A Meaningless “Hate Crimes” Report

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, November 27, 2013

DOJ report for 2012 is utterly unreliable.

The Department of Justice has just released its “hate crimes” report for 2012. As usual, it is a mix of the inexcusable, the unreliable, and the incomprehensible. To begin with the inexcusable, it still lists Hispanics as a victim category but not as a perpetrator category. Offenders can only be white, black, Indian/Eskimo, or Asian, so despite the fact that Hispanics are the second largest group in the country, as offenders they are lumped in with whites.

The report lists 42 different categories for where hate crimes took place—105 at bars or nightclubs, 72 in convenience stores, for example—but it would have us believe that not one of 53 million Hispanics committed a “hate crime.”

It is bad enough that the Justice Department treats Hispanics as whites for its reports on index crimes, thereby inflating the “white” crime rate. To fail to account for Hispanic perpetrators in what is supposed to be a report on discrimination is beyond inexcusable.

Hispanics are only the largest perpetrator category that is omitted. Homosexuals, the handicapped, Jews, Muslims, etc. are carefully classified as victims, but never as perpetrators.

As we will see, local reporting to the DOJ on “hate crimes” is so wildly inconsistent that it is not possible to take any of this information seriously, but what does this report claim to tell us?

In all of 2012 there were 6,705 bias “offenses” which had the following motivations:

Race: 3,297

Sexual orientation: 1,318

Religion: 1,166

Ethnic/national origin: 822

Disability: 102

Types of offense range from serious violence—there were 10 murders—to such things as 1,906 cases of property destruction/vandalism. Some of the finer bias motivations—and the number of incidents—were as follows:

Anti-black: 2,180

Anti-homosexual: 1,089

Anti-Jewish: 696

Anti-white: 739

Anti-Hispanic: 488

Anti-lesbian: 162

Anti-Islamic: 149

Anti-Asian: 134

Anti-American Indian/Eskimo: 109

Anti-Catholic: 79

Anti-Protestant: 34

Who are the offenders? No fewer than 30 percent are unknown, and most of those cases were anonymous graffiti and property damage. Of the known offenders, 60 percent are said to be “white,” which includes Hispanics, and 21 percent were black. There is reason to question whether the police look as hard for “hate” when whites are victims as they do when whites are perpetrators, but blacks are still considerably overrepresented as hate criminals. They are 13 percent of the population, and when the Census Bureau calls Hispanics white, it counts the white population as 78 percent. On a per capita basis, therefore, blacks were 2.1 times more likely than “whites” to be counted as hate-crime perpetrators. The Justice Department does not point this out.

The report includes 209 anti-white offenses committed by “whites.” It is hard to understand these crimes as anything but anti-white offenses committed by Hispanics who were classified as white.

The report says that in all of 2012, there were 3,968 crimes against persons that were, as the report puts it, “motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias.” Of this number, 1,570 were simple assaults and 1,489 were acts of “intimidation.” The FBI does not even count these crimes in its Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) because they are so unimportant, so if we subtract them that leaves 909 cases of murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault said to be motivated by all the varieties of hate. In 2011 the UCR counted 1,206,000 violent crimes in the United States, so those 909 hate crimes represent 0.075 percent of the total, or one in about every 1,350 violent crimes.

As for inter-racial crime, the best source of general information is the large-scale FBI survey called Criminal Victimization in the United States. In 2008, the most recent year racial data were collected, the American public reported 571,117 cases of violent crime and attempted violence by blacks against “whites” (as usual, the FBI lumps Hispanics in with “whites”) and only 90,717 such crimes by “whites” against blacks. (This means that any given black was 38 times more likely to attack a “white” than the other way around—a good subject for a different article.) These acts of inter-racial violence included single– and multiple– offender crimes, and not all of them were reported to the police, but they add up to 661,888 attempted and successful crimes of interracial violence.

How does that number compare to the interracial offenses in this report? The total of  2,695 official acts of “hate” violence committed for reasons of race (2,197) and ethnicity (588)—and this includes simple assault and “intimidation”—are just 0.4 percent of the total interracial violence figure of 661,888. If we are to believe this report, only one out of every 250 acts of interracial violence is motivated even “in part” by racial animus.

