Will There Be a Resurgence of White Political Power?

Colin Liddell, American Renaissance, November 18, 2014

We may have one last chance.

White Americans are “scheduled” to become a minority around about 2042, although they will continue to be the majority of voters for a few years longer. This trend is usually greeted with pessimism and hand-wringing by race realists, but at some point it will almost certainly create a surge of racially conscious white political power.

Already there are signs that whites are starting to think, feel, and vote like a minority–placing their identity and group interests first–and this trend to vote identity over policies will only increase.

In the 2012 presidential election, the vote in several Southern states reflected what can only be incipient white racial consciousness. Mr. Romney won no less than 89 percent of the white vote in Mississippi, 84 percent in Alabama and Louisiana, and more than 70 percent in Georgia and South Carolina. In the country as a whole, only 35 percent of white men voted for Mr. Obama (42 percent of white women voted for him), in an election that saw a decline in white turnout compared to 2008.

The recent midterm elections continued this trend, with white men voting Republican two to one. The midterms also had a low turnout, but that cuts both ways: A higher turnout might only increase the white vote for what is the default white party.

Increased identitarianism and increased apathy, while appearing to be opposites, are actually two sides of the same coin and part of the pattern that arises as a political system that is based on differences of political and economic ideas transitions into an ethnopolitical system.

As demographic changes make race increasingly salient, increasing numbers of voters feel apathy for parties like the two main parties in America that do not overtly express a racial identity. At the same time, voters with ethnic and racial affinities try to project that identity onto parties that are not expressly identitarian.

Apathy is clearly driving the lower-than-normal white vote in recent elections. As for the projection of identity onto non-identitarian parties, this has been going on for decades, with Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians voting Democratic and Southern whites voting Republican, regardless of conflicting economic or social issues.

At some point, however, the identitarian voting patterns will express themselves more consistently, at first in a coded way but then with a tendency towards increasing explicitness. American politics are still largely at the coded stage–with an extra layer of denial serving only to confirm this–but the trend is unmistakable. As this trend develops, we can expect to see less apathy, and the political expression of increasingly clear racial interests.

The implicit indentarianism of the Republican Party already means that whites must be much more motivated by ideology or party platform to vote Democrat rather than Republican. For Democrats, the same can be said for Jews and Asians, whose economic interests would be best served by the Republican Party but who vote Democrat instead.

In the future, the degree of political motivation required for whites to vote Democrat will only increase, so that only the most radical and committed left-wing whites will continue to vote Democrat.

Spoiler parties

Some will say that if whites become a minority, surely it doesn’t matter who they vote for, especially if a significant portion of them continue to vote with the non-white majority.

This view hinges on the idea that being a minority implies a united majority opposed to that minority, in a kind of zero-sum game. This is far from the case, but it is easy to see why Americans think this way, conditioned as they are to a two-party system.

Despite the dominance of the duopoly, America has an interesting history of third-party politics, including the efforts of the Libertarian Party in the recent elections, which, according to VDARE.com, may have cost the Republicans a senate seat:

Libertarian Robert Sarvis took 53,000 votes in the Old Dominion, far greater than Republican Ed Gillespie’s losing margin of 16,700. That’s a significant 2.5 percent. As the Washington Post’s Norman Leahy and Paul Goldman gloated, ‘2014 is apparently the first time in Virginia that a protest candidate decided the outcome of a major election.’

A better example is the presidential campaign of Al Gore. One reason often cited for his narrow failure to become president was the 2.74 percent of the vote that went to Ralph Nader’s Green Party, which took many more votes from the Democrats than from the Republicans. Similarly, how much of Bill Clinton’s success was due to the spoiler role that Ross Perot’s 19 percent and 8 percent of the vote played in the 1992 and 1996 elections?

In a two-party system, where the two main parties have a tendency to converge on a center by adjusting their policies to counteract each other, and where winning margins are typically narrow, a third or even fourth party’s spoiler effect has the potential to shift the results dramatically.

History shows that both Democrats and Republicans are vulnerable to this threat, but how will this vulnerability be impacted by demographic change? Consider the Libertarian Party’s effect on the Virginia mid-terms. The party appeals to a small, overwhelmingly white group of voters, but even to get a small percentage of whites to vote for it required that it have a well worked out economic and political theory and some kind of track record: The party has existed since the 1970s and has been scoring over a million votes at most presidential elections for over a decade.

Still, part of the Libertarian Party’s limited success stems from the apathy that whites feel towards the “main white party.” As whites diminish as a percentage and identitarian sentiments strengthen, the ground becomes even less fertile for parties like the Libertarians, who could see their support drawn off yet further by the eventual emergence of an explicitly white party.

It is obvious that the Democrats are inherently less unified than the Republicans, and more prone to defection. It would be easy to start a third party that appealed to parts of the Democratic Party’s coalition of races. Any such party would simply need to declare its advocacy of black or Hispanic interests in a context in which voting for it would produce perceived benefits, even if they were only emotional.

Let us imagine a Democratic administration forced to implement a policy of austerity in a metropolitan area with a majority black population, or having to enforce order over an issue of race and policing, as is now the case in Ferguson. Any reasonably organized and funded black party rising up to challenge the Democrats’ usual tack to the center would be able to shave off at least a few percentage points, and success would breed further success.

The biggest obstacle to this happening, however, is the inability or unwillingness of the members of the uneasy Democratic coalition to start their own parties. Jews or Asians could certainly do so, but would be unwilling. Blacks and Hispanics might be unable to create effective parties, though movements such as the Nation of Islam and La Raza suggest a willingness.

Something, somewhere has got to give. The more the anti-white coalition of the future hangs together, the more it will galvanize the identitarianism of the biggest and most powerful group–whites themselves–with their vast financial resources, especially as these come under attack from non-white politicians promoting redistribution of wealth under the banner of social justice. Under these conditions, it is unlikely that the Democratic coalition could hold together indefinitely. Jews, Asians, or white Hispanics would break ranks.

Power surge

Let us therefore imagine a projection of current trends: Reduction of whites to a minority and the ethno-politicization of the two-party system leads to an increasingly identitarian Republican Party and an increasingly fragile anti-white coalition based in the Democratic Party. Perhaps the best option for whites would then be to encourage and even covertly to fund identitarian third parties that could split the anti-white Democratic vote. Once non-whites start to vote outside their coalition the breakup would hopefully become irreversible.

If the Democratic Party splits into warring racial factions, the white minority–as the largest minority–would be in a position once again to gain an overwhelming majority of the power, despite being a minority. This is because, unlike most European nations, the American voting system is not proportional but instead favors whichever party can get its nose in front of its rivals.

Back in the 1990s, when Ross Perot was playing an important spoiler role, Clinton did not need a majority to win a landslide in the Electoral College. He did that with only 43 percent of the vote. Something similar is likely to happen either shortly before whites become a minority or shortly after. Such an outcome will of necessity involve much greater white racial consciousness. This window of opportunity for increased power for whites will remain open for only a few years. Whites will eventually be pushed aside demographically, so it will be vital for them to find a way of using their Indian Summer of power to ensure their survival.

This could be done either by changing the voting system, partitioning parts of the country, or by encouraging emigration of non-whites and immigration of whites from South Africa, Eastern Europe, and South America.

In the run-up to this scenario it will also be vital for whites to avoid two things: political fragmentation and proportional representation. At present, the Republican Party may look like a curse, but in the future, one big party in the face of splintered opposition could prove vital to a racially conscious white minority seizing control of its country again, even if only for the last time.

Topics: , ,

Share This

Colin Liddell
Mr. Liddell is a Scot who lives in Japan. He is the co-editor of Alternative Right.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • AndrewInterrupted

    Some articles indicate that white people are exiting the Democrat Party in large numbers. Battle lines are being drawn: Democrat=non-white, Republicans=white. LIV types from the Left need that type of simplistic clarity. Ferguson may cement those distinctions.

    • Publius Pompilius Quietus

      One hopes that such a distinction will be explicit, rather than the implicit distinction that one can find betwixt the Republican and Democratic parties from the 1970s onward. Should it be implicit, it’ll be more of the same, only with larger portions of white people voting Republican. But, if explicit, the Republican Party may earn our votes.

      • Max

        The Repubs are often explicit in speech but complicit in deed.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          They see that demographic shift just as we do. There was seismic demographic shifting in the 2014 midterms.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        If a good portion of Hispanics vote Republican, or even vote for an explicitly White racial realist third party, the Negrocrats could turn into beached whales for quite a few years to come. Not living near a large Hispanic population, I have no feel for how many Hispanics are White Hispanic, or Mestizos that are mostly Caucasian, such as George Zimmerman.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Funny you should say. That appears to be happening in the San Diego area. Recent arrivals don’t want even more recent arrivals slurpin’ their gravy. See how the border has turned red. Interesting.
          .

    • Charlie

      The Republicans are not our allies, nor are the Conservatives…never, for they are partially to blame, for the current malaise that we are suffering from…both political parties, have been co-opted and corrupted by the Zionists, who are working, 24/7, for our destruction and the destruction of the entire Western World…our people cannot win, in this current political “system”, for we have nearly totally lost our tribal and racial awareness and allegiance…only the rigid discipline, of a race based, National Socialist system, can save us…Democracy fails the White Race, on all fronts, for Jewish lobbyists always fight on behalf of non-Whites, as well as recruiting suicidal, traitorous, self-loathing liberal Whites to their cause…Nationalsozialismus…

    • What we need to do is just change the voting laws. Last time I looked we didn’t let dogs and cats vote. We didn’t let 19-year-olds vote in the 1960s. In 1900 some states let women vote, some didn’t. In 1800 most negroes and indians couldn’t vote. Raise the voting age to 30 (or 50) and limit voting eligibility to those who can pass a test and/or prove American ancestry for four generations or more. There is absolutely no reason why this can’t be done.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I think a veto proof 60 votes for an immigration moratorium would be a good start in January. That would stem the bleeding. It would have to extend to asylum seekers as well. That’s where most of the fraud is; the importation of Democrats, that is.

