitic canard.” Or perhaps he has noticed.

          • Martel

            Marxist philosophers are as popular as ever, take the Occupy Wall Street crowd, take the teachers unions spotted at Marxist conferences, who will prepare another generation to vote socialist and lean Marxist. As long as McCarthyism is a pejorative, despite the fact that he has long been vindicated by the Soviet Archives, it shows the Marxist sympathizers are still in power. This is only sensible as political correctness was manufactured by communist sympathizers.

          • JohnEngelman

            A Marxist is someone who calls himself a Marxist. I have known Marxists. I have often liked them. They were not shy about identifying themselves as Marxists.

            During the War in Vietnam Marxism was a minority persuasion of some anti war activists. Since that war it has fallen out of fashion. The American Communist Party consists of several thousand members nationwide. The Progressive Labor Party has several hundred members. If the Socialist Workers’ Party, the Workers’ League, and the Revolutionary Communist Party exist at all they consist of a handful of dues paying members.

            A few of these members may be seen at Occupy demonstrations handing out leaflets. That does not mean that the Occupy movement is Marxist.

          • David Ashton

            Was it Bukovsky or another Russian who said, “There are no Marxists in the old Soviet empire; they’re all in American universities”? An exaggeration, but a shrewd one.

            The “Marxism” of Marx differed from that of Lenin, of Mao, of Marcuse and of Slavoj Zizek, just the Christianity of Jesus differed from that of Athanasius, of Zwingli, of Pius XII and of Judge Rutherford. The return of a global crisis of capitalism will produce new forces in this “tradition” in an environment already well-prepared by liberal egalitarianism, reverse colonialism and dysgenic chaos.

            It is risky to quote the doyenne of conspiracy theory, Nesta Webster, but nearly 100 years ago she pointed out with some truth: “To that small minority among working-men that comprises the ‘revolutionary proletariat’ the meaning of ‘The Communist Manifesto’…is clear enough…the abolition of monarchy and all ordered government, of property and inheritance, of patriotism, of marriage and the family, of all religion…and the communal education of children by the State. This, divested of its trappings, is the real plan of Marxian Socialism, which enveloped in the algebraic phraseology of ‘Das Kapital’ is less easy to discover.”

          • Geo1metric

            Gosh David, Nesta would be told to put on her tinfoil hat today! I have read some of her work.

          • David Ashton

            Like many untutored researchers of her time she wrote a mixture of good and not-so-good material, and the Oxford historian Alan Taylor paid tribute to her book on the French Revolution. Her secretary Tony Gittens, who made a mess of updating her book on World Revolution, admitted that she did NOT in fact believe that the Protocols of Zion were genuine, and in this particular respect she was right.

          • Geo1metric

            I got my college degrees (yes, I have advanced degrees) when colleges required meeting academic standards to graduate. I also know what my IQ is, Mr. Engelman, and I bow to no one in that regard either.

          • Martel

            I highly doubt you will find that a significant portion of college students pays for Tim Wise’s speeches. Any evidence for this claim?

          • JohnEngelman

            First of all I do not agree with Tim Wise. I do not admire him. It was by reading his essay “The Color of Deception,” which was a condemnation of “The Color of Crime,” that I was attracted to the American Renaissance website.

            During an exchange of e-mail letters that I was trying to keep civil he became increasingly uncivil, and eventually blocked my e-mail letters.

            What I suspect is that whites who pay for his nonsense are college educated.

          • Jotun Hunter

            and therefore intellecutally ‘superior’ as you like to put it and therefore justifying tim wise as a fellow intellectual superior by right of his apparent ‘success’. Must I remind you how to follow the crux of your own hollow arguments?

          • JohnEngelman

            I respect successful people even when I do not like them.

          • Geo1metric

            Define successful.

          • JohnEngelman

            Successful people are those who achieve wealth, power, and prestige doing what they enjoy doing.

          • Geo1metric

            When someone who has wealth, power, and prestige kills themselves, what do you call them…besides dead?

          • Geo1metric

            You say what he sells is nonsense, and also say he is “intelligent”. What does that make him?

          • antiquesunlight

            If the professors and student body at my college are any general indication of what college educated people think about racial and cultural issues, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised…

          • Sick of it

            Most college students, including grad students, that I’ve met have had an unimpressive IQ. Some were just plain dumb.

          • Geo1metric

            …or the unbounded ignorance of his audiences.

          • WhiteGuyInJapan

            Mr. Wise displays a certain verbal intelligence, characteristic of his ethny. Argumentation using moral persuasion and even ignoring/denying data seems to fit that (horrible) debating style. Quick to accuse others of evil, straight out of Allinsky.

          • Sick of it

            His people are natural born liars. It’s their best trait.

          • Rhialto

            Wise also knows that advancing Liberalism is (at least in the short term) to his benefit.

        • IstvanIN

          Henry Ford and Philo Farnsworth were farm boys.

        • JohnEngelman

          The white liberal guilt complex has not made sense since the War in Vietnam, when white anti war activists were trying to win black allies.

          Any intelligent white liberal should understand (and I am sure most privately do) that the black ghetto riots of the 1960′s, and more enduring increases in black social pathology have changed the United States into a Republican country. Race wrecked liberalism.

          Nevertheless, Tim Wise is able to make a fairly decent living pandering to the white liberal guilt complex. It takes considerable intelligence to reinforce guilt among those who should feel angry.

          • Geo1metric

            “It takes considerable intelligence to reinforce guilt among those who should feel angry.”

            And the ability to shamelessly lie.

          • JohnEngelman

            While we are discussing lies, the lies of Rush Limbaugh have been documented since 1994. Lies work politically when there is a large audience that wants to believe them.

          • Jotun Hunter

            everything is bias engelman, and truth depends on perspective. Objective truths lie firmly within the realm of self preservation, and not merely survival, but gain. For that reason the likes of you must be weeded out from our own group. Not that I truly believe you are western european, but you present yourself as, so I must go along with that just in case.

          • Geo1metric

            He claims to be White, and if that’s so, then he is truly a “self-hating” White.

          • JohnEngelman

            How do you intend to weed us out?

          • Jotun Hunter

            you’re not going to cry are you?

          • JohnEngelman

            First of all, and most obviously I am not part of your group. I would rather spend my time with an intelligent, well informed, and civil Negro than someone like you.

            Now answer my question. How do you intend to weed us out? Keep in mind that my opinions are far more mainstream than yours are.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I don’t have to answer any of your silly questions troll – I would weed a niusance like you out by banning you from these forums. I would rather be around an uncivil negro than a parasite like you.

          • Geo1metric

            “Keep in mind that my opinions are far more mainstream than yours are.”

            Being a member of the majority is nothing to brag about.

          • Geo1metric

            Two lies don’t make the truth; why on earth would you bring up the blowhard Limbaugh? Yet another non sequitur.

          • JohnEngelman

            Most people allow their likes and dislikes to influence their judgement of what is true and false. Rush Limbaugh and Tim Wise take advantage of this tendency.

            I can understand why angry white reactionaries want to believe the lies of Rush Limbaugh. I have difficulty understanding why white liberals want to believe the lies of Tim Wise.

            White liberals ought to be angry at blacks. Blacks have disappointed the hopes placed on them during the civil rights movement. By doing so blacks have made liberalism an unpopular persuasion.

          • Geo1metric

            Astute people did not place any “hopes” on blacks at any time. They knew what blacks were capable of.

            The only ones who placed “hopes” on blacks were starry-eyed utopians/ progressives. They are the ones who have destroyed our culture.

          • antiquesunlight

            What sort of things are you referring to when you mention Limbaugh’s lies? I don’t listen to him much, but when I do, most of what he says makes good sense to me. Actually, I prefer that guy Mark Steyn, who occasionally fills in for him.

          • Jotun Hunter

            objective truth is more elusive than you are capable of realizing. But that only puts more importance on the belief in ones own subjectivity.

          • Luca

            The country was quite Republican during most of the 50′s, remember Eisenhower’s two terms? JFK was an economic conservative – socially liberal Democrat and LBJ simply rode in on his coat tails playing the sympathy card after the assassination.

            LBJ unknowingly started the modern Liberal domino-effect because he was a sinister fool. LBJ started recklessly spending in Vietnam and with the so-called “war on poverty” welfare state, then he threw in the immigration Act for good measure.

            You can trace the decline of the country right back to 1965.

      • TheAntidote

        They are still better off with less people. They are going to need fewer and fewer peasants as agriculture steadily mechanizes, and eventually all those people in factories making buttons, toilet scrubbers, fly swatters and erie valves are going to want better pay….which will lead to automation, then robotization, and fewer and fewer workers needed.

      • Brian

        This is true, but most advanced societies are suffering from that same childbirth dysgenic problem. If the Chinese can take contravening action on the (primitive) gengineering front, and they alone do it, they could have an enormous comparative advantage, even if the birthrate problem remains in place.

        • Geo1metric

          I like “gengineering”. I think genetic engineering will hold some major surprises for us in the not to distant future. And I agree with you that those who get the “jump” will have tremendous advantage, an advantage which could easily be impossible for others to overcome.

      • MikeofAges

        They may be under “One Child”, but we’re under “All Children Left Behind”, and have been since 1970. Except for those for whom specific arrangements have made to bring them into the overclass.

    • WR_the_realist

      That’s not catastrophic when a country’s population is 1.3 billion and its people are in no danger of being outnumbered by minorities within their own country.

      • Spartacus

        Yes, but they’re still in danger of being an extremely aged society, and that’s not the making of a super-power, quite the opposite .

        • WR_the_realist

          Who cares whether China gets to be a superpower? The U.S. being a superpower simply means we incur unpayable debt in order to fight other people’s wars. Any government leadership with any sense would try to avoid that fate.

    • CaptainCroMag

      My bets are with the Japanese. They are east Asians but they are naturally more organized and suited for industrialized civilization than the Chinese. I’ve traveled to both China and Japan as well as other Asian countries and when it comes to order and cleanliness, Japanese stand apart from other Asians. They too have and an aging population, but they lead the world in robotics. Their new conservative government is already rebuilding their military and proposing to change their pacifist constitution. Their new aircraft carrier that is designed to accommodate drones has infuriated the Chinese. The Japanese create technology that the Chinese have to buy or steal from Western countries. The Japanese are just biding their time and waiting for US power to wane.

  • NotAnEskimo

    Mr. Taylor, can you please try to organize a debate with Mr. Diamond? I want to see Jared vs. Jared!

  • B.B.

    It appears Mr. Taylor his misspelled Mr. Wade’s name as “Mr. Ward” some 8 times.

    • Spartacus

      Yeah, I noticed too. Slip of the pen, no big deal .

  • Glen

    “The ease with which our rulers have driven common sense about race, sex, and nation underground shows how cowardly and conformist the heirs to the Industrial Revolution have become.”

    The number of warriors among our people has been on the decline since long before the Industrial Revolution. Post-IR technology and socio-political reality has steadily amplified the selection pressure against the warrior gene. The American Civil War and two World Wars in Europe killed off a huge proportion of our bravest and reduced the number of our warriors to a pittance. Something/s in the environment is causing a drop in the testosterone levels of Western man. So tell me again why we are bothering with any of this? Most of our remaining warriors have been co-opted by the regime. It pays more and the career prospects are better. The remainder are too few, too scattered, and lack the resources to change anything – that is, unless they are willing to fight extremely dirty and are willing to lose 3 or 4 for every one of the regime’s warriors. There is simply no persuading the plutocracy controlling the regime to our point of view, for they have always hated us and are protective of their position and status. When John Derbyshire says we’re “scre*w*d,” I believe him.

    • ThomasER916

      The last warriors left are in America and Eastern Europe. Unfortunately Americans are Zionists and won’t point their guns where they should.

      • BonV.Vant

        Hunger, starvation, will turn any man into a warrior.

        • Glen

          Hunger and starvation turns men into thieves, not warriors.

          • Erasmus

            I take it you’ve never heard of armed robbery.

          • Glen

            I take it your unable to distinguish between warriors and armed robbers.

          • BonV.Vant

            The only difference is the size of the organization.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I like to think of it as warriors who feed on their conquests.

          • Glen

            Warriors can loot and pillage, of course, but pillaging is unorganized mob action that follows the organized killing of enemy warriors. I know that my point above is unpopular, but is nevertheless true. Hunger and starvation is not sufficient to turn genetically docile, cowardly men into reliable, trained comrades with effective leaders and sufficient resources to wage war against the regime.

          • BonV.Vant

            Correct, but the docility of a group of people evaporates under conditions of starvation. White people in the US are not “genetically” docile, nor are they unreliable, nor are they untrainable. To conclude that a population that has no reason to rise up in an organized manner and rebel, has been genetically tamed is not logical. One does not necessarily follow from the other. There are many reasons why they are currently docile. The Spartans fed their slaves breakfast, lunch and dinner, while the Spartan’s themselves only ate an evening meal. Being over fed makes one docile.