But what about the 10 murders and 15 rapes that the FBI says were committed for reasons of bias? Six of the murders were motivated by “anti-other religion,” and are undoubtedly the six people Wade Michael Page killed when he shot up a Sikh temple. Two were described as anti-Islamic, one was anti-homosexual, and one was anti-white. Eight of the murders were by “whites,” one was by a black, and in one case the killer was not identified.

One of the rapes was anti-white, three were anti-American Indian, and one was anti-Hispanic.

Four of the rapes were anti-homosexual, four were anti-lesbian, and one was anti-bisexual. It’s not obvious what would be an anti-homosexual or anti-bisexual rape; the report does not explain. Of the 15 rapes, six were reportedly by “whites,” two by blacks, one was by an otherwise unidentified mixed-race group, and six could not be identified by race.

One wonders how a victim could fail to identify a rapist’s race, but there are other strange things in this report: 142 burglaries, 258 larceny/thefts, and 23 motor-vehicle thefts that were apparently motivated by “in whole or in part” by bias.

There are also 203 offenses bafflingly categorized as “crimes against society.” According to the fine print, this is a catchall category for “hate crime data about drug or narcotic offenses, gambling offenses, prostitution offenses, and weapon law violations.” The report does not explain how selling drugs or carrying an unlicensed pistol can be a hate crime.

The fact is, there is really no point in trying to puzzle over what this report means because the data are meaningless. The Department of Justice itself concedes that not all police departments report data. Hawaii has simply opted out of the program, and New Jersey didn’t bother to send any information for 2012.

At the same time, many states send in unbelievable data. Alabama’s 4.7 million people produced only 6 hate crimes, whereas Kentucky’s 4.3 million were guilty of 194. Texas, with 25 million people, reported only 52 hate crimes, while Tennessee, with only 6.3 million racked up 316. Thus hate crimes run from a low of 0.13 per 100,000 population in Alabama to a high of 11.97 per 100,000 in the District of Columbia—a preposterous 92-fold difference.

DOJ concedes that it does not get reports from all police departments, and that what it gets covers only 79.3 percent of the American population. However, even the places that do count hate crimes do it in wildly inconsistent ways. No fewer than 13,022 departments sent in information, so there was plenty of room for inconsistency, and of those departments, no fewer than 11,290 reported no bias crimes at all.

One might conclude that the hate-free departments are in out-of-the way, homogeneous places where everyone gets along, but no. Atlanta, for example, reported no hate. In fact, all 2.4 million people who lived Cobb, DeKalb, and Fulton Counties were free of hate. The 2.5 million Floridians who live in Miami-Date County and the 1.8 million in Broward County were equally hate free. The 1.3 million people of Hillsborough County, which contains Tampa, were just as fortunate, as were the 900,000 North Carolinians who live in the county that contains Raleigh and the 780,000 people of San Mateo County, California.

New Orleans had only two hate crimes, and Philadelphia’s population of 1.5 million produced only 11.

Seattle, Washington (population 627,000; 85 hate crimes) and Lexington, Kentucky (population 302,000; 41 hate crimes) are, according to this report, some of the nastiest places in America, with per capita hate-crime rates that are 19 times that of Philadelphia, 26 times that of Chicago, and 85 times that of Baltimore. It is easy to imagine majority-white police departments earnestly tracking down hate; the police in Baltimore and Philadelphia have their hands full fighting crime.

Even within the same state, there are strange disparities. The populations of Memphis and Nashville are about the same, but Memphis had 61 hate crimes to Nashville’s 10. Dallas, Boston, and Louisville are a few of the cities that didn’t bother to send in reports at all.

Obviously, this report is meaningless. Every year DOJ puts it out because Congress requires it by law. Every so often Congress adds new categories of victims for the police to track: handicapped people, homosexuals, Muslims. Police officers can’t stand this kind of paperwork, and plenty of them probably just don’t do it. The DOJ bureaucrats who actually have to compile the crazy stuff they get from the field are bound to know that the report they are writing is a farce, but they get paid anyway.

