Here’s Audio from the Event Michael Bloomberg Is Trying to Block from Being Broadcast

Chuck Ross, Daily Caller, February 16, 2015

An audio recording of a talk former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg has attempted to block from being broadcast has surfaced online.

The full audio of the Feb. 6 event, held at the Aspen Institute, shows that the 73-year-old media mogul’s remarks about minorities and gun control were even more candid in some respects than initially reported.

“It’s controversial, but first thing is all of your–95 percent of your murders, and murderers, and murder victims fit one [unintelligible]. You can just take the description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all of the cops. They are male, minorities, 15 to 25. That’s true in New York, it’s true in virtually every city in America,” said Bloomberg.

“You’ve got to get the guns out of the hands of the people getting killed,” he continued. “First thing you can do to help that group is to keep them alive.”

While it is true that upwards of 95 percent of shooting victims and suspects fit the categories Bloomberg suggests, his implication that minority gun owners should be targeted was called “slander” by Tom King, the president of the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association.


Representatives for Bloomberg recently asked the Aspen Institute and GrassRoots TV, the company that filmed the event, to refrain from broadcasting the talk, the Aspen Times reported on Friday.

“The kids think they’re getting killed anyways because all of their friends are getting killed,” Bloomberg told the audience, which reportedly numbered around 400. “So they just don’t have any long-term focus or anything. It’s a joke to have a gun, it’s a joke to pull the trigger.”


Bloomberg, who heads the pro-gun control group Everytown for America, also spoke about “stop-and-frisk,” a controversial tactic police have used to rid the streets of guns and to cut crime.

“We did a calculation on how many people who would have been dead if we hadn’t brought down the murder rate and gotten guns off the streets,” Bloomberg said. “And the way to get guns out of kids hands is to throw them up against the wall and frisk them.”

Bloomberg also defended the tactic from accusations that it is racist.

“So one of the unintended consequences is, people say ‘Oh, my God you are arresting kids for marijuana that are all minorities,’” Bloomberg said.

“Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in the minority neighborhoods. Yes that’s true, why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is. And the first thing you can do for people is to stop them getting killed,” Bloomberg said.


Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • If I was Bloomberg, I’d let this audio go public, and in fact, I would hope that there was video. His approval ratings would skyrocket.

    I’m dismayed that the lamer cons are reacting to this based on ideological and 2A politics, but then again, it’s not as if I didn’t know they would. Tis life in the big city. The big news with this is that Bloomy has turned over his hand and admitted that he knows that it’s young black men. What it also means is that he also knows he was being deceitful running around the country blaming every rural white person with a gun rack on his pickup truck he could find for crime in his own city. And also, his statement “they just don’t have any long term focus,” is also Bloomy toying with HBD; we call it “future time orientation,” or in the case of blacks, their lack thereof.


      If things get too noisy Bloomberg can always scream “anti-Semite!”

      • Reynardine

        The Ace of the Diversity Deck is the Jew.

    • Krista

      What approval rating is he concerned with? He’s out of public office. If this was Mr. Wilhelmina, er– DeBlasio, then we’d have a news story!

      • Not approval rating as such, but you know that someone like Bloomy is still interested in the public perception of himself and his Q score.

        • John Smith

          He still is involved in commerce and has a front to maintain so he keeps getting invited to cocktail parties and fundraisers.

    • Anon

      When jews finally alienate blacks sufficiently, they are going to start asking questions they’ve been brainwashed not to ask. The answers to those questions are known but not widely talked about. Once they are widely talked about, the only reasonable reaction is war.

      Bloomberg doesn’t dare let such a thing become open to public scrutiny.

      The issue is extreme. Even jewish multi-billionaires are kept on a short leash when it comes to mentioning the truth about blacks.

      • Jesse_from_Sweden

        Most blacks aren’t clever enough to see the difference between white and jewish, so they’ll just blame “white racists”.
        Those blacks in leadership positions already know it and are already in on it.

        The jewish identity is quickly changeable to fit the circumstances. They are jewish when it suits them and white when that betters their agenda.
        Jews are heavily overrepresented at universities, but there they are grouped in with whites, and suddenly it’s white anglo-saxon protestants who needs to give way to make room for underrepresented minorities.

    • Why are the Blacks and Hispanics, the main VICTIMS, not profoundly interested in getting the thugs, their potential murderers, stopped and frisked?

