Rand Paul Warns Eugenics on Horizon Unless Conservatives Stand up Against Abortion Rights

Washington Post, October 28, 2013

Tea party hero Rand Paul warned scientific advancements could lead to eugenics during a Monday visit at Liberty University, looking to boost the political fortunes of fellow Republican Ken Cuccinelli’s bid for governor.

During a visit to the Christian school founded by Jerry Falwell, Paul looked to energize conservative supporters by warning that genetic tests could identify those who are predisposed to be short, overweight or less intelligent so that they could be eliminated. {snip}

“In your lifetime, much of your potential–or lack thereof–can be known simply by swabbing the inside of your cheek,” Paul said to a packed sporting arena on Liberty’s campus. “Are we prepared to select out the imperfect among us?”

Some states ran eugenics programs that sterilized those considered defective in the 1900s, though all were abandoned by the 1970s after scientists discredited the idea.

{snip}

Meanwhile, former President Bill Clinton said genetics is helping doctors identify individuals at greater risk for illness and advising them to get tested earlier. Clinton, a McAuliffe pal who is campaigning with him, said the science is saving lives, not costing them.

“We are now learning things that will help us deal with Alzheimer’s and various kinds of cancers. We’ve already identified the genetic markers that are high predictors of breast cancers,” said Clinton, who as president announced the first map of the human genome.

{snip}

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Erasmus

    The American taxpayer already underwrites the cost of low-skilled blacks and latinos having lots of illegitimate babies. Plus, our “leaders” allow the country to be flooded with 3rd world trash. So, I seriously doubt we’ll ever start selecting out the imperfect any time soon, when the forces that be are now working so mightily to make Idiocracy a reality.

    • Alfred the Great

      Put me in charge of the program and I will be able to identify the ones who go very easily.

    • Fr. John+

      THANK YOU!

  • Rand Paul Warns Eugenics on Horizon Unless Conservatives Stand up Against Abortion Rights

    And the down side would be….?

    • dd121

      Much of the eugenics practiced in the 1920, 30s and 40s was discredited in part because the science was not well understood. Well it’s very well understood now. It’s ironic that the far left on the one hand and the evangelical right seem united on this point to preserve the worst of the human race. I wonder if attitudes on this subject will start to change? Seems obvious to me that all the mental defectives and those who are carrying horrible inheritable diseases should be culled for the good of the race.

      • RisingReich

        “Surely one retarded will find another retarded to mate with…”
        Science of Eugenics – 1914
        I own the book and guard it with my life. Sometimes I think I’d be arrested if certain cretains found out I owned such PC blasphemy.

        • Jesse James

          Most of reality TV is a celebration and expo of the mating dance of retards.

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

          I find that quote a bit humorous. Why did those “scientists” assume that a retarded person would be smart enough to find another like them, or even recognize a need to mate at all? The ones I’ve known about don’t spend their time pondering such questions. In fact, they don’t seem to care about that at all. I do know of cases where “normal” men raped or “had sex” with retarded, even institutionalized women. It was common in the 40s and 50s as part of the corrupt state and privately run mental institutions and I knew of individual cases as late as the 1980s. I don’t doubt things are happening now, but I am not around to know about it, being retired.

          • RisingReich

            The point they are making is that they will stumble in to reproductivity without intervention by those who know better, and it’s very clear that we should NOT be allowing retarded blood lines to continue on. It’s not in the best interest of anyone involved. Simple as that.

      • Webspin

        This isn’t simply the ” evangelical right” but most religions. The Catholics are near fanatical in bringing in other races or at least outreaching to the third world. The left and the right are both meddlers against nature visa vi big and bigger government/church.

      • The dominant eugenic perspective present in the earlier 20th C was strongly leftist and even globalist. for example if you look at the Eugenics Manifesto, it feels very like a Communist text.

  • Transpower

    This topic of abortion is one of the few issues with which I disagree with Rand Paul. I am pro-choice to the 20th week, when human brain waves begin, and pro-life thereafter. This is the new law in Texas, and it is biologically correct. If abortion were to be banned totally, we would be stuck with far more living human debris than we are now! Crime would rise tremendously!

    • What would the political system make of me, who is both pro-life from conception and supports eugenics? Rand Paul’s brain might blue screen.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        Not much. What do you make of a Pro-Choice member of the NRA?

        Women have been having abortions since before recorded history. No one is going to stop them. Conservatives waste their time on what is a solidly settled issue. I don’t see you or other conservatives anxious to support all those babies once they are born to poor, unprepared mothers, either. What next, forbid sex except for pro-creation? White realists need to learn how to pick their battles.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      Start with outlawing abortions from white women.

