Report from Saint Petersburg

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, March 23, 2015

Jared Taylor’s account of the Russian Conservative Forum.

On March 22, I addressed the Russian International Conservative Forum, held in Saint Petersburg. Its purpose was to provide a forum for politicians and thinkers united in their support of national traditions and in opposition to globalism. There was a strong sentiment throughout the meeting of support for Russian sovereignty and European national independence in the face of pressure from the United States. As Yury Luybomirsky of the Russian National Cultural Center explained at the beginning of the meeting, the goal of all the participants was “to preserve national identity and culture,” and that independence from outside pressure and influence was essential for that purpose.

This was not a meeting that went unopposed. Demonstrators protested outside the conference site, and the meeting had to end early because of a telephoned bomb threat.

The meeting may have been an unprecedented assembly of European “far-right” groups, including Forza Nuova (New Force) of Italy, the National Independence Party of Finland, the Attack Party of Bulgaria, Golden Dawn of Greece, the National Democratic Party of Germany, and the newly-organized European group, the Alliance for Peace and Freedom. These parties have been tarred with the extremist labels, but are all dedicated to preserving European and national traditions.

Russia was represented by such groups as the Russian Imperial Movement, New Russia, and the editor of nationalist magazine Russian Observer. There was also a contingent of Cossacks, dressed in traditional military uniforms. The Russians strongly supported the effort to establish autonomous regions in Eastern Ukraine.

Cossacks at the forum.

Cossacks at the forum.

There were at least 30 speakers, all of whom gave remarks of about 10 minutes each. Most were in Russian, but the conference provided headsets for simultaneous interpretation into English. Here is a sampling.

Georgios Epitideios of Golden Dawn pointed out that 10 percent of the population of Greece is now composed of illegal immigrants, and that a mass influx of foreigners jeopardized national identity. He denounced the Greek government’s efforts–including imprisonment of party leaders–to “exterminate our movement.” He said that Golden Dawn opposes European sanctions against Russia and noted the common orthodox faith of Greeks and Russians.

Mikhail Remizo of the Russian Institute of National Strategy emphasized that Russia and Bulgaria would never join the European Union, which is in favor of globalization and opposes “the national project.” He also noted that Chinese economic pressure can be added to American political bullying as a growing threat to European autonomy. He argued that a healthy middle class was vital to national identity, and that the post-crisis collapse of the middle class is a grave concern for all patriots.

Ironically, he said, nationalists fighting globalization must have a global strategy. By this he meant that those who believe in national identity must cooperate as widely as possible. It is the Right and not the Left, he added, that will fight the leveling forces of globalization and defend the traditions and culture of the West. He concluded by quoting Arnold Toynbee–“Civilizations are not murdered; they commit suicide”–noting that the West is approaching this point.

Sam Dickson from the United States also spoke, and introduced himself as a representative of the real Americans who believe in peace with all countries and who want to preserve our race and civilization. He began with the old proverb, “one hundred repetitions make one truth:” the defenders of the truth can be overwhelmed by repeated lies.

He argued that one of the current lies is that Russia is a danger to the United States. He pointed out that it shares no borders with us, and has never fought a war with the United States. Indeed, it was Vladimir Putin’s solution to the problem of chemical weapons in Syria that spared the United States the costs and the casualties of military operations against Syria. He also praised Mr. Putin for encouraging higher birthrates in the West, while American rulers work for our dispossession by promoting Third-World immigration.

Davidson Yukka of the National Independence Party of Finland pointed out that in some respects Russia is freer than any other country in Europe. Some forms of speech have come under attack in countries such as Finland, where it is possible to lose one’s job for criticizing homosexuals or opposing gay marriage. “The European Union is an idea that has failed,” he said, “but the politicians are still riding this dead horse.” He concluded that if our enemies abuse and denounce us it is because we are right.

One of the Russian delegates, Vadim Zazimko, touched on another theme that was common throughout the conference: the importance of a national economy that serves the nation. He said that the state should be active in guiding the economy and that it was a myth to think that state-owned companies are always inefficient. He said that the Chinese model of government-directed economic growth is one worth studying, since the unbridled search for profits can have destructive results.

Olyvia Wyssa was the one French representative, and is a member of the Rhone-Alpes Regional Parliament. He said that he was active with the French National Front for many years but left the party when Marine Le Pen was voted in as its leader. He said that freedom of speech is in grave danger in France and that Miss Le Pen has been reluctant to fight the authorities on this point. All over Europe, he pointed out, people are in jail because of vaguely worded laws against “incitement of hatred” or for taking a dissenting view of historical events. In fact, he said, the situation is so bad that Russia is probably the only European country in which a meeting of this kind could be held. “Freedom of speech is the key to victory,” he concluded.

Alexey Zhivov is a coordinator for Fight for the Donbass, an organization that supports Russians who are fighting in Eastern Ukraine to establish an independent republic. Like many of the speakers, he denounced the Ukrainian government, which he called “fascist” and under American control. American thinking is alien to that of Europe, he said, and Europeans must be free to pursue cultural and national independence. He called Russia the eastern pole of Western civilization, and said that it was prepared to help all Europeans.

Jim Dawson, a Scot, is head of an organization called League for Life. He opposes abortion, which is helping reduce the numbers of Europeans. “If you don’t have babies you have no future,” he said. “We need babies in order to survive.” He emphasized that Christianity is the traditional faith of the West and that without Christianity the West will not survive. He called it the vaccine against liberalism.

The only Ukrainian speaker at the conference was Victoria Shilova, who runs a humanitarian organization in the Eastern Ukraine called Antivoyna. She said she is a Ukrainian patriot, but that it is important to draw a distinction between the Ukrainian government and the Ukrainian people. She said that 90 percent of Ukrainians want peace and want to end the fighting on the basis of Minsk agreements signed by the two parties, but that there are forces in the Ukrainian government that want to keep fighting. She said that a more accurate count of the deaths in the Eastern Ukraine would be close to 15,000 people, of whom the majority are civilians. “Weapons will not solve our problems,” she said, “and this fighting could even lead to nuclear war, which would leave no place habitable.”

Nick Griffin is the former head of the British National Party and is now active in the Alliance for Peace and Freedom. He argued that Western leaders have the Midas touch in reverse: Everything they touch turns to blood. He predicted that Europe will either end up as a caliphate or there will be a civil war, and that it is now Russia’s turn to lead the world and prevent catastrophe. To this end, Russia should go on a media offensive to counteract the irrational hostility found in the West. RT television broadcasts are a good first step, but they must be supplemented with a strong social media campaign. Mr. Griffin also argued that Russia must help replace the dollar as the sole means of international exchange.

At about 6:30 in the afternoon, the meeting was cut short by a telephoned bomb threat. The entire hotel where the conference was being held had to be evacuated while police with sniffer dogs checked for explosives. The call was a fake, but it did succeed in breaking up the meeting before a number of interesting people had a chance to speak: I was sorry not to hear Nikolay Trushchalov of the Russian Imperial Movement and Orazio Maria Gnerre of the Italian Millennium Party.

Police arrive with bomb-sniffing dogs.

Police arrive with bomb-sniffing dogs.

It is common to think that there is a monolithic political position in Russia, but that is clearly not the case. The conference attracted about 40 demonstrators, some of whom made trouble and were arrested. Nor was the Russian English-language press keen on the meeting. The Moscow Times reported that leftist politicians had called on the governor of Saint Petersburg to cancel the meeting, which it described in these words: “The forum’s speakers collectively ticked off all the boxes of intolerance and anti-Western sentiment, egged on by the enthusiasm of the audience filling a conference room at the St. Petersburg Holiday Inn.”

It is common in the West to assume that Russia does not distinguish itself in support of free speech, but a number of the speakers were probably right: This meeting was an exercise in vigorous free speech that probably could not have been held anywhere else in Europe..

Cossack argues with demonstrator.

Cossack argues with demonstrator.


What follow are the remarks I made at the forum:

It is a great honor and a pleasure to speak to you today, and I am grateful to the organizers of this forum for inviting me.

We are all united here in our opposition to globalization and in our love of traditional societies. It is these traditions that make societies unique. They are the qualities that make Russia Russian and France French. These qualities are treasures that we have received from our ancestors and that we hold in trust for our children. If even a single generation fails in its duty to pass its traditions to the next generation, these treasures can be lost forever.

As you know, tradition is under attack. One way is to replace the people who created traditions with an entirely different people. This is happening in the modern world through immigration. If, through immigration or conquest, the Russian people were replaced by Chinese, for example, everything that is unique and beautiful in Russian culture would be destroyed.

Another way to destroy tradition is to try to undermine the traditions of a people and replace them with alien traditions.

So there are two main ways by which tradition is destroyed: by replacing or diluting a people with foreigners, or by persuading a people to accept alien traditions.

Today, one country leads the world in aggressively exporting its own ideas–most of which are vulgar or worthless or completely opposed to human nature. That same country also leads the world in promoting the replacement of Western peoples through immigration from the Third World. That country is the greatest enemy and murderer of all authentic tradition.

Alas, my friends, that country is my country, the United States of America.

But I can tell you this: When my country promotes Muslim immigration into France and Germany, when my country tells the European Union it must accept refugees from Libya and Syria and Somalia, it is not being hypocritical. It is destroying itself in exactly the same way it promotes the destruction of the West.

It was not always this way.

The United States began as an outpost of Europe, of the Christian West. Its language, culture, institutions, religion, and aspirations were all European and exclusively European. Its first law of naturalization, passed in 1790 allowed citizenship only for “free white persons.” Until 1965, it had an immigration policy that was carefully designed to keep the country overwhelmingly European.

Now, people from the Third World are coming in such large numbers that Americans of European origin will become a minority in just 25 years. Because non-Europeans have so many children, a young white child is already a minority in his age group.

It is impossible to maintain any kind of tradition in what America is becoming. No country that is a mix of Africans, Asians, and Central Americans, and a dwindling remnant of aging Europeans can have an authentic culture and authentic traditions. My country is committing suicide.

The religion of America is no longer Christianity. It is “diversity.” We are not to believe in Jesus Christ. We are to believe that a crazy mix of races, of languages, of habits, of religions, of manners is a great and wonderful thing.

The slogan of America is “diversity is our greatest strength.”

In 2007, General George Casey, who commanded the American troops in Iraq, announced, “I firmly believe the strength of our Army comes from our diversity.” What is this? Does the strength of an army not from good training? From good weapons? From love of country? No. The US Army is strong because it has soldiers from Guatemala and the Philippines and Haiti and Mexico. This is insanity. But this insanity of diversity is the new religion of America.

But my country is not content just to commit suicide. It wants every Western country to commit suicide. When the United States was dropping bombs on Serbia in 1999–America loves to drop bombs–General Wesley Clark explained why the bombing was necessary:

There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. We are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.

And for Americans, multi-ethnic does not only mean Serbs and Croats and Bosnians. It means Arabs, Africans, Asians, Muslims, Hindus–anything and everything. That is what my country wants for you! Diversity!

And, of course, diversity is the great assassin of tradition, of identity, of everything that makes a society authentic and unique.

On the cultural level, when my government is not able to force a country to replace its own people with aliens, it lectures and browbeats them and tries to destroy their ancient traditions. It claims moral authority on matters that are none of its business.

My country tells the world that traditional marriage is a prison for women. That any government unlike its own is tyranny. That abortion is a sacred right. That homosexuals should marry.

My government seems to forget that the last American laws against homosexuality were overturned only in 2003. Homosexuality was illegal in my country for 400 years, but now we say to the world: “We were wrong. We were wrong for 400 years. But now we are right, and you must be like us or you are hateful scum.” This is astonishing arrogance.

But there is worse. Sometimes my government exports its ideas by force. It sees the world in terms of good and evil, and of course, America is the number one good country. Americans think of themselves as the Hollywood heroes of history.

Did you know that until this year the recruiting slogan of the United States Navy was “a global force for good”? That’s right: This concentration of tremendous destructive power called itself “a global force for good.”

This mentality of good and evil leads to war. I have lost count of how many nations my country has bombed in just the last few years. We bombed Afghanistan and the result is chaos. We bombed Iraq and the result is chaos. We bombed Libya and the result is chaos. We almost bombed Syria, but your President, Vladimir Putin, helped save us from that madness. Our policy seems to be that if we kill enough Muslims the survivors will believe in Jeffersonian democracy and wear bikinis.

I know it is tempting to think that the rulers of my country are evil, but they are not evil. It would be better if they were evil because it would be easier to unmask them and replace them. No, they genuinely believe that they are bringing enlightenment, modernity, freedom, and happiness to the world.

Of course, the United States government is not the same as the American people. There are many Americans, like me, who are dismayed by the arrogance and blindness of our government. Our voices are seldom heard, but we are there. And we support a strong and sovereign Russia that defends its traditions against all attacks. We support a Europe of nations and of regions, each with its own wonderful, irreplaceable traditions.

TaylorSpeaking

Jared Taylor addresses the forum.

Let me close with a word about us, about the world brotherhood of Europeans of which we are a part. I support authentic tradition everywhere, whether in Japan or India or Persia or Ethiopia. But our greatest love must be for our own traditions, for the spirit and genius and destiny and people of Europe.

My ancestors have lived for 350 years in North America, but I am a European, as much as you, whose ancestors have lived on this continent for ten thousand years. The same is true for all the Europeans who built outposts overseas, whether in North America or Australia or New Zealand or South Africa. We are all brothers and sisters, members of the same great family of Western Man.

But we are a small minority on this planet. Our numbers are shrinking while those of every other group are growing. That is why we must have territories that are exclusively ours, which are for us alone and for our children for ever. Without this, everything we love will be washed away.

We Europeans are one people. We have the same heritage and the same destiny.

