Experts: Coming Demographic Shift Will Strengthen US Culture

Victor Morales, Voice of America, March 31, 2015


The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that by 2045, the United States will have a population of some 389 million people. And for the first time in the nation’s history, the majority of people living in the U.S. will be non-white.

“This new diversity boom that we’re seeing right now will be every bit as important for our country in the decades ahead as the baby boom [people born between 1946 and 1964] was in the last half of the 20th century,” said demographer William Frey of the Brookings Institution.

“We know that the baby boom has changed the country in lots of ways–popular culture, changing values about all kinds of social issues, families, women’s roles and politics. And I think this diversity boom is going to have just as big of an impact. We’ll be a very different country and we’re only just beginning to see the start of it,” said Frey.


By 2045, Hispanics, Asians and African Americans are expected to grow from more than a third of the population to a little more than half of the people living in the United States.

“The degree of cultural diversity that this introduces to this country is rather like the cultural diversity we had in the 19th century, and for that matter in the 18th century at the time of founding,” observed American Enterprise Institute political scientist Charles Murray. In many ways, according to Murray, diversity has been a positive force throughout America history.

“We used to have radically different ways of life among different groups in this country. And the 20th century was something of an anomaly in this regard as we saw an increasingly homogeneous culture with the rise of mass media,” Murray said. “In many ways, I think the America of the 21st century with its increased cultural diversity is going to look familiar to historians of America. And in that respect, it’s as American as apple pie.”

A few decades ago, many analysts warned that these demographic trends would lead to a balkanization of America. However, most experts now agree that U.S. culture and assimilation will reinforce America’s national character, particularly as the rate of interracial marriage grows.

In 1960, multiracial marriages accounted for only 0.4 percent of all marriages in the United States. By 2010, that figure rose to 8.4 percent, with interracial couples accounting for 15 percent of all new marriages–a trend that experts say will only continue.


Topics: , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • phorning

    How disappointing. Murray not only has to know better, he has to know this isn’t going to spare him any of the hate he receives for telling the truth in The Bell Curve. Our popular culture and mass media are disgusting. Why would anyone think they are creating something worth celebrating?

    • Oil Can Harry

      And Murray’s lie that the coming Third World majority will be “as American as apple pie” reminded me that Obama used the very same phrase to describe the illegal alien Garbage Pail Kids who snuck across our borders last year from Central America.

      • Sick of it

        His first wife was a third worlder and he has half-third worlder kids.

        • pcmustgo

          what ethnicity?

          • silviosilver

            Thai, I think. It’d make sense because I know he worked there as a young man.

    • Charles Martel

      He thinks the 3rd world is the same as white ethnicities. Because of local pay as you go taxes one squatmonster in a Swiss town forced thousands of families taxes higher because she and her spawn consume 1/3 of the budget in benefits.

    • LackawannaErie

      Murray doesn’t receive hate from the people who matter. He works at the mainstream respectable American Enterprise Institute.

      • anony

        AEI is a hotbed of Neoconservatism.

        • Speedy Steve

          An arm of AIPAC.

          • anony

            But we repeat ourselves.

          • LackawannaErie

            The Israel lobby and the open borders lobby are one and the same.

        • Realist

          So Murray is a bootlicker. Hey the pay is good.

          • anony

            So it seems. Most academics these days are, either that or “true believers”. “Bootlickers” are utterly reprehensible; “true believers are simply stupid.

          • Realist

            Also he is a Libertarian. They like open borders.

          • LackawannaErie

            Does Murray call himself a libertarian? He certainly is not one. He is a big advocate for interventionist, Israel first foreign policy and the police state.

          • Realist

            Wikipedia calls him a paleolibertarian.
            AEI states one of his research areas is Libertarianism.

        • Speedy Steve

          They employ Jonah Goldberg. Enough said.

  • Zimriel

    Is Murray being blackmailed?

    • Ed

      He’s human, he’s been a pariah for 20 years in a heavily left wing field, sociology. He probably wants to go out with a few folks outside of the despised right wing liking him. Besides he’s never been a conservative

      • Usually Much Calmer

        Or maybe what he said was taken out of context and presented with spin.

        Murray’s quote really only said that increased diversity will factionalize the American public and do away with the pervasive monoculture, which will be healthy. I both think and hope he’s right actually. I don’t really like many of my fellow Americans and I don’t want to share their culture. The juggernaut of diversity brings my sentiments stronger to bear every day.

        Victor Morales, of course, is not going to see it the same way I do, probably can’t even comprehend how I do. So he does a piece like this. I don’t care about Victor Morales or his viewpoint, however.

        • Sick of it

          His personal life has been diverse. Why should he have the same views that we do?

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Who’s personal life? Murray’s or Morales?

        • anony

          “I don’t really like many of my fellow Americans and I don’t want to share their culture.”

          That’s exactly why most of us are on this site.

          “American” is difficult, if not impossible, to define these days.
          How do you define it?

          • Usually Much Calmer

            The people that you meet. . . when you’re walking down the street.
            Oh, the PEE-pulh that. you. MEET. EACH. DAAYY.

            Seriously, I haven’t left the country in a few years. I don’t speak Spanish or live in Minneapolis, El Paso, or Dearborn. Pretty much everyone I come across is an American. If you are hinting at some country song chauvanism about what ‘the REAL America is’, I am not buying. You know I am a northeastern bred liberal. If pressed to name some quintessentially American person, I’d probably suggest Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. People like that have almost no legacy in this nation any more. We have had almost a complete discontinuity with our past.

            What do you mean by American?

          • anony

            No hinting on my part. I truly don’t have a definition. I asked because I wanted to see what your answer would be. And I don’t know any country music. Make no assumptions about me because I live in Appalachia. I speak three languages fluently (one is English), have lived overseas for years, and feel comfortable in just about any venue from a biker bar to an embassy party in Rome. Been there, done that.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I did not know you lived in Appalachia. I hope you were not offended, I was not making an assumption about you in particular.

            (I don’t even speak English fluently!)

          • anony

            I’ve mentioned numerous times on this site that I live in Appalachia; unlike many Appalachians, I live here by choice. I grew up in and around W, D.C., and points South. Many of my “career” years were spent in Europe, Middle East and North Africa.

            I’m not offended at all; I appreciate your thoughtful comments, and only wanted you to understand why I post some of the things I do.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I catch some details, I lose some.
            Thank you, I appreciate your comments also.

      • LackawannaErie

        He hasn’t been a pariah. He has a sinecure at a lavishly funded neocon think tank and is regularly published in mainstream periodicals. Sam Francis became a pariah, not Charles Murray.

        • Here’s another thing we’re all forgetting.

          Nowadays, people associate The Bell Curve purely with the taboo concept of racial differences in intelligence. So much so that I call the subspecies Africanus Bellcurvius and their nests “Bell Curve City,” and suggested that to Paul Kersey as the title for his book about St. Louis that goes on sale tomorrow.