      • Alfred the Great

        Agree, unless it’s of mixed race.

      • 48224

        Do white women even have kids anymore….unless the baby daddy is black of course? Ala Kim Kardashian.

        • sbuffalonative

          I saw three white women today pushing strollers. Being curious, I always like to look at the babies. To my very pleasant surprise, all three babies were white. Some white women are still selective.

          • NorthernWind

            I’d change that “some” to “most”. We tend to be oversensitive and engage in a kind of confirmation bias by which we see and remember those bad situations more often than the regular ones.

            But yeah, I also check and in the rare cases when it’s a half-breed I clearly sneer at them. It’s fun and on some occasions you can tell that it hurts them.

          • RisingReich

            If you can’t make people see the light – BURN them by it.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I’m against such thinking. I have no desire to be in a fascist world of self-righteous whites that will dictate and provide for death sentences in cases that violate their edicts. The basic idea to be free and what you are representing here is not freedom, but tyranny. I don’t support it in any color.

          • RisingReich

            You should read up on what true facism really is.
            Toss the brainwashing. Give it a shot.

        • It’s satisfying to believe that Robert Kardashian – being the bantu lover that he was – is aware that his daughters allow black guys to have their way with their respective sphincters.

          Happy barf-bag, Bob.

          • blight14

            Indeed, there are sins for which there is no forgiveness……….miscegenation is at the top of the list. Perhaps it is the ONLY entry in that category!

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

          I don’t think of her as white.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        Yep, just as soon as hell freezes over…

    • No thought for the white kids slaughtered and lost to the race, nor the rights of their white fathers…

      Besides Steve Sailor debunked the Freakonomics theory.

    • winn sutanto

      I am a non-white naturalized US citizen.
      I am also a born again Christian.
      Abortion is abominable in the eyes of God.
      I have a tremendous appreciation to western civilization which is based on Judeo-Christian principles.
      If you take away those Judeo-Christian values and replace them with secularism and liberalism, you destroy your country from within.
      You guys at AMREN scream every day on white genocide.
      But what have you done to stop abortion??
      Don’t you know that more than 25 millions white babies have been aborted since 1973 when they legalized abortion.
      You white Americans forget on what Grace your land exists and the freedom you have in your heart.
      But that freedom and that Grace come from the teaching of the Bible.

      I am just a humble immigrant working from 10 AM to 7 PM six days a week.
      But I love USA with all my heart and all my heart.
      I wish you guys at AMREN the very best. God Bless

  • Daniel Schmuhl

    I consider myself a fairly right-wing person but I don’t mind abortion or eugenics. I have to cringe every time a Christian conservative mentions the numbers of aborted black babies as if that was a bad thing.

    • Kenner

      Laura Ingraham, on Fox, has recently lamented ’16 million’ aborted black babies. I think she’s a single mother who’s adopted three non-white babies. 16 million– if you think it’s bad now, imagine if Ingraham had her way…

      • robinbishop34

        She adopted two boys from Russia, and a girl from Guatemala. I think her lamenting aborted black babies is a futile and foolish attempt to poach minority voters from the democratic party. We’ll see elephants climb trees before that happens.

    • Manaphy

      Over the last few months I have started taking a strong dislike to organized Evangelical Christianity. I have seen thousands of Evangelicals protest for Amnesty, and too many are willing to sacrifice the lives of white soldiers in pointless wars for Israel. Christianity in Europe has historically, always been a beautiful thing, however, American Evangelicals are very much anti-white, and are not our friends.

      • Jackryanvb

        Agreed.

        Race denying White American Evangelical Christians are a real pain.

        • WASP

          Agreed and they have been taught this racial equality, diversity nonsense in their churches — which is not Biblical. Their young, White daughters are carrying around mulattoes, and even more surreal and ridiculous are White grandma’s and grandpa’s carrying their bushy-haired, dark-skinned grandchildren with a big stupid grin on their faces.

          • Jackryanvb

            The Romans should have thrown these types to the Lions and spared us this treason.

      • NorthernWind

        The problem with many Evangelicals is that their brains are non-functional. They simply go along with whatever their preacher says.

        • RisingReich

          Followers = sheep

        • Andy

          I have not found this to be true, at least in my area. Evangelical Christians here have to be pretty independent-minded, because there are positions that would get them disdained more. Support for amnesty seems to me to be partly sincere (and uninformed) and partly a desperate attempt to get the mainstream to approve them on something.