        • ThomasER916

          That will turn any man into a bandit. Not the same thing.

          • BonV.Vant

            when a GROUP of people is forced to starve, then they are not individual bandits. What is an army other than an organized group of bandits?

          • ThomasER916

            It didn’t take long before you went full Libtard in public.

          • ThomasER916

            “What is an army other than an organized group of bandits?”

            You’re obviously indoctrinated. You’re so indoctrinated you believe whites don’t have a right to form in their collective self-interest.

      • JohnEngelman

        And where is that?

        • ThomasER916

          Where is a place.

          Who is a person or people.

          The Culture of Critique.

        • ThomasER916

          Where is a location.

          English is difficult for people like you who have an agenda that runs counter to whites and Western Civilization.

  • The Verdict of History

    We are neither created nor equal.

    • Alexandra1973

      I agree with the last half of that.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I lean toward Deism, like Jefferson et al. The world is too perfect, the periodic table too complete for the universe to be an accident. I believe in Natural Law. I leave the door open a crack as to how the universe was created. It’s quite likely that there is a higher power that created the universe–and ultimately evolution. But, no religion ever got that right.

        • BonV.Vant

          Evolution is one of the most anti intellectual theories ever proposed. To suggest that humans were not created but “evolved” begs the question “evolved from what and how did that stuff get here?” Evolution answers nothing.

          • Jerrybear

            The theory that evolution came from randomness ignores the incomprehensible complexities of life and the universe.

          • Geo1metric

            I agree, but what you state is equally true when one defaults to the spiritual answer.

          • BonV.Vant

            you mean, who created god? Yes, but believers of religion know and admit they can not answer some things. Evolutionist have their theory and think it answers everything.

          • Geo1metric

            That’s close to what I mean; The “spiritual” answer to “what’s it all about, Alphie”, actually generates as many, if not more, questions than the “physical” answer.

          • BonV.Vant

            Why can one not accept the fact that some questions are not answerable?

          • Geo1metric

            Actually, I think that we can never know everything since the more we “learn”, the more questions are generated. So, scientific investigators have job security…well, forever.

          • BonV.Vant

            Depends on what kind of spiritual person one is talking about and how simple their understanding is. The evolutionists theory leaves no room at all for any variation. IT is a very simple and uncompromising theory that answers no questions at all but pretends to explain everything.

          • Geo1metric

            I agree that the standard theory of evolution is flawed. The creation story of the bible is flawed.

            I think we simply do not know our origins. One interesting fact is that we share many physical traits with other life forms on earth.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            You need to read more closely what I said. It’s possible to have both. Creationists don’t believe we’re much more than 5,000 years old.

          • BonV.Vant

            Creationists that believe that are unthinking, rigid people who like simple answers. I once had a discussion with such a person. I mentioned that the length of a “day” in the bibles story of creation was not really a 24 hour period, that the term means a length of time that could have been millions of years. My statement was met with name calling and angry rebuttal and the insistence that the bible is true word for word, on the most basic level.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            If we believe part our DNA came from Neanderthals (1%-4%) and we know they roamed Europe for close to 400,000 years then think of how many charismatic figures must have risen to the Jesus level. The difference is record keeping. Religions don’t go much beyond the advent of record keeping. Perhaps a Jesus character occurred 100 times in our evolution, but there was nothing to record it.

          • John Smith

            Evolution explains how the variation we see within life came to be, not how life originated.

            Evolution isn’t an alternative to God dunnit in general, it just gives the mechanism behind changes in populations.

          • BonV.Vant

            wrong, for the vast majority of those who believe in “evolution” it is a refutation of the notion of a God.

          • John Smith

            Still, it doesn’t answer the question that you presented.

        • Geo1metric

          “Aliens” “created” us; their technology is 1 million years ahead of ours. After all, in about fifty more years, we will be able to “create” new life forms through genetic engineering, if not sooner.

          • BonV.Vant

            exactly, now who created the aliens? It is a good example though of how people come up with a theory and think they have answered the riddle of existence. No, they answered nothing.

          • Geo1metric

            I was offering an answer to “who created us”. See below. Actually, there are hints to the truth of this in the bible regarding “the sons of g-d mating with the daughters of men”.

          • captainc

            there is no alien, aliens are none other than the devils, come to think of it, how come they keep on being secret for all these millenia? and their secrective abductions?

            if you realize that, everything falls perfectly into Bible’s or Qur’an’s narration.

          • Geo1metric

            One man’s “devil” is another man’s alien.

          • BonV.Vant

            it is not an either or proposition

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Something created the building blocks (periodic table, etc.) for evolution to occur. But, evolution happened. They both happened.

          • John Smith

            We don’t know enough about reality yet for you to be able to say that something had to have created reality.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I didn’t say something HAD to have created reality. I said I leave the door open a crack and I purely speculate. Do you work for the NYT?

        • Geo1metric

          Speaking of T. Jefferson:

          “the Athanasian paradox that one is three, and three but one, is so incomprehensible to the human mind, that no candid man can say he has any idea of it, and how can he believe what presents no idea? He who thinks he does, only deceives himself. He proves, also, that man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without a rudder, is the sport of every wind. With such persons, gullibility which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason, and the mind becomes a wreck.” — Thomas Jefferson

      • The Verdict of History

        ahaha

        I knew I’d get something like this as a response.

        I’m half happy.

        • Geo1metric

          I love these kinds of discussions, but think this is not quite the appropriate venue. But thanks anyway. :)

          • David Ashton

            Neither do I, but does anyone know where I could find a website appropriate for someone like me who finds Eden, Deluge and Babel literally and totally incredible AND the notion that all the human and animal species on earth arose, from an unconscious cosmos, through random mutation and selection, barely credible?

          • Geo1metric

            I don’t know of any specific web sites.

            Maybe the cosmos isn’t “unconscious”.

  • Lord Sandwich

    Africans likewise cannot maintain government institutions. Their colonial masters wrote nifty constitutions for them, showed them how elections work, and explained the importance of an independent judiciary. That all ended up in the ditch once Africans took over.
    I wonder sometimes if our blessing can, at times, become a curse. Might our propensity to establish and defend our chosen forms of government also have contributed to our self-inflicted genocide. I wonder how the world would be today if all the white men killed in the American civil war, WWI, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam had lived and had large families.

    • ThomasER916

      This is precisely why I’m not a Libertarian. Libertarians believe that people don’t exist, only principles. If any applies their principles you’ll have success.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        The Libertarian template could work depending on which races and sub-populations try using it. If America were 100% European American the Libertarians would be doing well in this country.

        • Nathanwartooth

          Try telling any mainstream Libertarian that they need whites to vote for them and they go insane.

          They think the only reason other races don’t vote for small government is because of a “racist past” or “we just need to explain our ideas to them”.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            An old friend of mine gave up on the Libertarians some time ago.

            He said: “…I got tired of herding cats…”

          • PvtCharlieSlate

            Once upon a time I was interested enough in the Libertarian party to attend their state (CT) convention. The final speech by the party chair and the things that had crawled out from God-knows-where to hear it cured my interest for good. The experience was as if I had been teleported into an episode of the Twilight Zone.

        • DaveMed

          The libertarians who are intranationally libertarian but supportive of strict immigration control are few and far between.

          In any event, libertarian-inclined WNs (or racial realists) have no use for today’s Libertarian Party, as the mainstream application of libertarianism in 2014 is utterly anti-White.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yes, the neo-Libertarians have poisoned the Libertarian well.
            No doubt.

        • ThomasER916

          No it wouldn’t. Why? Because Libertarians don’t believe biology exists. They don’t believe borders, language, culture, ethnicity, or race matters. Unless you completely change Libertarian ideology to state “Libertarians for Europeans and tariffs, exclusion, and white owned businesses for everyone else” then sure, it will work. But then it’s not a Libertarian template.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Well, the original template, before the Left crapped all over the concept, was small government and self reliance. It has evolved many times, to be unrecognizable. Some of the earlier, paleo versions of Libertarian principles were actually building blocks of this country. It no longer exists in its original form. I think the Left intentionally diluted it.

          • ThomasER916

            You should read about what happened to Charles Lindbergh after he spoke against the Culture of Critique. Kevin MacDonald talks about it at great length.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yes, Lindbergh had a tumultuous life. He’s in my top ten Americans category. Most people don’t know about his technological contributions in WWII, for example.

            His improvements on the P-38 Lightning are the reason why they were able to ambush Admiral Yamamoto. His contributions in the Pacific are a good example of the European American brain at work—-> Troubleshooting and Innovating—->and doing the right thing.

      • Jerrybear

        It’s an ideology that tries to ignore race, history, and culture while worshipping at the alter of the ‘free market’. The principles of limited government and individual liberty (which I agree with) do not work in non-white communities. Really, it’s an ideology limited to white Americans. Europe rarely entrusted so much freedom and power to the individual citizen.

        • DaveMed

          Exactly. I have pointed out time and time again (on other sites) the polls demonstrating that the ideal of limited government is an inherently White one.

          But the libertarians really believe they can convert the non-Whites. Unbelievable.

          • Martel

            The book, The Audacity of Hope was a middle finger from Obama to conservatives. Keep hoping!

        • ThomasER916

          True. It’s a religion for whites that worships the Free Market while denying whites exist. It’s ethno-masochism.

      • Nathanwartooth

        Mainstream libertarians come off as nut jobs because their premises on which they base everything is so wrong.

        The idea that open borders and no minimum wage can work together is just insane, leaving out the massive demography changes that would warp America beyond recognition.

        Just watch any video on Reason TV about Detroit and you’ll just cringe at half of it and yell at the screen for the other half. Ignoring the fact that blacks destroyed Detroit makes you come up with some really nutty explanations for it’s failures.

        Watching Reason TV and reading mainstream Libertarian thought like on /r/Libertarian makes me want to distance myself from it as much as possible.

        I just call myself a Libertarian race realist for now until I can find a better fit. I don’t like big government and I’m not ready to embrace the monarchy.

        • DaveMed

          Almost all of the libertarians I’ve met in real life have been childish naifs.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Those are the neo-Libertarians versus the paleo-Libertarians. The neos just want to smoke pot without going to jail. The paleos are intractable curmudgeons.

          • DaveMed

            On that note, I consider the fight against the War on Pot to be silly and irrelevant anyway. I smoke once in a while, and I have no trouble procuring the materials or being discreet about it.

            It’s all about libertarians trying to sell their ideology to Blacks.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I’m sure it’s some sort of Alinsky scheme. They are trying dilute and destroy the brand. Certainly your last comment alludes to that. The Left has many sleazy tricks.

            They like to diminish terms proactively, too. For example, someone on the Right began speaking of Diversity Fatigue. When the Right began using it the term meant just what it sounds like: people are tired of basing everything on identity politics.

            Within a few months the Diversity Devils had stolen the term and flipped the definition to meaning a need to ‘…redouble their efforts…’–a favorite rhetorical term used by the social engineers. They stole it and flipped it’s meaning.

            When do those Diversity weasels sleep?

          • Geo1metric

            “Evil never sleeps.”

          • Geo1metric

            The war on drugs…let’s see, how is that different from Prohibition?

          • David Ashton

            The mass-marketing of habit-forming brain poisons is socially undesirable, and libertarians may care to look at the rare confusion of J.S. Mill with respect simply to alcohol which temporarily can undermine the rational faculty that justifies and fructifies individual freedom. Bronfman or Soros? Neither, thank you.

          • Geo1metric

            Agree that these “habit-forming brian poisons” “undermine the rational faculty that justifies and fructifies individual freedom.” I usually abstain since I like my interior the way it is.

            But, my objection is with “prohibition” since it has been proven to not work, and is extremely expensive; it also generates huge amounts of crime, organized and not so organized.

            No Soros or Bronfman, for me, thank you. I prefer fish and chips.

          • JohnEngelman

            A libertarian is a Republican who likes illegal drugs and pornography, but who does not like going to church.

          • antiquesunlight

            That was pretty funny, John.

        • Geo1metric

          “I just call myself a Libertarian race realist for now until I can find a better fit.”

          Why not just call yourself a thinking person?

        • ThomasER916

          I’m a pro-white. Libertarians believe that economic systems are a moral and sacred force, which is why they’re indistinguishable from Marxists in their hatred of whites Europeans and Western Civilization. Their conclusions will be based on economics and not on people, never on what’s good for white Europeans.

          When speaking of Detroit we also need to speak about the massive influx of Jews that moved to Detroit in the 30′s. Think of Joe Slovo, Litvaks, and South Africa when you think of Detroit and you’ll better understand what really happened.