          In reality, only one chapter of TBC was about race. If one actually reads TBC from cover to cover, then one discovers that it’s mostly about the consequences to society of what Murray and Herrnstein saw starting to happen at the time and which has only gotten more intense in the twenty years since TBC was released, that is, the merging of the cognitive overclass with the money-wealth overclass into a hardened almost intractable cognitive-wealth-income overclass. And also, predictions of the public policy consequences that they predicted would come of it, which also turned out to be mostly right.

          I think the only reason they included one chapter about racial differences in IQ was to demonstrate how the coming mega-overclass would impact racial policy. It most likely was not intended to stoke ethnonationalism or racialism in white people.

          What if M&H’s purpose in writing TBC wasn’t to alert “us” about what “they” were going to do, but instead to give “them” ideas about how to use their ever-increasing and ever-growing power over “us” to rule over “us” and how to maintain that power? To put it another way, what if TBC was an instruction manual designed for consumption by the emerging mega-overclass to teach them about the toy they just purchased?

          • Raymond Kidwell

            I did read that book cover to cover, although it was a while ago. They spend a lot of time explaining that I.Q, is real, it correlates with success and explaining other basic assumptions since people will argue against those things. Then they basically argued that racial differences in wealth or education were largely related to I.Q. rather than environmental differences. There is also an argument that Murray follows up on in some later books and interviews, stating that there is now more stratification in terms of I.Q. and class and that this can have negative impacts on society. In other words, in the past you might live in a small community around a few smart people, a few average people, and a few morons. In today’s world most smart people live, work and interact with people who have similar I.Q.s, most low I.Q. people in a similar situation etc. This can create its own social challenges.

            But according to Murray and Hernstein, based on my I.Q. I should be a wealthy college graduate living in some elite community. Instead I’m dirt poor, live around mostly morons, struggle to get the money to finish college etc. I think his sense of social justice is exaggerated, as well as his sense that America is a meritocracy.

            The Bell Curve does almost nothing to explain policy except at the end stating that laws should probably be simplified and easier to understand for the low I.Q. people to follow them, and similar suggestions that I thought were great.

    • Charles Martel

      Yea they have pics of him snorting cocaine off of little boys penises at the DNC.

      • Hammerheart

        That’s an… interesting past time.

        • Kenner

          Maybe he was trying to cut back.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Is this a joke?

        • anony

          Of course it is; the entire country has become one big joke!

        • Charles Martel

          The funniest part is people are not sure.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            Well what you described is typical behavior of our elite, so it’s hard to tell whether it’s a joke or not.

    • LackawannaErie

      He has always been an anti-white neocon.

  • Luca

    Well if you want to see what diversity brings, just look at Brazil. if this isn’t propaganda, i don’t now what is. Liberals are trying to convince everyone through journalism that common sense, observation and experience need to take a back seat to their agenda.

    • Bossman

      The ideal in Brazil is someone who looks white even if he or she may not be 100% white. Sample some Brazilian TV on your computer or smartphone and you’ll see most of the faces look white and an occasional Mulatto will be seen now and then but almost no East Asian faces to be seen.

    • De Doc

      That reminds me of an apocryphal story in which President C. de Gaulle, returning from an official visit to Brazil in the early 60s, was asked what he made of it. His reply was supposedly, “Brazil is the country of the future…and it always will be”.

      • anony

        We are there already.

  • I am not at all surprised by Charles Murray officially embracing “diversity.” That’s because he is not and never was an ethnonationalist. He was and I guess continues to be a race realist. There is nothing inherent in race realism that necessarily begets ethnonationalism. IOW, it’s very easy to be a RR but not an EN. It’s also easy to be an EN without being an RR. It’s also easy to be neither, or to be both.

    We may have really screwed our own pooch by promoting race realism without ethnonationalism, thinking that a high IQ elite will automatically be or eventually become ethnonationalist. In reality, the American high IQ cognitively stratified elite is anything but ethnonationalist, in fact, it’s only interested in self-preservation and to hell with everyone not inside of it. If our incumbent “race realist” high IQ elite ever seems to toy with racialism, it’s only in a “for thee but not for me” elitist hypocritical way to keep the diversity away from them, and to pawn it off on someone else.

    • Sick of it

      To be truly race realist, one must realize that the usual races applauded are not as capable as we are.

      • Exactly. If The US will be better with a more diverse population, then can Charles Murray explain why Brazil is not a much better country than the United States or Canada?

        • Bossman

          A little bit of diversity is okay as long as the majority remains white and the minorities make an attempt to assimilate to the larger culture. But that is not what would happen if the gates were to be opened to the hordes of East Asia and Africa. The USA would not be strengthened but would become a very strange and a very different kind of country than it is now.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Yeah, only East Asia and Africa are not where the biggest hordes are coming from right now. And you know that.

        • Sick of it

          Or why China hasn’t invented anything in centuries. The Japanese have made great strides…since their exposure to ‘Dutch learning’.

          • 李冠毅

            Excuse me, can you please do a least a bit of research before assuming what you believe to be correct?


    • He is NOT a race realist. A race realist knows that diversity is NOT a strength and knows that there are inherent differences in races. This is NOT race realism.

      • nicholasstix

        Maybe he’s obituary-shopping.

    • I’m a Racist (that’s race-ist), so I can honestly say that I never believed the label of race realist to be anything other than an acknowledgement that racial differences are a fact of life. Just because someone will acknowledge that men and women are different doesn’t mean that they will all of a sudden shun the opposite sex.

  • Chip Carver

    Laugh now, but there is no doubt the US is not going to last long enough for this multi-cult fantasy land to arise. This fantasy land was never the intention of the people who took it upon themselves to wreck America.

    • cyrusthevirus

      Agenda 21 my friend–it is being implemented all over the world but is most obvious and destructive in the West as we have the most to lose !!Once the west is destroyed then they can start in earnest the plagues and wars to destroy most of humanity–leaving them and their proposed 500,000,000 slave/servants

      • cherrie greenbaum123

        I think that’s one of the reasons Putins standing up to the beeyatches. Russians still are homogeneously white Christians. And that drives them crazy.

        • Alden

          Putin’s top 100 advisors and officials are not Christians. They run the country.

      • Alden

        I doubt the elites want to depopulate the earth. They keep on feeding and medicating dis functional populations. It is all that food and medical care that caused the earth’s population to explode.
        The elites have something horrible in mind but if depopulation was their goal they would not have interfered with natural selection for the last 70 years

        • Raymond Kidwell

          I disagree. In the short term population growth serves their needs even if at some point there will be de-population. Right now they are dumbing down/weakening people to the point that it will be easier to wipe them out when the time comes. If you don’t think WWI and II were massive DE-population events, then think again.

          They want to destroy national barriers/nationalism so need to promote a global race, migration, race mixing, free trade etc. to achieve that goal. To promote such things they need to give the handouts the lowest performers. Not sure how this is more desirable than european colonialism, but it is their goal.

    • anony

      “…but there is no doubt the US is not going to last long enough for this multi-cult fantasy land to arise. ”

      I suspect that the “US” you speak of has not existed for over 100 years.

  • connorhus

    If Murry and/or the rest of the pro immigration politicians and baby boomers think the incoming immigrant hordes of Hispanics, Arabs and Africans are going to save their retirement accounts, social security and staff the homes for them, they are in for a rude surprise.

