British Islamist: Muslims Should Humiliate Christians to Make Them Convert

Nick Hallett, Breitbart, May 10, 2014

A British Islamist leader has outlined how an “Islamic State” should humiliate Christians to encourage them to convert to Islam. Abu Waleed, who follows the hard line Salafi branch of Sunni Islam, quotes from the hadith (Islamic writings outside the Koran) to demonstrate how Christians and Jews should be treated if they do not convert to Islam.

In the sermon, posted online by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Waleed says that Islam is incompatible with the UN Declaration on Human Rights, as it cannot treat all people as equal.

He lists the humiliations that non-Muslims should undergo in an Islamic State, including being forced to walk on a narrower side of the street to Muslims–or in the middle of the road–shaving their foreheads, wearing a red belt around their necks, wearing odd shoes and handing over their clothes to a Muslim if he asks them to.

Omar Ibn Al-Khattab . . . In his own charter–not the Charter of the United Nations–in his charter with the people of the Levant, the Christians of the Levant, [it is stated] that infidels and Muslims were not allowed to wear the same clothes as one another.

If a Muslim comes out on the day of ‘Eid and sees an infidel with nice clothes, the infidel has to take his clothes off and give them to the Muslim. When an infidel walks down the street, he has to wear a red belt around his neck, he has to have his forehead shaved, and he has to wear two shoes that are different from one another. He is not allowed to walk on the pavement. He has to walk in the middle of the road, and he has to ride on a mule.

This is only for adults, not for the children. You can see how Islam would make the child become a Muslim. The child growing up in a state of heresy would turn to Islam. Why? Because the child would be walking along with his dad, and would say: ‘Dad?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Why have you got your forehead shaved?’ ‘I don’t know, these Muslims make me do it.’ ‘Why can’t you ride the animal like the Muslims, who ride like this? Why are you riding with both legs dangling on the side of the donkey?’ ‘Why is it that every time a Muslim comes and asks you for your clothes, you give them?’ ‘Why is it that every time he tells you to get down from the horse, you have to take it?’

He adds that while Christians would still be able to have churches in an Islamic state, they would be forced to take in and shelter a Muslim for the night for whatever reason he wants. They will also be forbidden from ringing church bells.

Waleed uses the example of a Muslim sheltering in a church on Edgware Road, London, suggesting he has Britain in mind for his Islamic State.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • kikz2

    Abu should take his islamic state, shove it, and waddle back to where ever he or his clan have come from……… :/

  • dd121

    Maybe the Muzzies ringing church bells will start to wake people up.

  • dd121

    Maybe the Muzzies ringing church bells will start to wake people up.

    • Kenner

      Yodeling from their minarets.

      • Lagerstrom

        Sing along, or follow the bouncing ball…
        “High on a tower stands a lonely goat *@#*er, yodel-a-dee- yodal-a-dee-ooh”!

    • The Verdict of History

      “There is some question as to whether Islam is a separate
      religion at all. It initially fulfilled a need among Arabs for a distinctive or special
      creed […] Islam when examined is not much more than a rather obvious and
      ill-arranged set of plagiarisms, helping itself from earlier books and traditions
      as occasion appeared to require. Thus, far from being “born in the clear light of
      history,” as Ernest Renan so generously phrased it, Islam in its origins
      is […] shady and approximate. It makes immense claims for itself, invokes prostrate submission or “surrender” as a maxim to its adherents, and demands deference and respect from nonbelievers into the bargain. There is nothing—absolutely nothing—in its teachings that can even begin to justify such arrogance and presumption.”

      “It has […] been some time since Judaism and Christianity resorted
      openly to torture and censorship. Not only did Islam begin by condemning all
      doubters to eternal fire, but it still claims the right to do so in almost all of its dominions, and still preaches that these same dominions can and must be
      extended by war. There has never been an attempt in any age to challenge or even investigate the claims of Islam that has not been met with
      extremely harsh and swift repression. Provisionally, then, one is entitled to conclude that the apparent unity and confidence of the faith is a mask
      for a very deep and probably justifiable insecurity. That there are and always
      have been sanguinary feuds between different schools of Islam, resulting in strictly inter-Muslim accusations of heresy and profanity and in terrible acts of violence, naturally goes without saying.”

