Concealing Black Hate Crimes

Investor’s Business Daily, August 12, 2011

Racism: Across the U.S., mobs of black youths are organizing on Facebook to loot stores and beat whites. Yet none dare call the “flash mob” attacks hate crime, least of all the attorney general.

The Associated Press is reporting that at least one of those arrested in the Wisconsin State Fair beatings said the mob was targeting whites, making it a hate crime. Where is Eric Holder’s civil rights division? About this epidemic of black-on-white assaults, we hear nothing.

{snip}

Earlier this month in Philadelphia, marauding black flash mobs beat and robbed tourists and other innocent bystanders. Several people were hospitalized, including one man with a fractured skull.

Mayor Michael Nutter, Philly’s second black mayor, said enough is enough. In an angry lecture from the pulpit of Mount Carmel Baptist Church, he blasted the punks, saying “you have damaged your own race.”

Similar attacks are under investigation in Los Angeles, Chicago, Cleveland and Washington, D.C., where our first black president remains mum.

Why isn’t Obama equally disgusted by the black pack attacks? Perhaps because his own church glamorized the thug culture. His mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, told his South Side Chicago flock that those committing black-on-black crime are “fighting the wrong enemy.” During the 2008 presidential campaign, Geraldine Ferraro condemned Wright for preaching to young blacks that “it’s OK to beat up on white people.”

Imagine if the flash-mob victims were black instead of white. Holder would have launched a special investigation. With the races reversed, he just shrugs. In so many words he has said blacks are incapable of hate crimes because of their victimhood.

“There is a pervasive hostility toward (prosecuting) these types of cases,” said Christian Adams, a civil rights attorney who quit after Holder refused to prosecute the New Black Panther Party for intimidating white Philly voters in 2008.

To Holder, blacks are the permanent victims. But his department’s own data say otherwise. In most cases of interracial crimes, the victim is white and the perp is black. Black criminals choose white victims 45% of the time, while whites victimize blacks 3% of the time. More than twice as many whites are murdered by a black than cases of a white murdering blacks.

And despite underreporting, blacks commit a disproportionate share of hate crimes. In 2009, almost 20% of known offenders of hate crimes were black, even though blacks make up just 13% of the population.

{snip}

Candidate Obama vowed to stand up for a civil rights unit that enforces laws “fairly and justly.” If his attorney general doesn’t pursue these black mob cases as hate crimes, punishing the offenders, he risks giving white racists an excuse to respond in kind.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • suffering & submerged

    The reason Holder can ignore it is because he can get away with it. What politician will hold hearings into “black flash mobs”?

    The Congressional Black Caucus would use the event as an opportunity to demand that “we do more for our most at risk and vulnerable victims of lingering racism and systemic bias.”

    If we try to solve our problems with the blacks as we should, we end up with even a higher tax on our White Privilege that we have now.

    Black win, always!

  • Anonymous

    ON January 7, 2007, Channon Christian​ and Hugh Christopher Newsom​ were victims of a horrible crime that most certainly did happen, but for some reason, their names wouldn’t ring a bell with the average American, no matter how well informed.

    On that night, 21-year-old Channon Christian, and her boyfriend, 23-year-old Hugh Christopher Newsom were carjacked in Knoxville by three thugs. Their attackers were sadly not satisfied with the Toyota 4-Runner​ that they commandeered at gunpoint. They kidnapped the young couple and took them to the house where one of the perps lived. They were joined by a fourth man and a woman. They proceeded to commit the stomach-churning crimes.

    All four men are charged with the anal rape of Christopher Newsom. They did so in the presence of Channon Christian. They then shot him to death, wrapped him in bedding, soaked him in gasoline and set him on fire. He was the lucky one.

    Channon Christian was a senior at the University of Tennessee. According to the charges and a source close to the investigation, she was repeatedly gang raped by the four men vaginally, anally and orally. Before she died, her murderers poured a household cleaner down her throat, apparently in an effort to kill the DNA they had placed there. She was left to die, either from the bleeding caused “by the tearing,” or from asphyxiation.

    Outside of Knoxville, the MSM had almost no interest in reporting these crimes, and the reason obviously was because they were black on white crimes.

  • sheila

    Can’t you imagine the old *intellectual revolutionaries* of the 1960s having orgasimic sensations about now? After all, this is what they have been praying for then and now…they have worked for so very long to bring about open bloody revolution in America…all of those people who *groomed* the sitting president of America! Wow they must be on cloud nine…what a pathetic pathogen…are we ready yet?

