The Problem Isn’t Just Illegal Immigration, It’s Legal Immigration, Too

Ann Coulter, April 24, 2013

The people of Boston are no longer being terrorized by the Marathon bombers, but amnesty supporters sure are.On CNN’s “State of the Union” last weekend, Sen. Lindsey Graham’s response to the Boston Marathon bombers being worthless immigrants who hate America–one of whom the FBI cleared even after being tipped off by Russia–was to announce: “The fact that we could not track him has to be fixed.”Track him? How about not admitting him as an immigrant?

As if it’s a defense, we’re told Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (of the Back Bay Tsarnaevs) were disaffected “losers”–the word used by their own uncle–who couldn’t make it in America. Their father had already returned to Russia. Tamerlan had dropped out of college, been arrested for domestic violence and said he had no American friends. Dzhokhar was failing most of his college courses. All of them were on welfare.

{snip}

My thought is, maybe we should consider admitting immigrants who can succeed in America, rather than deadbeats.

But we’re not allowed to “discriminate” in favor of immigrants who would be good for America. Instead of helping America, our immigration policies are designed to help other countries solve their internal problems by shipping their losers to us.

The problem isn’t just illegal immigration. I would rather have doctors and engineers sneaking into the country than legally arriving ditch-diggers.

Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act so dramatically altered the kinds of immigrants America admits that, since 1969, about 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from the Third World. They bring Third World levels of poverty, fertility, illegitimacy and domestic violence with them. When they can’t make it in America, they simply go on welfare and sometimes strike out at Americans.

{snip}During the three years from 2010 through 2012, immigrants have committed about a dozen mass murders in this country, not including the 9/11 attack.The mass murderers were from Afghanistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Haiti, South Africa, Ethiopia and Mexico. None were from Canada or Western Europe.

I don’t want to hear about the black crime rate or the Columbine killers. We’re talking about immigrants here! There should be ZERO immigrants committing crimes. There should be ZERO immigrants accepting government assistance. There should be ZERO immigrants demanding that we speak their language.

We have no choice about native-born losers. We ought to be able to do something about the people we chose to bring here.

Meanwhile, our government officials just keep singing the praises of “diversity,” while expressly excluding skilled immigrants who might be less inclined to become “disaffected” and lash out by killing Americans.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • The__Bobster

    Due to boozehead Teddy, the legal immigrants pretty much look like illegal aliens. Only 10% of the legal ones get in because of their talents, and most of them don’t look like traditional Americans either.

    We need a moratorium of at least 10 years to cool things off. After that, the immigrants we admit should look pre-1965.

    • MikeS

      We need an indefinite moratorium on all immigration. Additionally, we need to create and put into motion a massive deportation program that rids us of the barnacles that are stubbornly attached to the USS Taxpayer which are hell bent on taking her down. This is a very difficult task made even more so since the captain and crew have no respect for the positions they hold and are only concerned with how much loot they can abscond with before she finally slips under the waves for the last time.

  • joegoofinoff

    Don’t listen to all these liberals like coulter…

    • roger

      when she’s right I don’t care what you label here and she’s right on this one

  • John McCain aint listenin’ to ya Anne.

    • Bill

      That’s because he still hears the still small voice of his N. Vietnamese brainwasher in his head.

      • Katherine McChesney

        McCain wasn’t brainwashed. He talked. He was pampered and given special favors by his so-called ‘captors’.

        • Tucker

          And, his Daddy helped cover up the attempt by Israel to sink the USS Liberty and murder its entire crew.

          Treason runs in this family, folks.

    • Dr. X

      Don’t you mean “Juan” McCain??

  • David Ashton

    In Britain, immigrants are welcomed for two “reasons”: either (1) we “need” their “help” or (2) they “need” our “help”. You can’t win.

    • Greg Thomas

      Britain and America seemed to do just fine before hordes of third world browns were allowed to invade. This leads me to believe reason number #2 is the correct answer. Unfortunately, our treasonous leaders have convinced the invading hordes that they are saviors and thus desperately needed. This has created an arrogant, militant and demanding class of immigrants, who seem to believe they are doing us a favor by blessing us with their presence.

      • David Ashton

        Shortly after the war the Royal Commission on Population warned against the important into our settled and organized British society of permanent immigrants of different race or religion. The contrary sequence was exemplified by #1 the Windrush West Indians as cheap labor, and later by #2 Uganda refugees from Amin. The interesting thing is how ostensible controls on primary immigration, “patriality” legislation, and voluntary repatriation provisions, were subverted along with the emergence of the “anti-racist” and “multicultural” propaganda of the Cultural Marxists, especially during the Reign of Queen Margaret of Finchley and Falklands.

        • KenelmDigby

          We’ve been here before.
          Way back in 1971, Ted Heath passed the Immigration Act of that year, (this was entirely due to Powellite alarm and agitation over the huge increase in ‘commonwealth’ immigration), which explicitly and unequivocally promised to curtail ‘”all further widescale immigration into the UK” in perpetuity.
          In actual fact, the third world descended part of the UK population has increased 8 fold since then.

          • David Ashton

            How and why are what we need to document in detail.

  • bigone4u

    I’ll up the ante on Ann Coulter: There should be ZERO immigrants period. I don’t care how skilled they are or their ethnicity. If there’s a labor shortage in some field, let salaries go up in that field to attract CITIZENS. This country did just fine for decades with ZERO immigrants period. It can do just fine again.

    • sbuffalonative

      I agree.
      I would also add that even skilled high-tech people don’t need to come here to work.
      Why do we need to import Indians to this country to write computer code or design circuit boards HERE when they can do they job where they are and transmit their work electronically?
      I’m sure Microsoft has tech space in India.

      • Anonymous

        I think it’s because if the Indians are doing it in India, they are paying Indian income taxes. Whereas if they were doing it here, they pay US income taxes (and since STEM occupations usually pay higher than most other fields, they end up paying a lot of income taxes compared to the average US born American). Both outsourcing and high-skilled immigration have their downsides, but honestly I’d rather have high-skilled immigration than outsourcing because you can’t collect income tax on Indians living and working in India.

        • Sherman_McCoy

          How abut neither?

          • Anonymous

            Way easier said than done. It’s one thing to say “well how bout the American corporations keep their operations in American and hire only White, US born Americans?” and another thing to expect them to do so. Corporations don’t care whether they hire White ppl or non-White ppl. They only care about the bottom line and they are fully capable of offshoring operations to India. I only care about plans of actions that are realistic. I want as many Americans to have jobs as possible. If this means that American companies stay in America and hire 50% Indian immigrant STEM workers and 50% Americans at least it is better than American companies moving overseas and hiring 100% Indian STEM workers.

        • KenelmDigby

          This is economically illiterate.
          If you consider free trade theory, what really matters is the cost base of Microsoft and the corporate profits. If costs can be kept down to a minimum, by moving Microsoft to India for example, Microsoft profits will rise and thus the tax take of Microsoft registered in the USA. Money microsoft will save by not paying Indians American wages will boost profitability and will be repatriated to the USA to boost American money supply.
          Why the Hell do you think everyone else and his brother have outsourced?
          Personally, I’d rather lose Microsoft if the price to pay was keeping Indians out. Companies come and go, but genes are forever.

        • NM156

          I doubt that. The H-1 visa holders make dink and aren’t in the top two tax brackets. An American programmer would earn substantially more and subsequently pay more in income tax. If some tax advantage does exist, Mom and Pop Hindu, approaching retirement and the time to collect Social Security benefits, may wipe out that advantage. Your explanation of tax advantages sounds like Silicon Valley propaganda, so it is immediately suspicious. I will bet it won’t stand up to scrutiny.

    • Intrepid

      You’re not against immigration. You’re just against non-white immigration.

      • bigone4u

        Apparently you have trouble reading. Until you learn to read, shut up.

      • Greg Thomas

        That’s right I am! We have enough third world diversity in this country.

      • Wayne

        Yep! There is no reason whatsoever that we should make our children a minority in their own country. Can you think of one advantage for them in being a minority? What sick demented people do not consider what is good for their children?

      • Sherman_McCoy

        Well, duh.

      • NeuBismarckian

        TROLL

    • Exoplanet Finder

      That’s right, and I am also against all immigration from that nonwhite world. That is a no-brainer at this point. For each white immigrant, as was the case 1924-1965, they had to be surveyed and scanned over before admittance. Just repeal the Kennedy (Hart-Cellar Act) immigration act and that system was just fine. Google the Johnson Act of 1924 and see real America in action.

    • Bob Frankenstein

      “This country did just fine for decades with ZERO immigrants period.”

      Early 1900s: massive immigration

      1920–30s: massive income inequality; gigantic depression; immigration cut down

      1940s–60s: immigration almost 0; most prosperous and happiest generation ever

      1965: whites stop having children; the floodgates are opened

      1970s–present: end of labor shortage; stagnant wages; Great Recession; same income inequality that existed in the 20s; massive debt (government, student, credit card)

      Meanwhile, Switzerland announced that it is cutting down immigration. So, there’s some sane white societies out there.

      • David Ashton

        I am NOT saying that correlation=causation, but in Britain our economic and other “goods” have declined almost in parallel as we have had increasing immigration. Yet immigration continues to be advocated as the answer to British economic problems.

        • NYB

          More immigration is generally good for the wealthiest speculators in the global markets.
          They get increased consumption in the First World, and when remittances and foreign aid spending are factored together, they get increased consumption in the Third World. Double win for them.

    • ProWhite son of Jacob

      I agree but also somewhat disagree. America was, historically, open to White immigration. I see nothing wrong with German, Australian, or Afrikaner immigrants. Or even a select number of immigrants from Argentina… Who have been screened as White.

      I don’t disagree with you necessarily (because America would do just fine without immigrants), but I am just tentative to say all immigration should be disallowed… America did well for decades with White immigrants, not “zero” immigration. Scandinavians settled much of Minnesota. Germans settled much of the Midwest. Irish and Scottish pepper the Eastern seaboard and there’s still White Spanish and French descendants across Louisiana. America has typically been open to Europeans, consistent with the founding ethos of America.

  • jake

    this needs to be on tv for everyone to see

  • Puggg

    I don’t want to hear about the black crime rate

    I do.

    Meanwhile, our government officials just keep singing the praises of
    “diversity,” while expressly excluding skilled immigrants who might be
    less inclined to become “disaffected” and lash out by killing Americans.

    I don’t really want the “skilled” H1B types either. Unless they’re both few in number and identifiably white.

    • Bill

      And NEEDED I might add. Due to a contribution we don’t have enough of our own. As in the Manhattan Project. And even in that instance, there were commies betraying the government and nation by giving their secrets to the Soviets. So……we need NO immigrants any more. What we need is to return our jobs back home as to textiles, other manufacturing, steel, autos, etc rather than impose killing taxes and allow loop holes to the greedy corporate boards can sell out the American worker in favor of Bangladeshis, Koreans, Chinese, Thais, Hindus, Mexicans, etc.