That is why your struggle is my struggle. So long as the light of the West still shines in Russia, or in Sweden, or in Italy or in Spain, it shines for all Europeans, even for us, far away in North America.

And so, my brothers, may you have courage. May you have wisdom. And may you have the success you deserve, not just for your own nation but for all your European brothers and sisters everywhere.

TaylorSpeaking

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • phorning

    “He argued that one of the current lies is that Russia is a danger to the
    United States. He pointed out that it shares no borders with us, and
    has never fought a war with the United States.”

    These are misleading statements. While there was never a formal declaration of war, the Cold War was a war. Plenty of covert operatives died between the end of World War II and the fall of the Berlin Wall. We may not share a border with Russia, but the shortest point between Russia and Alaska is only a couple of miles. I know a lot of people here like Putin, but I don’t trust him. I admire the way he puts his countrymen and the interest of his country first, but it is his country, not ours.

    • Weisheit77

      And your statement is misleading because your seem to forget who was America’s most effective ally in her greatest hot war.

      We knew Stalin was a murderer. We knew Stalin was worse than Hitler but we saved him. Who’s responsible for the Cold War, exactly? And what did winning the cold war get us? This! Where we have to go St. Petersburg to discus the future of Western Civilization.

      Go back and watch Rocky IV and relive 1983 again.

      • hanfeedback

        Well put. It’s clear we were on the wrong side in WW2.

        • ShermanTMcCoy

          Sadly for the Jews. Had England not declared war on Germany, the non-lethal policies and programs to remove Jews from Germany could have continued. Eventually, I believe there would have been war between Germany and the USSR, as Germany looked for territory in Ukraine. I don’t think war against Russia would have succeeded.

          Hey, here’s a question for y’all:

          What’s the difference between Obama and Hitler?

          Hitler wanted to 1) Reunite the Germans, 2) Purge the country of parasites, and 3) Take over Ukraine.

          Obama wants to 1) Divide the Americans, 2) Fill the country with parasites (or, purge the country of the productive whites) and 3) Take over Ukraine.

          • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

            Well said.

        • WR_the_realist

          Actually, there wasn’t a right side.

          As with most wars.

          • Sick of it

            The right side would have been led by the nationalists who took out the revolutionaries in power. Obviously that would not include Hitler, FDR, or Stalin.

      • Earl P. Holt III

        We won the war but lost the peace to the Soviets, because Roosevelt’s Administration was largely run by the NKVD and GRU. (See “Blacklisted by History,” written by M.Stanton Evans.)

        • Alden

          And LBJ’s administration hired their children and grandchildren fit the war on poverty organizations that invaded every government agency in the country
          I know, I was there

      • Jefferson Goodberry

        Rocky IV was in 1985… just sayin’

    • libertarian1234

      “These are misleading statements.”

      You’re splitting hairs, based on examples that do not refute anything really, and each of your points of contention do not offer anything substantive to back up your allegation that the statements are misleading.

      And what do you hope to prove by stating Russia is only a couple of miles across the Bering Strait? I assume you’re deducting the 12 mile limit, plus the island claimed by Russia, otherwise Russia is 55 miles from the Alaskan land mass.

      “I admire the way he puts his countrymen and the interest of his country first, but it is his country, not ours.”
      How on earth could you expect him to put any other country but his own as a top priority?

      • How on earth could you expect him to put any other country but his own as a top priority?

        Because we’re so used to it from our rot gut leaders, that it seems like bizarro world when one does the right thing.

      • phorning

        I don’t expect Putin to put any other country first, I don’t understand why there is so much admiration for him here. He is a politician, looking out for his own political interest. As an American, middle class white man, he is not looking out for people like me. Some of the comments I read about him sound like things progressives were saying about Obama in 2008.

        I’m don’t understand why Sam Dickson keeps bringing up Russia not being a threat to us because of it’s geographic location. Given it’s proximity to Alaska it is not an accurate statement.

        • 1RW

          Russia has enough problems on its own. If America weren’t aggressively being a threat to Russia by constantly meddling in its politics and those of its neighbors, and trying to eliminate Russia’s ability to retaliate to a nuclear first strike with its missile defense then Russia wouldn’t want anything but friendship and cooperation with the states.

        • Putin !! Bravo !!
          It has been over a year of blood, tears and destruction in Ukraine especially in SE Ukraine. The new country now called Novorossia, has been fighting the puppet government in Kiev; however, it is the USA which is encouraging the genocide in the Donbass region.

    • OHDeutschePolkaConfederate

      He is right. The #1 danger to European Civilization is the Negroized culture of The United States of Obamaca.

      • WR_the_realist

        Obama is merely continuing the program. A succession of Clintons and Bushes, or their ideological clones, will ruin this country just as well as Obama is doing.

      • Chutzpahnovich

        The JewSA has never been in more dangerous hands.
        OWNERSHIP.

        It’s a matter of ownership. DC Inc is owned by the Rothschild financial cartel via its federal reserve bank subsidiary. DC Inc is a corporate asset of a bank. Whereas Israel is the echelon state. As Bibi once remarked, “Israel owns the U.S.”.

    • Alexandra1973

      We share a maritime border with Russia, between the Diomede Islands.

    • Light from the East

      Yes, Russia cares about Russian interest and USA cares about USA’s interest. That’s normal for a nation and that’s normal for humans since humans are tribal. But does that mean everything must use force to solve? Does that mean USA must change the culture and demographics of Russia and Russia must change the culture and demographics of USA? I don’t think so. What Jared Taylor did is seeking cooperation for all conservatives across nations over a common interest meanwhile keep the original identity of each one of them. Why do European Union have so many troubles? Because it is a system of cooperation but it forgets to keep the identity of each individual, especially the real European identity. If all the individuals are gone, this cooperation is no longer possible. It is a unstable system over the long term. As long as we know what issues can be done together and what issues cannot, we can all live in a stable and balanced world. If the relation of USA and Russia is in good shape, more than one third of total worlds problems would be solved, but it seems Obama didn’t realize that.

    • Awakened Saxon

      I admire the way he puts his countrymen and the interest of his country first . . ..

      He doesn’t even do that. Putin fills his country with Third World immigrants and fills Russia’s jails with nationalists. Meanwhile, communist groups are allowed to operate openly and are even the second largest party in parliament, whereas nationalist groups are banned from participating in elections (except for phony civic nationalists, e.g., Zhirinovsky’s Liberal Democratic Party).

    • “Love for one’s motherland is one of the most powerful and uplifting feelings. It manifested
      itself in full in the brotherly support to the people of Crimea and Sevastopol, when they resolutely decided to return home,” Putin said.

  • Brady

    Russia has an important role to play in world history today than neither America nor Europe can. Putin has been doing an excellent job of it so far.

    • Bossman

      No! He has not. Russia is a boring, cold land-locked country that does not mind its own business and is forever looking to extend itself to the more favorable parts of the world.

      • newscomments70

        Russia has 36,289 km of coastline (including warm water ports in the Black Sea), almost twice as much as the US. They have problems, but they have some of the most beautiful terrain in the world. Moscow, St Petersburg, and Sochi are world class cities rich with history and culture. Do some research; you are making false statements.

        • Bossman

          Almost all of that coastline is frozen in the winter. The Black sea is an inland sea, more like a lake. They do have history and culture but they’ve always been less advanced than West Europe.

          • Hilis Hatki

            Their buildings are beautiful, thanks to that Italian architect. It would be like living inside a Christmas ornament. Never been to Russia, just the youtube tours.

          • Alden

            There is a website of Siberian houses , absolutely gorgeous

          • Hilis Hatki

            Thankyou, looked at Vladstudio. Very ornate. The exterior moldings are beautiful. Looks like they use milk paint.

          • newscomments70

            The Black Sea has ocean access through the Mediterranean. Yes, they are less advanced than Western Europe. Furthermore they have a high crime rate and are ruled by corruption. Many Russians are virulently anti-American. They don’t say, “We hate America, but whites are ok”. They simply hate Americans in general.

          • MikeofAges

            High crime rate and ruled by corruption? Are you sure you are not talking about the gold old USA? The good old USSA?

          • newscomments70

            Russia homicide rate is about 2X that of the US. Most Russians distrust and dislike the police. I distrust our government but I like most of the US police I have came into contact with.

          • MikeofAges

            It’s sarcasm. People sometimes like to talk like the United States does not have the problems other countries have. We do have them.

          • newscomments70

            It’s not the same magnitude yet, but it’s coming.

          • USofAntiWhite

            They don’t hate Americans, in fact quite the opposite. I have been to Moscow and St. Pete and Russians are some of the nicest people. Don’t believe the anti-Russian media, they lie to make Americans think Russia is their enemy.

          • Alexandra1973

            I wouldn’t say it’s the people, but their government.

          • newscomments70

            I have met some nice people as well, but I have read some nasty comments online. I have also known people who were mugged and scammed in Russia (during and after communism).

          • WR_the_realist

            The widespread hatred of America is a relatively new thing, because of America imposing economic war on Russia due to Russia annexing Crimea after most Crimeans voted for it. And of course America being an avid promoter of gay marriage doesn’t improve the image of Americans to the average Russian.

            The United States is the world’s chief cultural imperialist backed up by the world’s most powerful military, so any advocate of traditionalism is going to view the United States with fear and loathing.

          • Itooktheredpill

            Are they necessarily less advanced? In terms of socioeconomics yes they are. But in terms of other things not so much.

            They have some of the best military technology on the planet. They have their own space stations. One of the few nations with the ability to destroy the planet.

          • newscomments70

            The brunt of their space, rocket and nuclear technology was captured from nazi Germany.

          • Itooktheredpill

            AS was the american, google operation paperclip

          • newscomments70

            Very true, but at that time, about 30% of our population was German American. They helped develop captured technology into a moon landing. The Russians imprisoned and tortured most of their Volga Germans. Russian space and rocket technology was always inferior to the US.

          • 1RW

            No, they relocated them to Kazakhstan were they carried on being Volgadeutch, and had some of the best agricultural enterprises in the USSR.

          • Russia carried out a successful test of its new Bulava intercontinental nuclear missile on Wednesday and will perform two more test launches in October and November, the head of its naval forces said.The armed forces have boosted their military training and test drills since the start of the conflict in eastern Ukraine,
            which Russia considers in its traditional sphere of influence.The 12-meter long Bulava, or mace, has undergone numerous tests, some
            successful, and can deliver an impact of up to 100 times the atomic blast that devastated Hiroshima in 1945.

            Naval Commander-in-Chief Admiral Viktor Chirkov said the test launch had been carried out from the White Sea and that the test missile had hit its target in Russia’s far east.”In October and November of this year, the naval fleet will carry out two more launches with two rocket cruisers equipped with ballistic missiles,” Interfax quoted Chirkov as saying.A Bulava missile weighs 36.8 tonnes and can travel 8,000 km (5,000 miles) and hold 6-10
            nuclear warheads.

          • newscomments70

            As the US becomes more third world, Russia will surpass them, no doubt. I hope that Russians can eliminate corruption from their government. I wish them the best.

          • Thank you for your suggestions.

          • newscomments70

            I learned Cyrillic and I always wanted to study Russian. It was never offered at any of the universities I attended though. Sometimes I watch old Russian media on youtube. I especially like Эдита Пьеха. She is a dream.

          • 1RW

            Ironically, its much more after the ’90s then during the Cold War.

          • The All Seeing Bry

            Russians: The White people that failed.

          • 1RW

            Failed to evolve into a bunch of fags like Western Europe and American SWPLs?

          • The All Seeing Bry

            No, failed to create a high trust society.

          • 1RW

            Of SWPL fags that let their daughters date negroes?

          • newscomments70

            They evolved into Africans though.

          • newscomments70

            According to Pravda, the Russian army plagued with sex slavery and male prostitution:

            http://english.pravda(dot)ru/society/stories/15-02-2007/87441-army_prostitute-0/

            It seems as though gay is wrong, unless they can make money at it through forced prostitution. Who are the faqs now? (I am not putting down the innocent young men who are forced into these disgusting acts. I feel badly for them.)

          • Это просто фантазии и бред сумасшедшего. Ложь.

          • newscomments70

            I didn’t say it, it came out of Russian media: Pravda.

          • Yellow pressa.Deshevaya sensation.

          • newscomments70

            I hope it’s not true. And I understand biased media, that’s all we have here. Last time I read Pravada/English, they spoke of the US, as if we were still in the cold war…and as if we were all the same person. They fail to realize that we have descended into a hellish, diverse existence of squabbling, third world minorities. Traditional Americans no longer rule the country.

          • newscomments70

            Also, most people on here do not read or speak Russian. Try Google translate, it works well between Russian and English.

            Кроме того, большинство людей на здесь не читать или говорить по-русски. Попробуйте Google Translate, она хорошо работает между русским и английским языками.

          • Nevsky

            where were you born and raised, if I may asked? You surely sound like an expert on Russia.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            He’s some sort of mudshark type. Forever making excuses for the greaserito nation.

          • Preston Wigginton

            Define advanced? Gay pride parades? Multiculturalism? Race mixing? Ya the west is way ahead of Russia in all three categories.

      • ShermanTMcCoy

        That must be why Russia put so many military bases outside of Russia.

        Oh, wait a minute . . .

      • Alexandra1973

        Land-locked? How well did you do in geography, anyway?

        • Hammerheart

          Bossman is either a troll, or is not very bright. He seems to be all in favor of the reconquista of the SW United States and believes the vast influx of low skilled, low IQ illegal aliens as a positive thing.

          • Alexandra1973

            I’d say a not-very-bright troll, myself.

      • Alden

        It’s not boring and it has Pacific ports in the frozen northeast. In has Baltuc ports that lead directly to the Atlantic
        You are absolutely right about the rest of your statement

      • WR_the_realist

        Actually it is Mexico that is looking to extend itself (north) to a more favorable part of the world.

