Anders Breivik’s Closing Statement, Final Day (June 22, 2012)

Andrew Hamilton, Counter-Currents, July 6, 2012

Translator’s Note:

The terrorism trial of Norwegian revolutionary nationalist Anders Behring Breivik, 33, began in Oslo District Court in Norway on April 16, 2012, and concluded on June 22, 2012, a month earlier than planned.

On the second day of the trial the defendant read a statement to the court setting forth his rationale for the attacks. (See translation of Opening Statement.)

Breivik was accused of “destabilizing or destroying basic functions of society” and “creating serious fear in the population” by bombing a key government building in Oslo and conducting a shooting spree on the island of Utøya at a gathering of the Workers’ Youth League (AUF, Arbeidernes ungdomsfylking), the youth auxiliary of Norway’s Left-wing, anti-white Labor Party. His July 22, 2011 crime, in which a total of 77 people died, has been described as the worst act of terrorism in Norway since World War II. Among Norwegians, the date “July 22″ is like “September 11″ in the US. Literally everyone knows what it means.

Breivik freely admitted committing the offenses, but denied culpability on the grounds that he was acting out of “necessity” (nødrett). The purpose of the trial was to determine whether he will be classified as a criminal or treated as mentally ill. A decision is expected on August 24, 2012. Either way, he will spend the rest of his life in detention.

On the final day of the trial the defendant read his closing statement to the court, a translation of which follows. Recording and broadcasting of both statements was prohibited, so reporters swiftly took manual notes. Parenthetical ellipses indicating missing material—( . . . )—are in the original transcript.

“The compendium” referred to by Breivik is his 1,518-page, Web-published 2083: A European Declaration of Independence (2011), which he released immediately prior to the attacks.

Hyperlinks and annotations within square brackets have been added by me to clarify remarks and supply background information. I have likewise added my own boldfaced subheadings to break up the text and serve as a rough guide to subject matter.

To my knowledge, Breivik’s courtroom statements have not been published by any major media outlet in any European language outside Norway.

I wish to thank a Norwegian reader for providing a transcript and suggesting this translation.

Anders Behring Breivik reentered the Oslo courtroom after the break.

Representatives of the Central Committee of the Worker’s Youth League (AUF), in attendance prior to the break, did not return to hear Breivik’s closing statement.

Some hostile observers who did return, by prearrangement rose and silently exited the courtroom as Breivik took the stand. They did not look in his direction.

“For a long time before beginning, Breivik studied his notes.”


Thank you.

I think we can all agree that on July 22 a barbaric action occurred. What happened on July 22 in the government quarter and on Utøya were barbaric acts.

And I remember that on July 21 I thought after several years of planning, “Tomorrow morning I will die.”

(“Breivik took a deep breath and leaned forward before continuing.”)

I came to within 200 meters of the government quarter. Then I remember I thought, “In two minutes I will die.”

And what am I going to die for? That’s what I’m going to talk about now.

I’m not going to deliver a speech. I gave my explanation on April 17th, and it contains many of my arguments. That statement explains the most. [See Breivik’s opening statement on Day 2 of the trial.]

There are still some things I did not say enough about, and that’s what I’ll take up now.


Democracy No Longer Functioning

As I’ve explained, especially on April 17 [the opening statement], the European democratic political model is not working. The arguments I presented emphasize the need for a fundamental change of leadership in Norway and Europe.

This began with World War II. In the 1960s the Labor Party decided that a large group of Pakistanis who had been refused entry into Finland, and who came to Norway on a tourist visa, should be granted residence.

And that was how the multicultural experiment in Norway began. The Labor Party decided that Norway should follow Great Britain’s example, with Asian and African mass immigration.

I have already talked a lot about the ridicule of cultural conservatives. So I will not talk much about it, except to address some high points.

The main characteristic has been political discrimination. Cultural conservative NGOs [non-governmental organizations] and youth organizations receive no funding. They are opposed. Perhaps the only cultural conservative newspaper we had in Norway, Norway TODAY, lost press subsidies just a few years ago.

After July 22 subsidies to HRS [Human Rights Service], a cultural conservative organization, were halved. That’s an organization that has nothing to do with me.

During the past 20 or 30 years there has been public funding of extreme left organizations in Norway such as Blitz [an “antifa” communist, anarchist, and socialist youth movement permitted by the state to employ violence against the Progress Party, the Fatherland Party, the Democrats in Norway, and others] Serve the People [Serve the People—Communist League; Tjen Folket—Kommunistisk Forbund, a Maoist group] and the Norwegian Center Against Racism [Antirasistisk Senter, an anti-white NGO].

Ethnic Deconstruction

Perhaps some will remember the leader of Future In Our Hands [Fremtiden i våre hender], Steinar Lem [a Norwegian environmentalist], who died of cancer a few years ago. One of the last things he said was something that had burned within him, but he had not dared to articulate before he knew he was going to die.

It was that we fought for Tibetan rights and the Tibetan indigenous people, but in Norway it is not permitted to say that Norwegians have as much right to a homeland as the Tibetans, and that our rights are in fact equally important.

He did not dare to speak the truth before he was told by his doctor that he was going to die. Only then did he dare to say what he thought.

In part of the compendium, I’ve written a lot about [ethnic] deconstruction and the absence of morality in Norway since 1968. They are huge problems. In Norway today, ideals are upheld that are extremely harmful and will be detrimental to our future.

When it comes to sexually transmitted diseases and the sexual revolution, it’s actually something that is underreported, and has created major problems in Europe. [This is a subtle and astute observation. Sex, reproduction, and the family together constitute the taproot of race and genetics.—Trans.] The ideal being upheld is to have sex with as many strangers as possible. Instead of focusing on the nuclear family, the focus is on dissolving it, and all the problems which that entails.

For example, the Sex and the City ideal, where Samantha and Carrie through 100—200 episodes of the series have sex with hundreds of men. These are the ideals that are upheld today. This is a disease. It’s like sugar to the audience. These sick ideals should be censored and shielded from our community.

So people neglect their duty to family and nation. They get education, travel, and are 35 before they start having children. Women should begin having children in their 20s. Our birth rate is below replacement level.