Hate Crime Statistics, 2012 is a perfect example of the confusion and futility that ensue when a multi-racial country refuses to accept the most obvious facts about race.

Note: A helpful guide to the US Census Bureau website can be found here.

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Martel

    Its a shame the myth of “white racism” is invigorated once more, and actual hatecrimes against whites will continue unnoticed. The positive side is this rapport can be shredded to pieces in only a few sentences.

  • Jesse James

    This whole report is a government hate crime of twisted statistics, misdirection and lies.

  • Manaphy

    The purpose of the Hate Crimes “Report” is to demonize whites and promote the leftist agenda. No open minded intellectual, researcher, or person of any kind should take this “report” seriously. For better or for worse, there is practically no anti-black, anti-Muslim, anti-Hispanic, etc “hate crimes”. However, Anti-white hatred is steadily rising, as seen with the recent popularity of the Knockout Game among Zulu “teens”.

  • Paul

    ‘still lists Hispanics as a victim category but not as a perpetrator category’

    So i guess this means a Mexican killing a Mexican is a ‘white on hispanic attack’

    • Jefferson

      Mexico must be an extremely “racist” country, especially with the violent drug wars down there where “White Hispanic” drug cartel members are going around murdering Brown Hispanic drug cartel members.

    • [Guest]

      Unless I’m mistaken, if a Mexican murdered a Mexican in a hateful (as opposed to a loving) manner, it could be labelled one of two ways—a white-on-white crime or a white-on-Hispanic crime.

      If the murder was labelled the first way, it could not be a “hate crime.” If it was labelled the second way, it could be.

      It’s a totally anti-white set up.

  • Spartacus

    This isn’t a hate crime :

    • 48224

      No that’s not a hate crime (HC). It’s TNB. Know the difference. Thanks for posting. I never heard of Amy Gibbins before. However, I know the name Trayvon Martin VERY well.

  • silviosilver

    Endless material here for historians of the future to puzzle over while attempting to explain the anti-white psychopathology America fell into the grips of.

    • 48224

      Correct, at some point in the future they will look back on this PC psycho-nonsense like the Salem Witch Trials….and say what the bleep were they thinking???

  • Spartacus

    These aren’t hate crimes either :

    • DLRisVH

      Autumn was also raped and found naked in that recycling bin. Dante is now free roaming the streets.


      • Spartacus

        Then go after it and do what must be done.

  • bigone4u

    Of course Mexicans are white. Don’t all whites tattoo their crimes on their bodies like the white guy below. Of course, one good tattoo deserves more, so let’s not leave the ladies out. BTW, great pictures to illustrate Jared’s report, especially the pic of those hateful ladies on the street.

    • Jefferson

      That Mexican gangsta looks like he came straight out of Norway. He is the epitome of a Nordic Aryan.

    • ViktorNN

      This must be a white person from that lost tribe of Aryan Nordics who lived in the Aztec Empire.

  • Greg Thomas

    Moreover, of course, the Good Samaritan calling in to report the hate crime is some type of asian/muslim/black hybrid. Jesus Christ. This government hates us!

    • Franklin_Ryckaert

      They don’t want to seem “biased”.

    • newscomments70

      Imagine if you were a white victim of a hate crime and you called that number? The liberal volunteer would stammer, nervously accuse you of being a liar, and hang up.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      I like the smug smirk on his face. What is not shown in the picture, of course, is the poor groid trying to play the knock out game with evil ol’ black belt hun gar kung fu trained whitey who is now justifiably beating down said shiftless darky.

      It’s all about the edit.

    • 48224

      And ironically the white guy is wearing a coat over a hoodie, which is a lower class “street” way to dress. And the black guy is wearing a preppy looking v-neck over a white tee-shirt…..I’m surprised the black guy is’t holding a chemistry book.

  • Truelitistnot

    Aren’t all crimes driven by hate? Hate being poor, hate being hungry, hate blacks, hate whites, hate Mexicans, hate the government, hate the anti-government people, hate not having Nike shoes, hate the other gang, hate whatever.

  • sbuffalonative

    What is the end game here?

    The numbers are rigged against us and inflated by manipulated and convoluted racial/ethnic definitions that change at whim. This report is deliberately stacked against us.

