You Swine Happy Now?

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, February 5, 2013

CrimeScene
Black kills white to right historical wrongs.

The script of this video and is available here.

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • KenelmDigby

    A simpler explanation is this:
    Blacks are a population with an enormously elevated rate of paranoid schizophrenia. This is a dirty little secret that you will find hard to prise out of the psychriatric community, but it’s a fact nevertheless. Couple this with the other predominant persnality traits of impulsiveness, bullying and aggression and you have an explosive cocktail, the psychological equivalent of fulminate of mercury. Just look at scenes of everyday life from any sub-Saharan African nation.
    A subsidary point is that the modern education industry and I use that word industry deliberately, especially amngst the academic second raters of the so-called social “sciences” is basically just a a massive mutual masturabation society, a great big circle jerk (if the moderator and Amrenners forgive my langauge), in which second raters boost themselves in a status game, played with each other in showing off ‘who is lefter than thou’. This is the way to gain kudos in the land of the perpetual Ivory Tower circle jerk, all you do is say something dumber and even more outrageous, call people who ‘don’t understand you’ ‘stupid’ in true Hans Christian Anderson style and thus get digits on the Marxist tool and more strkes to rarified lefty nirvana.

    • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

      A few years back, a report was released in England showing blacks had higher rates of mental illness. The report was denounced as ‘racist’.

      • JohnEngelman

        If racism is the belief that genetic differences are primarily responsible for racial differences in average ability levels and behavior, then the truth is racist.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Or as I say it, reality is racist.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Miller/100004334405350 Bill Miller

            Mother Nature is racist.

        • Luca

          Just as statistics that show in every category, no matter how you present the evidence, blacks commit more crimes. Truth and math are racist. That is the only answer.

        • Djangotamer

          You were no doubt thinking of Asians and Jews when you typed this, right Engelman? I’m onto your game fool.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is just exactly what I was thinking about.

      • David Ashton

        I wonder whether this phenomenon sometimes blamed on culture shock may be caused in part by racial crossing?

      • pcmustgo

        That being said, I think Blacks and other non-whites are more likely to reject meds, so maybe that’s the reason. Psychiatry and “Meds” are seen as rich white people stuff… they are also more distrustful of the medical community and less likely to seek help. So maybe they are just less medicated than whites.

        I have been inside psych wards myself (I’m bipolar) and the demographics are similar to prison- whites are a minority there, even in white areas.

        • pcmustgo

          Blacks also lead more stressful lives, primarily due to other blacks creating chaos and stress and distress around them.

        • Andy

          Really? Most the people in the psych ward I’ve been in (PTSD) were white, and it was in a fairly black area.

          • Katherine McChesney

            Whites seek treatment. Blacks don’t because they can always blame it on whites.

          • gemjunior

            LOL. So true. It’s da man. Or, as our Commander-in-Chief says “dat’s just how white folks’ll DO YOU”.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            What kind of PTSD? In general or military-related? If military-related, then of course few blacks would be there because PTSD is almost always a function of active front line combat, and military blacks tend toward “services” (cooks, mop floppers, affirmative action/EEOC enforcers, etc.)

        • Joseph

          They seem entirely happy to “self-medicate” in huge numbers. You know- the drugs the CIA and NRA bring into the “community” to trap blacks in poverty and self-destructive behavior.

      • vladdy1

        Narcissistic and histrionic are pretty obvious traits.

    • pcmustgo

      It’s interesting. I do see TONS MORE BLACK MALE HOMELESS “BUMS” , OBVIOUSLY SCHIZOPHRENIC HERE IN NYC… Like 100 of them for every white 1… I assumed whites just had more money to help their schizo relative out so he wouldn’t have to roam the streets…

    • Joseph

      It is true. The more perverse or outrageous each new “discovery”, the more “progressive” the discoveror -and “progressivism” is always a good thing. The second-tier hangers-on maintain their positions by defending the leaders of the cult against any contrary public opinion and indoctrinating the suckers paying tuition as initiates into the cult.

  • Dan Reardon

    Excellent video by Mr. Taylor! His use of the word ” swine” is a perfect description for these anti-White college professors.

    • Liberalsuck

      I don’t mind Jared talking harsh with them. These leftists and anti-white bigots are not nice people and they have never been fair with us, so give them a taste of their own medicine.

      • Lazlo

        Giving them a taste of their own medicine would require rape and murder.

      • Tucker

        You are correct. These leftists and anti-White bigots are consumed with hatred for Whites that is so deep, so expansive, so all encompassing that I often wonder how they can manage to function on a day to day basis in society.

        I was remembering the unbelievable torrent of venomous hatred that was exploding out of the mouths of the liberals on TV, back during the GOP Convention when the cameras panned through the convention center and there was that sea of white faces in the audience. That seemed to trigger some kind of bizarre, uncontrollable, vitriolic hysteria out of the liberals on TV and they dropped their masks and began to spew massive amounts of raw, unfiltered race hate at the GOP and its ‘White base’. Prior to 2012, I had never seen such an open, in our faces display of that sort – and I sensed that something had definitely changed in the minds of the Cultural Marxists who own and control our mainstream media. It seemed to me that the anti-White tirades were now being encouraged, whereas in the past, the media owners had a policy of keeping such outbursts toned down to a more subtle level.

        No doubt about it. I believe that the word has come down from the top – and there is now a bright green light which lifts the restrictions that might have once served to temper minority hate whitey outbursts.

        This is one of Jared’s best and most provocative videos. Good job, Jared.

        • Liberalusck

          The anti-white bigots played their hand too soon in the game. That has actually hurt them and exposed them more than they now. I think as time and time goes on most whites aren’t going to trust liberals or nonwhites more and more because of that.

      • Tom_in_Miami

        I often wonder if those virtuous college professors realize they would get the same treatment as we wicked whites if a black ever got the chance to beat or kill them. According to the professors, they deserve the wrath of the black man.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Gillilan/100002768506927 Tom Gillilan

          Form a new political party.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            A third party, a real party, is inevitable, but how long can we wait for the charismatic leader to emerge from the Tea Party and start unifying whites and minorities who believe in freedom and equal rights?

    • Joseph

      “…His use of the word ” swine” is a perfect description for these anti-White college professors.”

      Not at all; I really enjoy pork. Pork is a valuable commodity and Moslem repellent. On the other hand, there is nothing redeeming whatever in these intellectual terrorists cum educators.

    • Steven Bannister

      Sorry, I have to disagree. Frankly, I am very disappointed in Mr. Taylor’s use of the word “swine.”

      Jared Taylor is a hero of mine, a rare soul that has the courage to speak the truth in bold, unvarnished terms. However, one of the things that I always loved about Mr Taylor was his LACK of name calling and ad-hominem attacks. As he is often fond of saying “When you are reduced to name calling, that’s the most graceless way of losing the argument.”

      Yes, I can understand why he used the word. Perhaps he’s seen just one too many beautiful white women murdered senselessly and finally lost his patience. I don’t blame him one bit.

      But it still didn’t seem right when I heard him utter the word “swine.” It reminded me of what Middle Eastern tribes do – call their enemies “pigs” and “dogs.” Far be it from me to criticize a man who has done SO MUCH for this movement. But I do hope that he remakes that video – or simply continues to refrain from name-calling in the future.

      • Jersey Markenski

        I would normally think that him calling others names was evidence of some lack of self control. But think of the articles you’ve read and videos you’ve watched by Jared. Has he ever even shown the slightest sign of impatience,even when dealing with the types of immaturity he’s encountered on the Queen Latifah show or at the college seeking a white student organization this past summer?

        If he calls some of the most vile people,with the most vile intentions,a name,just one time,I think it is simply saying that he has had enough and he truly despises them. It’s not as if he just started ranting and swearing. It was one word with a direct recipient and it was meaningful as it was inspiring and provocative.

        I wouldn’t compare this to some trivial argument between some tribesmen that ends in a cacophonous burst of curses and I don’t think it’s enough to criticize. Wait until he’s made a habit until you find fault in his words. He’s a great teacher and we should really be taking lessons from this speech.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          And also, don’t you think Jared Taylor has emotions just like the rest of us? True, I wear my snark on my sleeve, except I tone it down around people whom I don’t know (because I’m often armed and I presume they are, too).

          But something occurred to me today, or rather, a clever but sadly tragic way of putting our dilemma and our situation: Art Bell and George Noory get five hours a night on public airwaves to talk about space aliens, but Jared Taylor is lucky to get one hour a year on public airwaves to talk about illegal aliens. People bet a total of $100 million on the COIN FLIP outcome of the Super Bowl, not the game itself, but the coin flip before the game, but none of the same people would give $100 to the New Century Foundation to help save their own race.

      • Daisy

        Murderer=swine, rapist=swine. He just used a synonym, and it wasn’t personal invective aka ‘namecalling’ it was a sheer statement of fact.

        • rightrightright

          It’s even biblical. Christ taught that you should not throw pearls before swine. Pretty apt.

          • Mark Reynolds

            Amen brother.Was Jesus “name calling”, or giving an accurate description of a good portion of the population?

        • guest

          Jared Taylor was being kind. The language that comes to mind when I think of liberal, anti-white professors and interracial crime is far worse than the innocuous insult, “swine”.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Gillilan/100002768506927 Tom Gillilan

        I prefer the word “pig”. More descriptive. “Swine” is more sophisticated, has more class.

      • Mark Reynolds

        “Name calling” ? that’s like calling someone a racist for stating that black males are responsible for half the homicides in the US. He’s simply stating fact. These professor’s are in fact degenerate human scum. I swear when I read these comments I’m convinced half of you must live in gated communities with a nanny and a butler in every home.According to FBI statistics, nearly 100 white women are raped daily by black males in this country.And your actually concerned that Mr. Taylor called these bottom dwellers “swine”? Wake up! It’s time to take the gloves off.

    • 48224

      These twisted killer blacks hear that they are victims of white opression from college professors, in church, from their parents and EVEN FROM THE VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN…..”they gonna put ya’ll back in chains”
      So heck, no wonder they believe it and it twists their minds into a knot and they rob rape and kill whites! It’s great living in this post-racial society…. isn’t it?

  • fakeemail

    Jared Taylor for interim-Dictator.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      I’d be fine with it. The more I know the man the more I like.

      • Hirschibold

        Beats the hell out of a third Obama term. And things are almost bad enough that I tend to take Alex Jones a little bit more seriously at this point.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          I’ve avoided that rabbit hole for a while now. I think he’s onto…something there…but hard to filter out the something from the “whaaa?”, ya know?

