Police: Grad Student Secretly Videotaped Hundreds of Women in Bathrooms on College Campus

Dave Urbanski, The Blaze, July 27, 2014

Hundreds of women may have been secretly videotaped from cameras found hidden in bathrooms at the University of Delaware, according to state officials.

After cameras were found in women’s restrooms on the campus in Newark, Delaware, authorities arrested a university graduate student, 38-year-old Javier Mendiola-Soto, a former doctoral student from Mexico. His arrest was announced Friday.

Javier Mendiola-Soto

Javier Mendiola-Soto

The suspect has been charged with 21 counts of felony violation of privacy and was being held in Wilmington on a $42,000 secured bond; federal immigration authorities added a detainer that would keep him behind bars even if he could make the cash bond, The News Journal reported, citing Skip Homiak, the university’s director of campus and public safety.

{snip}

Mendiola-Soto told campus police he downloaded 1,500 separate videos of women using miniature cameras he hid in sanitary napkin dispensers in bathroom stalls on and around campus, News Journal reported, citing Homiak. But since some of the woman were recorded “three or four times,” Homiak told the News Journal, “hundreds” of victims is an accurate estimate.

More from the News Journal:

Once the case is adjudicated and any sentence served, he said, the ‘likely outcome’ for Mendiola-Soto is deportation back to his home country of Mexico.

Mendiola-Soto has been expelled from the university, Homiak added.

Homiak said it’s understood that some of the victims–all of whom have been offered counseling–might be reticent to appear in court.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    “He was such a good boy. He was studying to be an ‘aspiring’ rapper… Peeping Tom.”

    And yet again – more brown ‘family values.’

    • Oil Can Harry

      Hopefully he gets more than the slap on the wrist they gave Chuck Berry for doing the same thing back in the late 80s.

      • HE2

        Oil, Berry, prosecuted for a violation of the Mann Act, spent nearly 2 years in Federal Prison. The girl in question was a 14 year old Mexican.

        • SSkreelings

          Roman Polanski nominated Javier for an academy award for the photos. Roman thinks that 14 year old girls are hot!

          • HE2

            Charlie Chaplin was afflicted with the same disease.

        • Oil Can Harry

          I was talking about something different; Berry owned a restaurant in the late 80s and installed a hidden camera in the ladies room.

          • HE2

            He did? I did not know that.
            I do know about the 14 year old Mexican girl he brought up from Mexico, allegedly for a job.
            Hence, the Mann Act prosecution.
            So Berry was a perv.
            He is alive, really aged, but still performs locally where he lives.

  • Bunky

    Just another obama dreamer.

    • John R

      Yeah. We can just imagine what he was dreaming about.

      • Oil Can Harry

        I’m sure it wasn’t a dry dream.

  • WR_the_realist

    If you’re Mexican it takes serious effort to get yourself deported.

    • John R

      Good point. More than to “sneak” into the country in the first place.

    • HE2

      He will make bail. This is how it works in CA. Mestizo shoplifts, rapes a juvenile, steals car, arrested for DUI, driving without a license, leaving the scene of an accident.
      Arraignment, released on bail with order to appear. Disappears. Nothing to it.

    • SFLBIB

      Well, it depends. If your victim is also a member of an oppressed people, it’s apparently easier. Maybe there is an unwritten hierarchy of oppressed groups and women rank higher than Hispanics.

  • The Blaze? As in Glenn Beck? Don’t anyone at The Blaze show their boss this story, else he’ll go to the jail and visit him to give him a soccer ball and a teddy bear.

  • Jo

    “some of the victims–all of whom have been offered counseling”

    Counseling? I’d sue the pants off of University of Delaware for admitting dregs from Mexico!

    • Usually Much Calmer

      Really? Why, to jump on the victim hysteria bandwagon?
      He watched some women pee surreptitiously.
      He needs to go, forthwith. We need to move on.
      No counseling, no damages, just a better understanding of what diversity is really like.

      • Jo

        Many rapists begin as peeping toms, then escalate to rape and murder. Similar to those who think animal cruelty is minor, but, in reality, it frequently leads to murder.

        Compared to Whites, Hispanic homicide and violent crime rates are almost one-third higher, contributing to an unsafe environment for students in college.

