RAMZPAUL Gone Wild at AmRen

YouTube, April 8, 2013

Review of the 2013 American Renaissance conference. SPLC chronicles RAMZPAUL’s naughty and irreverent jokes.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • WhiteKnight

    Why do we whites even care if we are called “Racists”? Why can’t a white man just say that he only likes whites and does not want to be around non-whites? I am proud to be a “Racist.”

    • LastBastionOfHope

      It’s because you can lose your job, scholarship, spot in a university, etc. Once they don’t care about stupid name calling though, we would be allowed to say what we want.

      • Bill

        ONLY because for over forty years we have allowed judges to be appointed by partisan affiliation by whomever is in power. The FIRST time that happened we should have demanded impeachment of said judge when he ruled extemporaneously and in a partisan manner outside the clear sense of the law.
        And frankly, until we remove partisan judges and replace them with fair and impartial judges things will only get worse. Or, until things get so bad most normal, average citizens will be boiling mad and engage in open revolution.

      • Tucker

        I sense that it is really galling to the Cultural Marxist left that, once Whites leave the work place and go home each day – that those of us who haven’t drank their poisonous kool-aid – can go to a home or neighborhood that is either 100 percent White or very close to it. Especially in our private residences – we can enjoy a few hours of relief from the presence of obnoxious minorities.

        I believe that, if they could, these anti-White haters would like to be able to legislate a solution to this ‘problem’, and force Whites to have any spare bedrooms in their houses filled with welfare queens and their brood.

    • StillModerated

      Actually, we’re moving up in the world. We have been upgraded to terrorists — scary terrorists like Al Q. Aeda.

  • WhiteKnight

    I am tired of whites being PC. If our race is to survive, we need to be openly “racist.” There is no other way for our race to survive.

    • jane johnson

      How about “whitist”?

      • Alexandra Roderick

        Nora. I agree that Francisco`s rep0rt is something… yesterday I got a brand new Toyota after having made $5410 this past 4 weeks and would you believe, ten k lass-month. without a doubt it is the coolest job Ive ever done. I began this seven months/ago and straight away got minimum $79.. per-hour. I use this website, Big31.com

    • Mentious

      Use “racialist,” and work to redefine “racist” in positive terms. It is, after all, an irrational slur on many natural and positive things like natural cohesiveness of peoples, love of people, or even appreciation of the varied peoples. All these are slurred as “racist” sentiments and of course, to imply these are negative is insane. So a great monkeywrench now and then is to use “racist” openly, and in a positive sense. A great line is, “She’s was obviously being racist when she turned him down for a date — and I mean that in a good way.” 8o)

      Other more elegant terms like “Racially Conscious” are great ways to monkeywrench the Zittgust. New-agers love the term “conscious” and this completely jams their gears plus breaks some trances.

      I like to invent silly versions of it, like “Well, I didn’t want to seem rastus, but…” or “That’s Rastus!” We could even invent some kind of endearing character called “Rastus” for further fun. Make their word manipulations ridiculous. “You supremistiss?”

      Hit them every which way from Sunday.

      • Grim Jim

        “Racism” is a term invented by Trotsky and used by commies and a term with ever evolving meanings, thus meaningless. It’s time to shuck it and tear apart any fool who uses it by pointing out the origin of the word and putting the commie tag on them, make them try to squirm out of it or define exactly what they mean, they won’t be able to come up with a coherent answer. The proper term we need to use for ourselves is TRADITIONALIST. Who, other than a moron, can find a way to denigrate a traditionalist?

        • Mentious

          When somebody makes a simple charge “That’s racist” I like to answer it with a positive statement like

          “Love your people.”

          It makes them realize that “love of people” — and other positive traits — has been grouped under “racist” and is being demonized. Their next logical comeback is: “But love of your people is racist”. The intelligent feel the dissonance of this and realize that “racist” is a flawed word.

          I like to make philosophical points in the background: Nobody can “love 7 billion” in any genuine or meaningful way.

          Another thing demonized by “racist” is a people’s natural cohesiveness. Cohesiveness is what takes care of people and creates communities. You can’t be cohesive with every tree and insect or the 7 billion. You can only be truly cohesive with limited number of people in this world. So if a white woman is interacting with a black or dating him, she is choosing to be cohesive with him instead of with her own people or one of her own men. She is choosing who she wants to be cohesive with out of the many possibilities. The question is why? She must remember she can’t be cohesive with everything any more than she can use her birthday cake to collect up the planets and cosmos. You can only really bond with a few people and communities in this life.

          And note that the membership of the Southern Poverty Law Center obviously finds that ethnic cohesiveness is good. Then why can’t they allow ethnic cohesiveness for Whites? They already have their own blood-won country. Why don’t they go there?

          Love your People. It’s Natural.

          (Create memes that monkeywrench their memes.)

          • Mentious

            ADDENDUM:

            Simple lines are best, and lines that deconstruct the miasm behind words like “racist.” In reality another thing they are demonizing with “racist” is fondness. When Mr. Taylor said ‘We simply prefer to associate with people like ourselves’ that was a statement of fondness. So a great line, especially with women, is:

            “You can’t be equally fond of everybody.”

            “Are you equally fond of everybody?”

            This makes them think and realize that “racist” demonizes a number of natural and positive feelings. Women relate to this. It’s emotional. It’s human. Or here’s a great one:

            “The white community is not pleased by….” (Perhaps in response to the latest anti-white injustice or sensational black-on-white torture murder.) Lefties like to reserve the warm-and-fuzzy, positive word “community” for their protected-class peoples. There is “the Jewish community.” And it’s always “the gay community” — like homosexuals live in little villages, chimney smoke wafting up into a blue skies, a butcher- baker-and-candlestick-maker, get together at a little town hall, with a Town Crier selling papers each morning. You’ll annoy lefties simply referring to “the White community” — and of course they’ll challenge it “What White community? You have no community.” Just say “Really? Go to AmRen-dot-com.” And of course, gays are not all agreed on topics either; so you have them as they squirm. “The white community” is just one more short and sassy stick in the ignorant eye of the rancor to discombobulate it. Example:

            Ramzpaul is enjoyed by the White community.

