JW Releases Confidential USDA Videos Revealing “Cultural Sensitivity Training” Program

Judicial Watch, February 14, 2013

Judicial Watch today released previously unseen USDA videos revealing a compulsory “Cultural Sensitivity Training” program requiring USDA employees to bang on tables, chanting in unison “The pilgrims were illegal aliens” while being instructed to no longer use the word “minorities,” but to replace it with “emerging majorities.” {snip}

The sensitivity training sessions, described as “a huge expense” by diversity awareness trainer and self-described “citizen of the world” Samuel Betances, were held on USDA premises. The diversity event is apparently part of what USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack described in a memo sent to all agency employees as a “new era of Civil Rights” and “a broader effort towards cultural transformation at USDA.”  In 2011 and 2012, the USDA paid Betances and his firm nearly $200,000 for their part in the “cultural transformation” program.

USDA Training Administrator, Vincent Loran, in an October 10, 2011, email previously revealed by Judicial Watch, asked Betances for a copy of a training video vowing to keep it secret. “It will not be used for or show [sic] in any way shape or form,” Loran promised.  {snip}

{snip}

USDA Sensitivity Training Video Excerpt 2—“I want you to say that American was founded by outsiders—say that—who are today’s insiders, who are very nervous about today’s outsiders. I want you to say, ‘The pilgrims were illegal aliens.’ Say, ‘The pilgrims never gave their passports to the Indians.’” Betances also asked the audience, “Give me a bam,” after these statements, to which the audience replied in unison.

{snip}

The complete video is available here:

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Shattered

    What a waste of taxpayer money. The Obama administration is spending billions of taxpayer money to promote anti-Americanism.

    • The__Bobster

      It’s not the first time the USDA was used to promote treason:

      http://www.vdare.com/posts/usda-teams-up-with-mexico-to-popularize-food-stamps

      • Dan_O

        Hope you come back to VNN Bobster

    • guest

      What’s also sad is how there are still people out there who are so brainwashed that they think this is a good thing. “Cultural sensitivity” is nothing more than a nice code word for hating your own culture and accepting other cultures that are incompatible with yours. All this will do is lead to guilt-tripping and becoming anti-American.

      • DudeWheresMyCountry?

        Incompatible and more importantly inferior. When people ask me what I am, I don’t say nationalist or realist… I tell them I am a “culturist” thus believing that all cultures are not equal or compatible and that Western Civilization is by far superior in countless ways to any and all other cultures.

        When they whine or try to refute I shut them down by saying they think the same thing and if they didn’t they and their family would be moving to Mozambique or Honduras. They get quiet.

        I also tell them that the history of humanity in a nutshell is simply various clashes between civilizations and cultures and the subsequent consequences of those interactions.

        • guest

          That’s what I really hate about those leftists. All they do is whine and complain about how they think Western Civilization is so terrible and oppressive. Yet they never actually do anything to help out the “oppressed people”. Instead they expect the rest of us to empty our wallets and sacrifice our ways of life for them.

          • Fair Dingum

            They believe America is a nation of thieves and murderers, but they don’t mind having a share of the loot.

  • Greg Thomas

    How much more of this Nazi propaganda are we going to tolerate! Someone needs to lose their job over this garbage.

    • So CAL Snowman

      Sounds much more like Soviet/Communist propaganda to me. If you recall the Nazi’s were not that fond of foreigners.

      • brengunn

        I don’t think the soviets were, either. This type of thing is more Western liberal and relatively new, in the scheme of things.

      • dmxinc

        What you haven’t grasped is that YOU are the foreigner to these people.

        This is definitely Nazism – racial socialism,,only this time whites are the jews.

      • Sherman_McCoy

        Actually, Hitler was quite fond of the British and felt that they and the Germans were natural allies. He never intended to have to make war against them. It’s a sad fact of history. I tend to agree with Buchanan. Had there not been a mutual defense treaty with Poland, or had the Poles not been so stiff-necked about Gdansk, things would have been very different, and maybe millions of people (including Jews) would not have lost their lives.

        That said, it was pretty obvious from everything he wrote that he was going to march into Russia to exterminate the communists to make room for Germans. To consider the fair-skinned, fair-eyed Slavs anything less than the genetic equals of the Aryans is at best fallacious, and at worst, insane.

        • shmo123

          While Hitler’s admiration for the British is well documented, and his wish that a “fratricidal war” would be avoided, he was, above all a delusional meglomaniac. It was only a matter of time before even the most ardent advocates of appeasement could see through his lies. Like Churchill said of appeasers: “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.” The Poles did what any other country would have done which had treaties with stronger powers–they defied him. Hitler’s aims were clear, and to avoid war in Europe would’ve been nearly impossible considering Hitler’s ultimate goals for his Reich.

      • Greg Thomas

        They believe we are the “foreigners” Snowman! The Nazi comparison is on the mark.

      • Room101

        Look at the administration of the Nazi government and their difficulties in controlling hostile foreigners assigned to work in the Reich, or else. They had a huge bureaucracy administered by one Fritz Sauckel, Plenipotentiary of Labor.
        Despite living in an extreme example of a vicious police state one party dictatorship, the foreign workers imported into the Third Reich were a significant threat to local police forces due to their inherent resentment at being subjugated and enslaved.

    • Tim

      Agreed! The people having to listen to it for starters…I`d quit my job, turn outlaw and prey on the same vultures peddling this poison before I`d sit thru another day of it.

    • Jason

      Maybe we need to emulate some Nazis

      • Conan

        Yeah. That approach sure worked out great for George Lincoln Rockwell, David Duke, William Pierce, Louis Beam ect ect.

    • Wayne

      Not Nazi’s, Bolsheviks.

  • concernedcollegekid

    My jaw actually dropped at the first paragraph of this. Articles on AR have made me mad before, but this one actually freaked me out. The short video looks like something that might go on at some weird fringe private school where crazy hippie communist parents sent their kids, but this happened in the government that’s supposed to govern ME.
    “Where to move to raise children when I have them?” is the question running through my head right now. I don’t want any future children of mine exposed to hateful propaganda like this, EVER. Evil is not too strong a word for this.

    • Tom Iron

      Don’t get upset, just be ready when we have to finally take action to make things right.

      • liberalsuck

        I agree. It’s hard for me not to get pissed off and think, “Man, I just wanna punch their lights out” to thinking, “Keep calm. one of these days, things will be in our favor again and all the people like him will pay dearly for it.”

    • MekongDelta69

      …some weird fringe private school where crazy hippie communist parents sent their kids.” = That is the government.

      • gemjunior

        “That is the government”.
        No joke, it sure is. Our useless president’s friends and associates are William Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, and some others in that gang who were domestic terrorists. They blew up government buildings, and planned 25 million deaths, re-education camps, and for those who couldn’t be re-educated to be marxists — execution. It’s all written down and recorded by an FBI infiltrate who then published it. Kathy Benoit and some of the other scum (Weathermen, Students for Democratic Society) shot some cops to death during the robbery of a Brinks armored truck when they needed the money for bomb materials. Ironically, the first negro on the Nyack Police was one they shot, I’m sure they wouldn’t have wanted to hurt one of their pets. Yeah. THAT is the company that our scummy, slimy, dirty, greasy, smirking dirtbag president is keeping and nobody says one word about it. Not one word. And in my view this is way more serious than him going to church where and angry black pastor is preaching, These were actual domestic terrorists, depraved animals who were killers and were also involved in group sex with each other. Not that it’s a crime but it just gives more insight into their characters. Sleaze. Our gov’t has really gone to the bottom this time. These people are who are trying to decide what way WE should be governed.

    • sbuffalonative

      Please find a way to share this with your friends. They need to know what their future will be like if current trends continue unchecked.

      • concernedcollegekid

        I think I’m going to send it to some liberal friends and family members.

        • Blaak Obongo

          If they’re like my liberal family members, they won’t see anything wrong with it. They will, however, call you a Racist Hater for even mentioning it.

          • newscomments70

            I get that as well…but I still cannot keep my mouth shut.