          Fairly convinced to this day that someone high up in the gubbamint knew something was gonna happen and let it happen as per PNAC (to give them their “Pearl Harbor” style blank check to enact the PNAC plan) in regard to 9/11.

          But what do I know?

          • vladdy1

            I swore for years that anyone who had doubts about 9/11 was crazy. But my, look at the happenings of the past 11 years. From “Islam-ROP” (when we might have found out differently ourselves sooner, if Bush hadn’t been there assuring us) to mosques and burkas all over to a president nobody knows whose middle name is Hussein. Hard to imagine this string of coincidences that changed America so much happening by accident. I’ve gone from “definitely not” to “who knows anything anymore.” Seems like the world turned upside down 9-11 and has not and will not return to what we knew — ever.

          • jack ryan

            vladdy1 writes:

            “I’ve gone from “definitely not” to “who knows anything anymore.”

            Jack replies:

            And that is the terrible consequence of falling down in to conspiracy theory paranoia. You end up just confused about everything. Somethings aren’t confusing, aren’t complicated from our side – things like Black crime, Black welfare mothers haven’t 8 bastard children, things like mass immigration of Central American Mestizos, Muslim throat cutters, rapists from Pakistan.

            What happened to Detroit? In 1950 Detroit was a prosperous city with the highest per capita income of any city in the world. Now it’s a third world hell whole. Are you confused about what happened to Detroit, think there is some super secret, sci fi conspiracy that has nothing to do with racial realities that took down the once safe, prosperous city of Detroit?

            We need to be much more like mainstream Japanese people, mainstream Swiss people, Japan and Switzerland are safe, prosperous, very racially homogeneous countries. Swiss and Japanese people don’t fall down in to paranoid, race denying conspiracy theory sci fi nonsense.

            If you or anyone you support is falling down in to conspiracy theory paranoia, get help, get out.

          • ATBOTL

            Great post. Conspiracy theory nonsense is one of the biggest things holding nationalism/racial back as a movement in America. As you note, it’s not a big phenomenon on the nationalist right in Europe, which is far more successful. Conspiracy theories take the focus off of the real issues and waste effort in political dead ends. Conspiracy crap has been a recurring problem on the right in America for generations.

            Stormfront has been overrun with conspiracy theory freaks over the last six years of so. These types seem to believe in racialism only as part of a general tendency to go against the official version of everything rather than for love for their own people or though logic. Many of these people appear mentally unwell. Way too many people on white nationalist internet sites want to wallow in despair or vent anger rather than find solutions.

            Our movement should have a zero tolerance policy for people with defeatist attitudes or who believe in crazy nonsense about 9/11, the Masons etc.

          • Orion_Blue

            One of the problems with being un-deceived on matters of race realism is that it can put you beyond the realm of what is acceptable. Once you can see clearly that the lies, distortions and omissions of the MSM are so readily apparent, it becomes much easier to mistrust everything we are told through the media, up to and including belief in insider jobs by powerfully-placed elements in the government in terror outrages.

            The bottom line is “if they are lying about the race issue, then what else are they lying about?”

          • gemjunior

            I always had doubts about what happened, who, etc. after the passport was found LOL! Gee how bout that! But I think this one is my favorite because it’s like a knock upside the head. Also, the story about pancaking and other fairytales are so utterly weak when compared with the reality of a demolition.

            http://youtu.be/MmbPh3u7_q0

        • Luca

          I would have voted for Charlie Sheen over Obama if they were the only two on the ballot.

        • Jerrybear

          I like Alex Jones but he can sometimes be his own worst enemy when he entertains too many conspiracies. Also, when he goes on rants about the the evil elite, he can go way over the top.

          • Katherine McChesney

            He’s clearly controlled opposition.

          • Jerrybear

            Perhaps but his overall message is good.

  • JohnEngelman

    All my life I have been told that I am more likely to be a victim of white criminals than black criminals. During my life I have been robbed at gunpoint once, mugged several times, and nearly murdered. I have friends and relatives who have been robbed at gunpoint, or their wallets were picked, or their purses were snatched. Every single time blacks did it.

    • pcmustgo

      What city did this occur in? The bad old days of NYC? Yes, of course all the muggers are black. Never heard of a white mugger. Occasionally white drug addicts rob homes.

    • pcmustgo

      They just blame mugging on poverty.

      • liberalsuck

        Liberals blame black crime on poverty, but they blame white mass shootings on “white privilege.”

        • JohnEngelman

          And guns.

    • Liberalsuck

      Who was this who told you that? Lying, self-hating, naive liberals?

      • Keep Honkin I’m Reloading

        Too many ADT commercials. :/

        • Mr Plankton

          I told the ADT Salesman that came to my area the other day that I’d never buy an ADT system because apparently, it only works on white burglars. He laughed and told me that he had noticed it as well.

    • Garrett Brown

      That’s because you’re a little coward.

      • JohnEngelman

        Hey, tough guy. In my neighborhood one needs courage to walk to the mail box.

        • Defoe

          Move. Why would a person remain in a dangerous situation? That defies logic.

          • Garrett Brown

            The self proclaimed Ashkenazi Jew has less common sense than a chimpanzee. must be on the low end of the totem pole.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am a Nordic Gentile and a Christian Zionist.

          • Garrett Brown

            Coward*

          • JohnEngelman

            Garrett Brown,

            I clicked on your avatar to see what you have been posting. Just as I expected there are no facts or insights, just irritable attitudes, and evidence of a poorly endowed mind.

          • Garrett Brown

            I just posted statistics yesterday. Now you’re a lying coward. Dig that hole deeper son.

          • JohnEngelman

            I checked your comments back two days. This is all I found that could possibly be called “statistics” and you did not document them: “3.8 children PER PERSON with an income of about four thousand per YEAR.(and that is supposedly doing well in countries like Rwanda)… It leaves me speechless.”

          • Garrett Brown

            Yes, that is a statistic. Thank you for proving me right:)

          • razorrare

            There is no such thing as a “Christian” Zionist…you and your tele-evangelist buddies are complete frauds and worship the big lie…truth is not in you.

            The term “Judeo-Christian” didn’t even come into existence until after the Second World War when Jews became supreme in their influence over major media.

            The truth is that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. That would be like saying Satanic-Christianity. The religion now called Judaism did not even come formally into existence until six hundred years after Jesus Christ. It began with the codification of the Babylonian Talmud. In Judaism, the Talmud is the supreme scripture, not the Old Testament. Only Satanism can rival Judaism’s vicious hatred for Jesus Christ. The Talmud even claims that Jesus Christ is being punished in hell by “being boiled in hot semen!”1

            Really,what kind of a christian would support the killings of other Christians and get giddy like a demon on l.s.d. when other Christians post get deleted because according to your rabbinic moderator the post are anti-semetic…You Jews Happy Now? har har har

          • razorrare

            There is no such thing as a “Christian” Zionist…you and your tele-evangelist buddies are complete frauds and worship the big lie…truth is not in you.

            The term “Judeo-Christian” didn’t even come into existence until after the Second World War when Jews became supreme in their influence over major media.

            The truth is that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. That would be like saying Satanic-Christianity. The religion now called Judaism did not even come formally into existence until six hundred years after Jesus Christ. It began with the codification of the Babylonian Talmud. In Judaism, the Talmud is the supreme scripture, not the Old Testament. Only Satanism can rival Judaism’s vicious hatred for Jesus Christ. The Talmud even claims that Jesus Christ is being punished in hell by “being boiled in hot semen!”1

            Really,what kind of a christian would support the killings of other Christians and get giddy like a demon on l.s.d. when other Christians post get deleted because according to your rabbinic moderator the post are anti-semetic…You Jews Happy Now? har har har

        • george00

          You were asked “What city did this occur in?”

          I live in Kansas City and was robbed by a black person, the next day at work I told who ever would listen what happened and to my surprise they then told me about when they were robbed and in every case the robber was black.

        • Garrett Brown

          If you had the intellect you claim to have, you would leave that neighborhood. Or you don’t have the income to do so because you spend too much time posting on here. I guarantee you’re a hypocrite in every aspect of the word in your every day life. Go get a job coward.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are making that claim. I did not. I try to be civil to other posters here, and to base my arguments on facts that that I document.

          • Garrett Brown

            So you aren’t intelligent? Self ownage at it’s best.

        • Nate Miller

          Which city/ town do you reside in John? I am a great admirer of your posts and love this site because of the diversity of conservative opinions. I find your posts interesting and informative. Please keep posting here. Take care!

          • JohnEngelman

            Thank you. On environmental and economic issues I am liberal, but I hate criminals and want them to suffer. I also believe that genes are considerably more important than any other factor in determining not only ability levels, but personality and character.

          • Garrett Brown

            You’re the immature child that thumbs downs every single response that disagrees with you. Grow up.

        • Juxtaposedhearts0

          Gotta be tough to get all these thumb downs rofl

    • ATBOTL

      Same here and I would add that I never reported a crime successfully. Every time, thepigs were so hostile and made it clear nothing would be done that I stopped trying. Most police are lazy gold brickers who couldn’t care less what happens to us as long as they get their absurdly high salaries, $75 an hour in overtime to watch real workers fix roads, ludicrous pensions etc.

      The vast majority of assaults, thefts, robberies and rapes that people I know were victims of were not reported. Almost %100 of the perps were black. I’m sure the reality of interracial crime is far worse than the FBI statistics account for.

  • JohnEngelman

    A professor who taught that Jewish financial swindling caused the Great Depression and the Great Recession would lose his position, and rightly so.

    Nevertheless, professors who teach that whites are responsible for black problems are honored.

    • David Ashton

      See Dr Harold Brackman, “Hatred in Hard Times” (Simon Wiesenthal Center, November 2008) p.23. (Internet accessible)
      An excellent background study by a professor is Jerry Z. Muller, “Capitalism and the Jews” (Princeton UP 2010).

      • JohnEngelman

        Jews are vulnerable during economic downturns because they tend to be prosperous. Many economically stressed white Gentiles who are reluctant to direct their anger at rich white Gentiles find it easy to hate rich Jews.

        • David Ashton

          I am interested to know why you think this so?

          • JohnEngelman

            Ethnocentricism and bigotry.

          • Luca

            So John, do Jews bear any guilt for any of their stereotypes, other than prosperous and intelligent? You know, like money grubbing, control of banking, media, movies, the concept that they work together to milk the Goyim, that they have no scruples, etc. etc. Is there another side to the coin or are they really innocent victims, as clean as the driven snow, who just happen by coincidence to attain these same stereotypes everywhere they go? Why is it the very same ethnocentrism and bigotry is not visited upon the Japanese diaspora or any of the other examples i could provide?