    Juan isn’t gonna step and fetch for your wrinkled hide and he certainly isn’t going to vote to give you any of his money. Nassar is going to vote for third world dictators that will bring in death panels and reduce public spending on the old and infirm.

    I have no doubt the can kicking politicians and their retire early followers are hoping mass immigration is their way to retirement bliss but it ain’t gonna happen. They will change the entire face of this country to assure their public pensions keep flowing.

    • SlizzardAjeosshi

      As Jared Taylor pointed out i expect, as soon as the demographic shift will be deep enough to allow Democrats to completely disregard the votes of white senior citizens, a thorough brutal assault on SS as intolerable white privilege.

      Particularly if the artificial intelligence/service robots revolution takes off, America (and any other industrialized nation) will be faced with massive unemployment problems and very likely further massive expansion of the welfare state will ensue in order to quell a very volatile situation.

      Being resources notoriously scarce, colored youf will push the political class to do away with the pension system

      • LHathaway

        “colored youf will push the political class to do away with the pension system”

        Isn’t that good news? Government is an evil. Everyone knows that: all true Whites know government is bad, if they know nothing else.

        • John Smith

          Some hope to get back what Uncle stole from them for decades, however.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          If we all agree beforehand on some system to protect property rights that goes beyond the private use of force, we are not truly white?

          • LHathaway

            Good point. Only a weak, sissy-white would need government, or even the Klan, to protect him. *sarcasm continuation*

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Sorry! (I hear it so often, I forget who is saying it.)

      • Alden

        Obama and his advisors have talked about pension equality.
        It meant raiding Iras 491ks annuities and other pension plans to give to people who never worked

        • LHathaway

          With an inheritance tax rate of around 50%, IRAs are a savings plan, for government.

      • Atheist Realist

        but won’t old black and hispanics be upset at there benefits being cut too?

      • Hilis Hatki

        Soon any whites as a “voting block” will no longer matter.

    • Sick of it

      The baby boomers tend to see things very different from their parents, who may well have been the last vestige of true Americans. They were nativists. Boomers onward generally are not.

      • Our downfall started with the Boomer Generation. The Reagan years were the last time that the World War Two Generation controlled the country. Since then, with the ascendancy of the Boomers. we have been subjected with this PC crap and multiculturalism nonsense.

        • Alden

          During the Reagan administration the federal civil service saw the greatest increase in affirmative action blacks of any pres administration

        • LHathaway

          Reagan definitely slowed the ‘decline’. Who knows, the day of conservatives might not be over, but it sure does look like Reagan was a last hoorah.

      • InAFreeCountry

        The Greatest Generation was followed by the Least Generation.

      • Atheist Realist

        boomers parents tended to be a mix between the GI and Silent Generation. The Silent Generation was pretty conservative but wasn’t 95% of all the liberal social programs of the 1960s implemented by the GIs?

        • Sick of it

          Those programs were top down back then. Today it’s a mix.

  • superlloyd

    “This new diversity boom that we’re seeing right now will be every bit as important for our country in the decades ahead as the baby boom..” says William Frey, positively salivating at the thought. This is rather a slow ticking time bomb that will blow the country apart forever.

  • superlloyd

    The dumbing down of the USA. Once achieved, the lower national average IQ will consign the US to that of a third world country. The new Brazil. I think Charles Murray’s comments have been framed to make him seem a born again diversitard.

    • Atheist Realist

      its not the national average but the percent above a threshold. What if the median IQ was only 90 but 25% of the population was above 115 IQ?

      • superlloyd

        That is highly unlikely with the huge percentages of dumb minorities present such as blacks, hispanics and muslims from the Middle East and North Africa. If the country was 100% white then 16% would have an IQ above 115 pace the Bell Curve, as that is not the case projected then this cannot occur. Your reasoning is specious.

    • Hilis Hatki

      It’s the high IQs that has put white America into this predicament.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    “most experts now agree that U.S. culture and assimilation will reinforce America’s national character”

    What assimilation? Today’s third world immigrants are encouraged not to assimilate to the white man’s norm.

    What national character? Leftists have made it their goal to destroy Western nations’ national character, and they’ve been fairly successful.

    What experts?

    • Without a majority there won’t be anything to assimilate to in the first place, and the whole immigration model falls through the floor. Not that it hasn’t been since the racial restrictions were scrapped during the ‘Civil Rights’ movement, but this is another step in that direction.

      • pcmustgo

        I agree… today’s immigrants and asians/hispanics have not “assimilated” into anything I can relate to in terms of shared cultural traits and musical taste and stuff.

    • TruthBeTold

      I know. Who’s assimilating? Hispanics are demanding their children be taught in Spanish and Muslims are asking for their own justice system. Where is the assimilation?

      • cherrie greenbaum123

        And blacks are demanding no justice system!

        • Kenner

          But, but…they keep saying, ‘no justice, no peace’-

          • John Smith

            They’re righter than they could ever have expected, ironically.

          • HE2

            Yes, Kenner. Negroes love mindless sloganeering. Simple, require no thought. Perfect for room temperature IQs.

  • David Ashton


    • HE2

      Exactly. He called it.

      Julien Benda should be read by everyone here.

  • Why do people believe this? Haven’t they read any history? Or met some of these enrichers they think are going to be the next Americans? It has to be willful ignorance or self-loathing or bribery; I refuse to believe anyone is just this dense.

    • disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

      For the same reason people swallow religious dogma. When something personal is at stake, most people tend to go with whatever makes them feel good over what is factual.

      • Sick of it

        I didn’t realize atheists and agnostics were on the front lines leading the charge against the multiculturalists. I was under the impression that they were the biggest pushers of this trash. You know, like some of the nutjob professors I had in college.

        • John Smith

          We’re everywhere.

        • Alden

          4 words Baptists Catholics and Lutherans

          • Sick of it

            I not only know Baptists locally who favor secession, I know some who would like to make certain individuals disappear.

        • HE2

          A steadfastly racialist non-deist here.
          It is entirely possible. Anyone critical thinker who lives in a world of reality can see what is happening.
          Those who cannot see are blind by choice.

        • Why don’t you start a poll somewhere about the religious persuasions of admitted racists. I’m pretty sure you would be surprised at how many not-so-religious people make up the entire spectrum of the pro-White sphere. Most religious people I personally know are either one of those we’re all god’s children kind of people, or they are very passive and lukewarm when it comes to the idea that they might have to be seen as a pariah and walk their own path in order to secure a future for Western civilization. They also tend to place their hokey religious doctrines well ahead of any kind of racialism.

          Many of the “Christian” racialists I’ve seen are also… ummmm…. not very Christian. I won’t name any names, but I do know of a few who only use religion to ingratiate themselves to a larger audience.

        • Anna Tree

          I agree Sick of it. Atheists are also followers of this liberal leftist albeit secular religion, it seems sometimes the most fervent: blind faith doesn’t always revolve around a god.
          But not all atheists fell for it. Amren and Jared Taylor made me a race realist, but so a youtuber called Realist Atheist or Atheist Racialist, sorry I forgot his name .

