White Men Vote Republican Because They’re Suckers

Jack Donovan, April 8, 2014

Amanda Marcotte recently wrote that “White men, as a group, vote Republican because they vote their resentments.”

The New York Times article she cited didn’t say or even imply anything about resentment. It did say that straight, working-class white men vote Republican because the Democratic Party has devoted the majority of its resources to appealing to women, gays and the various groups of less-white men who are nostalgically referred to as “minorities.” The Democratic Party has been on the opposite side of issues that working-class white men have cared about for decades, and according to the Times piece, many strategists within the party think it’s a waste of time trying to win them over.

Working-class white men vote Republican because the Democrats have made it clear that they care about representing the interests of everyone but working-class white men. These guys vote Republican because Republicans actually make an effort to tell them what they want to hear.

Basically, white men vote Republican because they’re suckers.

The likes of Marcotte say that working-class white men are motivated by fear and resentment, but the majority of people who vote Democrat are doing it for nobler reasons.

They’re not. Most of them are voting for their own short-term self-interest.

Sure, there is a small class of progressive white men who make a big show of putting everyone else’s interests first. They demonstrate their moral superiority by standing up–mostly online–for whatever “rights” they believe that women or blacks or illegal immigrants or transsexuals or chickens are somehow entitled to.

Everyone else is just voting for stuff they want.

Women vote Democrat because they understandably want the convenience of being able to kill their unwanted children. They vote Democrat because they want free birth control and they want free healthcare for the kids they decide to keep. Women also vote for Democrats because Democrats offer special programs to help women get education and jobs.

Women have always depended on men for protection, but they’d rather depend on many men than just one or a few, so they are happy to vote for measures to increase “security.” As a group, women don’t like or understand guns, so they vote Democrat because Democrats promise to take guns away from men–usually those working-class white men–and give them to the big group of men in the government.

Men have historically been suspicious of what big groups of men will do when they have all of the weapons.

Blacks vote Democrat because they are smart and racist. They were going to vote for Obama no matter what he did because he was black, and like sensible people they figure it is better to have one of your own in power. Democrats, as a group, are known for caring more about giving free stuff to black people. Blacks are smart, because they know that it is always better to get something for free than to pay for it.

Blacks also know that you don’t need a permit to buy a gun. You just go buy one from that guy down the street and, you know, take care of business. White men are afraid to buy guns without following the rules, so more rules means less white men with guns. This is good for black men, because they like the convenience of being able to wear a hoodie in the rain without getting shot by nervous white men with guns.

Latinos vote Democrat because their families came to America to take advantage of employment opportunities and all of the benefits and protections that America offers to its citizens. They figure more benefits and protections are better than less, and Democrats always offer more benefits and protections.

In places with a lot of Latinos, Democrats say that you shouldn’t have to go through the trouble of becoming a citizen to get those benefits and protections. This is convenient for Latinos who are not citizens, because using a dead person’s social security number can sometimes be inconvenient.

Gay people vote Democrat because Democrats offer gay people stuff they think they want. Aside from marriage and sadistic thrill of being able to force Christians to make wedding cakes, this includes free healthcare. Free healthcare comes in handy when you’re a man who occasionally has sex with guys he met 30 minutes ago on Grindr, or a lesbian who occasionally gets drunk and has sex with men. (See the first point about women above.)

Transsexuals vote Democrat because they want the government to pay for the very expensive cosmetic surgeries and hormones that are necessary for them to become who they really are. Also, they are confused about which bathroom to use, so they want more special bathrooms for confused people.

(Chickens are not technically allowed to vote yet, but we hear they want to be free range, which sounds libertarian.)

As Gari Day, the white male bus driver featured in the Times article said, “Republicans make you work for your money, and try to let you keep it.”

He probably doesn’t understand how the government can afford to keep giving everyone free stuff forever. He probably does figure that some of that money for the stuff other people want is coming out of his earnings. But he’s not alone in that–I’ve yet to see a successful Democrat turn down a tax break. No one actually wants to paymore taxes.

Aside from voting to keep more of their own money and to keep the guns they bought, a lot of these straight, white, working-class men are not asking for anything. They’re too proud for that.

As old-fashioned voters, they see themselves as part of the government. They’re not just trying to get more stuff from the government and come up with reasons why they deserve it. They’re voting for a society that works the way they think things should work.

And that’s why they’re suckers.

Democratic and Republican politicians, like everyone else, see the government as a way to get what they want. Politicians want power and status. To get elected, they accept money from regular people, from rich men, from businesses, and probably from foreign countries. In return, they promise favors. That’s how the system works.

People who don’t want anything from the government are useless to politicians, because they are difficult to manipulate and impossible to please. The government, like every big bureaucracy, is in the growth business. Making the government smaller isn’t in the short-term interest of any ambitious bureaucrat. Contraction only makes political sense when you’re trying to reduce an opponent’s sphere of influence.

Democrats promise more government, and more free stuff. Republicans promise less free stuff for poor people, and promise to lower taxes in return, but they rarely manage to lower taxes for anyone but rich guys who–let’s be real–were usually born into money and didn’t work any harder than the guys driving buses. Many of the wealthy elite are white guys, true, but they care about as much about the working-class white guys as the Democratic Party leadership.

White men are suckers because they haven’t figured out that the America they believe in is already gone, and that they are the only ones who aren’t asking for whatever they can get while the gettin’s still good. They’ll vote reliably Republican as long as the Republicans keep talking about self-reliance and how things should work, and that will free up Republican politicians to do favors for people who actually want stuff.

Editor’s note: Jack Donovan will be speaking at the AmRen conference later this month.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Nancy Thomas

    We vote GOP because we have no other choice, except I will no longer make the choice of lesser evil. If they run an open borders loon, i will vote third party and let Hillary have it.

    • D.B. Cooper

      That’s what I’ve been saying for years here on Amren. It’s time to let the GOP suffer for pretending to be democrats. Who is your salvation, white boy…… him?

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Oops. Should have scrolled first. Oy, with the Boehner thing. It looks like Cantor is becoming a problem in the House. He has to go.

        • Jim Kental

          White women naively vote democrat thinking that democrats have their best interests in mind. But more and more white women are finding out each day that they are just as despised by minorities as white men…… and that the democratic party is just anti-white. If liberals really wanted to help non-whites, and not promulgate white genocide, then they would actually work to improve the third world, and not just simply dump the entire third world into white nations. Another reason for third world immigration is because bankers like the Rothschilds and Sassoons want the natural resources of the third world…… and they want third worlders out of those countries.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            They will always outbreed their exporting of third world breeders. Africa in the next 40 years will breed another BILLION Africans.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Yeah, while the West continues to FEED them.

            If we did the humane thing and stopped feeding them, nature would takes it’s natural course and the African population would return to normal, far lower levels.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I’ve been saying similar things at earlier links. White women, at the federal contractor where I was purged, were experiencing a new sensation—>they weren’t getting the usual pass. Suddenly, when they screwed up, it mattered. They also felt the new sensation of trumped up and/or invented charges to get them replaced by minority females. A sensation white men have known for decades. The white women there had the epiphany that they had only been temporary, ‘useful idiots’ and now it was their turn.

          • Pollitically Uncouth

            “A sensation white men have known for decades” We have? Tell me more. I think I may have some back-privilege to collect.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Depends on your age, industry, profession, etc. I’ve experienced reverse discrimination regularly since the 1980s when I was excluded from going ‘in-house” at Duke Power (now Duke Energy). It wasn’t Duke’s fault. They had guns to their heads from the race quota hustlers (re: Griggs versus Duke Power – 1971). But, if you started your career with union protection, for example, you would be oblivious of what is quite pervasive elsewhere.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I really don’t understand the big fuss over “the gender divide” within the white race when it comes to voting. Ever since I have been alive the percent difference between how white men and white women vote is usually under 10%.

          • DonReynolds

            The gender divide in Alabama may not be significant but there are other states where it is more of a problem.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I agree, but the national difference overall is always under 10% every year. That is the national average….all regions of the country combined, when looking at the difference in voting patterns between white men and women. I agree with you about single white females, but let’s face it,…. a lot of YOUNG white males are pretty brainwashed also.

          • PolishKnightUSA

            If you look at the exit polls from the last presidential election, white males and females both at the college level voted (narrowed) majority Republican. This is a huge tipping point. For the first time in recent American history, young white men and women were starting out Republican as a majority and then only got MORE Republican as they got older (and wiser).

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Mission Accomplished
          .

      • John K

        He should be sharing a prison cell with Obama or Holder.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        I hate and despise that photo of the “Crier of the House” — taken before his make-up ran.

        Better:

        • AndrewInterrupted

          I’m more worried about Eric Cantor at the moment. He’s a little shrew. Or how about–wandering shrew….;-)

          • RisingReich

            Jew. Fixed it.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Why is Tucker in terminal moderation mode?
            Is he the next Spartacus?

          • RisingReich

            Any time Spartacus or I type Jew the mods here start deleting. Feels like anytime “Jew” or “Nationalist” or “Reich” is typed they have a seizure.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I read Tucker’s lengthy responses to my posts yesterday, that appear to have been deleted in moderation. The language was clean and articulate. That’s unfortunate.

        • r j p

          Crier of the House” John Boehner, R-Ohio has never worked a day in his life.
          I cry every day, my eyes look like crap. It’s been 14 months since I have worked. Opportunity is gone. I might not be able to program (because I find it tedious and boring), but I can work magic with numbers. I may not be the smartest man in every room but there is some smug satisfaction derived when the boss of an options trading firm refers to you seriously as “the smartest guy in the room”. I miss my life.

      • rasher223

        Please stop posting that q*eers picture.

        I hate looking at his face.

        • Who Me?

          Yes, PLEASE do. I get sick every time I see that–you’re ruining my health!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Let’s move on to watching his scheming weasel replacement.

          • RisingReich

            This guy is rat, not a clown. Junior weasel!

          • It doesn’t matter if he’s a clown. What matters is that he’s a Jew. This kosher Cantor had sole authority during one of these more recent budget debates. If we got rid of all clowns in the government we wouldn’t necessarily be getting rid of the right people, though it sounds good. If we got rid of all the dual citizens, we’d be getting somewhere.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            “Israel-first on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and….”