          Most people just don’t understand that there are racial differences. If you work off that assumption, supporting amnesty is a rational thing to do.

          • Webspin

            “Most people just don’t understand that there are racial differences.”

            This is unfortunately true. Anyone with any common sense should have figured this out by age 20. It’s why I really don’t think the average white is all that bright. They appear smart only by comparison to some other races.

        • WASP

          Now that is very true. I sent a friend of mine two video’s on Bible topics and asked for her opinion. Her only response was that she didn’t look at the video’s and only listens to her minister and his teachings.

      • Erasmus

        A lot of the “evangelicals” now shilling for amnesty are George Soros sock puppets.

    • Viking_61

      At what cost? Half of the 40 million aborted babies since Roe vs. Wade were W-H-I-T-E.

      • The good news is that if someone where to hack in a few clinics a few more lovers, husbands and family members would be guaranteed their right to know.

    • blight14

      We share similar feelings on the issues…………..

    • Jackryanvb

      Stress more humane, non abortion forms of birth control for unhealthy, poor, non Whites, especially the underclass and mountain, tribal Muslims. Present your pro birth control positions as trying to…

      Help these people, help poor women of color have healthier, more prosperous lives, enjoy many of the benefits of wealthy White women.

  • WASP

    I agree with what has been stated thus far; not everything conceived should be brought into this world.

    • Alfred the Great

      I think a way that may tend to make everybody happy is to deport/relocate/colonize them somewhere else. And then we would only have to concern ourselves with our own; and no abortions of our own blood.

      • Alexandra1973

        That’s more or less what I’m saying. Let them worry about their own.

      • WASP

        Sometimes fate is unkind and hard choices must be made. For that reason, I tend to be pro-choice and don’t agree with Rand Paul. I’m a woman. In a more perfect world, abortion would be rare (especially White babies). Certainly, exceptions must be made for incest, rape, severe abnormalities, retardation, the mother’s life, etc. I’ve always believed different races should live separated and each in their own nations.

        • Pro-choice is explicitly a position that children can be thrown away like trash on a whim, it is not the position that there should be ‘special exceptions’ at all.

          • WASP

            I understand some people are pro-life regardless of what the circumstances may be; others are not. I know this issue will always be controversial. I still see abortion as a grey area, but everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion.

  • Alexandra1973

    If you’re okay with aborting black babies, then it follows that you should be able to kill black children, etc., for no reason other than they’re black. And blacks should not go to jail for killing their children. (Yes, I am fully well aware of black savagery.)

    I am against abortion, as it takes an innocent human life–and brainwaves start VERY early. Human life begins at conception. Science has already proven this.

    Now that having been said…we need to criminalize abortion while AT THE SAME TIME sending certain groups home. In fact, abortion technically is illegal (see Fifth Amendment). Roe is not settled law, it’s just a court decision that came about by some activist judges twisting the Constitution.

    Once said groups are back in their own nations, they can do as they please. Abortion is still murder, but just let them deal with it as they see fit, and reap the rewards/consequences.

    I do believe that abortion clinics are set up in “minority” areas on purpose. And my thinking is so it gives them a reason to hate whitey (as if they need a reason). I believe that TPTB do this on purpose to create chaos and eventually have their martial law. Which is another good reason why each race should have its own nation(s).

    • Daniel Schmuhl

      I respectfully disagree, I don’t think it really logically follows though that just because one is in favor of aborting a fetus that one is ok with killing a grown child because of it’s race. One has a well developed nervous system and the other does not. Biologically I don’t think there is a single moment of conception either, it’s gradual process. Is telling blacks to use condoms genocidal?

      • Alexandra1973

        Preventing conception is not the same as killing a child that’s been conceived.

        You were a fetus once, weren’t you? I was. Then I was a newborn baby, then a toddler…and so on.

        I don’t believe in killing the innocent no matter the race. And it wouldn’t be such an issue if “certain groups” would go home.

        • Daniel Schmuhl

          Yes, but the entire argument is based on the assumption that a fetus is a child when I just think it’s a gradual process and there is no single moment that’s what I’m getting at.

          Personally I just don’t find the pro-life arguments convincing.

          • Alexandra1973

            Well, life is the continuum from conception to death. That’s the way I see it.

          • Growth after birth is just the same, single, gradual process. All that matters to survival is whether an organism dies before it passes on its genes.

      • Of course there is a single moment of conception. this may not imply a moral ought, as moral oughts are not inherent qualia of phenomena, but it is obvious that you don’t know what you are talking about before mouthing off about life science and bioethics.

        Let me guess, you follow the HBD net kooks?