      • DaveMed

        Excellent points, along with those of Jerrybear below.

        It is a highly theoretical worldview, and one that instantly falls apart upon attempted application.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      The hostile elites that have hijacked American and European governments know that western success is the result of the greater individualistic tendencies of whites. Unfortunately for whites, their greater individualistic tendencies have made them more receptive to the notion that all human beings should be treated as individuals and that racial/sexual differences don’t matter. Only in white societies will you find the majority of people concerned about the eradication of “racism”; only in white societies will you find the majority of people promoting their own ethnic suicide through massive 3rd world immigration. The globalists have exploited this Achilles’ heel to their own personal advantage, allowing the hyperindividualist societies created by whites to be destroyed from within by highly nepotistic, ethnocentric and collectivist ethnic minorities.

    • Sick of it

      Americans did not choose Marxism, it was thrust upon us without mercy at gunpoint. Can’t help it that some folks are still in denial.

  • ThomasER916

    After spending much time at “The West’s Darkest Hour” I’ve come to the same conclusion but from a slightly different angle, that the America’s plague of Negroes and Amerinds comes from a lack of a racial religion that protects and fights to defend our ethnicity. The Catholic Church allowed Conquistadors to marry Incas, Mexicas and Peruvians, creating Mestizos and dividing tribal loyalties forever. It’s the divided loyalties through miscegenation that makes solidarity and identity for any tribe impossible. As a result, the Americas have been forever mired with low-IQ, illiterate rabble. If you look at the Mexicans coming across the American border and beheading people you’ll see the same tribal cult from Apocalyto. Genetically there’s little difference.

    There’s a considerable amount of failures in mixing with blacks and Amerinds, far more failure than success. The historic details tell us of Conversos paying passage to flee with the Conquistadors are lacking, considering secrecy was the most important need for survival, however DNA gives us evidence. Entire cities of northern Mexico have DNA indicating they’re related to Spanish Jews (Shephardic primarily). What happened? Same thing that happened to the Jews in the 60′s and 70′s that had mixed race Negro babies – most stopped being Jews. Why? When you’re “The People of the Book” the minimum requirement is literacy. If your children’s IQ collectively drops far below 100 you can kiss that tradition goodbye.

    There’s also a pattern in Negroes, and to a lesser extent Latinos, of explicitly murdering intelligence, not out of “fear” or “difference” either as many will claim. The ancient Amerinds murdered their most successful, that much is documented. Since this is a discussion of genes and culture we’d be wise not to ignore it. However, if you just do a search on “acting white” and you’ll find hundreds of millions of pages dedicated to blaming whites for everything for both desegregation AND segregation to evil SAT scores. Use your verbal IQ to manipulate the searches and you’ll find teens and adults murdering the most successful of their race claiming they’re “acting white.” This is not the same as locking up Galileo, which most people know nothing about and only parrot the Marxist slogans. This is murdering someone because they scored well on a math test. One might be able to understand killing a stranger from another tribe for taking your place but killing your own for merely excelling, not even succeeding belongs exclusively in the Black and Brown World.

    • Martel

      “The ancient Amerinds murdered their most successful”

      I never heard of this, any pointers?

      • ThomasER916

        Yes, look into their first official sport best described as “hip ball” or “Mayan soccer.”

      • ThomasER916

        It looks like my reply was deleted. I’ll try again…

        The best description of the official Mesoamerican sport is Mayan Hip Ball. The winners were sacrificed.

  • dd121

    The author of the book tried mightily, but just couldn’t swallow all of his medicine.

    • antiquesunlight

      I’m tickled pink about it, though. It’s a big step forward.

  • Andy

    Look at this lovely quote from Wikipedia:

    “Although some Yanomami really have been engaged in intensive warfare and other kinds of bloody conflict, this violence is not an expression of Yanomami culture itself. It is, rather, a product of specific historical situations: The Yanomami make war not because Western culture is absent, but because it is present, and present in certain specific forms. All Yanomami warfare that we know about occurs within what Neil Whitehead and I call a “tribal zone”, an extensive area beyond state administrative control, inhabited by nonstate people who must react to the far-flung effects of the state presence.”

    First-rate logic, that.

    • Sangraal

      That is some serious mental cartwheeling.

    • WR_the_realist

      Amazing. Yanomami are violet because they live in tribal areas outside of the influence of white people. So it’s white people’s fault.

    • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

      I’ve seen some black apologists argue that cannibalism and slavery in Africa was learned from the White man. I would say, “you can’t make this stuff up,” but that’s exactly what somebody did.

    • Spartacus

      The guy who wrote that went full retard .

    • Martel

      I love such quotes, it doesn’t surprise me because most politically correct fools take amazing leaps of logic to come to their conclusions.

  • Snakes on a Car

    Diet-Coke Human Biodiversity is still better than nothing. Here’s to putting a crack in the Cultural Marxist Zeitgeist.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    The map the author used to depict migration routes and dates is grossly outdated.

    For example, they recently found footprints of human ancestors in England that were close to a 100,000 years old. It’s also quite likely that ‘Montana Boy’ is 80% European because of western migration of humans originating from the Iberian peninsula (Across Atlantic Ice, Dennis Stanford).

    This book appears to brave and at the same time full of Leftist projection and subterfuge.

  • BonV.Vant

    “Farmers had to think ahead and save seed corn, whereas hunters immediately gorged themselves on kills that would rot in a few days.”…….

    Wouldn’t the arctic environment change the situation for hunters? The deep freeze of the arctic areas would mean that there would be no immediate spoilage of game.

    • http://nclinksandthinks.wordpress.com/ Roger U

      I’m not sure that “hunters immediately gorged themselves on kills that would rot in a few days…” is true. Meat can be preserved in a warm climate by smoking or salting. Even in Alaska in the winter, meat still has to be preserved by smoking or it gets “freezer burn” for lack of a better term, but I imagine it does keep longer than in the tropics.

      The jungles of the tropics have food available pretty much year round, where as climates that have winters have scarcity. I think that’s the difference.

      • TheAntidote

        He was trying to say it was feast or famine. I personally know this is true because I have a paleolithic metabolism and fat storage system. My body tells me, “eat it today, wear it tomorrow pal, because the day after tomorrow there might not be anything at all…”

      • itdoesnotmatter

        I’m not sure that “hunters immediately gorged themselves on kills that would rot in a few days…” is true.

        Captain Cooke noted on his travels that Abos did exactly that. Made kills, gorged themselves on the uncooked meat; [they had not yet stumbled upon the use of fire.]
        As lion and other large predators, they did not eat until the next kill.

        • http://nclinksandthinks.wordpress.com/ Roger U

          Australia’s aborigines are an extreme example, but they still have access to plenty of food. Relative to the arctic, they never have to go very far to find something edible so they can get away with feasting on a big kill and then eating lizards, insects and plants until the next one.

          • itdoesnotmatter

            Roger, what I posted about Abos and the findings of early Euro exploration, [according to what is now on the Net], is no longer held to be true. Or, one might conjecture that what I read some years ago has undergone historical revision for PC reasons.
            Instead, all the Aussie websites glorify Abo culture, stating that Cook and other early explorers did not spend time among them, so how could they know? One site suggested that Abos have always used fire, even carrying hot coals to ignite the next campsite fire.
            The “noble savage” who suffered at the hands of evil White man is alive and well Down Under as well as here.

    • JohnEngelman

      Eskimos tend to be more intelligent than Bantus.

    • Geo1metric

      The “Arctic” wasn’t always the Arctic just as the Sahara wasn’t always a desert. There have been massive regional climate changes. This has happened primarily for two reasons, geo-precession and energy output fluctuations of the sun.

      After all, the Vikings were grazing sheep in Greenland between 900 a.d. and 1200 a.d. Did you read that Mr. Gore?

  • BonV.Vant

    “Mr. Wade cites one study that estimates fully 14 percent of the human genome has been under evolutionary pressure since the races separated, and that substantial differences are therefore inevitable. DNA studies show that Tibetans split off from Han Chinese only 3,000 years ago, so it must be only since then that Sherpas evolved their ability to function so well at high altitudes”….

    This is contrary to an article that appeared a week or two ago which stated that the modern Tibetans are a milling of Sherpa and Chinese. The Sherpa , the theory goes, developed the adaptation first, then bred with Chinese to create what are today called Tibetans. There is no reason that the adaptation could not be far older than Tibetans. The Sherpa could have been carrying it for millennia.

    • Peter Connor

      Greg Cochran shows that is highly likely.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I always wondered what the stimulus was that caused certain American Indian tribes to evolve with no fear of heights?

    • JohnEngelman

      Inter racial marriage can have beneficial results when each race has desirable characteristics.

      • silviosilver

        Maybe, but it’s also the path to racial extinction. People who prefer to associate with those they regard as racial familiars would opt for racial life over racial death. You make it clear that you are not one of those people. Unfortunately, you find it difficult to admit this, so you concoct monstrous lies to cover up the inevitable consequences of your preferred policies. You are, in short, a complete a–hole; absolutely not to be trusted.

        • JohnEngelman

          What are my “monstrous lies?” List several.

          There is a difference between racial extinction and racial amalgamation. What is happening for all of the human races is amalgamation into one hybrid race. The process is accelerating.

          In most of the United States interracial marriage is not an issue any more. Every year there is more of it.

          • silviosilver

            The end result of racial amalgamation is racial extinction. Your monstrous lie is your outrageous denial of this fundamental reality, a lie you repeat every time the issue surfaces (which is often, because you are unrelenting in your promotion of miscegenation).

            In this post you switch tack from claiming that the process of racial extinction is not occurring to the claim that it is a non-issue, quite likely wishing to imply that it is inevitable. I agree that the process is occurring, but I regard its long-term consequences as highly undesirable. Making those long-term consequences known would heighten resistance to the practice and suggest an alternative course of racial policy, and this, one must suspect, is why you are so hell-bent on denying those consequences or portraying them as inevitable.

          • JohnEngelman

            Extinction happens when a race or a species dies off. When this happens the genes that make that race or species unique no longer exist. Amalgamation happens when two or more races come together as one. When this happens the beneficial genes in each are preserved by the evolutionary process, while the harmful genes are removed by that same process.

          • silviosilver

            Racial extinction occurs when a race stops reproducing itself. Miscegenation prevents racial reproduction and ultimately leads to racial extinction. The length of time required for extinction to result in a specified territory depends on the numbers of racial others present on that territory and the rate of miscegenation with those racial others. Although the process may take hundreds of years to play out, once a race is reduced to a sufficiently small proportion of the total population it can fairly be considered “effectively extinct.” This is the path whites are presently travelling.

          • JohnEngelman

            Several thousand years from now if not sooner there will by one hybrid race on this planet with a higher average IQ.

          • silviosilver

            Demographic trends would have to change considerably for that race to have a higher IQ than 100. Indeed such changes could only realistically occur via the introduction of eugenic population management policies. If that is the case, then such eugenic population management policies could be introduced to raise the IQ of whites as well as to guarantee the existence of whites. If this can be done why should it not be done? Why must whites submit to extinction if there is no need to? Explain yourself.

            PS – I note once more that you are no longer denying white extinction. Will you now retract your earlier statement (on another thread) that it is a “preposterous exaggeration”?

          • JohnEngelman

            The trend throughout human evolution has been toward higher intelligence. When the bow and arrow was invented those who could learn how to make and use them survived. The others did not. Bows and arrows seem simple to us because our ancestors were able to learn how to make and use them.

            With the development of agriculture the culling process continued. The process happened again with the development of urban civilization. Men with more intelligence became merchants, government officials, money lenders, artists, and so on. They tended to have more descendant than less intelligent men.

            As our economy and technology become more complex the process continues. Computer technology increases the relationship between intelligence and income. In an interview Bill Gates said, “Software is an IQ business.” He should know. He has an IQ of 160.

          • silviosilver

            This is rank evasion of the issue.

            A melding of the world’s population as it is today would result in an average IQ well below 100. Demographic trends are dysgenic, meaning that a future melding would result in an IQ even lower. These trends are unlikely to reverse themselves. Attaining a mean global IQ higher than 100 seems very unlikely in the absence of eugenic population policies. If such policies could be implemented to raise global IQ they could also be implemented to raise white IQ and to safeguard white existence. Your reply does not address this point at all.

          • JohnEngelman

            Nicholas Wade and I take the long view of things. Dysgenics was a temporary phenomenon of the twentieth century. It is coming to an end as the AFDC is being phased out, and as it is taking a higher amount of intelligence to earn a decent income.

            Those who are biologically inferior can only have descendants when those who are biologically superior choose to subsidize them.