      I never understood why the majority of decent Blacks, and Hispanics, does not happily accept being occasionally stopped and frisked, for a substantial decrease in crime.

      Even if stop and frisk benefited Whites, why would a law abiding Black not cooperate in order to catch or disarm the Black thugs?

  • Easyrhino

    Is this the same Bloomberg that travels with his own person fully armed Navy Seal team to serve as his body guards?

  • JackKrak

    This from the same people who pretend to be offended when you assume that someone named J’Quandrious is black.

    • Caucasoid88


    • Raydonn

      How about this one!

      Police are investigating a shooting at a local food mart Tuesday morning.

      Investigators with the St. Pete Police Department said it happened
      outside the Obama Express Food Mart at 1400 18th Ave. South around 3
      a.m. when a man, identified as 23-year-old Jhai-quel Rai-Tez Black
      entered the store after an argument outside.

      Security guards asked Black to leave, but said he refused and pulled out a gun.

      The guards fired theirs first, shooting and killing Black at the scene.

  • LHathaway

    “You’ve got to get the guns out of the hands of the people getting killed”

    Double-speak award of the day . . .

    • ricpic

      People are getting killed but who are the people killing the people getting killed? Ooh, what a mystery, NOT.

      • LHathaway

        whites are being murderd by blacks. It’s not a mystery. It can be hidden, however.

        • Jesse_from_Sweden

          Whites are being killed by blacks in unproportional numbers but blacks are still killing more blacks than whites.
          It’s just that whites don’t kill blacks in anywhere the numbers that media infers that we do.

      • Anon

        An interesting point. The CDC keeps statistics on this (sort of). They refuse to sort the data in such a way as to clear a few things up but one fact they will say is the most common cause of death for black males under age 50 (no info given on females…how about that) is a combination of being killed as a victim of crime and being killed in self defense during a crime (as if these were equivalent events). Most common cause of death among white males of the same age is slipping in the bathtub, btw.

        We know through other stats that most of the victims are killed by blacks. NO INFORMATION GIVEN AS TO THE RACE KILLING IN SELF DEFENSE.

        But one can read between the lines. Blacks are monsters. At least half commit a serious victim crime at least once in their lives and are arrested for it…a rape, robbery, murder, assault. A significant number do this over and over again, which is the only way a non-white can end up in prison. They kill each other so much that despite every black woman popping out illegitimate kids, their population is rapidly shrinking.

        Many attack whites and do succeed in killing them. But 3 million times a year, in this country, every year, every single year…3 million times, a gun is used to “stop” a violent crime. Whites aren’t committing such crimes. White crime is lower than its ever been in human history. What does “stop” mean. Sometimes, the guy runs away. Sometimes (rarely) it means he is arrested. But lets be direct here. A large amount of the time, it means a dead black guy. A Zimmerman.

        Are we really talking about “crime” anymore? Or is this more or less open race war. Blacks attack whites and whites kill them for it. Perhaps many blacks kill other blacks in self defense (they certainly aren’t killing whites in self defense). Somehow I doubt it.

        Taylor really needs to write “The Color of Crime II” and expand on such things.

        • Who Me?

          “They kill each other so much that despite every black woman popping out illegitimate kids, their population is rapidly shrinking.”
          I wasn’t aware that their population is rapidly shrinking, but I can’t really see a downside to anything that facilitates it. Now, can we get the Mestizos onboard with the same program?

    • Anon

      Actually, it’s only doublespeak when applied to white people.

      White people (and ONLY white people) have a clear understanding of right and wrong. Most people are normal and law abiding with a handful of criminals. Keeping guns out of the hands of criminals while making sure normal people are armed is the sane, effective and moral thing to do. To imply that disarming normal people someone stops the criminal is a lie and an attempt to trick others.

      What white people don’t understand is the tendency of non-whites especially blacks (almost universally all blacks) to be both victim and victimizer. For example, a recent case here in NYC had a couple of guys walking down the street where some insane robber shot both, killing one. The surviving victim was out on parole for murder and his friend was in the middle of being prosecuted for an aggravated rape. Both were armed with illegal guns (just too slow on the draw).