      – Chris Hitchens, from God Is Not Great [p. 2007]

      Chapter: “The Koran is Borrowed from both Christian and Jewish Myths”

      • captainc

        “The Koran is Borrowed from both Christian and Jewish Myths” no, it isn’t. Qur’an has its own narrations on how or when things actually took place then, and it turned out to be right, for example Pharaoh title during Moses time and King titled during Joseph time. Bible mentioned all rulers of Egypt were titled Pharaohs.

        • The Verdict of History

          There are other difference between the Koran and the Bible.

          For instance, Issac (Israel) is not the recipient of Abraham’s inheritance or God’s special blessing, but rather Ishmael, the patriarch of the Arabs (Ishmaelites).

          Why did the author(s) make this modification?

          Because they wanted to make the content suitable to, complimentary to, and palatable to the inhabitants of Arabia to whom they needed to proselytize so as to kick start their conquests in adjacent lands.

          That there are unique or varied narrations in the Koran does not disprove the thesis of Hitch-ens (or any of the critical scholars and textual critics who’d agree with him).

          If anything, this fact merely serves to underlie his point.

          Crackpots are often unoriginal and make sh** up.

          —-

          That the Koran takes the time to mention details and characters from ancient Hebrew fables is evidence enough that its content is at least partially borrowed from other sources.

          (Zoroastrian themes also litter the text.)

          Whenever one is dealing with half-literate, unoriginal imitators, different iterations of, interpretations of and variations on the same original fairy tales are bound manifest themselves.

          • captainc

            No, I think you think upside-down. First of all, if all prophets work for the same God (boss), then the stories must be the same, only the forgeries differ and forgeries can be exposed by historical evidences or scientific facts.

            Second, why would a Jew named Jesus, would later make modification that he is God reincarnated while Judaism believes that God has no form and uncomprehensible by senses? Or is that something attributed to Jesus by pagan Greeks?

            Your question should be, whether Qur’an is from God and 100% truthful? Therefore, it should not be compared to the Bible, but to objective references. It should be easy to prove it, because Muslims can not have any excuse, as they claim they memorize Qur’an since its inception.

          • saxonsun

            A question. When God wrote the Bible and the Koran did he use a pen or a pencil?

          • captainc

            God didn’t write Qur’an, it is God’s words verbatim which Muslims memorized by heart and later copied on bones, dates’ leaves until the later Caliph would bind them all together in a Manuscript.

            I give you two sites to compare and decide on your own.

            From Wikipedia,
            /wiki/History_of_the_Quran

            From Islamic site,
            islamic-awareness(dot)org/Quran/Text/Mss/

          • BerndV

            How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Fiction plagiarized from fiction that was plagiarized from still more fiction. The fact that millions of ignoramuses are willing to allow their weltanschauung to be shaped by such utter nonsense is as disturbing as the existence of millions of self-flagellating white libs attempting to dstroy the white race and western civilization.

          • captainc

            Qur’an is not plagiarization, it has its own prophecies and scientific claims which considering the world of Arabia in 670 AD, these claims are indeed divine, because they don’t contradict with science, not even one.

            God is not a fiction, that’s for sure. How do I know that? Because for evolution to be succesful or the Universe to become as it is, it needs Fine Tuning, and this is statiscally divine. It won’t happen by mere coincidence. But, which version of religion tells us the truth? Or perhaps, none?

            If there is none, then our meaning is to be the last man standing in this ever evolving arena, and we are His gladiators. Throw away your compassion, play the rule like Zionist Jews with their Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the world is flat, no one is turning the other cheek, we all are the Jews too. Evil and Good are neutral and should be used as means towards a goal. God loves the winners, I think most of you Amren readers have come to this conclusion as well.

        • The Verdict of History

          The Quran is filled with biblical stories, for example, most of them told in an extremely elliptical or what has been called an allusive or referential style. For someone who had not read or heard the Bible recited many of these Quranic narratives would make little sense. But they did, obviously, and we can only conclude that Muhammad’s audiences were not hearing these stories for the first time, as the already cited remark about “rehashing old stories” [25:5] itself suggests. Thus there were stories of Abraham and Ishmael (or Isaac), of Moses and Solomon, David and Enoch, current in early seventh century Mecca, though we have little idea how or for how long; and when Muhammad “retold” them in his allusive style in the Quran to make some other moral point, God’s vengeance for the mistreatment of earlier prophets, to cite one common theme, his listeners might not agree with the point, but they apparently knew well enough what he was referring to.