        Crimea was part of Russia for centuries. It was a historical aberration that Crimea was tacked onto Ukraine, when Ukraine and Russia were both part of the U.S.S.R. (so at the time it didn’t seem to matter). Most Crimeans are happy to be part of Russia. I can’t say that most white Americans are happy to be part of Mexico.

        • BulgAryan

          No. Crimea was an exclave of the Byzantine empire for centuries, the last one to fall under Ottoman yoke. The northern part belonged to the Golden Horde, a mongol-tatar client state

          • 1RW

            But the Russian empire conquered it, and it has been under Russian/Soviet rule for 2 centuries, making the statement correct.

      • The US provokes and provokes Russia.. It reminds me of a kid provoking a dog. The dog might not bite for the first or second time, or even the third time. But eventually it will bite, and the kid will get hurt only because he did not listen to his parents telling him not to do that.
        For the US it’s a game: Ukraine now, Iraq, former Yugoslavia, Lybia etc…a “color” revolution here, another one there.. what a fun. They never think of the people who live in those countries, of the people that died because of their game. It’s really sad.
        And now, instead of finally doign at least one good thing and stopping supporting a war in a country which is thousands of km far away from the US, they continue pushing and pushing…. now Kerry come sto Kiev and we’ll see if another provocations comes right after this visit…https://youtu.be/rtVqrkxcu9Q

      • Nevsky

        Not to worry, I’m sure you are enjoying all the fun diversity in the US of A under sunny skies.

  • Evette Coutier

    Who would have thought Russia would be the savior of the white race? Why couldn’t it be a nice, warm, tropical resort island in the Caribbean…lard.

    • Race Heretic

      Hard places breed hard men. Our race was forged in the crucible of the steppes of Ukraine, where we broke the hooved beast of the plain and made him our servant, and fashioned the wheel serve him. Wherever we have gone and conquered in warmer climes, be it India, Africa, Central America, we have ruled for a time, then the darker-skinned people have displaced us (through our own folly).

      The white race was bred for the cold, ice and snow. As lovely as the middle latitudes are, they are not our environment.

      • Bossman

        No! The white race emerged in the dry and temperate highland regions of the Near East. It is north East Asians who appear to have evolved in extreme north latitudes.

        • Hilis Hatki

          Professor Sledge told us a longer nose was better for the cold, warms the air more, as oppose to say a flat African nose.

        • Race Heretic

          The Indo-European race whose culture and genes are the root of western civilization evolved in eastern Ukraine and southwestern Russia.

          • Alden

            That is why we are called Caucasians for the mountain range from which we spread all over Europe, India, Persia and ultimately the Americas Australia and New Zealand

          • Race Heretic

            Semites and North Africans are Caucasians but they aren’t Indo-European.

      • Evette Coutier

        I would settle for the Frence Riviera. I say we take back France.

      • Kenner

        Whites can thrive anywhere, because we bring advanced knowledge and skills.
        I see exceptions like rain forest and tundra, but we do fine anywhere else.

        • Ludwig

          Indeed, the debate of generalized vs. specialized, the European has demonstrated the ability to adapt to any environment. From the forest of Scandinavia to the outback of Australia, the European man can mold any terrain to his benefit. However, how long would the sub Saharan African last in Scandinavia without the technology of the European man. This is a rhetorical question, I know you already know the answer. Generalization is the greatest evolutionary asset of the European man.

        • George Moriarty

          It has often been said; somehow swap the population of NZ (Still mainly white Anglo but changing fast) with the population of Libya and within 2 generations you would have a thriving technically advanced democratic nation where Libya used to be and the former NZ would be a mildly backwards Islamic hell hole.
          Now re Putin, I think we admire him because he stands up for his people but remember he has effectively declared himself president for life. (Perhaps there is a certain other president who would also like to do this. He would also stand up for HIS people)
          Russia is an amazing country but remember it has always been ruled by a small cultural educated elite and always with the real strongman at the top. Most Russians still live a pretty miserable life compared with us.

          • 1RW

            I got news for you, every country is ruled by a small elite. Democracy is how they trick the masses into thinking that they should obey the government. It’s cheaper and nicer than coercion

    • anony

      Edgar Casey predicted that freedom would by saved by…Russia.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Edgar Casey was a fraud.

        • anony

          I know; even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

      • Tim_in_Indiana

        Are you talking about the prophet and mystic? His name was spelled Cayce.

        • anony

          Right. I once spelled martial marshal.

    • Bossman

      Russia is not a friend of the white race. Their actions in promoting international communism has forced the USA to become friends with China and to give them massive amount of technological assistance which they are now using to overtake the West.

      • Evette Coutier

        You man wish to rethink your assessment. China turned semi-capitalist after Russia tried. Red China was solid c commie. We did not give China much of their technology, it was stolen or obtained by corporations willing to sell out their country for profit. Regardless, their past doesn’t matter. If their current efforts are in the right direction, then so be it. Right now world wide whites are losing, and we need their efforts.

        • Tim_in_Indiana

          I can’t help thinking about how many missiles the USSR had pointed at us, and how many we had pointed at them. Pure insanity. In fact, I have to believe that the irrationality that this country has shown in embracing multiculturalism has to stem at least in part from the sheer terror of the nuclear threat, from which we have still not recovered to this day.

          • Evette Coutier

            Please explain how you connect the nuclear threat with multiculturalism. I’m not sure following you on that point.

          • Tim_in_Indiana

            If this country were a mishmash of different races, we’d be a less attractive target of nuclear warfare. After all, who needs to bomb a third world pesthole anyway? Of course, who wants to live in a third world pesthole,either? But perhaps they think that would be a better fate than to die in a nuclear Armageddon.

          • The All Seeing Bry

            Tim, that is such a long shot. The genocide of Whites is a calculated maneuver by elites to create a 2-class society. Whites all throughout history have been the hardest to subjugate (We like freedom the most and are willing to get bloody over our views). The elitist know this, and know that if they eliminate Whitey, they eliminate their biggest threat to a 2-class society.

            Genocide of Whites is a means to an end of a 2-class society.

          • 1RW

            I blame the jews personally

      • Hilis Hatki

        What is a “ism” when it really gets down to it? Just reasons for having things a certain way. The most enlightening thing Bill Clinton every said was “It depends on what the meaning of is … is.”. And it is, what it is, what it is. A truth is not “the truth”. There are as many facets to life as there are twinkles in the night sky. We became friends with China because when the wall came down Russia would not let our corporations rape their country. The Horses of Capitalism and Communism both pull the same socialist wagon.

      • NotYouNotSure

        “Russia is not a friend of the white race”

        And do you consider America a friend of the white race ? I cannot think of nation that is more anti white than America, it has done permanent damage to Europe and has done more harm to white interests than any other nation in all of history.

        • Awakened Saxon

          How does arguing that America is anti-white prove that Russia is not also anti-white? Both are anti-white. Both are competing to dominate Europe.

        • UncleSham

          America became anti-White during the Cold War because we thought opening ourselves up to Blacks would stop Africa from going Communist. America and the Soviet Union were both trying to prove they weren’t racist in order to compete for the hearts and minds of the third world.

      • ShermanTMcCoy

        Another fool who still can’t stop fighting the Cold War against an adversary that no longer exists.

        • Awakened Saxon

          Only the adversary does exist, just as it existed before the Cold War and, in fact, hundreds of years earlier. The Russians have been trying for a very long time to Russify Europe.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            I repeat.

          • Awakened Saxon

            ShermanTMcCoy: Russia and her valiant president have less interest in “Russifying” Europe than the US and her NATO lickspittles do in turning the entire world into a globalist multiculti “paradise.”

            Both are bad. This has nothing to do with the Cold War or a Cold War mentality. I am against the Americanisation of Europe and the Russification of Europe. I want nationalism for Europe; I don’t want Europeans to have to choose between cozying up to one evil empire or the other evil empire.

            ShermanTMcCoy: Mr. Putin may not be explicitly “pro-white”, but at least he is not “anti-white” and is the only leader daring to stand up to the NWO.

            Putin is building his own version of the NWO, i.e., the Eurasian Economic Union. Russia’s own nationalists denounce Putin as anti-white. He is the most pro-immigration leader in Russian history.

          • Brady

            What you want, and what’s in the cards are two different things. Europe is caught between two juggernauts. The only way is to play one against the other. You may not want Europeans to have to choose between Americanization and Russification, but for the time being, that’s precisely the choice that stands before them. In the Russian sphere of influence there is some hope of the European nations retaining their national identity. The US offers none. Essentially the reverse of the situation they were in 70 years ago.

            The European nationalists know that shaking off the shackles of US hegemony will need Russian support. In the Russian sphere of influence there is some hope of the European nations retaining their national identity. The US offers none. Essentially the reverse of the situation they were in 70 years ago. This is why intelligent Europeans support Russia. Failure to supporort Russia effectively means supporting more US domination of Europe, more EU bureaucracy and more dispossession of Europeans by Third World immigrants.

            Things a much more hopeful for Europe than in the ’90s, when Russia itself was virtually a vassal of the US. Hopefully the day will one day come when Europe won’t need Russia, but it’s not here yet.

          • 1RW

            Wasn’t the other way around? I mean Peter the Great made epic efforts to Europinize Russians. And then Napoleon and Hitler tried to make Russia a European colony. I’m not sure what history books you’re reading

          • Awakened Saxon

            You seem to act as though Peter the Great’s efforts prove my point to be wrong. Napoleon and Hitler both failed, thus making them irrelevant to the Europeanisation of Russia.

            1RW: I’m not sure what history books you’re reading

            I could say the same for you. You’re unfamiliar with the Russification of Finland, Karelia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, East Prussia, the former East Germany, Poland, Ukraine, Romania, and Moldova?

          • 1RW

            All these countries (Karelia not being a country by the way) retain their native languages and customs. Russian rule over them at one point or another is not the same as “Russification” which implies a suppression of the local culture and its substitution with Russian culture. This plainly didn’t happen, and it was both Russian Imperial and Soviet policy to let nations retain their borders, language, and culture.

          • Awakened Saxon

            1RW: All these countries (Karelia not being a country by the way) retain their native languages and customs.

            Where can I find German language and customs in Kaliningrad Oblast? How about Romanian language and culture in Transnistrea? As for Karelia, the Karelians have either fled to Finland or been thoroughly Russified. Other countries had to undo Russification after the USSR collapsed.

            1RW: Russian rule over them at one point or another is not the same as “Russification” which implies a suppression of the local culture and its substitution with Russian culture.

            That is exactly what happened. Russia replaced their customs, their language, their religion, and even their national identity. Look no further than the Ukrainians who are so Russified that they are fighting their fellow Ukrainians on behalf of Russia.

            1RW: This plainly didn’t happen, and it was both Russian Imperial and Soviet policy to let nations retain their borders, language, and culture.

            This statement is shockingly ignorant. Look up ‘Russification’. I suggest you start by researching the demographic transformation of the Baltic states which the USSR filled with Russian settlers during the 20th century.

          • 1RW

            Kaliningrad got ethnically cleansed, not Russified. And frankly, the Germans brought it on themselves. Next time don’t sneak attack Russia, kill 20 million of them, and then loose. Germany got off light considering what they had in mind had they won.

            Transnistrea was the result of a backfired hyper-nationalist policy in Moldova. If the Moldovans hadn’t been so violently insistent on in their cultural supremacy, the non-Moldovans in Transniester wouldn’t have fought back.

            Ukranians are more Ukranified than Russified. Ukraine is a patchwork of various regions assembled by the Russian Empire and then the USSR. It includes territories taken from Turks (South coast), Tartars (Crimea, though now back in Russia), Parts of Poland, Hungary, maybe Romania, I’m not sure. Russia being the core of the empire and then the Soviet Union certainly had a large cultural influence. Much like the whole world watches American movies (which are childish and corrosive by the way). However, notice how none of these countries stopped existing.

            Anyway, the fact that all these actual countries you mention, as well as well over a hundred non-Russian ethnic groups inside Russia itself still exist and have their own language, culture, and borders is testament opposite to what you say.

          • Martel

            The Russians committed genocide in nearly all occupied nations. If they had continued om the same rate in exterminating Estonians the country would have been an empty landmass by now. What’s with people and their obsessive need to pick a side. Pro-Russian nationalists are as idiotic as those who support American aggression.

      • Light from the East

        I both agree and disagree your comment. When you consider the international relation, there is no friends or opponents forever, only interests matter. So it’s okay for you to not to interact with Russians, but it’s hard for other countries to ignore since Russia is a big country. If you think the USA becomes friends with China is because of Russia, then you are wrong. The USA becomes friends with China because of its own decisions, both rational or irrational. After the economy reform of China, its GDP has been skyrocketing. If you are a race realist, you know with the average IQ of Chinese and its population, China’s GDP is sure to in the top 3 within 5000 years most of time of human history. Because China’s growing economy, it earns so many US dollars (foreign exchange reserve) in its hands. Meanwhile the USA wants to execute many new policies but lacks money so the USA persuaded China to use its foreign exchange to buy US debt and that’s why China is currently the biggest US debt foreign holder. I remember if the USA decides to save the welfare spending on those illegal aliens, it can actually pay off the debt owed to China. That will be a favorable situation to both countries. The US does not have to use other way (like technological support) to pay the debt and China does not have to fear if another financial crisis makes the debt in hands valueless. International relationship is a complex issue so it will be too hurried to treat it as humans’ relationship. Oversimplification of a problem can result in more chaos for all countries.

      • EuropeanIdentity33

        I completely agree with you White Russians are not friends of the white race, but Mestizos are true allies to us alright. I mean countries like Mexico, Honduras and Columbia are the pinnacles of enlightenment and human achievement right?

  • Red

    Excellent speech Mr. Taylor.

  • Epiminondas

    Thanks, Jared. You are our hero.

