Ann Coulter’s Upcoming Book Directly Confronts Mass Immigration

James Kirkpatrick, VDARE, April 14, 2015

Ann Coulter, the queen of conservative commentary, is about to unleash a new book that slams liberals and elites in America for opening the floodgates of illegal immigration so they can have “cheap nannies and lawn boys”–and a devoted corps of voters.

Her upcoming ¡Adios America! The Left’s Plan To Turn Our Country Into A Third World Hell Hole is likely to play a role in the debate over immigration and the 2016 presidential race where the issue splits Democrats and Republicans.

While Regnery Publishing isn’t shipping the book until June 1, word about it is already out and Coulter’s book is climbing the Amazon ratings. She has been a New York Times best-seller 10 times.

[Coulter: Liberals use illegals for ‘cheap nannies, lawn boys, votes,” by Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner, April 14, 2015]

Coulter has been absolutely heroic in identifying the central importance of the immigration issue to the future survival not just of American conservatism, but of “America” itself in any kind of meaningful sense. And she’s paid a price, as we can see from her sudden banishment from CPAC.

If American conservatism is to have a future, it requires centering on the immigration issue and redefining the American Right as a patriotic, pro-worker, and populist movement. Hopefully, Coulter’s new book will be a step towards that sorely needed development.

Cover

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • David Ashton

    Now, give her credit. This all helps. Never mind her sex life.

    • Publius Pompilius Quietus

      I don’t care for Coulter’s rudeness and fondness for ad hominem, but I’m glad that she is giving voice to concerns about immigration.

      • LexiconD1

        Replace rudeness with sanctimonious and I totally agree.

        • Charles Lufkin

          I am not interested in her personality.Coulter is the best “pundit” on immigration.Will ALWAYS raise the issue if given even the slightest opportunity.Courageous.Buy her book.

          • TruthBeTold

            I’m not looking for perfection. I’m looking for policy changes.

            I hope this book makes the right people uncomfortable.

          • I’d much rather someone buy the book of a staunch racialist than someone who is one dimensional like Coulter.

          • Fox Dragoon

            How is she one dimensional?

          • BlueSonicStreak

            Americans NEED to be one-dimensional. The only issue to vote on in America right now is immigration. Nothing else.

          • DelmarJackson

            Coulter has been repeatedly stating for several years she is a one issue voter, and the issue is immigration. Phyllis Schlafly came out and said the same thing and also Laura Ingraham has been strongly focusing on immigration on her increasingly popular radio show as the primary issue America faces. More and more people are becoming aware of how billionaire open border globalists have bought the media and most of both parties in order for them to push their anti American agenda of massive immigration. Mickey Kaus quit his relationship with the Daily Caller as his story was killed by Tucker Carlson on how FOX news has stopped focusing on immigration and amnesty. The people that want less immigration have very few champions on the left or right. coulter is a friend and patriot on immigration regardless of what anything else people say about her.
            Coulter has my highest regard.

          • NoMosqueHere

            Meanwhile, back at rancho, Senor Yeb Bush is favored to receive the GOP nomination.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            Bush will NOT receive the GOP nomination, and I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is. I’ll even give you odds…

          • conservatroll

            Not a chance. The Republican elites are morons but even they know Jeb is the only candidate who would lose to Hillary.

          • Spikeygrrl

            “The only”?!

            ANY (R) is going to have a tough row to hoe against ANY (D).

            Bizarre as it may seem, dam’near 50% of the voting populace thinks Bathhouse Barry Soetoro is doing a great job and hopes our next President will push his Leftist policies even further.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            The “elites” — who gave us Ford and Dole and Bush and McCain and Bush and Romney and would give us another Bush — have the money, but not the numbers. That’s where we win this thing…

          • WR_the_realist

            I hope by now that Ann Coulter has realized that the neocons are not her friends.

          • The Worlds Scapegoat

            By claiming to be a 1 issue voter, they have an excuse for not mentioning anything else that is destroying this country and all other white countries.

            .

          • DelmarJackson

            The drive behind massive 3rd world immigration are the billionaire globalists who have bought most of the media and most of both parties. They have spent over 1.5 billion since 2007, when their last attempt to pass amnesty failed to try and pass another amnesty. If they continue to flood the country no other issue will matter as they will have succeeded in importing anew electorate with no connection to the historical American people and nation.

          • The Worlds Scapegoat

            How about they name the wizard(s) behind the curtain, put them on trial (preferably Stalin style), and then throw out the invaders – at gun point if necessary.

            .

          • Spikeygrrl

            There you go again.

            Are you actually out there donating your time and/or money toward closing our borders, or just lurking in Mommy’s basement spinning conspiracy theories about your favorite comic-book international supervillains?

          • The Worlds Scapegoat

            Why can’t you clowns ever come up with anything original?

            Always treat the symptom, and never get rid of the problem, because there is more money in prolonging the problem than fixing it. How many people would lose their jobs if drugs were legalized and taxed?

            How do you close the border? Is it one big door?

            I would rather get rid of the door stop that is holding it open. Most likely, the door stop is someone in your family, or even you. Never identify the problem: Just waste time on the symptom.

            .

          • Spikeygrrl

            I do give my money. It’s hard for me meaningfully to give my time because I have severe mobility issues (a rare form of progressive paralysis; I can no longer either walk or drive and the nearest wheelchair accessible mass transit stop is 4-5 miles away). If I could meaningfully give my time, I would! I come from a very politically active family, and have been volunteering for causes and candidates since long before I was old enough to vote.

            What’s YOUR excuse?

          • Earl P. Holt III

            I agree with all those three women I greatly admire: Immigration is THE issue of the next 100 years. If we lose THAT battle, it is all over but the shooting…

          • Irish

            In far less than 100 years it’ll all be over for this country if trends continue as they are.

      • John Ambrose

        Often times conservatives are too polite and fair-minded for their own good; sometimes you have to fight fire with fire and many on the Left have no qualms about being crude and aggressive especially if it helps intimidate their opponents. Just read some of the vulgar and crude things on sites like Salon or Jezebel.

        • TrueNorthFree

          Salon or Jezebel, Gawker, Alternet, etc

        • Recently at Taco Johns, I was reading news on my laptop on their wifi. Discovered AmRen was blocked. We still have censorship, I thought.

          • David Ashton

            We have a similar problem in parts of Britain.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          That’s right.
          The left is a pirate culture.
          Time to think dirty like them–then dirtier.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          The next communist who is aggressive with me — and poses a legitimate threat — will be ventilated. My only dilemma is whether to put nine in him with my .45 auto, or five in him with my .500 Magnum…

      • Earl P. Holt III

        She always has: This isn’t anything new…

      • baldridge999

        I like her rudeness and ad hominem against these bolsheviks who want to eradicate our people. To hell with debate – they’re not interested in debate, these anti-white degenerates need to be crushed into dust. Ann, at least, stands up to these bums and gives them the contempt they deserve.

      • Realist

        “…. but I’m glad that she is giving voice to concerns about immigration.”

        Ann leaves out a group at least as culpable as the left…..the right.

        • ElComadreja

          Yes, there’s plenty of blame to go around on this.

        • Irish

          I don’t know about that.. Her last book was entitled -Never trust a liberal over 3 ( especially a Republican)..

      • Benny Ehud

        Her career is now over.

    • Jason Lewis

      That whole thing with the Good Times guy was a rumor which she denies happening.

      • The Worlds Scapegoat

        I have never masturbated with either hand – or both together. The dog lies, and regardless of what my mom says it was intense joke itch.

        .

      • spahnranch69 .

        Are you referring to Jimmy “Dyn-o-mite” Walker? So Mizz Coulter is a coal-burner, eh?

        • voiceofstl

          No she is not. She went out with JJ as a joke.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That myth arose when the two were paid participants for a TVLAND awards show.
            .

          • ElComadreja

            It’s not funny.

        • Xerxes22

          I heard that Ms. Coulter is not into men of any race. I don’t know if the rumor is true or false.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That’s the whole “Adams Apple” snark. She doesn’t have an Adams Apple. She’s hyperthyroid, so she has no body fat. Everything sticks out without body fat. I just learned that Matt Drudge was gay. Didn’t really faze me. Who cares.
            .

          • Facts are good. Thanks.

          • Bossman

            She looks like a man in drag so I can see why girly-liberal boys could like her.

          • slobotnavich

            Well, I ain’t a girly liberal and I like Ann. In fact, were I not happily married and well into limp-dickhood, I’d track her down and hit on her relentlessly. She’s my ultimate mate fantasy, tall, blond, brilliant and witty – I love smart ladies, and it bothers me not one wit that my present spouse is probably smarter than me. I find brains in a woman both sexy and highly appealing. Dumb and insecure men generally don’t.

          • Irish

            For a woman in her early fifties she looks fabulous..I’ve always found it funny how the left is oh, so thoughtful, sensitive and pro-woman. Except when they lean right, Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a slut comes to mind..

          • slobotnavich

            Well, the Left is generally characterized by a level of intolerance and sheer viciousness virtually unknown on the Right, an overweening and vomititious sense of their moral superiority; they always consider themselves “the best people.” That these “best people,” in the 20th Century alone, killed an estimated 150-180 million people in just the USSR and Red China alone matters not all these to these fine “idealists.” And let’s not forget that noble revolutionary, Pol Pot, who murdered half the entire population of Cambodia in the Seventies. Marxism is, I believe, a particularly vicious and destructive form of simple infantilism, one which many people outgrow as they age and mature. Others seem afflicted with it for life. In America we charitably call those so afflicted “Democrats.”

          • AndrewInterrupted

            You came out as a lefty shill a long time ago, Pussman. You are just noise.

          • listenupbub

            Is he really? Can you link to the source? I’ having a hard time believing it.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            The source is my MD wife. Her colleagues on the psychology side of the equation also estimate that Ann has a rare genetic trait called: fearless dominance.

            She’s actually a natural president–or queen. But, not the types of queens you’re fascinated with.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            She has a boyfriend: Sean Hannity regularly teases her about identifying him when she is a guest on his show.

            I cannot believe people on this site would engage in the kind of “cannibalism” of our own team-members, that I see in the above delusions about Ann Coulter’s “dating” habits…

          • Earl P. Holt III

            It’s a lie, initiated by the usual suspects — queers and communists…

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Ann mingles with all number of celebrities when in LA. She hung out with my hero, Andrew Breitbart as well. She wasn’t sleeping with him either. Andy was a happy father of 4 and madly in love with his wife, Suzie. Of course Suzie is now being sued by the working-welfare sow, Shirley Sherrod. What a beast that old warthog is.
        .

        • InAFreeCountry

          Man, did he die too young.

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          Of course Suzie is now being sued by the working-welfare sow, Shirley Sherrod. What a beast that old warthog is.

          Can you provide a link?

          I’m interested in the details…thanks in advance.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            http[colon]//dailycaller[dot]com/2013/10/07/shirley-sherrod-sues-nicest-person-in-los-angeles/
            .

          • AndrewInterrupted
          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Excellent.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Breitbart died before he could clear his name. The full Sherrod video was always available.

            The White House (or Black House) intentionally over-reacted with Sherrod to make her a martyr in the media. Probably a Rahm Emanuel idea. The standard procedure for such matters is administrative leave, then investigation.

            Procedure wasn’t followed so Obama and his Chicago gangsters could put the blame on a conservative white guy. Just one variation of many on “throwing the race card” (and orchestrated by a scheming tribe member). It works time and time again.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Thanks. I knew the Sherrod story – I didn’t know she tried to sue Breitbart’s widow.

            She had doors opened for her and money thrown at her – undeservedly – for being black.

    • TruthBeTold

      We don’t have the luxury of waiting for our flawless messiah.

      Coulter isn’t perfect but she’s still in the MSM where she can tell people off.

      I don’t know enough intimate details to know about her sex life. Is ‘dating’ a black man sex with a black man?

      Maybe she made a couple of public appearance with a black guy so she could take the steam out of anyone accusing her of being a racist.

      As long as she’s on the front line making people uncomfortable I don’t care about her personal life.

      • BloodofAlbion75

        The best thing about Ann is that she is a formidable debater whose not afraid to engage the Left in the public arena,which is a helluva lot more than I can say about the spineless and weak-minded leadership of the Republican Party.

      • Irish

        Howard Stern learned that little trick 30 years ago..Think he’d of got away with 1/10th of his antics without Robin Quivers as a comic foil.

    • FozzieT

      So what, perhaps she hasn’t reached the great racial enlightenment just yet. She’s definitely on the right side of the immigration issue, and will reach more people than we can ever dream of reaching with her book. Definitely deserves our support.

  • Dave West

    Problems like income inequality, America falling behind in terms of education, rising poverty, ghettoization of the inner-cities, “marginalized, angry people of color.”
    Would exist much less if the US had the same demographics as it did in 1960, before the brown tidal wave act of 1965.

    The problem with this is that liberal cries for socialist reforms would be much less relevant and few would give them the light of day. The solution for liberals is to import the problem. The problem with liberal “solutions” is that they are not solutions, but are exacerbations of the problem(s) itself.

    • Sheik Yerbouti

      If we remove black and Hispanic students from the education numbers, the US moves from 32nd to 2nd in education.

      • rebelcelt

        Sheik, I believe you, but where can we find that data?

      • See also: crime, poverty, venereal disease, obesity, etc.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        Here’s a graphic you might be interested in – it lists what would happen if the black population were to disappear from the U.S.

        What a wonderful world it would be.

        • InAFreeCountry

          Imagine if the blacks AND the mexicans were gone!

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            We’d have America as it was before 1965 – a 90% White country.

            A safe, orderly, beautiful, peaceful country – the freest, wealthiest, most prosperous country ever seen on the entire planet – a place where people left their doors and windows open, their cars unlocked (my grandfather used to leave his keys IN the car everywhere he went -unthinkable now) and the streets were safe to walk at any time of day and night.

            Now, a dream. What in the hell have we lost? What have they done to us? To our country? Who did this to us and why?

          • TrueNorthFree

            I totally believe the turning of our Western countries into third world cess pits is being done very deliberately, and most likely for economic reasons. Instead of third world people working for pennies a day, the international corporatists want North American whites working for pennies a day.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Whites won’t work for pennies a day and the hostile elite that has its hand on the levers of power in the US well know that.

            They want us Whites dead. NO question about it. They want us dead.

          • Sheik Yerbouti

            I don’t agree. We are too valuable. The whole point of it is to keep us from realizing this. White people don’t NEED “diversity” at all. Non-whites can’t exist in today’s world without socialized diversity.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            So true. That’s why the sirens go off in every direction when ever a Western European American speaks of Nationalism. The parasites don’t want the hosts to get away.
            .

          • Guest

            >>>Anna>>
            >
            >
            >>..
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

          • Robert Smith

            Bingo

          • TrueNorthFree

            “White people don’t NEED “diversity” at all. Non-whites can’t exist in today’s world without socialized diversity.”

            Very true!

          • InAFreeCountry

            I wish I could have been here for that.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            I have coffee table books that I’ve picked up over the years – such as “Los Angeles in the 50s” – and pine over old photos of downtown LA and Echo Park when it was a safe, incredibly beautiful place for families, especially when the water lilies bloomed.

            Now it is an open-air 3rd world Central American drug market, a no-go area for whites.

          • anony

            “What in the hell have we lost? ”

            We have lost our country. We have lost a future for our children and grandchildren.

            Who did this to us and why? There are several theories; pick your favorite one. I prefer to think that we “allowed” it to happen to us. We should take our country back ourselves, failing that, we should create a country for ourselves which would create a future for our progeny.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            14 words.

          • LHathaway

            “We will collect them, brand them, and place them outside our borders”?

            Those are my 12 words.

            I honestly believe our children will do this. Will it be a handful? dozens? Hundreds? Thousands? Will it be from among our ranks here? Probably. I honestly believe a reckoning will come and justice will prevail.

            The only relevant question is what time of the year this will be done, and at exactly what location outside the border will they be placed?

          • bilderbuster

            If I have my way it will be The Marianas Trench.

          • anony

            Summer and the deep blue sea.

          • LHathaway

            I always pictured winter and the middle of nowhere. God help us.

          • anony

            Indeed, 14 words. Quite the mission statement!

          • dean53

            The reasons for our defeat are many. Importing AfricansAfricans, a genetic bubonic plague and the seeds of our destruction. The creation of the Supreme Court. The Civil War. Universal sufferage. Establishing compulsory public education. WWI. WWII. Drafting Africans to fight in our wars. Vietnam. Social Security Act. Birth control. Immigration Act of 1965. Civil Rights Act. Dropping voting age to 18. Welfare. Integration. Just to name a few.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            “The reasons for our defeat are many.”

            The reasons are one: Cultural Marxists.

            It is they who have created, implemented, fomented those programs, marched through the institutions and put their boot firmly on Whitey’s neck. They won’t stop until all White homelands are gone, in fact, they’re stepping up their efforts.