      • White Mom in WDC

        So true. Screw Bill Gates the socially retarded sociopath.

      • Gwynn Ap Nudd

        Yes that’s the 3rd Way. And any Companies that don’t want to hire Americans can get the hell out of America. Isolationism – that bizarre undefined term they throw at us? No, it doesn’t have to be, but even if it were it would be infinitely preferable to what they have created. It simply means that we take care of ourselves and our own first. Then we trade for anything we need or for profit.

  • roger

    why would anyone want a more crowded country?

  • Conan

    This is what I talked about a few days ago about how opinions that were once exclusively held on Amren are now dripping into the national consciousness. Baby steps, everyone.

    • Robert Binion

      Perhaps, the libini would wake up if they thought this mayhem the work of white extremists: our nefarious, neo Confederate conspiracy to topple the federal government by means of low rent immigration continues apace.

    • Nathanwartooth

      There is some evidence that Ann reads Steve Sailer’s blog and probably VDare as well.

      • Exoplanet Finder

        I agree. A lot of public figure whites probably do. Truth attracts truth-seekers, and while we can excuse nonwhites for not being truth-seekers because nothing in their history tells to us they are, want to be, or can be, we ourselves are actually truth-seekers. Some of our talking heads are seeking. Others are playing their asinine role and for some reason, whether career, money, fear etc. are simply dishonest, what the psychologists call dissonant. They live in fear. If you are one and you are reading this, you must overmaster your dissonance and the fear that causes it. Ann Coulter, I believe, came to a serious realization a couple years ago, the realization that every single Amren reader (except the Leftist minders working for Leftist charity inc.) has had at some point: The Present Circumstance of Liberal Government is Not Working. And then the search for why begins. Ann C. has experienced this awakening- erwache (Air-Vak-Eh). It is a German word co-opted by the National Socialists, to denote a social awakening, but it can happen wherever and whenever a group of people begin to awaken to the social forces around them, and then use that acquired knowledge to work for the public good. We are on the verge of such an ERWACHE. It isn’t National Socialist, it is pro-West, which means it is pro-White Civilization. It is pro-White Life.

        • Nate Miller

          Unlikely! Read Ann’s column carefully.

          1. She clearly emphasized that she could care less about black crime or white serial killers, her only issue are criminal elements within the immigrant population i.e. Muslims, Africans and some East Asian communities. Thus she is okay with African Americans! “Erwache” does not work for Ann here!

          2. Secondly, she even stated that she would rather have immigrant doctors and engineers “sneaking” into the United States across the border illegally, which meant, she is perfectly okay with flooding our nations with well educated, scientifically qualified immigrants. And she knows quite well what she means! Now the only problem for us with this thought is the undeniable fact that the vast majority of “immigrant doctors and engineers” entering America are from India & other east Asians!
          I guess Ann is perfectly okay with non white Indians/ east Asians in this case! NO “ERWACHE” for Ann here! Sorry!

          3. Ann dated & slept with an immigrant from India, the well reputed conservative personality Dinesh D’Souza who is a wealthy well educated and successful man who recently penned many best sellers and even made the most successful conservative right wing movie of all time: Obama 2016. It is fairly obvious she was and perhaps still is a race-mixer. “Erwache”? My ass!

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            I don’t like her, she’s probably insane, and she definitely has a sexual thing for non-Whites, but any level of support for our cause from the mainstream pundits is a good thing.

          • David Ashton

            Very sensible. Use her “mainstream” arguments and push them further.
            No need to attack or praise her personal life or looks.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I’ve never been a big fan of Coulter, but she’s widely known and her opinion Venn’s nicely with mine on this issue. This is a step in the right direction. I generally liked the article and others she’s put out lately. As a former liblefty I can’t believe I’m saying this, still have some issues, but again – she’s on the right rack here and well known. This is good news.

            Ever seen the Boondocks episode where she had a black boy toy? LOL…

          • Tucker

            I’ve noticed that Coulter seems to have some kind of obsessive, personality disorder that motivates her to want to write and say things that are designed to ‘shock’ people into noticing her. Its as if she isn’t happy unless she is the center of attention, and so, I suspect that a lot of what she says is actually designed to force herself into the spotlight.

            The other day, for example, she was on Hannity and was talking about the wife of one of the older Boston patsy that was apparently murdered after being captured and handcuffed by the cops – and she comes up with some very crude and inappropriate speculation about whether or not his wife had gotten a certain disfiguring type of surgery on her female genitalia.

            Not the sort of language I would expect to hear, coming from a lady who calls herself a conservative.

          • ChiefDanGeorge

            Ann is widely reported to be dating Jimmie “JJ” Walker…you know…Mr. Dynomiiiiiiiite. Yes, she is a race-mixer indeed.

          • Exoplanet Finder

            Baby steps. Baby steps. She is awakened. She’s taking the baby steps commensurate with her station. Put her in a higher position, and she would bar immigration altogether, legal and illegal. She used those phrases purposefully to twist the minds of the non-Amren readers into an impression of what is possible.

      • NM156

        Yep. “Immigant Mass Murder Syndrome” belongs exclusively to Steve Sailer. Ann has been borrowing to good effect, without revealing her source.

        • Nathanwartooth

          It’s actually pretty smart and who would dare call her out on it? Even if they knew it was Steve’s blog, they wouldn’t give him credit since it would draw many more people to his site.

          But a super liberal might be dumb enough to. They would think they caught Ann being a super racist by going to his site, which would give nationwide attention to it.

        • Exoplanet Finder

          It is like when Roosevelt told Churchill the US would send over war material and dare the Axis to sink a transport, Lusitania-style. She’s putting them in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t position. Sure- expose that it is from Sailer. Then the media exposes Sailer’s material and they DON’T want to do that. So what a great strategy to use it, and vDare them.

          • NM156

            If the general public were exposed to Vdare, most would not be horrified and most would be educated. However, mainstream media people cannot risk that just yet. Good point though. This serendipitous bombing is a gift from On High.

    • Exoplanet Finder

      Right- it is still possible that these things will work themselves out through sheer permeation into the national consciousness. I am hoping that is the case for all our sakes, and really believe that there is still hope for this. We on Amren and Vdare etc., writers, readers and comment-makers, are like the white blood cell antibodies of society. It has a disease, for reasons we understand partially at first and then certainly later, we move into a state of defense of something we want to preserve, that we were made to preserve. That thing is our life-culture, the nations we made for thousands of years, built-up in great zeal recently during the awakening of modernity. The baby steps Conan is talking about are like Neil Armstrong’s baby steps. It isn’t the length of the step, it is the step’s direction, a social frontier new, at least for our generation. The men of the pre-WWII era are passing on, and we forgot what we were like then, as well we forgot a great deal of that other Kennedy’s inspiration of the American nation given at Rice University in 1961, but the reinvigoration of the West lies in the view before us now, and that true message is connected to Armstrong’s step onto the Sea of Tranquility. http://www.antarcticaedu.com Click on visions of the future.

      • Jenny M. Raulston

        If you thiʼnk Carmēʼn`s stοry is ēxcēρtiοʼnal…, 5 wēēĸs agο Μy aυʼnts stēρ daυghtēr gοt $5416 ĵυst sittiʼng thērē sixtēēʼn hουrs a wēēĸ frοm thērē aρartmēʼnt aʼnd thēy’rē ʼnēighbοr‘s stēρ–aυʼnt`s ʼnēighbουr dοʼnē this fοr fivē Μοʼnths aʼnd gοt ρaid οvēr $5416 ρart-timē οʼn thērē cοmρυtēr. υsē thē tiρs availablē οʼn this ρagē, . http://www.MillionaireBusiness2013.qr.net/kiLN

    • Hal K

      Coulter is still twisting everything around to avoid white racial solidarity.

      • Conan

        She’s hardly going to say it outright at this juncture. Read her book ‘Mugged’.

        She’s a realist.

        • Hal K

          She’s not a race realist. This attitude is unacceptable. We need to get white identity politics into the mainstream, and Ann Coulter isn’t helping. She is playing along with political correctness rather than challenging it. She makes everything the fault of liberals.

          • Conan

            You have got to be kidding.

            Her book, Mugged, is as close to a version of The Color Of Crime that we are going to get at this point from a mainstream pundit. She also wrote a few ‘demographics is destiny’ style articles that would not have been out of place on amren or vdare.

            If you really believe that it isn’t helping then I don’t know what to tell you. No mainstream person is going to come right out with white identity politics right now. This is as good as we can hope for at this point.

            Baby steps.

          • Hal K

            That is unacceptable. Mainstream conservatives take implicit white solidarity and twist it around into something inert or self-defeating. Notice how Ann Coulter is calling for more skilled immigration, and she makes sure to bash some Americans as “losers.” She is still part of the problem because she gives the illusion that things can be resolved without explicit white solidarity. She uses liberals as scapegoats for everything, ignoring how things have gotten worse with either party in power.

            As far as baby steps, she spoke up for the Council of Conservative citizens in 2009 (by saying they didn’t support segregation), and other than that I don’t know of a single instance where she endorsed white identity politics or mentioned a racial realist approvingly. These are baby steps to nowhere. It is important to know the difference.

            What “demographics is destiny” articles are you talking about? Noticing that demographic trends are bad for the Republicans does not qualify you as a racial realist or a white advocate.

          • Nathanwartooth

            I would agree with her “losers” statement but I wouldn’t put it that way.

            We need jobs for the Whites who are on the left of the bell curve. Unskilled immigration hurts those people. It also hurts them to move all of the factories away.

            Getting people to realize that there are just as many people on the left of the bell curve than on the right would be a good start to people realizing we need good paying low skill jobs.

          • Hal K

            We need jobs for whites on the right of the bell curve also. There is no way you can let in so many skilled immigrants and not have an effect on higher IQ whites.

          • Exoplanet Finder

            We need jobs on the white side of the bell curve.

          • Nathanwartooth

            Well yeah, I 100% agree. I’m against all immigration. Except for refugees Whites from South Africa or wherever they may be.

          • Exoplanet Finder

            Saying Ann Coulter is not on the right side is like saying Reagan was not enough of a Cold Warrior because he didn’t invade the Soviet bloc. She’s like a Reagan surrounded by Carters and Clintons, and it baffles me why some people are complaining more about her than about the Carters and Clintons. You need a Khrushchev before a Gorbachev. This establishment is a lot like the Soviet system. The goal is to self-correct. Having said that, I also hope it doesn’t take 40 years, because there isn’t that much time.