        “Moving on” is a typical White attitude. We’ve been ‘too calm’ for too long. In other words, doormats.

  • Dave West

    As much as I am against the “dreamers” this story seems a little trivial; does it say anywhere that he was an illegal immigrant? It sounds like he was a guest student with a visa.

    • coco bongo

      Trivial? My understanding is that many serial rapists start out as peeping toms.

      • Dave West

        I guess what I’m trying to get across is that I don’t think it helps our cause pointing out one case of a hispanic committing a crime that could have also been committed by some white creep. I’m more interested in the proportion of these types of crimes committed by hispanics vs whites.

        • kjh64

          I think it does. I don’t think it is “trivial” to the women who were taped. Yes, White creeps do on occasion do this, just like Whites on occasion rape, rob, murder and molest kids. Why import foreigners who do this?

        • tlk244182

          Of course you’re right, but I think the idea now is to gin up an angry mob, and then unleash that mob on the enemy. And a closely reasoned argument about higher crime frequencies among Hispanics, while necessary, isn’t likely to be sufficient. We need to generate rage among what’s left of the Aryan race. Every incident like this must be trumpeted from the housetops as irrefutable evidence of the righteousness of the White cause, taking a page from the “liberal” news and entertainment industry’s playbook. The “Left” wants to cook the frog slowly, we want the frog to get a sudden scalding and jump out of the cauldron before it’s too late. And most people wont be motivated by logic, but only by indignation directed at a common enemy (and by mythology, but that’s another topic.) We must secure the existence of our People, and a future for White children. Diversity is White genocide.

      • SSkreelings

        My experience is that little Mexicans eventually become big Mexicans. And then they become democrat voters

    • John R

      Guest student or illegal immigrant? What’s the damned difference? He wanted to see some of those cute Anglo females nude, that is what it is all about. He should be charged with a hate crime!

  • Mexicans tend to high rates of sexual perversion of all kinds. Mexico is the number 2 producer of child porn. I think, when adjusted for population size, Mexico is number 1. Probably #1 in incest too.

    When I’m in the barrio in San Antonio, I hear stories, but none of them ever appear in the paper, probably because the local cops look the other way. Mexican worship is gaining traction to stand along side negro worship as our national religion.

  • A Freespeechzone

    Hey—what happened to ’embracing diversity’….after all, it’s racist to attack without understanding other cultures and their perverted values….

    They’ll try to deport him…and watch, he’ll just disappear and stay here anyway and collect from the rest of us…

  • dd121

    What do you bet they don’t deport him?

  • IstvanIN

    How sick do you have to be to want to watch someone use the toilet? And he “might” be deported? Good grief, what do we need weirdos like this for?

    • We have plenty of our own perv-tards. Why import them?

      • IstvanIN

        Absolutely! When I use a public restroom I am in and out. I don’t want to even talk to another guy! Who would want to record and replay? Gross!

    • John R

      He’s a perv. He probably likes to see the Anglo woman in such a degraded situation. It is just like rape.

      • I’ve been strip-searched by cops, and I doubt they liked it any more than I did.

        • John R

          That’s different. The cops were just doing their job, and you probably did something wrong; that is part of the consequences. Please don’t sound like a liberal.

  • Uncle_Dan

    Well, we finally found something that illegal immigrants can be deported for.

  • JohnEngelman

    Ewww!

    • Riiiight, we all know if this had been at “our dear leader grand university of the people’s education” in China, you’d be desperately searching for a download link for the videos. Or the one arrested.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      You inspire me, Engelman.

      I disagree with you as often as not but the way you handle the incessant and juvenile flak that you catch here for expressing your views honestly and measuredly is admirable.

      • JohnEngelman

        Thank you.

        A number of things attract me to American Renaissance. Jared Taylor has much to say that is worth thinking about. I enjoy political controversy and debate.

        I am a convinced race realist. By this I mean that I believe that the races differ significantly in average ability levels and behavior. I believe that these differences are the result of centuries and thousands of years of evolution in response to different population pressures. I believe that this is why the civil right legislation and the War on Poverty have not been able to improve the performance and behavior of American Negroes.

        Race realism has political implications. Nevertheless, it is a scientific theory, rather than a movement. I burned out on movements years ago, when I realized that democratic socialism was not selling in the United States. Polls indicate that socialism is becoming more popular in the United States. Nevertheless, I retain burn scars.