No Free Speech

One of the most influential people in Norway, Arne Strand [a print and broadcast journalist and former member of Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland’s cabinet] inDagsavisen [the daily newspaper Strand edits, until 1999 the official organ of the Labor Party, now independent] has issued many statements about press subsidies.

He proposes that everyone on the right, to the right of Carl I. Hagen [former Vice President of the Storting (Norwegian Parliament) and ex-chairman of the Progress Party], should be censored, and excluded from the democratic process. He says straight out that government press subsidies [to the Left, denied to the right] are necessary to preserve the current political hegemony.

We must protect hegemony, we must not allow people the right to express themselves. The system of press subsidies ensures that Norway will never be a democracy, because those on the far right are excluded.

I will mention some important political actions by the Labor Party, those in power in Norway, that legitimize and may trigger violent counter-reactions.


Violence Against the Right

What else has the political power instigated and applauded that is likely to precipitate violent resistance?

The Fatherland Party [FLP, Fedrelandspartiet, a nationalist party in Norway between 1990 and 2008] received about 0.5 percent of the vote in 1993, the first time they ran in Parliamentary elections.

[FLP leader] Bjarne Dahl in 1993 tried to legitimize political opposition to immigration. At a market square meeting in Oslo, he had his face smashed with an iron pipe, his jaw broken, and his teeth knocked out in attacks by some Blitz members [antifas belonging to the state-funded group mentioned previously].

Party leader and professor Harald Trefall [1925—2008, experimental physicist, anti-immigration activist, and Fatherland Party founder] was also hit in the face by something that was thrown. The party chairman was bleeding from a wound in the face.

Also, others were beaten and kicked.

When a horrified spectator tipped off Dagbladet [one of the country’s largest newspapers] about these violent attacks, he received the following response fromDagbladet: “Isn’t that good, then?”

This was their attitude. The same attitude shared by most of the press. The mass media made no mention of the violent and dangerous attacks againt the Fatherland Party.

No Freedom of Association

On June 28, 2002, the parliamentary parties committed democratic suicide. They passed a new law saying that all parties that hadn’t received at least 5,000 votes in the last election were stricken [from the ballot].

They must collect 5,000 signatures under stringent restrictions. This means that there are very few small parties. It is almost impossible to start a new party in Norway today. In Sweden, the requirement is 1,500 signatures.

The PST [Police Security Service,Politiets sikkerhetstjeneste, internal secret police] boasts unrestrainedly about how they crushed Vigrid [link to its website]. The police called on all the young people in the organization and their parents. PST destroyed the organization through harassment of its young members.

[I urge readers to examine Wikipedia’s heavily-slanted write-up of Vigrid to grasp at least dimly the nature of the group Breivik is referring to. Vigrid was founded in 1998 by Tore Tvedt, whom Breivik called to testify at his trial. A Canadian news site approvingly described PST’s operation this way: “The agency launched a campaign to disrupt the group by sending agents to visit everyone involved except its top leaders. One day in 2004, agents from all 26 field offices paid personal visits to each of Vigrid’s members, many of whom were teenagers living with their parents. The investigators continued this tactic for several months, until about 60% of Vigrid quit the group voluntarily.” “Voluntarily”—I like that. Employ the same tactic against Jews and the Left. Would it be “voluntary” then? Also, anti-”conspiracy” theorists please take note. The world is what it is.—Trans.]

What they have done is systematically harass political activists.

In addition, PST ran a comprehensive harassment campaign against the leader of Vigrid, Tore Tvedt. Among other things, extensive surveillance, house raids, arrests, and making sure he was repeatedly thrown out of rented houses.

At a school debate on August 28 in connection with the parliamentary elections of 2009, the party leader [Øyvind Heian] of the Norwegian Patriots [NP, NorgesPatriotene, a defunct anti-immigration party] received cuts in his forehead causing severe bleeding [during an attack by a far left anti-white mob including SOS Racism], forcing him to leave the meeting. The meeting continued as if nothing had happened. Neither the school administration nor the police did anything at all about the attack on the party leader.

Before local government elections last year the Christian Unity Party [KSP, Kristent Samlingsparti] was attacked by a person belonging to SOS Racism; they are communists.

Such things of course anger everyone with nationalist attitudes in this country.

That a counter-reaction has not occurred before July 22 amazes everyone who follows national trends. The anti-democratic forces that govern our country are obviously expecting something. This can be seen from the adoption of new surveillance measures. They have been doing exercises on scenarios like what happened [on July 22].

Yet those who govern the country say they have done nothing that could give rise to such a reaction. It is quite possible that many people connected with the power structure actually believe this.

Which means dark prospects for our country.

Communism and the Ruling Class

It is well known and documented that the Labor Party before World War II received funding from the Soviet Union. However, it is wrong to say that Labor is a full-fledged communist party. They do not support a planned economy. Hence the expressions “cultural Marxists” or “semi-communists.”

It is known that many Labor Party leaders had close relations to the Soviet Union right up to 1993. The Prime Minister’s father, [former Norwegian Foreign Minister] Thorvald Stoltenberg, had, for example, a code name in the KGB. Even Jens Stoltenberg [leader of the Labor Party and current Prime Minister of Norway] had a code name, “Steklov,” in the KGB archives.

[According to Wikipedia, until 1990 now-Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg “had regular contacts with a Soviet diplomat who later was revealed to be a KGB agent. According to Stoltenberg he immediately broke off this relationship when he came to the knowledge that his contact was a KGB agent. Several sources have confirmed that Stoltenberg’s code name within the KGB was ‘Steklov,’ a name Jens Stoltenberg used as his online alias when playing computer games such as Age of Empires.”]

Of two books about this, one, The Eagle Has Landed [Ørnen har landet, 2003] by Reiulf Steen I do not think has been suppressed, but I believe there’s a new book by Christopher Andrew that has been halted.

The problem with Labor is not their communist past, but that they refuse to acknowledge it.

Deconstructing the Nordic Race and European Culture

Labor Party Secretary Raymond Johansen claims they are required by international agreements to admit immigrants—instead of confessing that they want to transform Norway ethnically and culturally.