          • JohnEngelman

            If you are aware of any evidence that Jewish businessmen or financiers are less honest on the average than Gentile businessmen or financiers post it.

            In the United States and Europe Christian antisemitism has pretty well ceased to exist. Secular antisemitism amounts to the following complaint: the Jews are different from us and they perform better.

          • Luca

            The subject was stereotypes and the question was are they guilty of these stereotypes around the world..or is the world wrong? There are reasons for stereotypes, they are based in truth. I am not quoting a statistic I am using common sense.

          • JohnEngelman

            There are no legitimate reasons to hate Jews, only psychological reasons that are due to shortcomings of the haters.

          • Luca

            Changing the subject for the third time and stating your personal opinion only convinces me that your points of view are only steeped in “realism” when it comes to the blacks who victimized you. The Jews have acquired these stereotypes the world over and throughout history. This is not my opinion, it is recorded. These days they play a heavy hand in enabling the very blacks you are “realistic” about. All those tear-jerker propaganda movies, portraying blacks as the eternal victims of racism are made by your buddies in Hollywood. And I’m not talking about the Asians.

          • JohnEngelman

            Christian antisemitism was due to religious intolerance. Fortunately it is fading.

            Secular antisemitism is due to the resentment failures feel for Jewish prominence in any field that requires superior intelligence.

          • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

            There are Jewish authors that disagree with you. They have written books on the subject.

          • JohnEngelman

            What did they say? Cite the book, the author, the quote, and the page number.

          • David Ashton

            At the risk of being accused of “antisemitism”, may I intervene again by saying that some Jews have expressed negative views of some activities by other Jews, rightly or wrongly, and then have often been accused of “self-hatred”. For a balanced rather than chauvinistic, “lachrymose” or merely apologetic view of Jewish history, you could read Bernard Lazare, Norman Cantor, Albert Landemann, Avi Schlaim or Chaim Bermant (among others); I do not intend to do your work for you by putting long quotes and page references on this site and thereby making readers heartily sick of the subject and your tediously declared, blind “love” of all Jews (and Chinese). Nor do I necessarily endorse every view of Jews by their Jewish critics; for example, I do not support Gilad Atzmon, not because he is a “racist” but because he is an “anti-racist”. The same might apply to the criticism of Jews that one finds in scripture from their own prophets – as they say, two Jews three opinions.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have never said that no Jews are criminals. Nor have I said that no Orientals are. I do know, having read Professor J. Philippe Rushton’s “RACE, EVOLUTION, AND BEHAVIOR,”

            http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

            and Jared Taylor’s “The Color of Crime,”

            http://www.colorofcrime.com/

            that Orientals have lower crime rates than whites. I have not found documentation on the subject, but I am reasonably confident that Jews have lower crime rates than white Gentiles.

          • David Ashton

            Not primarily a matter of intelligence or criminality but ethnic identification by self and other. The Jews are an ethnic group (perhaps more precisely a combination of four closely similar and related groups [see Richard Lynn, "The Chosen People" (Whitefish, MT 2011) ch.2]). So people see them and they see themselves as culturally different from other peoples, and this has caused some culture clash in different places and at different times (including the Middle East today). If Jews were no different from anyone else except in their average intelligence, we would not know who were Jews or who were not. You yourself note an ethnic difference when you suggest that Jews (not others) are entitled to own and occupy the land between the Mediterranean and the Euphrates.
            Perhaps we could leave it there?

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews have a better claim to Israel than whites have to the Untied States.

          • Daisy

            After leaving israel to suck off of the european masses they return to genocide the palestinians. The vast majority of whites in the US worked their own land, John, unlike the majority of jews whilst in Europe and unlike the jews in Israel who suck off the europeans in the US. If asking why the jews refuse to carry themselves makes me some kind of racist then perhaps I am. But there is no such thing as antisemitism. Resentment of jewish exploitativeness wasn’t a pathology in europeans; entitlement was the problem in the jews. On occasion there occurred a two-way street, but remember that jews started calling european blonde women ‘abomination’ well before the Czars called them that back. Source: ‘Shiksa’ by Christine Benvenuto.

          • David Ashton

            So you agree, therefore, that “Jews” are ethnically different?
            It is not just a matter of being a collection of clever individuals.

            For a particular group to make a claim to a territory to the exclusion of other groups it must have some cultural or historical character different from that of others. The “Jewish” claim to “Israel” therefore must depend on an ethnic self-identification, which has nothing to do with IQ or moral behavior, whether this claim is justifiable or not.

            Given that Jews are ethnically different from other groups, there is a prima facie possiblity that friction might arise between their ethnic behavior and that of others. It need not be due solely to envy of intelligence or legitimate achievements. What is called “antisemitism” has not been ended by the creation of the state of Israel, but seems now to have spread to other groups in its geographical area.

            Now for the quite different point you make that White people have a weaker claim to live in and control the USA than Jewish people have to the land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan (or Euphrates), perhaps you could expand on your criteria for occupation, including the dates.

          • JohnEngelman

            Genesis 12:1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee.

            Genesis 12:7 And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him.

            Genesis 13:14, 15 And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him. For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever.

          • David Ashton

            These quotes answer your own question as to what distinguishes Jews from other people other than higher average intelligence.
            Not all scripture scholars see in these ancient statements any justification for the Zionist occupation of Palestine from 1947-8 – not even those who take the Old Testament as literally true and divinely inspired; e.g. Stephen Sizer, “Zion’s Christian Soldiers” (Nottingham IVP, 2010). Many Christians have taken the view that Jewish possession of Israel depended on fidelity to the Lord’s commandments, and this ended with their rejection of the Messiah and the subsequent destruction of the Temple.
            Personally I don’t believe any of these stories about God actually “appearing” to Abram any more than I believe that God walked in the Garden of Eden or told Noah to build an Ark; and it is worth mentioning that many Jews inside and outside Israel do not believe these ancient tales either.
            I do think the west should prevent the Israeli people from being killed by Arabs, but there is much more to the problems of the area.

          • Defoe

            Those statements were written by the same people who make the claim to the land. The Cherokee claim that they are the chosen of the great spirit. What utter nonsense. I think I’ll write a book and claim that god has given me Mars.

          • Joseph

            The culture of a nation is more than the average IQ or the violent crime rate. If there were a nation comprised solely of Mexican geniuses who taught Sunday-School I still would not want to live there. They are not my people and my descendants and theirs would never be alike. I have worked at length with Mexicans, Chinese, Indians, Thai, Lebanese, once an Ethiopian and my former boss for years was an American Jew. I can work with these people and even respect their cultures but I do not want to live among any significant number of them nor have them making laws for me -no matter how smart or moral they may be. They are not the people who designed and built this nation and they are not like me nor my ancestors.

            As Israeli mouthpieces have said as long as I can remember: “We have a right to exist”.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews have been prominent in the United States throughout American history. More than six million of them live in North America. That is more than in any other part of the world.

            http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape-jew.aspx

            I would not want it any other way.

          • David Ashton

            You are not alone in this view, and most of Engelman’s responses evade this essential issue, as he keeps repeating himself like one of those old speak-your-weight machines on English piers.

          • David Ashton

            PS – Professor MacDonald’s notes on the contribution of Jews to non-white immigration need also to be considered.

          • David Ashton

            The more intelligent people are the more they can do – creatively or criminally.

          • Daisy

            John can you ever address how many jews cheated off of me, not to mention orchestrated physical violence (and even acted out some directly). Why were they doing this if they were so smart? Was it because, gasp!, they just weren’t? Could it be that the jews couldn’t compete with an abomination white female whose IQ was in the 140’s while theirs couldn’t make it above 130?

          • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

            So now Ford was a failure?

          • JohnEngelman

            Not in his field, but he was astonishingly ignorant outside of it. Once at a trial he revealed that he thought the American Revolution happened in the 1820s.

            I keep asking for documented evidence that Jews on the average are less moral than white Gentiles. I keep getting no answers.

            The important difference between Ashkenazi Jews and white Gentiles is that the Ashkenazim have much higher average intelligence. That is why antisemites hate them.

          • SpiderMan

            Uh, I gave you a great answer. Or series of answers. The mods here deleted it.

            Here’s a hint: Madoff, Goldman Sachs, Blankfein, Soros.

            You cannot offer criticism of Jewish criminality on Amren. It is like trying to criticize MLK at huffpo, not going to happen.

          • razorrare

            Yes,thats what they do…they delete well written responses concerning the jewish question of power & influence…its well documented in the Talmud how morally decadent jews are compared to Gentiles…jewish criminality…think finance,media,politics,academia…modern sex slavery(often children) is a jewish racket as is child pornography and nearly any other kind of criminal vice you can think of.

          • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

            every post you make amounts to the same thing, over and over and over, it is basically ” I want to vote the Jew off the island”

          • SpiderMan

            Like most of what you say, this does not bear up under scrutiny.

            Jews have experienced “anti-Semitism” in many countries other than those run by Whites. It is not because of any superior jewish intellect, which is a myth, but it is often because jews frequently undermine and attack the foundations of non-jewish societies.

            For example, Japanese or Chinese communities are not, and never have been, under threat from their White neighbors because of their higher average IQ. This is because these Far Easterners do not teach their children that their hosts are evil or subhuman, both of which many jews are taught from birth.

            You keep asking for evidence, yet somehow never produce any yourself. So why not produce examples of Whites attacking jews because they think the jews are smarter?

          • JohnEngelman

            “While thus examining the working of the Jewish race over along periods of history, the anxious question suddenly occurred to me whether perhaps inscrutable Destiny, for reasons unknown to us poor mortals, had not unalterably decreed the final victory of this littler race?”

            – Adolf Hitler, from Mein Kampf,” Volume I, Chapter II, “Years of Study and Suffering”

            “Also, the intellectual abilities were schooled in the course of centuries. Today the Jew is looked upon as clever, and in a certain sense he has been so at all times.”

            – Adolf Hitler, from “Mein Kampf,” Volume I, Chapter XI, “Nation and Race”

            In “Mein Kampf” Adolf Hitler makes it clear that he did not begin to hate the Jews until failing in his efforts to become an artist and an architect. Living in Vienna as he did at the time he saw plenty of Jews who had succeeded in both endeavors. Secular antisemitism is the politics of envy.