  • Puggg

    Did you know that until this year the recruiting slogan of the United States Navy was “a global force for good”? That’s right: This concentration of tremendous destructive power called itself “a global force for good.”

    My father hated those TV commercials. The most dangerous place to be in this world was directly in between him and a TV if that sort of commercial came on and he had anything in his hand.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I think the new slogan for the Marines just came out:

      “A Few Good Transsexuals”.

    • WR_the_realist

      Those sorts of ads are very bad for my blood pressure.

  • Red

    American thinking is alien to that of Europe, he said, and Europeans must be free to pursue cultural and national independence.

    ‘American’ thinking may be, but not for me or many of my fellow Southerners. We were the first victims of this madness.

    • Weisheit77

      As a descendant of soldiers who fought for the Confederacy, that is exactly my interpretation of American History, too.

      • Speedy Steve

        Female scum is still moving to Virginia from Massachusetts, where they buy a house, and run for the school board, and then immediately foist upon we redneck yahoos all the policies that failed up there in New England.

        • Triarius

          Californians are doing the same thing throughout the American Southwest and Mountain West. I love calling then out on it, of course they have no response.

    • Alden

      I’m not a southerner but American thinking is not mine. Southerners were the first but the northern and western working class was the second victim of
      “American thinking”

    • OHDeutschePolkaConfederate

      I agree. The next victims were immigrants from Continental Europe. Forcing European immigrants to assimilate to the already watered down version of Anglo-Celtic culture that prevailed in White America was the first stroke in deculturization of White Europeans in America. The American Indian was allowed to influence and miscegenate with the original Anglo-Celtic strain far too much, creating a culture marginally White. The German/Irish immigration of the 1850’s, and Eastern/Southern immigration at the turn of the century both greatly iimproved the culture and genetic stock of White America. Only another mass influx of European immigrants, IMO, will reinvigorate the European greatness of White America that was at the core of American greatness 50 years ago.

      • Awakened Saxon

        When did European immigrants assimilate into Anglo-Celtic culture? Anglo-Celtic culture is nearly extinct in the areas that received mass European immigration.

        • Speedy Steve

          Northern Italy is far different from Sicily.

          • Awakened Saxon

            You’re right. I should have clarified: Going to parts of the Northeast today still feels like going to southern Italy.

          • Triarius

            In terms of industrialization like the American North and South, yes. Sicily and Calabria have more farming and open area. In terms of ethnicity, not a chance. Been there dozens of times, still have family all over Italy.

            Note I am not counting the Morrocan street vendors, which the North has more of.

          • Speedy Steve

            The attitude of Milanese is that Sicilians are North Africans.

    • Speedy Steve

      Yankee imperialists out of Dixie!

  • What was their reaction? Was their lots of intermittent applause?

  • silviosilver

    Mikhail Remizo of the Russian Institute of National Strategy emphasized that Russia and Bulgaria would never join the European Union,

    Did he really say Bulgaria or did you mean to write Belarus? Bulgaria is already a member of the EU.

  • Weisheit77

    Strong words, Mr. Taylor, but I’m afraid you’re right. All the “progressive” (I hate that word) attacks on tradition are being supported by force of American arms.
    It is why I’m surprised that some on the side of tradition think fondly of the US Military. It’s not your granddaddy’s military anymore.

    I’m also glad that freedom of speech was mentioned. This clearly demonstrates that the growing acceptance of “hate speech” laws is to end debate regarding progressive issues while the left allows its “useful idiots” to labor under the delusion that they support freedom of expression, yet seek to outlaw haters who oppose gay marriage, for example. I say this as an American who up until very recently was employed on at university and it amazed me the amount of people who actually thought we have hate speech laws; in some people’s minds hate speech is already illegal.

    • Race Heretic

      As C.S. Lewis said, progressing towards what? The destruction of our society seems like the target of progression.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I believe the word “progressive” was being used as subterfuge. The word that best applied was “incremental”, but Antonio Gramsci and his termites had made that a dirty word by the time ‘The Frankfurt School’ hatched their scheme to destroy western civilization.

        This link puts cultural Marxism into layman’s terms.

        http[colon[//theconservativetreehouse[dot]com/2013/07/23/cultural-marxists-the-barely-visible-termites-destroying-from-within/

    • AndrewInterrupted

      “It’s not your granddaddy’s military anymore”.

      Jared understands this. That’s why he’s forging alliances with quasi-white regions like Russia. I don’t consider Slavs to be “white” by western European definitions. Nor do I consider Hungarians western Europeans (where Mr. Taylor and Mr. Spencer were bravely forging “white” alliances last year). European-America will need to forge many more alliances, perhaps with New Zealand, Australia, Norway (Forget Sweden. What happened to those people??), Estonia, etc.

      • Alexandra1973

        Slavs are just another branch of the White race, same as Mediterraneans.

        (Half Polish here.)

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Understood.

          If Western Europeans are the core of “Western Civilization”, the Slavs and Mediterraneans (like Greeks) are the next tier. I consider Hungarians, “Conquistador Spaniards”, Slavs, and Greeks to be more Eastern European, though. With some of them–BARELY European.

          Everything east of Poland (and obviously south) has a little too much Khazarian in the blood, for my taste. The “nation-maker” versus “nation-taker” line of demarcation begins there. Have to get mighty particular when handing out nation-maker licenses in that region.

          Ancient Khazaria
          .

          • Alexandra1973

            For what it’s worth, it’s my understanding that among Whites, Germans are on the top, Slavs on the bottom.

            I must have enough German in me to offset my Slavic genes. LOL

          • Alden

            That was Hitler’s opinion. Back in the 18th century the Kings of Prussia were very concerned that the merchant and trades class of Prussia was migrating to Poland because Poland was much better for business, industry and technology In fact seizure of Poland’s superior mines and industry was the motivation for Prussia’s joining the partition of Poland
            Hitler’s blonde German vs Slav sub humans was ludicrous considering how very much blonder Poles are than Germans

          • Itooktheredpill

            I consider one of Hitlers biggest mistakes identifying the slavs as inferior and waging a war of extermination against them. It was ultimately the slavs that stormed and sacked berlin bringing the reich to its knees.

            When evaluating the slavs you are talking about a group that controls the most landmass on the planet (Russia, Poland, Ukraine, Belarus,Czech republic, Slovakia, etc)

            Routinely scores more or less the same on IQ tests as other whites despite lower socioeconomic standards.

            Has some of the best military technology on the planet (Russia), and is one of the few groups who has conquered the space frontier.

            Not to mention all slavic groups have had no trouble integrating and finding success in America, Australia, Brazil , Argentina etc.

            Not exactly signs of inferiority if you ask me.

          • Martel

            Your first paragraph makes absolutely no sense unless your knowledge about Hitler’s views on the slaves and why he developed these views comes strictly from US propaganda material passed on to you in highschool or via the History Channel.

          • Itooktheredpill

            My first paragraph makes perfect sense. The Russians (Slavs) caused 80% of hitlers casualties in the war. The eastern front is where the war was won and lost. Contrary to AMERICAN propaganda which tries to portray D-Day as the most important battle of the war and tries to minimize the contribution of the Russians. Its unlikely an “inferior” group would be able to perform in such a manner and defeat “superior” Germanics if that was not the case.

            Please explain to me what is wrong about my view?
            What are Hitlers views on the slavs then? Did he not identify them as inferior and murder millions of them? These things happened.

            Over the years of surging white nationalists sites you will see this argument come up over and over. Are the Slavs white? Are they inferior? Did Hitler really hate the Slavs? All of my research and experiences says yes they are white and its highly unlikely that there is enough genetic distance between them and “Western Europeans” to be considered inferior.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            It wasn’t just Hitler’s opinion and it has since been backed up by the Human Genome Project. Slav and German genes are very different. Slavs have heavy Khazarian admixture.

          • Nevsky

            According to who?

          • Alden

            Have you ever looked at a map? Spain is one of the westernmost nations of Europe. Some if the coast is almost as far west as England.

          • Martel

            The vast majority of populations you accuse of being “Khazarian” are as European in behaviour and appearance as I am, a Dutch man. This sort of overambitious divisioning of the white race belongs in the 19th century, its the same strain of thinking which inspired ruthless intra-European warfare, the labelling of Germans as barbaric “Huns” by the English and so forth.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Actually it’s the proper definition and application of “diversity”: acknowledging the differences and protecting them. The trouble with Khazarian genes, aside from spreading far and wide, it takes so little of that taint to turn a person into a nation-taker. It’s like genetic Ricin.

          • David Ashton

            The Russians fought the original Khazars.
            The Ashkenazim have only a small percentage of Khazar “blood”.
            “T

        • Awakened Saxon

          Russians are heavily Asiatic, at least culturally, if not in blood.

          • Alexandra1973

            My paternal great-grandparents came from Belarus and Poland. I wonder how much Asiatic ancestry that would give me…?

            I read an interesting book about the history of Russia once. Because of its size and proximity to the Orient, you can see a lot of Asiatic influence.

          • Awakened Saxon

            Not sure about the blood issue. I’m sure someone has done genetic studies, however. As for culture, the popularity of Eurasianism in Russia – even among self-described nationalists – is a good clue as to the extent of Asian influence in Russia. I suppose it is to be expected considering Russia’s position on the frontier with Asia.

            Westerners who cozy up to Russia do so at their own peril, in my opinion. Russia’s goals are not a reborn and awakened Europe.

          • Alexandra1973

            If I had the money, I’d get a DNA test done so I can get a breakdown. My mom wants to do it but she’s not half-Eastern European.

            The breakdown I’m aware of is about 47% Anglo-Saxon-Celtic, 3% Amerind (Cherokee–and that’s at most), and 50% Eastern European.

            Still, you don’t have to be 100% White or 100% NW European to be a realist.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            It’s only $99 now. I had mine done last year. See my other comment. You just spit into a vile and mail it off.

          • Alden

            There is no Asian blood in Poles and Belarians the tartars and Mongols never got that far west

          • Triarius

            The Mongol’s west capital was Kiev for a long time, and the Tatars(Mongols) occupied Crimea for half a millennium.

            Look up the Penchenegs in Ukraine, that is what the Byzantines called them. But they were all the same people with three names (The West, Rus, Byzantium).

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Spend the $99 and get your DNA mapped out. Go to 23andME[dot]com or NatGeo.

            They will even tell you how much cave man blood you have. I am 3% Neanderthal. NatGeo also lists your % of Denisovan blood. Western Europeans tend to be 5% caveman (Neanderthal and Denisovan combined). And that is a good thing.

            Neanderthal Man was found to have invented the first manufacturing process–45,000 years ago.

          • Triarius

            You’re too far west, so probably none. Poles were captured and exported to the Ottomans, so any offspring is in Turkey.

          • Nevsky

            We, Russians, were under Mongol rule for over 3 centuries. So, yes, there’s a lot of Asian influence. It also depends on the region.

          • Nevsky

            Mentality-wise, we are quite Asian. That is why we will survive this globalist experiment and you, progressive Westerners, are being “brownized” up to your rectum.

      • Alden

        The E. Europeans are as White as the Nordics and English . In fact, Sweden and Finland are in E Europe

        As far as appearance goes, people have blonder hair, fairer skin and bluer eyes the farther east you go . Of course the SE Europeans , like the SW Europeans are darker than the northerners

        It is very true that E European culture is very different from W European culture There is an old Austrian saying , Asia begins at the eastern edge of Vienna

        White is a race, not a culture. A Russian is as White as a Swede or a German but a lot of Europeans used to refer to Russians as White Asians referring to their non European culture

        • Itooktheredpill

          Regarding the cultural thing it depends on which countries you are speaking of. The Czech republic and Poland have always been very western in their culture despite being slavic. Its not until you reach the former borderlands of the Polish Lithuanian commonwealth (Belarus and Ukraine) that you start to see the civilizational, cultural changes . Even then its nothing drastic.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          It comes down to two or three events in history: how much exposure to the Khazars and how much exposure to the Muslim and Hun hordes.

          That’s why the further east and south you go, the less western civilization material you have to work with.

          Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Chechens, and Persians all “look white”, to quote Jared Taylor, but it isn’t “white looking” that made western civilization. It was westerners who “looked white”.

      • Itooktheredpill

        Just about every genetic study done on europeans shows that all the european nations cluster together and from a classification standpoint can certainly be looked at as one race. To not consider slavs to be white is profound ignorance and lack of knowledge on the topic.

        In regards to mongoloid admixture of the Russians its fairly miniscule. The vast majority of Russians are from a genetic standpoint very white.

        If you ever traveled to the Czech republic, Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, etc and came to the conclusion that these people are not white both in a genetic, cultural, and civilizational sense I would recommend a shrink.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          It isn’t called western civilization because of Slavs, but they may join. The ignorance is yours.

          • Itooktheredpill

            I don’t consider Slavs to be “white” by western European definitions.

            What are they then?

          • AndrewInterrupted

            A tier, as I mentioned.

            American Africans aren’t African by American standards either. They average 22% European blood.

            And Caribbean Africans have even more European in their blood.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            They were polluted by the Khazars, the civilization killers.
            .

          • 1RW

            Not really. They actually are the ones who destroyed Khazars.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            They mixed with them. Yes, the Khazars were the last Neanderthal hold-outs. All of Neanderthal Nation was assimilated.

            http[colon]//johndenugent[dot]us/neanderthals-and-semites/

          • Itooktheredpill

            Like I said a shrink should help

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Facts offend. Perhaps you should consider the Democrat Party.

          • 1RW

            You don’t have facts, just a cheap feeling of superiority.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            The grievance industry awaits you.
            Wear something pink.

          • 1RW

            The deNugent article you site has nothing about Slavs being heavily Neanderthal.