    • Vanessa

      I looked into emigrating to New Zealand or even Australia, but unfortunately they don’t give out amnesty like candy the way we do. You either need a Ph.D. or have to invest $1.2 million or more in their economy to get a permanent residency card. And they deport you if you overstay your visa, again unlike our dystopian, dysfunctional country.

      • GM (Australia)

        I was talking to a dear friend a few days ago, she was saying that her future son-in-law is having difficulty in getting Australian residency. She was very surprised as he is white, well educated and comes from the UK. My very polite comment was that these thing don’t matter any more, this white man from the UK has about the same rights as a black African as far as getting a visa is concerned. My friend said “I realize this now”. Perhaps people out there may soon begin to realize just what is happening.

        Pleased be assured Vanessa that if you ever do come to Oz or NZ you will find a mainly white country as soon as you get out of our main cities and towns.

        Also note that we are surrounded by a lot of ocean which helps keep illegals out but that does not stop the do-gooders advocating for open borders and a lot more 3rd world immigrants.

        • Eddie Willers

          Well, Canada is still pretty easy to get into and does, at least, apply consistent standards to its applicants. Here in the Atlantic Provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island) the non-white population of Nova Scotia (the most populous province), for example, is around 4% – and that includes the ‘First Nations’ peoples.

          • Daisy

            Canada doesn’t take americans easily at all, which I guess isn’t hard to understand.

          • Nate Miller

            Which American in his/ her right mind would want to settle in Canada? In fact, its quite the other way around. Many Canadians come to the United States, some do overstay their visas. The last I checked America had a much better economy and pay scale as compared to socialist Canada!

          • kjh64

            Actually, Canada’s economy is better than ours now. Also, America is well on its’ way to becoming socialist(which only works if the population is White or say Japanese, Korean or homogeneous.)

          • Nate Miller

            At kjh64: I doubt it, if Canada’s economy was so great, please explain why so many Canadians come to work and live in the USA and NOT the other way around. Look Canada is a beautiful country and I like visiting the national parks there BUT, I’ve never ever heard of any American wanting to settle or shift to Canada. Also unlike some Canadians who overstay their visa illegally here in the USA, I’ve never heard of a US citizen do the same there. Canada’s economy is not even in the top 10. America is still the world’s #1 economy as of 2013!

            I don’t see Canada in the top 10 World Economic Power list:

            http://money.cnn.com/news/economy/world_economies_gdp/

            At Iain:

            When I visited Canada, granted there are very few blacks, but I encountered plenty of racial diversity (the better kind) – mostly Asians ( Chinese, Indians, Koreans) but even a few Caribbeans and Middle easterners.

          • kjh64

            More Canadians come to the US because it is much bigger in population than the reverse but as nations go, Canada’s economy for its’ own inhabitants is doing better than ours right now. Of course our economy won’t stay in the top if things continue as they are.

          • This is correct, and unless you live in Halifax you will go through most of your life without encountering any non- white people at all (the Micmacs tend to stay in their own communities, as does the tiny black population). Even a small city like Moncton, which has about 100,000 people, is probably about 99% white (mostly English and French descent), and very much a reminder of what the rest of Canada must have been like about 50 years ago.

        • True Blue Aussie Mate

          Not really mate! In Australia we get heaps of illegal Indonesians and other moslems from as far as Afghanistan & the middle east/ far east who come to our shores via the Northern Territory and even have legal loopholes to convert their refugee status to permanent residency/ citizenship status!

        • kjh64

          My guess it that Austalia would, like the US, discriminate against Whites in favor or non-Whites. Of course, both nations claim they won’t but non-Whites will have all kids of loopholes like “refugee status” etc.

      • Greg Thomas

        That’s the requirement for White westerners. If you are a member of diversity, all those requirements seemingly, disappear.

    • This government of ours has outlived its usefulness. Time for a new government.

    • LIberati

      Actually he is right. The Pilgrims were ILLEGAL and UNIVITED aliens in the Americas. Its not like the true inhabitants of America i.e. native Americans wanted them here. What goes around, comes around!

      • concernedcollegekid

        Even if he’s right, I don’t think it follows from that that the descendants of the Europeans who “wrongly” established a country here have no right to try to maintain what their ancestors made. There simply aren’t enough Native Americans around today that giving the whole country back to them makes any practical sense. (If they were a majority of this country I might feel differently.) Modern white Americans not having a right to act in their own interests (by restricting immigration) because their ancestors displaced Native Americans a long time ago is like saying that the Japanese are morally obliged to allow massive immigration into Japan because the Japanese displaced the Ainu. It’s also like saying tribal warfare, in which warring tribes displace each other, is always wrong and that tribes today should act in a way that makes up for all the injustices of all tribal warfare in the past.
        I could agree that what we did to the Native Americans was wrong, but it was such a long time ago and there are so few of them left that it makes no sense to use them as justification for sitting back and watching the country we built get destroyed.

        • Liberati

          Actually the Ainu are still a significant part of the Japanese people. My anthropology professor stated that the Japanese are related to the Finnish culture and people, that explains why the Japanese tend to look more Caucasian as compared to the Chinese. The Ainu became part of the migrants from the Chinese mainland. On the otherhand, native Americans were not only dispossessed and displaced, they were strictly segregated from whites….humiliated, discriminated and many of their tribes were cruelly wiped out by whites whether directly or indirectly.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            Boo Hoo. The native americans lived short, violent lives. They spent their days killing and enslaving each other. Did you ever see Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto? or the scene in Dances with Wolves where the Pawnee raid the Sioux village? That’s day to day life as a native american. The White man put an end to their incessant tribal warfare and gave them a chance to live long, productive lives.

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKigJvj6m8I

      • ncpride

        Yet, those Pilgrims bought land from these ‘Native Americans’ with their consent, and ask for help in killing off rival tribes. You liberals never want to tell the whole story, do you? You’d have everyone believe those horrible Europeans came to the New World, killed off all those peaceful, loving Indians and took their land. What bullsh!t. There is much more to it than that, and there were mistakes made by both parties, but don’t pretend it’s as cut and dried as you claim.

      • kjh64

        Wrong. As I said above, 99% of the Americas(US/Canada) was NOT owned or occuped by anyone and was unsettled wilderness, so the pilgrims were not illegal aliens, as nobody owned the Americas at that time. The Indians were not native, they came from Asia. All races engaged in violent behavior in the past, non-Whites were as bad or worse than Whites and invaded, slaughtered, raped etc. their way across the world.

        • Liberati

          Utter rubbish! Just because you make a preposterous claim of 99%, does NOT make it true. Show me evidence that 99% of America was uninhabited by indigenous native tribes?

          Evidence: More than 95% of America WAS part of different native American tribes clearly divided according to tribal/ linguistic zones.

          http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Early_Localization_Native_Americans_USA.jpg

          On the contrary, most of America WAS INHABITED by non white tribes. Even names of places like Manhattan and Chicago are native American in origin. Manhattan is derived from the native American place “Minahatta” (Lenape tribe) and Chicago from the original native American city known as “Chicagoua” inhabited by the Potowatomi tribe.

          It has been clearly established that natives who were and will always be the true inhabitants of the land we call USA lived and settled most of this nation were then cruelly displaced, exterminated and later humiliated by illegal and uninvited white settlers from Europe. It is rather ironical that today we see scores of the descendants of indigenous native American tribes from Mexico come to the USA and now whites have the audacity to call them illegals!
          The only real ILLEGALS in America are the whites! The good news is they are winning and your side is losing!

          Hear it from a real American!

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ8oW_OmGsQ

          • kjh64

            “Utter rubbish! Just because you make a preposterous claim of 99%, does NOT make it true. Show me evidence that 99% of America was uninhabited by indigenous native tribes?”

            Nope, not rubbish at all but true. There were an estimated 500,000 to 2 million Indians in what is now the US/Canada, when Whites came. That would mean that about 1 percent of the US/Canada was occupied by Indians at that time. Indians were nomadic tribes that fought against each other and some tribes were wiped out by others. The truth is that the world was not settled then and most of North America was empty wilderness not owned or occupied by anyone.(Wikimedia is PC and not always accurate at all.)