          • Nate Miller

            Enough of the Jew hatred. I’m a white Christian conservative gentile from a Red State – Indiana and I support Israel and the Jewish people. Based on documented evidence, the Jews are not only the smartest people on the planet but their contribution to science, technology, music, arts, medicine, religion/ theology and finance is priceless. Jews are an asset to any civilization, be it Austria-Hungary/ Prussia, Spain or even Persia. Despite period of progroms, persecution and forced deportation from some foreign lands, the rulers of those lands also had the good sense to invite such a talented ad intelligent race back to improve their economy.

            Dislike or opposition to Jews/ Israel is a clear sign of envy and deep seated inferiority of their detractors. Whenever I see a bunch of low IQ muslims, blacks (Nation of Islam types) or white Neo Nazi retards attacking Jews, I see epic losers!

          • JohnEngelman

            Nate,

            Antisemitism is the politics of envy.

            A book I recommend to you is “The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution.” I learned about it here:

            http://www.amren.com/ar/2009/05/index.html#article1

            A chapter in the book is entitled “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews Got Their Smarts.” The argument is that for over a thousand years Jews in most of Europe faced religious discrimination. They were excluded from most trades and from owning land. Consequently they lived by commerce and money lending. These professions require superior intelligence, so Jews who could not learn the necessary skills left the faith, or did not have children.

            Unfortunately, money lending did not win friends for the Jews, and perpetuated prejudice against them. People do not like to have to borrow money. They do not like to have to pay it back. Nevertheless, it is interesting that discrimination made Jews more intelligent. Many liberals blame discrimination for making blacks less intelligent.

            A comparable selection process was happening in China. Brilliant young men who could pass the imperial exams entered the Scholar Gentry. They were expected to have several wives, and many children. Because they were well paid most of their children survived and reproduced. It did not matter if they came from humble origins. What mattered was passing the exams.

            While this was happening, intelligent peasant boys in Europe entered the Roman Catholic priesthood and were forbidden to have any children at all.

            For American Indians and Negroes in Africa fighting ability mattered more than intelligence. Hispanics are a hybrid race composed of whites, American Indians, and a few blacks.

            These factors explain why Ashkenazi Jews tend to be more intelligent than Chinese, who tend to be more intelligent than white Gentiles, who tend to be more intelligent than Hispanics, who tend to be more intelligent than blacks.

            What happened to the Ashkenazi Jews is now happening to the entire human species. Computer technology enables a small number of geniuses to amass vast fortunes. It enables individuals of superior intelligence to make good incomes. It reduces the economic value of jobs most people are able to learn.

            I cannot claim to be benefiting from the process, but I recognize that it is happening.

          • Daisy

            Semiticism is the politics of envy.

          • Defoe

            “Antisemitism is the politics of envy. “,

            Ok, Mr. “I document everything I post”, document that statement.

          • JohnEngelman

            It is a truism. Just look at all the demented scum who hate Jews.

          • Defoe

            “It is a truism.” So, when you post an unfounded assertion, it is a truism, but when others post an un-documented assertion, it is…well, not a truism? How convenient for you.

            As to “demented scum”, I don’t know any. I also don’t know any people who “hate Jews”. I certainly don’t hate Jews. Your vitriol sounds like you “hate” some people. Don’t hate; it diminishes a person.

          • David Ashton

            Especially superior in theoretical science, mathematics and medicine. Otherwise nothing specially creative. Finance – depends on one’s view of usury and usury to the n-th degree. In philosophy and theology rather poor, except for destructive analysis (e.g. Ayer); Spinoza ejected from the synagogue. Marx more harm than good. Freud an interesting cultural commentator, but psycho-analysis largely a fake. In poetry nothing to match the ancient Hebrew achievement. Modern novels verbally sparkling but too often self/race-obsessed (like black fiction); e.g. Roth, Jacobson, Wesker. Entertainment promotion very successful, but often with a moral downside on the products.

          • David Ashton

            I am not going to check my copy of “Mein Kampf” but I seem to remember that he says he found that in discussion with Jewish leftists just kept repeating themselves verbatim after he had refuted their arguments, and gradually came to hate them. There is a Nordic Gentile Christian Zionist of our acquaintance who is liable to evoke a similar response.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have read my copy of Mein Kampf twice, and frequently reread portions of it. I do not remember reading any recollections by Adolf Hitler of any discussions he had with Jewish leftists.

            The Nordic Gentile Christian Zionist of your acquaintance who has his arguments refuted should read my comments on American Renaissance in order to improve his debating techniques. If he does he will learn of the importance of documenting his factual assertions, and reasoning logically from them. As he reads responses to my comments he will come to understand how personal insults reduce the credibility of the insulter.

            Please recommend to him this website:

            http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

            It has a list of logical fallacies, as well as an explanation of deductive and inductive reasoning.

          • David Ashton

            Hitler’s remarks appear between two of your own previous quotes.

            See MK, Vol.I, ch.2, “The sojourn in Vienna…I talked to them till my throat ached….[they] bolted away to another field of discussion…The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened….I gradually came to hate them.”
            YOU are the incorrigible Nordic Gentile Christian Zionist, of course, that reminded me of this passage.

          • JohnEngelman

            I just found that passage in my edition of Mein Kampf. It would be interesting to find a transcript of Hitler’s debate with Jews. I doubt very seriously that he was as triumphant as he claims to have been in Mein Kampf.

            It is easier for you to claim that you have bested me in debates than it is for you to explain where and how it happened. When explaining why I admire Jews and Orientals I have an easy time quoting articles I found on this website.

          • David Ashton

            I leave others to decide between us on the facts.

          • JohnEngelman

            Hitler’s personal experience with the Jews was failing as an artist and an architect in Vienna and seeing many Viennese Jews who were successful in those fields. Antisemitism is the right wing form of the politics of envy.

            Those who disagree with me about the high average IQs of Orientals and Ashkenazi Jews and their insignificant amounts of social pathology disagree with Jared Taylor, J. Philippe Rushton and others whom I have read on this website.

          • David Ashton

            I do not defend hatred of any people who cannot help their ethnic origins, but I can criticize activities that might have been more peculiar to a particular ethnic group or a section of it than others; for example, “white slavery”. You can do your own research into this, so we shall not upset Jared and the Moderators. Then if we turn to (say) achievements in physics or violin playing we can find a more positive return. That’s life.

          • JohnEngelman

            Are you claiming that Jews are heavily involved in prostitution? Where is your documentation? I do not have documentation myself, but I am confident that the Mafia – largely composed of Italian Americans – has had more to do with the sex industry than any Jews.

            I have always disliked the sexual revolution. Hugh Hefner and Helen Gurley Brown did far more to promote that than any Jew.

          • David Ashton

            Prewar prostitution greatly concerned Jewish apologists. See e.g. Edward J. Bristow, “Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight against White Slavery, 1870-1939″ (NY 1983).
            The involvement of Jews in the modern porn industry has been far from negligible (for example, the Golds in Britain), though the explanation is more likely an eye for profit than a conspiracy to corrupt Christendom. Accurate documentation on this and current “Russian” mafia involvement in the sex traffic is available on several “antisemitic” websites, which you can consult yourself. I would rather not reproduce any of this matter here, because (1) it is unpleasant stuff, and (2) I have already expended precious time on a race-realist booklist.

          • Defoe

            Achievements is physics? For example, Poincare?

          • David Ashton

            Modern physics; see Lynn’s “Chosen People”. But “Aryans” have had and still have colossal achievements to their credit, especially as pioneers in experimental science, technology and invention; see Murray’s “Human Accomplishment” etc. A hugely complex subject, not easily discussed in these website snippets.

          • Defoe

            I’ve read HUMAN ACCOMPLISHMENT. Poincare, a Frenchman, preceded Einstein in much of the theory of relativity. In fact, Einstein gave NO credit to Poincare in his seminal paper. Today that would be labeled fraud.

          • David Ashton

            His Croatian wife helped too.
            See my comment above on Engleman’s Hitler reference.

          • http://www.facebook.com/lila.dennis.7 Lila Dennis

            Ever notice how how blacks blame whites for their problems -that somehow whites control everything and there is some evil cabal of whites intent on the destruction or enslavement of the black race? And in many extreme circles the solution is the annihilation of the offending class? Ever notice that many whites feel the same towards jews? Apparently, one of the drawbacks of having a higher IQ is that gifted “tribe” gets blamed for the shortcomings of others and that the world would be better off without them?

          • JohnEngelman

            Yes, Lila. I have noticed.

          • Daisy

            Apparently, one of the drawbacks of having a higher IQ is that the more gifted “tribe” gets blamed for the shortcomings of others and that the world would be better off without them?

            Lila, I have so noticed this! The northwestern european people’s higher IQ’d, not to mention aesthetically-favored, members always get blamed for the failures of jews. Upon reflection, make that scapegoat my whole tribe!

          • Daisy

            No, jewish women hate white women because white women don’t bear the physical unattractiveness that inbreeding causes; jewish men hate white women because white women prefer white men. Stats for jewish askhenazi inbreeding: go look it up or stop by any fertility clinic servicing so much as 10% jews where part of pre-treatment involves an entire panel of genetic testing for ashkenazi jews. Also check the stats for all the problems, ie higher rates of cancer, etc., that jewish ashkenazi inbreeding caused in their population. Israel is the only country I know of that has to have people tested for inbred diseases before they marry.

            That is not jealousy on the part of ‘gentiles.’ Neither is the parade of jewish females getting nose jobs to try to look like my ethnicity, or dying their hair blonde, or getting colored contact lenses to make their eyes look blue or green. Nose jobs, John, ranked anywhere from #1-#3 most commonly performed procedures in the last 30 years and the majority were not anglos trying to look semitic.

          • Nate Miller

            Are you insane? Jewish women are hot, more intelligent, well off & wittier as compared to gentile women! And I say this as a white red blooded gentile who has dated Jewish girls in the past. I’m now happily married to my white conservative mid western American wife of German ancestry. Would you call Jews like Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johannson, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Bar Rafeli, Esti Ginzburg, Patricia Arquette, Goldie Hawn ( when she was young) & Elizabeth Taylor unattractive?

            Also, Israel has some of the most beautiful women I’ve ever seen. Tel Aviv was voted in the top 10 cities for having the most beautiful women in the world.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBU2hZ2JhbY

          • Daisy

            Natalie got a nose job to look more european sadly. Scarlett is only half jewish, or even less so DNA-wise I suspect. Same for Goldie. Taylor converted. I wish the white guys I grew up with agreed with you, b/c then all the homely jewish girls I grew up with would have only been jealous that I was smarter. I wish jewish guys agreed with you too, for that matter.