      • Reynardine

        Given the marriage gap for voting, how about you can only vote if you are lawfully married and have at least one child. People should only get to decide the direction of an institution if have an investment in it. We don’t allow non-stockholders to vote in a board of directors election.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      I’m hoping for that as well. Hopefully, 2016 will be another 1968 for Whites, with formerly Democrat Whites supporting a racial realist candidate in droves, and said candidate claiming the electoral college in a number of states. As the author indicates, this would mean a Republican victory, but probably with a minority of votes. Hopefully, with a clear mandate from White America, Repubs would push for decisive racial realist legislation, such as closing the border, ending AA, and cracking down on crime Rudy Giuliani style. Hopefully, this would have side effects, such as an open pride in racial pride by Whites, with White Hispanics asserting racial realism and working to forge solidarity with White Americans, an end to the suppression of White cultural symbols such as The Confederate Flag, etc.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I still say the key is fronting a woman republican candidate. The Demo-rat social engineers are determined to front a woman in 2016. Maybe Joni Ernst will impress next year? Take a look at the Republican House coverage map. Estimated to be 88% of the land mass of the U.S.

        • AndrewInterrupted

  • TruthBeTold

    (These are the same comments I made on a previous post but they are relevant here)

    Listening to and reading comments from blatantly liberal media talking heads and the MSM commentary leading up to the election I kept hearing about the coming non-White majority.

    I believe that the left believed that the last midterm elections would be the last time Whites would matter in a national election.This was the turning point when Whites would no longer be a challenge to liberals and non-white minorities seizing control.

    I believe the left and non-white minorities were honestly shocked that White people still held any power to sway an election.

    To their surprise, we squeaked through.

    They are still planning for and counting on our demise and see Republican wins as a small setback in the political game.

    They expected us not to matter but we did.

    Their hubris was evident and they were defeated by it.

    Will we squeak through next time?

    • WR_the_realist

      As whites become an ever smaller minority it will be ever more difficult for the Republicans to squeak through. And the Republican Party will continue to be the party of stateless corporations and war, so whites only vote for them because the alternative is so horrible.

    • Anna Tree

      While in the past I encountered only a couple of proud whites while I posted on yahoo, nowadays I encounter proud whites who already know about Amren.
      It seems to me they don’t care about GOP or Dems. I think more and more are ready for a pro-white party. I am.

      • Garrett Brown

        We will accomplish nothing in this two party system. We need a party for Whites. And no, that most certainly is not the Tea Party (Andrew).

        • Anna Tree

          At least an anti-open borders party. I think that if we stick to that message only, as a start, that party can succeed.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            At this point, I think that secession would occur with zero bloodshed. Blacks and Bronze race Hispanics will be happy when the Whites they hate most bid them adieu. White Leftists will of course react by turning their noses up at us, and pretending we are backward hayseeds for wanting to escape the die-versity slime pit.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Agreed. The Tea Party got Jeanne Shaheen re-elected in my state. They are as good as Demo-rats.

        • redstone357

          There already are those candidates and they get no votes..our only hope is to keep influencing the political system we have, and not one that we wish we had. The article goes a way to showing how we can do that…

          • Garrett Brown

            What White nationalists ran for office this year other than the man in Kentucky? (who I could unfortunately not vote for).

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          I agree. Instead of espousing cutting unemployment and food stamps benefits to put s stop to the Negro abuse of these safety nets, we need a White racial realist party that boldly speaks the truth about race. The safety net works fine in all White societies. Working Whites deserve a safety net when we have paid hard earned taxes into this system all of our lives. Secession and the forming of politically independent, racially homogenous White ethnostates should be our long term goal. The Tea Party is a rich man’s party that is too cowardly to address the race issue, and is willing to throw working Whites under the bus. A party that cares about the White race addresses Black sociopathy with boldness instead of prattling about fiscal responsibility for fear that the Negroes will accuse them of racism. This is pointless. Negroes will always hate Whites no matter what we do. We might as well stand up for our interests, and give the Negroes the middle finger if they accuse us of racism. Our survival is at stake.

          • none of your business

            Best post I have read in years.

      • Georgia Boy

        Sadly I think the more likely scenario is a party that is socialist in all but name. (Or happily, if you believe the article’s take on the electoral dynamics.). The mexicans are not going to give up their more socialist worldview, nor the blacks and muslims their kleptocratic ones, and they are the growing factions.

        The article’s suggestion to fund left-wing third parties is playing with fire., do we need a movement to increase their favorite respective gimmedats? The one percent will do it anyway if that’s what keeps them the one percent, though.

      • saxonsun

        Just saw an article in the Daily Mail about an British elementary school that was penalized for being “too English.” And this is an area that’s over 90% white. If this evil keeps happening, there’ll be more proud whites–hopefully.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        I’ll definitely raise my glass to that!! We need a White racial realist populist party. This is what the Democrats were in the days of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The Democrats used to be a White racial realist party, and were such until Negrophilic JFK decided to make the Democrats the Negro party.

        • none of your business

          It was Johnson, not JFK. And the northeastern and midwestern big city demorats were solidly pro black early on. All those northern politicians who led marches down south during the civill rights era were demorats. One of the most pro black demorats was Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota as far back as 1948, The whole civil rights movement was northern demorats, not northern Republicans.

  • Whitetrashgang

    Third party or bust, its called going down swinging.

    • Sick of it

      I prefer the Jeffersonian approach at this point.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      First the U.S. needs to adopt a “run-off” system like exists in Louisiana.
      That would give third parties more of a voice.

  • rebelcelt

    What was not addressed was that the old WWII whites that still vote Democrat. they are disappearing. That is where a lot of white Democrat votes were.

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      Back when my grandfather voted with the other white workers in his railroad workers union.

      • JohnEngelman

        Most Americans over 65 years old vote Republican. Most Americans under 30 vote Democrat. Indeed, more Americans under the age of 30 support socialism than capitalism.

        For the under 30 generation interracial dating and marriage has long ceased to be an issue.

        • WR_the_realist

          Those under 30s favor socialism because they were educated in public schools, which is now thoroughly under the control of the left.

          • JohnEngelman

            Political messages are only effective when they tell people what they want to believe, and what they know to be true in their own lives.

            Millions of young people can tell that capitalism is not working for them. They get good educations and bad jobs. Their parents lose good jobs and have to take bad jobs.

            Meanwhile, the rich get richer.

          • WR_the_realist

            They should try living under the old Soviet Union to find what a bad political system really feels like. Socialism is the theory that the vile people known as politicians have both the right to take your money and the wisdom to spend it better than you would yourself. I find it astonishing that anyone could believe that.

          • JohnEngelman

            An absurd theory on one side of a question forms no justification for alleging a false fact, or promulgating mischievous maxims, on the other.

            – Edmund Burke, from On the Revolution in France

          • WR_the_realist

            What false fact? Under socialism politicians have control over much more of the economy, and use it to enrich themselves.

          • Tim

            On a similar note… I never understood how someone could let a pension fund have use of their money for forty years and then expect to not only get it back, but with interest!!.

          • none of your business

            Pension funds work. Ask anyone who has one, not Stoessel or some other libertarian.

          • We don’t have capitalism, we have crapitalism, aka globalism. Big difference. Today’s youths have only known globalism. zerohedge had an article on inequality up earlier today. Back in the day a CEO earned $20 for every dollar a worker earned. Today, it’s $374. That’s crapitalism. It’s not the free market, although youths are brainwashed to believe it is.

          • JohnEngelman

            There are different kinds of capitalism, just as there are different kinds of socialism. What we have now is casino capitalism. Good luck matters more than hard work. The odds favor the house.

          • John, I would add that with government controlling about half the economy these days, and deciding who the winners are, that it pays to be connected. Gates and Zuck donate huge sums of money to further the destruction of white America because the government reciprocates in their favor.

          • SentryattheGate

            Yes, the New World Order wants to discredit capitalism to the youth so they will become the “useful idiots” needed to bring in socialism to communism. The NWO elites create fascism by enabling large corporations to become monopolies, in bed with big government (like GE, given special favors by Obama’s admin.yet paid no taxes). This crony capitalism discredits capitalism in the eyes of youth.

          • me

            Indeed!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I bookmarked the site.

          • David Ashton

            How about a national sort of socialism?

          • JohnEngelman

            I like racial socialism better. Social democracy only works well with no third world people to game the system.

          • David Ashton

            You may be interested then in Keynes’ introduction to the 1936 German edition of his major classic on the economy.

            No, do your own research.

          • JohnEngelman

            The German economy recovered faster than the U.S. economy from the Great Depression because the German government intervened more in the German economy. It does not surprise me that John Maynard Keynes would acknowledge that. John Kenneth Galbraith did.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I agree. Democratic Socialism works beautifully in homogenous White European nations.

          • JohnEngelman

            Social Democrats have a death wish. They do not understand that third world immigration conflicts with everything they are trying to build. This is true for liberal Democrats in the United States too.

            When the War on Poverty made welfare benefits more generous and easier to qualify for hundreds of thousands, perhaps several million, blacks in low wage jobs quit their jobs, and went on welfare. They knew that the good life was out of reach, so they choose the easy life.

            White are less likely to behave that way.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I was a Conservative Democrat until the Democrats decided to become the Negrocrats in 2008. My hope was that more and more Conservative Democrats would be elected to public office and speak in favor of Government health care and lowering taxes on working people, but against AA, third world immigration, and homosexual marriage.