      • Liberal multiculturalism is the “Church” of the twenty first century. People like Jared Taylor are the Galileos of our age.

  • There are only two paths open to us. One is to continue to participate in the present policies until whites are eventually almost completely exterminated, now via soft genocide, but later via outright mass extermination. White cultural values of honesty, integrity, justice, heterosexuality, the traditional family, Christianity, etc. have already been essentially destroyed. Our physical bodies are next.

    The second path is far more difficult to bear in the short run. That path is to initiate a guerrilla war on the power elites, including politiicians. The political system is not responsive to the white majority, so why not do everything possible to destroy it. In a guerrilla war, many whites will have to sacrifice their property and their lives, just as in the Revolutionary War and in Civil War I.

    When whites run, we die anyway, but we just die tired. If I’m going to die, I prefer to take as many of the enemy with me as possible.

    Sadly, I see no other options. In my own sphere, which I still control to a degree, I intend to fund a small group of white militia men, dedicated to our cause. That means weapons, ammo, and courage. Since my money will soon be worthless anyway, I might as well spend it now and have something to show for it.

    • Hilis Hatki

      As in the two examples you give, all personal assets will have to be put into the cause.
      There can be no half stepping.

    • Cannot Tell

      What about fleeing to Eastern Europe?

      • John Smith

        Too close to China, India and the muslim world, IMO.

      • Alden

        There are plenty of jobs teaching English but the economies are shaky and God knows what Soros will do next

        • anony

          He’s pretty old, maybe he’ll take a dirt nap.

    • Atheist Realist

      i’m of the cloward-piven school of thought. The only way to dissolve the U.S. like the Soviets did in 1991 is to provide a catalyst and that is to allow anyone and everyone to come across the border, the more illiterate the better and make sure they are all on welfare. Eventually, state and local governments will run out of tax money to pay for these “treats” and they’ll have to implement a “wealth tax” as opposed to an income tax.

  • TheCogitator

    And they wonder why people are doubting science. Murray just proved that science is for sale.

    • Alden

      Like the scientific study about the word comprehension of 9 month old babies

    • anony

      The AIDS epidemic showed me that “science” was for sale.

  • Bossman

    I believe you to be correct in your assumptions. So-called Hispanics are the ones most likely to intermarry with whites and many Asian females are also looking for white husbands. The only unknown variable in this diversity equation are the East Asians since they were effectively kept out of the USA for more than a 100 years and there are more of them in Asia than anybody else.

  • MekongDelta69

    Die-versity = DEATH.

    I’m SO disgusted with ALL these White-haters…

  • “Now, do you want another beating? We have ways of breaking you. Repeat after me: America will be much better off with a more multicultural population.”

  • cherrie greenbaum123

    I’m surprised our country isn’t in worse shape than it is for all the havoc they’ve wreaked. Don’t laugh, because I’m not trying to be funny.

  • phillyguy

    in the year 2045 will have 389 million people in this country,where will the resources be, freshwater, fuel for heating ? we are over populating this country with third world parasites who will drain all of our resources within a hundred years and then it’ll be Armageddon every man for himself.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      An interesting news item this morning reports that California is facing a water crisis. Perhaps all this chaos will begin much earlier than assumed.

      • John Smith

        You made the point I was going to. And let’s not forget that Kalifornia is filled with third-world migrants and that many other states in the Southwest are in similar straits, with limited water resources and growing populations of mainly illegals and their spawn. I expect many will push out beyond “Aztlan” to whiter areas, like Idaho, Kansas, Georgia, etc., which are trending that way already.

    • Spikeygrrl

      I’m glad I won’t live long enough to see it.

    • anony

      All of which points to the utter hypocrisy of the “progressives”. They lament the damage to our environment while flying around in their private jets, etc, and keeping our borders open for the masses of 3rd worlders to swarm in and further erode our environment.

  • Exactly. Once again people think the new multicultural America will be in love with black people and all of us evil White people will be gone. I have two words in reply: George Zimmerman.

    • pcmustgo

      I have a few words for you. George Zimmerman and MANY Hapa half east asian/whites don’t look “white”… expect them to resent whites too…

      • rentslave

        You missed the point.

  • Capn Dad

    That’s all assuming that white folks don’t finally say “Not on my watch” and settle matters out of court. No one knows the future.

    • Jason Lewis

      Don’t see that ever happening.

  • Jason Lewis

    “A few decades ago, many analysts warned that these demographic trends would lead to a balkanization of America. However, most experts now agree that U.S. culture and assimilation will reinforce America’s national character”
    How do the experts come to this conclusion?

    • Pax Romana

      “How do the experts come to this conclusion?”

      By lying.

    • John Smith

      In small numbers, it would work. It would also work better if most of the people involved weren’t from right on our border and were abandoning cultural influences to geographic distance, like happened in the past.

  • Kenner

    Thanksgiving and Columbus Day will be combined as ‘Native American Genocide Day’.
    You’ll know it’s coming when stores stay open on Thanksgiving, because our yellow, brown and muslim countrymen ‘can’t relate’ to America’s founders.
    –Oh, right, that was last year.

  • LHathaway

    “by 2045, the United States will have a population of some 389 million people”.

    So, in less than 80 years we’ve added 189 million people, all of them non-white.

    • John Smith

      Time for a refresher view of the NumbersUSA videos.

  • LHathaway

    Only Whites would see themselves being reduced to a minority, in fact, on track to dropping lower and lower in number to the point that the only likely result is them disappearing entirely, and then respond to this by saying their number one concern is a ‘dumbing down’ or that ‘culture isn’t what it used to be’ and things won’t be (for them) as good as they once were . . .

  • antiquesunlight

    “‘The degree of cultural diversity that this introduces to this country is rather like the cultural diversity we had in the 19th century, and for that matter in the 18th century at the time of founding,’ observed American Enterprise Institute political scientist Charles Murray.”

    Have you hit your head, Charles? Our current situation is almost nothing like that of the 19th and 18th centuries. At that time, with the exception of black slaves/former slaves, virtually everyone was of Western European heritage and most of them were from some part of the British Isles. Diverse? Sure. Diverse like 2050 or even 2015? Absolutely, positively not, and if that’s what you think, you need to click your magic slippers three times.

    “A few decades ago, many analysts warned that these demographic trends would lead to a balkanization of America. However, most experts now agree that U.S. culture and assimilation will reinforce America’s national character, particularly as the rate of interracial marriage grows.”

    How in the world do they figure that? U.S. culture and assimilation don’t even reinforce American national character NOW. We don’t know what U.S. culture IS anymore, and we actively encourage DIVERSITY, which amounts to non-assimilation.

    This article is so stupid.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      The future is here. We can see the beautiful, multicultural mosaic as we travel down Buford Highway from Duluth to Chamblee. Or Beaver Ruin Rd… with the emphasis on “ruin.” you want a picture of America in 2045? We have it right here in the metro Atlanta suburbs.