            And actually lacks hard data on the genetics to support its point anyway. It has a theory and makes assumptions about data that don’t support that theory terribly well.

            additionally, the Negro race is not mixed with Neanderthal swhile being perhaps the most psychopathic and violent.

            So you got no actual facts, just some notions

          • Nevsky

            Khazar is another word for a Semite

          • AndrewInterrupted

            True. The genes are present in Ashkenazi Jews (Sheryl Scamberg, Mark Zuckerbird), Armenians (KarCrashians), Georgians (Joseph Stalin), Chechens (the Tsarnaev brothers), Persians (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad)… People don’t make the real-time, real-life connection.

    • Alden

      I remember a liberal who told me that the word gals is a sexist slur. But the word guys is not a sexist slur.

      • thomasdosborneii

        Sounds kind of like how “only whites can be racist”, so “only men can be sexist”.

  • libertarian1234

    The rabid leftist controllers in the West will find out what diverse weaknesses have been created when they bait Russia or China into a confrontation. Their “global force for good,” is going to be revealed as a weakened conglomeration of oddballs, flakes and misfits.

    Did you see their new admirals lately? Or a few of the higher ups in the Army and Marines? And how about a good percentage of the rank and file? They’re a grand experiment in diversity and social engineering, instead of a fine example of military readiness. The rabid, radical leftists now control the US military.

    A concentrated effort to build up militaries from Iran to North Korea to China to Russia has been underway for many years now, and especially Russia and China have made great strides, with Russia ahead of the US in much military technology. At the present time they are known to have the greatest nuclear arsenal in the world, while the US nuclear inventory has been reduced by the community organizer.

    And, incidentally, the above countries are right this minute organizing an alternate group so that the US dollar will be replaced as a reserve currency, so, in addition to a degraded military, the lefties and the community organizer are causing this country to be a second-rate economy always on the verge of collapse….and a third world zoo.

    The fact that only in Russia could the above described meeting have taken place, because the US is effectively controlled by leftist crazies, just as the EU is, is proof that freedom is on the wane in the West. The corrupt elites are too busy spying on us 24/7 to pay close attention to the harm they’ve caused with their policies of social engineering. Or are they just too dense to understand any of what they’ve caused to happen?

    Russia is now the only hope for Caucasians. This country has relegated us to the role of cannon fodder and bullet stoppers. And it gets worse every day.

    • Gnapp

      They’re not “leftist crazies”, they’re Jews. Name them.

  • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

    ‘The religion of America is no longer Christianity. It is “diversity.” We are not to believe in Jesus Christ. We are to believe that a crazy mix of races, of languages, of habits, of religions, of manners is a great and wonderful thing.’
    This is sadly true. I read an article on CNN that a protestant/non denominational preacher has his congregation say Hindu, Buddhist and Islamic prayers in his church to show case how diverse his congregation is and accepting of DIE-versity and all religions. This is totally anthetical to the teachings of Christianity. Even some Catholic and protestant denominations follow this nonsense.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Churches in the World Council of Churches are apostate. They no longer believe in the Bible. Instead they peddle the New World Odor religion of political correctness.

      • Alden

        Did you hear about the Pres Church USA, the church from which your Pres church split ? They recently married a lesbian couple both of whom are Pres USA clergy and pastors

      • Alexandra1973

        That is why I go to an *independent* Baptist church.

        You ever read the book by Cathy Burns, “Billy Graham and His Friends”? She goes into what the WCC and all those other groups are about.

        • Katherine McChesney

          That’s why I am a member of the Presbyterian Church in America. It is true Conservative and is not politically correct.

          • Alexandra1973

            Nothing wrong with a church that teaches out of the Bible. 🙂 My emphasis was not on Baptist, BTW, but on “independent.”

            My mother identifies as Methodist and she’s a two-time Obama voter. There’s a “religious left” as well and I think Methodist fits in that category.

        • Alden

          WCC was a soviet communist front from the beginning All during the Cold War the Catholics were castigated for refusing to join

  • Ronald Roman

    Mikhail Remizo of the Russian Institute of National Strategy should have been told that Bulgaria is already in the European Union.

  • David Ashton

    The Cold War was an interactive phenomenon, but its principal roots were in the Leninist plan for world revolution, followed by the foreign policy of Stalin. Russia has always been justified in fearing invasion from foreigners, however, and the actions of the “new” NATO have been provocative. We must learn correct lessons from an objective and thorough study of the past, especially of international communism, but the way forward for us all must be co-operation between the national groups within a hitherto diminishing white race, defensive of our own traditions while not seeking enemies outside, and restoring our people, and the best within our peoples, in the interest of our own survival and also the general progress of mankind and its future evolution.

    • MikeofAges

      The “new” NATO? I have a question. Exactly what part of the North Atlantic is the Ukraine located in anyway? In the Cold War era, the Soviet Union respected NATO because it represented a cultural community of the developed nations ringing the North Atlantic. NATO was a force for rational order and stability. What is today’s NATO? North Atlantic Treaty Organization? North Atlantic? Is that a joke?

      Furthermore, through the Helsinki Accords, the Soviet Union and the West recognized the boundaries of all European countries up to the borders of the Soviet Union, including the boundaries of Germany and Poland. Russia as the legal successor to the Soviet Union continues to respect these borders. Yes, we have an interest in what happens beyond the border of the former Soviet Union, just as the Soviet Union had an interest in what happened beyond its border. But the issues deriving from the breakup of the Soviet Union have never been settled through a definitive process with the gravitas of the Helsinki Accords. The terms of that settlement, which must deal with the consequences of Czarist and Soviet territorial arrangements, have yet to be worked out. But one thing should be clear. Although the West has an interest and should be a party, the terms cannot be dictated by the West nor can the breakup of the Soviet Union be treated as akin to the decolonization process carried out after World War II.

      The Soviet Union was a world power and one of the victorious powers of World War II. Its successor Russia cannot be treated as anything less. In the West, the pro-multiculturist leftists know that conflict behind the former Soviet borders and the fate of Russia are the fulcrum on which the fate of Western civilization will turn. That is why the left particularly sits on its normally activist hands even as America and the West potentially blunder toward war with Russia in the effort to mindlessly expand NATO beyond the boundaries of the inherent cultural community NATO represents. In a word, crazy.

      • David Ashton

        A well-informed, lucid and sensible comment.

        • Spikeygrrl

          But you did not upvote it. Why?

          • David Ashton

            Oversight now corrected.

  • LHathaway

    There’s a great and optimistic ending to the speech but what exact traditions do Whites have to return to, and what national customs must be rekindled? We have a tradition of hedonism, independence, vulgarity and diversity and multiculturalism and also failure. Even if all Whites in the US stand up and band together, the vast majority of them will have been born and raised as multiculturalists. How many of them are over 80 years old And lifelong staunch conservatives (of the kind we can all agree)? There is no tradition to rally around and go back to. Any ‘traditions’ new White leaders sell will be one’s they have made up likely basically to fool and sooth people. Whites in the US need to rally around Whiteness. No call to tradition, nation, creed or politics can help us now. Only White solidarity matters now. Nothing else. After we have our own nation, an Israel of our own, then these other ‘traditions’ and differences and issues can be settled. Our ancestors will likely settle these issues they way we do now, by voting on them.

    The same is true for Whites in other countries where they are still the majority. Only immigration matters, nothing else. In nations that remain White (where Whites are not on track to becoming an ever smaller segment of the population spiraling to the number zero) their White ancestors will also be able to decide these issues however they see fit.

    • Mack0

      You’ve made an interesting point and one I’ve ruminated on many times. Does our survival mean transcending the limitations of whiteness. Whiteness being a meaningless term if you think about it .

      • LHathaway

        I’m not sure. In three or four hundred years there may be no Whites left in North America. The same won’t likely be true for Hispanics, Asians and Blacks. There may be no White on any island left on this Earth. Western Europe (though perhaps a Century behind) seems on track to follow. Our cultures, traditions, beliefs, or our economies – they are not under attack. We don’t face a threat from leftists, gays, jews, communists, muslims, corporations, the wealthy or foreign navies. It is our DNA which is under attack and at risk. I believe Whites can and should be improved by our mixing with other races. This doesn’t mean I want to see Whites disappear, especially since this only seems to be occurring to Whites.

        • Hilis Hatki

          Whites are intrinsically the most diverse people on the planet because we were extrinsically diverse at the edges of our societies. Now we are being diversified to our core and will end up as……

          • Speedy Steve

            mongrels

        • IstvanIN

          I believe Whites can and should be improved by our mixing with other races. I beg your pardon? We are already at the top of the heap and by mixing with most other races would simply mean devolution. Even mixing with Jews or Japanese would simply mean extinction for us as a distinct people. We are the only truly diverse race.

          • Spikeygrrl

            Judaism is not a race.

          • Alexandra1973

            Yes it is. It’s both a race and a religion.

            You’re Jewish if you descend from one of the tribes of Israel.

          • Spikeygrrl

            How silly of me. Of course there are no such things as German Jews (White), Russian Jews (White), or converts (ANY race).

            Idiot.

          • Alexandra1973

            There’s Judaism as a religion (which was a forerunner to Christianity), then there’s Jewish as in bloodlines. When I think “German Jew” I am thinking of German nationality, not German blood.

            Sure, there are Gentile converts to Judaism. But if you read the Old Testament, you’ll see that the Jewish religion was given primarily to–guess who?–the Jewish people. Jews are descended from Shem; Caucasians from Japheth.

            The first Christians were Jews. Christian Jews, Jewish Christians….

          • Awakened Saxon

            Alexandra1973: When I think “German Jew” I am thinking of German nationality, not German blood.

            You mean “German citizenship, not German blood”. German nationality implies German blood. Nationality is based on tribalism, not on citizenship, therefore a German nationalist promotes the interests of Germans by blood not the interests of any featherless biped who has attained a German passport.

          • Awakened Saxon

            A ‘German Jew’ is simply someone whose Jewish ancestors migrated from Asia and settled in Germany. A ‘German Jew’ is not a member of the Germanic tribes that form the German nation.

          • HJ11

            There are no Aryan Jews, by definition.

            Defintion of Aryan used by many of us: Aryan: A non-Jewish White person of European descent. Ergo: Aryan and White (with an upper case “W”) are one and the same. Thus, there are no White Jews even though there are white Jews (with a lower case “w” to indicate color, but not race).

          • Spikeygrrl

            Whydoncha quit wasting your time with people whose IQs are above room temperature and go get yourself another swastika tattoo instead. Sieg heil!

          • Awakened Saxon

            Judaism is the tribal religion of the Jewish race.

          • Tarczan

            Yeah, I mistakenly upvoted before I read that.

        • gooberboy9999

          Interracial mixing is very, very rare. If you looked at statistics instead of just what the media tells you, you’d see that barely 1 out of 10 whites marry interracially, and those marriages are more than twice as likely to end in divorce (which given our current divorce rates, makes it a practical certainty). Whites aren’t going anywhere, though our numbers are shrinking, something that needs to be stopped and reversed.

          I am interested as to see your logic behind how mixing would improve whites. We’re already at the top of the gene pool. Is the chance for better developed twitch muscles an acceptable trade off for an immensely lowered IQ and disgusting aesthetics by mixing with blacks? I’m just not seeing it, especially since we’ll likely be able to add those benefits without any negatives as our knowledge of genetic engineering advances.

          • Tarczan

            Uh, one in ten over two hundred years is a disaster.

          • LHathaway

            That’s true. Each race may be able to improve themselves the most by positive breeding within their own race and genetic advancements, such as selecting the ‘best’ sperm and eggs nevertheless accepting some number of the most intelligent, gifted, fit or athletic of other races could also improve each race. Interbreeding may be necessary in order to keep us all the same species. If racism is bad it certainly can’t get better as races become more and more diverse to the point they are so different and alien from each other.

      • HJ11

        Whiteness is not meaningless, unless one only conflates the word with color. Many of us use the term to mean Aryan. And,we use a lower case “w” when we just mean color but an upper case “W” when we mean Aryan.

        And, what is an Aryan? In the defintion that many of us use it means: A White of European descent born of White parents and grand parents who is not Jewish.

        • HJ11

          More…I also see our white color as essential to who and what we are. If we are no longer white, we are no longer us. Not only is skin the largest human organ, but as most of us know, our white skin helps us produce more Vitamin D in the less sunny climes where we evolved and diverged further and further away from darker humanity.

          I say our evolution requires that we become whiter and Whiter, i.e. that our conscious evolutionary trajectory should be toward acquiring more of what we now have genetically, not less. Going darker is devolution for us.

    • hanfeedback

      Very well put and I agree 100%. We must forget this bickering about this or that and accept the fact that any nation that can be used to ultimately advance our people is the right country to support. The details can be sorted out later.

  • Dwight

    Great speech Jared. Very nice.

  • B.A_2014

    Is that the same Jim Dowson that has been organizing peaceful riots in Belfast for over two years?

  • Rurik

    Tsarist Russia was one of the first countries to recognize the new American republic, after France which recognized us in sending military aid, and Britain when they ended the war of Independence. And Alexis de Tocqueville after traveling in both America and Russia compared the two new young giants, which he predicted, would grow to divide the world between them, being booth different and yet alike in their energetic characters.

    • Alden

      France lent us 70 million in 1776 dollars. This included our first gold reserves. Ben Franklin. Silas Dean. Arthur Lee and others spent 15 tears lobbying the French government for their aid. The 1774 Philadelphia convention was not held until Franklin and Dean had firm commitments from the French government and the munitions manufacturers as well as the French navy were producing war materials not just the ships and arms but rents boots knapsacks blankets etc
      Franklin’s main French allies were the arms manufacturers who wanted to make money.

      • My memory fails me but I recall that France spent something like 2 billion French livres in supporting the American Colonies in our War for Independence. 6 livres were a silver dollar or Spanish silver crown. I’ve heard that fiscal problems resulting in spending so much $ to support our Independence was one of the reasons for famine in France leading to their Revolution in 1789.