          • JohnEngelman

            When I study American history until the 1970’s I have an easy time identifying with what was considered to be liberal, and on the left. By the 1970’s it was obvious that ending racial discrimination would not achieve racial equality. At that point the Democrats decided to force racial equality with policies like affirmative action and forced school busing.

            There are conservative aspects to my thinking. I am pessimistic about human nature and human potential. I am skeptical of untried social and economic experiments. I think there is often wisdom in tradition.

            However,. to the extent that I am a conservative, mine is a conservatism that is without concern for the economic well being of the rich.

          • JohnEngelman

            I used to be a card carrying member of the Moral Majority, and the Christian Coalition. During my life I have only voted for two Republicans though. The GOP serves Mammon, not God.

          • none of your business

            I consider racial socialism aka facism the best system. Hitler, Mussolini and General Franco imposed it on Germany italy and Spain until Hitler invaded most of Europe caused the defeat of Facism and gave half of Europe and China to communism.

            They symbol of facism is a bundle meaning in union there is strength and one for all and all for one.

          • none of your business

            And they either can’t get jobs or can’t earn a living wage so they better be socialist.

        • Sick of it

          In crazy town, where you live.

          • JohnEngelman

            Young people — the collegiate and post-college crowd, who have served as the most visible face of the Occupy Wall Street movement — might be getting more comfortable with socialism. That’s the surprising result from a Pew Research Center poll that aims to measure American sentiments toward different political labels…

            socialism has more fans than opponents among the 18-29 crowd. Forty-nine percent of people in that age bracket say they have a positive view of socialism; only 43 percent say they have a negative view.

          • me

            Are you a socialist?

          • LHathaway

            John Engelman is a proud, card-carrying member of the communist party. Many of them became ‘anarchists’, more Chomskyi types, after the Soviet Union broke up. The question is what will we become after North America becomes divided?

          • JohnEngelman

            I am a registered Democrat. I voted for Barack Obama. I never thought of him as the Messiah. Nevertheless, I would vote for him again against any Republican. I favor Scandinavian Social Democracy.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            After witnessing his repulsive anti-White race hustling, I’ll bet you are sorry that you voted for him. You were obviously thinking he was an Oreo Cookie in 2008. I have learned that exceedingly few Blacks are true Oreos.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am sorry I voted for Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary. I think Hillary would make a better president, if only because she is more intelligent.

            I like what Elizabeth Warren is saying about the growing income gap. Unfortunately, she wiggled her way into Harvard using every affirmative action program she could find. Also, she is in favor of amnesty for illegals.

            I like what Republicans say about social issues. However, the only thing they really care about is making the rich richer. They are really good at that. Tax cuts for the rich never did me any good.

            I am not angry at President Obama. I just wish he had been a more effective leader. Like most liberals he does not understand that a high rate of third world immigration interferes with everything else liberals are trying to achieve.

          • SentryattheGate

            Of course they favor socialism—they were raised in gov’t. schools, increasingly influenced by the UN and New World Order elites. A capitalist and Christian US is an obstacle to their tyrannical plans for humanity!

          • JohnEngelman

            They favor socialism because with good educations, they still get crummy jobs. They see their parents lose good jobs and have to take low paying jobs. They favor socialism because capitalism is not working for them.

          • SentryattheGate

            That’s like throwing the baby out with the bathwater!

          • WR_the_realist

            Socialism means that the government pays for your housing, food, and health care, and provides you with employment. Then it has you by the balls. Remember that housing, food, health care, and guaranteed employment are also provided in prisons.

          • JohnEngelman

            Capitalism means that everything you need to thrive as a human being depends on the caprice of private employers. It does not matter if you are working hard and everyone else thinks you are performing well; if your boss does not like you,he can destroy you economically.

          • Max

            My son-in-law IS the employer. He owns the business and if he is clever and diligent he makes money. He in turn hires others who work for him on a contract basis and he gives them as much work as they can complete. If he is stupid or lazy he fails, or at least makes less. If they are diligent/clever/stupid/
            lazy the same penalties or rewards accrue to them. These market signals are hidden from those who have controlled-market, often artificial gummint jobs or worse yet, just get a check for existing.

            You champion Jews and Asians because you believe their success is earned according to merit. The real-life situation I describe is THE merit-based system but you don’t apparently find it valid for the general public or at least whites.

            ?

          • WR_the_realist

            You have only one government but you can choose another company and another boss. Or you can even start your own business, if government regulations and taxes don’t make that option nonviable.

          • SentryattheGate

            Something like 85% of millionaires are made by starting their own small business, and provide ~80% of jobs in the US. So, Engelman, how would socialism be so much better then capitalism?

          • anony

            Socialism means the taking of the fruits of your labor by force.

            I’ll take free markets and free people instead of socialism, but that’s hard to find.

          • anony

            There’s something which you fail to mention and that’s the entrepreneurial drive. Many people are their own “employers”.

          • TheGothFather412

            Yeah these young-uns weren’t around when the Eastern Bloc and Soviet Union existed and never met people who fled from there while these Tyrannies were still extant. (I knew some Baltic Lutherans who escaped the USSR back in the 1980s, they went to my Church)

            An encounter with real Socialism would probably slap some sense into these naive youth.

          • JohnEngelman

            There are different kinds of socialism, just as there are different kinds of capitalism. What we have in the United States is casino capitalism. Hard work matters less than good luck. The odds favor the house. The rich get richer. The middle class declines.

            I prefer Scandinavian Social Democracy.

          • TheGothFather412

            As I am sure some other Amreners or White Nationalists have mentioned before, Scandinavian Social Democracy seems to only function in a racially homogeneous society.

            ‘It’s worth asking, then, why Scandinavians are consistently willing to spend more and pay more than Americans. An important part of the answer is that members of small, homogeneous societies are much more willing to bear the burden of supporting their fellow citizens than members of large, diverse ones.

            Schwartz contends that “the publics in these countries trust government because the social democrats built their welfare state upon a vision of comprehensive and universal social rights.” That’s partly true. But it neglects the crucial fact that this vision was achieved in societies where the vast majority of the population looked the same, talked the same, had names and relatives in common, went to same churches, and so on.

            As the political scientist Robert Putnam has found (behind paywall), increased diversity tends to decrease social trust and willingness to make sacrifices for others. And that’s just what’s happened as the generous North has experienced its first encounter with mass immigration, as The Economist obliquely acknowledges.’

            Source : ‘The Nordic Mirage’, The American Conservative.

          • JohnEngelman

            As I am sure some other Amreners or White Nationalists have mentioned before, Scandinavian Social Democracy seems to only function in a racially homogeneous society.

            – TheGothFather412

            I have mentioned it on several occasions myself. White liberals are too civilized for their own good. They have difficulty understanding the mentalities of people and peoples who are less evolved than they are.

            When the War on Poverty made welfare benefits more generous and easier to qualify for millions of blacks quit low wage jobs and went on welfare. They knew the easy life was unattainable. They opted for the easy life. Race wrecked liberalism.

          • none of your business

            Also Scandinavian socialism grew from small peasant communities that had always cooperated to help each other

          • publius

            The middle class in America has declined precisely because of interference by governmental policies initiated by the democrats.

          • none of your business

            You prefer the myth of Scandinavian social democracy.

          • JohnEngelman

            Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland have less public debt as a percentage of gross domestic product than the United States. They retain AAA ratings with Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s.

          • JohnEngelman

            Forbes 1/09/2013

            The United States is a nation in decline. Last year the land of the free and the home of the brave came in 10th place in the annual rankings of World’s Happiest Countries. This year the U.S.A. has slipped to 12th.

            This marks the first time in the six-year history of the Legatum Institute‘s Prosperity Index that America has not placed in the top 10.

            The U.S. has slipped in the areas of Governance, Personal Freedom, and most troubling, in Entrepreneurship & Opportunity. The slide in that final category, according to the report, “is due to a decline in citizens’ perception that working hard gets you ahead.”…

            So who are the happiest people in the world, as measured by Legatum? Norway takes the crown, followed by Denmark and Sweden (which leapfrogged Australia and New Zealand this year). Rounding out the Scandinavians is Finland.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            The tyranny under which Eastern Europeans lived prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall bore no resemblance to life in Canada or England in the eighties. Democratic Socialism has created a better quality of life for the average White person in both countries than Capitalism has for White Americans. Liberal Immigration policies are the biggest threat to quality of life in all Western lands, not Democratic Socialism.

          • Kalashnikov

            But how many of them can actually describe socialism? Even “Ultra Conservatives” like Bush and Reagan didn’t abolish the income tax, or dismantle the welfare state. They fiddled with tax rates while allowing masses of foreigners into our country. That ain’t conservative or capitalist. In fact, socialist politicians and policies have been presented as “conservative” for so long you would have trouble finding 1 person in 100 that could accurately describe either system.

          • JohnEngelman

            They see capitalism up close every day and don’t like it.

          • frederickdixon

            Do you know how those figures break down racially? Presumably we’re only interested in how young whites think?

          • JohnEngelman

            What matters is how American citizens think.

          • frederickdixon

            If we’re thinking abou

          • anony

            Many don’t. Much of the trouble we experience now is the result of “low information voters”.

        • B.A_2014

          That has been the case for a long time. Young liberals eventually turn into old conservatives.

          • JohnEngelman

            That was because their incomes rose. That is not happening anymore.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            As someone who was liberal as a youngster, and not richer when I got older, I can tell you that economic insecurity in middle/old age is even more of an impetus to become conservative. After decades of slavery to taxation with zero benefit, you wise up and realize that you’ve been a cash cow all your life to liberals and non-whites, a truly useful idiot. You also come to realize that the lifeblood of liberalism is adolescent rebellion; regardless of SES, most whites will eventually grow up. I was fully onboard with the homosexual and racial agenda until I lived around blacks, browns and homosexuals. Nothing dispels propaganda like real life experience.

          • JohnEngelman

            Says you.

