Confessions of a Public Defender

Michael Smith, American Renaissance, May 9, 2014

Inmate
Still liberal after all these years.

I am a public defender in a large southern metropolitan area. Fewer than ten percent of the people in the area I serve are black but over 90 per cent of my clients are black. The remaining ten percent are mainly Hispanics but there are a few whites.

I have no explanation for why this is, but crime has racial patterns. Hispanics usually commit two kinds of crime: sexual assault on children and driving under the influence. Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes. The handful of whites I see commit all kinds of crimes. In my many years as a public defender I have represented only three Asians, and one was half black.

As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people, but are so poor they must turn to crime to survive. Actual black behavior was a shock to me.

The media invariably sugarcoat black behavior. Even the news reports of the very crimes I dealt with in court were slanted. Television news intentionally leaves out unflattering facts about the accused, and sometimes omits names that are obviously black. All this rocked my liberal, tolerant beliefs, but it took me years to set aside my illusions and accept the reality of what I see every day. I have now served thousands of blacks and their families, protecting their rights and defending them in court. What follow are my observations.

Although blacks are only a small percentage of our community, the courthouse is filled with them: the halls and gallery benches are overflowing with black defendants, families, and crime victims. Most whites with business in court arrive quietly, dress appropriately, and keep their heads down. They get in and get out–if they can–as fast as they can. For blacks, the courthouse is like a carnival. They all seem to know each other: hundreds and hundreds each day, gossiping, laughing loudly, waving, and crowding the halls.

When I am appointed to represent a client I introduce myself and explain that I am his lawyer. I explain the court process and my role in it, and I ask the client some basic questions about himself. At this stage, I can tell with great accuracy how people will react. Hispanics are extremely polite and deferential. An Hispanic will never call me by my first name and will answer my questions directly and with appropriate respect for my position. Whites are similarly respectful.

A black man will never call me Mr. Smith; I am always “Mike.” It is not unusual for a 19-year-old black to refer to me as “dog.” A black may mumble complaints about everything I say, and roll his eyes when I politely interrupt so I can continue with my explanation. Also, everything I say to blacks must be at about the third-grade level. If I slip and use adult language, they get angry because they think I am flaunting my superiority.

At the early stages of a case, I explain the process to my clients. I often do not yet have the information in the police reports. Blacks are unable to understand that I do not yet have answers to all of their questions, but that I will by a certain date. They live in the here and the now and are unable to wait for anything. Usually, by the second meeting with the client I have most of the police reports and understand their case.

PublicDefender

Unlike people of other races, blacks never see their lawyer as someone who is there to help them. I am a part of the system against which they are waging war. They often explode with anger at me and are quick to blame me for anything that goes wrong in their case.

Black men often try to trip me up and challenge my knowledge of the law or the facts of the case. I appreciate sincere questions about the elements of the offense or the sentencing guidelines, but blacks ask questions to test me. Unfortunately, they are almost always wrong in their reading, or understanding, of the law, and this can cause friction. I may repeatedly explain the law, and provide copies of the statute showing, for example, why my client must serve six years if convicted, but he continues to believe that a hand-written note from his “cellie” is controlling law.

The cellie who knows the law.

The cellie who knows the law.

The risks of trial

The Constitution allows a defendant to make three crucial decisions in his case. He decides whether to plea guilty or not guilty. He decides whether to have a bench trial or a jury trial. He decides whether he will testify or whether he will remain silent. A client who insists on testifying is almost always making a terrible mistake, but I cannot stop him.

Most blacks are unable to speak English well. They cannot conjugate verbs. They have a poor grasp of verb tenses. They have a limited vocabulary. They cannot speak without swearing. They often become hostile on the stand. Many, when they testify, show a complete lack of empathy and are unable to conceal a morality based on the satisfaction of immediate, base needs. This is a disaster, especially in a jury trial. Most jurors are white, and are appalled by the demeanor of uneducated, criminal blacks.

Prosecutors are delighted when a black defendant takes the stand. It is like shooting fish in a barrel. However, the defense usually gets to cross-examine the black victim, who is likely to make just as bad an impression on the stand as the defendant. This is an invaluable gift to the defense, because jurors may not convict a defendant—even if they think he is guilty—if they dislike the victim even more than they dislike the defendant.

Black witnesses can also sway the jury.

Jeantel Rachel: Blacks often make bad witnesses.

Most criminal cases do not go to trial. Often the evidence against the accused is overwhelming, and the chances of conviction are high. The defendant is better off with a plea bargain: pleading guilty to a lesser charge and getting a lighter sentence.

The decision to plea to a lesser charge turns on the strength of the evidence. When blacks ask the ultimate question—”Will we win at trial?”—I tell them I cannot know, but I then describe the strengths and weaknesses of our case. The weaknesses are usually obvious: There are five eyewitnesses against you. Or, you made a confession to both the detective and your grandmother. They found you in possession of a pink cell phone with a case that has rhinestones spelling the name of the victim of the robbery. There is a video of the murderer wearing the same shirt you were wearing when you were arrested, which has the words “In Da Houz” on the back, not to mention you have the same “RIP Pookie 7/4/12” tattoo on your neck as the man in the video. Etc.

If you tell a black man that the evidence is very harmful to his case, he will blame you. “You ain’t workin’ fo’ me.” “It like you workin’ with da State.” Every public defender hears this. The more you try to explain the evidence to a black man, the angrier he gets. It is my firm belief many black are unable to discuss the evidence against them rationally because they cannot view things from the perspective of others. They simply cannot understand how the facts in the case will appear to a jury.

Upset

This inability to see things from someone else’s perspective helps explain why there are so many black criminals. They do not understand the pain they are inflicting on others. One of my robbery clients is a good example. He and two co-defendants walked into a small store run by two young women. All three men were wearing masks. They drew handguns and ordered the women into a back room. One man beat a girl with his gun. The second man stood over the second girl while the third man emptied the cash register. All of this was on video.

My client was the one who beat the girl. When he asked me, “What are our chances at trial?” I said, “Not so good.” He immediately got angry, raised his voice, and accused me of working with the prosecution. I asked him how he thought a jury would react to the video. “They don’t care,” he said. I told him the jury would probably feel deeply sympathetic towards these two women and would be angry at him because of how he treated them. I asked him whether he felt bad for the women he had beaten and terrorized. He told me what I suspected—what too many blacks say about the suffering of others: “What do I care? She ain’t me. She ain’t kin. Don’t even know her.”

NoRemorse

No fathers

As a public defender, I have learned many things about people. One is that defendants do not have fathers. If a black even knows the name of his father, he knows of him only as a shadowy person with whom he has absolutely no ties. When a client is sentenced, I often beg for mercy on the grounds that the defendant did not have a father and never had a chance in life. I have often tracked down the man’s father–in jail–and have brought him to the sentencing hearing to testify that he never knew his son and never lifted a finger to help him. Often, this is the first time my client has ever met his father. These meetings are utterly unemotional.

WheresDaddy

Many black defendants don’t even have mothers who care about them. Many are raised by grandmothers after the state removes the children from an incompetent teenaged mother. Many of these mothers and grandmothers are mentally unstable, and are completely disconnected from the realities they face in court and in life. A 47-year-old grandmother will deny that her grandson has gang ties even though his forehead is tattooed with a gang sign or slogan. When I point this out in as kind and understanding way as I can, she screams at me. When black women start screaming, they invoke the name of Jesus and shout swear words in the same breath.

Black women have great faith in God, but they have a twisted understanding of His role. They do not pray for strength or courage. They pray for results: the satisfaction of immediate needs. One of my clients was a black woman who prayed in a circle with her accomplices for God’s protection from the police before they would set out to commit a robbery.

The mothers and grandmothers pray in the hallways–not for justice, but for acquittal. When I explain that the evidence that their beloved child murdered the shop keeper is overwhelming, and that he should accept the very fair plea bargain I have negotiated, they will tell me that he is going to trial and will “ride with the Lord.” They tell me they speak to God every day and He assures them that the young man will be acquitted.

Christians

The mothers and grandmothers do not seem to be able to imagine and understand the consequences of going to trial and losing. Some–and this is a shocking reality it took me a long time to grasp–don’t really care what happens to the client, but want to make it look as though they care. This means pounding their chests in righteous indignation, and insisting on going to trial despite terrible evidence. They refuse to listen to the one person–me–who has the knowledge to make the best recommendation. These people soon lose interest in the case, and stop showing up after about the third or fourth court date. It is then easier for me to convince the client to act in his own best interests and accept a plea agreement.

Part of the problem is that underclass black women begin having babies at age 15. They continue to have babies, with different black men, until they have had five or six. These women do not go to school. They do not work. They are not ashamed to live on public money. They plan their entire lives around the expectation that they will always get free money and never have to work. I do not see this among whites, Hispanics, or any other people.

The black men who become my clients also do not work. They get social security disability payments for a mental defect or for a vague and invisible physical ailment. They do not pay for anything: not for housing (Grandma lives on welfare and he lives with her), not for food (Grandma and the baby-momma share with him), and not for child support. When I learn that my 19-year-old defendant does not work or go to school, I ask, “What do you do all day?” He smiles. “You know, just chill.” These men live in a culture with no expectations, no demands, and no shame.

If you tell a black to dress properly for trial, and don’t give specific instructions, he will arrive in wildly inappropriate clothes. I represented a woman who was on trial for drugs; she wore a baseball cap with a marijuana leaf embroidered on it. I represented a man who wore a shirt that read “rules are for suckers” to his probation hearing. Our office provides suits, shirts, ties, and dresses for clients to wear for jury trials. Often, it takes a whole team of lawyers to persuade a black to wear a shirt and tie instead of gang colors.

Marijuana

From time to time the media report that although blacks are 12 percent of the population they are 40 percent of the prison population. This is supposed to be an outrage that results from unfair treatment by the criminal justice system. What the media only hint at is another staggering reality: recidivism. Black men are arrested and convicted over and over. It is typical for a black man to have five felony convictions before the age of 30. This kind of record is rare among whites and Hispanics, and probably even rarer among Asians.

Stats

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

At one time our office was looking for a motto that defined our philosophy. Someone joked that it should be: “Doesn’t everyone deserve an eleventh chance?”

I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t. This world view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it.

My experience has taught me that we live in a nation in which a jury is more likely to convict a black defendant who has committed a crime against a white. Even the dullest of blacks know this. There would be a lot more black-on-white crime if this were not the case.

However, my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. They cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well. They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike.

I do not know the solution to this problem. I do know that it is wrong to deceive the public. Whatever solutions we seek should be based on the truth rather than what we would prefer was the truth. As for myself, I will continue do my duty to protect the rights of all who need me.

Topics: , ,

Share This

Michael Smith
Michael Smith is a pen name.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Alexandra1973

    He’s a liberal? Well, this bit of reality may be what gets the ball rolling for him to really take a look at what he believes.

    • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

      Democrats aren’t ‘Liberals’, they are ‘progressives’, or if you’d preffer, they are neomarxists. There is truly nothing liberal about the Democratic party these days. They just hijacked the word a long time ago, and it has worked for them. People associate ‘Liberalism’ (classical) with them, which is utterly wrong.

      • JohnEngelman

        Words change their meaning over time. Today a liberal is someone who wants the government to help people who are not rich get through life.

        • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

          Nice try, but liberalism is not only a word. It is a political philosophy that advocates for freedom and the least possible amount of intervention of the state in the life of individuals.

          Liberals will always advocate for freedom. Advocating for government forcing others to give up their rightful property -in the way of taxes- is a far cry from being truly a liberal. You just don’t know what being ‘liberal’ truly means.

          In many ways, even if you don’t believe it, conservatives are way more liberal than the so called ‘liberals’ from the Democratic party. I know, sounds crazy, huh? It is true though, if you know what you are talking about.

          • JohnEngelman

            Like liberalism, “freedom” has various definitions. Libertarians see the concept through the eyes of employers and investors.

            Most Americans are employees. They feel the power of their bosses and employers more than the power of local, state, and federal governments.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            What a load of… freedom is freedom, it means living life without having others interfering or meddling in your affairs.
            Having the government nannying the living hell out of your existence is definitely not freedom.

          • A_Nobody

            By it’s very nature liberalism today is a cancer on society who’s main purpose is to take from those who work to give to those who won’t (or can’t) so they can feel good about themselves. For those who truly cannot help themselves, I have no qualms about doing so. For those who could and do not; they can hit the road, Jack.
            As you say, freedom is freedom. I have the right, just as they, to work, just as they, in an attempt to succeed. Many choose not to, which is their right also, but they do not have the right to expect me to pay fro their sloth.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            We don’t have ‘liberalism’ these days, get it through your head. It’s the Democratic party’s own brand of neomarxist social/government policies. That is NOT ‘liberalism’.

          • RealisticGuy

            Liberalism means unrestrained. Liberals back in the age of the founders didn’t want to be restrained by the King. Liberals today don’t want to be restrained by anything. The liberality of today is in fact the spiritual continuation of the liberality of then; it is the same impulse.

            Freedom can lead to dangerous and wicked things, if a man desires too much of it.

            Consider the words of Demosthenes: “Arrived at man’s estate, I lived suitably to my breeding; was choir-master, ship-commander, rate-payer; backward in no acts of liberality public or private, but making myself useful to the commonwealth and to my friends.”

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            You have the mind of a slave. Do you lick the politicians’ boots as well? Or the cops’ boots? Are you happy that your master protects you from all harm and danger, real and fictitious?

            Thomas Jefferson said it better than anyone else: “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”

          • RealisticGuy

            So nothing to say to my argument, just an attack on me. Speak to what I have said or say nothing.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            You do have the mind of a slave though.

            Freedom can lead to dangerous and wicked things, if a man desires too much of it. Remember, the criminal mind is the most free of all; the criminal mind feels free to meet its own ends, even by hurting others.

            Too little freedom or too much freedom is not what compels an individual to kill another. It is its will and determination what compel him to do so. As I said before, freedom is freedom. Having a master or several masters telling you what you can or cannot do is not freedom. I am assuming you understand that you don’t need an overlord to tell you to kill someone to do so. If you want to, you will do it and do whatever it takes to accomplish that goal. Humans are that way. That doesn’t mean is acceptable. That’s why there are laws and ways to punish people who kill.

            If you cannot even grasp why I said you have the mind of a slave maybe you should examine yourself and reflect upon what you, yourself wrote.

          • RealisticGuy

            I am speaking of freedom in a man’s soul. How do you think a free society comes to be? By its people, of course. Those souls who thirst for freedom will create for themselves a democracy.

            Just as in a single man, when he decides he will not be restrained by high minded ideas like justice — that for him, hurting others is acceptable, he becomes in his heart a criminal; a state, when it becomes free of the same ideas, it too becomes criminal. This rule of the criminal we call Tyranny.

            That’s why I said, that the completely free man is a criminal, because his base, beastial soul has no boundaries. He will do whatever he feels and think nothing of it. His freedom is absolute.

            You and I, we aren’t as free as him, we are restrained by ideals of justice, and of good. The beast within our souls, which just desires, is kept in check.

          • MnVoiceofReason

            That’s total crap. Free people have the right to create a form of government for the SOLE purpose of the protection of individual rights. That WAS the U.S. In a Laissez-faire capitalist system (we’ve never even been close) No one would have the “right” to be a criminal. In a Laissez-faire capitalist system my freedom to live the way I want to without coersion from the “majority” would have no effect on anyone’s life, just as my creating a new widget and collecting $millions of other peoples money VOLUNTARILY would have absolutely no effect on anyone else’s life (anyone not involved in that exchange)

          • RealisticGuy

            Go back and read what I said. I did not say that anyone has the right to be a criminal, or that anyone ought to be a criminal.

            You have completely misunderstood/failed to grasp what I wrote.

          • Geo1metric

            “[...] I love the trite mythos of the outlaw. I love the self-conscious romanticism of the outlaw. I love the black wardrobe of the outlaw. I love the fey smile of the outlaw. I love the tequila of the outlaw and the beans of the outlaw. I love the way respectable men sneer and say ‘outlaw.’ I love the way young women palpitate and say ‘outlaw.’ The outlaw boat sails against the flow, and I love it. Outlaws toilet where badgers toilet, and I love it. All outlaws are photogenic, and I love that. ‘When freedom is outlawed, only outlaws will be free’: that’s a graffito seen in Anacortes, and I love that. There are outlaw maps that lead to outlaw treasures, and I love those maps especially. Unwilling to wait for mankind to improve, the outlaw lives as if that day were here, and I love that most of all. “[...] In my bartender’s pockets I still carry, out of habit, wooden matches. As long as there are matches, there will be fuses. As long as there are fuses, no walls are safe. As long as every wall is threatened, the world can happen. Outlaws are can openers in the supermarket of life.”

            “When freedom is outlawed, only outlaws will be free.”

          • David Ashton

            Should parents master their children?

          • Ace

            He is right and we must recognize this. Or we are slaves.

          • RealisticGuy

            How do you figure?

          • Ace

            L-FR was in full condescension mode and took it upon himself to tell you you have the mind of a slave. I thought that was pretty amazing. :-)

          • RealisticGuy

            He was completely wrong, so it wasn’t that amazing.

          • Ken

            Out of curiosity, what did you think of Ron Paul as a candidate?

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            I agree with many of his views. He knows his stuff and he is the closest thing we have to a classical liberal in modern politics, even though he is not a congressman anymore.

          • David Ashton

            Can a libertarian become a congressman in good conscience?

          • Ace

            You need to get it into your head that no one uses “liberal” today as you demand. The word’s been coopted. Get it?

          • Conrad

            You are both right, in a manner of speaking. But this is an old unproductive argument. This is why I no longer use such terms. For me one is either pro-white or anti-white.

          • Bryan W. Carpenter

            Politicians use good sounding words to for awful rules for us. Example: EEO, Equal Employment Opportunity. Sounds good, but it doesn’t mean equal to politicians, it means to discriminate against a race to forward another race. Nothing “Equal” about it. Simplest illustration I can think of to support what you are saying about the USE of words.

          • jorgaone

            HEAR! HEAR! I couldn’t agree more!

          • ndim2000

            Well said.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            You have to admit that since the Constitution was dumped they do have the right to expect you to pay for their sloth. If you work legally you are supporting their sloth.

          • Ken

            Perfect definition of libertarianism, not liberalism.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            Classical liberalism precedes libertarianism. Libertarianism borrows many concepts/ideas/theory from classical liberalism.

          • David Ashton

            A borderless “society” of rational adult individuals linked solely by contracts enforceable if at all only by insurance companies?

          • Ace

            But it’s what “liberals” crave.

          • http://disaffectedteacher.blogspot.com/ Hy Alldredge

            The difference between the employer/employee relationship and the government/governed relationship is that the former is entered into voluntarily and may be severed at any time by either party. There’s no escape from the federal government though.

          • JohnEngelman

            People have to learn a living. Many people have to take any job they can get.

          • MnVoiceofReason

            Perfectly said.

          • MnVoiceofReason

            Oh, right John, because you’re forced at the point of a gun to work for an employer & their investors. BS! If you don’t like your lot in life, change it. Do what you want to do. Now, as far as GOVERNEMENT is concerned, everything they tell you to do, you MUST do. If not, you’re fined, taxed, leans are put against your property or you’re jailed.

          • JohnEngelman

            If you do not like the way things are run in the United States you can move to a country with less government and lower taxes.

          • MnVoiceofReason

            Right. Those 3rd world countries are bastions of capitalism and free trade. Cliches?? You’re talking to me about overused cliches and you hit me with “if you don’t like it you can move to a different country?” Holy hypocrisy, Batman.

          • peedee

            Love it or leave it, you pinko commie.
            Move to Saudi Arabia, no taxes there.

          • Guest

            Countries are wealthy to the extent that they honor private property rights and the rule of law.

            “But without government,” claim the statists, “we wouldn’t have any roads!”

          • BillMillerTime

            Countries enjoy prosperity to the extent that they honor private property rights and the rule of law. “But without government,” claim the socialists, “how will the roads get built?”

          • Guest

            And the answer to the roads question is…

          • David Franklin

            ‘Liberalism’ is a contrived vehicle designed to sell Communism to the ovine masses.

          • curmudgeon

            And a serious mental disorder.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            You are referring to ‘progressivism’. Liberalism opposes communism by its very nature, as well as socialism and many other minor and major forms of government intervention in the life of individuals. Google ‘classical liberalism’ and learn for yourself.

          • MikeofAges

            See my post above, where I describe the difference between liberal nationalism and “progressive” or Popular Front liberalism. The word has come to have a different that what it originally had. How that came about is good question and one I don’t have the knowledge to answer. It may have had something to do supporting individual rights and the right to free expression. Popular Front liberalism has, in fact, put liberty under threat.

            One of the tenets of Popular Front liberalism is that all expression and private choice have to either support the Popular Front or “movement” as they call it. Or if not, fall into some pre-approved form of opposition. Before the so-called Fall of Communism the DDR (East Germany) was Communist Bloc’s laboratory of advanced socialism. Opposition parties, and membership in them, was allowed. But the spectrum of possible agendas and stances was under regime’s control, so that only unavailing opposition would be allowed to exist..

            The meaning of the word has changed over time. As you, yourself, note, classical liberalism and modern political liberalism are not the same thing even though the same word is used to identify them. Best just to identify you topic and have your say on it, I would say.

          • Ken

            The problem is that people who call themselves liberals are usually not “classical liberals.” From the way you describe classical liberalism, it sounds like libertarianism is the new classical liberal.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            Libertarianism and classical liberalism are not the same, but they share many ideas and concepts. Classical liberalism precedes libertarianism.

          • JohnEngelman

            American liberalism is different from social democracy, which is different from democratic socialism, which is different from Communism.

            A mark of intelligence is the ability to make distinctions.

          • MnVoiceofReason

            communism; death by dictator. democratic socialism; death by dictatorous mob suicide

          • JohnEngelman

            The closest approximation to democratic socialism can be found in Scandinavian Social Democracy. How are dictatorous mobs killing people over there?

          • MnVoiceofReason

            Dude, let’s just end it with this. How much of my life is yours? Let me know, how much?

          • peedee

            Whereas ‘Conservatism’ is a contrived vehicle designed to slide a Royal pomegranate up your nether regions, ever so methodically.

          • JohnG911

            Unfortunately for you, anti-freedom marxist and communist hijacked the word liberalism and you can’t unring that bell.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            it doesn’t matter. The US is not the entire world. If people here are brainwashed into believing marxism equals liberalism, that’s fine. They can twist the word, misinform people, force you to believe the opposite. Anyone with enough intellectual curiosity will eventually find out about the truth. Truth always prevails.

          • MikeofAges

            No one is twisting the word. It just worked out that way, probably because, as I suggested, early American liberals were more libertarian as regards personal, artistic and intellectual freedom. And that’s the truth.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            You cannot call yourself a liberal and want the government enforce your moral/personal/political views on others. It is ridiculous.
            If you are an individual, you say it out of ignorance.
            If you are the media, you say it because you have an agenda.
            What good would it do to the media to tell people that being a true liberal is to oppose government intervention in their daily lives? None. They are not stupid. It’s a fixed narrative, and a very convenient one.
            So yes, the meanings are reversed, the word’s meaning has been twisted to adapt to the new political landscape. But liberalism is and will always be about limited government. It has been that way since Locke’s times. ‘Liberalism’ is not a buzzword that comes and goes, it is a political philosophy, why is that so hard to grasp? Google ‘classical liberalism’ and learn by yourself.

          • Stan D Mute

            “You cannot call yourself a liberal and want the government enforce your moral/personal/political views on others. It is ridiculous.”

            Ah, but I do call myself a classical liberal and I do want the government to enforce some of my moral/personal/political views on others. For example, I want the government to impose a moratorium on *all* immigration until *all* the illegals and their spawn are removed. I also want the government to lock up, castrate, or execute those who indulge in child pornography and child sex. The first (immigration) is my political view and the second is my moral view.

            Yet many calling themselves classic liberals or libertarians would argue there should be no restriction on immigration and that child porn and much child sex is “victimless” because the child “consents” to the activity.

            Classical liberalism is *not* anarchy. Nor does it (or any free society) survive in a multicultural state.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            Natural rights, property rights.

            What you want the state to do to others in the name of your own personal beliefs will, at some point, be used against you as well. Be careful what you wish for.

          • David Ashton

            Not necessarily. Image three exactly similar “countries”, except for the following. A is an anarcho-capitalist zone with open borders. B is a minimal state society with what Rand called a “rational patriotism”. C is similar to B except that it “irrationally” (1) prohibits individual citizens from destroying their rational faculties by hard drug addiction, (2) their social behavior by child-torture porn addiction, and (3) damaging future generations by feckless dysgenic breeding.

            Given any experience of real human beings which would survive and prosper the most?

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            Also… mind you? The US is NOT the entire world.

          • MikeofAges

            So?

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            So, hopefully you are not deluded into thinking that just because Americans believe that Liberalism = neomarxism the entire world will follow suit.
            I know that for some people the US looks like the entire universe and beyond, but it is not.
            Take care.

          • MikeofAges

            I’m not deluded. Unfortunately, if you want to talk about classical liberalism, you will just have to make note that you are talking about classical liberalism. No one is going preface every discussion of contemporary politics, verbal or written, with the disclaimer that liberalism really means free market libertarianism. It’s just one of those things, bro.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            Point taken. You can change those false perceptions though, with reason and arguments, one person at a time… I agree with what you say. But then again, like Rothbard said, Libertarians need to engage with non libertarians to spread their message. Nothing will be accomplished by exchanging ideas only with like-minded people, that is the kind of behavior progressives favor, as nothing nor anyone will challenge their views.
            Again, one person/comment at a time…
            God bless you. Cheers my friend.

          • Stan D Mute

            Aren’t there *bigger* fish to fry? We are a borderless state undergoing invasion and occupation while *paying* our occupiers to dispossess us of our birthright. We are in the midst of a race war where only one side is fighting and indeed only one side even appears to be aware that it’s happening.

            And in this environment, you choose the battle of *semantics*???

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Probably because someone who posts under the handle of “Laissez-Faire Rothbardian” either supports a borderless world and unrestricted migration, or is unable to oppose it, because of his ideological propensities.

            I’m surprised Jack Ryan isn’t here tearing the Rothbardian a new one.

            Ironically, the real life Murray Rothbard was a Sam Francis fan, one of his long form articles was where I first heard of Sam Francis.

          • Frank Morris

            That is my biggest problem with Libertarianism, the Open Borders advocacy. Do these doctrinaire libertarians (should be an oxymoron, I know) really think liberty can be achieved while flooding the country with immigrants who will demand more and bigger benefits, higher affirmative action quotas, gun control, and charismatic dictators with powerful, oppressive central governments? There is abundant evidence that is precisely what Open Borders will accomplish.

          • jaxtom

            Good target for a drone….

          • LeSellers

            The problem with your hypothesis, that libertarians want “open borders”, is that that is not what libertarians advocate for.

            Yes, we want “open borders’, but that does not mean what you infer. What we want is peaceful people being allowed to cross borders without hindrance. That is, they cannot come here (or go anywhere) with the intent of robbing their new neighbors (or doing them any harm at all).

            The photo you posted does not represent what a libertarian desires. Why? Because the people in the photo are robbing (or planning to) USmericans, wanting to kill people until they can rob us without any hindrance.

            When you attack someone for his beliefs, it might be a good idea to understand those beliefs first, and to represent them correctly. What you have done is create a straw man.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            And I think the problem with your mentality is that you can’t comprehend that there are good reasons to restrict immigration beyond the criminal intent or the political creed of potential immigrations. You don’t seem to understand that destination countries for potential immigrants have pre-existing populations whose individuals are related to each other by some commonality of blood and want to keep it that way.

          • LeSellers

            What you say may be true, and I am not rejecting it. In fact, I agree with much of it.

            But that is not the reason people give (or gave) for restricting immigration. It’s all about jobs one the one hand and welfare on the other.

            Japan is a country that is a “nation” (the word coming from the Latin for “birth” — meaning all of the same ethnic stock). There are benefit of that nationhood, but there are limitations, too. USmerica is a “melting pot”, or was (today’s USmerica is as balkanized as the Mideast). There are weaknesses that derive from that mélange just as there are incredible strengths.

            The issue, to the libertarian mind, is how does one stop immigration? If it is by using force to stop it, then that infringes the innate rights of the would-be immigrants.

            Nonetheless, we must recall the wording of the immigration question: Should the right of peaceful people to cross borders without restriction be restricted?

            The word people fail to recognize is “peaceful”. As long as such people do not harm you in any measurable way (being offended is not harm), why should you be able to tell anyone where he can live, or how he can live his life?

            As long as USmerica allows any immigration, what difference does it make if the number changes, either up or down? We are a nation of immigrants, and, until the early XX, there were no quotas. Like it or not, your ancestors probably come here without benefit of documentation or permission — none was required. The position that we have ours, the rest need not apply is hypocritical.

            If an immigrant cannot justify his coming to USmerica by producing benefits for others (who register their approval by buying his labor, product or service), then he won’t come in the first place or will not stay.

            If people, exercising their right to reject his offering of labor, goods, or services for whatever reason, including his “outsider” status, they will essentially force him to go back home (or elsewhere) so he can provide for himself and his family.

            There is no need for a law restricting his entry. Either he pays his way of he starves.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            The issue, to the libertarian mind, is how does one stop immigration

            And why are we prostrating ourselves to the ideological rectitude of forces that have never really won much of anything? As for me, I started to get a hell of a lot more sane and a hell of a lot less neurotic the day I cast off the very concept of ideological rectitude and consistency, and all ideological cults. Now all that matters to me is this: Is it good for white people?

            Who cares what libertarian “minds” think?

            We are a nation of immigrants

            All nations are nations of immigrants. The entire history of the world after the development of agriculture and written languages can be summarized in the vicissitudes that come when one group of people get up and leave where they are and go somewhere else confronting the people already there, and also the progress that is made when that does not happen.

          • Geo1metric

            “There are weaknesses that derive from that mélange just as there are incredible strengths.”

            Please list some of the “incredible strengths of “that melange”.

            “The issue, to the libertarian mind, is how does one stop immigration? If it is by using force to stop it, then that infringes the innate rights of the would-be immigrants.”

            Those immigrants have no “innate rights” to enter another country. The sovereignty of a country is akin to private property. A nation (and I understand the definition) has, in my opinion, an innate right to exist within the bounds of a sovereign territory. Their duty, if that nation wants remain intact, is to protect the sovereignty of that territory. Immigrant “rights” be damned.

          • Frank Morris

            “just as there are incredible strengths.”

            - He must be referencing sushi bars and taco stands. I love tacos, but I could do without them!

          • Geo1metric

            Or, make your own. Or go to Mexico and enjoy some. There are alternatives.

          • David Ashton

            Excellent exposition. The libertarians and anarcho-capitalists need to “check their own premises” which are misguided. They do not fully understand or appreciate the concept of home and homeland, and family and nation, although blood can sometimes be thicker than water – as when Leonard Peikoff wanted to bomb the masjid proposed for the site of the Twin (actually Triplet) Towers.

          • Frank Morris

            You admit you want Open Borders, then obfuscate about what that means. Just like the libertarian party: www (dot) lp (dot) org/issues/immigration

            I consider myself a small (r) republican (nothing to do with Republican Party, but an advocate for a true republican form of government), IOW, I advocate for maximum freedom within our borders, but tight control of foreigners entering our nation, and no immigration, legal, illegal, or otherwise, unless and until full employment of US citizens is achieved. If such occurs, then I want a return to our sane pre-1965 immigration policy that ensures whites remain the vast majority, at least 90% of population.

            Citizens would be allowed to come and go as they please, and exceptions could be made for marriage, etc., and refugees such as white South Africans, but no more intentional browning of the nation and no more importation of menial laborers whose jobs should rightly be filled with many of our welfare recipients, and damned sure no one else who cannot prove they will not be a burden on said welfare system.

          • LeSellers

            What’s the real difference between someone’s going form North to South Carolina or from Detroit to Denver and going form South America to Arizona?

            In either case, there is an arbitrary line on a map that says you are now entering a difference jurisdiction.

            Let’s just end the welfare system entirely and there won’t be that draw. If you see the one part of the libertarian position, you have to see the whole thing.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Because, unlike almost all libertarians, I think there are such things as national-racial-ethnic interests.

          • LeSellers

            Of course there are interests as you note.

            That does not mean that peaceful people should be denied entry into a country because they do not speak the local language, do not worship the same way, or have different colored skin.

            As long as they are peaceful, do not harm others, and can pay their own way by offering goods and services (including labor) that their new neighbors want, they not only do not hurt the existing people, they make them better off.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            If their skin is Olive, and they are full blooded Caucasians from Sicily, Greece, Portugal, or Spain, they will maintain and further Western Civilization. Race is far more than skin color, as this article attests to. The different races have different basic temperaments. That basic wisdom has been tossed out the window in the past 50 years, and we have paid with the wholesale decline of Western Civilization.

          • Geo1metric

            “That does not mean that peaceful people should be denied entry into a country because they do not speak the local language, do not worship the same way, or have different colored skin.”

            People should be denied entry into a country at the sole discretion of that country. They have no rights to enter arbitrarily any country.

            Most clear thinking Whites are not prepared to give up the idea of sovereign territory.

          • David Ashton

            Visitors, bona fide students and immigrants on essential contracts are one thing. Permanent settlers of different race, religion, language and loyalty are another matter -e.g. La Raza.

          • Frank Morris

            Absolutely!

          • Frank Morris

            The difference, obviously, is that people in the first instance are citizens traveling within their own nation, and the latter is invaders coming to take jobs, suck welfare, and agitate politically/racially.

          • LeSellers

            In other words, they are not peaceful people.

            South Carolinians, at one time in USmericna history, despised North Carolinians. They thought that intermingling with them was treasonous and evil.

            Today, a mere two centuries later, there is no appreciable difference between them, and they get along peaceably.

            The United States of America is not a “nation”. It is a union of fifty nations. Economically, and socially, and in ‘most every way, we get along well. We move into others of these foreign nations and there is almost no problem (except Kommifornicatorians who move to Utah and Colorado and bring their statist, leftist politics with them).

            When I lived in France and in Italy (on assignment from the USmerican government) back in the 60s and 70s respectively), I learned the languages. I did not break their laws, I observed their traditions (at least those that did not interfere with my own beliefs). It would be great if incoming people to USmerica would do the same as I did. They do not. They are not peaceful border crossers, ergo, they do not meet the criteria libertarians have for “open borders”.

            Once again, you should understand what we mean when we say we want peaceful people to be able to cross borders without hindrance.

            As it is, all you appear to be is racist.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Frank Morris

            “As it is, all you appear to be is racist.”

            Yeah, so what?

          • LeSellers

            It doesn’t make your position look very good.

            Paul the Apostle was much wiser than that, even in his boldness. You could do worse than follow his example.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Frank Morris

            My position is factual and reality based. Yours is ideological and doctrinaire.

          • Geo1metric

            “It doesn’t make your position look very good.”

            It makes his position look great to me.

            Your outlook is the one needing adjustment in my opinion.

          • LeSellers

            It makes his position look great to me.

            I’m sure it does.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Geo1metric

            Someday you too may become realistic.

          • David Ashton

            Paul was not a libertarian. And he believed that God had established ethnic boundaries.

          • Frank Morris

            I agree that, on paper at least, the US is a confederation of 50 nation-states, but border control has been ceded to the federal government by the same document. Since that government will not allow the states individually to control their borders, I would love to see any state (especially Texas) become independent and see to their own needs, without DC’s social and economic Marxism.

          • LeSellers

            I’d like Texas (and a bunch of other, primarily western) states seceded, as well.

            The federal government is too large, too unresponsive, and too intrusive to be effective.

            When, in 1977, soon after his inauguration, Jimmy Carter vetoed a “water bill”, he discovered a serious backlash on that act. His defense was “Where I come from, ‘water’ is just another word.” His tin ear shows exactly why we need secession.

            My point was that, just as there is no significant problem between North and South Carolinians crossing the border between them (as long as the intent of the crossing is benign), there would be no problem with Canadians crossing their southern border (given the same limitation).