          We, however, cannot follow these narratives so easily, first, perhaps, because they have been broken up or pasted together in ways different from their original recitation, or, more pertinent to our present purpose, because these stories are “biblical” only in the sense that they take characters or incidents from the Bible as their point of departure. But their trajectory is haggadic, the residue, echo, recollection–we are at a loss precisely what to call it–of what is palpaply Jewish midrashim, though which they were, or whence, we cannot even guess. We have only one biblical midrash current in the seventh century Arabia, and that is the Quran itself.

          F.E. Peters, Muhammad and the Origins of Islam, 1994, Appendix

          • captainc

            First of all, majority of his audience was pagan Arabs, why would Muhammad filling his Qur’an about Jewish prophets? And, why would some Jews live in Arabia then when they had Israel? They were expecting a Massiah from Paran, that’s the reason.

            The author compares Qur’an with Bible, when Qur’an is neither Bible nor Jewish Midraishm, therefore, it has no obligation to conform to any of them. But, it was revealed as reformer or restorer or criteria to judge what the actual words of God in the Bible are.

            So, when Qur’an contradicts with the Bible, according to the author, Qur’an is false. Is this logical? Shouldn’t i that any Book or claim be compared to historical or scientific facts?

            Let me give you an example what happened in Catholicism,
            /watch?v=5z1KaE3zKkI

          • Sick of it

            There were Jewish communities all over the world back then.

          • captainc

            but only in center of Europeans civilizations or the residual effect of Babylonian captivity. Arabia was backwater then.

    • borogirl54

      Personally, I would rather hear church bells, than the Muslim call to prayer.

      • dd121

        I didn’t make the point very well but what I was pointing out is that a once Christian country is becoming Muslim and Christians will soon be at their mercy.

        • kikz2

          agreed, it seems once they reach critical mass, they become quite intolerant and demanding of the presence of ‘the other’

        • Sick of it

          The many haters of Christianity will also be at the mercy of Islam, while most likely blaming Christianity for the entire situation. And then converting to Islam (being people without real core beliefs).

  • TruthBeTold

    Mooselimbs are also using a ‘Trojan Horse’ strategy to infiltrate schools. Their plan is to harass schools with complaints and force schools to bow to their demands.

    It is the first time a major teachers’ organisation has confirmed that such
    concerns exist. The plot involves the alleged takeover of secular state
    schools and the removal of secular head teachers by radical Muslim staff and
    governors.

    Google this headline:

    Head teachers raise ‘serious concerns’ over Islamic school take-over

    It’s in the UK Telegraph.

  • IstvanIN

    And how many times has the BNP’s Nick Griffin been arrested? Or how about Emma West? Or that young Olympic swimmer from Wales? I wish I could remember the names of all the REAL British folks who have been arrested and had their lives ruined over the slip of the tongue and yet here is a man who want to destroy Great Britain and that is just hunky dory.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      And don’t forget Paul Weston, the Liberty GB party leader, who was recently arrested and jailed for publicly reading aloud this passage from the unabridged 1899 edition of Churchill’s The River War: An Account of the Reconquest of the Sudan:

      How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man ashydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.

      No truer words were ever written about the religion of Islam than those penned by Churchill. Islam is an evil religion that appeals to psychopathic, low IQ peasants; it always has been and it always will be.

      • captainc

        too bad, Churchil didn’t live in 13th century Iraq to give a wholesome analysis.

    • JSS

      The lies and filth of the British ruling elite are frankly worse then what we see in the U.S. On the surface the British state claims tolerance and diversity are the states greatest virtues, thus the state has a duty to jail anyone who disagrees publicly. But then this parasite who belongs in trashcanistan is free to preach all the intolerance and hate he wants, and not only that but any White Brit who complains about him in anything other then a halfway apologetic “Im not racist but” fashion might face fines and jail time. Thus in this case, tolerance and diversity really are codes for White genocide. Its so obvious I don’t see how any White Brit cant see it to.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    Humiliation is what drove whites time and time and again to not just merely overthrow their enemies, but to annihilate all of them. It also leads to rebellions and massive wars. Germany was so humiliated by those who cannot be named and the Allies that Hitler tracked down the very street care where Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles in to accept the French’s surrender in 1940. The Muslims clearly do not understand what happens when the Saxon’s hatred reaches the tipping point and bursts into action.