            I am reactionary on social issues, especially crime and punishment. I am still liberal after all these years on economic and environmental issues. Tax cuts for the rich have never done me any good.

          • anony

            Lose your democrat talking points.

          • anony

            We are not total economic animals.

            Many have brains and conscious thought processes. there is something call wisdom, in most people, that typically grows with age.

            I will stipulate that the more wisdom one has, the less “socialistic” one is since wisdom is rooted in the “long view” of things.

            The long view says that free markets and free people trump “socialism” every time.

          • JohnEngelman

            That depends on what you mean by “socialism.” The economy usually does better when the government intervenes in order to assure for most people a better standard of living than they would get from the unaided law of supply and demand. From 1920 to 2000 the per capita gross domestic product in constant dollars grew twice as much under Democratic presidents than Republican presidents. There have usually been more jobs created per year under Democratic presidents than Republican presidents.

            Countries with Social Democratic economies usually responded better to the Great Recession. Scandinavian countries retain AAA ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. They have less national debt as a percentage of gross domestic product than the United States.

            Karl Marx made mistakes. He never claimed infallibility. He once said, “I thank God that I am not a Marxist.”

            He had two valid insights. First, the natural tendency of capitalism is to accumulate wealth and income at the top. Second, the natural tendency of capitalism is to go through increasingly destructive economic downturns.

            The economic policies of John Maynard Keynes countered these policies. Since the inauguration of Ronald Reagan in 1981 the Republican Party has reversed Keynesianism. The tendencies are again becoming obvious. The rich get richer as the average standard of living declines. Recessions get longer and deeper. Now we have “jobless recoveries,” when the economy grows, but unemployment remains high. When unemployment declines, average wages decline too.

        • Viking_61

          Most of the “under 30” population in the 1960s supported socialism over capitalism as well. Then they bought a house and started paying taxes.

          • JohnEngelman

            I doubt it. I have not seen any polls that indicate it. During the War in Vietnam socialism was popular among anti war activists, but opposition to the War in Vietnam was centered on college campuses.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            “….where all the TV cameras were”.

          • SentryattheGate

            I was one of them, but kept my ears and eyes open to learn more, and with decades of employment and real life experience, so I changed.

          • anony

            THE BLACK BOOK OF COMMUNISM, and DEATH BY GOVERNMENT…

        • Nancy

          That old joke about “If you’re still in college and vote Republican, you have no heart; but if you’re graduated and paying your own bills and still vote Democrat, you have no brain” still applies today, but the age at which graduates are able to make a decent living has been pushed back to, what, 30 or so?

          And that IS made worse by the social issues being a non-starter in many quarters: interracial marriage, gay marriage, legalizing drugs, abortion, etc.

          As one of the Christians on this board, I am still a big supporter of legalized abortion, for the same reason many of you guys are: WHO in their RIGHT MINDS wants to pay for the millions of negro babies that will suddenly start being born as a result of striking Roe v. Wade? Not me.
          .

          • JohnEngelman

            I am in favor of replacing Temporary Aid for Needy Families with free abortion on demand.

            When a pregnant and unmarried woman goes to the nearest welfare office to sign up for TANF she should be told, “That program no longer exists. Wait a minute while I call you a taxi to the nearest abortion clinic. It is free now. They will pay you to be sterilized.”

          • Nancy

            That would be SO nice.

          • Max

            -same for habitual criminals; felonies or violent misdemeanors

          • none of your business

            Anyone on medicaid can get a free abortion anytime she wants.

          • Alexandra1973

            That’s why you ship them back at the same time you recognize Roe as unconstitutional.

            Then again, they’d probably abort their children regardless. If they get caught they play the race card.

          • none of your business

            Roe was probably unconstitutional but so what? Most of our laws and regulations are unconstitutional anyway. Roe benefitted Whites by reducing the number of black criminals who prey on us and the number of unqualified affirmative action morons who steal our jobs.

          • none of your business

            Amen to that sister!!!!!!

        • none of your business

          Another falsehood from Engleman. Most seniors vote demorat.

          • JohnEngelman

            Pew Research Center NOVEMBER 5, 2014

            Yesterday’s elections brought a widespread win for the Republican Party…

            Fully 22% of 2014 voters were 65 and older — a group GOP candidates won by 16-points.

            ———-

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        My Grandparents were Democrats as well. Old style segregationist Democrats. They loved FDR, but voted for George Wallace in 1968.

    • BernieGoetzFan

      There are some white subgroups – Jews, gays, feminists (almost all of whom are white) – who vote overwhelmingly for the Dems. Take away these groups and probably only 30% of whites vote Democrat. And this includes whites in places like Vermont, Iowa and Oregon who can do so since there are few blacks there.

      • me

        Limit the vote to landowners, repeal the 19th Amendment, get rid of PACs, repeal the ‘corporations are people’ insane SCOTUS ruling, end the Federal Reserve, close the borders, limit the amount of money that can be spent on a campaign, and you eliminate a lot of sponge votes for socialism and crony capitalism. We also need to have a mandate for U.S. ID to be eligible to vote.

        • bilderbuster

          We should return to having senators chosen by the state legislators like it used to be done.

          • anony

            that would be repealing the 17th amendment. I used that as a tag line years ago.

          • Alexandra1973

            Isn’t how it should be done to begin with? Devvy Kidd over at newswithviews(dot)com rails on that quite a bit.

          • none of your business

            I’d hate to see what my hispanic,gay, lunatic fringe tree worshipper state legislators would choose as Senators. There are still enough somewhat normal Whites in California to choose not totally lunatic fringe Senators. Our legislature would choose Senators who would make BarbaraBoxer look like Michelle Bachman.

        • UncleSham

          “limit the amount of money that can be spent on a campaign”

          Why? That would just give the owners of the media corporations more of a monolithic voice than they already have.

        • none of your business

          The start would be to eliminate all the foundations and non profits. That is where the money that funds the anti White causes and law suits comes from.

    • Andy

      My grandfather is hardworking, no-nonsense, opposed to mess and noise, and thoroughly liberal.

      I’d like to hear his politics after attending a gay pride parade or my brother’s school.

      People doing that in public?!
      Bigoted for saying they shouldn’t?!

      Kids walking on the desks?!
      Kids squirting bodily fluids across the hall?!

      I don’t think older white democrats have any idea what they’re voting for.

      • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

        My mother was a Roosevelt liberal. In the ’80s she used to say that the ’70s liberals and feminists failed because they “went too far.” This sentiment used to be quite common. I can’t imagine what she’d think of current trends, she’d probably join me as an Amren contributor.

      • meanqueen

        I think you’re right. I see it in my own circle.

      • Garrett Brown

        My mother can never put together the social decline and people forgetting how to behave is directly associated with the social policies the progressives have pushed in this country. She still overwhelmingly votes Democrat.

        She is finally starting to wake up though, maybe my arguments for the past few years always made sense in a way (they better have, I supported them with statistics), now with absolute proof though, she can no longer deny it.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          I am definitely a liberal and I behave here much more measuredly than you do.

          Liberalism is for those who can handle it. Therein the tragedy of it.

          • Garrett Brown

            You make an assertion about maturity levels with an ad hominem, that’s priceless. Well done ol chap. How does one “behave” on the internet? Too funny.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I apologize if I have offended you, that was not my intention.

          • Garrett Brown

            I don’t take you seriously, so you don’t have to worry.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I am so relieved.

        • none of your business

          My mommie was a commie so was daddy. We (sibs and I ) did a little FOIA search and discovered that the organization where they met was indeed a communist front. A lot of their friends were CPUSA members and front group members. They went along with virtually every liberal piece of garbage. They were born in 1910 and 1917 and my sibs and I are baby boomers. Mommie thought blacks were misunderstood angels till the day she died.
          We were raised to be like Obama’s commie Mother. it didn’t work. As soon as we went off to college or the military we met some blacks and learned the truth.

          At least they left their money to us and not to some black non profit like NAACP or the united moron college fund. They never shut up Dad constantly harangued about evil capitalists and the starving workers of 1750 England. Mom spent all her time,money and energy on blacks, indian reservations and even gypsy rights.

          They moved right into environmentalism when it became the liberal cause. Mom blamed the banks for shylock lending to minorities when the crash came. No amount of proof that it was Janet Reno’s threatening massive fines and lawsuits that caused the banks to make loans to minorities they could never pay.

          Holidays were interesting. They would harangue us about the evils of capitalism and the wonders of blacks and we would go off and talk about how awful blacks and liberals are.

          • Garrett Brown

            I dislike arguing with my mother but we have grown past that era to where we can have respectful debate (mostly on my maturity). I believe it’s important for family to know each others political views. It helps with planning and lets you know who will come to your aid in time of need.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        This is very true. Most older White democrats are living in a time warp.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Yes. These Whites are also concentrated in areas where they encounter few Blacks in their daily lives. I remember looking at the county by county election results in 2008, and noticing this. Old style Southern Democrats did not vote for Obongo. Remember how the media, during the Democratic primary, made light of almost no Whites in WV/KY/Southern Ohio voting for Obongo, and throwing out those predictable accusations of racism?

  • Daniel

    The real long term strategy for anti- DEMS is to consolidate power at the local level(state legislatures and governorships). Many congressional districts will also remain viable for the GOP.
    Begin a process of resisting federal authority and eventually progress to a large scale secession movement.
    We’ve all seen that map of the red versus blue areas where the red counties overwhelm the blue. That’s the gameplan for a new America.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    Sure more whites will continue to become politically race conscious as they see increased racial hostility directed toward them, but it’s probably already too little too late for whites to correct America via the political process.

    • Daniel

      I think you’re right. We need to fight an organized retreat in the form of consolidating power at the local level and then aim for a large scale secession movement away from blue state areas.