            In fact, as long as the immigrant is self-sustaining, he makes everyone better off by creating new services (which may be his labor) or goods. He also trades money earned in the market p[lace for other people’s goods and services.

            The issues of language, or welfare, of schools (which I abhor even for citizens’ children), and of a host of other non-peaceful usurpations are manifold, and I agree with anything you could say about them. But peaceful people do not cause any harm and do much to improve their new communities.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Frank Morris

            We now have de facto Open Borders. “Peaceful People,” at least by your definition, are few and far between.

          • LeSellers

            On these points, we agree fully.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            If Texas secedes, being that it is a majority Black/Mestizo, how is that going to benefit Whites in Texas?? Secession needs to occur in mostly White areas such as Northern Michigan, Western Maryland, and Central PA. I could see Northern Arkansas/ Southern Missouri seceding, for example, to form the new state of “Ozark”.

          • Frank Morris

            The line is NOT arbitrary. That is the biggest fallacy Open Borders ideology.

          • Ace

            >> Let’s just end the welfare system entirely and there won’t be that draw.
            If you see the one part of the libertarian position, you have to see
            the whole thing. <<

            I don't see ANY part of the libertarian position, except the part about selling out your own people.

          • LeSellers

            If you can’t see the libertarian position, you are also incapable of criticizing it knowledgeably.

            You need not agree with it, but you should understand it.

            Your last statement reveals your ignorance: no one is selling out his own people, not me especially. But it is apparent that you and I have a different definition of both “”[my] people” and “selling out”.

            My people are freedom lovers. Who yours may be is a different category altogether. It seems you’d rather be “pure” racially, and give no value at all to liberty, a white slave not a freeman in a free land.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Ace

            So libertarians are okay with 30,000,000 more peaceful foreigners deciding they have a perfect right to move here if they wish to?

          • LeSellers

            There is no one-word answer to this question.

            The question itself is useless because it presupposes that 30,000,000 people would want to move here and have the ability to do so. That premise is fallacious because, when some number, say 5,000,000 people move here, “here” isn’t the same thing it was before. Since that is the case, the other 25,000,000 in your hypothetical example would both need to an want to re-evaluate their choice. A sizable number would no long desire to immigrate.

            Further, not all of those 30,000,000 come to stay. They’re looking for a temporary change in their circumstances and want to go home.

            Finally, why would anyone want to forbid them to come in the first place? People who risk a great deal to get here (or go”there”) are dedicated to being successful. They will put a lot into making their new homes a better place. When (let’s assume) an Asian comes to USmerica, he does well, creates more Jobs, amasses more wealth, establishes a stable family, etc. Since we’re assuming peaceful people (meaning no one comes for welfare, to rob or steal, to kill or rape), those immigrants will make their new neighbors better off.

            This has been the history of immigration in USmerica (and elsewhere, for that matter). Unrestricted immigration has always been a benefit for the gaining country, at least until governments started making immigration a cruise ship: all you can eat, all the entertainment you want. That makes a huge difference in how immigration affects the desirable country.

            Let’s be open about it: the primary reason people oppose wide-spread immigration with few restrictions do so because the current generation of immigrants is also widely composed of potential leeches. But these people are not peaceful by libertarian standards (since welfare is at its base, theft).

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Ace

            Thanks for your thoughtful response.

            So far it appears that the point of equilibrium has not be reached. Net inflow is the reality and it has meant a massive presence. The official figure of something like 12M illegals, is it, is not credible. It’s been that for a decade or more, I believe, and is probably twice that. And yet they come and the “comprehensive” solution will no doubt still have family reunion provisions.

            Some do want to go back but the net flow is in. Those that come and then leave don’t come to start businesses or put down roots. They come to skim wealth and send it out of the country.

            The percentage of business owners is surely minuscule. Those who come thus directly compete with citizens. It’s not their country and they’ve no right to do that. You don’t believe your car and house belong to anyone but you. The principle’s no different because we are talking about a country.

            Unlike legal immigrants in the past, today’s illegals can and do become public charges. They close down hospitals and are a net economic drain according to one analysis.

            “Peacefulness” is irrelevant to the real issue, which is cultural inundation. Open borders advocates and multiculti fanatics think culture is irrelevant but it’s everything. This is a European nation in which several minorities are fortunate to be citizens. If it were to become an African, Hispanic, Muslim, Chinese, or Japanese-majority nation its realities would change forever.

            Muslims are arguably “peaceful” now but European nations with larger percentages of Muslims have soaring crime and Muslims simply are angling to take over and subjugate infidels. Anyone who denies this is deluded and weakening rational defense against this 1400-year scourge that Islam has been to civilized people.

          • LeSellers

            “Peacefulness” is irrelevant to the real issue, which is cultural inundation.

            To the contrary, “peacefulness” is the core of the discussion, because you posed the question of “30,000,000 peaceful foreigners” coming here. I was not talking about and am not defending the influx of hostile, aggressive people, in any numbers, coming here. That is not libertarianism and it is irrational to claim that libertarians want “open borders” for peaceful people and then to use a myriad of examples of non-peaceful people to make the counter case. It’s called a straw man.

            No rational person, certainly no libertarian, wants aggressive people crossing borders into his country. I live in Colorado. We have thousands moving here to escape the cesspool they created in Kommifornicatoria. I know because I’m one of them. But I came here to escape and reject the cesspool. Many are coming to expand it. That’s not peaceful.

            USmerica was a “melting pot” where newcomers were expected to (and wanted to) assimilate the values and culture of their new homeland. That’s peaceful. Coming explicitly to change the new place is not peaceful. On the contrary, that’s an invasion. (Which is why Arizona, for example, wanting to enforce immigration laws is constitutional — the Document literally says states have the right to repel invasions).

            And, lastly, my example of an immigrant businessman was noted to be Asian to avoid the stereotypical illegal immigrant. When legal immigrants arrive, they have the intent to make the new place better. It’s illegal immigrants who come to undermine the country.

            In the end, we agree: non-peaceful immigrants are a bane on this (and any) country. But our immigration laws (and the lack of enforcement) make it more difficult to get peaceful immigrants, and (coupled with our welfare laws) make it far more likely that aggressive, hostile immigrants will come here in vast numbers.

            It’s not immigration that makes this work against our interests. It’s making people break the law to get here, which law-abiding (i.e., peaceful) people do not do.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • David Ashton

            Not just a matter of economics in any case. It is a question of cultural compatibility and long-term genetic deterioration.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            The modern libertarian is going to be either an out and outright advocate of open borders, or be unable to articulate a case for real patriotic immigration reform. The reason behind that is really the rock bottom fundamental problem with modern libertarianism, that groups of people related by some sort of common blood don’t have any group rights beyond just the sum total of the individual rights of the individuals in the group, so much so that the modern libertarian doesn’t even allow us to notice that there are such things as groups of people related by common blood (“race denial”).

          • Feet2Fire

            Disgusting leeches. DEPORT them.
            NO AMNESTY.

          • David Ashton

            They also believe in the abolition of state welfare along with borders open to the world supposedly to deter unwanted immigrants. This is too late a realistic remedy. Immigration is “unarmed invasion”. They accuse other Americans of parochialism, but their ideology is based on the assumption that “everyone” is an English-speaking family-free adult like the imaginary Hank Rearden.

          • DelmarJackson

            Amen, Brother. Amen!

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            I do what I want with my time. You are welcome to do the same. Thank god I still have the freedom to do whatever I want with my free time.

          • LeSellers

            The issue is, however, that you have far less free time than you deserve. The government requires that you send about ½ of your working time to support it, and that does not even address the compliance time (applying for permits, calculating their taxes, filling out forms, stopping for presidential motorcades, etc.).

            What would you do if you had another 1,000 hours of “free time”? That’s what government is stealing from you.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            I agree with what you are saying, although I don’t understand why you are saying this to me.
            Government is like a tumor, a parasite. Life would be better without it, there’s no doubt about it.

          • LeSellers

            You said that you are still free to do what you want to with your free time.

            I;m saying that the government is stealing your time (and money), so you have much less free time to spend doing what you want to.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            Meaningful change takes time. I am confident things won’t be this way forever.
            Also, I like your signature :)

          • LeSellers

            Some people don’t get the satire.

            They think I am waiting for the government to give me a Job. But, as you and I both know, government is incapable of creating Jobs. At best, they can create temporary jobs, like those with Solyndra, that last barely long enough for the bundler or other crony to cash the check and declare bankruptcy.

            Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

          • David Ashton

            Is government necessary for defense against internal and external violence?

          • Ace

            Now we’re talking. The article here is a refreshing account of jaw-dropping black dysfunction and complete unwillingness and ability to get a grip. Bravo to the author but one has to gape in disbelief at his statement that a liberal has a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who can care for themselves but don’t.

            Every day he deals with scum who can take care of they sef but don’t. But he clings to his belief. If HIS experience won’t banish such absurd beliefs from a liberal’s mind whatever will?

          • David Ashton

            God?

          • Stan D Mute

            To my knowledge, the word “liberal” has been corrupted in every western nation to mean “Marxist”.

          • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

            Intellectual curiosity always leads people to learn the truth.

          • David Ashton

            Too few have it, unfortunately.

          • ShamrockRancher

            We seem to be rapidly running out of folks with “intellectual curiosity”. They’re too busy texting/facebooking/playing xbox360. I personally don’t hold out a lot of hope for the next two generations. All that education and still clueless. “FRIEND ME!”

          • David Ashton

            Can you prove your assertion that “Truth always prevails” either by rational argument or historical example?

          • Ken

            What you are describing is libertarianism, not liberalism. I know several family members who call themselves liberal and they think government should force people to do their bidding. None of their beliefs are anything about freedom.

          • Stan D Mute

            @ken – the Marxists corrupted the term “liberal” and stole it from us. Without looking it up, because there are far more important things, I believe the theft happened in the 1920′s-1940′s. I know that when John Stuart Mill was writing in the late 1800′s, he was firmly a liberal and today his masterpiece “On Liberty” is considered a “libertarian” work. This thread confuses me … We are discussing semantics and how the communists/Marxists have redefined a political term … Meanwhile Rome burns (metaphorically speaking).

            Classic liberalism or libertarianism is a great ideal. But we are SO far from that ideal it’s pointless to debate the issue. We are overrun with alien invaders and occupiers, under siege by a hyper violent alien race we stupidly brought here ourselves, with a government determined 100% to destroy us economically, morally, and genetically. Now is not the time to debate whether utopia should be called liberalism or libertarianism. Nor is it the time to debate whether “democrat” and “republican” still mean what they did in the 19th century. This is a pointless tangent.

          • oceanluvr30

            So you are one of those head-up-their-ass liberals who think, liberalism advocates for freedom and least possible amount of government interventions. REALLY! Without giving you a history lesson, lets just take this latest liberal disaster to occupy the White House. His administration has enacted, in many cases by executive order, more new regulations which hamper our freedom to do business, and to conduct our lives, [to the best WE, as individuals feel we can], than any previous administration, and they are not through yet. Obamacare is just one horrendous example of the creation of the Nanny State, where Big Brother knows best, and the moronic liberal party is in lock step with the destruction of personal freedoms.

          • OzMan

            You are right that true liberals want less government intervention.

            You are wrong that conservatives are more liberals than the so-called “liberals” in the Democratic party. They just have a different set of rules they want the government to implement.

          • Ace

            True about 100 years ago.

          • http://www.insectman.us insectman

            There are few true liberals. Few understand the meaning of “progressive”.

            Here is a word I coined to desribe the large group that give liberalism a bad name.

            levobortomite (lev oh bor’ tow mite) noun.

            Anyone who believes and/or promotes left wing extremism,
            evolutionism, abortion, and/or anti-family activities such as sodomite marriage. These people are not limited to any particular political party.

        • curmudgeon

          With other people’s money I might add!

        • Feet2Fire

          If you (and so far 27 others) think that’s what a “LIBERAL” is, our country is in deep trouble. A LIBERAL is somebody who for various unrecognized, subconscious reasons, identifies with the “Underdog” to the point of wanting to take from one set of people their resources to hand over to the so-called “Underdogs” in society. In the old days, “Liberal” meant “Live and let live.” Not so any more. It now means “WE, The Democratic Party know what is best for all of you, and we intend to make ‘PROGRESS’ by dividing the population up into factions that feel ill will toward each other and will only turn to US, the DEM-WIT GOVERNMENT, for answers and rules as to how you are to live your daily lives. In exchange for this submission to our RULE over you, we will provide subsistence level of your daily needs, including food, shelter and health care. Welcome to the New World Order.” In order for Dems/Libs to gain this much power, they have to use lies, hocus-pocus, propaganda, manipulation and every other manner of deception and trickery, and the dumber the people, the easier it is for Dems to gain and hold that power. Thus, they infiltrate education and every institution of society.

          You folks need to wake up and recgonize what’s going on around you, before our country is gone completely. We’re very nearly there already.

          • JohnEngelman

            Why are you so angry? I do not want your excuse for being angry. I want the reason. What is not going on well in your life? Why do you blame that on Democrats and liberals?

          • Feet2Fire

            The fact that you could ask such an asinine question shows that YOU and your ilk are a huge part of what’s wrong in USA today. J/A!.

          • JohnEngelman

            By expatiating upon the incurable baseness and vileness of the times, the frustrated soften their feeling of failure and isolation. It is as if they said: “Not only our blemished selves, but the lives of all out contemporaries, even the most happy and successful, are worthless and wasted.” Thus by deprecating the porsent they acquire a vague sense of equality.

            - Eric Hoffer, from The True Believer

            ———-

            You still have not answered my question.

        • Ace

          And have someone else pay the freight for their l
          pets and live as far away from them as is humanly possible.

        • MnVoiceofReason

          That’s great John, but incorrectly assumes that Keynesian economics actually helps people. It doesn’t – free markets and voluntary charity help people. Forced wealth distribution just creates class warfare, debt and death.

          • JohnEngelman

            Those are right wing cliches that are divorced from actual experience.

            From 1921 to 2000 Republicans were presidents for forty years. Democrats were presidents the other forty years. There was over twice as much growth in the per capita gross domestic product under Democratic presidents as under Republican presidents.

            There was nearly as much growth in the per capita gross domestic product during Franklin Roosevelt’s first term as during the terms of Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolrige. There was considerably more job creation.

            From the presidencies of Harry Truman to that of George W. Bush there were nearly always more jobs created under Democratic presidents as under Republican presidents. Under President Carter there were 2,600,000 jobs created per year. Under Ronald Reagan that declined to 2,000,000 jobs per year.

            According to a Wall Street Journal article that appeared November 6, 2012: “Despite the fact that Wall Street tends to prefer Republican candidates, the stock market historically has performed better under Democratic presidents.

            “Since 1900, the Dow has averaged a 7.8% annual gain under Democratic presidents, compared with a 3% annual gain under Republicans, WSJ reported earlier this year.”

        • Tom_in_Miami

          You are right, as far as you go, but a liberal is also someone who wants to take away the money that normal people earn, often in backbreaking jobs, and give it to those who not only are not working but absolutely will not work. That is just one characteristic of those whom we call “liberal.” I’m not rich and the government goes out of its way to make my life more difficult, both financially and in terms of my safety.

          • JohnEngelman

            We have different perceptions, I see a liberal as someone who wants to raise taxes on rich people in order to help normal people in backbreaking jobs.

            The welfare budget is smaller than you imagine.

        • ConradCA

          Supporters of Tyrant Obama the Liar are either those who don’t think logically but rely on feelings or members of the progressive fascist religion. The latter a dedicated to the destruction of “evil” country and replacing it with their utopia. A utopia where they control the government and the government controls every aspect of society. Not that different than Nazi Germany and the USSR and we all know how well those worked. However, they think they have good intentions and that their better than everyone else so nothing bad will happen.

      • JohnG911

        Actually they aren’t progressives either because their true agenda is regressive as far as liberty and freedom are concerned. Black people aren’t actually black and special rights mean special privileges. Tolerance actually means forced acceptance of liberal views and intolerance for non-liberal views. How can you have equal rights and special rights for women and minorities at the same time? The left has always used doubletalk, doublespeak or obscurantism to hide or mask their true intentions from the general public.

        Here’s a short list of commonly used words and phrases the left uses to hide their true agenda: racist, racism, gay, black, fairness, equality, compassion, redistribution, contribution, courage, diversity, multiculturalism, inclusive, tolerance, community, affirmative action, opportunity, shared responsibility, undocumented workers, hate crime, equal rights, women’s rights, minority rights, choice, freedom, inequality, raising awareness, prejudice, religious right, acceptance, understanding, assault weapons, extremism, religious extremism, and liberalism.

        You can argue the use of liberalism all you want but it won’t keep the left from misusing it and glorifying the word will only benefit the left.

      • Bear Baker

        Ahh let’s waste all our time and effort discussing the minute differences in liberal vs. classical liberalism vs marxist vs neoliberal. I see you guys are discussing this until the cows come home. Well when you solve the black problem let me know.

        • Stan D Mute

          Let’s not forget the alien invasion and occupation! Although in one sense the invasion by 50 million mestizos and Indians will largely take care of the black problem for us in the long run. I’d say it’s pretty darn far from an *ideal* way to handle the problem..

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          I agree. We just read a superb article where the unabashed truth about Black behavior was laid bare. We should be discussing secession, not kibitzing about the correct definition on Liberalism. This article is a thesis statement for segregation. When the author says he is a Liberal, this is his way of saying that he cares about developmentally disabled children, and other truly disadvantaged people, being treated with compassion, as an advance rebuttal to forthcoming accusations of racism, not because he wants us to worry about the definition of Liberalism. He is also pointing out that exposure to Blacks has made a racial realist out of a former Libtard Leftie who believed the media claptrap regarding Blacks until he acquired a front row seat at the Black sociopathy circus.

      • teaman

        You are wrong! The dummycratic party has been hijacked by the perverted left many years ago! Fact is, the party is made up of everything you say and much more! In some of those areas, the Repub-a-Flubs are no different! True freedom loving, constitutional driven, Godly inspired living, and anti big Gooberment, folks like me have not political party!

        Although I understand some of what this Lawyer states, he still does not understand what drives the black population(NOT ALL)! Blacks are taught(and I have many black close friends who have told me this), from birth that they are living in a white mans world under a white mans constitution and justice system and nothing at any level of government applies to them, except HANDOUTS, which they believe they are entitled to because they are black and the white man is to blame for everything!

        Even though, blacks have a strong history of support to “OUR” Nation, most blacks have NO desire to learn the “WAYS OF THE WHITE MAN or their on history” at all! Have no desire to at hear to what is “RIGHT” and “WHAT” is wrong! They believe they are entitled simply because of what happened hundreds of years ago!

        They refuse to accept truths like this;

        According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.

        Prior to 1655
        there were no legal slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants.
        All masters were required to free their servants after their time was
        up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be
        held. Upon their release they were granted 50 acres of land. This
        included any Negro purchased from slave traders. Negros were also
        granted 50 acres upon their release.

        Anthony Johnson
        was a Negro from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work
        on a tobacco farm in 1619. In 1622 he was almost killed when Powhatan
        Indians attacked the farm. 52 out of 57 people on the farm perished
        in the attack. He married a female black servant while working on the
        farm.

        When Anthony was
        released he was legally recognized as a “free Negro” and ran a
        successful farm. In 1651 he held 250 acres and five black indentured
        servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a
        black indentured servant. Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending
        his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert
        Parker.

        Anthony Johnson
        sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the
        court ruled that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely.
        The court gave judicial sanction for blacks to own slave of their own
        race. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the
        first slave owner.

        Whites still
        could not legally hold a black servant as an indefinite slave until
        1670. In that year, the colonial assembly passed
        legislation permitting free whites, blacks, and Indians the right to
        own blacks as slaves.

        By 1699, the
        number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection.”
        Virginia Colonial ordered the repatriation of freed blacks back to
        Africa. Many blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would
        not have to go to Africa. This was the first effort to gently
        repatriate free blacks back to Africa. The modern nations of Sierra
        Leone and Liberia both originated as colonies of repatriated former
        black slaves.

        However, black slave owners continued to thrive in the United States.

        By 1830 there
        were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves.
        By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in
        the city of New Orleans alone.
        Slavery started among blacks long before the first black person ever set foot in our country!
        Slavery is BAD no matter who is doing it, but blacks need to wakeup and start becoming part of society instead of railing against whites at every turn!
        I was a member of a jury that convicted two black young men of capital murder and sent them to be executed! Everything these two men did was on a clear video and their identities were not in question! I was extremely upset for months, not for the conviction but because these two were young and had destroyed their lives!
        You could easily tell during this trial that they hated their lawyer and the justice system…..period! Showed absolutely no remorse, but what was most disturbing was their relatives in the background blaming the victim(a white man) and the white system!
        I still remember their names, never to forget!

        • BTeboe

          And it was other blacks that sold blacks into slavery to begin with. I believe that the destruction of the black family by permanent welfare state is the true cause of a break down in black society. I taught briefly in an Alabama school that was over 75% black. The parents were aggravated that their children were not being taught to be ‘black enough’. Whatever that means I do not know. I look at kids as kids not the color of their skin. Stop the permanent generational welfare and see if that makes a difference.

          • Stan D Mute

            It would help, but NOTHING will or can ever make the African behave like a white. There is simply too much evolutionary distance – about 50,000-100,000 years worth – for it to happen. Africans are Africans and will always behave like Africans.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            You are absolutely right. It is not in their genes to adopt White behavioral patterns.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Not Black enough indicates their refusal to even attempt to adopt White behavioral traits and culture. Southerners in the old days understood the intensity of this refusal. Their response was segregation.

      • ronwf

        There’s nothing particularly about them that represents progress either, so I refuse to use the word “progressive”.

    • noworries

      That IS what liberals believe. If you believe that everyone should accept responsibility for their actions, that people are capable of great things no matter what, and that people help when they want to, then you wouldn’t have written this. He ends with a reiteration of his political beliefs and I wasn’t surprised in the least.

      There is no contradiction here and that’s what leftists need to really understand–if you believe there’s a MORAL OBLIGATION to give (that should be enforced by the state) then there’s an implication that it won’t happen naturally because humans aren’t capable of it. They’re misanthropists to the core.

    • JohnG911

      This liberal PD complains that blacks are brutal, have little or no empathy for their victims, and he acknowledges they will commit more crimes once released; yet, he’s working on their acquittal or early release. Yet another typical liberal who refuses to understand the consequences of his liberal compassion. He’s no better than the driver of the getaway car in a bank robbery.

      He believes we have the duty to care for those who can care for themselves but don’t yet he acknowledges the poor black culture produces violent monsters who prey on the public. He fails to realize or refuses to acknowledge that liberals like him created these monsters! The liberal welfare state subsidizes the culture that produces these monsters. Liberals actually believe most blacks are mentally inferior and require special needs programs like Affirmative Action to compete against other races. Of course they can’t say that publicly so they claim its required because of racism. Of course that reinforces the hatred blacks already have for whites. Liberal’s antipathy for whites, capitalism and America also contribute to black’s sense of hopelessness and justify their abnormal and uncivilized behavior. I call it the “black attitude” that most blacks didn’t have 40 years ago.

      White liberals like this PD created these monsters and they’re a thousand times worse than the KKK – who were also demoncrats.

    • MikeofAges

      I want to put out an idea here and see what people think about it.

      As I see it, there have been two kinds of liberalism within the lifetime of people alive today. These are not particularly compatible with each other even though they have existed under the same political umbrella within the Democratic Party, with the nationalist element steadily declining over the intervening decades.

      The first was liberal nationalism in the period 1945-1970. The tenets of this were economic nationalism, support of labor rights, civil rights under the rubric of equality, unity of national purpose between corporate business and ordinary people, economic development and job creation, and anti-communism.

      The later species of liberalism, 1970 to the present, has been “progressive” or Popular Front liberalism. Its tenets have support of “liberationist” ideology, identity politics, group rights. It has been disinterested in economic issues and national development. Its primary goal has been to build up its electoral coalition in order the achieve permanent political control over the United States, so that is can implement its eventual agenda, whatever that actually may be. The well being of society and social peace has been secondary to the goal of achieving eventual political and legal control over society.

      This may be a disturbing idea to some people, but liberal nationalism had more in common with national socialism that it did with communism or even democratic socialism or social democracy. Economic nationalism, national development and some basic unity of purpose between capital and labor for the sake of national development were the central concerns of liberal nationalism.

      • JimH69

        Interesting how JFK’s assassination syncs up nicely with your timeline

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        I agree. Truman was an old time Liberal. Concerned with working people not being abused by the elites, but not enamored with Blacks. Bill Clinton is the modern type Liberal. He has a Freudian infatuation with Blacks, and wants to force Whites to feel the same White guilt hogwash he feels.

      • Lt. Greyman, NVA

        Agreed, and a very insightful analysis indeed. Those of us who are working for the establishment of a White homeland are seeking this exact pattern, a kind of Switzerland in North America, with the only taxes being on imported and exported goods. The Swiss model has lasted nearly 600 years on a Continent torn by terrible strife. Add to that a low tax, high freedom Government and a vote franchise earned by military and labor service (much like National Socialism) and you get the Northwest American Republic.

        • MikeofAges

          National socialism is a generic concept just like any other political concept. It connotes a system of strong labor-oriented policies combined with a nationalist rather than internationalist orientation, unity of purpose between labor and capital and anti-communism. Like any approach, it has its hazards. The potential hazard of national socialism is the risk inherent in an excess of nationalism. These were shown early, but nevertheless the itself idea is generic and exists apart from the German National Socialist Worker’s Party and it crimes and excesses.

          Liberal nationalism, as noted, paralleled in a more limited way the generic idea of national socialism, but not the regime (1933-45) of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. Liberal nationalism worked in the United States for as long as it lasted, and contributed mightily to the America’s national development in the immediate Postwar era. A salient reason was that it drew the elites into a commitment to serving the national purpose and gave them prestige and respect when they did so. Neither “progressive” or Popular Front liberalism nor libertarian universalism conservatism has been able to do that that since.

  • DaveMed

    A well-written piece. A quibble:

    ___________________________________________________________________

    I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t. This world view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it.

    ___________________________________________________________________

    Many (if not most) of those of us who consider ourselves conservatives hold the very same values. As far as I am concerned, the definition of “conservative” in the 21st century is: someone who champions the preservation of Western societies and cultures. Period.

    Some of us believe that lower taxes are likely to result in a rising tide that will lift all boats. Others take the position that the people’s government should, ideally, play a more direct role in aiding the less fortunate.

    What we hold in common is care for our kin and the desire to see our people(s) thrive.

    If you are a “liberal”, well, I guess you’re the kind of liberal I’d gladly associate with.

    I apologize if this is a sidetrack from the article’s thrust, but I just wanted to make that clear.

    • Tarczan

      Any government support programs for the disadvantaged are abused and overloaded by the black freeloaders. They do the same with the safety forces. They take viable programs that would work fine in a white society and destroy them. An example would be oublic housing. When the projects were mostly white in Cleveland, they were relatively orderly, safe communities. Now they are no go zones.

      • Ronald

        Tarczan.

        You are right. After the war when the boys came home, there simply was not enough housing for them all. At that time, Milwaukee County used the city park system to provide temporary public housing until returning vets could get on their feet and make the transition to civilian life. I lived in one of those public housing projects. It was entirely White. Everyone got along. The intention of resident Whites was to get out of taxpayer subsidized public housing as quickly as possible.

        At that time, the city was composed of all the various White ethnicities of Europe. Milwaukee was known as a clean, progressive, and safe city. Every Euro-group enjoyed the right to primarily live among others of the same ethnicity. There was no forced integration with Africans. At that time, a few Africans may have lived in Milwaukee, but I never saw any.

        Milwaukee is probably typical of the way every other large American city has gone since the Africans began swarming in to get “free” taxpayer funded food, housing, child support, and Obamaphones. I no longer live there, but it is my understanding the city has become just another American racial battleground.

      • TheAntidote

        Negroes cannot be self directed or self governed. When the keys are turned over to them, the jungle quickly takes over.
        In the 1920s and 30s the summers were so brutally hot in Chicago (long before AC) that entire families and neighbourhoods of Whites were permitted to sleep on the lawns in public parks. There was no rape nor drive-by shooting nor hold ups nor stabbings caused by disrespect. The people organized their own sanitation and amusements. Contrast this behaviour with last Easter Sunday in the City of Chicago.
        In 1953 the North Sea broke through the dykes of Holland and the polder land was flooded. The people immediately formed themselves into brigades to fill the breaches and rescue the stranded. Contrast this with the insane, savage conduct of the New Orleans Negroes during Katrina. They raped, they looted, they fired upon the rescue helicopters (!) and they set fire to the buildings they were marooned in!!
        Racial differences exist. Get used to it.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          As late as the very hot summer of 1954 in St. Louis, people could sleep out in the open in St. Louis city parks with no fear of being victimized.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Very accurate. The West side of Cleveland used to be very safe because it was all White. Hispanic influx and White kids copying Black behavior have destroyed this area.

    • PotusTotus

      In the 50 years since LBJ declared war on poverty we have spent an inflation adjusted $20 trillion. What have we gotten for such sweeping “compassion”? 73% black illegitimacy rate, generations dependent on welfare, destroyed inner cities and a substantial percentage of the population that will never contribute.

      I draw the line at “caring for those who can care for themselves but don’t”. Nothing good comes of that for anyone.

      • Rurik

        … “caring for those who can care for themselves but don’t”.
        That is the point where assistance becomes exploitation, even semi-enslavement of those forced to provide.
        It is even worse when this “forced charity” is met not with gratitude but active contempt. How many times have I heard “Fools work”?

      • Ace Decade

        Before the “war on poverty” the marriage rate amongst blacks was almost parallel to whites.

        • dogbite186

          Countless aspects of American life were destroyed under the Johnson Administration. Most social ills can be traced back to policies that were initiated by LBJ.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Those policies merely enabled what was already present. Blacks have always been violent, sexually deviant, and sociopathic. The difference was that, in the pre Civil Rights days, they knew better than to visit their dysfunction upon Whites. Southerners knew how to handle Blacks in the old days.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Maybe so, but what was the actual infidelity rate amongst the Negroes?? Those of us familiar with their behavioral patterns know the answer. It was commonplace. Remember, the philandering MLK was their hero back then. Negroes have never had our values, and never will. What they had in the old days was proper respect for Whites. Amongst themselves, degeneracy ruled as it does now. Find a nursing home in the South, and talk to an appreciable number of Southern Whites who are now in their eighties, and they will attest to this.

      • DaveMed

        I can’t believe I skimmed over that line.

      • Strike_Team

        The “War on Poverty” was never considered as such by the people who created it; the usual suspects. The “war” was nothing more than wealth transference, and also a way for those hateful folks to kill the US Space Program, which the hard core red diaper crew hated with a passion. They saw all the advancements and inventions that were resulting from a group of brainy, creative whites, with concrete goals, those creative and inventive whites working as an organized group, and it gave them fits of rage and fear.

        • Andross

          Very true. I’ve been watching Tom Hank’s “From the Earth to the Moon” series that dramatizes the Apollo program. Half of episode 4 is spent juxtaposing NASA scientists and astronauts at work with footage of “civil rights activists” rioting, MLK, etc. It presents a highly amusing contrast of brilliant, productive white people and hordes of perpetually indignant incompetents. I have to wonder if that impression wasn’t intended?

    • Peter Connor

      No, real conservatives see legitimate human need as a subject of private charity, not government handouts.

      • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

        Jared Taylor’s discussion of this very issue in Paved With Good Intentions is one of the best I’ve ever read. He neatly destroys the liberal notion that coerced welfare is morally equivalent to freely-given charity.

      • DaveMed

        I don’t support handouts as much as I do a basic safety net.

        Again: strictly in a White society.

        • Terra Magnum Imperium

          Agreed, White society taxes = common good.
          Multiracial society taxes = coerced welfare.

        • Seriously

          There is a safety net built right into our capitalist society with no handouts from the government. From the time I started working I’ve been buying up dividend producing stocks in public run companies. I started with 10 shares of Dow Chemicals and continued buying whatever I could afford. When I’ve been out of work I survive on the monthly and quarterly dividends. No need for welfare, when I work my assets grow and my savings grow. Its a great system, the little peices I own of a whole bunch of corporations pay me and don’t care who I am, what my circumstances are.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Exactly. Safety nets were designed for homogenous European societies as just that. Safety nets. They also worked beautifully in countries like Sweden when everyone was all White. In the U.S., they worked fine in states like Minnesota and Wisconsin when the demographics were pure. They are built on the assumption that folks live by a moral code, as has traditionally been the case in the European cultures. It is the Blacks, Mestizoes and Muslims that abuse our safety net, making it into a tax burden on Whites.

    • RTUT

      Taking care of those who can care for themselves but choose not to is Not a conservative position. That is a horribly corrosive position to foist on society.

      • DaveMed

        I missed the part where he said we have that duty toward those who can care for themselves but don’t.

        A very unfortunate miss on my part.

  • Daniel Schmuhl

    “Michael Smith” seems to be headed in the right direction, but unfortunately hasn’t entirely dispelled most of the liberal illusions that obscure his thinking.

    Race realism or more broadly speaking *genetic realism* does not fit well with liberal political ideology. The welfare state without a eugenics program, is inherently unstable (even in an ethnically homogeneous society).

  • JohnEngelman

    After the Second World War liberals made assumptions about the Negro race that have not been substantiated by subsequent events. For every black person who can perform and behave as well as whites, there are many more who cannot.

    Nevertheless, there is more to liberalism than beliefs about blacks. From 1920 to 2002 there was nearly always more economic growth under Democratic presidents than Republican presidents.

    From the presidencies of Harry Truman to George W. Bush there were nearly always more jobs created per year under Democratic presidents.

    Even this is true: “Since 1900, the Dow has averaged a 7.8% annual gain under Democratic presidents, compared with a 3% annual gain under Republicans.”

    - The Wall Street Journal November 6, 2012

    • JP Rushton

      ” From 1920 to 2002 there was nearly always more economic growth under Democratic presidents than Republican presidents.”

      Obama told me that current presidents have nothing to do with how the economy is doing and only the previous president has power over that. Obama always tells the truth, don’t try to lie to me.

      • PotusTotus

        There is no doubt that Clinton rode the massive wave of prosperity Reagan created when he cleaned up Carter’s mess. Nixon was left cleaning up LBJ’s mess. Eisenhower had decades of FDR’s failed economic policies.

        • JohnEngelman

          There was nearly as much economic growth during Franklin’s first term as during the terms of Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge. There was more job creation.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            In truth, whenever Democrats become the dominant force in government, they inevitably increase the size of government, expand social welfare programs, increase out national debt, and compel Americans to pay more in taxes. Republicans, admittedly, have contributed to this in their own way as well – but Democrats take it to entirely new levels.

          • JohnEngelman

            Since the election of Franklin Roosevelt most Americans have benefited from a well financed public sector of the economy that is paid for by steeply progressive taxation.

            Every item in the federal budget has a powerful political constituency to protect it. The largest and most expensive programs are the most popular. Republican politicians learn this whenever they move beyond vague campaign promises about reducing the size of government, and try to make specific cuts.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Oh yeah, Franklin Roosevelt has proven to have been great for our nation’s economy – and that “steeply progressive taxation” has done wonders for us (sarc).

            Republicans have betrayed their party’s own platform and have done a disservice to the American people when they’ve tried to follow in the footsteps of Democrats and support “the largest and most expensive programs.” Instead of adhering to our founding principles of a limited government, they have chosen to follow the popular but often foolish desires of American citizens who want the government to pay for everything – cradle to grave.

          • JohnG911

            You’re completely insane if you believe any government social program is “well financed.” Social Security is a PONZI SCHEME that was doomed from the beginning and its real purpose is to provide political leverage for one party. Social Security and Obamacare are both untenable and doomed to fail. I’m always amazed by progressive’s total failure to understand the simplest economic concepts. A high tax rate results in lower tax revenues because you destroy people’s incentives to work and take risk. Why would anyone want to work hard knowing their confiscated earnings are being used to subsidize loyal demoncats who refuse to work? You can’t print money forever and your progressive beliefs won’t put food in your bellies. If we continue down this road to serfdom, our economy is certain to crash forcing government to shrink and that’s not a “vague” promise.