          • Even when I check my Replies to my comments in my dashboard, your replies are not listed. Political speech is worth protecting and rights need to get exercised to not get whittled away. I don’t understand why you would limit the volume of your voice in this way. I hardly think it provides meaningful anonymity. A pseudonymous moniker and avatar suffice for that. There is no privacy versus those who would peer further.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I poach Libtard sites regularly and don’t want then following me back here. I think we do more good throwing stink bombs around places like Politico and Raw Story than we do here. Just my opinion.

            How many eyeballs come here everyday do you think?

          • By my estimation almost all eyes who come here already have perceived much truth of their situation so it’s preaching to the choir essentially. I find this place a curiosity because I consider it a thoughtfully crafted nest of pied pipers who, like AJ’s sites and JF’s too, expend great effort, story selection and modding, to shelter the identity of the architects of the white man’s demise. They’ll discuss symptoms, but not causes. If you name the cause too clearly, your comments get deleted. Keep doing it, you get deleted. It’s also apparent by the high number of camped shills here who follow that agenda and yet they really only post here mostly so they’re sort of part of the furniture.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            On a positive note, I have noticed a certain pied piper from the tribe who has been noticeably absent lately.

          • DonReynolds

            I disagree that we preach to the choir here. There is still plenty of disagreement among ourselves, and this is one of the places where we can iron out those differences.

          • DonReynolds

            If you are caught in the middle of responding to a post that has been deleted, it will be disallowed.
            I agree completely. Political speech is not something that should be throttled in this country. How else are we to have any meaningful discussions?

          • Hahahaha. No.
            This isn’t that sort of happenstance comment goes missing thing. This is just as I described above. Mouse over my avatar or read back some comments from me or from some of those I follow if you want to learn more.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Mission Accomplished
            .

      • Paleoconn

        Wow, quite the talented photographer who was able to catch him in the nanosecond between squirts. The same guy who photographed Clinton too, I bet, but different squirts in that case.

        I agree with the article. It is time for all white men to vote Democrat en masse. Extinguish the GOP. It’s been dying slow for a while now, time to skewer it through the heart once and for all, like a dying bull in the corrida. Its testes are long gone. It is enduring a humiliating existence for the spectators as well. It is time to end its anguish, and ours.

        Hail the New American Party headed by Kris Kobach, Jeff Sessions, Steve King, Joe Arpaio, Jan Brewer.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          What is funny about this article is that it weaves in and out between satire and reality. It’s in the: “I’m only half kidding” genre.

          • Paleoconn

            Absolutely right. Generally, I don’t think we’re suckers, it’s just there are no other options. But it is time to kill off the GOP since they have taken their White base for granted for too long. Let them hispander all they like without our votes to prop them up.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            There is a way to kill off the GOP and make a new one. Jeff Sessions and Ann Coulter could consolidate the Tea Party and form the Sovereignty Party within the GOP. Tell Americans straight out: we are the choice for enforcing the laws of the land. No amnesty, mass deportations.

            They would become the only clear choice for the Right. Ann would become the first woman President. Imagine the Liberal heads exploding. All those years of Hillary’s scheming and conniving–and again defeat snatched from the jaws of victory. Women are starting to turn in Hillary. The timing for another female choice is right.

            Coulter/Sessions or Sessions/Coulter of the Sovereignty Party.

    • Daniel Schmuhl

      Anyone who understands a tiny bit of public choice theory will tell you that voting is a waste of time.

      • paul marchand

        The US did fine before universal suffrage, though.

        • A whole lot of other things were very different back then too.

      • DonReynolds

        Well, public choice theory aside……we have very few options:
        soap box
        ballot box
        cartridge box

    • Whitetrashgang

      The tribe runs both parties, third party is the only yet slim hope.White people should have been voting third party 50 years ago.

      • Nancy Thomas

        It will only work if all of us vote third party and nobody votes GOP, but how on earth could that ever be coordinated? Whites just don’t understand what they’re up against.

        • Whitetrashgang

          True, that’s why its over for us in the states. Its all over but the crying.

          • Nancy Thomas

            I’ve been crying for a long time now. Very upset and depressed.
            Don’t know what to do. I can plainly see this disaster coming, especially as a canary in the coalmine white minority in Los Angeles. How can we make the rest of them see?
            Seriously, I am so deeply depressed over this I’ve lost my love of life.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Is your family also in that area?

          • Nancy Thomas

            Just one family member, yes. The elders are all gone.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yeah, that’s tough. Constantly having to move to safer areas has caused a real siege mentality for me, too. I’m moving soon.

          • DonReynolds

            The pioneers who settled this country found out that a trembling defense inside forts and blockhouses was a losing game that ultimately would cost them everything. Better to seek out the enemy and deal with him, than have him seek you out.

          • Whitetrashgang

            Most white people are idiots, without a strong leader most whites are lost. I hate to say here but here is another blood bath that you could see coming 50 years ago.

          • Nancy Thomas

            I just wish there was something we could do besides fret and worry. I’m watching a slow motion train wreck and I don’t see what I can do to stop it. It’s horrible.

          • Whitetrashgang

            Our only saviour will be technology , going north and then to space.Death star Mars whatever that is how it will play out. At this point we don’t need more white kids just really smart white kids.Technology will save us or thats it.

          • Daniel Schmuhl

            Yeah, these kinds of thoughts make me sad too. Most whites are too entertained and complacent, by the time they actually act, if ever, it might be too late. Liberalism will destroy itself when whites go extinct, but that’s not a very pleasant thought, is it?

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Once the parasites run out of host–back to the jungle.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            More like they will stay. Check the movie Elysium for a future glimpse of Los Angeles.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I was just checking out the Alex Jones review on it. Sounds like the Cultural Marxists are revving up the Latin hordes. He said it was the most spectacularly racist thing he had ever seen. Now I see why the cast Matt Damon in it. He has a Cucaracha for a wife in real life.

            Jones said Oblivian is better.

          • ThomasER916

            Alex Jones belongs to the Culture of Critique. How else do you think he’s able to meet with Hollywood Stars? He gets more coverage than Glenn Beck, who is now richer than Oprah.

            Alex Jones is a fraud.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            No clue. I don’t sense he has all that much access. Beck was just a crack-pot to appease the Bible thumpers. He wisely moved away from the conservative table, conservatives’ sake.

          • ThomasER916

            Glenn Beck, for all of his crack-pottery, has given a bigger voice to smaller government than anyone else, ever. He exposed Soros, SEIU, AFL-CIO, Obama’s Marxist cronies (Van Jones, Cass Sunstein, Sam Powers, Anita Dunn, Andy Stern, Trumpka, et al), Stephen Lerner and how he orchestrated the Occutards (nearly a year before their choreographed tantrum politics), the Arab Spring fraud that was abetted by Google and Bill Ayers/Bernadine Dorhn, Operation Fast and Furious, Benghazi, and he created another News Organization that reports on Leftists and Muslims. While Alex Jones was ranting in generic terms about Banksters, Glenn Beck was exposing their networks and naming them. He exposed that Americans owned nearly half of BP and the Oil Spill was a scam to make Soros and his Marxist buddies in Brazil rich (Petrobras). As Anthony Weiner used the House floor to smear him for Goldline, along with the MSM cronies, the price of gold increased nearly $500.

            Call him “crazy”. It really doesn’t matter. TheBlaze(dot)com is a better news site than anything Conservatives have right now. Moving away from the establishment meant Beck could fight against them and their collusion with the Left. What’s interesting is you’re using the exact same language without substance used by the Left to describe us and any White. Same diction, same source. You’d might as well be reading from the Antifa handbook to criticize Amren. It’s just as valid and insightful.

            The bottom line – Alex Jones can’t name people because he’s a fraud.

            We’re all “crazy.” That’s not a valid argument anymore.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            The Right is the Sit and Spin party. They cling to and beat dead horses. Religion should have long since been moved off the platform. Fiscal conservatism should be the only sheet of plywood on their platform. Make no stances on gay marriage, abortion, etc.

            All of those needless positions make them easy pickin’s for the MSM propaganda machine. If they’re asked their position on abortion, their response should be “Leave it to the states”. Same with gay issues. Same with labor laws.

            Not our problem, we’re about small government and balanced books.”

            They get suckered into social issues. They let the Left control the narrative. Centralized federal government was never the founding father’s intent. Which is why leaving such issues to the states is the perfect Conservative response—>It’s what George Washington and Thomas Jefferson would have wanted. That appeals to the Right, and Americans–what the founding fathers would do.

            Glen Beck may have done all those great things–and they are great, but he negated most of it with his bug-eyed, voodoo Bible thumping.

          • ThomasER916

            Nothing you said addresses anything I’ve said.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Let me read it again. Is there some site that exposes Alex Jones as a “fraud”? Like a one-stop-shop?

          • ThomasER916

            Anyone who is relevant and strays from the Culture of Critique gets sued. The best source for proving Alex Jones is a fraud is Alex Jones.

            Alex Jones said that Arabs run Hollywood – Yes, he actually said that. No one should ever listen to Alex Jones after that argument.

            Alex Jones meets with long time, outspoken Marxist Ed Asner to discuss the “Prison Planet.” Why? Because Marxism has been so good for Whites and freeing people? There’s a reliable source.

            Listen to Alex Jones’ interview with Howard Stern. I would post a link but Amren wouldn’t allow it. Jones sounds pathetic. Everyone is magically a “Nazi”, something we’d expect from Antifa losers.

            Really, I should have just stopped with “Arabs run Hollywood.”

          • It is my experience that we can’t squirm out of the social issues by genuflecting to states’ rights and/or local option. With the Lenin Wing, if you’re only with them 99%, you might as well be against them 100%. If you say “make aborticide and gay ‘marriage'” states option, all you’ll hear from the crowd you’re trying to appease is that you “want to take away a woman’s right to choose or deny people marriage equality blah blah.”

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That’s why multiple secessions are the only answer. The Left will always try to take ideological hostages. Although, given the intense level of friction today, and given there are plenty of states people can pick to abort and be gay in, people would like the secession feel of states option. It deescalates the friction, without the drama and risk of real balkanization.