        Incidentally the first American Independence coin was made & is dated as a “1776 dollar” but few remain today or, more accurately, few were made in ’76. I don’t own one of course as prices are on the order of $25,000 apiece.

        • Alden

          Our first gold reserves arrived in Philadelphia from France around 1780. The 70 million and the lobbying if Franklin Lee and Dean is well known to historians. Franklin’s master stroke was hiring the playwright Beaumarchais as publicist and propagandist .
          You won’t find the info on Wikipedia or a high school history book . You will have to go to a university library

  • Reverend Bacon

    That’s a very nice piece, Jared. It seems incredible that anyone would call that hateful speech, or even anything except common sense. Yet, they will.

    • Susan

      I agree; it’s anything but hateful. It’s a testament to Western/white bravura, but to illogical liberals it’s racist and hateful to esteem or appreciate the white race.

  • OHDeutschePolkaConfederate

    Jared Taylor is right. The United States of Obamaca is the poop chute of the Western world. Our Negroized pop culture causes truly talented musicians and artists to live in poverty while untalented, braying Negroes such as Beyonce and culturally Negroized, untalented White entertainers such as Miley Cyrus bathe in public adoration and millions. This is our number one import. Negroized junk pop culture, and a Leftist diversicult political philosophy that is geared to the destruction of the White race, and our White cultures. Europe should be recoiling in disgust at America, and recoiling in disgust as a unit. Until recent years, this was the case. Even Canada recoiled at the Negro worshiping, violence ridden cess pool to their South, and had no desire to partake of our Negroized sleaze culture. Russia is smart. Smart American Whites have met the enemy, and have a clear view of who the enemy of the White race is. The diversicult Leftist coalition of Negroes and their White Leftist admirers who can’t imagine a world without their Negro pot dealer on speed dial. 60 years ago, this was the greatest country on earth. Aforesaid coalition has made this the sewer of the White European world. The United States of Obamaca. Most of our White youth are not even White in a cultural sense. They are Negroes culturally, worshiping at the altar of Negro culture. Even Prince William had to invite that horrid Negro rapper Kanye West to the royal wedding. Without the cancerous influence of our loathsome Negro/Leftist coalition, Europe would be so much better off.

    • Hilis Hatki

      So true. America is the Madam of the Diversicult Brothel.

    • Tim_in_Indiana

      From even a cursory glance at social media, I have to agree with you that most of our White youth are not really White in a cultural sense. But what to do about it? They are brainwashed lock stock and barrel.

      • Tarczan

        I’m a bicycle rider and I often come up to a red light and hear the African rap music emanating from a car of white wannabe darkies chilluns. “Why are listening to that crap?” Dumb stare.

    • Alden

      During the 1930s,40s and 50s the state dept sent Louis Armstrong all over the world instead if our great orchestras or Native American southern country music

      • Spikeygrrl

        I’ve never heard of any serious connection between Native Americans and country music.

        • Alden

          I don’t mean Indians when I say natives, I mean you and me, Americans born in America

          • Spikeygrrl

            Suit yourself re terminology. Still, like it or not, they were here first.

            Thought experiment: Would you willingly pack up and permanently relocate to [one of] the areas[s] of your European ancestors’ birth if Native Americans decided that they, too, want and deserve exclusive rights to the lands of their ancestors’ birth?

            “America for Whites” is a concept with enormous appeal…or else I wouldn’t be on this board (duh). But viewed in the above light it looks a lot like intellectual dishonesty.

            I would really appreciate your feedback — and anyone else’s here — on the intellectual dishonesty question. TIA!

          • Chasmania

            I’m sorry Spikeygrrl, but just because a bunch of stone age tribes were squatting on some territory that a technologically and socially advanced people wanted ( and took ) doesn’t give them any real moral ground to claim ‘native’ status as the way they mean it – as the true owners – IMO.

            The way American Indians cling to that claim reminds me of the way modern blacks do to the slavery issue. It strikes me as one of ‘victimhood’.

            Indians should take pride from tribes history AND from their being Americans. They at least belong here, unlike the blacks

          • Spikeygrrl

            Thanks for your input. I’ll weigh it along with others’. For the moment, it’s probably wise to consider when basing your case for “America for Whites” on our more advanced culture, that our own North European ancestors were the
            “barbarians” who sacked Rome…which was, at the time, the pinnacle of what we now know as Western Civilzation.

          • Chasmania

            True, but the real difference in technology between Rome and the rest of the Europe was negligible. Nothing near the ‘stone points vs gunpowder’ level of 1492 and beyond.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I don’t even see a place for honesty in it. I am not one of the ones that wants to forcibly separate. I think we should just get hard and fight for this ecological niche the organic way- by monopolizing resources. But if I did come at the expelling others position, it would simply be mechanistic self interest- “Ya’ll need to leave because that’s what I require and I have the force to make it happen”. No ‘justice’, or other parlour conversation, would be involved. Power and necessity govern this one. If I lost and had to move, I would accept that with the same dispassion. The Vonnegut refrain: And so it goes.

            Thanks for asking, that was an excellent question for this space!

          • Spikeygrrl

            Thanks. Having made one truly catastrophic error of judgment in my early 20s (and many others not so serious in my teens), I took on the ongoing work of hauling my own personal behavior into conformance with my passionately held sociopolitical beliefs. Not a job for the fainthearted.

            Recommended Reading: The Secret Knowlege: On The Dismantling Of American Culture, by the brilliant David Mamet. Previously a typically liberal NYC Jew, Mamet compellingly tells the tale of his political conversion via the realization that he’d lived his whole life mouthing (and voting!) the Leftist party line…but lived his life by libertarian-conservative principles.

  • hanfeedback

    Love this article, would have loved to see a video of the comments.

  • In a sense was this a successful implementation of what was unsuccessful in Hungary with NPI? I am pleased that politically incorrect parties could find a place in Europe to meet and seek out what they have in common. With the European Jihad against “hate speech”, this was no easy accomplishment. I appreciate both Sam and Jared representing the American face of political “heresy”. Keep up the good work.

    Q.

  • Kenner

    It’s a safe bet that, soon, angry whites in this country will be sending military and industrial secrets to the only ‘white’ world power left — Russia.
    When the Chinese recruit their co-racialists in America for espionage, they tell them ‘Look in the mirror. That’s where your loyalty lies.’

    • Hilis Hatki

      I’ve often said, since the 90’s that China will back/is backing the diverse redefined fundamentaly changing America, for our resources, etc. When I told people in the 90’s that we are at war with China the looks I would get.I wish I could bring Ben Franklin to this time and hear what he had to say after having a good look around.

      • Spikeygrrl

        Or de Tocqueville. He was one sharp cookie.

  • DaveMed

    Stellar speech, JT. Knocked it out of the park.

    A calm but firmly-convincing explicit case for White Identity.

  • Excellent speech by Jared Taylor, although I personally would have preferred the words ‘US Government’ had been repeatedly used, rather than repeating “my country,” which can leave the impression that a majority of Americans might want illegal alien invasions, endless Mideast wars, anti-White affirmative action, etc, which they do not, and of course have never been allowed to vote on such things by the 2-party monopoly.

    • Ludwig

      Exactly, many commentators use the term Washington. Meaning that Washington, DC’s agenda agenda diverged from America long ago.

      • Yes, I think it was more dramatic, romantic and poetic to say “my country,” as in my country has abandoned me. So good choice there, but sometimes I’m bothered when I hear European traditionalists refer to the bad guys as ‘the Americans,’ as if they have forgotten that most European Americans are gagged and tied by the globalists, issuing pathetic muffled cries from down in the basement, just like they are.

  • Taylor/Duke 2016!

    It’s time to bust out with the bumper stickers!

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Books too!

      • Ella

        Let’s be mindful here, and give up Starbucks corporate coffee, invest the money into your child’s education, and make a cup of REALLY fresh coffee.

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          I am 100% in favor of Whites – all Whites -never setting foot in Starbucks. Permanently.

    • JSS

      Michaloliakos/Duke would be far better.

    • PaleoFuturist

      I prefer those men a 1000 times to the current dynasty of race-denying lib-left and neocon US presidents.

  • FozzieT

    “I know it is tempting to think that the rulers of my country are evil, but they are not evil. It would be better if they were evil because it would be easier to unmask them and replace them. No, they genuinely believe that they are bringing enlightenment, modernity, freedom, and happiness to the world.”

    I recently attended question-and-answer session with George W Bush. He was extremely pro-immigration, and expressed his belief that it was racist to oppose massive immigration from Mexico. He was extremely heartfelt in his belief.

    He also discussed his deep friendship with Bill Clinton, calling him his “brother from another mother.” He and Clinton are working together on a leadership project in conjunction with their Presidential libraries.

    There really is only one party that controls our government.

    • Alexandra1973

      It’s like pro-wrestling. The parties talk trash at each other but at the end of the day the same guy signs their paychecks.

      • Hank Richter

        Interesting, I always thought of it as more like Game of Thrones, they are fighting, but not for any of our benefit, only for the power, they will come together to defend the power when it is threatened.

  • JackKrak

    Bulgaria is already in the EU and has been since 2007.

    Just sayin’…..

  • Light from the East

    To my understanding of Russian people and their political preference, most of them (about 85%) are on the right of political spectrum. Mr. Putin is devoted to restore the glory and culture of Russia, his people show overwhelming support for him even though he is controversial in Western media and of course, west Ukrainian people.

    For white people worldwide, Russia now becomes more conservative than almost all Western countries. It is considered a solid fortress of “traditional Western value, merit , and culture”. I don’t say we have to live a life like Russia with its GDP per capita or HDI, but Russians’ mindset for their identity and their race is way better and healthier than some white people living in America and Europe.

    Now the West (the USA and its allies) wants to pull down Russia and stigmatize them with everything possible. However, if West politicians spend more time on issues like deporting illegal immigrants, abolishing affirmative actions, enhancing border control, revoking citizenship for criminal immigrants, etc, we will enjoy a better quality of life and we don’t have to risk to involve in wars with Russia. Why do politicians like Obama love to sacrifice the big cake (a good relationship with Russia) for the small cake (welfare to illegal aliens) and think they are on the right side.

    I would say Jared Taylor’s work in Russia is a good starting sign for AR’s message to spread to white people in Europe. European whites have similar problems to face with like American whites. We need to let Russians know not every Americans treat Russia as enemy. It’s all about keeping the integrity of authentic American white and European white heritage and culture in a white minority world population. That’s the common interest of all white countries around the world.

    • Ella

      I don’t have much hope for seniors or our youths to become aware and active for change. When I talk to a handful of seniors about these social problems, they moan endlessly,”What can I do? I tried to vote them out years ago.” They slip into a passive mindset. Overall, many elders never taught us any cultural traditions or identities including language, foods, cultural myths besides Disney (laugh), crafts, and traditions. As a result, many young has a very week identity and confused on current roles. They were programmed long ago since 1930’s that the government will provide better over family; So, they can enjoy new personal freedoms over traditional family responsibilities by just paying few taxes. It is a slow breakdown over generations between postmodernism and cultural abandonment.

      • Light from the East

        Indeed, many elders do act passively. But now is 21st century, even you are not a politician, you have more access to influence the mind of others than any other era. For example, people can learn using blog services or building their own website to promote their ideas. Besides American Renaissance website, American Border Patrol is a successful example. If you are not good at writing articles or expressing ideas, you can donate to such organizations. If you don’t have money, at least you have to gain some knowledge. Issues like history of the Western culture, European languages, inventions and technology, and genetics of human beings are important ones. Someday you may have a chance to stand on the platform of conservative organizations like AR to address your insights to more people. If you are a tech savvy, you can become the IT of conservative websites or help to gather more confidential information of our opponents. If you are familiar with Big Data, you can develop a model to show all characteristics of all people including different characteristics among races, revealing the truth of race by having large number of samples. If you are good at making propaganda, remember to make a chart to show white people is the minority of the world but some people want whites become minority in their homeland. If you care about the truth, remember to tell more people stop making donation to the 3rd world because they don’t use our money to develop a better society but to have more children. We thought that we can end hunger but more and more kids are born so it is impossible to feed all of them. Responsibility is on their hands not ours, not even to mention if they flood into Western countries they will drag down the overall quality and threaten the survival of white people.

        You see, all of above is what a normal person can do and it is just a tip of the iceberg. I am just a college graduate seeking for Master or PhD degree and I have considered many possibilities to ensure the survival of the Western culture. I know what tools and resources are in my hands and seek to gain more influence over the all society, or possibly over the world. I have my personal career and that’s important to me but once I succeed I can have more time helping conservative organizations like AR with any kind of support. It is hard to achieve but it is worth a try. I hope you can combine your profession and your ideal to make a better society and influence people around you, good luck!

  • Hank Richter

    Partly true. Not all Christians are the same, any religion can be twisted just as any ideology can be twisted.

    • Awakened Saxon

      It is true that not all individual Christians are on board with the anti-white agenda, but nearly all the clergy and other leaders of the faith are on board with it (at most, accepting it to the point of not doing anything about it).

      • Chasmania

        I’ve met more fruit loop, ‘We are the World’ , ‘everyone is equal’ pagan types than any who espoused a pro Western Civilization and pro white agenda. In fact it wasn’t UNTIL reading comment sections in places like AmRen, VDare and others that I have heard from any.

        • Awakened Saxon

          You must be talking to Wiccans or some other type of new age weirdo. Followers of the Old Ways are far less interested in multi-racial brotherhood than nearly any mainstream church-going Christian.