            “On the contrary, most of America WAS INHABITED by non white tribes.”

            False, most of America was emply, uninhabited wilderness not owned by anyone.

            “It has been clearly established that natives who were and will always be the true inhabitants of the land we call USA lived and settled most of this nation”

            Rubbish. They were not “native’, they came from various parts of Asia at vastly different times, occupied a very small part with the rest an empty, unsettled wilderness. Also, there is increasing evidence that some Whites came around the same time as the Indians (Soutrean theory). It was Whites who created the USA, settled most of North America and are the rightful owners of the USA. The Indians are entitled to the percentage of the land they occupied and have a right for each tribe to have its’ own nation seperate from White people using the percentage of the land they occupied. That is fair and I’m all for that if that is what the Indians want.

            “Indians were then cruelly displaced, exterminated and later humiliated by illegal and uninvited white settlers from Europe.”

            True, the Whites did treat the Indians horribly and that was wrong. However, Whites were not worse than any other race. Indians treated other Indians horribly, Asians, Muslims, Blacks, Latin Americans all fought, invaded, raped, enslaved and slaughtered others as the world was being settled.The human race was vile.. It has nothing to do with people, White or otherwise today or immigration today. Any issues are between Whites and Indians within the US and nobody else.

            “It is rather ironical that today we see scores of the descendants of indigenous native American tribes from Mexico come to the USA and now whites have the audacity to call them illegals!
            The only real ILLEGALS in America are the whites! The good news is they are winning and your side is losing!”
            Nice try but the Mexicans coming here are not the descendents of American Indians in the US so have NO claim to it and ARE illegal. Whites are NOT illegals as we created this country. As far as good news, yes if you think living in a 3rd world country is good news and it will be a 3rd world country if immigration continues, then you will be happy.Funny, all these non-Whites pour into the United States for a “better life” but as Whites dwindle, so will their better life. They will kill the goose that laid the golden egg.
            PS-Asian mongels led by Atilla the Hun attacked, raped, invaded, humiliated and slaughtered huge numbers of Europeans long before Europeans did the same to the Indians. I guess that gives White the right to enter Mexico and Asian nations, right???????

          • Liberati

            Again. NO evidence for your claims except mere grandiose rhetoric! Unlike you dear sir/ m’am, I have actually provided ample evidence and links and I shall continue to do so to engage in a civic confabulation.

            Native Americans DID inhabit most of what is today known as continental USA and clearly established civilized settlements all over this nation which included distinct languages, religious customs, concept of land ownership and laws. They were MORE than mere nomads – they WERE settlers.

            “My reason teaches me that land cannot be sold. The Great Spirit gave it to his children to live upon. So long as they occupy and cultivate it, they have a right to the soil. Nothing can be sold but such things as can be carried away” –Black Hawk

            “I love this land and the buffalo and will not part with it…I have heard you intend to settle us on a reservation near the mountains. I don’t want to settle. I love to roam over the prairies. There I feel free and happy, but when we settle down we grow pale and die. A long time ago this land belonged to our fathers, but when I go up to the river I see camps of soldiers on its banks. These soldiers cut down my timber, they kill my buffalo and when I see that, my heart feels like bursting.” — Satanta, Kiowa Chief

            And where the dickens did you get this ridiculous figure of “500,000 – 2 million native Americans in the Pre-Columbus period” from?
            On the contrary evidence & scholars point to the fact that there were an estimated 50-100 million native Americans alive before the undesirable European conquest of paradise.

            Alan Taylor (2002). American colonies; Volume 1 of The Penguin history of the United States, History of the United States Series. Penguin. p. 40.ISBN [[Special:BookSources/780142002100|780142002100]].

            It is a clearly established FACT (not subjective opinion based on irrational bias) that the native American populace dropped down drastically after an undesirable contact with Europeans. Read it from an authentic source ripe with geographic, scientific DNA and anthropological data.

            http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/12/111205-native-americans-europeans-population-dna-genetics-science/

            Also your unlettered point of claiming its okay to steal land just because the Arabs etc did it in history is moot! Two wrongs don’t make a right! Just because there were and still are humans who murder, steal, rape and pillage does NOT make it right for you or me to do the same. The whites should be ashamed for what they did to the REAL Americans – native Americans. The facts hit hard and the truth can be a bitter pill to swallow, and in the end justice SHALL be served in a silver platter. Amazing, I see it happening every day as this nation gets transformed. What goes around, comes around!

          • gemjunior

            If your prediction ever turns out to be true, this country will be nothing but a wasteland. European ingenuity made this the richest and best country in the world (IMO, 1950s America must have been like Paradise). The American Indian was mired in the Stone Age until Whites came. If what goes around comes around, everyone, including the Indians will absolutely pine for the good old days when Evil Whitey made warm water come out of the faucet to bathe in, made light come into pitch black with the flick of a switch, made a frozen house warm again with the flick of a switch! Made getting from here to there in many creative ways quickly and efficiently so that almost everyone in the country could go to the other side of the world and see things they would never have seen but in books. Speaking of books, what will happen when there are no more? I guess you all will pow wow around the fire and everything will be soooooo peaceful when Whitey is only a memory? Somehow I don’t think it’ll pan out like that, Libby. When the last White Man and Woman are history, so will all the original thought and innovation that has created the greatest civilization that ever was, Europe, and her peoples that spread to the far corners of the earth and tried to make it better. The White Man’s Burden by Rudyard Kipling comes to mind. I think you would really be affected by that poem.

          • Liberati

            Ever heard of the term human evolution? We evolve – all races evolve.

            Every race today is adept at using science and technology even if there may be an average degree of fluency in the utilization and application of the same. If whites were to disappear tomm. technology would still evolve and no there won’t be darkness…the light bulbs will still burn.

            Asians ( Chinese, Indians, Mesopotamians) & Egyptians were the first human civilizations to pioneer and introduce the concept of academia, written and oral language, complex towns/ cities, irrigation, agriculture, metallurgy, rockets, mathematics, science, medicine and religion. Obviously at some point they stagnated and the late comers ( Europeans) propelled that base knowledge into far more complex and applicable fields that we can see today. Now just because the Asiatics stagnated, did that mean the end of civilization? NO! The Europeans continued the trend and in fact far surpassed the Asians by the middle ages to pioneer modern science & technology. Likewise, the world will run well even without whites. The Asians will take over and pioneer further into the horizon.

            The world does NOT depend solely on one race to function. At some point we all adapt and evolve.

          • kjh64

            “Again. NO evidence for your claims except mere grandiose rhetoric! ”

            No, you can check many reputable sources for what I have said. I said “estimated”, I never said it was fact. Records were never kept by the Indians, nobody really knows how many there were, estimates vary wildly.

            “I have actually provided ample evidence and links”

            Your “evidence” are estimates that are no more or less accurate than mine.

            “On the contrary evidence & scholars point to the fact that there were an estimated 50-100 million native Americans alive before the undesirable European conquest of paradise. It is a clearly established FACT (not subjective opinion based on irrational bias) that the native American populace dropped down drastically after an undesirable contact with Europeans”

            Again, nobody knows how many, there are no records. There were a lot more Indians before the White man came, that’s true.. What happened is not that the White man conquered most Indians but that around 95 percent of them were killed by diseases such as smallpox leaving their numbers very few and the Americas vastly more empty and unoccupied. If there had been 50-100 million Indians, the White man NEVER could have stayed in North America, he would have been vastly outnumbered and killed. Also, the Americas were not “paradise”. Indians fought against other tribes wiping them out and were often at war with each other.

            “Also your unlettered point of claiming its okay to steal land just because the Arabs etc did it in history is moot! Two wrongs don’t make a right! Just because there were and still are humans who murder, steal, rape and pillage does NOT make it right for you or me to do the same.”