    Is this falsified crime ledger going to be used at our future trials to prove we’re guilty by race?

    • Franklin_Ryckaert

      The report itself is a hate crime against Whites.

      • sbuffalonative


        The title of this piece should be Anti-White Bias: The Real Hate Crime

  • Funruffian

    They are 13 percent of the population, and when the Census Bureau calls Hispanics white, it counts the white population as 78 percent. On a per capita basis, therefore, blacks were 2.1 times more likely than “whites” to be counted as hate-crime perpetrators. The Justice Department does not point this out.
    The DOJ can’t even calculate properly let alone identify individuals by their race or ethnicity. Our DOJ is a dangerous farce represented by an Anti-White Bantu.

  • Garrett Brown

    Very well done Jared. I was waiting for an official response from this site.

  • Massif1

    The misleading reporting on hate crimes is mandatory by Congress, but states can optout and even report bogus information in the first place. I can see a police officer making up numbers just to please his DOJ contact in D.C. Every crime that’s committed by blacks against is a hate crime.

  • ShermanTMcCoy


    For some odd reason, I can’t get this as a vanity plate.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Exactly my sentiments.

  • Very, very, very good article. People who don’t understand statistics should never preach to those who do have an understanding beyond the simple regurgitation of those stats. One thing I’ve learned throughout the years when looking at crime statistics is that there is always some uniformity and parallels you can find, whether they be along racial lines or just simply economic lines. These stats not only show no real and unbiased uniformity, they completely go against basic logic and reason.

    How is it that black-on-White crimes are so prevalent throughout America, but anti-black “hate crimes” are supposedly higher?

    How can a true perspective of “hate crimes” even be attained when the entire data collection process is dictated to by people who insinuate White, non-Hispanic people aren’t supposed to be victims of “hate crimes” in the same capacity as non-Whites?

    How in the world can anti-Amerindian “hate crime” incidents be roughly 1/6th the number of anti-White crimes, but the Amerindian population is only about 1/70th of the White population? If you have looked at crime data for the Amerindian population, then you would understand how odd these numbers are. This discrepancy of this alone is so beyond the realm of possible that you would have a better chance of being struck by lightning while riding your unicorn than you would for these numbers to be an accurate depiction of “hate crimes” in America.

    The only uniform and constant thing I’ve noticed with these stats is that the White population of America is the only race, religion, or whatever “hate” category that is underrepresented as victims when you look at per capita numbers.

  • DaveMed

    Thank you, Jared, for cutting through the gunk and politically-correct obfuscations of the Report.

    The first paragraph alone (about Hispanics being listed as a victim group but not as perpetrators) damns the entire thing.

    • DiversityIsDeath

      Yes, that sneaky business about the DOJ classifying Hispanics as a separate group only when they are victims but lumping them in with “Whites” when they are perpetrators makes plain what the DOJ’s intention is.

      • emiledurk16

        Not surprising. Same DOJ that didn’t prosecute the black militants menacing the Philly voting booths of a few years ago. If I remember a white attorney resigned over the blatant double standards and glossing over of black crime by this nefarious agency. Remember the “my people” comment uttered by Holder. A comment that would have incurred wrath if said by a white person.

  • David Ashton

    July 4, 1776.

  • Greg Thomas

    So it is I see, which begs me to ask: How long until we see similiar 999 “hate hotline” posters in the US, with the magical muslim/asian/black hybrid acting as the “Good Samaritan?”

    White hate has no borders.

  • mrcan

    Hate crime legislation was introduced to deter White vigilantism. Whites know the MSM is simply a propaganda machine for the New World Order. Yet the elites are still afraid of a majority backlash. Being charged with a hate crime carries a substantial penalty, not to mention the loss of income, reputation, relationships etc…

  • ViktorNN

    What a great, well argued analysis. I hope Taylor will consider trying to get it re-posted on other sites if possible so as to spread the word to a wider audience.

    I also want to suggest that we take the next step and connect the dots. Why are these stats which are so worthless, put out by our government? Why do they portray whites the way they do? Why aren’t interracial crime stats gathered anymore? Why is the collection of hate crime stats done so poorly and haphazardly, while at the same time groups like the $PLC use them as scripture in order to help their fundraising efforts and for demonizing the “extreme right?”