        I am opposed to affirmative action. I am in favor of more restrictions on immigration.

        Political websites attract many intelligent and well educated people. They also attract those who have strong opinions, but who are uneducated. When their opinions are challenged, their minds are not opened; they become angry and respond with what you have noticed as “incessant and juvenile flak.”

        Unfortunately, a website like American Renaissance attracts a few posters who blame Jews for social changes they do not like. In addition, these posters resent the superior intelligence and prosperity of Jews and Orientals. They even call this “genocide” and “race displacement.”

        They pose as defenders of the white race, and Western civilization. They prefer that pose to acknowledging that in an increasingly competitive economy they have little of value to offer employers.

        I suspect that Jared Taylor and Henry Wolff find the presence of those posters an embarrassment. Occasionally one of them is banned. Nevertheless, I am glad most are allowed to stay. Every now and then one of them posts a comment worth reading. When rummaging through trash one occasionally finds something valuable

        • Usually Much Calmer

          Thank you for such a careful and thoughtful reply.

          There are commenters here who I think of as very well informed and quite capable mentally who give you an unreasonable hard time. It’s embarrassing to witness. I do not dismiss all poor conduct directed at you as being based in lack of development. You can be quite provocative, knowingly or not.

          But I am in awe of the graceful way in which you take abuse.

          • JohnEngelman

            The only poster here who gives me an intellectual challenge is David Ashton. Even he can be disappointing.

            In a rational debate where facts and logic matter I believe I have few equals.

            I provoke by posting facts some posters do not want to be told about.

            I am at a disadvantage in an exchange of insults. I regret that occasionally I am pulled down into one.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Perhaps his ears are burning now; although I think there are a few, Ashton was the one I had in mind.

            “In a rational debate where facts and logic matter I believe I have few equals.” Would you mind if I asked if you are autistic? I inquire because even if your claim were true, it seems like it would be an uncomfortable expression to make for most people. If the question is offensive to you, you needn’t respond & I hope you’ll consider it nothing but earnestly posed. I myself am not autistic -I’m just a jerk, so it might seem that way to polite people.

            Thanks again, John.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have never been diagnosed with autism.

            What some may interpret as autism is my love for political arguments, and my self confidence in those arguments.

            I care nothing for the feelings of those who are hostile to Orientals and Jews. I enjoy angering them by drawing attention to Oriental and Jewish intelligence and the prosperity is earns them.

            Pointing that out is consistent with race realism. I am not a white nationalist. I am certainly not a white supremacist, for reasons I frequently explain.

          • David Ashton

            Are you an Israel nationalist? Are you a Jewish supremacist?

          • JohnEngelman

            BTW, I have never thought of you as a jerk.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Ah, I have ‘wiggle room’. Good to know!

            I’m kidding of course. Have a great rest of the day.

          • David Ashton

            I was the one you had in mind in what respect?

            What I do not enjoy about Engelman’s contributions are their repetitiveness, and his refusal to adapt or admit or concede any point, however lucid and massive the criticism, before returning at a later date with precisely the same assertions, often verbatim, that have been made and refuted before, sometimes more than once.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            You are, if your posts are indicative, learned, measured, and astute. Most people who taunt him are not. (Some of the taunting is awful. Nasty comments and conjectures about his personal life and proclivities, dehumanizing nicknames, mob-like responses. I think I’ve only ever winced at yours once or twice, I’m glad you’ve moved on.)

            I agree with you, he often argues like Ali, dancing all over the place at times in a beguiling way to confuse. Not always rhetorically clean.

            But he won’t be bullied out of expressing opinions that are unpopular and he keeps coming back for more. I find that fascinating. I’m not sure I want his particular secret for it, but it’s nice to observe someone doing it. And I agree with some but not all of his minority opinions.

          • David Ashton

            Overlooking the de haut en bas stamp of your approval, I suggest that you express frequently in future your agreement with some of Engelman’s opinions and state your reasons – for a livelier debate.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I’m glad you are able to overlook it, it was accidental on my part I assure you.

            And thank you for your suggestion.

          • David Ashton

            I’m much calmer now too! Best wishes!

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Glad you’re calmer. I poked a hornet’s nest, I see from below.