            I never said it was ok to steal anything. However, much of North America hasn’t been proven to have been “stolen”, contrary to what you refuse to believe, there is no evidence that much of North America was occupied or owned by anyone. My point about other races is NOT moot. What you are saying is that Whites and ONLY Whites have no right to their country because of something that happened in the distant past that has nothing to do with today. Yet, every other race and people all over the world throughout past history when the world was being settled, fought, invaded, slaughtered etc. Most nations and all races around the world were formed this way or engaged in this. So by your logic, NOBODY today has the right to their country. Correct? Everybody’s land is “stolen”, correct? You have to hold all races equally accountable and you don’t. This means you have an agenda and that is you hate Whites and want to destroy Whites. Otherwise, you’d be demanding justice for all people, right and open borders all over the world? Until you do, you are being hypocritical.

            “The whites should be ashamed for what they did to the REAL Americans – native Americans. The facts hit hard and the truth can be a bitter pill to swallow, and in the end justice SHALL be served in a silver platter. Amazing, I see it happening every day as this nation gets transformed.”
            Whites have soundly criticized those in the past unlike non-Whites who don’t. Why should Whites today be personally ashamed for something that occured between 2 groups of people, long since dead? Something Whites today had NOTHING to do with. As far as transformation, as I said, the goose that laid the golden egg will be killed.

          • Liberati

            Sorry my friend, but like before, yet again, all I get is more subjective opinions and mere rhetoric sans any backing evidence or links which would otherwise verify your claims. I don’t care what you personally think on this issue, I’d like to see valid arguments based on evidence based facts NOT subjective scenarios or opinions. Just because you wish “Batman” or “Captain America” to be real, does NOT make them any more real than wishing the ridiculous numbers and claims about native Americans you have quoted in your previous posts could be true! Seriously learn to use reputed evidence to back up your claims the way I do when I quote facts.

          • Greg Thomas

            Mexico is a third world toilet bowl because it’s inhabited by mexicans. You call that “good news” for this country. Mexicans cannot make use of the land they have, what good could they possibly do with more. The differences here, it that White men, the greatest race this world, have already developed the land in question. Mexicans have a penchant for simply taking what they want, law be damned.

          • Liberati

            Mexicans of today are an example of what happens when a particular race is forcibly and cruelly deracinated by a conquering alien race. The Mexicans of the past ( indigenous NON-Spanish) were a highly evolved and successful race known as the Mayas. And like every other race under the sun, they too had SOME demerits in their beliefs and practices (eg: human sacrifice to the sun God – Kukulkan). However, their advances in mathematics, astronomy, science and town building was outstanding for their times. They were in fact far ahead of the Europeans in their golden era.
            Things would have been better had there been NO invasion, destruction and deracination of the Mayas by alien catholic Spaniards. Like the Japanese, who were thankfully NOT conquered nor deracinated, the Mexicans would have had a natural evolution based on trade and information. Today the Mexicans are a confused lot…they follow alien (European Spanish) customs, religious beliefs and even speak a language alien to them. It is a well known fact that when immersed with concepts alien, no tribe can function well.

            http://www.history.com/topics/mayan-scientific-achievements

            The same can be seen when in some small cases, white Europeans who settled and were deracinated in India ( also known as “Anglo Indians) fare worse than their local fellow citizens in academia, economic status and social status. That is because Anglo Indians ( descendants of white settlers in India) have been culturally deracinated by the Indian govt. and population around them. They are trying hard to follow the rules set by indigenous Indians in India. Well typically the Anglos in India fail and we see the result of deracination yet again.

            http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40553309?uid=3739664&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101694580281

            http://www.nzasia.org.nz/downloads/NZJAS-June06/5.pdf

          • Greg Thomas

            I see…According to you, the White man is to blame for mexico’s dysfunction. If that’s the case, why are millions of illegal invading mexicans violating our sovereignty in order to break into another still majority (I realize you hate that and will support this invasion in an effort to displace White Americans) White country? Your theory (taken out of La Raza 101) does not pass muster.

          • Liberati

            I was talking about cultural deracination which has nothing to do with “blame whitey”. Looks like you are unable to do some simple English reading comprehension skills. In fact, in the 2nd paragraph of my post, I did mention how even whites ( the example of Anglos in India) when culturally deracinated by ethnic Indians can function poorly and fall down the social, economic and academic ladder. So are Asian Indians to blame for the poor social & economic status of the tiny white Anglo minority in India? Can Indians be blamed for Anglo-Indians scoring poor grades at school or for the high unemployment and poor social status most of them have in India? No!

            Like the racially and culturally deracinated Mexicans, the Anglo Indians share similar attributes & myriad problems on socio-economic issues.

            http://maryscouch.com/?p=10

          • Greg Thomas

            Your entire rant has a blame “whitey” undertone. What more is there to “comprehend?” You hate Whites and that is apparent.

          • Liberati

            Well, since you still cannot comprehend simple English. I guess, I just need to help you out. There actually are sources on the internet where you can gain fluency in enhanced reading comprehension skills. Just thought, I’d let you know. Better luck next time!

            http://www.dumblittleman.com/2010/10/how-to-massively-increase-your-reading.html

            I’m sure we can resume our interesting little conversation after you have acquired some level of proficiency on the subject. Good luck!

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            So are Asian Indians to blame for the poor social and economic status of the utterly massive 1.35 billion Asian Indian majority in India? Stick around, you might learn something your ideological professors didn’t feed you with.

          • kjh64

            You are rabidly anti-White. Yes, there have been advanced non-White civilizations such as Asian ones. Today, nations like Japan and Korea are very advanced. However, the White race today has created more achievement in various disciplines, science, medicine, inventions etc. I say this not to brag, but it is reality. Mexicans aren’t the way they are because of “White oppression” neither is any other race or country. It’s amazing that “evil ol Whitey” can make Mexicans and others “stupid”. Wow, we have a lot of power, LOL. No, Mexico is the way it is because of Mexicans. If they and other 3rd worlders become the majority, the USA will become a 3rd world country.

          • Liberati

            I seriously doubt you have the caliber to comprehend the English language beyond middle school level! The points you have used in your rather unlettered rebuttal only shows your poor reading comprehension skills. I will give you another shot at this – please READ my previous posts AGAIN and reply back. If you are unable to understand anything, please do not hesitate to ask me and I will gladly break it down to you. What I said in my previous post is quite different to what you took from it.

          • gemjunior

            “If you are unable to understand anything, please do not hesitate to ask me and I will gladly break it down to you.”
            Now THAT sounds like something a pompous ass would say.

          • Liberati

            Well, I take that as a compliment! By the way, just to help you, there actually are sources on the internet where you can gain fluency in enhanced reading comprehension skills. Just thought, I’d let you know. Better luck next time!

            http://www.dumblittleman.com/2010/10/how-to-massively-increase-your-reading.html

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            The Mexicans didn’t exist until the Spanish arrived. And The Spanish never conquered The Mayans, they were already extinct. The Aztecs, along with many other tribes were in Central America when The Spanish arrived. And they were not ahead of Europe in their golden era, The Mayans at their peak were hundreds of years behind classical Rome and Greece and they were not even in the same stratosphere as far as advancements go.

          • kjh64

            Yes, I wonder what Liberati’s solution is? He says two wrongs don’t make a right, ok. That means only the desendents of American Indians tribes who occupied the US belong in the USA according to him? So this means that All immigration must cease. All White people must go back to Europe? Correct? This means that all Asians, Mexicans and Latin Americans who came from outside the USA must go back to their own homelands. All Blacks must return to Africa. Only those who were directly desended from the American Indians tribes on US lands have a right to be here, everyone else is just profiting from “stolen land” including all these Mexicans coming here for a “better life”..

          • Liberati

            Look it is very simple. We can have an “all or none” law. We could hypothetically, as you yourself have stated, cease ALL immigration and return the land to the natives ( Asians can go back to Asia, Africans to Africa, Europeans to Europe etc) OR the more likely scenario is continue with legal immigration. Of course, you have the right to disapprove legal immigration however, your view has NO moral rationale whatsoever. More so, at least legal immigrants come here legally based on invitation & sponsorship. When the pilgrims arrived, neither were they invited nor sponsored by the natives of the land. That makes your case even worse.