        • Garrett Brown

          A realist dating blacks…. Hmmm, no.

          • Frank

            Where is your evidence?

    • Tucker

      Baby steps? Sorry, but, I want the kind of steps that eat up one heck of a lot more real estate on this issue than just that. What we need are Giant Steps, not baby steps.

      As for the following comment, Exoplanet Finder – ‘it is still possible that these things will work themselves out through sheer permeation into the national consciousness.’ ?

      To that, I say the train has already left the station. When I drive around town in my local community, I pay very close attention to the racial composition of the drivers that I see around me on the roads. I will tell you – it is an extremely depressing habit, because it seems as if every car I see will have one or more ‘immigrant’ faces in it that are not White European. To make matters even more depressing, there are the almost unbelievable number of white females tooling around town alongside their IQ of 80-85 trendy black gang banger boyfriends, following the MTV white genocide script and feeling so giddy and “proud” of themselves for doing so. To stop and think for a second, how diabolically successful our Cultural Marxist enemy has been in their scheme to encourage Whites to climb down the evolutionary totem pole – that phenomena alone ought to completely destroy any notions of ‘white supremacy’. If anything, it proves the opposite.

      To Courtney – White females who are in their prime reproductive years comprise only about 3% of our rapidly dwindling White European race. These are the females who have been targeted by our enemies for the heaviest dose of anti-white, race mixing propaganda – and this targeting is intentional, for obvious reasons.

      So, I have serious doubts that the old America that we in the AmRen community love so passionately and long to see return will ever be a realistic objective. What we need to focus on is the acceptance that the old America has been destroyed and we need to remember the identity of the treasonous rats who were responsible for that destruction. Armed with that knowledge, we must focus our efforts on the creation of an exclusively White Ethnostate somewhere inside the North American continent. We must have this new homeland, people. It is an absolute, non-negotiable requirement – and once this new homeland is ours – then we can begin the process of weeding out the race traitors within our own people.

      • Conan

        Congratulations on missing the point entirely.

    • guest

      The problem though is we see these things as bad, our hostile elite see them as good.

  • Secret Tribunal

    Noridicsm to our rescue.

    Too late, but it’s definitely fun to watch.

    If you’re not fostering xenophobic hatred and racism today, you’re acting old and outdated.

    “This wouldn’t be happening if the White community had won a country of our own. First step: dismantle anti racism, because racism saves lives.” -RevJed DeValley

    • Hal K

      The first step is to dismantle the Republican Party and mainstream conservatism, which keep white solidarity suppressed.

      Any effort helps to bring down the Republican Party in the name of white solidarity is worthwhile.

      • Secret Tribunal

        Sammity was nearly choking last night when Anne Coulter went all anti immigrant in front of him.

        • Tucker

          “Shammity” is on the list of White race traitors who will be prohibited from residing inside the new White Ethnostate, once it gets established.

      • Bill

        The Democrats are doing that for you with their illegal invasion of new voters.
        Should please you, from what you’ve said, so what’s your gripe exactly? By the way, all those WHITE Democratic voters? Are THEY suppressed by the Republican Party? The problem isn’t parties. The problem is Whites who betray their own, regardless party.

        • Hal K

          The push for amnesty is not done in the name of white solidarity. It is clearly motivated by anti-whiteness. The point is to get whites to start acting in their group interests explicitly. The Republican Party suppresses this. Is that so difficult to understand?

      • george00

        If it weren’t for the Republican party we would have amnesty right now. The Republicans voted against it and kept it form happening. Then the Democrats came up with the Dream Act and the Republicans voted that down too.

        The first step is to get access to the Main Stream Media so we can talk to our people, Lemmings and all, so we can counter act the MSM brain washing. Trying to build a political party before we do this is a waste of time.

        • Hal K

          No. This is wrongheaded. You are arguing for more of the same, which has gotten us to where we are now. The Republican Party is going to collapse anyway. We need to make sure everyone gets the right message when that happens. Whites can’t afford to keep suppressing white solidarity in the hope that the people in charge will be nice to us. You have to realize that implicit whiteness is the whole problem. You are right where anti-whites want you to be. They have a wall separating mainstream conservatism from white identity politics, and you are cowering on the wrong side of the wall.

          • george00

            I’m all in favor of “white identity politics” but still too many white people don’t get it and need to have their thinking straightened out. That’s the fault of MSM brainwashing. In the mean time doing away with the Republican Party until we have something better to take it’s place is a bad idea.

          • Hal K

            In the case of conservatives it is not MSM brainwashing. It is conservative media brainwashing. This includes American Thinker, Human Events, (essentially) all of conservative talk radio, and conservative writers/commentators.

            We can’t do away with the Republican Party all by ourselves. It is on a path to collapse anyway. What we can do is set the stage so that white identity politics can enter the mainstream sooner rather than later. Explicitly pro-white parties that draw votes away from the Republican Party will help to accomplish this.

          • george00

            Explicitly pro-white parties won’t get any where because the MSM will use brainwashing to condition people to think negatively about the party. Until we can reach the white masses with our message, whites will be conned by the MSM into not supporting pro-white candidates. The MSM is not on our side and is not fair. The MSM is run to advance the interests of the people of who own the MSM.

          • Hal K

            You are being a naysayer. An explicitly pro-white party doesn’t have to win any elections to be successful. All it has to do is take votes from the GOP as a protest against the GOP’s blocking of white identity politics.

          • george00

            You are assuming that a Republican defeat would be correctly interpreted. Romney lost and that was interpreted by the Democrats, Republicans and the MSM as being because the Republicans were not pro-immigration enough. We will flounder until we can reach the White Lemming masses with our message.

            Maybe you’re a troll who wants amnesty because without a Republican Party to block it that’s what we’d have right now.

            Why not vote for Republicans as a protest against the Democrat’s blocking of white identity politics?

          • Hal K

            I never said I wanted amnesty. It is the Republican Party that is blocking white identity politics, not the Democratic Party.

            What is your plan for reaching the “white lemming masses?” I think the plan I am suggesting is a pretty good one. It will put pressure on the GOP to start talking about white group interests, which is something they avoid like the plague now even while pandering explicitly to blacks, Hispanics, and other groups.

            The Republican Party is at the center of our problems. There is a wall keeping white identity politics out of the mainstream, and the Republican Party is the political component of the wall. We are stuck with the two party system in our country because of our winner-take-all elections. It is not realistic to think that a third party could get established. The only recourse left is to bring down the Republican Party.

            Why is it so important to you to keep the Republican Party intact when things keep getting worse regardless of who is in power? What we need is white identity politics, not a few more years of implicit whiteness while the Republican Party clings to power.

            Do you really think it matters whether the GOP clings to power or not? Things are going in the same direction regardless.

          • george00

            Your plan is stupid. Here’s why: We all vote in Democrats to protest Republicans supposedly preventing explicitly White identity politics, that right there is stupid but I digress from my main point, then we have all Democrats who could and probably would do unimaginable damage and set back whites for decades, all in the hopes of waking white people up. My idea is to wake Whites up through education not by dragging them through hell.

            Ultimately I agree with you about explicit White identity politics but I disagree with your method of getting White people to wake up to it.

            When you say things like “The Republican Party is at the center of our problems” that makes me think you have a difficult time grasping reality.

          • Hal K

            This is the second time you have imagined I said something that I didn’t. I did not say we should vote for Democrats. I said there should be explicitly pro-white parties to allow whites to protest the blockage of white identity politics by the GOP.

            The demographics are changing, and the GOP is sliding to the left with the Democrats. Whites are going to be “dragged through hell” regardless. Please read my comments more carefully. I have already dealt with the issues you just raised in earlier comments.

          • george00

            How is the GOP blocking White identity politics?

          • Hal K

            They never talk about white group interests. This is prohibited by the GOP leadership. The GOP is kept in power by our winner-take-all electoral system. There are two ways to try to change this situation. One is to try to change them from within, and the other is to try to change them from without. Perhaps both approaches are valuable, but it is the insider route that is more likely to be misinterpreted (contrary to what you said). The GOP is going to collapse anyway, and if there are any people speaking up for whites explicitly inside the GOP at that time then there will be a tendency to try to make them the scapegoats.

            The GOP has ousted people with connections to the racial right. This happens at the local level usually. Mainstream conservative publications such as the National Review and the Washington Times also do this to their writers.

          • Hal K

            One more thing. The Republican Party is already defeated. It let the demographics change. You are thinking in terms of the past where the Republican Party was the implicitly pro-white choice and the Democratic Party was the explicitly anti-white choice. We need to move past that. The time for clinging to implicit whiteness while the conservative establishment shuns explicit pro-whiteness is over. Think in terms of the stages of the grieving process. You are still in the anger and bargaining stages. Stop trying to bargain. We need to move on. Implicit whiteness is a failure. Read the writing on the wall. You are playing into the hands of the left by thinking we need the GOP to block the latest threat from the left. This is the strategy of more of the same. We need to move beyond that.

          • george00

            “They never talk about white group interests. This is prohibited by the GOP leadership.” Name this GOP leadership person or persons that made that rule and who is it supposed to prohibited from talking about white interests. Site your sources.

          • Hal K

            As I said, people have been expelled at the local level.

            Why should I go out of my way to dig up details for a lone skeptic anyway? The evidence is right there in front of you.

            The word is cite, not site, by the way.

          • george00

            David Duke won as a Representative at the State level as a Republican.

            Yes there are some dumb Republicans but they blocked the first Amnesty attempt and blocked the Dream Act.

            If enough whites voted for a pro-white 3rd party the Democrats would win everything because the whites would split their vote. Whites make up something like 90% of the Republican Party.

            Yes you are right the Republican Party used to be better but the Jews took over the Party and the conservatives turn into neocons. It is hard to start a new party it would be easier to retake the Republican Party.

            You act as if a pro-white party is some new idea, it’s been tried many times. The most recent pro-white party is the Freedom Party.

            F

          • george00

            Go to NumbersUSA.com and find out the Party of 99% of the Senators and Representatives who are working to stop this new Amnesty Bill and make E-Verify a national law and every other thing that benefits whites and you will see they are Republicans. If you want to do the white race a favor, spread the word about race differences and why and how the whites got into this mess and stop telling people how much better it would be if we could just destroy that horrible Republican Party because a lot of whites are dumb enough to believe you. The Republican Party is buying us time to turn this mess around.

          • Hal K

            Duke won more than 20 years ago. He was opposed by the party leadership.

            As I said before, an attempt to change the GOP from within might be valuable also. Think in terms of the carrot and stick strategy.

            You still don’t seem to understand what I am talking about. A pro-white party doesn’t have to win anything to be successful. All it has to do is take votes away from the GOP while getting the message out about the need for white identity politics.