            Where I agree with John in his unpopular views: many people who post on AR are bitter about things other than the dominant ideology denying human biodiversity. They are bitter about economic, social, and technological change that is lowering their relative value. So on the one hand, they are here because they refute some lies that are widely believed, they bring with them the baggage of not being able to handle the truth in other areas.

            But I really don’t want to raise this issue here, because I don’t see it being productive. Who would listen to me? For many lessons, experience and reflection are the only teachers.

            I hope that seems an acceptable position.

          • JohnEngelman

            de haut en bas – In a condescending or superior manner

            ——–

            That is an interesting foreign phrase. It is the way I am usually able to respond to those who flame me for my admiration of Jews and Orientals.

          • David Ashton

            G’d, don’t you take the unleavened biscuit for undisguised arrogance!

          • JohnEngelman

            I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee with my well documented facts.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            All I said was the butterfly bit. I believe your sting is weaker than you imagine, in all honesty. I’ll add that you also exhaust your opponents like Ali.

          • JohnEngelman

            Keep in mind that I am able to substantiate my “minority” opinions by quoting articles I have found on American Renaissance, as well as Jared Taylor, and others who have spoken at American Renaissance conferences.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I know, John. I know.

          • JohnEngelman

            My contributions are repetitious because the truth does not change. Unfortunately, the insults of those who do not want want to be told the truth do not change either.

          • David Ashton

            You are the Way, the Truth, the Life, and no-one comes to The Truth except through “vain and verbatim repetitions”.

            PS – Have you read “Culture of Critique” or not, Mr Truth? And if so, what are the passages therein that resemble “Mein Kampf” according to your previous comparison?

          • JohnEngelman

            I have not read The Culture of Critique. According to a Wikipedia article, Kevin B. MacDonald argues in it that Jews are motivated by a desire to advance their collective self interest.

            If that is true, what is so terrible about that? That is what white (Gentile) nationalists do.

            Second, Jews do not agree on much of anything. While secular and Reform Jews usually vote Democratic, Orthodox Jews usually vote Republican. They vote Republican for the same reason most Evangelical Christians vote Republican. They believe in family values, the Judeo Christian tradition, and all that.

            Even then, there are Orthodox Jews who vote Democratic, and Ashkenazi atheists who vote Republican. One Ashkenazi atheist was Ayn Rand.

            Jews are blamed for advocating open borders in the United States, while advocating that only Jews can move to Israel and become Israeli citizens. The number of Jews of any variety who desire open borders is much less than the number of Gentile businessmen who desire open borders.

            It makes sense for Gentile businessmen to agitate for open borders. Open borders lower wages and raise profits.

            I am not sure how Jews benefit from open borders. They certainly do not benefit from the immigration of Muslims.

          • David Ashton

            1. So your statement that CoC was like MK was unfounded and untrue.
            2. I have noticed that some Wikipedia entries relevant to very controversial Jewish issues have been changed over a recent period to avoid not only a critical slant but to deflect research away from primary texts into hostile secondary sources.
            3. MacD’s comments on Jewish support for multicultural immigration has become dated and needs qualification since many Jews in their own self-interest have realized the folly of allowing settlement from communities, not only Muslim, that are not only anti-Israel but antisemitic. The chapter & verse he gives for the earlier, longer phase of immigration are quite sound.
            4. The collective interest arises largely in response to hostility in my view, but the organisation and influence of Zionist groups are thoroughly documented, if not by MacD by many others across the political spectrum (e.g. James Petras).
            5. Historic hostility to Jews has arisen for several reasons, not just envy as you seem to think; e.g. the clash between church & synagogue. Lazare, Herzl, Bermant, Lindemann and Cantor are among the Jewish writers who do not put the “blame” solely on the Wicked Gentile.
            6. Of course, Jews are subdivided into many groups (as are the French or even the Koreans). So what? You may recall my own joke here about the Jewish speaker who said that antisemites are mistaken to think we [sic] have anything [sic] in common, since Jews all disagree with one another, and someone in the audience shouted his disagreement with that statement.
            7. It wouldn’t hurt you at all to read MacD’s interesting trilogy. You might learn something you couldn’t find already in your little box of “unchanging truths”.
            8. I have made a special study of Ayn Rand’s fascinating writings and views. Towards the end, the Israel issue revealed that blood was thicker than liberty in her case. Her “official” successors are great advocates of “open borders”, “global usury” and bombing the A-rab ter-rists to smithereens.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            John, much of the criticism about your style of argument is warranted.