    Add in some more dots (like the mainstream media’s double standards in reporting different kinds of interracial crime) and I think a pattern starts to emerge. The notion that this system is institutionally racist against non-whites is absurd. These are clear examples of whites getting institutionally discriminated against. This system is anti-white!

  • Reverend Bacon

    A very nice essay; thanks.
    While we’re on the topic of “other related articles” that should be written:
    – how do those 909 episodes of actual crime break out along racial lines? Your point about inconsistent enforcement is key- crimes against whites are seldom interpreted as hate crimes- but even so, I suspect that in the violent crime category, whites would be overrepresented as victims and underrepresented as perpetrators. Angry whites may write graffiti, but are less likely to assault, IMO.

    – For your “38 times more likely” number: it’s astounding that this is true even given that Hispanics aren’t broken out from “whites.” The mind boggles at how large that number could be if they were. Of course, this would take some serious labor to investigate.

    – The inconsistent enforcement problem, which really points out how stupid hate crime laws are to start, could make the puppeteers look very bad. Start with Atlanta, with zero hate crimes, or Philadelphia, with very low numbers. Find several white victims of crimes committed by violent blacks, and prove the absurdity of the Orwellian thought-crime/hate-crime statutes.
    Finally, Jared, Happy Thanksgiving!

  • JohnEngelman

    Hate crimes are thought crimes, because they incriminate the way one thinks about one’s victims.

    Liberals have legalized burning the American flag. Is not that a hate crime?

    • NeanderthalDNA

      That’s the most sinister edge of it. “Racism” is “thoughtcrime” pure and simple and this law therefore makes certain forms of thought illegal in effect.

      Another creepy edge to me is the denial of the right to dissociate. Without the right to dissociate, the right to associate is meaningless. It does not exist, replaced by the imperative to associate.

      I could list a few other examples of “democratic totalitarianism” but time and space limit.

      • JohnEngelman

        Now that “hate crimes” are illegal, “hate speech” may become illegal. Laws against hate speech could be used to prevent men like Jared Taylor and Charles Murray from mentioning basic facts about racial differences.

        • What kind of man is bound by laws which only serve to make him work against the safety and security of his family and his own well being?

          Hypothetically speaking, of course they could pass laws that would prevent people like Jared Taylor from speaking truth and citing facts. We are really only a step or two away from the kind of mental slavery they have in much of Europe today. Then again, hypothetically, one hundred million White men and women could wake up tomorrow and realize that they bound themselves and put their own families on the path to destruction the second they accepted that kind of capitulation. They could just refuse to play the game.

          The more they push, the more you have to push back. They more laws they pass to make you neuter yourself, the more laws you have to disregard. You try and silence me, I’ll only get louder. You burn my house down, I burn your entire village. You try and make me disappear, I’ll make sure five other people take my place. Anyone who really believes in truth and a rational and reasonable existence will always find some kind of solace and inner peace when following this model.

          I said that to say that people should quit worrying so much about what they can’t do, or what they aren’t allowed to do, or especially what they might not be allowed to do in the future. Quit dwelling on that and just do what needs to be done. You don’t need permission to survive. What you need is a collective of pro-White people that are on the same page.

          • emiledurk16

            I appreciate those words greatly, my friend.

            In social comingling the air of political correctness and
            what you’re not supposed to say is evident and quite sickening.

            An interlocutor at a social gathering recently uttered: “The
            Jews are in charge of Hollywood you know,” Can’t remember what the prompt was. Then, like clockwork, the obligatory “not that there’s anything wrong with that” spews out with an agreeing friend righteously affirming “nothing wrong with that at all.”

            Two white guys I might add.

            “Nothing wrong with whites being in charge of Hollywood either” I
            responded. (to deafening silence)

            I’ll speak out always against this Marxist political
            correctness despite my being accused by friends of being a “buzz kill” or being too serious on our time off.

            I clearly see the strategy of social ostracism (and possible
            work termination) for those who dare challenge this perverse “religion”. That’s what it appears to be to me.