            Moral of your message: I can damn well steal, plunder and loot whatever I want because “god” and “Rudyard Kipling” is on my side….damn the natives and damn their women, children, culture, land, resources and heritage…but hey, how dare you foreigners come to America and settle/ take it from us “native born white Americans” even though unlike our ancestors you folks came here on legal invitation?

            What the deuce? That sir, is a complete bilge, from stem to stern! I sense classic hypocrisy here!

          • gemjunior

            Good heavens sir, you cut me to the quick. Might I observe that it is you who are jousting in the wrong tournement? Utter jabberwocky, my mannie, or poppycock if you prefer. You attempt to address a few points and provide us with a well-meant dissertation on the subject. However, we are attempting to point out that it is wrong we are being culturally deracinated and it’s future generations who will pay the price. White people have given the world more than any other culture or race. The only reason any other group was earlier was simply because it took so long for the results of the ice age to fade in Europe so the land could be arable enough to support some grains etc. Every other nation and race and culture are always going on about how much pride they have, Black pride, Asian Pride Mexican Pride, Hispanic Pride, Chicano Pride, Indian Pride – but any form of White pride is overt white supremacy and racism. I have no guilt and I’m very proud to be White. I wouldn’t want to be anything else. I’m disgusted that you see nothing wrong with the total disappearance of White people into history. White genocide, extinction whatever should not be something anyone looks forward to and honestly,there will be really negative unintended consequences…..So old boy, put that in your pipe and smoke it.

          • Liberati

            “I’m disgusted that you see nothing wrong with the total disappearance of White people into history. White genocide, extinction whatever should not be something anyone looks forward to and honestly,there will be really negative unintended consequences…..So old boy, put that in your pipe and smoke it.”

            I say lad, you mean the way you see nothing wrong with the near destruction & disappearance of native American people into history by uninvited illegal white interlopers from Europe? Native American genocide, near extinction whatever should not be something anyone looks forward to and honestly, there was actually negative unintended consequences for those folks….so my old fannie-man, put that in your pipe & snort it. The only difference, old lad is that while the genocide against native Americans was a real documented historical fact, the supposed “white genocide” is pure fiction churned up by paranoid, xenophobic, racist morons with an infertile imagination. What, offended? Oh the irony!

          • kjh64

            “Look it is very simple. We can have an “all or none” law. We could hypothetically, as you yourself have stated, cease ALL immigration and return the land to the natives ( Asians can go back to Asia, Africans to Africa, Europeans to Europe etc) OR the more likely scenario is continue with legal immigration.”

            No, it could only be EVERYBODY goes back to their respective homelands for to continue legal immigration is to further marginalize and displace the Indians by even more people of even more different races who will take jobs from not only Whites/Blacks but Indians, who will take land, resources and public/welfare funds, not only from Whites/Blacks but Indians.

            “Of course, you have the right to disapprove legal immigration however, your view has NO moral rationale whatsoever.”

            I am opposed to most legal immigration and all illegal immigration(excluding people temporarily fleeing genocide).. I have every moral right to oppose this. Why do I oppose it? For one, we don’t need it. We don’t have enough jobs for Americans of all races. Secondly, for environmental reasons. We are having shortages with water, electricity and our cities are already overly crowded. We do not need any more population growth. Thirdly-Multiracial and multicultural societies do NOT work. They have far more friction. You have different racial and ethnic groups fighting with each other over whose culture takes precedence, whose race etc. runs the country, whose group gets what. Politics and the whole country become divided and weakened and eventually destroyed. This will HARM the Indians, not help them. You can’t base immigration policies today on something that happened in the distant past history. It will NOT right those wrongs because the world was a different place, it was a different time and all of those people are dead. We have to base our policies on today’s people and the world today and increased immigration and multiracialism will only hurt and eventually destroy the country as a first world country.

            “Moral of your message: I can damn well steal, plunder and loot whatever I want because “god” and “Rudyard Kipling” is on my side….damn the natives and damn their women, children, culture, land, resources and heritage…but hey, how dare you foreigners come to America and settle/ take it from us “native born white Americans” even though unlike our ancestors you folks came here on legal invitation?”
            That is NOT the moral of my message. I never said it was ok for anyone, White or otherwise to do this. I said that every race and people in distant past history did this, wrong though it was. The human race has always been vile. This doesn’t mean that people today, who had nothing to do with this, must allow immigration nor does it give foreigners the right to immigrate today. The American people were never asked whether they wanted millions of foreigners to come nor do most want this and they have a right to this. However, I blame American leaders for allowing this and ignoring the will of the people as opposed to legal immigrants.

          • Joseph

            The area of the 48 is about 3 million sq. mi. (land) so even at the high end guess of 18 million Indians or “natives” if you prefer, then there were 6 persons/ sq. mi. That is pretty empty.

          • Liberati

            Evidence please?

            The fact is the figure was more than that and I did provide ample evidence to back my facts in my previous posts. Also, by the dictum of your own logic should Pakistanis, Sudanese, Somalians, Arabs and Chinese be allowed to forcibly displace local white Europeans & settle in the sparsely populated island of Greenland? After all most of Greenland or even some other European nations are pretty “empty” too, right?

          • Tom UK

            There is no god-given “right” to a piece of land, when it comes to the national scale. To whom do you propose such appeals be directed? Every nation is founded on land that once belonged to another group. Where do you draw the historical line, and say “This is the point at which the world was fairly divided”. Good luck finding yourself some Jebusites to whom you can return much of Israel.

            Lands only belong to an ethnic group for so long as they can defend it, and Amren is all about that defence, of the Eurosphere by the European race. If you seek to undermine that defence, or indeed to import millions of foreigners, how are you any different from those “evil invaders” you’re so smugly insulting above?

            The Red Indians were well within their rights, as nations, to oppose European incursions into their lands- lands they doubtless won from other groups, families even, at some point in the distant past. I have little doubt that were they to have developed formal laws they would have described the Europeans as illegal migrants. However, they lost. They were beaten by superior weaponry and numbers, a product of the more effective European economies of the day. The nation you know as America is a product of the Europeans- the land was taken once more, but it’s only ever a place to put the society you build.

            Something tells me it’s not the land, per se, that today’s invaders are after, in contrast to the old Europeans- it is the wealth of the nation. That doesn’t grow on trees, it is the product of the people who live on the land. The Indians were proud people, but I have little doubt that were the land to have remained in their hands we wouldn’t have had an industrial society there today- the industry that defeated them was very much a European peculiarity.

            History tells us that it was ever thus- mass migration and open invasion vary only in degree of violence, rather than in effect. So what would you have modern America do? If they continue to accept millions upon millions of migrants, and subsidise their birth rates, then there will be a changing of the guard, and the replacement of the European-descended peoples who built the nation, for whom that is the only nation they have ever known. Are they to accept it, or should they attempt to preserve the nation for their own progeny, as the warring Indian tribes once did?

            The Indians fought, they fought hard, but they lost. Numbers and industry told on them in the end. Surely you can’t seek to deny the European American’s wish to preserve his land and where he built a great nation, shaped by and for European Americans?

            Or does historical guilt only cut one way? Is there a way to separate the product of a nation’s labour from the land that it was built on, so we can surrender the land to an ethnic group of your choosing, but retain what was built there as our birthright?

          • Liberati

            Ok, so by your own dictum, it can be inferred that there is no big deal if an alien race conquers the land by any means necessary away from the native inhabitants. Well since the Europeans came to America illegally & uninvited, much to the chagrin of native Americans of course, and you see no moral issue with that, what is so morally wrong when Mexicans come to America “illegally” & “uninvited”? I see no difference, only that this time the actual indigenous tribes (unlike white Americans, Mestizos are native to the SW region of the United States) are reclaiming it back. From a historical point of view, much to the chagrin of white Europeans of course, it has come full circle.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            Without Western money and technology they wouldn’t be able to survive a colonization of Greenland. The irony of your ill-convieved arguments are laughable.