            I don’t think the American Freedom Party is explicitly pro-white anymore.

          • george00

            I understand exactly what you’re talking about. A pro-white party takes votes away from the Republican Party and gets the Democratic Party elected and sets the white race back 20 or 50 or what ever years and you call that success.
            There have been many implicitly and explicitly, and what ever else you want to call it, pro-white parties in the past and they get no where because the gate keepers that control the access to the MSM are in the hands of the hostile elites. Brain washing works best when the subject is bombarded with one message over and over. If we just had one half hour show a week on the MSM we could turn this whole thing around rather painlessly.

    • Exoplanet Finder

      The first step is the rescue of our race-soul, something that many of our younger readers are discounting because they don’t know any better. It is not too late. We faced population bottlenecks in the past, and will do so again in this century, but the white race will emerge stronger after it loses its mixers to the nonwhite LatinoAfroAsian block. They will absorb many of us, but those who do not mix will be the eugenic flowering of our civilization. It doesn’t look good, it looks horrible, but remember there are iron-clad biological laws working with us and against us, and that the more we understand these laws, the more we can make good, eugenic decisions.

      • Intrepid

        If that’s true, then why does everyone make a big deal about people (especially white women) who race mix? After all, the white race is just going to “emerge stronger” from it.

        • Bad_Mr_Frosty

          Almost all the mixers I’ve seen are no loss to our race. Either they are physically disgusting or mentally disgusting.

          • Tucker

            I used to think that, myself, for a period of time. Usually, in the beginning of this race mixing sickness – the vast majority of White females I’d see in such unnatural couplings were usually the type who seemed to have Rosey O’Donnell or Rosanne Barr as their role models. Not so much so, these days.

            I’ve seen fairly decent looking White females – women who would have no problem finding a White male to date or marry – pushing shopping carts or strollers around in Wal-Mart or the local mall, and there will be that Cultural Marxist planted white genocide poison pill (mulatto crumb cruncher) planted inside that cart or stroller.

            Something tells me that a significant percentage of these White females are probably hard core liberals, and it’s not really their looks and appearance that makes White men shun them – it’s their twisted and suicidal political ideologies. The White men who might date these women get a dose of their feminazi, ‘I just love Obama’ attitude – and are immediately repulsed by these women, which is a perfectly natural reaction to have to any liberal.

            Liberals are radioactive, as far as I am concerned. I shun them as if they had the plague. Which, when you think about it – they really do. The White Genocide Plague.

          • Anon12

            Usually both!

  • wattylersrevolt

    Is Coulter the skank serious? She wants to bring in more skilled immigrants? I can not believe that Mattress Back Anne has never heard of the H-1 L-1 visa program. Why is she hostile to the idea of Native Born White America producing its own doctors instead of importing them from India?. In other words, this childless 51 year old loose morals “Conservative” wants to import a large highly skilled Asian voting block that will vote every four years for the rapid race-replacement of the Native Born White American Majority…I think its goes like this:Treason is the Reason.
    Highly skilled Asian Legal Immigrants are actively partcipating in the destruction of thousands of years of acquired Native Born White American Engineering,Scientific,and Medical experience..future generations of Native Born White American Engineering, Medical, and Scientific experience that will never be developed in places such as Apalachia included.

    • Frank

      You missed the point entirely. She is saying that if we are going to have legal immigration, we should bring in people who will contribute to society, not be a drain on it. What makes you an expert on Coulter’s morals? You need a remedial reading course.

      • wattylersrevolt

        And who are these legal immigrants that the skank Coulter wants to bring in?

        • Bad_Mr_Frosty

          The ones that share her bed…

      • Garrett Brown

        She supports immigration from THIRD WORLD AFRICA. Do your homework.

    • sbuffalonative

      Coulter isn’t perfect. She does have access to the airways that is denied to others.
      We can’t afford to wait for the great White Messiah to speak for us.
      You don’t have to like her but I’m really getting fed up with people ignoring the message because they don’t like the messenger.
      Petty infighting and attacks aren’t going to help any of us.

      • wattylersrevolt

        You seem to have found yours. I don’t like her message. I want 0 asian legal immigration of any kind.

      • Tucker

        Coulter clings to just enough of the ‘establishment’ line of baloney to maintain her ability to get invited to appear on mainstream TV. Like how she immediately jumped onto the bandwagon about the Boston Marathon ‘official narrative’, which has been coming unraveled almost as fast – if not faster – that the Sandy Hook and Aurora, Colorado ‘official narratives’.

    • Jefferson

      On the issue of immigration Ann Coulter is way better than those Libertarians Ron and his son Rand, who believe there are not enough Spanish speaking Amerindian janitors and fast food workers in the U.S, so we need to import more of them because that is what Libertarian free market crony capitalism is all about.

      Those types of blue collar jobs could have gone to poor lower class Whites.

  • Dave4088

    The common perception is that legal immigrants are good and nearly indistinguishable from the Cleaver family and Brady Bunch, but there are plenty of cases to dispel that myth most notably the Boston bombing. Ann gets it right in several areas, but immigration should be dramatically reduced to include only highly educated and skilled Europeans or ended altogether and the mass of the third world segment of the population deported.

    • sbuffalonative

      And white South Africans.

      • Dr. X

        Yes. White South Africans would make much better immigrants than even most White Europeans, because they GET IT. Many White Europeans are just as PC and brain-addled about race as our own elites here are.

        • Dave4088

          They would make better immigrants, but there’s little evidence that they GET IT. There has been no physical, armed resistance by S. African whites to their displacement and genocide by the ANC.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            NATO would bomb them and invade SA to protect the ANC and those lovable genocidal blacks. Why, they look just like Obama’s sons!

  • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

    Good for Coulter. With most attention on Rubio’s plan to reward 11-20 million ILLEGAL aliens with immediate legal status, far less attention has been focused on his plan to accelerate LEGAL immigration. Below, from the LA Times:

    “. . . one of the biggest immediate impacts of the reform bill being prepared in the Senate would be a sudden, large surge in legal migration. The U.S. admits about 1 million legal immigrants per year, more than any other country. That number could jump by more than 50% over the next decade under the terms of the immigration reform bill that a bipartisan group of senators expects to unveil . . .

    “. . . the bill . . . aims to increase temporary visas for both high-wage and low-wage workers. The number of visas for high-tech workers could nearly double to more than 120,000 per year. At the other end of the wage scale, a new visa system would allow businesses to bring in workers for jobs including janitors, housekeepers and meatpackers.”

    SOURCE: Immigration bill would spark surge of legal arrivals

    LOS ANGELES TIMES

    April 13, 2013

    http://tinyurl.com/d8cndkm

  • Exoplanet Finder

    By the calculations of the diversity lobby and its minions in the government and all walks of life, even perhaps in your workplace, the years 1924-1965 in the United States must be the worst years in the history of any country in the history of the world. Why? Because they were years of too low for zero immigration (from the nonwhite world, popularly called The Third World, LDCs, ‘developing nations’ or today the ‘Global South’) combined with a certain assimilative attitude. We went ‘On the Road Again’ to finally populate our own country sea to sea, and actually build the country. That building, within living memory, is what is being disassembled before our eyes. We fill the potholes, and build a new road to accommodate new nonwhite man seeking lebensraum in our land, but what we built is being hollowed out. In college it was cool to check out the thrift store for party wear. Lots of funny stuff, donated by many unassuming Americans that were given an assuming outfit, or someone’s closet that had been emptied upon moving, or the old crap of someone who moved underground. Now we are living as a college student at a thrift store, but in time. We are living on the past, the Third World invaders are living on it (and many of us are as well, just like many of us and them are living off the businesses and men who pay the revenue of the government). Zero immigration is right, and in fact, lets also consider reverse immigration, sending the confirmed marriage fraud men and chain migrants back. You know, a real nation can do that kind of thing. A bureaucratic class of parasites can actually be removed and revoked from their position. Affirmative Action CAN BE REVOKED. Disparate Impact cases CAN BE THROWN OUT OF COURT. 20,000,000 aliens CAN BE DEPORTED. We are the masters of our own fate and our own destiny, and also of theirs. I recommend we break the chains of mental and political slavery. Beethoven’s Prisoner’s Chorus (youtube it) from Fidelio can be our anthem. And if we make the shift, now that would be anthemic.

  • Dr. X

    Coulter made a great point in the original article (much of this point was snipped for the AmRen edit) about how many immigrants have committed mass shootings. She had a whole laundry list of examples, including Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter who killed 32 people, Jiverly Wong, and the Hmong who shot up some deer hunters after trespassing on thier land. (Coulter even missed a couple of well-publicized cases).

    The point is that we are currently in the grip of a criminal government in Washington, D.C. and in left-wing state capitols that is actively attempting to deny natural born American citizens their Second Amendment constitutional birthright, while simultaneously flooding the country with murderous Third World criminals through both legal and illegal immigration.

    The American Nation is in mortal danger as never before — not even during the Cold War was it in as much danger. The enemy is a Fifth Column actively seeking to subvert our Constitution and flood White America with Third Worlders under the ideology of a post-racial and post-national New World Order. As Jared Taylor is reported to have said at the AmRen conference, it may be too late to save the U.S. White patriots and constitutionalists need to think very seriously about founding a new nation within the ruins of the old, and keeping the Blue State diversity cancer from metastasizing any further.

    • David

      The Plan is there. The Northwest Front. If we would get our A**** in gear we could start to actually DO something about all this. The founders gave us the 2nd amendment but not the courage to use it.

    • Octavus5

      Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter, grew up in the States and “benefited” from our great k-12 educational system as well as all the other wonderful things our society had to offer.

      • Tucker

        If I remember the Virginia Tech incident correctly, Cho had some issues that dealt with his ability to race mix with White females on campus, who found him to not be sufficiently appealing.

        This, I think, is a very common source of anger, animosity and antagonism inside the vast majority of non-white males. These men are intentionally bombarded by our Cultural Marxist enemy controlled media with the message that the preferred acquisition of beauty and desirability must be for them to poach a White female, and when these men are brainwashed to have this obsession – and it runs into a dead end, those who are borderline unstable will often times snap.

        Were these non-white men not inside White European nations, and in their own native homelands – they would be in a far healthier environment and they would focus their attention on pursuing the women in their own race and culture.

        In essence, ethnic nationalism is the absolute best foundation upon which to establish a society and nation.

        Are you listening, RamZpaul?

        • Octavus5

          “If I remember the Virginia Tech incident correctly, Cho had some issues that dealt with his ability to race mix with White females on campus, who found him to not be sufficiently appealing.”

          Come on, you really think this is what turned him into a mass killer?

          I’m sure he had many grievances, his lack of a social circle being just one.