Raymond Johansen is intelligent enough to know that Japan and South Korea have experienced the same pressure from the UN to accept immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers. Japan and South Korea have learned to say no. They do not want the nation to be used as a dumping ground for the birth rate of the Second or Third World.

The political model in Japan and South Korea proves that countries that say no to mass immigration in the long run will be stronger than those open to mass immigration. ( . . . )

We will experience huge ethnic, cultural and religious conflicts. It is such conflicts that led to July 22.

This the Labor Party and Raymond Johansen know. If they had any integrity they would admit why they want mass immigration. In other words, they have exactly the same agenda as the social democrats in Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Great Britain.

Labor wants to deconstruct Norwegian culture. They want to deconstruct the Nordic race and Norwegian and European culture.

Individuals who have manifested support for cultural conservative organizations have been systematically ridiculed, harassed and persecuted in Norway and Western Europe since World War II.

In Norway, several hundred people over the last ten years have lost their jobs and been branded as racists because they opposed immigration.

An example is Remi Huseby [the young spokesman for the Norwegian Defence League, a group affiliated with the English Defence League], who lost his job after being labeled an intolerant and vicious right-wing extremist on the ground that he was opposed to the Norwegian state ideology, multiculturalism.

As a result, his employer felt pressured to fire him. This is only one case that documents journalists and editors ridiculing and persecuting cultural conservatives from WWII to the present.

The worst thing is that this demonization is better than being ignored. Being ignored is the worst of all.

In hundreds of cases in Europe and Norway cultural conservatives, anticommunists, and nationalists have been driven to suicide by public labeling and demonization. It is the same as in the Soviet Union.

So, another point I thought of omitting: cultural self-loathing. Norwegian society is suffering from a cultural psychological disorder that manifests itself through self-contempt for Norwegian ideals. This collective cultural psychosis is caused by decades of cultural Marxism.

A good example is Norway’s contributions to the Eurovision Song Contest over the past four years.

We let a White Russian asylum seeker, probably with a Tartar background ( . . . ) It is indeed good that we very occasionally allow an asylum seeker to represent us. But what is going on?

A few years later we let Stella Mwangi [a black, Nairobi-born “Norwegian-Kenyan” singer] win with a bongo song. What is Norway doing, sending an asylum seeker as ambassador? Is it lack of Norwegians in Norway, or are they suffering from self-hatred?

Then we let an asylum seeker from Iran win. This is an insult to all Norwegians ( . . . )

The answer is simple. A great many Norwegians suffer from cultural delusions and have urgent need for “medication,” with immediate implementation of cultural protectionism and the Nordic ideal.

Regarding the definition of the term “indigenous people,” this means original or old residents. It does not mean ethnic Norwegians are not indigenous.

We know of course that the United Nations does not recognize ethnic Europeans as indigenous people. But we must observe the UN’s agenda, its creation when the Axis powers were defeated in WWII.

The UN supports the deconstruction of European states. So does the European Union [EU]. The UN does not support the idigenous European population because the UN is controlled by cultural Marxists—the same as the EU.

For example, [José Manuel Durão] Barroso, who has been the EU’s supreme leader for many years, was a longtime member of the Portuguese Communist Party. This shows the kind of people that hold power in the EU and the UN.

So, to come back to the definition of the word “indigenous.” There is no definition of “indigenous peoples” that nationalists and cultural Marxists can agree upon. Europe’s nationalists and cultural conservatives use a different definition than does the EU or the UN. The correct definition is “old or original people.”

Why should one support the struggle for indigenous people in Tibet, Bolivia, and other places but not in Europe? Why do indigenous activists in other parts of the world receive support and praise, while indigenous activists in Europe are branded as racists?

The battle is identical for all indigenous activists, namely, to fight against the ethnic and cultural extinction of their people from immigration. The fact that activists elsewhere are supported while we are combated as if we were a disease is an intolerable injustice.

When it comes to ongoing ethnic deconstruction I would recommend that everyone read the essay [he mentions its title, but the reporter omits it] by David Coppell and Johan ( . . . ) [Presumably this is a spelling error; I know of no David Copell he might be referring to. At any rate, he named the essay and its authors.]

Muslim Demographics

Regarding Mullah Krekar [a Kurdish Islamic refugee in Norway], the reason I wanted to call him as a witness was to shed light on orthodox Islam’s view of Europe. He calls himself a Kurdish religious leader. (. . . ) He is one of the few Muslim leaders who are honest about Islam’s takeover of Europe.

Krekar said, “In Denmark they printed drawings, but the result was that support of Islam increased. I, and all Muslims, are evidence. You have not managed to change us. It is we who are changing you. Look at the changes in the population of Europe, where Muslims reproduce like mosquitoes. Every Western woman in Europe has 1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries gives birth to 3.5 children.”

[“All the sources are in the compendium,” Breivik says, looking at the judges.]

I also remind you that Muammar Gadaffi, who was recently killed by NATO, said in March 2007: “There are signs that Allah will grant us victory in Europe without use of the sword. We need no terrorists, we need no suicide bombers. The millions of Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”

I will mention a few points about demographics. Demographic examples documenting how Islamic demographic warfare works in practice.

Kosovo [in southeastern Europe, formerly part of Yugoslavia] is a very good example that I have not talked about. In 1900 Kosovo was 60% Christian, 40% Muslim. In 1913 the figure was 50% [Muslim], 1948 72%; in 1971 it was 79 percent Muslim. In 2008, after NATO had bombed our Serbian, Christian brothers, Kosovo was 93% Muslim. In just 100 years Kosovo has gone from being a Christian country to being a Muslim country.

Lebanon is an occupied state. In 1911 it was 21 percent Muslim. Today there are more—approximately 80 percent. This is demographic warfare. Warfare that is waged against Europe and against Norway at this moment.

And not only against against Christians, but against Hindus as well.

Pakistan [carved out of India as a Moslem state in 1947] was 25 percent Hindu in 1941; in 1948, 17 percent. Today, it is less than 1 percent. This is Pakistani “tolerance” for people who think differently.