    • Spartacus

      If you’re okay with aborting black babies, then it follows that you
      should be able to kill black children, etc., for no reason other than
      they’re black.

      ———————————————————————————————————–

      Yep.

      • David Ashton

        Mass-murder Incorporated has spoken (again).

        • JohnEngelman

          He would have made an enthusiastic guard at a Nazi death camp.

          • Spartacus

            I can imagine all the “survivor” tales: “He waz ze most IIvel man zere ! He gas me six times ! And my cousin Shlomo, he gas him nein timez ! Oy vey!”

          • David Ashton

            The difference is that the holocaust you have explicitly advocated is not going to have survivors with tall stories or true ones, am I right or wrong? Also, it will not include just “six million” Jews but all the Negroes, Gypsies, Muslims and anyone else you could lay your hands on, isn’t that so?

          • RisingReich

            Ah yes GOT to throw the Nazi word in when you have nothing of substance to retort with. Some of us are a bit more passionate about our existance.
            I think it’s hillarious, b/c you’re obviously disturbed by Spartacus. Some of us have had all we’re going to take, and plan for retribution. A word of advice – don’t get in the way.

          • JohnEngelman

            I look forward to the imprisonment and executions of Jew haters.

          • Spartacus

            Aren’t you worried we’ll come back as nazi zombies ?

          • David Ashton

            Retribution?
            Spartacus hates and wants to kill everyone with a “dark skin”, all blacks (one drop presumably included), all Jews, all half-breeds, all Gypsies (including little angel albinos), Turks, Muslims…. I don’t know about Hungarians or Chinese.

            I don’t think you’d find just John Engelman getting in the way, but a large number of normal white people who are just as passionate about preserving the existence of our own race and its civilized values.

          • Spartacus

            “…
            lynching for some, gassing for others, maybe an H-bomb or three?”

            —————————————————————————————-

            Now THAT is the kind of diversity I’d happily embrace .

          • David Ashton

            Are you simply a psychopath, or an ADL plant here to discredit the New Century Foundation as a racist hate-and-genocide organisation?

          • Spartacus

            Not sure about the first issue(after all, if I were a psychopath, odds are I wouldn’t know it) but I can assure you I’m no ADL plant. I’m just tired of people trying to appease those who are openly working for our extermination . The sheer fact that you think me posting some angry words on a public comments section can “discredit” the NCF is just yet another proof of the pathetic shape we’re in, and I’m sick of it.

          • David Ashton

            “Some angry words”? Is that what you call your posts? What you would say or do if you really lost your rag?

            It is just too wearisome to explain the actual problem to which I refer, which has dogged us for decades, except to say that it is not about naming enemies but advocating in “public comments” the wholesale slaughter of people personally innocent of working for “our extermination” who just happen to be born with a different appearance from some pseudonymous “sick” Romanian.

          • Spartacus

            When the RAF was bombing German civilians, they didn’t do it because they were “sick” . Those civilians were helping the enemy government directly and indirectly, regardless of whether they individually held any malcontent against you guys.

            Tis the same thing in our current situation. When Klansmen or Skinheads have any kind of public gathering, you see tons of White people protesting them, but you never see any blacks protesting against the New Black Panthers when they yell “I WANNA KILL ME SOME CRACKER BABIES!” . When Lee Rigby was chopped up in the streets like a pig on Christmas Eve, I personally saw the muslim “spiritual leaders” on CNN and BBC, and NOT A SINGLE ONE CONDEMNED THE ACT ! They blabbered about how this was caused by Britain’s foreign policy, and said they don’t believe in violence, but not a single one of them directly said they were against it. When Ignatiev, Spectre, Wise, Mendelsohn and other jews openly act against our interests, do you see any jews being against it ? No, you don’t. You might see one or the other half-hardheartedly oppose some specifics, but there is never any direct condemnation or disapproval .

            Stop defending people that hate you !

          • David Ashton

            There were protests over Lee Rigby which the news-media failed to publicise.

            I must stop beating my wife too, as the saying goes.

            The experienced enemies of white civilization are only too content to sidetrack all our efforts into the closed prison of jew jabber and keep us trapped on this particular treadmill.

          • David Ashton

            Guard? Too tame an occupation to judge from previous contributions, deleted or retained.

          • JohnEngelman

            Guards forced people into the gas chambers. I think he would have enjoyed that.

          • David Ashton

            He doesn’t believe there were any gas chambers. The Nazis let him down there. There is a difference between a holocaust revisionist and a holocaust revivalist. He has grander ambitions of his own, and that is the point here.