      Under THAT situation, Bloombergs comment makes perfect sense. Except for the part about why I should care to stop such people from killing each other. The state saved easily a million dollars now that it no longer has to prosecute the rapist. Who knows whom this pair were planning to murder that evening as entertainment.

      • Who Me?

        That part of his speech does make perfect sense. Ask any LEO who has spent some time down in the trenches of any large “inner city”. He will tell you they see the same faces over and over and over again. One week the guy is a witness, the next week he’s a victim, the third week, he’s a perp. Lather, rinse, repeat.

  • George Costanza

    Bloomberg is definitely a race realist, however he’s a bit of a control freak.

    • Luca

      Actually, he’s not a realist. He’s blaming the guns and not the negroes pulling the triggers.

      • George Costanza

        actually he is..

        “You’ve got to get the guns out of the hands of the people getting killed”

        who are those people getting killed? blacks and hispanics

        • Luca

          He’s not advocating getting blacks off the streets, he wants the guns off the street.

          • George Costanza

            baby steps

          • John Smith

            The black thing is a diversion, since most of them don’t qualify to legally own a firearm under current laws, mostly due to prior convictions. More gun control laws will only affect law-abiding, mainly white, gun owners.

    • Ike Eichenberg

      Most Jews even the hardcore marxists believe they are a superior race.

  • superlloyd

    America doesn’t have a gun problem; it has a negro problem.

    • Anon

      Actually, I’m having alot of trouble getting enough ammo at reasonable prices despite production being many, MANY times what its been in the past decade,

      We have a gun (and ammo) problem. Supply can’t meet demand.

      I’m actually understating the issue. The prez of Hornady…the largest but not the only ammo manufacturer says the same plants that used to work one eight hour shift now having rolling, 24 hour production and put out a billion (that’s billion,not million) bullets a week.

      I used to have the hobby of loading my own. But commercial demand for primers, brass and, most of all, powder is so high that the guys who make the premium stuff, at least have basically told me…you hobbiests are SOL. There is not enough to fill your orders and the commercial manufacturers have priority. TWO YEARS….that was the last estimate they were willing to give me.

      And then there is cheap .22 ammo. It no longer exists. Hell, I no longer practice .22 handguning anymore. Cheaper to use my .357 magnum and easier to get ammo.

      This is a far cry from pre-Obama america where it was common for me to buy .22 for 2 cents a round in buckets of 5000. Plinking isn’t dead in this country as there are more bullets than ever before. But its become a rich persons conceit rather than a rednecks backyard pleasure.

      • John Smith

        Don’t forget the BATFE is planning on banning M855 .223 ball ammo, probably many more kinds of FMJ and solid ammo, if you read between the lines. Ammo is the weak link in the 2nd Amendment.

  • Frank Pucillo

    He can he is sorry and say he meant everyone of any race should be disarmed.

  • Vito Powers

    Michael Kinsley once famously defined a gaffe as when a politician tells the truth — not the truth about the world, but a true version of what he believes.

  • Capn Dad

    I’m all for negroes not having guns.

    • LACountyRedneck

      The negroes doing all the killing and robbing have guns illegally. It would be better if everyone were allowed guns. That way Whites could protect themselves no matter what liberal sheeithole city they lived in.

      • evilsandmich

        Yeah most of them aren’t allowed to own a gun already; lot of good that does.

        • Alexandra1973

          Which proves the point–if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have them.

          • Anon

            Under that situation, an outlaw no longer is an outlaw. He’s a warlord.

          • Who Me?

            Alexandra: SOME bumper stickers are pure truth–this is one example!

        • Anon

          I used to work in Harvey Illinois….probably the worst neighborhood outside of detroit in this nation. Although it was never “good”, the situation was never better than when the entire police force was infiltrated and then taken over by a gang. All policing ceased and everyone knew that the place to get your drugs was the local police cruiser.

          You see, trouble makers are bad for business. Molesting customers is bad for business. People who are bad for business have a tendency to mysteriously disappear.

          What happened (twice) in the last decade when the FBI infiltrated, arrested and removed the gang? Well, for one, all mail delivery stopped. People would rush the mail truck, tip it over and set it on fire.

          The issue isn’t so clear cut and its relative. At least until you are willing to admit everyone in such a neigborhood should be given the 50 cent solution (two bullets in the back of the head).

      • Anon

        Allowed? No one “allows” me to own guns.