      • antiquesunlight

        Lord have mercy, Buford Highway is a landfill. Ruined Beaver is just a couple miles from me. You are right on. I live in America 2045 every day and it’s nothing to look forward to.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          When Cleve’s Country Cookin’ shut down on Buford Highway and sold the property to MexiUsedCars or something dumb like that, I knew we were in trouble. Grandma’s Biscuits on Buford Hwy. in Doraville… that’s gone, too.

    • silviosilver

      Articles like this aren’t intended to elucidate truth but to spread propaganda, to suggest a party line. I’m quite sure that Charles Murray knows that the country he once knew and presumably loved is irretrievably lost (though he holds out hope that something of its culture might be salvaged). All he’s looking for now is the least bad outcome, and part of that involves encouraging people to believe that all is well, so as to minimize the likelihood of conflict. It’s all pretty pathetic if you ask me, but not surprising: Murray always was squeamish about ‘racism.’

      • LackawannaErie

        You’re being too charitable. Charles Murray was always a neocon fellow.

        • silviosilver

          You mean in the sense of desiring white demographic eclipse? I’m not prepared to go that far. I think if he could wave a magic wand he wouldn’t choose the demographic mix he awaits in this article. I’d guess he believes that the fight to prevent it is politically futile and professionally risky. Personally, I vehemently disagree with the former and am willing to brave the latter. I wish more people would.

          • LackawannaErie

            Look at who Murray allied with for his entire career and who promoted him. All neocons. He never worked with paleocons or other white sympathetic conservatives. He was close with the people who purged the paleocons and never spoke up to defend anyone the neocons attacked. That tells you all you need to know about where his heart was the whole time.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Our beloved Mr. Murray has submitted to the Borg.

  • TL2014

    Ok people, relax. He didn’t say anything horrible. At least not as quoted in the article. He said that the diversity will be more like what we had at the time of previous big immigration waves in terms of different cultures and groups. He didn’t qualify it as good or bad, really. Not sure why the reporter paraphrases it thusly, unless part of the quote was omitted.

    • I suspect that the “waves” of Irish, Scottish, English, German, French, Italians, Greeks etc of yesteryear American history have very little in common to waves of Somalians, Nigerians, Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, Arabs, Mexicans, etc.

      They are not the same thing, they are not a continuation of a phenomena that has happened before and they are not of the material for a cohesive, prosperous and safe future precisely because of their culture and precisely because of their on-average lower IQ.

      Murray knows this, but he appears to be disregarding it in favour of fairy tales about there being “nothing to see here, nothing new”.

  • IKUredux

    TPTB know the only way to make this multiculturalism work is to brainwash Whites into interracial marriage, Seriously, if Whites can be brainwashed into thinking Kim Kardashian is to be emulated, our race is sunk. Her entire family, pretty much, only has black males as romantic interests.

    To be honest, I don’t consider the Kardashians to be be White. Sadly, much of America does. TPTB are doing everything possible to promote miscegenation.

    The brainwashing is unrelenting. The Disney channel is the worst. Have you ever watched their programs? Walt is spinning in his grave. He had no idea that the Red Sea Pedestrians would take over his white Gentile Christian oriented company.

    If we are not going to pick up guns for our revolution, could we at least, STOP going to movies?

    Could we at least, STOP watching T.V.?

    Could we at least vote for the American Freedom Party candidate?

    If not on the ballot in your state, could you not at least write him in?

    Could you do something to fight back?

    • pcmustgo

      Half Jewish here… thought Disney was Jewish? The under 18 generation already is like 40% non-white, hence the super diverse disney movies.

      • IKUredux

        One hundred percent Non Jewish here, since we’re counting. Walt Disney was not Jewish. In fact, he was accused of being a Nazi sympathizer. He was as fond of Jews as Henry Ford was fond of them. The current Disney studio is one hundred percent Jew. Sorry about your fifty percent. You could have made more money if your percentage was higher.

    • Spikeygrrl

      The AFP website is brim-full of crude anti-Semitism. Believe me, I’d love to see an electorally viable 3rd party on the ballot… but AFP isn’t it.

      • LackawannaErie

        Can we do something about this neocon troll?

        • Spikeygrrl

          Thanks for the best laugh I’ve had in weeks. 😀

      • curri

        You’re hallucinating about the presence of “crude anti-Semitism” at the AFP website. But no third party in the US will get anywhere until some jurisdictions adopt proportional representation voting,

        • Spikeygrrl

          Respectfully, you are in error about the anti-Semitism at AFP. I read six feature articles at the site; anti-Semitic sentiment was in four of them. If I’d left out the epithet “crude,” would you have still disagreed?

          I disagree with you about proportional voting, but notice I’m not hurling insults at you about it. You aren’t “hallucinating” by disagreeing with me, we just see the world from different perspectives.

          • LackawannaErie

            Spikeygrrl think us goyim are not allowed to criticize the self chosen ones. There is no place for creatures like it in the pro-white movement.

    • It is extremely hard to know what to do, particularly when those that care are so far spread out from each other, when your own team is aiding the opposition and when there are no actual deadline days of reckoning being set.

      Boycotts etc only tend to have a limited lifespan. People drift back into them eventually.

      Over here in England there were outrages over Tesco funding some charities that were promoting non-whites and gays. People said boycott it. Subway the food chain went Halal, as did many KFC outlets. People said boycott it. Adverts for Cheerios, Marks and Spencer and John Lewis promoted race mixing. People said boycott them.

      How many are still doing so, or even remember what they were boycotting them for? Very few I suspect. Furthermore, the situation here is so bad with regards to promotion of race-mixing advertisements that if we boycotted everything we would not be able to live. It is everywhere.

      Stopping going to the cinema is one thing that can be done, I suppose, but I still think it would mean millions of people doing it as a whole recognised block to make a known dent.

      However, the thing that strikes me the most is the lack of a day of reckoning or any kind of deadline day that we are all working towards being a showdown.

      We can say it will be 10 years from now and our role is to build up to that moment. Without any limitations being set, the days roll into weeks, the weeks into months, the months into years and the years into decades.

      Due to the fragmentation and washing in and out of various issues along the way, our future is just evaporating as that day of reckoning never comes, and how can it come when there may only be a handful of people in a town or city that feel so strongly about it?

      I suppose I think we need massive numbers of people, unflinching, uncompromising, unified, making a united push that shakes up the world and would not be seen nor treated as a storm in a tea cup. We would need plans as to what to do, where to do it, how to do it, how to play our cards and what to do afterwards.

  • Hammerheart

    I think he forgot to calculate that when diversity increases, tax payers decrease. Not only that, but a democracy will only remain so with an informed voting base. I predict Russia and China replacing the US as the ‘world authorities’ in about 20 years.

    I can’t help but laugh at this because we really did do this to ourselves.

    • libertarian1234

      “I predict Russia and China replacing the US as the ‘world authorities’ in about 20 years.”

      That’s probably a good estimate, but China has already got its AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank) off and almost ready to go, which will offer the world another choice than the US dominated World Bank and the IMF, and could economically damage the US badly in maybe half that time or by about 2025.

      Russia and other European nations are signing on to it. I’ve also read where China, Russia and Iran are trading in currencies other than the dollar, which includes oil purchases and sales. They’re tired of being financially and militarily bullied by the US.