          • Spartacus

            “In a dramatic and unprecedented videotaped interview,
            Dr. Franciszek Piper, senior curator and director of archives of the Auschwitz
            State Museum admitted on camera that ‘Krema 1,’ the alleged ‘homicidal
            gas chamber’ shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year
            at the Auschwitz main camp, was, in fact, fabricated after the war by the
            Soviet Union -apparently on the direct orders of Josef Stalin.

            What Piper said – in effect and on camera – was that
            the explosive 1988 Leuchter Report was correct: no homicidal gassings took
            place in the buildings designated as ‘homicidal gas chambers’ at Auschwitz.

            With this admission by none other than the respected
            head of the Auschwitz State Museum, one of the most sacred ‘facts’ of history
            has been destroyed. This ‘gas chamber’ is the major historical ‘fact’ on
            which much of the foreign and domestic policies of all Western nations
            since WWII are based.”

            http://rense(DOT)com/general53/aauz(DOT)htm

          • David Ashton

            I have read Mattogno, Faurisson, Rudolf and Butz, among others. In fact, I met Butz in London some years ago.

            They do not condone or advocate the mass-murder of helpless and innocent children of a different pigmentation.

            You do.

          • Spartacus

            If it were merely a matter of pigmentation, I wouldn’t bother . But it’s not, and you know it .

          • David Ashton

            OK then. Of a different combination of genes. Still massacre, and you know it.

      • Alexandra1973

        My point is, I’m against genocide.

        But I am all for deportation. Send them home.

        • Spartacus

          Most of these “people” are incapable of even feeding themselves. Deportation, and not allowing them to parasite on Whites,is a death sentence .

          • David Ashton

            So hunt them all out and lynch them all on the spot, whether or not they have done anything wrong?

            Or would that be too quick and painless for you?

            Do these futile sentiments really advance our cause?

          • Spartacus

            No. But acting out on them, when the time comes, will . And the time is coming fast .

          • David Ashton

            I am beginning to wonder if my time is best spent in contributing any longer to this website. I shall see what the next News selections bring forth, and decide whether or not transfer my efforts and proposals for constructive world-wide white self-defense and advancement to more rational and productive sites.

            You will have to wait a bit longer to murder me too.

    • David Ashton

      What about eugenic contraception including sterilization, voluntary or compulsory depending on the circumstances?

    • Lt_Greyman_NVA

      I’m pro-choice for Blacks.

      As to Whites, Excuse me, but we know a lot more about genetics now than in the past. Terrible deformities, non-optimal couples, people that carry all sorts of genetic
      diseases and weaknesses for cancers, physical deformities, etc that can be removed simply by Counseling, which for a negro does not work. They sleep with whatever they can, their sisters, their mothers (Calling them “Their little man”) so they make their own brothas and sistas, etc (See: http://youtu.be/FpvZbKvEEEY ).

  • Pro_Whitey

    I have historically been a pro-lifer, and thinking about what an abortion actually entails versus the euphemisms used to describe it can still upset my stomach. However, we have two major problems.
    One is that white women have been very much infected with the idea that being able to kill their own children in the womb is all-important. I would rather attract white men, and bring white women along with them, with an agenda that is at least implicitly pro-white: immigration control and enforcement, trade balance, and ending affirmative action. If we can build a solid coalition of whites on issues like that, I think we can broach the subject of how abortion is a form of suicide for whites.
    The other is that we whites are at great risk of being overwhelmed by the blacks and browns. Current demographic trends bear that out. Every abortion of one of them helps us forestall the awful consequences of that turn.
    As for eugenics, I doubt it was truly “discredited”. To the extent there is a welfare state, the dysfunctional are subsidized, and the functional are impressed into service via taxation to support them. Some kind of control of their population is necessary to encourage function and discourage dysfunction. The existence of dysfunction is not random.

    • Kenner

      Perfectly reasoned. –Thanks.

  • 48224

    “Are we prepared to select out the imperfect among us?”
    YES WE ARE! But instead of calling them “imperfect” how about we call them: Criminally insane, mentally retarded, chronicly unemployed, unproductive, burdens to society?

  • Spartacus

    If a serious eugenics program started tomorrow in the US, the country would become over 90% White in less than a generation .

  • bigone4u

    Mandatory sterilization comes with the EBT card. Mandatory sterilization for rapists. Mandatory sterilization for IQ below 90. We might quibble about eugenics, but the positive would surely outweigh the negatives.

    • Jackryanvb

      Agreed. Just add one more:

      Mandatory sterilization for open border immigration Libertarian loons like Rand Paul and Ron Paul.