Bangladesh [which declared independence from Pakistan in 1971] in 1941 was 30 per cent Hindu; today it is less than 8 percent.

Then one can look at the exploding populations in Muslim countries.

In 1951 there were 33 million people in Pakistan. Today they are nearly 200 million. From 33 million to nearly 200 million in 60 years. Officially, they report a birth rate of 3.58, but it is of course a lie.

The media like to convey the idea that most Muslims support democracy, but it is not true. A survey conducted by the University of Maryland, in which 4,000 Muslims were queried, shows that 65 percent want to unite all Muslim countries into a caliphate, and 65 percent wish to implement strict interpretation of Sharia law.

“Child Killer”

One last point. Lawyers previously called me a child murderer. But we know that the average age on the island was over 18.

Many armies in the world have 18-year-old soldiers. Many of our own soldiers in Afghanistan are 18. Does this mean that we send children to war?

The Labor Party and the AUF [Labor’s youth auxiliary] are themselves guilty of mass murder of children in hospitals across the country. Thousands of children are killed every year by abortion. Muslims do not practice abortion because Sharia does not permit it. Labor is thus a culprit in mass murder, and then uses the low birth rate as an excuse for mass immigration.

Resistance Increasing

If you choose to recognize my claim of necessity, you will effectively send shock waves through all the illegitimate regimes in Europe.

The court should remember that the biased judges who worked for Hitler’s Germany were condemned by history after the war. Likewise, history will judge the judges in this case. (“When Breivik said this, district court judges Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen and Arne Lyng looked directly at him.”) History will tell whether they convicted a man who tried to stop the evils of our time. History shows that sometimes one must implement a barbarity to stop an even greater barbarism.


Create an Ethnostate

In the compendium I described a solution that can prevent all future conflicts with ultra-nationalists.

The smartest thing that could be done is to give us autonomy, autonomy within a specific area of Norway for people who oppose mass immigration and multiculturalism. We are interested in having our own state within the state, reserved for the indigenous Norwegian people. In other words, national conservatives, orthodox Christians, and National Socialists.

Such a solution would be good for both parties. Marxists and liberals would not have to experience our anger and complaining about the current state. And we would not have to live in a multi-ethnic hell. I have written about this political model and will convey the proposal later.

A solution like this can be used in all European countries, and can thus prevent further escalation of the conflict between cultural conservatives and multiculturalists.

The starting point might be that they get control over an area equivalent to about 1—2 percent of the country, and the area increases proportionally with growth. If we do not succeed and flourish, the autonomous state will not be developed. This political model is similar to political solutions relating to indigenous peoples in other parts of the world. Many ultra-nationalists and others would feel positive about developing such a solution.

Fair Warning

The alternative is that we focus on the takeover of the entire country of Norway—something Marxists and liberals would be mightily displeased with.

But the current regime is not interested in dialogue with us, so we have nothing to lose and the conflict will escalate over the next few years. It might not be tactful to say this in that the prosecutor is “gunning” on with “mental incapacity,” but I must convey my peace proposal, which could save many lives in the future.

(“Breivik raises his voice when he talks about what will happen in the future if his proposal for an autonomous area for nationalists is not followed.”)

This trial should be about finding the truth. The documentation of my claims—are they true? If they are true, how can what I did be illegal?

Norwegian academics and journalists work together and make use of ( . . . ) methods to deconstruct Norwegian identity, Christianity, and the Norwegian nation. How can it be illegal to engage in armed resistance against this?

The prosecution wondered who gave me a mandate to do what I did. Was it the KT [Knights Templar] network? I have answered this before, but will do so again. Universal human rights, international law, and the right to self-defense provided the mandate to carry out this self-defense.

Everything has been triggered by the actions of those who consciously and unconsciously are destroying our country. Responsible Norwegians and Europeans who feel even a trace of moral obligation are not going to sit by and watch as we are made into minorities in our own lands. We are going to fight.

The attacks on July 22 were preventive attacks in defense of my ethnic group, the Norwegian indigenous people. I therefore cannot acknowledge guilt. I acted from necessity (nødrett) on behalf of my people, my religion and my country.

I therefore demand that I be acquitted.

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • “Recording and broadcasting of both statements was prohibited”

    He could deliver the same speech in America about America.

    • Global Minority

      Of course it was prohibited. The elites KNOW if his speech were aired way too many people would agree with him! Maybe not his actions. The elites don’t want this spreading. They would loose pwoer very quickly. And they can’t have that.

  • JohnEngelman

    the European democratic political model is not working. 
    – Anders Behring Breivik          
    The European democratic political model is not working for those of Anders Behring Breivik’s persuasion because most Europeans disagree with him. Nevertheless, candidates who favor more restrictions on immigration are allowed to run. They are allowed to express their opinions. When they win elections they are allowed to serve politically.  
    I agree with those candidates. Unfortunately, Anders Behring Breivik has seriously discredited their cause. 

    • The__Bobster

      Yes, they serve….and accomplish nothing.

      • IstvanIN

         Their political parties are persecuted by the mainstream parties, forced to take in non-whites or out-right banned.  The UK, Netherlands, France and Germany come to mind.

      • JohnEngelman

        That is because only a few get elected. That in turn is because most of the voters disagree with them.

  • alltoohuman

    Breivik should have left Norway for a White country that isn’t quite as insanely suicidal, like one of the Baltic or Eastern states.  With his intellect he could have done a lot of good in a more White-friendly nation.

    Look at Golden Dawn in Greece: the stupid nordics would never allow a party like them to gain power.  Breivik’s biggest mistake was in thinking that Norway can be saved.  It can’t.  The people there are mentally sick and marching to the tune of judeo-bolshevism. 

    • alastairabbacle

      There is nothing judeo about bolshevism.  Atheistic jews turned on their own religion, rejecting the Judaism.    Jews are smart and hard-working, and when they turn against tradition and morality, of course the result will be bad.    Bolshevism is anti-judeism, anti-god, anti-good. 
      Norway needs to be more like Israel in ethnic pride.   Envy against the jews is useless.  One can be neither philo-semitic, nor anti-semitic. 