            For example, your paragraph:

            “Jews are blamed for advocating open borders in the United States, while advocating that only Jews can move to Israel and become Israeli citizens. The number of Jews of any variety who desire open borders is much less than the number of Gentile businessmen who desire open borders.”

            contains two sentences which are not logically related. But the paragraph is crafted to give the impression of argument.

            Your two (unrelated- what do atheist and democrat have in common, logically?) observations, “Even then, there are Orthodox Jews who vote Democratic, and Ashkenazi atheists who vote Republican. One Ashkenazi atheist was Ayn Rand.” are as germane as the statement “my cat’s breath smells like cat food” to an argument of a book you admittedly have not read.

            Rhetoric is a discipline; it has rules. You don’t follow them and your arguments are not persuasive to educated people. If you ask me to tell you how, I will not. It is has been decades since I have studied it and it is like grammar, once you become proficient, the names of the things which you have mastered are of little use outside your pet peeves (I remember exactly what a dangling participle is because that’s one of my pet peeves- any other error I would have to look up to call correctly). If the onus is on your opponent to demonstrate persuasively to you why you have not persuaded them, your opponent is nothing more than your servile clerk. This is what people find arrogant and annoying.

            You are extremely level headed and articulate and quite indefatigable and these things are very admirable. But those fine qualities augment debate, they do not constitute debate.

            There is also the suspicion that you know quite well that your ‘arguments’ are not carefully constructed and you think that you can overwhelm people with quotes, your tone, the nimbleness of your mind, etc. This is just a faint whiff of a suspicion, but it is very offensive.

            You pluck still has my awe and I remain grateful that you share your views here.

          • JohnEngelman

            John, much of the criticism about your style of argument is
            warranted.For example, your paragraph:

            “Jews are blamed for advocating open borders in the United States, while advocating that only Jews can move to Israel and become Israeli citizens. The number of Jews of any variety who desire open borders is much less than the number of Gentile businessmen who desire open borders.”

            contains two sentences which are not logically related. But the paragraph is crafted to give the impression of argument.

            – Usually Much Calmer

            ————

            The reason these sentences are logically related is that Jews here are being blamed for political policies that could not exist without considerable Gentile support.

            Jews are also blamed for social changes antisemites do not like. Social changes are not forced. They happen because most people want them to happen.

          • JohnEngelman

            John, much of the criticism about your style of argument is warranted.

            For example, your paragraph:

            Your two (unrelated- what do atheist and democrat have in common, logically?) observations, “Even then, there are Orthodox Jews who vote Democratic, and Ashkenazi atheists who vote Republican. One Ashkenazi atheist was Ayn Rand.” are as germane as the statement “my cat’s breath smells like cat food” to an argument of a book you admittedly have not read.

            Rhetoric is a discipline; it has rules. You don’t follow them and your arguments are not persuasive to educated people. If you ask me to tell you how, I will not.

            – Usually Much Calmer

            ————

            Here again, the reason my points are relevant to the discussion of antisemitism is that Jews do not agree on important issues. Nevertheless, those who dislike them claim that they do. They will say that “the Jews” believe in this or that, when one can find many Jews who disagree on whatever the antisemite clams that “the Jews” believe in.

            Now, you have made a statement and you state in advance that you will not explain it. Because your statement derogates me, I have the right to ask for an explanation.

            My arguments are persuasive to educated people because they are fact based and logical. They are not persuasive to poorly educated people whose whose narrow minds are governed by fear, hate, and anger.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            “Because your statement derogates me. . . .”
            Unless you object to being compared to Ali, I have not derogated you. I have told you that your style of argument does not persuade me.

            Neither David Ashton nor Kevin MacDonald has said (to my knowledge, please correct me if I am wrong) any of the following:
            1. All Jews vote Democratic
            2. All Jews vote Republican
            3. No Ashkenazi Jews are Ayn Rand
            4. No atheists are Ayn Rand
            So, your observations that ” there are Orthodox Jews who vote Democratic, and Ashkenazi atheists who vote Republican. One Ashkenazi atheist was Ayn Rand.” disprove nothing.