      • Greg Thomas

        Really? What laws did they break by cultivating what was once wild land? You have been indoctrinated to believe our immigration laws and sovereignty are “racist”
        constructs because White men established them. Do you disregard all law or just
        the ones you disagree with?

        • kjh64

          He disregards only laws that pertain to Whites. Only non-Whites should be respected despite all the evils their ancestors did.

          • Greg Thomas

            Yes…That’s exceedingly clear KJ. He/she has sat through one too many La Raza indoctrination courses, or in this case, USDA indoctrination courses.

  • The__Bobster

    http://www.vdare.com/posts/pilgrim-slurring-treason-lobby-indoctination-compulsory-at-usda

    The individual being paid consulting fees to perpetrate this indoctrination is a Dr
    Samuel Betances,

    a biracial, bicultural, and bilingual citizen of the world

    who proclaims on his website

    “It matters less where we are from; what really matters is where we are going. Accept our diversity. Embrace it. Make it work for you. Harness the rainbow.”

    • Tim

      “Harness the rainbow?!?” WTF? Isn`t that a skittles commercial? And the way I heard it was, “I don`t know where I`m headed but I remember where I came from…” Finally, Notice the quote. “Accept OUR diversity.” Not YOURS, but Ours…No thanks!

  • MekongDelta69

    Remember all those tripped out kids at Woodstock, banging on drums and chanting in unison?

    Well, they all grew older (but not up), and now they’re banging on desks and chanting in unison.

    Welcome to kindergarten – again…

    • I might add–these antics are to INSURE the complete destruction of Whites…unless Whites submit to minority dominance. I’ll NEVER submit

      • DudeWheresMyCountry?

        As I say often, Western unrequited altruism and liberalism are crimes of nature; when the strong allows the weak to diminish and eventually destroy it out of some false abstract thought nature and humanity suffers as a whole in the long and short term. The strong should never acquiesce to the weak, it goes against evry tenant of evolution and adaptation there is… and no other plant or animal species does this. No other human group does this, other than Western Whites.

  • Enar_Larsson

    Like most conservative-minded Americans I have a tremendous respect for the farmers of yesteryear and a great deal of nostalgia for the overall way of life it used to represent. But we need to start being honest with ourselves and recognize that the industry is dead. The federal government pumps billions of dollars into its perpetual bailout year after year and it’s the farmers who say they need more and more illegal aliens to work off the books for them. This story and the video that goes with it–along with all the discrimination settlements for black farmers–prove (or at least strongly suggest) that farming just isn’t what it used to be in this country of for this country. My ancestors came from Sweden and Germany and transformed what to the Indians was useless high desert in SW Idaho into abundantly productive farmland that fed the family from the 1870s through the 1960s but that’s just not what the industry seems to be about anymore. It just doesn’t make sense anymore for those who love small government and hard-working whites with family values and a strong work ethic to support either the USDA or the farming industry as it has become in the U.S.

    • Kblankenship7

      i see apple juice from China on shelves, while orchards in Virginia and Md. are fallow. It is truly obscene.

      • GM (Australia)

        Be like me, I refuse to purchase any foodstuffs from China, this includes Nabisco food products which are now sourced from there.

        As you say, your orchards are unproductive while Agricultural Dept officials play silly role model games.

        But note, my contacts in China do report that there is lots of Australian produce available in supermarkets there.

  • Enar_Larsson

    1. Why in the world isn’t there some oversight committee or even just a vigilant “conservative” lawmaker making a stink about this?

    2. “Hate Week” anyone?
    3. The pilgrims couldn’t have been illegal aliens because there was no country on North America when they came.
    4. We shouldn’t be talking about “Indians” or “Native Americans” as if they were some unified group that could have conceivably formed a country in North America that the pilgrims could have been unauthorized to colonize. Rather, there were dozens and dozens of warring factions of savages hellbent on destroying each other.

    5. Even according to the liberal mythos the comments about pilgrims make no sense because the Noble Savages had no concept of land ownership, private property, mine-thine distinction, and no jealousy or violent tendencies until the evil white man gave him beads and whiskey.

  • Tom Iron

    For the most part, all minorities hate each other. Also, for the most part, we don’t hate minorities. We just understand what we must do to keep them under control – expell them.

    • liberalsuck

      I ask these people that there are third-world countries with a white minority already, but the white minority there either lives better off than the majority nonwhite population (Mexico, Latin America, etc) AND/OR they have killed the white people and their country is in disarray (like South Africa, Zimbabwe, Haiti) They can’t even revolt against the whites in Mexico or Colombia, for example, so how could they take on a white minority in the US that is well armed and pissed off? I don’t see more whites becoming weaker as time comes on even if our numbers dwindle; I see them getting militant and aggressively seceding off parts of the country for whites only. I’m seeing and hearing more whites being more anti-diversity lately.

    • GM (Australia)

      This is so very true.

      There is a new “fringe” political party here in Oz, One of it’s main aims is to keep Muslims out of the country. Who runs this party? A redneck from outback Queensland? No way, it was established by and is run by a Sri Lanken migrant!

  • tightwad

    This isn’t new. Almost 20 years ago, IRS had a post of duty in southern Jersey that had to
    conduct one of these indoctrination sessions after a black and a Caucasian got into an
    Argument. Guess which race did NOT have to attend the brainwashing?

    • liberalsuck

      All of this anti-white stuff going on isn’t new, be it anti-white “diversity” trainings or black on white crime or illegal third-world immigration. the only difference is it getting exposed more lately.

  • NYB

    Samuel Betances maintains a home in Puerto Rico, and another in Chicago. His asking price for a speaking engagement runs up to five figures. He’s a professional at working the diversity game, claiming both African and Hispanic roots.

    • Ulick

      And to think that what he’s doing skill-wise is akin to kindergarten teaching. He is asking the class to repeat after him without discussion or rebuttal. Just repeat.

      • Anders

        That’s right, and instead of repeating his childish slogans and banging the table, why can’t the audience just say ‘No’! What’s he going to do about it?

      • concernedcollegekid

        That’s perhaps the creepiest part of it, to me.

    • Felix_M

      He’s a professional at working the diversity game, claiming both African and Hispanic roots.

      That would explain a lot.

  • wattylersrevolt

    Which means that the open intent of post-1965 immigration policy is to reduce as rapidly as possible the Native Born White American Majority to a racial minority within the borders of the US. As far as Native Born White American racial interests go…there is no economic,cultural,demographic and ecological reason for doing this. Vislac is on the take from agribusiness..that is to say…Vislac is on the take from slave labor interests…which makes Vislac an extreme sociopath. This is what Jared Tayor should be saying in public talks-debates.

    Just a reminder…if the majority of hispanics voted Republican Party..they would still be voting for our race-repacement..someone should tell Comrades Sailer and Brimelow this.

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    fgsdjngf

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    ghfsngfsn

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    gnsngf

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    ngfsngf

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    ngfsng

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    ngfsngg

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    gggsng

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    gnsng

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    ngsngs

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    ngsngfs

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    gnsfngf

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    ngsfng

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    sfngf

  • wheres my comment you piece of

    sfngfgngfsngfs

  • MadMax

    Somewhere, Karl Marx, Antonio Gramsci, and Leon Trotsky are laughing their heads off.

    • The “errors of Russia” have a choke hold on this government.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      I don’t believe Karl Marx would be giddy about White civilizations being inundated with non-Western tribal hunter gatherers. He lived in an era where this kind of ridiculousness wasn’t possible and would’ve been taken for what it really is now, invasion and genocide.

    • newscomments70

      I believe Karl Marx would have supported the far right, if he saw how the liberals perverted his philosphy, and what a general failure it has become.

  • SoCal LoCal

    “A new era of Civil Right?” Try “Sibyl Rights.” This is equality aimed at splitting America’s national personality.

    • Ulick

      I wish that they would define what this new era of civil rights entails. And what civil rights are minorities currently missing that we need a new era? Whites are the people discriminated against via affirmative action, HUD, disparate impact, etc. Where is the era of civil rights for whites?