          • JohnEngelman

            From the presidencies of Harry Truman to that of Jimmy Carter the national debt was paid off as a percentage of gross domestic product. It was paid down in absolute terms during the last three years of the Clinton administration.

            The national debt only became a problem during the Reagan administration because of the fraudulent promises of supply side economics.

          • http://saberpoint.blogspot.com/ Stogie Chomper

            You don’t know what you are talking about.

          • JohnEngelman

            Then why is it so easy for me to document my assertions using sources like The Wall Street Journal, and articles I have found on American Renaissance?

            I admit that it gets tiresome to keep pushing facts into narrow minds. Most people allow their likes and dislikes to influence their perception of what is true and false.

          • running_riot

            Most people understand facts, but disagree with how they are used to produce what is ‘true or false’.

          • running_riot

            As a percentage of my neighbors’ income, my mortgage is paid off. Just thought you might want to know.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            In 1948, a married couple with the median income and two children paid only 2 percent of its income in state, federal, and social security taxes.* In 1991 they paid 30 percent. In return, today’s couple does not get correspondingly better roads, schools, parks, libraries, and police. However, it does get a growing army of doletakers, and a growing army of bureaucrats, policemen, and social workers to process, supervise, and uplift them. – Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions, p. 347.
            .
            *William Galston, “Home Alone,” The New Republic (December 2, 1991), p. 43.

          • Peter Connor

            According to Franklin(a proven liar) there was–curiously, a huge recession set in right after he was reelected in 1936.

          • JohnEngelman

            That happened because President Roosevelt made the mistake of reducing government spending.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Oh yeah, he should have kept spending us into bankruptcy just like the Nothing Man who currently sits in the Oval Office.

          • JohnEngelman

            The Great Depression was ended by high government spending, and high government employment paid for by high taxes on the rich.

            That is why President Roosevelt was reelected three times, and why the Democratic Party dominated the country until 1968.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            It was perhaps able to work for a while (as most things do), but such “high government spending” and high taxation hardly proved good for the nation in the long run.

            There’s an important principle here that you’re missing: The more our government spends and the more bloated it gets, the more intrusive it will be and the less freedom we will experience. Such excessive spending has a way of snowballing and while we may have been able to manage it at one time in our nation’s history, it can no longer be maintained, including the rationalizations used to justify such policies.

          • Geo1metric

            I don’t think he cares about freedom; he seems to lean toward a dictatorship of the proletariat.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is an example of a straw man argument. In a straw man argument one distorts the argument of an opponent in order to make it easier to refute.

          • Geo1metric

            I learned the definition of a “straw man argument in 8th grade. What I said stands.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are incapable of a rational argument.

            You are either ignorant of basic facts and the rules of logical reasoning, or you ignore them.

          • Geo1metric

            Are you taking a class in “logical reasoning” now? Or did you find a web site with lots of definitions like “Straw Man Argument”?

            You repeat the same posts over and over. And your “progressive” talking points are also boring. Anyone can “google” any subject and become an instant “internet expert”, and it’s obvious that that is exactly what you do. Boring.

            As I have stated before, this site caters to White advocates, not Republicans, democrats, or progressives. You seem to want to deflect every discussion into a discussion about how great democratic administrations are and have been and how terrible republican administrations are and have been, and oh how great FDR was and how he saved the country.

            I am a retired molecular bio-physicist. I have a Masters degree in bio-chemistry and a doctorate in physics. My IQ, though I hesitate to broach that subject, is high; I’ll leave it at that. I suspect, Mr. Engelman, that I have done more logical reasoning in my life than you can even imagine. I have traveled the world in my work capacity and lived among divers peoples for most of my adult life.

            I have also, informally, studied anthropology, and find it interesting, in some ways, more so than my professional career. Humans are infinitely variable. That, and my experience living in third-world countries, attracted me to this site, although I think I was born a race-realist. In my work and travels, I have always treated people with deference and respect regardless of their circumstances.

            I have an extensive private library consisting mostly of books about political philosophy, anthropology, geo-politics, and some texts in obscure areas of science. All of these areas interest me greatly. I read extensively.

            I come to this site, not to “win arguments”, show off my knowledge, or brag about how intelligent I am, but to enjoy pleasant conversation with like-minded people. It’s hard to find that anywhere else these days.

            I have also learned a lot from many on this site. You are not one of them.

            I disdain pretenders. I disdain polemics and pedants.

            “You are either ignorant of basic facts and the rules of logical reasoning, or you ignore them.” J.E.

            That is, to me, the hight of pretension.

          • JohnEngelman

            On an internet forum anyone can claim any number of distinctions.

            If you were as impressive as you claim I would expect you to be better informed and more civil. In addition, you would not get so angry when I draw attention to the intelligence and achievements of Jews and Orientals. Successful white Gentiles do not resent the success of successful people of other races.

            Moreover, you would find it easy to ignore what I post. You follow me around like a cur, biting at my heels. This is because I say things that you suspect are true, can’t refute, and do not want to be reminded.

          • Geo1metric

            And you can believe anything you wish; what you believe does not change reality.

            I try hard to ignore you. However, your ridiculous statements are hard to let pass without comment.

            In fact when you were recently absent from the site for a few days, I found it quite pleasant.

            Your writings don’t “anger” me. I would better describe it at astonishment.

            Again, I post here without reference to sourcing. You cannot find errors in my posts contrary to your accusation that I am uninformed.

            I’m through with you.

          • Geo1metric

            “If you were as impressive as you claim I would expect you to be better informed and more civil.”

            I am, and thank you for the compliment.

            I am also informed; I simply refuse to copy/post from the internet boring statistics which prove nothing.

            I don’t get “angry”; I am astounded by some of the things you post.

            “Successful white Gentiles do not resent the success of successful people of other races.”

            I have never expressed resentment of any others’ success.

            “Moreover, you would find it easy to ignore what I post. You follow me around like a cur, biting at my heels.”

            What you fail to notice is that I, in fact, do ignore much of what you post; nevertheless, I find it impossible to ignore your most egregious posts.

          • JohnEngelman

            I come to this site, not to “win arguments”, show off my knowledge, or brag about how intelligent I am, but to enjoy pleasant conversation with like-minded people.

            - Geo1metric

            If you want to reinforce your prejudices, you would probably be happier listening to the demagoguery of Rush Limbaugh.

          • Geo1metric

            I never listen to Limbaugh; he does not express my views.

          • Terra Magnum Imperium

            Hey John E I guess you are a fan of Keynesian Economics…

          • JohnEngelman

            You bet I agree with Keynesian economics.

          • http://saberpoint.blogspot.com/ Stogie Chomper

            You are well versed in Democrat talking points and self-delusions, but not so much in common sense and economics.

          • JohnEngelman

            It is easier to say that than it is to demonstrate it. I document my factual assertions. My detractors blow hot air.

          • DrEvil007

            You provide links to others who are just as wrong as you and who misunderstand basic economics and misunderstand history. Government consumes wealth, the private sector creates wealth. Under the system you believe in the government consumes more and more wealth, leaving less for the private sector to utilize for growth which always results in stagnant economies. More links supporting the same disproven ideas is not documentation which will convince anyone who understands economics and who has an understanding of economics.

          • Strike_Team

            Trolls document opinions, fables, lies and belch them endlessly, everywhere. The old big lie method, accredited to Hitler but actually part and parcel of the very lifestyle of the usual suspects in all dealings, whether it’s business, politics, personal relationships or anything else.

          • JohnEngelman

            I post facts. You post cliches. If what I say is mistaken, why am I able to document assertions by quoting The Wall Street Journal, and Forbes, among other sources?

          • Geo1metric

            Wikipedia is not exactly an authoritative source. It’s ridiculous to think so.

          • JohnEngelman

            I usually prefer other sources of data, especially those I find on American Renaissance.

            Why is it necessary for me to keep pointing that out again and again?

          • Geo1metric

            “Why is it necessary for me to keep pointing that out again and again?”

            It isn’t necessary so stop it.

          • JohnEngelman

            Stop denying the truths about race realism that I post.

          • Geo1metric

            I don’t recall ever denying any “truth” that you have posted.

          • thomasdosborneii

            North Korea, Cuba, Zimbabwe, these are some of the paradises that await your residency. Not quite sure why you aren’t there, now…or ARE you?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            John would obviously shun Cuba, and especially a Bantu hell on earth like Zimbabwe. As far as North Korea, he would want to see a democratic government enabling people there to have the quality of life their Oriental Brethren in South Korea and Japan enjoy.

          • thomasdosborneii

            LOL! You bet you do, all that wasteful spending of misbegotten loot. The government is a parasite but such parasites love Keynes because he showed them the way to greater totalitarianism.

          • Geo1metric

            Keynes was certainly a popular economist, and most of the Western countries enthusiastically followed the economic “suggestions” he outlined in his GENERAL THEORY.

            Virtually all Western countries who followed his “theories”, however, like America, are now in dire economic straits.

            The reason for this is that Keynesian theory was proven to be rubbish.

            Henry Hazlitt demolishes Keynesian economics as a viable system and shows that it leads to dead-end socialist systems unable to sustain a population at even marginally comfortable levels. Worse, Keynesian economics destroys any incentive for people to work at all.

            And no, I am not going to explain Hazlitt’s thesis. To learn something about it, you too must read the book.

          • Geo1metric

            Keynes was certainly a popular economist, and most of the Western countries enthusiastically followed the economic “suggestions” he outlined in his GENERAL THEORY.

            Virtually all Western countries who followed his “theories”, however, like America, are now in dire economic straits.

            The reason for this is that Keynesian theory was proven to be rubbish.

            Henry Hazlitt demolishes Keynesian economics as a viable system and shows that it leads to dead-end socialist systems unable to sustain a population at even marginally comfortable levels. Worse, Keynesian economics destroys any incentive for people to work at all.

            And no, I am not going to explain Hazlitt’s thesis. To learn something about it, you too must read the book, THE FAILURE OF MODERN ECONOMICS.

          • https://twitter.com/davidjkramer DavidKramer

            There was no country left with an industrial sector following the war. THAT is what dug us out of the GD. Geez you lefties are insane.

          • DrEvil007

            Twenty years of pent up demand from consumers who suffered from shortages during the Great Depression and WWII. And having virtually no competition for American exports.

          • BrutalTruth

            So, your whole premise here is stealing from someone is justifiable? Sorry, but your rationalizing immoral actions to try to support other moral actions. It doesn’t work and never will.

            Forget a moment about outcomes and focus on doing the right thing at all times. Decisions have consequences. You may see a short term improvement, but it is usually based upon lies and will not endure. By it’s very definition it cannot.

          • JohnEngelman

            There is a difference between stealing and taxing. Currently in the United States there is a broad consensus that taxes on the rich should increase.

            The economic policies of the New Deal lead to a broadly based economic expansion that continued until the OPEC Oil Boycott of 1973.

            Republicans blame the stagflation that followed on Keynesian economic policies, which they never liked. The stagflation was caused by a significant rise in the price of petroleum caused by the OPEC Oil Embargo, and the Iranian Revolution of 1979.

            Keynesian economic policies were not designed to deal with a shortage of an essential natural resource, but chronically low demand. During the Great Depression inflation was not a problem. Deflation was.

            Republicans refuse to acknowledge the role the increase in the quantity and price of petroleum played in the stagflation of the 1970′s for three reasons. They never liked Keynesian economic policies. They do not want to admit that foreigners they dislike have considerable control over the U.S. economy. They do not want to admit that America’s dependence on automobile transportation is a national problem.

          • BrutalTruth

            John, you just proved my point for me. I always go out of my way to show my appreciation when someone does me such a good deed. Thank you very much.

          • JohnEngelman

            Your thanks are gratuitous, because I have done nothing to help your argument.

            You make me think of a saying I have found on the Internet, “Arguing with a fool is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon will knock over your pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like he is victorious.”

          • Strike_Team

            The trolls are so self-absorbed they can’t grasp the truth or see when they’ve been trapped. Good job in getting one to fill a post by repeating the same belief twice in one post – a post that was a panic filled attempt to counter you that merely ended up verifying what you stated in the first place.

          • Geo1metric

            Explain the difference between taxation and stealing.

          • JohnEngelman

            Taxation is legal.

            ———–

            Constitution of the United States

            Article I, Section 2 Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States…

            Section 8 The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes…

            Sixteenth Amendment The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

          • Geo1metric

            Everyone knows that, but did you know that anything can be made “legal”. It is still, at essence, the taking, by force, of private property.

            Read some Lysander Spooner; Oh I forgot, you only read what is on Wikipedia. But, even Wikipedia may have something about Spooner.

            Internet experts are tiresome.

          • JohnEngelman

            As I have pointed out on many occasions, much of what I post on American Renaissance consists of articles I have found here, and articles that have been written by those who have spoken at American Renaissance conferences.

            Your refusal to acknowledge that is tiresome.

          • Geo1metric

            I pick and choose. At some point discernment enters the picture.

            I might also remind you that Amren and those who may have spoken at Amren conferences are not the “last word”.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Taxation is when we have services to show for our tax dollars. It becomes stealing when Negroes and Mestizoes exploit our safety net.

          • running_riot

            The oil problems in the 1970s were caused almost entirely by price controls. The prices were rising for many months prior to the oil embargo.

            I’d like Keynesian policies better if the government actually followed them. They always leave out the “save during good times” that was part of Keynes’ theory.

          • JohnEngelman

            Republicans are greater offenders than Democrats. During the rather mild economic recoveries that happened during the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush they claimed that “tax cuts work,” and kept tax rates low when they should have raised taxes.

          • running_riot

            Of course, spending problems are best handled by more taxation and not less spending.

            I’m sorry, what is it exactly that you don’t like about obama?

          • JohnEngelman

            Obama is incompetent. Right after his inauguration his approval rating was about 65 percent. That was when had the clout to raise taxes on the well to do and use the money to reduce unemployment. Instead he forced through a health plan most Americans do not like.

            Before Franklin Roosevelt moved on the signature and durable reforms he introduced policies that reduced unemployment. That gave him the economic credibility to do more.

          • thomasdosborneii

            The difference between taxing and stealing is that those who do the taxing don’t go to prison for their stealing.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is because they are democratically elected officials.

          • MikeofAges

            The world war ended the Depression. Up to that point, the economy improved but society never fully emerged from the Depression. I often have pointed that the only time we have had full employment was when our population was 130 million, we were fighting a world war on three fronts, supplying three major allies and had 10 million or more white men between the ages of 18 and 40 removed from the civilian workforce.

            After the world war, many veterans had extreme difficulties establishing themselves economically. If the birthrate had not been low during the 1930, the younger people coming up might have been hired ahead of them and they might never have establish themselves.

            The postwar prosperity of our nostalgic remembrance did not become established until the mid-1950s. It ended around 1970, with deindustrialization and the rise of the Rust Bowl. Some have never recovered.

            Any recoveries since then have been “booms” and “bubbles”. The motif today is not for most people a stable career. Corporate practice today is to hire people, usually young workers, under the rubric of “diversity”. These people, if they are lucky enough to get hired in the first place, and often it is the luck of being the right age at the right time, will be used for a few years and then set adrift. The way companies do it is eliminating entire departments and facilities, and reestablishing them elsewhere with a new cohort of young worker. You’ve lived in the vicinity of Silicon Valley for a long time. You should know the routine.

          • JohnEngelman

            Military spending and employment is government spending and employment. If the money spent on World War II had been spent on domestic programs the benefits to the economy would have been greater.

            I agree that employers have become increasingly predatory toward their employees.

            When Henry Ford opened his assembly line factories he paid twice the going rate for factory work. He explained his policy this way, “I want my workers to be able to buy the cars they make.”

            That attitude has faded among the employer class. Now employers try to get as much work as possible from their employees for as little pay as necessary.

            The buzzwords they use are “down sizing” and “cost cutting.” They would rather reduce the number of their employees than increase the number of their customers.

            The Republican Party likes a fairly high degree of unemployment, because it relieves employers of the need to compete for employees. That is why there have usually been more jobs created per year under Democratic presidents.

          • r j p

            Ford paid twice the going rate to try to keep unions out, he also hired negroes, whom he despised, for the exact same reason as the unions at the time did not allow negro membership.

          • http://www.bannedofbrothers.com/ RickZ

            The Great Depression only ended with the onset of WWII. The Government ‘priming the pump’ in the ’30s did diddly squat, although we did get some cool dams out of it, unlike today where Government spending is throwing money down the toilet. We’ve spent, between the States and Federal governments, upwards of $4-5B (that’s billion, with a ‘b’) on 404Care. Based upon those numbers, it would have been far cheaper for the Government to give every citizen (around 320 million of us) $1M to buy our own insurance and for the Government to stay the hell out of the process. But that’s not an argument President If You Like Your Plan will ever debate.

            Today’s liberals are not liberal at all, but progressive totalitarians seeking to control others in a way that’s been tried many times before, and which all ended in failure. Progressives are nothing if not diligent in their drive to fail.

          • JohnEngelman

            Progressives are nothing if not diligent in their drive to fail.

            - RickZ

            The vast majority of Americans approve of inter racial marriage. Since 1980 the percentage of Americans marrying people of other races has more than doubled. A growing percent of Americans favor socialism. Is that what you call “failing?”

          • http://www.bannedofbrothers.com/ RickZ

            Progressives are nothing more than communists with a new moniker. Communism is a failed ideology. But you knew that, didn’t you?

          • Geo1metric

            You should stay away from economics; your red skirt is showing.

          • JohnEngelman

            What did I say that is not true?

          • running_riot

            To become an eternal superpower, the US need only increase their government spending by a factor of about 100. And if that doesn’t make every citizen filthy rich, try a factor of 1000.

            100% tax rate on everyone won’t quite cover that, but once the returns roll in, who will complain?

          • Geo1metric

            He and Harry Dexter White were both communists. FDR was the worst thing to happen to America. And I don’t care how many times he was elected.

          • IstvanIN

            Economies do not turn around over night. They are like large ships. You can start the turn but the effects don’t show up until much later. The terrible damage caused by Clinton and Bush is showing up now. the even more severe damage caused by Sotero will show up during his retirement.

          • JohnEngelman

            During the Clinton years we had low inflation, low unemployment, and eventually budget surpluses.

            GW turned things around by starting two expensive wars he could not win while cutting taxes, especially for the rich.

          • http://mysteresmoonbatslayerclub.blogspot.com/ mystere

            You have a very good point here IstvanIN. I was working a media event in 2008, and heard Israel’s first Army General Shimon Erem tell the crowd that America’s worst president ever was Jimmy Carter. General Erem mentioned a long list of things Carter did which we were now reaping the consequences for, among them, the high price of fuel. As General Erem mentioned the laundry list of Carter’s blunders, it brought back memories of things I read in the newspapers in 1978-80 when I was a Register paperboy. General Erem and some ex Muslims Walid Shoebat (ex Muslim terrorist) and ex Muslim author Nonie Darweesh confirmed that Muslim Terrorists made huge inroads into terrorizing the world, thanks to Jimmy Carter destroying 30 years of ground intelligence during his presidency. General Erem stated that Carter continues to interfere with his successors by going on visits to other nations, hurting foreign policy. Even Bill Clinton had suffered under one of Carter’s escapades during his terms as President. A huge part of GW Bush’s economic policy suffered from Carter’s past blunders, and Barack 0bama is piling onto Carter’s blunders, which we will suffer from in the next few decades.

      • JohnEngelman

        From 1921 to 2000 Republican presidents were in the White House for forty years. Democrat presidents were in the White House for the other forty years.

        According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the per capita gross domestic product in 1996 dollars grew over twice as much under Democratic presidents.

        • JP Rushton

          Praise Obama!

          Those Democrats were only successful because of the Republicans before them.

          You should let Obama know of this information so he can further confirm what he is saying.

          • JohnEngelman

            More jobs were created per year under Jimmy Carter than Ronald Reagan.

          • JP Rushton

            All hail Gerald Ford then! Man, these Republican presidents were sure good for the economy.

          • JohnEngelman

            When Gerald Ford was president an average of 745,000 jobs were created every year. Under Jimmy Carter this rose to 2,600,000 jobs created per year. Under Ronald Reagan this declined to 2,000,000 jobs created per year. Under George H.W. Bush this declined further to 625,000 jobs per year. Under Bill Clinton it rose to 2,900,000 jobs per year, only to decline to 375,000 under George W. Bush.

            These statistics came from an article on The Wall Street Journal blog that was dated Jan 9, 2009.

          • JP Rushton

            Wait, are you calling Obama a liar? Is the economy Obama’s fault or Bush’s?

          • JohnEngelman

            A little of both. The Republicans in Congress have contributed too.

            President Obama’s chief mistake was to force through a health plan most Americans do not like before introducing programs that were effective in increasing employment.

            When Franklin Roosevelt was inaugurated he substantially raised taxes on the well to do, and expanded government employment. Unemployment declined 1.9 percent. Democratic majorities increased in both houses of government, giving Roosevelt more power to deal with the Great Depression.

          • Tarczan

            So I guess we have to rethink our perception that the 1930′s were an era of economic depression? That must be why they were singing “Happy Days are here Again”.

          • JohnEngelman

            Life for most Americans began to improve almost as soon as Franklin Roosevelt was inaugurated in 1933. That is why he was reelected three times. It is why Republicans have never been able to repeal the signature reforms of the New Deal.

          • will249fyi

            Then why isn’t obamas term helping in the employment issue ? He said that vision was to be lasered in on unemployment . Yet he also stated that the shovel ready jobs were not really shovel ready . So it failed ? Yet unemployment has not ! Because he wasted the bulk of the money on administrative cost production payrolls and only a small fraction went to the labour force and the actual work to be implemented . All these presidents that you so profoundly claim to to have CREATED jobs is false . You’re telling me that a bill that someone else creates ? To be heaped upon the future of this nation’s children is fair ? How ,when these futurist humans have yet to be born in a society that now has said if your work harder you will succeed . Here’s the catch 22 ? But oh, your rate of success will never equal that of the past ? Because past generations limited your allotted lifetime-wealth by regulating how much time you are permitted to collect in your-new-founded- supposive-success ?

          • JohnEngelman

            Barack Obama is an incompetent affirmative action beneficiary. He loses to Republicans on issues where public opinion is on his side.

            I want Democratic politicians who can win decisively on election day, and then go on to out think and out maneuver the Republicans.

          • Tarczan

            You should read “The Forgotten Man” by Amity Shales. The forgotten man was the poor guy who had to pay for all the nonsense programs of FDR, like killing hogs to raise farm prices while people were going hungry. WWII ended the depression.

            This is one of those things that we disagree on and can’t be resolved. We look at the same data and draw different conclusions. I just don’t see how anyone can say the 1930′s were an era of growth, my parents told me it was terrible.You probably believe Paul Krugman when he says inflation is good for the economy.

          • running_riot

            Roosevelt used make-work projects to “reduce” unemployment. And those projects, not surprisingly, benefited his own interests, disproportionately.
            Obama could reduce the unemployment rate to zero if he hired all unemployed people to work for the government.

          • JohnEngelman

            One of those projects was the Civilian Conservation Corps. It planted trees, and built parks and roads.

            In 18 April 1936 a Gallup Survey indicated that 82 percent of the American people supported CCC.

            John Maynard Keynes’s insight was that demand had stabilized at a permanently low level. To raise demand, anything that turned unemployed people into consumers was good for the economy.

          • running_riot

            If they would have hired thirty million more people they could have had more parks and roads!

            Think of how great the economy would have been if they would have created that many more consumers! Why was Roosevelt so stingy with free money? It’s free, after all. Right?

            Better yet, why not just raise the minimum wage to, say, fifty dollars an hour? Think of all the money that would have entered the economy!

          • http://mysteresmoonbatslayerclub.blogspot.com/ mystere

            Things began to improve because Hoover took steps during his tenure to get the ball rolling. Hoover may have gotten the blame, but if you look at the trends, America has a 70-80 year cycle of crashes to recover from. 2008 was spot on for the crash. Also, George Soros played a role in causing the crash. On the day of the crash, Henry Paulson and his team saw a huge electronic transfer of funds going to a Swiss bank account. Paulson and his team tried to intercept it, but found the transfer was encrypted, and couldn’t crack the code. Paulson spoke about this, months later, when he got interviewed. This was the “October Surprise” the Democrats spoke about during 0bama’s 2008 campaign for President. Soros decided to launch it early when John McCain was ahead in the polls. Soros continues to profit off the misery of others.

          • MikeofAges

            A friend of mine calls him George “Goldfinger” Soros. Comme d’habitude, life imitates art.

          • MikeofAges

            The problem with the health plan is that it is incoherent. Universal health care, or nearly so without a means of paying for it established. A “mandate” which, if it actually was a mandate, would be unconstitutional, or so the Supreme Court thought 8-1. The court correctly identified the mandate as a tax operating much like the social security tax. That was why they found the law constitutional. The basis on which the court promulgated the ruling made it not exactly a constitutional precedent. But it is still good advice. The primary power of the federal government is the power to tax and spend.

            I can tell you in three sentences how to establish universal health care. Have a payroll tax levied in the same was as social security, first dollar to last. Give employers who provide a health benefit a credit against the tax. Use the money you raise, along with some general revenue, to buy everyone else a policy. Not hard, is it?

            The advantages of a system organized on this basis are considerable. I don’t want to detail them, except to note that those on the high end get to keep what they have, while employers lose their incentive to hire only part time help.

          • JohnEngelman

            What you advocate is similar to the Canadian single payer health plan. That is popular in Canada.

          • MikeofAges

            Absolutely not. Universal health insurance. Not sat all the same thing a single payer. although both are tax-based systems of universal health care.

            The law passed by congress is an abomination, in my opinion. It is not quite universal, lacks a coherent funding mechanism, and attacks the private insurance system without replacing it.

            If you want universal health care, either you have to have single payer or universal health insurance. Not much middle ground. I;m on the side of universal health insurance, not single payer.

            The president violated rule number 1 in the Machiavelli playbook. If you are going to do something unpalatable, do it all at once and you only have to deal with one s-storm. But he had little choice but to sign the bill congress created. The bill was based on the Senate version. The House passed its own bill, which was somewhat better in my estimation, but the Senate by that time could not have voted on it.

          • JohnEngelman

            ROCHESTER, N.Y. – August 12, 2009 – As members of Congress return to their states and districts to debate

            the merits of the Democrats’ proposals for health care reform, critics of the proposals may repeat the phrase

            used by some Republicans, newspaper editorials and bloggers that ‘the American health care system is the

            envy of the world.”

            If so, they should read the results of a recent Harris/Decima poll in Canada that found a 10-to-1 majority of

            Canadians believed their system was “superior” to the U.S. system. They might also note that a 70% majority of

            Canadians thought their system was “performing well”; and that a majority favored an expansion of public sector

            health care (i.e., “government-run” health care in the current debate) over private sector health care.

          • MikeofAges

            Still changing the subject. Do you understand the difference between single payer, tax-based universal health insurance, true socialized medicine and a so-called “mandate” based system. Also, do you understand that the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding the Affordable Care Act (i.e. Obamacare) was based on the idea that the “mandate” actually constituted an income tax?

          • JohnEngelman

            What matters is that every country with socialized medicine prefers it to the American system.

          • JohnEngelman

            Obamacare is nearly the same as Romneycare. Romneycare is popular in Massachusetts.

          • MikeofAges

            Changing the subject again? Or are you arguing that, if you want to create all-time universal healthcare, the middle ground of the mandate system is superior to either form of a tax-based system?

          • Peter Connor

            I highly doubt it, since those numbers are wildly wrong.

          • JohnEngelman

            What are the correct numbers? Document your assertions.

          • Peter Connor

            Give me a cite for your crazy numbers. Anyone can look this stuff up in 2 minutes.

          • JohnEngelman

            In 1932 the unemployment rate was 23.6. In 1934 it was 21.7. In 1936, when FDR was reelected in a landslide it was 16.9.

            My source for those assertions is the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Peter, I hope you have a lot of time on your hands. With Engelman, you can expect to go around and around for a long time and never arrive at your destination. He lives for this stuff.

          • JohnEngelman

            By the way, I have frequently quoted J. Philippe Rushton in order to explain my admiration for Orientals. Race realism is not the same as white supremacy, or white nationalism.

          • JP Rushton

            “Race realism is not the same as white supremacy, or white nationalism.”

            Sweet, thanks for the explanation! All this time I thought Rushton was secretly carrying out Klan meetings!

            I’m a long time Amren visitor and commenter. It’s good to delete your account once in a while, helps to keep people from being able to dox you.

          • trouble maker

            How many of those jobs created under Jimmy Carter were paid for by tax dollars.

          • JohnEngelman

            Not as many as the number of jobs created under Ronald Reagan. Government employment increased under Reagan because the military expanded. Unfortunately, much of the increase in pay checks was paid for with borrowed money.

          • running_riot

            You give far too much credence to political party and position in job creation.

            You lay off 10,000 in the third quarter, make your fourth quarter income look great, then rehire them at lower pay and benefits. Behold, 10,000 jobs created!

            A decade from now the wonks will tell us that obama created x number of jobs, and will say nothing about the fact that the 2nd largest employer in the USA at the time was Kelly Services, staffing agency for temp and part time workers.

        • Peter Connor

          Apart from deficit spending, book cooking and bad loans, Democrats also got us into 3 major wars in this period, which led (according to government economists) to lots of “GDP” that was promptly destroyed in the wars.

          • JohnEngelman

            Deficit spending increased under President Reagan.

      • JohnG911

        I totally disagree because America’s economy grew in spite of demoncrat presidents – not because of them! FDR’s economic policies were a complete disaster and he prolonged America’s Great Depression long after Europe came out of it. WWII saved America’s economy from FDR’s progressive stupidity. Jimmy Carter was also a complete disaster too and Reagan saved us from Carter’s economy. Americans quickly realized Bill Clinton was an idiot and that’s why Republicans won a Congressional landslide victory 2 years in to his presidency. Republican policies saved us from Clinton. Just as American oil production is growing today in spite of Obama’s efforts to destroy it.

    • Peter Connor

      Democrats spend debt money and make bad loans, Republicans get to clean up the mess at the cost of recession. Democrats also cook the books.

      • JohnEngelman

        You keep forgetting that Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt, and that Bill Clinton paid off part of it.

        • Geo1metric

          Neither statement is true. The House controls the purse strings. Yes, I know the president has to sign the bills.

          • JohnEngelman

            The presidential administration composes the budget and presents it to Congress. Congress adds and subtracts, and returns it to the president who can sign the budget or veto it.

            Regardless of what the Constitution says, the system has evolved to that the president plays the leading role. Every one of Reagan’s budgets arrived at Congress with a huge deficit built into it.

          • Geo1metric

            The administrations present a budget, true. Except that the Oblabla administration has not done so for the past five years until, IIRC, this year. Nevertheless, the House produces the budget, conference committee, until deal is struck.

            This is Civics 101; you must have cut class that day.

          • https://twitter.com/davidjkramer DavidKramer

            Liar. Not one Obama budget got more than 1 vote. What are you going to lie about next? The House creates the budgets. They can incorporate the president’s bill or not. Why do you have to lie to debate? It is because your side of the argument is wrong? Oh yes, yes it is.

          • JohnEngelman

            If I lie, why do I have such an easy time substantiating my arguments with material I have found on American Renaissance?

        • Peter Connor

          No he didn’t, he robbed the SS Trust Fund, among other things. Republicans kept him from enacting some spending programs too.

        • SandyToesSC

          He paid the debt by robbing the social security trust fund. That is the democrat party’s way. Rob Peter to Pay Paul.

        • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

          I keep telling you that spending bills originate in the US House of Representatives.

          • JohnEngelman

            The way it really works is that the presidential administration composes a budget and presents it to Congress. Congress adds and subtracts sends it back to the President who can sign it or veto it.

            Every one of Reagan’s budgets arrived at Congress with a huge budget deficit built into it.

    • Andy

      I don’t like the Republicans’ financial policies, but they aren’t quite as quick to leap into social idiocy.

      • JohnEngelman

        What you say is true. Race wrecked liberalism.

    • Terra Magnum Imperium

      Maybe but Democrats before the 60′s had many realist and even some racist beliefs also since WW2 the democrats held the majority in congress until 1995 near the end of President Clinton 1st term and during Clintons 2nd term the Republicans won and controlled both house and senate this and an era of economic growth.

      • JohnEngelman

        That economic growth came to an end when GW started two expensive wars he could not win while cutting taxes for the rich.

        • http://mysteresmoonbatslayerclub.blogspot.com/ mystere

          George Soros played a part in the economic destruction along with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

          • JohnEngelman

            Please explain how they did that in your own words, using the internet only to substantiate factual assertions.

    • running_riot

      Yes, and China’s unemployment rate is zero, and their economic growth is unparalleled. Another liberal success story.
      North Korea’s democracy has an extremely engaged electorate; the last election showed a 100% turnout.
      Iran
      is devoted to clean, carbon-friendly energy such that they are willing
      to earn the ire of their enemies by acquiring plutonium for their energy
      independence initiatives.
      Gun crimes in the UK are down several thousand percent since the 1950s.
      Muslim countries’ population control efforts have paid big dividends.
      Detroit’s debt has been reduced 75% in the last year, under Democratic rule.

    • throttler

      Why can’t you stay on the subject? This article was very interesting, and I would like to see comments about it, not about economic growth.

  • JP Rushton

    I enjoyed this article thoroughly.

    Everyone who has worked around blacks for long enough tends to notice how different they are from other populations.

    I also don’t care about the government giving money to people who need food, shelter, etc. I just wish the money only went to my kin and not every third worlder who can cross a river.

    • Rhialto

      He told me what I suspected-what too many blacks say about the suffering of others: “What do I care? She ain’t me. She ain’t kin. Don’t even know her.”

      I must agree with the Black thug on this point. The set of people that I care about is larger, but I consider the Liberal position of concern for “All Mankind” decadent and self-destructive.

      • trouble maker

        In the Military during the Vietnam War I learned firsthand that many Blacks were insensitive towards the suffering of others , when they would respond to my attempts to help others by saying (what do you care) .

      • Andy

        We have increasing duties (and, for those of us who are mentally healthy, increasing concern) for life as it becomes more similar to us. We would not crush an ant for the fun of it; we would help out a bird or rodent if it didn’t take much effort, we would save an elephant or an ape if we could safely do so, and we would put considerable effort into protecting another human. That principle does not disappear as we pass the species line. I care most for my parents, siblings, and nephews (I do not yet have a husband or children of my own), then for my extended family, then for my very extended family (the descendents of early British and Germanic settlers of America), then for NW Europeans, other Europeans, peoples of western Asia and northern Africa, Amerindians and Orientals, and finally groups like Aborigines and sub-Saharans. I would certainly feel sympathy for a black shopkeeper attacked by thugs, but God and nature ordain that we nurture, provide for, and protect our own blood before strangers. If we can foreign peoples real help without neglecting our duties to our own children and brothers, I’m all for it. However, I’m not convinced we can, especially as long as we keep up the pretense that all the Congolese need is an internet connection (or worse, a trip to France).

    • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

      With all due respect, Mr Rushton, I DO care about the U.S. government giving money to people for food and shelter. This simply isn’t the role or function of government as envisioned by our founders since it inevitably leads to the very bloated welfare state that we see today.

      Moreover, giving to those in need is the role of private charity organizations as well as private individuals. The minute the government sticks its fat nose in this realm, there are always abuses.

      In principle I agree with you that if the government is going to give money to people for food and shelter, I at least want its recipients to be those who are of my own kin as opposed to the Mexican invaders and every third-world peasant who happens to arrive on our shores.

    • Hal K

      I guess the moderators don’t mind if someone assumes the identity of a dead person.

  • Tarczan

    This is the type of article I enjoy most on Amren. It’s funny and it reinforces my beliefs.