          • silviosilver

            AFDC (became TANF nearly twenty years ago) is only one part of the welfare system. There is little evidence that welfare as a whole is being phased out.

            Even if welfare were eliminated lower IQ people can outbreed higher IQ people for as long as they are able to feed, clothe and shelter their offspring, none of which requires any subsidies from the higher IQ segment.

            Based on this my conclusion that a global melding would result in an average IQ well below 100 is clearly more reasonable than your optimistic claim that a global melding would result in a hybrid race with a higher average IQ (by which you presumably mean higher than 100).

          • Jotun Hunter

            and poverty is going to stop the stupid people from breeding, is that what you are saying?

          • David Ashton

            Evolution, including that of hominids, depends on differentiation and variety rather than hybridization and uniformity. Proactive eugenics is more humanitarian than culling.

          • KevinPhillipsBong

            But is IQ a baby-making business? (…anymore…)

          • Geo1metric

            Is that crystal ball found at Toys R US?

          • BonV.Vant

            no crystal ball, it was something he got out of a fortune cookie. REAL world events show that diversification INCREASES over time, and then is periodically culled. My guess is that a core of the white race will always exist and periodically expand and contract.As long some whites recognize the special qualities of their race, it will always survive. The white DNA profile is the most valuable treasure the earth has ever had.

          • Jotun Hunter

            utopia!

          • BonV.Vant

            no, there won’t, you need to stop reading fortune cookies and thinking they are predictive of future events

  • BonV.Vant

    “Mr. Wade points out that most European populations had been evolving similarly, so were quickly able to industrialize as well”

    There could very well be a totally different explanation and that that is that the races have always been different, that there has been no “evolving”. The Europeans developed the Roman civilization over two thousand years ago. The civilization then fell due to several factors, some of which may have been natural phenomenon such as climate changes, plagues, etc. The fall of that civilization did not mean that the genetics of the white race backpedaled. It could be that the natural abilities and traits of the white race have always been the same. Recent research into the antikythera mechanism show that it is much more advanced than previously thought, by about 1,500 years. There is truly a fetish for the darwinian notion of “evolution”, but what people such as this author are calling “evolution” is not evolution at all, at most it is adaptation or breeding.

    • JohnEngelman

      During the Roman Empire physically aggressive men had fewer descendants, while intelligent men had more descendants. During the Dark Ages there was a reversion to the population pressures that had prevailed before civilization. That is one reason Orientals tend to be more intelligent than white Gentiles.

      • John

        OK, now I’d like to see that list of the Orientals super-mentalists’ inventions and innovations. The type of culling you describe incidentally is something I’ve seen describe for whats happened to whites because of WWI, II and to a lessar extent, the Napoleonic Wars, but have never read anywhere that this process was in play during that period in history. Dues to the nature of their armament and how it dictated combat styles, physically aggressive men were more likely to survive to bear children. My sword trumps your abacus any day type of thing.

        • Katherine McChesney

          *crickets* from John Engleman’s list of “Orientals” innovations and inventions.

          Hello Kitty.

          • John

            Thanks for that. I knew someone, somewhere, could enlighten me to this most important and paramount issue. Now if someone will only chime in with the list for the Jews, I can finally move forward. Join the enemy maybe? Become a liberal? Stop training? Sell my guns? Nah. I don’t think so.

      • Jotun Hunter

        intelligent on paper, when testing, but utterly incapable of creative invention. They can build you a fleet of ipads providing you’ve already invented them.

      • BonV.Vant

        would you stop repeating this conjecture as if it was anything other than conjecture.

    • Geo1metric

      Correct. Adaptation is quite different from “evolution”. There also exist genetic mechanisms at work which are only now being recognized but are little understood. We are a long way from understanding human evolution.

  • BonV.Vant

    This book is another crack in the wall. The west has often had times where orthodoxies ruled absolutely yet all of those orthodoxies eventually succumbed to truth. The first ones to find a fault with the orthodoxy have always been treated as pariahs and persecuted. The record though is that the world of the white man values truth and reason more than it values it’s orthodoxies and their institutions. Truth and reason do not exist at all in the african mind, and the asian mind is too submissive too conformist to stray from the accepted beliefs. Look at Chinese writing. It requires incredible numbers of hours to memorize the characters and to practice reproducing them.

  • Malgus

    “The next-smartest thing would be to have truckling scientists calmly “refute” it by peeing on it from a very great height.”

    This one sentence had me laughing for a good 10 minutes…. and it reminded me why I come here – that everything isn’t doom and gloom…

    Thank you for making me laugh…

    • Geo1metric

      “He stands on the steeple and pees on the people, and the people cannot pee on him.”

  • Nathanwartooth

    This guy is going to get torn apart.

    If you write a book like this, just go full out “racist”. You are going to get called a racist no matter what, so who cares.

    • WhiteGuyInJapan

      I see your point, but I appreciate the baby steps.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I don’t trust it. Anyone with the odor of NYT on them are up to no good. Nothing is ever what it appears when it comes to Lefties. Sometimes you have to peel back more layers of the onion to find the stink.

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    Mr. Wade writes that his book is an attempt “to dispel the fear of racism that overhangs discussion of human group differences and to begin to explore the far reaching implications of the discovery that human evolution has been recent, copious and regional.”

    That’s not possible. If human differences have “far reaching implications” there is no way to “dispel the fear” of what goes by the name of “racism.” What, to begin with, are these far reaching implications? Mr. Wade himself manages to propose exactly one: that foreign aid is probably wasted because poor countries are not genetically prepared for the institutions necessary for wealth.
    ——————————————————————

    People are deluded to such an extend that only radical honesty or openness about race might still convert them. My awakening was a personal odyssey, and it was the result of my clashing with the norms of liberal society. I do not think that it was worth trying to conceal the implications of this book, because that might even make the defence much more complicated.

    People are highly suspicious of others who challenge their beliefs, and especially when they are prone to associate negative stereotypes with others who challenge their beliefs. We are just fascists, nazis or racists to them. We have not moved beyond the stage of being perceived as certain stereotypes, and staying marginalised is actually the most frightening thing for us. People do not understand us, and are unwilling to understand us. What to do?

    In any case, I wish the author good luck. May he awaken more people.

  • Dave4088

    From this excellent book review it sounds like “A Troublesome Inheritance” explodes the crusader like faith in assimilationism/anybody can be an American and the belief in Lysenkoism and man is a blank slate Marxism subscribed to in whole by the anti-white left and increasingly by the so called conservatives. But it also explodes the myths of the religiously inclined and proves that Nigerian and Somali refugees and other third world racial groups cannot become civilized white men simply by reading the Bible and accepting Jesus Christ as their savior.

    Not surprisingly Wade hurled the obligatory broadsides at figures of the racialist far right from the early 20th century and affirmed his commitment to racial equality in an obvious attempt to forestall criticism from the equalitarian and totalitarian left. I would have rather he find his courage and flip the left the proverbial bird, but courage is in short supply these days.

    If a sufficient number of the American public could read, think critically, and reach logical conclusions then this rotten multicultural edifice would collapse like a house of cards. Unfortunately, we live in an idiocracy so the book will have a marginal impact at best.

    • antiquesunlight

      Jesus can’t make a black man a white man, but He can make a black man more or less decent and tolerable to be around. The fact that the South is (was?) so religious is part of why blacks weren’t a hundred times more of a nuisance than they were.

  • Steven Barr

    “According to Professor Clark, who teaches at UC Davis, from 1200 to 1800, the British became less violent, more literate, more inclined to save, and more reliable workers. Prof. Clark’s ingenious studies also show that the rich, who were more likely to have these useful traits, had more children than the poor, many of whom were erased from the gene pool. This naturally occurring eugenics program laid the foundation for the Industrial Revolution”
    Modern Britain is going backwards in this respect thanks to our insane welfare system which favours an increase in the useless parasites of all races.

  • Rhialto

    I agree with JT that it will be informative to observe how the Liberal establishment responds to this book. My guess is that it will give the book minimal publicity, i.e. “Nothing to see here folks, just some reworked long discredited ideas!”

    • Emblematical

      “Long discredited ideas”
      And let’s go out on a limb. Do you think there’s any chance the words “pseudo science” might be used?

      • David Ashton

        “Scientific racism rears its ugly head again.”

        “Wade may pretend otherwise but this sort of thing led directly to the gas chambers that killed millions of men, women and children.”

        “This racist rubbish will only add fuel to the flames being lit by the neo-nazis/far right/Golden Dawn/David Duke/”the likes of” Jared Taylor….[fill in, as desired]“.

        “Penguin Books have decided to withdraw this book from publication after representations from the American Anthropological Association, the US Attorney General, La Raza, Huffington Post, the CPUSA, the Reverend Al Sharpton, the “No Platform Anywhere” Organization….&c”.

  • NoMosqueHere

    A major problem for america and the world is that the best and brightest american jews are disappearing through intermarriage with white gentiles. The New York Times recently published a report showing that 71% of secular/reform jews are intermarrying; those jews are the best and brightest jews. So, we americans can expect to receive fewer Nobel prizes and receive less innovation in science, medicine, physics, and the arts as our jews disappear. Even if you hate the jews — and I don’t — you will miss them when they’re gone.

    • TheAntidote

      I won’t miss Howie Stern nor Al Goldstein nor Chuckie Cheese. Can I still get a bagel with a smear?

      • Geo1metric

        Bagels were invented by a German. Not sure about the “smear”.

    • antiquesunlight

      Can’t speak for the other things, and I’m no anti-Semite, but I can’t tell the Jews have contributed hugely to the arts as far as innovation. Their shining stars are Marcel Proust (who was half “Gentile”) and Felix Mendelssohn (who was nowhere near as creative or innovative as some of his non-Jewish contemporaries). And Gershwin, I guess.

      • itdoesnotmatter

        List non-Jewish virtuoso classical violinists, both alive, still touring and those who have died.

        • antiquesunlight

          But we’re talking about artistic innovation, not the ability to play pianos well. Not the same thing. Asians are the new Jews in classical music, too. There are some good Asian orchestras and soloists. Fine, but playing and creating are two different things.
          Even in the decadent past several decades, Jewish artistic output (as far as I’m aware) has been significant, but not overly impressive. Look at movies. Who’s the best Jewish filmmaker you know of? Woody Allen? Steven Spielberg? Woody Allen practically worships Ingmar Bergman, who certainly wasn’t a Jew. Anyway, I’m not trying to sound like I know everything about the arts, but I haven’t seen any reason to think Jews have a whole lot going for them artistically.

          • itdoesnotmatter

            Have seen Lolita many times, also read the book. Enjoy Nabokov, and James Mason is one of my favorite actors.
            Will get back to you on the subject of music and films. From my observations, Jews still dominate the scene. For a list of various Jewish composers, musicians, etc., visit jinfo dot org music

        • antiquesunlight

          And for the record, Joshua Bell is half-Gentile. And among the usual canon of Great Pianists of the Twentieth Century, at least two were non-Jewish whites: Glenn Gould and Sviatoslav Richter. I don’t think Josef Hoffmann was Jewish, either. Also, a high percentage of the great conductors were/are non-Jewish.

      • WR_the_realist

        I’ll never pass muster with White Nationalists because I like Mahler better than Wagner, although there are Christian composers like Bach and Monteverdi that I’d rank higher than either. As for performers, I know of many of good violinists and pianists who are Jewish, many who are non-Jewish whites, and many who are East Asian. I don’t see much reason to keep score.

        • antiquesunlight

          I forgot about Mahler. For no particular reason, I’ve never listened to him much. As for Wagner, I avoided him for a long time because I have a horror of opera, but Liebestod blew my ears off and I’ve been slowly educating myself about him since then. Generally, my own tastes are more in line with the Baroque and Renaissance.

          I agree about not keeping score, though it might not seem that way from reading the comments I’ve written right here.

        • SoulInvictus

          “I’ll never pass muster with White Nationalists because I like Mahler better than Wagner…”
          lol, Dude I am much more likely to be listening to Klaypex, Duran Duran, or The Cult. I do love Bach, Vivaldi, and Chopin though… Love all kinds of music, so I’d never hold someone’s musical tastes against them.
          Art and music is the one happy space where racial and political divides dissolve and humanity’s talented tenth shines. I’d never taint the sublime with the sordid realities of our baser existence.

      • Jotun Hunter

        They have done more harm than good, to be sure – but there are always those that deserve honourable mention, in modern times (in the arts) I would say: Stanley Kubrick, John Milius, Irvin Kershner, Paul Newman, Norman Mailer, others — just for gods sake keep them away from painting and architecture.