          “Were these non-white men not inside White European nations, and in their own native homelands – they would be in a far healthier environment and they would focus their attention on pursuing the women in their own race and culture.”

          I agree, but being a minority hasn’t precipitated many Asian Americans to snap. (Disclosure: I am Asian American)

          What has been less talked about and investigated are the prescription medications Cho was on prior to and leading up to the shooting. In fact, it appears a number of shooters were on medication, including Adam Lanza?

          I’m beginning to suspect our over prescription of prescription drugs, particularly among our youth, may be partly responsible for some of the shootings and other problems.

          • David Ashton

            Investigate cannabis – honestly.

          • Tucker

            The drugs you describe and complain about are, without any question or any argument from me – a huge and probably dominant factor in these mass shootings. However, you must also consider the fact that these types of drugs are being prescribed to people who go to see doctors and who claim to have emotional and/or psychological related health issues – and this is where the rejection factor and feelings of social and sexual ostracism come into the equation I was attempting to describe in my earlier post.

            Consider also the age range of most of these shooters. It is no coincidence that most of these young men are in the period of their lives where their sexual hormones and testosterone levels are at their peak level. The desire to mate at this time in a male’s life is at its absolute strongest level, and I can vouch for this – because I have personally known at least 4 young guys who were so despondent over their lack of success with finding a girlfriend that they attempted suicide.

            To further compound the misery and despair that many young men experience when they are rejected, our Cultural Marxist controlled media has helped to teach many young women to be downright cruel and vicious in their treatment of men who ask them for dates, but who somehow don’t meet 100 percent of their increasingly unrealistic criteria.

            Combine all these factors, and you’ve got an explosive situation.

          • Octavus5

            I can’t disagree. But these factors, as much angst as they create among teens, don’t go on to trigger killing sprees. Indeed, if it did, we should see it least among white males. I think other more important factors are at play.

          • Hage

            Right and East Asian males are perhaps the least attractive race of males on the planet and they mostly get left-over slop Caucasian girls even with money.

          • Octavus5

            Least attractive? LOL! Sure… Let’s see if you can say that in another 20yrs when East Asia rises further. Perhaps then when you’re older and wiser, you’ll realize the aesthetic blinders you were narrowly gazing through in your youth.

          • Garrett Brown

            Have you ever seen a sub Sahara African? Stop trolling, you’re horrible at it.

      • David Ashton

        The paradox then is that the Left will then blame the American environment instead of the disaffected foreign-born.

        • Octavus5

          Cho arrived in the States at 8. I’d say he was pretty much immersed in Americana by the time he shot up Virginia Tech. Mass shootings are peculiarly “American”.

      • Anon12

        No, he “benefited” from his own DNA. Asians have NEVER assimilated into White society. They live among their own and practice their own “culture” and you know it…I am glad they do not live among us, I want ALL nonwhites NOT to live among us, period.

        • Octavus5

          No, Asians readily assimilate, esp. after 2 or 3 generations. To the extent Asians do not FULLY assimilate, it is due to white’s inability to accept them as one of their own. And the fact that Asians, among all minorities, are never fully accepted into Americana, you must surely know!

  • MekongDelta69

    Before the Swimmer “This bill will not change the demographics of this country” Kennedy / Cellar Immigration Disgrace of 1965, emigrees of 20 of the top 20 countries were from White countries.

    After 1965, emigrees of Zero of the top 20 countries were from White countries.

    Nothing else needs to be explained…

    • George

      Actually, Canada is number 19 on the list. We have our problems with brownie infestation, but we’re still (in the main) a white country.

      • MekongDelta69

        I literally just saw the official list approximately a week ago. I have been pretty fanatic about saving information for decades, so I can supply links or info later on. I have a 99% track record of doing so. Unfortunately, this link is one of my brain-lock (::doh::) 1%, which ticks me off no end.

        If I remember later, I’ll post it. And believe me, I won’t have any joy in posting it, if I find it. I read the entire article and all the stats and lists and Canada (nor any other White country) was on that list. Not only do I wish you were correct, I wish the entire list returned to the pre-1965 list.

        • GeneticsareDestiny

          ” [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia”

          What a disgusting traitor. We’re being flooded with Somalis and Indians, among others. It’s hard to believe anyone could care so little about his country that he would speak such a massive lie to his people and his nation.

      • Anon12

        NO, we are NOT! Don’t you have eyes? I don’t blieve one word of those who say Whites are still 40 or 50 or 60% of the population! They are LYING through their teeth. Remember MANY people check the White box who are NOT White Euros!

  • Bobbala

    I wish we had somebody on our side that voted …

    • Garrett Brown

      And Coulter is most definitely NOT on our side.

      • David Ashton

        But we can pick out her best arguments and use them.

        • Garrett Brown

          No, we can’t.

  • to be correct, non european immigration. peroid.

  • Sykes

    Poor article by Coulter. We don’t need to import a foreign upper class. About half of recent American college graduates are unemployed or underemployed and she wants to open the floodgates on skilled immigration. But since we have already destroyed the lives of many ordinary whites with outsourcing, mass immigration, and visa programs we might as well destroy the lives of wealthy whites as well. It’s only fair.

    • Octavus5

      Exactly. We could easily sell citizenship to foreign millionaires, but that would be bad policy.

      • David Ashton

        Look at London, “England”.

    • NM156

      She knows perfectly well that we need no foreign labor at all. Saying that, however, is racist, so restrictionists have to hide behind calls for better immigrants.

      • Sykes

        You may be right, though I have heard many people advocate for more foreign labor so I wouldn’t assume that she knows that. But even so, I’m tired of mainstream pundits having to hold back. It’s time to start telling the truth because white America’s time is running out fast.

  • Garrett Brown

    Anyone that respects or agrees with the mudshark Ann Coulter is a joke. Why Amren is linking one of her articles baffles me. She’s a huge part of the problem.

    • Jerrybear

      She’s one of the few mainstream conservatives who has woken up to the problem of immigration. Legal and illegal. Why wouldn’t Amren link to her articles?

      • Garrett Brown

        Because she’s a negroid loving republitard. It’s pretty obvious.

        • Jerrybear

          Just keep excluding potential powerful allies who can get our message out and see how marginalized this movement will become. Mr. Taylor is not even that much of a purist.

          • Garrett Brown

            Ann Coulter an ally? LOL! Never ever ever is that going to happen. JT isn’t a purist, but he most certainly does not want white women assimilating with blacks.

          • Jerrybear

            She dates blacks? News to me. I could really care less. She’s too old to procreate.

          • Garrett Brown

            Of course it’s news to you, you’re ignorant about this whole subject which is why you’re defending her in the first place.

          • Jerrybear

            She spreads the word about the evils of third world immigration. That’s all I care about.

          • Garrett Brown

            She spreads her legs for the race that is majority destroying this country. She can die for all I care

          • KevinPhillipsBong

            Rumor, nothing more. She’s been seen with Jimmie Walker of Good Times but neither said they were even dating the other – there’s even less evidence they’re screwing around. Maybe she fails the test for ideological purity, so what? Are we to believe that there are so many people in the MSM giving voice to our concerns that we can afford to spit on a few?

          • Garrett Brown

            It is not and never will be a rumor. You’re listening to the wrong news.

          • Ngati Pakeha

            I agree with you for what it is worth. We are trying to espouse the notion that we are not a kinder of Stormfront yet give people who accuse us of that all the ammo they need sometimes. Divide & Conquer works against your cause as much as it assists if you do not appreciate the need to form allies. When we make up such a small percentage of the population we really need to be as smart as we say we are.

          • Anon12

            Divide and conquer sure has worked very well for the Dems, right?

          • David Ashton

            We need to learn something from our enemies, the communist fronters of yesteryear and the political correcters of recent vintage. They adopt temporary, partial or still undeveloped allies for public purposes, while keeping an eye on the long-term goal and pushing the ratchets forward.

          • Garrett Brown

            You can stoop to liberal’s levels but I never will.

    • Luca

      I believe her ” public appearances” with JJ Walker were for PR shock value. He has the intellectual capacity of a flea.

      Regardless, I don’t care about her personal life, she is on the right track here and always has been when it comes to exposing the cause of these problems,(Liberals).

      • Garrett Brown

        You can believe whatever you want, the fact is she has openly stated they have been and are dating.

        So if a mudshark goes and has 4 mulatto babies with three different negroes but suddenly starts dating a white man who’s a nationalist it’s ok? She has always been part of the problem. She is a REPUBLICAN, that is not any aid to us or our movement.

      • Garrett Brown

        You can believe whatever you want, the fact is she has openly stated they have been and are dating.

        So if a mudshark goes and has 4 mulatto babies with three different negroes but suddenly starts dating a white man who’s a nationalist it’s ok? She has always been part of the problem. She is a REPUBLICAN, that is not any aid to us or our movement.

        • Bad_Mr_Frosty

          She may not lift her skirt, but she’s still a whore for the Republican party. She’ll made tons of money getting White Americans outraged, but will never explicitly work for their interests.

          • Garrett Brown

            “She can lift her skirt for 100 blacks but as long as she talks about immigration she’s ok in my book! Herp derp!”Some people on this site are die hard republitards and its hilarious to read their bias.

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            So if you agree with her that legal immigration is awful you are a Republican? I agree that legal immigration, any immigration is bad and I’m not a Republican.

          • Garrett Brown

            If you agree with Coulter on anything without noticing her past you are most likely a Republican. It doesn’t matter if she is anti amnesty and immigration now, she will soon, as she always has, say something that is anti white or hurts our cause and only praises Republicans.

        • Luca

          The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Liberals are my enemy and Ann is my friend. I’m not familiar with your movement, but let’s not argue.

          • Garrett Brown

            If you consider someone as stupid as Ann coulter your friend that doesn’t say much for you. The “lesser of two evils” logic is ignorant and just plain wrong. She’s just as bad as liberals and does not care about the interest of whites like us(or should I say, me).

          • DudeWheresMyCountry?

            It’s not about her, it’s about what she is saying. She is saying something you never hear in the media… not only is illegal immigration bad for America but plain old legal immigration is bad too.

          • Garrett Brown

            It’s not about her??? So if Bill Clinton was anti immigration tomorrow you wouldn’t care because he is NOW anti immigration? it is COMPLETELY about her. We still wont hear this in mainstream media, This was in her personal article. Sure O’Reilly might interview her and she’ll rant a bit, so what. It still isn’t getting out to the masses,

    • I’d rather read Debbie Schlussel than Ann. Not that I trust hardcore Zionists all that much, but I know that when the crap hits the fan people like Ann don’t have the fortitude and gall(chutzpah in Debbie’s case) to stand up and shout if there isn’t money to be made or a book to be sold. If someone isn’t brazen about their ethnocentricity, then they are going to turn on you the second it becomes profitable to them. People want to believe Ann Coulter is somehow “speaking their language” just because she mimics a few things real pro-White people have been saying for decades. Let them believe it.

