White Privilege

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, September 20, 2013

Lucky
The new frontier for white guilt.

The full script of the video is available here.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Manaphy

    Excellent video and arguments as usual. This video is probably the best so far, and I would just love to see how the Anti-Whites will attempt to respond to this. The facts are on our side, as usual. Keep up the good work!

    • JohnEngelman

      The anti whites will ignore this video. They will try to destroy the career of anyone who mentions it positively.

      • Garrett Brown

        Such as yourself.

      • Garrett Brown

        Such as yourself.

      • Garrett Brown

        Such as yourself

      • Garrett Brown

        Such as yourself

        • ThomasER916

          Bazinga!

      • Garrett Brown

        Such as yourself.

      • Paleoconn

        You’re not exactly pro-White pal, with your assertions of Asian and Jewish superiority and your revelling in their domination.

        • JohnEngelman

          They are superior. Some posters who enjoy gloating about lower IQ’s for Hispanics and blacks resent it when I remind them about higher IQ’s for Orientals and Ashkenazi Jews.

          • Paleoconn

            You’re the one who’s gloating. The posters simply have no use for these hispanics in their country, or the blacks in their daily associations and their communities.

          • M&S

            I think Mr. Engelman suffers from Implicit vs. Functional White Contempt.
            Functional contempt would be something that ‘he truly meant’ as a hatred or repudiation of our attitudes or existence.
            Implicit is a contrived convenience as ‘attitude’ you carry around with you to prove you are balanced in your views, while covering for something else.
            It is perilously close to the hypocrisy (whites may be privileged, I surely hope so, we certainly should not be willing to part with what we have to ‘lose the guilt’) that Mr. Taylor tries to highlight.
            In this case, caring for and preferring the company of our own is a function of potential, not actualized or implicit belief. I don’t have to hate nor feel superior to blacks or Asians or Jews or Hispanics to wish my own people to have what makes them happy and successful.
            Where there is only enough for -one- group to be so blessed, it’s not even wrong to want my group to be that one.
            Just ask a soldier or pilot who gets told that this is a particularly dangerous mission and ‘only one of you is coming back’. He’s going to look around and sure feel bad about those other guys. Might even ring a bell and lift a glass to their memory.
            When he returns to base.
            The truth is this:
            1. Geneticists do not know or will not discuss the variations the heritability of particularly mental abilities between population groups.
            2. We do know that IQ is heritable but not additive nor even direct though it may rotate between every other generation for reasons not known or discussed.
            3. As a function of the process of homogenization of mutations, some groups have gained more than others and this likely has something to do with both the size of the group (generating beneficial mutations) and the relative sociability of them in generating rapid sweeps.
            FoxP2, Herc2 and MCM6 are all prevalent in white groups, particularly those with origins in Europe and North Asia. They are not native to Africa and much of mid-latitude or tropical Asia.
            Until and unless we come up with some honest truths about how advancement has differed between population groups, it is _evolutionarily stupid_ to give up the diversity by which some of us have drawn aces, solely to adopt less functional peoples into our gene group with all their genetic primitivisms.
            Racism is thus nothing more or less than the protection of genetic algorithms dating from a time when DNA was unknown. If they are your people by looks as affinity, mating with them will reinforce the genes you have and through small inbreeding coefficients, increase the likelihood of repeat codes which will either mutate or fix in such a fashion that the traits they control for will become even more refined and capable.
            This means that Whites should remain white, not Jewish or Asian or black, or Hispanic, _because it is our genetic algorithms_ whose evolutionary advancement is at stake.
            And all the critical behaviors as beliefs that go with them.
            Empathy, altruism, intelligence, conservatism, homeostasis.
            Forget this in a race to cross breed and whatever good traits you have are likely to be overwritten or halved in their variant hosting potency, just because _our geneticists will not say the obvious_:
            We are not all equal. But we are all optimized. Past the point at which rehomogenization will do anything but harm.

          • Brian

            Why are there so many Asians and Ashkenazim in America? What draws or keeps them here when they could live in Asia or Israel among their high-IQ brethren?

          • JohnEngelman

            Willing employers draw them with big pay checks. They obviously think they’re getting their money’s worth.

          • Brian

            How do those big paychecks exist here more so than in their own nations?

          • Jefferson

            John Engelman do you agree with my ranking of Caucasoid ethnic groups based on I.Q from highest to lowest.

            1.Jews
            2.Northern Europeans
            3.Southern Europeans
            4.Eastern Europeans
            5.Arabs

          • Norseman

            How would you explain the superior accomplishments of whites?

    • JohnEngelman

      A liberal cannot win an honest debate with a race realist. Therefore liberals try to suppress the debate, while hypocritically calling for a dialogue on race.

      • Luca

        A liberal cannot win an honest debate on any subject using facts.

        They answer a question that has not been asked, answer a question with a question, change the subject, use anecdotal evidence that is the exception and not the rule, name call, raise their voice, pretend to be horrified or offended or they chant slogans.

        • JohnEngelman

          Under Jimmy Carter there were more jobs created per year, less unemployment, and far lower budget deficits than under Ronald Reagan.

          There was more economic growth and job creation under Franklin Roosevelt’s first term than during the terms of Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge.

          Facts documented upon request.

          • Luca

            You answered a question that had not been asked.

            But now I can improve upon my previous post. Not only do Liberals use anecdotal evidence, they also use cherry-picked, one dimensional facts, graphs, statistics and charts that do not give a complete picture but tend to be self-serving to the outcome they desire to achieve.

            Thank you for helping me expand my point.

          • JohnEngelman

            This is what I responded to, “A liberal cannot win an honest debate on any subject using facts.”

            My point is that in important respects the economy under Roosevelt was better than it was under Harding and Coolidge and it in many respects the economy under Jimmy Carter was better than under Reagan.

            So, how was the economy under Reagan better than under Carter? Document your assertions.

          • Luca

            The subject was liberals and debates. Repeat after me: “Liberals and Debates.”

            You respond with FDR, Carter, Reagan, Warren G, Harding, Calvin Coolidge and some cherry-picked facts and figures in specific economical areas.

            How is that not “Changing the Subject”? My statement did not ask a question and yet you felt compelled to manufacture an answer to an economical question that had not been asked.

            You are trying to draw me into a side debate about Presidential economics and I have neither the time nor the inclination to educate you because you will not listen. You have your agenda, enjoy it.

          • JohnEngelman

            Luca,

            This was your assertion, “A liberal cannot win an honest debate on any subject using facts.”

            So let’s have an honest debate and see who wins. Facts and logical reasoning are all that counts. Insults do not.

          • Luca

            Just below this post, I responded to your false assertion that Eisenhower started the war in Viet Nam. I’m not going to start a whole new debate in this forum that is supposed to invite polite debate on Race realism. This is not a Freidman vs, Keynes forum.

          • JohnEngelman

            All Eisenhower had to do to avoid the War in Vietnam was to sign and honor the Geneva Agreement of 1954.

          • Luca

            Once again, as in my previous assertions, you are cherry-picking one fact in hopes it will trump the rest of the debate. I talked about the Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson administrations sharing the blame and all you do is address Eisenhower to provide the outcome you have already decided upon.

            All Truman had to do was answer one of the requests sent by Ho Chi Minh and/or not support French Colonialism. You didn’t address this point.

            I agreed Eisenhower shares blame, but absolutely not all of it.

            Kennedy should not have sent advisers (among other things). You did not address this.

            You did not even address LBJ who is the true architect of the real tragedy known as the war in Viet Nam and responsible for the overwhelming damage inflicted upon us.

            Another example of your arguments being one dimensional with cherry-picked facts.

          • Thor Bonham

            Next Engelman
            will say that the Cuban missile crisis was the fault of President Lincoln ..

          • The Mad Jewess

            Fact: Why are blacks murdering, raping and robbing white people EVERY DAY?
            Answer that, John.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Where did you come from? I thought you hung out at Incog’s site.

          • The Mad Jewess

            Nope, I must have angered him again, he banned me :(

          • Fair Dingum

            Why should he document his assertions when you haven’t documented yours?

          • JohnEngelman

            OK, let’s go.

            This is what the Geneva Agreement of 1954 said:”The Conference takes note of the clauses in the agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam prohibiting the introduction into Viet Nam of foreign troops and military personnel…

            “The Conference takes note of the clauses in the agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam to the effect that no military base at the disposition of a foreign state may be established in the regrouping zones of the two parties…

            “the military demarcation line should not in any way be interpreted as constituting a political or territorial boundary…

            “general elections shall be held in July 1956, under the supervision of an international commission composed of representatives of the member states of the International Supervisory Commission.”

            This is why President Eisenhower refused to sign and honor the Geneva Agreement of 1954: “I have never talked or corresponded with a person knowledgeable in Indochinese affairs who did not agree that had elections been held as of the time of the fighting, possibly 80 per cent of the population would have voted for the Communist Ho Chi Minh as their leader.”

            Source: Dwight D. Eisenhower, Mandate for Change, 1953-56 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Compnay, Inc., 1963), p. 372

          • JohnEngelman

            Here are the links to those quotes.

            http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1954-geneva-indochina.html

            https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/vietnam/ddeho.htm

            I am aware that this is a side track from the topic of the thread, but I am responding to Luca’s comment, “A liberal cannot win an honest debate on any subject using facts.”

          • The Mad Jewess

            Here is a fact, JOHN:

            A black male in CLEARWATER, Fla. – Myron Farley, 32, is charged with murdering one homeless WHITE man and attempting to murder another homeless WHITE man. Police have also named him as a person of interest in the murder of a third homeless WHITE man in Clearwater.

            Can you please explain the FACT, John….that if this was in reverse, it would be national news for a year, but if it is 3 white homeless men, its not.
            Racism thats why. White hatred, thats why.
            Explain that and stop diveritng all over the place.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Right on Mad Jewess! Why does Incog bash you so much?

          • The Mad Jewess

            Ah, you know..Love hate relationship ;)

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            This maximalizing of attention on white-on-black crime while minimalizing or even ignoring black-on-white crime (which is far more frequent) in the media is a conscious plot by the media and part of an anti-white race war. Ask youself who owns the media then you’ll know who is engaged in this race war.

          • Thor Bonham

            The thing is, it’s mostly white reporters doing this … Why in the world do they hate the color of their skin so much ? So much that they’re willing to give this country of ours away and make life miserable for their grandchildren and great grandchildren ..
            It boggles my mind ..

          • The Mad Jewess

            What in the hell are you talking about?
            Trying to divert the issue onto some past presidents, etc.
            The issue is racism against white people. And, just what are YOU going to do to stop it, John????

