Politics and White Consciousness

Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, November 18, 2014

An analysis of the 2014 elections.

The midterm election was the “revenge of the white male voter,” according to the professionally offended Amanda Marcotte of Slate. When it comes to the numbers, she’s right. Sixty-four percent of white men voted for Republicans; 34 percent voted for Democrats. Whites overall voted 60 percent for the GOP and whites made up 75 percent of voters, as opposed to 72 percent in 2012.

Despite the spectacle of black Republicans Mia Love and Tim Scott, and giggling from National Review about how the GOP is going to win over non-white voters, the Republican Party is actually growing more dependent on the white vote. This is what underlies the emerging liberal claim that the elections were somehow illegitimate because insufficient numbers of non-whites voted. However, even though the GOP won because of white voters, the Republicans’ share of the white vote is comparatively low to the margins won by Presidents Nixon and Reagan in 1972 (67 percent) and 1984 (64 percent).

If the Republican Party isn’t quite the “white party,” it’s certainly the party of the white majority. In the South, whites vote as a bloc for Republicans the same way blacks do all over the country. The most extreme example is Mississippi, where 89 percent of whites voted for Mitt Romney in 2012. This election, progressives were stunned to discover that the “war on women” failed to inspire white women to vote Democrat, leading journalists to charge that racist white women had “failed” females everywhere.

However, it’s worth asking why whites should vote for the Republican Party. After all, Republicans have hardly been defenders of white interests and were stopped from helping Barack Obama amnesty millions of illegal immigrants only because of outrage from their own base. Republicans are simply less awful than Democrats.

As Thomas Jackson pointed out in his recent review of The Hidden Agenda of the Political Mind, European-Americans are unrepresented when it comes to the two most prominent issues affecting our people: racial preferences and immigration. Political leaders generally support more affirmative action and immigration despite widespread opposition. Perhaps an even more important issue is freedom of association–something briefly defended by Senator Rand Paul before he decided betrayal was a better way to serve his ambitions.

Therefore, while white votes are still enough to determine the political landscape, and white politicians are still overwhelmingly in power, this doesn’t translate into white representation. This is especially true since any white politician who acted explicitly in defense of white interests would quickly lose power. On the other hand, non-whites are rewarded for acting on behalf of their people.

Although Republicans rely upon white voters and use coded racial appeals to win their support, a Republican politician will find himself disowned by his own party if he attempts to champion white interests. The Republican Party’s attacks on its own candidates in the cases of David Duke and Pat Buchanan show that the GOP would actually prefer electoral defeat to the charge of being “pro-white.”

The Republican Party could win a greater percentage of the white vote by supporting popular causes like ending racial preferences, establishing English as the national language, and cracking down on illegal immigration. They could also make a concerted effort to win over the white workers, many of whom, as Mr. Jackson pointed out, do not vote.

But what white advocates think the Republican Party should do bears no resemblance to what the Party will do. After all, if the GOP was interested simply in winning elections by appealing to whites, we would not be in the current mess. Therefore, what is likely to happen?

Despite the Republican Party’s traditional cowardice and corruption, Democrats may be creating a unified white political consciousness. As Pat Buchanan and Steve Sailer have both observed, the Democrats campaigned on the politics of grievance in 2014 by talking up a “war on women,” championing Ferguson, and accusing Republicans of passing voter ID laws to suppress non-white voters.

Combine this with Barack Obama’s determination to push through an executive amnesty, and the racial battlegrounds will become clear. If there is to be a mass amnesty, we want it to come down unilaterally, illegally, and at the hands of a black President whose administration seems to be driven by anti-white animus.

The Republican Party will benefit from white outrage in the short term, even if it doesn’t do anything. In fact, we can expect that they won’t do anything. But the Republican Party is not what is ultimately important. What is important is that permanent racial tension and imposed diversity will continue the progression of America towards a Lebanon-style political culture of tribal head-counting. The fact that whites will continue to migrate towards Republicans, who don’t have whites’ best interests at heart, is less important than the long-term trend of whites consolidating as a unified political force. The anti-white media ensure that even a relatively small white majority (like the GOP’s sixty percent vote) will be defined in racial terms.

Democrats can try to counter some of this through economic outreach to white workers, as some progressives are urging. The problem is that anti-white identity politics are now so central to progressive ideology that it has overwhelmed issues of class and income inequality. Even the Occupy movement quickly collapsed because it insisted on Byzantine discussion about racial privilege rather than focusing on issues that could rally white workers. And the Democrats’ dependence on black turnout will necessitate more Ferguson-style race-baiting, which will result in the kind of rioting and violent rhetoric that will force European-Americans to take a side in the racial Cold War, even if they don’t want to.