            Keep it simple. Create at least 3 pleasant white-protecting memes a week and set them on the waters.

          • Pelagian

            The biggest problem is King’s “content of their character” line, which puts a burden on us to go around sussing out everyone’s supposed character at all times.

            But, I am not judging my mother by the content of her character. I am loving her in a preferential way. I am sure there are other women with better character … but I am not making them my mother-designee.

          • Svigor

            First of all, libs don’t judge by the content of character, they’re blatant racists. Second: “You exit a building into a dark alley and the door locks behind you. To your left is a group of five young black men; to the right, a group of five young white men. Which way do you go? No time for the content of anyone’s character.” Don’t let them ask for other differences; tell them both groups are otherwise identical.

          • Very good mentious!

          • me

            Great comment! Women and eglalitarianism….it’s their strength AND their weakness. White Women who have been brainwashed by the pc crowd, the Marxists, and the mass media should be reminded of their first duty–love of their own clan.

          • Svigor

            I just hurl the accusation back. It’s trivial to make the charges stick. Any WN who can’t make charges of racism stick against a lib (any lib; they’re all racist) he’s cross-examining (one starts by saying “you’re racist and I can prove it”) should go back for a remedial course in rhetoric.

            This accomplishes three goals:

            1. Proves “liberals” are racists.
            2. Debases the currency of the “racism” charge.
            3. Rehabilitates the reputation of “racists.”

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Good advice. Keep bustin’ it out brutha Mentious!

      • MBlanc46

        Racially conscious. That’s good. By the way, Rastus is a nineteenth century black name.

        • Mentious

          All the better! “I’m not Rastus!” then becomes a real statement making another point. (I’m not black, I’m White; I have White identity.) And if people consider “rastus” or “reesus” (“Don’t be so reesus!”) confusing and absurd — all the better. Pile heaps of absurdity around “racist” until the word is a joke. After all, it’s a dishonest, misleading, ham-handed word.

      • me

        Yes! Hoist them with their own petard!

  • Robert Binion

    CNN may expostulate and MSNBC might opine, but no one can sit around and dream up stuff to hate like me. I detest:
    Al “Boy, my toes are cold” Gore
    The smell of cabbage cooking
    The Biden Doctrine
    Meetings of the Board of Education and pro wrestling.
    I browse the dictionary learning new things to loathe. (You know, the Sanctimoni–my new word–can hide behind a degree, microphone or title. The poor Wizard of Oz had merely a curtain.)

  • wattylersrevolt

    Ha..Ha..Alfred E Neuman…

  • bigone4u

    Since Ram has a nice following on the Internet he was a good choice to bring in to speak. By puncturing the balloon of PC with humor he brings in new blood to take a look. I just wish there was a female equivalent to him. Most of the commenters here seem to be male as were the attendees as far as I could tell. Where are the women?

    • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

      10 percent of conference attendees were women, many of whom were attractive young women.

      • bigone4u

        I’d like to see some of the Amren women do some videos or write an essay. Over at libertarian websites a young attractive counterculture female named Amanda Billyrock has made a name for herself with her libertarian ideas and I think she helps attract young males to the cause.

        • Fredrik_H

          If they have something worthwhile to say and can deliver it with style, sure. I do not believe in getting caught up in the “we need more women/gay/minority faces” -business like old right has.

        • anonymous_amren

          But libertarianism is just mindless self-centered narcissism anyway, so that’s hardly an achievement.

        • blight14

          Lets just say that ‘Courtney from Alabama’, who was in attendance, is surely the most attractive lady of AmRen……..in my humble opinion…..AND she’s a scientist!!!!! Its a win-win situation…….

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            That is so sweet of you blight14. Thank you!

          • blight14

            Oops, you caught me…….!!!!

        • me

          You mean that you have to use sex to attract males ‘to the cause’? LOL!

      • Michael Ryan

        probably spies

      • Tucker

        How about the idea of a tastefully done swimsuit calendar, featuring the ‘White Ladies of AmRen’? That could be a fund raising idea, and the ladies could be shown in pleasant scenes, surrounded by cute white children and other Whites and help remind all Whites of the old America that they are losing.

        Please, let us not have any white females who’ve disgraced themselves with ugly tattoos or African style body piercings! Just clean, wholesome, girl-next-door types and let us remind the world that White females are number one on the list of nature’s most beautiful!

        • me

          Swimsuit calendar?? And you wonder why White Women aren’t involved with the White Nationalist movement…..

          • Svigor

            Right. The fact that there is no Amren swimsuit calendar is driving women away.

            Nuts much?

          • concernedcollegekid

            “Amren swimsuit calendar”
            As a young woman, this phrase made me laugh out loud. I think light, funny comments like this are good way to attract a younger crowd to Amren, so young people stumbling on this site don’t think it’s just a group for bitter, angry old men. I started posting on this site largely because I identified with some of the posters that seemed funny, down-to-earth, and non-intimidating (like RamZPaul is). We need sites to show young people that you can be conservative and racially aware while still being down-to-earth, funny, cool, and normal.

          • Svigor

            Young men love anger. It’s what about 3/4ths of them have for breakfast. They find fascist aesthetics appealing, which is why there’s such a strong undercurrent of fascism in movies like Nolan’s Batman series, Dredd, 300, etc.