            As poster Luke comments:

            We are not fighting an enemy who gives two hoots about fair play, sportsmanship, honor, or integrity. This enemy fights dirty and is absolutely the most ruthless, cold-blooded, sadistic and violent enemy that White European people have ever faced.

            Whither White man?

          • James Hamilton

            At least in America there is enough land for whites to flee to. In Europe, and especially the UK, everyone is so tightly packed that there is no escaping the vibrant hordes.

          • listenupbub

            Go to Russia with me, friend. Or at least go to some ethnocentric homeland of a white people.

          • anony

            Russia may be the White future. We shall see.

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            According to Edgar Cayce, it is.

          • anony

            Yes, I commented about that recently and was told that Cayce was shown to be a fraud. Not so sure, although I have never put much stock in “prophets though I will consider anything until shown otherwise. I have read some about the man.

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            I would ask, where is the proof? I have never heard or seen anything proving that, he seems pretty legit to me. There are a lot of frauds, but he seemed genuine. But I love prophecy, and find it endlessly fascinating (doesn’t mean I believe it all, of course)

          • Deacon Blue

            Where do I sign up?

          • anony

            You signed up when you were born White.

          • Sheik Yerbouti

            Safe as long as you weren’t drafted.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Yeah, now you don’t have to travel to Viet Nam to get your *** shot up – you can travel to any of a dozen or more American cities like Detroit, Camden, Oakland, Memphis or Birmingham AL. All once safe, White cities.

            The Viet Nam war was fought so Southeast Asians could pour into the U.S. to trap feral cats in Golden Gate Park.

            Someone had to do it.

          • anony

            They taste pretty good with some soy sauce and deep fried.

          • John Ambrose

            The Viet Nam war was fought so LBJ wouldn’t look soft on Communism and in the end he believed this would improve his own political prospects.

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            New Bern, NC has a large Burmese “refugee” population. How the HELL did that happen?? It’s everywhere and it’s disgusting.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Yes.

            Cats started disappearing around Golden Gate park in the late 70s when the Vietnamese moved in.

            Authorities said this was merely a coincidence.

            In 1980, in California, refugees from Indochina were trapping and eating animals, including stray dogs and cats in Golden Gate Park, SF. Californians were outraged and a state senator presented a bill to the Senate Judiciary committee that would have made it a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to five hundred dollars and a jail term of six months for killing a dog or cat for eating purposes or permitting it to be eaten.

            Eat Not This Flesh, Frederick J. Simoons, p. 202

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            Ew! Gotta love that diversity!

          • Enticer26

            Who did this to us? All the usual suspects.

            Why did they do it? Cause it is their nature to do it.

            Plessy should be reaffirmed in the courts with the main argument being that forced integration of public schools of inferior black children has resulted in psychological and physical harm(rape-robbery-murder) to White children. The question is…why hasn’t there been that challenge in the last 60 years?….and the only answer is,as always,the “usual suspects.”

            “We” did not allow this to happen to us.This was done to us. Don’t let no-one tell you different.

          • TheHBD

            Who did this to us and why?

            –They have many names and faces (the Left, progressives, communists, etc)…but the honest truth is that they did this because they are evil, anti-social, nihilistic reprobates who despise everything about pre-1965 America…its whiteness, goodness, moral health and prosperity. They represent a primal force in humanity…one which will always seek to destroy what is built up by others in an attempt to reconcile their inner pathologies. We must resist them at every turn and expose them as the intellectual/moral frauds that they are. Say whatever you want about Ann Coulter, but this book is a step of courage that no other beltway-right politician would ever write.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            It’s also very important to remember there is nothing random or insane about this; indeed it is a coldly calculated, meticulously laid-out plan that’s unfolded over the past 70 years designed and implemented to destroy all White homelands and eventually genocide the White race.

            When all data, facts and empirical evidence, in toto, as in Culture of Critique, there is no other explanation.

            I threw that out there as a rhetorical question, BTW.

          • David Ashton

            Marcuse & Co were driving forces, but they had allies and collaborators not listed by Dr M.

          • David Ashton

            Britain much the same.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Worse. Britain is the size of California.

            The bastards that are in control of your government are as bad as the bastards in our government – only you are a bit further down the paved road. You live in a police state – and we are only about 3/4 there.

          • David Ashton

            Americans, look into our abyss and be warned.

            “There is an issue which apparently matters to voters more than any other. More even than the economy. And yet so far in the election campaign no party except for Ukip has bothered to mention it…. No wonder politicians are held in such low esteem if they loftily disregard what matters to many people.” – Stephen Glover, “Daily Mail”, April 2, p.14.

          • anony

            The vast majority of pols are, as we all know, are bought and paid for. As the old saying goes, “theme thats got the gold, rule.”

          • David Ashton

            “Where there’s money, there’s muck.”

          • Enticer26

            Have you ever viewed this David? Thought you might be interested since you like to do research.

            Synagogue of Satan full Documentary by A.C. Hitchcock…1876–2006…5hrs and 30 minutes–Youtube.

          • David Ashton

            I have made a note for when I get six hours to spare. I wonder if Mr Engelman would be interested.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            The abyss is South Africa.

          • David Ashton

            South African white population 22% in 1921 and 9% in 2011.
            “Don’t ask for whom the bell tolls.”

          • NoMosqueHere

            I prefer the pre ’60s America. Pre 1860s that is.

          • InAFreeCountry

            I remember the Tylenol scare. Just another step of lost innocence.

          • James Hamilton

            Whenever I see movies and TV shows about America in the 1950s and 1960s it makes me sad to see what a wonderful country it once was. Diversity is a curse.

          • David Ashton

            I feel the same when I watch old US movies – but remember that some of the good stuff was then produced and directed and even acted by “tribesmen”.

          • anony

            Yes, they were “boiling the frog”. I enjoy watching old movies, as in ’30’s and ’40’s movies, Even then, “progressive” ideas were embedded in the themes. It surely has been a “long march”.

          • AmericanRemnant

            Diversity is a weapon, the curse is Cultural Marxism and those that embrace it’s philosophy.

          • Bossman

            Well, you can’t blame Mexicans for that because before 1965 they treated the same as Canadians and Germans for immigration quotas.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            I don’t, Bossman.

            What Mexicans don’t realize and understand (and never will) is that they are tools of other forces – a force that wants to destroy White America and uses Mexicans – and blacks – as useful idiots.

          • Bossman

            In case you didn’t know it, before 1965 Mexicans were treated the same as Canadians, Germans and Englishmen when it came to immigration policy. Take a good look at this table for the year 1963.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Yes, America is definitely a White country.

            The US was created solely by White people. Until just a few decades ago she was 90% White.

            The Constitution dedicates America to “ Secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and OUR Posterity.”

            That was White people writing those words, so they meant White people`s Posterity, not Somalis, Hmong, mestizos or any other non-White.

            1790, the second session of the first Congress approved the new nation’s initial effort to codify the rules under which foreign-born persons could become U.S. citizens.

            The Naturalization Act of 1790 specified that “any alien, being a free White person, could apply for citizenship, so long as he or she lived in the United States for at least two years, and in the state where the application was filed for at least a year. The new law also provided that “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural born citizens.

            Mexicans, mestizos, latinos, chicanos, whatever they want to call themselves on any given day – they all belong in Mexico, not in the USA.

            People who are of ‘Hispanic’ descent own, occupy and control every inch of the territory that begins on the southern edge our US-Mexican border and which extends all the way down to the remote tip of South America.

            That land mass is far more geographic territory than which constitutes the United States, and that land is more than a sufficient amount of land for Hispanics to live in and to have complete dominion over.

            White European people – whose ancestors settled this nation and who fought and defeated their ethnic competition on a field of battle, won this land by conquest – which is precisely how all nationalities have operated since the dawn of time. Thus, if White European people have to once again, resort to physical confrontation with other competing ethnic groups to settle the question of who rightfully owns the USA, then that is very likely how this question will once again be resolved.

            White Europeans are perfectly justified to wish to remain dominant and in full control of our native homelands, in the exact same way as are Mexicans who have some of the strictest immigration laws of any nation outside of Israel.

          • Denis

            Not only the nations of origin but the numbers, Much more reasonable than importing (legally) a million plus a year of Hindu cab drivers, PRC/PLA spies, And ISIS/Al-Qaeda peppered Syrian ‘refugees’. Perhaps someone should sue the federal govt. for knowingly contributing to things like the boston bombings, Importing people from a region known as a hotbed for islamic fundamentalism..

          • AmericanRemnant

            “Who did this to us and why?”
            I know that was a rhetorical question Bon.

          • JohnEngelman

            The Immigration Reform Act of 1965 was promoted by Ted Kennedy, and signed by Lyndon Johnson, but it passed with broad bi-partisan support in both houses of Congress.

          • Irish

            Yes, and Uncle Teddy assured the Senate that the act would not change the demographics of the country..I was taught not to speak ill of the deceased..So I’ll just let you surmise my feelings on him, and the rest of his extended brood.

          • Irish

            A conflux of leftist and greedy capitalist..

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            You know who they are…just can’t name them.

          • Bossman

            Who is a Mexican? Mexico is a country in North America. Analysts at Goldman Sachs are predicting that Mexico’s economy will be in the top five by the year 2050. Toyota has just announced that it is closing an auto plant in Canada and moving to Mexico. The Germans are spending billions to expand their auto facilities in Mexico so are the big three auto makers of the USA. So the country is more than just Aztec Indians and dark-skinned Mestizos.

          • InAFreeCountry

            My main beef is with those that come here illegally and refuse to learn English or assimilate. Where I live, they have brought the barrio with them and have turned their parts of town into a vibrant trash dump.
            EDIT: 25 years ago, they were just a joke. They would come here and marry the fat white women for a green card. Now they come here in large numbers and breed prodigiously, causing a large drain on social services and infrastructure.

          • Denis

            It’s Aztec Indians and dark-skinned Meztizos performing relatively relatively simple labor over the supervision of white spaniards (look at their president), Or managers brought in from Germany or elsewhere by Benz, Toyota etc. Reminds me of Isengard..

          • Irish

            The new Dean of the University of Miami is a Mexican National names Julio Frenk..He sure isn’t a Meztiso.

          • Denis

            Surprised he isn’t Cuban.

          • Sid Ishus

            Maybe then they’ll stay on their side of the fence.

          • ElComadreja

            And all the rest from the Caribbean and south of the border.

        • ZaphodEpicurus

          And don’t anyone forget that.

        • slobotnavich

          Well, that may all be true, but what’s your point?

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            I not happily married and well into limp-dickhood…

            —slobotnavich

            What’s your point?

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Hey, Sheik. Haven’t seen you in awhile.

    • Murphcon

      You left out one thing. If we had the same demographics as 1965, there never would have been a 9/11 and the 13 year old war on terror. The Moslems would not have gotten the visas to attack us here. We’ve given them the access to attack us.

      • More important: We would be a NATION, so they would never DARE attack us. Remember the Barbary War? We had to BUILD A NAVY first, then we could go over seas and kick their asses. Imagine if we now had only a fraction of the cultural pride that we had back then? The muzzies would not have stood a chance.

      • spahnranch69 .

        1965: The Watts race-riot, the escalating war in Vietnam, the escalation in violent street crime, White flight from the cities, Johnson’s War on Poverty…………

        I’m afraid the past will not provide you with any refuge.

    • Dave West

      The only good thing I about America turning into a territory of Latin America is that at least we won’t have to listen to blacks whine about everything, because I highly doubt Brown-America will have any of it.

      • bilderbuster

        While not having to listen to Blacks whine is a slight improvement, the fact that they will still be here means all of the other never ending problems associated with a Black population will continue to plague whoever gets stuck with them.

        • Sheik Yerbouti

          Ah, but there will be a Hispanic buffer. That’s been the plan all along.

          • bilderbuster

            After living in Miami I can promise you the mannerisms and loud jibber-jabbering of the large family Latinos is no walk in the park either.

          • Irish

            My only retort would be that if I had no choice in the matter I’d far rather live in Cuban Kendell, or White-Venezuelan Doral & Weston than East La..

  • JohnEngelman

    The book has a catchy title. However, it implies that the employers who favor more immigrants are liberals. On any economic issue you can think of the vast majority of these employers are conservatives. They favor lower taxes for the rich, and fewer business regulations. They want more immigrants so that they can cut wages for American citizens.

    • The people you describe aren’t true conservatives; they’re simply selfish.

      • Luca

        John thinks all employers are republicans. I am sure he has a chart somewhere in his basement to prove that point.

        • JohnEngelman

          Not all of them. Certainly most of them.

          • Alexandra1973

            I kind of doubt it…ever been through a meeting about “diversity and inclusion”?

          • Blackfish

            Or look at the attendees at liberal fund raisers?

          • Silly Frog

            A believing conservative wouldn’t pump money into liberal politicians campaign coffers and therefore by proxy support a war against western civilization, Christianity and “old school” USA. They are for all purposes, elitist, a third group and not in the middle, in ideology, probably opposed to conservatism, not saying they are liberal, just not conservative.

          • JohnEngelman

            There are various strains of conservative thought, just as there are various strains of liberal thought.

          • Silly Frog

            I prefer my conservatives to be “conservative classic”, not the rhino version.

          • JohnEngelman

            There are conservative aspects to my thinking. I am pessimistic about human nature and human potential. I think there is often wisdom in tradition. I am skeptical about the value of abrupt political changes in any direction.

            However, to the extent that I am a conservative, mine is a conservatism that is without concern for the economic well being of the rich.

          • NoMosqueHere

            If people can’t get rich then innovation won’t happen. The guys who started Apple and Microsoft, for example, craved fame and fortune. So did the Beatles…the list goes on and on….

          • JohnEngelman

            Nearly every country with more economic inequality than the United States is a country with dirt roads, dirty drinking water, corrupt law enforcement officials, and a high murder rate.

          • spahnranch69 .

            Where do you keep that chart, Engleman?

          • Irish

            Silicon Valley

      • JohnEngelman

        They want to conserve what is for them a lucrative status quo.

        • Deacon Blue

          I take great exception to that remark and for the most part, I view
          you as an important member of this board who possesses keen
          intellect and a rational perspective most of the time.

          I worked my fingers to the bone for 20+ years and sacrificed more than you can imagine to achieve what I have attained. The implication in your comment that me wanting to preserve what I have achieved via sweat equity is somehow a great unfairness or some moral wrong is misguided.

          If I managed to make piles of gold and its enough to keep 10 generations of my family after me in wealth or allow them to accelerate the accumulation of more wealth, how is this bad? I worked for it. Meritocracy, right?

          My assets, my right to use them or abuse them as I see fit!

          • JohnEngelman

            It sounds as though you want to conserve what is for you a lucrative status quo.

          • Deacon Blue

            I do! But my inference from your post is that is somehow a bad
            thing, John. I worked 20+ years to put myself into this “lucrative status quo” and I’ll be damned if I give that up overnight without fighting tooth and nail because others who have not worked as hard are unhappy with their lot in life. That is why I take great umbrage with your remark.

            I did not roll out of bed this morning into a pile of gold
            bullion I did not have yesterday or the day before and surely
            a pile that I did not earn over many decades, John.

            Why do you think I owe anyone any part of my “pile?”
            I have already paid the require tribute to Caesar on this
            pile, why should I not be left alone with my money to do as
            I please with it?

            Please tell me you do not think I should allow the government to, without my consent, just come in and dictate how I do business, whom I do business with, how much my margins should be, and how any “excess” margin should be re-allocated to underclass Blacks and illegals?

            If that’s OK with you, John…if allowing all this to happen is part
            of “Engelman’s Grand Plan” to save the world? Than I will have to concede I made a great error in my assessment of your
            character.

            The reason being? If they are just going to come in and steal it
            from me anyhow in the end or even before the end then I have very little reason to make the sacrifices to earn it in the first place. And this means the collateral innovation and job creation will come to a grinding halt. The repercussions
            for the rest of the economy should be self evident if
            this happens to enough “Deacon Blue” people.

            I should get to keep the vast majority of what I endeavor to
            earn as a priority. My business exists to fund me and mine.
            That it throws off some taxes for the public good and
            that it provides gainful employment to a large number of
            people are both important. But not as important as feeding
            my kids. And anyone who disagrees with this is either
            not a business owner/entrepreneur or should be beatified
            by the Vatican for their blanket altruism.

            I don’t see the government or my employees risking their own
            assets to expand or improve the business either. If my
            plans to expand fail then *I* alone lose my shirt. Its my
            risk, John. The rewards if there are any should be mine
            to do with as I want outside of paying the taxes I am required
            to pay. This includes increasing number of employees
            and their compensation.