A deeper problem is that the Republican Party may try to prevent itself from becoming the de facto white party. This is in fact the party’s intention as laid out by RNC chairman Reince Priebus, who has aggressively pushed for openness to illegal immigration and a greater effort to win non-white voters. The trajectory of presidential contender (and possible front runner) Rand Paul speaks for itself.

The Republican base already reflects a powerful implicit white identity and an increasing impatience with Democratic minority politics and anti-white posturing. While white advocates are used to hearing the old saw about whites “waking up,” it’s striking that the Republican base forced the Republican Party to oppose amnesty in spite of itself. Even Rand Paul ultimately voted against the Gang of Eight amnesty bill.

Slowly, painfully, and against the wishes of both the Democratic and Republican leadership, a white political consciousness is developing. It is most forcefully expressing itself on the issue of immigration. Barack Obama’s upcoming amnesty will escalate this process. Even though whites don’t want to think of themselves as a bloc, they are subject to a government that increasingly insists on treating them as one.

The 2014 elections were good for whites not because the Republican Party is worth supporting, or because it will do anything substantial protect white interests, or because it is becoming a white party. It’s good because it is setting up a conflict between what Peter Brimelow calls a Minority Occupation Government and a Congress that is perceived by a hostile media and by the Republican base to be “white.” It is furthering the development of a white political consciousness by forcing a conflict that can be interpreted only in racial terms. And as the progressive movement in this country justifies the redistribution of resources and power chiefly along racial–not class–lines, white political consciousness will develop further in the years to come.

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

Gregory Hood

Mr. Hood has been active in conservative youth movements in the US.

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • AndrewInterrupted

    Ann Coulter did a good job herding cats on the Right this year. She convinced many Tea Partiers, Libertarians, and Independents to vote against the Democrats, not for their favorite candidate. Unfortunately, that wasn’t so in New Hampshire. The cats couldn’t be herded there. And the Tea Partiers were even bragging about preventing Scott Brown’s victory. Only to see Jeanne Shaheen, the amnesty queen remain in power. I though white people were the smart ones?

    • CallahanAuto

      They value and tout their independent-mindedness in New Hampshire. It’s a luxury they can afford to have in a state that’s 95% white. Not an option in Mississippi.

      • rentslave

        They love ditsoons in New Hampshire-as long as they don’t have them nearby.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          I give up: “Ditsoons”? (Etymology, please?)

          • Yves Vannes

            It’s Italian for that word that means black person and it starts with an N and ends with an R, unless a N____R is saying it then it ends with an A.

          • Earl P. Holt III


          • AndrewInterrupted

            I though Goombahs called them Mooley Heads?

          • Yves Vannes

            “Mulignan” , which is Italian for eggplant.
            “Ditsoon” is the word for burnt or overdone.

      • Like the proud liberal Minnesotans of a generation ago. “We don’t have a problem with negroes. You people in the South are just prejudiced.” But the worm turns.

        • CallahanAuto

          Did it ever. North Minneapolis ain’t exactly the land of “Prairie Home Companion,” is it?

          • Usually Much Calmer

            All the kids are below average.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          How are those Somalis workin’ out for yez…?

      • Earl P. Holt III

        …or Zimbabwe, or Haiti, or Detroit, or South Africa, or Newark, or St. Louis, or Chicago, or Washington, etc., etc., etc…

    • D.B. Cooper

      You know, when I post my pictures, I don’t post them as is. I shrink them a little bit first.

    • Was it only because Scott Brown was carpetbagging? Was that the difference?

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I think the “carpet-bagging” propaganda campaign was moderately suc-cessful. Democrats are LIV types. They just want their bumper sticker. It was pointed out by me and others that Brown had owned a home in Rye, NH since 1992, had relatives who lived and died there, etc. It was also pointed out that Jeanne Shaheen was born in Missouri and went to high school in Pennsylvania, while Brown had always been a New Englander. But, the LIVs had their bumper sticker–and that was that. Like feeding pigs, really.

      • Yves Vannes

        Southern NH is full of MA- D voters who have a summer home there. They often switch locations for voting depending upon whom is running where.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Granted, but Scott lived within the Boston beltway to accommodate his wife’s network job. I guess the Demo-rats would have preferred Gail commute the hour and a half from Rye. At least the Demo-rats would then have remained consistent with their war-on-women.

          You could fit two New Englands inside the state of Texas. Scott is a native New Englander. Jeanne Shaheen is a native of Missouri, but facts rarely have an effect on LIV sheeple.

          They are the party of end-justifies-the-means.

      • Scott Brown is from NH.

    • WR_the_realist

      There were two other Republicans running in the primary, either would have been better than Scott Brown. The Republican establishment shot itself in the foot by insisting upon backing Mr. Pretty Boy.