      • IstvanIN

         Judaism was protected in the USSR after the Christian monarch and his family were slaughtered. Churches were closed and turned into warehouses and stables.  The majority of the leaders of the revolution were Jewish.  Just the facts. 

        • alastairabbacle

          Many of the leaders were Jewish. This is partially because they knew the way the winds of history were blowing, and decided it was better to be in charge and persecuting, then to be killed and persecuted by the coming Communist machinery.
          You can think of this as ethnic self-defense. The Jews were clever enough to know that the new form of power was based on mass crowd control, in the form of Communism. This was simply reality, and necessitated self-preservation.
          Kill, or be killed became the name of the game. There was no question some Jews did a number of bad things in Europe of 1910s-30s, but they never deserved what came to them.
          In an age where you genocide and ethnic wars in Europe where commonplace, EVERY group went to the deck to captain their ship. The Germans did wrong, the Russians did wrong, the Jews did wrong, the Polish did wrong, it was very ugly.
          In an all-out ethnic war, Jews did find that using the machinery of Communism provided a usable defense against their smaller numbers. This did go to far, resulting in the purges of Jews in Communist Russia during the 1930’s-1950’s.

          I think we all need to get a good read of “200 Years Yogether” once it comes out in English.
          Here is a blog about it: “”

        • alastairabbacle

          “200 Years Together

          Two Hundred Years Together was written by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the famous Russian dissident who won a Nobel Prize for Literature. It is about the time of the Russians and the Jews inside the empire. He wrote in Russian of course but various publishers decided they were not going to put out an English version because they were Jews or frightened of them.

          The together of the title refers to Russians and Jews. The first volume was Russian-Jewish History 1795-1916. The second was called The Jews in the Soviet Union. So it is clear enough why the Jews were never going to like what he had to say.”

          It IS out in German, French, and Russian.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        I agree that Noway needs to be more like Israel in its ethnic pride.

        Why should the Norwegians NOT be allowed to do the same thing Israel is doing right now with its undesirable immigrant population?

        June, 2012:

        The Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz reports “Israel’s Immigration Authority began rounding up African migrants on Sunday, with eight arrests reported in Eilat and central Israel. The Jerusalem’s District Court ruled on Thursday that Israel could deport South Sudanese nationals back to their home country.

        The article continues: ‘Interior Minister Eli Yishai said that this was a first of many steps and that a great deal of work is left until his vision of a migrant-free Israel is fulfilled.’

        Imagine a U.S. or Norwegian politicians standing up and saying: “We are going to make the U.S. (or Norway or Britain, etc.) Migrant Free!”

        It seems even mentioning doing the same in Norway puts one under real threat of physical violence and real risk of losing his career.

        Why is there no outcry from the UN as there would be if Norway (or the U.S. or England or France) tried the same thing??


        • alastairabbacle


          Do you think AmRen is degenerating? What is the deal with the justification of acting fools like Breivek? He speaks well, but acts horribly.

          It is so difficult to be an race realist, because we now associate with supporters of teenager-murder……

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble


            I don’t think AmRen is degenerating; it is Western civilization that is degenerating.

            I don’t think people here are justifying what Breivek did, but understand WHY he did what he did.

            We Whites are losing our culture, heritage and homelands. Homelands some of us, as in Britain, have lived in for 40,000 years. We are losing a civilization that WE and WE alone created, forced to hand it over to African and Muslim savages. In South African, White women, babies, children and elderly are being targeted and slaughtered in the most vile manner possible by feral blacks while the Western media say NOTHING.

            White homelands are being handed over to non-Whites and we Whites are being set up for genocide.

            Whites are starting to become aware of this more and more, of the peril we’re in, and we’re being backed into a corner, legislated against, hunted for assault by blacks while the government and media look the other way and call us Whites “terrorists,” “racists,” and “bigots” — at the same time flooding our homelands with high fertility, diseased, uneducated, unskilled non-Whites from the most depraved corners of the world. Not one of these creatures belongs in White homelands.

            This is what Breivek speaks about above in his manifesto, what many of us here write about under cover of Internet anonymity, knowing if we were to speak these things aloud — that WE are losing our homelands to hostile non-Whites — we put ourselves at risk of physical assault, our reputation destroyed and the loss of income

            Make no mistake: There WILL be more of this mindless lashing out as living conditions for Whites become increasingly dire and we become outnumbered, surrounded by and lorded over by a hostile non-White population that has been taught by the world media that WE are the cause of all of their problems and to hate, despise and dehumanize us.

            Also, make no mistake: This is happening to Whites and White countries only, no one else, only us — we who are 7% of the world’s population and falling, the most endangered of endangered species on earth — and some people are cheering this on.


          • alastairabbacle

            “I don’t think people here are justifying what Breivek did, but understand WHY he did what he did.”

            This is true, analyzing causation rather than abstract “blame” is worthy.

            The hallmark of cultural primitivism and savagery is the use of “blame” to explain events, rather than seeking causation.  In our modern savagery, we have reverted to this primitive “blame” strategy, “blaming” the vaporous voodoo spirits of “Racism” and “Insanity” for events, rather than analyzing causation.

            Further than this causation by anger over White genocide, DOES lie malicious intent of the spirit.  Murderers tend to seek reasons to murder, having already wanted to exert wanton aggression in the first place.  The rationale for murder is often merely post-hoc justification for pre-hoc bloodlust and selfishness.  

            The fallen spirit of Anders Breivik is fundamentally to blame.  Some part of causation, DOES lie outside of causation, as the spirit is its own agent.   Though Breivik may have come close to reality, the greatest demons circle about close to the truth.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am attracted to American Renaissance for three reasons. I think we need to restrict immigration, especially third world immigration. I agree with books like The Bell Curve. I think those books need to be defended and popularized. I think we need to tell and learn the truth about black social pathology.

            Unfortunately, some of the posters who post comments here seem to be motivated by little more than their hostility for anyone who is not a Gentile of European descent. 
            The comments that support what Anders Breivek did infuriate me and make me sick. 