  • Anonymous

    The other big lie is that they are all teens.

  • Intelliboy

    Nonwhites show a lot of unuity at the expense of the whites. White persecution is one of their few productive activities and helps keep them off each others throats. Seriously, there is little that can be done about this nonwhite persecution of whites. Nonwhites enjoy it so much and they forget about all their own shortcomings. Whites will gradually come to understand they have to reciprocate this hostility.

  • Ljot

    It’s plausible that these black flashmob actions are rehearsals and trainings and testruns for obstructing white voters in crucial elections, the 2012 presidential being the big one. Also plausible is their orchestration by ACORN, that widespread urban pet organization of Obama. Anyone else thinking along these lines?-We should begin planning guardian networks for this contingency. Of course, Holder & assocs. might call this conspiracy to commit hate crime….

  • NBJ

    They will never admit the truth, and continue to go out of their way to hide all evidence to keep these things hidden and quiet.

    I’m not kidding when I say while channel surfing today, I came across 3 different CSI – type cop shows where the white guy is portrayed as the evil doer against an innocent minority. One was where 2 white cops planted drugs on a Mexican (yeah, that makes sense because there is no such thing as Mexican drug cartels) The second was an innocent black guy accused of murdering a white woman ( we all know the statistics there) and the 3rd was a white cop who shot and killed a black teen who really didn’t have a gun after all (how many times have we heard that one) and he was really a good kid.

    I know these shows are fiction, but they are so far beyond reality it’s laughable. Whites are always portrayed as the evil ones or the goofy stupid ones. Anything to maintain that illusion and continue to cover up black on white crime.

  • Anonymous

    The Associated Press is reporting that at least one of those arrested in the Wisconsin State Fair beatings said the mob was targeting whites, making it a hate crime. Where is Eric Holder’s civil rights division? About this epidemic of black-on-white assaults, we hear nothing.

    ———————————————————–

    Of course Eric is only for “his people”..

    I really don’t hear much talk about it on talk radio from the RINOS either. They mention it and that is about all they do.

    They HATE to talk HONESTLY about anything that involves black against White and the hatred blacks have for Whites, let alone WARN Whites of the danger from the blacks. They all have black “friends” and co-workers, don’t ya know. EVERY Rino host has blacks as part of their staff and so they are useless as advocates for any White survival or telling any truths about the black race.

  • olewhitelady

    Hopefully, one response of the “white racists” will be to go to the polls and vote against Obama, even if their vote is for a lesser of two evils. Imagine what Obama will unleash if he’s not worried about reelection!

    As I’ve said before, I wonder if Obama won’t address the mob attacks because he actually wants white Americans to be afraid not to reelect him for fear of greater riots if he loses. Or he may hope many whites in cities will fear going to the polls. He also may fear that he’ll lose black support if he criticizes even lawless ghetto thugs. Even if few blacks will vote against him, some might just stay home on election day.

  • Bud

    In 2009, almost 20% of known offenders of hate crimes were black, even though blacks make up just 13% of the population.

    Simple nonsense. Presumably these statistics come from the government’s hate crimes report, and it is bizarre that the author would quote them in an article entitled “Concealing Black Hate Crimes.” Doesn’t he realize that such concealment is pervasive in all branches of the establishment? He complains about concealment but trusts the statistics of some of the very people he complains about. The FBI’s hate crimes report is a fairytale made up out of whole cloth to support the establishment’s white-hating racism.

  • Anonymous

    “despite underreporting, blacks commit a disproportionate share of hate crimes”

    ‘underreporting’ there’s a huge understatement. . . It’s nearly a thought-crime itself, accusing people of color of hatred?

  • Jeddermann.

    “Black criminals choose white victims 45% of the time, while whites victimize blacks 3% of the time. More than twice as many whites are murdered by a black than cases of a white”

    And of course as we know, these statistics are rigged by Holder AG [ZANU-PF] to make whitey look worse than he is. The actual stats if gone over carefully show far different results and whitey is to blame a lot less than what is thought. And this is our own government doing this to us folks. We all know what is what.

  • highduke

    50 years of bending over backwards to make Blacks our equals has resulted in a racial holy war against Whites, so this better be a wake-up call that racializes mainstream conservatives. Even I never imagined the Blacks would go this far. Does anyone have credible data on what % of the White or general population know that the mobs are a Black phenomenon directed against Whites?