            We are located in an industrial park that houses something
            like 60-70? other medium size businesses, John. I have
            met the owners and executives of perhaps 20 of these as
            they are my neighbors here. None of them started their
            businesses under the premise that, “gee, wouldn’t this be
            a great idea for increasing employment and adding money
            to the public coffers…OK, I’ll do it!” All of them had an
            idea or two, thought, “heck, I bet if I work hard and bust my
            *ss I can make this idea into a grander idea and claw ahead
            for me and mine.”

            If you think any different, if you think that people risk their
            time and treasure to start a business for the “public good”
            then you have no idea what its like to be an entrepreneur.

            Businesses for the public good are called “non-profit businesses” John and most of them end up being tax
            exempt.

            It’s time people look less an the qualitative figure and more
            of the quantitative figure “rich” people have to pay.

            I just stroked a rather large check to Uncle Monkey and the
            Chimps yesterday. Irrespective of what my income is/was,
            the amount I paid in personal income tax would have kept
            a neighborhood of Blacks in Detroit knee deep in purple drank,
            Kool cigarettes, watermelons, crack, weed and malt
            liquor for MANY years to come. And this bothers me greatly.

            I don’t see what I am getting for my “money” so to speak.

            Understand now, John?

          • anony

            He doesn’t care; John is a “progressive” from way back. He likes the “collective” outlook for communities, forced collective, not voluntary caring for the less fortunate as we used to do it.

          • Deacon Blue

            I am for both actually. I have no real issues with “forced”
            mandated caring {obviously I have zero issues with charitable
            giving either}. The problem I have are the proverbial moving
            goal posts and changing {increasing} programs. We need and
            must have some sort of safety net for our citizens. I am fairly
            sure that most would agree to that. This can’t become a crutch
            for people who are able to work but just don’t want to though
            & it can’t be allowed to become a multi-generational method
            of survival for a family either. My feel is that increasing these
            entitlements just rewards irresponsible behavior and absolves
            people from making poor choices.

            If you tell me I need to pay X% in taxes to fund some social
            programs for communities I expect its going to be X% {or less}.
            Coming back and saying, “well, we want more programs or
            we want to increase programs that historically have failed
            so you need to pay X%+Y% now!”, is unacceptable.

            Just look at our public school mess and disaster?

            Funding has become outrageous on a per pupil basis
            and yet the outcomes of public education have been
            “less” for years now, decades even. Why would we throw
            more money at something that clearly can not be fixed with
            more money? Why should tax payers be forced to pay more
            in this instance?

            We do need to honor our commitments to our retirees as
            they have paid into the system and deserve to take out of
            it what has been promised to them.

            I don’t feel we, as US citizens, owe the people of Guatemala
            or El Salvador ANYTHING even if they made the “dangerous”
            trip to illegally cross our border. Well, we owe them a
            quick deportation hearing. 🙂 That’s about it.

            Again, social programs that reward bad {illegal} behavior is
            just something I do not want to support/fund with my tax dollars.

          • anony

            I generally agree with you. Able-bodied people should have to work for anything they get from the government. There’s always plenty of work to be done.

          • Deacon Blue

            Cool. There is plenty of infrastructure repair needed for roads,
            bridges and public parks that needs to be done.

          • InAFreeCountry

            Shiftless people that contribute absolutely nothing to society that are able-bodied should at least clean up the trash around their neighborhood, go work on a crew filling potholes, SOMETHING to earn their free gibs.

          • JohnEngelman

            Understand now, John?

            – Deacon Blue

            The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

            – John Kenneth Galbraith

          • Deacon Blue

            That’s actually a pretty good quote and there is a fair amount
            of truth in it. You still are avoiding answering me directly though.

            I consider myself to be economically conservative. I don’t
            need to repeat my position. And my argument is one that others
            hold as true. If you hold a contrarian viewpoint please consider
            being less passive-aggressive in your reply and just be more
            direct. Enlighten me as to why I am incorrect?

            Why should I just roll over and give up all my stuff for something
            others consider “altruism” John?

          • JohnEngelman

            You can’t be converted. Nevertheless, others in your tax bracket can see beyond their economic interests.

            “The Hidden Agenda of the Political Mind” was recently reviewed on American Renaissance. It pointed out that vast majority of the Harvard graduating class of 1977 is in the upper two percent of incomes, and that six out of seven vote Democrat.

            Those who vote Democrat are voting for higher taxes, because the Democrats will raise the top tax rate if they get the power to do so.

          • Deacon Blue

            They won’t raise taxes on the special interests who lobby
            and support them. So an MIT graduate who is pro-global
            warming and pro-green energy will surely be rewarded with
            tax deduction and tax credits for his company and more broadly,
            for the industry segment he earns his money in.

            If you do not think big business/Wall Street is not cozy with
            Hillary and Bill then you need to look again.

            So they are voting for higher taxes for others. Not themselves,
            As the IRS tax code is so convoluted and full of loopholes
            that such people as you note have an army of CPA’s and lawyers
            to take full well advantage of such.

            GRIT and GRAT trusts John? You need more examples of
            tax shelters and schemes embraced by high earning Dems?

            Sure, a flat tax is not perfect but it least its simple, fair and
            best of all, pretty damned transparent.

            We could wipe out the income tax code {all 80K+ pages}
            and replace it with one page that is easy for all to understand.

            You don’t agree I assume.

            You’re incorrect. I could be converted. If the Dems offered
            some real reason that differed from the Repubs.

            Both agree greedy and myopic. The DNC is just more
            latent and deceptive with their chicanery and manipulations.

          • JohnEngelman

            During the Eisenhower administration the top tax rate was 91 percent. Even though few people paid that much, the rich paid more of their money in taxes than they do now. A high top tax rate gives the government more control over the economic behavior of the rich.

            I do not see any reason for tax loopholes at all. I am also in favor of government financing for political campaigns. I want to reduce the power of money in American politics.

          • Deacon Blue

            >I do not see any reason for tax loopholes at all. I am also in >favor of government financing for political campaigns. I want >to reduce the power of money in American politics.

            Now see John? We actually agree on some thing related
            to economics, taxes and politics after all.

          • carriewhite64

            As a small business owner, I agree with you completely. I’m in a community small business organization. Most of the non-profit “businesses” are tax shelters pure and simple. The owners who legitimately make money in their businesses believe and behave as you do. Everyone knows it.

      • The same can be said about those describing the actions of intolerant and zealous anti-Americans(anti-Whites) as being liberal.

    • Publius Pompilius Quietus

      Such employers may be conservative in the sense that they support the Republican Party. But immigration enthusiasts are not authentically conservative in a Burkean sense.

      • JohnEngelman

        There are few Burkean conservatives in the Republican Party. There are reactionaries who want to repeal the New Deal reforms. There are also right wing radicals who want to try untested economic experiments.

        • Publius Pompilius Quietus

          Yes, there are some Burkean conservatives in the Republican Party, but they are very few. Most would suppose that privatization is not a comparably important goal compared to opposing leftist social-engineering. And they certainly aren’t promoting mass immigration to reduce wages, as you suggested.

          • JohnEngelman

            I got this from the Chamber of Commerce website:

            “Are immigrants good for the economy?

            “In the debate over immigration reform, we come back to this argument again and again. The answer is still, “Yes.”…

            “Despite their best attempts, immigration reform critics can’t refute the abundant research available showing that immigrants create jobs and strengthen our economy. All the more reason to fix our broken immigration system.”

            ———-

            No, the Chamber of Commerce is not a Democratic constituency.

          • Alexandra1973

            I’m sure there are more jobs for prison wardens and guards.

          • Deacon Blue

            Go to a local CoC luncheon. Most country and city groups
            meet monthly. Gather your own data, John.

          • JohnEngelman

            Most of the folks at those luncheons are Republicans, aren’t they? They also want more immigration, don’t they?

          • Deacon Blue

            Irrelevant. Are you implying you can learn nothing from attending
            such a luncheon?

          • anony

            It’s certainly not conservative.

          • JohnEngelman

            There are varieties of conservatism. The variety that gets its way in the United States is the variety that says we should do everything that is in the interest of the business community. That is to say, the employer – investor class.

          • spahnranch69 .

            What happened to all the Rockefeller Republicans?

          • Irish

            They’re Dems now.

    • dmxinc

      You are still confused John.

      • JohnEngelman

        What am I confused about? What did I say that is not true?

        • Luca

          You said conservatives favor lower taxes on the rich. Conservatives favor lower taxes for everyone.

          You’re not confused, you’re spouting left-wing talking points.

          • JohnEngelman

            During the Reagan administration the top tax rate declined from 70 to 28 percent. Nevertheless taxes that are fairly flat, rose.

          • Deacon Blue

            How about a flat tax on income across the board with zero
            loopholes or deductions, John? Everyone pays 17.5% or 20% or whatever the number is. How about a national consumption tax?

            The progressive tax system allows too many people to
            evade paying taxes at all (income) and yet these people can in theory when their numbers are large enough vote themselves a larger chunk of my money for their benefit.

          • JohnEngelman

            A flat tax will raise taxes on most Americans, including lower income white Republicans.

          • Deacon Blue

            Maybe. But at least then everyone has some skin in the game.

          • JohnEngelman

            Tell white blue collar Republicans you want their “skin in the game,” and watch them return to the Democratic Party.

          • Deacon Blue

            I can’t see it. Nope. Not in its {DNC’s} current iteration.
            Don’t infer I am in lust or love with the RNC either. Both parties
            are ineffective and have agendas I am not wild about.

            Just RNC > DNC for sure. That should not be construed though
            as a tacit approval of the RNC. Just they are the lesser of the
            two evils, John.

            I don’t see Joe The Plumber or Bob The HVAC Guy voting for
            the majority of the candidates the DNC has put forth as of late.

            They may not be happy with their lot in life but they recognize
            they will be far unhappier when Pedro The Plumber or
            Hector The HVAC Guy is doing their jobs – illegally I might add –
            for less than half the going rate.

            You know, they want to protect that “status quo” you were
            bemoaning elsewhere…inasmuch as they can.

          • JohnEngelman

            If the Republican nominee tells white blue collar workers he wants to raise their taxes – because that is what a flat tax will do – I am confident Hillary will win in a landslide. Just wait and see.

          • Deacon Blue

            And Democrats do not want to raise the taxes of White, blue
            collar workers, John? Elaborate.

          • JohnEngelman

            Democrats want a more progressive tax system. If you must know, so do I.

            I may be wearing out my welcome on this thread, so I will give you the last word. I think each of us has made our opinions clear.

          • Deacon Blue

            Fair enough. I appreciate your honesty. I disagree about a
            more progressive tax system but I admit I can see why some
            find it appealing and necessary. For sure, if I were a poor,
            illegal alien with limited opportunities in the country who
            benefited from American generosity I may see things
            differently than I do. Same if I were Black and poor or
            even White and a truck driver.

            Perspective is relative as you well know. I feel a progressive
            tax system establishes a tangible risk to productivity and
            innovation. At a tax rate of 93% {or even 70%} I would
            find it difficult to justify to continue working.

            If at some point I get to keep only 7% of what I bring to the
            table with 100% of my efforts than I would probably stop
            working {or find a way to reduce my income} at that point
            and spend my time lounging on the beach somewhere in
            the tropics while sipping a rum laced concoction until the
            proverbial tax clock reset to zero again.

            Our opinions are clear. Thank you. I am being quite genuine
            when I write that too.

          • Speedy Steve

            This conservative hates seeing his excessive taxes subsidize sloth.

          • spahnranch69 .

            But if the rich pay less in taxes the difference has to be made up somewhere. And that difference always winds up being paid by the ever-shrinking middle-class.

          • Deacon Blue

            Why do people feel that those who by hard work and diligence and
            IQ (or a combination of all three) manage to “become rich”
            somehow should be forced to pay a higher marginal tax rate for
            their success? The difference can be “made up” in reducing or
            eliminating some of the wasteful and useless “social engineering”
            programs our government has foisted upon us.

          • Luca

            How about the difference being made up by politicians spending less on their pets and pet projects?

            The top 5% of income earners paid about 59% of all the income tax the Federal Government took in for Tax Year 2012. The top half of income earners paid 97.2% while the bottom half only contributed 2.8% of federal revenue from income taxes.

            Top income earners are taxed at vastly disproportionate rates. The uber-rich can fight back with tax shelters and fancy lawyers. The rest get nailed.

            The government punishes success and rewards failure. This completely defies common sense. Success should be encouraged.

        • dmxinc

          For one, you continue to believe that there is a measurable amount of redeeming qualities springing from Leftist politicians.

          They are not for the “little guy.”

          They are not trying to make America a better place for Americans, only for themselves.

          Many, maybe most, actively work against the interests of White Americans and are proud of it.

          If the Right came out and asked for millions more immigrants, amnesty for all those here, 90% tax rates, more government agencies, more Affirmative Action and quotas, more power for the IRS, mandatory White Privilege training for all Americans, an end to homeschooling and other dwindling freedoms Americans currently enjoy, the Leftist politicians would fall all over themselves trying to be the first to implement these proposals.

          You don’t know the animal you are in bed with.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have known more leftists than you have. I think I know them better. I do not recognize them in your description. You are projecting your hostility onto them.

          • dmxinc

            John, I have known them and fought against them for 35 years.

            They are as I have described and worse.

            I am not projecting.

            I have witnessed their actions firsthand.

            Apparently, you are too close to the trees to see the forest.

          • Rob

            Ignore John. He is a troll here an from his previous comments you can see that he is not with us.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am not with you. Be sure of it.

          • Rob

            I am 1000%%% sure.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have known good people and bad people of many political persuasions.

          • TruthBeTold

            I have witnessed the destruction they leave where the enact their policies. Schools, cities, neighborhoods all fail under liberal democrat administrations.

          • Deacon Blue

            Obama and his team surely qualify as Leftists. Do you dispute
            this, John?

            Obama and his team can not be described as anything but
            “pro-3rd world immigration,” would you deny this too?

            Obama and his team absolutely are for increased government
            oversight, increased government meddling in business, more
            AA, more “forced diversity,” etc.

            You are an empiricist from what I have read on this board.
            How is it you can dispute that Leftist are not “pro” all this
            when the Leftists wielding power brazenly state that these
            are their objectives?

          • LHathaway

            Well, I’m a ‘conservative’ and I have a few wacky ideas of my own – a lot of them. Our own Mr. John Engelman is a liberal who is against most immigration. We have few better friends.

          • Deacon Blue

            I respect John quite a bit. His comments are usually well
            thought out and grounded in inductive as well as deductive
            reasoning. He understand and gravitates to empirical data.
            And he call it like he see it. Can’t say he’s dishonest.

            But sometime, my experiences and John’s are quite
            divergent regarding an issue like the one herein.

            I am hoping – maybe – that he may read about my experiences
            and opinions and perhaps they may “modulate” his own a bit.

            I tend to be more of a pragmatic libertarian on social issues
            and more “race realist/true conservative” regarding
            economic. However, where the social and economic
            intersect I most often defer to race realist/conservative
            over libertarian.

            I also realize that some here may not appreciate me appearing
            out of thin air and making a splash in this pool.

            Tough cookies.

            I say it as I see it – for better or worse. Thus far? My instincts
            have served me well in life. I see no reason to change such.

          • throttler

            He actually voted for Obama.

          • Deacon Blue

            No way!!!

          • anony

            Twice.

          • David Ashton

            And he would prefer to live in Israel OR Red China….!!

          • JohnEngelman

            More immigration is also the goal of the Chamber of Commerce, as I have pointed out. The Chamber of Commerce is quite brazen about this objective.

          • Deacon Blue

            Not at the local level. It maybe at the national level but my
            observations having attended supernumerary lunch and learn
            events locally by our CoC is that the message is that unfettered
            and unchecked that immigration is a bad thing. This is why
            I suggested you contact your local CoC and see if you can go
            to their next get together and meet some of the folks who own
            small businesses. My experiences is in diametric opposition to
            what you’re writing. Empiric evidence, John?

          • JohnEngelman

            You probably listen to people you agree with. I already quoted the Chamber of Commerce website. Here is that quote again:

            ———

            U.S. Chamber Comments on USCIS’ Proposed Guidance on L-1B Classification for Intracompany Transfers – March 25, 2015

            WASHINGTON, D.C.— U.S. Chamber of Commerce Senior Vice President of Labor, Immigration, and Employee Benefits Randel K. Johnson issued the following statement today on the new proposed guidance from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to bring consistency to the L-1B classification for intracompany transfers…

            Immigrants are good for the economy – December 5, 2014

            Are immigrants good for the economy?

            In the debate over immigration reform, we come back to this argument again and again. The answer is still, “Yes.”…

            Want a pay raise? Ask your employer to hire more immigrant scientists…

            Come One, Come All – Shrinking American cities are increasingly betting their economic futures on immigration – May 8, 2014…

            I am president and chief executive officer of the Ohio Hotel & Lodging Association, which represents nearly 600 members across Ohio. Hotels are one of the largest segments of the $36 billion Ohio tourism industry, the fourth-largest industry in Ohio.