          • Nancy Thomas

            I like Beck. As I recall, he got booted after having G.Edward Griffin on his show.

          • ThomasER916

            Glenn Beck didn’t “get booted”. He wised up and left. The fact that everyone thinks he “got booted” was reason enough to leave. George Soros and the Culture of Critique pumped millions and millions of dollars into ginning up propaganda against Glenn Beck and it worked wonders.

            If you remember, he used to be on CNN. I never watched his stuff back then. Like most Whites I didn’t see the mass non-White immigration so I didn’t care, and Obama wasn’t president either. Not to mention, Gasoline was around $1.75/gal. People have created montages of Glenn Beck where he talks about Muslims, Islam, money, housing and terrorism. What you’ll see is someone digging around for information and slowly uncovering the truth. Of course, we all know the truth is definitely NOT the official script.

            Glenn’s rating on CNN were very high. They were better than any Leftist, and back then he was leaning Libertarian. He started to get shut down at CNN, much like John Stossel had experienced on 20/20. The more he looked into the stories the less the Liberal Lies would seem like real news. Either he’d Lie and read from the Liberal Scripture or he’d tell the truth. In the end, both went to Fox because that’s the only place they could report. Glenn, unlike Stossel, wasn’t simply interested in business and that’s where he outgrew Fox. Business can be safer because you can get away with exposing fraud. Politics is personal because that’s borders, language, culture, and people. There was a time when we understood people meant race. Now, just talking about “people” is enough to cause seizures in anti-Whites. Beck left so he could name people.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            La Cucaracha, with bambino Cucaracha in the oven.
            Wait until she takes him to the cleaners.
            Should we take him back?
            .

          • rasher223

            I understand exactly how you feel.

            There’s really not much we can do except sit by and watch the horror show unfold in front of us.

            It’s absolute soul crushing torture.

          • jeffaral

            We’re in this mess because Adolf lost the war.

          • Whitetrashgang

            Truly one of the worse things to ever happen. My Grandfather fought for the Germans because we lost everything to the tribe controlled Russians. Lots of fun on the eastern front.

          • RIN0Huner

            They won’t see until it’s too late. Whites should be stockpiling firearms and ammo at this point.

          • DonReynolds

            They buy it as soon as it hits the shelves. That is why you seldom see any available.

          • We are, in record numbers. Or haven’t you seen the headlines?

            It isn’t over until it is.

          • That is what our enemies want you to do. They want you to despair. They want you to be too sad and forlorn and hopeless to fight back. Do you really want to make it so easy for them?

            It’s normal and healthy to grieve. But once you’ve mourned what is gone and never coming back, channel your anger. Summon every ounce of rage you can find within yourself at the thought of what has been done to you and yours. Despair is a self-defeating state of mind. Righteous anger reshapes continents.

            Don’t get sad–get even.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Thank you for the post and I do agree with you, but it’s hard to know what to do. I give to Numbersusa and other groups, and I make phone calls, and i write letters. But you know what I’ve been thinking lately? I’m not saying I would do violence, don’t get me wrong, but i think that is what’s going to happen. The left took over in the 60’s because of the threat of violence. The WASP establishment got scared and let the loons have our country. I fear that this is what will have to happen to take it back. Only the threat of violence will stop this takeover. I hate to have to say it but these are my fears.
            I look at the lousy ethnomasochistic fools in the GOP and I know they are not going to help us. It seems as if they are required to hate whites to be able to run for office.
            If whites are not given a voice, if whites have no representation, whites will eventually do the same thing the Palestinians do.

          • Luca

            “What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.” – Thomas Jefferson

          • Luca! TJ did not misuse apostrophes 🙂

          • AndrewInterrupted

            NUMBERSUSA has been VERY effective. They may have single-handedly postponed the immigration debate. They bought us time. I joined a couple years ago. One of their lawyers at NUMBERSUSA produced a 15 minute video describing and repeating the sneaky ‘lawfare’ practices that Peter Brimelow and Nicholas Stix have been reporting on. The woman from NUMBERSUSA spoke of how the Left (minority occupation government) is concentrating on ‘process’, meaning refining their ‘lawfare’ game. Not right or wrong, but what they can get away with while engaged in white genocide.

          • Who Me?

            Glad to know the robo-fax is doing some good, I practically run that thing dry. Keep up the good work folks. Send, send, send those letters. As many as you can and as often as you can.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I sent off a half dozen yesterday.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Don’t think about what they’re doing to you, think about what YOU are going to do to THEM for purposely destroying your homeland and race.

          • RisingReich

            A most excellent post. I fight this battle with myself all the time. White America is a death in process, a slow, miserable one.
            Anger is the correct emotion. I can’t wait to get even.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            Don’t feel that way. Now is the time to be strong, to revel in our convictions. Remember, our enemies rely on lies and deceit. And know that there are plenty of us good Americans here in Los Angeles County that know the score… and we are well armed.

          • Garrett Brown

            Be a realist, not a defeatist. You are a white warrior, act like it.

          • jeffaral

            If you don’t know what to do, go McVeigh!

          • Nancy, yes it’s depressing but nothing comes from giving up. There’s always things that can be done. Always. Please come over to Presstitutes and start a conversation. It’s safer there. See my profile for directions.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Thanks. I wish that there were more articles and info dealing with things that we can do to stop the destruction of our country. Sometimes all of this bad news just gets me down. But I’m not giving up, don’t worry.

          • DonReynolds

            I gently disagree.
            There may not be a peaceful political way to solve the situation by pushing ballots into boxes or signing petitions.
            The government is the one living on borrowed time.
            The country will still be here after it is buried.

          • ThomasER916

            There isn’t a peaceful way to do this because we had no say in the first place. This was forced on us and the only way it will change is when it’s forced off of us.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          That is exactly right, Nancy. You can vote your conscience some other time, when we get our country back. Now, it’s casino gambling. We’re in a race-to-the-bottom.

          ‘Convictions are prisons’.–Nietzsche

        • DudeWheresMyCountry?

          You are correct but times are changing. The funny thing is both these anti-White treason parties would simply fall apart without White people. Even the Democrats would flounder into nothingness if left to non-Whites, like anything.

          • ThomasER916

            True, which is why White Nationalists should focus on plundering the system. If there’s a White movement to collapse the system and we’re planning on it, then we’re prepared for it by networking and stock piling. When the looters come we’re the only Whites ready and the Libtard Whites will discover their instincts. This time the Culture of Critique won’t survive.

        • PolishKnightUSA

          Most conservative whites I talk to tell me that bringing up the race issue makes me as bad as the Democrats and “two wrongs don’t make a right” or they don’t want to dirty themselves with race politics.

          Yet, I tell them, when 911 happened they didn’t mind seeing the country go to war to deal with that and even get some innocent bystanders killed. They support wars over the years that spilled a lot of innocent blood. But simply opposing in a politically forceful manner anti-white male political dogma is beneath them?

          So they tell me that we should only care about “limited government” and The Constitution. Pretty thin gruel to ask white male (and women) voters to bother showing up at the pools for.

      • Nathanwartooth

        Third parties are not viable unless the voting system changes to something like the alternative vote. Since that never happens, everyone just votes against the things they don’t like.

        This is why the Democrats spend as much time bashing Republicans as they do shouting about higher welfare checks.

        • rasher223

          Third party is useless because the Republicans and the Democrats are one in the same and have an iron grip not just on the U.S. but the entire world.

          Their reach extends to every continent. And no one has anywhere to run or hide.

          No more continents to flee to. It’s all been claimed by another nation state who will use force against anyone who tries to stake a claim on it.

    • Who Me?

      I’m there with you, and Shrillary is a loon, too, but surely even SHE can’t be as bad as the half-wit half-breed we got in there now.

      • Alexandra1973

        Never challenge worse.

        • Who Me?

          Oh Gawd, I know, I know, things can always get worse, but somehow you just can’t help hoping you’ve hit the bottom of the hole and gotta start up anytime now…

      • Garrett Brown

        Try being much, MUCH worse. You think Obama has an evil mind towards social issues? Wait until muff diver gets in there.

    • rasher223

      I’ve come to the conclusion that the Republican party is largely liberals who just tell whites what they want to hear but don’t actually do it.

      They’re there to keep a leash on us basically.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      And she will let you have it. My Auntie Rachel said so.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Whenever I point out that the Democratic Party hates white people, especially white males, the most vile, hateful retorts I get are from…… white males.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Brainwashed ethnomasochist fools.

    • paul marchand

      And those white males have to be called out. I realize that many would regard Facebook as a superficial means of communication, but it IS outreach, and in the process, one aspect that is noted about leftist white males: if they have any sense, they retreat and go into the shadows.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      White males who are union? They have to vote Demo-rat.

      • evilsandmich

        And their political reasoning is like listening to someone pulling fingernails out of the truth. At least minority parties aren’t embarrassed in just saying “Gimmie Dat!”

      • RonanTheLibtardian

        Just union chumps. That must be tough voting for your own execution.

    • Who Me?

      People shout loudest when they are afraid.

    • Nevsky

      Me too, when I talk about Liberal nonsense, non-whites tend to agree with me, and those who go all bananas are typically your average white folks.

      We are our worst enemy.

  • Luca

    Since 1965 the Democrats have learned to appeal to all the disgruntled in our society. Anyone with a cause who was willing to demonstrate, riot or strike rather than work for change was viewed as acceptable to the Dems regardless of the negative results it might have on the economy or culture of our society.

    The college history book I am now reading published in the mid 1990’s stresses, women, blacks, unions and liberals in a very positive light and as the main drivers of positive social change. Consequently, Whites, males, big business, and corporations are viewed as the racist, villainous, greedy, warmongering, bigots.

    The Democrats are working full time to degrade the Republicans and the Republicans are not doing enough to counter those claims. They are also making a poor showing by allowing Rinos in their ranks.

    • John R

      College history books! PLEASE! Don’t even get me started on those!

      • r j p

        I have one good history book at my dad’s home. It has to be in a box.
        It details the failure of the post War of Northern Aggression’s Sea Island Experiment.

    • paul marchand

      Big business and corporations : how cowed are they by the federal govt? EEOC? Dept of Justice ? EPA ? FDIC? Etc ?