  • Anonymous

    4 — Jeddermann. wrote at 10:02 PM on August 15:

    The “white” stats include clearly non-white hispanics!

  • Jake

    In the government’s hate-crime statistics, Hispanics also are denoted as a victim class– but NOT as a class of perpetrators! When someone of Hispanic ethnicity commits a so-called hate crime, he is listed by his race, not his ethnicity; and, that race is usually denoted as white. Consistent with the “Color of Crime” statistics, most of the supposed white-on-black hate crimes are actually Hispanic-on-black crimes, such as inter-ethnic gang attacks. Actual non-Hispanic-white attacks on blacks as so-called hate crimes are just a minor fraction of those claimed by the government.

    There is also the matter of selective prosecution, by which the authorities go to great lengths to avoid calling obvious bias crimes committed against non-Hispanic whites hate crimes. Thus, when marauding gangs of black teens attack only white victims, authorities essentially require actual confessions from the black teens that they were explicitly and premeditatedly attacking white victims because of their race. In short, the fix is in, from the git-go!

  • Uptown

    It is time to debunk all this hate crime business. So, everyone listen up. Hate crime. as opposed to love crime, laws purport to create a more severe offense if committed because of the person’s race, ethnicity etc. This makes for real bad jurisprudence because:

    FIRST,

    .

  • Uptown

    Hate crimes are real bad jurisprudence.

    First, because hate crime penalties are so severe, the state can coerce guilty pleas in doubtful cases by offering to dismiss the hate crime allegation. Prosecutorial overcharging is a common tactic at the federal level, and it frightens defendants to plea when they otherwise should not.

    Second, hate crime allegations invite a criminal jury to focus on whether the defendant is a bad man. Assaying character, to decide the issue of guilt or innocence, undermines our traditional concern about unjustly convicting unpopular defendants.

    Third, whether or not someone convicted of a hate crime was actually motivated by hate, is impervious to effective review on appeal.

    Fourth, that the victim may have been vulnerable is a factor which can be considered on sentencing. There is no reason to make it a formal part of the jury trial.

    The whole idea of a hate crime is a stopgap sop thrown to the public, to convince one and all that the criminal justice system is equal to certain of the emerging problems generated by racial hostility. It is not. Hate crime legislation is a bad idea when applied to white defendants, and it’s useless when applied to minority defendants, and we should say so, and move on.

  • Bibiana McArdle

    IBD misunderstands the term “victim” when used by elites. Blacks lack political power. Therefore, they cannot be racist or commit hate crimes. Only those in power, i.e., whites, can commit such crimes. I learned this little tidbit as a university student in a class I had to take to get a California teaching credential. It was a large class. Everyone in the class readily bought into it except for moi. And that’s where we are today.

  • Douglas

    As horrible an AG as Holder certainly is, I think maybe we’re being overly critical of him in this case. He is probably handling the flash mob beatings no differently than any liberal white who may have been appointed the AG position by the Obama administration. Heck, that probably goes for McCain’s pick too, had he beaten Obama in 2008.

  • Anonymous

    It gets worse. Take note of advertising and entertainment. If a commerical is negative (lice, feminine itch, hemmoroids, etc) then the ads are all white. No diversity. If the ad is postive, then there is slew of blacks. Anti-white jokes and ghetto wisdom is in practically every film. Blatent hate-crimes are ignored for ‘news’ like the Duke Lacrosse Team and the Jena Six (who are guilty of hate crimes).

  • Anonymous

    There was a time in this country that few Blacks would ever dare attack a White person. But then again, that was at a time when Blacks feared and therefore respected Whites. Blacks knew that if they got out of line, White retribution would be swift, uncompromising, and overwhelming.

    No Black defendant could demand mercy from the court because they came from an underprivileged broken home. The concept of “racism” had yet to be invented by radical leftists such as Trotsky and Magnus Hirschfeld. Whites were free to be racial realists who knew from experience that both races benefited from separation and a firm hand when dealing with transgressors.

    Will we ever have the courage to admit these truths and once again embrace these time-proven realities of race relations?

  • kgb

    Imagine if the flash-mob victims were black instead of white. Holder would have launched a special investigation. With the races reversed, he just shrugs. In so many words he has said blacks are incapable of hate crimes because of their victimhood.

    How can we help black kids with ipods and blackberries loot the homes of liberals who have made excuses for them for a generation and a half? Would that change the likes of the liberal media?