      • Viking_61

        Let Southern California secede and become Mexico al Norte, and the number of Mexicans in the US would drop by 1/3, and the country would probably become 3-4% whiter.

        • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

          There would be one heck of a fight in California if that were to happen. This is ground zero of the Mexican flood, but they are only a plurality; there are other Hispanics here who hate their guts, there are economically-powerful Asians, Jews and other middle easterners who would not be keen on the idea, and there are already signs that the Hispanic/White libtard coalition is coming apart. In short there is way too much multicult chaos here for it to become Alta California anytime soon.

          • none of your business

            The Russians, Persians, Armenians and israelis would fight to the death to stay in America. There is also the entertainment industry which is huge in S. California. But all of the above sure love the hispanic immigrants. The entertainment people love the household help and the White immigrants love the hispanic immigrants who work in their crooked little businesses for $100.00 per week for 80 or 90 hours of work a week.

        • alex

          Who will fund EBT and section 8 vouchers in Mexico Norte? Who will need their unqualified, low quality labor?
          It won’t take long before Nortenos start sneaking across U.S. border.

        • Garrett Brown

          Which will help the rest of the country how?

        • UncleSham

          I would hate to think we are reduced to offering all of that beautiful real estate to brown people as a bribe to please leave us alone. It would just expose us as being weak and unable to defend our territory. That is not the type of thing that prevents future aggression.

          • Viking_61

            Los Angeles has been SACKED. Look at the numbers. Only thing to do now is cut off the gangrened limb.

          • none of your business

            Millions of Los Angeles Whites still live in expensive safe White neighborhoods.

  • CallahanAuto

    Things I look forward to/hope for: The growing of white racial consciousness in New England. A divorce between NYC/Long Island and the rest of New York.

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      I never wish for war…but that would be an interesting battle to see played out, I admit.

    • Cheri Rodriguez

      Northern New England is goofy. Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont are 96% White yet the majority voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. If there’s White racial consciousness anywhere it’s in Southern New England–namely Connecticut. With heavily ghettoized cities like Bridgeport, New Haven, Waterbury, Hartford, etc., Whites get to experience black sloth and criminality on a daily basis. Some Whites pack up and move away; the remainder are arming up and preparing.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      I agree. Upstate NY is pretty conservative socially compared to other parts of the country. Greater Buffalo seems to be more socially conservative than Pittsburgh or Cleveland. The rural counties form a sea of red stretching from the PA border to Quebec each election.

  • Larry Klein

    Unfortunately I still think most whites are more or less oblivious to how the demographic shift/globalism will affect their own fortunes. It’s still “someone else’s” problem for the most part. Even most of the destitute whites aren’t connecting the mass immigration dots. I think more tough times are to follow as political power dissipates, and large swaths of whites disappear into the underclass not counted by the labor departments’ unemployment data. Though their sons will still be called upon by Fox News to die for the Israel-first oligarchs who helped purchase the displacement of said whites. And I haven’t even brought up the minority-on-white crime wave that is sure to only intensify after years of liberal incitement

    • Frank_DeScushin

      Many whites are still not only oblivious to racial patterns, but are so thoroughly conditioned to think one way that they’re downright upset with you for pointing out a pattern. On a message board thread regarding the Cosby rape allegations against, I noted that if the allegations against Cosby are true, than Cosby has a pattern of raping young white women. A factually accurate comment considering the known allegers, but treated like I wanted to bring back slavery on a mainstream board.

      • See The Future

        What is the count now? 13 white women drugged and raped by Cosby. Let’s see if he gets off on this one because of all the racist white women. Just depends on the media whores. If they decide to persist or let him slink away.

        • Who Me?

          Way I see it, Cosby is in deep trouble. 1) He’s male. 2) He’s rich. 3) He “acts white”. 4) He hasn’t been very actively supporting “Black” causes. 5) He’s probably guilty.

          Now granted he did say a few feeble things praising Obongolo, and so forth, but not nearly as much, or as loud, or as forcefully as they wanted him to. He’s also rather consistently over the years decried fatherlessness and lack of responsibility in the Afro-merican community. For that his fellow darkies are going to throw him under the bus. They don’t give a rats backside if he raped a few White girls or not.

          • Frank_DeScushin

            Oh, wait and see. I bet you that blacks circle their wagons around Cosby specifically because: (1) he’s a famous black man; and (2) all the allegers are white women. I’ve lived around black people and work with black people. I know that one of their favorite phrases is, “Why you tryin’ to tear a brother down?”, when whites are pushing criminal allegations against a black man. I heard that phrase during the OJ trial, and during the Michael Jackson trial, and during the Michael Vick criminal matter, and I’m willing to bet that I’ll hear it again regarding Cosby. We already saw Whoopi Goldberg circling the wagons for Cosby.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I agree Frank. You know Blacks well. They defend serial rapists and homicidal maniacs to the end, provided that the victims are White.

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    “As demographic changes make race increasingly salient, increasing numbers of voters feel apathy for parties like the two main parties in America that do not overtly express a racial identity. At the same time, voters with ethnic and racial affinities try to project that identity onto parties that are not expressly identitarian.”

    Whites are gonna be whites whether they like it or not. Contra the frog in the hot water, we’re moving deeper into the unheated pool and the chilly water’s about at our *ahem* midlevel and is making more and more of us take notice.

  • WR_the_realist

    The strategy described seems to depend upon a third party forming that draws votes away from the Democrats. There already are such parties (The Green Party and the New Party) but they are small and if people realize that voting for them means that the Republicans win, they will stick to the Democratic Party. Also remember that white support for the Republicans is weak, the Republicans never do a damn thing for them.

    • See The Future

      A third party will only guarantee the dems succeed. Third party votes will come from the GOP.

  • There is a little bit of (somewhat) precedent for the author’s “power surge” scenario. It’s called Chicago.

    Why hasn’t Chicago had an elected black mayor since Harold Washington went to the great watermelon patch in the sky in 1987? Because Chicago politics at the mayoral level are now black versus anyone-but-black. Of course, I wouldn’t give you two cents for Richard Daley and Rahm Emanuel combined, but that’s not the point. The point is that demographically challenged white voters can still eke out elections by exploiting the contempt and mistrust that non-white groups have for each other. Steve Sailer suggests that there can be a wedge dropped between black Democrats and non-white but non-black Democrats by casting the Democrat Party as the black party then making sure the non-white non-black Democrats know it, asking them if they want to take a back seat to black people or to white people.

    Personally, though, I think the real future lies in benevolent Putin-style despotism.

    • See The Future

      Your last statement is spot on.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      I like the sound of this. With the Amnesty Obongo had just granted, though, I doubt that Hispanics will change their voting allegiances.

    • none of your business

      How about General Franco,the only 20th century leader to drive the communists out of his country by winning a war against them? He is my hero.

  • Yves Vannes

    I only hope this doesn’t turn out to be what Lawrence Auster call an Unprincipled Exception UE. By this he meant that liberals will often abandon a liberal position because things have become too extreme – but in doing so they don’t directly question the basic tenets of liberalism but simply see this as a temporary common sense fix.

    In the case of this election, Obama had racked up so many failures and the confluence of things like Ferguson, etc. just became unworkable for most people so they reacted by putting on the brakes. It is a temporary stop gap measure that does not question liberalism’s underlying assumptions about the need for egalitarianism and the endless rooting out of racism. It is not the ideology they may find wanting but its execution and of its representative in the epic failure of Ozero.

    Eventually, a new liberal pied piper will come along and they will all jump back onto the lib-left band wagon.

    To bring about true change would require a series of dramatic events that would force people to question their basic assumptions. Maybe a nation with a dozen Fergusons burning is exactly what is needed.

  • JohnEngelman

    The business community has always dominated the Republican Party. I do not see that changing. Businessmen want more immigrants because a high rate of immigration makes it possible for them to cut wages and raise prices.

    Since Bill Clinton left office the average standard of living has declined, while the rich have gotten richer. The Democrats have not learned how to respond to that. Nevertheless, it is intrinsically a Democratic issue.

    • WR_the_realist

      And life has gotten so much better under Obama. The reality is that the president has little to do with the economy, so it’s sheer dumb luck if there is a booming economy under some president. Bill Clinton was president during the tech boom. Was he responsible for that?

      • JohnEngelman

        The Reaganauts give Reagan credit for the good economic numbers of this administration.

        When I ask, “What about the deficits?”

        They say, “Deficits? What deficits? Oh, those deficits. That was the fault of the Democratic Congress.”

        • WR_the_realist

          The deficits were the fault of both Democrats and Republicans. Except for Ron Paul, who hates spending other people’s money.

          • JohnEngelman

            Ron Paul, like other Republicans, has never made it clear spending programs he intends to cut or eliminate in order to balance the budget, while cutting taxes.

          • WR_the_realist

            Wrong. Ron Paul wants to get rid of entire departments, like the Department of Education. In his presidential campaign he spelled out hundreds of billions of specific spending cuts he’d make. He has consistently voted against unnecessary war, and as any real constitutionalist would he voted No on almost every bill congress put up.

          • JohnEngelman

            Pew Research FEBRUARY 22, 2013

            As the March 1 deadline for a possible budget sequester approaches, a new national survey finds limited public support for reducing spending for a range of specific programs, including defense, entitlements, education and health care.

            For 18 of 19 programs tested, majorities want either to increase spending or maintain it at current levels.

            ———-

            60 percent want to spend more money on education.

          • none of your business

            ’60 percent want to spend more money on education.”

            Brain washed idiots. More money on education means more affirmative action administrators, curriculum(anti White) developers,compliance officers busing enforcers, “don’t discipline or expell black rapist and murderers” enforcers and assorted garbage.

            People want to spend more money on education because for about 70 years education was the key to a decent job. Not any more.
            if people realized that more money for education meant more ghetto women running school systems and that the best education doesn’t mean Whites can get a job they wouldn’t be in favor of more money for education.