            People outside of Amren are brainwashed and petrified of voicing any disagreement with the fashionable way of thinking. Fools.

            I’ll always speak out. I don’t care whose feathers I ruffle
            or whose buzz I kill. I know you share this sentiment also. Appreciative of this forum.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    The smirk on the caller’s face betrays the real story here. Darky number one, the poor fella getting bawled out by evil whitey, is in fact suffering the consequences for showing up late the tenth time in two months and having repeatedly failed to follow simple instructions, taking hour breaks, playing around on his cell phone while clients/customers went unserved…

    And now darky number two, who is #1’s homey and not much better an employee himself, is playing the race card and telling the kommisars that his evil White boss is RAYCISS!!!!

    It’s all in how you look at the situation…

  • gemjunior

    I know. It’s laughable. It would be great if that thing could be posted everywhere here in the USA. I think this would work really well on our population – it’d backfire and cause massive wakeup. It could be a national sarcasm joke in about a week. I could imagine it being lampooned all over youtube with budding film-makers showing facetious skits of bad whites attacking “innocent” blacks in thug regalia….

  • [Guest]

    >>>…lists Hispanics as a victim category but not as a perpetrator category…

    This alone proves that the report is a farce … or maybe worse—a weapon against any racial group that the government chooses to target. I think we all know which one that is.

    By the way, I have gotten into one discussion after another with “anti-racists” who scream both that “Hispanic” is not a racial designation and that to desire that our southern border be made secure is racist against Hispanics. They have it both ways, and they’re delighted to parade their foul double standards in front of our faces.

    Also, I recall when we first began to hear about the supposed great need for government to provide special protection to special groups using “hate crimes” legislation. Plenty of people spoke up against it but were shouted down as racist bigots. And, of course, the opponents of such legislation were exactly right.

  • [Guest]

    In an earlier AmRen essay, Alain de Benoist is quoted as follows:

    “In the United States [as opposed to Europe generally and France in particular] you have racial statistics. You can go to the government and find race statistics on everything, including crime and social patterns.”

    He’s mistaken. In the U.S. we have racial statistics that are wildly inaccurate and are sometimes bold-faced lies intended to elevate blacks and browns and demonize white people.

  • TheCogitator

    I did a double take. We have ‘protected classes’ in this country? What in God’s green earth is that?

    Potentially anything but a white, heterosexual, able-bodied, male.

    • rightrightright

      Exactly. In the UK there is the concept of “protected characteristics” which sounds a mite less in your face than “protected classes”, perhaps. An Englishman has none of this protection (although white invaders from Poland or Bulgaria do, but probably less protection than the preferred invaders from the Indian sub-continent, the Stans and Africa). The protected ones are favoured in employment opportunities, social housing and so forth. Once again the US state and the British state are working in tandem.

  • joesolargenius

    It’s not the Government that hates us but the Socialist running the Government that are the true Bigots.

  • rogerhicks

    “Hate crime”, like “racism” (= racial prejudice = the natural human inclination to identify with and thus discriminate in favour of one’s own tribe, race or ethnic group), is just another taboo the state uses to intimidate the society it rules over.

    In medieval Europe it was Church ideology, with its notion of “original sin”, which only submission to church/state authority could save the individual (irrespective of social status) from eternal damnation for. Adapted to our more secular times, it is now “racism”, which again only submission to state ideology and authority can save us from eternal damnation for, not as heathens and heretics, as in the past, but as “bigots” and “racists”.

    • Anglo

      Yes, the marxists really have made “racism” a religion not to be questioned. Even Jesus’ disciple, Thomas, was allowed to have honest doubt. John 20:24-28

    • ” …only submission to state ideology and authority can save [whites] from eternal damnation …”

      Actually, if you listen carefully you will understand that nothing can save us. We’re white therefore we must be exterminated. Recently Oprah Winfrey didn’t quite call for death squads but she made it absolutely clear that as far as she is concerned the only way for “racism” in America to disappear is for white to die out.

  • eavesmac

    The non-whites are washed up and they know it. Their only chance is to take over what we’ve built, and then act like it belongs to them. Sound familiar? Tribal mentality.