      • Earl P. Holt III

        The Republican “Establishment” wouldn’t know “Man-O’ War” from a mule…

      • AndrewInterrupted

        And the Tea Party candidate, Marilinda Garcia, running against
        the cardboard cut-out known as Ann Kuster–got slaughtered.
        For the record, I voted for Garcia. I live in southern NH.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          On first glean, she doesn’t look like congressional material. (She doesn’t look like a harpist, either.)

          I don’t know her, but she looks like what republicans come up with when they scrape the bottom of the diversity barrel.

          I vote strategically, too.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            She didn’t do well because she was Tea Party, but also voters were concerned she might be a La Raza sleeper cell. Kelly Ayotte did the same thing as a closet feminist–and switched into RINO mode not long after the election. Ayotte actually invented a new political traitor genre: the Femi-RINO. Garcia is half Italian, which may explain her apparent mixed allegiance.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Where did you get that photo? Candidates hire people to scrub the internets of images like that.

            I have nice legs too but there is no way in hell I would ask for anyone’s vote while they are thinking, “If I squint, can I see what color her panties are?”

            Epic fail. Cannot stress enough. Speaks volumes.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            It may have been a college photo. I think it’s tastefully enough. She was trying to appeal to the young female and hipster crowd, of which there are few in the Republican camp. She’ll be back. It’s much easier for a young person to run for the House than the Senate. Even easier at the State level. They elected an 18 year old conservative in West Virginia, Saira Blair.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Now I feel old.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Me, too.

            ‘Old age aint for sissies’. –Bette Davis

        • ATBOTL

          The GOP is running nonwhite candidates in homogeneously white districts and for statewide office in Southern states where the whites are yellow dog Republicans. The goal is to prove they are a “diverse” party. Districts where these AA candidates are running are good bets for nationalist third party challenges to get a significant share of the vote, as many whites in those places will privately resent being used like this.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            But, you need a run-off system like Louisiana. People won’t vote 3rd Party unless they know they can vote for their “lesser of two evils” candidate after the 3rd Party one fizzles. The Mary Landrieu loss (presumably) would have been a victory, if not for the run-off system in Louisiana. Did you notice the high level of Tea Party votes? Those numbers were high because they knew their votes wouldn’t be wasted.

    • Garrett Brown

      That mud shark didnt do anything. Whites are waking up regardless of who is the guest of O Reilly or Hannity.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        You are an angry little troll

        • Garrett Brown

          Calling names wont change facts, sorry. She is a known mud shark.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That is false. Standing next to J.J. Dyno-mite at a TV-land promo does not a mudshark make. If standing next to a broth-uh auto-matically makes a woman a mudshark, then your mother is a mudshark.

            And if Ann did have a hankering for dark salami, do you really think she’d shop at the J.J. Dyno-mite Deli?? She’s worth $8.5 million.

            Admittedly, her PR attempt at blunting race cards being forever thrown at her backfired: no black people believe she’s a mudshark and shrill, white dumb f*cks like you do.

          • Garrett Brown

            It wasnt just for a promo, they were seen together (getting rather close) multiple times. You cannot deny the evidence. She went to the dark side and should no longer be taken seriously.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          I think he is just very young. But yes, he could dial back the angry a bit.

      • Whitesneedtobebrave

        WHy is Ann Coulter a mud shark. Did she ever date a negro?

        • Yves Vannes

          Sit down. Ready? Jimmy “Dy-No-Mite” Walker.

        • Garrett Brown

          DY NO MITE!!!!!

      • jaye ellis

        Stop lying.

        Stop spreading completely unsubstantiated gossip.

        • Garrett Brown

          I never lie anymore.

  • D.B. Cooper

    The Republican Party is still going to ignore the white voter, who came to the GOP by default. Therefore, expect more republicans uttering how they still need to reach out to attract more minority voters.
    These nimrods are still in office. The job is far from over.

    • CallahanAuto

      McCain is crazy. He’d like to see us clashing with Putin, al-Assad, Iran, ISIS and China. This is a man who will get more white males killed.

      • Sick of it

        That’s the point.

      • Max

        Yeah, McCain with his black fambly.

      • Realist

        Yes, and there are plenty of other Republican warmongers.And many who are for crony capitalism.

    • NoMosqueHere

      Just like Eric Cantor, Speaker John Boehner needs to go. At minimum, his replacement should recognize that the republican party’s future is dependent on white voter turnout and addressing white issues.

      • Earl P. Holt III

        I thought MY Congressman — Louie Gohmert — would challenge that coward, low-grade moron and drunkard, Boehner, for the Speaker’s position…

    • Max

      Nimrod was a great warrior. This hardly describes the RNC.

      • Earl P. Holt III

        The “Leadership” of the GOP aren’t “nimrods,” they are “DIMRODS”…

    • WR_the_realist

      Arizona Republicans are very much against illegal immigration. Yet they keep voting in McCain every time. Who put the stupid juice in Arizona’s water supply?

      • me

        Who said that our votes count? Diebold corporation shills, or government shills?