    • NoMosqueHere

      Germany was so humiliated by those who cannot be named and the Allies that Hitler tracked down the very street care where Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles in to accept the French’s surrender in 1940.

      ————————————————————————–

      You omitted what Hitler did next. He wrecked Germany, leading it to the most humiliating defeat and the most horrendous disgrace in human history.

      Thanks to the generosity of the Marshall Plan, Germany was able to salvage itself.

      • Manaphy

        AIPAC? Is that you?

        • IstvanIN

          Hitler had Europe and then blew it all by invading Poland. He could have won the Danzig issue without starting a devastating war.

          • Ahnenerbe

            The German Reich was militant from the beginning, it was reincarnation of the Imperial Roman Empire.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I think you mean the Holy Roman Empire (also known as the First Reich).

          • Ahnenerbe

            Hitler was a Caesar, Charlemange was a Vatican pawn

          • DonReynolds

            Charlemange was king of the Franks.
            The East Franks were the Germans.
            The West Franks were the French.
            Hitler was mild by comparison.

          • ftex

            Everyone was mild compared to the Mongols. Islamists like to blame the “savage” crusading Christians as the reason for their decline in science, medicine, arts, etc. But it was the Mongols did the real damage, not only to Islam, but to most of Eastern Europe and Russia.

          • captainc

            Perhaps, that’s the reason why Hitler didn’t win the war, he tried to be humane when opportunities presented themselves, like the one in Dunkirk for example. Blessed was Genghis Khan for he was ignorant about the Golden Law and God while being an expansionist savage ruler.

          • DonReynolds

            Actually…..it ended up being the new Holy Roman Empire…..and like the one before, it was neither Holy or Roman.
            But don’t worry. We have a new one. It is called the European Union.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Hitler’s war with Poland was over in three weeks. It was France and Britain who turned it into a devastating war.

          • IstvanIN

            Granted France and Britain made the problem worse. But Hitler had no justification for attempting to destroy the Polish nation and people. He could have gotten his corridor without giving the French, and especially British, who hated the Germans because they threatened Britain’s world-wide hegemony, an excuse to start a world war. Sort of like the US tormenting Russia by ringing her with NATO nations after the fall of the USSR.

          • Long Live Dixie

            How could he have gotten his corridor? The Poles were not negotiating.

          • IstvanIN

            It would have taken more time, but had he waited, had a bigger navy and army to ensure France and Britain wouldn’t dare attack, he could have intimidated Poland more effectively. Or waited for a more amenable government. Or infiltrated the government of Poland. The war was a waste.

          • Long Live Dixie

            In hindsight, I agree he should have waited about ten years. But in the context of the day, it should be understood that the West had done very little to stop him before, so he expected the same weak reaction.

            Hitler was an Anglophile. He had a rosy view of the English. He underestimated the zeal by which the English would ignore all blood ties and rip Germanic Europe to pieces.

          • IstvanIN

            He should have recalled WW1. The British were no friends of the Hun.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Very true, but rose-coloured glasses will do that to someone. I think Hitler viewed the English as being duped by their leaders in 1914. Somehow, he thought they would see through it the second time around and rally to the side of their German kin. So, I fault Hitler for being naïve and misunderstanding his foe. But I fault Churchill for being a warmonger with no loyalty at all to his Germanic kin or even to his own people (whom he readily sacrificed in his hatred of Germany).

          • DonReynolds

            Hitler himself served on the British segment of the front lines in WWI and was in the hospital recovering from a British poison gas attack when the war ended. He knew the British well and said they were most like Germans. Of course…..they are Germans……Angles, Saxons, Jutes.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Speaking of waiting ten years, Plan Z is interesting to read about. Germany would have had a fleet of hundreds of U-boats and dozens of surface ships, including carriers, under that plan.