            Lefties tend to add the “bitter” part in there themselves in their characterizations because they fear this truth.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          I think we should do an Amren version video of the Dos Equis commercials that feature Jared Taylor sitting in the middle of a fancy restaurant table with some of the young attractive women in the movement sitting around him. I would volunteer to be in that commercial hands down! After all, Jared Taylor speaks fluent French and Japanese, faced a bunch of angry blacks on the Queen Latifa show, has been to Africa and back, has faced liberal mobs, …why he is the most interesting man in the world!!!!!

    • brengunn

      I know the left wing groups attract more women but I don’t think it’s anything like a 50/50 split. I think it’s just the nature of politics in general that men are more likely to be partisan, and therefore involved with particular movements. That’s just one of the reasons why I don’t think women should ever have an equal representation in politics. They just aren’t as involved.

      • robinbishop34

        Speaking as a woman, I unfortunately have to concede that women are much more simple minded and easy to manipulate than males. They will adopt suicidal attitudes to fit in and think they’re smart for doing so. The left has a monopoly on female control.

        • me

          ‘Much more simple minded and easy to manipulate…’. Charming….Spoken like a true mysogynist.

          • Svigor

            WNism is essentially a maverick movement. The vast majority of mavericks are men.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          I agree with you robin. I just don’t understand why the men in this movement complain about the way we were biologically made. Maybe they should put more blame on themselves for allowing society to manipulate their women this much. If God made us “simple minded”, then how does it make sense to blame us for our race’s failures? Are we the race’s natural leaders? Were we ever supposed to be?

          • Svigor

            I for one don’t blame them at all. I’m simply stating facts for people who I think are deluding themselves about human/sexual nature.

          • brengunn

            Like Svigor, I don’t blame women either, though you’re right there are some who place a considerable amount of blame on women for the modern world.

          • Svigor

            If the world didn’t want female-influenced politics, the world shouldn’t have given women the vote. 🙂

        • Svigor

          Women are far more concerned with fitting in, yes. So, generally speaking, they’ll serve as signifiers, rather than as catalysts; when we see them jumping on board in large numbers, we’ll know all the hard work is already done.

        • robinbishop34

          I should of used the term naive rather than simple minded.

      • me

        How do you explain the POTUS, then, if women aren’t ‘involved’ in politics? Quit bashing and start educating….deprogram White Women–don’t make them your enemy.

        • brengunn

          I never said they weren’t involved, just not as involved and much less partisan. Neither was I bashing, just stating a fact.

          Women tend have a higher percentage of swing voters, where men know who they vote for and stick to it, through thick and thin. Also, women are less likely to get involved with political parties, especially leadership roles within parties.

        • Svigor

          Huh?

      • Svigor

        We don’t need women per se, so much as we need alpha women: the kind of women other women look up to.

        As I mentioned above, alpha chicks make good spokesmen (ahem).

        But run-of-the-mill women are much less a requirement. Run-of-the-mill women are political drones all. They won’t sign on until the war’s mostly won and critical mass has been achieved. And they won’t really be needed until then, either.

        Show me a movement women started and I’ll show you a bridge for sale.

    • Michael Ryan

      yeah i have to admit we look the stereotype

      • anonymous_amren

        Stereotypes are true.

    • Fredrik_H

      I frankly think it is down to biology, at least in part. Women are more peer-orientated and more likely to conform. Pretty much every political movement that goes against the grain – bar feminism, I guess – is dominated by men.

      • Derelictus

        Hmm…Mother Jones, Emma Goldman, Rosa Luxemburg, Naomi Klein…I mean I hate all of them but they’re still “against the grain”, so to speak.

        • MBlanc46

          But still a fairly small minority.

        • David Ashton

          Two cheers for Phyllis Schlafly!

      • me

        What?? Biology, like the ‘wandering womb’? Come off it! If White Women weren’t confronted with mindless drivel like this, maybe more of them would post on AmRen.

        • Svigor

          See? Women know instinctively that they can’t take the heat like a man.

      • Svigor

        Even feminism owes more to men than to women. Feminists aped their male predecessors, used the infrastructure they created, lobbied the institutions they built and ran, spent the money they donated, cribbed their notes, took their advice, read their books, etc.

        The whole of feminism was basically women nagging men and men going “yeah, sure honey, why not?”

        The idea of feminist “struggle” is risible.

    • anonymous_amren

      I went to an anti-Islamist meeting last night, and it was exactly 50/50 men and women. But that’s rare.
      The simple fact is, men and women are almost as different as white and black people. Women are not equal to men, and never will be. Women are just less interested in the world and more interested in themselves.

      • Tucker

        “Women are just less interested in the world and more interested in themselves.”

        Truer words have never been said. I have observed this tendency myself, and have spent countless hours trying to figure out why this is the case. This was probably the primary reason why our Founding Fathers did not intend to allow women to vote or take an active role in the governance of our nation – those wise men understood the female mind and it was as if they had the long range vision to imagine how massive, intrusive, overbearing and out of control our government would become, if women were allowed to vote.

        I’ve seen websites that have charts that document the size and cost of the Federal government – before and after women got the right to vote, and the statistics are mind-blowing. This nanny state we are now burdened with, and which is teetering on the verge of complete financial collapse – can be traced directly to the decision to allow women to vote. Our Founders never intended to create this cradle to grave monstrosity because they correctly thought that White Americans were fully capable of administering to their own needs and did not need some bureaucrat in D.C. mandating how many gallons of water they should be restricted to use to flush their toilets.

        Or, how many projectiles they should be allowed to have in their firearms magazines.

        • me

          When the White Male quits bashing the White female, maybe they’ll be inclined to listen to what you have to say…..

          • Svigor

            Which is why no man will ever take your opinion seriously. You lack the courage of your convictions.

        • Svigor

          I agree about women and the vote, but then, I don’t think men should have the vote, either. Democracy’s outdated.