  • daasdasd23123123

    Interesting article, but I was surprised from the outset by how you described black and hispanic differences- hispanics mainly involved in sex crimes against children and DUI, and blacks involved in few sex crimes. And at the same time, hispanics much more amicable and stable than blacks. That does not square with much of the rest of the country, even if hispanic crime rates and general social pathology are considerably lower than that of blacks.

    Then again, I always think of the level of barbarism and sadism many hispanic gangs and cartels exhibit in latin america, or when they come out here, the kind of stuff you usually see in african warzones (and at the same time, behavior that even american blacks don’t often exhibit.)

    • Nancy Thomas

      Uh….come to Los Angeles. The jails are FILLED with Hispanics.
      20,000 hit and runs per year.
      TWENTY THOUSAND.
      Drunk illegals.
      And yes, they can’t keep their hands off of kids.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        Unless they are cut off literally………

      • daasdasd23123123

        You misinterpreted what I wrote. I’m saying I found it surprising that he found hispanics mainly involved in DUI’s and sex crimes against children, when it’s clear, nationwide, they’re involved in much more than that. And blacks committing few sex crimes? Yeah, that’s just… you know.

        • trouble maker

          In North Carolina there is a group named NCFIRE which emails the names of illegal aliens arrested each month by the county where they were arrested. There are 2000 DWI and approximately 100 child molestation cases each month in this state, and then comes the drug offenses which are third, with the theft charges bringing up the rear.

        • silviosilver

          It isn’t clear that the rate at which they’re involved in those other criminal activities is notably higher than that of whites. The sensational nature of some hispanic criminal activities obscures the fact that they are not an outrageously high crime population in the USA – not remotely in the class of blacks.

  • Nancy Thomas

    A liberal? Maybe he is still in denial?
    90% of interracial crime is black on white crime.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes

    I have a theory about why blacks commit very few sex crimes, or seem to commit very few sex crimes.

    40 year old white man is found on top of 13 year old white girl in a suburban bedroom. Cops get called. End result is that a white man is facing a crime of a sex charge, and if he doesn’t have enough money to hire his own lawyer, he will have a PD like Michael Smith. 40 year old black man is found on top of a 13 year old black girl in a ghetto hovel bedroom. No cops are called, must not snitch, just two people doin dey thang and keepin it real. Besides, the cops are too busy drawing chalk lines in the street. Therefore, the 40 year old black man committing a sex crime never gets charged with a sex crime. A lot of black committed sex crimes run under the radar of official legal system consciousness because of black insouciance and overworked cops.

    I bet a lot of the blacks that Michael Smith have defended actually have committed sex crimes.

    As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people, but are so poor they must turn to crime to survive.

    It’s like Puggg said about a story out of Pittsburgh where three blacks raped and robbed a white nun, if poverty caused crime, the nun would have raped and robbed the three blacks, who have more money and wealth than her.

    Even the news reports of the very crimes I dealt with in court were slanted. Television news intentionally leaves out unflattering facts about the accused, and sometimes omits names that are obviously black.

    Watch out for the obligatory black reporter or anchor. If the details are vague, but a black anchor and/or black reporter is doing the story, that’s a deliberate media counterbalance to the truth that the doers/suspects are black.

    Black men often try to trip me up and challenge my knowledge of the law or the facts of the case.

    That’s because they think that since they read a few pages out of a law book in the jail house library, this all of a sudden makes them as good as someone with a JD.

    Most criminal cases do not go to trial. Often the evidence against the accused is overwhelming, and the chances of conviction are high. The defendant is better off with a plea bargain: pleading guilty to a lesser charge and getting a lighter sentence.

    This is why so many blacks are doing such long bits for “drug crimes,” because drug crimes are often the plea bargain fodder. But don’t try to explain that to black militants and white libertarians.

    When a client is sentenced, I often beg for mercy on the grounds that the defendant did not have a father and never had a chance in life.

    My father was, as a matter of his own choice the day of my birth, nothing more than a sperm donor. Yet somehow I know better, that there is right and there is wrong.

    I have often tracked down the man’s father–in jail

    And that should tell you something.

    When I learn that my 19-year-old defendant does not work or go to school

    As if he could be a productive employee or learn anything anyway. Like Mr. Smith says earlier, they’re mostly all stuck back in the third grade in mind.

    From time to time the media report that although blacks are 12 percent of the population they are 40 percent of the prison population. This is supposed to be an outrage that results from unfair treatment by the criminal justice system.

    I’m convinced if the CJ system was truly fair, it would be way more than 40%. The reality is that the modern CJ system does everything it can to keep black men out of prison.

    I am a liberal.

    For God’s sake man, why? What’s it going to take?

    My experience has taught me that we live in a nation in which a jury is more likely to convict a black defendant who has committed a crime against a white.

    Maybe there’s a good logical non-diabolical reason for that, because of the brutality of the nature of black on white crimes, even above and beyond the brutal nature of blacks when they commit crime against other blacks.

    I do not know the solution to this problem.

    I do, but they’re mostly taboo. Read this, and you’ll realize that certain Constitutional protections that white people created for white people shouldn’t apply to blacks. And that’s only for starters.

    Most of the rest of this article is an endorsement of HBD, or confirmation of what we have noticed about blacks our whole coherent lives.

    • 48224

      I developed the same theory on my own. Oprah has talked about how her uncles used to molest her, sounds like they shared her. Cops were never called.

    • Rurik

      Channon Christian is unavailable for comment.

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      Many black men also rape adult black women, but those women rarely report it to police. They can’t be seen “snitchin’ on they brothas”.

      The only times black men really have to worry about being reported is if they rape a white woman, and even then they will have the entire political system of the United States on their side, since white women have “white privilege” and their black male rapists don’t.

    • JP Rushton

      You might be on to something about the sex crimes.

      Something like statutory rape requires the victim to come forward and snitch, something that isn’t going to happen in the black community.

      I also think like you said, the fact that they have to deal with crimes like murder on a daily basis means that something like a 30 year old having sex with a 16 year old just isn’t something they are going to care about.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        Incest and molestation among blacks is something else more common than anyone cares to admit. You wonder why potty mouth blacks like to throw around the accusations of incest and being inbred around flippantly, maybe it’s because so many of them are.

        Consider this: A lot of black women have x number of children by y number of men, in some instances, she may not be sure exactly which man fathered this or that kid of hers. A lot of black men nave x number of kids by y number of women, he may not even be aware that he has some of the kids that he does.

        Then consider blacks’ propensity to stick around in a relatively small geographical area.

        Put these things together, and what do you get? Girl meets guy in a run down hole in the wall that’s called a black night club, hits the sack, and they may very well be first cousins and not even know it and may never be able to find out for sure.

        • JP Rushton

          Oh man, I’ve actually thought of this same exact theory.

          The number of blacks who have babies with their half-siblings and cousins has to be astronomically high. How can you know who your cousins and half-siblings are if you don’t know your dad?

          But I think that is part of the reason why the moms give their kids such unique (read: awful) names. This helps a little bit in figuring out who you are related to. But it’s most likely just part of the ghetto culture.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            I don’t give blacks that much credit for strategic thinking. You were right to chalk it up to ghetto mentality.

            There is the theory that Afrocentrists advance that the unique/awful names came from slavery. A mother would give her newborn child a unique name, sort of like deuterium in the water, because she knew the kid would eventually be sold away to someone relatively far away. Therefore, when plantation gossip got around about the various slaves, when the gossip got around to this one individual, she would know it was her son or daughter because he or she would be the only person with that first name. The problem with that theory is twofold: One, again, blacks aren’t that strategic, and two, it happens not to be true: Enslaved blacks gave themselves common names.

            If anything, black mothers coming up with outlandish names for their newborn children today is I think a subconscious admission on the part of a new ghetto mother that this is her only shot in life to do something special. That’s a theory that someone here in AR advanced a long time ago, and the more I see, the more I think it’s plausible.

  • DudeWheresMyCountry?

    What is funny is that if you listen to almost all Blacks and most lefties they will spout the usual dribble about how almost all Africans in jail are victims of White racism or crooked courts. They refuse to see reality. They refuse to see the truth. If they had a shred of humanity they would be concerned with trying to fix Black criminal behaviors, trying to get at the problem to prevent it’s prevalence in the future… they would have an inkling of shame. They don’t care about fixing anything nor do they care about the victims. This is why I don’t care in the least about them. You get what you give.

  • Sick of it

    “This inability to see things from someone else’s perspective helps
    explain why there are so many black criminals. They do not understand
    the pain they are inflicting on others.”

    They do understand, they just don’t care.

    Also, I dispute his pro-Hispanic comments, having had a LOT of contact with them in Texas. They hop on welfare just like blacks.

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      It is very true that Hispanics love to leech off welfare. But they do tend to also work, whether above-board or under the table, at the same time, while blacks will avoid doing any kind of work, even if they could keep their welfare while working.

      There’s also the other pattern of Hispanic women going on welfare and pretending to be singe moms (to get higher payments), while their husbands or baby daddies work in the fields or in construction and bring home paychecks the moms fail to report to the welfare office.

      Hispanics are taking a lot more from the public coffers than they are putting back in, but they are more likely to work than blacks.

      • Sick of it

        Yes, but just about anyone is more likely to work than the average black. I used to live by numerous young Hispanic men and women who just sat at home and went on siesta every single day, courtesy of our tax dollars.

    • JP Rushton

      Since Hispanics cover such a wide range of races, the Hispanics he deals with might be of a different race than the ones that you are in contact with.

      Just like at the Zimmerman trial there was a “Hispanic” juror, but she was just a black who happened to be from Costa Rica.

  • TruthBeTold

    I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a
    moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those
    who cannot care for themselves.

    What about people who can care for themselves but won’t?

    I’m sure you deal with legitimately helpless and needy people but there is a sizable number of people who are scamming the system.

    • bilejones

      It rather begs the question: What sort of Abundance is a government defense attorney producing?

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    Amazing it took him that long to come to the conclusions he did. I knew what blacks were before I was even 15 years old. I knew they are more often than not sociopaths who do not care how their actions affect others, even their own families. Contrary to what he says though, blacks commit sexual offenses against each other when they are not raping non-blacks. Some of the most heinous crimes they commit against our race involve rape, sodomy, and forcing victims to engage in degrading sex acts. All too often they are followed by the victim’s death. He is correct though about their total concern for what is to come in the future, they really do live in the here and now.

    • Luis

      Beautiful, Zapor!! Where did you get this illustration from?

      I especially like the “Gun Culture” rep as an attractive young female wielding a rifle, rather than some middle-aged white guy dressed in camo. But, why isn’t the thug culture side showing a Bantu male resembling Martin Lawrence or Wesley Snipes – why is it a silhouette?

      Threat of a lawsuit, if they showed an actual Bantu?

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        I got it from a White Nationalist forum I frequent. I think the silhouette is more a reference to the fact that any young black man you see these days is probably armed and a threat to you and yours.

        • ShermanTMcCoy

          Nice target silhouette, anyway. Just blow it up and “blow it up!”

      • DaveMed

        The “do-rag” and the way he’s holding the gun imply quite clearly that the guy on the right is not White.

  • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

    As a cop for many years and having had my own experiences in dealing with the criminal justice system, I can assure you that what Michael Smith wrote is true.

    The blacks I’ve witnessed are loud, abrasive, and self-entitled. They act as if the entire courtroom ordeal is cramping their thug lifestyle (which it is). They often sit there bored to tears, and have this attitude as if they’re getting unjustly treated by the white man’s system. The black women who appear often dress inappropriately, and many of them have great difficulty sitting in their chairs due to their obesity. Nothing they do is low-key and considerate of others around them.

    When I used to show up for court as a cop, they’d often stare me down, especially if they knew I was the officer who arrested them. They show no remorse in most cases. If they do, it’s only AFTER they’ve been given a stiff sentence – but that’s because they got caught and will have to do serious prison time. Their remorse has nothing to do with the horrors they’ve committed against their victims.

    Working within the criminal justice system – whether as a cop or as a public defender – frequently has a way of making liberal and idealistic people into race realists.

    This is why I always recommend that what whites who praise the virtues of multiculturalism and ‘diversity’ need most is not LESS ‘diversity’, but MORE ‘diversity.’ Lots of ‘diversity’ in one’s life has a way of waking us up to reality (although when it comes to liberals, there’s never any guarantee).

  • ncpride

    A realistic look at black criminal behavior can be viewed on The First 48. I’m surprised that show has not been deemed ‘racist’ and pulled from the air. After all, it ‘stereotypes’ blacks and makes them look bad. That’s the kind of logic we’re dealing with when it comes to blacks and their loony White liberal enablers.

    • Puggg

      But so many big city PDs are pulling out of it, giving that as a reason. So while it won’t be pulled from the cable channel it’s on, it will simply disappear because no PD wants to allow it and its cameras in.

      • ncpride

        I should have known. Protect blacks from being judged by their own behavior while hiding their endless crime from the public. Of course…

    • RileyDeWiley

      They are having a hard time convincing the city’s cop-shops to cooperate, and the alleged racism of the show’s producers – specifically, their fascination with black crime – has been cited as a reason.

  • TL2014

    Everything great until “we have a duty to care for those who can care for themselves, but don’t.” What. The. Hell.

    Sadly, nothing new in the article for most readers at Amren, I suspect. It should be printed and nailed on Eric Holder’s forehead.

    Boy, who’d have thunk we would still be paying for that doggone cotton today.

  • [Guest]

    >>>As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people…

    How could anyone possibly reach adulthood without being more aware of the truth than that?

    • TL2014

      Your be amazed. Country is full of such poor, naive idiots.

    • JP Rushton

      Grow up in a white neighbor hood, go to college in a white city and then live and work in a white city after you graduate. Pretty easy to stay isolated.

      The tech workers are probably the worst offenders. They meet east Asians and then assume all races must be great just because white and east Asians are so similar.

  • jeffaral

    Whites are the only ones to blame for the “black question” in Amerika: Whites brought them from Africa, then told them all humans are the same. Whites and Christianity are to blame!

    • watson800

      Not true. Actually Jews played a dominant role in the slave trade. Whites deserve blame too, and so do blacks who sold the slaves. Plenty of blame. Christians played a big role in ending slavery, but that is not a bad thing.
      Whites believed in the philosophical doctrine that all men are created equal (under the law before God, etc)–again not a bad thing if it is not misinterpreted to mean equal outcome. Until 1964, segregation was very much taken for granted by most whites–they tried separate but parallel societies. Again, not a bad thing.
      So what changed in 1964? Christians? No liberals gained power. Immigration gates opened. Anti-white, anti-Christian rhetoric became the norm in universities, etc. The mass media also changed dramatically. The media became anti-white and unified in its message. These are not white Christian values. These are anti-White liberal values. And now it is spreading worldwide, England, Canada, Sweden, etc.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        But now Christians promote massive third world immigration and multiculturalism. Many of the biggest anti-racists are Christians. They also justify these positions on scriptural grounds. Whatever it was in the past, Christianity is now just another murderous anti-white cult that advocates nation-wrecking universalism.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          Nope, look again. Jews are behind the flood of non-white invaders that are turning our nations into war zones.

          • NoMosqueHere

            What’s your proof of this accusation? Jews are part of it, but by no means the only ones and they don’t deserve all of the blame, unless you’re a nazi of course.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Because they openly admitted it, on more than one occasion. This one is far from an aberration.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GuzTb3fTxc

          • watson800

            Right. And the reason Jews want immigration to the once predominantly white nations is to break white hegemony. It is strategic on their part. Divide and conquer.

        • watson800

          No. You are way off. Christian altruism is not the problem. Jewish leadership wanted to break the white hegemony for strategic reasons, and they did so by pushing mass immigration. They also push anti-white rhetoric in the schools, Hollywood, and media. Christians are not pushing the anti-white rhetoric. They haven’t put up much of a fight, but then neither have the3 white politicians, white leaders, the white middle class, the white population in general, etc.

          • Geo1metric

            That’s because most of the White leadership, church and State, has been bought off or intimidated or both into “toeing the line”.

          • watson800

            exactly

    • fgbrunner3

      Africa is a very dangerous place. It has many very dangerous diseases. Blacks are far better off living in the USA than in Africa.

      • BART SIMPSONSON

        True, and those American blacks should be thankful that the despicable slavery existed here in the past, because it created the possibility of their existence here. But today, America would be far better off with most of OUR africans living in africa.

  • watson800

    “I do not know the solution to this problem.”
    A good start is voluntary segregation. Simply remove AA. Let employers hire whom they see fit, and let landlords rent to whom they choose and societies would quickly sort themselves out on racial lines.

    • Geo1metric

      Explain how we accomplish those laudatory goals.

      • DNA Explains It All

        Just allow freedom, black behavior would soon enough isolate them entirely.

        • Geo1metric

          Ok, good point. So, let’s allow freedom.

      • JP Rushton

        You can’t without the Supreme Court ruling in favor of it. So yeah, impossible.

  • PROUD TO BE WHITE

    There is only one solution to the black problem – send them back to Africa. They would feel right at home in Liberia. I do not want to see them, smell them, hear them speak, financially support them or deal with them on any level.

  • William Krapek

    “All this rocked my liberal, tolerant beliefs, but it took me years to set aside my illusions and accept the reality of what I see every day.”

    Some people here have thought I was some kind of stupid for taking so long to come to even “obvious” conclusions about black people. But as obvious as they are, it’s still hard to lower that kind of judgment-boom on an entire race. But I’ve thrown in the towel on this. Keep away from blacks as much as you can. Keep your KIDS away from them at all costs. Eighty hour work weeks to afford that more expensive apartment. Eating Ramen noodles a dozen times a week to keep them in that White school district. Whatever it takes!

    • tlk244182

      The reason I didnt see various truths until late in life is that my focus was constantly being deliberately misdirected. I was deceived, pandered to, flattered, and subtly threatened into accepting a constellation of false beliefs which led to my political support for a group of people, “liberals,” who were actually a front for a smaller and much more powerful group which has been fighting a clandestine war against my ancestors for over 3000 years.

    • TL2014

      Better yet: homeschool. White school districts will indoctrinate them. Even the best ones.

  • Ed

    You’re part of the problem, I actually respect the Blacks in the story more than you.

    • Mad Dog

      I’m willing to cut him some slack. Although I don’t know really know anything about him, many liberals have never lived near conservatives, have never socialized with conservatives, never had classes with conservatives and couldn’t name any conservatives except maybe Rush Limbaugh.

      If he actually sat down and talked with a real conservative for 20 minutes, he might realize that he is one.

  • 48224

    Having grown up in Detroit and attending school with blacks and watching them move into, and destroy my neighborhood THREE TIMES, I can tell you that Mr. Smith has lived it.

  • Luis

    This guy only now says what we at Amren have known for a long time – Bantus simply think differently from everyone else. For example, they cannot understand how someone from another race can use a gun on a bantu committing a crime. It’s like self-defense with a gun is totally alien to them. A non-Bantu is simply NOT ALLOWED to kill a Bantu rapist, or a Bantu armed robber or an armed Bantu home invader or carjacker.

    The Trayvon Martin – George Zimmerman episode is a salient example of this. Almost all Bantus saw this as Zimmerman shooting an unarmed Bantu teen – they never mention that Zimmerman fired in self-defense, because his head was in the process of getting splattered by Martin.

    • Rhialto

      I disagree. Blacks understand why Whites would want to kill Blacks, but Blacks know that it is in their interest to screech about White men defending themselves. Don’t underestimate Black social skills.

  • NoMosqueHere

    Back in 1986, Yasuhiro Nakasone, Prime Minister of Japan, made the following comments:

    “So high is the level of education in our country that Japan’s is an intelligent society. Our average score is much higher than those of countries like the U.S. There are many blacks, Puerto Ricans and Mexicans in America. In consequence the average score over there is exceedingly low.”

    Of course he was roundly condemned and “forced to apologize.” And the New York offices of the Fuji Bank and of Japan Air Lines received bomb threats. The bank temporarily evacuated its offices, and the threat against JAL delayed flights….

  • JohnEngelman

    Since the Republican Party was formed in 1854 the business community was the most important Republican constituency. The business community has always sought the lowest possible taxes, the fewest possible regulations, and the highest possible business subsidies.

  • raptor45

    Great article and I agree with the writer in all but one comment:

    “I believe we have this duty (to take care of others) even to those who can care for themselves but don’t.” (Parenthetics added)

    It is immoral, unethical (and always reverse racist) to provide a litany of handouts or support to anyone who can work to obtain them on his or her own and the fact that it is governmental policy to provide for this class is the strongest argument against subsistence recipients, across the board.

  • Feemster

    “I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t. This world view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it.”

    This one line was the only thing that separated me from Mr. Smith. I’ll go with the Bible on this. “Let he who will not work….let him also not eat.” 2 Thessalonians 3-10 If you give a man who won’t work money…you are just buying what little dignity he may have had in the first place. That person….if you stopped feeding them….would eventually go to work. If not…then I can’t think of a singe reason why I should care.

  • Ograf

    Within the first few paragraphs I saw the quote ” Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes” At that time my bs detector went off loudly. The rest of the article was probably very close to reality. Yet he identifies as a liberal. One of his disgruntled clients may well hit him physically in court or murder him outside of the courtroom. I wouldn’t want his job for any salary.

    • raptor45

      I agree with that and you are right, he is very likely to catch a blind sided fist in his head from any of his nigra clients and at any time.

      Naturalists generally say that a grizzly bear was the most unpredictable and dangerous animal in the Northern hemisphere. They are wrong because, without question, it is your basic every day run of the mill black male, followed closely by black females. They go off at any time, any place for any reason.

      • Rurik

        No, the Black female is the more unpredictable; with the male you always expect the worst.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      I wouldn’t make a Federal case out of him thinking that blacks commit very few sex crimes. He operates professionally entirely in the realm of the above board official legal criminal justice system, and like I said elsewhere in this thread, I think a whole lot of black sex crime flies under the radar of the system because of black insouciance and overworked cops.

      However, you’d think a man with a graduate degree would be able to reason his way out of a paper bag. After all, yours truly, no graduate degree, came up with that theory all by myself, it’s one of my few really good and clever original thoughts.

    • alex

      “Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes”

      If Mr. Smith had googled “FBI Table 43″, he would’ve learned that in 2012, blacks, 12% of the population, committed 32% of rapes, 24% of sexual assaults and 31% of crimes against family and children.
      I don’t think Mr. Smith can comprehend the concepts of likelihood and crime rate.

      • Zimriel

        The article was worth linking, but not worth a headline. In my opinion.

      • Mad Dog

        It’s all a matter of proportion. According to FBI figures, 52% of murderers are black. So if you’re a PD and you’re told only that you’re defending a guy charged with murder, it’s a better than even bet that the defendant is black. If it’s a rape, there’s a two-thirds chance that he’s not. Throw in a mix of armed robbery, aggravated assault, ADW and other violent crimes where most offenders are black. By comparison, black sex crime defendants are *relatively* uncommon.

    • BART SIMPSONSON

      Likely the main sex crimes africans commit involve impregnating african women and then moving on to the next one to repeat the act, on ad infinitum………

  • Brad Griffin

    Excellent article.

  • http://www.twitter.com/xthred Rick Evans

    A race of sociopaths.

  • Fishrrman

    This writer is a self-proclaimed liberal, and despite his education is as stupid as the rest of them.

    Worse that that, he is a hypocrite. He clearly sees and describes the realities in front of him, yet cannot -understand- what he sees. Perhaps he does, but refuses to accept it.

    The writer describes the symptoms and the underlying causes, but is too cowardly to comprehend a solution. He excuses himself from such burdens, because he is “a liberal”.

    He should wise up to the level of the female character in the film “The Big Chill”, who was a public defender. When asked why she changed careers, it was because that (as a PD) her clients were so…. “guilty”….

  • fgbrunner3

    Recent discoveries in genetics suggest that the high rate of crime by black Americans might have a genetic basis, such as a tendency to be violent, the inability to control one’s emotions, a desire for instant gratification and insufficient mental aptitude for the modern world. This is all conjecture, but genetic deficiencies are not easily remedied.

    • JohnEngelman

      Orientals have higher average IQ’s than white Gentiles, and lower rates of crime and illegitimacy for reasons that are also genetic.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        “Orientals” do not have higher IQ’s than white Europeans. “Orientals” have lower IQ’s than white Europeans. The lower “Oriental” IQ is the result of genetic factors.

        • JohnEngelman

          You know that is not true. Why do you say it?

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            No, what you say isn’t true. Europeans are responsible for almost all of the major achievements in the sciences and technology from 800 BC to 1950 AD. They produced civilizations that were vastly superior to those of the Far East. Europeans practically invented the modern world. On the other hand, “Orientals” contributed almost nothing to the field of science and technology. “Orientals” were always in the position of having to embrace superior western scientific and technological achievement, whereas Europeans had no use for inferior “Oriental” civilization. Given this, we can say that Europeans have higher IQ’s than “Orientals.” To say otherwise is to undermine the predictive validity of IQ.

          • JohnEngelman

            By John Pomfret

            Washington Post Staff Writer
            Monday, June 28, 2010

            Centuries after it led the world in technological prowess — think gunpowder, irrigation and the printed word — China has barged back into the ranks of the great powers in science…

            Chinese engineers have significantly improved on Western and Soviet coal-gasification technology as part of a multibillion-dollar effort to create green Chinese energy.

            Action, not research

            “The action is here,” said S. Ming Sung, the chief Asia-Pacific representative for the Clean Air Task Force, a U.S.-based nonprofit entity, and a former Shell Oil executive. “In the U.S., there are too many paper researchers. Here, they are doing things.”…

            In 2007, Chinese geneticists discovered vast differences in the genetic makeup of Africans, Asians and Caucasians.

            ———-

            Instructions: For each of the following items, give the name of the country in which the item was invented or discovered and the approximate date of invention.

            1. The horse collar

            2. The wheelbarrow

            3. The moldboard plow

            4. Paper money

            5. Cast iron

            6. The helicopter rotor and the propeller

            7. The decimal system

            8. The seismograph

            9. Matches

            10. Circulation of the blood

            11. Paper

            12. Brandy and Whiskey

            13. The Kite

            14. The rocket and multi-staged rockets

            Answer: China

          • MrMagog

            Gee, the Chinese invented “the rocket” huh? Then why did they need Bill Clinton to give them our launching technology so they could send something into orbit? THEIR rocket was nothing but some gun powder in a paper tube, and that was as far as they ever took that invention. Much of the other stuff on your list is debate at best. For instance, their invention of the “helicopter rotor”, clever of you to add the word “rotor”. They in no way created a functioning helicopter. The west did. There were also iron fragments found in the great pyramid for instance. So it’s invention vastly predates China. More of your “facts” I guess. Half truths where you try to hide all the other circumstances and facts around them.

          • MrMagog

            gee, the chinese invented “the rocket” huh? Then why did they need Bill Clinton to give them our launching technology so they could send something into orbit? THEIR rocket was nothing but some gun powder in a paper tube, and that was as far as they ever took that invention. Much of the other stuff on your list is debatable as well. For instance, their invention of the “helicopter rotor”, clever of you to add the word “rotor”. They in no way created a functioning helicopter. The west did. There were also iron fragments found in the great pyramid for instance. So it’s invention vastly predates china. More of your “facts” I guess. Half truths where you try to hide all the other circumstances and facts around them. The ability of the chinese to invent technology is actually represented quite well by the “kite”, it is a very primitive novelty, and that is as far as they ever took it. In all of their “inventions” they merely stumbled upon something in nature or by accident but never tried to understand HOW it worked. That is a domain that is COMPLETELY dominated by white Europeans.

          • JohnEngelman

            This was posted by SlizzardAjeosshi Bob Dole.

            While you parade around changing ‘USA! USA!,” and “We’re number One! We’re Number One!” China is preparing to dominate the world.

            Meanwhile Orientals and Jews in the United States are dominating America’s best universities and most prestigious corporations.

            ————-

            I will answer your question to what is now currently the
            biggest Asian achievement.

            First let me put things in contest: I work for a financial
            group involved in private equity deals with several Chinese manufacturing companies. I’m not saying this to brag about what kind of hotshot I am, I’m just saying I may have the pulse of the situation a little bit.

            The area where currently North East Asia hold a world
            leadership so immense the West is not even perceived as a serious contender is robotics, with all the ancillary technologies attached to it (A.I., nano, innovative materials etc.)

            Japan used to be the world leader, now the dominant player
            is S. Korea from where 1 robot out of 6 in this world comes, Taiwan is also there while China is taking off rapidly.

            Robotics is on the cusp of pretty much redefining entire
            economic sectors: manufacturing, healthcare (Korean nanobot surgery is widely recognized as the best in the world for certain tumors), personal services, learning, logistics & transportation, entertainment, financial services etc.

            This is akin to a fourth industrial revolution the West is
            entirely missing. As i said every time i board a plane to Europe when I arrive I feel (even in the Northern rim) like all of
            a sudden I’ve been teleported to a black and white TV world.

            This giant leap forward has the purpose of keeping afloat
            the growth rate of countries with an aging and, in some cases, shrinking population (N. E. Asians have the lowest birthrate in the world) through a massive leap in robotic productivity.

  • NoMosqueHere

    For blacks, the courthouse is like a carnival. They all seem to know each other: hundreds and hundreds each day, gossiping, laughing loudly, waving, and crowding the halls.

    ———————————————————————-

    Many blacks don’t fear committing crime because they don’t fear prison. Most blacks have extensive family or gang related ties in prison. As long as they “keep it real with their homies,” they can cope well in prison. And since they’re often the majority population in prison, they don’t fear racial victimization either. I tend to support the death penalty because even the dimmest black nitwit killer fears death.

    • MBlanc46

      They might fear death, but that doesn’t keep them from shooting people for practically no reason at all.

      • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

        Death is a silly little thing to fear.

        “What seems like the end of the world to a caterpillar is only the beginning of a butterfly.”
        –Robert A. Heinlein

        Being afraid of a certainty is absurd.

        Yes, we’re going to die. Yes, it is going to hurt. Cowboy-up and deal with it.

        • MBlanc46

          Sounds a bit like Spinoza.

  • MBlanc46

    These reports from the trenches by people who deal with blacks every day always make me so glad that I don’t have to deal with blacks every day.

  • Rurik

    He was unable to ask Channon Christian.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      Nobody “asked” poor Channon.

  • DucLap

    I was a public health paramedic and a policeman in a major west coast city for 30+ years. This essay rings as clear and true as anything that I have read on the subject.
    I agree with the author that there are NO answers on the horizon to correct this growing enormous problem. I think that a correction will come, but it will be very ugly and outside the imagination of most civilized people who hope for the best from this country. People only wear a veneer of civility to survive amongst others in a polite society. Take away their food, their water, heat and electric power, their gasoline, etc and their hope for immediate relief, and watch the veneer fall away as our base instincts, successfully encoded into our DNA over tens of thousands of years, jump into the saddle and take us to safety.

    • Jack Whistler

      Nature always wins in the end.

      • Mad Dog

        “Stupidity cannot be cured. Stupidity is the only universal
        capital crime; the sentence is death. There is no appeal, and execution
        is carried out automatically and without pity.”


        Robert A. Heinlein

    • Geo1metric

      ” Take away their food, their water, heat and electric power, their gasoline, etc”

      My sense is that you only have to take any one of those things away to watch the veneer melt.

      • DucLap

        Little doubt.

  • punstress

    “I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves.” Wanting to help others doesn’t make you a liberal. Conservatives share, too. But they want to decide whom to help and how, instead of having the government decide for them. You see how this so-called help is in fact hurting entire generations of people, yet you don’t reject it?

  • Capt. Bryant

    I left law enforcement because of blacks! I could never get out of the “hood” and came to realize that blacks are somewhere between an animal and a human. To be fair I arrested a lot of whites but it was all minimal compared to the criminality of blacks. Talk to police officers from primarily white states like Maine, Idaho, Montana etc about their jobs. Then ask a cop from Birmingham, Alabama or Little Rock or Atlanta and the stories will be different. The writer in this article said he didn’t know the solution to this problem. Well segregate yourself from them and read The Talk by John Derbyshire.

  • Geo1metric

    The fed has extreme effect on the economy.

  • Greg Thomas

    What about them? I doubt they are on public assistance.

    • Whitehall

      No, too many trustafians go into policy positions in government or academia.

      They are the most dangerous of all.

      • Geo1metric

        “They are the most dangerous of all.” Not necessarily.

  • DaveMed

    I limit my support for a safety net to European or European-American societies.

    I agree with you.

  • Jack Whistler

    “I do not know the solution to this problem.”

    Solution: B=SIR

    Bantu = Segregate, Isolate, and Repulse.

    Segregate from Bantus the way you would any danger, isolate said danger, and repulse said danger’s attempts to infiltrate your domain.

    The Bantu are feral animals that are largely incapable of coexisting with civilized people, this is not difficult to understand outside the realm of willful ignorance. As with all barbarians throughout history they want what civilized men have, but cannot create it for themselves, cannot maintain it after seizing it, and as a result do nothing but bring destruction, ruin, and desecration to whatever is great.

  • George Clark

    Does this trend continue under Obama, Oh Autistic One?

    • JohnEngelman

      How am I Autistic?

  • fgbrunner3

    Obviously many blacks lead short violent empty and wasteful lives. Africa is a very violent and dangerous place. They are the children of Africa and are not prepared for the modern world. In addition to all the dangers of Africa that might limit the development of civilization and human intelligence, there is the obvious question of the ability of the body to cool the brain and whether there are limits to the development of human intelligence in the equatorial regions?

    • FlaVet

      Asians and other non black races do very well in equatorial regions. Singapore, Hong Kong to name a couple. Someone always has to be last or at the bottom. It’s nature that dictates this “inequality”.

  • truelies2

    Does Al Sharpton or Jessie Jackson know about this article?

    • Geo1metric

      Can either of them read?

      • truelies2

        Still laughing…..

        Have you watched Sharpton try to read off his teleprompter?????

        • Geo1metric

          No, but maybe I should. Thanks for the tip.

        • Geo1metric

          No, but I’ll make a point to try to catch that comedy. Thanks.

  • Mad Dog

    I’m sure that the race baiters will condemn this as racist. They won’t even try to argue that it’s not true. They’ll just say that Mr. Smith is racist for saying it.

    • nunyabidnessfoo

      hatefacts

  • crazy8′s

    Thank LBJ for the current state of black culture. Its not only blacks either, but a majority of folks living their lives on public assistance. Here in the North Woods (black population 14) at least half of the white folks work three or four months out of the year, collect “seasonal unemployment” 8-9 months a year, and cook and smoke meth ALL year. Where there’s a free ride, there is no self respect, respect for others, or living up to the potential that God gave you.

  • Huckfunn

    From what I can tell, the inner city black population is basically a criminal culture. It’s amazing that these people are given free Obama phone to further facilitate their lawless activities.

  • ThisObamaNation

    I was liberal who grew up in DC. Constant contact with reality gradually transformed me from bleeding heart into a conservative. But the whole process took about 30 years.

  • howie roak

    When I was a lad in Baltimore the country was segregated by race and ethnicity. we had neighborhoods based on race or ethnic heritage – Chinatown, little Italy, Greek town, Pole town etc and black neighborhoods. To some degree we all got along. As a boy I could go easily into any of the neighborhoods without worry. As I got older it became more difficult but the reality was unless you started something or showed some disrespect, everyone left you alone — including the black neighborhoods. I used to walk through the projects and not once did I ever have a problem; I would walk through Little Italy and never had a problem; I had a paper corner in Greek town and never had a problem.

    As a Young lad and man the black culture was the king – they influenced music, the arts, sports etc. One of my first heroes was Big Daddy Lipscomb – I had met him and night train Laine and they was super nice. I worshiped both along with Johnny U, Raymond Berry etc.

    Latter in life as a young man I was in the military and on-base we all got along; off base the blacks mainly went to their side of town and we went to ours but the blacks were accepted in our side but we rarely were accepted on their side of town. Then the civil rights movement hit the country and integration was big and acceptance was the mantra. Yet still we were never accepted on the black side of town nor did life change in the military – as a unit we all got along but off base we still were self segregated by race. My first NCO was a big black guy from Philly — he taught me everything I needed to know and introduced me to a full spectrum of black culture.