      • Norseman

        I have nothing against big business as such. If they owe their success to free enterprise, good luck to them! However, this very often not the case.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yes, the Demo-rats are the Grievance Industry Party.
      You have the GOP and the GIP.

      • Alexandra1973

        And you get GYPped.

  • RisingReich

    Can’t get my Father to see the truth of this, but he’s 88 and probably won’t be voting for too much longer. He thinks I’m handing the Country over to Dems b/c I refuse, REFUSE, to vote for the traitorous Stupid anti-White lite party.

    At least I can look at myself in the mirror knowing I’m not handing my vote to people whom HATE me.

    • Pro_Whitey

      Well, one course of action is to do what the leftists did, take over the GOP and purge it of undesirable elements. The major problem is that getting to a lot of less political white people requires getting the decades of leftist lies out of their heads so they can view reality and lose the conditioning that they should not think certain ways. That’s a challenge, much easier if the white guy does it himself. What Donovan does not address is that married white women vote very differently from single white women, and the longer they are married, the more like white men they vote. That means that he and his gang, pack, sk8terboys, or whatever he calls them ought to look into settling down with the best white woman they can find.

  • Urbane Neanderthal

    Lot of truth, but white women mostly vote for republican presidential candidates.

    • The split in white women is a marriage and baby gap.

      • Urbane Neanderthal

        Yes single white women vote more for democrats. As would be expected in a younger demo with more lezz and feminists man haters.

      • RisingReich

        You keep mentioning this. Please kindly explain what you mean by ‘marriage and baby gap’?

        • Women who are married and have children (presumably by her husband) versus women who are not married and may or may not have children.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yeah, I figured that was your point.
            The single Moms rely on the nanny state.

    • John R

      But, the point you are missing is that White women vote for Republicans LESS than White men vote for Republicans. In other words, Whites have a GENDER GAP: Blacks don’t; Hispanics don’t; Asians don’t; only we do. So, despite being the “majority” we still lose elections to people who are the “minority.”

      • Urbane Neanderthal

        The point is the minority block is growing faster than the white block and it’s not likely to change.

        • RonanTheLibtardian

          Congress can decide who enters this country. They’ve done it before.

      • DonReynolds

        No…..white men lose elections because they are stabbed in the back by white traitors, many of whom are white single females.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          A lot of young white males vote stupidly also. We could go into many reasons why Republicans lose elections. Depends on which reason we want to focus on.

      • paul marchand

        Due to traitors to sanity.

    • paul marchand

      Yeah, but add about 30% of white women to the bloc / block voting of the dem govt-connected group, and ……………………….KABOOM

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Yeah, the feminists vote straight Demo-rat. Most of the time I think the women vote cancels itself out. They need to show up for the good guys in 2014 and 2016, though.

      • Urbane Neanderthal

        Just shy of half the kids under 5 in this country are minorities.
        Since minorities vote overwhelmingly for democrats white votes are headed for irrelevance.

    • Bill

      Maybe married women do. Not single young women, nor those who run with bantus, nor feminazis, nor lesbians, nor single aged “career women”. Nor almost any woman working in education.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        It doesn’t matter. White women vote pretty closely to white men overall, when looking at the percentages after every election.

  • Jesse James

    White men in Georgia vote Republican because if we didn’t our state would be run by whacked out black radicals. The former Confederate states remain liveable for white because we block vote for what are fairly conservative state Republican administrations. We don’t have the luxury to sit out elections like someone in Maine or Ohio might. Should we stop voting together for a couple of election cycles our states would be destroyed.

    • D.B. Cooper

      Don’t give the enemy any type of ammo to ridicule you. Using the incorrect word is what “those people” do, not us.
      The correct term is “bloc”, not “block”.

      • Jesse James

        I think both terms are considered acceptable usage but thanks for pointing it out. I expected you to give me a hard time for voting Republican on the state ticket D.B.

        Hmm after a little more research I have decided that you are correct so I will correct it. I do agree with you that precision in writing matters. Thanks for helping me sharpen up my writing skills.

      • jambi19

        I am from Florida and I agree with Jesse. Be part of the solution for once Cooper. We get it. You don’t like Boehner.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Yes, he did have a bit of a boner for Boehner for awhile there. Not lately, though. I beat dead horses here, too.

          • Garrett Brown

            He just posted something of Boehner this weekend. He’s still rock hard.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I’m more worried about that insidious little wandering shrew, Eric Cantor.

          • Garrett Brown

            Yes, we have much more severe problems than a house speaker.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I didn’t know he liked to knit?

          • Garrett Brown

            Lol what the hell? I don’t even.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            He is a beady eyed little demon isn’t he?

      • paul marchand

        Writing skills are important.
        But only a % of basic truth and justice.

    • John R

      Good point. And why do you Southern Whites manage, in most cases, to keep your blacks in line? Because your womenfolk are less likely than Northern women, to throw their men under the bus come election time. As I said on another comment here, it is an issue of the “gender gap” that only plagues Whites.

  • Eagle_Eyed

    A lot of truth to this. But politicians aren’t monolithic. Try and find a true, principled conservative who defends our interests like a Kobach or Sessions and do your best to support him. Most mainstream conservatives are angry at the Boehner/Romney/Cantor perpetual losers but don’t know where to turn.

  • So CAL Snowman

    Well the Republican dominated House has thus far refused to cave on amnesty. I suppose if the House AND the Senate were dominated by Democrats, the entire population of Mexico would be taking up residence here in So Cal. Having one Jeff Sessions is better than having no Jeff Sessions at all.

  • Daniel Schmuhl

    As a 23 year old reactionary, i’ve never really been a Republican. All the people who think that the Republican party can somehow be reformed are fools. Conservatism in the West needs to be completely destroyed.

    • paul marchand

      If not Pubs, just another musical chairs group of rightfully resentful white men.
      Solution: tax revolt.

      • RisingReich

        Tax revolt will never get off the ground. Enough people that try it will be locked away forever, that everyone else will notice and play by the rules.

        Anything short of real revolution probably isn’t gonna cut it.

        • Daniel Schmuhl

          A lot of people suffer from a belief in folk activism. Humans evolved political intuitions that work well on a small scale, but no longer work in our modern managerial state.

          Tax revolt might work if the government was much smaller. It’s impossible to get enough people to do that now. I don’t think this coordination problem could be solved without some sort of religion or really strong ideology.

          • evilsandmich

            Dollar destruction will take care of that; can’t pay taxes if you aren’t making any money! And the U.S.A. can’t pull off the petro state fiasco like the middle east, Venezuela, and Russia.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          It will probably take a significant catalyst, like a meteor or something.

          • So CAL Snowman

            I’m betting on a massive solar flare or a massive CME that will knock out Earth’s electrical grids for years. A massive solar flare hit the earth in the 1800s and another massive one will hit again. It’s just a matter of when.

          • RisingReich

            The destruction of the dollar (or it’s realization, b/c it’s already destroyed) may do it.

            Essentially, the Fed gov needs to be completely incapacitated. Not sure what’s going to accomplish that.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Despite modern technology, I noticed they still get blind-sided by meteors, like the one up in Siberia recently. I think they said that one would have been much larger than Hiroshima had it taken a slightly different trajectory.

          • Brian

            Maybe we should stop using NASA for ‘muslim outreach’.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            “ALL TO THE SNACK BAR!”

  • IstvanIN

    Excellent article. He justifies what I have always said, universal suffrage is a disaster.

    • paul marchand

      Time to forcefully extract the vote of:
      * government employees ( nobody will twist their arms to work for the govt)
      * illegal aliens since c. 1970, and their children
      * net recipients of govt largesse
      DO THIS AND SMALL AND NON-TYRANNICAL GOVT IS LONGTERM.

  • sbuffalonative

    Most of them are voting for their own short-term self-interest.

    Most people will vote for their own self-interests. Republics at least pay lip-service to white males so they get the white male vote.

    At the moment, Republicans are the only game in town for white males.

    • RisingReich

      The game of tails they win, heads we lose?
      We’re having fun with that, aren’t we?

  • Frank_DeScushin

    “White men, as a group, vote Republican because they vote their resentments.”

    There is a lot of truth to the statement that white men vote their resentment. Nearly all of the various groups that make up the Democrat coalition vote their resentment too. If a study concluded that any other demographic group in America (literally any other demographic group) the media and academia would demand that we as a nation explore why that demographic is resentful, and would demand that America do more to appease and accommodate that group. When it’s white males who are resentful, however — screw those racists!

    • paul marchand

      Right. White men are a resentful minority. For reason.

    • John R

      Vote their resentments. Yeah, who doesn’t?

      • AndrewInterrupted

        We aren’t allowed to have grievances. Wrong party.

        • sbuffalonative

          We are told white males don’t have legitimate grievances.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Complete with rolled eyes, followed by death stares.

      • So CAL Snowman

        Didn’t obongo say voting was the best revenge, or something like that? It’s only revenge or resentment when White men do it, obviously.

      • Peter Connor

        Voting against people is the only sensible strategy, it’s easier to know evil than good.

  • It’s not even that hard. It’s white bread America versus everyone else.

    “Everyone else” already has a party. White bread America doesn’t. The party it voted for is trying to deny white bread America like Peter did Christ, trying to figure out how to get everyone else to vote for it.

  • MBlanc46

    A bit overwrought, perhaps, but basically on the money. Dems only care about women and “people of color” and the corporate elite (who are their paymasters) and the establishment Repubs only care about the corporate elite (who are their paymasters). Populist Repubs are just wasting their time and energy because the establishment types will always call the tune.

  • Greg Thomas

    The truth is “offensive” to the diversity hustlers. Fortunately for me, I do not give a damn if they are offended!

  • Dave4088

    I never vote for a Republican. In most cases I’m voting against the non-white worshipping Democrats. Non-whites vote Democrat because doing makes them feel like they are striking a blow against white people whom they hate with a passion.

    But I’m now at the point where I will probably stop voting entirely since the Republicans continue to alienate white people with their new strategy of winning the hearts and minds of mestizos and other Democrat voters. On immigration they offer only quarter measures, but are poised to sell out on amnesty by 2016. Rand Paul has signed on to the white race replacement agenda since that’s the ticket to securing media approval, fat donations and to winning national elections.

