Oxford Grooming Gang: We Will Regret Ignoring Asian Thugs Who Target White Girls

Allison Pearson, Telegraph (London), May 15, 2013

Rochdale, Rotherham, Derby, Oxford. The towns change, but the pattern is always the same. Gangs of men, mainly of Pakistani Muslim heritage, lure white girls as young as 10 with gifts and displays of affection. Next, the girl is raped as a way of “breaking her in”. Once the child’s spirit is subdued, and her mind fogged with drugs, she is sold for sex to multiple men at £200 a time. If the girl tries to break away, a gang member might threaten to behead her or firebomb her home. Mohammed Karrar, who was found guilty in the Oxford sex-grooming case this week, took a scalding hairpin and branded one girl so she would know she was his property. Later, the gang gave the same girl a DIY abortion. She was 12 years old. And this, all this, is happening in Britain now.

In a particularly warped twist, the pimp will teach his victim that her parents are racist towards Asians, which is why they disapprove of their relationship–absolutely nothing, of course, to do with him being a violent, controlling thug. Gang members have grown wise to the wimpy ways of Western society. They exploit the fact that police, newly trained in “cultural sensitivity”, are terrified of being accused of racism. So the pimps operate with impunity until, years later, the slave girls find the courage to testify in court against their masters.

We all know what happens next, don’t we? Leaders of the Pakistani Muslim community – essentially a Victorian society that has landed like Doctor Who’s Tardis on a liberal, permissive planet it despises – are at pains to deny that the grooming gang’s behaviour has anything to do with ethnic origin or contemptible attitudes towards women.

Then Sue Berelowitz, the lamentably foolish deputy children’s commissioner, trots out her lame line that Asian men targeting white girls is “just one of a number of models”, even though such “models” account for an improbably large proportion of all gang sexual abuse. Did Berelowitz not hear Nazir Afzal, Chief Crown Prosecutor for North West England, when he blamed “imported cultural baggage” for appalling crimes by members of his own community? “The men think that women are some lesser being,” he said.

The chief constable who was in charge while all that torture and rape was going on in Oxford appeared on Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday and said that she took “full responsibility” for shocking police failures. But, no, Sara Thornton, head of Thames Valley Police, would not be resigning. Why ever not?

Because saying you take responsibility is the new not taking responsibility, stupid. All that remains is for the panel on tonight’sQuestion Time to do a little gentle hand-wringing about the Oxford horrors before it concludes that no particular group is implicated in these vile, misogynistic crimes. And, once again, the fear of racism will have trumped sexism, and hundreds of young girls – or the “hollow shells” of girls, as one tearful copper called them – will be betrayed. Then we can all sit back comfortably and wait till the next hideous court case comes along, probably in Bradford, where at least 30 men have been arrested in the past few months over child sex-grooming allegations. Sue Berelowitz may believe the perpetrators could turn out to be Buddhist podiatrists. But I wouldn’t count on it.

At least some good has come from this spate of incredibly distressing cases. Those brutalised young women have not testified against their tormentors in vain. Courageous Muslim writers and community workers have spoken out with repugnance and great moral clarity. Kris Hopkins, the MP for Keighley and Ilkley, believes the police crackdown in Bradford reveals that the political correctness that made the authorities reluctant to act in the past is gone.

Maybe. But what remains is a political class still far too timid to challenge growing and alarming separatism in Muslim education and law. It is 30 years since I first taught English to Bangladeshi women in their flats in Tower Hamlets, and I still remember how those smiley, interested ladies shrank and cowered when their husbands came home. Only one thing can permanently change the misogynist behaviour of certain Pakistani men and that is the education and empowerment of their daughters. Female emancipation drags societies with even the darkest attitudes towards the light. But what hope is there of those girls getting the education and status they need to take their men to task?

Back in January, there was a profoundly disturbing case at Nottingham Crown Court. Adil Rashid, who had “raped” an underage girl, was spared a prison term after the judge heard that the naïve 18-year-old attended an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless. Rashid told psychologists he had no idea that having sex with a willing 13-year-old was against the law; besides, his education had taught him to believe that “women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground”.

If the fresh-faced Rashid had picked up that view in a madrassa in Karachi it would be profoundly depressing, though not surprising. But the school he attended was in Birmingham, for heaven’s sake! Although it cannot be named for “legal reasons”, the school is voluntary-aided – mainly funded by the taxpayer. At this hugely popular Islamic school, where a majority of pupils are from a Pakistani background, boys and girls are taught in separate classes; a segregation policy no normal comprehensive could get away with.

Rashid’s barrister said: “The school he attended, it is not going too far to say, can be described as a closed community.” So, the defence against a rape charge by a young Muslim living in 21st-century Britain was not just ignorance of the law (which should be no defence at all). It was that the law and, indeed, the values of the wider country, were irrelevant in his Islamic school, even though it was a state institution funded by citizens who would go straight to jail if, for instance, they tried to have sex with a child.

The fact that the judge accepted Rashid’s defence shows what a god-awful mess this country has got itself into over multiculturalism.

I reckon Britons in a hundred years’ time will look back at us in outraged astonishment for allowing Islamic schools to flout the laws of the land and teach boys that women are worthless. All Islamic schools should be obliged to introduce mixed-sex classes, so boys can learn at first hand that girls are their equals, or those schools should be closed.

If you teach boys that a female is no better than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground, eventually you produce a pimp who thinks that you break a girl’s spirit as though she were a horse, before branding her with your initial. That man and those attitudes have no place, no place at all, in Britain now.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • PLEASE stop calling ‘Paki’s” Asian.

  • steve7789

    A lot of these girls have no fathers to protect them. A major cause of this is that militant feminists in our government have been pushing for women’s “emancipation” which in practice means dependence on the taxpayer for their children’s livelihood instead of a husband.

    • Freya

      Oh don’t try to blame and scapegoat feminists for all of society’s problems, least of all it’s misogyny. Did you read the author’s opinion of females:

      “All Islamic schools should be obliged to introduce mixed-sex classes, so boys can learn at first hand that girls are their equals, or those schools should be closed.”

      • Jotun Hunter

        feminism has proven the lynchpin key to our downfall – no other race pays the slightest attention to it. women were never repressed throughout the entirety of history just fulfilling their nature as mothers and caregivers. wherever women get control they destroy creativity

        • Freya

          Poppycock.
          How on earth people turn this author’s expose on islamic misogyny into a witch hunt for feminists is beyond me. I attended a very misogynist university and the main complaint from disaffected men was that it repressed creativity.

          • Morris LeChat

            well, it is beyond you because you do not wish to face a simple explanation that another poster already stated and is as follows: “A lot of these girls have no fathers to protect them.”. Do you dispute that this is correct? If you do then you are just plain wrong. Do you refuse to connect the obvious dots between fatherless little girls and feminism? IF you do then once again, you refuse to accept obvious truths. YOu do not think with reason, just emotion, you dispute how damaging feminism is and yet you give a good illustration of the dysfunction of feminine thought.

          • White Mom in WDC

            It is not feminism. There people out there who are fatherless because their fathers died on the job. Yes, fathers are protectors. Mothers are protectors. My son was almost jumped in broad daylight by a little turd at a park. I got in that kids face and told him I’d kill him. Gangs of kids and thugs roam the streets if our cities attacking random people. What have the police done!? Nothing. Why? Their to not to ! Why? White people are the enemy. Connect those dots. I called the police once on a gang of teens in DC and the police gave crap’ nothing ever happens here the said. The police know damn well what’s going on, but their hand are tied and they are told by the elites who face bought our government not to do anything. Know this: the poor and middle class whites are the targets in this country. We are the targets. They want us gone and our children gone. They view our daughters as whites and our sons as chattel. Same in Britain. We need a revolution! Don’t ever believe that ANY institution in the USA is on the poor or middle class white persons side, in fact, they despise you and want you to either kiss their ass or you are dead.

          • bigone4u

            I have found what you say to be true. In my observations, the schools, universities, police, politicians and other institutions practice at best benign neglect to helping whites solve their problems. At worst, they are hostile to us.