          • JohnEngelman

            I guess I could go out and kill a lot of blacks. What do you suggest?

          • The Mad Jewess

            What? Go out and kill a lot of blacks?
            WHAT?
            Batting a thousand in craziness, John.

            Whites are the hunted, now. (Or anyone that looks white) What are you going to do to expose black on white hatred, John?
            Wait til you’re a victim?

          • Thor Bonham

            I guess you forgot about the GAS lines just to get a gallon of gas during the Carter admin … They were actually only serving odd plate numbers one day and even the next, the lines were around the corner .. That is just one point I will make that proves you need your head examined ..
            I bet you weren’t even alive during the 70’s ..

          • JohnEngelman

            The gasoline shortages of 1980 happened because of the Iranian Revolution of 1979. That in turn happened because in 1953 President Eisenhower directed the CIA to help overthrow the democratically elected government of Iran and install Mohammad Rezā Shāh Pahlavī as dictator of Iran. Previously he had been a constitutional monarch, sharing his power with a democratically elected parliament.

            The Shah of Iran was never a popular dictator.

            With that decision President Eisenhower guaranteed that when the Shah was overthrown the people of Iran and their new government would hate us. They punished us with an oil boycott.

            In 1979 the only way President Carter could have prevented the Iranian Revolution would have been by occupying Iran. We had learned in Vietnam, and have since learned in Afghanistan and Iraq, that occupying a hostile population willing to fight back is not a good idea.

          • Thor Bonham

            Blah, blah, blah .. Just more of the same bloviating lies ..

          • The Mad Jewess

            He is just trying to divert the convo.
            Thats what tools of the genocidial maniacs do

          • vladdy1

            Loved the gas lines and interest rates, too. Not to mention giving Iran to the mullahs. But to give him credit, Carter only got our people held hostage, not killed.
            Psst. hey, Neil — song idea — “Four Dead in Ben-gha-zi.”

          • Norseman

            “You’re going to say that Reagan brought inflation under control. That
            was because of a decline in the world price of petroleum for which
            Reagan was not responsible.”

            Ascertaining which factors caused something is often difficult and even experts can disagree sharply. However, I don’t think many economist would pinpoint (even large) increases/decreases of individual prices as being the direct cause.

          • MikeofAges

            But were the starting points lower? So low, in fact, that there was “no way to go but up”, so to speak. Roosevelt took office at just about the absolute low point of the Depression.

            What most people do not know is that there was a near-depression in the early and mid-1970s. Entire industries shrank or outright collapsed. Even the universities made drastic cuts in their staff. In some cases, whole departments were eliminated.

            Another thing that happened in the early 1970s was that middle aged corporate employees were laid off en masse. Often, their departments were eliminated, then reconstituted within a short time with new staffs of young workers heavily weighted toward women and minorities. Black women became prized “two-fers” because they could be counted in the “equal opportunity” audits on both the “woman” and the “minority” ledgers.

            Roosevelt gets some credit exercising some visible leadership and keeping people interested. Even those who did not agree with him. Carter had nothing to do with anything. His only accomplishment was packing the federal judiciary with affirmative action apparatchiks. He appointed a huge number of district judges, but fortunately fewer on the appeals level and none on the Supreme Court. This is something few people know, but it isthe major the reason why older blacks hold an opinion of Carter so at odds with the rest of society.

            Fact? Get some.

          • JohnEngelman

            The inflationary recession of 1974 happened because of the OPEC Oil Embargo of 1973.

            Republicans would rather blame the economic policies of John Maynard Keynes. They never liked those policies. They do not want to acknowledge that foreigners they dislike have considerable power over the U.S. economy, and that America’s dependence on the automobile is a national problem.

          • MikeofAges

            Another simpleminded cause-and-effect cycle. Doesn’t anything have a bigger arc than what happened within the last six months?

            The decline of the American industrial economy was a great historic event which must have had bigger antecedents than a gas crisis. Most likely, it was planned. The issue is, by whom? Or was it just, as some say, that the Japanese could buy congress? They were allowed to ship in complete trucks, minus the beds, attach the beds here, and call both “truck parts” to avoid the duties and import restrictions. Not exactly fair trade policy.

          • JohnEngelman

            If the decline in the American industrial economy was planned by anyone, it was planned by members of the American plutocracy, who discovered that they could raise profit margins by closing factories in the United States, and moving production to countries with low wages, and little employment and environmental protection.

            The American plutocracy is almost exclusively white, and predominantly Gentile. It contributes money to both parties, but benefits from Republican tax cuts for the rich and deregulation.

          • MikeofAges

            Benefits from Republican tax cuts and deregulation. And what from the Democrats? If nothing else, the Democrats seems to support rule by the elite universities than the Republican do. But what else?

          • vladdy1

            And NO Repub ever added trillions as a one-time “stimulus” and then kept it in the budget every year. (Although with some of the idiots using “Republican” as their party title — are you listening, McCain — I’m not standing up for them either.)

          • JohnEngelman

            The elite universities do not have nearly the power of the major corporations and those who own them.

          • vladdy1

            Both parties have global elitists trying to destroy American sovereignty. The Repubs have a few who are still Constitutionalists. The old myth about Dems being for the “working man” should be retired.

          • JohnEngelman

            The United States Constitution is vaguely worded, and open to diverse interpretations. Those who claim to stand in front of it defending it are really hiding behind it.

            The Constitution is the last refuge of those who realize that their arguments are otherwise untenable, and that most Americans disagree with them.

          • The Mad Jewess

            Did blacks have the leeway to hunt whites in 73, 74, John?

          • ricpic

            Does this mean the crushing rejection of Carter was irrational? That’s known as a rhetorical question, you driven subversive.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jimmy Carter was less successful than Ronald Reagan, but he was a better president. During Carter’s presidency more jobs were created per year than under Reagan. There was less unemployment. The national debt declined as a percentage of gross domestic product. Under Reagan it increased dramatically.

            During the 1980 campaign Carter was often ahead of Reagan in the polls. Reagan only pulled ahead after the presidential debate. In preparing for the debate Reagan studied from a briefing book that had been stolen from the Carter campaign. That was a felony.

            There is also reason to believe that the Reagan campaign worked out an agreement with the Iranian government not to release the hostages until after Reagan won the election in return for weapons shipments to Iran. We know that the hostages were released the day of Reagan’s inauguration. We also know that the Reagan administration did ship weapons to Iran. That is what the Iran Contra scandal was about.

          • ricpic

            “There is also reason to believe…”

            Making it up is much more fun than dealing with inconvenient reality.

          • vladdy1

            I think Carter’s PR guy is passing out talking points this week.

          • Thor Bonham

            Jimmy Carter was less successful than Ronald Reagan, but he was a better president.
            WOW dude , just WOW !!
            You also accuse Reagan of being a criminal .. WOW man, you need some serious help ..

          • Sean

            Reagan was a criminal. Carter was not a very good president.

            Homogeneity is a far better indicator of success for a civilization than partisan agendas.

          • JohnEngelman

            During much of the 1980 campaign Jimmy Carter was ahead of Ronald Reagan in the polls. The presidential debate turned that around. While preparing for the debate Reagan was aided by a briefing book that had been stolen from the Carter campaign.

            That was a felony, but Reagan got away with it. He also may have made a deal with the Iranian government to ship weapons to Iran if the Iranian government would not release the hostages until after he was elected. We do know that Reagan did ship weapons to Iran.

            In addition, many voters erred in blaming Carter for the gasoline lines and the inflation. Those were caused by the Iranian Revolution of 1979. That was caused by the CIA lead coup that overthrew the democratic government of Iran in 1953, and installed the Shah as dictator.

          • lessthantolerant

            Wow! this guy really needs help with reality. I agree that anyone can cherry pick information to make a point, but your is so obvious its sad.

          • Thor Bonham

            WOW !! Ok show the facts, don’t just talk out of your ass ..
            You’re WAY off ..
            Remember these words : Are you better off today than you were 4 years ago ? Now I ask, how in the world could Reagan say that if it weren’t true, without being laughed right out of the room ?
            Just imagine Obama saying that last year during his constant campaigning before the election…

            You’re facts that you will show, I’m sure will be liberal talking points and nothing else ..

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            “On either end of the political spectrum there are weak minds with strong opinions.”

            Let me add, and everywhere in between.

            But posters like Luca making comments like this are here for their own therapy and must be understood that way and perhaps excused, as long as they eventually gain some true wisdom.

          • JohnEngelman

            Luca can be nasty. Nevertheless, I respect observations he has shared from working for the government for thirty years.

            I did not know that there were welfare chiselers until I was the manager of a rooming house in downtown San Jose, California.

            I did not feel the reality of black crime until I was robbed at gunpoint by two blacks.

    • Diversity Fatigue

      Privilege is defined as a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group of people.

      Affirmative action, contract set-asides, the lowering of employment and educational standards, unqualified lending practices, special rules for not punishing black students, suing employers for not hiring convicted felons, destroying all-white neighborhoods through forced diversification via section 8 housing, and a now aggressive EEOC as mandated by Barry and his side-kick Eric.

      Sounds like black privilege to me.

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      They would simply respond that as a white- and male-privileged individual, Jared Taylor couldn’t possibly understand the numerous ways he benefits from his race and sex every day and that moreover, he is an awful racist for daring to ever doubt non-whites when they scream racism.

      In fact, his very lack of acknowledgement of his privilege is proof of his privilege!

      They would also say on the topic of Sweden and other formerly all-white nations that those nations benefit from white privilege because white privilege functions globally. White nations are “privileged” over non-white ones, regardless of if they lack any actual privileges such as natural resources (Iceland comes to mind).

      And thus, all whites, no matter where they live, are stained with the indelible sin of white privilege and must pay for this by reminding themselves daily of their awful sin, perhaps by writing it on sticky notes and sticking it on their computer or refrigerator.

    • Kathy M

      “In the grand scheme of things, its all about making whites a servile minority.”

      I made this comment on the black nationalist takeover of Jackson thread. Somebody apparently flagged it and a moderator promptly deleted it. This leaves the impression that I said something so repulsive that it had to be deleted.

      We have a government guaranteeing that whites become just that. Do you get that, moderator?

    • Blah Halb

      You couldn’t even have the picture you have if it wasn’t for Japanese culture though. Are you people really this delusional?