  • Anonymous

    ALL black on white crimes are hate crime. This is a moot point.

  • Anonymous

    kgb wrote at 10:14 AM on August 16:

    “Imagine if the flash-mob victims were black instead of white.

    How can we help black kids with ipods and blackberries loot the homes of liberals who have made excuses for them for a generation and a half? Would that change the likes of the liberal media?”

    There are quite a number of those in London right now. Whilst the looting and arson was going on, gangs of mainly black yoofs roamed the streets, taking advantage of the overstretched police. They burgled, mugged and terrorised with impunity. There is even one reported rape,- by a 15 year old yoof – of a 13 year old girl.

    However, the police weren’t so overstretched that they couldn’t send in a heavy mob to attack White men in Eltham and Enfield protecting their neighbourhoods. The media branded them “racist vigilante mobs”

    Meanwhile, Sikhs, Turks and Pakistanis were brandishing swords, baseball bats and two foot long kebab knives, and threatening to take the law into their own hands. The media tell us they were “protecting their neighbourhoods”.

  • Anonymous

    These (race unidentified) flash mob “youths” or “teenagers” are all blacks, aged 11 to 45 years of age. I thought that a person became a legal adult at the age of 18…

  • Anonymous

    13 — highduke wrote at 10:29 PM on August 15:

    50 years of bending over backwards to make Blacks our equals has resulted in a racial holy war against Whites, so this better be a wake-up call that racializes mainstream conservatives. Even I never imagined the Blacks would go this far. Does anyone have credible data on what % of the White or general population know that the mobs are a Black phenomenon directed against Whites?

  • margaret

    One thing we must all remember. Hate crime is an invention of the ADL/SPLC. They invented it. They lobbied for it. They coerced lawmakers to vote it into law.

    ADL/SPLC tactics threaten lawmakers with election losses. Go along with their anti White hate crime agenda and a legislator is assured of massive contributions and experts of every kind to insure election for life.

    Refuse to vote for any ADL/SPLC bill and the lawmaker is pretty much assured of losing the next election and never being elected to any office again. The ADL/SPLC is expert at targetting lawmakers who are agains their agenda.

    ADL/SPLC will go to any state, find a candidate and undertake a massive effort to replace any lawmaker who goes against ADL/SPLC

    proposals. ADL/SPLC keeps track of evey election in the country from a small town city council to US Senate. They reward those who obey the agenda and destroy those who don’t vote according to ADL/SPLC diktats

    ADL has been doing it successfully for 100 years.

  • Sadly, the Latest Scoop

    I came across 3 different CSI – type cop shows where the white guy is portrayed as the evil doer against an innocent minority.

    Unfortunately, illiterate people tend to believe everything they see on TV. Entertainment and truth, especially to minorities, are one and the same. More unfortunately, with the excessively poor news media, most non-minorities think the same way. People in this country watch too much TV and believe all of it when they should watch a whole lot less and believe none of it.

  • dying breed

    Just this morning I watched in utter disgust as a CNN hack reporter did her best to pull the wool over the eyes of the masses. In reporting the latest ‘flash robbery’ in Maryland, she represented to the audience as well as the detective she was interviewing; that this was the first time something of this nature has happened.

    To ignore the fact that there have been quite a few of these cases including: convenience stores in Las Vegas & Milwaukee and I believe a Macy’s in Chicago is just beyond ludicrous! How can the MSM continue to tell these bold face lies to the masses? Have these reporters no spine? Is there a gun pointed at their heads just beyond the camera view?

    When does this madness end?

  • Anonymous

    Poster 27 Margaret is so right about the ADL (and their offshoot the SPLC) and their anti-ethnic European (White Christian) agenda. They have power over our politicians, law enforcement, media…

  • Anonymous

    Comment 26:

    I’m not sure of the timeline. It could be a year. It could be 10. I am sure though that it won’t be 60-100 years. I’ve found myself to be an early adopter of a lot of things that go mainstream a few years after I take them up. I strongly suspect that this is going mainstream.

    From what I see of the comments and their popularity, a mass rejection of PC values is not far away. The sentiment online from what I see is vastly different from where it was 5 years ago. Back then, few people were well informed. Few people knew what the problems were or what could be done.

    That has vastly changed. Now, the average comment writer is very well versed. They are intelligent (for the most part). Their numbers have grown and the degree to which they have support of other people has grown by leaps and bounds.

    The actions of these intelligent, articulate people to sway their friends and relatives will have an impact.