      • Earl P. Holt III

        The power of incumbency is enormous, particularly when you have Karl Rove and the RNC telling you that only the establishment’s incumbent could possibly win against a “Democrat” challenger…

    • wildfirexx

      Yes, this old war horse would have had us in a third world war by now, had he beaten Obama in 2008. Some one should give him the golden handshake, and send him to his grave.

    • Whitesneedtobebrave

      Would have been better if McCain never came back from Vietnam or if he did, did not enter politics. He has just helped ruin this nation. Jon Boehner should be ashamed for allowing his daughter to marry a Jamaican Negro with dreadlocks and who has a criminal record. He has failed as a father and these two men have failed as Americans but are slightly better than white libs.

  • TruthBeTold

    Listening to and reading comments from blatantly liberal media talking heads and the MSM commentary leading up to the election I kept hearing about the coming non-White majority.

    I believe that the left believed that the last midterm elections would be the last time Whites would matter in a national election.This was the turning point when Whites would no longer be a challenge to liberals and non-white minorities seizing control.

    I believe the left and non-white minorities were honestly shocked that White people still held any power to sway an election.

    To their surprise, we squeaked through.

    They are still planning for and counting on our demise and see Republican wins as a small setback in the political game.

    They expected us not to matter but we did.

    Their hubris was evident and they were defeated by it.

    But how long do we have? What is their next move? What is our next more?

    • drattastic

      “Squeaked through” ?

      • TheGothFather412

        A true demolishing of the Democrats would be a scenario where the Republicans won a filibuster proof 60 Senate seats. Did not happen this time, although over-all I am pleased with the election results.

        • drattastic

          I too would love to get a 60 seat Senate majority but don’t want to downplay the significance of the victory we enjoyed .

          • TheGothFather412

            Well there will be another election in 2 years. Maybe the 60 seats can be achieved then. It is good to keep ones eyes set on positive objectives.

            I do think that 60 seats is totally within the realm of the possible.

          • drattastic

            We can only hope enough people wake up.

  • Trevor Pilsbury

    Nothing will achieve white unity faster than the pain and suffering brought on by an anti-white government hell-bent on their demographic replacement.

    • dd121

      If only it were true.

      • Fletch

        It has to be. When whites really begin seeing that they are getting the shaft from every angle (and they are) with no one representing them and nothing but white traitors selling them out, they will have to unify at least politically.

        • Sparky

          I just heard an interview Rand Paul did with Bill Maher. Paul said he wants to end the war on drugs because it disproportionately targets “blacks and browns.”

          He is now pandering to Obama’s constituents:

          • Luca

            So does rape and murder.

          • 1gravity

            There are, of course, good reasons, not based on race, for amending laws about Schedule I drugs, but now, perhaps, is not the time for that discussion.

          • jayvbellis

            Rand Paul us now as bad as Jack Kemp.

        • TheGothFather412

          Also remember a sizable number of the electorate can still remember when there were guys like David Duke and ‘Uncle Jesse’ Helms around who were unquestionably Pro-White. These folks ask themselves ‘Hey why don’t we have anyone like that in politics today?’

          Liberals don’t like those kinds of questions

    • Diversity Fatigue

      The more suffering the better. Let diversity work its magic.

    • Dwight

      It also helps when Obama is acting more and more like a Nigerian war lord.

      • me

        Someone needs to stop Obongola. The globalists have him in their pocket…

        • Realist

          “Someone needs to stop Obongola.”
          It won’t be the Republicans.

        • Anna Tree

          It’s the dangerous and suicidal trick of the European Union…

  • dd121

    The republicans may need the white vote but they’re way to cowardly to court it.

    • Realist

      Very true.

  • MekongDelta69

    If more Whites were like Jared Taylor, et al, we’d have no problems. (And I’m not saying that to get ‘bennie points.’ – It’s the truth.)

    • bilderbuster

      In a sane world Jared Taylor isn’t a radical or a racist but more resembles the upper middle class businessman who lives down the street.

    • JohnEngelman

      I was banned from Daily Stormer for standing by Jared Taylor.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        That’s because Jared has a little Voltaire problem.
        He’s a race realist–with an asterisk.
        But, I’m guessing he has his reasons.
        I don’t fault Jared or Daily Stormer, only Garret Brown.

  • JohnEngelman

    When I study American history I find it easy to identify with what was considered to be liberal and on the left until the 1970’s. When it became obvious that ending racial discrimination would not achieve racial equality Democrats tried to force racial equality by discriminating against whites with policies like affirmative action and forced school busing.

    • WR_the_realist

      And now the knives have really come out. Listen to the pro-Democrat mass media and their contempt for white people is blatant. They are 100% in favor of illegal immigration precisely because it will hasten the day when whites are a tiny minority.