        • Jotun Hunter

          and even then, for their genius, they still largely capitalized on a medium and trail blazed by ‘gentiles’ (gods I hate that term)

    • antiquesunlight

      As far as mixing goes, I think Jew with non-Jew has got to be the least troublesome kind I can think of.

    • John

      “you will miss them when they’re gone” Wrong. Please reference one historical instance where they were “invited” back with open arms into a political entity of any sort by the populace (not their sniveling politicians) after they’d been expelled. Please one. I thought so. On the other hand, as a group they’ve been expelled from every country in Europe going back 1000 years. Often more than once. Leads one to believe that something more must be at play than “religious persecution”.

    • Jotun Hunter

      oh and how did american ever form or survive without them? woe is me

  • alex

    “Hunter-gatherers left Africa about 50,000 years ago, and once they wandered into all of earth’s habitable spaces, they stayed put and bred with their neighbors.”
    It remains to be proven.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      True. True. There is a new Out-of-Asia theory going around. The other thing with western Europeans is their 1% to 4% Neanderthal DNA infusion. That may be a big deal. Neanderthals were roaming Europe for 400,000 years.

      • antiquesunlight

        Don’t Asians have some Neanderthal DNA, too?

        • AndrewInterrupted

          I don’t believe so. Check the u-tube videos on it.
          Search on Dr. Paabo.

          • antiquesunlight

            “Levels of Neanderthal ancestry differ in European and Asian groups, according to the study. Han Chinese people in Beijing, for example, have the most such ancestry while Puerto Ricans have the least.”

            Google “How Neanderthal DNA Changed Humans.”

          • AndrewInterrupted

            When Paabo’s results were first announced there was no mention other than western Europeans. Something is fishy here. This link is pretty cool.

            wwwDOTdemocratic-republicansDOTus/neanderthals-and-semites

          • antiquesunlight

            Yeah, every article I’ve ever read about Neanderthal DNA says that all people except blacks have some percentage of Neanderthal in them. But the article I mentioned above is the only one that has suggested Asians might have more of it than whites. All the others say whites are the most Neanderthal. So I don’t know.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yeah, the original piece from Paabo said the most was in the Tuscan and Caucasus region. 4% in those areas, 1%-4% in Europe, then no appreciable amounts anywhere else. I think the subterfuge here is they description “Asia”. Europeans are from the Asian continent. The Leftist slight-of-hand is already at work here.

          • Sick of it

            You’ll find that pure-blooded white folk have some of the lowest levels of Neanderthal DNA. Some folks still don’t get what “archaic DNA” really means, unfortunately.

        • JohnEngelman

          Yes they do. Miscegenation between modern humans and Neanderthals happened before Caucasians and Mongoloids evolved into two separate races.

  • TheAntidote

    An excellent, fair review.
    “After the races separated, they evolved different mental patterns that gave rise to different social patterns….” This is not heresy, this is blasphemy! He’s saying the unforgivable; that culture comes from race.
    No amount of Montgu/Gould/Holocaust disclaimers and back pedaling will help him. They can’t ignore this affront to their religion.

    • Geo1metric

      Pink Floyd’s THE WALL.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Mr. Wade goes over some of the same ground, pointing out how dramatic a
    change it was for our ancestors to switch from nomadic hunting to
    settled agriculture.

    This is why I think humanity is slowly getting less intelligent. The foresight to invent agriculture, metallurgy, the wheel, written language, portable alphabets, base-numerical systems with zero as a placeholder, basically all the things which took humanity from hunter-gatherer to agriculture-based civilization, took a lot of intelligence. There have been a lot of great inventions since the start of the industrial revolution, but it does not seem that any of them have had the dramatic effects and domino effects of, say, inventing agriculture.

    Smash-and-grab made sense for fast-moving nomads but not for city-dwellers who had to live with neighbors.

    A problem we still have with us.

    Mr. Wade makes the crucial point that what is known as “national character” is undoubtedly genetic, and that is why group behavior is consistent. Jews prosper everywhere they go. So do overseas Chinese. If the Malays and Indonesians envy the success of their Chinese minorities, why don’t they just copy their good habits? Mr. Wade argues that they can’t; they don’t have the genetic predisposition to act Chinese. Africans likewise cannot maintain government institutions. Their colonial masters wrote nifty constitutions for them, showed them how elections work, and explained the importance of an independent judiciary. That all ended up in the ditch once Africans took over.

    This is why I think a socio-political ideology and the people and civilization that developed it and whose evolution caused it and in turn it helps the group’s evolution are inseparable. It’s why white people can have political ideology and the black African cannot, but it also manifests at finer gradations, why the northern-western European can have ideologies that are more libertarian than authoritarian while the Russians, among others, have ideologies that are more authoritarian than libertarian.

    Mr. Wade repeatedly emphasizes the importance of public trust—the ability to deal fairly with people who are not kin or fellow tribesmen. If a race has not evolved this level of trust it will not get beyond tribalism.

    Except racialism IS tribalism. The tribe is lot bigger. Because:

    That is why Americans can’t get Iraqis or Afghans to behave like good democrats no matter how many of them we shoot. Middle Easterners don’t have the genetic capacity for republican government, so it is just as crazy to try to force our ways on them as it would be to try to turn Americans into tribalistic, cousin-marrying Afghans.

    And, at the risk of attracting HBD Chick here, there’s the reason behind that: Cousin marriage. Which means that the fundamental unit of loyalty in tightly endogamous people is the immediate family.

    Academics have long chased their tails trying to explain why some countries are rich and others poor. Mr. Wade points out that their fatal blunder is to assume that all populations are interchangeable. He uses findings by the economic historian Gregory Clark to suggest that in Britain, where records go back far enough to make such studies possible, there was steady evolution towards the qualities crucial to the Industrial Revolution.

    And all the qualities he lists could also be found in the Alexandrian Empire, aka the Hellenistic Empire, aka Hellenistic Greece. Why didn’t the industrial revolution spark then and there? Either it didn’t have enough time, or it was just a matter of fate.

    Chinese rulers showed an utterly un-European lack of interest in science and exploration, and argues that this reflected long-bred traits of conformity and submission to authority.

    The Chinese explored, if and only if the ruling authority had a thing for it. What often happened is that the next ruler that came in had no interest, so China could develop no exploratory verve that was a constant across generations and regimes.

    None of this belongs in a book about science. It is a clearly an attempt to demonstrate virtue and avoid beatings, but it won’t work.

    And it’s blatantly hypocritical considering the rest of the book’s contest. I happen to think it’s his get-out-of-being-fired-free card, or so he thinks.

    Mr. Wade’s discussion of the MAO-A gene is even more contortionist. He concedes that American blacks are no less than 50 times more likely than whites to carry the variant most closely tied to violence, but says we must draw no conclusions: Whites might have different, as yet undiscovered, alleles that would make them just as violent.

    All we have to do is look at areas where black people and white people are under the same political jurisdiction to see that there are no such alleles. In this case, I think absence of evidence IS evidence of absence.

    And yet there is no mental plague in China that even approaches the conformity and closed-mindedness Mr. Wade is trying to combat with this book. The ease with which our rulers have driven common sense about race, sex, and nation underground shows how cowardly and conformist the heirs to the Industrial Revolution have become.

    And a mental plague Wade himself prostrates to, a plague which his soon-to-be former employer has helped bring about and enforce.

    Mr. Wade writes that his book is an attempt “to dispel the fear of racism that overhangs discussion of human group differences and to begin to explore the far reaching implications of the discovery that human evolution has been recent, copious and regional.”

    That’s like trying to sell cows to people who hate hamburger and steak. The NYT and the crowd it caters to is on the wrong side of these crucial issues not be cause they’ve made idle long term mistakes, but because they are either ideologically or ethnically or both invested in what we would call wrong ideas, but for them are right ideas. A hammer won’t stop being a hammer because it’s bad for nails. A hammer necessarily exists at the bane of nails. And hammers aren’t going to give up being hammers because the nails somehow have a better or a more clever argument.

    That is why the reaction to this book will be so interesting. Lefties will not be placated by the back-cover assertion that “Wade believes deeply in the fundamental equality of all human peoples.” They will realize that a very respectable figure is blowing a raspberry at their religion. The smartest thing they could do is ignore A Troublesome Inheritance.

    And that is what I think they will do, after the NYT quietly fires Nicholas Wade.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Maybe the NYT is moving slightly to the right? They see all these Lib publications and so-called news outlets shrinking and imploding. Maybe moving toward the truth is a survival strategy? I’m guessing the WP will only appear to be in business going forward because of J. Bozo cash infusions. CNN, MSLSD, PBS and the like only exist because of the rigged cable/satellite tier system. They are all essentially on working welfare. Maybe NYT is seeing the light?….. Nawwww……<;-)

      • ThomasER916

        No. The NYT will move to Israel claiming the “Right of Return.”

    • John

      Thanks. Couldn’t have said it better myself except for the fact I’m not that ambitious.

    • disqus_yeZNegncsV

      He’s retired.

  • JohnEngelman

    As a New York Times science writer Nicholas Wade felt the need to write his book in such a way as to continue to be invited to fashionable Manhattan dinner parties. Nevertheless, his book is an important step forward. Gradually the constrictions of political correctness are weakening. Eventually they will collapse as abruptly as the Soviet Union, and it will be safe to say in public what most people are privately aware of.

  • William Krapek

    “Mr. Wade includes a chapter on the superior intelligence of Jews—this is something people can write about without losing their jobs…”

    Every time I see or hear comments Ike this I remind people that 95% of the work that went into “Einstein’s” relativity was put in over the previous decade.

    By White men.

    • JohnEngelman

      Albert Einstein was a white man.

      • John

        No, he was a Jew. Jews don’t consider themselves “white”. Generally speaking, in modern vocabulary, “whites” are considered to be of European descent, with a Christian heritage. The verdict is still out on the Jews, even amongst themselves. He was (Einstein) a phony and a plagiarist and for those that care to get beyond several decades of MSM pimping of how “smart” he was, there are several volumes and articles available for consumption that deal with this precise subject. I’ve asked this before incidentally, but since you’re our resident all-things-Jew expert here at Amren, where’s the link to that list of Jew inventions? We’re all just dying to see their contributions to the world in something aside from questionable financial and economic practices.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Jews are chameleons. If there is benefit to being white, they’re white. If there is benefit to being a victim, they’re victims. It’s an honor issue. Rabbi Engelman is still grappling with the honor concept. Maybe his brain can’t get there?

          I half jokingly said here at AmRen a while ago that:

          “…If you ask 10 Jews if they are part of a race or a religion–you will get 10 different answers…”

        • antiquesunlight

          I consider Jews to be white. I’ve never seen a good reason not to. They look and act white. Most of them I’ve known seemingly consider themselves to be white, but it does seem that some of them do not, and I think that is an unfortunate source of unhelpful white disunity.

          • John

            They’re Caucasians but not. white. See what a white person is in my description above.

          • antiquesunlight

            Seems like it would be clearer to just say that (some) Jews are culturally distinct from mainstream white culture. Saying they aren’t white sounds like you’re saying they’re a different race.

      • Geo1metric

        So, any White can emigrate to Israel?

        • JohnEngelman

          No, of course not. There’s not enough room. Countries have the right to determine who is allowed to immigrate to them.

          • Geo1metric

            That was meant to be funny.

          • John

            The indigenous population should decide the immigration issue but as none other than Ann Coulter said recently “I didn’t vote for all this immigration” or something to that effect. The American public is overwhelmingly against the current open border policy of the Federal (feral) Government. We need enforcement, not reform. Personally, I refuse to talk to foreigners anymore. I’m retired and have that luxury. The only thing I would have to say to one is have a nice trip and don’t let the door hit you in the behind on the way out (of the country).

      • RileyDeWiley

        The argument “Jewish, therefore white” is false exactly because “White, therefore Jewish” is false.

        They are not equivalent.

        • antiquesunlight

          Huh? That doesn’t work for any ethnicity, though. “Filipino, therefore asian” is true, but “Asian, therefore Filipino” isn’t. I am white and Italians are white, but that doesn’t make me an Italian.

      • Paul

        Does Engelman have 3 trolls voting up his posts now? He always went into negative in the past.

    • BillMillerTime

      Every genius stands on the shoulders of the geniuses who preceded him. So what? The fact is that Einstein revolutionized physics. Had he been a pure-bred German with blond hair and blue eyes, you and your ilk would be crowing over his accomplishments at every turn, but since he was a Jew, you are ideologically invested in smearing the man and all his works.

      • John

        He didn’t revolutionize squat. He is “credited” with this by the media which, gasp, what a surprise, is mostly controlled by his coreligionists. His work was based on plagiarized prior works for which he gave no credit. Anyone doubts this, just do a web search on “Einsteins plagiarism” to get yourself a re-education.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          That is true. Several people here corrected me awhile back for some of Einstein’s work. They reminded me that it was believed that Einstein was pilfering IP while working at the patent office.