    In Vietnam we fought together but in base camp the segregation remained. On my last tour 68-69 the blacks flat out would not take orders from whites and would threat whites if they tried to tell them what to do. In the field it was different since blacks made up a smaller portion of the unit and were out numbered – Besides we had guns too.

    After I got out the fruits of MLK and others began to take fruit and many blacks became more educated, more successful and integrated well into American society. This steady progression of integration led to the new acronym – IWEBs – Integrated Well Educated Blacks. In business it was hard to tell the difference – we worked together, went to lunch together, played together and had the same hopes, dreams and goals. In fact both black and white shared the same distaste for the non-educated blacks – the thugs, the gangsta culture and the lazy black as well as the red necked bigots that judged everyone by color or their religion. a cop friend introduced me to a universally accepted term for them; “Mondays” — everyone hates Mondays(!) they are the ones the above article is describing.

    I was never a bigot, never tolerated bigotry and now I am afraid that both sides are rushing headlong into distrust of the other.

    In the early ’90s I was conducted a meeting regarding a contract negotiation when a IWEB impeccably dressed began a meme that what we needed was a good “Jew Lawyer” to “Jew” the government up in price. I was shocked – I had at my side, I had hired him as well to be my deputy – a Black David Duke! That is when I started realizing the tide had shifted – The blacks had become the bigots!

    I took notice of blacks using the words to describe whites as crackers, the Asians as “ieses”, the Latinos as “burrito muchers” and began putting my foot down — I got rid of the IWEB that disrespected the Jews — and would not tolerate others to be bigots in my presence at work.

    After Obama was elected it became problematic to walk in the metro stations where the blacks were — the common courtesies of providing space to walk towards each other disappeared — blacks of all economical status would walk right at you and would not move an inch – they expected you would move for them versus mutually provide an inch or two so that both persons could get to where they were going without bumping into each other. Also overnight the office environment changed, instead of going to lunch with one another and debating politics and policy it became an environment where anything negative said was immediately tagged as a white racist statement against a black president. if you retorted with a question — why did you vote for Obama the answer was usually ” you had 43 white guys as president we deserved our own”.

    Slowly across months as each white co-worker was offended, a ’50s culture developed anew. We were civil to each other but a separation began to develop between blacks and all other races. They used to be our friends now we no longer trusted them with our thoughts, opinions and personal conversations – back to their side of town versus ours. Black men and women I had know for years, shared lunches, family celebrations, office celebrations did not want to equal – they wanted to be superior and demanded that we change everything to suit them — else we were racists. We accommodated them as much as possible because it was easier to get along but a very important trend began to develop.

    The new hires seem to be anybody but black men and women, more Latinos, Asians and those from the Asian subcontinent were getting hired and less blacks. In the normal course of business as blacks left — the hiring trend became apparent. No one wanted to hire a black – they were no longer trusted as co-workers, office partners and friends. Note the black unemployment across the board and by age group — it is rising and will continue to rise.

    And that is the legacy of the blacks blinders on politics, the scandals of Obama and the blind passion for him that gave 97% of their vote on both elections.

    This trend will take some time to reverse. I am not sure what can occur to convince me to believe again that we all were in this boat together but just had different perspectives.

    Lastly the popular culture praises blacks in sports, music, arts — Samuel Jackson is cool dude!, Dr. Carson and Justice Thomas are just Uncle Toms dude! Trayvon Martin was a martyr, Zimmerman was a racist killer, etc …Somehow this needs to be reversed and the first step is requiring schools to go back to first principles — an education of right, wrong, honor, integrity and respect for each other. Forget the BS of white privilege, black victimhood, etc — get the honesty back into the news media, re-born the MLK dream of judging others based on the content of their character not the color of their skin — get rid of the thug culture that whitey is the devil…

    In the ’50s it was the whites that forced the issue that led to integration and fairness — this time it must be the blacks that do it not the whites. ELSE we are all doomed!

    • ShermanTMcCoy

      “In the ’50s it was the whites that forced the issue that led to integration and fairness — this time it must be the blacks that do it not the whites. ELSE we are all doomed!”

      Then, doomed we must be.

    • Geo1metric

      Sub-Saharan Africa.

    • silviosilver

      My reply will sound coldhearted, but I will say it nonetheless: the sooner your delusional generational dies out the sooner an attitude of realism towards racial issues will be able to take shape.

      • howie roak

        Your posting doesn’t make sense. Maybe you know what you you wanted to say but your lack of writing skills does not convey any meaning in the posting. Why would my generation dying help or hurt the racial issues?

        Hopefully you are just a troll versus someone that really believes your own BS.

        • silviosilver

          My post makes perfect sense. It identifies the delusions held by your generation as both a major reason for the present mess and and as a major obstacle to the adoption of racial realism, since so many of your generation hold positions of power and influence in society and at the ballot box. You have proven remarkably resistant to reality-based racial reasoning, no matter how gently it is couched, preferring instead to tenaciously cling to fantastic visions of racial harmony, many of which I’m sure result from “false memories” of your youth. I am left little option but to conclude it will be better when you’re gone.

          • howie roak

            I’ve read your prior posts and conclude that you are a verbose egotist along with having delusions of intellect. Thankfully those that think like you can hold a convention in a disappearing phone booth. Racism by white or black is abhorrent and anyone like you that wants to revert to the old segregation schema should try it on the other foot first.

  • http://GuardAmerican.com/ GuardAmerican

    As this article specifically confirms, the issue is not “single-parent” children, but NO parent children.

    Kids passed from mother to grandmother, grandmother to friend, friend to…no one.

    In major American cities, there are children, young children, that are literally feral.

    It is the Great Tragedy of The Great Society. And it really pisses me off.

    Thanks, Democrats. You b@stards.

  • Laurel

    The solution is to do away with entitlements that have done nothing but undermine society. This lawyer epitomizes what C.S. Lewis called ‘the righteous do gooders’. This lawyer has done more harm with his liberalism than anything else.

  • Latin2

    Do you know why Hispanics in the Southwest commit crimes against “children”? The children are mainly young Latina girls who are dating Latinos over 18 and around in their early 20s. It is not uncommon for Latinas to date older guys and start dating and even marrying earlier. Once a parent of a girl or the girl herself gets mad they turn the guy in to punish them.

    • ThomasER916

      Wrong. You’re lying and making excuses.

  • Vernon Alarcon

    das sum boosheeut…YT system beez rigged to keeps da black man down… nowhadimesayin. YT aint beez wantin to gibs us da free sheeut dat evrywon else beez gettin.

  • Jacksonian_Libertarian

    “I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t. This world view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it.”

    From this statement it is obvious that Michael Smith doesn’t even realize that it is his very socialism that created these black criminals. Before Lyndon Johnson’s great society programs, black families were just like everyone elses. But welfare killed the black family and most blacks are now born out of wedlock and never know their fathers. Parents are the original role models, and if you don’t have a father, and your mother is a skanky whore drug addict, then you are screwed.

    A little known fact is that orphans (regardless of race) are the most successful segment of mankind. When you grow up imagining your parents as the best, you work hard to be like them.

    • ThomasER916

      It’s a little known fact that people like to use Feel Good Stories to prove a point and then claim it’s a little known fact.

  • Oompaul

    “I do not know the solution to this problem.” Really? South Africa had the solution until that communist ganster Mandela, sponsored by the jews, took over the country

  • mutterfudder

    Wish our forefathers had picked their own damn cotton

  • Joe Dokes

    “They plan their entire lives around the expectation that they will always get free money and never have to work. I do not see this among whites, Hispanics, or any other people.”

    They exist. I grew up in a 99% white (but poor) area and went to junior and high school with girls who aspired to live in the fancy new brick housing units the State had just put up. They, too, knew the formula for success: more kids = bigger welfare checks. Last I heard, they succeeded in their career paths. That was almost 30 years ago. I’ve known many, many such white folks since then. They are everywhere.

    “I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who CANNOT care for themselves.”

    Fair enough.

    “I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t.”

    And this is precisely why the anonymous author will remain part of the very problems he so ably describes.

  • kanenas101

    “I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves.”

    That is not a liberal value. The liberal version of this value is to use the state to force someone else to do the same. Most conservatives have no problem with helping others in need, and we feel that it is our moral duty to do so.

  • JohnEngelman

    Military sending and employment is government spending and employment.

    I am glad we entered World War II, but if the money had been spent improving lives rather than ending them the results would have been even better for the economy,

    • running_riot

      If increased government spending is good for the economy, and military spending is government spending, then you must agree that fighting endless wars, and more wars, is a guaranteed way to improve the economy.

      • JohnEngelman

        Read my post again. I pointed out that domestic spending does the economy more good than military spending.

        • running_riot

          But you didn’t document your assertions with endless links to WSJ bloggers, so how could your assertion be true?

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      I am not glad we were driven into World War Two. Unlike you, I have actually been to war. You never get any sleep. You stink and your feet hurt. I pissed my pants in every firefight. One of my old college girlfriends once told me that she never loved me and that I was just a good f**k. Battle is worse than that.

      • Geo1metric

        “Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth and easy, or that anyone who embarks on the strange voyage can measure the tides and hurricanes he will encounter. The statesman who yields to war fever must realize that once the signal is given, he is no longer the master of policy but the slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events.” Winston Churchill

        “It is well that war is so terrible, otherwise we would grow too fond of it.” Robert E. Lee

  • ImNoDhimmi

    This excellent piece should be on the front page of every major American newspaper.

    • Refuse2giveup

      I sincerely hope not.

  • Roger

    Sounds like you could really use a Beer Summit with Obama

    • Coyote12

      Obama would most likely be too obnoxious and wouldn’t listen to a word this man said. He thinks he knows more than anyone else at all times.

  • gideonssword79

    Reading this, I realized one thing: this is why Obama won. When you have a black man who promised the black and poor white and Hispanic races free stuff, that “whitey” and “the rich” are the cause of all of their problems, and that “we are going to give the poor free health care,” they voted for that in trainloads. Hillary Clinton will run in 2016 on “Obama gave you people free stuff, and I am going to give you MORE free stuff.” Unfortunately, the idiotic Asians and Jews and white middle class will vote for it even though this hurts them economically – but they will vote for it because they are also liberals.

    Until the poor and black races learn to cope without “free stuff,” America is finished. We need a Congress and a President who will finally say no them. But that will take courage, it will take votes, and it will take ignoring a media that sympathizes with the black freeloaders while refusing to hold them accountable for what they are doing to this country.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      For the foreseeable future, I highly doubt that the politics of philosophical opposition to the welfare state and transfer programs will be able to win much of anything. There are just too many white people who experience some sort of government benefit, means-tested, non-means-tested, or informal.

      Here’s a better political strategy: Accept the welfare state, but campaign on the notion that the sort of welfare state I propose is better for white people and wouldn’t fuel NAM dysfunctionality. IOW, play the Who-Whom game on gibs.

    • nunyabidnessfoo

      lol for every dime that poor people leech off the system, corporations leech a dollar. You’ve been brainwashed into becoming angry at poor people for leeching what they can while you turn a blind eye to the theft at the top

  • azgirl

    Eric Holder is on the job and will stop this unequal prosecution of blacks over other races. We must make the percentage of blacks in prisons exactly equal to the black civilian population or we are a racist society. Already some public school districts are imposing this policy in their system of discipline.

    • gideonssword79

      I hope and pray that you are making a joke and being ironic – because if that is how you really feel, you are a Grade-A idiot and obviously didn’t read the article this man wrote.

      • azgirl

        It’s becoming hard to get away with being sarcastic in comments sections because there are so many idiots who believe outrageous liberal talking points. But yes, I was just repeating what liberals view as the “solution” to this issue.

    • Chucky77

      ax girl… Exactly the same? Then whites must get out there and commit a lot more violent crimes. Where do you live, exactly?

      • ThomasER916

        She lives in Libtardia. It’s like Narnia only really stupid.

      • silviosilver

        She was being sarcastic, except for her last sentence which referred to what is actually occurring – based on her earlier sarcasm I doubt she approves.

    • Geo1metric

      Huh? That kind of drivel doesn’t fly around here. Why are you here?

      • Hallie Eva

        Geo, the comment in praise of Eric “my people”™ Holder’s actions to correct his delusional ideas of inequitable criminal accountability and school discipline may have been sarcasm. At least I hope it was.
        Slogging through the hundreds of comments on this thread, do notice multiple troll-ish posts that are out of line with AmRen’s race realism efforts. One would hope that some visitors take the time to read and educate themselves.

        • Geo1metric

          Yes. Sometimes I’m in a hurry and don’t stop to think that some of the really silly posts may very well be sarcasm. Thanks for reminding me. :)

  • Mustang

    In declaring liberalism, it is necessary to say whether you are a classic liberal, or a member of the progressive movement. I too am a liberal. I am a classic liberal. I believe in the notions set forth by the founding fathers. I believe charity must originate within our hearts, not from within the office of a federal bureaucrat.

    No one works harder at keeping blacks stupid and enslaved to government largess than progressives; this behavior is hateful and repugnant. If those that claim to be liberals actually did care about black people, and wanted to help wean them off the government’s teat, then they would become conservatives. Jobs will feed the poor; handouts will only
    create a demand that we give them more. The adage is true: give a man a fish, you feed him for a day …

    • ThomasER916

      “Classic Liberal”?

      You’d might as well say “Classic Unicorn.”

      Liberalism is the denial of biology. It was created by Whites to explain a White problem but it was made Universal and therefore has no basis in biology or reality. Much like Libertarianism.

      • silviosilver

        You’re putting too much stock in labels. America was born and grew up as basically a “classical liberal” society. People in power in those days had no trouble recognizing basic biological realities and putting in place policies designed to protect people against black depravity.

        • ThomasER916

          You’re so full of crap. First you say “you’re putting too much stock in labels” then you attempt to defend and explain those labels. You really don’t have a clue WTF you’re blathering about. If you had a modicum of intelligence you’d be able to gather I put zero “stock” in labels.

  • Rdlake

    Everyone’s afraid to face the truth so the problem persists. We’ve moved further into the world of omitting Islam radicals, illegal aliens, abortion mills as taboo subjects

  • Feemster

    Is that your entry for Stupid Question of the Year Award? They are not asking me to support them…so why on earth should I care? You could just as easily have asked…what about dead people? It would have made just as much sense. Good job public school system!!!

  • M&S

    Turnus,
    Did that war do us any good? I maintain that it did not. The soldiers who fought that war _never_ would have allowed for the multicult condition we now live in if we had stayed firmly out of that war.
    We spent the better part of 400,000 lives pushing through islands we didn’t keep six months after the war ended under conditions where, just like Hitler in Russia, to win is to cut the supply lines (mines, torpedoes, bombs) _between_ centers of gravity, not by getting trapped into logistics pits, trying to seize them, directly.
    The Japanese were utterly dependent upon bauxite, oil, copper, timber, quinine and tungsten from Indonesia, Burma and Malaysia as well as the Spice Islands. We sank virtually their entire Maru fleet of coastal steamers taking that away, and thus, by 1945 they were industrially crippled, whether we fire bombed or atom bombed them or not.
    It _did not matter_ what they did with their little jungle outposts as ‘outer ring’ of islands so long as we defended ONE such springboard (‘AF’) well enough to hold them hostage to a Warplan Orange engagement where we held all the Submarine and Strategic PBY Spotting Recce high cards.
    Their was no reason, with the atom bomb program established, not to go Midway-> Wake-> Guam and have the means to finish the Japanese where they lived, rather than to liberate European colonial outposts and barren islands whose only use was as airfields, anchorages and supply depots to jump to the next island.
    All of which could have been accomplished on a tenth the expenditure we actually made while continuing to do -exactly- what we did in WWI, which was make huge amounts of money (propping the economy back up) supplying the Europeans desire to slit each other’s throats with munitions to aid in their quest.
    Or not.
    Indeed, even knowing what he did to the Jews, which isn’t half as much as is claimed, I would rather have seen Hitler pull the Europeans into a nation state of their own with a Russian bread basket and mineral resources than be stuck looking at the devastation of lost whites and destroyed national resources spent ‘saving the world’ so we could rebuild our enemies and our friends to take away our own economic strength from us.
    How could that -possibly- be considered long-term profitable?
    In this, I think that economists who seek to measure a nation’s as a people’s greatness, solely by numbers on a ticker tape are missing half the picture, at least.
    Because profit is virtual if it applies only to how fast a wealth class can undercut it’s own nation and nationalism is worthless if only one group is in it to win it as a separate power from the madness which drives the world. Americans have done little but tread water relative to inflation since the 1960s. After we finished exploiting the massive quantities of patents we pillage from Germany at the end of the war, we have done very little to push ourselves forwards into a new era of technology and we have become culturally divided by our loyalties to people as troubles not our own.
    How can any of this be seen as an improvement of _Who We Are_? Economic indicators are little more than the statistical vitals of a patient, they don’t show the true health or potential inside a nation or it’s people. America is sick at heart. It has been for a long time.
    Maybe even since September 2, 1945.

    • Geo1metric

      You might enjoy some of David Irving’s books on WWII.

    • thomasdosborneii

      That was brilliant and beautifully written, M&S.

  • Richard Lee

    This is all our fault. We voters did this. By voting for unsuitable people for the last 100 years, we put the progressives (meaning: statist, liberals, leftist, socialist, Marxist & idiots etc) behind the wheel.

    Elections have consequences. All Americans will have to pay the price for our carelessness. We should have chosen our ‘leaders’ more wisely. We have failed.

    Since we have chosen the most inappropriate leaders possible, there really isn’t any short-term solution to this worsening problem.

    Our government (made by us voters) is worsening the situation daily. They have no wish to ‘fix’ the problem. They don’t even see it as a problem.

    Our out-of-control semiconscious-Statist goverment has very few real goals.
    To grow larger, more militant and to have more control over the people, are their main goals..

    Government fixing itself isn’t on the agenda..

    The only people that can fix this, are the people that caused it.. The voters..

    • rawtheory

      Bravo.

    • ThomasER916

      “We voters did this.”

      Get off the cross son. I didn’t do any of this. I never voted for Affirmation Blaction. I never voted for Amnesty. I never voted for illegals getting tuition. I never voted for Somali Muslim “refugees.”

      The problem is people are indoctrinated beyond stupid. When you’re beyond stupid you believe that a “vote” did or didn’t cause this. Wrong. This had nothing to do with voting. This is the Culture of Critique poisoning the Well of Western Civilization. The Immigration Act of 1965 was never “voted on” by Whites and was pushed by non-Whites. When all of this happened without a single vote it’s utterly insane to believe “voting” will end this.

      When militias set up to guard America’s border DHS shut them down. Who voted for DHS? Which “homeland” are they “securing”? The sooner you figure out that everything is anti-White the better off you’ll be. There is no government today that isn’t anti-White because Whites are the ONLY race to not need a government.

      • shmo123

        Amen, regarding the infamous Hart-Cellar amendment of 1965. Even more important is the fact that no matter how well intentioned it might have been, once special interests latched on to it, it was, and continues to be one, of the greatest monstrosities ever foisted on the American people.

  • Logic_Mine

    I believe the Liberal party had been hi jacked by socialist. I believe this man is a liberal in the truest sense of the definition.

    What he mispercieves as only a liberal trait, (duty to take care of those who can’t take care of themselves ) is not just a liberal ethos, it also is part of a conservative ethos as well but with an acknowledgment that there are people who will unfairly take advantage of all of our good intentions only for the sole reason to enrich themselves maliciously.

    The common understanding when reviewing such assistance is that there should also be a expectation to make an effort to advance oneself to a point in their lives where the assistance is no longer needed if able!

    • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

      Liberal party?
      The Democrats are anything but ‘Liberals’. They are mostly a left-wing neomarxist organization. They are very, very far away from their roots back in the day when they used to be the true ‘Liberals’ of this country, back in the early eighteenth century.

      • ThomasER916

        Libertarians are Free Market Cultural Marxists.

  • https://twitter.com/davidjkramer DavidKramer

    You do know that economic policy is not always implemented by the president right? You do know that economic policy does take time to be seen in the economy right? You do understand that there is a certain point when the makers will say enough is enough right?

    • JohnEngelman

      I have documented, using facts drawn from the Department of Commerce and The Wall Street Journal, that Democratic presidents have usually been better stewards of the U.S. economy. The extent to which this has been true is too great to be dismissed as accident or coincidence.

    • Strike_Team

      Like others have mentioned, it is probably better to ignore trolls who obfuscate by presenting facts out of context, facts garnered from dubious sources, and opinions and statements from thin air presented as facts. It’s part of the usual tactics from the usual suspects, whether they’re working as a group, or as an individual, such as a middle aged man still leeching from his parents while managing to somehow never finish college.

  • silence_dogoode

    “my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. They cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well. They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike.”

    I realize the majority of your clientele are black, but this blanket statement pigeonholes all blacks, not just your clientele. This is obviously untrue as Ben Carson, Walter E. Williams, Herman Cain, Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, Alveda King, Niger Innis, and, (most obviously), Martin Luther King and countless other Americans have proved this statement false.

    As a Tea Party organizer, I have been mindlessly declared a ‘racist’ so I deplore the easy, insidious and always unsubstantiated use of the ‘race-card’ being used by the left to demonize those who hold different political views from theirs. But I find your statement to be as wrong and divisive as any spewed by demagoguing Democrat politicians, the hacks at MSNBC and other media outlets.

    As to the “why”, I suggest you take a hard look at who is at the helm and responsible for implementing socialist ‘Social Justice’ policy in your community and communities around our country where blacks are encouraged to maintain the hideous cycle of dehumanizing poverty.

    • FlaVet

      Then ask your self why 99% of blacks have utter contempt for those exceptional blacks you listed…and BTW you missed Powell and Condi Rice. I think Smith realizes that in their feral, immature, selfish, narcissistic minds they can’t grasp the idea of a better life and to use these people as role models. We’re all aware of why Obama was elected and any other black that gets elected with 110% of the vote.

      Poverty has become an industry and big business. Run by the same poverty pimps, former coke dealers and hustlers and so called “reverunds” that keep the base all fired up and ready to march, picket, riot at a moments notice and to get YT…cause he’s the one that still “holds you down”.

      • silence_dogoode

        If you read my comments accurately, and apparently you didn’t because I did include Conci Rice and “countless other Americans”, you would find the answer to your question at the end of my comment.

        As to “Poverty has become an industry and big business”, I couldn’t agree more.

      • ThomasER916

        He can’t ask that question without contorting into absurd apologetics.

    • Snake Plissken

      I would hope the writer would acknowledge that his clients are all (obviously) in contact with the criminal justice system, and that fact obviously colors his observations. Likewise, many of us have contacts through work or just friendship with black folks who buck this assessment. One friend of mine, with whom I have had business dealings for over 15 years works his ass off, turned adversity to his advantage whenever challenged, and has shown a kind heart towards a step-son who deserved absolutely none. He is one of the most inspiring people I’ve met in my 60-plus years. He happens to be black.
      But the writer is spot-on in his evaluation of a culture that was spawned by the Johnson administration, and you can’t help but wonder what Martin Luther King, Jr. would say when looking across this wasteland of welfare promoted under the guise of “help”. I don’t think anyone imagined this as the objective when the civil rights movement gained support, and if subservience of blacks to the Democratic party WAS the intention, then shame on them.

      • nunyabidnessfoo

        No one has said that there are no hard-working, intelligent blacks. Well maybe a few idiots might say this but the vast majority of people, “racist” or not, will acknowledge that some blacks are better people than some whites. But the numbers don’t lie.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          Indeed, for every black man or woman I know that IS a decent person, there’s at least ten more I do not want anywhere near me and mine. One such man is a neighbor, some of whose siblings are the ones I do not want anywhere near me.

      • silence_dogoode

        Well said.

        Giving Mr. Smith the benefit of the doubt, I’ll alter my comment: His statement ‘could be construed’ to be as wrong and divisive as any spewed by demagoguing Democrat politicians, the hacks at MSNBC and other media outlets.

        Which brings us to the crux of the problem.

        This insidiousness dilemma and its solution cannot begin to be addressed intelligently and maturely on a national scale as doing so would subject any and all to venomous ‘racist’ attacks in the media.

        The mainstream media would first have to start reporting honestly and accurately. This would require they acknowledge the problem and the reason for the problem which is due to socialist progressive policy. I don’t see that happening anytime soon as they are the primary enablers of the insidious political agenda that keeps these insidious policies in place.

      • silviosilver

        None of that changes the fact that the presence of large numbers of blacks has a devastating impact on white communities.

        • Snake Plissken

          I don’t disagree with the author’s assessment, but to someone skimming the article, without the context of his experience, it could be perceived as racist.
          The problem with the way integration into traditional white communities has proceeded was the introduction of “low-income housing”, in the form of apartments, into otherwise single-family neighborhoods. My old shop was adjacent to a golf club community, built in the 70′s, with very nice houses on large lots, some lakefront. Apartments were built, and the property values plummeted. The golf club went broke and the clubhouse burnt down. I drove through there one late morning to get some lunch and was passed by a black SWAT vehicle, with city police dressed as though they were barreling through Beirut stuffed inside and hanging on the back. They were on their way to a drug bust at the apartments.

    • Refuse2giveup

      I agree; good post. I wonder, how does the author effectively represent and defend people who, in his view, are inferior? How does he justify “producing abundance” by representing people he considers ignorant and inferior? The generalizations he makes about blacks, Hispanics and Asians are offensive. I work in a large industry with many intelligent, hard-working, capable people of all races and ethnicities, contrary to “Mr. Smith’s” clearly biased opinion.

    • Pat Hines

      “Michael Smith”‘s statement still holds true. You’ve listed statistical “outliers”, that have no value in demonstrating the truth. You could have just as easily listed Robert Mugabe and Idi Amin as examples, they’re statistical outliers too.

      The real fact is, as an accumulation of genetic evidence is beginning to prove, that blacks and whites are NOT the same species, just as Neanderthals were a different species.

      Blacks will never be more than they are today, they have never been more in their entire history on this planet.

      • silence_dogoode

        I don’t argue that his statements don’t hold true for those he deals with within the criminal justice system, I’m sure they do.

        As to my “outliers”, I was speaking specifically about Americans and said as much, and I think they do demonstrate the obvious truth that not all black Americans “…cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well” and that they “are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike”, if indeed he was speaking of our black population as a whole and not just those within the criminal justice system.

        I’d be interested in seeing some of your “genetic evidence”.

      • Whitehall

        I think the strict biological definition of “species” would contradict your statement that ” blacks and whites are NOT the same species.”

        We’ve evolved in different climates and ecologies so there should be some diversity in our genes. I read once where the greatest diversity of genetic material (and the less homogeneity) was on the African continent amongst blacks.

        • Pat Hines

          The idea that climate caused black people is commonly held, but has no scientific validity at all.

          Sorry.

          • Whitehall

            Climate (at least tropic disease) is one reason that blacks were taken to work as slaves in warm, humid climates like the Southern US or the sugar isles. Disease resistance definitely has inheritable characteristics.

    • alex

      Don’t blame Democrats for everything. Democrat policies prevent black underclass from rioting and create artificial black middle class. Do you really think that some enlightened conservative/Republican policies will compensate for low IQ, poor impulse control, propensity for violence, need for instant gratification and inability to plan ahead? Genetics are more important than policies. You can institute new feeding procedures in a Zoo and hire a new director, but it won’t make hyenas herbivores.
      And go easy on MLK worshipping. He was for affirmative actions and racial quotas. He wanted equal rights, but expected equal outcomes. If MLK were alive, he would be another race hustler, like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson.

      • silence_dogoode

        Where in my comments do I “blame the Democrats for everything”?

        I’m hardly “MLK worshipping”. MLK was a republican and if you can provide documentation of his views regarding affirmative actions, racial quotas and equal outcomes, I’d be interested in seeing it.

        I think you do a real disservice to MLK comparing him to Sharpton & Jackson. Nothing in his public remarks that I remember or that I’ve read could be construed as divisive.

        As to my “hideous cycle of dehumanizing poverty” comment, I’m not referring to the accumulation of material possessions but rather the poverty of their perpetually rotting inner city environment, the poverty of mind, the absolute lack of intellectual stimulation and moral standards that is inevitable when everything is handed to you, and absolutely nothing is expected of you.

        • alex

          “MLK was a republican”

          What difference does it make? Parties change their positions, people change their views.
          Lincoln wanted to deport freed slaves to Africa.
          McCain, Jeb Bush and Sheldon Adelson are Republicans.
          “..if you can provide documentation of his views regarding affirmative actions, racial quotas and equal outcomes, I’d be interested in seeing it.”

          • silence_dogoode

            You’ve made many assertions and are being evasive. Just because you read it on the internet doesn’t make it true. If you want to be taken seriously provide your sources.

          • silence_dogoode

            Affirmative action was not in place during MLK’s time and as a republican it certainly isn’t something he would likely be an advocate of as affirmative action is a liberal progressive policy. I know for a fact he never spoke of being an advocate of any policy like it.

          • alex

            ” I know for a fact he never spoke of being an advocate of any policy like it.”
            Were you his confidant? Were you with him 24/7? Have you read all his books and interviews, transcripts of all his speeches?

          • silence_dogoode

            I’m speaking of his public comments. You’re still evading.

          • alex

            Have you read all his books, interviews and transcripts of all his speeches?

          • silence_dogoode

            I heard some of his speeches at the time he made them and nothing I remember serves to justify your statements. You’re still evading and making assertions you aren’t prepared backup.
            Get back to me when you are, otherwise this conversation is futile.

          • alex

            “Get back to me when you are, otherwise this conversation is futile.”
            I recognize the stile. You sound like a typical liberal with a degree in advance libtardery.
            In any case, don’t tell me what to do.

          • silence_dogoode

            “You sound like a typical liberal with a degree in advance libtardery”… “don’t tell me what to do”

            Pardon me. I was under the misconception that I was conversing with an adult capable of critical thinking and engaging in civil discourse.

            My mistake.

            BTW, you may want to re-read my first comment, the one you initially responded to.

            ADHD?

          • Guest

            Pardon me. I was under the misconception that I was conversing with an adult capable of critical thinking and engaging in civil discourse.

            My mistake.

            BTW, you may want to re-read my first comment, the one you initially responded to.

            ADHD?

          • KevinPhillipsBong

            King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the “Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life.” When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that “A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis.” To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, “If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas.” King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population.

            King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can’t Wait, he wrote, ”

            No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries…Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law.”

    • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

      Blacks are kept in poverty so they keep voting for the politicians that promise them the most freebies. They VOTE for a living!!

  • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

    The government has broken black culture beyond repair. You can thank the Democratic party and Lyndon Johnson for this.

  • RTUT

    I never really understood that a liberal, as the author describes himself, believes he should provide for those who are able to do so themselves but choose not to. This, to me, is a belief that contributes to the appalling conditions the author describes. He subscribes to a belief that you do not have to ever become an adult and contribute to the society you are so lucky to be part of.

    • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

      He is right in believing whatever he wants to believe, as long as he doesn’t advocate for the government to force others to do what he deems correct, rightful, morally correct.

      In fact, it is a very liberal (in the classical sense) attitude to uphold. He wants to help people, that is fine as long as he does it with his own resources/energies/time. I kind of have issues with him being a state employee though… still, he gave us an excellent piece to read and think about what we have let government do to our society.

      • ThomasER916

        You’re the reason why I’m not a Libertarian.

        The author is wrong. Furthermore, he’s wrong to hold an opinion that is dangerous to Western (ie White) civilization. He’s in a position where his “belief” is functionally dangerous. I only hope it gets him killed so someone else who isn’t a dodo can take his place.

  • Chris Banks

    Wait until your country has negro Muslims. They decapitate unarmed soldiers on the streets of London and claim it was justified from their point of view. After they killed Lee Rigby they stayed near his body and casually talked to the general public about their reasons for killing a soldier.

    • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

      I don’t understand why that soldier wasn’t armed. You need a second amendment in the UK because you’re getting your asses kicked by the Muzzies.

  • Strike_Team

    The only reason that this public defender has dealt with such “respectful” Hispanic clients is because those Hispanics are less than 10% of the total population, as he himself pointed out. His view of Latinos would be destroyed if he were in L.A. County having to deal with them. They do not act the same way as blacks per se, but the level of violence has been ratcheting up, bit by bit, for years out here. Gaining on blacks.

    I mention this in case his remarks regarding these people as respectful or not very violent have lulled any newbies into thinking these invaders are not a threat. Mexicans are violent, but the Salvadorans and Dominicans we have had to deal with for example, put blacks to shame in a lot of ways when it comes to sheer violence and cruelty. These people are more dangerous than blacks in many ways as Latinos in general can be as impulsively violent as blacks, but they can also plan things out at a higher level than most blacks ever do.

    Otherwise, the author does a great job in describing black behavior. Latinos have pushed most blacks out of Los Angeles, but there are still enough of them in L.A. and L.A. County to keep the County Jail full on their own – but the blacks roll in on top of the never ending stream of Latino criminals that has our jails ready to burst.

    I should mention we do in fact deal with Asian criminals all the time – of course at nowhere near the levels of blacks or browns. They are showing up, bit by bit, more often in crime reports. SE Asians are more prone to violence than E Asians, and a lot of us feel they are actually more prone to violence, at least certain types of violence, than whites, but their own communities tend to not report things, keeping the stats artificially low.

    This brings me to another thing that should be mentioned; as bad as black and hispanic crime is, keep in mind that those communities don’t bother reporting a lot of crimes, so the true numbers are worse than what you see. Also keep in mind that officials nationwide are forcing officers to change the way they report or classify things, so that’s keeping the true numbers down as well.

    By our own estimates – and this is from guys working the streets, comparing notes amongst ourselves, along with what we know about the real figures for certain crimes – we figure for example that a subject of Mexican background is five times more likely to commit murder than a white, even though a lot of sources say that a person like this is three times more likely. And the numbers for these kinds of people doing these types of things are getting worse, not better.

    The fact that the FBI still classifies Hispanic perps as “white” is disgusting. They do this even when an Hispanic perp is black, which can be the case with a lot of Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, etc. The FBI classifies Hispanic victims as Hispanic. There are a lot of reasons for this. One is to no doubt narrow the gap between whites and blacks in stats that the FBI presents to the public. It is also likely done in order to hide the true extent of Hispanic crime while the usual suspects keep the gates open, flooding the US with these South of the Border peoples who are in no way capable of keeping a modern civilization running.

    I have met some nice Hispanic folks. But the number of Hispanics with the wherewithal, with the brains and ability to keep things orderly, clean, modernized and everything else required for modern civilization to run smoothly is quite small. Too small for the US to go anywhere but straight down the drain should they and the other third world people, blacks etc., who are the tools of the usual suspects, become the majority. This is by design.

    • Whitehall

      Hispanics are neither culturally nor racially homogenous. Cubans differ considerably from Mexicans who have their own internal, regional differences.

      Admix with different US regional differences and there is bound to be a lot of variety in behaviors.

  • DrEvil007

    Roosevelt was an economic illiterate ideologue.

  • Doug Wakeman

    I would like to ask the author how many generations of government dependency stand behind these defective people. He sees that his clients did not have fathers present in the home, but how about their father’s fathers all the way back to the establishment of the Great Society programs? There is something equally defective and even more damaging in the Liberal mind that can catalog these failings of the welfare state and remain oblivious of the root of their causes that lay within his own philosophy.

    • MBlanc46

      Blacks have shown very similar personal qualities and behavior for as long as they’ve been in the Americas. The roots of what they are are much deeper than a couple of generations of government programs.

  • Chasmania

    ” Blacks…They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike.

    I do not know the solution to this problem….”
    I do: Repatriation to their self ascribed continent of origin, Africa. The question then becomes one of degrees and proportion while implimenting.

  • Anon Anonymity

    Just send the niggnoggs back to Africa, they always complain about muh slavery. So just return them from where we got them.

    All the educated, job-holding, regular acting black people can stay.

    • Bleau Gumms

      It’s too late for that. We have to make them good.