    • liberalsuck

      In 20 years the next ‘civil rights’ agenda will be killing off all the white people directly and confiscating their properties all over the world.

      • Look at South Africa…..unless concerned Whites stop this crap–by ANY means necessary, Whites WILL be exterminated here.

        • Katherine McChesney

          Whites ARE and HAVE BEEN exterminated for decades. There are over 3500 farm murders reported. SO FAR.

  • Luca

    Aside from the $200k this brainwashing, affirmative action, fool gets for pretending to be teaching a subject that is a complete hallucination, every person sitting in that room is making an hourly wage compliments of the US taxpayer. Can anyone ever again wonder why government is inefficient? This is also going on across our country in our schools and universities. Now you know where the “Occupy” wackos came from.

    • a multiracial individual

      Private Universities have the same professors, the same departments, the same curricula, yet they are well endowed. What’s the deal?

      • Luca

        Government student loan programs have driven up the cost of tuition. When an institution is awash in money, they tend to get frivolous with it. More money equals more profit, departments have bigger budgets, more pay, more benefits, new construction, upgraded infrastructure, and more stupid, senseless classes, programs, speakers and the such, Typical liberal behavior. Spend, indoctrinate, and ask for more money.

        The government loves to give away the money they steal from tax payers and give it tax takers who in turn keep them in office. When money is easy to come by the law of supply and demand kicks in. When everyone has money to buy a car or house, they’ll never go on sale, but instead the price goes up to whatever the market can bear. Case in point: housing bubble. Everyone could suddenly afford a home so the price went through the roof. When everyone can afford to go to college, the price of tuition goes up and professors get paid more etc.

        • Even simpler than that. When you divorce the economics of the cost of something and the ability of the average consumer of that something to pay for that something, either in toto or in reasonable revolving credit financing, the cost of the something will do nothing but shoot up and up and up.

    • Ulick

      “every person sitting in that room is making an hourly wage compliments of the US taxpayer”

      DC has the highest average income of any US city, and that’s inculding the poor, unemployed blacks DC has. Government workers are paid exorbitant amounts for what little work they do.

      http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/10/09/washington-tops-list-of-americas-richest-cities/

  • StillModerated

    My name is Samwell Betances. Now you say it: Sambo-dances.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    “I want you to say that American was founded by outsiders—say that—who are today’s insiders, who are very nervous about today’s outsiders.

    If they’re so nervous about it, then why aren’t they doing anything about it? The truth is that whites, as predicted, will never get any credit or appreciation for handing over their countries to outsiders.

    The whole term “minorities” was originally used to conjure up images of persecution and to elicit sympathy on the part of whites, but these nonwhites know that they can now get away with using such terms as “emerging majorities” because most whites are not only brainwashed to think there’s nothing wrong with it, but to actually believe their own dispossession will be a good thing.

    This is the ultimate inversion of logic: “minority” means “persecution” when applied to nonwhites, but “liberation” when applied to whites. I would never have believed whites could become so emasculated as to accept their own replacement if I had not seen it with my own eyes.

  • Chris

    So many leukophobes. Why doesn’t the USDA stick to inspecting meat and making sure all those wonderful illegals don’t poop e-coli onto the lettuce?

  • David Ashton

    Emerging majorities = whites declining to a minority.
    Race replacement. Do we go quietly and voluntarily into the “painless gas chamber”?
    Nazi or anti-Nazi – forget this semantic diversion from yesterday. The jackboots on other feet now, and white people have the right to defend themselves, their heritage and their homelands against genocide.

    • Daisy

      There’s nothing painless about the gas chamber liberalism foists upon me. The problem for some whites is that they don’t know where the pain is coming from.

  • libertarian 1234

    I saw this video on the O’Reilly Factor and was so enraged I almost kicked the t.v.

    Judicial Watch tells us also that this kind of propagandizing is rife throughout the community organizer’s administration, which is no surprise, but it’s far different when you sit in front of the t.v. and watch someone spewing such anti-white hatred.

    It makes a person wonder how those white weinies in the audience felt about themselves after reciting this racist’s vile assertions, especially since they were doing nothing less than spitting on the graves of their ancestors.

    • Liberalusuck

      I saw it too on O’Reilly with a relative I had over. We were both pissed as well. Funny, the guy looks very white. The silence in the audience means they are cowards or they are in agreement. I had a anti-white male professors in post-graduate school a few years ago. I always openly debated her in front of others as I got tired of her rubbing that in our faces. People need to start speaking out and quit getting worried “Oh, I’ll lose my job” or “oh, this radical liberal professor might flunk me.’ We’ve been silent all this time and it hasn’t done us any good, right? So what is there to lose?

      • Kblankenship7

        Good for you! Don’t take their garbage. Shout the truth right back at them!

  • Heck. That the Pilgrims are at fault for everything is official policy of the Chicago Police Department.

    http://www.amren.com/news/2012/07/police-chief-blames-pilgrims-cops-for-chicago-violence/

  • guest

    “Judicial Watch today released previously unseen USDA videos revealing a compulsory “Cultural Sensitivity Training” program requiring USDA employees to bang on tables, chanting in unison “The pilgrims were illegal aliens” while being instructed to no longer use the word “minorities,” but to replace it with “emerging majorities.”

    In other words, they really are looking to replace us with these illegal immigrants. Anyone with even half a brain can clearly see that those in charge of this “cultural sensitivity training” are up to no good. It’s not about learning to accept other cultures, it’s all about replacing ours with another.

  • SouthernPatriot

    Jesus. He’s like Obi-Wan Kenobi using Jedi mind tricks…

  • And the Part 1: USDA Cultural Transformation Session video is gone ……

    Six hours ….. that’s pretty good for a government supported entity.

  • UK Expat

    What this tells me is that government is too large. They just love to heap on the bureaucracy to keep themselves in employment, and they get away with it. If government were efficient and the individual departments were devoted to their vision, there would be no time or money for this BS. There are too many chiefs in government and they like it that way as they get to suck the taxpayer dry.

    I worked in the largest government DOE lab as a postdoc for three years (not the only government job I have had) and noted fully not only the waste, corruption, and disincentive to excel, but also the propensity towards patting oneself on the back, massaging research data and creating bureaucracy for the sake of personal enrichment and longevity. More particularly, I worked on a project that is politically currently attractive, I wanted to publish data, but could not under the so-called export control laws, it turns out (later) the research was exempt and therefore my rationale for them not publishing amounts to self preservation … i.e. to not have competition in the field. This competition would mean universities who can do the same research at 1/5th the cost per unit output, and, of course that output may never be public since they don’t want any competition that would make them look bad. The kicker here is that DOE labs are operated as subcontracts and therefore salaries are very high compared to the GSA schedule.

    This diversity crap serves the government purpose. Not only does it create posts for additional bureaucrats, it also provides additional means by which managers/research staff can gain brownie points by playing that game.

    • liberalsuck

      What would people like Samuel Betances and Tim Wise and Al Sharpton and countless other ‘anti racist’ jackasses do for a living? One of these days, their gravy train will run out and there will be no more money to give them. They’ll find some other scam to latch onto. Hating whitey is a very profitable business venture for these people.

  • ViktorNN

    Multiply this crap by dozens or hundreds of Betances “training” government workers in every agency in this anti-white re-education and indoctrination.

    These govt workers then turn around with this stuff fresh in their minds and present in every one of their decisions. Imagine how they will look at you when you cross their path, needing their help or trying to get govt services of which you’ve paid the lionshare.

    This is why losing the Presidency is so much more than enduring one incompetent person at the very top. It’s enduring the army of activist ideologues that are intent on transforming the government in order to change the country in a way that is – let’s be honest – genocidal to white people.

  • jay11

    Do you think japanese workers in their government offices sit around a table and chant: “We are illegal aliens! The japanese migrants never gave their passports to the Ainu!” (The ainu are the people who were in japan before the japanese came.)

    Do you think the Zulus sit around and do the same, as they are also not indigenous to South Africa but migrated down there and exterminated the locals they found?

    Did the American Indian tribes in each territory they MIGRATED to over the centuries show their passports to the indians who were there before? (There’s some good books that cover how different tribes displaced each other over time.)