        That is the most important thing to understand about guns.

        This isn’t an individual issue but a societal one. If government says I’m not allowed to have guns and you, as an average joe agree they can make that decision, that makes me a criminal (it also makes you a slave, but thats a separate issue).

        But if the government has the opinion it can disallow my gun ownership and you as the average person disagrees, that makes me something else.

    • Nonhumans

      I’m indifferent on it. At least they mainly kill other nonhumans. Which has a throttling effect upon their infestation rates. Most of the whites they target for crimes are libtarded. If not a libtard, then most of the realists they go after are armed and carrying.
      Nonhumans having guns is more of a boon for us than a detriment. Especially considering how ignorant that they are in their use and care of them. Not to mention that they are usually carrying stolen guns or are in possession as a felon, which gives the police and courts ample justification to remove them from society.

      • Anon

        Unfortunately, there is far more to the issue that this.

        What does “gun control” really mean? Guns are largely irrelevant. Most murders and serious assaults involve knives and blunt objects. Your average crack head does not shoot you. He jumps out of a bush with a cheap hammer from Walmart. By the way….20 feet. That’s how much distance you, as a gun carry need, to draw aim and fire at said crackhead to stop him from crushing your skull, stapping you, throwing bottle, whatever. I highly recommend everyone get a tape measure and really train with two distances in mind…20 feet and 5 feet. If some nutcase is within 20 feet, you’d best pull your weapon. If he’s within 5 feet, you’d best shoot him (and keep shooting him until he’s no longer within 5 feet).

        At the distances involved, there is no… advantage of a gun over any other weapon. We could have frank confiscation of all guns in the nation and it would not matter. Carry a knife. Good luck confiscating those.

        None of this is the real issue. The real issue is criminalization of self defense. This is something that has claimed millions of white victims since WWII. Prior to this crap, it was understood that a criminal was a criminal and his victim had the right to kill him and that was that.

        Today….George Zimmerman is what many people will experience. Blacks victimize whites, each other, everyone. There is simply not enough resources to realistically stop them. But there are plenty of resources, it seems, to arrest the white guy and make him spend, on average, a million dollars, to keep himself out of jail for what is obviously morally right.

        Not only that but our culture has become cowardly over the issue. Past generations of men carried guns anywhere and everywhere. If you had a pickup truck, you had a gun rack in it. No one would bat an eye at a gun on your hip (much of the US is still like this).

        Many places, although still legal, people freak if you do this. Pennsylvania is a good example. Every once in awhile, one gun owner or another will remind everyone else that, in the entire state, it is perfectly legal to carry a gun on your hip or go around with an assault rifle on your back. And although, in general, the state is very pro-gun, people treat this as abnormal. Never realizing that its actually having to conceal guns that is not only abnormal but sinister.

        One day, soon, I hope, normal people will control the federal government long enough to get a national law passed standardizes carry and self defense. Self defense made an ironclad indemnification from prosecution (there is that Zimmerman case again) and it illegal to say boo about any gun I might choose to display, carry, or even draw. If that happens, many problems we have in this country will disappear…..just as fast as they appeared around the 1960’s when the first gun control showed its ugly head.

    • Anon

      Negros with guns kill other negros to such an extent that, within a couple more generations we will run out of negros.

      • Who Me?

        That would be nice, but I think it’s wishful thinking.

        • Ike Eichenberg

          They breed much faster than they kill each other.

  • WR_the_realist

    We see again that:

    Liberals don’t like guns because they’re afraid of blacks and Mestizos with guns.

    Conservatives like guns because they want to defend themselves from blacks and Mestizos with guns.

    So you see, both liberals and conservatives are “racist”.

    • And imagine what white liberals and white conservatives could accomplish together if they joined up and hated blacks more than they hated each other.

      • WR_the_realist

        I don’t hate blacks. I just realize that blacks are different from whites on average, so that black neighborhoods differ from white neighborhoods in ways that make whites not want to live near too many blacks. I do want the left to stop teaching blacks to hate whites.

      • ricpic

        Don’t even have to hate them. Just see them as they are and then govern accordingly. Apartness would follow a clear-eyed view of blacks, enforced by legislation. Blacks would still be carried by whites (liberals would insist on that condition) but at least actual contact would be minimized.