          Let’s compare: The largest Germanic Heathen organisation in the US is the Asatru Folk Assembly, which is perfectly fine with its members attending white racialist meetings, which links European survival with the continuation of the religion itself (since it is a tribal religion), and which states that the white race is uniquely singled out for destruction. The largest Christian organisation in the US is the Southern Baptist Convention, which began its mission in the South by preaching to the slaves, which was headed by a black until last year, and which recently issued a statement encouraging a greater amount of inter-racial church attendance.

          • 1RW

            The Asatru are allowed to be racialist because they are marginal. If they had actual political power, they’d be infiltrated.

          • Awakened Saxon

            ‘Allowed to be racialist’? Asatru is a religion of the tribe. It is racial – folkish – by its very nature. If the Germanic people cease to exist, then Asatru ceases to exist. Not so with Christianity which can simply find new supporters from among the non-white hordes.

          • Chasmania

            And for every 1 Asatru follower there are 50..100, hell probably much more SB, Methodist, Pentecostal, etc… who may go to a church that is in an organization that pays lip service to racial equality, but they REALLY don’t believe it any more than they think the moon is made of cheese !

            They don’t want blacks next door , in their neighborhoods or even the same continent, but it’s convenient to the point of being damn near a survival skill to pretend they’re ‘okay’ with it so as to not face the sort of public lashing that people like this Levi Pettit are facing.

            Pettit, for those who missed it, is the OU student who was exercising his constitutionally protected 1st amendment rights and is now being given the modern equivalent of tarring and feathering.

            I’ll tell you this right now. You pagans keep pushing us and trying to marginalize our belief, you’re going to be very alone in your oh so small tent. You WILL lose some of the greatest thinkers of the pro white movement, and you will do it to what gain ? Exactly what do you think you are gaining by that action ? All that will be gained is that we’ll be fractured and divided and just that much weaker for the infighting.

            I personally wish you guys would check your religion at the frigging door and stick to the subject at hand, and the subject, if you haven’t guessed, ISN’T religious beliefs !

          • Awakened Saxon

            Whether the masses of white Christians are paying lip service to racial equality or genuinely believe in it is irrelevant. The churches – with the physical and material support of the churchgoers – are at the forefront of the campaign to replace whites with non-whites. The clergy who come up with these ideas would get nowhere without the support of their flocks. I have never heard of Germanic Heathens bringing African refugees to formerly white areas, have you?

            As for trying to marginalise your beliefs – give me a break! Christians have tried for the better part of 2,000 years to marginalise everything they disagree with, including other denominations within Christianity.

            I will be happy to work with and include nationalists who have somehow managed to reconcile their Christian faith with the advancement of their blood, but Christianity is not something that I wish on future generations of Germanic people.

          • Chasmania

            Christianity has been the greatest defender of Western Civilization and the people of Europe there has ever been. Your brand of religion didn’t even bring about the idea of Western Civilization, and lets not forget that the ONLY reason why it’s even remembered is largely BECAUSE of Christian scholars who recorded it for posterities sake.

            I am of course being generous in making the connection of pre-Christian Germanic paganism and Asatru, as what Asatru truly is is some ersatz, 70s era invention loosely based on a collection of sources ( Prose Edda, etc..). There’s my ‘marginalising’ for the day 🙂

            I’m not sure why or where you get this ‘top heavy’ theory of the Christian faith, except that you must be basing it on Roman Catholicism. I can tell you that what most people of the Christian faith ‘do’ when confronted with a intellectual or moral decision that is posed them by their leadership or hierarchy, and it’s much like what we do when our government does the same. We make our own minds up !

            In fact the country analogy works well. I am an American citizen, but that by NO MEANS IN HELL means I am in lockstep with Obama in his decision making or goals. Nor do I follow the GOP with lemming like adoration.

            ” I have never heard of Germanic Heathens bringing African refugees to formerly white areas, have you? ”

            I really had to laugh out loud at this one. If the progressives thought for one nano-second that you guys were going to become a major societal or political power, you would (and maybe ARE ?) already be infiltrated and in the process of being subverted. And lets forget what you haven’t done for blacks, but instead talk about what you have done for whites ?

            I KNOW that Christian Europe was the spring from which the world was given Western Civilization and all the other great things our people have done, but could you illuminate me on the achievements of Asatru ?

          • Awakened Saxon

            Chasmania: Christianity has been the greatest defender of Western Civilization and the people of Europe there has ever been.

            Can you name even one Christian church today that defends Western civilisation and the people of Europe? Or are you just speaking historically? If so, then I direct you to this article, The Myth of Christianity as a Wall Against Islam, which argues that Christianity has historically caused numerous intra-European wars while ignoring external threats from Africa and Asia: thuleanperspective[DOT]com/2014/09/11/the-myth-of-christianity-as-a-wall-against-islam/

            Chasmania: Your brand of religion didn’t even bring about the idea of Western Civilization . . .

            Neither did yours. Western civilisation has existed since pre-Christian times. It came from the Hellenic pagans.

            Chasmania: . . . and lets not forget that the ONLY reason why it’s even remembered is largely BECAUSE of Christian scholars who recorded it for posterities sake.

            This is ludicrous. If it were not for Christians waging a centuries-long campaign to erase Germania’s native customs, then remembering them would not be an issue because they would still exist, or at least, they would not have been intentionally buried (in much the same way as ISIS currently tries to erase all evidence of Iraq’s pre-Islamic heritage). So, are we supposed to be thankful to Christianity because a small number of Christian scholars thought to write about what their fellow Christians were eradicating?

            Chasmania: I am of course being generous in making the connection of pre-Christian Germanic paganism and Asatru, as what Asatru truly is is some ersatz, 70s era invention loosely based on a collection of sources ( Prose Edda, etc..).

            Germanic Heathenry was revived in the 19th century and was a major influence on the rise of nationalism in Germanic countries.

            Chasmania: I can tell you that what most people of the Christian faith ‘do’ when confronted with a intellectual or moral decision that is posed them by their leadership or hierarchy, and it’s much like what we do when our government does the same. We make our own minds up !

            Then why do the Christian masses continue to go to churches that preach white genocide? Why do they continue parroting the multi-racialist nonsense they hear from their preachers?

            I KNOW that Christian Europe was the spring from which the world was given Western Civilization and all the other great things our people have done . . .

            The ancient Greeks were not Christian. Why do you want to give the world anything? That is a typical Christian attitude. Christianity looks outward; it is universal in nature.

            Chasmania: If the progressives thought for one nano-second that you guys were going to become a major societal or political power, you would (and maybe ARE ?) already be infiltrated and in the process of being subverted.

            You speculate that Asatru could be subverted in such a way that it could come to be at the forefront of white genocide as Christianity is today. Christianity contains elements that make it easy to interpret as anti-white. It is a universalist religion that makes no mention of race, it comes from Asia, and it preaches the conversion and sameness of all people of the world. Thus, there have been anti-racialist traditions within Christianity for centuries. Asatru, in contrast, is an explicitly tribalist religion. If the tribe is weak, then Asatru is weak. If the tribe dies, then Asatru dies. It is much harder to turn a folkish belief against the folk than it is to turn a non-native, universalist belief against them.

            Chasmania: . . . but could you illuminate me on the achievements of Asatru ?

            It is unfair to compare the achievements of an ancient people to those of a people who lived centuries later. If the Germanics had instantly become an advanced people after adopting Christianity, then perhaps you would have a point, but after converting to Christianity it was centuries later when great achievements were made. It was during the Renaissance (an age when Christianity was starting to lose its grip) that Germanics really proved themselves.

          • Chasmania

            You are achingly ignorant of history, or have so deeply drank the anti-Christian kool-aid that you can’t see facts for opinions or vice versa.
            OMG you have an article in some neo-pagan website that’s going to refute entire libraries of western history ?!?
            …And I totally forgot about that Hellenic led 12th Century Renaissance…wait, there wasn’t one.

          • Awakened Saxon

            Chasmania: To a degree Church hierarchies ( and countless other organizations) have been infiltrated by progressives and progressive thinking.

            How do you explain the anti-white nature of the independent churches that have no hierarchy? How do you explain the anti-white nature of every denomination that does have a hierarchy?

            Chasmania: What, you’re not humans . Totally infallible somehow ?

            You really didn’t understand my point? Germanic Heathenry is not a belief that is fundamentally egalitarian and disconnected from the land and people of Europe. Christianity is both. Christianity makes a major point of converting the entire world; it rejects tribalism and is attached to no people other than those who believe. Christianity declares that all men are brothers in Christ. Christianity looks to the deserts of western Asia as the Holy Land; it does not look to the land of the Germanics (or other Europeans) as the Holy Land. Thus it is far easier for Christianity to become a force for anti-white policies than it is for Germanic Heathenry. Christianity could survive and prosper perfectly well without whites. Whites are already a minority among Christians, yet whites are effectively 100% among Germanic Heathens.

            Chasmania: So when you hit a point you can’t refute – or lacked a “Asatru talking Points” memo on – you call foul ?

            Your example is intentionally designed to produce a misleading result because the Germanics – Heathens and Christians – had not yet achieved great civilisation until the Renaissance Era. Singling out the Germanic Heathens for this fact while ignoring the same condition of the Germanic Christians of the same era is dishonest. Your example only works because it compares Heathens of the Middle Ages with Christians who lived hundreds of years later, yet your example ignores the great achievements of Southern European pagans who lived even earlier and were more advanced than the Christians who lived 1,500 years after them.

            Chasmania: If you can’t at least agree that Christianity + Western Europe = an explosion of Western thought, art, science, etc…. Then you really are being obtuse and disingenuous.

            No, I don’t agree with that at all. Western Europe languished in darkness for many hundreds of years after accepting Christianity. European minds were shackled with foreign superstitions. It was not until the Renaissance and the weakening of Christianity’s influence and the rediscovery of ancient (pre-Christian) knowledge that Western Europe began to make the achievements that you speak of. Ironically, many ancient texts had to be rediscovered from the Muslims because the Church had banned them as heretical.

            Chasmania: I am to believe, based on your reasoning, that what OTHERS think is a paramount point in having a belief.

            If you can reconcile racialism and Christianity, then more power to you. You’re in an infinitely small demographic within Christianity, whereas racialism is commonplace among Germanic Heathens (perhaps not the majority, but at least a sizeable and influential minority). The fact is that Christianity can be judged on the basis of the overwhelming majority of its professed followers. The fact that a handful of its followers take a dissenting view is inconsequential overall. You might as well argue that academia can not be judged as an enemy of the white race on account of there being a tiny number of racialists in academia.

  • Hank Richter

    Is it mandatory to evacuate the building? I mean of course I would never argue with anyone else on how to deal with their own safety, I myself would have stayed, not because I’m saying I’m so brave I’d face being blown up for my principles, but because I know 99.999999% of the time these things are fake.

    Seems evacuating the building is just letting the Marxists win – AGAIN.

    • Speedy Steve

      Marxists and whigs.

  • Speedy Steve

    Demonstrators protested outside the conference site, and the meeting had to end early because of a telephoned bomb threat.

    And those same trust-fund babies will be at AmRen’s upcoming shindig.

  • Ella

    So when will a European country actually say “NO” to refugees from Africa and/or the Middle East? What would be the consequence, high loans or economic sanctions? US cannot force EU countries to take in more immigrants. In my opinion, it is the love for cheap labour and expanding consumer markets that drive globalism today.

    • libertarian1234

      Absolutely right.

      They want consumers and taxpayers to bolster and increase their wealth and power.

      They’ve created a Ponzi scheme that will collapse if there is no robust working class to keep feeding it money.

      The good news is that it looks like it’s all beginning to unravel, because too many of the third world hordes are taking from the tax base and not contributing enough, while a large number of them are turning to open jihad.

  • Alden

    Stalin presided over the genocide of 100 million Russian Christians

    • 1RW

      Come on. That’s ridiculous. And my family got the Stalin treatment.

  • Alden

    9 out if 10 of Putin’s closest advisors are Great grandchildren if the genocidal murders who conquered Russia back in 1917. Since the end of the evil empire the looting and plundering has been done by the same YKWs
    The old commissars raped who they would with impunity but they did not export Russian women as sex slaves as the oligarchs do now

    I have no influence and my opinion will not change anything but Putin cannot be trusted, his advisors even less and Russia is a mess
    Soviet Russia got into WW2 because it’s economy was destroyed and it needed to plunder Central Europe to survive

    • 1RW

      Soviet Russia got into WW2 when Hitler’s Germany launched operation Barbarossa in June 1941.

      • Fredrik_H

        It invaded Finland, the Baltic countries and Poland before that.

        • 1RW

          That was to push the borders out in case of German or British attack. It had nothing to do with economics. Poland, Baltics, and Finland didn’t have the massive tank plants, aircraft factories, armaments factories etc… that Stalin loved and built in the ’30s.

  • Susan

    This is a horror story that I believe most of the populace doesn’t realize or doesn’t realize the scope of it: Jared Taylor said, “I have lost count of how many nations my country has bombed in just the last few years. We bombed Afghanistan and the result is chaos. We bombed Iraq and the result is chaos. We bombed Libya and the result is chaos.” And we’d like to bomb Syria and probably will. The death, destruction, blood, and sorrow that the US government wreaks all over the world is obscene & evil. And we taxpayers are forced to pay for it! Is there anything that can stop it? I doubt it.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Jared’s speech at this conference should be entitled:

    What Would George Washington Say?

  • Roger James Michael Sutherland

    Which Ukrainian organisations were represented here, at this event advocating national sovereignty against “outside pressure” (e.g. against encroachment by the Russian Federation and the European Union)?

  • Awakened Saxon

    Very good post. It’s a tragedy that Europe ever accepted a religion that has nothing to do with Europe – one that came from the deserts of Asia and is the story of another people’s ancestors.

    • 1RW

      Your avatar has a St.Andrew’s cross on it.

      • Awakened Saxon

        1RW: Your avatar has a St.Andrew’s cross on it.