      • William Krapek

        There’s nothing I know about “Einsteinian physics” that Einstein came up with. He didn’t come up with his famous equation. He didn’t come up with four dimensional space-time. He didn’t come up with the idea for the atom bomb. I’m not a super genius, and although I’ve read in several places why he should get credit for Relativity I’ve never understood any of those explanations.

        Einstein did not win the Nobel prize for Relativity because he did not earn it. Most of the groundwork – for Relativity – was laid by Henri Poincaré and Hendrik Lorentz over a span of time stretching more than a decade. They worked very diligently pulling it out of Maxwell’s equations. The geometry of four dimensional time space was worked out by Hermann Minkowski; who had in turned been prompted by Poincaré.

        All of them are White men. None of them are Jews. Why shouldn’t they get the credit? Why have I never even heard of them until recently? I don’t mind saying that makes me very angry.

        • Geo1metric

          ” Why have I never even heard of them until recently?”

          The answer to that is that the media didn’t want you to know.

      • John

        In reply to your comments below. All this was covered in a book by C.J. Bjerknes titled “Albert
        Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist”. Not many people delve into such
        esoteric history as this as Mr. Bjerknes has. Interesting you site a
        common propagandist technique ‘straw-men’ when your post is a variant of
        one in itself “ad hominem”. Let’s discuss whether or not Sir Newton
        actually said that rather than deriding the source. Are you prepared to
        do that? I don’t think you are because first, everyone has heard of
        Newton and all of his works are too widely spread to discount any quotes
        of his. I think any decent college library would have the necessary
        source material such as Poincare’s works etc., etc. Once again, as with
        most of the tribe’s manufactured “herors”, Einstein joins the Emperor in
        having “no clothes”.

      • Paul

        Generally when people blatantly steal someone elses work you don’t crow over them. Just like MLK…a plagiarist and a liar.

        • BillMillerTime

          It’s not clear to me that Einstein “blatantly stole someone elses work.”
          See this interesting take down of your claim.
          politicsforum [dot] org [forwardslash] forum [forwardslash] viewtopic [dot} php?t=43982

    • Geo1metric

      Most by the Frenchman, Poincare, to be exact.

    • alex

      Why White men didn’t build a nuclear bomb for Germany during WWII?
      Der Fuhrer should’ve supported Jüden Physik instead of Deutsche Physik

      • Geo1metric

        The Germans were getting the physics bombed out of them at the time; otherwise… .

        If Oak Ridge and Los Alamos were being bombed daily, I’m not at all sure the US would have won that race.

        • alex

          Purebred Arian Physicists and their Nazi curators made some mistakes in their research.

          • Geo1metric

            For example?

          • alex

            I don’t have time right now. The information about German nuclear research can be found on the Internet. It doesn’t mean you have to trust everything that posted there.
            I know it’s hard for you to believe, but Arians can be wrong sometimes.

          • Geo1metric

            “I know it’s hard for you to believe, but Arians can be wrong sometimes.”

            that’s not hard for me to believe at all.

            I do know that “Operation Paperclip” disclosed evidence that the Reich had done extensive research and experimentation on nuclear weaponry well prior to the end of the war, and that they were much further along than the allies had any idea of.

          • ThomasER916

            Wherever you find a Judeophile you’ll find an anti-White.

            This comment will be deleted.

          • KevinPhillipsBong

            Arians? What does the Trinity have to do with this? Oh, you meant Aryans…

          • alex

            Duly noted.

      • PvtCharlieSlate

        There was a book published several years ago (don’t remember the title) that covered the Nazi efforts to develop a fission bomb. It concluded that those efforts may have been subtly sabotaged by Werner Heisenberg who was one of the senior researchers involved. Lots of circumstantial indications but nothing definite.

        • alex

          I’ve read something online about Heisenberg’s real (not intentional)incompetence and that he had exaggerated his influence.
          The only person who knew the truth is probably Heisenberg himself.

        • RileyDeWiley

          The Mare’s Nest, David Irving.

    • alex

      Can you find some dirt on Niels Bohr?

    • Paul

      He actually stole the formula outright. Even the actual E=MC2 was copied from Poincare. Amazing what you can learn working in a patent office.

  • sCARY sPOOK

    Thanks for your input Mr. Taylor, I appreciate your
    endeavors.

  • Garrett Brown

    Those bushmen have some nice bows man. Almost as good as the plastic variety you find at the dollar store.

  • JohnEngelman

    Some old habits were no longer useful. Farmers had to think ahead and save seed corn, whereas hunters immediately gorged themselves on kills that would rot in a few days.

    - Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, March 2, 2014

    When blacks and whites earn the same income, whites are more likely to save money, and less likely to go into debt.

  • JohnEngelman

    Biological explanations of racial differences give insight into why the results of the civil rights legislation and the war on poverty have been disappointing.

    • Geo1metric

      10,000 years of “experience” had already given many of us that insight.

      • JohnEngelman

        The civil rights legislation was forced on whites who had extensive experience with blacks by whites who had little experience.

    • disqus_yeZNegncsV

      And why immigration in droves will result in a low trust society which falls apart

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    “…so it is just as crazy to try to force our ways on them as it would be to try to turn Americans into tribalistic, cousin-marrying Afghans.”

    This is exactly what the US (or whatever comes after it) will be in a half-dozen or more generations. Civic trust will not be able to withstand such a weight of differences. Doubtless this is why the Middle East (a genetic crossroads for the planet) is as screwed up as it is. The ancestors of the Ashley Montagus of the West came from the Middle East and they have been tirelessly culturally terraforming the West into an approximation of their homelands. I would argue that this is unintentional on their part; nevertheless the traits which preserved these people express themselves in cultural characteristics which (if given power) recreate such societies.

    People see Brazil as the US’s future (and so it is); but what is Brazil’s future (and ergo the US’s more distant future)? It is the Middle East – coffee-colored tribes of varying hue at perpetual war with one another over the scraps of faith, culture and industry left behind by their betters.

    I’m not saying that this cannot be stopped. But if things continue apace I don’t see it playing out any other way.

  • David Ashton

    I was thinking of buying this book as soon as possible until I came across Jared Taylor’s discouraging paragraph on Spencer, Galton and The Holocaust. I already have enoigh books with disappointing contents like that, usually repeating one another’s distortions or inaccuracies. If only we could get the quality of Gates, Coon, Baker and Darlington back in this field, with all the new DNA data, &c.

  • Luca

    Memorization is one very important component of intelligence. The fact that Asians have complex alphabets proves that they possess the gift of memorization but lack the “creativity” to adapt to an alphabet with only 26 or so characters. Some of their dictionaries contain 50,000+ characters. Imagine being able to read an entire encyclopedia and memorizing everything contained within, people might say you are smart but it would not say much about your ability to create, reason, rationalize or have original thought.

    Once you read and repeat what you are taught, you only know what you have read. Being able to decipher what part of that is true and real is a much better trait than memorization.

    Because of what is and isn’t being taught in schools these days and what is broadcast by Hollywood and the MSM we are getting quite a batch of misinformed, indoctrinated young people who don’t know why we fought in WW2, but know about the exploits of the Tuskegee airmen. They are being handed diplomas, being recognized as intelligent, but I doubt they even carry the DNA that might truly have allowed them to pass junior high.

    • ThomasER916

      My father programmed robots for Mitsubishi in Tennessee. He said, “The Japanese build the best robots in the world but they can’t program them with a crap.”

      My own experiences with Japanese programmers are far more limited, though I’ve never been impressed.

    • Sick of it

      As always, it depends upon how one defines intelligence. I’ve known rather stupid people who had photographic memories. Not very impressive.

  • Ed

    I disagree with the premise that the Chinese are not adaptive or can’t catch the West. The West has more or less renounced the values that have made it great. The White out of wedlock rate today is higher than that of Blacks when Moynihan wrote his infamous report.

    Today Drudge had a link of a drag show on a military bases performed by gays. I mean this type of debauchery especially among our warrior class is what brings down empires in the long run.

  • Sick of it

    “Ashley Montagu (the stylish name British-born Israel Ehrenberg chose for
    himself), were clearly trying to distort science for political
    purposes, and that more recent peddlers, such as Jared Diamond and
    Steven Jay Gould”

    I wonder what these three men have in common…

    • ThomasER916

      Cultural Insurrections by Kevin MacDonald PhD

      • Sick of it

        Thanks, I’ll have to read it sometime. I came to similar conclusions through my own studies.

        • ThomasER916

          Most of us don’t believe in coincidences. Since you’re auto-didactic, I believe most of us are which is why we’re here and not part of the herd, I’d like to steer you to toward the shady history of “The New School.”

  • Luca

    Israel is our only reliable middle-east ally. That does not mean we admire them. Your cut-and-paste factoid compares American sympathy towards Palestinians and Israelis.

    Do you really consider that a lucid response to the very precise points that I made?

    What kind of liberal-delusional disorder do you have? Avoiding my topics and pasting an unrelated issue does not make you appear smart. You are confused or dyslexic at best.

    • JohnEngelman

      If you have a poll drawn by a credible organization that indicates that your hostility for Jews is at all widespread in the United States, post it.

      • Luca

        Once more you have failed to respond to my post. “Why is there no equal universal hate for the intelligence and wealth of Asians?”
        Liberal tactics, answer a question with a question or answer a question that has not been asked.
        Polls are subjective and manipulative, but I suspect like me, most people don’t hate Jews. I have no hostility towards them, I simply see the bad side that everyone has been talking about through the ages on every corner of the earth except your little corner. But just as there are good and bad blacks, so there are good and bad of others and in virtually all cases their stereotypes may be exaggerated but they are certainly earned. That is just reality. Remember reality? or are you only a realist where blacks are concerned?

        • JohnEngelman

          You are assuming something without proving it. Is there more hostility toward Jews than Orientals?

          If there is I do not know why. There is no legitimate reason for disliking either group. Both groups tend to be more intelligent and prosperous than white Gentiles. Orientals have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy than white Gentiles. I have not found figures comparing the rates of crime and illegitimacy of Jews and white Gentiles. I am confident that Jews have lower rates. Those with more intelligence, education, and income usually do have lower rates.

          • Luca

            “There is no legitimate reason for disliking either group”- JE

            You are right, however there is no legitimate reason to deny that all groups have negative, as well as, positive attributes. Are you saying you are in denial and that stereotypical negative attributes are not earned? Or are you simply ignoring them since you have not responded to the ones I listed.

            How realist and honest is it to continuously praise a group’s good points, and totally deny the bad?

            Many liberals praise and defend blacks and totally deny and make excuses for them.

            Do you see my point? Do you get the analogy?

          • JohnEngelman

            Yes I see your point.

            The point I have made is that by tangible measurable criteria it is easy to demonstrate black deficiencies. They tend to be less intelligent than whites. They have higher rates of crime and illegitimacy. These deficiencies can be documented using credible sources of data.

            Now in saying this I am well aware that there are decent and capable blacks.

            What I keep asking is this: what are the tangible deficiencies of Jews and Orientals? Show me the numbers. I want statistics.

            When people try to justify their hostility toward Jews and/or Orientals they mention anecdotes, or they speak in vague measurable generalities. For example, they will say that Jews are parasites. Oh yes? How? Do they have a high rate of welfare dependency? No they don’t. Neither do Orientals.

          • Luca

            I gave you two websites that clearly illustrate the concept that Jews are disproportionately represented and therefore have a huge controlling position in certain outlets such as: Big media: Hollywood television, music, radio, advertising, internet, etc, Banking, Government, academia and Globalism, They are positioned to persuade opinions through propaganda on subjects such as diversity, religion, pop culture, gun control, Israel, tax spending, socialism, activism and climate Change. We find them in Labor Unions, ACLU, SPLC, etc.

            These websites are virtual encyclopedias on the subject and now you are telling me you need more?

            Now, if Asians (Orientals) have high levels of wealth, education and intelligence, why aren’t they equally represented in such staggering proportions?

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews are highly represented in any environment that requires high intelligence because they are highly intelligent.

          • Luca

            And Asians are highly intelligent but not represented in such numbers.

            Because you have refused to answer my core question after repeated courteous attempts, I must write you off as irrelevant and incapable of answering direct questions. I don’t require you to recite polls or cut and paste articles. Any logical reason or intelligent theory would have been more of a contribution than your mindless mantras.

            “There are none so blind as those who will not see.”

          • JohnEngelman

            There is nothing to see. Jews are widely accepted in the United States. Only vermin hate them.