          • alastairabbacle

            I have personally seen this, and see the more debate within AmRen as  positive thing.  I have noticed people who come on here and attempt to COMMUNE the opinion, to shut down any free debate.  If your idea is better, let it win on its merits, not on anger.    I believe that we are close to the truth of many matters, but that demons tend to circle closest to the hole of reality.  

            On a practical note, you are absolutely right.  All most of us truly want is that the facts of the “Bell Curve” are well known, and considered in policy decisions that are currently hurting White, Asian, AND BLACK people.    

            Nobody ever learned to drive a racecars by pretending  “all cars handle the same”.  This is a recipe for disaster.  

            The covering up of Black social pathology has harmed Blacks just at much, if not more than Whites.
            White soldiers come on board, and prefer to attack straw men and allies rather than attack the enemy.   The enemy is nothing less than the depotentiation of modern man in civilization.   

            We just want man to be all he can be.

  • Vil

    Well, this will surely be deleted… but what the heck?

    “In 2008, after NATO had bombed our Serbian, Christian brothers, Kosovo
    was 93% Muslim. In just 100 years Kosovo has gone from being a Christian
    country to being a Muslim country.” 

    The only muslims in Kosovo are the Bosnians and maybe the few turks who live there. The Albanians don´t care about religion, culture, decency or anything. I can´t come up with any reason why Albanians call themselves Muslims.

    It is mainly the Albanians and the NATO´s fault for what happened to Kosovo, and let´s not forget Bill Clinton. I should know for I am born there and have spent my childhood there. And I also am at least 4 weeks a year down there to visit family and for “vacation”. I really don´t want some guys who spent a weekend or two in the Balkans to lecture me.

    Breivik may have really done us more harm than he can imagine. The leftists are most likely going to quote him and his actions whenever they talk about rascism and multiculturalism and many race realists will not speak up out of fear of being compared to him.

    • IstvanIN

       Sadly you are correct.

    • HenryHolliday

      So the leftists quote him and we who consider ourselves race realists are too fearful to speak because we are afraid of being accused of being something we are not.  Who is doing the most harm?

      • alastairabbacle

        Cowards of the mouth, but fools of action do us the most harm.

  • Whiteyyyyy

    Politics has not worked, I personally believe Breivik and people like him are the future.Maybe his actions are the kind that will eventually achieve results.Why play by the rules when the game is rigged

    • alastairabbacle

      I would not call murdering children to the route of the future.  Breivik is a demon of the highest class.  A lot of truth mixed in with potent evil, this is the way of tyrants.   

      • The__Bobster

        Very few of them were “children”. They were future leaders willing to sell out their heritage.

        • alastairabbacle


          Were you a liberal at age 16? Age 17? Age 18?

    • Global Minority

      You have a huge point. He went after the leftist elite’s children and gave them a taste of their own medicine. He wanted to cause them the pain that the elites have been causing the Nordic people that have lost their children and loved ones to non-white invaders. And then their government does nothing but promote more of it. The left is insane as far as I am concerned because they have signed their death warrants too and that of heir family eventually. These people will be voted out of office by the new majority of non-whites and all their mass fortunes will be taken from them.

      • alastairabbacle

        The modern Left never seems to understand that the point of orthodox religion is the grow and prosper the tribe.    Othodox Judaism, Orthodox Christianity, and Orthodox Islam are all about prospering in both THIS world, and the next.    Orthodox religions focus the effort of the community on being fruitful and multiplying.   Fertility and security is the focus of traditional religion, infertility and experimentation is the focus of the New Left.

        In the long range of humanity, the irreligious by the decree of God/Reality die themselves out.  

    • JohnEngelman

      The game is rigged by regular elections that are won by majorities that disagree with you. 

      •  One of the problems with “elections,” such as they are, in much of the white world today, is that they are procedurally effective but substantively ineffective.  You can vote one person out and the other in, but the same universalist / globalist /egalitarian mentality remains in power.

        • JohnEngelman

          That is because “the same universalist / globalist /egalitarian mentality” has become the electoral consensus.

          •  Except during election season, when everyone becomes a patriot and a nationalist.

          • alastairabbacle

            How to gain power  demonically 101: Promise people something they cannot attain, but have them give you money and support anyways to attain it. 

  • splitsing

    Don’t agree with the murders but that’s about all I disagree with here.

  • Breivik is a tough one.

    He wanted to draw attention to the problems with multiculturalism but he did it in an abhorrent manner. It’s difficult to believe anyone is going to listen to his message or take up his cause if they believe it involves killing teenagers (‘guilty’ of being liberals or not).

    The one thing we can say is that Mr. Breivik did in two or three hours what multiculturalism is doing to our future. 

  • JohnEngelman

    Anders Behring Breivik is a mass murderer. He deserves to be executed, and not by lethal injection either. A gallows, using the short drop method of execution would be appropriate. 

    • Boereseun

      So was Nelson Mandela…

      The only difference is what difference the left ‘decide’ there is. Nelson Mandela was a ‘hero’ and a ‘freedom fighter’ to them. Breivik is, however, a ‘mass murdering loser’. 

      The devil is in the detail. Two sides of the same coin. I don’t agree with murder, therefore by association I don’t agree with Breivik’s method and can freely call Nelson ‘Saint my sweet white buttocks’ Mandela, a Marxist Terrorist scumbag and feel absolutely no guilt in doing so.

      Every time a lefty brings up Breivik, insert Mandela as a counter argument. And watch their faces go ‘pooof’! 

      I also agree with the Judge of the Rivonia trial, Nelson Mandela should have been hanged…

      The left shouldn’t be able to use Breivik to shut up the right, they have far more mass murdering nutjobs then the right could ever dream of. For heaven’s sake, why doesn’t the right use them to prove the left wrong?

      What always bothers me is that Breivik would always begin his day in trial with a common LEFTY closed fist as a salute.


      Multiculturalism is a mass murder.  It needs to be excuted.

      • JohnEngelman

        How to you intend to execute multiculturalism? By killing those who support it? 

        • Vil

           Not a bad idea, John! I support your idea 100%!