      • bilderbuster

        They’ve been treating us like it’s a done deal already.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          That is because they are attuned to the second derivative.

          It doesn’t matter what the value of the variable (political power, numbers, whatever) is now. What matters is the rate of change of the rate of change.

      • Realist

        “Listen to the pro-Democrat mass media and their contempt for white people is blatant.”
        Notice how many commercials have a wimpy white being dominated by a large tough black. There are lots of them. Who are they selling to? Or is it just psychological against whites?

  • DaveMed

    I just looked up the NumbersUSA grades for the representatives in my state. F, F, and D-. I sometimes wonder if there’s even any point in fighting, but I have no intention of giving up.

    • ViktorNN

      Same here. No one to vote for on the issues that matter most to me.

      • Usually Much Calmer

        Yeah, but consider what soulless people go into politics these days.
        They respond to feedback MORE than people with integrity.

        We just have to call and hector in sufficient volume.

    • TheGothFather412

      Still turning out to vote does hurt the opposition party though. They still have to worry (and spend money) to fend off any ‘surprises’. That is money spent that can’t be spent on a true battle ground state.

      Also there are often measures and initiatives to vote on as well. Voting no on increased taxes can help to cut off the spigot to ‘diversity programs’

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    “What is important is that permanent racial tension and imposed diversity will continue the progression of America towards a Lebanon-style political culture of tribal head-counting. ”

    We’re being terraformed into the Middle East to the benefit of certain Middle Easterners.

    • bilderbuster

      They played a large role in making Lebanon into what it is today.

  • Luca

    I tend to think that if anything the Republicans should overtly ignore race and say, “Listen, we are the party that believes in work and not welfare; in free markets, not free handouts; we believe in education, not indoctrination; we believe in states’ rights, smaller government, personal responsibility, balanced budgets and The Constitution.”

    Such an agenda should overwhelmingly attract Whites (and Asians) with no mention of race whatsoever. The left is constantly dividing us against each other. Whites argue over religion, politics, environment, gender issues, unions, schooling, race, etc.

    I would call out the useful idiots of the left and point out that as long as they are on welfare they will always be caught in a quagmire of dependency, they will never get ahead.

    “Government that is big enough to give everything you need and want is also strong enough to take it away.” – Thomas Jefferson

    • See The Future

      You present a rational politically correct strategy…….but, in the end the result will be the same (white extinction) unless we are able to get strong leadership now to “hit the nail on the head”. Subtle appeasement will slow the slide but will not arrest it. We need to make fundamental change in so many areas if there is to be something to look forward to in the future. There will be no great white leader without a supportive media. The media makes or breaks the government.

      • Luca

        If rampant, rabid liberalism can be brought under control by neutering the Democratic party, many of the ills we suffer today will also naturally come under control. No more special privileges for blacks, browns, gays, illegals and Muslims, no more coddling of femi-nazis, labor unions, environmental mental cases, no more support for academic and media indoctrination, no more ridiculous tolerance for the ACLU, SPLC and the NAACP, more enforcement of our immigration laws and our justice system in general.

        Under these conditions Whites have a better chance at flourishing. I would also do many other proactive things to pluck the vermin out of our society. I believe strongly we should outsource much of our prisoner population and/or strip them of citizenship and deport them permanently.

    • jayvbellis


      Economic Conservatism , Libertarian true believer cult nonsense has failed us terribly for close to 100 years.

      Build the goddamn wall!

      The Interstate hi way system works fine. Build something similar on the border.

    • JohnEngelman

      “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.”…

      Earliest known appearance in print: 1952 [1]

      Earliest known appearance in print, attributed to Jefferson: 2005[2]

      Comments: Neither this quotation nor any of its variant forms has been found in the writings of Thomas Jefferson.

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    “Even the Occupy movement quickly collapsed because it insisted on Byzantine discussion about racial privilege rather than focusing on issues that could rally white workers.”

    A white party may be inevitable as all others become anti-white parties. Anti-white whites. It will be hard for the Democrats to gain long-term traction with whites as long as they’re consistently running with the “whites suck” mantras. The armed assembly they’ll be able to field in the “whites suck” infantry is not going to be an impressive one.

  • B.A_2014

    During the republican debates, would it be too much too ask an Amrener to attend a live broadcast and shout out something, anything in regards to the displacement and the seemingly inevitable minority status and the problems that will arise when whites become a powerless minority.

    • Tim_in_Indiana

      Jared Taylor did attend one such debate and interjected a pertinent question as well.

      • Holden

        That was so awesome. My respect for Taylor was sealed with that:


    • TheGothFather412

      It seems that the annual CPAC gathering has become a locale for this to happen. Jamie Kelso, Scott Terry and Matt Heimbach have all uttered some politically incorrect stuff at CPAC in the past.

      I would keep an eye out for the next CPAC if this is something that really interests you.