        • concernedcollegekid

          I once read a comment on a mainstream site where a man said something like “Forgive me for being horribly offensive, but I think women’s suffrage essentially extended the maternal into the political and that’s why now we have governments doing all this ‘Save Darfur’ type crap instead of man stuff like updating the space shuttle”.

          As a woman, I laughed out loud because I saw truth in what he was saying although I’d never thought of it before. I wouldn’t want to give up my right to vote, but I think “extending the maternal into the political” has probably been a consequence of women’s suffrage whether you like it or not.

          • Svigor

            Don’t worry, nobody’s asking you to give up your right to vote.

            We’ll just take it away.

      • me

        This is what keeps White Women away….what tripe!

        • Svigor

          The fact that there’s any verbiage that can “keep white women away” proves their opinions aren’t needed, generally speaking.

      • Svigor

        Well, that’s the backhanded way of saying it. “Families and loved ones” would make an excellent replacement for “themselves,” though.

    • spin

      I’m a woman but I’m Canadian. Sorry.

      • bigone4u

        I don’t think anyone here is prejudiced against Canadians. Just unhappy that your government is PC.

    • There is a young, attractive, articulate, racially aware woman on YouTube who would have been a big hit at the conference, and she has a real appeal for the Gen-Y crowd. She goes by the name “HeyRuka” and is a real breath of fresh air.

      • bigone4u

        Very talented videos. I watched several vids including zomgits–a social construct. She appears to be Hispanic and anti-Marxist.

    • sarah giavelli

      I volutneer to speak next year! collapsereport.com

      • bigone4u

        I believe the website has contact info. You might think about writing for it first.

    • Bad_Mr_Frosty

      I’m madly in love with this woman.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RtZ1GFDDVM

      • bigone4u

        Cute, but when you marry her wash her mouth out with soap.

      • NeanderthalDNA

        I’ve been in love with this spitfire ever since I saw her.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHwDC7vjXM8

        BNP, that’s me! Welcome to London…

        I like the potty mouth.

        • me

          It’s not ‘feminine’ to use profanity….LOL! What a funny and medieval attitude towards women these dorks have!

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Queen Boudica with her little pink rose and ferocious roar.

            No problem with warrior women here.

            I LOVE her attitude – white men could learn something from this one. We have to get mean. We have to return to the way of the warrior. This beauty should shame and inspire…

            That’s worth fighting for. That’s worth fighting alongside!

            “Born and Bred!” Nice.

    • freddy_hills

      Men and women have a different psychology. It takes a different approach to attract women.

      • me

        Oh, rly? LOL!

    • CourtneyfromAlabama

      Why do men in this movement want feminine women, but then at the same time constantly ask white women to act like men by showing up at these things? It is not as if 50% or even a large minority of white men are shouting this racial stuff in the streets and still being rejected by their women. If less than 1% of white men are showing up at these conferences, is it really fair to ask “where are the women?”.

      • David Ashton

        Men want feminine women, period.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          My point exactly. Let’s stop asking why more white women aren’t at the conferences then, until at least 10 to 25% (more would be better) of white men would start showing up at these things first.

          • Svigor

            Agreed.

      • NoName

        I don’t see how showing up at a conference is a masculine (or feminine) thing to do.

        • Svigor

          Probably because you don’t know anything about the subject?

      • Svigor

        Excellent point, assuming they’re the same men holding these contradictory opinions.

        But good point that feminine women aren’t generally into “these things.”

  • Bobby

    THE SPLC, is a corrupt, anti-American citiznes, lawless organization and all those associated with it are criminals.

    • Hunter Morrow

      Semitic Poverty Law Center:

      President Richard COHEN
      Legal Director Mary C. BAUER (she’s “German”)
      Deputy Legal Director Daniel WERNER
      Intelligence Director Mark POTAK
      Director of Research Heidi BEIRICH (“German”)

      On and on and on…

      All the muckety mucks Look White To Me ™ and are sitting on a quarter of a billion dollars.

    • me

      But they bring in so much geld….oy!

  • Jaego

    Jews in the New America? It will just start all over again.

    • Hunter Morrow

      What? You don’t think they are White? They look White to me!
      You can’t get true dealing when it comes to the Jewish Question with
      American Renaissance. Christ almighty, the first American Renaissance
      meeting had a rabbi as a dinner speaker!

      • robinbishop34

        That is called ‘controlled opposition.’

        • Hunter Morrow

          Did the conference control the rabbi or vice versa?

          Anybody catch a good look at him? Did he look White?

          • robinbishop34

            The better question is did he look gentile. Answer: No. You’re pissing in the wind on this site dork.

      • The__Bobster

        Up 30 minutes so far. Let’s go for a record.

        • Hunter Morrow

          I hope we get to 6 million minutes.

      • Grim Jim

        This is why AR will fail, the jews within this suicidal group will make sure of it–of course, those jews will come away richer and full of levity.

      • dhs

        The situation is that “white” is ambiguous. It can mean (the forbidden word) Aryan, or it can mean Caucasian. Jews are Semites, therefore they are Caucasian, but are not Aryan.

        There are much more important issues to consider, than verbal quibbles.

        • David Ashton

          Aryan is a linguistic term equivalent to Indo-European.
          Semitic is a linguistic term that includes Hebrew.
          There are historical connections between “race” and “language” but they are not identical.

        • The Ethiopians are Semites but they’re only partially Caucasian and mostly Negro. Ashton is right. You’re mixing linguistic and racial terminology.

  • brengunn

    Is he Canadian? Strange accent, where is it from?

  • brengunn

    Like the reverse red neck piss take. Poor red necks, they get caricatured by the left and now the right, too. No one stands up for them, though.