    • 48224

      I read a news story that said some east coast state passed a law which dictated that if a woman on welfare became pregnant and had another child, her welfare payments would NOT increase. Abortions went up 50% in the state. I wish I had the story or the link. Maybe someone else has it.

    • RisingReich

      How about we quicken things a bit – mandatory execution for rapists that we can confirm commited the cirme with DNA? Why waste time and give them an opportunity to live?
      I guess I’m all out of sympothy. They have no sympothy for us.

  • Jesse James

    The problem with eugenics and governments is wondering who they will select to decide who to get rid of and what constitutes good characteristics. Could you imagine how the current administration would administer a eugenics program? I vote no to eugenics under our current political system. Didn’t we just learn that the Homeland Security apparatus that so called patriots helped cheer lead into existence can in our extremely volatile political system go from protecting you to persecuting you in a single election cycle?

    • David Ashton

      Of course state control of reproduction depends on the state and its objectives. However, mainstream eugenics has had similar aims as education and medicine, to improve the mental and physical capability of future generations.

    • WR_the_realist

      I favor scientifically based, voluntary eugenics. The only thing I want the state to do is stop subsidizing dysgenics. The government needn’t be involved in eugenics programs, and is likely to corrupt them if it is.

      • GeneticsareDestiny

        I agree. I am against forced sterilization for anyone, but I am very pro-voluntary sterilization, and the government needs to stop subsidizing dysgenics now.

        I think it would be nice to see the government simply shift the monetary incentives they’re already giving out around a little though. If they provided low IQ people with powerful monetary incentives to not reproduce, low IQ birthrates would plummet. For instance, a program that offered generous welfare benefits for poor unemployed/unemployable people who stay childless (and who lose some of the benefits if they have children) would be great.

  • Dave4088

    Perhaps the Rand man could have also mentioned the dysgenic system of taxing productive, law abiding, working and middle class whites into the poorhouse so that they cannot afford children and flooding our living space with violent non-whites. Of course, race doesn’t matter to the economically obsessed libertarians unless it’s to parade around the token black and brown libertarians.

  • sbuffalonative

    Paul looked to energize conservative supporters by warning that genetic tests could identify those who are predisposed to be short, overweight or less intelligent so that they could be eliminated.

    Well, he certainly didn’t energize me.

  • Larry Klein

    What’s the problem again?

  • Larry Klein

    I used to be against abortion, since it’s a policy promoted by liberal feminists and does seem barbaric. But it’s hard to ignore the fact that it’s the only form of birth control practiced by the stupid, irresponsible and diverse parts of our society. So one can definitely warm up to the practice

    • Viking_61

      50% of abortions are white babies. 40 years ago most abortions were white babies.

      This country would have had another 30-40-50+ million whites (including future offspring) if abortion was never legalized.

  • Luca

    Blacks are having illegitimate births and abortions at a very high rate and will continue to do so. They pretty much do as they damn well please as long as the gub’mint is paying for it.

  • TheCogitator

    Rand Paul is wrong on this one. Blacks use abortion more than whites, without abortion there would be even more of them. No sane person could think that would be an improvement.

    We need to use the tendencies of blacks and other degenerates to accept some reward to be sterilized. It is either that, or ….

    • redfeathers

      Sean Hannity thinks the US would be a better place with the extra millions of non-aborted blacks. Oh, you said no sane person……

  • Jackryanvb

    Oh dear.

    There’s a reason “Libertarian” sounds a lot like “Liberal”.

  • willbest

    The idea was discredited because the technology didn’t exist. It will in 20-25 years.

  • NoMosqueHere

    Rand Paul and his dad also support open borders. So under the Paul regime we will have many more millions of third worlders, in addition to the inability of parents to find out if their babies have dreaded diseases.

  • joesolargenius

    Abortion and Religion are the two main subjects that help to divide our race the most , I try to avoid those conversations as much as possible.However I find it really hard to believe that the Human Seed is the only seed in the world that once it has been planted and begins to grow and mature is still not considered to be alive.On the other hand I am starting to believe that Margaret Sanger had the right idea by placing Abortion Clinics near black neighborhoods !

    • Margaret Sanger did no such thing. I do very often sit here wishing people would have some knowledge of subjects they see fit to write about.

  • WR_the_realist

    No eugenics program will produce perfect people. What we can hope is that a scientifically based eugenics program will produce people who are less bad. Who can seriously be against that? Who really wants more genetic diseases, stupider people, or even uglier people? All the “acceptable” elites, apparently.