  • IKUredux

    You know, it is amazing what people can accomplish utilizing guerrilla(gorilla) tactics. Which, of course, can really encompass so many different modes. You know, like something as simple as declaring yourself to be the opposite sex on government forms. You have been transgendered. Or, identifying as another race(nowadays, you are apparently what you say you are). When a society has decided that certain folks don’t need to play by the rules, that only works when everybody else, does. So, don’t. Don’t play by the rules. They are, after all, White people rules. All our enemies are flouting White rules knowing that it will have an impact. However, their premise REQUIRES Whites to continue playing by White rules. In fact, it can only succeed if we do. So, DON’T.

    • me

      I’ve been thinking about it, and one of the quickest ways to stop this crazy train is to halt all immigration, stop paying federal income tax, abolish the Federal Reserve, start a third party, repeal the 19th Amendment, and limit the vote to landowners.

      • Spikeygrrl

        Good luck with that.

    • kikz2

      i’ll take Machiavellian Pragmatism for $1000 Alex.

    • MBlanc46

      Those are interesting possibilities. They’re not likely to bring down the regime, but they do offer the chance for some anarchic hijinks.

    • Spikeygrrl

      Oh, great. Now we’re supposed to jettison the culture and the civility which are important parts of what makes Us so different from Them?! Thanks, but no thanks.

  • Bo_Sears

    “Despite the Republican Party’s traditional cowardice and corruption, Democrats may be creating a unified white political consciousness.”

    An interesting and poignant comment. It is true that the diverse white American peoples are very much in love with “sticks & stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” Some of the glamor of that old poem may still be with us, but it is wearing off.

    The real pressure to re-tribalize (and de-citizenize) is being forced on us by the two most prominent extreme tribalist groups in America today, and we will have to take thought as to whether to mobilize in favor of citizenism (now just a kind of Teddy Roosevelt fantasy) or to favor a moderate kind of tribalism ourselves. It is ironic that the diverse white American peoples simply do not have a “talented tenth” to look after things…we do have a “talented one percent” who can tell the way the wind is blowing and who are looking to the future not the past.

    What we really need is to develop a culture of white authenticity, and refuse to accept being junior partners in defining ourselves, much less being the kind of supremacists that value being “allies.” (Those white “allies” of other groups are the true white supremacists.)

    Half the hate propaganda we hear and read is really about colonizing our minds with the viewpoint, values, and goals of the extreme tribalists. Most commenters believe that “guilt” is the motive underlying the anti-white narrative, but it is really all about denying our authenticity. We should be a little more tribalist in rejecting hate speech and personal attacks…. and the best tool for that is an attackback at the speaker or writer. We can do ritual denunciation (not unreasoned name-calling), too.

    If tribalism is to be the new way of life here, let’s do it well and decently. North American history has had many twists and turns, and somehow we need to discuss these things in a sane way without our own name-calling of others…not to be nice, just because it isn’t part of white authenticity which is about us developing our full potential into the future. There are many ways to accomplish these things, and most do not touch on the Republican Party.

    The largest gift from the most extreme tribalist group was “pluralism” which is now described elsewhere as one of “the pillars of the Constitution” which is nonsense. But its advocates won that social/political battle with some of the most vicious personal attacks on relatively ordinary people who stood up for a unitarian view of the USA all the way into the early Fifties. Then they morphed pluralism into multiculturalism, and now into multiracialism, and soon into multinationalism.

    Buckle up for the next 50 years, and don’t forget it took from the 1640s to the 1770s (about 130 years) for independence from monarchical rule to take hold.

  • gemjunior

    “And the Democrats’ dependence on black turnout will necessitate more Ferguson-style race-baiting, which will result in the kind of rioting and violent rhetoric that will force European-Americans to take a side in the racial Cold War, even if they don’t want to.”
    Hmm, it is going to get ugly, fo’ sho’. I shake my head when I see these stupid white people lying in the road in Ferguson with chalk outline around them – what the hell are they thinking? They could be attacked and killed at any given moment, and I’m surprised it hasn’t happened yet – but it Will, mark my words when the so-called “black rage” is at an all time high. Perhaps after the grand jury decision. What will happen to all the white idiots that are over in Ferguson holding signs about how racist white people are? I wonder if they will ever get it, or if they will be treated as honorary black people because they are ‘good’ white people, and not evil white people like us. Will they paint themselves black and try to walk through the crowd, like in The Walking Dead? LOL. It’s not funny though!

  • connorhus

    Give some of the up and coming State level Republicans some time. Up until four years ago and even two years ago the standard victim politics of the left was working for them still. Not everywhere but they managed to pull off a few hail Mary races due to their war on women and minority twists. Let the Republicans landslide a few more elections with overwhelming White support (Men and Married Females anyway) and they will begin to get the picture. This is really the first time the pictures has been shown to them in clarity.