          • White Mom in WDC

            Thank you

          • Morris LeChat

            “There people out there who are fatherless because their fathers died on the job”– this is a ridiculous and totally unsupported statement. There is an epidemic of single motherhood. The rest of your post is not worth reading after such a totally insane comment.

          • Freya

            Morris, what gravitas you bring to discussions of gender. (sarcasm off.)

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            And what blindness you portray in yours…

          • White Mom in WDC

            So don’t read it. I don’t give two poops what you think anyhow

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Yes, there are some people who are fatherless because their fathers died on the job (as in war), but there is a vastly larger group of fatherless children due to feminist influences on women to divorce a man at the drop of a hat while also neglecting to teach them how to be more selective when choosing a mate in the first place or even to be more selective in choosing who to have children with or by. With highly successful feminist media and entertainers from Madonna to programs like “Sex in the City,” women have become “liberated” in EVERY way, while men are expected to fulfill their traditional roles as providers or suckers, whichever suits the liberated woman.

            Only lately have white women began to see in increased numbers what white men have been seeing and experiencing since the 60s and the rise of the Feminist Movement. That’s a good thing for whites, but don’t project your personal situation onto the majority of cases when it is well known that feminism caused a huge increase in fatherless child rearing. Did you miss NOW and feminists in general when they proclaimed that children didn’t need a father around or that no white woman should bear a white man’s baby?

          • Freya

            When did NOW ever say that no white women should bear a white man’s baby?

          • GM (Australia)

            Disagree totally. Feminism is a very significant element in this whole mess. It is also part of the whole feminist outlook on life to try and destroy traditional values such as a Christian family with a mother who performs her natural role in bringing up her children and a father who can act as a decent role model and teach both his sons and daughters how to to well in life. Feminism is part of the whole loony left that has pushed for open immigration over the past 2 generations.

            As I have posted previously, the ONLY good thing about Islam in our society is that it acts as a brake against feminism, particularly in the education system.

          • Freya

            Please prove this concrete connection between feminism and open immigration. At best it seems tangential.

          • Doctrinally speaking, there is nothing of feminism which demands that its adherents support open borders. However, from a practical political standpoint, modern feminists will almost always vote for open borders, because of the KKKrazy Glue factor.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Actually, not so. Read my post to Freya, above.

          • GM (Australia)

            Hi Freya, my (simple) answer is; “Guilt by association”

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            There actually is a historical line of fact to show a concrete connection, in fact, a huge historical one. But it is now so old and well established that it is a forest and cannot be seen for the trees in it.

            Perhaps, the best illustration comes from the fact of the political alliances made during the early modern Feminist Movement. It’s early modern leaders like Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem were also Marxist oriented Jews as many of the leaders were (Jane Fonda being a conspicuous exception). One place they all met and conferenced in Berkeley was the collective leftist center called “La Penya.” (Which last I knew, still exists). The local public raidio station KPFA was from early on, the mouthpiece of the Feminist Movement. Gloria Steinem is famous for her alliance and support for the Black Panthers. There is stuff on youtube that you can search and find. I found a photo of her with a famous female Black Panther, both with raised fists. Also, all of these Sixties feminists supported the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act as a way of diminishing white male power in America. As many of them were Jews, they were linked to the prominent members of the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School. Emmanuel Cellar was the member who wrote the 1965 document for Ted Kennedy. Herbert Marcuse (regarded as the father of the New Left) was the member who wrote “Eros and Civilization” which was published in 1956 and was devoured at college campuses and a chief influence in both the so-called Beat Movement and the Sexual Revolution. It basically says that sex is a liberating tool for social revolution that would lead to emancipating the oppressed classes. Marcuse was a popular lecturer at all Ivy League campuses and taught political science at the University of San Diego until his retirement in the late 1990s.

            The fact is that the feminist movement sympathized with the Civil Rights Movement and in fact claimed its mission as merely an extension of it. There was also a huge support for Hispanics in general but through the Marxist leader Ceasar Chavez. “La Penya” was where all these groups interwove and found common ground in the Bay Area. But these types of centers sprung up all over the U.S.. Certainly wherever a college or university town was located (except perhaps in the South until much later). I do recall that one of the methods feminist used to ply their philosophy on Southern women was to characterize the condition of Southern Women as oppressed by their white male family members and husbands by the same system that enslaved and oppressed blacks. John Lennon wrote a song with Yoko Ono that contained the words, “Woman is the N***er of the world.” Relentless programs like requiring all high school children to read, “To Kill a Mockingbird” along with the film and every proclamation such as “Who needs to read the works of a bunch of Dead White Men,” were feminist created slogans.

            By the time NOW was making the argument against the necessity of a father in a family and the case that no white woman should bear any white man’s child, feminism was generalized into the mind’s of most young women. (Today were are in what is termed “the Post Feminist Period” or “Third Wave Feminism,” were almost anything a woman chooses to do, from porn to the occupation of the Chief Executive seat in the White House is all defending as the right and result of a liberated female in the West). Part of that effort was seen and it was official, that by increasing immigration from non-European, even non-Western countries, their goal of killing off the hated white male would be more quickly realized. But in general, everyone was against the system and the system was successfully characterized by NOW as a “good old boys club” of white, male chauvinist, sexist pigs,” and everyone else was made their ally. (You may not recall due to your youth, but the hatred NOW and these feminists spewed out was not just loud, but a daily event). Today, anti-male propaganda has been distributed for almost four decades in colleges as “women’s studies,” and are unchallengeable due to their seniority and a general situation of feminist control at nearly every college and university in America. One bit of evidence is the Protected Groups system for putting every special interest group, especially females in front of any white male in any consideration of inclusion, hiring, scholarship, etc. You can read about most of this by consulting some of the “tell all” books written by Tammy Bruce for one, who was the president of the LA Chapter of NOW until she went rogue on them. Her book, “The New Thought Police,” was her first and a good one to start with. But the literature out there and searchable matter on the internet is out there for anyone to find. People like me are old enough and were near enough to the actors and action to remember what happened and see its effects today.

          • I don’t think your missive here contradicts my point above. You are outlining the practical politics of feminism, that it’s a core component of the left wing coalition, and as such, cooperates within that framework. Because we live in the real world, we have to oppose feminism for that reason alone. Theoretically, in a world where the only kind of human beings are white, there can be a feminist movement.

          • romulus

            You are indiputably correct in your analysis. If we observe the collision of the feminist movement,unchecked miscegenation and third world immigration(both legal and illegal) our people will reach a tipping point for our survival. It will arrive when there arent enough equal breeding pairs of our race that share common genetic inheritances. A 2.1 birthrate (minimum) is required to replace a given population. We may have to have blond males reproduce with multiple females. At least the Duggars and the mormons have the right idea. For further analysis, please read “The death of the west” by patrick j. Buchanan, “The dipossessed majority by Wilmott Robertson.

          • Freya

            Without addressing every instance in which you blur distinctions between feminists and between them and various elements of the civil rights movement, I will ask how it is you consider that white feminists wanted to ‘kill off the white male’ without killing off themselves. I also don’t accept that there is anything pathological to whites to have a woman president.

          • Morris LeChat

            Yes, of course it is, but it is useless to talk to women. Ignore the silly creatures

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            What you call the Christian family existed in the world before Christianity and in other places besides Christian dominated societies. Humanity would not have survived up to the advent of the Christian epoch if the family had not been established as the basic cultural unit of any society long before.

          • OlderWoman

            White women were suckered by Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine which was funded by the CIA, to destroy White Christian families. As a result White women are more morally loose and independent now. These femininazis blame men for all their problems. They’ve been masculinized because they drank Steinem’s poison rhetoric and like blacks and AA members they play the professional victim card.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I find it hard to believe my comment was deleted – regardless, id rank feminism on a level of threat equal to islam. it decimates the family and birthrates – women in the work force merely means more reality tv, more celebrity gossip, more bad taste and terrible music, more postmodernism in thought and architecture…

          • RisingReich

            The closer you get to the truth the more likely your post will be deleted. Consider yourself part of a club that is fighting the good fight.

          • Djangotamer

            The problem is that what you interpret as “misogyny” is due (in some cases) to behavior caused by genetic predisposition. Males are programmed to act in certain ways towards females, and vice versa. No amount of social conditioning is going to change that anytime soon.