          • Jotun Hunter

            using words like vermin, like ‘hate’, really betray your weepy, emotional side – or that you are misrepresenting yourself as you are secretly one of them. Are palestinians also ‘vermin’? You would be a vile, vermin bigot to many a little further to the left, with your anti black talk. You’re a ‘hate criminal’

          • Luca

            To have any type of meaningful exchange I suggest we not debate closet Liberals who contribute nothing more than mindless propaganda using mantras and cherry-picked statistics and responses.

            The greatest insult is to ignore someone.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I try, I really try, then he’s always there again on the next post, with the same old crap.

          • JohnEngelman

            Your “same old crap” consists of expressions of hostility for me or Jews. Do me a favor and ignore me. While you are doing that try to find out why you have such a vast reservoir of hostility. It is not a becoming trait.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I do not feel emotionally angry – I have hostility for anyone that advocates for the genocide of the white race, even by your gradual miscegenation / immigration methods. Stop posting or change your tack if you don’t want to be reminded how flawed and dangerous your nonsense is.

          • Geo1metric

            We’re usually called “goyim”, whatever that means.

          • Geo1metric

            “Only vermin hate them.” To call humans “vermin” is despicable. It’s like calling them “cattle”.

          • Geo1metric

            There are more “highly intelligent” Whites in America than “highly intelligent” Jews.

          • Geo1metric

            Exclusion by race is most natural; no one needs statistics to justify it since this exclusionary bias is innate.

            Your denial of it, if you are White, is simply fulfilling a need of yours to feel superior to your fellow Whites by displaying how oh so broad-minded and evolutionarily advanced you are. Typical stance of a progressive, hence the moniker, “progressive”. ” Oh, look how “progressive I am, I am a citizen of the world!! I love everyone!!

            Complete denial of natural law and self-deceiving.

          • JohnEngelman

            In the best universities and the best corporations people of all races who perform well (in other words, who do not owe their positions to affirmative action) are widely respected.

            To most intelligent, well educated young people race consciousness is non existent.

            This is how John Derbyshire, who will be attending the next American Renaissance conference put it in a 2003 interview: “The kind of thoughtful and intelligent young people that [National Review] would like to have as readers…are…determined to make the multiracial society work, they believe it can be made to work…, and they are unwilling to read, say, or think anything that could be construed as unkind towards people of other races. The pessimism and cynicism on this topic that you rather commonly find among conservatives – including NR readers – born in 1930, or even 1950, are profoundly unappetizing to these younger conservatives.”

          • Geo1metric

            Young people are not known for having wisdom. As they age and encounter more of “race reality”, they will surely change their minds.

            After all, racialism is as natural as breathing. Those who deny it, or want to make multi-culturalism “work” are in denial.

            Even John Derbyshire cannot see into the mind of any of these “young people”. In their more candid moments, John would be surprised. I know I have been.

          • JohnEngelman

            If this is true, “racialism is as natural as breathing”. why is the practice and approval of interracial marriage increasing?

          • Geo1metric

            It may be increasing by a statistically insignificant amount.

          • Jotun Hunter

            well lets see – anybody who has shirked their media brainwashing should feel somewhat hostile towards them – you can guarantee all the muslims feel extremely hostile towards them. Then there’s the Mel Gibsonesque hard core catholics who hate them as Christ killers. Then there’s the anti-israel occupy-types who can be very vocal against them. As long as you have ‘studied the figures’ engelman then we can all sleep sound at night

          • JohnEngelman

            Brainwashing does not exist. It is blame by those who recognize that popular attitudes are shifting away from them.

            Your ossified prejudices are becoming unpopular.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I’m not speaking about myself, jist pointing out one of your many observational failings – this new comment (media has no influence) really being one of those doozies of naivety and foolishness (mixed with ego) that betray you as 1) not being compatible with an amren philosophy & 2) likely working to some queer and nasty agenda

          • JohnEngelman

            Your antisemitism is not compatible with the philosophy of American Renaissance. Race realism means that the races differ significantly in average behavior and ability, that these differences are durable, and that they evolved over a long period of time. It does not mean that Nordics are the master race. It certainly does not mean that Jews are morally inferior by any respectable criterion. They are obviously intellectually superior.

            Your “queer and nasty agenda” does not belong on this website.

          • Jotun Hunter

            why would a website about race realism cower before idiot liberal accusations like ‘anti-semetism’? ive never tried to claim ashkanazi dont have the higgest iqs, they jusr have ‘other problems’ – primarily no sense if idealism. Also a kind of rotten, undesirable culture – and by and large and blacks have more creativity than asians.

            jews still do not account for the majority of historical advance (because they spend all their time lining their coffers). they have asiatic hearts. your iq & SAT scores do not encompass everything. for our predecessors (the likes of spengler, ford, stoddard, washington and others) the evidence of history and their own eyes were enough to.make them ‘race realists’. you live in a fantasy land and are nothing like like a realist. btw you do not represent popular opinion with your mindless ‘asians are superior’ talk

          • JohnEngelman

            It is easy for me to document the superior average intelligence of the Ashkenazim in ways that are tangible, measurable, and objective.

            Your claim that Jews lack a “sense if [sic] idealism,” and that they have, “a kind of rotten, undesirable culture,” only reveals your own blinkered way of looking at the world.

            Opinions are interesting. Opinions not based on facts that can be documented are not truths; they are facts about the people with the opinions.

            I like facts, statistics, and numbers on paper. Show me the evidence that by any respectable criterion Jews tend to be morally inferior to white Gentiles. On numerous occasions I have documented that they tend to be intellectually and financially superior.

          • Jotun Hunter

            Well thank god ‘you’ have documented it for us – where would anyone be without you? you like the look of numbers on paper allright. You have no concept of how subjective reality is, or that you even have a bias yourself. You live in perpetual childish naivety of a much wider world. Jews are over-represented in the porn industry for a start, promote liberalism via their media ownership, promote miscegenation and immigration. They do not tend to go into idealistic fields, such as engineering or exploration, but prefer banking, money lending, mercantile activities. Would you try to deny that? From there they promote terrible modern fashions, sexualize young children and promote black ‘music’. For the wretched destruction and stupidity of the jewess Betty Freidans radical feminism alone we have paid a most loathsome price. Wherever they touch art or architecture we find hideous anti-aesthetic modernism. They mutilate their childrens genitals, and the orthodox look positively ridiculous. Google jews and porn for a start to your new education, engelman

          • Jotun Hunter

            and by the way its not as ‘easy for you’ to enlighten us with your repetitive statistic pasting as you think, you are like a running joke to most people here, and with good reason. You really must try to check that hebraic ego of yours, engelman

          • Geo1metric

            No one cares who has the highest IQ; we want to be amongst our own kind. I’ve tried to explain this to you previously.

            We all know that you worship at the alter of IQ. You don’t have to constantly explain that to us. Please, give it a rest.

          • JohnEngelman

            I would rather spend my time with an intelligent well informed Negro than a stupid, poorly educated white nationalist.

          • Geo1metric

            You sound “elitist” to me. :)

          • Geo1metric

            If you truly believe that “brainwashing does not exist”, you are insufferably ignorant.

          • JohnEngelman

            Brainwashing is the excuse reactionaries give to explain changes in values and behavior they do not like.

          • Geo1metric

            That statement is simply another of your ridiculous opinions.

          • Geo1metric

            Orientals like to eat dogs; Whites consider dogs as companions.

          • JohnEngelman

            A small minority of Orientals eat dogs. Americans eat more meat per capita than people of any other country. Most animals raised for human consumption in the United States live horrible lives in feed lots and pens.

          • Geo1metric

            I’ve been to “dog markets” in Shanghai; it’s more than a “small minority. BTW, where did you pick up that morsel of mis-information?

  • John

    CBS and the New York Times are owned by the very types that are promoting and supporting the opens borders, unlimited immigration initiative not only here but in Europe as well. You can quote them and MSM all you want and I’ll not believe a word of it. I’ve allowed myself to be polled, mostly in connection with hospital stays for surgical procedures, so I have first hand experience of which I speak. The whole battery of questions comprising a poll are very cleverly worded in such a way as to inevitably deliver the results the pollster is commissioned to obtain by their employer. Visit Vdare or NumbersUSA for more information on the immigration problem. Or just look around where you live.

  • John

    Sorry Rabbi, I should have been more explicit than saying “in modern vocabulary”. Try this; it has become customary, when referring to someone as a “white” person, to be referencing a Caucasian individual of European descent with a Christian heritage. Jews, although Caucasian, as a general rule, do not consider themselves “white” because of the European origins aspect as well as the religious, or Christian aspect of the above definition. Regardless, no doubt you knew precisely what I was saying from the get go, did you not?

  • William Allingham

    if evolution is occurring right now then the only sensible thing to think is that a new subset of white people should arise which besides of being smart they must be immune to manipulation and blackmail (selection could easily do the job).

    also I would love to see a courageous economist or historian pointing out that our present system, developed by you know who, is stupid and sick and they should show that we westerners could have developed a more efficient and fair one based on white peoples values (on similar lines with some middle ages values where pride in quality, almost disappearance of slavery, a quest for self sufficiency and free association started to stand out, -until classicism took over and brought back slavery and dependency in Europe)

  • SoulInvictus

    The best disputation of your delusion, is (as I mention in greater length above) that ancient world Hebrews were in no way innovators.
    In any area of human development.
    They never led any field until mixing with European culture and DNA and sucking off its collective teat to build capital.
    That is the simple historical fact.
    They had a documented difficult time of even evolving past nomadic tribes into a monarchy. And the best architecture accomplished was a pretty crappy and simplistic temple.
    Nothing rivaling Egyptian structures, or Greek philosophy, or Roman organization and government.
    I guess they were just held back for all those thousands of years.
    The “superior” “chosen” people have always been middle men. Merchants. In an era when commerce and legal manipulation are god, then that genetic skillset is a profitable one.

    • JohnEngelman

      The intelligence of the Ashkenazim began to develop during the middle ages when Jews in Europe were excluded from owning land and most trades. Money lending was open to them because it was forbidden to Christians.

      Money lending is an intellectually demanding field. It was even more intellectually demanding before the adoption of Arabic numerals. Arithmetic with Roman numbers is much more difficult.

      Jews who could not learn the skills did not have children, or they left the faith.

      After the French Revolution anti Jewish discrimination in Europe lessened. It became obvious that Jews were exceptionally intelligent.

      Jewish intelligence evolved in response to religious persecution. It gave rise to secular persecution because many gentiles resented it, and the prosperity it enabled Jews to achieve.

      • SoulInvictus

        “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial
        tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them into the program of the Communist Party. In America, we aim for several victories. While inflaming the Negro
        minorities against the whites, we will instill in the whites a guilt complex for their supposed exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Blacks to rise to prominence in every walk
        of life and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry
        with the whites and will begin the process which will deliver America to our cause.”
        -Jewish Playwright Israel Cohen,
        A Radical Program For The Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in
        Congressional Record , Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957, by Rep. Thomas Abernathy.

        That quote, and the current state of affairs that evidences the success of this vile philosophy, is all I need to know about your favorite tribe to earn my contempt.

      • Jotun Hunter

        money lending is a dishonest and atypically parasitical, exploitative behaviour that they do because they believe they are ‘chosen people’ who can do what they will with others. Their total lack of altruism or universalism is what tends to make them so… undesirable

        • JohnEngelman

          Without money lending commerce would be impossible. Most Americans would not own homes and cars, as few can pay for homes and cars with checks that clear the bank.

          • Jotun Hunter

            Then how did it ever thrive in times when money lending wasn’t permitted? Once again your history blinders do you no service.

          • JohnEngelman

            Study some history yourself. During the middle ages money lending was forbidden to Christians by Christian governments, but allowed to Jews.

            What matters is that money lending and commerce bred the Ashkenazim for the intellectual superiority that is so obvious today, and which makes Ashkenazi Jews so prosperous.

          • Jotun Hunter

            so it was money lending as opposed to fierce interbreeding and persecution (probably warranted) that led to the higher iq, in your funny word of playtime and egoistic imaginings. Your grasp on objective truth is actually even more biased than most. Your insane ego permits you to think you have the ultimate answer on every issue. Honestly you should seek psychiatric help, you do betray traits of sociopathy or psychopathy.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are projecting your psychological deficiencies on me. Anyone with your need to hate is a very deficient individual.

          • Jotun Hunter

            ah, the obscure and trendy use of ‘hate’ again – now that’s some impressive rhetoric. If my opinion seems vociferous it is only to combat the sense of absolute finality which you robotically regurgitate your childish and self-hating opinions.

          • JohnEngelman

            My admiration for Jews and Orientals is not motivated by hate, but by my love for excellence.