            From front-desk clerks to hotel owners, immigrants are an important part of our industry’s work force. I urge Congress to act to fix the immigration system so it works for the U.S. economy, and the sooner, the better. Business owners need clarity from the government.

    • FozzieT

      I’ve read Ms. Coulter’s columns, and she does not seem to shy away from calling out the employers who favor more immigrants. She absolutely identifies them as conservative/Republican-chamber of commerce types. She belittles them for being wealthy landowners who hire peasants at below-market wages in order to increase their profits.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Landlords are especially hooked on the 3rd World hack labor. I’ve noticed most of them look to be jacked-up on methamphetamine most of the time. Those landlords are creating ticking time-bombs who will eventually become wards of the state, sucking the taxpayers dry.

      • JohnEngelman

        I hope she does that in her book.

        If she does, a more honest title for her book would be, “How the Plutocracy Intends to Benefit Itself at Your Expense.”

    • Deacon Blue

      I disagree, John, but will admit that some of the really uber-elite may want this.
      I am an employer. I would seal our borders to ALL immigration for at least 18
      months until a cogent and implementable plan could be developed, written
      into law and put into force. My company is not employing tens of thousands
      but there are a lot of 25-150 FTE employers – like me – who feel as I do.

      I had lunch with CEO’s/COO’s of these type of companies today.

      I suggest you attend a Chamber of Commerce meeting or join the local Rotary
      Club and you will see that small to medium sized companies are anti-immigration.

      I favor lower and fewer taxes for all. And if you do not think the current regulatory burden is onerous and anti-business you might wish to reflect on this awhile.

      The average turn time for inventory in my business has almost doubled under
      Obama/Jarrett due to more government rules, edicts, inspections and
      harassment. That hurts me from a cash flow through top/bottom line
      analysis. It prevents me from expanding my business as I would like to,
      perhaps paying higher wages than we do for Americans.

      Its all very connected, John.

      • JohnEngelman

        I favor lower and fewer taxes for all.

        – Deacon Blue

        You probably also oppose deficit spending. Since the presidency of Ronald Reagan you should have learned that it is not possible to cut government spending without cutting or eliminating government spending programs most Republican voters will insist on keeping.

        • Deacon Blue

          No. But I do oppose wasteful spending and I do oppose kicking
          the proverbial can down the road for my kids and grandkids to
          deal with. There are situations that may require a deficit.
          But the deficit can not be permanent or the debt just keeps
          accruing. How do you pay down or off this debt? Do you think
          you can just pile on more taxes and fees? That has economic
          implications too, John. Its more complex than you’re two
          sentence reply. But I am 100% sure you are aware of this.

          So tell me, do you think that all of these social programs are
          meritorious and there is no fat to be trimmed or even overt,
          largesse that is a bit insulting to the tax payers? Should not
          the government be held to have a fiduciary responsibility to
          its citizens not to bankrupt the country?

          • Luca

            Wasteful spending? Tsk, tsk. You must be one of those mean-spirited types who doesn’t want to give your fair share to the ‘unfortunates’.

            You need to work harder so liberals can take the fruits of your labors and solve income inequality. You see, illegals who just crossed the border are not making as much as you and obviously that is just not fair. And neither is Lo’Quiesha with her 6 babies and no husband living at your income level. They are victims of racism and she can’t work, and the government has no interest in going after the 6 sperm donors because they are probably in prison anyway. Again, poor Lo’Quiesha needs for you to put up your fair share. I hope you realize that the cost of weaves, pedicures, Kools, and Colt 45 has risen dramatically since her grandmother started the family tradition of collecting welfare back in the 60’s.

            The really good news is, all these ‘unfortunates’ sucking on the teat of the taxpayers will gladly vote for any zany liberal who tells them they are victims of rich, White, neo-cons and to stay home and collect benefits. I believe Marx would call this ‘class-warfare’.

            So please, stop whining and get a second job, or perhaps a third. You need to abandon your privilege and share your good fortune with others. Afterall, sharing your weath promotes diversity and we all know how enriching that is.

          • Deacon Blue

            >Wasteful spending? Tsk, tsk. You must be one of those mean->spirited types who doesn’t want to give your fair share to the >’unfortunates’.

            Yes, I am the spitting image of an albino Grinch.
            Scrooge was White, yes? Aren’t all of us Whites, especially
            those of Scottish descent, penny pinching, skin flints?

            Just imagine if we were Scottish and Jewish how mean
            spirited and greedy we would be?

            >You need to work harder so liberals can take the fruits of your >labors and solve income inequality. You see, illegals who just >crossed the border are not making as much as you and >obviously that is just not fair.

            Wow. Thanks for clearing that up. Life must be absolutely
            fair. No matter what. Because if its not fair we’re not all
            equal. And that would be bad. I will take your kind advice
            good sir and go to work even harder so the La Raza crowd
            can stay at home, make more babies for me to support,
            and complain even more about what a selfish do*che bag
            I am.

            >Again, poor Lo’Quiesha needs for you to put up your fair >share. I hope you realize that the cost of weaves, pedicures, >Kools, and Colt 45 has risen dramatically since her >grandmother started the family tradition of collecting welfare >back in the 60’s.

            Gotcha! I’m all over it. Just for my personal edification
            because I see the term thrown out all the time, exactly what
            is a “weave” and why is it needed? OK, I don’t need to know
            why its needed, I just need to pay for it, correct? But please
            can I at least be told what the heck it is?

            >I believe Marx would call this ‘class-warfare’.

            I loved Groucho, Harpo, Chico, Gummo & Zeppo.
            Their humor was a mainstay in my granddad’s house.
            To think they would go and sell me out like this…

            >So please, stop whining and get a second job, or perhaps a >third. You need to abandon your privilege and share your >good fortune with others. Afterall, sharing your wealth >promotes diversity and we all know how enriching that is.

            I feel enriched already. Would you kindly send me a fancy
            piece of paper that reads “Bachelor of Arts in Diversity
            Studies?” I feel I have earned it, if not formally by spending
            money I don’t have and can’t pay back at some ‘for profit’
            internet based university then by reading your thoughtful
            posts. I feel there is great value in “earning” such an
            academic credential. I am confident that if I really put more
            effort into it and fork over every dime I have that I can
            earn other equally useful degrees. Perhaps one in
            African-American Studies or Wymyn’s Studies or even…if
            I am truly among the blessed, a graduate degree in the
            LBGQT {did I get it correct?} Studies.

            Then I can reflect and decide I am really a woman in a man’s
            body who is a lesbian that identifies as about 2/3rds across
            the gender spectrum towards male, on alternating Tuesdays
            but really about 1/2 way across the scale most of the time.

            DON’T JUDGE ME EITHER! I want to marry a man, a woman
            and my horse. All at the same time! And if you do not agree
            and embrace this then you’re just a narrow minded bigot.

            You can cater the wedding too. OK? 😉

          • Luca

            Doh! You out-sarcastic-ed-ed-ed me. Very good.

          • JohnEngelman

            It is not possible to make significant cuts in the federal budget without cutting or eliminating programs most Americans, and at least a plurality of Republicans will insist on keeping. These include Social Security, Medicare, military pensions, farm subsidies, and business subsidies.

            Republicans learned that during the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. They will learn it again if they sweep the next election.

          • Deacon Blue

            OK John, I will bite. What’s the solution? Is there a solution,
            John?

          • JohnEngelman

            When the top tax fluctuated from 94 to 70 percent the national debt as a percentage of gross domestic product declined. The national debt has only become a problem since Ronald Reagan promised dishonestly that tax cuts for the rich would balance the budget.

            President Clinton raised taxes on the rich and left office with a budget surplus. President Bush cut taxes for the rich while starting two wars he could not win. Once again the national debt is a problem.

          • Deacon Blue

            This is disingenuous and you know it. Nice try.

            Three Card Monty by John Engelman?

            So your boy Obama, what has happened to our debt under
            his reign as Kaizer? When does it stop becoming the problem
            of Reagan or Bush {not that I necessarily agree with you, I am
            humoring you for the sake of argument} and when does it
            become the problem of the current occupant of the Oval Office?

            Better still, when and how do we resolve the problem?

            You are quite adept at replying without providing an answer
            to the question(s) posed to you. Shall we call you the
            “Artful Dodger” then, John?

            Lay out your position on how this gets resolved please?

            We ALL know you surely have one. I promise to keep
            an open mind and agree to examine your proposals
            fairly. For real. Maybe I will learn something?

            Just do not blame an intransigent Republican Congress in your
            reply. Obama had a Democratic majority for his first two
            years and got the ACA passed via sheer deception and
            the stupidity of the average American. And the deficit
            is increasing as we read all this.

            Such glib remarks as “Obama has reduced the rate that
            the deficit is increasing and its less than yesterday” will
            also result on you being called to task. It still increasing, John.

            Thanks buddy.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have pointed out that the national debt only became a problem when the top tax rate was reduced under Ronald Reagan, that Clinton raised the top tax rate and left office with a budget surplus, and that Bush returned the country to deficit spending while cutting taxes while starting two wars.

            Those are facts. Those facts have obvious political implications, but I will let others draw their own conclusions from those facts.

            Tax cuts for the rich to not lead to jobs for the unemployed. they mean tax increases for everyone else (the flat tax you advocate will do that) they mean cuts in government spending programs that benefit most Americans, and/or more national debt.

            If the Democrat Party can make that clear to lower income white Americans the Democrat Party can dominate the country.

          • Deacon Blue

            And I have pointed out that a president you have apparently
            voted for twice now owns the largest national debt in the history
            of national debts, more than doubling since he was coronated.

            A debt which is larger than the accrued debt of all American presidents that came before him since the history of American presidents began!

            A fact {it is} you just ignore and overlook. Don’t feel like
            discussing that, John?

            A flat tax will not be a tax cut for all the wealthy. If its set at
            17.5% with zero loopholes and deductions even Mitt Romney,
            the archetype, evil, wealthy, out-of-touch White privilege
            stereotype the Left likes to erroneously put in their tragic
            proletariat narrative will have to pay substantially more than
            he has in the past.

            Show me where I am incorrect, John?

            Thanks.

  • I’m going to make a bold audacious prediction:

    Fox News Channel won’t invite her on to tout this book, not a once.

    • dmxinc

      And the Left has the nerve to say Fox is “far right.”

      • Publius Pompilius Quietus

        FOX News is an echo-chamber of neoconservatism, which is right-wing liberalism. That is, they agree with all the assumptions of the liberal establishment (e.g., that all humans are equal, tribalism/nationalism is primitive, the trajectory of history is toward democracy, and so on). The neocons differ with the Left, however, in that they want to stop liberalism where it is; meanwhile, the Left is constantly delving into more absurd versions of itself. For example, the necons supported civil unions for homosexual couples, so the Left proposed gay merriage. Now that the neocons are close to accepting gay marriage, the Left is pushing transsexualism. All in all, in the juxtaposition of right-wing liberalism and left-wing liberalism, the neocons are right-wing.

        Of course, that ignores authentic conservatives like myself.

        • ekwaykway

          I sure miss William F. Buckley Jr.

          • jayvbellis

            I don’t.

            Buckley sold out.

          • David Ashton

            He was OK at first. Most “con” groups and publications in the Anglosphere seem to have been “progressively” neo-conned.

          • anony

            It seems that the neo-cons began to systematically co-opt the conservative movement, such as it was, in the early ’70s. They are complete control of the “Right” now which is why I think there is not really a “two-party” system here, rather a system with some “throw away” wedge issues to make it appear to be a two-party system.

          • David Ashton

            Your last sentence makes a good point, true in the UK also, where we are stuck not only with a first-past-the-post system but also moribund local associations and a limited print media; in the US debate is actually freer, better informed and more lively. Our national legislation permits (for example) only multiracial political parties.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Yes, they have drifted terribly left as of late.

    • stonepillow

      I suspect you’re right (no pun intended.) P.S. Coulter is the best – original research and like General Forest sharpens her sabre all the way from the point to the hilt.

    • shatwood

      ???? Hannity will definitely have her on. She appears on Fox and Friends especially when she has a book to promote. She occasionally goes on O’Reilly as well.

      This book is going to include many things she has ALREADY said, and many of the same things she has already said on Fox News several times such as liberals not changing minds, they just changed who the voters are. What? They’re not going to include her now just because the thing she’s already said on the network are now in print?

      Fox News won’t have ANN COULTER on?! She’s a huge hit for ratings.

      Of course they’re going to have her on to discuss this book. It’s not even a question that they’ll have her on several of their shows to discuss her book.

      • Kenner

        She was on The Kelly File the other night. But this book is hot a potato for a network that ties itself in knots so as not to appear ‘racist’.

        • shatwood

          Coulter is who she is. She’s doesn’t shy away from what she thinks. The network knows this. If Fox News was so concerned with not appearing racist, they would never have her on in the first place.

          • bilderbuster

            She totally avoids Tribal power even though as an admirer of Joseph Sobran she is fully aware of their many sins against Christianity and White people.

          • shatwood

            Well, whatever. I don’t know. Not saying you’re wrong.

            Anyway, point is we’ll all be seeing a lot of her on Fox News promoting her book.

        • bilderbuster

          Kelly believes in White Privilege.

          • throttler

            Yes, she often annoys me a lot. She is not pro-white enough.

          • bilderbuster

            I was visiting my parents when she stated correctly that Santa Claus was White and there was a “controversy”.
            The next night she ended up agreeing with some stupid Black reporter that Santa could be Black.
            She couldn’t even take the heat and defend Santa and she claims to have a law degree.

          • anony

            There’s a place in the struggle for deception. If she “David Duked” on national tv, that would end her career probably.

            We need to “fight smart”.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        With Ann and O’Reilly it turns into a big ego fest.

    • Caucasoid88

      Half of Fox News’s audience are Hispanics with traditional family values, right-wing leanings, and patriotic beliefs (act of love) … don’t you know?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Oh, Hannity promised her a segment.

  • propagandaoftruth

    redefining the American Right as a patriotic, pro-worker, and populist movement
    ———————–
    Tall order that.

    • BloodofAlbion75

      “Tall order that.”

      Yes,but not an impossible one.

      Know hope.

    • spahnranch69 .

      When was the Right ever patriotic, pro-worker and populist?

      • propagandaoftruth

        There was a time, not Camelot, but a better time…

        I’m a former Dem, former Prog (American Marxist). I don’t know what I am now, but I’m not an effin’ Marxist, lol.

        I don’t hate an active gubbamint per se, but a politicized, intrusive, meritless, Marxist ideologized, genocidal… Where was I? This thing we groan under, I hate it.

        For example I like the best of both worlds, a solid social safety net and a vibrant free market sector – I don’t think the two are mutually exclusive – quite the opposite if well balanced, competently run.

        It’s the ideology of my gubbamint and its inherent resultant hostility to me, to Truth, much less to common sense.

        You know…common sense.

        At least I’m beyond “left” and “right”.

      • Lexonaut

        When Henry Ford opened the River Rouge plant to make the Model T cars that obsoleted the horse in the USA..

        Ford took iron ore in at one end of the plant and put finished cars out at the other. In between he staffed the plant with highly paid hourly manufacturing employees, equipping them with the tools and machines they needed to be highly productive so he could afford to pay them well.

        The communist left emasculated Ford and then went on to ruin the entire US auto industry.

        • anony

          “The communist left”, bolsheviks, took control of Russia and systematically murdered millions upon millions of people.

      • Cliven Owens

        excellent point Spahn. We need to get rid of this left-right paradigm and get to work on what’s best for us and not for the lobby groups and corporations. Democracy is a flowery version of communism – plain and simple.

  • Johann Wald

    Ann and her fellow “conservatives” such as Pat Buchanan do a good job within limits but they really need to step up, quit dancing around the elephant in the living room and start naming who’s truly behind this idiocy instead of blaming it disingenuously on the “left”, “neocons” etc.

    • Brady

      Who’s behind it is far less important than what should be done about it.

      • Whitetrashgang

        No.

      • Johann Wald

        To the contrary… “Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.”
        Sun Tzu

    • HJ11

      It begins with you and with me and with each one of us individually. No disrespect intended but if any of us urge some others to step up and do what we think is needed, we must also be standing up right where we are and in the best way we can.

    • Deacon Blue

      I don’t agree. We need people along “the spectrum” to appeal to those who
      have not woken up to the full reality of this situation. Ann and Pat are great
      starts for potential, neophyte race realists. The message gets blurred when
      some of the more “hardliners” start to spout off. Let them start with Ann and Pat.
      In time, many may migrate further to our cause as they recognize the truth and
      path put in front of them,

  • USofAntiWhite

    I love the title, it will piss off the lefties, progs, anti-Whites and La Razas… the truth always does.

    • Speedy Steve

      I’d buy a copy for the title alone. You can learn a lot about a man by looking at his book collection. I’d place it next to Slouching Toward Gomorrah by Robert Bork.