      The WH came out recently and declared that it dropped the ball big time by allowing the AIIB to form without fighting it. Other countries were not so kind and said outright that Obama screwed up royally.

      How apropos. As the US sinks slowly in the West culturally, it’s waning economic power is going with it.

      The radical left….. barely able to contain their glee……keeps printing news stories about whites becoming minorities in their own land, by 2040, but I wonder how gleeful they’ll be when they discover that their standard of living has plummeted and the US is a third world country, with the wealthy in gated communities while the third world hordes they promoted so joyfully control the streets at night.

      • Hammerheart

        That’s what I find sick about the radical left. They’ve essentially bethrothed their own people and children to decay, ugliness, and third world corruption because in their damaged minds it was the ‘just’ thing to do. They arrogantly believe they are going to be exempt from the fruits of their own poisonous trees. They’re going to learn the hard way you can’t have a first world nation without first world people.

        I also highly doubt the Iranians, muslims, enraged blacks rioting, whatever are going to take the time and ask them their political ideologies and who they voted for. They’re going to be lumped into the same category as you and I. I’m sure their last words will be something like “but…but this was supposed to be progress…?” And “but I voted for Obama… twice”


        “but I wonder how gleeful they’ll be” – Man, I’ll tell you what. The treason these people are actively engaged in is so enormous, so treacherous and so packed with malice. That I don’t doubt that we’ll eventually begin to see horrific Anders Breivik style retaliations being carried out on them. Especially when the scale tips from simply blaming Whites and their so-called “unearned privilege” for every negative aspect of everyone elses existence. To persecuting Whites in order to mitigate the make believe beneficial affects of “unearned privilege” on Whites, and it’s make believe negative affects on all non Whites.

    • Atheist Realist

      the U.S. still has Silicon Valley and Wall Street.

      • Alden

        Silicon Valley is Indian and Chinese.

        • Atheist Realist

          yeah but they tend to be naturalized

  • pcmustgo

    Only 20-30% of Hispanics and Asians are inter-marrying with Whites now… what makes you think that will increase in the future? Also, with Hispanics, a lot of us don’t see the Mestizo looking ones inter-marrying, seems it’s mostly “White Hispanics” going with whites…

    • Alden

      After 50 years in Florida. New Jersey, New York. Etc White Cubans marry other White Cubans

      • Bossman

        Well, at least, Ted Cruz’s father married an Anglo- American. It would be interesting to see what kind of president a half Cuban would be.

  • pcmustgo

    yup, tell it!

  • IKUredux

    So, the only way America will work in the future is if we Whites allow ourselves to be genocided. That pretty well sums up TPTB’s position. News Flash MFERS, a country exists because of the people who inhabit it. NOT the other way around.

    Despite what non Whites think: Europe does NOT exist on magical pixie dust. Yes, yes, I know we Whites invented “magic” and “pixies”, however, since we are all EQUAL, I am waiting for you to come up with the equivalent! You know, that cultural appropriation and all that you keep accusing we Whites of doing.

    Here’s a thought: Go develop your civilization according to your own principles. Go develop your own sense and standards of beauty. Go invent your own cultural icons. Go develop your own technology. Go create your own universities. GO! GO! GO! Go make something of yourselves. without leeching off of White society. Since we are ALL EQUAL, PROVE IT.

    • Spikeygrrl

      That just might be the best post I’ve ever read here. OOORAH!

    • silviosilver

      They’ve already proven it. Blacks “built this country!” didn’t you know?

  • John Smith

    What a crock of pollyannaish horses***. This taco bender sure can spin it.

  • John Smith

    It might be the best reality we can hope for, unfortunately.

  • John Smith

    Meaning, “be robbed and murdered by them.”

    • Kenner

      The black motto re whites is, ‘If you can’t join ’em, beat ’em!’.

  • Alden

    4 words Catholic Lutheran and Baptist

  • Light from the East

    “The degree of cultural diversity that this introduces to this country is rather like the cultural diversity we had in the 19th century, and for that matter in the 18th century at the time of founding,” observed American Enterprise Institute political scientist Charles Murray.

    But back then “diversity” means immigrants from different parts of Europe, blacks were enslaved or segregated, there were no Hispanic illegal aliens, no Asians either. Murray has already unintentionally proved that white Europeans really mattered at the time of founding the USA, not other people.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      And Chinese men who built the railroads and died on the job or shortly thereafter without issue because we did not let women and children accompany them and we thought they were expendable precisely because of their ‘diversity’.

      D’oh! Turns out the past and the present aren’t so analogous, after all.

  • Atheist Realist

    immigration and diversity can be good or bad. The bay area has a lot of immigration/diversity but much of it has helped continue the prosperity there. The immigration/diversity in SoCal though has been more of a plague.

  • The Dude

    If they’re counting on interracial marriages and relationships to avoid the balkanization of the country, then they’re gonna be disappointed. While mixed-race marriages and relationship did increase, but the proportion of multiracials is only expected to attain 6.2% by 2060.

    • John Smith

      Some good news, relatively speaking.

  • The Dude

    The fight is not over yet.

  • meanqueen

    Oh no . . . I feel betrayed by Charles Murray. There are immigrants, and then there are immigrants, and they are not the same thing at all.

  • Garrett Brown

    I find it very, VERY hard to believe that Murray actually said these quotes. How does one write the bell curve then retract to opinions such as these?

    • Usually Much Calmer

      I actually find it harder to believe in light of “Human Accomplishment”.

  • Germanic Depressive

    There’s no getting around the fact that if we are to survive as a people, it is going to be in a very diminished way both in terms of the land mass we control, the influence we have, and in our raw numbers.

    A very deliberate, very successful campaign to destroy us has taken place and as much as it pains me to say it, I think it has essentially already succeeded.

    I only hope that the rest of the species will be satisfied with knocking us down several pegs, and will allow us to exist as a remnant and have some corner of the globe to ourselves. I don’t know where that will be, but I truly hope such a place is permitted to us and that my descendants can live there.

  • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

    ‘In 1960, multiracial marriages accounted for only 0.4 percent of all marriages in the United States. By 2010, that figure rose to 8.4 percent, with interracial couples accounting for 15 percent of all new marriages–a trend that experts say will only continue.’
    How disgusting that the trend is continuing.

  • LackawannaErie

    First of all, note that this is appearing on VOA, a US government propaganda broadcast. Nice of Charles Murray to contribute to an anti-white government propaganda puff piece. That’s some real serious conservatism.

    I can’t believe anyone is surprised by Charles Murray here. If you paid any attention at all to the man, you knew he thought this way. Why do you think the neocons published him? Why do you think he wasn’t destroyed professionally and made a persona non grata around institutional (neo)conservatism like real pro-white advocates are. Compare the treatment of Sam Francis to Charles Murray.

    The whole purpose of the Bell Curve and Charles Murray’s neocon created career as a pundit is to provide a kind of false flag for disgruntled white gentile conservative to rally around, to keep them in the neocon camp.