      • Manaphy

        The Japanese represent everything that whites lack, yet they should have in terms of race realism. The Japanese resisted (and still resist) Jewish cultural Marxism, and the Japanese stand strongly against third world immigration and diversity, which is why they, as a racially homogeneous society, are very successful. Anything else?

        • Blah Halb

          LOL. No I think you said it all. Japanese > Europeans. Thanks for clarifying.

  • Erasmus

    Civilization keeps down minorities. Why not go after that? Time to turn the culture back to an era where blacks and latinos can thrive? Mud hats and uncured animal skins for everybody. If you can’t lift Kwame and Pedro up, then bring everyone else down.

    I don’t expect African-Americans to apologize for the misrule of Robert Mugabe and the thuggish regime in South Africa, so I’m certainly not going to apologize or feel guilty about “white privilege.” And, I’m not going to be brow-beaten into apologizing for the greatness of my culture just because some bitter, post-menopausal lesbian from Wellesley wants me to.

    • ms_anthro

      I agree with you and enjoy the same refusal. Lately, nothing is as satisfying as watching an anti-White’s face crumple in anger and confusion when I simply refuse to be ashamed, or to apologize for my realist views. It leaves them completely off balance and makes them look as foolish as they are. I enjoy it as a sort of social sport now.

      • Brian

        I’ve noticed they hate that. They expect histrionics or denial/backpedaling.

        • ms_anthro

          Yes, they really have no idea how to handle it. Bullies are unsettled when their intended victims stand their ground. The key is to be genuinely unashamed of what you say. Don’t just fake it for a reaction–mean it with every fiber of your being.

    • lessthantolerant

      Let’s see… England and Ghana, which rose from the mud and became a world power? Hmmm…..

  • WmarkW

    White privilege…

    At the Burger King near my house, I hand my money to the cashier face-to-face, she gives me cup to draw my own fountain beverage, and service items like napkins and ketchup are out for patrons to take as needed. At the one near my work, the cashier is behind bullet-proof glass, employees serve every drink, and apportion service items to each patron. Being in a white (my) neighborhood, lowers their operating costs and the savings are passed onto me.

    • ncpride

      Wow, really? I’ve never seen bullet-proof glass at a fast food joint. But then again, I’ve only lived in the city for a short time once in my life years ago. That’s just beyond sad.

  • JohnEngelman

    By every tangible criterion I can think of American blacks are better off than African blacks. American blacks benefit from the black privilege of living in a civilization incomparably superior to anything blacks have been able to create on their own.

    • CoweringCoward

      But, we only were able to build this with the slave labor of the blacks we oppress so effectively.

      • 1XXX

        You mean picking cotton 200 years ago is directly linked to the Apollo moon landings?

        Blacks ARE indeed magical!

        • watling

          In Terminator 2 a black guy (Miles Dyson, played by actor Joe Morton) was the brains behind Skynet.

          In Die Hard a black guy (Theo, played by Clarence Gilyard Jnr) was the technical wizard in the terrorist gang.

          In the film adaptations of Tom Clancy’s books James Earl Jones plays Jack Ryan’s boss.

          Clearly the western world could not function without black brainpower.

          I mean, Hollywood wouldn’t lie to us, would it?

          • 1XXX

            Yeah, Dyson is left holding the bag for the destruction of the world!!!
            A black guy gets the blame for the end of the world….priceless! Ha! Ha!

          • lessthantolerant

            Now we all know that the white man stole all his ideas from the black slaves, don’t we?

        • MikeofAges

          They did do a lot of the labor that built the South. But it wasn’t special work, just labor and some higher skilled work. The same kind of work white laborers did in other parts of the country. Not to mention, Southern whites would have done the same work as paid laborers.

        • lessthantolerant

          I think they know if we had picked our own cotton, we would not have had time to develop into superior beings.
          Must have been something in the cotton that stunted their development.
          After all, look at them now.

        • Brian

          The black Gypshuns invented spaceflight and we stole it from their schematics. At least that’s what Ra’shawnius told me.

    • Bo_Sears

      Engelman, there you go trying to convert a white-centric discussion into a black-centric discussion. Do you understand the difference?

      Being positive about white American’s past, future, histories, cultures, and mores is not about black Americans. When you discuss “black privilege” in American and African contexts, you are changing the discourse completely and you really shouldn’t do that. White Americans are not defined by black Americans.

      Even in multiracial 2013 America, we are a separate people with the full right to describe ourselves without reference to others.

      • proudwhitegirl

        No, he doesn’t.

        Race traitors are only concerned about the issues that directly affect them and a bantu obviously intimidated this one. It takes courage and dedication to be pro-white and to challenge the lies that diversity is anything but the active destruction of our people. Race traitors just like to hang around and whine about mean old bantus and brown asians (mesizos), while hanging on fiercely to the idea of the magical yellow asian.

        The enemy of my enemy is NOT my friend.

        • Bo_Sears

          You are right. There is a huge set of differences among (a) an Engelman seeking to deflect, (b) an innocent white American who has learned to use his or her white voice, and (c) a toughened-up white American who is willing to use his or her white voice in a white-centric way in which all discourse is for us, by us, and about us & our cultures, histories, futures, hopes, and families.

  • Spartacus

    Let me put it this way. Every single country in eastern Europe has a smaller GDP per capita than the African-American “community”, but not a single one of them, not even Ukraine, comes close in terms of murders, rapes, muggings, illegitimacy, illiteracy, or any other symptom of groidness. It’s about race, not about “privilege” .

    • FormerlyEdNY

      Excellent point!

  • pcmustgo

    Whites are privileged insofar as they are the majority….

  • JohnEngelman

    When I was a young man I benefited from the white privilege of being to walk behind people on a lonely city street without them fearing that I might mug them or rob them at gun point.

    Well, I do not feel one bit guilty about that. I was not going to mug them or rob them at gun point.

  • http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/ 1776is1984

    ‘lucky to be the majority’? yeah, like everyone else does benefit from it. Just picture if we did became the minority! chaos.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Q.D.’s Axiom #64:

    Of the some 7 billion people on Earth, if even only one of them is a gentile white heterosexual non-leftist man, the other 6,999,999,999 people will be oppressed minorities.

    • Oil Can Harry

      And when that last white scapegoat perishes the world’s problems will all be blamed on the Legacy of Slavery/ Colonialism / Apartheid etc.

      • IanJMacDonald

        And don’t forget the “Legacy of White Skin Privilege.” Yes, they’ll be able to keep blaming and hating the white man long after his extinction. Rolling blackouts due to inability to keep complex machinery and power plants online? Whitey’s fault.

        • Lagerstrom

          Legacy of slavery, colonialism/imperialism, apartheit etc, etc. As long as the sheep believe this nonsense, the left have it all sewn up.

          • Sick of it

            The sheep are ignorant of conditions in various countries before we conquered and/or colonized them. The sheep are ignorant about a lot of things.

      • MikeofAges

        No, you’ll just have what always existed before the white scientific, political and economic revolution commencing maybe around 1600. Worldwide feudalism.

        I have argued that what Third World peoples detest is not the white man but the hated “machine”.

        For them, short lifespans, the end of technological civilization and the goodies it creates, limited to no education, and the absence of opportunity to advance during their lifetimes might be an acceptable price to pay for the end of the reign of the “machine”. Some whites would sign on to the same idea.

  • Germanacus

    A society was built by and for whites. That society is fine-tuned for whites. They function well in it as by design. Naturally, non-whites will not function as well in it. The idiots identify this as white privilege. Its insane.

    • Spartacus

      “Race is not a social construct. Society is a racial construct.” – Some guy from Stormfront.

      • Sick of it

        Societies do reflect the ethnic group which created them.

    • JohnEngelman

      Orientals function well in the United States too, better than most white to be exact.

      • Bo_Sears

        What would those measures be? Over-population? De-forestation? Willingness to accept totalitarian rule? What are the “ingredients for a successful society” by Asians in which they are “objectively superior”?

        Have they really done that well in their homelands? Why the mad rush to migrate here? There has to be more to that Taylor quote because, if the Asian societies were so successful, California would be East China or East Korea or East Japan. Each of those three societies had the ability to expand eastward across the Pacific with the winds and tides (north of the equator) pushing them on, but utterly failed to do so…or is staying home until someone else settles a wild land evidence of “objective superiority”?

        • JohnEngelman

          You do not see the people of Japan, Taiwan, or Singapore rushing madly to get here. In time the people of mainland China will reach their standard of living.

          • Bo_Sears

            Engelman, you never quite answer the questions, do you? The key word was “Asians” not Japanese, Taiwanese, or Singaporeans. How about outlining the “measures” that you are relying on regarding “objective superior” peoples?

      • ricpic

        If Engelman were to vote with his feet and move into an Asian neighborhood he would instantly be disabused of his illusions about the “superior” ones. Do it Engelman, put yourself in real extended proximity to Asians, go experience the hate, then get back to us.

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          No no, don’t let him get back to us, let him stay!

          • David Ashton

            He says he would be happy to stay in China OR Israel (sic) if he could speak the language(s) and find suitable employment. But this is the persistently ignored crux of our objections to his stance. It is not (just) a matter of IQ, but of different languages, traditions, identity, ethnic affiliation, etc. Of course, he fancies Chinese girls and “loves Judaism” (simultaneously) so racial appearance and religious difference are outside his box.

  • Evette Coutier

    Asians and Jews enjoy more privileges than whites economically and educationally in America. Why are America’s universities ignoring Asia privilege and Jew privilege? The answer is academic group think. Academic folks are some of the worst group thinking social conformist in our society. The will even knowingly lie to fit the mold. The reality is most of these people know blacks are weak intellectually, but don’t have either the morals or integrity to speak factually against social pressure.

    • ThomasER916

      Because Asians and Jews run the Universities.

  • Jefferson

    I don’t believe in White privilege, I believe in Green privilege. You will have it way easier in life and struggle less if you have $20 million dollars in your bank account for example than if you have $20 thousand dollars in your bank account.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    I loved that bit when he talked about how whites supposedly can talk with their mouths full without anybody thinking negatively about them while showing the sainted Barack Obama doing the same thing!

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    White people reach into their “invisible knapsack” and pull out maps? I guess the woman Taylor is talking about is too old to have heard about GPS. And who uses the word “knapsack” anyway? She probably also uses words like “hepcat” and “23 skidoo.”

    • Sick of it

      Prior to GPS, I remember us having to buy maps. They didn’t hand them out to white people for free.

  • shawnmer

    I’m a 44 y/o white male from the South with an “unreconstructed” view on race instilled in me by my family, and bountifully reinforced by familiarity with all the relevant socioeconomic stats and, most critically, decades of first hand experience that comes with living in a majority-black town. I’m also, I guess, a dinosaur.