    The stark reality is that racially conscious white people are the only group who have no political representation in America. Our country has left us and we owe it nothing in return.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      Shouldn’t your avatar be a lamb being led to slaughter?

  • paul marchand

    Sort of fatalistic conclusion. But real. As far as the vote goes.
    Only one way out, IMO. And it aint the vote.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      I think white people will surprise us in a positive way in the next few years.

  • John R

    This time, I had my satire detector up and running. Yes, this article is satire-how people that vote Republican are suckers-but it is also so true in pretty much everything that it said. It is so direct and honest that it is almost frightening! I am going to save a copy of it, and read it aloud next time I encounter liberals.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Jack is speaking at the AmRen conference, I believe. I’ve read some of his stuff.

  • paul marchand

    But, IMO, whether Pubs or * whatever new party *, the conclusion will be the same.
    It’ll only be musical chairs.
    The numbers, politically, probably aint there (unless white women get full of fear of what their children will face).
    But IMO the will is there.
    Time for a full-fledged tax revolt. If not more.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      There is a type of tax revolt taking place amongst the MGTOW movement.
      Men “Going Galt” who live within their means and work under the table, etc.

  • Diversity Fatigue

    Great piece. It really does seem to be everyone against white men. They all want to kill the ones who made it all possible. Imagine how things would change if all white men instantly vanished. What would they do without us?

    • Dave4088

      Likely die of disease, ethnic conflict and starvation until the Chinese arrive to deliver the coup de grace.

    • HJ11

      We need to be careful. What we’re seeing, I belive, is an attempt to fragment the White population by making a distinction between White MEN and White WOMEN. When we discuss White rights, we need to include both our men and our women and not let the haters of Whites fragment us by gender.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        I agree. The writer of this piece was very simplistic with his description of white women. It disturbs me that a lot of people on here are going along with it.

        • Mike

          It’s probably because liberal white women are over represented in the media.

        • RonanTheLibtardian

          That is part of Donovan’s schtick. He’s a man’s man. This piece is also semi-satirical. You should click the link and go over to his site. He is one of those people fighting the feminists.

  • dewdly

    They vote Republican by default because they reject the Democrats and there is not, as yet, a party that represents their interests.

  • HJ11

    One thing that Whites–both male and female–should demand from the GOP is that the party get behing starting a White Caucus in every state legislature and in D.C.

    In the California legislature there is a Latino, a Black, an Asian/ Pacific Islander and now a Jewish Caucus (the Jewish Caucus says it’s not based on religion but ethnicity, just like the
    other ethnic caucuses). However, there is no White Caucus. Who the hell represents Whites–no one.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That’s a good idea. Something that might even become a SCOTUS case.

      • HJ11

        The key, I think, is to get a single legislator with gonads to bring this forward. I see no downside for Whites in this (except, perhaps, to the legislator who brings if forward if he or she is not strong or smart enough to handle it right). I see only upside and the possibility that the debate that would follow trying to establish White caucauses just like the other ethnic/racial caucuses could awaken many more Whites. Perhaps, it would even awaken enough so that we start getting a critical mass of awakened Whites.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Yes, one of the retiring legislators should have served up something like this.

    • Lots of luck with that one. The GOP is scared to death of being savaged by the media and countless interest groups as ‘racist.’

      • HJ11

        You’re correct, of course, however, this asking for equal representation by having our own caucus similar to other ethnic/racial caucauses would help take our struggle out of the theoretical and general and make it concrete and pinpoint.

        We can all constantly complain about things being unfair to us Whites, but unless we bring those complaints down to specific actions we are demanding, we won’t get far.

        • Yes, but who is this ‘we’ you are talking about? We, Whites, European Americans, hundreds of thousands of us, are already demanding all sorts of things, like an end to all amnesties, but we are ignored. And we will be unless we organize into a large group or many large groups so that our influence is felt. If you want to start such a group, great, maybe I’ll sign up. But if we finally organize, demanding White caucuses would not be a high priority of mine–it is much too late for that and, frankly, rather pathetic for people who built this civilization in the first place.

          • HJ11

            We are not demanding things AS Whites, FOR Whites. We (and I mean the masses of Whites) are like various conservative groups that are afraid to BE White. I say that must change. And, I’m not waiting for a herd to form so I can hide behind others. I’m taking action right where I am in every way possible.

            We have to face the reality that in any revolution–and that’s what we’re about–only a small fraction of the people will take action until a critical mass is reached. I take action, because I know it’s the right thing to do, and I’m simply not waiting for others.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          That’s why they would have to initiate it, take their lumps, then embarrass the SCOTUS in siding with them. Then the MSM Libtards would be put in the position of criticizing the SCOTUS.

          And don’t use White Caucus. White is a trigger word. They should transition to something like the European Caucus.

          • HJ11

            Personally, I’ve gone the European-American route but have come back to White. Our Whiteness is our most obvious feature and I no longer run from it–indeed, I relish it.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Well, the Caucus principle is based on the mythical oppressed minority. People forget that minority means: statistical minority. Western Europeans settled this country. Probably 5 or 6 countries: England, France, Ireland, Germany, etc. If you concentrated on the founding demographic when proposing a European Caucus you would qualify for statistical minority status, with respect to winning a SCOTUS case on technicality and fact.

            If you strip away the intentional statistical subterfuge done by the minority occupation government, western Europeans comprise less than half of America’s population. Members of the coup purposely puff up those numbers with questionable sub-populations such as: Muslim Albanians, Persians, Jews, Armenians. They even falsify crime data by listing Mestizo gangsters as white. This to fool the European Americans into believing their numbers are greater than they really are. The frogs in the saucepan don’t realize there is very little time left before they boil.

            The ‘founding demographic’ is easily in the minority in the U.S., and should win a technical victory in the SCOTUS if creating a (western) European Caucus gets challenged. The Afrikaners were the founding culture in South Africa. Their (token) classification at least granted them the legal ability to establish a small pilot autonomous region called Orania. I believe there will be a speaker on Orania at the AmRen conference.

            Legal ‘founder’ status through baby steps like a European Caucus could create an effective ‘lawfare’ weapon, just like the occupation government uses against us in the U.S.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            That is something Rahm Emanuel would try. Why not us?

        • It is White congressional representatives themselves that would need to form such caucuses. So if you have a White congressional member, you need to call him or her and demand that they organize a White caucus. After the deathly telephone silence or the burst of laughter, let me know what they say.

          • HJ11

            Why so negative? I’m a realist and I know I’d get the reaction that you’ve indicated. In fact, I already have. But that isn’t stopping me from making even more noise. Our cause is righteous and it is just. The haters of Whites count on us slinking off to hide in corners if they just call us names. It doesn’t work with me. I’m the “wrong White,” to try to browbeat.

          • It is important to be realistic when taking action. That is not being “negative.” Like I say, take some constructive action and report back. You will have my admiration.

      • HJ11

        You’re right, but it starts with one. I’m one. You’re one. That’s how things begin. They don’t begin with negative do-nothing talk.

        • ThomasER916

          That’s right. There’s a tidal wave affect that can happen with Whites. Once you start staying:

          Racist is just code for “I hate White People” and stand tall the Left becomes terrified. Their name calling doesn’t work anymore. Most Whites are afraid of losing a job. That’s our biggest concern. Right now Whites only mobilize for implicit Whiteness (Duck Dynasty or Chick-Fil-A). When Whites discover they have a voice it can be powerful and unstoppable.

          I always tell Conservatives –

          Black Preachers say, “I want to help the Black Community” and you Whites cheer.

          If a White Preacher dared to say, “I want to help the White Community” you’d scream racist.

          And you wonder why Whites don’t go to church? Whites are tired of getting attacked. They don’t need to go to church to be called evil, racist, or sinner. That’s mainstream now. Stop hating Whites, start helping Whites and they might go to church. Until then you’re just being Anti-White. You’d might as well join Rev. Al Sharpton, Rev. Jesse Jackson, and Rev. Jeremiah Wright. They believe the same things you do.

          • Mike

            Why are so many looking for the government to ‘do things’ for us though? When whites in America thrived it wasn’t because of the government doing stuff for us, it was because back then they weren’t doing the stuff TO us that they are now!

        • I agree completely, but don’t assume that everyone here commenting is doing nothing else. After all, you are just commenting, but I don’t assume that is all you are doing. I’d guess a vast majority of the people here agree with your comments about taking action and have made such comments themselves, as have I. Maybe a good idea would be for you to go out and take some action and report back to inspire us all.

  • Dave4088

    The Republicans never, EVER make any attempt to reverse the gains made by the radical left and anti-whites once in power. They are the party of compromise, retreat and surrender and anyone who thinks the offer white people and the country hope better disabuse themselves of those fantasies and fast.

  • connorhus

    While some of us are just waiting and hoping they will soon start voting with the cartridge box.

  • Romulus

    Thanks Jack for letting us know why we vote repub. Ok,….. so,… Then inform us of whom we should vote for. After all, our choices are limited.
    Bear in mind that ONLY white christian hetero males are targeted. I will keep repeating this untill i die. . Without our males we CANNOT pass on our line! Without an equal # of breeding pairs of our people, we cannot replace our lost populations mutations.

    • RisingReich

      You’d think our women would realize this. The ones on here do, but most of them can’t be bothered with thoughts about White continuance. Try navigating the world of modern dating and bring it up, for example. She’ll likely throw her drink in your face.

      Marxism may have permanently poisoned the well between White men and Women. I have many a time lamented on these boards how much misery it’s brought on both sexes.

      • Daniel Schmuhl

        There is some research indicating that females are more conformists. If change is to be had, don’t expect it from them.

        • What a hasty assumption.

          • Bartek

            Both sexes are fools.
            Men are told by Hollywood what to desire.
            Woman are fed the same subversion by the same cabal.
            Few Whites bothered raising their children, that was what school and mass media were for.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            It’s evolutionary, Watson.

      • Romulus

        I feel your pain like no other. When I discovered that I am descended from northern Roman stock, I felt great pain in retrospect of the empires treatment of the germanic people, despite all the technological and cultural achievements my ancestors achieved. It is my belief looking back in hindsight that Europe would be quite a different place today without the incursions of the empire and the ensuing invasions/migrations.