            Education is outmoded. It was once the key to a decent job. Not any more.

          • none of your business

            We should get rid of all the anti White departments, the Department of Education, Department of Housing and urban renewal, Civil rights Division of the DOJ,maybe the entire DOJ to punish it for its war on Whites for the last 60 years.

            Any more suggestions?

        • none of your business

          As every person your age remembers,Reagan stopped Carters double digit inflation every year within 6 months of his election. Since Carter froze wages while allowing run away inflation, Reagan saved the working class middle class Whites from sinking into the working poor although some of had already sunk from lower middle class to working poor barely able to afford to get to work and pay property taxes at the same time.

          You were there and you know Reagan stopped that runaway inflation and saved the working class.

    • B.A_2014

      Just because the economy is in the green does not mean the people are any better off. It usually just means that a small commercial elite is rolling in a more dollars than it did on the last count. You are right when you say that many people have realised capitalism (a system that guarantees the investments of shareholders is hardly capitalism now is it) doesn’t work for anyone except a select few.

      • See The Future

        18 trillion and climbing is not economy in the green. It is only a matter of time before a full scale collapse of the dollar and the market. That is only Federal. Add state and municipal debt and the number is around 53 trillion. It is unsustainable.

        • Max

          It is borrowing money to buy gifts for your friends.

  • withcaution

    The battle is over! We’ve all seen the evidence, hundreds of TV shows and TV commercials having a black male with a pretty white female and no outrage from the public. Millions of jobs and positions in college enrollment where whites been openly discriminated against and no outrage from the white public. Tens of millions of lawbreaking illegals entering the country 5 presidents openly refusing to not just enforce the law but openly encourage the breaking of the law and no outrage from the white public.

    • Sick of it

      Maybe for people in Detroit, but the white youth of the South are slowly but surely becoming more conservative than their go along to get along hippie grandparents. Of course, we’ve had all of our dreams stolen from us thanks to multiculturalism and globalism, so it’s really not that hard to understand.

      • See The Future

        Such a travesty that so many of our best white youth are coming back in body bags and with physical/mental injuries maintaining a useless presence in the mid east. We should be out of those areas. Let them kill each other and if they threaten do what stopped the suicide attacks in the second world war.

        • Tim

          I`ve never understood why we were so ready to drop Atomic bombs on Japan for Pearl Harbour and Bataan, but not Islam for 9-11 and the beheading of civilians…

          • anony

            TPTB did it to announce to the world that they were on top, and intended to stay there.

    • See The Future

      The war has been started but most whites are still living in a fools paradise. It will take some time yet for white people to respond. Times for most are too good, it is someone else’s problem for a while. But there will be a time for correction, unfortunately the path to recovery will involve the most draconian of measures that are unacceptable today. History has shown over and over the consequence of corruption at all levels of government. White liberals, many in the GOP and the media are complicit in the events described in the post above.

    • A Gambell

      Exactly. One as also take into acount the absolute prevalence in media,’entertainment’ , corporate capitalism, schooling , academia and indeed a tv /propoganda commercials,like the one I just saw, made for a chain of supermarkets, /w****t, the sub/text was whites are helpless without non whites and such propgacommercials continues the negation and destrrcution of whites

  • kjh64

    “Whites will eventually be pushed aside demographically, so it will be vital for them to find a way of using their Indian Summer of power to ensure their survival.”

    THIS is the problem, Whites are ALLOWING themselves to be pushed aside. This does NOT have to happen. If Whites rose up en masse, they could stop and reverse a lot of this, not all of the damage, but a lot of it. However, Whites aren’t doing this because so many Whites today are insane. Unless they do, it really won’t matter a whole lot who votes what because this country will be a 3rd world dump.

    • See The Future

      Unfortunately white women are not supporting their white men. The white male vote is being cancelled by the white feminist women that no longer cherish and value the family unit and the raising of children. Of course the society is devolving to the point where it is questionable whether having children subject to a life of abuse is a worthwhile endeavor. It will take a great white leader to motivate white people to take the steps necessary to reconstruct what could have been the greatest society in the years after world war II.

    • anony

      Maybe some Whites are insane, but I think the bigger issue, by far, is that most Whites are not aware of the racial problems extant in this country, and the reason for that is that the lame-stream media do not cover those problems.

      This lack of coverage is purposeful. The lame-stream media have blood on their hands, and they are complicit with those who are “browning” all formerly White countries.

  • Whitesneedtobebrave

    Should be or we are doomed.

  • Whitesneedtobebrave

    Inter racial marriage is the biggest abomination which the jews and white libs support. Shame on them!!!

    • See The Future

      Reintroduce laws against this abomination!

      • Epiminondas

        No. Secession is the way. I don’t want to enforce laws over unwilling whites. Let them have their own nations and commit cultural suicide the way they wish.

  • Petronius

    Large cohesive subgroups are fatal to a democracy–especially where, as here, certain subgroups have limited capacity or inclination for civilization, are deeply rooted in violence, and share few ideals, values, and loyalties with the rest of the electorate.

    Under these conditions the rule of law is eroded and a country drifts into semi-anarchy or some form of despotism. Both of these tendencies (semi-anarchy and despotism) are currently underway in the US.

    • Cecil Broomsted

      Democracies (and especially forms of Libertarianism) can only remain stable and workable with homogenous societies.

      America has been presented to the world as the great multiracial experiment that works. A model for the rest of the world to follow. The fact is that nothing could be further from the truth. America has only worked up to this point because all of its institutions have been overwhelmingly controlled by whites. This is changing now and everything will quickly unravel as non-whites gain control.

      In the end, history shows the only way we will survive: separation.

      • Epiminondas

        And as non-whites gain important positions of power in our institutions, those institutions will be increasingly shunned by whites. It started over in education, but will spread. When the end comes, freedom from the liberal/minority coalition will arrive. Secession is the way out!

        • anony

          Separation is the only answer.

  • Whitesneedtobebrave

    I do not think we should allow whites from South America to come to America. They consider themselves HISPANIC and not whites. They support illegal immigration and also amnesty. They do not bother to assimilate, but hang around their own Latino crowd, even though they are brown. I know one girl from South America of German, Italian and slight South American Indian descent, but she looks white like she came from Sweden and she considers herself Hispanic and is even dating a Mexican mestizo.
    I approve of whites from South Africa, Kenya and Zimbabwe coming here. Eastern European seem OK, but some of them especially Romanians are trash.

    • Holden

      A good example of that is the current pope.

      • TXCriollo

        Ya he is sure something else

      • Whitesneedtobebrave

        I agree 100%

  • “No matter who you vote for, money always wins.”

    Until our corrupt system of government is overthrown, nothing real will change. Democrats and Republicans are just two heads on the same snake.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      Petrodollar = our current corrupt system. Until that changes… I’ve never wanted any man more in my life than Vladimir Putin.

      • anony

        I heard the best foreign policy speech I’ve ever heard delivered by V. Putin about 4 years ago. In the audience sat a smirking J. MaCain who probably understood very little of what Putin was describing. It can be found on youtube.

        I’ve long been a fan of Putin; I like his “make a new Russian month”, his re-establishment of the Russian Orthodox Church, and his strong stand against the tyranny of the petrodollar.

    • Evette Coutier

      These an old saying that goes: if elections could change things they’d be outlawed.

      • See The Future

        Yes, and it is not the votes/voter that matter but the counter of the votes.

    • anony

      The golden rule: those with the gold rule.

  • IKUredux

    No quote marks were needed for the word:scheduled. It was planned, pure and simple. Here’s what I want for Christmas: White men all over this country showing up en masse to DMV offices dressed in burkhas, insisting on new driver’s licenses to reflect that they are now female, and, recent converts to islam. Break it up so there is at least 10 males per day at different offices. Don’t pay your property taxes until just about to lose your home. Starve the beast. Or, well, you know, there are other methods. Democracy? Voting? Does that really work in a culture where nobody but White patriots play by the rules? Dump the proverbial tea into a harbor.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      Unpaid property taxes accrue interest and penalties, so I wouldn’t recommend not paying them. I agree that we need some white people to “come out” with their “issues”. I like the guys showing up at DMV offices, asking for sex reassignment on their licenses. How about printing “YT DOLLAR” on all your dollar bills? Big things have to start out small.

      • IKUredux

        You’re right, it does accrue penalties in the form of interest. However, if you could get everyone to pay their property taxes on the last day possible, that would help. On the other hand, if, IF, everyone in the community could be persuaded NOT to pay, then all hell could break lose. Seriously, they need tax dollars to foreclose on non payers, so, if everyone is a non payer? Perfection.

      • Tim

        I agree with you on the property tax thing. I would advocate for generating income off the grid with that property instead…

    • See The Future

      The dollar and market collapse will get the ball rolling. People will start to see that they have been deceived for years.

    • none of your business

      Or move to a medical marijuana state, get a license, grow a garden and evade most of the taxes on it.

  • Young Werther

    What does “even if only for the last time “mean to you?

  • Viking_61

    Sounds like GENOCIDE.

  • shmiggen

    I’m white but I’m staunchly pro-union. I couldn’t vote for the GOP until they embrace the AFL-CIO. Now multiply me by 100 million. This is why white people are divided.

    • 1G25

      Unable to stand on your own two feet ?

      • shmiggen

        Well, that is why we have unions.

        • 1G25

          That’s the damn truth. Surprised you admitted it.

          • shmiggen

            So carpenters, pipe-fitters, longshoremen, truck drivers … shouldn’t be able to bargain collectively? What miserable southern state are you from?

          • 1G25

            Louisiana and Texas, where men stand up on their own two feet and aren’t afraid to go out into the world alone, unlike a pack of craven Yankee dogs.