  • newscomments70

    “34 percent of white males voted for Democrats”….beta male faggots.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      There is also the unfortunate union component. If a white male weren’t in a union he’d be more likely to vote for his race. If the Repugs made a major shift in policy and started backing unions, they’d win every election for the next decade.

      • newscomments70

        Unions definitely are the road to communism. When communists take over, the trade unions are taken over by the government. Communist trade unions promote quotas and cut wages. Currency is basically worthless in a communist society. Strikes and protests become effectively illegal.

    • MartelsGhost

      Maybe they were all pre-op trannies? Or really butch “ladies” who “self-identify as males”?

      • newscomments70

        The trannies and butch lesbians could beat the hell out of the liberal beta males.

        • MartelsGhost

          Wouldn’t that be a wonderful thing to behold?

          Hilarity heaped upon irony.

          Have you heard how beards are now “part of the rape culture”?

          • newscomments70

            If that is referring to beards on Muslim men, that i assume it is true.

          • MartelsGhost

            muslims don’t have beards, they have chinstraps that are left untrimmed. A real beard includes a mustache.

            But yeah, all muslims are goat rapers. May Odin spear them all.

  • ImTellinYa

    I “Like” you Mr. Hood. A million Dittos to you, sir.

  • Amren wrote:
    “This is especially true since any white politician who acted explicitly
    in defense of white interests would quickly lose power. On the other
    hand, non-whites are rewarded for acting on behalf of their people.”

    Yes, but why is this so?

    Unless you understand why this situation came to pass, nothing will change.

    Unless you understand the forces that created this situation, any analysis you have to offer is simply cargo cult analysis.

    Those primitive pacific islanders reaped the bounty from planes that landed on their islands during WW2. After the war, the planes stopped coming. Those islanders in the pacific wanted the planes to land again. So they constructed landing strips and control towers. No planes landed, however.

    The islanders did not understand the forces that caused the planes to land. They seized upon superficialities such as appearances and hoped that would be good enough.

    In order to effect real change, you must understand the forces that cause the effects you cite in the quote above. If you cannot even attempt to do that, you offer nothing but cargo cult analysis. Perhaps you do not seek change. Perhaps you seek something else?

  • LHathaway

    This is a great article, and it and it’s coverage of immigration would have made sense 50 years ago. The only thing whites need to do as a group is vote for separation/reservation. We’ll call it sanctuary.

    • Daniel

      Absolutely correct!
      But here’s the real question:
      Why have white Americans tolerated this multicultural guilt trip for so long?
      Are they suicidal?
      European whites seem to have the same problem psychologically.
      Is this a symptom of a mental disease that plagues European based culture…….and predicts the end of that culture?

      • Kenner

        Pathological altruism. The natural altruism of whites extended to non-whites who use it for tribal advantage,

      • kikz2

        mostly it’s because they are Christian, and have a blind spot for tribal occupation of their own damn government.

        • Daniel

          Almost all of the Leftists who embrace the politically correct policies of multicultural “tolerance” are………..atheists.
          Hate to break that news to you.
          AND………a large proportion of the US elite military units(Delta Force, SEALS etc.) who do the most damage to militant Islam are Christians.

      • jayvbellis

        Read Wilmot Robertson’s The Dispossessed Majority.

  • I think it is more so as voting in people that respect law, true equality to all and freedom.
    This last 4 plus years has been rather lawless in too many places, as well as some in washington ignoring the constitution, and beliveing that they are above the law.

    • MBlanc46

      All any party politician is interested in are money and power. If you want those other things, you need self-government, not government by politicians.

  • John R

    Very good analysis. Thanks!

  • Brian david Riley

    I live in the UK. Can someone tell me what GOP stands for ?

    • Evette Coutier

      It means Grand Old Party.

    • me

      Greasy Old Politicians. Grubby Oy! Prostitutes. Greedy Oil Poachers. Gregarious Oppressors of Page-boys. Grumpy Oligarchs for Plutocracy. Great Obligations for Philistines. Gangrenous Obeyers of Power. Glib Oyster-Pounders. Ghey Orthopedic Prancers. Grimy Opossum Panderers. Giant Obsequious Pompadours.

  • ricpic

    As long as whites can’t say they oppose the illegals because whites don’t want to live in a browning America it’s like fighting with both hands tied behind whites’ backs. And they can’t say that. Not publicly anyway. Until that taboo is broken, until whites can proclaim their pride in being white and their desire to keep America white, the war is unwinnable. Why? Because it takes whites’ most passionate belief and argument and seals their lips. It renders whites impotent. That’s why the Republicans are a ticket to oblivion for whites. We must get behind an unapologetically conservative, traditional values party that celebrates white culture. Then at least we’ll be able to go to battle armed.