      • Garrett Brown

        Strongly agree. All of these people will look like complete idiots when in a few weeks or months she’ll come out with something defending blacks or supporting some other progressive garbage. She isn’t helping us what so ever and is still the stupid woman she’s always been. A race traitor is a traitor to race realists(duh).

  • Luca

    When immigration policies were sane, over 100 years ago, the United States had a desperate need for masses of people to work in their booming factories or in semi-skilled trades. They were shipped in from Europe, processed through Ellis Island and almost a fourth were rejected due to health or criminal history issues. They worked and studied hard, learned English, assimilated and achieved the American dream. my grandparents were among them

    Now they hop fences, over-stay visas or chain migrate. They show up with their lawyers demanding their rights, refusing to assimilate, applying for welfare and committing crimes.

    Our immigration system is broken alright, but not in the way the Liberals would have you believe.

    How about we freeze all immigration due to the sequester? We need air transportation far more than we need millions of illiterate, third-world criminal peasants whose kids vote themselves more benefits.

    And once again these types of problems visited upon the American people are traceable back to Liberal politicians.

    • Ngati Pakeha

      Interesting stat about 25% at Ellis Island being rejected for amongst other things a criminal past. If they rejected that many these days as opposed to .05% (see the article about 99.5% of the illegals being approved for sanctuary) you might just get some of this filth being rejected. Then again they will probably reject all the Afrikaners, Germans & Irish for being unable to become “good” Americans.

  • George White

    Get on the phones and CALL the Senate and the Congress about S.744, the awful immigration bill that not only will amnesty millions of losers but radically increase the importation of MILLIONS of legal losers as well!!!!! Call, send emails, faxes, letters, etc., we MUST stop this amnesty!

  • fakeemail

    Go for it Ann! You’re not perfect, but I would accept you as our Liberty leading the people!

    Immigration (legal and illegal of 3rd worlders) has NO benefits as various moderates like to tell us. “Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.”

  • Ella

    Our govt is broke. Our immigration system is broke. Our Borders are broke. You cannot ask a CRONY govt corrupted by Lobbyist groups to fix the “broke system.” I think many Americans are slowly realizing the problem is really severe after Boston bombing. Voting in new deadbeats don’t seem to work and they just vote for Big Business interests of unlimited immigration regardless of quality. Both Dems and Repubs have their hand in declining American life.

  • Jefferson

    The Republican Party has a cancer and his name is Grover Norquist. This man is an enemy of White America.

    He is a crony capitalist who sees dollar signs at the mere sight of poor low skilled Spanish speaking Amerindians who work for dirt cheap.

    • Puggg

      Grover Norquist really hearts Muslim immigration. I dare him to say that now. But he probably would because he didn’t stop his Islamophilia/xenophilia even after 9/11.

  • Octavus5

    I enjoy Ann Coulter speak but this is frankly a poorly written article. Ann Coulter hurts the cause for better border control, even putting a pause on immigration, in the way she frames the immigration debate. Her article is not only factually untrue and misleading on some points but replete with implicit racism. This is not the way to frame the immigration debate. Tightening our borders is not about whether the immigrants are from “third world” countries (how quaint) or whether they’re “losers” who become mass killers. Immigration control is about taking back sovereignty over our social, cultural and political future. Period.

    • Octavus5 writes:

      “Her article is not only factually untrue and misleading on some points but replete with implicit racism”

      Jack Ryan replies:

      Oh horrors! Who would have ever thought someone would find something RACIST, pro White on Amren?

      • Octavus5

        Is it necessary to hold negative views of other races in order to be pro-white? If so, this is your mistake.

        • It’s necessary to stop being a spineless, pussy. Yeah, people will scream “RACIST”. Get over it.

          • Octavus5

            Respecting others is not being a spineless pussy. Being proud of your own ethnic group doesn’t have to entail hatred. And coloring the immigration debate with overtones of racism doesn’t help the cause.

          • Sherman_McCoy

            What about blacks is positive, for example? As Freed Reed so precisely put it, they are “a failed race on custodial support.”

          • Octavus5

            Maybe they are a failed race. So what? Respect them as sentient entities and go on with your business. Organize your “pro-white” society, but lose the hatred. It’s not a productive emotion.

          • rightrightright

            It isn’t hatred. It is recognition, and the wish for our civilisation to survive.

          • Octavus5

            That’s fine, but we must also keep in mind what our civilization has wrought on others. For instance, we can’t ask blacks to return to Africa after we had a hand in bringing them here by force. So we have to find and make peace with our own history.

          • Sherman_McCoy

            You speak as if whites have to power to change anything at all about his situation. I do not trust blacks because they are 13% of the US population and commit over 50% of violent crimes. Blacks rape whites at an approximate ratio of 3000 to 1 vs white on black. Hate them? I wouldn’t say that exactly. I prefer just to avoid them. What I hate is the blindness whites are supposed to have when it comes to race.

            Stop AA and prosecute black and white crime in a color-blind fashion and I’ll think about stopping the “hatin’.”

          • JLR

            Who brought them by force ? Likely the same who want immigration now.

            For instance In France (I am French) who got profit from the colonies ? french farmers ? likely not…
            Those who did money with the slavery of African want to make money with immigration now. No matter if mixing different people and therefore different cultures, religions, custom results in creating civil wars…They don’t care about any of us, slaves can be black, yellow, white or green…the oligarchy is really not racist, yes really not…

            “Let’s mix up all these people, they will serve us very well, in the worst scenario they will kill each others…”

          • Octavus5

            “Who brought them by force ? Likely the same who want immigration now.”

            I agree. The same motivations are probably at work among the white elite: money.

            Poor border control and/or liberal immigration policies serve the interest of corporations and big/small business, just as slavery did hundreds of years ago.

          • Anon12

            Baloney! Your “argument” does not hold water.

          • Talltrees

            Jews controlled most of the slave trade.

            By the way, freed blacks in this country also had Black slaves.

            When you speak of “we,” not everyone had slaves in America. My ancestors came in 1644, never had slaves. I’m not about to accept guilt for those Whites who did. Even if they would have had slaves, why should I feel guilty for what they did?

            I do agree, though, that we shouldn’t demean those with lesser capabilities; however discussing them objectively shouldn’t be a problem. I think the reason why Blacks are frequently discussed is because the left fails to accept this reality.

          • Octavus5

            “My ancestors came in 1644, never had slaves.”

            Wow… I’m more amazed at the 1644, but it should probably apply to both facts.

            “I’m not about to accept guilt for those Whites who did. Even if they would have had slaves, why should I feel guilty for what they did?”

            I agree… there’s no reason for guilt. However, there is a collective responsibility.

          • Talltrees

            “there is a collective responsibility.”
            You can accept it, but I won’t. I actually think their coming here was a blessing. They were given food, housing, clothing, in exchange for work. Most were treated well. We must remember what life was like in Africa at that time?
            American Blacks, today, are in a far better environment than their bothers and sisters in Africa. In my opinion, they should be thankful. Most all of our lives are better than our ancestors.
            I will say their voyage here was very unpleasant, but they can thank the Jews for that. They bought the slaves, owned the ships, and controlled the conditions on those ships.
            All of us that work buy food, housing, and clothing with what we are paid by our employers. How free are we when we are beholden to them eight plus hours a day, not to mention travel time to and from? We must work to live just as Black slaves did. Yes, there is a difference, but not much if you hate your job.
            All races and ethnicities fared far worse situations in history than American Black slaves. Only Blacks complain and complain only about White Europeans having slaves. Never hear about Jews selling slaves, other Blacks owning Black slaves in America or Muslims who still have slaves.

          • Octavus5

            “You can accept it, but I won’t. I actually think their coming here was a blessing. They were given food, housing, clothing, in exchange for work. Most were treated well. We must remember what life was like in Africa at that time?”

            As chattel, maybe they were treated well. I don’t know. But in the end, they were no more than livestock.

            Life is more than the improvement in living standards. If material increase is not accompanied by the feeling of emotional well-being, then there is no net gain.

            Yes, Africans improved their living standards by being stolen away to the Americas. But I doubt they felt any increase in emotional well-being.

            “American Blacks, today, are in a far better environment than their bothers and sisters in Africa. In my opinion, they should be thankful. Most all of our lives are better than our ancestors.”

            But on other measures, psychological, they are worse off.

            “All of us that work buy food, housing, and clothing with what we are paid by our employers. How free are we when we are beholden to them eight plus hours a day, not to mention travel time to and from? We must work to live just as Black slaves did. Yes, there is a difference, but not much if you hate your job.”

            I understand and sympathize with the grind of 9-5, and its corollary to effective slavery.

            “All races and ethnicities fared far worse situations in history than American Black slaves. Only Blacks complain and complain about White Europeans having slaves. Never hear about Jews selling slaves, other Blacks owning Black slaves in America or Muslims who still have slaves.”

            I agree that the incessant whining needs to stop… and soon, regardless of merit.

          • Talltrees

            Much worse was the time following their freedom. At times, treatment was emotionally cruel. But, still, there were White ethnicities treated just as badly. Can we say British snobbery had something to do with it, don’t know? They didn’t like Southern German and Italian immigrants.

          • Freya

            White people and white people alone, freed blacks. The blacks who sold them didn’t. Is there collective responsibility in black people? No. In jews? No. Whites are the only ones who take responsibility for a tiny percentage of their alleged crimes.

          • Freya

            ETA: I meant to write their people’s alleged crimes.

          • Octavus5

            Blacks were “freed” into what kind of society? Not a very pleasant one for them. Perhaps concomitant with that “freedom”, whites might have carved out a piece of America and given them a homeland they could call their own? But that kind of foresight they didn’t have…

          • NM156

            Have you heard any outcry from the Black electorate, with sky-high unemployment rates, or Black politicians about Obama’s immigration and border enforcement policies, which harm them even more than whites? They couldn’t care less. Their political objective is to ally themselves with other minority groups to squeeze whitey for benefits and privileges and to use their electoral power to keep Black politicians in power, no matter how detrimental their politics is to them in the long run. You didn’t notice how Colin Powell metamorphisized into a left winger for the 2008 election. It’s all about race, no matter what.

          • Octavus5

            I understand that for many, it’s about race. But whites can’t inform their arguments by race because that tells the other side that they have little choice but to organize around race as well, pointing the finger at whites as justification.

            Personally, I don’t see how an increasing number of non-black minorities help blacks. I think it marginalizes them. And few non-black minorities have much sympathy for blacks.

          • Sherman_McCoy

            The “other side” has always organized around race. It is about time that whites did the same.