          • Freya

            Sorry, I don’t believe that epidemic levels of rape are programmed in the human species. What’s odd is that men who express such terror and paranoia about women’s ’empowerment’ are the same ones who consider male domination to be the natural order. If that is so, then how have these female stormtroopers beaten you? I guess it’s just the natural order.

          • Djangotamer

            Although misogyny is no doubt inextricably tied to rape-once again, in most cases; rape specifically is not what I was referring to in my comment. I was referring to the fact that males are naturally more aggressive/assertive than females, due to inherent male biology. “Male domination” may not be the natural order, but male assertiveness certainly IS the natural order. Social conditioning will never change this fact.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            It’s beyond you because you haven’t thought it out. That is likely because you’re either brainwashed into feminism since a young age and/or not being objective. The writer of the article called for a feminist styled cure, which won’t work anyway.

            We can’t say that having fathers to protect them would stop what is going on, but we can say that most of these children come from single female parent households. The PC culture in the UK has gone so far that even if there is a man around, he hands are politically tied, just the same as the police’s have been. This is the result of feminism and it’s war against any notion of British Nationalism.

          • Freya

            You’re making a huge leap and assumption; I don’t feel comfortable saying that most of these girls come from single female parent households. I’d need to statistics. In my experience girls become vulnerable from all different sorts of angles, and the same goes for boys.

        • Morris LeChat

          Very true. The fall of the west can be tracked directly to giving women political power. Unfortunately, the Margaret Thatchers are very rare.

      • steve7789

        I don’t believe feminists are responsible for all of society’s problems, just a huge chunk of them. Ironically, the white feminist hostility to large families is a major reason behind the Islamisation of Europe.

        • Freya

          I have never seen or heard of any ‘white feminist hostility to large families,’ nor have I ever seen proof that this alleged aggression motivated the Islamisation of Europe. Even if your first contention were accurate, it doesn’t cause the second anyway.

          • NYB

            There will always be a balance of cooperation and struggle between the sexes. That’s nature’s way. We should understand it and welcome it as the foundation of Modern Western Civilization.

            Unfortunately for the West, this dynamic is being exploited by people with other agendas.

            ‘Third Wave Feminism’ attempts to graft Marxism, multi-racialism, and anti-Western ideals together into a coalition against white male heterosexual gentiles. Third Wave Feminism is pro-immigrant, anti-gun, anti-European, anti-border, pro-socialism, etc.

            This is a corruption of the original feminism, which was intended for a heterogeneous white civilization.

          • IstvanIN

            Feminism was a largely Jewish female phenomenon.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            At least the modern epoch was… Betty Friedan wrote, “The Feminine Mystique” that projected her unhappiness onto all American women in the 50s. Gloria Steinem was half Jewish (a Jewish father that deserted early on). But Jane Fonda was not Jewish. Betty Friedan was not all that supportive of the radical feminists of the late 60s because they went a lot farther in what you could call “sleaziness” as part of their act and also the hatred they spewed was not kosher to Betty, either. You can look their bios up online.

          • OlderWoman

            funded by the CIA. Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan slowly poisoned White women’s minds by portraying them as victims. They taught women to hate White Christian men. Feminazi’s are like blacks. No matter how much you cater to them they’ll still find some way to blame males for their problems. Feminazi’s are hard and resentful…and those character traits are destructive traits. No sane man wants to be around women who have the entitlement attitude.

          • Romulus

            Once again, another truth exposed. Thank you. Im sure you wouldn’t be surprised that you little factoid is also “true” throughout western civilizations history. Who could forget Joan of the ark ( of the covenant).

          • zanegray

            Feminism was also tacitly supported by the political establishment in the 60s and 70s because of labour shortages and the need for women in the workplace at that time. This was certainly the case in the UK.

            And when we ran out of women we brought in immigrants.

          • bigone4u

            Muzzies are evil raping misogynists to an unsettling degree. Agreed? Too many white men, hearing the siren song of sexual freedom, have behaved atrociously and immorally toward their wives, lovers, and offspring. Agreed? Some white women, hearing the siren song of feminist independence and fulfillment, have behaved irresponsibly toward their husbands, lovers, and offspring. Agreed?

            If white men and white women had not been duped by the lure of an enticing but ultimately false vision of freedom, little girls and boys would be safer because the family unit would be intact and functional. I think that’s the point of this thread in a nutshell.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Actually, you put it very well. I always go into detail, because I feel that historical detail ensures a deeper understanding as well as references that can be confirmed.

          • RisingReich

            I’m sure our in-house feminist general would find some delusional reason to disagree with your very factual post.

          • Romulus

            I agree completely. Of course,that is the underlying goal, to annihilate the traditional family that was the bedrock of white civilization.

          • sbuffalonative

            You can’t deny that one of the basic tenants of feminism is that women shouldn’t need to depend on men. ‘Career first, family… maybe later.’
            I value a strong women with strong opinions but not to the point where they end up sterile spinsters. A strong woman with strong convictions in terms of rearing a family is an asset in my opinion.

          • Freya

            I agree and disagree quite heartily. I don’t think women should have to depend on men, but I also don’t see any need to create a divide between the sexes either. I believed career and family didn’t have to
            be mutually exclusive. A strong woman with strong convictions in terms of doing both seems like the ideal to me!

          • OlderWoman

            My former church’s downfall was directly related to allowing women to become pastors and to hold office in the church. Once women took over they began to promote political correctness. Many churches suffered under female leadership. Women should never be in positions of power over men. I’ve worked for a now deceased feminist in the Nashville music business and she was more sexist than the men I worked for. Jewish men were responsible for helping me achieve my career successes.

          • Gunrunner1

            Freya, now you are being disingenuous. Feminists have been insisting for years that having children locks the female into the home (and rightly so) and by so doing is “oppressive” and ‘patriarchal” and there for evil, even though it is the core of the family unit. Such thinking has destroyed the family in europe, where Whites are halving (!) in number every generation. Want to stick it in the eye of a liberal, have lots of nice white babies!

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I actually don’t think that a white woman should just have baby after baby. We need quality, not quantity. Making white women into baby machines only will only result in a more ignorant and more easily led white population. There needs to be a balance. But I would agree with anyone who says that the non-white baby making world needs to be controlled and by almost any means.

          • Bobby

            Nonsense. Quality is a result of quantity. One person of quality has more effect than do ten people who are below par. We need white people by the billions in todays world.

          • Most women, feminist or not, wind up having kids. What you’re dredging up is a dated, 70s-era image of the “radical feminist” as a social type.

          • Freya

            No, they insisted that being locked out of ‘equal pay’ and opportunity in the workplace is oppressive and patriarchal. The feminism I was exposed to emphasized the concept of choice, in whether a woman wanted to marry, have kids, etc., and of how she chose to raise them and provide for them if she did. It also promoted choice for men. Most feminists fought for the rights of women who wanted to both have kids and compete on some level playing field with men in the workforce. This notion that feminism sought to somehow sterilize white women just isn’t accurate, which is not to say that there weren’t fundamental problems in the movement, particularly for whites.

          • RisingReich

            Your blathering is completely transparent idiocy. It’s obvious you can’t see past your own self delusion. Stupid ass women like yourself are a a large part of what is destroying Whiteness in America

          • Nicator

            You are shockingly dull.

          • Freya

            In the context of the reactionary extremism shown on this thread and with regards to feminism in general on this site I take that as a major compliment. I might list the ability to shock and bore at the same time on my resume.

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

          While I agree with you, I would like to make a reply just as a way of unpacking some of the history of the whole mess.

          What drove the issue of smaller families in the beginning was not actually feminism so much as the once very strong, Zero Population Growth Movement. Since the 1950s, this was a movement that had projected the growth of humanity and predicted a vast array of human and planetary tragedies if we did not begin to realize that what was required was “quality in humanity, not quantity.” That movement began in Northern Europe. I actually attended grad school with the daughter of the American chapter of the movement and they were a Danish/American family. The influence of the movement was strong until the early 90s when it was common to see a commercial on tv proclaiming that the right family size was something like 2.3 (which I always found amusing. How does one have a .3 child?) The problem was that only Western, typically Protestant dominated white nations took it to heart.