  • Michael Ryan

    no I disagree I think most people are too far gone to hear us as “racists” Ive tried it on some of the most conservative and PC derisive friends I have and Im known for being inflammatory so I even get cut a lot of slack. it doesn’t work and I know from being on the other side it really sounds ugly and ignorant. This may not be true down south or if youre somehow surrounded by natural racist but thats not my world. What worked on me was first the Bell Curve and later more science starting slow with EO Wilson I think Steve Sailor has just the right tone to turn the middle class. You cant accept what someone like Jared says until you have accepted certain facts. Humor particular light ridicule of the inconsistencies, immigration from an employment perspective works I have been describing immigration as an attempt to save the multinationals the transport costs of shipping off shored goods back by bringing their workers here for us to support their families while they do our old jobs at 1/3 the wage.thats a concept they get without getting into race at all.

    • robinbishop34

      Everyone should read Steve Sailer’s blog… and Takimag as well. I think Jared Taylor writes for Takimag now as well.

  • Funny the women is like the stereotype that the so called anti-racist have of any racist neonazi homophobe.I made a comment about homosexuals once and was called a beerbellied ignorant redneck.I happen to be in pretty good shape and have a degree in microbiology.I drink wine only.

  • Oh now amren needs to produce a pro white version of all in the family.Just read an article about how people are canceling their cable and watch television on the internet.We could get the show on netflix.What we need are people willing to invest money.

    • The__Bobster

      The usual suspects were shocked to find that most Americans sided with Archie Bunker, even though they made him look like a fool.

      • David Ashton

        Same in Britain with Alf Garnett.

      • Tucker

        Carrol O’Conner is a very talented actor, and his Archie role was without a doubt his best career effort. But, in real life, O’Conner was what Rushbo would call an egg sucking dog liberal.

        You’re right. Archie used to regularly clean Meathead’s clock, and all Meathead wound up doing was to confirm the already established belief that the 1960s counterculture was nothing more than a collection of looney-tuned losers.

        Incidentally, if All In the Family were on TV today – I’m sure that it would be pushing race mixing, dope smoking, pedophilia, homosexuality, lesbianism, and Archie’s character would have a KKK Robe hanging on the coat rack where his coat & hat used to hang.

        • me

          Caroll O Conner changed his tune after his junkie son was ‘killed’ by a negro drug pusher.

    • me

      Brilliant! I would subscribe!

  • Michael Ryan

    I also like to make the point along with the science that “racism’ is a very unscientific term it denies the indisputable fact of racial difference that what most people mean is racial hatred and that one can acknowledge the facts without hating. this is important most of us these days have friends or at least co workers and acquaintances that are different races. My theory is those minorities we tend to meet at work or school are likely to be the brightest, which makes some of the statistical facts seem wrong to many in the middle class. another problem is jareds sort of asking the impossible if I understand his desires.To reconstitute a racially pure America at thus point would take a massive civil war or catastrophe and while we may never have been closer to either they are really really remote possibilities so people cant take the concept seriously. but they do get the concept of college admissions and PC hypocrisy welfare fraud illegal aliens minority crime rates etc I think jareds crime report was fantastic and wish he would include prison crime with it and push for segregated prisons. I also would love to see him do something similar on the diversity shakedowns its possibly trillions if welfare govt grants corporate shakedowns govt contract set asides lawsuits and the rest thees a an app that will lay on a map where all sorts things are of small business loans in minority neighborhoods are outrageous

    • David Ashton

      I believe one can make a rational and moral case for maintaining a white majority and a European culture in the USA, UK, Australia, France and all the rest, without hating or acting violently towards well-meaning non-white individuals who cannot help how they were born. Many among the minorities can see the general advantage in retaining an overall beneficial public mono-culture. Illegal invaders, white haters and criminals are a different matter. To this extent white “supremacy” would be a justifiable term.

      • PesachPatriot

        This is a great post. I am technically non-white by the standards of many here even though most people who passed me on the street wouldn’t think so. I think america should most definitely retain the english language, the stars and stripes, the fourth of july, presidents weekend, memorial day labor day,halloween, christmas, easter, st. patrick’s day and thanksgiving. I also think there is great value in teaching all students american history from much better textbooks than the ones we are probably using now. I think you might have a harder time in the UK because everyone is cooped up on top of each other….americans have room to spread out over thousands of miles.

        • Svigor

          I’ve said it before, but I’ll go over it again.

          If you mean white as “Caucasoid,” then sure, Jews are white. But then so are Arabs, Levantines, south Asians, etc.

          If you mean white as “Europid,” then Jews are, generally speaking, 1/2 white, which is to say, their mixed ancestry is about 1/2 white.

          If you mean white as “the people being attacked when lefties talk dirt on white people, as they are wont to do,” then Jews are not white at all. I think this is the sense most applicable to “White Nationalism,” “White Advocacy,” etc.

          Context matters. For me it’s not so much about genes, as it is about ethnicity and identity. It really has nothing to do with any individual Jew who genuinely wants to fight for our side.

          • PesachPatriot

            I guess you would probably have to put me in the RJ category. I obviously find this site pretty interesting and feel pretty comfortably assimilated into english speaking non jewish white american society. One of my best friends growing up was from a very old WASP family and I really like the Constitution, american history and western civilization in general. I’m probably not going to be doing much political stuff other than voting for the lesser of two evils every four years, but if I see aspiring rappers trying to play the knockout game on old white WWII vets I know exactly what to do. When it hits the fan in this country you guys might want some jewish doctors for your side.

      • Michael Ryan

        oh im sure we can make a moral case for maintaining western civilization but we must sell it to white liberals who may actually be controlled by marxists who different motivations entirely. they can mind control the minorities at this point no problem in 20 yrs maybe not so much.The biggest problem seems to be figuring out the motivations/ intentions of this cabal it seems so suicidal they cant imagine they will be allowed to rule or have anywhere to hide yet dont seem stupid

  • c684570

    I watch ramzpaul’s ads to support what he does. We need more vocal race realists like him on YouTube.