    Our species breeds its cattle more carefully than it produces its own children.

    • Sick of it

      We will never be rid of genetic disease unless we alter human DNA. ALL of us have dangerous recessives.

      • WR_the_realist

        First, sometime within the next century we may well develop safe ways to alter our DNA. Second, preventing births that are homozygous for genetic disease (as is already done for Tay Sachs disease) will at least prevent a great deal of human suffering.

    • MBlanc46

      The concerns are who is going to decide which other people are going to get to breed, and what means are they going to use to implement those decisions? I’m skeptical that you’ll get majority support for any set of answers to those questions.

  • David Ashton

    Eugenics does not require the killing of sentient and viable babies before or after birth. There are other aspects and methods to improve the fitness of future generations, which is a humanitarian goal.

  • JohnEngelman

    Rand Paul is an example of how selective libertarians are about the liberties they care about.

  • Nathanwartooth

    Yeah Rand, let’s open the borders and produce as many low IQ criminals that we can.

    Funny joke. What’s your real plan?

  • robinbishop34

    Couldn’t it be argued that abortion itself is a eugenics program cloaked as a woman’s right issue?

    How hard would it be to convince the contingent of malleable minded leftist women to believe being sterilized is empowering? All you need is a slogan and a symbolic ‘white male oppressor’ that wants to control their vaginas and bingo… instant control.

    Before you know it these shrill magpies will be endorsing sterilization clinics next to the liquor store; something I could get behind.

  • RisingReich

    This is typical. Idiot politicians and most of the American public have been brainwashed into believing that anything ‘eugenic’ is a NAZI program. Eugenics is exactly what this ‘country’ needs but won’t implement due to PC [email protected]
    As far as ‘conservatives’ go – to hell with them, too. What is left to ‘conserve’ anyhow?
    “When the WHITE parts of apples ROT they turn BROWN.” Think about it.

  • blight14

    So Rand, as one of your KY constituents, am I supposed to shudder when I hear the word ‘eugenics’? Am I to shudder when I hear the name ‘Margaret Sanger’? I do not, on either accord.

  • Juan Outtamany

    I don’t see the problem of liberals killing liberals. Reduces crime.

  • MBlanc46

    I thought that Rand Paul was moving toward the center in order to make a serious run at the presidency in 2016. I don’t see how banging on about eugenics contributes to that. When is Mr. Paul going to have something to say about the real issues that concern us–black crime and violence, millions upon millions of illegal immigrants, monstrous government deficits and unfunded pension liabilities, huge trade gaps, persistent un- and under-employment, the hemorrhage of jobs to Asia?

  • Andy

    There are lots of reasons to oppose abortion. The fact that it improves our gene pool is not one of them.

  • Jackryanvb

    Rand Paul pandering again to Blacks, same as his father – it doesn’t win him any votes, just an attempt to get covered by Lib media.

    The whole Libertarian Rand Paul, Ron Paul show – it’s just a show is to stay in the game enough to get on TV, sell books, promote the cursed race denying Libertarian cult. Like all American race denying cults, the cult leaders at the top get rich, get fame, get to escape regular brutal race realities regular White people face.

    Here’s hoping Rand Paul and top Libertarian cult members do face brutal racial realities.

    We can always hope.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Eugenics – good idea, fighting against Roe v Wade – a waste of political muscle and evidence that many conservatives don’t know how to pick their fights.

    Genetic alterations for longevity and disease control is just around the corner. In fact, while I was perusing The Futurists website last week, I read some predictions to the effect that in the future (assuming we get that far) there will likely be two new human species; those with genetic enhancement and those without it. It projects that these two groups will not only be separated by class, (only the wealthy will have genetic mods) and will likely not be able to interbreed. There are many ways to look at it, but the cynic in me thinks that this is a capitalists dream. The problem is that many whites will also end up in the species that is not genetically enhanced.

    Good to repeat here is the prediction (one of them) made in the book “Before the Dawn.” They say that in the future, human species unable to interbreed will likely develop as more racial mixing takes place. This is because it is mutations from “inbreeding” that create opportunities for natural selection and the more “outbred” a subject becomes the less mutations there are, until there are none. The groups will have to seek those with similar genetics in order to reproduce. Those that remained the purist by limiting their mates to members of their own racial groups will have the better chance of evolving, but will not be able to breed with the others.