        • Just see them as they are and then govern accordingly

          Don’t you know? That IS hate.

        • John Smith


    • ricpic

      I guess that makes the survival instinct racist. And I’m not saying that facetiously.

      • Who Me?

        Self preservation is inborn. Somebody attacks you, you fight back. If you don’t believe me, watch a couple of 4 year olds play until they get into an argument. What’s the first thing out of their mouth? “He hit me first!”

  • Reynardine

    “So they just don’t have any long-term focus or anything.”


  • Oh oh, a moment of truth accidentally spilled out! But the operative word here is “accidentally.” Liberals, in other words, know that what race-realists claim is true, but they can’t admit it publicly because it undermines their entire racial ‘narrative’ and Utopian framework.

    Thus, when the truthful words (partially, at least) of Bloomberg are exposed, every opportunity is exhausted to suppress it. The man is incredibly disingenuous and intellectually dishonest.

    This shows how liberals are both hypocrites and have a strong aversion to the truth. People that love truth, even unpopular or ‘hard’ truths, will not only speak the truth, but they won’t erect barriers to prevent it from being known.

  • RacialRay

    Better outlaw crockpots, too. I hear that’s become the weapon of choice for middle-aged black women, in sort of a perverse take on the Knockout Game. They lure middle-aged white neighbors to their kitchens for some innocent discourse on politics, and then BAM! its lights out, YT.

    No lie. It happens.

  • One big irony about Michael Bloomberg’s politics in his latter years as mayor and now in his political retirement is that he’s been spending a lot of time dumping on people who either already agree with him that SQF is necessary and helpful or are very close to thinking that.

    Incidentally, all this reads like:

  • Sick of it

    Bloomberg is simply ashamed that he was caught telling the truth. He loses street cred with his community.

    • Charles Martel

      Bloody never had any cred with The Community (“Stop and frisk be racist!!”) but because his foundation gave a lot of money to black rabble rousers they decided not to bite the hand that feeds them.

  • Anon

    Before I comment on this, let me make clear that I am not a “race realist”. I am a racial extremist and white supremacist who feels that the final solution is the only real solution to the problem of blacks. I wasn’t always that way….but life experiences have taught me that is the best, most moral, most appropriate, and most realistic understanding of race. Only a scant few generations ago, it was the dominant way of thinking….for good reason. It’s also something the Christian religion demands and makes no bones about the consequences of refusing to abide by that (those consequences being experienced right not). I feel very strongly that the current world situation absolutely cannot lead anywhere except a genocidal third world war, in the wake of which, anyone who doesn’t at least pretend to think this way will be whipped daily until they give over. Or expulsed from white lands. When the bubble bursts, that will be that.

    OK…now back to the current day situation with blacks and guns. I want to remind people that we are now in year 25 of the experiment in gun control. No..not gun control where they are confiscated. I mean like in Kennesaw, Georgia. About 25 years ago, this very, very bad neighborhood that is part of metropolitan Atlanta, passed a law. That law requires every head of a household without a criminal record to own and keep in the house at all times, at least one gun. Crime immediately plummeted and has stayed low for decades now.

    Kennesaw is 1/4 black. Not educated fake blacks people occasionally see pretending to get degrees in college and pretending to speak like Obama. But your average, 80 IQ, welfare inner city blacks. Not just allowed but forced to own guns. And what is the result?

    This is not an isolated case, just the prototypical one….although you RARELY see it EVER mentioned in ANY media, ever. Mandatory gun ownership stops crime dead in its tracks (more or less literally). And no, it is not necessary to keep guns out of the hands of blacks. No one dares experiment with the issue of criminal, even violently criminal blacks. All I have to say on THAT issue is violence in prison disrupts business which is why gangs will disappear trouble makers. Recently a fascinating book was reviewed on Amren that went into this in some detail. The author described what was going on quite clearly but did not have the courage to state the obvious. Which is to say that only whites behave when there are no consequences for misbehavior but non-whites do and will behave in a situation where being a jackass gets one shot.

    It’s the ambiguity that seems to be the problem. Jamel decides it would be funny to play the “knock out game”. He doesn’t know his victim is armed and kills him. In a situation where Jamel KNOWS his victim is armed, he decides, even in his retarded mind state, that he doesn’t like getting shot.