        Since we can not change the past ( and true to form, speculation of what might have been is wishful thinking) at least we can forge a future. All it takes is the will.

        It’s possible, that we may have to write off our leftist females, while working the numbers game from our side to continue the people. Of course, the den ladies might well change their tune and come back to the flock when Amerika becomes the likes of SA.

        • RisingReich

          I hear you loud and clear, but I have absolutely NO faith in White women. I love them, and wish they would come around, but I just don’t see it happening, sadly.

          • Mike

            Men’s job is to lead, women’s is to follow. Many women will talk the P.C. drivel but still love an ‘alpha male’ so that’s what we need to be. Playing by the rules of the cultural Marxists (and to a lesser extent the gynocentric modern conservatives) will only lead to our extinction.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        You can’t blame white women for not “being on board” when most white men don’t seem to be (at least not openly).

        • Mike

          Both white men and women need to work on ourselves and undo this Marxist brainwashing that’s been imposed on us.

        • RonanTheLibtardian

          I know that white men overwhelmingly vote Republican.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            Ummmm, most white women vote Republican too, just less than ten percentage points less than white men. I was referring to actual racial awareness in my post above…..not voting Republican.

      • Mike

        Women in general don’t think as independently as men. This isn’t bad within itself it’s just nature, what’s bad is that men have been brainwashed into thinking that putting them in the most important leadership roles in society is a good idea.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          I couldn’t have said it better, Mike!

  • Romulus

    In other news: The constitution center is rolling out more run down the old white guys propaganda!

    A new exhibit titled “Slavery at Jefferson’s Monticello”

    The centerpiece being a bronze of Jefferson With a wall behind him naming his 600 slaves.
    I plan to attend wearing a shirt with his picture on it.

  • Northerner

    Let’s say the Republicans won and were in charge right now. Do any of you think things would be substantially different? I seriously doubt it. Two seemingly different parties give you the impression there’s actually a choice when in reality none exists.

    • Whitetrashgang

      If anything things would be worse, look up their record kids.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That just isn’t true. Granted, the choices suck, but the Demo-rats are over-whelmingly in the tank for those undocumented Democrats. The Repugs held off the debate until after the midterms. There is a reason for that. The Repugs will pivot the debate to deportation (IMO) if/when they retake the Senate. If they wanted amnesty they would have already agreed to it. Jared linked an article today about how a right wing party in Europe gained more popularity by a softer stance; that’s what the Repugs are doing. There is no written commitment to anything for stalling the amnesty debate. They made no promises. That’s why the Demo-rats are panicking with EO threats. They see the Repugs are biding their time until past November and retaking the Senate. That will slow O’Bumbles way down.

      • Northerner

        Voting Republicans or Democrats is just the decision to go to the same destination either slowly or quickly. They may differ on a few wedge issues, but today they’re basically the same when it comes to things like war, foreign policy, and even immigration.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          I see criminal collusion (they call it bi-partisanship) with respect to the H1-B scam. I call it a bi-partisan deal with the devil. The Repugs get their cheap labor to keep their 1% crowd happy, and the Demo-rats get brown and yellow people to displace white people, for their continued white genocide quest. But, there are differences. Immigration is the only issue for 2014/2016. Everything is riding on it. And the Repugs haven’t thrown in their cards.

      • Whitetrashgang

        No, you are watching theater. My family were billionaires in Russia till 1920 you have to look top down not bottom up If.you have money you run the show.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Believe that all you want–and you may be right, but don’t throw away your vote in 2014/2016. Throw it away after 2016.

      • “The Repugs will pivot the debate to deportation (IMO) if/when they retake the Senate.”

        I see no evidence of this. In fact the GOP leadership has been trying to wiggle its way to an amnesty. I believe that when Bush II was in office, he was able to get about 1/3 of congressional Republicans to go along with his amnesty. Really, that’s about all you normally need to join with the almost unanimous traitors in the Multicultural Marxist Party.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          “I see no evidence of this”.
          We have something called a representative government. (Let me get all my disclaimers in here to mitigate the turd bombing runs from the many defeated AmRen seagulls.) Not a great system, a very broken system, barely resembling the original system, not a system I like-defend-condone (that should do it). When the people kick and stomp enough (NUMBERSUSA, etc.), events such as ending debate on an unpopular topic like amnesty occur. That is evidence, IMO. Retaking the Senate has other synergies. It allows for impeachment. That originates in the Senate. (Seagulls make your first black president never get impeached bombing runs here). The threat of impeachment is the leverage. They don’t have that now, which is why they are treading lightly i.e. stalling for time.

          Eric Cantor, in the House, is beginning to concern me, though. He’s a weasel wildcard.

          • You must be involved with the GOP and remain ever hopeful no matter the evidence. Fine with me.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I registered Independent at age 18–and that was a long time ago.

            I was one of those guys with solid bringin’-ups who was taught to ‘vote your conscience’. Because of that, I voted for Ross Perot in 1992, which diluted the conservative vote, creating co-president, Slick Willy and co-president, Hildabeast.

            That is what Jack Donovan means by white men being ‘suckers’. They have an exploitable conscience. The Democrat sociopaths don’t. White men are the last of the nation-makers. The host is being consumed by the parasite.

          • Well said, I like the term “Hildabeast.”

          • RisingReich

            He’s a Jewish weasel. I’m shocked. /sarc

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            I try to stay positive, too.

      • Ella

        Or, is it just a show off with the Middle Class losing of course? The entire political battle reminds me of the WWF matches being fixed with their intimidating stunts.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          It means arm conflict will be the only remaining option if 2014/2016 goes badly. Many AmRen posters are already there, waiting for the first opportunity. I will be there if 2014/2016 goes badly. What “there” means will be up to everyone’s wildest imaginations. One thing I know for sure, our enemies exploit martyrdom really-really well.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Which is why US elections are no different from a Punch and Judy show. The US is a totalitarian state ruled by a single party: the mass 3rd world immigration, multiculturalism party. The stupid party and the evil party have secretly colluded with each other to permanently keep mass 3rd world immigration and multiculturalism off the electoral table. You only vote for the figurehead.

    • John K

      They are different sides to the same coin. At least the Democrats are largely honest about who they are. The Republitards shun their predominantly white voter base to kiss the asses of non-white invaders and black thugs who will never vote for them, while telling that they’re fighting for the preservation of the country.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    Forget the democrats. Forget the republicans. Forget the American electoral system. What the US really needs is an American National Fascist Party with its own paramilitary wing, similar to the party established by Mussolini in Italy, but with strong isolationist tendencies.

    • We need our own Golden Dawn.

      • Romulus

        The tribe ( $plc,adl ) controlled FBI would squash that immediately. Just like WEAVER .

        • They can’t squash all of us.

          • Ella

            They’ll audit us to death and finds ways to sue us to oblivion. Families will even be threatened.

          • I’m not saying they won’t try. I’m saying they’re outnumbered and outgunned. We can give up without a fight, or we can fight to the bitter end and then burn everything down and salt the ashes before admitting defeat.

            If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

            – Samuel Adams

            Demoralizing us is a key part of their strategy. What if that tactic didn’t work anymore? Whites will fight or we will die, like any other organism on the planet.

          • Romulus

            We certainly have the numbers, but not the same technologically advanced weapons systems. Remember in Nov 2012, DHS purchased 1.2 billion rounds and 2700 MRAP urban assault vehicles. Drones, tanks, MLRS ( multiple launch rocket systems). Magazines are being limited, registry lists are being updated, compliance legislation is moving forward, mental health administrators are consulting the new psychiatric playbook, their pushing for an article 5 con con. We have small arms.
            The good news is that the vast majority of police and military personnel are ours. So, yes, … I say bring the boys HOME. Then, if need be, they might align with the nearly 200 of our generals that have been pushed out.
            I am with you on this, I’m just weighing assets.
            Will it come to that?,… Is anybody’s geuss.

          • Please forgive my cynicism but it’s hard to imagine a military so corrupted by Affirmative Action, feminism, and the other trappings of cultural Marxist “progress” as any real threat. The technology you cited is next to worthless in a civil conflict unless they’re willing to destroy their own vital infrastructure and supply lines to take us out. Will it be bloodless? Of course not, but let’s not get too carried away here. Our best-armed enemies will be AA police (city forces, not sheriffs) and armed diversicrats in DHS and other pseudomilitary alphabet soup agencies. Our worst real threats will be from the White [sic] traitors among us.

            This is the same US military that is allowing people who are literally retarded to sign up. Someone has to maintain and replace all that expensive, high-tech equipment. Someone has to have the brains to even use it. So…who? Weighing assets is a good idea, and it never pays to underestimate your opponent, but I just can’t get too worked up about the threat from Uncle Sugar. The hilariously incompetent theater they put on after the Boston Marathon bombing should give comfort to us all.

          • Romulus

            I like your optimism! I could use some inspiration. Forgive my general malaise. You know how it is,……… A never ending cycle of bad news can wear a person down with a sense of foreboding. Lol!

          • I do know how it is, believe me. Regular breaks from the doom and gloom are beneficial to your soul and general outlook. It’s easy to get caught up in the negativity without recognizing how good things still are for our people. Regular exercise, a healthy diet, time with loved ones…these things are rejuvenating and will help you to maintain your vitality. Humor is also key!

            Keep fighting, but take care of yourself too. It’s so important to remember that you aren’t alone, even if our enemies work tirelessly to keep us feeling isolated and alienated in our own lands.

          • Romulus

            After learning that Samuel Adams owner JIM Koch decided not to endorse the NY St. Patricia say parade because homosexuals are still excluded (thankfully) , I’ve since decided to never again purchase guinness or Sam Adams beer.
            I suggest hitting them were it hurts.

          • True. I proudly quote Sam Adams while boycotting the beer sold under his name. You shouldn’t drink Guinness anyway–it’s loaded with horrible ingredients, including high fructose corn syrup.

          • Romulus

            Thank you for the tip! I never cared for DARK beer anyway

          • Just remind them that Sam Adams was a slaveholder 🙂

          • Romulus

            😉

          • William_JD

            You must have missed the pro-miscegenation commercial they ran about 10 years ago. I dropped Sam Adams for good at that point.