          • JohnEngelman

            That’s not my idea. It is your idea. 

          • alastairabbacle

            That would be a brilliant ploy for a totalitarian government.  

            Decide you they think supports multiculturalism.  Kill them.

            So, Vil, WHO decides what “supporting multiculturalism” is?  
            What would this “multiculturalism” consist of?
            What if someone in charge just doesn’t like you?

            You are a national socialist.

          • Vil

            You do not get that I am simply trying to piss off Engelman, do you?

  • ncpride

    One thing is clear. Breivik acted out of desperation, frustration, and anguish. We may not agree with the way he went about expressing his feelings and views, but I think almost all of us agree that most of what he says is absolutely true.

    • alastairabbacle

      Actions speak louder than words. 

  • s shadow

    A desparate act by a desparate man.  He couldn’t bear the rapid replacement of his people by hoards of swarthy muslims.  So many of his Nordic peers seem to have lost their instinct for group survival, and take the side of their future replacements in the face of any pressure to do so.  The angry, low IQ invaders, on the other hand, have fierce group loyalty.  It is a near certainty that in a few short decades Norway will be 95% middle eastern muslims.  There will be no turning back, ever. 
    We see a similar pattern in the USA.  Blacks vote 95% for a black candidate.  Hispanics vote 75% for the darker candidate, and if he were Hispanic and left wing it would be easily 90%.  Whites, in contrast, will vote only 50-60% for the white candidate against a swarthy one, with much hysterics about how wonderful the dark one is.  We have a weaker group loyalty so our leaders should be strategizing to compensate for that, instead they are aiding and abetting the enemy.  We either change that or perish.

  • I thank You for publishing the article and linking to our website. I testified in the court in the breivik-case june 5. and was denied to hold my prepared speech and got my time reduced from 45 minutes to 21.
    Norway is a consencus-dictatorship and function as a lackey-state for the angloamerican Zionist-Empire. It is a disgrace.
    Tore W. Tvedt

    • JackKrak


      I’d like to support you, I really would, but the “angloamerican” lackey remark makes it difficult for me. The US and Britain have more people sympathetic to your cause than Norway has people. Don’t paint us all with the same brush.  

  • JohnEngelman

    If Anders Behring Breivik wanted to sacrifice himself for his cause he should have committed suicide in a public location, after explaining in a proclamation posted on the internet that he hoped his suicide would help to dissuade the Norwegian people from committing national suicide. That would have attracted positive attention, and a certain amount of sympathy. 
    By killing 77 people he discredited anything in his cause that is just and wise.
    His action is somewhat comparable to the segregationist response to the civil rights movement. Segregationists had a valid point that racial segregation was a wise response to intrinsic racial differences. Nevertheless, it was difficult to convince white Americans who had little experience with blacks that blacks were inherently dangerous when segregationists were beating and sometimes killing peaceful civil rights demonstrators.  
    Civil violence is never justified in a democracy.   It rarely achieves what those responsible for it want to achieve. It usually achieves the opposite.

    • curri

      Civil violence is never justified in a democracy.   It rarely achieves what those responsible for it want to achieve.  ”

      It worked for Nelson Mandela: 

      And don’t forget that IRA terrorists are now in government in N. Ireland and one of them recently shook hands with the Queen! 

      And of course two former terrorists who became Israeli Prime Ministers.  

      The key thing is to make sure you have a substantial base of popular support before you set off your bombs.

      • JohnEngelman

        Under apartheid South Africa cannot be considered a democracy because blacks could not vote. The the same can be said of Palestine when it was a British protectorate.  
        When you have “a substantial base of popular support” under a democracy all you need is another election. 
        Does anyone think there is any support in Norway for Anders Behring Breivik beyond a few fanatics? 

        • Boereseun

          Yes John, blacks could not vote in white South Africa because they were given their very own countries. Land that they settled. They could vote in those countries and whites could not. Do you have the faintest clue about Apartheid?

          “When you have “a substantial base of popular support” under a democracy all you need is another election. ”

          Except when you’re a minority stuck in a country where the majority want to kill you. Then what?

  • David Ashton

    A narcissistic psychopath who engages in an evil, misdirected and counter-productive act of cowardly mass-murder only compromises any sensible arguments that he might have collected on vitally important issues at the very moment when these are most needed.


    What’s the difference between Breivik and mass immigration/multiculturalism?  

    Breivik killed 60 people in one day. 
    Multiculturalism will kill (eliminate, ethnically cleanse) hundreds of millions of native Europeans and replace them with Africans, Asians, &  Middle Easterners. 

    Which is more evil, the destruction of 70 or 500,000?

    When considering the coming genocide of Whites in Europe, or, alternatively, the coming bloody war to drive out the invaiders, Breivik is insignificant.

  • Either you’re saying Breivik is bad, or John Brown was good – neither of which is the case from an ethnically conservative perspective.

  • Fredrik_H

    They were kids, not some die-hard apparatchiks. I too was semi-active on the left when I was 15-16.  So was the norwegian blogger Fjordman, one of Breiviks main inspirations.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    I collect them too.  This current election cycle will give us a whole new trove to collect — they’d make nice, educational trading cards…


  • Sheila Dinehart

    both were terrorists but lots of people worship terrorists history sure is funny

  • Sheila Dinehart

    Wow what a great thing it is to have access to all information

    well, as much as we can

    thanks AR

  • Mariner33

    Bill Ayers and the Weathermen Underground makes Brevik seem like small time.  25 million people vs 86.  The only difference is that Ayers was not able to carry it out.

  • alastairabbacle

    How old are you Conrad?  At what age did your multiCULTural brainwashing wear off?

  • alastairabbacle

    Killing teenagers, most too young to have had a chance to escape their cultural programming, is wrong. 

    It would be much more productive to produce a groundswell campaign against the destruction of the indigenous Norwegian culture.  This may be more difficult, but the right thing is always more difficult in the beginning.  

    You are a moral relativist, a barely escaped cultural liberal. 

  • alastairabbacle

    You poor, vilified lamb.  You have victim mentality, no better than a rioting Black.