          • Daisy

            Oh and add to that black guys, hispanic guys, even italian guys who sometimes claim to hate red hair but couldn’t keep their hands off my celtic germanic redheaded self, etc. I truly wish white women weren’t so desirable to what seems like the majority of men, I sincerely do. If jewish women could compete, I would have been much happier growing up around them. Hanging out in extra-curricular worlds outside of my hometown, I was around some beautiful white girls and they handled competition way more gracefully, but why wouldn’t they have?

          • Nate Miller

            I think beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. I personally think dark complexioned Mediterannean women from Italy, Spain, Portugal, Israel, Lebanon, Tunisia, Greece and Armenia are some of the most beautiful women in the world outscoring both blondes and red heads. Also, if what you state is true, than explain why quite a few white & Jewish men including very wealthy, famous and good looking ones prefer Asian women ( “Asian Trophy wives”) over white women.

            If you think a few ordinary white and some ordinary non white men fondling your red/ blonde hair makes you attractive than what can be said about extraordinarily wealthy, powerful, famous and good looking white & Jewish men dating/ marrying Asian women? Even Jared Taylor had a Japanese lover when he was younger.

            Some examples of white men-Asian women relationships include but are not limited to: Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook founder/ owner), Nicholas Cage, Rupert Murdoch (Media Mogul & owner of Fox News/ 20th century Fox etc), Jean Todt ( CEO of Ferrari Auto), George Soros ( Powerful Businessman & the “King maker” in American politics), British glam actor Hugh Grant, etc

            http://www.lovelovechina.com/celebrities/chinese-women-western-men-celebrity-couples/

          • David Ashton

            Don’t forget Golda Meir, Betty Friedan and Barbara Streisand, top of the Global Hot Parade.

          • Defoe

            “Jewish women are hot, more intelligent, well off & wittier as compared to gentile women! ”

            Simply your opinion. There” ain’t no accountin for taste”.

          • Defoe

            “Once at a trial he revealed that he thought the American Revolution happened in the 1820s. ”

            Kinda like Oblabla and his “57” states?? What a ridiculous statement.

          • JohnEngelman

            I think the number of states and territories the U.S. has is 57. That was a slip of the tongue. The mistakes are not comparable.

          • Defoe

            “The mistakes are not comparable.”

            So say you. Oh, I forgot, Oblabla can do no wrong since he is the “Messiah” of people such as yourself.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have never heard any Obama supporter call him the Messiah. Quite honestly I am disappointed in President Obama. I wanted the Second Coming of Franklin Roosevelt.

          • David Ashton

            It would just be too cruel to comment on your grief at this time.

          • Garrett Brown

            Stop getting your gf to thumbs down with you every time a post disagrees with you. A bit immature son.

          • Defoe

            Martin Luther says you’re wrong. Read Shakespeare’s THE MERCHANT OF VENICE. Explain why Isabelle and Ferdinand threw them out of Spain. It goes on and on.

          • JohnEngelman

            I say Martin Luther was wrong.

            So was Shakespeare.

            So were Isabelle and Ferdinand.

          • Defoe

            You say?

          • David Ashton

            So was the author of the Fourth Gospel, Tacitus, Voltaire, Marx, Disraeli, Weininger, T.S.Eliot, etc., etc.
            And etc.

          • JohnEngelman

            Like the other gospel writers St. John portrays Jesus as a Jew in a Jewish setting.

            As far as the others are concerned, do you agree with them about the Jews? Would you please explain in your own words what is wrong with that splendid, gifted race? .

          • Defoe

            Also, Hilaire Belloc. Mr. Engelman needs to read some history.

          • David Ashton

            Belloc’s “The Jews” [2nd edition, 1937] overstates the Jewish aspect of communism, but there is much contempory pre-WW2 sense in this book which is denounced as “antisemitic” by people who have not read it. In these matters misstatements of fact are repeated by people who neglect primary research, comparable to Chinese Whispers (sorry about the adjective here, JE).

          • Katherine McChesney

            England tossed them out also.

          • Nate Miller

            And Zimbabwae tossed out most white English expats and workers, and our point is?

            Btw, since when did the Bard of Avon ( William Shakesphere) become God. The man may have been a great author but he was still a victim of his times and prejudices. Anti-semitism was and still is ripe all over Europe. Like any mere mortal Shakesphere succumbed to his environment. Ditto for Martin Luther and some others.

          • Defoe

            The Bard of Avon is an example of a playwright “reflecting the tiimes”. Get a grip.

          • Joseph

            No, we resent them because they insinuate themselves into a nation, culture and system of law built by white gentiles and then do their utmost in their positions of “success and prosperity” to morph the culture into a socialist empire rife with foreign criminals while carefully segregating themselves from the filth they promote.

          • JohnEngelman

            Joseph,

            Your comment reveals more about you than Jews. You have not and cannot document any of your assertions.

            Jews have contributed to the United States from the beginning. This is what George Washington wrote to a Jewish congregation: “the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.

            It would be inconsistent with the frankness of my character not to avow that I am pleased with your favorable opinion of my administration and fervent wishes for my felicity.

            May the children of the stock of Abraham who dwell in this land continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other inhabitants–while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid.

            May the father of all mercies scatter light, and not darkness, upon our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in His own due time and way everlastingly happy.

            G. Washington
            http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=21

          • David Ashton

            He “CANNOT” document “any” assertions? Take a leaf from the book of the Jewish philosopher Karl Popper and keep your own mind open – to the possibility that you might be the bigot when it comes to “the stock of Abraham”. There is good and bad in all peoples, as the Bible alone makes clear, and the good and bad also can have their ethnic aspect. I would not expect criminality among Blacks, Jews or Chinese do take absolutely identical forms, on occur on a comparable scale. Having said that I agree that Jews have had very bad experiences from persecution, though I do not attribute it all solely to envy of their abilities. (Nor do their own historians.)

          • JohnEngelman

            Until about 1800 Jewish persecution in Europe and the United States was due to religious intolerance. It still is in the Muslim world. Since then in the West it has gradually segued into a right wing variant of the politics of envy. Fortunately antisemitism has not prevented Jews from distinguishing themselves in every field requiring superior intelligence.

            In Mein Kampf, “Hitler’s Table Talk, “The Diary of Joseph Goebbels,” and on Stormfront I have never read rational reasons for hating Jews, or even for regretting their influence. I have only been exposed to revelations of demented minds.

          • David Ashton

            There is no need to “hate” Jews or anyone else. Hitler’s books are hardly the only or best source of rational criticisms of Jewish activities!! I have been unable to access Stormfront on through my previous providers/servers or my censored county library computer, and have had no particular wish to do so after getting through a few times out of recent curiosity. David Duke and David Irving are also locally censored, though a few recent inquiries there (e.g. the pornography issue) did turn up a few relevant important points. However, I prefer a more detached sociological analysis of Jewish-Gentile interactions, from classical antiquity to present times, and have learnt much from Jewish historians, including Roth, Poliakov, Lindemann, Katz, Muller, Cantor, Wistrich, etc, etc.
            But I have other interests in what remains of my life.

          • Defoe

            “Antisemites are failures who resent the Jews because of their success and prosperity.”

            So, Henry Ford was a failure, Kevin MacDonald, Disraeli, Martin Luther, Belloc, were all failures??

          • JohnEngelman

            They were exceptions. They were also unsavory human beings because of their antisemitism.

          • Defoe

            Are those who “hate” Christians unsavory? Are those who spit when they say the name “Christ” unsavory? Are you unsavory because you dislike low IQ people? Who decides which people are “unsavory”?

          • David Ashton

            I sometimes wonder what you mean by “antisemitism”. Are all Jews immune from criticism? The Old Testament prophets didn’t think so.

          • JohnEngelman

            No one is immune from criticism. The Jews deserve more praise than criticism.

          • HamletsGhost

            If they perform better, then explain why Israel is such a mess and will likely not survive the next 20 years, despite all that wonderful Jewish genius.

          • JohnEngelman

            By what criteria is Israel a mess? Israel is the only stable democracy in the Mid East.

            This is what “The CIA World Factbook” has to say about Israel: “Israel has a technologically advanced market economy. Its major imports include crude oil, grains, raw materials, and military equipment. Cut diamonds, high-technology equipment, and pharmaceuticals are among the leading exports. Israel usually posts sizable trade deficits, which are covered by tourism and other service exports, as well as significant foreign investment inflows.

            “The global financial crisis of 2008-09 spurred a brief recession in Israel, but the country entered the crisis with solid fundamentals – following years of prudent fiscal policy and a resilient banking sector. The economy has recovered better than most advanced, comparably sized economies. In 2010, Israel formally acceded to the OECD.

            “Israel’s economy also has weathered the Arab Spring because strong trade ties outside the Middle East have insulated the economy from spillover effects. Natural gas fields discovered off Israel’s coast during the past two years have brightened Israel’s energy security outlook. The Leviathan field was one of the world’s largest offshore natural gas finds this past decade, and production from the Tama field is expected to meet all of Israel’s natural gas demand beginning mid-2013.”
            https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html

          • HamletsGhost

            Israel is a foreign aide parasite that schlooks up over $3 billion in U.S. taxpayers dollars, yet life there is increasingly unlivable. Ask any Israeli traveling outside that country how hard it is to make a living there, and get an earful.

            The economy is in the hands of criminal gangsters, and the body politic is increasingly in thrall to the ultra-Orthodox fanatics who ruthlessly haggle for more state subsidies while refusing to work or serve in the army. As their numbers grow, so too do their demands on the state.

            If you ever go to Israel, (as I have) you’d see up close and personal how unworkable a Jewish state is. It is just like the Soviet Union, another unworkable scheme that finally collapsed upon its own internal contradictions.

          • JohnEngelman

            If it is hard to make a living in Israel why is the unemployment rate lower than it is in the United States?

            https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2129rank.html?countryName=Israel&countryCode=is&regionCode=mde&rank=65#is

            Why is the per capita gross domestic product higher than in oil rich countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Libya?

            https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html?countryName=Israel&countryCode=is&regionCode=mde&rank=41#is

          • HamletsGhost

            You’re your usual confused self. Employment is not inconsistent with unlivablility. You can have a job that doesn’t pay enough. Ever heard of a living wage? Well, most Israelis don’t have one.

            As for per capita GDP, see my earlier remark about foreign aid parasitism.

            You’d do well to put down your CIA fact book and go out there and see the truth for yourself. Of course that would cut down on your thread commenting, so I guess that’s out of the question.