            And I sincerely hope that you were not obliquely referring to Ashton as an anti-semite in your post; you would lose my respect.

          • JohnEngelman

            My comments were directed at antisemites in general.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Just like a butterfly. 😉
            Have a fine weekend, John. And the same to David Ashton and Dr. MacDonald, wherever he is.

          • David Ashton

            Sorry to disappoint such a confident super-brain.

            “Must try harder.”

          • JohnEngelman

            Keep working on it. I am sure you will succeed. 🙂

          • Usually Much Calmer

            . . . clockwork!

            I hope you both enjoy it more than you let on.

          • JohnEngelman

            You have compared me to Muhammed Ali. I like to think of myself as a counter puncher.

          • David Ashton

            Meanwhile, perhaps you could tell us, for instance, about the comparisons with “Mein Kampf” that you found after studying “Culture of Critique”. You could do what you have so often recommended to others: summarize the contents for our readers.

          • JohnEngelman

            There are no legitimate reasons for disliking the Jess.There are only reasons for sharing my admiration of them.

          • David Ashton

            I am NOT an “antisemite”, i.e. someone who hates the Jews as a people, and do not care whether others here approve or disapprove this principled position. But I do not think Jews historically have no responsibility whatever for engendering opposition; I have given several times my outline sociological explanations for the so-called “oldest hatred”.

            Nor do I think all Jews are specially immune from criticism as a self-described “chosen” people or “holy” seed; cf. Acts 7.52. Some Jews and Jewish-related activities can quite reasonably be criticized, just as others can be commended for achievements in mathematics, physics, medicine, historical research, musical interpretation, verbal skills, &c.

            Your subjective tunnel vision amounts to a sort of stiff-necked idolatry. As I say, you could learn interesting new things just from the Jewish writers quoted by MacDonald.

            A lengthy analysis of your argumentative techniques has been deleted here; this commentator was surely right about your “cut-and-paste” approach.

            I have no wish to highlight websites which promote antisemitism, but will simply quote, against two of your persistent contentions, brief passages from Professor Jerry Muller’s scholarly “Capitalism & the Jews” (Princeton UP, 2010): [1] “Another factor that explains Jewish economic success is their ability to form social networks” (p.91). [2] “…the extreme poverty of eastern European Jewry together with international migration led to substantial…sexual commerce. [In the USA] successful Jewish gangsters then invested their profits in the gambling industry” (pp.90-91).

          • David Ashton

            A nice example of your sarcasm. Like Benjamin Netenyahu, you can’t take it, but you can certainly dish it out.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Oh, man. Like. . .

          • David Ashton

            Engelman flagged up the “super-brain” bit!

          • Juggernaut3000

            Are you “in awe” of these anti-White comments that he posts constantly on American Renaissance?

            White nationalists are bitter, vengeful, and stupid white Gentiles who cannot compete with Jews and Orientals because they haven’t got the IQ power.

            I have no interest in designating a country as exclusively white Gentile.

            The thought of you losing your job to a more intelligent Jew or Oriental is pleasing to me. As time goes on there will be more of that.

            –John Engelman

            Anyone who posts such anti-White drivel on pro-White sites deserves abuse, and to be banned as well, as SF, Daily Stormer and Alternative Right had the sense to do.

            We’re out here trying to promote White rights in an anti-White world that seeks to eradicate every last one of us and Engelman undermines everything we’re trying to do.

            Engleman is what he is: an anti-White who supports the racial displacement of Whites by Asians and Jews.

            Why do YOU support someone who supports such an anti-White agenda?

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Expect stories like this to become more and more common as cameras become more and more miniaturized. Have you looked at the video camera on your cellphone lately? It is tiny! All that is needed is a miniaturized power source, and these will be able to be hidden anywhere. On the plus side, this should flush out more and more perverts, as they will trip themselves up sooner or later.

    • Tim_in_Indiana

      Oops…Did I say “flush out?” Unintended pun…

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Following his arrest, police searched his home and found approximately 1,500 video files. An analysis concluded that the suspect hid video cameras in several other restrooms both on and off campus from May 2012 until his arrest this month, officials said.

    Well according to one American president, he was just doing a job Americans refuse to do and another American politician and presidential hopeful will claim he was just doing it out of “love.”