  • John_H_Holliday

    Breivik is a hero to his people.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Excellent comment.

    The statement Brevik read above is not the ramblings of someone who is insane — it is coherent, intelligently constructed, easily understood and makes perfect sense in light of the genocide that is happening in Norway to his people, the Native Born Norwegian population.

    Breivik lashed out violently at the enormous injustices and loss of native homeland that is being perpetuated on his people by the Norwegian government, on all White people for that matter — and he outlined this obscenity well and rationally.

    In that context, it is understandable to comprehend what he did.  I’m surprised this hasn’t happened before.

    But, I expect a lot more of it in the future as Whites lose their living space and will be forced to either fight or die.


    • JohnEngelman

      Yes or no. Do you approve of what he did?

  • JohnEngelman

    People who hate Jews resent them because of their superior intelligence and their resulting prosperity. Then they invent lies about them to justify their hate. 

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble


    With all due respect: What different methods are possible and desirable?  What recourse does anyone who wants to preserve his native heritage, culture, language and civilization have in Norway (or any White country for that matter)??

    This is what Breivik points out:

    * Far left organizations are state-funded and permitted to employ violence against opposing parties while the police and media look the other way.  The same state funding and “courtesy” are not allowed conservative organizations.

    *In Norway, Native Born Norwegians are not permitted to state that Norwegians have a right to a homeland.

    *Native Born Norweigans are terrified of speaking out against a government-funded genocide that is being committed against them.

    *Those who oppose Third World immigration from Africa and Asia into Norway are physically assaulted, have their faces “smashed in with iron pipes”, their “jaws broken and teeth knocked out,” are “beaten and kicked” and have “things thrown at them” by government-funded leftists. The media are silent about such attacks, the response of one large paper: “Isn’t that good, then?”  

    *Police are being used to crush political opposition through intimidation and harassment of young people in their homes, leaders subjected to raids, extensive surveillance, arrests and loss of housing.

    These are police state tactics that are being used in Norway to crush Native Born Norwegians who oppose their own dispossession and displacement in a land they’ve lived in for thousands of years.  They have done nothing to deserve this and are violently attacked by government -funded thugs if they object.  

    They have no police protection or media support.

    If you know of any possible way for Norwegians to put a stop to their own genocide and encroaching police state, please explain.  I’d be very interested in reading what you have to say.


  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    They buried those who tried to take away their guns.


  • JohnEngelman

    Definition of GENOCIDE
    : the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group—compare homicide                   

    Caucasians are not threatened by genocide. Nevertheless, computer technology reduces the economic value of jobs that can be learned by those with low IQs. They do face a grim future.

  • JohnEngelman

    If one feels something strongly it is easy to overestimate the number of people who feel the same way. It is easy to underestimate the difficulty of converting others to one’s persuasion.
    In the United States and in Europe there is not an overwhelming demand to stop immigration. 
    According to a FOX News poll released 6/24-26/12 54 percent of Americans support President Obama’s plan to stop deportation and grant work permits for certain illegal immigrants under the age of thirty who were brought to the United States as children. Only 36 percent are opposed. The President’s policy will help him in the next election. 

  • alastairabbacle

    “Systematic extermination of Jews by the Bolsheviks began in 1917, with the liquidation of the Mensheviks”.

    Menshevik – A member of the liberal faction of the Social Democratic Party that struggled against the Bolsheviks before and during the Russian RevolutionThe American Heritage® Dictionary
    Interesting.  It seems the Mensheviks were the precursors of the Social market democrats of postwar West Germany in ideology.   This would be the party of Konrad Adenauer, whose SPD (Sozialistische Partei Deutschlands)  helped rebuild post-WWII Germany with his.  “Sozialmarktwirtschaft” 
    The Mensheviks are also similar to the Democrat party of the USA before the more socialist Obama wing took over.

    According to

    Menshevik InternationalistsThe radical wing of the Menshevik party, opposed to any coalition with the propertied classes, yet unwilling to accept the Bolshevik concept of the dictatorship of the working-class. Trotsky was long a member of this group, and also included Martov and Martinov.

  • alastairabbacle

    You still live in a “SHOULD” reality, where you think Whites should be able to take up arms and attack immigrants, or brainwashed marxist children.

    This is not the modern world, it is NOT acceptable to attack civilians.  If you want to win in the world, you must abide by the forces at play in the world .    Information wars, with the the sword as the computer keyboard, and the bomb as the information leak, is far preferable to the horrible conflict you foolishly wish to bring about.  

    We should take up arms, and not “Talk” them out of this, huh?
    I would love to see how that would work in REALITY, not in SHOULDREALITY.    The deployment of violence that goes against gain in public support and prestige gain lies outside of the realm of Machiavellian power enhancement.  

    All successful and respectable armed insurrections, such as the American Revolution, must have their basis in sound doctrine, sound goals, and good timing.   An uprising of the indigenous Norwegians would have to have all of these ingredients.

    I do not pity the failed revolutionary, their revolution will fail if it is not based on reality, and instead based on endless “should” victimhood.  

  • alastairabbacle

    Thanks for the tip to David Dallin. I have been searching a true historian to make sense of this era. “Real Soviet Russia” sounds like a good start.

    Yes, I did just make the mistake of mixing up the CDU and the SPD. Konrad Adenauer was of the CDU. The SPD did help productively with German governance in the post-WWII period though. The point I was trying to bring out, it that there are those market-oriented socialists who have struck a balance. It is just that the more sensational socialists, and also the more sensationally crazy Jews amongst others have made the most shocking headlines.

    Would I be amiss to liken the Menshevik wing of the Russian Revolution to something akin (on a far smaller, more mixed scale) to centrist Bill Clinton Democrat wing losing out to the Obama left wing?

  • alastairabbacle

    Impressive, it is very hard to find penetrating historians of 1930-1945 who search out the fundamentals of the little-taught history of our Soviet WWII allies. I think many people feel a need to finally see that historical time for all of the grit, past the pablum popular for the last couple of decades.

  • Hirene

    He reminds of the words spoken by American Revolutionary, Patrick Henry, “Give me liberty, or give me death.”