  • Geo1metric

    It’s called private property.

  • paddymanning

    However, my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. ” Your experience has been with people destroyed by the very Liberalism you espouse. 5 generations of dependency culture is spawning monsters without empathy. Turn off the spigot.

    • alex

      ” Your experience has been with people destroyed by the very Liberalism you espouse.”
      Liberalism hasn’t directly destroyed such people. Liberalism has given them an opportunity to be themselves.

    • silviosilver

      If the spigot had been redirected such that blacks were financially rewarded for not having children rather than for having them, since 1960 the black population might realistically have declined to some 15 million rather than grown to the some 50 million it sits at today. Blacks would have become only 5% of the American population by now.

      • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

        At the rate they are killing each other and aborting babies, black population should be declining soon. After the coming riots, there will be a lot less of them–and get used to Obama because when he leaves office, he will become the leader of the black and illegal alien faction–unless he’s too lazy and decided to golf 7 days a week instead of only 2.

  • Geo1metric

    Certainly of a different sort.

  • JohnEngelman

    Anyone can find something on the internet they agree with. If you understand that article, present the argument in your own words. If you cannot do that, you do not understand it.

    Economists cannot prove their theories with controlled, repeatable experiments the way chemists and physicists can. We cannot go back in time, choose a different economic policy, and measure different results.

    Nevertheless, life for most Americans began to get better almost as soon as President Roosevelt was inaugurated. That is why he was reelected three times, and why Republicans have never been able to repeal the signature reforms of the New Deal.

    Moreover, on this website I have documented, using data drawn from the Department of Commerce, and The Wall Street Journal, that since 1900 the stock market has grown more under Democratic presidents, from 1921 to 2000 the per capita gross domestic product in 1996 dollars has grown more under Democratic presidents, and that between the presidencies of Harry Truman to that of George W. Bush there have nearly always been more jobs created per year under Democratic than Republican presidents.

    That is impressive evidence that the Democrats are better stewards of the economy. During the New Deal when life was improving for most Americans, Democrats had a saying that resonated with the voters: “If you want to live like a Republican, vote Democrat.”

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    The problem is that Jews are disproportionately overrepresented among liberal do-gooders and multicultural extremists.

    • ShermanTMcCoy

      And therein lies the problem. As JE is so fond of reminding us, Ashkenazim have the highest average IQs on the planet, but 75% self-identify as liberals and do immeasurable harm to white interests. The rest appear to be neo-”any war is good for Israel”-cons, with a very few actual race realists who see themselves as whites first and would be on the front lines with us.

      If only there were more Jews using their intellectual gifts for good, instead of white genocide.

  • Whitehall

    Segregation was tried and rejected, largely by the whites in the North, as unworkable and immoral. (Most Southern blacks didn’t like it but some supported it.) It failed in South Africa too.

    For the first few decades integration had many successes, people like Condi Rice, Allen West, and Justice Clarence Thomas were able to make their significant contributions to society at last.

    But the welfare system worked its poison. The family structure that helped to make Rice, West, and Thomas such great individuals (read Thomas’ autobiography for an example) is vanishing for too many blacks.

    People are on bell curves. For some groups it is shifting in the wrong direction.

    • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

      “For the first few decades integration had many successes, people like Condi Rice, Allen West, and Justice Clarence Thomas”

      These were the exceptions. Liberal programs just made things worse.

      • FlaVet

        Notice that those exceptions…were never members of the plantation of the Dems either.

    • Rose215

      I think those successes were less about integration and more about strong family role models.

      • ThomasER916

        You’re a bucket of baseless blame and excuses.

      • Whitehall

        During segregation, really bright black kids had greatly reduced horizons. My early schooling was in segregated schools and black schools were definitely inferior.

        Strong families could get a young black up but segregation blocked advancement.

  • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

    “I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves.”

    This assumes infinite wealth, particularly with vastly differing white v. nonwhite birthrates and open borders.

    • WR_the_realist

      Yes. I feel no obligation whatsoever to subsidize people who keep dragging society down. I have no problem with the principle of social security (although I believe it should be on a sound financial footing, and not run as a ponzi scheme) but then we don’t have old people robbing 7/11s.

      • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

        Yes, but of course the AARP has the answer to the Social Security problem. Bring in countless more Mexicans, Somalis, Cambodians, you name it, and it will be like the Fifties Baby Boom all over again and the economy will skyrocket and Social Security will become solvent again! I couldn’t believe this stuff when I first read it. Then I looked a few pages over at the guy running their AARP Magazine and he was once a top Editor at Rolling Stone. Of course these people have never awakened from their Cultural Marxist utopian dreams because for them it has meant a very prosperous and fashionable existence.

        • WR_the_realist

          Yes, AARP is basically a branch of the Democratic Party.

      • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

        We will soon with what health insurance is about to cost.

  • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

    I agree, and it’s an issue. Society must hold government accountable and regain its independence from government intervention. It is the only way.

    • ThomasER916

      You talk about “society” but that doesn’t exist. Who is “society”?

      Is it anchor babies?

      Is it Somali Muslim “refugees” with an 80 IQ?

      Is it a newly arrived border hopper who can’t speak English?

  • TunaSushi

    “They plan their entire lives around the expectation that they will always get free money and never have to work. I do not see this among whites, Hispanics, or any other people.”

    I do. Maybe this guy needs to see the white trash of the burbs. Every welfare cheat I ever met was white.

    “… blacks … cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well. … I do not know the solution to this problem.”.

    The solution is painfully obvious, Mr. “Liberal”. Poverty and lack of education is the cause of this endless cycle.

    • JohnEngelman

      Since 1960 spending on public education has increased considerably. Academic performance has hardly improved at all. We cannot educate what does not exist.

      • TunaSushi

        What are you sating doesn’t exist? I don’t see any effort to educate the poor. I see ineffective systems that function as babysitting until they hope the students go away. Teachers are part of the problem. None that I met really care… all they want is a job with summers off.

        • JohnEngelman

          I have talked to people who taught in black schools. They did care. They wanted to transfer to schools full of whites and Asians who had the intelligence to learn, and who were safe to be around.

          • TunaSushi

            The bling culture is poison. Blacks have to get past immediate gratification.

          • JohnEngelman

            On that we agree.

          • TunaSushi

            I won’t be staying. I followed a link from another board. Thanks for the sentiment though.

          • FlaVet

            It doesn’t matter…like all apologists for criminal behavior, you’ll never see the facts, the truth or believe the insurmountable evidence.

          • TunaSushi

            You don’t know me. I’m not an apologist. Criminals are responsible for their actions and should be held accountable.

          • ThomasER916

            Actually, now he does know you. You’re trying to pretend as if your figurative flailing around never happened. You posted one piss-poor excuse after another.

            You don’t get to make over a dozens posts in a single position then claim you believe the opposite. For you, the indoctrinated know-nothing apologist, a “criminal” is never black because YOU never hold them accountable for the actions. You blame everyone else. Here’s a prime example:

            “I don’t see any effort to educate the poor. I see ineffective systems that function as babysitting…”

            The most salient feature of indoctrinated is self-censorship. You say you “don’t see.” That’s wrong. What you really mean is your CAN’T see.

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            They can’t. For almost all of them it is short-term gratification.

          • FlaVet

            They have to get “past’ more than that sushi san. Such as instantaneous violent reactions.

            You do know that too much tuna can lead to mercury poisoning, don’t you?

        • Rose215

          I think you are scapegoating. How do other races get educated?

          • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

            They show up, pay attention, obey the rules, do their homework, graduate without having 3-5 welfare babies and usually work part-time. I went to parent’s day with my stepdaughter back in 1998 and I was literally STUNNED by the number of kids that had kids of their own–and many had more than one!! I never thought getting my stepdaughter through high school without my becoming a grandmother was an accomplishment until I saw the STAGGERING number of mothers that were not able to achieve it.

        • WR_the_realist

          Plenty of new teachers enter those inner city with a sincere desire to
          educate those black children, obviously held back by white oppressors, and do their best to educate them. (All those starry eyed Teach For America types, for example.) They find that their attempts to educate fail utterly. Those who persist in the system survive by dumbing down the lessons and accepting the reality that they are highly paid babysitters. Those who still insist upon teaching do their best to get transferred to white schools, although the supply of white schools to transfer to diminishes each year.

      • silviosilver

        Since you mentioned 1960, I just thought I’d direct your attention to a comment I made a page or two up about the consequences for today if blacks had been paid to limit childbirth rather than provided incentives to expand it – their numbers may have declined to only 5% of the population today.

        • JohnEngelman

          What you say is probably correct.

          I would like for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) to be replaced with free abortion on demand.

    • alex

      They plan their entire lives around the expectation that they will always get free money and never have to work. I do not see this among whites, Hispanics, or any other people.”

      “I do. Maybe this guy needs to see the white trash of the burbs. Every welfare cheat I ever met was white.’”
      All dogs bite. Some breeds are more likely to do it than other.
      There are middle aged killers and violent women. Id doesn’t change the fact that young males are more likely to commit violent crimes than any other group.
      Actually, young black males are more likely to commit violent crimes than any other group.

      • TunaSushi

        You’re proving my point. Poverty begets misery, desperation, and more poverty.

        • alex

          I proved your point only in your imagination. There are more poor whites than poor black, but blacks, 12% of the population, commit 50% of all murders.
          Real poverty exists in slums of Rio de Janeiro and Bangalore. Ghetto blacks are relatively poor, but most of them don’t live in actual poverty. They don’t suffer from lack of food, water, clothing, shelter and basic necessities.
          Have you ever heard about food stamps, Section 8 housing, TANF, energy assistance, rent assistance. etc.?
          Blacks don’t commit crimes because they have nothing to eat or nothing to wear.

          • FlaVet

            ” 12% of the population, commit 50% of all murders.”

            Actually if you think about it…it’s really only 3% of their population that’s doing the hard crimes. Which makes it worse than it really is.

          • TunaSushi

            What’s your point? Poverty is good for blacks?

          • alex

            My point is that causes of black criminality and underachievement, more often than not, are genetic.

          • TunaSushi

            If my personal experience is meaningless, your point is equally absurd.

          • Rose215

            Poor parenting and no cultural traditions or aspirations are also problems.

    • FlaVet

      Subject: Conundrum is

      The definition of the word ‘Conundrum’ is: something that is puzzling or confusing.
      Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:

      1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.

      2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.

      3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.

      4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.

      5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

      6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries.

      Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the 21st Century.

      Makes you wonder who is doing the math.

      • TunaSushi

        Their representatives represent in name only. All serve corporate interests.

        • ThomasER916

          Those are great bumper-stickers!

      • Fantaman

        I wish I could upvote you more than once

    • Budd Smith

      You sound like Peter March.
      Here’s your debate on You Tube:
      Jared Taylor vs. Peter March – Racial Diversity In North America

    • Pat Hines

      Your statements are absolute nonsense.

      Poverty does not cause low IQs, low IQs cause poverty.

      The kindest thing that could be done for blacks is to return them to Africa where they’ll be the majority and among their own peers.

  • WR_the_realist

    Yup, that’s Common Sense Guy, and he does have common sense. I just wish more black people did.

  • running_riot

    Precisely. It wasn’t meant to contradict you. It wasn’t even a response to your ideas per se. It was meant for anyone reading your statements, to help put your facts in perspective by reminding them of the numerous ways in which facts distort conclusions.

    • JohnEngelman

      I am sorry if I seemed to be short with you.

      Nevertheless, opinions should be based on facts. Too many people believe things that are not true. I often surprise people by pointing out that more jobs were created every year under Jimmy Carter than Ronald Reagan.

  • JohnEngelman

    As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people, but are so poor they must turn to crime to survive. Actual black behavior was a shock to me.

    - Michael Smith, American Renaissance, May 9, 2014

    White liberals are usually too civilized for their own good. They have difficulty understanding the mentalities of those who are less evolved than they are.

    • silviosilver

      Whites in general are too good for their own good, both in the sense of being too civilized as well as being “too superior.” We can infer this because appeals to white superiority tend to turn whites against their race’s interests rather than encouraging them to support their race.

      • JohnEngelman

        Appeals to white superiority are made by those who cannot claim personal superiority. Eric Hoffer put it best when he wrote in “The True Believer,” “The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause.”

        Successful white Gentiles have no reason to be attracted to white supremacy. They take pride in their achievements, and satisfaction in the achievements of Jews and non whites.

        • FeuerSalamander

          YOU AINT GOT NO FENG SHUI!!

          • JohnEngelman

            You reveal your low intelligence with every comment.

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU AINT GOT NO NIPPON HAGENE!!!

  • FlaVet

    OK…then they behave like low life predatory animals. How’s that suit your liberal “feelings”?

  • FlaVet

    I’m certain they don’t know the difference when the clear choices are laid out before them.

  • Pookie Toot Toot

    Once a racist….

    • alex

      There is nothing wrong with being a racist.
      Feel free to copy my comment and post it on theGrio, DailyKos, HuffingtonPost , etc.

    • Rose215

      Meaning?? Is that all you take away from this? The writer has flagged a serious social issue.

    • Fantaman

      I see kool-aid on your lips. Typical leftist reaction. Don’t bother debating, call the messenger racist. Case closed.

  • nickthecat

    I, as a true conservative, am very disheartened hearing these truths. After 6 years of a black man at the top…NOT ONE TINY LITTLE THING as gotten better for black Americans. He is a mere slight-of-hand circus performer…

  • kaosethema

    hmm, exchange “black” with “white” and “criminal” with “CEO” and you get the same thing.

    • alex

      Google “corruption in Detroit”, “corruption among black politicians” and “corruption in black run America”.

    • silviosilver

      No, you don’t actually. But thanks for playing.

  • Fenny Famous

    Great article. I’m a teacher and could write a similar piece

    • Fantaman

      I would LOVE to read a teacher’s perspective. Please, PM me if you write an essay.

    • TruthBeTold

      You should write a piece for AR.

      While statistics are useful, nothing is better than a first-hand account of dealing with minorities.

      People often believe they’re the only ones who experienced a situation with minorities and learning that others have had similar experiences makes them more likely to speak out.

    • silviosilver

      Amren published an article “What It’s Like To Teach Black Students” a few years ago. Other blogs have reposted it. One repost by Marty Nemko generated hundreds of comments in the space of a few days. (Unfortunately, Nemko has since deleted it.)

    • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

      Please do–I’d love to read it–and I’ll post it on my blog!!

  • Funruffian

    Talk about Cognitive Dissonance! Here’s a guy who sees how one race can cause so much turmoil, disorder and havoc due to the laws that protect these criminals. Yet, he still upholds the liberal and insane belief that these cretins deserve the same right as anyone else.

  • s_c_f

    He may call himself a liberal, but most liberals today will no longer call him a liberal.

    Most of what he wrote is painstakingly obvious to many people (some of them black), but few are willing to put it in writing.

    • Fantaman

      That’s because liberalism is a cult, not an ideology.

  • dogbite186

    At least one person has awoken to the realities all about him. There are only 150,000,000 to go.

    • Budd Smith

      Likely many more than that to go.

  • RevnantDream

    This guy related to many real facts. He went off the collective reservation just a wee bit to far. The left will crucify him as a racist .Make no mistake on that score. For having the balls to actually admit reality as it really is, not the unicorn fantasy of the left.
    Frankly he may be one of the last real social Liberals left. Instead of phoney “progressives” ( communists) using that title, who want to shut every one up killing free speech. First in campuses , courts & now talk show hosts.
    Censorship has become the default of the West in the 21st century. Just watch how the depredations of Islam are covered up daily , as well its infiltration of sharia law.

  • irandom419

    If only getting welfare or disability was as difficult as getting a building permit for a single family home in a progressive town. Sounds like the males are a lost cause and there needs to be a focus on elevating the women.

  • ImTellinYa

    Everything he says about Blacks is true. You can tell he’s a liberal though, because he’s still trying to give Hispanics a pass. I’ve had a LOT of experience with Hispanics, and the vast majority of them are as stupid as a bag of hammers. They commit huge amounts of violent crime, and have the empathy and impulse control of an enraged badger. They are somewhat smarter then Blacks on average and therefore have the sense to at least maintain minimal appearances. But Hispanics are third-world savages who have no business in a White country.

    • DenisetheCelt

      Amen. Mestizos are actually more dangerous than Blacks, because they are able to maintain the illusion that they are “civilized”.

    • Hallie Eva

      Right you are. Mestizos are just as likely to have babies as teens, live on welfare for life while working for under the table wages, cheat, lie, steal, commit vile murders, deal drugs, and gang bang as blacks.
      They are just able to put on a better show when the SHTF with da man.

  • DenisetheCelt

    Here’s the solution, Lawyer Smding that Blacks should be giiving the same social privileges and status as Whites. Stop pretending that Blacks deserve to be anywhere around Whites. PLEASE stop deluding yourself that people of any Race, who do not contribute to society, in a positive way, should be given ANYTHING except the door.

    • Fantaman

      The solution is segregation. Blacks are not whites. Physically, emotionally and mentally.

  • ThomasER916

    All I hear is excuses.

  • JustinTime314

    A lawyer uses the noun ‘plea’ as a verb?

    • sixpack

      because it is an action word—you make a plea, you are not a plea.

      • JustinTime314

        Wrong. The correct word is ‘plead’ as in “how does your client plead?”

        • sixpack

          sorry, I didn’t realize that.

      • JustinTime314

        The correct word is ‘plead’ as in “He decides whether to plead guilty or not guilty.” The author used ‘plea’ incorrectly at least twice, which make me question his credentials as a lawyer.

        • sixpack

          and your Bar # is?

  • hanfeedback

    All that and he doesn’t know the solution, I mean he seems to come to the realization that it’s not a learning behavior and very ingrained (i.e. genetic). There was a solution, it was called segregation.

    • http://www.coinsandhistory.com/ Claudius_II

      Probably he does but he’s just being careful as to what to say– so as not to lose his Job!

    • TruthBeTold

      I believe this man is very religious which makes it difficult for him to accept evolutionary differences.

      • ThomasER916

        Religion and the understanding of evolutionary differences have nothing to do with one another. Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens both believed that evolution stopped at the neck and all “humans” have the same magical brain.

        When people believe in “equality” then they stop believing in evolution.

  • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

    I used to put in weeks like that in the lab.

  • ShermanTMcCoy

    You are a racist! How dare you describe black culture as behaving “badly?” They just be “keeping’ it real, gnomesayin”?

  • Rene Girrard

    How do whites force blacks to stop blaming whitey for their problems? That’s the solution. Getting rid of affirmative action would be a good step. We must get blacks off their white liberal slave master’s plantation in Washington, DC.

    • Fantaman

      Remove the welfare system. Remove AA. You’ll see riots from east to west coast but after a month, it’ll solve itself.

      • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

        When you have to work to eat, it gives you a huge incentive to get out of bed and go to work. Having everything handed to you courtesy of my tax dollars does nothing to solve the problem. No more welfare breeding, and if you have a child and are on public assistance you don’t get any more money for a second child.

    • ThomasER916

      What you’re asking is “How do you stop blacks from being black?”

    • silviosilver

      That is far less important than teaching whites to ignore black whining. If whites were dismissive of blacks’ attempts to blame whites for black problems all the whining in the world by blacks wouldn’t make a difference – indeed, it would only serve to stiffen whites’ resolve.

  • ThomasER916

    Positive racism only exists to promote the value of non-Whites in a White nation. Here’s what I mean:

    “Racism and discrimination are wrong as a matter of principle, not of science. That said, it is hard to see anything in the new understanding of race that gives ammunition to racists. The reverse is the case. Exploration of the genome has shown that all humans, whatever their race, share the same set of genes.”

    This is precisely the kind of Boasian Junk Science that pushed Multiculturalism.

  • Stating-the -Obvious

    Just wait until amnesty is given to the illegals. From the front of the bus to under the bus in a heart beat your “clients” will go. I guess the Democrats want to place their bets on a horse of a different color.

  • http://www.coinsandhistory.com/ Claudius_II

    According to Hernstein & Murray’s “The Bell Curve”, our welfare system works to reproduce lower IQ “people”, including blacks at a higher rate than intelligent people. This is the result of 50 years of selective breeding processes to increase the population of those who will breed in an unrestricted fashion without worrying about a job or career or even caring for their young. Why care for their young when we, as a white society do it so well for them?

    • Whitehall

      This was Ms. Sanger’s argument for birth control and on-demand abortion.

      • ThomasER916

        No it wasn’t her argument. I’ve listened to Sanger interviews and read her bio. She was against life itself. She hated the idea of being a mother and regretted giving birth. She hated “large families” and believed they should be culled. Margaret Sanger was just a monster.

        • silviosilver

          She was entitled to her views and her views make much sense. Not all women are cut out for motherhood and it is unwise for society to promote motherhood as normative for all women. Although whites today find themselves in a demographic hole, it is very important not to lose sight of the fact that limiting fertility is necessary to prevent populations growing wildly out of control to the detriment of everybody.

          • ThomasER916

            “She was entitled to her views…”

            ^^I want you to explain “her views” in no uncertain terms and lay them out explicitly. You can’t do that because you don’t know anything. You don’t know “her views.” You’re lying. You begin with the same BS I’d expect from a Cultural Marxist then you try to posture enlightenment.

  • Freedomless2012

    Pretty well written article.

    Instead of you idiots attacking each other in the comment section about what stupid political fixation have you been suckered into rooting for, why not talk about ways to make the situation better?

    • SlizzardAjeosshi

      I think Claudius in the comment underneath makes some valid points: they key is finding the right incentives to stop morons from reproducing. Personally i would offer a small but significant enough sum of cash (700-800 $ maybe ?) in exchange of undergoing vasectomy/tube ligation surgery.

      This would work marvelously in terms of adverse selection incentives: probably it would be only the least desirable specimens who would accept such an invasive and irreversible procedure for some cash

      • Fantaman

        This. the more feral blacks will jump at the opportunity to do it, blow the cash on drugs for the first two days and we solve the problem long term.

      • http://www.coinsandhistory.com/ Claudius_II

        Such things (immediate cash rewards) tend to appeal to those with very short term goals. Thus they’d work marvelously. Higher IQ blacks would not be as tempted by such offers so it would change the average IQ within that population: at the very least.

  • A_Nobody

    I understand the culture and agree with all he says but a single issue. I agree we do have an obligation to help those who cannot help themselves, but for those who can but do not it is a personal problem and our government needs to wake up to that fact. For those who can and try, I’m also willing to pitch in and help them work their way out.

  • NotThatGuy

    The problem starts at home, which the author brought up. How do we stop 13 year old blacks from breeding?

    • Fantaman

      I see the solution being clear as day. Offer blacks 500 cash for vasectomy. This will solve the problem right away.

      • jeffaral

        A slice of water melon will do too.

        • FeuerSalamander

          or pair of “air jordans”

        • FeuerSalamander

          or a bucket of KFC

        • FeuerSalamander

          Blacks will oil each other over a bag of chips. They will surely have no problem with sterilization for remuneration

          Remuneration for negro sterilization
          it will slowly end the tide of urban mutilation
          fat white girl miscegenation
          and national disintegration
          it is a path way to salvation
          a rebirth of our great white nation!

      • silviosilver

        Effective “demographic management” may require substantially more than $500, but it is difficult to imagine public money better spent.

        • FeuerSalamander

          nope, blacks will do it for less than $500.00. Just pretend it is something that they can come in for once a year. They will do it. These are retarded people we are talking about .

      • FeuerSalamander

        This is actually a very good suggestion. They would definitely do it. The men are not interested in the children at all. They would be trying to “game” the system by getting it done repeatedly. WE should pretend that they are “putting one over on us” and let Bixtavious come in every year for another $500.00 payment. They will laugh amongst themselves about how they are fooling whitey. WE will be laughing because no black babies will be being born. IT is much cheaper this way than paying for welfare.

        • Fantaman

          Exactly. Sure, let Jamal get another 500. If he’s ready to game the system like that he’s a thug and won’t last long. Even after 5 times, it’s a minuscule fraction of what their spawns are costing civilization.

          • SpawnTaviousJackson

            exatly!!! We do not need to wait for the gun-mint to do this either, we can do it through private organizations.

    • jeffaral

      Love your profile pic!

  • skedaddle1

    The start of a solution is to begin jailing violent offenders on their 1st felony and no plea-bargaining the charges down. The quip in the article about doesn’t everybody deserve an eleventh chance points to the problem. Take all the money we send uselessly overseas and spend on sports arenas for wealthy owners here and redirect it to the criminal justice system to truly prosecute each individual for the crime they are accused of. Maybe one free chance (on a non-violent offense) but no more.

  • Tom_in_Miami

    “Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes.”

    I wonder where he got the idea that Blacks commit few sex crimes. It seems to me that I read in more than one source that Blacks commit 37,000 rapes per year against whites alone.

  • MLP123

    FYI, I am a conservative and I also believe we have a moral duty to provide for those who are truly in need. That’s not a liberal or conservative issue. The issue is the delivery system, and you are seeing the results of a liberal delivery system. Maybe it’s time to rethink?

  • Fantaman

    Conservatives provide a lot more for the poor than liberals do. The difference is that we do it with our own ressources instead of pressing others to do it.

  • PouponMarks

    The only solutions are: a eugenics program that is humane. Give cash payments to these Blacks, Hispanics, Whites, etc.,who show mental defects that manifest in social pathologies, to undergo irreversible sterilization. Even at $10K, this is a bargain.

    Secondly, for those that are here today, institute flogging and caning, like Singapore, but both public and private. Increase the duration and severity, until La Bone and Emilio cease criminal transgressions.

    • http://www.coinsandhistory.com/ Claudius_II

      It doesn’t even need to be irreversible. It just needs to cost $20,000 or more to have it reversed. The effect for 99+% of the cases would be the same. It should also be mandatory for criminals. If the person is later found to be innocent, then the state can have the reversal preformed.

      • PouponMarks

        Remember the “Three Strikes and You’re Out” program proposed by the NRA, where three felonies meant a long minimum sentence? How about, “Three Strikes and You’re Cut”?

        • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

          3 strikes?? One is plenty!

        • silviosilver

          One is quite sufficient for criminals, many of whom might sire numerous offspring before their third strike.

    • MikeofAges

      Sterilization is bad public relations because it is perceived as bad morality particularly when those who are to be sterilized are very young. There may be other ways to encourage people not to reproduce. Primarily, these have to be focused on women. I used to tell people, not much point in neutering the tom cat. A female will always find a tom.

      • PouponMarks

        I disagree. Perception is much less important than Reality and perpetuity of the Nation. Your alternative is vague and fading.

        • MikeofAges

          How do you turn what you advocate into a policy with the force of law behind it? Not possible. Almost no one would support it. Policies to encourage girls to delay childbirth might get some support and could have some effect. I am aware, however, that teenage pregnancies among minority females very often are not unwanted. That first pregnancy represents the girl’s entree into the world of publicly supported matriarchal village socialism. If that is the limit and extent of the girl’s horizons, perhaps even the limit and extent of her capabilities, it is hard to put her on another course.

          But let me repeat. American society is not going to support a program of sterilization of adolescents and young adults. Even one based on inducements rather than coercion.

          • Fantaman

            Not the force of law. just offer money in exchange of neutering them. It’s a legitimate business transaction.

          • MikeofAges

            You will not be able to do this with public money. If you try it with private money, you will be sued. And you will end up with civil judgments against you. You might even be prosecuted, particularly if you induce minors to participate.

            If you did this with private money, if you limited your activity to women over 21, particularly women who had children already and did not want to have more, you might be okay. But there are going to be people who do not like you very much, simply based on your motive.

            Get a plausible agenda.

          • silviosilver

            There is no inherent reason it could not be done with public money. The justification would have to be more elaborate than “less blacks, please,” but it seems reasonable that a cultural shift of sufficient force could occur that would enable such a policy to be publicly funded. One could hardly argue that blacks would suffer for it – they would be its prime beneficiaries.

          • MikeofAges

            That is true. If there was a cultural shift, a eugenics program might become acceptable. Long term birth control for troubled women, or those who just want, already is available.

          • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

            From what I understand 80% of terminated pregnancies are performed on black women.

          • silviosilver

            Check again. I think you’ll find the numbers are not nearly so lopsided. But yes, the black propensity to abort has been about the only positive racial trend over the last forty years.

          • PouponMarks

            It’s the force of choice, not law. She makes the choice. The funding could be private; Bill and Melinda, Oprah, could all chip in. She could go out and buy Beyoncé stuff, Air Jordan’s, and the. Borrow someone else’s baby or rent one for the short time it takes for her to tired of it.

          • MikeofAges

            Someone will donate. But if you try to start a non-profit, expect legal harassment, even prosecution. The doctors who perform the procedure might be subject to legal harassment. If you were serious about implementing this idea, you would be stepping into a dangerous territory. Major religious organizations would oppose you also, some for different reasons than others.

            But good luck. And seriously, stay from adolescents and people under 21 generally. 18 year olds might legally be able to give consent, but the opposition would be especially intense in the case of 18 to 20 year olds.

      • TruthBeTold

        There are reversible procedures for women and men though with mixed results.

        As the article points out, blacks don’t reason well so trying to convince them that having fewer kids might be best for them may be an up hill battle but some would have it done if they were offered money or told they would be financially responsible for any children they produce.

        The hardest part would be to convince liberals to go along with it.

        If offered money, many blacks would take up the offer.

    • Jay Dee

      Eugenics like Hitler did? Nice. We saw how well that went.

      • silviosilver

        I think you’ve been watching to many Holocaust documentaries. There are numerous different ways of applying eugenic logic to social problems, plenty of which would not require any force at all – or even inconvenience.

      • FeuerSalamander

        there is a soft eugenics program against whites in this country right now.

    • ThomasER916

      The problem is you believe the government isn’t anti-White.

  • TruthBeTold

    I find it remarkable that the author is still a liberal and clings to his ideals despite the evidence of race-realism he sees every day.

    I have defined myself as a former ‘passive liberal’. I didn’t champion any cause but I did fall for the liberal line that blacks were victims (slavery being a clear example) and deserved an extra foot-up.

    But I lost my liberal beliefs when I graduated from college and entered the real world and saw that much of black victimization was self-inflicted.

    What is clear to me is that blacks and whites are different in how we think and reason, choices, ideology, etc.

    The intelligence gulf is stunning and insurmountable. Blacks know what they know and no amount of reason or proof will change their minds.

    I sense the author my have strong religious beliefs that drive him to help the helpless. That one’s a tough one surmount.

    Even to believe God made us different might not change one’s beliefs even when confronted with reality and that the white man is responsible for picking up the slack of the less able black man.

  • JohnG911

    Actually, you’re the naive one here because the welfare state isn’t covering the needs of the poor – its creating the poor!. The war on poverty was a complete failure! It created a culture of dependency and its destroying the American family – it already destroyed the American black family. The welfare state is subsidizing a degenerative culture assuring generations will remain in poverty. It was private charities who came to the aid of the poor during the Great Depression. My mother grew up during the depression and she told me stories about how people help each other. Private charity and churches did infinity more to help the poor than government. America’s black culture problems are a byproduct of the welfare state.

    • meatwad_SSuppet

      You are talking about a welfare system that is long gone. Then we started hearing about all the upset men that have to actually PAY for the kids they created. Funny twist isn’t it.

  • SpeedersKill

    Blacks are mentally inferior and everybody knows it. The press won’t let anyone say it but americans need to say it anyway.

    • Fantaman

      My wife calls blacks the “Pet project”

  • http://mysteresmoonbatslayerclub.blogspot.com/ mystere

    That is true. Newt Gingrich kept Bubba from going hog wild.

  • anne leace

    Frankly could care less what political/world views the author has- he is still dead correct and braver than nearly everyone I know (of).

    I think I could guess what is causing the problem. The inability to think rationally reminds me of little children, really. It is possible that their brains never developed past that point in significant ways. Genetics may play a part, but I think the zero schooling might be doing it. The brain is a muscle, and like all muscles, if it isn’t exercised it wastes away. Literally. If they haven’t done any real thinking in their entire lives, their brains are probably eroded enough to accurately call them brain-damaged…

    To solve that… no clue. The trouble lies in the upbringing- or massive lack thereof. It’s not like we can confiscate all the kids from their parents and magic up good homes. It would be even harder to re-program the older and younger generations to actually take some responsibility (older, to not sleep around that much and if so, to raise the kids; younger, to be fruitful people anyways).

    • FeuerSalamander

      they are afraid of facing the reality of what black people really are which is ” violent, soulless beast without any conscience but with extreme narcissism. Beast who will rape and kill and feel they have done nothing wrong at all” This reality is what people resist for so long, it is more out of fear than charity. The fear is facing the true nature of blacks, and facing what it means , what we need to do about it.

      • anne leace

        Eh… no. Sorry, but do have to correct you there. Blacks are not inherently “beasts” as you put it- too many genius and good men are black to ever make a blanket statement (Ben Carson, for one). The trouble may be genetic at this point, but it is certainly not *all* of them and probably has a hell of a lot more to do with environment than nature.

        • Wapitiman

          It has a lot to do with nutrition. During the first two years of life, nutrition plays a very vital part in brain development.

          • FeuerSalamander

            no, it is DNA all the way

        • FeuerSalamander

          name one

  • Caped Crusader

    I would love to know where there is a large metro area in the Southeast with only a 10% black population. For this reason I doubt the veracity of this story, but not the facts or statistics, for they seem true>

    • http://www.coinsandhistory.com/ Claudius_II

      I’ll bet Austin, TX has a low black population. Yep, according to wikipaedia 8.1% black as of 2010 census. Of course it’s borderline whether it’s a large metro area & it’s in the middle of the country.

  • bwbeeman

    The black people I know are not like that. Of course, my black neighbors make more money than I, and are fully integrated into the socio-financial progress of society.

    • FeuerSalamander

      fiction

  • StanSki

    Insanity: Repeatedly trying to do something impossible but expecting a different outcome.

    This lawyer is insane. There is a reason why, when we bring Gorillas and Chimpanzees into zoos, that we make sure they are in cages to protect ourselves and them from harm. This is as it should be with blacks as they are incapable of living in human society unchecked. It is evident from this “liberal’s” own writings that blacks are not up to human evolutionary standards. This makes them dangerous animals. The best course of action would be to send them all back to their origins. Either that or sterilize them and cage them until they are no longer a problem.

    • FeuerSalamander

      “Insanity: Repeatedly trying to do something impossible but expecting a different outcome.” this is an old trope but it is wrong. It is more a definition of STUPIDITY!!! Insanity is holding two opposite beliefs to be true at the same time and or a total disconnection from reality. Example : a person believes they who they are but they also believe they are” jesus”. Or, a person believes that criminals should not be executed but that innocent children should be aborted.

  • durabo

    Michael, Obama gone sent Eric Himmler and da PC Polis to arrest yo’ass, knowhwatisayin’ dawg?

  • Eric Shun

    Very good article; sort of like the one written a couple of years ago by the White liberal inner-city public school teacher.

    I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t. This world view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it.

    What’s so liberal about that? This view is no different from that of a conservative.

    • Tony Nobaloney

      Makes him sound and feel good since deep down inside he dislikes blacks just like the rest of the phony “liberals” out there, especially in Hollyweird.

      • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

        Can you blame him? Look at what he deals with every day!

    • Natassia

      “What’s so liberal about that”

      —–> “I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t.”

      Conservatives believe that if you don’t work [and yet can] then you don’t eat.

      • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

        I’ve got NO problem with that. I’ve worked since I was 11 years old and hunger is a great motivator.

      • Wapitiman

        “For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: ‘If a man will not work , he shall not eat’” (2Thess 3:10)

  • Arbeideren

    Yes, but no heli chase like this one, US ghetto style.

  • John Lenin

    This guy is a liberal? Well he just broke the first rule. Don’t notice!

  • TheUltimateCurmudgeon

    I really don’t understand why some people are so up in arms about this article. Are you mad at the article, or mad at the truth within it?

    • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

      Truth hurts–and this article screams truth from the mountaintop! Here’s some more truth in cliche form: There are none so blind as those who will NOT see.”