    • Daniel

      That’s absolutely correct.
      Study the drug war down in Mexico and see the level of barbarity of what Mexico has become. Human trafficking of sex slaves, pre-teen hitmen , total corruption, beheadings and torture.
      That’s Mexico……check it out. And that’s what Obama wants for you.

  • LeonNJ

    I did vote Republican and I’m happy they won the senate, but I know most are bums. Yes, whites voted by a large number, but so what? In the general election, we all know the masses come flooding into the voting booth to vote D. Come 2016, anyone who isn’t white will vote D. It really doesn’t look good.

  • jayvbellis

    State and local politics is where we have the best prospects.

    Go local

    And don’t write off White Liberals. Support all forms of birth control for urban poor, present these arguments as empowering poor women of color.

  • jayvbellis

    Steve Sailer noted that Asians voted GOP this time. That video of Michael Brown roughing up the small Asian shop keeper did the trick.

    • That, and Asians have a propensity to take their political cues from people that surround them. Probably the big swing in Asians in 2014 relative to 2012 has lot to do with the swing in the white people that surround Asians.

    • Yves Vannes

      I live in San Francisco. On the rare occasion that one hears a city official make something that can be construed as maybe not conservative but critical of the runaway train that is left-lib insanity, it in most cases tends to be someone of Asian ancestry.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    That gossip originated from this TV-land promo shot.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    I thought this graphic was pretty funny.

    • Kenner

      Surprised it was from Family Guy, a very left-nihilist cartoon.

  • jaye ellis

    Pat Buchanan could/should have ran for governor of New Hampshire where he had strong support against George Bush Sr. and Bob Dole in GOP presidential primaries. But, his ego got the best of him, his supporters wanted him “on TV” in a ridiculous 3rd party Reform Party debacle. Pat Buchanan could and should have been a George Wallace beloved populist governor of New Hampshire, dominating state politics, building and organization. But, that’s the same mistake our side usually makes:

    Presidential all or nothing, then we win nothing – and frumpy lib White women who are clueless about racial realities inherited state victories.

    • The history of Republican Presidential politics since WWII has been such that whoever wins the nomination must:

      (1) Have held one of the “big five” informal prerequisite offices (Governor, Senate, Vice-President, Cabinet Secretary, Five-Star General)


      (2) Have run at least one serious Presidential campaign before, OR had a very well known name.

      The only exception to that was 1964, and even Barry Goldwater was an elected Senator.

      Plain words, “coming out of nowhere” is not a Republican thing.

      PJB would have had a lot better chance if he was actually an elected Governor or Senator. But since he lived in Virginia, I doubt it would have been from New Hampshire. Hell, he has St. Louis on his resume of journalism careers, his first journalism job being at the old Globe-Democrat. I sometimes fantasize about an alt-history path where in 1994, two years after his first Presidential campaign, when Missouri had an open U.S. Senate seat, he moves back to St. Louis, runs for and wins the Republican nomination for Senate instead of John Ashcroft, then of course he would have won in November (it was a red wave year), and by 2000, he has one full Senate term to his credit and he uses that to run for President.

  • Luca

    This is proof positive how gullible people (yes, even White people) can be. This is why 1/3 of White people are Liberals. They’ll believe anything.


    I disagree with the following statements:

    “If there is to be a mass amnesty, we want it to come down unilaterally, illegally, and at the hands of a black President whose administration seems to be driven by anti-white animus.”

    Quite the opposite, that keeps the charade going. Better a GOP enacted amnesty that causes many whites to become disillusioned and open to more radical ideologies than conservatism.

    “The fact that whites will continue to migrate towards Republicans, who don’t have whites’ best interests at heart, is less important than the long-term trend of whites consolidating as a unified political force.”

    This is also wrong and fundamentally misunderstands how politics works. Consolidating whites behind anti-white leaders does nothing but support the status quo. There is no inevitable shift towards pro-white policy even if the GOP were to get 100% of the white vote.

    Instead, a pro-white third party is need to begin peeling off the racially aware segment of the white population from anti-white and aracial political ideologies(conservatism and libertarianism). This is the tactic that is working across all of Europe. In no white country has any center-right, GOP type party shown any movement towards pro-white politics at all. What does happen is that nationalist success in elections forces the center-right(and sometimes the center-left) to move rhetorically towards nationalist positions to stop the loss of voters. This has the effect of legitimizing nationalist ideas in the mainstream, which then causes PC attacks to lose effectiveness.

    As someone who has read AR since the beginning, I cannot fathom how its writers can continue to orbit around the GOP and the fraudulent conservative movement, especially as nationalists in Europe are ever increasingly successful using the exact opposite strategy. It’s like being trapped in a time warp. AR had articles debating whether or not nationalists should vote GOP back around 1996. There can be no debate anymore, we know that strategy does no good, both from the from the failure of nationalists in the USA and the success of nationalists in Europe.


    Waste of orange skin.