    • Epiminondas

      Jeff Sessions has done more for labor by opposing amnesty than anyone. Where does the AFL-CIO stand on open borders? You place your political theories ahead of your own civilization? Sick.

      • shmiggen

        In all fairness that’s a question you could also ask the party of Big Business.

      • none of your business

        AFL-Cioi s totally open border, a direct opposite of their position 100 years ago when the unions led the movement to end immigration. They are part of the demorat power structure. Like liberal jews who ignored the destruction of jewish neighborhoods by blacks, the AFL-CIO doesn’t mind if every private sector union disappears as long as the affirmative action government unions survive.

    • Max

      Where are these hundred million? Are other planets unionized?

      • shmiggen

        American men.

  • Mr. Loverman Shabba Ranks

    The white male will cease to exist very soon.

  • Garrett Brown

    One last chance for… what? Republican rule? And what will that accomplish?

    • JohnEngelman

      Tax cuts for the rich. That is about it.

      • Max

        I’ll take it. Everyone who isn’t getting entitlements of some kind is now apparently “rich”.

  • I vote White. More precisely, I vote Pro-White.

    At this point, I don’t care so much about abortion, homosexuality or gay marriage, gun control(I do love my guns though), drug laws, environmental issues, etc. If you are not emphatically pro-White and do not stand on a platform that elevates Race to its appropriate foundational level of nation building, then don’t even bother asking for my help, because you are not getting my vote. All of the other stuff can be tackled once Racialism is used as the impetus for change and progress. Implicit racialism is for sissies and procrastinating dreamers who have embraced their roles as chattel and consumerist sheep.

    • UncleSham

      Any supposedly pro-White person that advocates gun control is a snake.

      • none of your business

        What has the NRA ever done for Whites? Exactly nothing. Yet Whites support the NRA and the 2nd amendment.

  • AmericanCitizen

    What whites need is a national leader who can withstand the inevitable charges of bigotry, racism, and any other -ism the Liberal media is going to label him with. In today’s political climate that simply isn’t possible. Historically such leaders have arisen after drastic problems surface, such as economic or political collapse. Those types of events have brought forth the Caesars, Napoleons, even FDR and men like Eisenhower were shaped by the Great Depression and the World Wars. Without the American Revolution George Washington would have lived and died an unknown member of the colonial landed gentry, a faceless nobody. Grant was a failed officer and rumored drunk who could barely make a living working for his father in 1860 on the eve of the Civil War. By 1865 he had become the first 4 star general, won the Civil War through battlefield victories over foes who had trounced previous commanders, and would be elected President in 1868 and 1872.

    The times make the man, and we don’t have the times yet. As long as middle class whites can bring home a check, drink a few beers here and there with a steak, and follow sports there won’t be a leader uniting whites on the basis of racial identity.

    • kikz2

      grant……rumored drunk…?! AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  • I wouldn’t think so much as a white movement, more of a back lash of blacks hating every one, if it is not the white man it is the Asian or Latino, taking over., This adminastration could of been the point of unity and to show that no mater what you are you can be successfull. But obumer missed the mark. He did just the opposite. Between him and holder, they have drove a deeper wedge in race relations that i have not seen in my lifetime. I am 40

    • Epiminondas

      Most of us predicted Obama would take that course of action. It’s why we wanted him instead of McRomney. Now the truth is out there for white “moderates” to see. And they don’t like what they now know. McRomney would have kept this hidden from view.

      • none of your business

        I knew exactly what Obama was around 2005 or 6 when I read his auto bio. It helped that my parents were exactly like his commie mommie and grandparents.

  • John R

    Two things will make Whites vote more heavily as a group: The decline of our standard of living and the growing non-white numbers. In past decades, anyone with a college degree could look foreword to a decent job, and move out to the all White suburbs, and be happily liberal in his views. Now, the good jobs are scarce, and even colleges and suburban areas are giving Whites no where to hide. Coming up against diversity will tend to make most White people think of themselves as Whites and realize they must stick with their own kind. Maybe that is what our people need to finally wake up.

  • Luca

    Perhaps we should start a Looney Liberal Party, (although that title may be a bit counter-productive.)

    The idea would be to attract all those lefty, soicalist, Occupy, Save The Whales, tree hugging, communist-loving, anti-capitalist, immigrant loving, pot-smoking, college professors, uber-liberal Hollywierds, Jews, Asians and Whites who find the Democratic party not liberal enough.

    They could have a platform of revolution, one-currency, free government everything, open borders, global warming, tax-the-rich and middle class, save the snail darter, anti-fossil fuel, common core, gay marriage, atheism and abortions on-demand in drive up windows.

    This would impact the Democratic Party quite dramatically.

    • mike j

      Sorry, but the Looney Liberal Party is redundant. The platform that you’ve created for it is already the Democratic Party’s platform.

  • Charlie

    Who in their right mind, thinks that Republicans, or anyone else on Capitol Hill, has the best interests of White Americans at heart? I mean, really, if they truly had White interests at heart, would that man be sitting in the current Oval Office? The question remains, why did tens of millions of White Americans, go out and vote, in all types of inclement weather, on those early two November days, in both 2008 and 2012? To elect and re-elect someone, who is not even of their own race? Both the 2008 and 2012 elections, were actually referendums on whether White Americans were still in allegiance, with their own ethnic and racial interests, and they voted against them, both times…

  • ganicus

    white revolution is the only solution!!!! it is time to nut up or shut up!!!

  • kikz2

    At present, the Republican Party may look like a curse, but in the
    future, one big party in the face of splintered opposition could prove
    vital to a racially conscious white minority seizing control of its
    country again, even if only for the last time.

    i’m betting the futures of my children and grandchildren yet to be on it. if their interests are not seen to, there’ll be hell to pay b4 i cast off this mortal coil.

  • mike j

    This is all nonsense. America’s new electoral majority will be government dependents who have no loyalty to their race or anything else, and care for nothing but the continuance and increase of their own unearned stipends. Some of the elderly beneficiaries of Social Security and Medicare still vote Republican, but only because they’re stupid enough to believe that they earned those benefits and therefore differentiate themselves from the beggars and scum who get their free goodies from some other government agency. Eventually, when Republican fiscal responsibility suggests that entitlements in general be cut, the beneficiaries of all income redistribution programs will vote as a bloc for the Party of Bread and Circuses. Even when Republicans do temporarily take charge, the number of government dependents and “social spending” both increase. I expect that everyone knows the ultimate outcome of this process.

  • anony

    I agree with you. The chances of your solution happening are nil.

  • Anna Tree

    If they leave the Dems because they at last understand that whites are in danger and that the Dems is working only for non-whites interest, then they shouldn’t fall for the false pro-whites of the GOP (those will disappear I think and be replaced with openly pro-whites.)
    I was kind of a liberal before I became a race realist (albeit never anti-white, I always was proud of being white and of my white heritage), and when I became a race realist, I became like all race realists, very good at sorting who is pro-white and who is not, it’s the only or at least the first thing of importance for me now. They should too I believe. It comes with the awakening.
    I think the real insane liberal leftists will never leave the Dems.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      The “real insane” ones are all members of the grievance industry. If the GOP is the Grand Ole Party, then the Demo-rats are the GIP:
      The Grievance Industry Party.

    • anony

      to the hard-core libs, it’s a religion. They are “true-believers”. Logic and reason are gone. There actions are based on pure “faith”.

  • WR_the_realist

    Our divorce laws have made marriage nonviable for the sort of responsible men who hold jobs from which child support payments can be deducted.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      So true. That is falsely spun as “a White fertility problem” by the mainstream Marxist media. White people don’t have a fertility problem, non-White people have a parasitism problem.

    • Alexandra1973

      If they abandon their families, they deserve to pay up.

      Of course, the same is true for women who bail, IMO.

    • none of your business

      You mean men should not have to support their children after they leave the Mothers? So the tax payers should support the children of divorced Fathers when the Mothers don’t make enough to support the kids?

      if the Fathers are entitled to bail after the divorce so should the Mothers be so entitled and the kids can go to black CPS and black and hispanic foster homes is that what you advocate?

      That is a black custom, leaving the kids for the Mothers and taxpayers to support.

    • listenupbub

      Hmmm…not buying it.

      The problem is that young white males just aren’t getting jobs like they need, even when they are college educated. If you can’t support a family, why marry at all?

      Some whites might need to consider just being poor…

  • puffdaddy

    Yet the Republican Party continues to grow the welfare state, and its non white beneficiaries. So identifying the GOP as “pro white” at this point seems pretty laughable.

  • Cheri Rodriguez

    But do YOU live in Connecticut? Up until the 1970s places like New Haven and Hartford were still majority White. Most remaining Whites are there because of work and school (Yale, SCSU, University of Hartford, Trinity College, Aetna, The Travelers, etc.). Westport and Greenwich are nice but you’d better have big money to live there. And then you always have to deal with infiltrators no matter how ritzy the town. Just look at Farmington: wealthy but they bus in tons of black kids from Hartford to attend the public schools.

    • none of your business

      Is Miss Porter’s in Farmington?

  • Tim

    “The fact you`re wearing a tattoo speaks louder than anything it says…”-Mom 1973

  • Steve_in_Vermont

    The Republican party needs to field a viable candidate in 2016. If they do they’ll have a good chance of winning. They did a good job on the recent off-year elections, keeping the fringe candidates away.

  • Yves Vannes

    The R party is not yet the White Party, but it will be dragged kicking and screaming into becoming just that. They are already that in the South. The D party runs as the anti White party so many Whites have moved over to the R party even though the R party is still trying to play both sides of the fence.