          • Jotun Hunter

            You don’t even have that — you only love orientals for their ‘excellence on paper’ as I’ve shown you many times, in actual recorded activity their lack of creativity fails them. Even on paper, you completly ignore the IQ graph that demonstrates whites have both more dunces and higher super genius than asians, the super genius perhaps being the highest level achievers. But it doesn’t take a normal adult (which you are apparently not) to recognize that IQ scores aren’t the full picture.

            I don’t even particularly ‘hate’ (to use your childish buzz wording) asians or jews. I have huge admiration for the Japanese frankly. I just think there is no need for them to flood into our territory. Your idiocy and parroting forces me to appear in the far reaches of the right wing.

          • Jotun Hunter

            for what its worth I don’t have a deep-seated hatred for jews and orientals – a natural and heathy mistrust for jews and chinamen, perhaps. But I outright love the Japanese.

            It is your ridiculousness that forces me to take the hard right position. Or seem to.

          • Geo1metric

            I love excellence too. That has nothing to do with integration of the races.

          • Jotun Hunter

            but no… I’m serous– psychopaths tend to have that kind of undeserved confidence, have you ever been analyzed?

          • JohnEngelman

            I am confident in my ability to defeat you in a rational debate where facts and logic are what matters, rather than your appeals to hatred, fear and anger.

          • Jotun Hunter

            You just lost it, the moment you starting prattling about hatred and fear. You argue like a little girl, ultimately.

          • Jotun Hunter

            you are confident in many undeserved ways which you should frankly self examine and re-assess.

          • Jotun Hunter

            and why am I the one, between us, who according to your inimitable wisdom is full of ‘hate’? I’m not the one calling for the deserved extinction of an entire race, that’s you. I’m just saying end immigration to western countries. Hatemonger

          • JohnEngelman

            Interracial marriage is not “the deserved extinction of an entire race.” It is a matter of personal choice. In most of the United States it is not an issue any more. It is a growing trend.

          • Jotun Hunter

            you are, in every possible sense, a total waste of time

          • JohnEngelman

            Then why do you spend so much time harassing me? That time could be better spent composing rational arguments using factual premises and logical reasoning.

            Go away. Study. Come back when you have become a worthy adversary.

          • Jotun Hunter

            fractal premising eh engeldink? you go away – you didnt even sit at the grown ups table yet. Your only tool is relentlessness and free time.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I have actually never heard someone argue worse than you – honestly. You don’t really have any valid points, they are easily dismissed, yet you just keep regurgitating them and thinking you’ve solved it all. You are also full of ‘hate’ for your own race, which is just weird.

          • Geo1metric

            I’ll bet that you have never engaged in a real debate.

          • SoulInvictus

            Yup, funny how that happens. That Americans can’t own anything without becoming debt slaves. Wasn’t always that way was it…

            http://wwwDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU

      • gene hayhoe

        I’d post Luther’s ”On the Jews and their Lies,” but I’d guess many in this crowd would be backers of Luther’s spewing.

        • JohnEngelman

          More than likely.

          I like facts, statistics, and numbers on paper. No one can present tangible evidence that Jews by any reasonable criterion tend to be morally inferior to Gentiles.

          It is easy for me to present tangible evidence that Jews tend to be more intelligent and more prosperous than Gentiles. That infuriates the antisemites.

        • TruthDetector

          Spews gene hayhoe…

          • gene hayhoe

            Ever read said book, TD?

      • AnthonyMa

        The right to charge interest was religious persecution? I don’t think so, it was a privilege granted by the king to a group he knew was beholden to him and had little chance to usurp him. You’re obviously right that money-lending is an intellectually demanding field, the loan sharks I knew as a kid were all Rhodes Scholars.

  • NM156

    The teetering stack is reaching greater heights. Eventually it will collapse on the opposition.

  • BonV.Vant

    read it, conjecture

    • David Ashton

      Why should we read an essay from the Nordic Episcopalian? He never reads anything we “white Gentiles” suggest. He quotes scriptures he likes from Lynn, Rushton, Nizkor, Old Testament and a few other sources, and is “confident” that he knows “the truth”.

      • BonV.Vant

        his essay was conjecture based on a book that was nothing but conjecture

  • Geo1metric

    “Jefferson knew a hell of a lot less than us.”

    While it’s true that T.J. knew fewer “facts” about science than we now know, but he was, and is today, considered to be a highly intelligent person with a very strong scientific bent.

  • Geo1metric

    Well, all of that may be true, but the naacp was founded by our Jewish brethren.

    • JohnEngelman

      The NAACP was originally formed to end discrimination against Negroes. Now it favors discrimination in favor of Negroes. Nevertheless, I agree with the original goals of the NAACP.

      • Geo1metric

        So you think blacks should be integrated with Whites?

        • JohnEngelman

          I am less confident about answering “Yes” to that question than I was when I was younger.

          I have had black friends. I would not want to have not been able to go to restaurants, taverns, and theaters with them.

          Nevertheless, I think integration only works well in environments where the black population is under ten percent, perhaps under five percent.

          I have come reluctantly to suspect that in states where the black population approaches fifty percent that Jim Crow legislation was based on sound instinct. Whites are not safe when blacks are in the majority.

          I actively resent the sanctions and taboos against saying what I just have.

          • Geo1metric

            But you state that you still agree with the original intent of the naacp, that is in your words, ” to end discrimination against Negroes”.

  • Geo1metric

    “A poll by Farleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey showed that of all the news channels out there, Fox News viewers are the least informed…”

    A “study” can be found to support any position one chooses. The validity of the “study” is another issue.

    To understand a “study” one needs to understand how it was conducted. For example, how were Fox News viewers isolated? How was their level of “information” (“least informed”) measured?

    I could go on and on, but perhaps you get the picture. Maybe.

  • gene hayhoe

    And so I see that the ‘intellectual racists’ still have their ‘spot’ in the world these days.

    ‘If you’re not like me, you must be inferior.’

    I give the human species 100 years, tops, before they become ‘the first self-extincted species in history.’

    • Jon

      Sadly i agree because at the the Animals do what nature intends and only allows the most fit to grow.

  • gene hayhoe

    John E, I WOULD point out that, in my estimation the ‘Protocols’ have been WIDELY used by NON-JEWS for ‘the promotion of dysfunction for profit.’ When/if used, they would have a profoundly negative effect upon the society in which they are used. The Protocols are a GREAT example of what a ‘hiding in plain sight socially disruptive tool’ is.

  • SoulInvictus

    Funny how all these hoaxes always seem to jive perfectly with what ends up being reality within a few years time.
    More fun quotes for you.

    “Marx was a Jew. His manner of thought was Jewish. His keenness of intellect was Jewish; and one of his forebears was a most distinguished rabbi endowed with a powerful mind.” N.H. Bialik, in an address delivered at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, May 11, 1933, which appeared in Lines of Communication, Palestine, July, 1933 .

    “Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism.” The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935.

    “Marxism is the modern form of Jewish prophecy.” Reinhold Niebur, speech before the Jewish Institute of Religion, New York, October 3, 1934

    “The Bolshevist officials of Russia are Jews. The Russian Revolution with all its ghastly horrors was a Jewish movement.” The Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 22, 1922.

    “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so
    many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” Jewish Chronicle London, April 4, 1919.

    “The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that,
    just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism.” (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 143-144).

  • LACountyRedneck

    Europeans have created far more than Orientals although Orientals have a large advantage when it comes to cooking live animals. Orientals coming to the U.S. have a mindset to do well, so comparing a Asian immigrant to the overall U.S. pop which includes blacks and Mestizos isn’t much to talk about. Having solely a high IQ in a narrow field does not equate to creativity. This is simply common sense, John.

  • ThomasER916

    Men respond to social pressures for success. If men are abandoned by the system (church, education, government) then they look for another route. All of those three require education. It’s no secret that England is anti-White, anti-male, and anti-heterosexual. Since the have no social circles that will accept them they instinctively form “teams” and see “teams” that will accept them.

    If the “Anglican” church was an explicit ethnocentric and racial institution England would still be English and most would simply shrug off the notion of “racism”, but the Anglican church delusions of Liberal “racial equality” and “racial harmony” were appearing during Charles Dickens’ time. He was explicit in his hatred for Liberal Christianity that characterized Exeter Hall which became the worship of Negroes and the hatred of Whites. In their pathology they supported the Jamaican Insurrection where freed slaves murdered, raped, and robbed the whites who helped them. This same pathology is now mainstream and it’s become a full blown suicidal, secular religion.

  • Northern American-Nationalist

    Thank God. I’m reading this one, and I’m already spreading the word to friendly non-believers. Thank you for the book review Mr. Taylor.

  • Jon

    Breeding is Evolution and Race is a fact of nature while Mr, Wade does deal with the question it does prove how cowardly he is when dealing with tougher questions. Truth is not all races are ready for civilization and never will be. whether we want to deal with Eugenics and Sterilization as a whole does not matter because the nation that master them will inherit the earth. William G. Simpson said it best that if we do not deal with the mass of human garbage then we will drown in it. I agree with Galton and the others mentions and it shows how cowardly Wade is for attacking them and bringing the holocaust into is low also. Nature is about survival of the fittest and we are not evolving as a race but rather stagnating and dying off. The best of us no longer care about family and are being outbred by the lower class.

  • Jon

    Truthfully I think the that people split from Africa before 50k yrs ago because DNA has shown to line of descent: one from 75000 yrs ago and one from 160000 yrs ago. I believe once the human genome is fully unlocked then we will have the true origins of all the races. As for the Japan. Korea and China, they all modernized after contact with us because when our navy showed up Japan was still in the Middle Ages but they proved they were good at assimilating our technology.

  • wildfirexx

    “Mr. Wade includes a chapter on the superior intelligence of Jews”
    How enlightening!…but I guess if he bites the hand that appears to control and allow our liberty of freedom of speech, his book would quickly be targeted as an outcast.

  • Guest

    As

  • wildfirexx

    Jared Taylor seems to state… Mr. Wade tries to avoid the conflict of comparing genetic traits of intelligence between races, but instead focuses more on visible and social behavioral differences, which can go along way in acceptance by the general population of disbelievers.

  • Falco

    Henri de Tourville (1842-1903), largely influenced by Paul de Rousiers’s study of American society, “American Life,” developed a classification of four types of families, based on childhood socialization patterns and types of values:

    (1) The ‘patriarchal family’ emphasizes the importance of the family community over the individual; self-denial is taught, individuality is suppressed, and children are not expected to form new family communities on their own. Societies in which patriarchal families dominate are generally conservative and stagnant.

    (2) The ‘quasi-patriarchal’ family develops a certain minimum of initiative in members of the younger generation, but on the whole maintains the patriarchal family organization; individual members may leave for a certain period of time, but since they generally lack the initiative to form their own family community, they often return. These first two types were dominant in eastern and central Europe.

    (3) The ‘unstable family’ instills neither the respect for authority and tradition found in the patriarchal family nor the sense of individual initiative of the particularist family. To fill the void, the state must provide remunerative employment and moral direction; isolated individuals and unrelated nuclear families depend on a centralized governmental bureaucracy for support. Such families were found in France and Germany.

    (4) The ‘particularist family’ instills in its children a strong sense of individuality and personal initiative; children are expected to manage their own affairs at a relatively young age and to form their own separate nuclear families. The particularist family was dominant in most Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon countries.

    The Saxon’s power arose from what we would now call nuclear families. Henri de Tourville, in his “The Growth of Modern Nations” (1907), believes this small family came into being in the following way: some Teutonic or Nordic people reached the plains of Sweden and in their search for undisturbed homes, passed on over the mountains and settled along the fiords of Norway. When the families of a fiord grew too large, the younger members gathered together, stocked a few ships and voyaged southwards, seeking land for themselves in fiords farther south, in the projecting thumb of Denmark, in the northwestern river-lands of Germany, and finally in the island of Britain. In the new settlements, the love of independence led to the persistence of the small family system.

    However rude and rough these early Angles may have been, there are few Englishmen now who will not be thrilled, when they read how Tacitus, coming from the great city-world of Rome, was struck by the jealous independence of each farmer and his family in their settlements. ‘They live apart,’ he wrote, ‘each by himself, as woodside, plain or fresh spring attracts him.’

    They could not, however, be quite independent. Dangers from other peoples sometimes threatened them and they then joined together, chose a chief and took to arms. They were fierce fighters and, when they arrived in Britain under their captains, they drove the Britons westwards or slew them, and took their land, until once more they were independent farmers at peace. They were the forerunners of similar settlers in America, Australia and New Zealand.

    The Saxons came to dominate all the other invaders, Angles, Danes, Normans, because of their cultural practices, particularly nuclear families, which Tourville calls “particularist” social structure. The Saxons generated a unique type of state apparatus as a result, operating large states on a federal-type basis.