          • JohnEngelman

            Fortunately, in the United States support for Israel is not a political issue. the only political issue is how best can we support Israel. As long as most Americans agree with me Israel will get its three billion dollars a year.

          • Joseph

            No, as long as Israel’s functionaries in the US gummint agree they will continue to get handouts. It matters not to what the public agrees.

            Of course, the neocon contingent making money from arms manufacturing and bankrolling the program will sign on as will the naive Christian peanut-gallery supporters of “the chosen people”.

          • Defoe

            Let’s not forget the “reparations” it gets from Germany to this very day.

          • Defoe

            @HamletsGhost:disqus : I’ve lived there too, and you’re spot on.

          • Beppo

            Secular antijaphetism amounts to the following complaint: they aren’t Jewish and are therefore evil.

            Ever heard of Goldman Sachs and the recent mortgage meltdown? Lloyd Blankfein? Bernie Madoff, the Jewish thief who the Jewish community turned on, only because he began ripping off fellow Jews?

            Can you produce a White who has stolen as much?

            “Antisemitism” is a problematic term, mostly because:

            1) The overwhelming majority of “Jews” today are a genetic pot-pourri of people with very little, real Semitic DNA.

            2) Several groups of people today exercise claims to Jewishness that would, by necessity, override the Jewishness of other groups (“Beta Israel” vs Yemini Jews vs Kaifeng “Jews”).

            3) Jews have been at war with and hated the Arabs since they existed, meaning there is no point in time where Jews themselves have not been antisemitic.

            4) The Jewish religion encourages antijaphetism and a general hatred toward non-Jews.

            It is unfair and unjust for a group with high levels of insular practices to condemn other groups for having the same practices. Yet, this is what organized Jewry does the world over.

            Before Jews complain about antisemitism, they should check their own antijaphetism and antigentilism.

          • JohnEngelman

            “If we look at alles that are clearly from the Middle East, we see that they account for a substantial fraction of Ashkenazi Ancestry today: at least 50 percent, according to our analysis.”

            – Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending from “The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution,” Chapter 7, “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews Got Their Smarts,” page 219.
            http://www.amren.com/ar/2009/05/index.html

          • Defoe

            I think you mean alleles.

          • Joseph

            You forgot Meyer Lansky and Moses Annenberg from the good ol’ days.

          • Defoe

            “In the United States and Europe Christian antisemitism has pretty well ceased to exist.”

            Is that because in much of Europe, for example, speaking against ANY “ethnic” group could easily get one incarcerated?

          • JohnEngelman

            I cannot speak for Europe. In the United States the only antisemites I have known were atheists, or at least non church goers. They were also human garbage.

            I have followed the religious right since 1980 with interest and a certain amount of sympathy since 1980. I have never heard a right wing televangelist express hostility for the Jews. Once Jerry Falwell called them “God’s people.”

          • Joseph

            “God is able of these stones to raise up sons unto Abraham”.

            -John the baptizer

          • Defoe

            “I have never heard a right wing televangelist express hostility for the Jews. Once Jerry Falwell called them “God’s people.” That is my opinion of them too.”

            The ignorant you shall have with you always.

          • JohnEngelman

            Ignorant and stupid people hate Jews. They resent Jews because so many Jews are successful, prosperous, and obviously superior.

            Hatred of Jews is a right wing variant of the politics of envy.

          • Defoe

            I’ve noted no “hatred” of jews on this site. I certainly don’t hate them. I don’t worship them either or any other peoples. Pointing out historical fact does not constitute hatred. Also, I don’t envy anyone. I am successful in my own right and have no need to deprecate any one or any people. Nor do I have the need to hold any people in awe as some do.

          • David Ashton

            The EU has a “monitoring unit” to hunt out “racists” and (!) “anti-Semites”. A leading figure was Eldred Tabachnik, a patron of fellow-lawyer and “premier designate” Tony Blair, and of the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

          • Defoe

            How is it that the country which penned the Magna Carta is now spying on its own people?? Is it no longer the same country? Or governed by the same people? Who runs fair England?

          • David Ashton

            I have just seen this important question at 2.15 AM GMT February 11) and must postpone an attempt to answer it another time.

          • Robert Marchenoir

            Not exactly. Anti-semitism is rife in France among the Christian far-right. It’s quite hidden, because it’s the third rail of politics (and can land you in court). But if you scratch under the surface, you’ll find it’s surprisingly active.

          • Joseph

            If Jews were given the same reaming over the Talmud that the Moslems are over the Quran by Christians, they would not have nearly the traction that they do. Read from the damned thing sometime. Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg, on the “court that looks like America” says that the “…Talmud is her daily guide to life.” or something to that effect. The propaganda machinery in the press and education ensures that the message of “our friends Israel” and rampant “anti-Semitism” echo without decay throughout every aspect of American life. No one anywhere has ever suffered as a Jew suffers. Another enlightening read is “The Holocaust Industry” by Finkelstein. These people as a collective, hate American Christian culture as surely as blacks hate whites BUT they DO have the intelligence and forbearance to implement their own sort of social destruction in ways much more insidiously and therefore malignantly than the most violent hateful blacks.

            Remember the Christian-hating Jewish supremacist Schneerson, who was actually reputed the be Christ by some, getting the Medal of Freedom?! This is the kind of inordinate political power these people wield by through calculating cliqueish insinuation into all organs of power by virtue of superior treachery genes. We eject Israeli spies with regularity from this country -far more than anyone else -even that other superior group -the Chinese.

          • Luca

            Whenever you have power, you have money, although the reverse is not true. Jews are very smart and very tribal. In most of what they do, they think “Is it good for me, is it good for the tribe and will I make money?” Money is their religion and the non-jews are the cattle who make them rich. Making money is admirable but at what expense? Look at TV and Hollywood, it is creating a fairy-tale about blacks. It suppresses the evil and promotes an exaggerated image of good about blacks. However, it makes money, so who cares if it hurts American society and culture? They laugh at us all the way to the bank while promoting infighting among the rest of us and simultaneously protecting their image as the eternal victims of anti-Semitism.

            i don’t hate them, I support Israel’s right to exist..but I know what they are up to.

            They have been overly represented in liberal causes and if anything I am an anti-liberal. I respect other people’s right to an opinion, but what liberal’s have done to this country goes far beyond expressing an opinion. they are engineering the destruction of America by going after those in power, namely the White, heterosexual, Christian, males. And they have been successful because we have been trained to allow it.

          • Joseph

            It really doesn’t even take training -though that surely is part of the program. The elk are not trained to be victims, they are simply going about their elk business as they graze; they have no agenda. The wolves on the other hand, have an agenda -to eat the elk.

            Today, there are now so many parasitic groups that it is impossible for the average person to divvy up enough time to fight every special interest group though the people who stand to profit at your expense can spend all of their time dedicated to that one cause. It is death by a thousand cuts for the average white guy.

          • David Ashton

            I do not know why my reference to a respectable Jewish history professor’s quality recent study of the relationship between Jews and capitalism, and to the domino effect of the Jewish-owned Bank of the United States, should have been deleted.
            I do know that the Great Depression caused economic distress also to many ordinary Jews, some of whom then reinforced the ranks of the American Communist Party which was for them something of a natural home because of the earlier refugee influx from Russia. Some Gentiles who had believed the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” – whose authenticity I have refuted in a previous post – saw in the Crash a fulfillment of a “prophecy” therein that Jews because of their control of gold would engineer an economic crisis that would send revolutionary workers onto the streets.
            The interactive conflict between an international people and national peoples has indeed an ethnic dimension. Most Jews are still raised with strong ethnocentric attitudes, reinforced by Hitler’s cruelly mistaken actions. Some of their leaders of opinion have shifted historically back and forth from “socialism” to “capitalism” to “socialism”; q.v. Jacques Attali, George Soros and many “neo-cons”. The ethnocentric Theodor Herzl wrote: “When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat….when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse” (“The Jewish State” [London 1934] p.26). Professor Norman Cantor writes: “Empirical data support the contention of French and German anti-Semites in the 1920s and 1930s that Jews were both capitalists and communists….” (“The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jews” [NY 1995] pp.274-5).

          • JohnEngelman

            For Adolf Hitler Jews were a full service hate target. When appealing to the German plutocracy he could portray them as Communist agitators. When appealing to German workers he could portray them as capitalists.

            What Hitler could not appeal to were facts, logic, and simple humanity.

          • David Ashton

            I have not defended Hitler. I have only suggested on a previous occasion that your explanation of his antisemitism solely in terms of his rejection from art college is not conclusively proven, and suggested other or additional explanations. I agree about “simple humanity”. What Hitler thought or said or did is not the only thing to consider when discussing antisemitism.
            I have quoted other people, Jews and non-Jews, who have no connection with Hitler. Your dragging him in “reply” to me is a prejudicial act, not a refutation.

          • JohnEngelman

            I keep asking: How do Jews differ from white Gentiles other than higher average intelligence? No one can give me a factual answer, because there is none. Hatred of Jews is the politics of envy.

          • Defoe

            “Hatred of Jews is the politics of envy.”

            Again you inject “hatred” into the discussion. Why always “hatred”? To oppose a political movement designed to destroy your culture is not necessarily hatred.

            I don’t hate anyone, but I do oppose those who try to destroy my people and my culture. I envy no one either. I have sufficient IQ, money, love, etc. so that I envy no one. I certainly don’t envy the Chinese. If they have built such a wonderful country and culture, why do so many of them come to White countries? If Israel is such a wonderful place, why are not diaspora jews flocking to it?

          • David Ashton

            Recognition of difference is not hatred, envy, love or admiration, though it can lead to one or more of those responses.
            An answer about difference (other than average IQ between Jews and white Gentiles) in the form of a question for you to answer: what is the difference between an Israeli Zionist and everyone else? The answer is: ethnic identity. Most Jews (whether clever or stupid) are still raised to think of themselves as ethnically different from non-Jews. If you think they are mistaken, tell them why.

          • Daisy

            I gave you the facts from a highly respected fertility clinic that claims genetic defects and vulnerabilities occur in Ashkenazi Jews at a profoundly higher rate than the rest of the population and you ignored it.

          • JohnEngelman

            In their chapter, “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews Got Their Smarts,” of their book, “The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution,” which received a favorable American Renaissance review here

            http://www.amren.com/ar/2009/05/index.html

            Gregory Cochran and Harpending discuss those genetic defects in their explanation of the superior average intelligence of Ashkenazi Jews.