    If kids are being indoctrinated with the nonsense Jared references there, we will eventually be outnumbered ideologically as whites my age and older die off.

    What a sad end to a great race. Good run while it lasted, I guess!

    • ncpride

      We can hope there are more parents like me that have taught their kids ( the next generation) that ‘White Privilege’ is a load of… sh… nonsense, to be proud of their race, and to FIGHT for it.

    • ShermanTMcCoy

      Fret not, shawn. I was raised to be a “color-blind” Democrat libtard. Then, I actually came into contact with groids in my high school, the military, and the work place. They, almost without exception, were worthless at best, and violent criminals at worst.

      I changed my mind over a period of tim, and many white young people will, too.

      But you betcha, I am definitely training my children up in the way that they should go, and in recognizing just who their enemies are.

      • Brian

        Same with me. As the demographics change, some whites will miscegenate away into the beige mass, but those of us who remain will harden our resolve, as the whitopias become all but unaffordable. And if it comes to gunfire, I’m confident we are worth 5 or 10 of them.

    • ThomasER916

      I grew up on the South Side of Chicago. I was taught everything white was evil and everything not white was good. What I learned on the streets was something completely different. I learned that if whites don’t stick together, they die. By the time I was in high school it was life saving. If any white was attacked you jumped in and punched anyone with a tan. When I joined the Marines everything I learned on the streets was still valid. Over time I was able to develop what is nothing more than a rational Nationalism base wholly on experience. That’s what leads people here.

      The key is we take this knowledge and make it part of our lexicon, our community, our culture. Work with our own to allow our identity to grow. If we have an identity, we have something to contrast the Bolshevik BS.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        You experienced firsthand and on a microeconomic scale the folly of atomistic individualist ideology. I know you now know that anyone preaching it is either a fool, an outright enemy or a willing shill for our enemies.

      • Norseman

        ” By the time I was in high school it was life saving. If any white was
        attacked you jumped in and punched anyone with a tan. When I joined the
        Marines everything I learned on the streets was still valid.”

        When was this?

    • Erasmus

      Be of good cheer. All the millions of kids they’ve brain-washed in school into believing they enjoy white privilege, are going to be happy to learn that they’re not from a race of white demons but from one that’s reached some of the greatest technological, scientific and cultural summits in human history, and we’re going to teach it to them.

      The moment they get out of the classroom and begin objectively looking at the world for themselves, they’re going to discover that their teachers and, in some cases, ministers have been lying to them. First, they’re going to be happy to realize they haven’t jacks*** to feel guilty about, and second, they’re going to be po’ed to discover their real heritage was stolen from them.

      I’m not say all will, but I’ll wager the majority will.

      Truth is the daughter of time.

  • William Krapek

    There’s a reason why you’re a godfather in this movement. :-) Every time you do a video I’m reminded of that.

    My one teeny tiny complaint? Bring the camera in a lot closer. You’re the reason we’re all here!

    (And was that a tip of the hat to our Spartacus that I spied?)

  • Mack0

    We are feeding the poor populations of the world. These people if left to fend for themselves would see a near instantaneous drop in population to levels sustainable by the resources of their environment. Yet another way we are expediting our own extinction.

  • Wilmoto

    Interesting video that raises a question…does Peggy McIntosh consider “White” Jews as being privileged?

    I came across this that readers might find interesting–Jenny Peto’s master thesis,at the University of Toronto,entitled,”The Victimhood of the Powerful: White Jews,Zionism and the Racism of Hegemonic Holocaust Education…

    I argue that today, Jewish people of
    European descent enjoy white privilege and are among the most
    socio-economically advantaged groups in the West. Despite this
    privilege, the organized Jewish community makes claims about Jewish
    victimhood that are widely accepted within that community and within
    popular discourse in the West. I propose that these claims to victimhood
    are no longer based in a reality of oppression, but continue to be
    propagated because a victimized Jewish identity can produce certain
    effects that are beneficial to the organized Jewish community and the
    Israeli nation-state. I focus on two related Holocaust education
    projects – the March of the Living and the March of Remembrance and Hope
    – to show how Jewish victimhood is instrumentalized in ways that
    obscure Jewish privilege, deny Jewish racism and promote the interests
    of the Israeli nation-state.

    “Some ideas are so absurd that only intellectuals believe them.”—George Orwell

    • Bossman

      Jews are the most privileged group because they’ve learned to use their brains more so than any other group. Their religion is a formula for success.

      • David Ashton

        The most observant and decent religious Jews are not as successful politically and financially as the “liberal” ones, but ethnic networking usually still applies. Instead of grumbling, “white Gentiles” should follow suit in co-operation.

    • Sangraal

      Very interesting…Is Jenny Peto Jewish herself? If so, I imagine she’ll be lambasted as a ‘self-hating Jew’, like Norman Finkelstein, Albert Lindemann et al, to divert people away from taking her seriously.

  • OhWow

    One obvious example that white privilege DOESN’T exist: the very fact that Jared Taylor is white and telling it like it is will be deemed as racist. But if a black man makes the same arguments, it’s fine.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Peggy McIntosh…

    …Is what we got when someone decided one day for grins and giggles to change the name on the building from Creedmoor to CUNY.

  • Jefferson

    I will believe White privilege exists in America if a law passes that prohibits importing Section 8 housing residents into predominantly White neighborhoods. I will believe White privilege exists in America when a law passes that prohibits granting birthright citizenship to the off springs of Illegal Immigrant squat monsters from south of the border. I will believe White privilege in America exists if a law is passed banning affirmative action in education.

    • Bossman

      The “squat monsters” from south of the border are the first Americans who helped greatly in making white people a privileged group at this time in history. Europe became great and energized after the discovery of the Americas. Before that religious superstition and having to fight the hordes of Islam were the main preoccupations of Europeans. As for diet, Indian food saved Europe. Read the book “Indian Givers.”‘

      • ms_anthro

        Our discovery of the Americas benefited our people because of the incredible natural resources and empty land we found here. The natives were occasionally helpful but for the most part, murderous barbarians and low-IQ savages that butchered our settlers, including women and children, when they weren’t busily slaughtering each other. To credit them with Europeans’ success in building the USA and Canada is absurd and totally ahistorical.

        Anyone interested in destroying the myth of the noble Indian savage need look no further than War Before Civilization by Lawrence H. Keeley.

        • Bossman

          I don’t what that book is all about but the title is highly suspect. Civilization? What civilization? Syrians are gasing their own people right now.

          • ms_anthro

            What do Syrians have to do with Indios and mestizos from the Western Hemisphere?

          • Bossman

            What is the book about?

          • ms_anthro

            You can find it easily on Amazon, where there is a full synopsis and reviews. I would post a link but links are held for moderation here. Google the name and author.

      • Brian

        None of that has anything to do with Aztecs themselves.

  • Puggg

    I may be barking up the wrong tree, but at the end of the vid, Jared Taylor lists some of the white privilege seminars and programs, in that they’re reminding white people to remind themselves constantly that they’re white and have all this unearned white privilege.

    Isn’t that a dangerous game for the anti-whites to be playing? If I truly believed that there was no such thing as race, the last thing I’d want to do is to keep reminding people that they are of a certain race, even if it is for the purposes of denigration. If you keep telling otherwise deracinated young white people that you’re an evil white person carrying around this invisible unearned fanny pack o’privilege, it’ll sink into them that they’re white, and that by golly, race really does exist.

    Then they’ll find AmRen.

    • ViktorNN

      You make a good point that anti-white “anti-racists” may actually help bring some white people to a positive kind white racial awareness. Of course, that’s not their goal – they’re trying to instill a negative self-image in us.

      But whatever accidental good they create by introducing some whites to racial awareness, they also do a great deal of harm with the bogus concept of “white privilege” by whipping up resentment and hate against white people by non-whites.

      By telling the lie that white people are walking around with “unearned” advantages that non-whites don’t get, non-whites are given permission by activists in academia and government to hate whites openly and publicly. All they have to do is use the appropriate code words to do so – words like “white privilege.”

      We see the real world results of the hate anti-white “anti-racists” whip up in the imbalance of interracial crime stats, where whites end up victimized by non-whites more than the other way around.

      In this sense, the very idea of “white privilege” itself is a form of systemic institutionalized racism against white people.

    • Andy

      That’s how it worked for me and my siblings. We were raised in a middle-class, semi-rural, almost completely white town. We’d likely all be good independents or Republicans who didn’t give race much thought and assumed poverty accounted for racial differences if it weren’t for constant attacks on white people and the absurd lionizing of black people in the schools.

    • Jefferson

      Liberals don’t believe there is no such thing as race. If liberals truly were color blind, they would not support affirmative action. If liberals truly want a color blind society where people rarely mention race to divide people, they would denounce race hustlers like Al Sharpton, the NAACP, Eric My People Holder, etc.

  • Funruffian

    The term “White Privilege” was coined by a fat and ugly feminist.

  • tech

    White privilege is the privilege of having your people conquer continents, travel to the moon, build civilizations, build computers; create rich nation states filled with rich languages, customs, and ways of life that are the envy of the world …

    Only to have millions of foreigners freely walk in and tell you that you have no rights to it but instead must be discriminated against to make brown people look better.

    It is the privilege to be: discriminated against in your own countries; to have every nation of your people filled with foreigners; to have your traditions and heritage disregarded; to be ashamed of your ancestors and what you are today; to be set up for campaign of genocide through mongrelization, mass immigration, and eventual violent ethnic cleansing; and to watch your society fall apart under the burden of millions of non-whites you are forced to cater to.

    • itdoesnotmatter

      B, bu, but, wait. What say you of Revrun NotSoSharpton’s 1994 enlightening statement to college kids in N.J.?

      Take this in: “White folks was in the caves while we blacks was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”

      You dare to refute it? [sarc]

      • watling

        He forgot to mention peanut butter.

        • Lagerstrom

          And Beethoven. He’s quite welcome to Michael Jackson and James Brown though.

        • David Ashton

          But don’t forget the great philosophers Afristotle, Immanuel Kunte and Uncle Tom Hobbes.

      • Sick of it

        I didn’t know Sharpton was part of the Nation of Islam…

      • Bossman

        Black people like to believe the above statements but unfortunately for them it is not true. Astrology, mathematics, and the art of pyramid building all came from the Middle East. Greek immigrants in Asia Minor and Southern Italy were the first philosophers.