          • The Z Plan relied for its success upon the British doing absolutely nothing. The carrier “Graf Zeppelin” was in particular an inefficient design: on 27,000 tons she would have operated 42 aircraft (30 Bf-109Ts and 30 Ju-87Gs). On the same displacement, our “Essex” class operated 91 (36 fighters, 37 dive bombers and 18 torpedo bombers). “Essex”, it should be pointed out was also considerably better protected. On 23,000 tons, HMS “Illustrious” operated only 33 aircraft before the permanent deck park was introduced, but had a flight deck made out of three-inch armor plate.

          • JSS

            What you say may have been the best course of action, but Hitler always the saw the war with Russia as the end game and he wanted to start it as soon as possible. He assumed rightly that the Soviets were planning to invade Europe and wanted to hit them first. He also felt time was against Germany and his rivals would grow stronger relative to Germany. Whether or not that is true is debatable, but there is no doubt that Germany entered the war with a fairly low tech mostly horse dependent army. It’s a testament to the moral weakness of his enemies that had as much success as he did early on.

          • IstvanIN

            I thought it was Poland that had an Army that was largely horse dependent and that Germany was the more technologically advanced.

          • JSS

            I don’t have the exact numbers on hand but throughout the war the Germans depended on horses for about 80% of their transportation needs. The normal infantry divisions which made up around 90% of the Wehrmacht were almost totally horse dependent. Thats why Hitler and the high command were always worried about the motorized and Panzer divisions out pacing the infantry so much. Other then the Panthers and Tigers which didn’t appear until late in the war German tanks were not any better then Soviet tanks. Essentially the rearmament of Germany was nowhere near finished at the start of the war. You are correct though that the Polish army was basically at a WW1 level.

          • DonReynolds

            German transport and artillery were horse drawn during WWII.
            But their fighting armor units and mechanized infantry outclassed the Poles.

          • DonReynolds

            Hitler was badly advised in two ways…..
            1) That the Soviet army was only 5 million soldiers. (A few months into the invasion of the USSR, the Germans had captured that many Soviet prisoners.)
            2) That the Japanese would continue to tie down the best 100 Soviet divisions in the Far East, but instead backed down, and attacked the Americans at Pearl Harbor, thus drawing in the US to the war. (The 100 Soviet divisions were rushed to Stalingrad immediately thereafter.)

          • Rhialto

            #2 is a key point that is little known. Perhaps a 3) might be declaring war on the US, after Pearl Harbor. Hitler could have declared the Japan-Germany mutual defense agreement void. This might have prevented Roosevelt from getting a declaration of war against Germany. Who knows?

          • DonReynolds

            Hitler was betrayed by the Japanese.
            The Axis alliance was to destroy Soviet Russia. The Japanese had occupied Siberia back in the 1920s with the Americans (under General Leonard Wood) and stayed after the Americans withdrew. But instead of helping to invade Soviet Russia, they backed down and attacked Pearl Harbor instead.
            Why did Hitler keep his agreement with the Japanese, by declaring war on the US?
            Perhaps he was still hoping the Japanese army would join him against Communist Russia by attacking Siberia from the East.

          • MBlanc46

            But Hitler wanted more than just the Danzig Corridor. He wanted Lebensraum im Osten.

          • IstvanIN

            True. He was a megalomaniac who got Germany back on her feet but then needed to be retired.

          • MBlanc46

            Things don’t generally work that simply in real life.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Some German generals most definitely thought that way, and tried to rub him out before he led Germany to ruin. Von Stoffenberg was not the first to try to assassinate him.

          • Sick of it

            Actually, it was America. Without America, the Allies had lost. Period.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I agree, but America would have had a hard time getting into the war if Britain and France hadn’t already done so.

          • Sick of it

            Surely Roosevelt would have found a way.

          • JSS

            Actually the Poles got a guarantee from Britain and France that they would save Poland if Germany invaded, so Poland had no reason to negotiate. As long as they had a war guarantee they felt secure. What’s especially perverse is that England was in no condition to offer such a guarantee, and while France had a bigger and more modern army then Germany they certainly made no attempt to help Poland. They declared war and then let Germany dictate the course of events. It’s interesting that the Soviets invaded the baltic states, Finland and Poland as well and Britain and France didn’t care.

            Of course when the war was finished Poland was under a worse tyranny then the Nazis ever would have been. The whole reason the war began being forgotten somewhere in the course of the fighting. That war was a total fratricidal farce.