          • Romulus

            I did miss that one.
            I try to keep up as best I can. Life being very busy and all.

  • John K

    We’ll see who the suckers are when white men turn back the clock to 1776.

    • BonV.Vant

      It won’t be turned back by VOTING

      • Ella

        If it comes to this occurrence, you ‘ll see both side of the Atlantic come to life. Europeans have a better history of fighting the leftists.

  • evilsandmich

    White men, as a group, vote Republican because they vote their resentments

    As opposed to, you know, black people.

  • john

    Blacks are smart, whites are suckers. Yep.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    The problem is NOT that white men vote Republican (what other choice have they got?). The problem is that they fail to speak up and demand that the GOP support their interests (including enforcing our immigration laws). THAT’S the problem. Unfortunately, too many white males are just as brainwashed and docile as white females.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    I think Jack Donovan was a little too kind to the Left. In this section he appears to give Trayvon Martin a pass:

    “…Blacks also know that you don’t need a permit to buy a gun. You just go buy one from that guy down the street and, you know, take care of business. White men are afraid to buy guns without following the rules, so more rules means less white men with guns. This is good for black men, because they like the convenience of being able to wear a hoodie in the rain without getting shot by nervous white men with guns…”

    Based on all the evidence that came out before and after the Zimmerman trial, Trayvon wasn’t eating skittles in the rain wearing a hoodie. Zimmerman said on the 911 call the: “The guy (Trayvon) is looking in windows”. Trayvon was casing the joint. And when he saw Zimmerman calling it in, Trayvon tried creating a diversion. That’s when he got capped. The kid bum-rushed Zimmerman and paid for it. That kid asked for everything he got.

    • Romulus

      The nationwide black hysteria that followed had nothing to do with the truth or facts. It was an effort by the traitors to use all means necessary to roll back castle doctrine and further their goal of disarmament. The news (is heavily censored and all propaganda) coverage was following the script.

      Speaking of Seagulls, their must be some reading the comments. When I pointed out some right hand propaganda using two RC CHURCH and their opposition examples, my comment disappeared. I geuss pointing out ALL the truth of media use is unacceptable.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Interesting. If you parachuted in from Mars and knew nothing about the case, and was privy to ALL the evidence, there would be no “there” there. Open and shut case of a young thug with no strong father presence. The kid was even caught with stolen jewelry and a pry tool when he was 15. They found it in the bottom of his backpack while at school. And, instead of a child wrapped in swaddling clothing–he was 6′ 3″..!

        That whole case was for the purpose of manufacturing a martyr.

        And it worked!

        • ThomasER916

          The Trayvon Case was concocted by the same Tribe that gave us:

          Pavel Morozov

          Pavlik, was a Soviet youth praised by the Soviet (JSM) press as a martyr. His story, dated to 1932, is that of a 13-year old boy who denounced his father to the authorities and was in turn killed by his family. His story was a subject of reading, songs, plays, a symphonic poem, a full-length opera and six biographies. (wikipedia).

          Of course, all of this is a complete fabrication. Research into the original documentation belonging to the Soviet NKVD and testimonies from surviving eye witnesses tells a different story. Pavel lived in a “kulak nest”, an area of independent, White, rural, Christian farmers. The most hated group by the Left and the Tribe is the White, rural, Christian farmer. It’s no coincidence that the “redneck”, “kulak”, and Boer are the most vilified by anti-Whites. That hatred comes from the Culture of Critique. Pavel, it turns out, was murdered in a heated argument. Why Pavel? Why Trayvon? Why fabricate this story and not use a real story? Surely there’s a real event people could use right? That’s where I figured out what was happening.

          If people used a real event then normal Whites who aren’t Libtarded ethno-masochists wouldn’t stand up for Zimmerman. There would be no argument. Blacks wouldn’t feel “betrayed” because they’d discover that Whites, who are honest and not out for delusional revenge, are on their side. No. What the JSM needed, just like the Soviets, is a bad case. They needed a case where people argued. When the Negro Messiah turns out to be a fraud, the smart Whites are vilified for speaking out. When your goal is to destroy a society you need infighting and chaos. Arguing over Saints is the best way to go about doing it.

          The Left needs another Barabbas to set free. When their Martyrs are murderers then all their Useful Idiots hear is blasphemy from the demonized opposition, in this case Whites.
          Call Trayvon a druggie and you’ll be persecuted for Blasphemy. Point out that MLK plagiarized his work and had sex with hookers and you’re magically transformed into a “racist.”

        • RonanTheLibtardian

          That’s my Auntie Rachel’s specialty!

    • Mike

      The guy who wrote this article is an idiot. The more paleoconservative leaning wing of the republican party is the only hope white America has politically. If he resents rich white guys or loves Trayvon Martin etc. that’s his own problem.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        It was actually satire. But, there was so much truth in it, it wasn’t always easy to tell. Such is the condition of the white male in Obamastan.

  • DonReynolds

    White, working class men vote Republican because they are motivated by fear and resentment.

    Thought provoking, Jack. But you were not explicit about why they are fearful or why they resent anything. So I will try my hand at it…..

    We are fearful because they believe (“That to secure these rights,) governments are instituted among men, (deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”)…..as stated in the US Declaration of Independence. And now we have a government no longer instituted among men, nor are they secure in these rights, nor are powers derived from the consent of the governed. Very seldom are we allowed to discuss or debate in public the issues considered by this government, much less can we initiate, among ourselves…..that which we find most dear or vital to the health of our Republic.

    We resent the decisions of the past, the feeble reasons given for the cause of those decisions, and the imprudent management of this country’s treasury, resources, legal tradition, and the ham-handed revisions of our common history. We resent the present agenda of the public discussions, the daily insults to our honor and reputation, the prospect of still more spiteful decisions promised in the future. We despise the pickpocket, the rapist, the child abuser, the murderer, and other low life; but we despise more those who would insist that such behaviors should be allowed to continue undisturbed in the interests of righting past sins and ever more burdensome racial harmony. We resent the waste of our common purse and the endless demands for undeserved charity. And we find that so much of what is good in our society being mocked, shamed, and insulted by tiny subcultures, who have no authority or right to demand anything from us beyond the same freedom that we hope for ourselves.

    • Romulus

      Thanks Don!! That was a stirring comment.

  • Norseman

    It is unfortunately true that many politicians that rhetorically support free enterprise and making your own way in the world are hypocrites. Just think of the bailouts!

  • rasher223

    I love brutal, hard, honesty like this.

    Need more people like that who aren’t afraid to say what everyone knows and isn’t saying.

  • I will often vote for a minor party candidate if they are sane on the third-world invasion. Many would consider that a wasted vote, but if a few more million people did that as a protest vote, someone would have to take notice. As bad a Mitt was, he was Charles Martel compared to the other major candidates. He refused to compromise on amnesty and the DREAM Act–and brainlessly wanted to welcome in a zillion foreign high-tech workers–but with the GOP becoming even more wimpy, with its ‘reaching out,’ its trying to become ‘more inclusive,’ with its deadly fear of being called ‘racist,’ when we vote for the GOP, we are voting our support for all those things. We are voting for the Stupid Cowardly Party over the Cultural Marxist Party, which makes us in some sense stupid and cowardly.

    Anything may be possible, even the GOP being taken over by patriots, but I think most likely the GOP has to die, or continue to weaken until it becomes a third party before we can have any hope of saving Western civilization through anything resembling traditional politics, and then it will be a holding action until some sort of national breakup takes place, since White voters are going to be ever more outnumbered and abused as a people. Obviously we are to be eliminated by dispossession and violent crime, and this is well under way.

  • WR_the_realist

    White men vote for Republicans because the only alternative is the Democrats. It’s certainly not because Republicans have ever done a damn thing for working or middle class white men.

    • Ella

      We are past voting to correct the problem and corporations and minority action groups will stand in the responsible citizen’s way for mega profits or wealth gains.

  • Bartek

    You have to hand it to Rand Paul, at least he is being an honest GOP drone when he tells Whitey to drop dead and submit.

  • Bartek

    Pay attention to Ukraine, East and West. They have some lessons to teach about armed violence and the legislative process.
    White men have the governance their passivity permits.

    • Ella

      I tell this to my drone hubby who embellishes in his materialism. “You reaped what you sowed” at the end. He finally saw the light.

    • benvad

      Should there be a revolution like the Russians are doing around eastern Ukraine now? Russians are a different breed with zero guilt, I envy them.

      You can say what you want but Putin is getting it done. His way!

  • Biff_Maliboo

    Marcotte will die alone and be found partially eaten by her cats.

    • bubo

      She’s a weapons grade nut. Completely unattached to reality. Plain ugly too.

      • Biff_Maliboo

        So, she’s Supreme Court justice material?

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Oh, those weapons grade nuts are the worst. Here is the first Polonium 210 feminist, Shulamith Bath Shmuel Ben Ari Feuerstein (Firestone).

        It turns out she was a lifelong schizophrenic who died alone in her own filth. The inspiration for Steinem, Sandberg, and Hildabeast, the czarinas of Cultural Marxism.
        .

        • benvad

          She wanted to end the nuclear family and stated that pregnancy & giving birth was “Barbaric”. She should have been sent to Israel a long time ago.

          I truly believe only Jews (culturally/religiously), know how to handle their own nut jobs. They’d have her on a kibbutz or in combat, just keeping this looney away from a library or typewriter.

        • RonanTheLibtardian

          It has never ceased to amaze me how this psycho had so much sway. It shows you how gullible women can be. She wrote the feminist bible that was completely bonkers.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            The only reason she “had so much sway” was because men eventually swallowed feminism just as badly as women….otherwise we wouldn’t be where we are at today. I don’t think blaming either gender more than the other in regards to social issues really holds much water. It is usually a 50/50 deal with one gender being just about as brainwashed as the other, and the numbers change according to the region of the country. Maine might have 50% of its men brainwashed and 60% of the women brainwashed. In a state like Alabama it is probably more like 20/30. In any case, the two usually mirror each other with the female population being only slightly more liberal.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I fought feminism the whole way. My father did, too. I just about invented the MGTOW movement in the 1970s. People like Ester Vilar (the manipulated male) and even George Will were very critical about the feminist movement in the early 70s as it was starting to take hold.