  • Ronald Nelson

    The solution is to return to individual responsibility beginning with the Black family… end socialized housing and support for those able bodied individuals who can work. Stop supporting single mothers and where a child is being abused make that child a ward of the State or put them up for adoption where possible.
    We must brake the cycle of dependency and poverty… that permits single women to lay on their backs for profit… by producing children thru which she achieves economic security. And yes I believe these women have children for economic and security reasons… often, abandoning them to the care of their Grand Parents/mother. We need to create a system that develops a sense of individual responsibility for ones lively hood and conduct. That begins with a STRONG TWO PARENT home… were Godly moral values are inculcated at an early age.
    We must identify and isolate troubled children at the earliest possible age… separating them from the social environment that creates generational lawlessness and poverty thru government subsidies. If that means creating a system of government homes…so be it… although I believe that the Churches and local community, if empowered, could find better solutions thru foster homes and adoption.
    We must stop teenage pregnancy by ending the financial and security these young girls seek thru bearing children. To do that we must END social welfare as it exist and create a system that discourages unwed motherhood in every possible way. Education is the key and the public schools and local churches must become the battlefield for the Black communities soul.

    • BernieGoetzFan

      Appreciate the post and we are on the same wavelength in terms of ending the welfare culture and handouts to the unproductive. That being said, I really think that we are dealing with something genetic when it comes to the black underclass and that policies can only help around the edges.

      • Natassia

        Genetics change over time. Set the ball rolling in the right direction today, and those blacks who show tendencies towards future-time orientation and civilized behavior will be more successful reproductively. Starting back in the 1960s we began promoting, albeit not intending to, bad behavior with the war on poverty. But just as the black community went way down hill after the 1950s, I believe they can improve over time as well. We gotta start somewhere. And when I see how whites behave in places like San Francisco with their sodomite festivals, or Harvard with their satanic celebrations, or in Texas with their rabid defense of all things abortion-related (see abortion Barbie Wendy Davis), I think that black violence is not even close to being the root cause of America’s problems. It is just a symptom.

        • ThomasER916

          “I think that black violence is not even close to being the root cause of America’s problems. It is just a symptom.”

          We could replace “America” with “Rhodesia” or “South Africa.”

      • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

        Well, considering the incredible amount of mixed race babies I keep seeing, hopefully the gene pool will improve.

    • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

      However it’s never going to happen since the other blacks resent those who get off the plantation MORE than those who stay–hence they are called “Uncle Tom”, etc. and criticized for using proper English i.e. “talking white” and the peer pressure to stay on the welfare plantation is tough to overcome. Look at the contempt the black community has for people like Clarence Thomas, Allen West and Tim Scott to see the truth of that. Nothing will change their culture of dependence until the EBT and SNAP cards stop working and the dust clears from the ensuing riots and race war–and it’s coming because we can’t afford to continue to use welfare as the only means of social control other than incarceration.

  • Frank Morris

    Blacks commit very few sex crimes? Blacks overall account for 13% of the population, black males accounting for about 5% of the population, yet, according to the FBI’s National Crime Victim Survey, they commit more than 34% of the rapes!

    • DeMarquise Elkins

      SHHHEEEEEEIIIIT !!!

  • Norseman

    I love these articles where people from different walks of life depict their personal experience of racial differences and their personal road to race realism. More please!

  • Potentialexpat

    Honestly this more so shows economic, and cultural differences, and nothing genetic at all. Honestly I believe this lawyers story to be true. But to say these blacks are like that, because of genetics is false.

    • Norseman

      How can you say conclusively that it is not (at least partly) about genetics?

      • ThomasER916

        He/she/it says “nothing genetic at all” because that’s his religion. His religion is “equality”. What we discover is “equality” will invariably be anti-White.

        • SpawnTaviousJackson

          yet the same person will have no trouble saying blacks are better dancers, aff-leets, singers etc, for genetic reasons. Only the POSITIVE differences can be admitted.

          • ThomasER916

            That’s precisely what I meant. I’ve discovered moral truths:

            One cannot give to other people and not steal from Whites.
            One cannot help other people and not hurt Whites.
            One cannot defend other people and not attack Whites.
            One cannot love other people and not hate Whites.

            They’re the laws of God governing our curse.

      • FeuerSalamander

        reply to trolls with a non sequitur that has no connection to what they said. This short circuits them

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU AIN’T GOT NO PANCAKE MIX!

  • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

    Yet whites are all a bunch of racists because we are tired of not only dealing with this behavior, but also BEING FORCED TO SUPPORT IT through our taxes.

    • FeuerSalamander

      Negro fatigue is setting in, it is saturating the American psyche like water saturating a sponge. Get ready for a lot more testimonials. In a few years time this guy won’t be perching his marxist egalitarian hogwash that he preaches at the very end. He will be fed up with them completely and be calling for their removal from amongst us.

  • Earl Turner

    “I do not know the solution to this problem.”

    Yes you do.

    You don’t live among them, do you? No. Of course not. You live in a gated community or upscale subdivision with one of those cutesy names and a fountain by the front gate. There might be one or two token black families living on your street or the next one over but they’re the rare top 1% of blacks and certainly not representative of the other 99%.

    You know the solution but you’re a typical American elitist. A white homeland? Preposterous! Only those wealthy – oh excuse me, successful – enough to afford the high cost should be able to enjoy the privilege of living apart from “those people”.

    And there lies the real problem. We as a people are no longer loyal to our race. We only care about ourselves. What I can afford. Where I can live. That must change. What happens to the poorest of white men happens to me. The right to live among one’s own kind is the birthright of every white man.

  • DeMarquise Elkins

    Nearly one in three African American males aged 20–29 are under some form of criminal justice supervision whether imprisoned, jailed, on parole or probation.

    Wikipedia: Statistics of incarcerated African-American males

  • Bear Baker

    Even though I lived in the suburbs of Detroit and had to deal with the blacks most of my life Katrina was what opened my eyes. I vividly remember sitting with my Mother watching the news and they were at the Superdome. All of a sudden a White man was screaming at the reporter about people being raped by black gangs in the Superdome! The reporter just calmly said that “emotions were running hot” and they quickly changed cameras to the studio. Never did I see that incident again even though they were just playing the same stuff over and over again for the next 72 hours or so.

    After that my eyes were opened. I was in the Navy at the time and I took note how all the blacks segregated themselves, and the token black SNCO’s were a lot less competent than their White counterparts. My military experiences with blacks in the Navy & Marine Corps entrenched my view upon blacks. For the most part blacks in the military are the best of their race. Yet they are still lazy, prone to crime, and not trustworthy. Today I teach my Wife (who is Filipina) and my daughter that they are to stay away from blacks and I give them an extended version of the John Derbyshire “talk”.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      As you know, Blacks destroyed Detroit. With a small Black population, Detroit would resemble Pittsburgh, or Buffalo until recent years. You were wise to escape.

  • CalMark

    How can this person say that he is still a liberal? He sounds deeply conflicted.

    • Natassia

      He believes in Karl Marx’s “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” See the fourth paragraph from the bottom.

      • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

        None so blind as those who will not see….

  • Natassia

    “I believe we have this duty [produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care] even to those who can care for themselves but don’t.”

    Well, then you are part of the problem. So long as you continue to treat black adults like mentally-retarded children, they’ll keep acting like it.

    • FeuerSalamander

      Liberals should be charged a “liberal compassion tax” and not the rest of us.

      • Natassia

        Except compassion has nothing to do with it. There is nothing compassionate about enabling bad behavior and failing to hold people accountable for their actions.

        Liberals are only liberal with two things: their morals and other people’s money. Really, they are just libertines.

        • FeuerSalamander

          IN their mind it is “compassion”. I say we go with it and charge them, we can call it a liberal vanity tax amongst ourselves.

    • Ruby_Con

      You are absolutely correct. But, I do kind of agree that as a moral society we do have an obligation to our neighbor. However, I do not believe that a government, through confiscatory tax policy ought to force an individual (effectively at the point of a gun) to do so. More importantly I don’t think the government should have the ability to pander to or to buy votes from a constituency that derives it’s lively hood off of the backs of hard working, productive and responsible citizens, irrespective of color or ethnicity.

  • Hal K

    His r/K theory for human races is pretty interesting. I watched some of the debate last year. Suzuki raises his voice in a way that comes across as disrespectful.

    • JP Rushton

      Suzuki was outright belligerent for what was supposed to be a scientific debate.

  • silviosilver

    Even more tragic is non-blacks’ tendency to allow the “offense” they take to straight talk about blacks to overwhelm their more rational estimation of the value of living around blacks. The result is that even people who understand what a disaster being surrounded by blacks is comfort themselves by feeling superior to the “real racists” – ie people who differ from themselves only in that their racial rhetoric is a little more forceful than their own.

  • silviosilver

    Everything you’ve said here is almost complete bs. That blacks may have at an earlier point in time exhibited pathological behavior to a somewhat lesser degree does not controvert the basic social fact of gravest importance – that integrating with them is an unmitigated disaster.

  • Peter

    You should get your own reality show. This is one of the funniest things I have ever read.

  • FeuerSalamander

    “Blacks ….live in the here and the now and are unable to wait for anything”- which is why they are in court in the first place!

  • FeuerSalamander

    “Usually, by the second meeting with the client I have most of the police reports and understand their case.”— while the blacks never, at any point in time, understand it, and will just decide they are a “bik-tim uff da ray-ciss white mans wohrllll.”

  • FeuerSalamander

    “A client who insists on testifying is almost always making a terrible mistake, but I cannot stop him.”—-and now that there is YOUTUBE and Starshiphiphop they are documenting their crimes and making that public and then letting everyone know who they are. Yep, the reason these geniuses can’t find work is not because they are idiots, but because the world is “ray-ciss”

    • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

      Would YOU pay $10.10 an hour for worthless help?

  • FeuerSalamander

    “The more you try to explain the evidence to a black man, the angrier he gets. It is my firm belief many black are unable to discuss the evidence against them rationally because they cannot view things from the perspective of others. They simply cannot understand how the facts in the case will appear to a jury.”— as I have said before, they suffer from incapacitating, terminal narcissism

    • Hallie Eva

      they suffer from incapacitating, terminal narcissism

      Exactly. This pathology is glaringly on display in the attitude/behavior of the affirmative action mocha messiah currently infesting the White House.
      His body language is so loud, actual words cannot be heard.

      • FeuerSalamander

        There was a ton of Judge Judy episodes on Youtube that were since pulled. They so amply illustrated the nature of the negro that I guess the powers that be had to have them taken down!!

        • Hallie Eva

          Feuer, sorry to hear they were scrubbed, but am not surprised.
          I would love to have seen them.

          • FeuerSalamander

            do a search, some might have been reposted.

  • FeuerSalamander

    “One of my clients was a black woman who prayed in a circle with her accomplices for God’s protection from the police before they would set out to commit a robbery.
    “—– you can preach christianity to a monkey, but it is still a monkey, and it will only understand the monkey version of christianity

    • Natassia

      As opposed to the white snake-handling Pentecostals who pray that God will heal them from venomous bites?

      Come on. Dehumanizing black people is not the right route to go here. In fact, by degrading them we only lower the standards of behavior that we should be expecting from ALL human beings. Black people are capable of living in civilized society. I have seen it with my own two eyes. They are not “monkeys.” They are people. And we need to start treating them like people and holding them accountable for their actions.

      • FeuerSalamander

        YOU AINT GOTS NO PANCAKE MIX!!!

      • FeuerSalamander

        YOU AINTS GOT NO PANCAKE MIX IN THERE!! YOU AINTS GOTS NO BISQUICK AND YOU ANTS GOT NO BIXSLOW!!

        • Natassia

          Well, you’ve thoroughly exposed yourself as a troll. No intelligent discussion to be had here.

          • ThomasER916

            You don’t even realize you admitted there’s “no intelligent discussion” when talking to a Negro.

            What’s really sad is you’re convinced your intelligent. You’re so convinced you can’t even see how easy it is to mock you and goad you into admitting things you’re deny on the surface just to be Politically Correct.

          • FeuerSalamander

            When people are not interested in listening,and talk at you “to educate you” the proper thing is to tap back, in the same disjointed way they do. She doesn’t even understand that A refusal to have any connection in a conversation is accusing her of not being able to connect thoughts.

          • ThomasER916

            Natassia thinks you’ve been exposed as a “troll.” You haven’t been exposed at all. You did a fine job of challenging someone who still holds a Politically Correct worldview, goading them out into the open where they’ll say things that cannot be unsaid.

          • FeuerSalamander

            I think it is a very good technique. I would like to encourage others to use it.

          • FeuerSalamander

            A DINGO ATE YOUR BABY!

      • Hallie Eva

        They are not “monkeys.” They are people.

        Disagree, based on my own up close and personal experiences.
        People do not do what I have seen and heard.

        • FeuerSalamander

          I have had two decades of close personal experience. I sounded like this lady at the beginning of those twenty years. Now, I am sure they are fundamentally different from humans. The guy who wrote this article describes them very well.

        • Natassia

          And I can put up my own anecdotal experiences against yours (and yes, I was bullied by black girls while growing up.)

          They are biologically human, and they are morally human. People are capable of extreme evil, regardless of race, sex, or even age. History shows it. Even among the most “civilized” you saw common behaviors like temple orgies, pederasty, sex with statues, murder, etc.

          • FeuerSalamander

            YOIU AINT”S GOTS NO SMOOTHIE MIX!!! YOU AINTS GOT NO SMOOTHIE MIX!!!

        • Natassia

          By calling them monkeys you remove any culpability they have for their actions.

          • FeuerSalamander

            YOU AINTS GOTS NO PANCAKE MIX IN THERE!!!

      • Ruby_Con

        The problem with your example is; “the white snake-handling Pentecostals” aren’t wreaking economic and societal havoc with their anti social behavior. Monkey may have been a poor choice of animal in this context, but if pig or dog or cat were substituted he still makes a valid point.

        • Natassia

          I beg to differ. White people destroying the traditional practice of Christianity is why we have the war on poverty, elective tax-funded abortions, and government-controlled education in the first place. All of those things have contributed to the destruction of the family, particularly among black people. And take a look at West Virginia if you want an example of an ass-backwards uneducated government-dependent white population with some of the highest teen pregnancy and obesity rates in the country.

          WHITE people have been in charge, and they are still in charge….and until we start changing our ways we can’t be expecting blacks to be changing theirs.

          • FeuerSalamander

            A DINGO ATE YOUR BABY!!!

          • FeuerSalamander

            A DINGO ATE YOUR BABY!!!

        • FeuerSalamander

          no, monkey is apt, they are monkeys

      • bushwacko

        “Some” black people de-humanize themselves. So the victims of “some” of these animals should just say aw!

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOIU AINT GOT NO AUNT JEMIMA MIX!!!!!!

  • Natassia

    I agree with most of what you are saying except the part where you said the media and Hollywood try to portray blacks in a negative way. We both know that is not true. The news media always tries to hide the race of perpetrators, particularly when black or Hispanic, and Hollywood certainly has no problem creating black heroes. Consider the movie based on the true story about scientists designing a prosthetic tail for an injured dolphin. Although in real life they were two white scientists, Hollywood decided to replace them with one black scientist played by Morgan Freeman. And that is just one example.

    Oh, and blaming social programs for keeping people down. Eh, wrong. Either black people are morally-culpable human beings or they aren’t. If they are, then they are 100% responsible for their actions, including abusing social welfare programs.

  • Johnny Clay

    The behavior of the black mothers and grandmother just proves the old adage that blacks “raise their daughters, but love their sons”.

  • Hallie Eva

    you are only around a certain type of person, the criminal element….

    What excuse will you offer for the blacks around which I served, the hospital patient element?
    I, too, could write a book, no an encyclopedia, that would only partially cover the dysfunction, violence, and multi-layered psycho-social pathology I witnessed as a physician, including near death raped infants who were bleeding out.
    Were these people grateful for the help? No. Their thoughtlessly loud, weeping, caterwauling family and visitors jammed into the waiting room and threatened that we “fix the brutha” or face the consequences. This, while they demanded we serve them all gibsmedat free food.
    As the author of this piece reports, they would create a “circus” milieu in the most inappropriate setting one can imagine with no regard for the sensibilities of others in the room.

  • Glaivester

    I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a
    moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those
    who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this duty even to
    those who can care for themselves but don’t.

    If that is true, do we not also have a moral duty to help these people to avoid reproducing, perhaps involuntarily, and perhaps in ways that are not easily reversible?

  • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

    Luckily we elected the biggest racist in the world to the White House who appointed an attorney general who wants to set thousands of these animals free. However, when the EBT and SNAP cards stop working, a great percentage of the herd will be thinned in the ensuing riots while the middle class folks who work and pay taxes watch it on TV and the liberal idiots scream about the injustice of it all. I travel extensively for work and I’ve learned NEVER to exit the interstate on any road named for Martin Luther King because that is just asking to have to use the gun that I’ve had a permit to carry concealed for nearly two decades. This article is absolutely spot on correct in my observation and it is a travesty that will all of the money we’ve spent to mainstream the black community, it hasn’t changed one iota. It’s also been my observation that the black community has an “entitlement” mentality–they’re ENTITLED to welfare and food stamps and free housing and medical care, and because they vote for the ones who promise the most money, they get whatever they want. The scumbag politicians are using OUR money to buy the votes of the black community–however, we are OUT of money. Using welfare/food stamps as an instrument of social control is no longer affordable and when the money runs out, all hell is going to break loose. It’s coming sooner rather than later, so stock up on ammo and non-perishable food because it may take 3-6 months to restore order and no help is coming from the police. You’re going to be on your own.

  • Hopsaregood

    What a sad indictment of our Liberal Democratic driven society.

  • E Wolfe

    Bitter truths, which both the government and press strive to conceal, rather than address. The former are classic enablers. Liberal politicians see this group, primarily the women, as a voting base to be cultivated. The liberal media, for the most part, trained socialist propagandists.

    Then we have the Rev. Jacksons’ & other grifters, i.e., Al Sharpton, who embrace these traits as career making opportunities. Parasites, feeding on the dregs of their own race, while whipping them into a frenzy at every opportunity.

    If a white fomented the violence which that crew stirs up, the full weight of the criminal justice. industry would be focused on them.

  • machodog

    What a terrific and wonderful and truthful and factual article this is. But to explain it to blacks and black sympathizers like he does…well, you might just as well try to explain it to a dog. You’d get the same blank stare from the dog.
    Blacks for the most part, sit around and wallow in self-pity over something that happened to their grandmothers and grandfathers twice removed. Listen to their grand parents and great grand parents stories of how awful slavery was in the 1860s right on up through the 1960s and apply this pity to themselves which didn’t happen to them, and dwell on it even to the point that they wanted to sue the white people of today for what happened to blacks in the days of slavery. Taxpayers paid hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting this insanity.
    Blacks don’t like their own kind. The overwhelming percentage of murders of blacks are committed by blacks. Why is this?

    • Wapitiman

      Every year the Jews celebrate their freedom from slavery (Passover) The blacks however, seem eerily to celebrate their slavery as an excuse for their failures..

  • jorgaone

    I’ve worked in or near Metro areas all my life–what he says is generally true. The exception to the rule is who always gets all the media hype…

  • chamuiel

    Wow! The truth comes out.

    Of course, it will be denied.

    • FeuerSalamander

      ON this very thread no less

  • powhatan1

    Painfully true

  • Doc

    As a former cop I have to agree with everything said in this article. The issue is the black culture of dependency created and nurtured by Democrats for votes. Nothing else. Until we can remove black children (at a very early age; like one) and place them into a normal growing environment they will not change. Eventually they will end up like the average Afghani male; illiterate and driven by any mullah (black ministers) who satisfies their basic needs and urges. I suspect the only way this could change would be if there is a civil war instigated by the need to stop the violence, hatred, and child abuse and neglect. The worst racist in the world are black religious leaders who exploit their own people for money and power.

  • jaxtom

    Exactly why I carry (legally) and have a spare magazine with me….but I’m willing to defend myself against ALL attackers – not just those referenced in this excellent opinion piece!

    • FeuerSalamander

      “spare magazine”…… “Hustler?

  • jonhartz

    Wow.

    • fistdeyuma

      Who do you think created the programs that tramped them in this downward spiral? It is not about “blacks” but about a culture that was created around federal programs. Before Johnson’s started this scam Blacks were more likely to retain the family structure and have better educations. This was in the middle of government supported racism of the worst kind. Well, perhaps the second worse because the government supported racism that followed did much more damage to blacks.
      As proof just look at the success rate of blacks who immigrate to the US. Do you honestly think white racism is only directed to blacks born here?
      The only disconnect I see is Jonhartz’s ignorance of history and lack of common sense.

    • FeuerSalamander

      Yaint gots no bix connect!

  • fistdeyuma

    When I showed this to people on a Liberal board I got the expected results. They attack me for daring to try and educate them. They live in a world were all evidence of their failure is deflected on others. They claim the problem is that people are unwilling to give more money and status to their failed programs. It is not that they are trapping people in a thugs world; it is they need more money and power to make it work. Their wonderful programs would work if they just had more money and time. Deliberate ignorance on a massive scale. All they need to deflect the facts is one word, “racist” or “privilege”. Those are the only problems. If they can just fix the evil whites all the problems would go away.

    • Billca

      Reminds me of the professors who tried to teach calculus to a horse. After 2 years they were nowhere. They said it could be done if only they had more time and money. Unfortunately for them, the horse stubbornly stayed a horse, not a math whiz.

  • InfidelCrusader

    It is refreshing to hear a self-professed liberal speak honestly. It may shock him to hear that many have already come to the same conclusions that he has based on their own personal experiences.

  • Psychodad

    Holy crap ! ! Truth from a liberal !

  • bpuryea

    Tragically, the last 4 paragraphs of this article spell out one of the root causes of that which the article points out. When you help someone do something that could and ought to do for themselves, you hurt that persons ability to live and survive by the means most of us chose to do so. Work hard, obey the law and be a net contributor to society rather then a net burden on society.

    Maybe someday, this attorney will put two and two together and arrive at four instead of three.

    • FeuerSalamander

      DNA is …….DEHHHHHHHHHH——–STIHHHHHHHHHHHH———NEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!

  • LeSellers

    The author hit on the reason for the disparity, but defends it with nonsense.

    There is no fundamental difference between black and white people, but there is a huge difference between welfare and self-sustaining people. The sentence, “They are not ashamed to live on public money,” says it all.

    And it is the “liberals” who have forced this atrocity down the throats of the very people they claim (against all evidence) to want to help. Get rid of welfare and we could get rid of the manifestation. The visible, the recidivism, the resentment, the bastards, that would all go away. But keep welfare as a way of life, and these problems will only grow.

    Black children who have fathers in the home, fathers who go to work, fathers who tell them “No” turn out much like white children in the same condition. White children who grow up in single-parent “homes”, who have no role modles, who can get away with anything they do, who see food, clothing and shelter as their right, end up like the black child in similar circumstances.

    Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU DONTS GOTS NO BIXQUICK!!!!!! YOU DONTS GOTS NO BIXQUICK!!!!!

  • http://baldilocks-talking.blogspot.com/ Juliette Akinyi Ochieng

    The real goal(s) of the LBJ’s Great Society is completed. Everything this author mentions are the features of that goal: the re-instillation of a slave mindset into black Americans.

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU DONTS GOTS NO KFC !!!! YOU DONTS GOTS NO BUCKETS OF KFC!!!!!!

  • Carl Stevenson

    After all of that he still believes we have an obligation to support them in this lifestyle?
    That takes a special kind of stupid!

  • Jay Star

    I disagree with trying to deceive the jurors that the defendant is something hes not. Let him/her wear what they want, also we do not have a duty to provide for the people who do not want to fend for themselves. Help them to get on their feet and become a good citizen, yes, but not want to do nothing to help themselves, No!

  • tdvann

    He must be a racist. How dare he point out the truth.

  • Billca

    The problem isn’t necessarily one of race or poverty, but education. But therein lies the rub. Too many poor young blacks are taught young that the way to get ahead is to look out for #1 – themselves and everyone else be damned. It’s taught in their homes by following the actions of their parent or elder siblings, on the streets, in schools and even in their churches. This breeds the lack of compassion the author mentions.

    If you try to educate these impulsive young people on compassion or empathy for others they will fidget and squirm then tell you that you’re wasting your time. For most, trying to better themselves or understand their own failings is not part of their agenda. Some are adept at discerning what you want to hear after a lesson and parroting it back, but will forget it as soon as there is no need for it. A young black solider once confessed that he had a hard time dating women of any color. “When was the last time you opened a door for them?” I asked. He looked surprised, “Open a door? Da bit*h got two hands don’t she? Why do I gotta do it for her?” Try to explain and they think your ideas are nutty.

    Sadly, LBJ’s Great Society has taken hold and he was right. Blacks now wear invisible chains and keep voting for their Democrat Plantation owners.

    • dd121

      Liberals hold the view that if only blacks could be educated enough to finish high school all these social problems would go away. I think that’s completely naive. The pathology of blacks goes much deeper than any superficial high school education.

      • Billca

        And that’s very short-sighted and naive. We agree that there is more to it than mere education (at least “public education”). Their community often lacks education in compassion, morality, honor and integrity, things that liberal educators just are not capable of teaching.

        To be sure, there are some who are trying to be decent people, but the evidence suggests they are by far the minority within the community.

      • FeuerSalamander

        The body count of keeping them in High school, for twenty years or more in order to learn what white people learn in four years, would be too high.

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU DON”T GOT NO PANCAKE BIX!!!!!! YOU DONTS GOTS NO PANCAKE BIX NOOD!!!!!!

  • none of your business

    40 years ago when I was young I met several cops and prosecutors who were familiar with black crime The prosecutor was about 55 in the early 1970′s. He had been a DA for more than 25 years so he began his career around 1950. Then as now, almost all the criminals were blacks. Those were born between 1930 and 1900. In those days blacks were either officially or common law married. He told me that almost all the young black criminals father’s had lengthy prison records. In those days the liberal mantra was criminal black fathers cause blacks to become criminals. Today both the liberals and conservatives blame the absence of fathers for black crime.

    The Public defender mentions the ranting raving black women. That group of disfunctional scum has been affirmative actioned into high ranking goverment and education jobs. Think about it. Although the soviets had affirmative action for party members, they selected the best qualified party members for the job and university admission. Furthermore, the soviets only selected reasonable intelligent mentally stable people fro party membership. We select raving lunatics for goverment and education jobs.

    Ever worked or been in a black female goverment office? Screeching, endless babbling, squabbling all day long, no different from the black women infesting the courthouse halls.

  • none of your business

    Both the police and DAs I have known say that the black victims of black crime are as bad as the defendants.

    • https://politicallogical.wordpress.com/ WideBridge

      Interesting.

  • none of your business

    Here’s how to handle the englemann nonsense and middle school social studies garbage he posts. I just keep my finger on the down arrow and scroll right past his idiocy. Since JT and the monitors won’t ban him, we can just ignore him.

  • Jim Kental

    Just read Genesis where Noah pronounces a curse on his disobedient son Ham (The ancestor of all blacks). They were all cursed to a life of servitude because of their lies and arrogance.

  • JosephHyde

    “I believe we have this duty even to those who
    can care for themselves but don’t.” How about “Won’t”? Thanks for an interesting article.

  • dd121

    “However, my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. They cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well. They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike.”

    Mr Smith describes in detail the pathology and inhumanity of negroes but then reaches the wrong conclusions how to react. How can this person remain a liberal understanding this? I think his pathology approaches that of his black clients. Just my opinion.

    • FeuerSalamander

      He describes what so many of us with experience also see. It is only those who have ZERO experience with these creatures that DARE to judge us for coming to the only possible conclusion that a sane person can about them!

  • Billca

    Stick with it Gabrielle, you’re on the right path. God bless you and your family for your hard work.

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU DONTS GOTS NO SMOOTHIE MIX!!! YOU DONTS GOTS NO SMOOTHIE MIX!!!!!

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU AINT GOT NO MILKBONE!

  • Tyro

    So this guy spends every day dealing with criminals, realizes that criminals “do not understand the pain they are inflicting on others,” (duh, that’s why they’re criminals) and then concludes “blacks do not understand the pain they are inflicting on others.” I’ve never seen such a massive failure of logical thinking from a supposedly functional adult.

    Maybe if he got out of his isolated bubble for a while and met people who weren’t criminals, he would think differently. I see this a lot, actually– people place themselves in positions where they deal with criminals or lower classes, and then use that experience as a means of denigrated others, from the comfort of a place where they are always dealing with criminals or the otherwise incompetent.

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU DON”T GOTS NO POPEYE”S CHICKEN!!!! YOU DONT GOTS NO POP EYYYYYYYYYES CHICKEN!!!!!!

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU DONT GOTS NO PANCAKE MIX!!

    • Billca

      It is probably worth noting that the author’s experience is with black people who commit crimes and not with blacks who have worked to become educated, productive members of society.

  • Tom2855

    We should have picked our own damn cotton.

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU DONT GOTS NO AUNT JEMIMA CHICKEN!!! YOU DONTS GOTS NO AUNT JEMIMA CHICKEN!!!!!!!

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU!! Have a brain, and a good point. You don’t need no pancake mix, KFC, popeyes chicken or bixnoodjemima fashizzle nizzle

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU DONTS GOTS NO RED COOL AIDS!!!! YOU DONTS GOTS NO GRAPE DRANK!!!!

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU DONTS GOTS NO JAMBA JUICE!!! YOU DONTS GOTS NO JAMBA HUICE!!!!

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU !!!! Have a well stocked pantry , are playing with a full deck, an above average IQ and a nice pair!

  • FeuerSalamander

    I was at an event today for graduating college seniors. It was the first day of a multiple day event where the kids were housed and transported and allowed to drink all they wanted. The kids were almost all white!!!!!!! Guess what!!! NOT ONE FIGHT!!!! NO TROUBLE!!!!!THE PEOPLE WERE ALL PLEASANT AND ACTUALLY FUN to be around! I do so many events that I was dreading this one when I saw the crowd. When an event has this many black people, SOBER black people, compressed into such a space, it is sheer mayhem, violence, fighting, viciousness, hatred , it just is just plain horrible. BUT with white people, even when they are drunk., they are VASTLY better than blacks!

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU DONTS GOTS NO WAFFLE MIX!!!!

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU AINT GOT NO POPEYE’S EXTRA CRISPY! YOU AINT GOT NO RED COOL AID!!!

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU AINT GOTS NO MAUI WOWIE!!!

  • Craven Moorehead

    i was raised on lies and the typical liberal indoctrination…..first time my bike was stolen,black guy.confronted him that it was my bike and the first time i got jumped by 4 black guys.first girl i knew that was raped,white girl by 5 black guys at a school dance, first time a black woman called me a white devil and almost murdered me because my black friend invited me over to have lunch when he thought she wouldn’t be home. just because i was in her house after her son had eaten a million meals in our home…i can go on and on and while white people are raised on love and tolerance and that people are people, blacks are raised racist to hate whitey…. thats fact

    michael jordan this week was quoted saying ” i was raised to be racist and hate white people”……my reaction was, “you dont say?”, dripping with sarcasm.

    protect your children people. dont be afraid to tell your kids the truth. treat everyone with respect and… just be aware.

  • asus3000

    Excellent article. Well written, unemotional, and fact based.

  • Northohio

    The answer to the probem is simple, education.

    • Murphy J NY

      Did you actually READ the article? They REJECT education, they REJECT facts. You cannot teach that which refuses to learn.

      • Shears_of_Atropos

        Among urban blacks, it has been my experience that pursuing an education is a white and Asian thing (in black perspective), and they reject “acting like Whitey”. That said, some do realize that education is important, and will act on that idea, but demand that their teachers and professors be black (with predictable results).

        Example: In Houston, during the ’70′s, it came to my attention that there were 2 Pharmacy schools in town: one at the Univ. of Houston and the other at TX. Southern Univ., a traditional black school. When their graduates took their State Pharmacy Exams, 90% of the former would pass on the first try, but the TSU success rate was about 35%. Investigation showed that the UH school had a mandatory class at the senior level (Colloquium) that was an intense review of the entire curriculum. TSU had no such review course. Also, UH ignored any organic chemistry courses in your earlier study, and taught medicinal chemistry as if all students were beginners. TSU accepted organic chemistry credits from other colleges, including those schools oriented to the oil and gas industry.

        Blacks pleaded for relief from the State, and got it. The UH was barred from mandating the medicinal chemistry course, and forced to drop the Colloquium. The immediate results were predictable. UH’s failure rate increased, and TSU’s stayed the same. Says a lot. Some people strive for excellence, and others do not.

    • FeuerSalamander

      YOU AINTS GOT NO BIX_QUICK PANCAKE MIX!

  • AR154U

    Ok,.. so when is the leftist media e-lynching of “Michael Smith” going to happen?
    This MAN cannot be allowed to state fact or truth in todays society !!
    He or She must be stopped !!

  • Laissez-Faire Rothbardian

    Yes he was, my friend! He was a force to reckon indeed!

  • Katyward

    What is truly sad is the fact that 50 years ago Black families were closely knit, education and self-control were valued and promoted by family and church, there were many fewer unwanted pregnancies and abortions. The pernicious effects of the drug culture, moral relativism, exhibitionism in our culture and welfare state have contributed to the deterioration of our society as a whole with all races. But it has impacted the Black community the worst due to the ideological drumbeat about their victimhood..

  • Divemedic

    I have no problem with the author’s belief that he has a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care
    for themselves. Nor do I have a problem with his belief that he has this duty even to those who can care
    for themselves but don’t. he is correct, his world view requires compassion and a
    willingness to act on it.

    The problem that I have is when anyone advocates using the law to enforce this world view, his morals, and his belief system on others, just as I have a problem with religious people doing the same with their beliefs.

  • LeSellers

    May your hope bear fruit. And you are a truly blessed person. You escaped a long-planned ambush.

    Unfortunately, there is a powerful force, government, that is working, and working hard, against you and willing to do you grievous harm.

    From government-run, tax-funded schools to antiSocial inSecurity, to TANF and SNAP, all government “social programs” are part of a mindset wanting to destroy the family. To a large extent, the Black Family no longer exists, and the White Family is failing rapidly.

    Strong families do not need, and do not want, much government. But the primary goal of government is to grown larger and to become more intrusive into (that is, to exercise greater control over) individual lives of their subjects. So, to achieve its goal, government must undermine the Family. This is true because weak families not only need, but demand large and powerful government.

    Fathers are a mandatory piece of strong families. This does not mean that individual families cannot exist when the father is dead or deployed to Afghanistan, but when the father never was part of the family, or is divorced and isolated from his children in huge numbers, the rest of society cannot overbalance that lack. Girls without fathers do not learn how to react to men and they get pregnant. Boys whose only adults (parent, teachers, etc.) are women do not learn to be civilized. They get girls pregnant, do drugs, kill others without remorse, and see only themselves as important in the world (which justifies all the rest).

    So, the first thing government must do, to achieve its goal of growth, is to get rid of fathers.

    Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

  • Ridley

    No such thing as a liberal, they are socialists and the end result of socialism is communism. Have fun in the bread lines people.

  • Shears_of_Atropos

    I am stunned! I worked as a private forensic chemist for years, mostly for defense attorneys (though sometimes called by the prosecution when they thought my evidence would help cement their cases) and have worked trials with defendants who were black, white and Hispanic….. somehow never an Asian or Native American. But then, most of the cases I worked were drug-related, now and then with a murder involved. What this writer describes with respect to the behavior of the defendant, the witnesses and the families, I have experienced first hand, and chalked up to cultural differences. I never sat down and thought about it analytically, and reading this article was like reliving my professional past. Well written, and a breath of fresh air in today’s PC world. Kudos!