          • Octavus5

            Who was the first to organize around race? Surely, it wasn’t blacks.

          • Freya

            It wasn’t? African tribal leaders didn’t wittingly sell out their race?

          • Octavus5

            I doubt African tribal leaders thought much about the concept of “race”.

          • Greg Deane

            What an inane objection.

          • george00

            Saying that blacks have an average IQ that is 15 points lower than the average white IQ or that they commit 10 times more violent crimes than whites is not hatred.

          • Octavus5

            I agree, statistics are not hate. But to make something of it more than you should could be hateful.

          • Greg Thomas

            I’m all out of respect for the ungrateful, militant and demanding third world hordes invading this country. They show zero respect for our race, why should I respect them.

          • Octavus5

            Maybe you are misunderstanding my use of the word “respect”. Respect doesn’t mean acquiescence.

            We should also try make sure that before we charge foreigners of disrespect and militancy, we are not acting in hypocrisy? Maybe it’s time we stopped meddling in foreign affairs as well? Bring back the troops and start minding our own business?

          • Anon12

            RESPECT IS EARNED, NOT GIVEN AWAY! NOT A SINGLE NON WHITE INSIDE MY NATION OR ANY WHITE NATION, HAS EVER EARNED MY RESPECT AND NEVER WILL! GOT IT?

          • Anon12

            You are nothing but the typical “see, how great I am”” and the “I don’t hate anyone” moron whose advice we will not heed nor accept. Period. Go your merry way and infect your poison where they love your poison.

        • NM156

          Oh sure, we could set the terms of the debate in terms of nationalities, but when those nationalities immigrating to America are all of another race, any criticism at all will be decried as racist, as has been the case for decades!

      • Greg Deane

        America like Australia can benefit from immigration, but immigrants who contribute to the social fabric and prosperity, not immigrants who come to feed off it and erode it with demands for special consideration of their barbaric laws and savage customs, and economic support for their ineducable, unskilled families. Migrants selected from similar populations to those that cultivated American (and Australian) growth and prosperity up to 1965 are desirable. Immigrants from the third world rarely, if ever, contribute to the societies in which they settle. They might work hard and prosper, but the ones who do are likely to repatriate their wealth, not use it for their new homelands.

        • Octavus5

          “Immigrants from the third world rarely, if ever, contribute to the societies in which they settle.”

          Really? How many 3rd and 4th generation Japanese or Chinese Americans do you see repatriating their monies to their motherland?

          • Greg Deane

            Third and fourth generation Chinese descendants of immigrants are usually disturbed, outsiders to both oriental and western communities, always trying to impress inappropriately-like you perhaps. One of the reasons for Australia’s deficits is the moneys Chinese send back to China. There are very few Japanese in Australia, but most of those here are here for business, to make money for Japan. What’s more, just about all the Asians in Australia are in retail, following procedures. A few are dodgy doctors or accountants but none know how to put things together of their own accord. Australia gets next to nothing out of them except inflation, competition for services, malfeasance and incompetence.

          • Octavus5

            “Third and fourth generation Chinese descendants of immigrants are
            usually disturbed, outsiders to both oriental and western communities,
            always trying to impress inappropriately-like you perhaps.”

            LOL… luckily for me, I’m 1st generation. No desire to please here.

            “One of the
            reasons for Australia’s deficits is the moneys Chinese send back to
            China.”

            Of course they’re going to send money back to families who may still be living in China. Most of these folks are 1st generation with existing families ties. What do you expect? Give them another generation or two and they’ll be completely assimilated… well, to the extent they’re allowed to be assimilated, that is.

          • Greg Deane

            You are such a simpleton.

    • IanJMacDonald

      The problem is not immigration per se. If the US decided tomorrow to allow in the Boer volk, I would totally support it, and on balance it would be a net gain for our country.

    • NM156

      And framing immigration in terms of taking back our sovereignty over our social, cultural, and political future won’t be immediately called racist?

      • Octavus5

        If it is, then the problem is theirs.

  • Greg Deane

    Ann Coulter is a good voice to oppose immigration, but she’s something of a milquetoast when called upon to face the full reality of race differences. She would probably behave as if she were embarrassed about being praised on American Renaissance even if asked about it on Fox News. And she’s probably vain enough to think she is some sort of trail-breaker when she says, “Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act so dramatically altered the kinds of immigrants America admits that, since 1969, about 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from the Third World. They bring Third World levels of poverty, fertility, illegitimacy and domestic violence with them. When they can’t make it in America, they simply go on welfare and sometimes strike out at Americans.” She would probably back down and apologise for these remarks in some fora.

    • IanJMacDonald

      I’ve read Ann Coulter’s, and it’s obvious to me that she reads American Renaissance even though she would probably never admit it, but that’s OK. Also, if you think that Coulter will apologize anytime soon for her observations about Third World immigrants, then you don’t know her very well.

      • Greg Deane

        I hope you’re right. I saw her with Whoopi Goldberg on The View and I thought she was less assertive than she should be.

        • Tucker

          Whoopi probably had a switchblade pressed against her ribcage, under the table.

          • Greg Deane

            I should have taken that likelihood into account.

      • robinbishop34

        I think she reads Counter Currents as well because what she is saying is eerily similar to what is said on a podcast with Greg Johnson and Matt Parrott over there.

  • White Mom in WDC

    Rock on. My dad was an immigrant. Became naturalized after eight years. Did it the right way. Worked. Was never on public assistance ever.

    Screw the third world turds that come here and pop out six kids without blinking an eye and expect us taxpayers to foot the bill for the turds expelled from their brown wombs. Squat monsters, hairy muzzies, et al go home!

    I don’t wish death or destruction, but something good always comes out of something bad. Perhaps the Marathon bombings will show our dumb politicians the HUGE downside to immigration, that being the erosion of the quality of life in America

  • MekongDelta69

    This doesn’t specifically have to do with this particular article, but I just read this on another site and I thought I’d throw it up here:

    April 24, 2013 at 12:24 pm
    On February 4th, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia:

    “In Russia live Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, then we advise them to go to those places where that’s the state law. Russia does not need minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell ‘discrimination’.

    We better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of most minorities. When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the national interest first, observing that the minorities are not Russians.”

    The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a standing ovation for five minutes.

    • Greg Thomas

      I would love to listen to this speech.

  • Viking_61

    Just look at Breitbart.com, half their stories over the last week have been on IMMIGRATION. Breitbart is kosher, non-racist, and miles away from the $PLC’s radar of hate. Lots of “respectable conservatives” and even reformed white liberals are having their “awakenings” right now. Let’s be kind and help them see the light.

  • NeoconsNailed

    If I were a curmudgeon, I’d point out it’s baby steps 45 years too late…. and that Coulter can almost be counted on to say something stupidly opposite from this within two weeks. That would be like her and other whim- and fad-driven CONservative media darlings.

  • JLR

    We are experiencing the same thing in France since 30 years now. The aim is clearly to destroy our nation. Besides those people can be used by the “humanist” oligarchy within the illegal/legal economy for a really good price.Moreover in France all our companies are closing going to the east where labor is quite cheaper. We are definitely under the control of multinational lobbies which are now much more powerful than ever. I really hope that american people and Europeans will start to understand that all those wars are triggered for the profit of only few people an oligarchy without any patriotic feeling. It sounds like the conspiracy theory but I am afraid facts are now strongly arguing against the fantasy…

    • NM156

      Neoconservatism is the political definition in America. In effect, it means “invade the world, invite the world”, as the writer Steve Sailer so aptly put it.

  • robinbishop34

    Ann Coulter is perhaps part of the trail of breadcrumbs that leads some mainstreamers into our line of common sense thinking?

  • PDK/Kelto-Scandic Secessionist

    Immigration and emigration, these are two similar words, but
    further, are words with the exact opposite meaning. The former immigrates into
    a new country; the latter emigrates out of the old country. An easy way to
    remember this is the im of immigrate is similar to into, while em in emigrate is
    similar to exodus.

    In 1965, Ted “Chappaquiddick” Kennedy championed the
    Hart-Cellar Immigration and Reform Act. This law replaced Calvin Coolidge’s,
    republican, conservative, 1924 National Origins system law which basically
    preserved the American population status quo, primarily white Nordic and
    western Europeans, our Founding Fathers were of this stock. America went on to
    become the richest, most powerful nation-state our planet Earth has ever known.

    By the way Calvin, along with JFK and RWR were the only
    Presidents who reduced taxes. Further, as JFK used to say, “When the high tide
    comes in, all the boats rise, the big ones and the small ones”.

    Early America was also primarily a Christian nation, and
    ironically, just as with the Christian belief in original sin, so too was
    America burdened, unwittingly, with an original sin, the OS of the black
    sub-species of humans.

    Among other realities, and as it turned out, the black
    sub-species of humans were from a gene pool which evolved to favor numbers over
    IQ, and subsequently were capable of only a tribal culture and further, were
    incapable of civilized culture. As a result, wishing to remain in the white man’s
    higher culture of civilization, realizing they could only flourish as a
    parasite, chose to adopt the 13% solution, the perfect % for a host/parasite
    relationship. Not too many to kill the host, not too few to fail to continue on
    the sub-species.

    However, Ted, the liberal’s lion of the senate harped
    incessantly upon the notion that the Immigration and Reform Act of 1965 would
    not change America’s demographics. So, why change the law? As it turned out it
    did change America’s demographics and whites now represent just 63.7% of
    America’s population. The bulk of the rest is of lower IQ and therefore has
    primarily become parasites and the host is in great jeopardy of extinction. As
    the host goes, so too goes the parasite, what, therefore, is the sense if one’s
    perspective is from the perspective of sanity.

    Clearly the liberal’s lion was lyin.

    Between the lyin lion and LBJ, the staggeringly stupid, the
    seeds for America’s ruination were sowed. The seminal year for this was 1965.

    Now near 50 years later, America finds herself 16.7 trillion
    dollars in debt. We cannot possible pay this off, we will either declare
    bankruptcy or devalue, either way we are doomed. Recently Australia changed its
    pegging of the Australian monetary system from America’s to China’s. What does
    that prophesize?

    White liberals and their ideology control America’s zeitgeist,
    which itself is the box in which we all must think, and further, the box we are
    never to think outside of. Instead of talking about immigration reform, America
    should be talking about emigration reform, riding us of the low IQ parasite,
    non-European whites for the sake of both redemption and salvation. But we will
    not.

    The liberal democrats, the anti-white, anti-American party,
    wish to transmogrify us from our FFs free enterprise Republic into a socialist
    democracy; from the greatest culture ever known into a loser nation-state, on
    the road to the new world, one world order of globalism, socialism and
    democracy.