      • I have that one! It is framed on one side by Camp of the Saints and on the other by White Identity, to name but three. It’s fun watching visitors’ reaction to my bookshelves.

  • Luca

    She is absolutely correct. The left loves to engineer a crises and then claim they have the solution (usually more spending) if only the huddled masses will vote for them.

    Immigration should not only be stopped, it should be reversed. The problem is, government needs ever larger numbers of warm bodies to fuel their Ponzi scheme (Social Security and now healthcare)

  • TheMaskedUnit

    Never underestimate the GOP power to pretend their candidate is opposed to the democrats.

  • Cliven Owens

    I would love to see Ann Coulter write a book about Jewish power. Only then will I support her and support her campaign.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      That book has already been written and written well: The Culture of Critique.

      • Cliven Owens

        Read the trilogy and loved every book!

    • Deacon Blue

      I may get bashed for this but if I can’t speak truth then I am no good to anyone,
      especially myself. There is little doubt that Jews worldwide hold a disproportionate amount of power and influence when compared to their sheer numbers of what? ~20,000,000 or so worldwide. But not all of them are enemies of White people and I would argue to the teeth that plenty of them ARE White people. I have known many from Israel who are nothing like the NYC liberal, cultural Marxist detritus ruining the country and by extension, the world.

      Most of the WN I see Jew bashing are bashing Jews for all of the very same
      things they claim to want for Whites but just are unwilling to grab and do.
      Jealousy? It is walks and talks like a duck…

      Any Jew who is pro-diversity, pro-3rd world massive immigration into
      predominantly White nations, and stands for Progressivist, Leftist, Socialist
      infrastructure is absolutely my enemy. The same as any gentile, Black, Brown,
      Asian or anyone who stands for such. And any Jew who agrees that “Whites”
      do not coexist well with Blacks/Browns and is anti-diversity and anti-immigration
      I view as a natural ally.

      I have been accused as a Christian Zionist and as a Jew here by White
      Nationalists – I am neither nor do I fully agree with either of their perspectives
      all the time or in some cases, part of the time. But that does not mean I
      will close the door on folks who want to meet me on common grounds to
      achieve a goal of preserving White culture, heritage and civilization.

      • Cliven Owens

        As White genocide continues to worsen with non-White immigration, miscegenation, feminism, Liberalism, and anti-White sentiment stemming from the controlled mainstream media, at some point, Whites have got to stand up and unite as a race.

        What you said should be discussed more often on this site, but I’ll leave it at that. Well said. Keep up the good fight.

        • spahnranch69 .

          CUI BONO?

        • Deacon Blue

          And there in lays the problem. The petty infighting over “who”
          qualifies as “White” and obsessiveness of genetic testing like
          23&me, etc., smaller, extraneous and axillary issues are more
          of a threat to all of us than anything else. If we can not find
          a common cause with that being preserving White heritage
          and culture then the battle is already lost.

          Better we should set aside the rest, solve this issue and then
          come back and decide the issue about “Jews” and who is
          “White” and what I would consider, “smaller points.”

          Agreed?

          • Cliven Owens

            I agree with your position. A common cause that focuses on White interests are going to be paramount above all else.

            How do we accomplish this without jeopardizing our cause?

            Well for one, we should avoid genetic testing. Disputing who is White and who is non-White is the wrong way to approach this issue. Even with the advancement of science, genetic identification is not only trivial, but it’s trying to square the circle. Whites are not going to accomplish anything by drawing blood and examining it. Since the fall of the Roman Empire, a lot of race-mixing has taken place between Whites and non-Whites and the fact that Christianity promotes miscegenation makes it very difficult to maintain a discriminatory system.

            Secondly, we should as a White ethnic group be able to come up with ideas by organizing a political movement focused on White interests. Since there is NO movement here in America that I am aware of we will have to find a way to initiate it ourselves.

            How do we get there? Not sure to be honest. Thankfully, many Whites are concerned about our future and would like to contribute in any way they can.

            I think the best thing we can do now is to mitigate the infighting (like you said) and only focus on our cause and our future. We know what the “special” minority wants and they chose to be our adversaries. Heck, “they” have been our adversaries for thousands of years and time and again White civilizations have crumbled as a result.

            So, because many of us know this, we should learn from history and avoid the same fate. Simple as that.

          • Deacon Blue

            We need more folks like you to “take up the cause” because
            elsewhere, the petty bickering and trying to measure “Whiteness”
            down to a gnat’s c*nt hair wastes time and resources.

            You “get it” which in my eyes, makes you rare {and wise}.

            Kudos CO.

      • Sid Ishus

        Read Culture of Critique by Kevin McDonald and revisit this discussion.

      • ViktorNN

        Jews are quick to claim to be white when it suits them, but everyone knows that behind closed doors they do not consider themselves the same as “white people” at all. They see us as dumb, boring, repressed, uncultured, and here to be ripped off.

        • Deacon Blue

          “everyone knows?” Guess I am just like half a retard then
          since I, a non-Jew and non-Christian Zionist have dined in the
          homes of many Israelis in Haifa and have had very frank
          discussion with these folks after a few hits of Scotch.

          The more secular Jews who hail from Spain, Portugal,
          and Italy {the non-Khazarian types} do view themselves
          as racially White and religiously Jewish even if they
          are not exactly Talmudic scholars. Or follow all the rules.

          Not all Jews are fundamentalists in the same way that not
          all Christians are fundamentalists. There are plenty of “back
          slid” Jews who absolutely view Black & Browns as a menace
          that can not assimilate well into White or Western culture.

          I have not been ripped off by any of the Israeli Jews I do business with. I can’t say the same for Indians or Asians or even “non-Jew Whites.” Although I recognize that past
          performance is not always indicative of future behavior.

          I see them as they see themselves: White first, Israeli
          second, Jewish third. Until they give me reason to doubt
          them I will take them at their word.

          And FWIW? I have witnessed many members of my own
          extended family on the Scottish side view themselves
          as “White” until they get into clannish behavior and then
          of course they don’t consider themselves “White first”
          but “Scotsman before all.”

          So let’s not move the goal posts for the Jews or any other
          group of self-identifying Whites. Fair?

          I am sure we likely concur that the NYC group of elitist,
          “do as I say, not as I do” Jews are likely the enemy of all
          things White. But not all Jews live in NYC.

          Fair?

          • ViktorNN

            As you said, I guess you’re half retarded.

          • Deacon Blue

            Guess so. That probably dq’s me from your master race plan
            of world domination in the future. Shucks!

          • ViktorNN

            The master race plan says that half retarded people may qualify for carrying boxes of ammo.

            So you’re not dq’ed. Yet.

          • Deacon Blue

            Thank you. I appreciate that. Truly so.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            There aren’t many non-Khazarian types. Since they all hail from the Khazar region, the Caucasus Mountain range. The Mizrahi, Sephardic, and Ashkenazi all hail from that Caucasus Neanderthal holdout group.

          • Deacon Blue

            The Spanish/Portugese/Italian/Russian immigrants and their descendants that I met in Haifa are absolutely not the “same” as the more German/Austrian/UK types regarding their political
            orientation and general philosophy. If you want to get bogged
            down with genotype and phenotype we’re probably not going
            to see eye-to-eye…and that’s fine. If they look White, act White,
            self-ID as White and are willing for help champion White
            causes, preserve White culture and civilization? Good enough
            for me unless/until proven otherwise.

            The “one drop” rule types – IMHO – are not really concerned
            about White culture and civilization but are more concerned
            with “feeling good” about their paperwork they got back from
            23&me. They can still be useful to the overall White cause.
            Just less useful.

          • JSS

            Yeah I have met some good Arabs and blacks on an individual basis. While growing up I even had a decent friend from an Israeli family. So based on those personal experiences I also think we should let non Whites live in our countries as long as they are the magic “good ones”. I don’t see how that could be problematic in any way.

          • Deacon Blue

            Excepts that Blacks are not White. And many, but not all,
            Israelis are. That’s a critical difference. You identify Whiteness
            by a religious trait that has no genetic component to it.

            In an alternate universe, you could seek out a bunch of very
            religious Jews and convert to their religion. I seriously doubt
            you can convert to being Black.

            And before you rail on about their being a genetic component
            to Judaism and that they are “genetically different” recognize
            that I realize many/most due hail from the Khazars. But
            there has been so much interbreeding between “them”
            and “us” as to blur the line. And I would argue that there are
            plenty of gentile Whites with latent “Jewish Khazar Blood”
            that are genetically indistinguishable from the leftist,
            elite, NYC type pests. This is why I feel the genetic “thing”
            is a waste of time.

            See other posts for more info.

          • JSS

            Most Jews including Israelis are atheist. Can you be an atheist Muslim or Christian? If being a jew is just religious then there should not be atheist jews but most of them are. Plus Israel sometimes requires DNA test for citizenship applicants. How can you DNA test for religion?

          • Deacon Blue

            Link to where it requires a DNA test for citizenship or I call BS.

          • JSS

            .timesofisrael.com/russian-speakers-who-want-to-immigrate-could-need-dna-test/

          • Deacon Blue

            Go read that again. Carefully. Lots of “may need” and “could
            need” language. Same when you google away for it.
            “Could…may…possibly…”, when its on the government form(s)
            or on a government website then I’ll believe it.

          • JSS

            You can test for Jewish ancestory. That should not be possible if Judaism is a religion. Jews even have unique health problems. Your’re just wrong that they are only a religion.

          • Deacon Blue

            I don’t agree. Some groups of people who happen to be
            Jewish by religion have genetic health problems because of
            centuries of interbreeding. If you converted to Judaism tomorrow,
            which you could start to do if you wanted to, would you instantly
            have these “unique” health problems? See what I mean?

          • JSS

            “The policy was reported in Maariv on Monday, one day after the Israeli paper revealed that a19-year-old woman from the former Soviet Union was required to take the test to qualify for a Birthright Israel trip”.

            That was from the original article I linked. You must have missed that right at the beginning. So you disagree then that you can do genetic test to prove Jewish ancestory? Really?

          • Deacon Blue

            Really! You can prove Khazar ancestry though.
            What about someone whose great grandmother was a Jew
            but “genetically” tests out as “Jewish” by your definition?
            What if such a person’s family has been say, Members of the
            Church of England for 3 generations after that and all of them
            look very British? Are you going to say, “nope, you had
            a ‘Jewish’ ancestor” so you don’t get to call yourself White?!?”

          • JSS

            I’m not going to get into the percentage crunching debate. I’m just maintaining that there is a Jewish race, highly mongrelized sure but a distinct group none the less that isn’t European in spirit or blood. Thus they don’t have any reason to be in our countries and that their presence up until now has been negative.

          • Deacon Blue

            The cognitive dissonance is astounding.

            >[…] there is a Jewish race, highly mongrelized sure but a distinct group none the less…’.

            You don’t see how contradictory that statement is?

          • JSS

            Are you honestly implying that a mongrelized group can’t also be distinct and indentifiable? Arabs and Turks are also highly mongrelized. Both are distinct and identifiable groups.

          • JSS

            .breakingisraelnews.com/22424/dnatesting-can-reveal-jewish-ancestry-bolster-zionist-narrative/#XY4llmVqGd0BMHsR.97

            http://www

          • Deacon Blue

            Did you read the piece? In its entirety? Again, when it becomes
            accepted and mandated policy I will consider changing my
            stance. But since there are Chinese Jews and Indian Jews
            and other non-Khazarian Jews and since anyone on theory
            can convert and become a “full fledged Jew” then I can’t agree.

            Judaism is a belief system. It may be hijacked by agenda
            driven people who don’t like all or some aspects of this
            system but there is no other “race” you or I can become.
            If race is based on genetic component alone then how can
            I become Black or Mestizo or have green eyes? I can’t.

            But yet if I for whatever reason wanted to become a Jew then
            I surely could.

            You obviously see the logic flaw in trying to maintain that
            Judaism is a race and not a religion.

          • JSS

            When people talk about Jews you know who they mean. That group is a race and that can be proven genetically. No one thinks about Indians or Ethiopians when they speak of Jews. You can’t identify beta or Indian Jews genetically. The others you can. If you converted chances are Israel wouldn’t take you. Why is that if it’s only a religion?

          • Spikeygrrl

            No. When people like you talk about Jews, we know what you mean. Big difference.

          • JSS

            That’s pretty neat and clever. What do you actually mean though? That because some people are religious Jews that the genetic ones that come to mind when people think “Jews” don’t exist or just that I’m wrong and bad because of reasons?

          • Spikeygrrl

            You just did it again. It’s so entrenched in your head that you can’t see it. “Does a fish know it’s wet?”

            Let’s try this again.

            You wrote, “…the genetic ones that come to mind when people think “Jews’…”. Who are these “people” who “think”? They are people who think like you. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, you probably grew up in an ideological bubble wherein everyone just assumed that Jews were evil non-Whites who lived to subvert White, Christian values. And you probably have never known any Jews up close and personal.

            Of course, I could be entirely wrong about all of that. If I am, I sincerely beg your pardon and would very much like to continue this dialog with a view to understanding where your hostility to Jews did in fact originate.

            Here’s where my attitude to Jews originated: I am incredibly fortunate that almost all my formal education from preschool through grad school was in strictly and explicitly “gifted & talented” environments. Can you guess who I met there? Of course you

          • JSS

            You are not getting what I mean when I say “people think”. Your average person may not explicitly realize that Jews aren’t White, or like you not want to believe it. But when a person thinks “jew” they don’t think of an Ethiopian or Chinamen. Whatever they picture it isn’t that.

            You are indeed wrong that I have never been around Jews. I grew up neck deep in them until I was 18 and thankfully haven’t been around them since then. If you had read my previous posts you would have seen where I said I even had a decent enough friend from an Israeli family. My bubble wasn’t anti jew. Quite the opposite actually. My mother is an evangelical dispensationalist Philosemitec type. Her ideas never rubbed off on me but your assertion that my views are just baseless bigotry or something are totally incorrect.

            It seems your experience with Jews is basically that you have had lots of time around them and find them agreeable on a personal level. I didn’t find them to be that great but will admit that living in one of their neighborhoods and going to school with them was safe. Of course that would have been the case if my neighborhood was Japanese so I don’t consider that fact relevant.

            I personally only came to my current opinions regarding Jews in the past few years. After seriously looking into the narrative about WW2 and their role in pop culture, government and banking I can only conclude they have been a disaster for our race. I readily acknowledge that they would not be able to do what they do without willing White accomplices, I’m not pretending it’s just the Jews, only that they are the primary problem and traitorous/ignorant Whites are their enablers.

            I’m also not promoting some idea of a huge Talmudic conspiracy. I am stating that they are genetically pre disposed to certain behaviors like any other race. One of their defining traits is that they undermine their host nations. They haven’t been expelled hundreds of times for no reason.

          • Spikeygrrl

            They have been expelled because people like you can’t compete with them, and it’s easier to bleed off your toxic envy into poisonous prejudice rather than an impetus to try harder.

          • JSS

            Why should any White be forced to compete with foreigners in their own country? And yeah they are so brilliant that the superior American Jews like their Chinese counterparts are notorious for stealing American technology and sending it where their true loyalty is.

            In any case your point makes no sense. If the key to a successful nation is “just add Jews” then European monarchs would have kept them around regardless of what the hateful bigoted dumb peasants like me wanted.

            How would you explain Spain entering a golden age after expelling it’s jews?

          • Spikeygrrl

            Re your quaint concept of “foreigners”: In this truly global economy, “nations” as traditionally conceived are becoming obsolete. We will soon live in a world of distributed “virtual nations” among which we will assign/reassign our loyalties and resources depending upon their day-to-day actions.

            Re your quaint concept of “competition”: Dude, don’t you realize that almost every life on this planet has almost always been in competition with almost every other? (The big exception: stable symbiote and certain highly co-evolved pairings, e.g., Man and Canine.)

            Yes, both East Asians and certain genetic strains among Jews (mixed with high percentages of both Northern European and Mediterranean White blood) are, on average, smarter than us. DEAL WITH IT. This is balanced by the traits in which Whites unquestionably excel, notably creativity and the compulsion to explore, to find out “what’s over the next hill.”

            I’d love to continue to pick apart your post concept by concept, but my physical therapy this evening was exhausting and I need to sleep.

          • JSS

            So you have informed me that I don’t understand what nationhood and nationality are and declared Victory. I would call that quaint myself. I notice you also set yourself up a little strawmam there by implying that I’m losing sleep over Jewish and Asian IQ which I never gave any hint of.

            An Austrian painter once pointed out that that is your kinds preferred debating style. Constantly changing the subject and declaring victory. Nothing new under the sun.

            But yeah good night.

          • JSS

            I see your whole reply now and I’m glad your dog didn’t break you or your tablet.