      • Brian

        So they forgot how to do all that? Not much better. And I always wonder why it took so bloody long for Bantus to colonize Madagascar, right across the water. Borneans beat them to it.

  • JohnEngelman

    White privilege consists of the fact that if you are white people assume that you probably do not have felony convictions, illegitimate children, and that you are functionally literate.

    If one is black those assumptions are less commonly made and less usually accurate.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      I am a (mostly) white felon on the Terrorist Watch List. My PO walked around the neighborhood handing out photos of me after I got home. After I returned home from the hoosgow, I used to get my mail at night because I didn’t want the neighbors to see me. One of my neighbors came to the Subway restaurant where I worked in 2004, recognized me from the photo and said “Hatch Circle?” I said “Yes”, and then she never returned. The first male neighbor who said anything to me said “You F*****g Felon”.

      He got in my face, so I invited him into my garage to fight, and he backed off. We wound up friends, eventually. Lots of them and I are friends now. It is very, very difficult to get back once you’ve been down in a serious way. You have to be willing to move pianos for old women.

      • ShermanTMcCoy

        You oughta write a book, Mike.

      • MBlanc46

        This does seem to be real problem. The theory is that someone commits a crime, is convicted and sentenced, serves his/her time, then returns to become a productive citizen. Clearly this is not how things work most of the time. Many ghetto dwellers complain that they are virtually unemployable after returning from prison. Of course they often have other social deficits as well, such as low IQ, illiteracy or near to it, and substance issues. Based on your experience, do you have any ideas how to make it more likely that ex-offenders from the hood can be integrated into society?

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          Many ghetto dwellers complain that they are virtually unemployable after returning from prison.

          They were virtually unemployable before they went to prison.

          • MBlanc46

            Yes, I acknowledged that. I’m interested to see whether MCS has any experience-based insights into policies for integrating ex-convicts into the economy, especially insofar as they might apply to blacks.

      • ricpic

        Yeah, but surely every now and then a young woman wants her piano moved if you know what I mean, nudge-nudge wink-wink,

  • Lagerstrom

    It is mind boggling that grown White men or women would voluntarily subject themselves to the base humiliation of having anti-White slogans written on their faces for such an absurd campaign. How low these people have sunk. This begs a question; do these people actually believe this b/s? Or are they just ‘sluts for hire’ from an advertising agency?

    • Sick of it

      Probably a mixture of prostitutes and those with the slave mentality.

    • ms_anthro

      For the ones who believe it, I think it’s just a degenerate sort of status signaling. Being a realist is déclassé and most liberals I’ve met are so filled with class insecurity and social anxiety that the pressure to conform is almost palpable around them. I’m not sure they’re even capable of thinking for themselves. If they existed in some bizarro paradise world where realists controlled the narrative, they’d be our dutiful followers because we would make it socially acceptable to be.

  • haroldcrews

    Much could be said on the relationship between guilt and egotism. Fortunately I’m not verbose. But it requires a person incredibly egocentric to believe that all the problems of the world arise from his or her own attributes or decisions. Such a perspective implicitly strips others of moral agency and infantilizes them at the minimum; if it doesn’t dehumanize them altogether.

  • http://independent-british-nationalist.blogspot.com/ British Activism

    Another brilliant video Jared. Thank you for continuing these series of explanations about our point of view. There is more conveyed in these 12 minutes than what might take 12 articles to get the root of, and the same applies to some of the older videos that have been made. They are good for helping to bolster and keep enthusiasm/belief in what we are doing, and, when the situation arises, handy to shove in front of people who are either on the fence or over the other side of the fence.

  • WmarkW

    It’s gated. The fence was built in the late 80s, after a couple corpses were found in the undeveloped part of the property.

  • ncpride

    I’m sure I’d have a severe case of ‘cultural shock’ were I to visit large cities around this once great Nation. I can’t imagine myself living anywhere other than small, very rural places. In our tiny town, I can pick my kid up in the late evening from music practice, and I MIGHT pass 3 to 4 cars on the round trip. However, I’d bet ‘city folk’ would absolutely hate the isolation of rural living. It’s the only place for me though.

    • ms_anthro

      I have done both and enjoyed the pros and cons of each. In the end I found it very hard to make a living in the country, as I lack the skills and knowledge necessary to be a small farmer or rancher. But living in extremely rural places has given me tremendous respect for country folk. In my experience, most of them are kind, caring, brotherly, and tough as nails. I’d trade one country type for 10 city dwellers any day.

  • cecilhenry

    White privilege is racial disparagement and has only one goal: White Genocide.

    At its core, its being white is a privilege, then destroying that privilege (ie Whites) is the logical extension.

    Ironically, the privilege of being white is never taken as evidence of superiority, or of ENVY on the parts of others, but merely as an unassailable justification for GEnocide.

    Enough.

    Anti-Whites: YOU Gotta GO!!

  • Luca

    Thank you Mr. Taylor for that graph at 1:55. It adds credence to my thesis that the beginning of the end started in 1965.

    That is when Liberals, emboldened by the LBJ administration, started the passive-aggressive take over of the United States.

    Events such as the War on Poverty, Affirmative Action, the War in Vietnam and the ensuing protests, liberalization of the media, relaxation of pornography laws, the Immigration Act of 1965, the start of all the “Rights” movements, race riots, etc. were all the ingredients necessary to start the NWO takeover of the US.

    Now we find ourselves being inundated from all sides. Anyone who is a White, Christian, Heterosexual male is target number one.

    I wonder if Liberal academia, media, Hollywood, and society at large has emasculated society enough to prevent a take back or rebellion. Time will tell, clearly there is more awareness but the indoctrination today is massive.

    Liberalism is a sick cult that is completely out of control and is destined to destroy the greatest country in the history of the world.

    • JohnEngelman

      The War in Vietnam happened because President Eisenhower refused to sign and honor the Geneva Agreement of 1954. That agreement forbade the entry of foreign troops into Vietnam, stated that the division of the country was temporary, and scheduled elections to be held in July 1956 to unify the country.

      In his Memoirs Dwight Eisenhower said that Ho Chi Minh would have won as much as 80 percent of the vote.

      The Democratic New Deal coalition collapsed in 1968. That is why recessions have gotten worse, why incomes have stagnated or declined for most Americans while the rich have gotten richer, and why the national debt has grown geometrically.

      • Luca

        The War in Viet Nam had its beginnings in the Truman Administration. Ho Chi Minh was an ally in the fight against Japan and begged Truman a number of times for assistance in becoming independent of France. Truman ignored him and instead helped France maintain its colonies by committing money and supplies. Truman feared the French could otherwise become communist.

        Eisenhower’s mistake was continuing military aid to France and not signing the Geneva Accord.

        Kennedy’s mistake went further by providing American military advisers.

        The previous administrations share blame, but none come close to what LBJ did. He lied to the American public by grossly exaggerating the Gulf of Tonkin incident and then committed more than 500,000 American combat troops to fight in Viet Nam. The drain on American resources and the economy under LBJ are staggering.

        During the Eisenhower administration there were less than 10 American casualties. During LBJ there were about 37,000 American troops killed.

        But lets blame it all on Ike.

        Yet another example of short-sighted statements and one-sided facts designed to bolster the liberal agenda of painting all Republicans as incompetent and evil.

        • JohnEngelman

          President Eisenhower is obviously not the only American leader who deserves blame for the War in Vietnam, but he would have had the easiest time backing away from it.

          Presidents Kennedy and Johnson were afraid of appearing to be “soft on Communism.” This was because of the anti Communist hysteria generated by Sen. Joseph McCarthy.

          What matters is that Vietnam was unimportant to America’s economy and security, and that as many as 80 percent of the Vietnamese supported Ho Chi Minh.

          Liberal support for the war began to dissipate after 1965. Conservatives continued to support the war until 1975. On the War on Vietnam the liberals had the better argument.

          • Luca

            Your original statement: “The War in Vietnam happened because President Eisenhower refused to sign and honor the Geneva Agreement of 1954. ”

            That statement levels the blame directly on Eisenhower.

            Now however, you are ever-so-slightly acquiescing that it is a shared blame.

            The war has its origins in the Truman administration but you never addressed this.

            Eisenhower did not commit troops so he essentially kept us out of an active role.

            Kennedy very quietly placed thousands of military “advisers” in country, greatly enhancing our chances of confrontations and casualties.

            It did not become a “war” until the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.

            Truman liked to display a sign on his desk that read “The Buck Stops Here.” Well, he is certainly responsible for the embarrassment of the cease fire in Korea and then he started the ball rolling to set the stage for Viet Nam. Frankly, it doesn’t matter to me what political party he came from, he simply made bad choices in international affairs.

            The war happened for a thousand different reasons but historians can clearly pinpoint the beginning, a Feb. 28, 1946 telegram whereby Ho Chi Minh once again begged Truman for assistance with independence and to stop French aggression. That telegram, like previous communications, was totally ignored.

            The really key date is Aug 10th 1964, the Gulf of Tonkin resolution giving LBJ full power to intervene in what was really a Vietnamese civil war. This opened up the gates of hell.

            This conversation has reached its natural conclusion.

          • JohnEngelman

            The War in Vietnam happened because of a cascading series of errors. If you want me to acknowledge that Eisenhower was not the only error maker I will. By the time most Americans could locate Vietnam on the map, Americans were fighting there.

            The novel “Seven Days in May” was published in 1962. The novel is set in the 1970’s. It is about an attempt at a military coup in the United States. The plot requires a frustrating, disappointing war to have recently been fought against the Communists.

            The novelists imagine a limited, conventional war between the Soviet Union and the United States in Iran. What is significant about that is that when “Seven Days in May” was written, hardly anyone had any idea of the brewing disaster in Vietnam.

            It never occurred to the authors to have an American defeat in Vietnam motivate a military coup.

          • David Ashton

            This (as I said before on this site) became what is still one of my favorite films, though my sympathies (as you can guess) were with Burt Lancaster’s patriot rather than Kirk Douglas’s “liberal”.

          • JohnEngelman

            Does that mean you would welcome a military dictatorship?

          • David Ashton

            Only as an emergency national alternative to a foreign enemy dictatorship as supported by e.g. many subversives investigated by US security commitees and the CPUSA. I was never deceived by the communist weasel language of “people’s democracy” which “liberals” and “anti-whites” have taken so seriously. If the UK had been invaded by the Nazis in 1939-40, or by the Soviets in 1946-47, we would have had to have a defensive military dictatorship of sorts even here. In the movie, the military leader was tying to protect his nation from treasonable disarmament in collaboration with a Soviet armed threat. Ho Chi Minh ran a military dictatorship against the French, the Americans and non-communist Vietnamese. So it all rather depends, doesn’t it?