  • Sgt Snuffy

    Poor soul, I really feel for the guy. He means well and he’s doing his hardest to help but eventually it will catch up to him and he’ll turn into a massive cynic. As far as Black on white crime???? It has been on the increase for the past 6 years and it’s getting worse. Beat downs and murder are common occurrences in black mob attacks on Hispanics and Whites
    now, and the Media and City, State and Fed governments refuse to acknowledge it. Remember when Obama was elected, We are in Charge Now was the phrase being used a lot, and They are my People also used by the US Attorney General Holder. It’s any wonder that Black on everybody else attacks increased over the past 6 years????? And Look at Chicago, Detroit, and NYC for examples

  • Dale Raby

    Nothing here was really news to me. I’ve seen the same behavior many times, though it is important to mention that the individuals referenced here do NOT constitute a majority even among their own racial group. Like the author of the article, I don’t know the answer, however: “Black people have to solve their own problems. No single white man or group of such can do it for them”… excerpt from 777 Bon Mots for Gunslingers and Other Real Men

  • DeMarquise Elkins

    It appears that most of his black clients are unsigned “artists” on WorldStarHipHop !

  • Devil Dog

    It was NOT always this way in the Black community. This is a result of 50 years of a progressive/ communist assault. Don’t believe for a second that your race is safe. America IS being destroyed from within.

    • FeuerSalamander

      WRONG!. Crime statistics for blacks going all the way back show that they have basically been just like this all along. THIS is why SEGREGATION existed. White police forces did not concern themselves with crimes that happened within the black community in most locales but in cities such as SF, NY and Chicago the crime statistic show that crime was always rampant within the black communities .

  • none of your business

    I had a thought about why blacks cannot conjugate verbs. Maybe they are so dumb they can’t grasp past and future? There was a youtube video of a 30ish black woman ranting and raving to a store clerk that he should reduce the price for her because her grandmother was a slave.

    • LeSellers

      No. Blacks can conjugate verbs when they hear the language early on.

      The problem is, they do not hear the language at home, nor in schools, nor in church. At least the welfare Blacks don’t. Ben Carson conjugates verbs just fine. But his mother insisted that he read a lot.

      Children, Black or White, who have no fathers, who never hear “No”, who don’t have a curfew, those children will never learn to conjugate verbs.

      The issue is not DNA. The issue is welfarism. Get rid of welfare, and the other problems will go away, too.

      Mr. Magoo O’bama, will there ever be any Jobs?

      • http://disaffectedteacher.blogspot.com/ Hy Alldredge

        Sorry but you’re wrong. People can’t conjugate verbs because they’re stupid. There were stupid people before LBJ and when the welfare state collapses there will still be stupid people. Ben Carson is obviously not stupid, but this article is written by a public defender so he comes into contact with the lower end of the bell curve on a daily basis. I’m guessing you don’t. The big problem with welfare is that it encourages stupid people to have more stupid children. It’s very Darwinian, really, except in this case the adaptive traits are low IQ, laziness, and lack of impulse control.

        • IstvanIN

          I work with blacks who have college degrees who can not conjugate verbs.

          • Hallie Eva

            As have I, Istvan. The majority of blacks, including affirmative action fellow pre-med students with whom I have been in contact, speak ungrammatical English. In spite of reasonable educational advancement, many say, “axe” for ask, [Oprah does this too], “gwine” for going, drop verbs from sentences, slur, elide, do not apply endings.
            I often cannot discern their speech at all.

          • IstvanIN

            Did you ever see the denture cleaner commercial with the black female dentist? In the commercial she says “dentures are different to real teeth”. “To” instead of from? What?

          • Hallie Eva

            Yes, I have seen that.
            It kills me that we send English mangling [black] troops and Olympic athletes abroad who shame us with their ignorant use of our beautiful language.
            I was watching the end of the “Big Game,” Cal vs Stanford, the only game I formerly watched, [and never again after this incident].
            A TV sportscaster was interviewing a cornrowed black footballer, discussing a particular play in which said player was tackled near the end zone.
            The footballer said, “I seen him coming.
            This, from a low IQ vastly unqualified black granted a space in a prestigious university, displacing a meritorious White student.
            Incensed X-husband called and asked, “Are you sending back your diplomas? I want to.”

          • http://disaffectedteacher.blogspot.com/ Hy Alldredge

            I just had a flash of inspiration – A remake of My Fair Lady, but set in America, and Eliza Doolittle is a ghetto black girl. It would be hilarious. Although if we’re being realistic I don’t think it would have the same ending.

          • Kenner

            It would end in gunplay.

          • FeuerSalamander

            hmmm, what an apt last name for a negro

          • FeuerSalamander

            the rain in Spain bees all up in d’air in da plane

          • http://disaffectedteacher.blogspot.com/ Hy Alldredge

            If Henry Higgins thought lower class Brits butchered the English language, I think he would have shot himself if he landed in 2014 Detroit. That is, if the natives didn’t shoot him first.

          • MikeofAges

            One thing people do not understand about the story is that it was not fantasy, but kind of like “Rocky”, exaggerated reality.

            Plenty of speech teachers out there helping people overcome their betraying accents. When I was a teenager, a friend’s mother did exactly that. Some of her clients were black men and women hoping to lose their ghetto and backwoods accents. Others people with speech problems.

          • MikeofAges

            “Pygmalion” is one of the most misunderstood stories in the world. I wrote a paper about the play in my literature class, which I took as an adult, not a postadolescent youth.

            The printed play includes as a postlude which explain what happens to Eliza Dolittle following the action of the play. It is made very clear that Eliza was a social conservative and that that creed was what made it possible for her to survive her darkest days with her integrity intact, not the empiricist ministrations of Professor Higgins.

            Liberals are very prone to creating stories which belie their own basic stance. Sometimes they know. Sometimes they don’t.

            Hollywood does it all the time. Sometimes Hollywood has to go to lengths to make sure the audience does not understand the meaning of the story they are seeing. “Sister Acts” was salient example. No, Deloris did not redeem the church, though she did help the parish. The church redeemed her. And the ending? Disgusting. The church choir, which had learned to incorporate popular music into the service with the help of Deloris, performed the old standard “My Guy”. Only they made it “My God”. A supreme act of misdirection, designed to assure that no one left theater understanding what the story was all about.

            “There’s not a man today

            Who could take me away from my guy”.

            Indeed.

          • Hallie Eva

            You are a better man than I am, Gunga Din, managing to sit through a Whoopi flick.
            Liberals seize the subtext of GBS’s Pygmalion, applying it to their delusional idea that schools and employers sabotage minorities with lowered expectations.
            The logical reasons why schools and employers must lower their expectations are never considered.

          • http://disaffectedteacher.blogspot.com/ Hy Alldredge

            Before affirmative action they would not have been able to get college degrees. Nowadays a degree in the hands of a black person doesn’t equate with basic literacy.

        • Shears_of_Atropos

          You’re on the right path. IMHO, speaking the pidgin English we call “Ebonics” (!) is no different from kids years ago speaking Oppa-Goppa or Pig Latin, as part of group identification. An inner city kid speaking proper English in the hood gets ridiculed that he “ain’t black enough!”

          Simply put, lousy English is a part of their freedom, as is a lack of education. This is cultural segregation, and urban blacks buy into it, in spades. And yes, blacks want it now so they can use/spend it now. Planning for the future as did our European and Asian forbears is a foreign concept. Hence: “Personal industry pays off in the long run; laziness pays off NOW!”

  • Geo1metric

    “Anyone can find something on the internet they agree with. ”

    J.E.

    • JohnEngelman

      I use the internet to document factual assertions I make in arguments i compose myself. There is a difference between doing that and linking to an essay that claims to blame Jews for something evil.

      Now, in the case of the link you mention it shows fluctuations in the per capita gross domestic product adjusted to 1996 dollars, from 1920 to 2002. The data was compiled by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis

  • Ken

    The ending to his story should be; the Liberal Progressive Democrats make possible for these people to remain in slavery. In fact is necessary to keep them in slavery so they can continue on within their bureaucracies and elected positions fooling the rest of the country on how great the need is to give these poor souls they have created and continue to keep slaves to their ideology.

  • Lou

    This essay explains the horrible situation, and its cause, in American ghettos as well as anything I have ever seen. I worked in a ghetto in NYC for 5 years and could add my own insight but this author covers it all, pretty much. This is what Democrat politics gets you. They care nothing about all the lives destroyed, all the money squandered, all the physical and moral destruction caused….just so long as these poor dummies register to vote and the Democrats impersonate them at elections. When the author says “They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike” he isn’t kidding. These kids are a criminal tsunami. Be careful out there.

    • FeuerSalamander

      Every area that turns black becomes a violent, crime ridden, crumbling, ruble down ghetto. For all those who claim this is about anything other than inborn, genetically determined hard wiring, please tell us why, no matter what, every black area becomes a ghettto?

      • Biggus Dickus

        Also, they should explain why there is no City, County, State or Country run by blacks is not a craphole. The USA is now turning down that path in just 6 Looooonggg years.

    • Biggus Dickus

      Very true. I grew up in the Detoilet Suburbs. All was fine until the mandated bus route from Detoilet, along Woodward Ave. to the Suburbs was put in play. Crime skyrocketed-Especially violent crimes such as Rape and Murder. Nice job, Libtards.

  • http://disaffectedteacher.blogspot.com/ Hy Alldredge

    “There are people of ALL races who are socially unacceptable.” True. He did point out that he’s had four Asian clients, I believe.

  • charles_1

    If he hadn’t said he was liberal this would be nothing but another example of racism. But somehow invoking the “i am a liberal” card means you can say things that others can’t.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    A very accurate portrayal of Blacks. The kind of behavior he has described is why Whites have left cities such as Detroit and Cleveland en masse. Wealthy Libtards employ that accusatory tone, and maliciously accuse us of “racism”, something they seem to think is a grave sin on par with rape or murder, for choosing to move away from Blacks. These Libtards would also move if they feared for their safety and possibly their lives.

  • Proud2bfromtheUSA

    I know what will work. The opposite of what Society is doing now.

    Stop rewarding unwed mothers with a paycheck. Make everyone who can work for their living work, meaning if they are on public assistance then make them work for it. Even if that work is something as simple as caring for the children of others also on public assistance, (in a supervised by security camera public building of course) while those other mothers are working at janitorial work in public buildings. This kind of program will require training so start training centers for those seeking public assistance and make training mandatory for receipt of that public assistance.

    Stop the abuse of child support. Put a moratorium on all future child support. Women are using sex to increase their income by forcing men to have babies they are not prepared to take care of, and yes I know this is letting the men off Scot free but the men are responding to a woman opening her legs to them. Men who have never had a father have no one to show them how to be a moral man and a man can not learn how to be a man from a woman sorry single mothers you can not do the job you are failing as the abundance of black men in prison attest to. Getting rid of child support will have consequences …… In a generation you will have less unwed mothers and more two parent families.

    Make maintaining your public housing part of the rent. Offer them lower rent for the ability to have monthly inspections and keeping their homes clean and well maintained. Make higher rents for barring those inspections, also offer rent free public housing to those willing to keep the parking lots clean and the grounds maintained. Force people on public assistance to become invested in their communities by forcing them to help maintain their communities. Hire from those on public assistance into jobs created for them such as groundskeeper for the park in your neighborhood and make their public assistance check reflect whether they are doing a good job or not. Give them a full public assistance check for completing their job with 100% accuracy but reduce their check by a percentage of each thing they are not meeting as far as the metrics for that job go.

    You will always get more of the behaviors you subsidize and less of what you punish.

    • IstvanIN

      Re: your second paragraph.
      Most of the women who have children out of wedlock are not doing it to increase their income for the simple fact that most of those men are bums or in and out of jail and far from a reliable source of income.

      • Proud2bfromtheUSA

        Yes and giving them child support for these children are not allowing them to learn any consequence for their action except continuing to have sex with many different men allows her to have more money for each child.

  • IstvanIN

    What a horrible racist!
    It is spelled realist.

    • Hallie Eva

      Thanks for fixing that, Istvan. Racist, he is NOT.
      My experience serving in an entirely different setting [urban hospital Level One Trauma care] mirrors his to a tee. There is a marked difference, however, between ours and the PD author’s conclusions.
      As clinicians and race realists, we knew from ongoing exposure, exactly what we were observing: a violent, tribal species whose members are incapable of living harmoniously among civilized European people.
      The “magic one percent” cannot offset the societal damage of the dysfunctional ninety nine percent.
      Separation and the return of restrictive covenants are the only solutions. Return to countries of origin would be the best, were this a perfect world.

  • IstvanIN

    The rate of unacceptability is the problem, not that some races are perfect and others not.

  • SamuelThomas

    This is why Democrats love abortion. They need it to cull the herd. Without abortion, women having 5 and 6 babies all with different men cannot keep growing exponentially. Abortion slows the growth enough that the Democrat voting block doesn’t implode. Guns and drugs also help a lot to keep life expectancy low and incarceration levels high. I think the main reason Democrats don’t like guns is they kill too many Democrats of prime voting age.

    • Bobbala

      My Glock 22 has been sitting in a drawer for weeks … hasn’t moved a millimeter …

  • Roger in Republic

    “I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t.” That is my fundamental disagreement with Liberals. If a person could provide for himself but won’t I feel no obligation to provide for him. In fact, as a drain on society why should he receive any of the benefits of society. Very often these non producers are the first in line demanding free everything. Only because the liberals Just can’t stand to make people take responsibility for their own choices.

  • alan_1969

    “I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t.” This one statement ruined the whole article. What kind of stupidity is that? I don’t help anyone that doesn’t attempt to help themselves.

  • http://PrimordialSlack.com/ Joan Of Argghh!

    A pen name, while understandable in this volatile confession, seems to align with the overall impression that this is someone who knows the truth, but can’t let it change his life or his world view. Hack.

  • FeuerSalamander

    the black community is made up of black individuals. Black individuals are extremely narcissistic and also not capable of self awareness. They therefore will cling to any fantasy or delusion to avoid seeing the reality about themselves. A couple of posters on here are a good example of that.

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU AINT GOTS NO PANCAKE MIX!

  • FeuerSalamander

    Liberalism is feminine thinking. They think they need to nurture, protect, etc. They think the lives and well being of others are dependent on them.They are like the smothering mother that believes that the entire future of the child depends on them and their actions. The mother that frets endlessly and reads endless articles and slowly circumscribes the child’s world until she has total control over it and the child accomplishes nothing on it’s own. Such mothers never consider the fact that each of us may have inborn qualities , interest and abilities,that will manifest themselves no matter what, and the best thing the mother can do is to let the child have much more independence as it has a plan or script for it’s life, based on DNA and perhaps God. It has a plan that the mother can not alter without erasing the whole thing and leaving a nothing, damaged human.When humans try to play GOD they are acting like such mothers.

    This is why liberals so strongly reject the idea of genetic , biological, and even divine determinism. Such people believe that they themselves have the power to form this world, tho change it, to tame it, etc. They end up being busybodies that create huge problems everywhere. They reject race realism so strongly because it cuts them out of the picture. With a race realist world view, they are not as necessary as they once thought they were, in fact, they are not important at all. Blacks will continue to be blacks, they will continue their criminality, low IQ, violence, laziness, and they will continue to have a profound hostility towards whites. The man who wrote this article is like the mother that is just realizing she needs to let go and let her children follow their own path. He is coming around.

  • Chuck Vipperman

    A very hard-hitting and sober look at some uncomfortable facts. Well done!

    I’ve been in the news business for a quarter-century and have covered God-knows-how-many trials. I admit, I have seen my fair share of whites act as you describe, and one or two blacks that deviated from your description…but otherwise, pretty spot-on. Of course, you get a completely different perspective by working face-to-face with the defendants.

    I *will* take umbrage at your definition of liberalism. Yes, I think we have a moral obligation to care for those who cannot care for themselves. The question is in the delivery system. Being willing to turn those responsibilities over to a central authority is inefficient and lazy…and gives people none of the spiritual benefit of caring for people on our own.

    Thanks for your thoughts!

  • soanonymous

    It’s also wrong to enable the behavior described above. The reason a spoiled child is called a spoiled child is that child is given things without having to do anything at all. It isn’t compassion to go above and beyond for someone who is perfectly capable of doing things for himself. I believe someone called it the “soft bigotry of low expectations.”

  • deepred

    And yet blacks such as Condoleezza Rice, Thomas Sowell, Justice Clarence Thomas, Dr. Ben Carson are derided as “Uncle Toms”. The “N” word is now a term of affection among blacks.
    Mr. Smith, Liberalism caused this. This is your great society. LBJ was right,”we’ll have those “Negros” voting democrat for the next 200 years.” Yes, we need to care for those who CANNOT care for themselves. I don’t give a rats anus to those who won’t even try.

    • Hallie Eva

      deepred, one slight correction of LBJ’s statement: he did not say “negroes.”
      He used the verboten to Whites, “n” word.

    • Biggus Dickus

      I agree.

      The above mentioned people who just happen to be black actually cared about themselves, and did not play the race card.

  • SoloDolo

    I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce
    abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical
    care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this
    duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t
    . This world
    view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it

    It is one thing to hold these beliefs it is another to force others to conform to those beliefs whether or not they agree with them. If the government requires someone to work towards the well-being of another without giving them a choice in the matter, that amounts to an infringement of their inalienable rights.

    All of possess a finite amount of time on this Earth and those of us who are able and willing to work for compensation have made the choice to spend some of that time working so that we can earn an income. When the government dictates how you spend your money, they are dictating how you spend your life; and that goes against the principals that America was founded upon.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    That all sounds very positive, but none of that changes racial reality. Mestizoes are not White people. The whole point of forming a White homeland is to preserve the White race, and White European culture. The culture of Mexico is non-White. This is a place where, in pockets, drug cartels rule with a reign of terror iron fist. Just because some Mestizoes are good people does not mean there is a place in a White nationalist state for a state that is half Mestizo.

  • none of your business

    More than 900 comments and this one will be way down,but here is an article about the ultimate black religious beliefs and asking God to help them. Defendant was black of course.
    $500K bond for man charged with beating, robbing elderly priest May 16 2014

    After allegedly robbing and beating an 80-year-old Catholic priest with his cane and holy water sprinkler, one of the two suspects requested that the elderly religious leader pray for him.

  • FeuerSalamander

    YOU AINTS GOTS NO PANCAKE MIX!!!!

  • jontrott

    You and your “anonymous” author — no real evidence at all exists that he is a public defender or a “liberal” — are racists. What a pathetic pseudo-intellectual patina you’ve applied to the same old tropes. I’d love to meet you in a public arena, Mr. “Smith,” and dismantle your fascism point by point. Anywhere, any time.

  • Shears_of_Atropos

    Disagree. He is making a rather limited correlation between race and behavior, but the commonality is cultural. IOW, race does not cause behavior, but culture does, and a culture that exists in a particular race can cause particular behaviors. American urban black people may stab someone, but they usually don’t necklace them South Africa style, even though an urban US black girl may set fire to a rival over a guy’s attentions.

    I daresay, since I live in the South (TX) that rural black people do not correlate as well as urban blacks. As there are climates, there are included micro-climates. If one can identify a “black” culture, there are variants and sub-cultures included. He is describing, for lack of a better word, an “urban” or “semi-urban” subculture compared to the same “urban/sub-urban” cultures of other races.

    Despite what the anthropologists and sociologists preach, all cultures are NOT equally valid. This is reflected in the disparity in many metrics, like arrests, convictions, suicides, assaults, education and income levels. Sad to say, we cannot introduce a “culture” metric…. race is as close as we have data on.

  • Lgbpop

    It doesn’t take compassion to be liberal, it takes gullibility. Conservatives are compassionate, but also know when enough is enough. I have no damned obligation to support someone who won’t lift a finger to help improve himself.

  • Feet2Fire

    An eye-opening piece that doesn’t hold back. It is amazing, knowing and feeling as he does, that he continues to represent black clients. One has to wonder why. “White guilt?’

  • Feet2Fire

    Much of what you say may be true, but this cr*p started a lot earlier than the 1980s. The Black Panthers and other militant “afro” groups were gaining traction in the 1960s, and they had a profound influence on the attitudes of black folks, as did M.L. King and the other race-opportunists of the past several decades. Then along came LBJ with his distorted, evil schemes. Seems each decade has contributed its own evils to the problem, and here we are…

    • FeuerSalamander

      don’t stir up the pancake mix

  • Lt. Greyman, NVA

    Liar.

    We did depend on private charity during the depression. When the “make Work” programs came about, years after the depression started, they merely deepened and widened the horror of the Depression. The seizing of Gold, the increase taxation, the other “interventions” were all part of a process that kept the poor poorer, longer, or deliberately harmed them, like the reaction of the Government to the “Bonus Army”.

  • Bo

    Dear Michael:
    As a former cop and defense attorney, the only question I have is, “Why are you still a liberal?” How many times does one have to keep sticking one’s face into the chain saw before realizing it is a bad idea?

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      If someone is still a liberal after the age of 30, he has no brain.

  • Biggus Dickus

    Pretty fair assessment. Just visit Detroit or Chicongo and you will find this to be true (If you dare).

  • FeuerSalamander

    The basic premise that you are trying to put forth, and that others have too, is that the defense attorney is only dealing with the “criminal” element of the black population. The author points out though that it is TYPICAl FOR A BLACK MAN TO HAVE FIVE FELONY CONVICTIONS BEFORE THE AGE OF THIRTY!! Since your reading comprehension seems to have missed the significance of this point let me explain. It means that the pathologies described here are not aberrant phenomenon confined to a supposedly small “criminal element” of the black community, it means that they these pathologies are common to ALL BLACKS and that ALL BLACKS are a criminal element. Statistics shows this to be the case for those who can understand them, here are some basic and irrefutable facts based on crime statistics:

    Blacks are seven times as likely as people of other races to commit murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime.

  • FeuerSalamander

    because as a public defender that is how he makes a living, it is self justification

  • UtahJarhead

    He rails on how his average black American relies on public assistance, then at the end says how much he believes we have a public (and moral) duty to provide it.

    His left hand requires us to dole out public assistance while his right hand is getting tired of being bitten by people on public assistance.

  • jnk9

    Where the writer says “black”, he means “member of the black criminal underclass”, because for obvious reasons these are the ones he meets through his work. There are many other black people who do not fit this template.

    • Ace

      They all overwhelmingly vote for the same politicians and the same programs. The black professionals who run the Atlanta school system were heavily invested in avoiding responsibility on their part and not holding their students responsible.The fool who ran Detroit wasn’t part of the underclass. Jeremiah Wright wasn’t part of the underclass but was the owner of some pretty bizarre notions having little to do with blacks taking responsibility. James Cone is a disgusting individual but he sure isn’t underclass. I think Pastor James Manning can resolve this matter to everyone’s satisfaction. Now there is a man with a brain and a spine.

  • mobilebay

    After what he has seen and experienced, why on earth would this seemingly rational public defender want to carry the burden of taking care of those who won’t care for themselves? I believe this can be called “aiding and abetting.” Maybe it’s true what they say about liberals.

  • John Reddy

    What a bunch of boneheads commenting on this article. This public defender has just written an expose of the criminal justice system and the absurd numbers of black defendants within it, and all you asshats can do is argue over the definition of liberalism.

    Did any of you actually bother to read it, or we’re you too eager to jump into a pointless internet pissing contest?

    This article should be on the front page of every newspaper in this country but from what I can see of who has read it, based on the comments, it may as we’ll be lining the bottom of a bird cage.

    • http://disaffectedteacher.blogspot.com/ Hy Alldredge

      Did you read it? “However, my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. They cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well. They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike.” You think any newspaper in this country would publish that?

  • condaggit2

    He states the problem perfectly they are functionally illiterate entering jail, and functionally illiterate when leaving jail

    So WE NEED A WAR ON EBONICS……….force black people to speak English ….want to get out of jail read the NY Times in front of a parole board…….YOU determine wether you want to stay in jail for 5 or 50 years……….

    • MikeofAges

      Because mentally stable rural residents are the cause of inner city crime. I though everyone knew that.

  • LeSellers

    I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce
    abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical
    care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this
    duty even to those who
    can care for themselves but don’t. This world
    view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it.

    This is the destruction of the Black Family that “Smith” seems to lament. His “compassion” is false and self-serving: it makes him feel good even while it kills the souls of those he imagines he is helping.

    To do for someone that which he could do for himself is to weaken him, to make him irrelevant. The whole article bemoans the facts of what welfarism have done to Black men (and women), but he still believes that making it happen is laudable.

    Welfare, not race, welfare, not poverty, welfare, not tradition is what gives people an “ inability to see things from someone else’s perspective” and that “helps explain why there are so many black criminals.”

    We need to do away with governmental welfare. It destroys all who participate in it, “giver” and recipient. Welfare is not “charity”. Charity is kind, welfare is harsh. Charity is love, welfare is force.

    Mr. Magoo O’bama will there ever be any Jobs?

  • Alfred the Great

    “Hispanics usually commit two kinds of crime: sexual assault on children….” When I researched my first book, I found that Amerindians (they aren’t Hispanics) regularly have relations with their daughters and sell them into the sex trade. It’s accepted in their societies. The Mosaic Law forbids such conduct, but we are told that those laws don’t apply anymore and that it is not the place of the Church to get involved in societal matters. This is part and parcel to the implosion that western civilization is experiencing.

  • David Ashton

    Suppose we had a minimal state with private ownership of the means of production, but with eugenic state ownership of the means of reproduction as a proactive defense against crime, violence and welfare parasitism?

    • SoulInvictus

      Horrible idea. By its nature, strong centralized power is corrupt and abusive. You’re talking about letting it all the way into the womb? We might as well kill ourselves.

      • David Ashton

        Glad to start a possible debate on this. I was not thinking of abortion, but sterilization.

        • SoulInvictus

          Either way, seeing the incompetence and corruption we already have, and the types that insinuate themselves into the bureaucracy, it’s a nightmare scenario.
          It would likely end up with forced “accidental” insemination of whites with brown babies and 100% white male sterilization. Oooops. One generation later, zero whiteness.
          At this point, I’m surprised people are even allowed to whiten their teeth man.;)
          That’s rayciss against coffee stains!

          • David Ashton

            That’s the worst case “opposite” scenario to be avoided at all costs, I agree.

            Regime change first, then more healthy and bright white babies.

    • MikeofAges

      History will reboot eventually. For a few more time in the estimated three to 12 million year lifespan of the human species. In the heroic view of life, permanence is not expected or necessarily valued anyway, while doom is deemed the eventual fate of everybody and everything. The mantra might then be “Go not gently in the darkness of that good night”.

      The problem for the West is, we face the leaving the wreckage of our civilization to people who can neither sustain it nor comprehend the inevitability of their own doom.

      I wish the “Mr. Wilson” idea was literal. Sit on your cloud and watch your antagonists get their just deserts. It would be a treat.

      • David Ashton

        My short answer is: I love my grandchildren.

        • MikeofAges

          But for how far in the future can anyone control what happens? People can make arrangements intended to be enduring and intergenerational, and attempt to inculcate in their progeny the will to sustain these arrangements for yet more generations. That is what wealthy people do, though the new fad is for those who have made vast fortunes to leave limited amounts to their descendants and give the rest away. These people, I think, see their fortune only as measuring stick of their own success, and not something to be kept intact after their own lifetime.

          When the entire system of a civilization fails, I don’t think these past arrangement can endure. Some people claim, the world’s elite families were established at the dawn of organized civilization, and that these have continued on from then to this day. But I don’t know what the evidence is. There might be some. But I haven’t seen it.

          • David Ashton

            Nations, empires and civilizations rise and fall. We are in a better position than our predecessors to understand the various factors in the process, and possibly to do something positive about arresting decline and controlling our future evolution.

          • MikeofAges

            We think we are in a better position. I don’t count on it. My question always is: Who is “we”? We, so far, have done little to forestall the Third World and non-Western immigration which already is undermining the foundations of our civilization. Some of us are facilitating it, because for some of us it help assuage moral guilt. For some it serves as a demographic bulwark against other of us with whom there is political conflict. For some because it seem to serves the interests of their businesses. Our technology opens new dimension that clearly never existed before. But how does that overcome human nature?

          • David Ashton

            You appear convinced that “we” are either powerless or suicidal. I am not sure I can change your gut conviction by argument, and think, with honest respect for your thoughtful exposition, that a debate here, however interesting, is a waste of my unavoidably limited time.

            Technology in principle provides potential answers to problems of defense security and food shortage. Biological research opens the way to humanitarian eugenics. There will always be the problem of the Eden Apple or Pandora’s Box, but since we cannot stop the world and get off, those of us with views in general alignment with AR values and interests can only do our best to persuade others while we can to take remedial action. Spengler said optimism is cowardice, but cowardice is not an option for me.

          • MikeofAges

            My time is unavoidably unlimited (LOL), or, more aptly, limited only by my lifespan. I am quite sure, however, that there is nothing we can do in our own time which will guarantee that any certain thing will happen many generations in the future. You can try, but I am dubious. I think your stance is more in accord with the heroic than you think.

          • David Ashton

            A prewar joke: “What’s the difference between a ‘fascist’ and a ‘perfectionist’?” – “The former demands a solution to most problems, while the latter finds problems in any solution.”

            No actions in our own lifetime can, of course, “guarantee” events “many generations in the future”, though some immediate actions can last longer and may prove more fruitful than expected. We can learn from the longevity of ideas and practices from the past. You and I will die tomorrow, but none of us on earth today were “born yesterday”, so to speak.

            History is made by people, and people can do different things or nothing as in your case. The larger issues you raise are questions for philosophers of history, any new Toynbees, though others should enter the discussion on this blog.

            In my remaining years, cut short by unexpected illness, I am rushing to write on current problems, including the causes and effects of third-world immigration on my own homeland. It remains a worthwhile effort undeterred by either defeatism or “political correctness”. I shall take therefore your last sentence as a compliment, however backhanded.

  • EPC

    We wouldn’t even need gun laws if it were not for the black race.

  • Conrad

    “I do not know the solution to this problem.”
    Deportation could be a start. There are, of course, other solutions.

  • MikeofAges

    Not because there are no offense, but possibly because the Asian community settles these issue behind the scenes so as to say face and protect families from the consequences of a criminal conviction.

  • MikeofAges

    You could be right, but what I was suggesting that often the matter might never be reported in the first place. Sometimes the complainants drop the charges or just don’t show in court as witnesses.

    I was thinking also that the community might settle the issue in its own way, as opposed to those communities where many crimes nothing whatsoever is done about many crimes.

  • NYGiants4246

    Blacks are animals

  • Geo1metric

    Yes, the responsibility to remain so.

  • Hallie Eva

    LBJ’s power to push through just about anything lay in his knowledge of “where all the D.C. bodies were buried,” according to Capitol Hill compatriots in the know.

  • drattastic

    And still a liberal , I wonder if this lawyer ever considers what his mental defect is ?

    • M.

      One may be liberal on certain issues and conservative on others (like race, self-reliance, etc.). I am.

  • Mike0oSS

    This article just shows how intractable the issue of race is, and how there are no “solutions” in a liberal and diverse society. The white folks will have to be watching the black folks and that is about the end of it…..nothing will be resolved

  • shawnmer

    Yeah, I was wondering when someone alleging “He’s not an actual lawyer, this is all a lie!” would show up.

    Peddle that tripe to someone who doesn’t live in a majority-black town, pal. I wasn’t dealing with the truly criminal, but behavior differences of about this magnitude between black and white was common in my customers in low-end lending.

    And If you’d read AR long enough, you’d know our estimation of Hispanics isnt nearly as high as this fellow’s testimony, so why would the author we put up to write a phone piece not “insult” them as well?

  • shawnmer

    I’m not sure why, but I’m going to dive in here.

    How do all these bogeymen of yours continue to “take their toll?” What the h*ll does that even mean? Slavery is gone, Jim Crow is gone. How do I go about getting out of bed in the morning and have it on my to-do list to “oppress” Quantavius and Shaniqua?? Because as I see it, I’m far more occupied with processes that add to to my economic column and are completely independent of subtracting anything from theirs!

    Oh, and what has this to do with the (shudder!) 1%?

    Really, I’m interested.

  • shawnmer

    Of all the idiotic cliches of the willfully blind like this fellow, I have to say this “There are bad apples in ALL races!” is getting the most tiresome. Yes, sir, we get that. We just happen to notice them in a bit greater frequency with this one particular group!

    And those like you who continue to ignore it and be willfully obtuse about it, after years and years and reams and reams of statistical data to back it up, are the ones being “illogical.” Regardless how “socially unacceptable” you deem it.

  • shawnmer

    My God. Excuse me, I really must go find a bucket …

    One of the simplest truths in life escaped you in your whatever shallow rot you earned your masters degree ( and yes, I have one, too) : Some are simply bad people! Not complicated, not mysterious, no real complexities or mitigating factors or convincing sob stories to be rooted out, young lady. They’re just BAD.

    Now, go apologize to your parents for whatever ungoldy sum they had to shell out for you to become this “educated.”

  • Some Guy

    “This inability to see things from someone else’s perspective helps explain why there are so many black criminals.”

    ” I asked him whether he felt bad for the women he had beaten and terrorized. He told me what I suspected—what too many blacks say about the suffering of others: “What do I care? She ain’t me. She ain’t kin. Don’t even know her.”

    This is the black mentality in a nutshell.

  • marbee

    The solution is to stop providing for those who CAN but choose not to! All that does is breed more of the same.

  • MathFaithWorks

    For those of faith, the question of whether Blacks have souls and whether they are the same as White souls is of interest. A soul transcends the here and now. What is of the moment is less of the soul and more of the flesh. The soul is what transcends the flesh and thus the moment.

    If Blacks are in the here and now and can’t transcend the present, that has implications on whether they have souls, and if so, whether they are the same as White souls.

    • MathFaithWorks

      Do Blacks create the conditions of the underworld? Are half of youth, minority? What of Saddleback adoptions?

  • Rodney S

    “They get social security disability payments for a mental defect or for a vague and invisible physical ailment.”
    I was with Mr. Smith up to this point. In order to receive Social Security Disability a person must have worked and paid into SS for at least 10 years. Then, he must undergo a fairly rigorous medical review by a panel of doctors before his case is even considered for approval. As a lawyer, Mr. Smith should know this, unless he has it confused with the SSI (Supplemental Security Income) program.

  • Bryan W. Carpenter

    That explains a lot. We need the “three strikes and you are up, for life” Politicians should fall under that also. That would give us a turnover in congress. I too think that we need to help those who NEED help but if a man refuses to work although able, let him starve. The constitution does NOT give the federal government the right to give tax money for charity, food stamps, nor gifts. All that the constitution does not specifically say that the federal government CAN or MUST do is then turned to the State and We the People. I can count more than 3 strikes on the administration for exceeding its authority.

  • chatmandu7451

    LBJ’s “Great Society” didn’t turn out so great. When the government takes responsibility the individual becomes a dependent.

  • chatmandu7451

    Make getting welfare worse than getting a job.

  • ConradCA

    Only solution to this is to stop all welfare except to those who are truly unable to work and to implement 3 strikes and your out nationwide.

  • sulah

    ALL
    men are created equal……..the difference is effectual and depends on
    choices one makes in his/her life. Bad choices over and over again
    lead to severe negative consequences that lead to the degenerate
    mentality we see in the black community. No one is to blame for this
    but themselves and liberals.

    There
    are many…perhaps not enough……black men and women on this planet
    who made good/correct choices and are reaping the benefits from those
    rightly made choices.

    Unfortunately, the bad always seems to out-way the good which is certainly evident in our society today. The liberals
    feed this situation. They are of the same mentality as all they see in
    this group of people is a ‘vote’ at the ballot box. If truth be known, liberals, for the most part, possess the same level of non-caring sentiment as the blacks do towards anyone who crosses them.

  • Frf Rere

    Another fake article like the one about the teacher. I’m going to write one about a public defender that has to put up with white trash clients all day.

  • Cainisable1

    Wow. Truth is truth. No truer words have ever been written about the black community.

  • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

    Reality can be a harsh mistress. Apparently “Mr. Smith” hasn’t had enough of a dose yet since he remains a liberal.

  • http://www.common-sensesolutions.com/ teridavisnewman

    How does that big bite of reality taste counselor? Reading this article confirms for me that the $65 I spend every 7 years to renew my concealed carry permit is money well spent. When seconds count, the police are 20 minutes away.