    Remember the time period, the early 90’s. The ” New World Order” when the globalist elite ramped up outsourcing, immigration and the police state. There was populist rebellion against mainstream politics during that era. It would have been dangerous back then if only William Pierce and David Duke were talking about racial differences. Neocons knew that a lot of white conservatives were getting disgruntled and that they had to throw them some red meat. The Bell Curve controversy gave the illusion of there being a real debate about race in the media, but in reality, it was a scripted debate where a single neocon approved book was allowed to be publicized, a book that was not pro-white, but only noted racial differences in IQ scores.

    Think of Charles Murray’s work as an operation is extreme neoconservativsm. Just like regular neoconservativism is packaging anti-white cultural marxism in conservative garb, extreme neoconservatism is packaging anti-white cultural marxism in far-right, race realist or nationalist garb.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      “….Just like regular neoconservativism is packaging anti-white cultural marxism in conservative garb….”

      That is beginning to describe the FOX Network. Maybe Murdoch was a Marxist shill after all?

  • LackawannaErie

    He was always with them, some just weren’t paying close attention.

  • MarxistMangler

    Nah, Brazil shows us otherwise.

  • dewdly

    The races of mankind are products of evolution within specific physical and social environments.
    Estonians in the Kalahari will never “assimilate” or become Bushmen, just as Bantus in Michigan will never assimilate or become Caucasian. There have been Africans in the U.S. since the seventeenth century but only because they were uprooted and transported by others. Left to their own devices they would be relatively small groups of primitive tribesmen unchanged over the last several thousand years. Murray can only be talking about ethnic diversity and assimilation among Europeans while all of the recent immigrants are like the unassimilated Africans who have been here for three hundred years.

  • Diversity Heretic

    Charles Murray is from my home town, so it is sad to see him unable to see the differences between the “diversity” of the 18th and 19th centuries and the “diversity” and multi-culturalism of today. To repeat Professor Murray’s own words when told that most people, given proper instruction, could accomplish anything, “[y]our views in this matter are not consistent with reality;”

  • Speedy Steve

    When I hear the words”strengthening culture,” I go for my sidearm.

  • Hilis Hatki

    I live in a county that is over 95% white. They are oblivious to what is really going on in America and believe that they will never have to experience the diversity happening elsewhere. This is also a very corrupt county where a handful of whites do what they want. This place is the perfect example of whats wrong with America, white people. Until whites deal with themselves there is no dealing with the rest. I whish I could move about 3,000 Somalians here. So whitey how does it feel to be the new Indian.

  • archer

    Exactly how is mooching off of the remaining white people a good thing?

  • Edward_Teach

    Diversity is a problem for the white race, we gain nothing from this. This is a lose lose for the white man and a win win for the ones who get to “diversify” us. The white man builds a business, a school, a town, a city, a country and the races who can’t build anything equal or better feel they’re entitled to it. They want the white mans world but they don’t want the white man in it.

  • jaye ellis

    Charles Murray now….

    Loves Big Brother.


  • AndrewInterrupted

    “Charles Murray is now on the diversity bandwagon”.

    The social engineering Marxists sufficiently tightened the thumb screws. Mr. Murray will now repeat “the party line”.

    • LackawannaErie

      No, he always thought this way. He hasn’t had any screws put to him, he has a comfortable position at an establishment approved neocon think tank.

      It’s pathetic that so many people who read Amren still don’t understand the neocon false flag strategy.

      • Hank Richter

        Yep. If you know the history of NeoCons they were all left-wingers who came to the Rep part in the 60’s and moreso in the 80’s. Both parties are effectively infiltrated.

  • jaye ellis

    Charles Murray has apparently….

    accepted the 30 pieces of silver.

    It looks like their can not be any racial realists in academia, the mainstream media, none. Zero tolerance.

    • LackawannaErie

      Murray was always anti-white if you paid attention. Race realism and pro-white are two different things.

  • Cid Campeador

    Oh so who are the source of this great news? Victor Morales and PoliScientist Chales Murray.

  • Where is the proof of this great new non-white future?

    Everywhere we turn we see whites being to blame for lacklustre black colleges, lacklustre block jobs, lacklustre black education, lacklustre health care, the endless lack-of-due progress when it comes to technology industries, school teachers, media corporation staff/management.

    If you are to listen to the same morons and the same media that endlessly whine about how unfair things are, how much there is “yet to do” to raise things up to where they should be, how discriminated the non-whites are in housing, representation, etc, it would seem that they are all downtrodden, left behind. A tale of failure to reach those heights.

    Yet in the same breath we are told that there is some magical day ahead where everything will be great and this “rich vibrancy” of cultures and races will lead our nations to a bright future of excellence.

    To me, all the indicators point to a slide into further dysfunction and third world status, complete with friction between those various non-white groups and a minority white population. One of higher crime, higher disease, less logic being applied.

    They really do believe that the “white man” has some sort of spell over everything and everybody else, and only when the white people are removed will these people “shine” to all their glory. But one only has to look at the nations these people tend to come from to know how it will end up in the long run. The short run tells us that, with the people already here.

    • As long as there is one white man left, the other races will be repressed. Only in Haiti, where whites were ethnically cleansed away in 1804, there culture can flourish, unimpeded by whites. /sarasm

      • silviosilver

        That’s the Last White Man and the End of History hypothesis.

  • The last German person in her building, about the only one in the
    entire area. A stranger in her own country. The rest are foreigners,
    asylum seekers, etc. Even the foreigners wish there were more Germans.

    einwanderungskritik de/fremd-im-eigenen-land/

  • LackawannaErie

    I’d like Jared Taylor to address the issue of Charles Murray’s anti-white activism on his radio show. I’ve long felt that Amren took a wrong approach towards white advocacy right from the beginning by focusing on IQ scores and trying to reach out to mainstream conservatives and neocons. One of the ways this manifested itself was overly friendly coverage of neocons like Charles Murray who sometimes said un-PC things, but who never had anything to do with the pro-white movement. I guess the idea was that if taboo ideas could get a hearing, pro-white politics would follow.

    That approach failed. Neocons successfully purged all the white advocates from the mainstream conservative movement by 2000. I’m glad to see Amren move towards political dissidence lately, but there needs to be some discussion about what went wrong with the Amren strategy back in the 90’s. Failures have to be discussed.

    Back in the 90’s Amren had articles about whether to support the GOP or a third party and whether Christianity was good or bad for whites. I’d like to see those issues revisited with the knowledge and experience that we have gained since that era.

    • Hank Richter

      I’ve always thought arguing the genetics thing was a waste of time as well. Just advocate free association, it’s a much easier thing to defend. I also agree that the NeoCons are no friend to whites.

      NeoCons are hated by most Americans and unfortunately most people associate them with whites, Christianity, Capitalism and Conservatism. NeoCons have tarnished us far more than the Marxist ever could have, but then again most NeoCons came from the left so it makes sense.

      • LackawannaErie

        Old conservatives are not aware neocons are like Satan to under 30’s and 40’s. The whole conservative movement has been discredited by these scum. That’s why most right of center millennials are calling themselves “libertarians,” rather than “conservatives.”

        Has everyone noticed “mainstream” conservatism is falling into a rabbit hole of hysterical neocon paranoia over Iran and other Israeli-related issues?