          • JohnEngelman

            Confucius lived during a war lord period between two Chinese dynasties. China was divided between independent provinces that were often at war with each other.

            One time a war lord came to him and asked, “How can I conquer the province that borders mine?”

            Confucius told him, “If you govern your province well, the people in the neighboring province will fight to join you.”

            Ho Chi Minh had the support of the vast majority of the Vietnamese. Ngô Đình Diệm had very little support.

            If Ho Chi Minh had been a better man he would have accepted the partition of Vietnam, and concentrated on governing North Vietnam well, and democratically. If, as President Eisenhower said, as many as 80 percent of the Vietnamese supported Ho, he could have afforded to allow a loyal opposition to exist, and compete in elections. He could have allowed a free press to exist.

            While governing North Vietnam after being elected and re elected in landslide victories supervised by the United Nations he could have continued to draw attention that the continued division of Vietnam, and the dictatorship of Ngô Đình Diệm was a violation of the Geneva Agreement of 1954.

            The existence of a Communist leader that popular would have been embarrassing to President Eisenhower. It would have also been embarrassing to Nikita Khrushchev, Mao Tse Tung, and Kim Il Sung. People would start asking why they did not run in free and contested elections.

            Alas. Ho Chi Minh was not a better man. He still had the support of the vast majority of the Vietnamese. He still posed no threat to the security and economy of the United States.

          • David Ashton

            Hypothetical.
            His “badness” is well documented in the US Government booklet “The Human Cost of Communism in Vietnam” which has a section on the Geneva Agreements.
            I should say that I opposed US “intervention” in Vietnam, for several reasons including the counter-productive propaganda effect of appearing to “Americanise” the conflict as another colonial albeit no-win war.
            I am opposed to conscription for foreign wars but fully support it if one’s own country is invaded.

          • David Ashton

            Kennedy was afraid of appearing soft on Communism because of -Communism. John and Robert had supported McCarthy’s attempt to expose subversives in US government, which the Venona documents had already partly disclosed but could not be used without revealing to the KGB & GRU the American code-breaking achievements. In the end JFK voted against the Senator without much ado, although Robert attended his funeral.

            Communist control of most of the Asian mainland, eastern Europe, Cuba and several other states was important to US security.

            Your repeated assertion that 80 per cent of all Vietnamese supported the Vietnamese Communist leader is based on a comment from Ike that refers to the “period of fighting”. It ignores the systematic elimination by Ho Chi Minh of political opponents of all kinds that makes the “Night of Long Knives” in Germany look like a Sunday School garden party. He never held proper elections.

            The idea that anti-communism in the USA was simply “hysteria” generated by one man’s temporary investigation is an incorrect rewriting of history. The UK and other NATO governments were not pro-McCarthy, but had studied and/or experienced communist attacks on the “free world”.

    • Bo_Sears

      You mention things like the war on poverty, affirmative action, Vietnam, etc., but almost all such lists miss the overwhelming power of the anti-white narrative maintained by academia and media…especially the latter which vastly emphasizes white crime and hoaxes that allege white crime, and greatly minimizes others’ crimes.

      This is an almost everyday thing since the hoax of The March On Skokie in the late Seventies which really kicked off the massive campaign of defamation about topics like the black churches burning hoax, the Zimmerman is white hoax, the Duke University athletes hoax, the Boston Bombers were white lads hoax, and so on. We are constantly wrong-footed and thrown on the defensive which saps our morale and makes us doubt ourselves by these huge public relations campaigns for the past 40 years.

  • Bo_Sears

    In dealing with the questions you raise, the one thing missing in Taylor’s message is a couple of short summaries, almost slogans, to counter the term “white privilege” and “the knapsack of unearned privileges.”

    We’ve adopted at Resisting Defamation two terms. First we call the whole enchilada “the anti-white narrative” as a way to stitch together the academic polemics hostile to white Americans with the over emphasis by media on white crimes and hoaxes about white crimes, compared with minimization by academia and media about others’ privileges and crimes. This is not based on comparative statistics…it is all about the narrative established in academia and reinforced by media. We just label it fiction and not debate the details.

    Second, when asked about “unpacking the knapsack of unearned privilege,” we respond that we’re too busy “unpacking the backpack of the anti-white narrative.” That stops a lot of white-bashing right there. And we go where angels fear to tread, we’ve shut down more than one inquisition by talking about the cars doors being locked near us and clerks following us around…the anti-white crowd is just fascinated that someone wouldn’t be drawn into that trick bag and would have the nerve to appropriate Obama’s faux claims.

    Arguments about the truth of “white privilege” don’t work in the day-to-day drive-by verbal assaults on white Americans, you need to have a white-centric way to develop your own discourse, and not one that features others. It’s a toughie but it is eminently do-able. We do it all the time.

    • ViktorNN

      I agree with what you’re saying.

      In another comment I made on this article, I link the term “white privilege” with the idea that it’s an inherently by-design anti-white concept that is in fact a kind of hate speech in the sense that it is used to whip up anti-white violence and hate crimes.

      I think there are certain contexts where characterizing the term “white privilege” as an example of “anti white hate speech” might be worth trying – especially if some kind of link can be drawn from the speaker to examples of actual violence against white people.

      For example, when leftist academics and liberal pundits start piping up about “white privilege” in the Trayvon/Zimmerman case, their rhetoric can be directly linked to anti-white revenge attacks of black mobs against innocent white people. The academics and pundits who use the term are using hate speech to whip up hate crimes against us.

      • Bo_Sears

        Along the lines of the creation of a hateful violent climate? Or something more specific…a law suit? A defense of a counter-attack?

        There’s certainly a climate of hate created that could probably be documented, perhaps studying hate crimes against white Americans for the thirty days following a Tim Wise hate-white rally? It would be interesting to see if they occur in close conjunction with his visits.

        • ViktorNN

          Yeah. A hateful climate is indeed created by their language – “white privilege” is one of their favorite terms for whipping up anti-white resentment – and it’s up to us to point out the connection between what they say and the anti-white hate attacks that happen as a result.

          I think the revenge attacks by blacks against whites in the wake of the Martin/Zimmerman episode are a good example of this.

          Even though Zimmerman wasn’t white, and even though Martin’s death was in self-defense, the anti-white media forced the story into their usual cookie cutter narrative of evil white America profiling young black men and murdering them for no reason than that they are black.

          They came out strong telling this bogus story, and many pundits and academic “analysts” pulled out the “white privilege” card as evidence of the story they wanted to tell. The result? Who knows how many white people were injured – some seriously – as a result of anti-white revenge attacks. The anti-whites in the media need to be at least called out for the climate of hate they created, and held accountable if possible.

  • proudwhitegirl

    I was carefully considering my privilege as I read an article about an upscale restaurant chain in Chicago being sued by the government for not hiring qualified bantus (an oxymoron). The victimized bantus will be receiving back pay for the time they did not work because they were discriminated against by not being hired. So now it is against the law, apparently, to not hire lazy, ill-tempered, violent, unintelligent members of the Homo Erectus tribe, or more specifically, hire whites in lieu of bantus.

    My privilege just keeps growing. I’d like to give a special thanks to the homely race traitor feminist that introduced this new means of self-flagellation for whites. I propose she now lead the way by moving to Detroit or Camden, New Jersey. After all, this indoctrination is leading to the obvious, which is whites must all die in order to make it right for the muds and the tribe.

  • WmarkW

    You know who befits from White Privilege? Blacks who live in white countries. African-Americans and -Canadians are the best off black people on earth.

  • proudwhitegirl

    No, back pay from birth has been taken care of and funded by white people and distributed through the social services departments via EBT reparations. So, the poor, victimized bantus only get a ghetto lottery from the time they put in their applications. Isn’t liberalism delightful?

  • CalMark

    Gotta love Jared. He is an American treasure.

  • FransSusan

    Thank you, Jared Taylor, for that great video!

  • Luca

    Hollywood produces whatever sells. Action, sex, violence.

    Within what they sell are propaganda messages. Nearly every movie will have in its story line something about the wonderful and victimized negroes, mixed-race relationships, evil corporations, evil Whites and/or homosexuality.

    • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

      Exactly.

  • nignogger

    This propaganda is done deliberately by design by our elites to the white race.

  • GeneticsareDestiny

    I’m glad to see Jared Taylor taking on Peggy McIntosh’s foolishness. I had to read her Knapsack paper in high school (thanks public school!) and though I was already a fledgling race realist, it propelled me down the path to truth even further.

    I can only hope it will do the same for the other white kids who will be forced to read it as a part of their school assignments.

  • watling

    Good idea about the black scientists of Hollywood. In Jurassic Park Samuel L. Jackson’s cool, organised computer genius contrasted with Wayne Knight’s fat, slobbish, crooked, greedy white computer genius.

    How about adding Gary Coleman’s eponymous black hero in “The Kid with the 200 I.Q.”? In that film black actor Robert Guillaume (Benson the butler in “Soap”) plays Professor Mills, the brainy kid’s protégé.

    • rowingfool

      I refuse to watch any movie in which Samuel L. Jackson appears. He typifies the cocky but ignorant black male. All puffed up on himself but just a bag of hot air.

  • Preston Wiginton

    Should have hit on Joe Feagin.

  • Bossman

    There is indeed white privilege because all of life is parasitic. Humans abuse animals and some races have natural advantages over other races.

  • Puggg

    We’ve well established that there’s no such thing as white privilege really.

    But why shouldn’t there be white privilege?

    We would expect Russian privilege in Russia, Ukrainian privilege in The Ukraine, Irish privilege in Ireland, Chinese privilege in China. It seems to me this is the whole point of countries and nations to start with, for the betterment of the related group of people that live inside of it.

    • Jefferson

      If White privilege truly existed in America, the racist anti-White Eric My People Holder for example would not currently be one of the most powerful men in America.

  • MikeofAges

    Jared misses one little point. Institutional racism might exist. Including anti-white racism, of course. So might other institutional biases, including bias against men, as well as against women. Or bias against the native born or against those descended from the traditional population of the United States, whether white or black These issues we can deal with rationally, not that we have. Perhaps even find a way to ameliorate them without imposing extreme dislocations on someone else.