        So? That flag is part of my heritage. I did not say I want to eliminate every hint of the last 1,400 years of Christian influence. Besides, the identification of the Southern Saltire with Saint Andrew appears to have come later.

        Likewise, very few Christians want to eliminate every influence from Heathenry, e.g., Christmas, Easter, the days of the week, etc.

  • Chasmania

    “… that the corruption of modern Christianity by the anti-White Cultural Marxists …”

    You name the problem but then continue to blame the institution of Christianity as the problem.

    The problem isn’t Christianity, but the influences that have invaded it just as they have every other facet of Western Culture.

    I know you vocal minority of pagans don’t like my religion, but for it, I believe that Europe would still be a benighted, socially and technologically backward 3rd world hellhole.

    Don’t write off over a thousand years of progress just because some ‘come lately’ progressives have managed to slither in to positions of power.

  • HJ11

    As I read through the comments I’m struck by how many commenters take too narrow a view of who is us and who is not us and who make meaningless distinctions between this White branch and this other White branch.

    White Russians are us and we are them. Slavs are us and we are them. Germans, English, Irish, et al. are us and we are them. We are all part of the non-Jewish White tribe.

    A good guide for who is us and who is not us can still be found in the Nuremberg Race Laws, if one but, updates them to include all non-Whites. Blacks and Asians weren’t a real issue in Germany back then, but today, they would be included in any present incarnation of the laws. And, of course, to rewrite them for today’s reality, we would change the word German to White and make some other minor changes, but the information about who is us and who is not us with the descent from grandparents, etc. is a good guide.

  • BulgAryan

    One would think that Russia under Putin, criticising the decline of traditional values of the West, would be a natural supporter of conservative values. Not so RT. You can count on RT to always take the politically-correct, multi-culti, anti-White stand.

    In covering the Ferguson incident, RT has been mirroring the anti-white, cultural marxist anti White stance of the DOJ and Eric Holder. A non-story about British immigration removal centre inmates hunger strike has been headline news for a week

    • Anon Wyatt

      It’s rather unfortunate as I slightly prefer RT to most of the hyper babble than defines most American “news” a.k.a. ‘Pravda Fish Wrap.’
      Thom Hartman gives me the hives.

    • Germanicus

      Exactly. I think that we need to be v ery careful about Putin’s Russia. It still exhibits subversive tactics. Russia is still a nation in need of conversion. Yes, they somewhat held the line on homosexuality in a few, recent, notable cases, but one can bet that a good bit of the move toward the homossxual corruption of Western society and the feminist undermining of the family was due to Russian communist intrigues and influences. Putin has to own that history to some degree because it is stlll here, active and in force.

      • BulgAryan

        He’s a classical Marxist, not a cultural one…

  • AndrewInterrupted

    The Khazarians existed BC. They were the last Neanderthal group to assimilate. The Khazarian label is just used to define the final variant. The Mongols, Huns, Semites, Muslims inevitably picked up their toxic mutant genes. That’s why I stop at Poland. But, as Jared indicates, just as our cultural Marxist enemy is beating us with ‘…strange bedfellowing’, we must do the same if we expect to defeat them. For example, LGBT Nation votes with African Nation, but the two are repulsed by each other. All for the purpose of destroying the founding western civilization cultures.

  • Awakened Saxon

    Leon Haller: Russia today is not a danger to white Americans who love their race and heritage.

    Perhaps not to Americans, but Russia is very much a danger to Ukrainians, Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians who love their race and heritage. In fact, Russia is a danger to Russians who love their race and heritage.

  • 1RW

    The masonic dishrag had the seeds of now in it from the start, when it traded a traditional monarchy answerable to God and posterity for a Liberal secular order answerable only to the passing whims of an ever more moronic electorate.

  • ShermanTMcCoy

    Probably a mindset he shares with Obama. At least, Obama is doing something about it. The more dead Russians/Ukrainians, the better he likes it. Damned white devils!

  • ravitchn

    I hope you understand that conservative nationalists in Russia, whatever they call themselves, are more or less Nazis and Fascists.

    • Anon Wyatt

      ….which means…what exactly?

    • libertarian1234

      The merger of government and business is fascism…..just like what is occurring here right this minute.

      And a country that spies 24/7 on its own citizenry and invoking an ideology that seeks to displace its founding people via unchecked immigration, along with gun confiscation and social engineering, is a form of Nazism.

      So, you probably should understand the situation here before trying to understand Russia and its aims and intents.

  • Awakened Saxon

    You didn’t even read your own link. The proportion of Estonians in the population has dropped from 88% to 69% since the 1930s. It was at a low of 61% in 1991 and has increased since then only because of Russians returning home. During the Soviet years, the Estonian share of the population was steadily dropping because the USSR was filling Estonia with ethnic Russians. I respectfully suggest you look into this subject before you continue commenting on it.

    Soviet deportation of Estonians: [DOT]wikipedia[DOT]org/wiki/Soviet_deportations_from_Estonia

    Russian settlement of Estonia: en[DOT]wikipedia[DOT]org/wiki/Russians_in_Estonia#World_War_II_and_the_Estonian_SSR

  • Awakened Saxon

    Finland:

    The policy of Russification of Finland (1899–1905 and 1908–1917, called sortokaudet/sortovuodet (times/years of oppression) in Finnish and förtrycksperioderna in Swedish) was a governmental policy of the Russian Empire aimed at limiting the special status of the Grand Duchy of Finland and possibly the termination of its political autonomy and cultural uniqueness. It was a part of a larger policy of Russification pursued by late 19th–early 20th century Russian governments which tried to abolish cultural and administrative autonomy of non-Russian minorities within the empire. The two Russification campaigns evoked widespread Finnish resistance, starting with petitions and escalating to strikes, passive resistance (including draft resistance) and eventually active resistance. Finnish opposition to Russification was one of the main factors that ultimately led to Finland’s declaration of independence in 1917.

    en[DOT]wikipedia[DOT]org/wiki/Russification_of_Finland

    —–

    Romania:

    Bessarabia had been annexed by the Russian Empire in 1812. In 1816 Bessarabia became an autonomous status, but only until 1828. In 1829, the use of the Romanian language was forbidden in the administration. In 1833, the use of Romanian language had been forbidden in churches. In 1842, the teaching in Romanian was forbidden for the secondary schools; it was forbidden for the elementary schools in 1860.[citation needed]

    The Russian authorities forced the migration of Romanians (Moldovans) to other provinces of the Russian Empire (especially in Kuban, Kazakhstan and Siberia), while foreign ethnic groups (especially Russians and Ukrainians, called in the 19th century “Little Russians”) were encouraged to settle here. According to 1817-census, Bessarabia was populated by 86% Romanians (Moldovans), 6.5% Ukrainians, 1.5% Russians (Lipovans) and 6% other ethnic groups. 80 years later, in 1897, the ethnic structure was very different: only 56% Romanians (Moldovans), but 11.7% Ukrainians, 18.9% Russians and 13.4% other ethnic groups.[13] During 80 years, between 1817 and 1897, the share of Romanian (Moldovan) population dropped by 30%.

    en[DOT]wikipedia[DOT]org/wiki/Russification#Bessarabia.2FMoldova

    ——

    Ukraine:

    In 1720 Tsar Peter I of Russia issued a decree in which he ordered the expurgation of all Ukrainian linguistic elements in theological literature printed in Ukrainian typographical establishments.[1] Later Empress Catherine II of Russia issued a secret order to Count Aleksandr Alekseyevich Vyazemsky (the Prosecutor General of the Russian Empire from 1764 to 1792) in which she instructed him to institute a program of Russification for the provinces of Ukraine, Livonia and Finland, “using light-handed methods”.[2] In the opinion of Vladimir Vernadsky, by the 17th century, Muscovy already had a long-standing policy to absorb Ukraine and liquidate the foundation for local cultural life.[3] In 1862, all Ukrainian Sunday schools, numbering over 100 at the time, were abolished and proscribed. In 1863, minister of internal affairs Pyotr Valuyev issued the so-called Valuev Circular, in which he stated that the Ukrainian language never existed, doesn’t exist, and cannot exist.[4] In 1867, Tsar Alexander II of Russia issued the Ems Ukaz, a secret decree banning the use of the Ukrainian language in print, with the exception of reprinting of old documents.

    en[DOT]wikipedia[DOT]org/wiki/Russification_of_Ukraine

    —–

    Lithuania:

    A similar development took place in Lithuania.[9] Its Governor General, Mikhail Muravyov, prohibited the public use of spoken Polish and Lithuanian and closed Polish and Lithuanian schools; teachers from other parts of Russia who did not speak these languages were moved in to teach pupils. Muravyov also banned the use of Latin and Gothic scripts in publishing. He was reported saying, “What the Russian bayonet didn’t accomplish, the Russian school will.” (“что нѣ доделалъ русскій штыкъ – доделаетъ русская школа.”) This ban, which was only lifted in 1904, was disregarded by the Knygnešiai, the Lithuanian book smugglers, who brought Lithuanian publications printed in the Latin alphabet, the historic orthography of the Lithuanian language, from Lithuania Minor, a part of East Prussia, and from the United States into the Lithuanian-speaking areas of Imperial Russia. The knygnešiai became a symbol of the resistance of Lithuanians against Russification.

    en[DOT]wikipedia[DOT]org/wiki/Russification#Poland_and_Lithuania

    • 1RW

      Never the less the actual number of Estonians in Estonia was steadily increasing in soviet times, and dropped after independence. Not really an extermination as Martel was claiming.

      On the other parts, you are right, there were waves of Russification, but there were also periods of benign neglect. Deportations typically occurred after resistance. I consider this better than outright killing. However, all these supposed victims retain their language and culture, so centuries of repression failed. This can be because Russians:

      -Didn’t try very hard
      -Were totally incompetent and didn’t improve for literally 300 years.

      I pick the first option. You also assume that Russia was acting in a vacuum. In fact, cultural warfare was just as present in the 1700’s as now. The Catholic church was always intriguing to bring as many Orthodox as possible into its fold through cultural and religious infiltration. This was particularly the case in Ukraine.

      I can see the Tsarist Russians having a hard on for Poland and Lithuania because the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth was a mortal enemy for a long time. The Poles occupied Moscow in the time of troubles, and fought Russia over Ukraine. Cracking down on a deadly enemy to prevent it arising again is fairly common sense. Perhaps that’s why Russian is spoken in Kaliningrad. Likewise, I have a feeling that Bessarabia was subject to the intrigues of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Stirring up ethnic separatism is a surefire way to trouble an enemy empire.

      What did your Saxon ancestors do to the Wends, eh?

  • Martel

    You read an article on wikipedia and you decided that is enough to deny the suffering of Estonians under soviet rule.

    Did you know that Estonia was not only occupied and oppressed by the soviets for over half a century, but that the Soviets implemented a policy of colonization/population displacement as well?

    Take the period of 1934 to 1959, and keep in mind that during Nazi occupation the deportations and Russian mass-immigration was halted. In the 1934 census, Russians constituted only 8 % of the Estonian population. In the 1959 census the Russian population jumped to 20%. The 992.000 Estonians dropped to 892.000 according to the same censuses. The effects of these policies are still felt today .

    Do you think Russian colonization policies may have offset the deportations?

    And this only covers one period. Given the fact that denying soviet atrocities has been part and parcel of the American and European left, made possible to a large degree by (intentionally) inaccurate recordkeeping by the soviets, I’d be ashamed to join their ranks.

  • America
    murdered hundreds of thousands of natives …

    America murdered and enslaved Africans ….

    America murdered hundreds of thousands of Japanese .

    America murdered in Iraq ….

    America murdered in Afghanistan….

    America murdered in Serbia ….

    America caused the wars in Yugoslavia

    America started the war in Syria.

    America started the war in Vietnam …

    America started the war in Ukraine….

  • The truth will out.

  • Read history:Crimea was, is and forever will be Russian.
    IF the US would NOT have made a coup and would NOT have installed an illegitimate gov in Kiev – Russia would NOT have encouraged Crimeans to make a referendum in order to be re-united with Russia. Russia NEEDED to PROTECT its military port from being taken over by NATO.

  • The New Ukraine Is Run by Rogues, Sexpots, Warlords, Lunatics and Oligarchs.

    Read more at http://observer.com/2015/01/the-new-ukraine-is-run-by-rogues-sexpots-warlords-lunatics-and-oligarchs/#ixzz3Srimau00

  • According to official data, the event was attended by 400 people (although the site was announced the arrival of one thousand five hundred). Among them – 40 representatives of European and American organizations. The receiving party – the organization “People’s House” – provided to foreigners spending on accommodation and visa (which, by the way,given not all). Flights forum members bought their own expense.
    In Russia, the Nazi movement did not have popular support. This organization unpopular.

  • Only the White Christian Culture is denied its heritage. Why is simple – it majestically exposes the radical division and separation of accomplishment and merit. It must be beaten down and removed – so inferior and mediocre accomplishments have no comparative matrix.

  • ….not all ukrainian leaders were pro-russian, you forget the orange revolution and the outcome of that, or the lady with the braided hair. western ukraine doesn’t
    have much industry just capable of exporting potatoes, wheat, mail order brides
    and prostitutes. if russia still redirects gas line through turkey and cease
    flow through the ukraine what then, how many years will germany have to pay the
    ukraine’s heating bills? as for reforms the first thing the kiev leaders did
    when they took over was outlaw the russian language. they also whitewashed the
    investigation of crimes their side committed like the snipers who killed police
    and demonstrators in the maiden or the fascists who firebombed the pro-russian
    demonstrators in odessa. not a good stat for a democratic government?

  • Preston Wigginton

    And what has Christianity done for “white” people? Nothing but kill them off. Arthur Kemp, author of “White History” detest Christianity as the most evil thing to happen to “white” people and the beginning of the end for “white” people.