    • David Ashton

      The irony here is implicit advocacy of racial mixing. The evolutionary process has been one of subspecies developing into species by separate breeding with some mutations separate from mutations elsewhere.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        I guess you mean Rand Pauls’ statement? As for my last paragraph, if that is what you are referring to, I don’t think it (the book) advocates anything one way or another. It points out in a scientific way, that race mixing is ultimately against nature. If questioned directly, I think they’d (have to) deny that, but it is there to understand without an implicit announcement.

        As I reported, the lack of those mutations in mixed race individuals means that those that did not mix would become a separate species and the mixed population would not be able to reproduce if they had sex with them.

        There are a number of different ways to look at it. One of them is that this could be nature’s way of rebelling against a too high human population. Personally, my view is that it was never natural for races to mix, especially in the mass collision of dna that modern transportation, etc., has allowed.

        My last paragraph also implies that the most mixed individuals actually represent devolution, but we knew that already.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Is “breathing” the definition of life (for you) then? A fetus cannot breath on its own until quite late in gestation. Again, when are whites going to learn to pick battles that they can win?

  • David Ashton

    Yes, I feel just as angry. I believe in self-defense. I do not think it helps to propose the genocide of all non-whites in retaliation.

  • disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

    Were you to do a word association test with 1000 random people and have them say the first word that comes to their mind after you say a word, I bet almost all of them would say Adolph Hitler after you say the word eugenics. The word eugenics is probably the most stigmatized word in the English language and this is why a politician like Rand Paul would attempt to use it to his advantage.
    If we could one day ensure each child is born with a high IQ can you imagine how that could change the world? Eugenics, like any other tool has the potential to be used in both positive and negative ways. Rand Paul is just looking for attention.

  • Sick of it

    Woah, if the powers that be realize you reasoned this out by yourself, you might wind up on the list…

  • IKantunderstand

    Eugenics made simple: The lighter your skin tone, the smarter you are. Interesting side effect: the lighter your skin tone, the more attractive you are. Period.

    • It has actually been suggested that genes for black skin increase the likeliness of a lower IQ score in themselves.

  • Jackryanvb

    Shouldn’t you be doing race denying Libertarian loon “outreach” to Islamic extremists/US Citizens in Yemen?

  • Jackryanvb

    You haven’t been “saved” until you’ve been saved from the race denying, open border immigration Libertarian cult.

    Don’t try to use reason with these Ron and Rand Paul Libertarian cult followers, just bar the door and keep them out. Like vampires, once you invite them across your threshold, they will never leave.

    • RyanP

      Actually, I think Ron Paul differs from the pure libertarian view on immigration. This may have changed in recent years but he has had a long history of arguing against open borders.

    • Northern American-Nationalist

      Your first line is why, in American parlance, I’m a paleolibertarian.

      I’ve been all over Ron Paul for years now, but not Rand so much. I imagine he’ll end up being to libertarians what Obama is to progressives . . . Think about it.

      The one issue with open borders is usually my only political disagreement with most libertarians, but I stayed true to my nationalist roots throughout my engagement in the struggle for liberty, so what I’m saying is we’re not all so bad or (color-)blind for that matter.

  • Brian

    Every civilization falls eventually, whether it has ‘child sacrifice’ or not.

  • Yet pro-lifers stood shoulder to shoulder with choicetards and actual baby killers to try and fight the humanitarian scheme Project Prevention.

    That said though anyone who has killed a white baby in the womb or otherwise should be used as body parts to shorten the waiting list. That way they’ll give life instead of taking it, and by their medical records we shall know them.

    Given the number of Jews at AmRen it seems likely the number of posts bashing the (admittedly often daft) pro-life movement are less about blacks breeding the fastest than they are about the general birthrate of we goyim needing to be controlled. In Weimar Germany there was a great conflict of interest between Jewish eugenicists like Felix Thielhaber and real, native German ones. Thankfully the German perspective prevailed in the 1930s.

  • And remember Savalescu’s argument, though presumably as a thought game, that “racism” be wiped out via eugenics.

  • Soft eugenics would likely fail because of the traits people find desirable. For example societies notion of ‘intelligence’ is simply getting As at tests after learning by rote, not a statement about critical thinking. Personality traits that lead to freethought or pushing an idea in the face of concensus would likely be deemed dysgenic as opposite personality types are more docile and therefore unlikely to rebel against parents. Eventually allowing soft eugenics would lead to good looking airheads.

  • No, prohibition worked at its goal, which was not to stamp out alcohol for its own sake, but to reduce social problems related to alcohol.

    Illegalisation, like taxation, drives up prices and therefore makes something less common and less available.

  • WASP

    Since her father is Armenian, which is south of southern Russia and borders on Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey, I would say she is not entirely White, hence her physical appearance as you described.