    The idea of white privilege is just a little too theological. Even if it it exists, there is no way to respond to the idea short of imposing Dantesque punishment on white people. Of course the weight of these will fall on those who have the least privilege. Those who have the most can simply admit their transgressions and skate. Even the conservative types in management and skilled work get a pass as they, without admitting guilt, nevertheless administer the punishments imposed on the less advantaged members of their cohort. For all of this, you can thank, more than anyone else, Thurgood Marshall.

    Marshall was one of the great creepy bureaucratic mass manipulators of the 20th Century. In America, in addition to Marshall, we had people like J.Edgar Hoover, Lewis Hershey, motion picture censor Will Hayes and sportsman and Olympic “czar” Avery Brundage, referred to by the athletes alternately as “Slavery Brundage” or “Avery Bondage”.

    As bad as these were, outside of the English-speaking world, there far worse. One of them was Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin file-keeper-in-chief. Beria was executed a few months after the death of Stalin in 1953.

    Our counterpart, Hoover, died a natural death in 1972. Shortly thereafter, his secret files were seized and destroyed.

  • Bossman

    If you don’t know what white privilege is, you can always read the book “Black like Me” or you can do what the author of that book did: Change yourself into a black man for a few months.

    • Jefferson

      Hey Vato, do you have Brown privilege ?

  • ms_anthro

    Dwayne Johnson isn’t White.

  • ms_anthro

    Please know that you and any other White South Africans are welcome here. Come for “vacation” and never leave. We want and need you here and will work together to keep you from being deported.

  • Franklin_Ryckaert

    It is about time this pertinent question be asked!

  • http://radicalamericancentrist.blogspot.com/ CORPORATIONS VS THE WHITE RACE

    white privilege is the phrase used by the corporations to create white race guilt in the minds of young, impressionable whites.

    Why do corporations want whites to think they have it made? So that whites will consent to mass immigration of cheap nonwhite labor into the american workforce and neighborhoods.

    More cheap labor, lower wages, higher profits, more consumers, more corporate revenue.

    Follow the money.

    White solidarity and pride is The Ultimate Evil because it stands in the way of the corporations cramming more and more cheap labor and consumers into america.

    • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

      If only the central culprits were limited to corporations.

  • PouponMarks

    One of the great, but unwritten and undiscussed social experiments of the entire span of humanity is coming to an inevitable conclusion. This started about 300 years ago when Blacks were imported into the United States from a continent so primitive, that most cultures there had no invented the wheel. As time when on, the experiment evolved from controlling this Black population with special rules to granting them full rights and privileges equal to the White majority. It was theorized and postulated that given a limited boost in education, easy money, and jump the line positrons that they did not qualify for, the differences between the races would be revealed, through Natural Law, to be only one of skin pigmentation. A multi-century study/experiment has now brought the results to the forefront with a confidence in its conclusions and findings:

    Blacks are not suited for full partnership in a complex and technological society with Whites and Asians. Unable to accept socio-economic status commensurable with their aptitude, production, and abilities, they resort to the irrational, lawless, and delusional to mask and rationalize a permanent wide gap on most all social and economic spectra. Unequal results to Blacks are prima facie that pernicious “discrimination” based on non productive criteria account to broad differences across many abilities.

    Their inability or unwillingness to accept this nature hierarchy, but rather to substitute an artificial system of elevated placement, for example, Black Run Administration cities and other jurisdictions has predictably and always resulted in ruin, degradation, regression, and collapse. Like muddy water, the solid particles eventually settle on the bottom.

  • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

    Superbly done, Jared Taylor.

  • Carney3

    I have mixed feelings about this video. Talk of black and Hispanic “failure” early on is probably too jarring a note for newcomers, and Taylor’s usual dignified, authoritative, high-credibility manner is undermined by the video’s persistent sarcasm. Yes, “white privilege” is garbage, but if we’re truly interested in persuading others, this video is not the right way.

  • Derp

    That last quote by that black poet was just too much! I can’t believe he got away with writing/saying that. I’m so glad I don’t live in America anymore.

    • Andy

      He also wrote a delightful poem called “Black Dada Nihilismus” which contains the passage: “Rape the white girls. Rape their fathers. Cut the mothers’ throats.”

      • Derp

        Whoa!!

      • Lagerstrom

        Did he mix up the mother and father bit? Naa!

  • Transpower

    Brilliant, Jared. Keep up the good work!

  • 1proactive2

    It never fails to amaze me that a liberal can just “invent” a theory without a trace of research or any other type of validation, and then see this delusion accepted as truth. It’s as if some people want to appear righteous due to some subconscious infantile deficit based on inadequacy fears. Put another way, this Peggy character is blissful in her willful ignorance, and she wants to spread her pathological joy. It also pays great financial dividends and fame.

    It worked for the late anthropologist Margaret Mead even after later investigations of her “research” among primitives was found out to be a hoax, but it helped launch the radical feminist movement. Mead is still considered an icon to the social engineering crowd, and she is still highly revered in public universities.

    Anyone can have their existential fears and misery, but the real problem is that some of these grossly neurotic people have to spread their misery and emotional instability, and that, for validation and the perception of being normal.

  • Funruffian

    I can’t praise Jared, our patron saint, enough. In 12 minutes he systematically destroys this idiotic concept (White privilege) with rational thought, descriptions and examples.
    Well done, sir!!

    • Raised Its Ugly Head

      We condemn his lack of awareness.

      He asked, “But what does a virtuous white person do about all this unearned privilege?”

      The answer in the anti racist “Free Indeed” movie by the Diversity worshipping Mennonites.

      Until Jared Taylor watches it and posts a video rebuttal, we’ll continue to condemn his lack of awareness of what is to be done.

  • Gotsumpnferya

    Where be mah White Privilege check ? Where mah check iyuh ?

  • Lagerstrom

    Exactly. Do not use that term or attempt to modify it. It was brought to you by the inventors of ‘sexism’, ‘homophobia’, ‘islamophobia’ and the latest chestnut; ‘transphobia’. Can’t wait for the next one!

  • David Ashton

    This has been increasingly widespread in UK education from the late 1970s onwards, and in much international academic publishing. The parallels with the US, Canada and other white nations are not just coincidental.

  • Bunky

    When Carter took office unemployment was 7.1%.
    When Carter left office unemployment was 7.1%.
    When Reagan took office unemployment was 7.1%.
    When Reagan left office unemployment was 5.5%.

  • Kathy M

    “In the grand scheme of things, its all about making whites a servile minority.”

    I made this comment on the black nationalist takeover of Jackson thread. Somebody apparently flagged it and a moderator promptly deleted it. This leaves the impression that I said something so repulsive that it had to be deleted.

    Do you get that, moderator? We have a government guaranteeing that whites become just that.

  • lessthantolerant

    How do people get this stupid?

  • lessthantolerant

    I agree, lets offer blacks five states and see how they do. I volunteer, NY, NJ, DE, MA, CO and VT.

  • lessthantolerant

    You do understand China has more room for growth as compared to more developed western civilizations? Hence higher growth is completely normal. Do you always cherry pick your facts?
    No wonder no one takes you seriously.

    • JohnEngelman

      I anger those who do not like to be reminded that Orientals and Ashkenazi Jews have higher average IQ’s than white Gentiles.

      • lessthantolerant

        Statistics do not prove your generalization.

  • JohnEngelman

    Sorry. Most Americans want other things. I do not think they will change their minds.

  • Thor Bonham

    Mr. Taylor you’re a genius and way to go making this “Peggy” lady look like a fool ..
    Thanks for fighting for my white privilege rights ..

  • Thor Bonham

    He may no be pro black but, he definitely is not left of center.. He is way over to the left, period ..

  • The Mad Jewess

    In 1979, were whites being murdered, raped and robbed by blacks as they are now, John?

  • http://jewamongyou.wordpress.com/ Reuben H

    That’s hilarious, thanks.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Well done video and presentation. I do wish to comment that the notion of so many whites on television is incorrect in the 21st century. I have to watch vintage tv and films to find an all white show or even a show with only one or two non-whites. And films, wow, what a golden opportunity missed here by Mr. Taylor. The last weekend’s box office winner was “Meatballs 2.” It has white people all right, but the preview I saw was of a black hero cop picking up a blond woman under one arm and running from some danger, while a blond white male in a diaper clings to his back like a baboon baby and comments that he just did his diaper. When whites, especially white men are in films and tv these days they are usually non-blond, but if they are, they are a villain. I dare anyone to watch a modern tv show that does not feature a white man being put down or actually punched (sometimes below the belt) within five minutes. I have been turning off my set when it happens for some time now and I find that I can’t have it on for more than a few minutes at a time, unless, I am on air tv (got rid of my satellite) and watching vintage stuff there or online. It’s impossible to watch any entertainment or news show without a black in your face and if male, paired with an attractive white woman. I have nothing against David Spade, but he plays the dumb blond Valley Boy role to death. It’s all he can be allowed to do, while the female version is the resident sl@t who dates a swarthy male of questionable ethnicity and gets passed around occasionally for plot variation, while the big white male “star” of the show is a genius who still doesn’t know what to do with his sexuality. AT least that ball-breaking feminazi on CSI has quit. I tried watching because for one thing, I really like David McCallum, and I do like the soft, goth character, too, but every time that skinny macho chick round kiced another guy down after that guy floored her male partner, I switched off the show. I hardly think about all that anymore.

    I am pretty convinced that much of the current permission for attacking whites, especially these beat-down murders of white men, are the result of many permissions and yes, they come from the Oval Office and Eric Holder, certainly. But it is a truth that when you play to kill of a group, the first thing you do if villify them. Whites, and white men in particular have been being villified by feminists like the one Mr. Taylor features here for decades and the entertainment world has finally caught up and possibly surpassed the tired, old ranting of the NOW style feminists. The message is clear; white women, especially blonds are asking to be had and white men deserve to be beat down and murdered. Our popular culture had been saying that for decades now. Queen Latifa has her own show now, but she used to rap anti-white violence. Whoopie Goldberg is a former black/feminist radical who gets to call the shots everyday of the week on The View.

    If anyone out there ever wonders how it all got that bad, this is certainly a big factor. As a white man, I feel nothing less than an unwanted stranger in America, at least when I access the popular media.

    • Blah Halb

      You sir, have an inferiority complex, you should recognize it so that you can deal with it and move on. Watch World War Z, it’s a newer movie with a “white blonde man” as the hero. Your inferiority complex drives you to only see what you feel inside.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        Nonsense. First, I am a retired doctor of a 25 year practice, I think I know myself well enough. Second, while there are very occasional exceptions, what I am saying is absolutely fact. Just because we have a Brad Pitt doesn’t erase all the demeaning of men and especially white men on film and tv.