    Because the republican party has been transmogrified into a
    useless castrated bull, America will not adopt an emigration law similar to the
    American Colonization Society of 1816, alone the purveyor of hope for the
    restoration of the white man’s great American culture as originally conceived.
    In fact, America has now been reduced to serving out the 2 centuries old
    liberal ideology of “The white man’s burdened”.

    As Jim Morrison and the Doors song said, “This is the end”.

    Perhaps a chunk of both America and Canada could be carved
    out by non-liberal whites for a new, non-liberal, white, nation state.

    Secession is the answer, the only answer. Thank you.

    • David Ashton

      Here is an unusually casual thought from this Englishman. Despite its similarity with pre-war CPUSA plans, why not a small ethnostate just for the blacks who cannot be blamed for “coming” to the USA, plus a phased repatriation of Mexicans and Asians, and let native-born whites of whatever national origin have all the rest?

      • Bossman

        What you’re proposing is an unworkable pipe dream. It will never happen. The best that the U.S.A. can do at this time should be to severely limit Asian immigration.

        • David Ashton

          OK. Your proposal is a start. Mine seems a bit more desirable than an Orania or a Nordic Galt’s Gulch in the Rockies.
          However, Bolshevism was a pipe-dream in 1916, Israel a pipe-dream in 1939, a Multicultural-Marxified USA a pipe-dream in 1964.
          Color-blind sterilization of irresponsible baby-breders is a pipe-dream.
          Never is a wicked word in politics.

  • elreyjones

    This site is probably controlled by Bolsheviks, international bankers, and Hollyweird types. If this site and its people had any gonads whatsoever, you’d have your fists in the air and would be protesting all over the USA. All I read on this site is a bunch of girly men who sit around and cry amongst themselves instead of real action. Protest, spread the world on active 2nd Amendment rights, protest, protest, protest. Immigration is invasion. We are ruled by modern day Bolsheviks and modern day conquistadors.

    • jeffaral

      Keyboard warriors come to mind !

    • David Ashton

      Frankly you have more chance in the Land of the Free than in Police-State Britain to take protest to the streets. Still, France could cheer us up a bit.

  • Immigration the diversity always leads to the same thing:

    http://youtu.be/lKDeyuM0-Og

    That’s why ‘anti-racists’ spend their whole lives justifying it.

  • William Allingham

    Does anyone here knows “pinatas” ? its a mexican tradition (which reflects their violent character and their opportunistic mentality) in which a cardboard figure filled with candies is beaten till it falls apart and then children are able to struggle with each other for having a part of the booty.

    i think that a good idea for a cartoon would be an image like this:

    a “pinata” of the USA being beaten by immigrants with crime and low-IQ sticks, same who have their eyes covered with a bandage with the label “multiculturalism” and from the beaten pinata starts to leak “welfare”, greencards etc.

    The same could be done with a pinata of Europe and the protagonists being Arabs.

    the principle is the same this people don’t give a damn about our culture or our people they are just having fun taking whatever they can. They are “breaking” our countries in order to take the free price that is inside.

  • mobilebay

    I’ve already written Ms. Coulter congratulating her on this column which I read on another site. This is what we’ve been saying for so long now. Speaking for myself, I would like to see all legal immigration stopped by our government (fat chance), as well as the US taking in refugees, political and religous amnesty-seekers, visa workers, visa lottery winners… in short, everyone from foreign countries. Then, line our borders with our military. I realize that our government would scream to high heaven and say, “That’s not the American way!” Well, let it become the American Way. We’ve been wimps long enough. Let’s show the world we’ve got a backbone and stop being Santa Claus to every third world inhabitant on the earth. We might just earn some grudging respect.

    • Octavus5

      “That’s not the American way!”

      You make it sound there is an American ideal our politicians and pundits desire to uphold. No, that’s too high a standard to hold our politicians and the majority of Americans to. It should be clear since the beginning of our war on terror that nothing is so important that it cannot be compromised on the alter of something even more important: money and security.

      Americans and our politicians will refuse to put a halt to immigration because it would mean putting a dent in our GDP. Big business and small, corporate interests and business lobbies representing every industry in America, will fight any proposal that will hurt profit margins or sales. Immigration, including illegal, represent cheap labor, more labor, and more consumers.

      • Anon12

        “That’s not the American way!”
        —————————-

        But it sure is the NON white UNAmerican way. Non whites can NEVER be called Americans simply because they can never be one. Only the White Euro race can assimilate and build and maintain our own civilizations! Our Constitutional and Bill Of Rights and LAWS are by and for White men/women only. It cannot be for any nonwhite.

        • Octavus5

          “Our Constitutional and Bill Of Rights and LAWS are by and for White men/women only. It cannot be for any nonwhite.”

          Saying things like this is how you fail to gain credibility.

  • coulter is just another GOP shill. GOP in nixon years INVENTED affirmative action. In 1986 during reagan years, the GOP allowed the first amnesty that precipitated a huge flood of immigrant cheap labor.

    The last GOP president we had, Bush, said these words when asked during an interview why he thought america needed more cheap labor immigrants:
    “Because texans won’t lay hot tar in august.” His exact words. Google it.

    And now you parade Coulter, another GOP shill, in front of us as if the GOP is the savior. All the GOP does is Lie. Just like the Dems lie about providing universal healthcare and taxing the rich, the GOP lies about stopping antiwhite policies and mass immigration.

    Look at their track record posted above.

    Is amren, vdare, taki, sailer, et al, paid GOP outlets or what?

    • We have self-proclaimed awakened people with pro-White views who still don’t understand how the power shift from Left to Right is nothing more than a game of musical chairs. Everything is always a reactionary fix to something “the other guy” did. But what almost never seems to happen when either party gets in power is a dedicated proactive fix that gives us something back. If you are black, illegal alien or any other non-White, then you can honestly say that, while one party might seem to give you more, you don’t actually lose anything when the other party takes hold of the reigns. Can White people say that? Nope. We just have different levels of losing that always make one seem more palatable than the other. Regardless of how it’s spun, it is a controlled descent and many pro-White people are so beaten down and still indoctrinated and hypnotized by political correctness that they can’t even see it.

    • Anon12

      I agree with every point you made.

  • not different in Canada !

  • check out the PDF at the following link:
    http://www.aha.org/advocacy-issues/letter/2011/110607-let-umbdenstock-obama.pdf
    It’s a letter that the president of the American Hospital Association (AHA) wrote to Obama in June 2011 expressing his concern about hospitals being required by law (EMTALA) to provide medical care to “undocumented immigrants”
    Excerpt:
    “The most recent statistics shows that America’s hospitals provided nearly $40 billion in uncompensated care in 2009.”
    That “$40 billion” is NOT a typo. Ya think maybe these hospitals are engaging in “cost-shifting” on that “$40 billion”??

  • Dogbone

    Typical Ann Coulter: She comes to the party late, listens to what others are saying then repeats it trying to look intelligent and dominate the discussion while making a profit at the same time. She is telling me what I have been saying for over 20 years.

    P.S. If you want to know why we keep importing garbage, here is part of Emma Lazar’s poem inscribed on the tomb, I mean base, of the Statue of Liberty:

    “Give me your tired, your poor,

    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

    The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

    Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

    I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

    You see that line about “wretched refuse” and “homeless”? That is why this country is the way it is. I think there should be something added to the bottom: “We give free EBT cards to all.”

    • Bob Willard

      “She comes to the party late, listens to what others are saying and then repeats it”

      Alright, tell me, who are these other mainstream pundits who are calling for an end to or heavy restrictions on legal immigration?

      Why do people here insist on condemning one of the few voices in the mainstream media that echo Amren views just because she was “late to the party”? We should be applauding Coulter.

  • Anon12

    I have been saying this for DECADES now. ANY legal immigration of ANY 3rd worlder is horrible for our race and nation. That is why our enemy DELIBERATELY instituted that 1965 Immigration Act in the first place. THEY wanted it to destroy our race. Haven’t we woken up to that fact yet? We are the dumping ground and it was done intentionally. Yet we still sit and NO ONE in the media will dare mention this FACT. Not Glenn Beck, Not Rush, not Hannity. NO ONE!

    • Octavus5

      “ANY legal immigration of ANY 3rd worlder is horrible for our race and nation”

      The “3rd world” is a term that is a little dated and passe and I’m surprised Coulter used it. Strictly speaking, the “3rd world” refers to _very_ undeveloped economies. Today, many non-white countries are comparable in development to Western countries or have developed to a level that would take them outside the “3rd world” category. Still, it can probably be inferred that when the term is being used by Coulter or in this forum, it’s probably being used improperly in reference to all non-whites?

  • nobody

    How do you guys feel about the legal immigration of whites into America? I am not opposed to this in any way. In fact I believe that we should encourage it wholeheartedly.

    • Octavus5

      Really? You don’t mind an onslaught of Jews, E. Europeans, and white Middle Easterners?

      • nobody

        Did I say we should encourage the immigration of Jews and Middle Easterners? No, I said whites. There is a big difference.

  • redundancy

    DUH !! Yea we already know all this … Go tell Thomas Jefferson to change the DOI and erase the pc equality lie that is not in The Book.

  • guest

    The problem is that what we see as bad our hostile elite see as good…

  • White losers

    I agree. Legal immigration of white losers from europe should be stopped immediately ! I prefer hard working brown and black skinned immigrants from asia and africa.

  • SFLBIB

    My grandparents immigrated to the United States, and I found their names on their ship’s manifest on the Ellis Island website. That manifest included the following “Affidavit of
    Commanding Officer”, dated 1913, as required of each ship carrying immigrants to the United States. (Thousands of these can be found on the Ellis Island website.)

    “I, [___name of ship’s commanding officer___] , of the [___name of ship___] , from [___port of origin___] , do solemnly, sincerely, and truly [swear] that I have caused the surgeon of said vessel sailing therewith, or the surgeon employed by the owners thereof, to make a physical and oral examination of each and all of the aliens named in the foregoing Lists or Manifest Sheets, [___number of sheets___] in number, and that from the report of said surgeon and from my own investigation, I believe that no one of said aliens is an idiot, or imbecile, or a feeble-minded person, or insane person, or a pauper, or is likely to become a public charge, or is afflicted with tuberculosis or with a loathsome or dangerous contagious disease, or is a person who has been convicted of, or who admits having committed a felony or other crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, or is a polygamist or one admitting belief in the practice of polygamy, or an anarchist, or under promise or agreement, expressed or implied, to perform labor in the United States, or a prostitute, or a woman or girl coming to the United States for the purpose of prostitution, or for any other immoral purpose, and that also, according to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information in said Lists or Manifests concerning each of said aliens named therein is correct and true in every respect.”

    It’s interesting to note that disqualifying health conditions and debauchery then are celebrated as “diversity” now.