          • IstvanIN

            It was a war to exterminate the Germans, and in the process enslaved eastern Europe and set in motion the end of Western Europe.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        There was no need to rehash what happened next, my family was torn apart because of it. But the fact remains, the western allies and those who cannot be named humiliated Germany so deeply, that it made it possible for the likes of Hitler to gain power then lead the whole continent into a disastrous war. Had they just accepted Germany’s surrender, and allowed the country to put the war behind them, Hitler would have been regarded as a lunatic. But our no-limit elites had other ideas of course. You forgot to mention the entire continent from England and France to Russia was one big wasteland and cemetery by war’s end, not just Germany.

        • IstvanIN

          The US never should have been involved. Wilson was mesmerized by “them”, as well as being widely anti-monarchist. Had the Kaiser been allowed to negotiate a peace Europe would have been better off. Neither the US nor the UK wanted a strong Germany.

      • Ahnenerbe

        You mean the jew Morgenthau Plan, I’m sure the Germans were very thankful

      • Long Live Dixie

        – The US, UK, and USSR wrecked Germany. It’s true that Hitler made several really bad military decisions, but without the interference of the West, Germany would have almost certainly triumphed and would have likewise destroyed communism. Blaming the loser in a war for the destruction wrought by the victor is ludicrous.

        – The Marshall Plan was anything but generous. It allowed the US to gain dominance over western Europe by the use of money. Is it generous to burn down your neighbour’s house and then give him money to rebuild it on the condition that he rebuild it to your specifications?

        • IstvanIN

          The UK, the US and the USSR are not the White man’s friend. Good post.

        • shmo123

          “The Marshall Plan was anything but generous.”

          What a ridiculous statement. The Marshall Plan provided much needed capital, and succeeded in checking the expansion of the communist party–particularly in France and Italy- to name two major accomplishments.

          • Sick of it

            Look at both countries today. Think about what you just said.

          • shmo123

            The political, cultural or demographic position of either France or Italy in 2014 has no relation to 1945, so not sure what you mean.

        • captainc

          can’t believe anyone who is reading Amren still obeying that Germans-did-this-whole-thing doctrine.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      The multicultural elites think they can turn our countries into dumping grounds for blacks, Muslims and other vermin from the third world. They think they can do this forever. They imagine to themselves that our compassion is infinite and that whites will simply roll over and die in the face of these brutal, vicious non-white invaders. But what they are doing is ultimately unsustainable in the long run. What the elites have forgotten is the concept of limit. When they reach that limit, human nature will push back and will consume all of them in an orgy of destruction.

      • DonReynolds

        I agree completely.
        When ANY people are promised subjugation, humiliation, slavery, and genocide, there should be no surprises when they take their fate out of the hands of those who hate them and begin to control their own destiny.
        There is a considerable amount of resentment in this country and it is building rapidly.
        I would not want to be on the opposing side.
        The only sad fact about what is coming is the senseless slaughter of a good many good and decent people on all sides.

        • captainc

          that is reality of war, those who are in gangs are the ones who are the most prepared, whites must form gangs and militia. don’t be left behind or FEMA camps and Hispanics oppression will be your future.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          If I am still around when that happens, the deaths of our enemies would only mean one thing. The more of them slain, the safer and freer we will be in our rightful homelands. Otherwise their deaths would mean nothing to me, and so would the destruction of their homelands too.

          • DonReynolds

            You might appreciate my simple test……
            How many of the enemy are you willing to kill to save just ONE of your own people?
            Correct answer……ALL of them.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            As many as I can, before they kill me.

    • DA

      Your are correct, there will be another crusade.

    • shmo123

      It wasn’t a street car, it was Marshal Foch’s private railway car–the one he used when Germany was forced to sign the armistice that ended WW1. Hitler tracked it down and used it to humiliate the French at their surrender in 1940. The treaty of Versailles was signed at the hall of mirrors at the palace of Versailles in 1919.

    • DonReynolds

      This guy is no Saxon.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        I know that, but our enemies think all whites are. It shows their ignorance.

  • MekongDelta69

    “A British Islamist leader…”

    THAT says it all right there.

    Stand up and fight before you are outnumbered.
    Think back to 1940 and do it all over again…

    • DA

      England is committing suicide and will die. You cannot defeat an enemy by embracing him.