            Their argument is that for about one thousand years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire Jews in most of Europe were discriminated against in ways that forced them to support themselves as money lenders and merchants. These professions require superior intelligence. Jews who could not learn the necessary skills left the faith or did not have children.

            In addition, periodic pogroms forced Jews to live by their wits.

            The Ashkenazi had to evolve superior intelligence very quickly. In the process they picked up some dangerous genes. The same genes that are dominance for superior intelligence are recessive for the genetic diseases.

          • Daisy

            Jewish scholars I know admit that jews purposely went into Europe to become money lenders, tax-collectors, etc., not the reverse. They were frequently invited in to perform these professions so that the european masses would remain poor and oppressed. It wasn’t hard to seem smart when the masses were tortured for even possessing a book; only 3% of white european males could read during the Middle Ages (The Cheese and the Worms) . Jews inbred because their creed demands it and so that they could maintain control over their dispossession of the european people. In so doing they ignored the natural drives of evolution.

          • Defoe

            Study their religion and culture.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have studied the religion and culture of the Jews and admire them as a result. The Jews are a superior, splendid people.

          • David Ashton

            Just out of interest, what is your opinion of the references to Jesus in The Talmud?

          • JohnEngelman

            Because those references were made after Christians began to persecute Jews I would not expect them to be favorable. They did attribute magical powers to Jesus.

          • Defoe

            They were unfavorable to Jesus from the beginning of his preaching. After all, he dared to challenge the authority of the rabbis. You need to study more.

          • JohnEngelman

            Have you read the New Testament? I have read the Bible from cover to cover including the Apocrypha eight times in seven translations. In addition, I have read quite a lot of Biblical exegesis.

            Christianity began as a Jewish sect. The leader of Christianity after the cruxification was St. James.

          • Defoe

            “Christianity began as a Jewish sect. The leader of Christianity after the crucifiction was St. James. He was Jesus’ next oldest brother, the first Bishop of Jerusalem, and the possible author of the Epistle of St. James.

            As the leader of Christianity St. James kept Torah and worshiped in the Temple of Jerusalem every day. Before his martyrdom by the Sadducees Pharisees tried to save his life because of his Jewish piety.

            The first Christians were Jews. All or nearly all of the New Testament was written by Jews.”

            We all know those things you posted. Why state the obvious over and over.

          • razorrare

            what he dosent say is the jews were the first to reject Christ and to break Gods covenant…and thus Christ made a new covenant,one in which all “souls” are saved who accept him as Lord & Saviour…souls are not race specific…What he dosent say is that St.James never kept the Talmud,the supreme law of Judaism,which didnt exist until 600 years after Christs death…the term Judeo-Christian was first coined after world war 2 in which jews had a strangle hold on media and other institutions…they created that term to infiltrate and subvert organized Christianity.

          • David Ashton

            Engelman is faced with a dilemma: either the writer of this particular passage (St John or some other person) is “unsavory” or “demented”, or Jesus himself is “unsavory” or (as Jews claimed at the time) “demented”.
            Apart from some sectarians, Jews have dropped the worst of the old Talmud allegations, which in respect of the foreign paternity allegation was ironically adopted by some Nazis, and generally claim that Jesus was a good if unusual Jew, and that Christianity, with Jesus as a divinity and a spiritual destiny, was largely invented by Paul.
            Alfred Rosenberg (Nazi) thought Paul was “Shaul”, the first Jewish “Bolshevik”, while Hyam Maccoby (Zionist) thought Paul was “Solon”, the first Gentile “Nazi”.

          • David Ashton

            Is John 8:33-44 unsavory?
            The leader of Christianity after the crucifixion, according to the NT, was the Galilean Simon Peter.

          • JohnEngelman

            St. James was the first Bishop of Jerusalem. St. Peter was the first Bishop of Rome. At the time Rome was a missionary diocese.

          • David Ashton

            I said the leader of Christianity after the crucifixion according to the NT was Peter (Acts 15:7-12, Luke 22:31-32, John 21:15-17).

          • JohnEngelman

            After the crucifixion there was a conflict within Christianity between St. James, who thought Gentile converts to Christianity should obey the Torah, and St. Paul, who did not. St. Paul won the conflict, and the New Testament is written from a Pauline viewpoint.

            When it comes to persecution between Christians and Jews Christians have far more to apologize for.

          • David Ashton

            The NT was written by Jews from a Pauline viewpoint is your view.
            Does this mean that you regard as lies statements of alleged fact therein that contradict your view about Torah obedience, &c?

            Is John 8.33-44 a falsely invented dialogue between Jesus and his Jewish hearers? Or is the Jesus depicted therein himself an example of antisemitic “demented scum”? Or what is it all about? Comment, please.

            During your advertised multiple readings of the “entire Bible including the Apocrypha” (wow!) did you select as true only the bits that praise Jews and regard as untrue any bits that criticize them?

            That said, I agree with you about the historical imbalance in Christian-Jew persecution. However, Jews have been tempted to take their revenge, for example in the massacre of Christians during a Persian occupation of Jerusalem and again indirectly through communism in Russia, Hungary and Spain. We know from Gibbon alone that Jews have been just as capable of atrocity as anyone else.

            To broaden your own viewpoint, I suggest you read all the references to Jesus and his punishment in the Talmud, the Toldoth Yeshu, and also one of the rare Jewish historians of antisemitism who do adopt neither a self-righteous nor lachrymose viewpoint, such as Albert Landmann.

          • JohnEngelman

            Actually parts of an anti Pauline viewpoint survive in the New Testament.

            The Gospel of St. Matthew 5:17 – 19, which was probably written after the death of St. Paul reads, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”

            This upholds the Law of Moses against St. Paul’s assertion that most of it was unimportant.

            The Epistle of St. James, which may have been written by St. James, the next oldest brother of Jesus and the first Bishop of Jerusalem reads 2:14, 17 “What doth it profit by vrethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? Can faith save him?…Even so faith, if it hath not works is dead, being along.”

            This is an obvious polemic against St. Paul’s doctrine of justification by faith alone.

            The Gospel of St. John has unfortunately been used by antisemites because Jesus opponents are not named as “scribes and pharisees,” but “the Jews.” The Gospel of St. John was the last Gospel to be written. It reflects a time when the division between Christianity and Judaism had become deeper.

          • David Ashton

            Exegesis from qualified scholars abridged solely for reasons of space:

            1. “The fourth evangelist is spreading to the synagogues of his own time the blame that an earlier tradition placed on the authorities [not just a few scribes]. The oldest extant Christian writing speaks of ‘the Jews who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets’ (I Thessalonians 2.14-15). John and/or his confreres have been driven out of the synagogue for professing that Jesus in the Messiah (9.22, 12.42). Within a few decades there was introduced into synagogue prayer (Shemoneh Esreh) a curse against followers of Jesus. At the end of the first century, expulsion from the synagogue exposed Christians to Roman investigation and punishment, even death…[16.2]“. – Professor Raymond E. Brown (Papal Pontifical Commission, “A Crucified Christ in Holy Week” (1986), pp.62-63.

            2. “Jesus is dealing a death blow to a claim that the Jew believed he was safe because he was a descendant of Abraham. They are seeking a way to kill him, precisely the opposite of what Abraham did (Genesis 18.1-8). When the Jews said to Jesus they were not the children of any adulterous union they meant they had never gone astray from God. There may have been something more personal: the Jews put it about that Mary had been unfaithful, that her paramour had been a Roman soldier….

            “The real father of the Jews is the devil, characteristically a murderer. When the Jews and Jesus met, inevitably the false tried to destroy the true. By calling him a Samaritan they meant that he was a foe of Israel, a law breaker and a heretic. In the original Aramaic the word for Samaritan would be Shomeroni, a title for the prince of the devils. His answer was that, so far from being a servant of the devil, his one aim was to honor God, while the conduct of the Jews was a continual dishonoring of God.” – Professor William Barclay (Glasgow University), “The Gospel of John, Vol.2″ (1975), pp.22-32.

          • David Ashton

            On persecution, read the Acts of the Apostles, the Fourth Gospel and Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians, written long before the Babylonian Talmud. This did more than attribute magical powers to Jesus! See e.g. Prof. Peter Schaefer, “Jesus in the Talmud” (Princeton UP 2007). The notion that Jesus was a deceitful money-making conjurer was revived in recent times notably by Morton Smith in “Jesus the Magician” (1978).

          • JohnEngelman

            I have read the Bible including the Apocrypha eight times in seven English translation. Some Jews persecuted the early Christians. More Jews joined the new movement. Christianity began as a Jewish sect. Most if not all of the New Testament was written by Jews. Each of the gospels, including the Gospel of St. John, portray Jesus as a Jew in a Jewish setting.

          • Defoe

            Certainly not a reason to hate, but they differ in culture, religion, and language. Now I know that they tend to speak the language of the country in which they reside but they often revert to hebrew or a mixture such as yiddish. Setting oneself “apart” does not help. and contrary to conventional wisdom, the ghettoes of Europe were as much if not more the fault of the rabbis as the Europeans “forcing” them into those ghettoes. The rabbis did not want them mixing with the “locals” as it would lead to social mixing and degrade the power of the rabbis over his “people”.

            I tire of these discussions of the “chosen”. I’m more worried about my people.

          • JohnEngelman

            My people are decent folks of all races, ethnicities, and religions who obey the law. In addition I prefer the company of those of superior intelligence.

          • Defoe

            How so broad minded and liberal of you.

          • JohnEngelman

            Thank you.

          • Defoe

            ;)

          • David Ashton

            So Jared Taylor and the rest of us are wrong to defend and work primarily for decent white folks who obey the law, even if they might not qualify for your company whose intellectual “superiority” has not been especially evident?

          • JohnEngelman

            I am a race realist, in that I think racial differences are significant and largely due to different genetics. I am not a white nationalist, or a white supremacist. I do not claim to speak for Jared Taylor, or to agree with him on everything.

            I am unaware of any policy by American Renaissance that says one has to agree with a number of basic assumptions to post here. I hope Jesse Jackson would be allowed to post comments on this website if he was civil. I am sure he would be.

          • David Ashton

            Or anyone who supports your persistent multi-racialism and/or opposes the content of AmRen publications, videos, speakers and mainstream posters.

          • JohnEngelman

            There is no rule that says I have to agree 100 percent with Jared Taylor in order to be allowed to post here. I am frequently able to substantiate my high regard for Jews and Orientals by quoting him, those who have spoken at American Renaissance conferences, and articles that have appeared on this website.