            I think most men hoped it was just a fad like pet rocks and Nehru jackets. No such luck. Feminism has done terrible damage to the fabric of the U.S. I would say men were more ideological hostages than anything else. Men are withdrawing in droves now.

            Dr. Helen Smith and Christina Hoff Sommers cover the ‘…Going Galt…’ phenomenon pretty well.

  • DudeWheresMyCountry?

    Don’t jump out of a plane with excitement D.B. Cooper but this article just might be right up your alley. Not that I don’t agree with you about the Democrat-light party.

  • Nevsky

    Now white, straight American males have “American Third Position Party” to vote for.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I’ve been watching the reverse rodeo cowgirl party pretty close–I mean…

  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    It’s not an easy question, who is more dangerous, an open borders Republican or an open borders Democrat? Right now, the only ones standing in the way of amnesty are some conservatives in the House. Some might say that as president, an open borders Republican can twist their arms thru the party apparatus and is therefore more dangerous. On the other hand, an open borders Dem like Hillary could simply expand amnesty via executive order. The real-life evidence seems to point to the lesser of two evils – House conservatives blocked Bush’s amnesty and they blocked Obama’s amnesty too – but as bad as Bush was, taken as a total package Obama is worse. On the other hand, worse could be better for us since it wakes up more Whites. Like I said, not an easy question.

  • This article was a nice slice and dice of the situation going on with politics.

    It could easily be translated to the situation in Britain – only in our case, all three major parties and the popular outside runner are essentially competing on the same underpining basis of ‘values’, reducing any actual ‘choice’. Parties are different, yet still the same.

  • Ella

    We know this already, but the system is set up for one to pay for all the goodies and exclude the White Middle Class from almost all government benefits unless you lie on applications. We may get 1K p/child for deductions and itemized/standard deductions about what about the 15-25K p/y handouts to mostly minorities? (White birth rate hovers around 1.7.) Your Whiteness will get you caught, fined or audited By Uncle Sam. The govt. constantly looks for us to pay in order to transfer the wealth for votes. I smell tyranny.

  • scutum

    Jack Donovan nails it. Wake up people; the Repubicans are never going to challenge the status quo that the left has erected and is now standard operating procedure for the bureaucrats in DC. Are you aware that Boehner and Cantor are now working as hard as they can to “fix” Obamacare? The Repubicans benefit just as much from big gevernment as the Demoncrats. As Iv’e said before, the only difference between the two major political parties is their rhetoric.

  • Ella

    How closely do we resemble the Weimar Republic before WW2?

    • RisingReich

      The parallels are written ALL over society. Time will tell….

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      Don’t know that one. Looks like I’ve got some reading to do.

  • MekongDelta69

    It’s not like we have a (realistic) choice.

    This country is a two-party system, whether anyone likes it or not.
    You have the marxists on the left and the appeasers on the (so-called) ‘right.’

    You can:
    1.) Vote for the marxists, if you want immediate destruction.
    2.) Vote for the appeasers, if you want slow destruction.
    3.) Vote for some third party, which might make you feel better, but which won’t count for a thing (numerically).
    4.) Don’t vote.
    5.) Ask Jared Taylor to run for President – and as much as I would like that, I live in the REAL world, and not in some fantasy-land of my own making.

    • Cid Campeador

      MD69,
      I agree. If we had a candidate that came right out and announced his support for the White race, he would never have a chance,
      Obama insinuated that he would be the POTUS but once elected his bias toward the Mau Mau was quite obvious as was that of the AGOTUS,

  • AndrewInterrupted

    For parody and satire, there sure was an awful amount of reality in this. Nice job, Jack.

  • If that traitor Jeb Bush gets the GOP nomination in 2016, I will vote for Hillary.

    • WR_the_realist

      I will do what I always do. Vote for a third party. It’s all very well to deny Jeb your vote, but that doesn’t mean Hillary deserves it. They both want to give illegal immigrants citizenship and they both want more wars.

      • RonanTheLibtardian

        I don’t think my Libtardians friends will notice or care if you flush your vote. They are crazy people.

        • Budd Smith

          Voting for the red anti-white party or the blue anti-white party just because one of them will win doesn’t make sense either. I’d rather support the American Freedom Party even if they don’t have a chance of winning a national election.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            The anti-white blue party is publicly, boastfully in the tank for converting the 40 million Latin locusts into blue, anti-white voters. The red anti-white voters, with the help of organizations like NUMBERSUSA, have postponed any such debate. You may be giving up too soon. That would be tragic. These next two elections are strictly red lollipop, blue lollipop. Save voting your conscience for when we get our country back.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            Just mathematical now I agree.
            Don’t go all libertarian on us now!

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Probably depends most on what tax bracket they’re in.

  • Truth Teller

    I haven’t commented in a while because the monitors support Englemann. But I have to say, any White who votes republican is an idiot. Always, always remember that the affirmative action president was Richard Nixon. Always, always remember that Ronald Reagan and Clarence Thomas betrayed us. Whites voted for Reagan because we hoped he would help us. Instead, he and his EEOC commissioner, Clarence Thomas abolished the last federal government merit civil service exam, the PACE exam.

    And of course it was Republicans Earl Warren and Eisenhower that destroyed the school system and subjected millions of White children to 12 years in the gulags of being forced to attend school with criminal OFEs

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      Where has that crazy guy been anyway? This site is peaceful. Kind of creepy.

  • FozzieT

    So…what do we do? Wish I could be at the AmRen conference to hear Jack’s solution.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    That has to do with the Democrats’ obsession with converting all the undocumented Democrats in the form of amnesty. Making it possible for 30 million unskilled laborers to work will hurt black people the most.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    Hey! That’s me! Auntie Rachel hates you people. Why do you always insist on talking about facts!? Who does that nowadays??

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    My daddy was Frank Sinatra. He voted Republican!

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    That woman is insane. Pray that Shrillary’s brain tumor gets bigger and explodes some time around October 2016.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    To your face. The Democrats only want your vote, my dear.
    And they’ll get yer little dog, too.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    So with a statistical margin of error of +/- 10% ….all of them.
    Why isn’t it racist to be doing that? I always ask myself.

    • CourtneyfromAlabama

      I don’t understand what you are implying. The white voting gap between men and women is always 10 percent or less also. I find it disturbing how so many people on here are so quick to make white women into enemies of white men. I find that VERY disturbing. The problem isn’t as big as a lot of you are leading on.

      • RonanTheLibtardian

        Because it’s white women on TV and in HR departments who regularly emasculate and persecute them, would be two guesses.
        Why aren’t more women stepping up to counter the feminists. True equality is so skewed there should be pitched battles against the feminists by now. Where are the powerful women (Ann Coulter aside) who are locking horns with the likes of the Sheryl Sandbergs of the world??

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          Well, because not enough men are going after feminists either.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    Well, he did sleep with my mother. Those two weren’t exactly the sharpest tools in the shed.

  • Budd Smith

    ‘White men are suckers because they haven’t figured out that the America they believe in is already gone, and that they are the only ones who aren’t asking for whatever they can get while the gettin’s still good. They’ll vote reliably Republican as long as the Republicans keep talking about self-reliance and how things should work, and that will free up Republican politicians to do favors for people who actually want stuff.’

    That pretty much sums the situation up.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    Why are we always separating white women from white men during these discussions? White women really don’t vote differently from their men. The difference is always under 10% every election.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      And that is ALL the difference.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        But it isn’t really fair to get upset with women over that difference. Women will always be slightly more liberal than men in any society. Women vote emotionally compared to men. Don’t believe me? I saw an article once where a woman in China was trying to speak out against the way tiger parts are used as aphrodisiacs. It was a Chinese woman, not a Chinese man. Stuff like this happens in every country (women are more sensitive and emotional about mainstream issues). I see it all the time. You can’t expect women to be just like men. I thought that was the opposite of what people would want on here. And the extent to which white women are voting differently from white men really isn’t big enough for white women to be getting treated like antagonists towards their men on here. Women always follow what the men are doing in any society, with the women being slightly more liberal.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Everything you say is generally true, but for one caveat. Despite the 63% ‘white’ number (which looks intentionally inflated: Democrat tribal members, Hispanics counted as whites, etc.), the ‘white’ population is hovering over the 50% mark.

          In the state of the jungle that now is the former USA, 51% you rule, 49% they rule. Every ‘white’ vote counts. In 1970, when the U.S. population was 80% ‘white’, the 10% difference between white men and women didn’t matter. Now it’s a matter of life and extinction.

          “The Transformation” that Obama repeats means from white to non-white. Make no mistake about it.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    There are more white women standing with white men than a lot of people on this website imply.

    • DonReynolds

      Yes, we are familiar with the numbers.
      Married white women vote much like men.
      Single white women vote with negroes and hispanics.
      Perhaps this is why they are still single (or divorced).

  • Mike

    “Democrats promise more government, and more free stuff. Republicans promise less free stuff for poor people, and promise to lower taxes in return, but they rarely manage to lower taxes for anyone but rich guys who–let’s be real–were usually born into money and didn’t work any harder than the guys driving buses. Many of the wealthy elite are white guys, true, but they care about as much about the working-class white guys as the Democratic Party leadership.”

    And people who think like this – let’s be real – are envious little bitches with no skills or talents that are especially useful to anyone.

  • PolishKnightUSA

    If you want to see a fun film about a war between the sexes, rent “sexmission” or “sexmisja” on netflix.

    One of the great speeches of the film against feminism is I think relevant to the notion of women seeing politicians and taxpaying men as superior to husbands: Personal service. A husband cares about you and only you. A politician is about as reliable as Bill Clinton is to his wife. They cheat. As others have pointed out, the Democratic party politicians have largely tossed white women under the bus as effectively as they did white males 50 years ago. Politicians care about themselves and their cronies, first and foremost, and the electorate, even one they pander to, way down on the priority list.

    50 years ago, a woman could marry a man and have a home paid off in 20 years, a month’s vacation, 2 cars in the driveway, and that was the typical working class woman. The middle class was even MORE well off. Now thanks to feminism, women get stuck with 40 year mortgages on a condo that’s underwater almost as soon as she buys it.

    Suckers.