  • White Dragon

    The reality is, those that promote diversity are anti-peace and full of hate – borne out by the statistics (however skewed they are).

  • DailyKenn

    Has the Dept of Justice become a hate group?

  • BobbyMalone

    Groan… You guys have got to stop listening to this guy… Jared Taylor is not a ‘race expert’; he’s a complete *amateur* who just likes to hear himself talk. He made two *major* mistakes in this article.

    First of all saying Hispanic is a race — it’s not. Wikipedia “white Hispanic” and “black Hispanic” if you don’t believe me. Alexis Bledel, Cameron Diaz, Martin Sheen, and Christy Turlington are all ‘white Hispanics’ (obviously — don’t even try to tell me that Alexis Bledel is not white; she’s one of the palest people you’ll ever see). Alex Rodriguez, Rosario Dawson, and Tatyana Ali (Will Smith’s ‘sister’ on ‘Fresh Prince of Bel-Air’) are all ‘black Hispanics’. There are Asian Hispanics and Pacific Islander Hispanics — wikipedia it if you don’t believe me. All Hispanic means is that you have a Spanish ancestor — however far back — in your family tree. The *race* he’s thinking of is *mestizo* (mix of indigenous American and sometimes white and/or black — and they mark themselves as “other race” or “two or more races” on census forms because that’s what they are. Don’t tell me you guys don’t know what mestizo is — every conservative news outlet was saying Zimmerman was mestizo during his trial!

    Secondly, Jared Taylor mixed up the two main annual government crime reports in the United States. He talks about “the large-scale FBI survey called Criminal Victimization in the United States” (the third paragraph under that ‘lovely’ “I hate white people” graffiti — which, by the way, if it was done by Hispanics why the heck isn’t it written in Spanish???). The FBI *doesn’t* publish the Criminal Victimization in the United States report — that’s published by the Department of Justice. The annual crime report published by the FBI is the “Uniform Crime Reporting” (UCR). Just google “criminal victimization in the united states” (the one he says is FBI) and you go straight to the Department of Justice website. Or *Google “fbi annual crime in the us report released 2011” or “The Nation’s Two Crime Measures Crime in the United States 2004” — they
    both confirm what I’m saying…

    I’m just a nobody and I know this stuff… Jared Taylor is not a race expert. Please for the love of God go listen to someone who knows what they’re talking about:(

  • BobbyMalone

    ***An Explanation Of Interracial Crime Rates — by Example of Playboy Bunnies***

    Say you have ten Brazilian supermodels and one Asian Playboy Bunny (Grace Kim for argument’s sake) — and they’re having a giant lesbian orgy.

    Assume though that they are very concerned about not hurting anyone’s feelings — and so they make sure to be completely equal. Each one of the girls makes sure to hook up with each of the other girls for exactly one hour — no more, no less!

    So, at the end of the night, Grace the Asian Sensation will have hooked up with ten Brazilians and no Asians, right? And Adriana Lima, Gisele, Alessandra, etc. (the Brazilian Bombshells) will each have hooked up with nine Brazilians and one Asian.

    That means that Grace will have had exactly ten times as much interracial sex as any of the Brazilians.

    Is it fair to say then, that Grace is a nymphomaniac? (Well, obviously she is — but compared to the other girls??) Or would it be more accurate to say that, due to the population differences, it was inevitable that Grace’s rate of interracial sex would be far higher than any of the other girls?

    Substitute “black” for Asian and “white” for Brazilian and “people killing each other” instead of having an orgy — and that’s half your answer for why blacks have a much higher rate of interracial violence than whites.

    (Blacks are only 13% of the American population. Whites are 72%. 72 divided by 13 = 5.5. Even if blacks are committing crime at *exactly* the same *rate* as whites overall, blacks’ rate of *interracial* crime still will be 5.5x higher than whites’ because of the population differences. Get it?)

    Part 2 tomorrow…

  • Bill Moore


    An important part of this discussion is the way crime statistics are un-reported.

    In Pittsburgh, PA, the Mayor and other folks don’t want the place to seem like other crime-ridden cities, so most crimes go un-reported.

    I’ve witnessed murders, and looked for a report, and there was none.

    Just My Thoughts,
    Bill Moore