          Feminist were against large families because it made women slaves (they claimed). I have to agree with that to a degree, as I also agree that what we need is quality in humanity, including whites, not quantity. What feminists DID do was get a lot of anti-male laws passed based on issues like domestic violence and the increase of grayer definitions of rape to the point that men became reluctant to marry. Witch hunt after witch hunt ensued as these new statutes became a great revenue source for prosecuting attorneys, raison d’etre for various feminist oriented organizations and even the creation of new bureaucratic departments in local, state and federal government. Remember the one where phony councilors enabled women to remember how their fathers abused them and wrecked families by the hundreds? Remember the “marital rape” outbreak? It goes on and on. So what intelligent man really wants to sign a contract when the conditions he enters into are so stacked against him?

          Only a few of us started to look around and say, “Hey, no one but white people are limiting their family size voluntarily.”

          What happened was in the 80s and then more so in the 90s, condemning big families became a way of insulting Hispanics. You’ll find La Raza and other Latino interest groups in that period were defending the Latino family as superior to the typical American one, etc. So it became Politically Incorrect to criticize large families. I think this issue swept away all others. Hardly anyone talks about world overpopulation now, except a few scientists. Stephen Hawkins has gone as far to say that we’d better find another planet to live on soon (as well as a way to get there).

          The other nail in the coffin is that once the results of Zero Population Growth was understood by governments and even the capitalist world, it was seen as the cause of a soon to arrive economic and revenue contraction. So they supposed that bringing in populations from countries teeming with overpopulated masses would be the solution. It hasn’t turned out to be that simple, but no one has come up with an alternative and it is too late to reverse it now, anyway.

          The conceit of the Feminists and the Internationalists has been that they could turn people from completely different racial, ethnic and cultural groups into the same sort of responsible, productive citizens as the white dominated ones that created the modern, industrialized, Western civil society through some sort of mass indoctrination or by order. This was and continues to be a HUGE and consequential miscalculation.

      • sbuffalonative

        I’m not blaming this on feminism per say but feminists in the west have left women vulnerable to unscrupulous men by telling them they’re strong, independent, and don’t need men for protection.

        As with race, we have to accept biological facts. In the evolution of humans, men were the defenders and protectors of women. Feminism denies this fact and blames men for making women dependent on men for their safety.

        I’m not anti women and pro men but redefining and denying traditional roles of men and women to fit a political agenda is a denial of evolution and biology.

        • brengunn

          In the evolution of humans, men were the defenders and protectors of women.

          This is, of course, true but there is also a darker side to this scenario which our Muslim friends also exhibit. Women with absolutely no power, always being segregated and kept in the home, made to cover up and wear the veil, little or no choice should they marry a brute who beats and abuses them, always being made to be submissive etc.

          It’s a delicate matter getting the balance of power right but on the whole I believe we have a much better system than most other cultures. The one major problem we have is how to restore child birth and the rearing of children to be central to Western females without them losing the choice to work. I feel there needs to be another major rethink about how Europeans and the European diaspora procreate and make families while also keeping a fairly modern outlook on the roles of the sexes. I have no idea how this is to be done though.

          • sbuffalonative

            Feminists would have us believe that women have always been the victims of men, regardless of cultures and religion.

            While women may not have had the same full rights as men in western tradition, women did have influence and power.

            Just think of the pre-Christian Greek play, Lysistrata.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata

            Is there any comparable tradition of such strong women in Islam?
            Western man often credit ‘their better half’ for their success. Is this idea found in any other culture? Is there anything comparable in say Native American history?
            What about Joan of Arc or Boudica?

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            In my view, it seems like it is the particular effects of Judaism, Christianity and Islam that create through their heavy control systems in their religions, the oppression that results in eventual rebellion and cultural upheaval. Other less severe religions seem to have more harmonious and even more cultural continuity as a result.

            As for the notion of equality between the sexes, it doesn’t exist. We are biologically not equal and politically unequal as a result. What the feminist movement did do was actually make women more equal than men. I could spend a lot of time in illustrating this, but I trust your intellect and general knowledge to fill that in.

          • OlderWoman

            Women rule the world…always have, always will. No matter what Feminists say WOMEN HAVE ALWAYS RULED THE WORLD.

          • Sick of it

            Nothing wrong with the traditional – Wives obey your husbands and husbands love your wives.

          • Sherman_McCoy

            And husbands be willing to lay down your life for your wife. St. Paul was right then, and he is right now. And when either partner in a marriage drops the ball, either the man or the wife for chasing hedonistic pleasures or career at the expense of the marriage, the whole thing falls apart.

          • Sick of it

            Well said. Apparently I’m being moderated.

          • RisingReich

            And that is a damned modern shame.

          • Romulus

            The answer is quite simple. The instant that the collective white peoples of the West realize that they are the minorities in their ancestral lands and brutality ratchets up against them collectively and publicly where it cannot be denied,omitted, or spin away, you will see a massive resurgence in racial consciousness. The one thing that we must “NEVER” surrender under any circumstances whatsoever is the greatest gift the founding fathers ever gave us.
            “A WELL REGULATED MILITIA,BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF THE FREE STATE,THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS,SHAll NOT BE INFRINGED”

          • Jotun Hunter

            we HAD a better system before radical femimism – but that still involves returning to a pre 60s culturael where girls are encouraged to behave like girls and boys like boys. whenever someone even mentions idiot terms like gender roles they shoul be branded a communist and a traitor – a womans role is in the home

            f

        • Gunrunner1

          Agreed. Women are lucky that White men are not adopting Islam, because that would end feminism real quick.

        • RisingReich

          In other words feminists lie to themselves and everyone else. Just like libtards. No good are either one of these groups.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        Maybe not ALL, but most and certainly for the PC, leftist form both here and in the UK and many other Western lands who used “racism” and alliances with “minorities” groups as long as the end result was the persecution of white males. What they replaced it with is a can of worms that will likely never be unraveled enough to save white females from this horrid fate and whites in general from eventual extermination. Feminists in the U.S. (I mean NOW, officially) made proclamations in the late 70s and early 80s that white men were the cause of all evil in the world and that no white woman should bear any white man’s child.

        If you want to be a white race realist and support the survival of whites, you must first deprogram all this horrid feminist junk from your mind as we must from our culture. When our survival was eminent as an everyday reality, men and women worked together successfully and for the benefit of all (meaning the family and then society). Since we have become too wealthy in the West, that model has been replaced by power seeking feminism, which is at the root of most of the West’s historical social disintegration since the beginning of the 20th century. Remember, for example that the feminist temperance movement caused the Volstead Act to be implemented, which opened the door to crime and decadence that saw the rise of the Italian Mafia and other smaller crime organizations that created crime over the use of alcohol, which only increased during Prohibition, but gave organized crime a foothold in all the crimes of vice, prostitution, gambling and eventually the distribution and spread of heroin use in America. That laid the foundation for what is now a national scourge of children doing heroin all over the U.S., and a huge supply coming over the Southern border and gangs fighting for control in U.S. cities, Chicago most notably, but even here in Portland, OR. This is just one example of the Pandora’s Box feminism opened up. This list of hugely consequential misdirection by feminism is long and it goes on daily as feminism has been generalized into our society and political system to the point that its huge hypocrisy is ignored as a general rule.

    • The__Bobster

      Yes, the muzzie savages seek out vulnerable White girls to groom. If the fathers aren’t there, it’s the duty of the police to administer street justice to these invaders.

      • White Mom in WDC

        It’s not the about fathers or no fathers or feminism. It’s about our ‘leaders’ and elite and the tribe trying to destroy white society by preying on its women and law enforcement BEING COMPLICIT. I can tell you for sure that I have worked with ‘street women’ who have all been with cops and have cops pimp them out and dive drugs with cops. Our leadership and laws and enforcers are CORRUPT and COMPLICIT in what’s going on. Just like the Ohio case. The cops knew damn well and probably partook in the hanky lanky. I can drive tonite through DC and point out to you where the whore houses are with teens. It’s happening. Don’t blame the girls or their families, blame the race traitor law enforcers, the laws, the elite, the government, and the squids and the tribe.