            Anyway it seems like your basing most your opinions off of personal experience. Many times there is nothing wrong with that. Basing your world view strictly off of it is naive in my opinion. My own experience with Jews was that I was never “family” among my Jewish friends. The adults were typically cold and cheap. I was invited to 2 barmitzvahs. I never saw them drink blood or anything and I can confirm that they can be pleasant sometimes. My friends growing up were actually fairly normal.

            I really don’t see how any of that has any relevance to the over all impact they have had on our culture and in our nations in general. Basing my opinion on them on my personal experience would be the equivalent of the wealthy White SWPL basing their views on Mexicans on the nice nanny and gardening crew and their view on blacks on the White presenting ones they may have known in college.

          • Spikeygrrl

            And you still don’t see that positive experiences with personal acquaintences — not one or two, but hundreds, possibly thousands — mean YOU CAN’T NEGATIVELY GENERALIZE?!

            One more try, and then I’m done: I have also known, worked under/with/over, and read the scholarly works of a good many Negroes. I can count the intelligent, industrious, and moral ones on the fingers of one hand (two hands, if I give the benefit of the doubt to a few I’ve only read). So yeah, even though my heart bleeds for the Thomas Sowells of this world, YOU CAN NEGATIVELY GENERALIZE.

            You speak of coldheartedness. I humbly submit that you absorbed more than you realize from a few az$hulls you’ve chosen to represent an entire population.

            What have Jews ever done to hurt you — except raise the bar for the entirety of Western Civilzation?

            I AM SINCERELY SORRY that you didn’t get invited to the Cool [Jewish] Kids’ catered parties at the country club, and/or were made to feel unwelcome at the Cool [Jewish] Kids’ summer camps, and/or didn’t make the grade to date the Popular [Jewish] Guys and Girls, and/or couldn’t equal the Talented [Jewish] Students’ academic achievements and/or artistic abilities, and/or didn’t get accepted into the same Ivies or Seven Sisters or med schools or law schools that the Hardworking 140+ IQ [Jewish] Grads did, and/or watched and resented Higher-Achieving [Jewish] Businesspeople get the jobs, the promotions, the contracts you wanted. I’m sorry, I’m sorry, I’m sorry!

            But just how counterproductive is it to fashion one’s own choice not to put forth the effort required to compete into toxic hatred of those you envy? Why not just work to the top of your capacity then flourish where you’re planted?

            I am SO done here.

          • JSS

            I see. I went from not knowing any Jews to having an inferiority complex towards them and your’re sorry about that. You hard core Philosemitec types are just as smug and condescending as the worst leftist. Nobody can possibly form their own opinion about them that differs from your own through their own reaserch and observation. We are either ignorant bigots or have security issues. Meh. So predictable.

            You are correct that I’m by no means one of your extradonery Jews we are so lucky to have. My IQ is average and I’m not a rocket surgeon. I’m quite happy to be an average White guy and I’m not envious of anyone. I have seen far more of the world then most people will, I have a good job and while I have few friends the ones I have are close and loyal. So yeah, your’re just wrong about me.

            I don’t see how Jews have raised the bar on anything unless your talking about perversion and financial scamming. I think Whites would do just fine without them.

          • Spikeygrrl

            I see I touched a nerve. Doncha just hate when that happens?

            You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. And I am entitled to disagree with it. Thank goodness we still have at least that much freedom left.

          • JSS

            I have no idea how you concluded that you touched a nerve. All you did was conform to the usual Philosemitec tactic of insisting anyone who doesn’t adore jews has personal issues. The usual Engelman/diversity fatigue/Sparky tactics. If anything debating with people such as yourself just reinforces my opinions. You guys always go personal and have no real rebuttals to our arguments other then “conspiracy theorist” “crazy” “can’t compete” etc.

          • Spikeygrrl

            My endpoint to this remains: You have the right to your opinion, and I have the right to mine. If you want a good old-fashioned mud-slinging duel of the ad hominems, please seek it elsewhere.

            At a life expectancy of only 3-5 more years, LIFE IS JUST TOO SHORT to spend it arguing with people I’d never even invite over for a home-cooked meal.

            Please, shake this off and have a great evening. Life really is too short not to.

          • Spikeygrrl

            If you read your replies at Disqus, PLEASE return to the actual thread to read mine in its entirety! One of my dogs dam’near knocked me out of my wheelchair in mid-post, my phablet went flying, and I had to hard-reboot everything. So sorry 🙁

          • jayvbellis

            That’s pretty fair. But, reality is that Jewish power in the United States, including supposedly Conservative Right Jews are insane, murderous on immigration to the USA, the West.

            We had to take out Eric Cantor the “Conservative” GOP house Majority leader, we took him out because he was just insane on immigration.

            The Sierra Club was getting some principled opposition to mass immigration, then some Jewish multi millionaire financier gave SC a huge gift with the stipulation that immigration restriction must never be mentioned again.

            Jews are very good at many things and of course they are not all evil. But American Jews simply suck on immigration, expect to be smeared as an evil NAzi if you even oppose the worst Muslim immigration. It will take a situation change like in France, where Muslim immigrant populations are specifically targeting Jews and even then we’ll have to out up with the spin that we evil racist Whites are the ones responsible for Muslim terrorism because we created a “climate of hatred and oppression”

          • Deacon Blue

            Where did I mention I agreed with or wanted to partner with
            American Jews? I mentioned – repeatedly – that Israeli Jews
            that I met are quite different from American Jews.

          • Luca

            Go to Youtube and search “Ben Shapiro: Why Jews vote Leftist.”

          • Deacon Blue

            Thanks – will do!

          • Cindy

            Thanks for suggestion. Video gave interesting explanations. I know very little about Jews. I grew up in an Irish Catholic neighborhood and now I live in a White/polish/mexican neighborhood. My house is 2 blocks from 2 all boys/girls Catholic high schools. No Jews or Jewish culture whatsoever. There have been a lot of comments on AmRen that have gone completely over my head.
            All I know for sure is that White people need to stick together.

        • Spikeygrrl

          You’ve never known a Jew up close and personal, have you?

          • ViktorNN

            I would estimate that I’ve had close friendships or acquaintanceships with about 2 or 3 dozen Jews in my personal life, and I’ve known less well, worked, or gone to school with several hundred Jews, perhaps more (I worked in an industry dominated by Jews for over a decade).

            How many Jews do you know?

          • Spikeygrrl

            May I presume that you, also, “keep a mask on” oh, say, at work or at church or anywhere else you are not surrounded by anti-Semites like yourself?

          • ViktorNN

            You’re big on presuming and assuming things about me. Knock yourself out.

          • Spikeygrrl

            LOL! I’m perfectly willing to concede that I have not once been right about you, personally. “Them’s the odds” on shots in the dark.

            So sue me, I inherited from my late beloved father the scholar my itch to know. His field was literature, mine is praxeology (Political Economy, Austrian School-style, with serious chunks of psychology and current culture as social anthropology thrown in. You can’t seriously study any of these disciplines without weaving them together. There’s a REASON that von Mises’ masterwork is entitled simply Human Action.)

            So please excuse me poking you with a fork about how you acquired what seems to me to be an irrational opinion. If you choose not to continue this conversation, that’s OK. OTOH, I have always been prepared to change my own opinion in the face of “new evidence” — “new,” at least, to me.

            The ball is in your court now. Drop it or pick it up and run with it, as you please.

          • ViktorNN

            Well, as I said, your second batch of guessing was wrong (despite your extensive education). What’s left to discuss?

          • Spikeygrrl

            As I just said: drop this ball or pick it up, as YOU please.

      • jayvbellis

        Weaves one very interesting Jews pretty much on our side.

        Jewish New York did vote in Guiliani over The Black David Dinkins when things got bad enough. But, sadly, it looks like New Jews reverted to anti White Leftism voting in the current race mixing, pro cop killer mayor they have now.

      • Luca

        The real enemies are Liberals (leftists, socialists, communists, social engineers, progressive seculars, cultural Marxists, or whatever you want to call them). Doesn’t matter what race or religion they are even though the stereotypes may be based in truth.

        • Deacon Blue

          You and LHathaway see this situation much in the same manner
          as I do. Good! So I have found some “common kin” finally.

          • Spikeygrrl

            Count me in, too.

      • Spikeygrrl

        Thank you, thank you, thank you! Upvote x 1,000.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      David Duke does a great job exposing the Zionists. But, Ann bashes Duke regularly, so we know where she stands on that score. She’s a paradox: courageous as bull fighter tactically, but a coward strategically.

      • Xerxes22

        She is a pragmatist. She knows who owns and runs the publishing companies. If she ever criticized the Tribe or their country, her books would never be published and she would lose a lot of money. It’s all about the money. That is how they control us. If you write or say anything negative about them, you will lose your job and your source of income.

    • Spikeygrrl

      She’s not campaigning for any office, ya maroon!

      • Cliven Owens

        Campaigning doesn’t mean achieving a position in office. It means accomplishing goals in order to promote an agenda for added support.

        • Spikeygrrl

          That’s going to come as a big surprise to Hillary’s CAMPAIGN, Rubio’s CAMPAIGN, Paul’s CAMPAIGN, and Cruz’s CAMPAIGN.

          • Cliven Owens

            Are you brain damaged?

          • Cliven Owens

            “At a life expectancy of only 3-5 more years…”

            I wish you the best! My previous post, please disregard. Regardless if we have political differences, nothing is more serious than life…and I hope you enjoy it to the fullest 🙂

          • Spikeygrrl

            Thanks for your kind wishes. I may yet beat this thing — some few do — but I’m not hanging my hat on that possibility. And no matter how healthy one may be, there’s something to be said for living each day as if it were one’s last. 🙂

  • Probably, on balance, a good thing that she’s written this book. But even on the cover it says “The Left’s Plan to turn our country into a Third-World Hellhole.”

    One, it’s not Left, it’s both Left and Right, for different reasons. Meanwhile she’s turned this into yet another partisan issue with predictable results. Nothing will be done.

    And two, a plan? No, in many parts of the nation it’s already a reality. And most of us are already having to deal with it.

    • BloodofAlbion75

      You’re absolutely right to declare that both the Left AND the Right are guilty of encouraging this invasion.We can only hope that Ann takes the GOP establishment to task for their undeniable complicity in this crisis,as well.

    • She won’t name the Enemy, so it’s just more yapping, and more income for her.

  • james AZ

    PERFECT …. 100% BOLD RIGHT about that problems for long time !!!!!!! LOOK at California become third world in few years !!!!!! In 1975 orange country really beautiful place to live !!!!!!!!! Last time I visited orange country in 2014, there really ugly and dirty !!!!

  • Steve_in_Vermont

    No country, or civilization, lives forever. Many countries had great empires, China, Russia, Rome, Spain and Britain being just several examples. Things change, for better or worse, and the US is no exception. We might not like it but it will happen, probably sooner than later.

    • Speedy Steve

      “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.”
      ― Alexander Fraser Tytler

    • HJ11

      Country? My country is within my genes. I am White. I happen to have been born in America, but America is not my country. It is not a fully White country and only a fully White country can be one with my country within.

      • Spikeygrrl

        So sad to read of someone so truly “homeless.”

    • TruthBeTold

      It’s a tragedy when a nation commits suicide through actions that are avoidable and unnecessary .

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Scares me to think of the Ideocracy to come.

  • Bossman

    When it comes to immigration, “cheap nannies and lawn boys” will be the least of the problem that the USA will face. There are over 1.35 billion people in China and over a billion in India. These two countries are supposed to rise in the 21st century. What does that mean? Will they demand that the USA and Canada take in more of their people. Black Africa’s population is also expected to explode in the 21st century. All these people have their eyes fixed on North America as the place to move to.

    • 李冠毅

      I think one thing that we can both agree on is that both of our races don’t belong in the West. I currently live in my native country, and do not plan on moving away. What about you? I think you live in the U.S. So if you’re genuinely concerned for their well-being, why not walk the talk and go back to Mexico or whatever Latin American country you/your ancestors came from?

      • Bossman

        There are only three races: East Asians, Africans and Europeans. So-called Hispanics are a mixture of many things. If they happen to be dark and look Meso-American then they are the descendants of the First American natives. They may not be citizens of the USA if they are illegal but they are still North Americans. America is their continent. As I’ve already said before, these low class and simple people who are streaming across the border without inspection will be less of a problem than the hordes of East Asia and South Asia for white identity in North America.

        • listenupbub

          Okay, you are obviously now trolling. Three races? WTF?

          I can’t stop laughing!!!!

          • Spikeygrrl

            Other than Australian aboriginals, that’s the science: Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid. Everything else is just an admixture of two or three of these.

          • listenupbub

            That is quite a bit different from “European, African, and East Asian.”

            But, anyways, when is this science from? The late 1800’s?

            And is it at the proper level of precision for discussion of nations and cultures? It is like using the six kingdoms of life to argue that lions and lambs are one in the same, and that they should lie together.

        • 李冠毅

          “Less of a problem?” Okay, here’s my take on it. Who gets offended by the American flag and demanded for it to be taken down? Who views America as their rightful homeland and are eager to drive Whites away? Who demanded that Americans speak to them in their native language? Who currently is a huge burden on American taxpayers because they collect a lot of welfare but don’t pay as much in taxes? Who currently commits a lot of crime? Sure, Asians are guilty of one or two of the above, but who is guilty of ALL of those and thus pose a bigger threat for White identity in North America?

        • BlueSonicStreak

          Bull feces. I live in Canada; most of our immigrants are Asian. Canada is going to wake up much slower precisely because they don’t cause us anywhere near the trouble Hispanics and blacks in the U.S. do, and certainly not as quickly.

  • HJ11

    She’s rght of course, but too many Whites just read such books and then take no action in their lives. Learning something is meaningless unless action of some type (legal type, of course) is taken. And,it all starts with each one of us as individuals as we stand up and say, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore.”

  • DLRisVH

    Shame, why weren’t people saying this back in the sixties?

    • Jason Lewis

      There were a few. Ted Kennedy promised the Immigration Act of 1965 wouldnt change the demographics of America.

      • InAFreeCountry

        Ted Kennedy would NEVER lie!!

        • Alexandra1973

          He’s lying in a cold grave now….

          • Sid Ishus

            I hope not. I hope he is writhing in agony.

    • Chasmania

      They really never thought in a million years that things would get like they are today.

  • Petronius

    Almost every real problem in the US has mass immigration as its root cause or as a key exacerbating component.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    If she comes out with an audiobook version I will definitely buy it.

  • shawnmer

    Hoo lawd, you can see this coming a mile away!

    Reporter: Senator (fill in the name of GOP Presidential candidate) conservative commentator Ann Coulter ‘ s new bestseller has been criticized as being highly controversial and even RACIST! Do you join other members of your party in denouncing Ms. Coulter? ?”

    • TruthBeTold

      Yes, the Demonrats are good at flipping the script.

      ‘Do you now or have you ever agreed with Ann Coulter? Senator, it’s a simply yes or no question’.

  • Hilis Hatki

    “The Left’s plan…” The Right is right there with them. No “business as usual” is going to change what is HAPPENING to America. No voting is going to change the flow of things. The solution to America’s woes are not pleasant nor easy. The biggest problem with America is traditional white Americans. And when that problem gets solved then the others can be addressed.

  • Rob

    Good job Ann. However I would have preferred that instead of using Adios, which is the language of the enemy (Mexico and Latin Americans), you should have said goodbye or Au Revoir or Aufwiedeshen. We need to keep ourselves as European aka white as possible.

    • dmxinc

      Didn’t you note the exclamation mark and upside down exclamation mark?

      Adios was exactly what she wanted to use and for good reason.

      • Rob

        yes that is Spanish as well.

      • LHathaway

        The title may have reminded me slightly of, “So long, and thanks for all the fish”. It is one of my favorite titles.

    • InAFreeCountry

      You see, this way they are hearing “goodbye” in their own language, the more likely they are to understand it, and LEAVE. (I can dream, can’t I?)

  • listenupbub

    I seem to remember her not being so serious about this issue before….It seems she has found the light.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      She needs money, so she wrote another book. She doesn’t give a rat’s butt about what happens to the USA. She cares about money.

      .

  • Just what the world needs… another book!

    I’ll consider Ann Coulter “heroic” the day she stands up and unabashedly admits that, not only is multiculturalism and unchecked immigration a death sentence to the West, but that the standards of civilization that we value in The West can only be preserved by blending various types of Racialist and Nationalist politics.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      Agree.

      Regan, McCain, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, GW Bush, and some other Republicans were/are for immigration from third world toilet-bowls.

      .

    • jayvbellis

      What is she supposed to do besides wring and speaking?

      She has been banned at places like CPAC and looks to be going to be purged from Conservative Inc as have Peter Brimelow and John Derbyshire.

