Video: Dispatches: Muslim Rape Gangs in England

It has always struck me as strange that feminists support open door immigration. Islam is the mortal enemy of feminism. They should oppose it fanatically. But they don’t…

Notable to me in this video is are the two Muslim men, one a Lord in Parliament, who blame racism and nationalists for the “racism” of the response to this ongoing sexual exploitations and life ruining crimes against British girls. The way they apologize, explain away, excuse the Asian men, while highlighting things such as the way some of the girls dress, the fact that they are out at night, allowing them to blame parents,etc., and the paralyzed state of the legal systems PROVE that multiculturalism, the leftist religion of Diversity is not a formula for Western survival.

Britain and the West in general have imagined that they could assimilate non-white cultural groups into their own. They refuse to acknowledge the truth of the error of these sort of assumptions. The only solution is to reduce the presence of these groups and rather encourage native whites in their lands to grow families. I personally would support even socialistic support in that sort of goal, because it is going to require government help if the white gene pool and percentage of the world’s population is to be protected and preserved.

The reason these things are happening is that it is a clash of islamic culture against British. And the Islamic culture is obviously winning since they dont have both their hands tied behind their backs as whites are even incarcerated today for so-called ‘racism” if they dare respond in similar vein to the muslims. In my opinion these “rape gangs” is a specific AGENDA of muslims, and the goal of this agenda is to make Britain culturally MUSLIM. If you keep on raping children and telling British society it is because they dress a certain way obviously the messiage is if you dress your girls in muslim style burkas then we wont rape them. It’s a tactic to Islamize Britain.

5 –

Oh, I don’t know, Netzach. It is a well-established technique by the criminal media to seek out the absolute worst example in any group for an interview in order to discredit the movement. As far as dating my daughter goes, I’d take this kid over the world’s most intelligent black.

British businesses want favorable trade agreements with Muslim countries so they pimp out their own nation/people. The Labour Party wants the votes that Muslim welfare recipients will give them. I hope the British people wake up rally around the BNP.

3 — Xman wrote at 10:54 AM on November 11:

“So the short skirts are to be blamed, come on! If something is attractive that doesn’t give us the right to own it by whatever means. But the reality is, attempts would be made to do so be it women, children, natural resources or land or whatever which is why strong defense for a nation, culture, person, land etc is essential.

In this context that would mostly be defense against Islam’s onslaught on the British culture. It’s easy to blame the victim, isn’t it and it’s easier to just blame!”

Even though I abhor rape and consider these men criminals who ought to be locked up with a bunch of homosexual blacks for life, I don’t agree with you. It is very silly to assert that a female doesn’t know that she is trying to attract attention when she wears skin tight, or body revealing clothing. I am no prude, but common sense is completely gone in the West where the over-sexual displays of and by women are concerned.

I don’t think Western women, or any woman should have to dress according to some code, but on the other hand, some common sense is just wisdom. If you aren’t trying to catch a fish, don’t use a flashy lure.

We live in a culture where teasing men is a 24/7 occurrence in both the streets and the media, and is so frequent it might be called a “normal” condition, but that doesn’t make it healthy, let along ethical or moral. This culture also says that while we can maybe look (eyes up, there twirp!), women can have a ball playing with tempting men, daring us to react. The law sits by with multiple rememdies for the men who fail the various tests and required behaviors. The result is that most men grow numb, while nurturing a quiet resentment (I’m loud about it at home), while a smaller majority act on it, getting mixed up with prostitutes and acting out in other ways, even becoming sociopaths and raping women. Yes, social dysfunction creates more social dysfunction.

Feminists have been hammering men for decades with assertions about how they’re free to wear a G string in public if they please, but take no responsibility for the psychological (passive aggressive) sexual games they are playing out of pure hatefulness.

This is disgusting. But expected. They have no respect for England or the Indigenous English who allowed them into their homes. Are Europeans even covered by Indigenous laws?

“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”