    The D party sees what is going on in the South and desperately wants to keep the same thing from happening in the Northeast, West and Midwest. The Southwest is conquered territory and a big part of executive amnesty is to make sure it stays that way. The Northeast and West will eventually see whites driven into the R party by default because the D party will become more and more anti White. At some point the R party will have to embrace the fact that it is a white nationalist party. The Midwest, being the whitest part of the country will probably be the last to embrace the idea of a white nationalist party.

    How Asians fallout in all of this will probably depend upon geography. Since Asians tend to mimic whites in behavior they will probably align themselves more and more with whites. This will be also due to the perception on the part of Asians that the D party punishes accomplishment and rewards sloth. Other the other hand, in areas with a weaken white power base the Asians may assume they can control and rule the Sun People – so they will align themselves with the D party.

    I’m not so sure that Hispanics will become loyal to the D party. One they don’t like blacks at all. And two, there is a fairly wide spread assumption in the Hispanic community that they will eventually set up a semi independent state only marginally aligned with the US.

  • scutum

    When I came back from the war and before I started at the University I had a positive view of socialism. After I got my degree and began to realize what socialism is really all about I changed completely, but it took time. I believe that the millenials and the generation behind them will also come to this realization as they age. They will then not only leave the democratic party, but will embrace true conservatism. This includes those who profess to be Libertarians. They will eventually come to the realization that most libertarian ideas, like open borders, don’t work.

    • JohnEngelman

      If one feels something strongly, it is easy to over estimate the number of people who feel the same way.It is easy to under estimate the difficulty of converting others to one’s persuasion.

      To be enthusiastic about capitalism one needs to believe that hard work will make one rich, or at least affluent. It is becoming more difficult for most people in the United States to feel that way.

      • Max

        I agree with your first paragraph and the second premise of the second paragraph. I think the statement about “hard work” is greatly simplistic. It is not the difficulty of the work which necessarily makes it valuable. Secondly, no matter how “hard” you work, you have to provide some product or service which somebody else wants. Likely no employer would pay for a “Gender Studies” graduate unless artificially compelled to hire an AA applicant to fill a quota. This is NOT a free market nor “capitalism”.
        I won’t pay more to have a contractor put in a driveway because he uses a shovel and mixes cement in a washtub instead of using a skidloader and has the Redi-Mix company deliver the cement. The first guy works MUCH harder -so what? Economic “natural selection” will enforce selection against the first chap. He will not put in as many driveways no matter how hard he works unless he wises up. If he can’t afford the equipment, he suffers or goes bust. Too bad. The guy who is smart AND works hard is going to get the most contracts. He provides the same service very likely in less time and possibly at a lower cost while he makes a greater profit. This benefits both him and the consumer though the less efficient guy is either weeded out or just settles for a lower income/ harder job. It is a socialist system that dictates that EVERYONE will use shovels or skidloaders and sets prices to “level the playing field”. This diminishes the incentive for efficiency and quality since all are deprived of market signals for the value of the service rendered.

        • JohnEngelman

          What matters is that the average standard of living is declining, while the rich get richer. The Democrats have not learned how to deal with this, but it is a Democrat issue.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Maybe this old quote applies: ‘A conservative is a liberal who got mugged’. Maybe those people got mugged and are true converts? Maybe they finally see Obama for the anti-White shill he always was?

  • Let’s get away from this birthrate solution. It’s a long time a-comin’, this notion of paying high-caste euro-americans to have extra babies. We’ll end up subsidizing people of unsuhtin ancestree. It’s based on a faulty premise, that we somehow need more than 150,000,000 people in the country. We don’t.

    No, the answer is to change the voting requirements. Can we do it? It’s been done many many times. Then we construct a repatriation program to extend over forty or fifty years, coupled with bounties paid to young nonwhites who have themselves sterilized. Easy-peasy.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That is true. The U.S. has been turned into a bedroom country.

      Population growth actually hurts countries with no economic growth potential. We no longer “make stuff”. Back in the early 20th century manufacturing was 1/2 the economy. Now it’s barely 10%.

    • redstone357

      in an alternate universe maybe….but here on earth…not so much….the birthrate solution is the only solution.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Starting with an immigration moratorium.

      • No, that’s just Humphrey Ireland defeatism. What always bothered me about Instauration. Get on your frickin knees and pray to St. Jude for a solution. Worked for Danny Thomas.

    • anony

      Change the voting requirements? We can’t even get voter-ID in all the States.

    • none of your business

      Life was good and decent jobs plentiful when there were only 150,000,000 people in the country.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    No, they vote GIP: The Grievance Industry Party. The nation-takers.
    Citizens of the Feminist Nation and the LGBT Nation are GIP.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Think of all that diversity you’re missing though.
    .

  • newscomments70

    I used to be technically liberal. I would vote for George Wallace or David Duke, if possible.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Same here. Still registered as a Democrat, used to think of myself as a Conservative Democrat, hoping for the old Southern Democrats to take the party. My awakening was Obongo winning the primary in ’08. I grew up with Grandparents who had voted for both Strom Thurmond and the Dixiecrats in ’48 and George Wallace, but remained registered Democrats.

  • Alexandra1973

    Consider this: Rs and Ds are the same garbage with different packaging.

    Say 38% vote R. 44% vote D, for a total of 82% voting “major party.” The other 18%, independent. You think conservatives lost there?

    Think again. The way I see it, 82% voted for the NWO party (which has two branches) and the other 18% have an idea as to what’s going on.

  • Alexandra1973

    We have a duopoly.

  • lib1

    We musn’t forget that power is centralized and whites have a stronghold in state and local governments. So long as our towns and counties are controlled by whites, we’ll be fine. In fact, I predict that Democrats will win at the national level, but conservative whites will maintain our strength at the local level.

  • While it will be too little, too late to save the United States in its current form, Whites will be able to carve out livable communities within the current borders of the collapsing U.S.A. We should welcome a surge in White racial consciousness with all of our heart. It is only right and logical.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    I wonder if Mestizos who are mostly Caucasian descent could be the key to pushing the Negrocrats aside. Such voters, if they feel culturally aligned with Whites and alienated by Obongo’s Negrocentric reign of terror, may vote for an explicitly White racial realist candidate.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Interesting.

      To hear some AmRen-ers say it, the Latins have already pushed the Africans out of Watts, the historic epicenter for the last big race hustle era. Now the black hustle is centered in Chicago and St. Louie. And the Latins are pouring into Chick-gog-go as well.

  • anony

    It also breeds ignorance about the “way of the world”.

  • anony

    There are good, though semi-covert, reasons we allied with Stalin during WWII. McCarthy was indeed correct. The Venona files prove his case.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    The Republicans have done little to harm Whites? I strongly disagree. The Republicans work to defend the interests of the wealthy, and constantly throw Whites under the bus. They did nothing to stop integration 50 years ago. They have done nothing to stop AA, and nothing about closing our border. If they cared about working Whites as well as wealthy Whites, they would have taken a stand against integration. Because of their to cool to care stance on White racial interests, Strom Thurmond and George Wallace both claimed the electoral college votes for several Southern states in two important elections. If the Republicans had taken a proper stance on White racial interests, the South would have put a Republican in the White House in 1968 instead of voting for an independent candidate who displayed the courage to at least address White racial interests. What makes you think that, after almost 60 years of doing nothing for working Whites, the Republicans will suddenly act decisively on the behalf of working Whites in 2016. W had 8 years in office to at least press to close our borders, end AA, etc. He couldn’t even act as a White racial realist after 9/11. A simple nuclear warhead dropped on Kabul, with threats to vaporize the Islamic world if they responded in any way, would have put a stop to Islamic terrorism. A White racial realist would not hesitate to nuke the entire Islamic world off of the map. We need a George Wallace in the White House, not another Reagan or W. Their focus was big business, not the interests of working Whites.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    I agree. The Constitution Party was our best choice for 2008 and 2012. Repubs claim to fight terrorism, yet W failed to drop several well placed nukes on the Islamic world, which would have brought terrorism to a screeching halt. Nukes were what stopped the Japanese Oriental supremacists almost 70 years ago in their tracks.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Many of them have also had Grandparents from the hippy Generation, who encouraged them that race doesn’t matter. Many of us over 40 grew up with racial realist Grandparents.

  • Usually Much Calmer

    We cannot breed faster than Obama can let in hoards.

  • none of your business

    You are right, all hispanics appreciate affirmative action and vote accordingly. Look at Selma Hyaak. Mother Arab and Father Czech, not a drop of even Spanish blood but she identifies as hispanic.

  • none of your business

    Hard to afford children when affirmative action keeps you out of many sectors of the economy. Safe White areas mean high property taxes that go up every year and long commutes which of course cost more money than short commutes.

  • none of your business

    How about a little support for the parents of all those kids. Maybe affirmative action for parents? I know that before the feminiazis came along most companies had a policy of more pay for the same work for married men with small raises when they had another child. France has support for all parents, not just for welfare slugs.
    Some of the support is minimal like free bus passes but every little bit helps.

  • none of your business

    I hate to keep repeating myself, but conservatism does not mean pro White.

  • none of your business

    Nixon more than Johnson or any demorat president was the affirmative action President. He also created section 8 which is destroying suburbs and small towns everywhere. He, by executive order invented the hispanic race for the 1970 census. I was there. I am 72 years old. I know what Republican Nixon did to Whites with just those 3 things, affirmative action, section 8 and the invention of the hispanic race as another affirmative action beneficiary.

  • none of your business

    Repeat, conservative does not mean pro White.

  • none of your business

    The parents of the under thirties are the younger baby boomers who brought us feminism, the sexual revolution and all sorts of destructive things.

  • none of your business

    Not everyone, especially goys can afford New Canaan or Greenwich.

  • none of your business

    The Christian Whites think banning abortion is more important than ending affirmative action or persecuting black on White crime. They are as hopeless as the 120 IQ professionals

    • Reynardine

      It is a small blessing of God that both have been frustrated in their attempts to bring us their versions of the American Utopia.