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

          They are corrupt because of the Sexual Revolution and the Great Society and the Feminist Movement, all of which led to the lowering of standards until even many white males aren’t the sort of chivalric gentlemen they once were.

          • RisingReich

            And the chivalrous ones left are looked upon by women as weak and stupid and not “worthy”.

          • Korpiklaani

            That is why I used to date Asian, and Hispanic women during my teens, and early 20’s. Ever since I swore I’d only date white women I’ve had nothing but horrible relationship after horrible relationship, and at 24 I’m starting to lose hope of finding a decent wholesome White woman.

          • RisingReich

            I can relate, sadly. I have all but given up on it.

      • 1stworlder

        The father might not be there due to his comiting a “hate crime” against his daughters rapist.

      • Defoe

        And if the police abdicate their duty? Then it’s the duty of other British men to take up that gauntlet, right?

        Where’s the British Bernie Goetz?

    • White Mom in WDC

      The police are complicit in this. They know what’s going on. The squids, the tribe, the elites, and the government via porn and sex slavery are destroying the fabric of white culture; our women. Sex slavery is in the States- The Cleveland case is just the tip of the iceberg. Those police took part on that sick plot. I can take you on yours to ire in DC and show you houses like the ken those girls were in. We are being invaded. Britain’s government, the US government are paid off by squids, the tribe, and elites to destroy the white middle and working class. Most porn stars are white. More white slavery exists in S America and in the Carribean. Girls are kidnapped off cruise ships. It is part if the white genocide. Believe it. It’s happening. Women in Eastern Europe and in Russia apply for jobs and think they are going somewhere for a job and end up in Israel as prostitutes. It is not feminism, it is the tribe, the globalists, the elite and others who have paid the government to demolish the white working class and the white middle class by destroying its women

      • Freya

        I have to say that where I work, which is in events catering all over central northern and northern NJ outside NYC, jewish men in the business and related ones are known for their importing of and liberal patronizing of prostitutes, many of whom sound like they could be enslaved. I try to stay out of it b/c it’s seedy and depressing and kind of hush hush, but it’s true. In general jewish men harbor a lot of hostility and disrespect generally for european white women and have traditionally regarded them as an underclass.

        • White Mom in WDC

          Hence the term shiksa. Means an unclean woman. Usually used for white Christian women

          • bigone4u

            Jewish pron star Nina Hartley acknowledges that Jewish men (like pron star Ron Jeremy) get into the business to have sex with “shiksas.” Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein states that Jews create porn in order to degrade Christianity and Christians. The latest I read on old man Goldstein is that his children will have nothing to do with him and he’s bankrupt. Justice?

          • White Mom in WDC

            Hey, what goes around comes around mang!

          • brengunn

            Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein states that Jews create porn in order to degrade Christianity and Christians.

            C’mon, are we really going to believe stuff like this? He’s making porn for the same reason every other pornographer is, money. I’m not disputing that he said that but I just don’t believe his motivations are to degrade Christians.

          • bigone4u

            I disagree. Sure he made a living from porn but the old saying about doing something you love and it won’t seem like work rings true. The hatred of Christ and Christian values is real with Goldstein.

          • Freya

            You might try the movie All Good Things starring Kirsten Dunst as the lower working class irish blonde shiksa wife of Ryan Gosling, who played her jewish husband and alleged murderer, based on a real life story. His family made their fortune off of the exploitation of women in NYC, and the movie portrays his wife-beating and eventual killing as a function of this evil misogyny. It also sheds light on jewish antipathy for shiksas, and of how race-betraying white, non-jewish politicians are.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            So you get your education from movies? Better to read some legitimate history books. Your comments on this posting issue show you to be pretty uninformed on commonly known history.

          • Freya

            Because I suggested an enthralling film doesn’t imply that that’s where I get my ‘education’ from, although there’s nothing wrong with learning about culture from a well-made movie. Many men on here simply have no experience of how jews often treat white women.

          • RisingReich

            Here we go again with the misogyny BS. Keep soaking up the Jewish “education” from Hollyweird.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Well, seen that way, you have to put it in order. It was the Christians that went after the Jews, first in doctrine and then in fact, and for centuries. How can you complain when you did it first and for longer? You expect them to love Christ and Christianity as a result?

          • OlderWoman

            Not always true. Paul, the apostle was a Jew. He was actually a “Super Jew” who hated Christians and was responsible for destroying many. Christians were hated in Israel. So, your statement about Christians ‘going after Jews” is faulty.

          • Freya

            No, the Jews went after the Christians first. They went into Europe to steal the fruits of the european masses’ labor.

          • just me

            Did it first? Ummn who persecuted whom first – (i am not talking about ‘chris killers’) ? The Jewish elite treated the early christians as catholics treated the early protestants – as heretics.
            The talmud is filled with anti-christian rhetoric (the virgin mary a harlot, etc)

          • robinbishop34

            Don’t be so naive.

          • BaronBaal

            A lot of people do believe that. Where have you been? If you want to really know why western civilisation is declining then you have to know who your enemies are and why they think and act the way they do.

          • Dave4088

            Then why did he openly state that was his purpose? Just for grins and giggles?

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Probably true, but these Jews that are doing this are not religious Jews, that’s for sure, they are mangled people, mangling others. I have seen this in other ways, so I don’t disagree with you, but I think it is secondary to just an easy way for a fallen Jew to make money, just like all the liberated Christian women who do it for money. This is all part of a demoralized, diversified society. First, you do it to make money, and then you can do it because they aren’t your people. Later you justify it by claiming the victims deserve it for whatever reasons. Ultimately, society is the victim.

            But I could tell you lots of stories about church going, married women that hit on me in the office during my 25 years in practice.

          • OlderWoman

            I bet you encouraged them somewhat to ‘hit on you’. No man is innocent when many women are interested in them. They’re doing something to attract them.

      • bigone4u

        I tried looking up the word “squid,” but found nothing that would suggest its meaning in the context here. What does it mean?

        • White Mom in WDC

          Well connected global elites with money, not uncommon to be Jewish or Israeli. SBPDL uses the term alot

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Why don’t you list them for us? Last time I looked, one third of them were women of European stock and most of the men were black, Latino, or Italian/Southern European or Indian. (I mean the wealthiest CEOs).

    • brengunn

      These aren’t girls from the average single parent family for which you blame feminism. These are girls from broken homes where substance and alcohol abuse are rife, families with histories if mental illness and, it’s highly probable, families that had already had sexual and physical abuse occurring before the rape gangs got there. None of these problems can be attributed to feminism as they predate any kind of women’s lib. If one was to get into the blame game here a considerable amount would have to go to the fathers of these girls rather than the mothers as men are much more likely to exhibit all those behaviours listed above. But, let’s not do that, let’s blame the scum who ganged up to rape them and the cowards who shyed away from protecting them for fears of accusations of racism. And, let’s blame society as a whole for getting to such a state where this type of thing can flourish for years without it being stopped.

    • SoCal LoCal

      Well said! If white men were welcomed back into their own families, rather than being branded “oppressors” and tossed like trash. If economic policy favored native born whites. Then we could end the cycle of dependency on blind government bureaucracy.

  • Rhialto

    A slight correction:

    I reckon Muslims living in the Caliphate of England in a hundred years’ time will look back at us joyfully for allowing Islamic schools to ignore the infidel laws of
    the land and teach boys that women are worthless.

  • Cecilia Sims

    Unfortunately, with our low-birthrates & increasingly decadent Western societies, Third Worlders see our way as failed, and probably gives them more confidence in their own ways! They see broken families, “liberated” women not having kids, homosexuality pushed as “cool”, wimpy males, job outsourcing and suicidal political correctness! They will outbreed us and eclipse if there’s not a drastic change! Our culture has been “raped” by Cultural Marxism. Seehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0POlI8FRj4 Agenda: Grinding America Down
    I think there may be some rebellion among young Americans; the BS that has been force-fed to them by Gov’t schools and mass media is being vomited up by some!

    • sbuffalonative

      Islam, unlike western Christianity, hasn’t succumb to ‘women’s lib’.