  • I read some of her other books. There is nothing surprising or revolutionary in any of her ideas. Intellectually she is no Jared Taylor. But, nonetheless, she deserves credit not for what she says, but that she is actually saying it. Yes, it is obvious, but at least if more well known people would state the obvious then maybe the message will get out to more of us, and we White people will finally unite, forget our petty differences, and realize that it is our country and our civilization that is being destroyed. We must remember that we are all Whites and forget such outmoded labels as liberal, conservative, Northern, Southern, white collar, blue collar, or any of the other petty differences that we have. Remember, for our racial enemies, their color and ethnicity, is all that matters. That gives them a huge strategic advantage over us. We must remove that advantage.

    • Deacon Blue

      She’s more “mainsteamable” than Jared by writings {at least today}.
      I don’t agree with all she writes or stands for either but I’ll take her as
      a good start in the correct direction. Getting the needle to nudge in the right
      direction is important. Most very large things start with smaller beginnings.

  • E. Newton

    Isn’t Ann married to that Afro-american cornerback from the 49ers, De’metrius something.

    • Rob

      She is single as far as I know

    • dd121

      Would YOU like being married to someone who always got in the last word?

  • phillyguy

    the biggest problem with all of these illegals and other immigrants is the over population of this country . in the very near future using up all of our natural resources, oil ,natural gas and freshwater . in 75 years it will be a free for all, kill to survive.

  • jim

    ..Says Ann as the Republicans do the same things…just differently than the democrats.

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    “The left’s plan to turn our country into a third world hellhole”

    Ahh – typical Ann. Selling another book. She never really names those who are responsible. Always some version of “them.”

    Answer these questions Ann:

    Who exactly are these Left’s?

    Do they have a specific religious or ethnic make up?

    Would they be related to Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, and all those others who turned Russia into hell around 1917?

    Would they also be related to the people who controlled the Weimar Republic in Germany, and tried to turn Germany into a hellhole like the U.S. until some Charlie Chaplin look-a-like tried to stop them and “take-over-the-world®”?

    Would they be part of the same group to turned White South Africa into a hellhole?

    How about the group of people that supported Mao and Pol-Pot. Are they related to those people also?

    Why not name this “left” phantom?

    .

    • bob 32

      Too true. This website was set-up to distract from the real enemy-the real threat. I realized that the other day

      We can all agree that the blacks and illegals are bad, most of us have been victims at their hands, or know people who have been. It’s easy to bash them-they have no real power.

      But when it comes to “they who must not be named” no one can agree. The other day some idiot named “L Hathaway” on here said something about people trying to distract from the real issue; in her (his?) mind the blacks are the true threat to America, she sounded lie a true liberal by blaming the tool not the hand that controls it.

      I need to stop coming here it’s no good. We all know blacks and mexis are bad so what do we have to gain by complaining about it to each other? It just keeps ours eyes off of the true threat.

      But since the true threat doesn’t go around shooting and rapping, they just lobby for our us to destroy ourselves, many can’t see the truth.

      • Spaniard in LA

        When it comes to this issue, I agree with Dr. Duke. I wish he were president.

      • MBlanc46

        See you around then, Bob.

      • Deacon Blue

        You correct. You’re at the wrong website. Yes. I agree with you.
        You ever wonder why if “that other website” is sooooo sure of their
        positions that all but perhaps three of their forums are locked?

        What are they afraid of? Truth? You don’t see any locked forums here
        now do you? And the “other website” has a much heavier hand with
        the moderation and ban hammer.

        Auf wiedersehen und viel glück!

      • spahnranch69 .

        Are you referring to the you-know-who’s?

      • Sid Ishus

        The moderator must be asleep at the switch tonight. Definitely more leniency is typical on this topic.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Plenty of “comment deleted” in the AM. Sigh.

      • AmericanRemnant

        Shhh –

        “There is a power so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so
        complete, so pervasive that prudent men better not speak above their
        breath when they speak in condemnation of it”
        Woodrow Wilson

    • Spaniard in LA

      She would not dare do such a thing and if she did, she would be muted for life.

    • dd121

      Nobody mentions “who” and keeps their perch on their platform.

    • Freedom?…

      You cannot name the jew…..

    • jayvbellis

      The anti White Left is not exclusively of the Tribe. Ted Kennedy wasn’t of the tribe. Nor are my idiot cousins and uncle – they both were huge ANC Nelson Mandela supporters.

      • Rob

        May not have to be, but there are a lot of stupid whites who will fall over themselves to show how anti white and cool they are. Are you from South Africa.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Unfortunately, many/most/all are union members. The right alienated the unions. A white union member votes for his tactical survival at the expense of his strategic one.

    • Spikeygrrl

      Why don’t YOU name who YOU think these shady international comic-book supervillains are?

      Because you know that if you start baselessly slandering Jews and Israel in this forum (again) you’ll be banned from this board (again). Change screen names and avatars all you want; you are known here by the poison you drip.

      Why don’t you do us all a favor: buy a one-way ticket to the Middle East and join Hamas. If you turn out to be no better a decapitator than you are a polemicist, an Israeli rocket will surely end your existence before you can do any real harm.

      Bon voyage!

      • Wow: you really are Spikey

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Sounds like the DNA service found a schlomo in the woodpile.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Stop by www[dot]DavidDuke[dot]com for a refresher.

        • Spikeygrrl

          ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about Mr. Duke is “refreshing.” Au contraire. His ideas about Jews are a steaming heap of putrefaction. Just look at those maggots go!

          But hey, thanks for letting everybody here know where you really stand.

  • Alexandra1973

    It’s too late for Detroit and other major cities.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Atlanta, Baltimore, St. Louis, Birmingham, Philadelphia….

  • spahnranch69 .

    Wetbacks provide a cheap source of labor, votes, consumers and union members. They can also be used to replenish the dwindling number of American Catholics who regularly go to mass. So the left and the right, Big Business and Big Labor, benefit from illegal invaders. Of course none of those groups actually cares about the welfare of Pedro and Guadeloupe, only how they can be exploited for maximum profit. Myself, I don’t want to exploit anyone, I just want my White country back.

    • AFlaVet

      And this is why we’re being held hostage by the illegal, militant beener groups whose potential to turn this country into the same crap holes they left behind, is a real threat. These beeners would ignore an opportunity to elect a Cruz or a Rubio and throw their vote to the past …to the past of a Clinton that Rubio so eloquently warned us of so that they can turn this country upside down. We’re facing electoral anarchy friends….and the loss of our language, our culture, our customs, our borders, our sovereignty…to 4th world scum whose first priority is the freebies…those same entitlements so freely given to illegals..are the same ones that we as citizens…cannot get. There will be a swinging of the pendulum next year…there will be anarchy. There will be a pushback. Otherwise say adios like Coulter has.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      For the right it’s appeasement, though. Once the founding population is overrun, the 3rd World parasites will just vote their way into every white person’s piggy bank.

      ‘An appeaser feeds the crocodile, hoping to be eaten last’ –Winston Churchill

      • The history of Mexico since Independence (1821) is basically an interrupted series of breaking up private property and “repatriating it back to the Indian masses”. These were the original inhabitants before the Spanish conquest in {I guess} around 1510.

        You can see the spendid results this policy has given them for the past 200 years. They will demand such policies be implemented in the US, once they gain political power. There is a ruling elite in Mexico while the peasants there don’t want a participary Republic, they just want to be fed.

        Unlike in the US the Spanish conquistadors did not wipe out the native population. They settled them in villages taught by Catholic missionaries. Eventually the Indians outgrew the villages and demanded the country be given back to them.

    • Rob

      We all do.

  • Hank chinaski

    She looks like a man because all men are puss sites

    • Spikeygrrl

      If Ann looks like a man to you, I’d hate to see what you think looks like a woman!

  • panopticon1984

    That she is right on the immigration issue is fine. Tragically, she is completely wrong on the Israel First, Forever War advocacy and that is as destructive as the immigration invasion.

    • spahnranch69 .

      You beat me to it.

    • AFlaVet

      I’d trade the CIA for the Mossad any day.

      • HarleyFreedom

        Then you should trade your American citizenship for one in Israel, traitor.

        • AFlaVet

          I meant…they’re not troubled by niceties or political PC nonsense. If our CIA had our interests in mind….we’d have the country we want. KUMQUAT.

    • jayvbellis

      If you go all the way pro White, race realist, anti Latino , anti Muslim immigration AND anti Israeli First wars, you will be a complete outcast, marginalized have zero access to any mainstream media.

      And if the Zionist, Neo Con wars , unconditional support for Israel is you main concern, you will probably have to make your opposition in Liberal, Left places ways, say Israel is racist Apartheid. I just can’t do that.

      • Rob

        You are right. I know a woman and God knows how she got her PhD, by getting it from a liberal university. She is very out there with her liberal ideas. She is anti white, anti America, pro gay, pro transgender, pro terrorist rights, pro negro, pro illegal immigration, pro muslim, pro third world America, pro feminism and so on and so forth and from what i have just said, she is following the stuff created by and promoted by you know who. Yet she is pro palestine and anti israel. So you can see how stupid she is. If you know what I mean.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          The Kool-Aid has some side effects.

          • Rob

            So true LOL

        • jayvbellis

          A stopped watch has the right time twice a day.

          It’s reality that the only people speaking openly against US unconditional support for the Zionists, Neo Conservative US wars are those hard Left, anti White groups you mentioned.

          There is certainly war fatigue in Red State White America, the South, but there is simply no out of the closet opposition to the Tribe in the American Conservative White Right.

          If your main issue is opposing the Zionists, Neo Conservatives or even the tribe’s power in the media, your choices are basically hold your nose and try to work with the Liberal Left, do the “Zionism is racism”, Israel is the new Apartheid, dress like Rachel Corrie or Amy Biehl, or else live a life like the Amish and just separate, don’t support any US Military etc.

          My advice is to concentrate on bad immigration, bad Black crime, lying Left media and simply change the subject if you are around Christian Zionists, Fox News viewers, Ted Nugent cult followers – agree to disagree with dumb goys who used to just worship Jesus the King of the Jews, now they worship Israel, all things Jewish including Sheldon Adelson a slimy, Shyster Vegas Casino owner. Maybe give these Christian Zionists a little grief for enabling the war against Christmas , draconian ADL, SPlC hate speech, thought crime laws at the same time when the worst hard core porn is allowed, promoted .

      • corvinus

        If you go all the way pro White, race realist, anti Latino , anti Muslim
        immigration AND anti Israeli First wars, you will be a complete
        outcast, marginalized have zero access to any mainstream media.

        Aw… rats. 🙁

    • Ellis Kurtz

      You are letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Ann’s is just one voice among many on the foreign wars issue, but one of very few on the national question. How many writers with her media prominence talk about the US becoming a “Third World Hell Hole”? Once her book appears and she does the usual round of TV spots defending it, the ideas we have been debating for years here in AmRen will be well and truly on the table. This is a good thing, no?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      As the world’s global policemen, the U.S. has generated millions of refugees, most of him show up on U.S. soil to take and not assimilate. In the 70’s it was the Cambodians, in the 80’s it was the Iranians, Armenians, etc., in the 90’s it was the Albanians. Now a MENA explosion. Enough already.

      And with refugee status it’s the gift that keeps on giving. A woman who arrived here from Cambodia at the age of 6 months will rape the American refugee/welfare system for a lifetime.

      Let Israel blow up Iran, let Saudi Arabia deal with Yemen and Somalia…..enough already.

  • FozzieT

    Ann Coulter is a very important voice on the “mainstream” right on immigration issues. Her opinions reach millions more than websites like this, Vdare, and others.

    It would be very effective if everyone posting here would comment positively in online reviews, Amazon reviews, newspaper reviews, etc. Perhaps with links to AmRen, VDare, etc. This is a great opportunity.

    • Ellis Kurtz

      This is an excellent idea; my main reservation is that, judging by responses and up-votes, outside of AmRen and similar sites, a bald, factually accurate description of America’s demographic future seems to turn people off. I mean this sort of thing, which I wrote in response to the influx last year of Central American kids (or disease-ridden gang-bangers, depending who you believe):

      All the influx of Hispanic kids, teens, mothers etc does is hasten the day that the US is transformed from an democratic Western, Anglosphere, first-world country into a Latinized, third world backwater intermediate between Mexico and Brazil. Ultimately, as a civilization, we are screwed. Nothing can prevent it. All that the current invasion does is ensure that we will be screwed a little ahead of schedule.

      Maybe Ann’s book will make the bad news impossible to ignore. If it achieves only that, it will be a major advance.

      • FozzieT

        Well, all we can do is try the best we can. We need to remember in our “Mainstream” posts that the audience is very different. They most likely haven’t been exposed to even the most basic ideas of race-realists. They’ve bought a lifetime of mainstream “we are all equal under the skin” thinking and haven’t given it a second thought.

        Posts like the one you gave above, while absolutely true, might be too much for most people to absorb at first. All we want to do is encourage them to read her book. She’s the expert at making the case. We just want to guide them to her message.

        Maybe posts like, “An excellent, if provocative book! It certainly paints the immigration issue in a different light than the Mainstream media portrays.” Or, something like, “Ann Coulter tells it like it is on immigration!”

        Just enough to entice people to read the book, but nothing to scare them.

        BTW, I’m not any kind of Ann Coulter publicist or anything. Just my two cents!

  • Evette Coutier

    Annie is still, despite her outspoken nature, afraid to really speak the truth.

    All races are in a genetic battle.
    If you lose the genetic battle you go extinct.
    The moral perverts that run the country place money and power before the genetic survival of their own race.
    Liberal whites, and many conservative whites too, have become brainwashed into genetic sheep.
    To their credit, many minority groups have a better understanding of the realities of race and the struggle for their own kind.
    It’s not enough to elect conservatives. Most are useless. We need genetic realists in control of the nation.

  • HarleyFreedom

    On one hand is the totalitarian police state that wants to control every aspect of society….On the other hand is a third world hoard that will make the police state wish this was an all White country… I’ll just sit back and watch it all crumble…. Can you say “o’dale vato I just got drafted to fight the next war in the middle East for Israel… iye cavrone”.

  • Freedom?…

    Diversity = White GeNOcide.

  • Mike Klecko

    Coulter is awesome. I’m going to buy this book.

    • if she were awesome, she wouldn’t be on the cover of Time and be on the talmudvision and be a millionaire

  • De Doc

    She occasionally nails it, so I’ll give a measured nod. Coulter is a hypocrite though, because she laments the passing of what she loves, yet has never bothered to add to the fold. She’s looking positively skeletal of late too.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      She’s hyperthyroid.
      I agree, she should have made a principled stand when Al Cardenas, the CPAC La Raza sleeper cell activated and prohibited her from speaking of immigration at the 2014 CPAC. She should have made a spectacle of him and boycotted right there and then. A golden PR opportunity missed.
      .

  • ZaphodEpicurus

    When you import the third world you get the third world.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Plus, she still thinks the left can be shamed. They have no shame. Time for a new approach–like running for President herself. If she got 10% support–she could throw it to her favorite candidate–a real chance to be a king maker.

  • Lion’s Mane

    Is it really just the Left’s plan?

  • Light from the East

    It is good for America to have her. But when do Sweden have a person like Ann Coulter? The country is not going into the right direction. They are really heading into the 3rd-world hellhole in 2030.

    • corvinus

      Sverigedemokraterna should get a few hundreds complimentary copies, IMO.

  • jayvbellis

    She’s an excellent writer and is very good face to face with lying Leftists. She’s a female Buchanan and not nearly as nice and kind as Pat B.

    Also, be aware that she can be and is rather rude in person to people on our/her side.

    I suffered her wrath.

    • Rob

      How did that happen??

    • AndrewInterrupted

      In Joe Muto’s book: Atheist in a foxhole, he spoke the opposite. Ann is friendly and accommodating beyond the camera. That was one of many frustrations for Muto being a mole inside the FOX right wing complex. They all ended up being people.

      Except Megyn Kelly and Kimberly Guilfoyle turned out to be leftist shills, who went to the highest bidder.

      Tell us about your Ann encounter.

      • jayvbellis

        It’s already been discussed and our enemies at SPlC went with it. Best to just smile move on.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Too cryptic for me. Oh well.

  • Mark Caplan

    I admire Ann Coulter and want to see her vital message disseminated as broadly as possible. So it’s too bad she never moved to a reputable publisher. Regnery Publishing prints too much fact-free rubbish and unsubstantiated sleaze for anybody other than an unhinged partisan to take their books seriously.

    • Spikeygrrl

      Color me unhinged. Regnery was very active very early on in getting conservative and libertarian messages out to a much wider public than those streams of thought had previously enjoyed. There is nothing wrong with that!

      If you want Leftist thought, by all means stick to the “respectable” old ivy-covered imprints. That’s what they DO.

    • she’s just a ho for the jew anyway

  • James Hamilton

    The republicans are no better than the democrats. Neither has the slightest intention of controlling immigration. What is the point of having the mightiest military on earth if you cannot control your own borders? They have the means but they lack the will.