    Now that the criminal has finally been caught, he will receive immunity from deportation.

    The streets of America do not have enough criminals and perverts to satisfy the regime in Washington and more are needed.

    The report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) shows that 36,007 immigrants in the U.S. illegally who were convicted of crimes were freed from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody, including those who had multiple convictions.

    Those numbers include 426 sexual assault convictions

    • Well, heck I like naked women as much as the next guy, but my wife and I do things with her sitting on my lap.

  • MBlanc46

    I was surprised that this wasn’t an Arab.

  • The Bogeyman

    Toilet cam installation, merely another job Americans just won’t do.

  • John R

    This is what the more educated Mexicans do.

  • Ashley Johnson

    Eww what a creep.

  • I’m a bit curious; couldn’t this whack-job find himself a girlfriend? He’s obviously mostly white, judging from his complexion, so unless his personality is totally hideous (like that of someone who secretly films women using the toilet), he would have no problems in this respect.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      This Mexican can’t find any girlfriend because he’s ugly. Just look at his high fluctuating asymmetry and lack of masculine facial features. His obvious nonwhite (Indian) admixture isn’t helping much either. It’s a misconception that personality and social skills are important for attraction. Women are primarily attracted to a man’s physical appearance because evolution by natural selection has decreed that physical appearance is the primary indicator of male genetic quality. This means that if you don’t look any good, you’re sh!t out of luck. His ugliness is the main reason behind why he does what he does. If he was better looking, he would be able to find a girlfriend with considerable ease. He wouldn’t need to videotape women defecating in public washrooms. Of course, this isn’t an excuse for what he did, but it does provide significant justification for the nationwide implementation of eugenic breeding policies, as well as the immediate repatriation of all racial undesirables.

  • SSkreelings

    Javier! Iss dot you, mon? Wassup!?!

  • Mark Hillyard

    I insist on the door to the bathroom being closed. I can’t in my mind make any connection to sexual gratification re: a woman sitting on a toilet. What kind of mind gets off on such things.

  • M&S

    I do wonder at the discovery process and specifically why it took so long.
    It will not be a small packaging effort because mass video memory of more than a few GB costs and even the best flash-USB can seldom begin encoding as fast as ‘the action’ happens which means it will always be on in selective surveillance mode. This in turn means that frequent inspections of easily accessed areas will discover the peeper package.
    A secondary question is battery time and how he got his product out of these same places while minimizing his exposure as own entry. Did he pose as janitorial staff? Work for the dispenser company? More likely he rigged something very like a cellphone which could be called and data dumped without disturbing the emplaced sensor and then used a motion detector or even remote feed to a distant hub node and/or recording site which he could service without being seen.
    A less intrusive inspection effort would thus require only that all RF sources be recorded and analyzed, in or near the facilities with those transmitting specific to video transmission standards (widebandwidth specific MP3/4/AVI etc. or similar recording codecs) be flagged for notification to the staff.
    Procedurally, the easiest way to prevent this (and by ‘this’ I am talking about half a million, easy, in court costs if he fights the sweetheart deportation deal) is to put facilities in all-female areas and separate coed classes back to gender controlled environments where access to those facilities is easier for women and hard to impossible for guys.
    All of which can hire female only staff or at least require accompaniment by female minders when entering to clean and restock or whatever. From a purely security driven standpoint, it is a workable ‘women’s country’ problem that would begin with vetting and bonding of servitors and passive monitoring as exclusionary security measures.
    To which I can only add: Google ‘UFLASH’ as indicator for what empowers these men to think so little of our females. In libraries usually (free webcam). But also in the bathroom and…everywhere.
    Those women who scream loudest that men are animals would do well to look for tits on some of the knuckle draggers they themselves associate with.

  • archer

    What a fool, all he had to do is wait a while, gender neutral bathrooms are coming soon, and he could “peep” all he wanted lawfully.

  • Paleoconn

    Looks pretty White to me. kudos to AmRen for diversifying the news.

  • David Ashton

    So you have said ad nauseam & no doubt will go on saying ad infinitum. Lynn’s book on the IQ of Jews is very good, and in no way undermines anything I have said about them; quite the opposite, of anything. Some people need to get out more (in your case armed with what in Britain would be an illegal weapon), and other people need to read around a bit more (in your case developing your knowledge).