    • kikz2

      i think i read, the labor party in canada just elected a muzzi… sigh…

  • Of course Britain’s strict religious vilification laws will not be applied to Muslims.

    • DonReynolds

      Nor will their strict laws forbidding any citicism of homosexuals……only Muslims are allowed to do that anymore.

  • David Ashton

    Not too difficult to humiliate the humbled. “It was not Germany that lost the World War; the West lost it when it lost the respect of the colored races…. The while ruling nations have abdicated from their former rank. They negotiate today where yesterday they would have commanded, and tomorrow they will have to flatter if they are even to negotiate…. Where a Christian school stood yesterday, a mosque stands tomorrow.” – Oswald Spengler, 1934.

  • Truthseeker

    This Muslim has identified the Achilles heel of White people: We care too much about respecting others and can be exploited because of it.

    I believe that Whites will fight back eventually, but it might take some severe losses (more severe than we’ve already experienced) before enough of them wake up. Meanwhile, those of us who can already see clearly have the responsibility to be prepared.

    • RealisticGuy

      As long as we go on thinking that having these people in our societies will benefit us, clearly a derranged idea, we’ll continue bringing them here.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      He’s got it wrong about many whites, including me. Respect is something that is earned, never given, and I do not respect others who seek my displacement, or worse. I have no respect for THEM, their genocidal death cult which is really a totalitarian political philosophy in disguise or their homelands. He will never have my respect, but my hatred that will probably survive the grave.

  • refocus

    I have seen some crazy looking muslim priests walking through airports in their full regalia… Crazy looking hardly describes them.

    • TruthBeTold

      Arrogant SOBs. They know they’re untouchable.

      • DonReynolds

        Of course, they will find out they are mistaken in that belief.

    • MBlanc46

      There are no priests in Islam.

  • The West sowed multiculturalism. It is only now beginning to reap the whirlwind. From random street beheadings to the rape and pimping out of white girls, Britain is reaping what it sowed. May the Creater have mercy on the British whites because the blacks, browns, and muds will show them no mercy.

    And whites in the USA are next. The amateurish Boston bombing is just a small taste of what is to come. All we keyboard warriors can do is keep writing while preparing for the hot war that is to come as surely as the sun rises in the East.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Yep, and to be ready to start repaying the violence against us with greater violence……..that will be the only way to deal with the likes of the Boston bombers. Hunting down and killing them wherever they attack us just might become a new sort of “varmint hunting.” They want a Jihad, let’s teach them a lesson that westerners too engage in Jihads of their own, complete with piles of pork products.

      • Ahnenerbe

        Do you know ‘they’ used fake amputees at the Boston Bombing?

        • Sick of it

          I know ‘they’ have used a company called Crisis Actors numerous times. You can tell by looking at people interviewed in various tragedies…same people.

    • RealisticGuy

      Our thirst for Empire is coming back to punish us. If we survive this, hopefully we’ll have a greater appreciation of nationhood.

  • Romulus

    The leftists scum from Hollywood and the Frankfurt school started this Big one! Let’s not forget who is mostly to blame.

  • Romulus

    I would perform the same operation on this ___________, That Islams disciples did to LEE RIGBY. Only before I cut off his head, I’d force feed him some bacon.

    • Capt. Bryant

      Get em Romulus!

      • Romulus

        I detest those crazies and don’t have much love for their cousins either,Cap.

        No matter how many moderates the elites parade out front, I don’t Care,… They are incompatible with our people.

        Did you get to see Martin Kaymer’s win yesterday in ponte verde? I like Jordan, but he seems to crater always on the back nine. It was great that he won!

        • dd121

          Though Speith is only 20 he’s won one PGA tournament was rookie of the year and has career earnings over 3 million. I wouldn’t write him off just yet.

          • Romulus

            I think the kid has amazing potential. Is like to see him shatter all of tiger’s records.

            I was just thrilled that a German won!

  • Alucard_the_last

    Yet Michael Savage is still banned from Britain.

    • DA

      to be banned from Britain is a badge of honor.

    • Ahnenerbe

      Who Michael Weiner? He works for the Mossad

      • IstvanIN

        I think he may really be someone who is upset over the destruction of the US.