    Do the ‘people of color’ who invade neighborhoods and bless them with the joys of diversity, ultimately driving out the previous (white) inhabitants ask permission to conduct such an ethnic cleansing operation?
    When I see stupid programs of indoctrination like this, I cannot help but think of how our loss of focus as a people has allowed us to be supplanted by lesser cultures.

  • jay11

    Liberals in education LOVE to say that we have to teach children HOW to think and not WHAT to think. Guesss what? I have only ever seen the opposite from them in ALL settings, everywhere.

  • Fed Up

    Unless that oft-predicted race-war actually starts, and does so damned soon. There will no longer be a White culture in this country or in Europe either, for that matter. What is WRONG with White people? Has the liberal rot spread that widely that we no longer care what happens in once-White nations?

  • libertarian 1234

    O’Reilly said this guy is the product of a white mother and black father.

    Blacks like this one love to include everybody into a group they call, “people of color,” but everyone in that category has very little in common. They do it of course as a clout multiplier against whitey, but the tactic is going to backfire on them just as most of the hare-brained ideas they borrow from rabid leftists have done.

    There is ongoing fighting between blacks and all other “people of color” throughout the nation, and the situation gives every promise of getting worse.

    I’m not sure if characters like this Betances really believe the country would be better off without whitey and that the black ticket to utopia is a non-white run nation, or if he’s just plain outright too stupid to understand that his group would likely be at the bottom of the totem pole in any “people of color” society, because eliminating whites isn’t going to magically give blacks abilities and injtelligence. And the inter-group fighting would be phenominal.

    If he likes to consider himself and other blacks as part of the “emerging majority, he obviously doesn’t understand that his co-horts whom he has involuntarily co-opted into his movement wouldn’t stand for blacks running anything and that the “achievement gap” would still be a problem his group couldn’t overcome, even if they would stop fighting with everybody and committing high rates of crime and violence.

    • Katherine McChesney

      ‘O’Reilly said this guy is the product of a white mother and black father.’

      He’s suffering some form of schizophrenia.

  • American Patriot

    The good news is that this terroristic enemy of American appears to have not been well received by his captive audience. Folks were not exactly shouting out his refrain were they.

  • American Patriot

    One other comment- absolutely NOTHING awakens a Realist Racial Awareness in ignorant Whites as does a good smelly dose of State Sanctioned Diveristy Training in the work place. This is largely because the training really encourages the non-Whites to let loose their inner anti-white racist bigotry in full view of their targets. My three years as a ‘diversity’ pimp was the greatest opportunity to promote Race Realism to ever come my way and I even got paid for it out of the enemy’s checkbook-sweet!

  • THE MAN

    Ward Kendall wrote a book “Hold Back This Day ” , years ago and it is back in print . It is an amazing book with unbelievable foresight . This reminds me of the book. This brain washing and chanting and group reinforcement with no room for alternative or independent thinking reminds me of an indoctrination camp !

  • Guest

    “A half-black, half-hispanic citizen of the world” Ok, I guess this means that your too lazy to steal?

    • StillModerated

      Therefore ideal for government consulting. He’ll show up on the job when the check clears. You can’t be to sure in this economy.

    • Greg Thomas

      He’s “stealing” from the American tax payer, with help from the White hating establishment running this government. This guy is a White hating fraud and being paid very well to peddle this rubbish.

  • MarcusTrajanus

    The fact that these people make a living spouting this garbage show that anti-White racism is the real “institutional racism”. When is the last time a mayor corporation or government agency payed Jared Taylor to speak?

  • THE MAN

    I love to read American Renaissance and be made aware of the news that the media hides .We have many problems that have been identified . I like solutions and we need to have a response to these attacks on our people and our culture and country .We need to become proactive and emerge as a unrelenting force against this and come up with a strategy that will have to be constant . They have engrained these policies in ever aspect of our society . We have to infiltrate these organizations and divide them from within . This has always been the other side’s method .

  • THE MAN

    The definition of ” cultural transformation ” as defined by Riane Eisler is “Partnership Model ” of civilization which eventually gave way to a “Dominator Model ” The “Dominator Model ” is where males in western culture have dominated that culture . Through the “Partnership Model ” this model is based on equal partnership .I think this is a progression toward a Marxist culture . Changes don’t happen overnight ,it happens a small piece at a time . Slight changes a little bit at a time . It is like the gun issue .Oh it makes sense to make sure the mentally ill can’t have guns. Then they redefine who is mentally ill and before you know all guns would eventually be confiscated .Oh all we want is to make sure it is all inclusive where everyone has a voice .Eventually no one would have a voice or rights or freedom .The way I define this term is transferring from a” Free Western Society ” to a ” Dictated Marxist Society ” !

  • red_skull001

    Embracing illegals? The USDA continues to lower its standards at our expense on multiple levels.

  • AvidReaderSometimePoster

    2 Minutes Hate

    …..a daily period in which Party members of the society of Oceania must watch a film depicting the Party’s enemies and express their hatred for them.

  • NothingMan00

    Dr. Samuel Betances? Doctor!?! How? I could not find any information on his educational background, but I’d assume a degree mill mailed a $5 certificate to him.

  • Viking_61

    This is one of the many little projects that the Obongo Administration is funding. This motivational speaker sounds more radical than Bill Ayers. This is truly frightening.

  • pcmustgo

    Holy s…. “the pilgrims were illegal aliens”…

    Well, hey , at least they’re being honest about “The Change” that’s coming, aka “emerging majorities”.

  • pcmustgo

    GROUP THING… DIVERSITY TRAINING ALWAYS INVOLVES ********GROUPS

  • kjh64

    “The pilgrims were illegal aliens.’ Say, ‘The pilgrims never gave their passports to the Indians.’”
    No, the pilgrims were not illegal aliens. During that time period, many parts of the world were not settled yet. 99% of what is now the USA/Canada was not owned or occupied by anyone, it was unsettled wilderness. The Indians, who migrated from different parts of Asia, were varying nomadic tribes who fought against each other, had no concept of land ownership and only occupied about 1% of present day US/Canada. While it was wrong for Whites to treat the Indians as they did, ALL races treated others horribly in the past. Any issues in the US would be between Whites/Indians and nobody else, not Mexicans or any other non-Americans and have nothing to with people or immigration today.
    PS-Actually, Whites may have come to N.America at the same time as the Indians, see the Soultrean theory, and either died off or were killed off.

    • libertarian 1234

      “PS-Actually, Whites may have come to N.America at the same time as the Indians, see the Soultrean theory, and either died off or were killed off.”

      Excellent points.

      The only thing I might add is that the Solutreans predated the indians by several thousand years. Their tools along the East Coast have been dated as thousands of years before the influx of the indians. If it weren’t for political correctness I believe that “theory” would be accepted right now.

      http://tinyurl.com/77mq44s

      Kennewick man was dated to be 9300 years old, also, which is also a bit earlier than the mass Asian migration.

      Also,I just might add one more item, while I agree somewhat that the indians were treated badly, they weren’t anything near the “noble savage” attributed to them via myth. Much of the action against them by settlers and the US calvary was retribution for atrocities committed on innocent people.

      Personally, I look at them as starting a conflict they couldn’t finish and were defeated like the Germans or Japanese.

      Your points about unoccupied land are right on also.

      Too, records verify that the indians who sold Manhatten and Staten Island didn’t even own it. Several experts point to the fact one tribe sold the same land six times to different groups of whites. Louis L’Amour, an historian in his own right, verfied that as well.

  • ye ol’ swampyankee

    If he can make these claims about The US, then the same claims can be made with Israel. Did the Israeli’s show their passports to the Palestinians? Come on say it “Israel was founded by outsiders”. Leave it to the semite to preach to the goyum.

  • Joseph

    “emerging majorities.”

    Yeah, that IS the program that they are pursuing. As I responded on another topic the day will come when there are two racial segments. The major group will be “People of Color” and the minor group of no consequence will be “whites”. We will be financing all of the changeover.