    Here are four new cuttings to paste in your scrapbook:

    1. “Some wealthy Jews…carried on money transactions in an unscrupulous manner. They extorted a high rate of interest, and
    mercilessly persecuted their dilatory Christian debtors.” – Heinrich Graetz.
    2. “The Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God and are contrary to all men.” – St Paul.
    3. “To live for 2000 years in a state of permanent rebellion against all the surrounding populations, to insult their customs…by an uncompromising separatism, is a monstrosity.” -Kadmi Cohen.
    4. “Many Jews do not adequately realize the irritation they inflict.”- H. G. Wells.

    You can have the pleasure of tracing the original sources, dates and page references of the above.

    • JohnEngelman

      As far as St. Paul is concerned, it was not “the Jews” who crucified Jesus, it was the Roman government. Crucifixion was a Roman form of execution.

      Also, very few prophets were executed by “the Jews” or anyone else.

      Christianity began as a Jewish sect. All or most of the New Testament was written by Jews.

      The New Testament does not record the death of St. Paul. According to Eusebius, St. Paul and St. Peter were executed together by the Romans.

      Your other comments are unworthy of a response, and unworthy of you. Once again you have disappointed me.

      • David Ashton

        So silly old Paul aka Saul! He didn’t know what he was talking about, a bit like the writers of the gospels of Matthew and John, and Acts, not to mention Christian scripture analysts and ancient Jewish material on the death of Jesus? The deaths of Paul and probably Peter in Rome have nothing to do with this argument.

        However, according to you, the stuff in the centuries older OT aka Tanakh fully justifies the violent occupation of large areas of the Middle East by modern Israelis, while Gentile whites have no similar entitlement to any territory in northern America.

        Why should I “gloat” about the deportation of Jews or anyone else? You impute antisemitic hatred and sadism to me, because I have quoted just a few high-IQ and well-informed Jewish and non-Jewish writers, among many, who have made “derogatory” statements about Jews. Why this widespread and longstanding consensus which has often focused on similar aspects of Jewish behavior?

        I do not condone any persecution, but merely ask why Jews have been “persecuted for hundreds of years” by all sorts of peoples and cultures? Your explanation that has all been down to envy of their intellectual and ethical superiority to everyone else is not adequate to the historical evidence, which you regard as too “unworthy” even to investigate.

        You refuse to research or refute, but react with abuse – “antisemite”, “unworthy”, &c.

        As for the credibility of any parts of the collected library known as the Bible, I personally rely on historical analysis, not “faith”, wherever it leads and conclusions can change. The Romans, by the way, crucified many non-Romans including rebellious Jews. The question is whether agitation by some Jews against individuals they (also) disliked was a factor in getting any such persons crucified.

        So who is the “true believer” aka boring bigot here?

        You don’t “disappoint” me because I might have predicted your pompous retort.

        • JohnEngelman

          You don’t “disappoint” me because I might have predicted your pompous retort.

          – David Ashton

          That is the kind of personal insult Usually Much Calmer finds “cringe worthy,” and which disappoints me.

          There are only three areas in which Jews differ from Gentiles. They have a different religion. They tend to be more intelligent. They tend to be more prosperous as a result. Their religion angers religious bigots. Their intelligence and prosperity arouses the resentment of their inferiors.

          I am still waiting for documented sources that indicate that Jews tend to have higher rates of crime and illegitimacy than white Gentiles. No one presents any.

          • David Ashton

            Sadly you cannot see yourself and the lordly manner that accompanies your reiterated, often refuted, verbatim assertions as others see them. You erect your little flag of impertinence on the impregnable fortress of deliberate ignorance, evasion and dogmatism.

  • none of your business

    What I don’t like about Engleman are his outright lies about life in San Jose and Silicon Valley back when he was a programmer. I’m his age and lived in the same area at the time and he lies and lies and lies.
    Next time he starts about the superiority of asians over Whites I’ll post IQ stats on ALL asian countries, not just China, Korea and Japan.
    In many ways I am a pro worker socialist as Engleman says he is. But if he is a pro worker socialist I’m getting out. Engleman is an anti White jew. I have met many in my life and I recognize his line of @#**&^#. I have heard and read it in many jewish publications.