      • bigone4u

        There is a middle ground between women’s lib and the misogynistic hatred of women. Back in the day, it was called the average American family.

      • Rhialto

        Perhaps you’re right, but only African men have biological immunity to Feminism. Islam provides cultural restrictions on women that protect Islamic men from Feminism, but once these cultural barriers are destroyed, Islamic men will be ripe for Feminist destruction.

  • Erasmus

    Stupid liberals. They didn’t know those mechanical dollies at Disneyland singing, “It’s a small world after all” were only make-believe, as make-believe as any multi-culti society that exists beyond a stage only slightly above subsistence farming.

  • WR_the_realist

    “I reckon Britons in a hundred years’ time will look back at us in
    outraged astonishment for allowing Islamic schools to flout the laws of
    the land and teach boys that women are worthless.”

    I wish I could be so optimistic. It is more likely that in 100 years’ time there won’t *be* any real Britons.

  • NYB

    “I reckon Britons in a hundred years’ time will look back at us in outraged astonishment”

    It is a certainty that attitudes aren’t set in stone.

    In less than a hundred years time, all Muslims, blacks, and Asians could be repatriated out of Britain. The Reign of Terror known as political correctness could be a dark chapter in history. Contemporary non-white immigration could be known as ‘the British Holocaust’.

    Outrage and astonishment could be long past, replaced with calm, yet unwavering resolve to answer with laws and arms any renewed attempt at racial genocide on white Britons. Enoch Powell could be a revered hero.

    • GM (Australia)

      “Enoch Powell could be a revered hero.” Yes as time goes on and disgusting ethnic crimes such the Oxford Grooming happen more and more, Enoch will be remembered as a hero he truly was, an man well ahead of is time as well as a Cassandra to whom no one would listen.

      It will probably never happen but it would really great to see streets and civic squares renamed after this man like they do for MLK and Mandela!

  • Jaego

    Yes, when Hillary said with a proud smirk that she took full responsibility for the Benghazi affair she knew it meant nothing. If it did, she would have been arrested right then and there.
    In a hundred years time Britons wont be Britons anymore. The author is not radical enough. Not nearly.

  • Homo_Occidentalis

    These upstanding immigrants are just doing the jobs that lazy white Britons won’t do.

  • Bobby

    “Gang members have grown wise to the wimpy ways of Western Society.”
    I’d say rather, that gang members have grown wise to the wimpy white males and females in Western Society. Yeah, that sounds a lot more accurate.
    I was talking to an old friend of mine, a very smart guy, has a masters degree in Chemistry,etc, owns probably a million or more in real estate, one of those people you might call, “with it”, hip, up on things, sharp,etc. We were talking about politics and the state of the U.S. in general. Then he drew a far out picture of how he thought things were at this time. He said that if a certain foreign powers that has a billion plus people, decided to invade the U.S. with paratroopers, they’d have no problem at all. He said that they’d find most Americans, at McDonalds, in the malls, shooting hoops, filled with beer and bloated on the couch watching tv, on meth, coke, heroine,etc.etc. They’d have no problem at all he reiterated.

    • Jerrybear

      There are enough of us white right wing gun owners left that it would be a nightmare for any invading army. There are roughly 100 million gun owners. Say only 1% take up arms. That’s an insurgency of a million people. China will not invade. Besides, our number one enemy comes from within.

      • PesachPatriot

        This is a pretty good point…if a foreign power were to ever invade the US the only place they might have a chance to make it more than 20 miles inland would be California or maybe the northeast….any foreign military attempting to land on the coast of texas, louisiana, florida, georgia, or the carolinas would be decimated within 45 minutes by furious gun owners.

        • There will never be a classic quintessential military invasion of the United States for that reason. Because there doesn’t need to be: We let it immigrate in legally or pseudo-legally one piece at a time. Why steal a cow when you’re gettin’ the milk for free?

          • Bobby

            SPOT ON!! This is really part of the point my old buddy(I’ve known him since the 3rd grade, eons ago) was getting at.

      • MBlanc46

        They don’t need to invade the US. They just buy it.

  • Anon

    I’m not sure what is worse.

    The fact that there are no men forming extermination squads and painting these areas with the blood of non-whites.

    Or the fact that white women, neither want that nor want the white men who should be doing that.

    What men do, they do for women. All things we do. And the plain fact of the matter is that white men no longer kill non-white men who threaten our women because they no longer want us. They love their rapists, their abusers, their murderers.

    These girls ignore the white men who want them and do anything and everything for their disgusting non-whites lovers who then beat them, drug them up and pimp them. They might not like that too much but they actively and aggressively choose that instead of a relationship with a normal, healthy white man. It’s far worse than that. They openly and just as aggressively hold such white men in contempt. If they want protection (which most do not), they want it from some nameless, faceless entity they don’t have to reciprocate with. In other words, a girl saved from this by a white man is far more likely to spit on him and call him racist than be grateful. And she certainly wouldn’t be interested in him nor anything remotely smacking of a healthy relationship. She wants a life of drugs, degradation, humiliation and she wants it with a bad man (more likely men).

    Such worthless women are not worth killing the scum over. So we don’t.

    That is the bottom line.

    • Korpiklaani

      Could not have said it better myself.

      I live in St.Louis, where mudsharking is the norm. One day when I was renting a small apartment off of “the Landing” I saw a black pin this white woman down and start mercilessly slapping her in the face, open hand albeit full force. Well I run over and deliver a brutal right knee to this knee-grows fore head. To my shock it didn’t put him under, and he tries to grab my right leg; big mistake, I turn him over and put him flat on his back and start dropping ferocious elbows and a mean right hand to the face. Then all of a sudden I feel a sharp pressure on my right shoulder, neck, and my upper right back. When I turn I see this bruised up white woman holding a knife, and the knife is covered in blood. It took me a moment to realize it was MY blood all over the place, it didn’t hurt…at first…it felt like sharp blows/hard punches. After about 30 seconds the greatest pain I’ve ever felt in my entire life set in. 41 stitches, all from wounds delivered by my own ethnic “sister”, and that is why I won’t help any white woman who is a race traitor.

      • Jerrybear

        A very sad story.

      • Freya

        Gosh I’m sorry to hear this. What a story. Makes me feel ashamed to be a woman.

      • OlderWoman

        You’re a good man for intervening. Your heart was in the right place. But, White women who pair with black men are trash. I’d just let them learn their lesson.

    • T_Losan

      Muslim women, even modern professional ones, value chastity. It is not uncommon for muslim women in their twenties to be virgins, and I don’t mean women cloistered in some desert camp, but urban professionals. Muslim fathers don’t let their daughters do what the hell they want. There is strong social and family pressure to do the right thing, and muslims still have large families who exercize control on their young.

      I’m not saying that what these scum did is understandable, but some white girls make for easy targets given the laxity of many of today’s white parents and the normalization of porn and sex in popular culture.

      • White Mom in WDC

        Blaming the victim again. Don’t blame a twelve year old for being put into prostitution. It has nothing to do with being a virgin or not. In fact, women who are not virgins tend not to be naive. Come on!

        • OlderWoman

          A twelve year old is old enough to know that prostitution is wrong. They have the ability to discern if a man is safe or not. They aren’t victims if they agree to be groomed in exchange of some bling.

          • White Mom in WDC

            Wow. Do you know about the psychological process of grooming and what it entails? Are you a person who was born into means?

      • 1stworlder

        Those very rare muslim women know how bad muslim men are. White girls are told its racist to know that.

      • rightrightright

        “Value chastity” is an understatement. Their lives are at risk at any rumour of inchastity. Being buried up to your neck and having your head stoned until you are dead is not a good way to go. Muslimas in the West pay to have their hymens reconstructed for their wedding night. There must be blood and pain – or else.

      • MBlanc46

        I’d guess that the reason that so many Central Asian/Middle Eastern/North African men are so sexually screwed up is that their own women are off-limits to them outside of marriage, and even in marriage, there’s often not much sex. It’s understandable that they go berserk when they see a woman who they think is attainable. Of course, they bring it on themselves for not allowing women some sexual freedom, but that’s culture/religion for you.