    What Bloomberg is saying is a lie. He knows the truth and his goal is to foment chaos. When there is chaos, people want someone to “do something” and then foolishly give people like Bloomberg more power (which he promptly abuses). Last thing he is interested in is solving any problems. When their are no problems, people tend to be free to ask questions. Questions like where did Bloomberg get most of his wealth (stolen from us). Or, why should the government need more than a handful of dollars to do its job.

    Anyway. A proven solution to crime is mandatory gun ownership. It probably is mandatory open carry. And yes, that includes blacks. It’s the best solution until the day we finally decide to do what we should have done 500 years ago and dump them all into africa with a giant razor wire fence around the continent.

    • Who Me?

      As to the Kennesaw experiment, yes it’s a good one. Bubba #1 gets mad and decides that Bubba #2 needs killing (for whatever BS reason). Yes, Bubba #1 has a gun (as per the law), but he also knows that Bubba #2 also has a gun (also as per the law), and he doesn’t want to get shot in return, so nobody gets shot. It doesn’t matter what color skins the “Bubbas” are wearing, it’s just basic universal survival instinct.

      • PvtCharlieSlate

        It used to be called “MAD” – for Mutually Assured Destruction.

  • antiquesunlight

    This shouldn’t be controversial. It’s common sense.

    • Alexandra1973

      Common sense isn’t common anymore. I daresay it’s just about illegal nowadays.

  • Danimalius

    Richard Spencer suggested that urban whites thought of crime and rural whites thought of hunting when the subject came to guns, and that is what decided their opposed views on guns. Turns out he may have been right.

  • bv

    The truth hurts.

  • John Ambrose

    Bloomberg must be suffering from cognitive dissonance. He instinctively realizes that murders in NYC are overwhelming committed by “minorities” but at the same time is gung-ho about amnesty which would saddle us with millions more of these “minorities.”

    • John Smith

      And at the same time endorse gun control measures that will do nothing to stop the minority criminals who commit most of the violent crimes. Gun control only works on the law-abiding, not the criminal element. He is all about disarming the peasant-class, any way he can.


    The ONLY people I see working to preserve endangered species of animals are White. The vast majority of people working to help others during storms, building hospitals, saving the environment or starting charitable causes are White. So what is your point?

  • Spikeygrrl

    Bloomberg: “… [W]e put all the cops in the minority neighborhoods. Yes that’s true, why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is.”

    Wasn’t it the notorious criminal “Slick Willie” Sutton who famously remarked, “I rob banks because that’s where the money is”?

    This is the most SENSE I’ve heard from Nanny Bloomberg in…..errrr…..well, EVER.

  • Let me try saying what I wrote above in a different way.

    When someone is making a fool of himself, the best thing to do is get out of their way.

    Likewise, when a fool makes sense for once, the best thing to do is not to try to convince him to revert to fool mode.

  • Mark Robert

    Gun Grabbers want to make YOU the Outlaw…

    These are a few other Zionist who wants to control OUR GUNS, INTERNET, SPEECH, and foment WARS.

    Bernie Sanders, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Al Franken, Chuck Schumer, Loretta Weinberg, Rahm Emanuel, Michael Bloomberg, Dianne Feinstein, Carl Levin, Barbara Boxer, Ron Wyden, Ben Cardin, Michael Bennet, Brian Schatz, Richard Blumenthal, Henry Waxman, Sander Levin, Eliot Engel, Nita Lowey, Jerrold Nadler, Bradley Sherman, Janice Schakowsky, Susan Davis, Steve Israel, Adam Schiff, Allyson Schwartz, Steve Cohen, John Yarmuth, Jared Polis, Theodore Deutch, David Cicilline, Alan Grayson, Lois Frankel, Brad Schneider, Alan Lowenthal.

    VOTE Them OUT!!!

  • Mark Robert

    The Zionist long-term agenda has always been to take our guns.

    The US Gun Control Act of 1968 evolved from Celler’s Bill H.R. 17735

    The same Emanuel Celler that spent 41-years fighting the restriction on immigration to the United States based on national origin, also introduced…

    The ‘US Gun Control Act of 1968’ act was introduced by Celler’s Bill H.R. 17735

  • Paleoconn

    Bloomberg financed gun control in Colorado. He’s not on our side, but sometimes it takes a liberal like him to say the truth that neocons don’t have the courage to.