        • Ahnenerbe

          I doubt it, he thinks two planes hitting skyscrapers near the top will make them fall down along with another building, 7 that is. He’s just part of the plan to deflect criticism away from jews. Don’t like him, don’t trust him. He’s a talking snake appealing to your emotions

  • DonReynolds

    COME TO TEXAS, Bubba…..and bring your Koran with you.

    • kikz2

      don, you know we don’t any more of em here:P)

      • DonReynolds

        Trees are not equally distributed throughout Texas. Some parts of Texas have lumberjacks and other places have very few trees, but every Texan would know how to decorate a tree. We just need to have plenty of spare rope.

    • 4d7711

      Get in line, Texas; Arizona has dibs. We’d have a warm welcome waiting for that mouth of his in any old West-Arizona ranching community bar.

      • DonReynolds

        OK…..but I get to watch.
        He can sit on the bar and read from his funny book until everyone gets in the mood.

  • Anon

    There is a company in Idaho County that makes a product that is the perfect response to this. Jihawg ammunition.

  • Ike Eichenberg

    Criticize Islam in Britain and they haul you off to jail, propose Christians and Jews be coerced out of their religion and they import more of your kind.

    examinerDOTcom/article/coming-soon-to-america-british-politician-arrested-for-anti-islam-hate-speech

    White people are the ones who are nuts for putting up with this.

  • LIBERTYSINCURSION

    Oh can’t you just feel the wonderfully pleasant vibrancy of multicultural Britain? Maybe the Muslims should force Christians to wear a cross sewn on to their clothes and oh, I don’t know maybe a uh, star for the Jews? You know the British establishment will have no problem with that and if any of their Jewish citizens did. They would surly recommend that they just leave. You know, the same way they do now when Islamic immigrants move into formerly majority Jewish areas. And instantly start vandalizing their property and literally beating them every time they are caught outside their homes.

    These Muslims sure know how to bring the vibrancy don’t they? The funny thing is that the terrorized Jews pushed out of their homes by violent Muslims. Not only still support the suicidal mass immigration and open borders scheme. They demand even more, and from Muslim countries too!

    • kikz2

      it is understood, generalized harassment fosters permanent aliyah.

      • LIBERTYSINCURSION

        So I hear.

  • Lagerstrom

    Has this winner had tea with the queen yet?

  • Sloppo

    I consider it to be a hate crime against the British people when a middle eastern arab muslim living in Britain is described as “British”. This kind of rhetoric denies the existence of the REAL British people and I believe it is specifically intended to suppress resistance to the ethnic replacement of British people in their homeland.

  • Calufrax

    But, but, but, Rene Guenon and Jobbik say Islam is good. I mean it is “Traditional” isn’t it?
    I mean Guenon was an occultist who converted to Islam and ended up calling for the destruction of Western civilization, and a Muslim sorcerer couldn’t possibly be wrong, could he?

    • Sick of it

      Demon worshiper joining a demonic cult? Say it ain’t so.

  • I suppose the Muslims are talking about eyebrows. I don’t have a whole lot of hair to shave on my forehead. On the discussions below, it seems that just as WWII divided Whites, the continual debate over WWII serves the same purpose, as we are all being shoved off a cliff. By the way, many may be right on this and the whole system could soon collapse and then we can all swing into action. But I don’t trust a strategy that basically says we don’t have to do much of anything but discuss stuff using our keyboards, make some preparations and there will be this exciting Sci-Fi Armageddon-type event, after which we will [insert soundtrack] arise victorious from the ashes. One possibility is that the US could just keep going in the direction of Brazil, and then continue sliding downward, without there being a single huge collapse during which our political enemies will sort of conveniently vaporize. Finally, yes, it is going to be essential to be armed, but I seriously doubt whether our adversaries are going to be so dumb as to fight from house to house grabbing our guns or sending us off to FEMA camps, when rapidly changing demographics and nonwhite-on-White ‘random’ violent crime are is already nicely taking care of the problem of the remaining White people on Earth.

  • Calufrax

    This is why people on the far right who admire Islam make me sick. They are enemies of European civilization and the European people. That poisonous serpent Rene Guenon unfortunately has many deluded followers.

  • Conrad

    I’m all for it.

  • captainc

    How about the God of OT?

  • NO TIME BETTER THAN NOW TO RIGHT THE WRONG

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Complete with a captive audience……..