  • bigone4u

    Call me a moron if you like but I believe that telling true stories of muzzie dysfunction will ultimately lead us to a better place. Not one in a hundred Americans will read this and similar stories, but if TV or Hollywood would dramatize the muzzie hatred of women, the world would pay attention. Why aren’t feminist actresses in Hollywood lobbying to get this story out to a world-wide audience? Where is lard butt Michael Moore? Why is the Power Elite in Hollywood silent?

    • White Mom in WDC

      Moore and the Elite are silent because they know that the way to break a society is to target its women. 70 % of porn stars are white women. White women in sex slavery is rampant in The Carribean and S.America. Eastern European and Russian women apply for jobs overseas and get duped into prostitution in Israel. There was a movie called o believe ‘Taken’ and its about white slavery

      • bigone4u

        In the 70s there were independent producers who made popular films that the big studios wouldn’t touch. Wilderness Family about a white family is one of my favorites, showing the white love of nature and inventiveness. The Grizzly Adams TV series was a by-product of the Grizzly Adams movie, although he was portrayed as having a “Native American” friend on the TV version to make it PC. There ought to be room for independents to go after the muzzies, although that would certainly lead to death threats for the producers, serious threats Ann Barnhardt gets threats all the time: http://barnhardt.biz/. Look at her “fanmail”.

        Regarding white sex slaves, the Alabama girl Natalee Holloway, was sometimes hypothesized to be a victim of white slavers, although I’m reasonably sure the white Dutch kid and his Hindu pals killed her and disposed of the body.

        As to porn stars I’m less worried about them than the seemingly millions of girls posting sex tapes and nude pics on the Internet. I’m also more worried about the women teachers, mostly white, who “fall in love” with a little boy or young male and betray their husbands and families in the process.

      • Sherman_McCoy

        And I thoroughly LOVE what Liam Neeson did to the Muzzie kidnappers.

        • OlderWoman

          Wasn’t Neeson considering conversion to Islam?

        • newscomments70

          That sounds like a fictional movie. We need this to happen for real.

    • Baloney, I can list at least a dozen recent movies, from “The Kingdom” to “United 93” to “Zero Dark Thirty,” that show Islam in all its brutality. As for Michael Moore, he’s not even Hollywood; he’s Flint, Michigan. People aren’t converted politically by film anyway — film has never worked that way.

      • Richard from Vancouver

        Film frequently works that way. Have you ever seen Leni Riefenstahl’s “Triumph of the Will” or the scores of Hollywood films made prior to 1941 that were specifically written and produced to help sway public opinion in favour of the US entering WWII? These films usually had Nazi spies infiltrating US industry and government institutions and the FBI tracking them down.

        • OlderWoman

          Riefenstahl’s turned out to be a Nazi sympathizer.

          • Riefenstahl was known from the get-go as a Nazi sympathizer. How the hell do you think she got to make that film in the first place?

        • Today’s Hollywood films have absolutely nothing to do, whether in view or tone, with “Triumph of the Will.” It’s most interesting that to “prove” your point, you rely on a piece of German agitprop made nearly 80 years ago. Not very convincing.

    • OlderWoman

      Mavis Leno, wife of Jay, has spoken out for the rights of Afghan women:

      http://archives.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/11/09/leno.cnna/

  • APaige

    Some call Islam a religion of peace, but it seems to be more a religion of rape. That is why their woman cover themselves-Abdul is uncontrollable if he sees some ankle.

  • So CAL Snowman

    Try finding anything like this in TIME magazine! I cannot express how much hatred and rage and anger I have towards what Western Civilization has become.

  • Rape in Pakistan
    .
    In a study of child sexual abuse in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, out of a sample of 300 children 17% claimed to have been abused and in 1997 one child a day was reported as raped, gang raped or kidnapped for sexual gratification.
    .
    Hank drinks and rolls smoke, because it is a family tradition.
    Pakistani’s rape children because child rape is a Pakistani Tradition.

    • Guest

      lies,

  • Stentorian_Commentator

    If they have no place in the U.K., then get them the f___ out! That QEII does not speak up with outrage and bitch slap Cameron into action proves she should be deposed.

  • Other Guest

    This muslim thing is much more heinous than feminism and a lot more dangerous to society as we know it. These people are trying to conquer us and turn our values on its head. They are completely indoctrinated by what they learn from their so called religion, in their mosques, schools, and on their tv stations with irrefutable laws that are the direct opposite of what we live for. They value death over life, don’t mind killing their own women or girls without emotion if they embarrass them for something as minor as leaving the house, rape is considered normal with the victim being prosecuted or executed, slavery and sex slavery is still approved. It goes on and on. How a society treats its women and children (girls as well as boys) is a good indication of their civilization or lack of same.

    • Guest

      lies

    • MartelC

      This muslim thing is much more heinous than feminism and a lot more dangerous to society as we know it.
      They work together to destroy the west- feminism creates nihilism which leads us ripe for conquest.

  • There once was a time in England when if word got back to the King that any of his young female subjects were kidnapped, raped and sold into sexual slavery, he would order those culpable executed instantly. And I can’t say that wouldn’t be an improvement over the present situation.

    • Whitey Bolger

      That still happens today just not in any White country. Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Yemen, you bet. The men would exterminate any foreigner so bold as to set up rape rings with the local girls.

      White countries? Diversity is more important.

    • newscomments70

      I cannot imagine the liberal, spineless Prince of Wales ever reacting this way. He sided with the blacks during the last riot and he remains silent on the issue of interracial sexual slavery. What a sorry excuse for a man. He will be one of Britians last monarchs.

  • rightrightright

    This article originally drew over 2,000 comments. The nature of the comments obviously alarmed the Daily Telegraph, because the paper withdrew the comments and comments option.

    Freedom of speech? Not any more and certainly not when it comes to the creeping islamification of Britain and the pimping/raping of our young girls.

  • Djangotamer

    Are Englishmen still men? How have things reached this point of no return?

    • loyalwhitebriton

      I’ve often pondered both of those questions. We would not have put up with this a hundred years ago – there would have been a hue-and-cry followed by lynchings. Perhaps Alex Jones is right: the fluoride they’re putting in our water is making a large percentage of the population docile and pacifistic. Who knows? Perhaps it’s the fluoride combined with mindless entertainment, dumbed down education, a liberal MSM, traitorous politicians, and a complacency born out of all of the above plus copious amounts of drink, drugs, and other physical satisfactions. Think I might be on to something there.
      I’m beginning to think I’ll never see revolution. Pity.

  • KenelmDigby

    Historically, an invader always expressed his dominance over the people he conquered by claiming exclusive copulatory rights (‘droit de seigneur’) over the women of the defeated people.
    A tale is old as time itself, which is read, literally, in the DNA of every person living. (If you study the subject, you will notice the geographical dischordance between Y-chromosome DNA and mtDNA).
    Bullpoopy leftwing politics and the myths peddled by degenerate ‘scholars’ relating to the differences between men and women, count for nothing against billions of years of evolution.

    • It’s an outgrowth of evolution. I saw movie documentary about a year or two ago called “Big Cats of Africa.” An invading trio of lions kicked out the pride male leader and took over the females for breeding purposes.

  • Token Finn

    Another thing I’m noticing is the muzzie bestial behaviour is getting so hard to deny, that the multicult types are steering away from their traditional shaming of pro-white people and now shaming us for not saving non-white, muzzie >women< from their men.
    So they think we would have to save the world and accept all oppressed non-white women of the world, or else we're cruel bastards. Given feminism's power, a lot of women and wimpy guys do not see any harm in implicating men in this way, although they'll avoid the racial angle.

  • Dom

    “If you teach boys that a female is no better than a lollipop that has
    been dropped on the ground, eventually you produce a pimp who thinks
    that you break a girl’s spirit as though she were a horse, before
    branding her with your initial. That man and those attitudes have no
    place, no place at all, in Britain now.” Actions speak louder than words. Obviously this attitudes have place in Britain. Enjoy in diversity.

  • Anonymous

    It seems that the white British society doesn’t consider a girl worth any better than a dropped lollipop either, by letting this shame carry on for so long.