    • Morris LeChat

      canned ballzz, this guys balls have been divorced from his body for decades

      • me

        His ex-wife got them in the divorce….a White Woman. That’s why he has ‘yellow fever’. LOL!

  • LOL

  • Ralph

    As someone else has already written, RAMZPAUL can be a gateway to our views. And, as such, he can perform a valuable service to our people.

    Even though, at present, he doesn’t seem to understand why miscegenation is bad for White people; in time he may learn that it’s not because of bigotry that some of us oppose it–it’s because it leads to our extinction. That’s why some of us call it bedroom genocide.

    Of course, he’s not alone in not understanding bedroom genocide; many of our people don’t understand it either. A little knowledge of genes and DNA is necessary to see the science behind why miscegenation is bad for us, and some of us believe that it is up to us to try to educate as many of our people as we can find who have open minds.

    • robinbishop34

      I think Ramzpaul is more clever than some give him credit. As a faithful watcher of his videos for years I believe that he understands that the last generation (if not last several) have been so marinated in this ridiculous notion of ‘multiculturalism is a strength’ and as such he attempts to make a subtle appeal to what has been hardwired into their brains but still get the true message across.

      • Morris LeChat

        IO think you are a fool

        • robinbishop34

          You’re SA, I’m SS.

    • pcmustgo

      Why? is RAMZPAUL married to an Asian woman?

      • Ralph

        I don’t think he’s married, but he does apparently have at least one kid. He needs more.

        If he’s looking for good breeding material, he might consider checking out Czech women and others from Eastern Europe–there are some real beauties there. Many of the ordinary women on the streets look like top fashion models.

        We need their genes in our gene pool.

        Also, you will note that many of the top professional boxers are now coming from that area and even though these guys get hit in the face a lot, many of them have movie star looks. Check out the Klitschko brothers who hold most of the heavy weight belts in the world right now.

        Womenly women and manly men. Like it used to be in Western Europe and the U.S.

        • me

          Mr. Ramsey is a bitter divorcee that is deluded into thinking that he won’t have any problems with the stereotype of a ‘submissive Asian woman’. He has a daughter and a son, and resides in Oklahoma. Czech women? LOL! Have you been to Slovakia?

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I like RamZPaul and didn’t have a problem with his talk. If I am going to critique his talk in any way, I would suggest that next time he list an equal amount of ways that white men have failed, and to make that point very clear. I don’t think it was his intent to make it sound like most of the blame is on white women. It is hard to talk about feminism in this movement without making it sound that way. But what I was worried about, and it ended up coming true, was how the bitter males in the crowd would take it and run with it during question time.

          • me

            Exactly! And I’ve been watching RamZPaul for years, when no one else was. The commments section is filled with mysogyny, and if he doesn’t delete them, then he condones them, in my opinion. White men should rethink the damage they’re doing by excluding, villifying, and ridiculing White Women who want to be part of the White Nationalist movement–otherwise, they will fail….

          • Svigor

            Bollocks. Anyone white worth his salt cannot be “excluded” from doing his part. Only sissies, who are not needed.

        • Nate Miller

          Eastern European women may certainly be very attractive but I hate to say it, they make poor wives. Most if not all are gold digging whores who would sell you out for a pan of 2 day old Alfredo Pasta! I have personally known many white American and British men getting duped by these beautiful yet vulturous and treacherous Slavic women. I don’t blame their genetics, it must be more to do with their tough environment.

          As a white man, if you were a divorcee looking for a partner, it is best to look for a white American woman, if not, an Asian woman would make a good wife. But better to be single than waste time and ruin yourself with a Slav. As for Slavic boxers, good for them, but I never considered boxing as the best way to judge fighting strength and spirit. A bunch of dudes using just their gloved fists in not realistic enough in an actual fight. I never respected boxing then and not now!
          I think UFC is way better than boxing. And from what I know Hispanics and a black seem to dominate UFC.

          Anderson Silva (black Brazilian) is considered the best pound to pound fighter in the world who is also the UFC Middle weight world champion for many years consistently. He also has some of the best techniques in street combat.

          http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/mma/post/2012-07-05/greatest-fighter-ever-anderson-silva-making-strong-case/797716/1

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSWzPyKJzbY

          One of the best UFC World Championship Fights ever in recent times:

          Silva VS Sonnen in 2012. (Full Fight Video)

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPy003iUuVc

          In the heavy weight, yet again we have the Mexican “Brown Pride” Cain Velasquez who is the reigning UFC World Heavy Weight Champion (as of Dec 2012)

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_ZPz6tJR8A

          I have also noticed unlike bigger built blacks and whites, brown skinned Hispanics are on an average much better fighters with a decent fighting spirit!

          Big built Blonde girl vs petite brown Hispanic girl Fight:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzPfyzvvTZA

          A white dude vs a wetback:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4ifbUAh1W0

        • George White

          Sadly…the Russian women are notorious for scams and leaving after they get their papers. They are even worse then Filipinas, if you can imagine that.

    • CourtneyfromAlabama

      RamZPaul added a new flavor to the conference and seemed to be very well liked. I talked to him in person and he has a very good head on his shoulders. I think he is trying to separate himself from petty issues in the movement that divide us. He is avoiding the miscegenation topic for the same reasons I get irritated with male posters on here who rant about white women sleeping with blacks. The fact of the matter is that a tiny percentage of whites participate in the act.

      What I took issue with was a couple of the gentlemen who stood up and commented after RamZPaul’s speech. One man got up and thanked him for going into the topic of feminism and then started ranting about how his wife left him and how he knows lots of white men who have been through the same ordeal, and how one white man he knows decided to marry a Vietnamese woman because she was more feminine.

      Another much younger man got up and asked “how can we attract more women to these conferences?…….We are proud of our race as white men but our women don’t seem to like us”.