        If you had been around here long enough to see the transition and even know anything about the actual and declared campaign of NOW and other groups that even included turning traditional, historical American heroes into villains, etc., you wouldn’t dare say such an ignorant thing. The tactic is called “Critical Theory” and was taught by the Neo-Marxist Frankfurt School and picked by many activist groups by the late 1960s. It’s how being called a “racist” comes to carry so much power. But I guess my inferiority complex causes me to imagine that too, huh?

        • Blah Halb

          I’m not saying it’s not real but you are the one that gives it the power to be real. I’m Asian and white Americans have always portrayed us as weak or servile. Look at “Mr. Wong” in The Hangover for example. I still don’t feel that this is a personal attack, I think that it is due to the ignorance of Eastern culture here in the West. The white male has had it the best for a long time and you still can’t stand seeing a COMEDY with a goofy white guy in it? There are plenty of goofy white men in real life, if you feel insecure seeing a weak goofy white guy on TV, it can only mean that is how you feel about yourself, think about it for a minute. Do you feel that every nerdy white guy represents you, just because of shared skin color? Not every white man is a Clint Eastwood or a John Wayne. That’s reality. I come from a bloodline of warriors and no Hollywood movie is going to
          make me any different. I still hold my head up and deal with these stereotypes everyday in this country. You know why? Because I don’t have an inferiority complex.. and some stereotyped Hollywood character doesn’t represent me or my people.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            You don’t know what an inferiority complex actually is, you just want to force it into your ideas of American society and culture from your limited exposure and understanding of it. If you had said that I perhaps suffered from a persecution complex, I would have to perhaps agree with you. Most whites that post here could be accused of that, but for good reason. I am reminded of a beautiful blond woman I dated back in 1994. She ought to have the world on a string. Men stared at her wherever we went. But she was tormented and defensive when it came to being blond. She had been told and heard so many “blond jokes” that it affected her every day. She had a persecution complex. How dare you tell me that I should take jokes designed to tear down whites as just another funny joke! Do you have any idea how many lawsuits have been lodged and how many careers of whites and especially white men have been destroyed for telling a joke about a minority, or a tv show that made fun of blacks, etc.???

            This is a political fight, not an issue of who has an inferiority complex or any complex.

            Seeing a goofy white guy on tv or film doesn’t make me feel insecure, because I’m anything but that and have a long list of scholastic, athletic and professional achievements behind me. No, I am outraged because I see what most posters here see, the systematic demeaning of whites and white men for the purpose of robbing them of power and authority in every aspect of American society so that others can replace them. As I already wrote you, this has been a planned scheme for decades. That it hasn’t been fully accomplished by now only demonstrates the resilience of white people and white men in particular. Most Asians corrupt pretty quickly once they get here. Gambling seems to be their main weakness.

            I actually am from a warrior blood line, one of the greatest, the Normans. I can trace my ancestry directly to the 11th century Battle of Hastings. My eldest great grandfather fought in it. It was actually Norman descendants (not so much Anglo-Saxons) that explored and settled North America, reflecting their ancestors, the Vikings wont to explore and settle new lands. I am (was, I am 61 now) a well accomplished (national level) fencer, an original Olympic sport based on the only Western Martial Art of the Duel of Honor. (Don’t pile on). What I notice about many Asian males is that they base their egos on some sort of fabled warrior line or association. I actually am and actually did it myself.

            Your presence here is part of the Marxist effort to turn America into an unlikely Multicultural Utopia. The very word “utopia” means “without form.” No multicultural empire has ever survived a multicultural condition and it can (and should be) argued that the Globalists are trying to create something that historic example and logical, common sense ought to inform is only likely to fail and result in chaos.

            How many whites live in the Asian country you are from? Do they have special interest poltical groups that exact government favors? Do they get to make demands, invade your culture, tell you what you ought to do and that you must CHANGE who you are, exalt us, give place, and marry you and have your children?

          • Blah Halb

            I’m from the Philippines not Japan. Here’s some of our reality for you. We were colonized by Spain in 1571. We fought for independence. Ever since Spain left, most of the people you see on TV are mestizos or Spanish looking Filipinos with colored contacts. The politics and economy are controlled by the Western corporations. Dark skinned Filipinos bleach their skin white to be like celebrities because of the standard of beauty that Spaniards forced upon us. White men go to the Philippines to have sex with children and expect to be treated better than the people who live there. Do you really know what it’s like to have your culture raped? I don’t think you do. Europeans did this to most other indigenous groups too, if you turn on Mexican television you will mostly see WHITE Spaniards who look nothing like real Mexicans. We’ve lived this for decades because of the evil sins that came from Europe that were disguised as holy. We KILLED Ferdinand Magellan and he still gets credit for traveling across the world? Look it up. Trust me, I know that this is a political fight. You don’t know anything about real persecution, you’re just whining because you can’t have everything that you feel entitled to. It’s a big world.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I did not say what country you mus be from. Your fall to name calling shows that you are not up to the reputed IQ of the average Asian and I have wasted enough time replying to you.

    • Brian

      Jack Bauer was a breath of fresh air for a while.

  • Blah Halb

    You aren’t supposed to feel bad for your white privilege, we just want you to man up and admit to your privilege. It effects all of us even if you pretend it’s not real just so you don’t feel uncomfortable. I’m not white but I admit that I have privilege living in the U.S. I don’t feel bad about it and if I was white, I would own up to it. Race doesn’t exist but American society was based off of race, we’re trying to fix it so we can move on. White nationalists are trying to stop this progression. Own your privilege , don’t let your privilege own you. You are all just being cowards who lie to each other and pat each other on the back.

  • Blah Halb

    “If one of the brothers mugs you…”

    HAHA really? You are such a obvious coward. Why don’t you just admit that black people make you scared and uncomfortable and that’s why you want to stay away from them? Why dedicate your whole life making excuses for being a huge vagina?

  • Blah Halb

    Really? Where did my other comments go? I see how this website operates now.

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    “We’re lucky we’re white,” says the inane scribble. Now answer me this…how could a person be born of a different race and still be the same person? Any sperm/egg combination, other than the one that created you, is not you and never could be. Therefore you’re not lucky you’re white…being white is part of the definition of “you.”

  • Blah Halb

    Yeah, I understand that race is real, because we created it. Europeans and Asians are especially obsessed with race. Eugenics and racial science is exclusively white because they don’t feel connected to nature the same way the indigenous cultures are, they have an “outside looking in” perspective on Earth. But being mixed race is what made me realize how ignorant the race issue is, God made me this way to remind the rest of you. It’s actually more of a culture issue. I’ve met whites who grew up around blacks and don’t even trust other white people. I’ve met suburban black people who prefer white culture and hate other black people. You “racialists” are trying to label and box people in before they are even born. Life is much bigger than that and it’s different for everybody. We all see race but when you are obsessed with race (like everybody on this site) you are limiting your experience/perspective and don’t even realize it. The real issue is CLASS, race is just the superficial part..

  • MikeofAges

    Nevertheless, you are mixing up economic arguments with social, cultural and historical ones. By your logic, the Irish didn’t build the railroad and the men who were at Boulder on the Colorado, pouring the concrete and doing everything else they did, didn’t build Boulder Dam. Carry your logic far enough and you could say the men who landed on the beaches didn’t win the world war either. What bothers me most is how these xenophobic black intellectuals constantly prate about how blacks are due something for “building the South” while whites are due nothing for the same. Sometimes, the meme is expanded to the point where where it is claimed that “blacks built the nation”. What a bunch of b.s. Maybe they have a share of sweat equity after all, but so do a lot of other people. A larger share, actually. To me, the claim is just another prop for disparate impact fascism.

  • Tacitus1

    I don’t use the term “Liberal” ….true liberals are the antithesis of these left wing ignorant bigots. I’ve been accused of possessing a “privilege” but cannot think of ever being on the receiving end of favoritism. With grace of God and support of my parents , I got where I am by hard work…not privilege.

  • Raised Its Ugly Head

    Why did Mods delete my tip regarding the anti white “Free Indeed” hate whitey movie from the Mennonites?

  • Brian

    It’s probably in their best interest. We’re incorrigible ya know. Sometimes I oppress three blacks before breakfast before realizing it. I pray to St. Skittles for help, but the flesh is weak.

  • Eduardo Garcia

    Comments are not allowed on his website. A few years ago I got into an email exchange with him. He won’t respond to emails or let readers post comments anymore. Someone once posted the census tract number he lives in and did some research on the estimated value of his home. He doesn’t live in a Black neighborhood, or even a racially mixed one. This guy lives in a $600K house in an all-white neighborhood. There are ZERO blacks in his census tract. What a lying weasel.

  • Jefferson

    What is your opinion of Southeast Asians ? Would you ever date/marry a Filipina woman or Thai woman for example ?

    • JohnEngelman

      Yes, but I think Chinese women are best.

      • Jefferson

        Why are Chinese women the best ? Are you not attracted to Southeast Asian women because on average they have darker skin ?

        • JohnEngelman

          If that is a factor, it is not a conscious one. I just think Chines women are prettier and nicer.

  • Marthinus Potgieter

    Thanks for your rankings John – I can comment and agree on your assesment of the bottom half as I live in Africa – I think you are spot on! I cannot however comment on the top half as I do not Know any Ashkenazi Jews.
    There is a saying here in Africa – ‘when the jews leave then it is time to leave but when the portuguese leave then it is too late’ !

    • Norseman

      As I understand it, many Portuguese have left Portugal the last years.

      • Marthinus Potgieter

        precisely – about 30 years too late again !

  • Brian

    Yep. The people who migrated out of Africa to Indonesia (Austronesians) are cousins to Aussie aboriginals, Maori, Polynesians, New Guineans, etc. They went all over in outrigger canoes, probably made landing in southern India also. Some came all the way back to Madagascar, round trip, over thousands of years. And then, finally, Bantus who had been in East Africa the whole bloody time, finally jumped across the strait to Madagascar just 1000 years ago. Guess they couldn’t put down the malt liquor very easily.

  • Greg Thomas

    Systemic change = importing millions of third world browns until Whites are a minority. That’s the change they are after.

  • Norseman

    Maybe he believes that will bring about a real renaissance..

  • laura

    brilliant as usual, thank you mr. taylor

  • http://white-men-welcome.com/ Charlie Galatas

    We should say “white earnings”; not privilege. What white men have was earned through education and hard work. What others want are privileges granted to them based on gender or ethnicity. This can only result in the destruction of society as-is happening now.

  • clemensb

    Wow! This was Jared’s best yet.