        They are losing touch with reality and forgetting to keep up a calm, lucid demeanor for the masses. When you go on National Review or other typical “movement conservative” sites, you are greeted with a wall of crazed ranting about Iran that normal people will see as scary and a sign that these people are unbalanced. They have created an echo chamber with all the purges of paleocons over the years, so there is no one left to suggest toning it down.

        • Hank Richter

          Oh man, you hit the nail on the head. When you look at libertarians for the most part they are split a bit where you have right leaning ones like Ron Paul and left leaning ones like Gary Johnson.

          But really I think the libertarians are just the real liberals and real conservatives who got sick of the Marxists and NeoCons in the 2 major parties.

    • LHathaway

      Your mistake is assuming AmRen is trying to reach out to a larger audience? You seem to think, at least by my reading of your comments, that if we just become better at hating jews and form a smaller and smaller tent where only true believers can nestle, and get rid of the outsiders, or circle ourselves in to a smaller and smaller band of wagons, then White Nationalists can become successful. That is, if one believes your attempts at outing Jews and the politically incorrect (by your beliefs) are actually intended to make White advocacy a smashing success?

  • Gallo Quartus

    Masking genocide with words like “diversity,” is tantamount to calling the electric chair a “permanent electroshock happy fun-time soil enrichment and therapy device.” Someone dies, but the upside is that their remains will be good for the environment.

  • bv

    Is it English?

  • Hank Richter

    Ugg, I have two cousins who went interracial, on the one side of my family it didn’t surprise me as much as they were always kinda trailer trash and I don’t hang with them much, but on the other side I never thought I’d see the day.

    What really sucks is how the rest of my family has just accepted it like it’s nothing, all the time they complain about how bad America is getting, yet like most they remain blind to why it’s happening and how they themselves contribute to it unknowingly.

  • scutum

    This is a complete sellout by Murray. He knows better and I have lost all respect for him. Any diversity there was in previous centuries in this country were ethnic and linguistic variations of European stock. Diversity between the Irish, the Poles and the Italians is not the same as diversity between Swedes, Somali’s, Polish and Bantu’s.

    • LackawannaErie

      It’s not a sell out because Murray was always like this. Remember who this man is: He spent his entire career working alongside the same neocons who support open borders and other anti-white ideals like the concept that America has no ethnic basis. It was Hernstein and Murray who wrote the Bell Curve.

      Search my handle on these comments to see my explanation of why the neocons did the Bell Curve and what the purpose of Murray’s career has been. IMO, Murray’s life’s work has been an exercise in sounding superficially pro-white while supporting the anti-white establishment. The reason to do this? Steel the thunder from nationalists by “filling the vacuum” on racial issues. “Filling the vacuum” is the idea that there is latent political support for anyone who will address issues that are being ignored. Sophisticated political strategists like the neocons understand this, the whole neocon project from the beginning has been an exercise in “filling the vacuum” on right wing ideas to stop anti-establishment right wingers from exploiting them.

  • LackawannaErie

    Charles’ Murray’s books are designed to give a white friendly veneer to anti-white neoconservatism. Murray has always been like this, read him CAREFULLY. He has never made pro-white statements or suggested any sympathy for pro-white ideas.

    White Americans need to learn to judge people by their associations. Politics is NOT about individuals with different ideas debating. It’s about organized factions with agendas competing for dominance. Murray has always been part of the anti-white neocon faction. We need to realize that NO ONE on speaking terms with neocons can ever be our friend. What gang someone runs with is what matters, not what they say. Not understanding that is how white conservatives in America get duped over and over. In other societies, this is understood by everyone. If you have ever paid attention to politics in other countries, you may have noticed that the press and public do not hang on every word politicians say, parsing it for meaning like they do here. It’s assumed by everyone that words are just fluff and what matters is who a politician’s allies are.

    Murray’s work back in the 80’s and 90’s give white conservatives a false sense that neocons were on their side, that was the intent. The idea was to stop nationalists, “white separatists”(to use the parlance of the time), paleocons etc. from having criticism of black crime or discussion of low black IQ all to themselves as an issue.

    • Tenniel

      Said LackawannaErie:
      “Charles’ Murray’s books are designed to give a white friendly veneer to anti-white neoconservatism.”
      Or else…Charles Murray’s books are designed to give Pro-White BODY BLOWS to the enemy’s Lies while showing a veneer of anti-White neoconservatism.
      Neither you nor I, LE, can get into Charles Murray’s mind to determine with certainty his motives and his White stance. But the best evidence for his motives and his racial stance, though, is NOT the subtle neoconservative veneer in his books, but the actual effective force and impact of those books. Both of the books I’ve mentioned — The Bell Curve and Human Accomplishment — are, as I said, seminal, powerful, if subtle, body blows to the enemy’s most fundamental Lies:
      * that there is only one race the human race,
      * that there are no significant deep racial differences among the races in genetic intelligence or in productive creativity,
      * that there is no natural genetic hierarchy of racial quality,
      * that the White Race has been only a source — THE source — of evil and destruction to the world,
      * that the White Race is a cancer on human life — and that the world will be well-rid of the White Race when the Genocide has been completed and the White Race erased from the face of the earth (to use the enemy’s own language).
      These are NOT superficial books, as you imply. They are seminal, implicit, deeply documented and argued, Pro-White books — regardless of what Charles Murray had to say in those books to get these books published by major mainstream literary publishers.
      Really, though, it doesn’t matter what Charles Murray’s public racial stance is — or even what he thinks is his actual racial stance. All the matters is the Pro-White the force and effect to date and the long term potential of the books themselves. The books stand alone — and are profoundly Pro-White.

      • C. Magnus

        As I read this argument I am actually thinking that it’s a good thing that Murray has never been particularly pro-white in his politics, since the science on race and IQ should be apolitical, like the laws of physics are. Either they are facts about the world or they are not. The ideas then cannot then be characterised as the ‘rantings of far right extremists’, from the perspective of liberals and cultural Marxists. If that argument were made it would fall flat on its head straight away, given Murray’s neocon connections.
        While it is true that race realism is not necessarily to be equated with racial nationalism, it does inform and even inspire it far more often than it does not. I can’t see it inspiring any form of Marxism or liberalism, and especially in today’s political environment where race is such a prominent political issue, it’s very hard to be informed of it and still remain apolitical.

  • gooberboy9999

    “particularly as the rate of interracial marriage grows.”
    How is it expected to grow, exactly, with hispanics and asians having other hispanics and asians to marry? Before, plenty of mexicans and asians HAD to marry interracially if they wanted to marry at all. Now they no longer have to. Even at the height of interracial marriage less than one out of ten whites were ‘marrying out.’

    What’s funny is that if you pay attention you note that they were crowing about interracial marriage reaching an all time high in 2012. Yet I don’t seem to recall anyone saying anything in 2013 and 2014. In fact, I can’t seem to find any statistics or reports about the subject matter from Pew or anyone else at all… hmmmm, I wonder why…

    Also, Murray is just another example of a smart person acting idiotic. Someone needs to ask him how importing hordes of dark hued people with garbage cultures and low IQs will strengthen America.