      I had a major problem with what both question askers inquired about/ proposed, for two reasons:

      1) The first man was implying that the majority of white women are moral degenerates who are incapable of being marriage partners. If the majority of white women are “unmarriable” then what in the world are most white men like? How are they ( most white men) perfect in every way, but yet somehow still sitting at home and having to stay single, as he is implying?

      2) The second guy asked why there aren’t more women in the movement and then proceeded to imply that most white men are openly proud for being white and that white women, once again, are genetically degenerate for somehow not liking most white men. The second point he made is using the typical gender blame game while overlooking the fact that white men these days have their own problems as well. The first point he made is a contradiction to what he actually wants. The men in this movement want feminine women but then expect us to act like men by showing up at these conferences.

      What I suggest is for us to look at the root cause of feminism and examine how it has hurt both men and women in our race, instead of giving men like these two I mention above, platforms to rant about how “most white women are the problem”. To be honest, I was a little hurt after I heard some of the responses/inquiries to RamZPaul’s talk. Maybe those two gentlemen need to examine their own problems as men, and perhaps why they don’t have partners right now.

      • robinbishop34

        The origins of feminism is jewish men.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          Exactly! Let’s direct our anger at Jewish men and elites instead of most white women, please.

          • robinbishop34

            We need to head over to Occidental Observer to begin to make a dent.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I will do it if you do it. Is that the website Roger Devlin writes a lot for? I don’t have a problem really with his articles, just the types of comments they attract.

          • blight14
          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            LOL, what are these videos you keep posting? Is that you?

          • robinbishop34

            BTW… never capitalize the word jewish, that lends credibility to the filth.

          • blight14

            I LIKE the way you think!!!!

          • David Ashton

            It is insulting to turn a proper name into a common noun – gratuitously so and counter-productively.

          • blight14

            Per chance did we meet at AmRen?

      • Ralph

        I share your comments about White men who blame White women for the failings of the White men. I’ve seen comments from White men who complain that they’ve never had children because they could never find the right woman. Scratch the surface a little and you’ll often find some of these guys are extreme introverts who are afraid of women and who don’t know how to carry on a conversation.

        And, of course, some White women also complain about White men, the way the White men complain about the White women. And, many of these White women are similar in personality types to the White men.

      • blight14

        Hey lady, I sat at your table Saturday night at dinner!…….Brett

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          It was a pleasure to meet you!

      • me

        It’s a huge issue, a serious issue, and something that AmRen should take on. We need White Women in the White Nationalist movement–otherwise, there won’t BE a successful White Nationalist movement! The mysogyny, and the constant blaming and complaining about White Women, will keep women away from the cause. When will White Men stop doing this?! Feminism started out as a radical thought of White Women like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who were pro-family, pro-marriage, and anti-abortion.These women thought that women should have the rights to earning wages, rights to vote, rights to owning businesses and other property, protection from rapes and beatings, and having the same protection under the law as men. Like every other genuine and necessary movement, it was hijacked by ‘chosen people’ like Gloria Steinem, Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan, etc., and turned on its’ head. Militant feminism replaced common-sense feminism, and was used as a weapon against White people. It is a problem that can’t be fixed by further alienation of White Women. The ‘chosen people’ are good at psyops–and the best way to combat this is through education and rational argument. Bashing White Women for being brainwashed by the Marxists among us is not productive nor helpful. Education and friendly discussion will be….

        • Svigor

          Bollocks. The WN movement doesn’t need more than a small cadre of alpha white women (attractive, articulate, intelligent, dedicated, and thick-skinned, which leaves out the vast majority of women). The only thing we need the broad mass of women for is to signal that we’ve made it, that the struggle has achieved critical mass.

      • me

        Also, the mass media have promoted miscegenation, promiscuous sex, lesbianism, and women acting like men–not to mention the Marxist colleges that like to indoctrinate the young White Women to their ’cause’. Wall Street, pornography,airbrushed Playboy centerfolds, and the mass media have convinced the American male that if they can’t have a ‘supermodel’ virgin of sixteen, they’d be ‘settling’ for second-best–even if the male in question is a slovenly beast. At least the Marxist males are more realistic when it comes to women….they get more sex.

  • Morris LeChat

    He’s an idiot that youtube made into something more than and idiot, but after a few moments of youtube one realizes he is lass than an idiot

  • Morris LeChat

    Stabbing Am,ren in the back and kicking the feet out from under Amren as soon as he got back to his coputer

    • robinbishop34

      Look up the word ‘finesse,’ and stop with the jackboot attitude.

  • Mentious

    Ramsey is probably delighted that he has earned the ire of Morris Dee’s Center for Getting-Rich-Quick-While-Destroying-White-America. He’ll be making hay from that for some time to come.

  • Funruffian

    RamZpaul is just a satirist. He really doesn’t touch much on his beliefs even when he mentions he does. I think that’s a facade. His claim to fame is that he mocks societal double-standards and the stupid people who mindlessly support them. He’s very good at what he does, because of his droll and deadpan approach. Of course he would never openly present himself as a hateful bigot, because he would be branded as such. That must be a scary thing to have happen to you. I’m curious as to how his affiliation with AMREN began. Was he sought out and invited? Did he invite himself?

  • cecilhenry

    Way to go Ramzpaul!!!

    This is smart and a great way to destroy your enemy— by engaging him and mocking him undercover.

    We need to find ways to do this more.

  • LHathaway

    Today’s post history is funny. It starts out civil and reasoned and slowly, slowly becomes woman bashing, then slowly Jew bashing, then blanket criticism of interracial sex. Today it’s like a contest to see who can be the most offensive, but instead of just coming right out and being offensive, as is often/usually the case, posters today, don’t want to be the one to make the big splash. Sorry, I just say stuff.