  • Greg Deane

    The Muslim corsairs enslaved well over a million whites between the 14th and 18th centuries, apart from those the Ottomans tore from families in the Balkans and the crumbling Byzantine Empire. Yet to talk of white slavery is to invite ridicule. Now the Muslims are reviving the practice that died out in the European colonial era, when Europe wasn’t afraid to be strong. But this time they are doing it with the collusion of Western authorities, including police and courts, who delude themselves that they are “culturally sensitive” rather than insanely suicidal.

  • Nocturna

    When a society no longer sees any interest in protecting its women, its a done deal. That society is headed to the trash bin of history.

    The primary and single most important aspect for the survival of any race is the sexual behaviour of its people — they have to reproduce with each other. If sexual conquest or miscegenation is allowed by the men folk, its over.

    • MartelC

      that is EXACTLY why the left is not only doesn’t care what happens to these girls, but secretly, many are actually ecstatic.
      That is also the reason for encouragement of islam – ANYTHING that helps destroy the west is ‘good’
      They are so arrogant that they think that once they have achieved their ‘revolution’ they will be able to control islam as well.

  • Many people on the ‘counter-jihad’ side of things will cite the Koran and Hadith as explanations of their attitudes to women and why they are doing this. Once of a day, I would have taken the same lines. But that has not been my opinion for quite a while.

    There is certainly an Islamic element here – but it is not as though these Muslims are scholars and simply doing what they think is right to the faith. They are not oblivious to our norms and expectations.

    These people probably only go to a mosque to please their relatives, and are otherwise drinking, taking drugs, dealing drugs, watching porn, mtv, and all the rest of it. Hardly the stuff of dutiful or practising Muslims that are usually trotted out as prime examples.

    They are the types of people will spend all year doing “un Islamic” acts, but, if you went into their takeaway or gym and bad mouthed their prophet, you could expect a good beating or stabbing.

    No, it is much more simple than that of a misogynistic nature of the Koran and Islamic culture.

    Through a much wider Islamic lens, these people have no respect for our society, our ways, our women. They believe their ways are superior. They know they can get away with doing whatever they want, they know they are taking over, they know the authorities are pathetic, that they have a race-industry to shield them, that liberal whites will jump through hoops to cover up the niche aspect of their crimes, that the establishment hates their own indigenous people, and that the said indigenous people will do nothing and perpetually re-vote in those who despise them.

    They probably laugh up their sleeve at the idiocy of the British letting them all in – something they would never allow in their own historical homelands – an laugh at how our society has been rotted down to the point where drugs are rife, promiscuity is expected, binge drinking is commonplace, hedonism, egalitarianism and individualism reigns supreme.

    Without all this immigration and societal decay, they would not even be able to do what they are doing. It is simplistic to pin all of this on Islam and Muslims. It is a major factor, but it is also a symptom of a bacteria that has caused the illness and symptoms to develop in the first place.

    In defence of a seeming inability to do anything to these people, I think it needs to be understood that this is clandestine. It is not obvious or out in the open. These people are spread out in a town or a region. It is not like you can head to some specific “project” and start kicking off.

    My own town is around 33% Pakistani now. That means there are over 10,000 Pakistanis here. Let us assume that there are 100 “groomers” in town somewhere. So, we get a little gang together (and it would be little, I suspect)….and….where do we go? Who do we see? Where are these groomers? Not only do we not know, but if we just randomly targeted the “innocent”, we would be the ones seen as the “bad guys”.

    There has been riots in Burnley, Oldham, Bradford in 2001. Even if there were new ones, I cannot see those 10,000 Pakistanis heading back to Pakistan any time soon. Without a government or establishment which would back up the indigenous population, I am afraid to say that it all seems pretty damned futile. The state is more likely to act against those taking retribution for grooming, than the groomers themselves.

    • Other Guest

      No they are not scholars but they do rely on their imams statements as to what is allowed or required of them. I have seen many so called rulings, statements, broadcasts, etal attesting to a free pass even a heavenly one based on the most authoratative imams reading of their so called holy books as to things we consider atrocious. The ones who don’t follow them are merely disregarding the advice, possibly only temporarily as in cases of spontaneous jihad.

    • KenelmDigby

      Excellent analysis, if I may say so.
      I think you’ve got it nailed down bang to rights.

  • Pelayo

    This calls for vigilante action on the part of British men. If there were an invading Pak army raping English girls they would be seen as enemy combatants. The same situation is occurring except that these scum don’t wear uniforms. These guys need to be taken out. They should be fair game. Obviously law enforcement knows who they are and doesn’t give a rat’s a– about its young women. Let a few of them turn up dead and you’ll see a mass return to the Hell Hole of Pakistan.

    • Anonymous

      There needs to be a retaliatory terrorist campaign against these animals;
      They’re not impressed bu our “civilized” reaction to their predations.
      Cast not thy pearls before swine.

    • Cid Campeador

      Brits,
      Make them afraid of you and they’ll stop coming. Find the pimps and eliminate them as you would termites or cockroaches.

  • White men r wimps

    Not a problem. How soon can we get some more immigrants here?

    • Whitey Bolger

      The next shipment of Arabs is due next Thursday. Bantus a week later.

  • Potestas Tenebrarum

    Here’s a simple fact about leftists in general and so-called “anti-racists” in particular: they never regret ANY harm their actions and omissions bring upon others. In fact, you’ll have a devil of a time trying to get them to acknowledge the fact of harm in the first place, but if you do, you’ll get some kind of rationalization for it, of the “compensatory justice” or “collateral damage” sort. From their perspective, their actions or omissions can never be faulted because, in their minds, their own motives can never be impugned.

    • True enough. Every time these creeps assaults a white, it’s to avenge “400 years of slavery” or something to that effect.

    • ms_anthro

      That’s because it takes character and a strong moral compass to admit to being wrong. Leftists and multiculturalists are morally bankrupt; they’re tyrants at heart who want to deprive others of their basic human freedoms. Freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of religion, economic freedom…our enemies attack these freedoms on all fronts whenever possible.

      You can’t expect people without morals to accept responsibility for their actions. They don’t care how many eggs they have to break to make their omelette. They are evil.

  • SlyDeNiro

    More multiculturalism at work. Where the hell did multiculturalism come from anyway? Congress never passed any such thing. It’s illegal by definition.

  • MartelC

    If men don’t stand up – and in the UK the authorities are making sure they won’t (you’ll get a tougher sentance for attacking these thugs than the thugs will get for rapingin women) , white women will start converting to islam for security and protection. In parts of europe white women are already weearing the hajib simply to avoid harassment.

    but remember this is what the globalists and elites WANT… ANYTHING that destroys the Christian west is ‘good.

  • MartelC

    The leftists /globalists are pushing buttons that go deep, deep within our beings.. they do not understand … Kipling did:

    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the English began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy-willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the English began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low,
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show,
    When the English began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd,
    It was not taught by the State.
    No man spoke it aloud,
    When the English began to hate.

    It was not suddenly bred,
    It will not swiftly abate,
    Through the chill years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the English began to hate.

  • MartelC

    Sue Berelowitz, the lamentably foolish deputy children’s commissioner, trots out her lame line that Asian men targeting white girls is “just one of a number of models”,
    why do i always see “witz” or some other un-English sounding suffix on the surnames of people who wish to brush off , and seemingly encourage, this behavior?

    • IstvanIN

      Because saving our girls doesn’t fit with their goals.

      • IstvanIN

        Now people won’t know who the “their” I was referring to is.

        • Rhialto

          If they have the wits to access the HTML source, will know.

          • IstvanIN

            I wish I had the “wits” to get what you just said. You mean a deleted comment is still retrievable?

          • MartelC

            See sue b above..

  • Whirlwinder

    This is how Islam treats non-muslim women, everywhere that Islam is in power. You had better start liking it or do something about it!

  • Licurg Enescu

    The governments want to destroy us, and democracy is no longer a solution. The only thing that could solve this would be to have a few Breiviks every day until the invaders just flee and never come back. I know some people might have a problem with the violence, but I’d rather we become “violent”, “hateful” and “racist” than to be subjected to this in our own lands. It’s not so bad here in Eastern Europe – The gypsies live separately from us, and we from them, and they’re not as violent as africans or pakis to begin with, but that will probably change eventually too…

    Remember the 14 words.