  • Spikeygrrl

    I LOVE LOVE LOVE Ann! I have actively disliked only one of her books, and own most of the rest of them in hardcopy. As soon as I tap [send] here I will pre-order it from Kindle and thus be one of the first consumers — not professional reviewers — to get it. Longstanding (since inception) Amazon Prime membership does have its privileges. 😉

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I dumped amazon years ago. Jeffrey Bozo is a cultural Marxist.

  • Hank Richter

    Fact is “the right” has destroyed itself with Foreign Policy, I generally agree with them until they start blubbering on about whatever boogeyman they’ve cooked up for the week.

    Fact is Bush had 6 with Congress and he totally F’ed it up, people in the middle I think are rejecting this insanity of the left, but then what does the right have to offer – War with Iran? No thanks.

    • James Hamilton

      The “right” is a wholly owned subsidiary of Israel and global Jewry.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        And yet American Jewry, up until Obama, voted 90% Democrat. It is true what they say, they have both sides of the narrative covered.

    • corvinus

      This. The Iraq War and other neocon idiocy was directly responsible for the obowel movement.

  • Robert Smith

    If she would quit holding back on a few other subjects she’d be the best man for the job of running for president. No one else appears to have the balls to do it.

  • Manxman

    I like the honest title except I think Nationalists need to move away from concepts of ‘left’ and ‘right’ in politics. Immigration is driven by an unholy alliance of right and left not by the left alone.

    The right is pro international free market capitalism with it’s requirements for consumption and profit through cheap labour, the ability to move money / capital and manufacturing to cheap labour markets etc . The left is driven by mental illness, self hatred, patronising pity for people who aren’t white and deluded teenage dreams of international socialism.

    The divide in politics is between Nationalist and Internationalist. This is an important concept to get your head around because immigration is driven largely by the ‘right’. The left are their useful idiots. Immigration is required by international capitalism.

    • redpill99

      true but capitalism is what makes high standards of living and technology possible.

    • Cindy

      “Immigration is required by international capitalism.”
      __________
      Can you explain this further, please. I’m very interested in this topic and want to learn more.

      I just read “STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES BY WELCOMING ALL RESIDENTS A Federal Strategic Action Plan on Immigrant & Refugee Integration”
      Dated April 2015.
      This thing reads like a Stephen King horror novel.
      Barry Administration plan is to import non-English speaking immigrants, give them HUD housing in 63 cities throughout US, help get jobs and become legal citizens.
      They’re practically on their knees begging for these savages to come here and get on the government teat. They claim this will be good for America but their reasons are lame and aren’t backed up with any statistics or studies. It’s 70 pages of complete drivel. I actually had a hard time sleeping last night trying to figure out why anyone, ANYONE, could possibly think America needs more low IQ non-English speaking brown people. I’m not buying the Jew conspiracy on this one because this is from the Barry administration and Barry is helping Iran get Nukes and the first thing Iran is going to do with Nukes is bomb Israel.
      Having America filled with third worlders will have a negative impact even on the very wealthy. They will not be able to completely insolate themselves. They still have to live here, drive here, work here, shop here.
      This program will have a negative impact on EVERYONE regardless of race or class. My neighborhood has a lot of Mexicans. And the Mexicans complain about too many Mexicans more than the Whites do!
      The SAME people who nag us about alleged climate change want to import MORE people.

      • Manxman

        Hi Cindy. Glad you are interested in this because it’s a vital concept. It would take me a very long time to do the subject any justice. I did see an article which explained it nicely a few weeks ago but can’t remember where. I will look out for you on here and post a link some other time.

        Its fundamentally about economics and international big business and finance. The left and the right both support various manifestations of globalisation but for very different reasons. I think perhaps because the USA has no real left wing tradition and has always rejected manifestations of socialism, perhaps Nationalists in USA have less interest or understanding of this? Remember. Hitler was leader of the ‘National Socialist Worker’s Party’.

        Nationalism is about putting the creators of a Nation first. International capitalism puts profit and the owners of big business first. They want a global market from which to draw cheap labour, more consumers, raw materials, oil. They want to be able to invest where they can maximise profit and minimise tax. Boarders and national identities are an obstacle for them.

        The left want no borders for mental health reasons. They believe their own propaganda. They think whites owe the world a living. They believe in ‘international socialism and ‘workers of the world unite’. They believe (or pretend to believe) that a worker in a factory in Scotland has more in common with a worker in a factory in Bangladesh than with the Scottish owner of a business. It is all about class according to Marx. Both are internationalists. They oppose boarders, nations and identity because these are obstacles in the way of their visions for the future. The right are greedy, the left are deluded.

        Republicans in USA and Conservatives in UK serve international finance. So do the Democrats and the Labour Party but people still believe that they represent ‘the man in the street’ and the ‘brotherhood of man’/ equality, redistribution of wealth etc.

        I’ no expert on this. This is not conspiracy theory. This is pretty much established economic fact. Best an economist explains it.

        • Cindy

          Manxman, thanks for info!
          I read this a few times, I’m not very familiar with the EU, and I always think of immigration being US problem, forgetting that immigration is a global problem.

          If I understand correctly, people who make money internationally are pushing to do away with borders all over the world.
          It’s not about politics, it’s about money.

          I have a few questions, you may or many not have answers but I’d be interested in your opinion.

          * What if Whites were willing to work for less money, less benefits. Would that stop immigration, or is it too little too late for that?

          * 1st generation immigrants work for less, that’s true. But 2nd gen immigrants want the same money & benefits as everyone else.
          Wouldn’t mass immigration be a very temporary 1st generation fix to cheap labor?

          * The likely result to no borders on Earth would be one big
          3rd-world country with constant racial conflict.
          1st-world countries would cease to exist.
          Where do Peter Sutherland and his ilk plan to live when the world is a big brown mess? And what about their great, great grandchildren, where will they live?
          Or are they Leftists, convinced this will make the world better?

        • “Remember. Hitler was leader of the ‘National Socialist Worker’s Party’.” — What’s your point?

          • Cindy

            A lot of White Nationalist are against Socialism. I think Manxman is saying that the Globalists pushing for immigration are also socialists.

      • weird. you write as if Obama makes policy or has power

        • Cindy

          Obama is a sock puppet. He does what his Liberal administration and Valerie Jarrett tell him to do.

          • he says and does what his filthy chicken-spinning talmud-reading yid bosses tell him to say and do

          • Cindy

            Yids want Iran to have nukes?

          • Moron. Obongo puppet got Satanyahu re-elected. Also K’s are dumb and always end up getting themselves in major trouble then wail like bltches for help

          • Cindy

            Are you a White Nationalist? If you are, I don’t want to fight with you. Whites need to stick together, we don’t have the numbers or resources for in-fighting.

          • So stop covering up for the Enemy

          • WTF did Obongo do to get Iran nukes?

      • crazy K-mind: “Barry is helping Iran get Nukes and the first thing Iran is going to do with Nukes is bomb Israel. “

        • Cindy

          I made a very long comment and because of one sentence about Israel being nuked makes me K?

  • ElComadreja

    This is all too late. We have already been de facto turned into a third world hellhole. We’ve been one in the urban areas since the 1970’s.

  • Irish

    While I use to find her bombastic, I now just think she’s a hero. She is absolutely fearless, with a brilliant mind willing to take on anyone, even supposed allies when she thinks they’re wrong.. And she’s now on par with the great Patrick Buchanan when it comes to defending our country..love her.

  • Earl P. Holt III

    It is for me…!

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Would you please get a Disqus account – otherwise I miss your comments/posts/replies.

    And I miss them.

  • Ograf

    If she just figured this out she is about 60 or so years behind the times.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      And her boy, Reagan, got duped back 1986. That was probably the straw that broke the camel’s back. It probably created 5 million voters who wouldn’t have existed had he vetoed greaserito amnesty last time. That 5 million got the Kenyan warlord in power in 2008 and kept him there in 2012.

  • they’re both just hos for the K

  • Ted Cruz woos Orthodox Jews

    He boosts fundraising while stressing traditional values and support for Israel.

    By Katie Glueck 4/16/15 POLITICO

    Ted Cruz loves Orthodox Jews — and they love him back.

    It’s
    a dynamic that allows the hard-line conservative presidential contender
    — a practicing [“practcing”? – kikespeak] Southern Baptist himself — to
    tap Orthodox donors more aggressively than any other 2016 candidate, as
    he zeros in on a small but potentially winnable slice of an otherwise
    deeply Democratic demographic.

    Leaders in the Orthodox community
    point approvingly to his vigorous opposition to the administration’s
    negotiations with Iran, his comfort level with religious references and,
    most important, his passionate support for Israel, a theme he touched
    on during his presidential announcement speech.

    “I share a great
    many values with the Jewish community and the Orthodox community,” Cruz
    said in a phone call during his first swing through Iowa as a
    presidential candidate. “Chief among them is a passionate dedication to
    strengthening our friendship and alliance with the nation of Israel.”

    And
    while no one doubts the sincerity of that position, it’s exactly that
    connection to Israel that has given Cruz entree into the Orthodox donor
    world. Very religious Jews are more likely to prioritize a strong
    Zionist approach while embracing traditional views on social issues, a
    dynamic that makes Cruz a natural fit.

    “Sen. Cruz started earlier
    than everyone else, so he’s probably had more contact in the community
    than anyone else,” said Phil Rosen, a New York lawyer who was a major
    bundler for Mitt Romney. “Many of the candidates have begun to recognize
    that the Orthodox Jewish community probably fits more closely to the
    Republican conservative viewpoint than many other groups. And I think,
    for the first time, in the Romney campaign, people like me were able to
    raise a tremendous amount of money from the Orthodox community because
    of that closeness of the mind-set on issues like Israel, and Israel’s
    safety and security.”

    Less than 24 hours after announcing his
    candidacy last month, Cruz hit his Week One fundraising goal of $1
    million, in large part from money raised at a New York City event that
    included a “sizable” Orthodox contingency, according to a source. (The
    host of the event, Rebekah Mercer, is not Jewish [sure, sure]. She and
    her family, major Republican donors, are now running a super PAC backing
    Cruz.)

    The Orthodox community is 10 percent of the Jewish
    population, a group that, in turn, makes up about 2 percent of the U.S.
    population and is heavily concentrated in Democratic-leaning urban
    areas. Asked about the political utility of engaging such a small group,
    Cruz pointed to fundraising and also nodded to states like Florida and
    Ohio, which have historically been general election swing states and
    have sizable Jewish populations.

    “The Jewish community has always
    played an important role in the political process, both as swing voters
    in a number of swing states, and also as key donors and financial
    supporters,” [NO! really? you dont say] Cruz said. “They take seriously
    the stakes that are posed, the gravity of the threats.”

    In the
    past several weeks alone, Cruz has met with an influential Orthodox
    rabbi from New York, hosted an event with Holocaust [what?] survivor
    Elie Wiesel to highlight the dangers of a nuclear Iran, and made an
    appearance at a swanky Passover gathering in California that drew
    wealthy Orthodox Jews.

    “The Orthodox segment is more open to
    supporting Republicans, and some individuals in the Orthodox community
    are active in political fundraising contributions,” said Nathan Diament,
    head of the Orthodox Union, who said Cruz has been the most “proactive”
    of the 2016 contenders in engaging Orthodox Jews. “That’s why you’ll
    see more activity on the Republican side, reaching out to the Orthodox
    community, than you’ll see more broadly [in engaging the rest of the
    Jewish community].”

    Over the past year, Cruz has also showed up
    at Sabbath services [if he were Christian, he wouldn’t attend Satanic
    worship services] at swanky synagogues in the Hamptons; in Bal Harbor,
    Florida.; and in Beverly Hills, California.

    His deputy chief of
    staff, Nick Muzin, will often spend the weekend with the community, and
    Cruz will pop in for a Saturday morning sermon.

    Muzin, who is
    playing several roles on Cruz’s campaign, including serving as a senior
    adviser, has shepherded many of the senator’s connections to the
    Orthodox world, according to about a half-dozen Jewish leaders.

    Muzin’s
    longtime relationships with leaders in the Orthodox community help
    explain Cruz’s focus on that segment of the Jewish donor class. For
    example, Howard Jonas, CEO of Genie Energy , has had Cruz over for
    Sabbath dinner and said he and his friends have supported him in the
    past and expect to contribute again. That invitation came because Jonas
    is friends with Muzin.

    Cruz is one of the two most active 2016
    contenders in reaching out to the Jewish community as a whole, even
    beyond the Orthodox community, said one currently unaligned Republican
    fundraiser who works with Jewish donors. The other is Rand Paul, said
    the source, noting that the libertarian-leaning Kentucky senator has
    sought to reassure hawkish donors that he is sufficiently pro-Israel.
    But other more establishment-friendly Republicans, like Marco Rubio and
    Jeb Bush, are considered likely to do better in the broader Jewish GOP
    donor world, which tends to support more moderate Republicans.

    He
    doesn’t necessarily have a lock on the Orthodox Jewish donor class yet,
    either. Rich Roberts is something of a kingmaker among ultra-Orthodox
    Jews in Lakewood, New Jersey, who frequently hosts politicians at his
    home, including Scott Walker, Lindsey Graham and Rand Paul and connects
    them to leaders in that deeply religious community. But he hadn’t yet
    made time to meet with Cruz, beyond a brief session in a hotel suite in
    Florida about a year ago, despite urging from the Texan’s camp. Roberts,
    who likes Walker, said in an interview that “this round might not be
    [Cruz’s] round to run.”

    But in many corners of the Orthodox
    community Cruz is a “folk hero,” said Jeff Ballabon, an Orthodox
    Republican operative. He assumed that mantle last fall when the senator
    told a group of Middle Eastern Christians booing Israel that “if you
    will not stand with Israel and the Jews, then I will not stand with
    you.”

    “All of a sudden, that put him very much top-of-mind as a
    strong defender [of Israel], someone who felt in his gut about the
    Middle East the way the Orthodox community does,” said Ballabon, the
    architect of George W. Bush’s groundbreaking outreach to the Orthodox
    community, a group that Republicans previously had largely ignored. “He
    didn’t think, ‘I’m going to be the candidate for the Orthodox Jews.’
    When that video went viral, all the Orthodox Jews were clamoring to meet
    him.”

    Ballabon first met Cruz when the senator was running as an
    underdog in the 2012 Texas GOP primary. He attended a Sabbath dinner
    Ballabon organized at the Conservative Political Action Conference, and
    appeared comfortable staying at the religious event for hours. Ballabon
    said Cruz is “clearly a person of great faith.” [in the devil and its
    children (John 8:44)]

    At CPAC this year, some of Cruz’s most
    ardent supporters were yarmulke-wearing yeshiva students, several of
    whom said in interviews at the time that they were so impressed with
    Cruz’s support for Israel that they didn’t much care whether he could
    win the GOP primary — they would be supporting him anyway.

    For
    Cruz, who attended an elementary school in Houston that was about half
    Jewish — HE GREW UP WISHING HIS FAMILY WOULD CELEBRATE BOTH HANNUKAH AND
    CHRISTMAS — the interest in Israel began in 1976, he said, as a very
    young Cruz learned of the Entebbe raid, an Israeli military operation to
    save airline passengers held hostage in an airport terminal in Uganda.
    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s brother Yoni was killed
    leading that raid.

    “It struck me as a profoundly Texan approach
    to an act of terrorism,” said Cruz, who is an admirer of the hawkish
    prime minister. That tough response appeared to stem from “a foreign
    policy approach driven from strength, which I often wish American
    foreign policy more closely resembled.”

    The senator also
    suggested he connects well with Jews because for his family, America was
    a safe haven from oppression in Cuba, just as it has been for Jews
    fleeing persecution in Europe and elsewhere.

    Last fall, Cruz
    deeply impressed Mort Klein, the head of the hawkish Zionist
    Organization of America, during a 45-minute conversation about Israel.
    Klein decided to invite Cruz to a November ZOA dinner, which drew major
    Jewish donors, including some who are Orthodox.

    “In coming to our
    dinner, seeing the response [from] people at the dinner, and the very
    wealthy Jewish activists at the dinner, I think this made him
    understand, ‘My God, Jews understand my position on Israel, even though
    I’m a Republican and most Jews are not, maybe they will be interested in
    considering being supportive of me,’” Klein said.

    That’s a
    premise Cruz has been exploring so much that Tevi Troy, a former Bush
    administration official and another friend of Muzin’s, relayed a joke
    making the rounds: “I’ve heard Cruz is also available for brises and bar
    mitzvahs, because he’s been so active and eager.” [He wants to be King of the Shabbos Goyim? or he’s Anusim?]

  • if the bltch cared about immigration she’d name the K, but she doesn’t, just like the ho mos who run this crapsite

  • Ayatollah Obama

    I like Ann Coulter but I think she alienates a lot of potential converts to conservatism with her hyperbole. It makes her writing seem fluffy and if she could affect a more scholarly persona in her prose she would get more of the legitimacy she deserves.