  • blight14

    What I’d like to say about Dees would garner me a visit from the authorities…..

  • Tucker

    I’ve been listening to Ramzpaul for the last several years, and to be honest – this guy has lost whatever luster he might have once had when he first broke into the alternative media ‘big-time’ on you-tube.

    I tend to see him as just another gatekeeper, who, while sometimes pretty funny and entertaining – if you really listen carefully to the stuff he says, he’s really only parroting the same basic line of P.C., Cultural Marxist propaganda as do the usual suspects – only with the added twist of wrapping most of it in his sarcastic, cynical, tongue-in-cheek style of delivery.

    He calls himself an equal opportunity ‘nationalist’, which seems to be pretty reasonable. I lean in that direction, myself. But, he opposes the idea of an exclusively White Ethnostate? Just how does Ramzpaul expect White European people to be able to establish a system of government within a defined piece of territory which, instead of being constantly at war with White European people and allowing highly ethnocentric, hyper aggressive non-white racial groups to form their ethnic interest lobby groups in order to better allow them to fleece, dominate, race hustle and guilt-trip Whitey – the system of nationalist government would instead be constructed in such a way as to protect and safeguard the ethnic specific interests of White European people, who I assume would be in the majority?

    And, how would such a nationalist state deal with the problem of White elite race traitors, who would continue to form alliances with non-whites and work to betray the interests of their own race in order to achieve some kind of personal material or financial gain?

    Just how would Ramzpaul manage to set something like this up, when he would be working with the same virulently anti-White, multicultural cesspool conglomeration of a nation that we already see is posing such an existential threat to the survival of White European people?

    So, as I said, when you really ‘listen’ and think carefully about the stuff that comes out of Ramzpaul’s mouth – what you will be forced to eventually conclude is that he is either a hopelessly delusional liberal who is promoting the same impossible and unrealistic dream of the perfect Utopian society – or, he is a gatekeeper with a better than average sense of humor who’s objective it is to keep his White audiences corralled into the Cultural Marxist preferred ideological cage which tells them that they should never, ever engage in 100 percent, non-negotiable ‘tribal thinking’. And, believe me – tribal thinking means asking ourselves the same question on every issue that confronts us – “is this good or bad for White European people”?

    Ilana Mercer, Robert Weissberg and a few others also use variations of this tactic – although minus the trademark sarcasm and cynicism of Ramzpaul. We all recall Weissberg’s speech at the last conference where he was criticizing ‘White Nationalism’? Or, Mercer’s appearance on the Political Cesspool where she parroted the same notion that whites must never think or organize ‘racially’. See the pattern, folks?

    Oh, and, when Ramzpaul says that he doesn’t care who goes to bed with who – doesn’t that sound exactly like something we hear constantly from the same group of Cultural Marxists who are aggressively pushing miscegenation between Whites (10% of the world’s population) and non-whites, (90% of the world’s population) and is it not a 100 percent certainty that following this kind of racially suicidal advice will result in the genocide of White European people?

    Hence, in my estimation – assuming Ramzpaul isn’t an enemy asset, he is just a guy who has a gift of being funny – but, as far his ability to engage in long term, coherent and rational thinking – he fails the smell test, if you ask me.

    • Hal K

      I stopped watching him a few weeks before the AmRen conference when he faulted his critics on the miscegenation issue for being “intolerant.” He presents a false choice on this issue, where either miscegenation is banned by law or we just don’t care about it (where he prefers the latter option). This overlooks the important social component of the issue, which is that it is regarded as immoral in the mainstream for whites to express a negative opinion about race mixing. This is what has to change first, but he jumps over this to his false choice.

      • Svigor

        Freedom demands that people be allowed to determine the constitution of their own communities and associations of every kind. Including communities that want rules expelling miscegenators or their offspring.

        Freedom trumps his intolerant desire to see color-blindness enforced by law.

        Freedom also demands political diversity, which is ironically in a death-struggle with Diversity.

    • me

      RamZPaul is a bitter divorcee who continually bashes women in the White Nationalist movement, who frowns upon White Nationalists who would have their own country, and who seems to pander to the belief that the ‘chosen ones’, and Israel, are not the REAL supremacists–but the White Nationalists are the ‘supermacists’ if they are against miscengenation in this country. I also believe that he has a bad case of ‘yellow fever’, and is under the delusion that an Asian woman would be a better mate than a White woman. He subscribes to the idea of other races embracing their White ‘brothers and sisters’, and traditional White American culture, in a White Nationalist country– when Mr. Ramsey is living up to his neck in the failed multicultural and diversity experiment started here in 1965. Mr. Paul Ramsey appears to be turning into a man who would rather have fame and recognition than to have his former opinions–which may keep him from his ego-driven goals.

      • Svigor

        I kick feminists out of foxholes. Roll their bodies up and out and use them for cover, I say.

      • Voilà

        Well, there’s a reason why he tends to flipflop on those sorts of topics and yet stands comparitively firm in his dislike of say, feminism. He was the guy behind the old mgtow forums, and for the years he’s been on youtube he’s basically just
        regurgitated a lot of his material from the manosphere. In a couple of
        videos he’s made inside jokes that refer to certain characters/commenters from that little corner of the internet, and
        during his time at the Amren conference he tweeted a little thanks-for-the-inspiration
        to Roissy/Heartiste, who it’s been obvious for some time now that he
        reads and repackages ideas from. This guy’s beef is with feminism and women first and foremost, hence why the only solid, unwavering theme that he doesn’t backpedal from in his youtube videos is – you guessed it, feminism and women . If you know the sort of places he
        frequents, his choice of topics and his take on things become fairly
        predictable.

  • [Guest]

    In the unlikely event that Mrs. Berman honestly thinks that AmRen is “spewing … filth and hatred about Jews,” she would probably have gotten that impression from nowhere other than the comments section of this website.