            Some of those who post here seem motivated by a dislike for anyone who is not a white Gentile of European ancestry. I do not think that is Jared Taylor’s attitude. I do not think those posts benefit this website.

          • David Ashton

            100 per cent – don’t make us laugh.
            You are a multiracialist, who says he would prefer to live in Vietnam or Israel, but welcomes a multicultural USA, ZPG for “white Gentiles of European ancestry” plus their race crossing with others, Chinese ascendancy over the West, etc.
            The only connections that I can see is that you regard the Jews as cleverer than the rest of us on the basis of IQ reports on this site and that you experienced violence by some black people. Otherwise you are a cuckoo in the wrong nest. It is useful to have people on this site who challenge white nationalists and others, but frankly your comments have become (to quote the Bible) “vain repetitions” in face of refutations and contrary data.

          • JohnEngelman

            How have I been refuted? When explaining my high regard for Jews and Orientals I find it easy to quote articles I have found on this website and the writings of men who have spoken at American Renaissance Conferences.

            In the United States there is too much of a taboo against criticizing blacks and against drawing attention to the environmental and economic costs of all immigration, especially Hispanic immigration.

            American Renaissance is a website where a contrary view to the politically correct consensus can be expressed, and where forbidden facts can be posted.

            Unfortunately, this website attracts a number of posters who are motivated by hostility toward anyone who is not a white Gentile of European ancestry. These are bad for the image of American Renaissance, and make it vulnerable to its enemies.

            Also, there is a difference between recognizing that a large black population is a problem, and disliking a person simply because he happens to be black.

            Many of the comments in the “Could the Next Pope Be Black? Ghanaian and Nigerian Cardinals Are Both Possible Replacements for the Pontiff” thread expressed hostility for all blacks regardless of personal qualities.

          • David Ashton

            I don’t want to harp on Jewish issues, but there is also a taboo against “antisemitism” all too widely defined. Nazi black-hating posters are one problem. In your case it is indifference to the survival and progress of “white Gentiles of European ancestry” and their homeland in contrast to your solicitude for Jews as a special ethnic unit and their Israel.

          • JohnEngelman

            The physical survival of white Gentiles is not threatened. The economic prosperity of anyone not born with lucrative talents is threatened by an economy that is becoming more competitive.

            From its founding the United States was a multi national, multi racial country. White Gentiles do not have a better claim to this country than anyone who has the legal right to be here.

          • David Ashton

            You think that US Jews have a better racial claim to a large section of the Arab Middle East than US white Gentiles have to a large section of North America, founded, developed and continuously occupied for centuries by their white Gentile ancestors or racial kinsfolk.
            The comparative survival of white Gentiles is threatened by pressures against reproduction and for miscegenation, i.e. gradual race replacement by others “legal” or “legalized” or illegal. This is what Am Ren and New Century are mainly all about, not the superiority of Jews and Chinese and their future “supremacy” over the rest of us.

        • MobyWhite

          Why don’t J-word private academies import vibrant, authentic and enriching Diversity?

          What do they know about Diversity that they won’t allow us to know, or say?

          Multi cult for thee, not for me.

        • Daisy

          All the upper middle class white people I grew up with had to send their kids to private schools to avoid being dragged into a lower economic class of jews who wouldn’t let the white kids’ parents and their town choose to go to a different public school.

  • FSR

    Excellent! Very well said. One minor correction that actually works in favor of your overall point – the black who killed the 4 white police officers in Washington was Maurice Clemmons, not Christopher Monfort. Christopher Monfort killed one police officer and tried to kill another.

    So actually there were two different hate-whitey cop-killer blacks in the Seattle area in 2009.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Clemmons

    Maurice Clemmons (February 6, 1972 – December 1, 2009) was an American felon who was responsible for the November 29, 2009, murder of four police officers in Parkland, Washington.[1] After evading police for two days following the shooting, Clemmons was shot and killed by a police officer in Seattle.

    ——–

    http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Lawyers-for-accused-cop-killer-plan-to-use-insanity-defense-189764861.html

    Lawyers for accused cop killer plan to use insanity defense
    By KOMO Staff Published: Feb 4, 2013 at 9:05 PM PST

    SEATTLE — The lawyers for accused cop killer Christopher Monfort are planning an insanity defense for their client.

    Monfort’s lawyers filed their notice of intent in King County Court on Friday.

    Monfort is accused of gunning down Seattle police officer Timothy Brenton as Brenton sat in his patrol car on Halloween night in 2009. He’s also charged with the attempted murder of training officer Britt Sweeney.

    In addition, Monfort is charged with first-degree arson in connection with the October 2009 fire-bombing of four Seattle police vehicles at a city maintenance yard.

    Prosecutors allege Monfort was attempting to wage a one-man war against the Seattle Police Department. He was shot by officers during his arrest and is now paralyzed below the waist and confined to a wheelchair.

    King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg has said he will seek the death penalty if Monfort is convicted.

    • http://www.facebook.com/JaredTaylorX Jared Taylor

      Thank you for this correction. I cannot fix this on the video but I will make the correction to the transcript. Very much obliged.

      • FSR

        Thank you for all your hard work, Mr. Taylor!

        I find it very telling that both of those men killed white police in the Seattle area, one of the first cities in the country to promote anti-white “white privilege” propaganda in the public schools. Seattle is only 6.8% black and full of sheltered white liberal “academics” bemoaning their “white privilege” to each other in what seems like a perverse contest to “out-progressive” each other. Funny how it always seems to work out that way.

        • Joseph

          No wonder there are so many suicides up in that area among whites. The “white-guilt” must be just too great to bear. Maybe more guilty whites will follow suit and self-correct the obvious genetic defect.

      • Jeff

        Mr. Taylor, great video as always. You forgot to mention the wonderful Lovelle Mixon who killed four police officers in 2009. This was followed by pro-Lovelle marches in Oakland. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_shootings_of_Oakland_police_officers

      • Garrett Brown

        My hero.

      • MobyWhite

        Can you correct the error of leaving out Action Steps for the White Community to Hold the University of West Georgia Accountable for the Hate Crime Murder of Brittny Watts?

        Next step tactics. Take ‘em. Morality is yours, but you must use it to justify it.

  • Barrack Osama

    It’s funny. These priest-professors never encourage their own dismantling. Never are they to be abolished. Never is the suicidal ideology of other-worship a product of an evil patriarchy. Never is their career the product of “white privilege”. Never are they the ones shot.

    • Robert Binion

      As Perceval seeks the Grail do they pursue hatred of us. Even unto the grave, they follow without remorse. For without that arousal, how barren and petty their lives would seem.

      • HamletsGhost

        “White privilege” for these professors is the same thing as Original Sin is to a Christian. A prenatal state of disgrace that has since infected all people born since then. Christians like to say they are not better than other people, just forgiven. Likewise these swine like to say that while all white people are guilty, they themselves at least have absolved themselves of their sinful whiteness by atoning for the crimes of their ancestors.

        Modern liberalism is basically secularized Christianity.

        • Robert Binion

          Mr. Taylor observes that these secular sacraments are performed with “medieval ferocity.” Actually, the Middle Ages was a time of great brutality, but of much pity, too. In some respects, we are poorer in spirit. If the central government collapses as many here predict, we could see a centrifugal flow of political power into various locales that would mimic Europe before the rise of nation states. And these would be rabidly tribal. And there would be no money in hating whitey.

        • Peoplesjustice

          A very astute and interesting observation.

      • Andy

        :) I was reading Morte d’Art last night and remembering how much I like white culture, whether the people on CBS think we’re “lice” or not.

      • Joseph

        Well yes. Otherwise they would have to find honest work. They are just like that icon “The Community Organizer”.

    • vladdy1

      Leftism is always “Hey, why don’t YOU stop what you’re doing and go over and help THOSE people” (while I stand here and feel good about myself for suggesting it.)

      How many leftist homes would willingly take Somalis in, if it meant sharing their actual space?

  • NeanderthalDNA

    I wonder if class descriptions for physics will include the dynamics of race, gender, class stratification soon…

    • Joseph

      Well, they do have “dark matter” and “dark energy” now so they are on their way to multicultural enrichment.

  • Fredrik_H

    Yes, I believe they are and there is more coming.

    I was listening to a segment from ABC where a bunch of minorities were discussing the future minority status of whites in the US and it was clear to me that when that day comes, whitey’s gonna get what is coming to him. Those comments were seemingly delivered in jest but there was an underlying tone there suggesting otherwise.

    It is truly unfathomable that most white people do not become seriously alarmed by the prospect of becoming a minority among minorities who have been brought up to hate whites and blame whites for every wrong..

    • HamletsGhost

      Whites are trained to believe that they deserve what’s coming to them.

      • anonymous

        Liberal whites do; not Red State whites. That is why their is even greater hatred for Red State America because they are white, conservative, dislike big government and don’t care for the communistic agenda that they’re trying to force upon us.

      • David Ashton

        WHO trains them so, and why?

        • Defoe

          Answers to questions like that will turn the world right side up.

          • David Ashton

            Let’s hear ‘em.

          • razorrare

            There is more than one answer but the one answer that is ultimately responsible is that group that you dare not critizise…

          • David Ashton

            As Spengler said, the direction of deference always points to the source of power.

    • Tucker

      I think you might be referring to the worthless program called ‘The View’?

      If so, I also saw a clip of that show and Whoopi Goldberg was spewing all sorts of gleeful anticipation of Whites being reduced to minority status and she was sarcastically dropping not-so-subliminal innuendos that had a definite threatening tone to them about what was in store for ‘Whitey’. Alongside Goldberg sat the resident liberal cast of smirking, virulently anti-white females of that certain alien tribe – Joyce Behar and Barbara Walters and these vile women were sporting huge smiles and they both were nodding their heads and beaming with excitement over the garbage that flowed from Whoopi’s mouth.

      A few feet away, sat one or two White European women – who said nothing during the tirade by Goldberg, but I watched the expressions on their faces and thought I could see faint signs of apprehension briefly pass over them. Clearly, these women – whoever they were, were going through a slow revelation on the realities of race and neither of them seemed to see any humor in what Goldberg was saying.

      • Fredrik_H

        Yes, that sounds like the segment I watched. One can only hope that Goldberg’s veiled threats – disguised as humour – woke up at least a couple of whites to the realities of “post-racial” USA.

      • Liberalsuck

        Blacks hatred of whites clouds their judgement. They don’t realize that not only have white people destroyed much more powerful enemies (even when they outnumbered us), BUT the blacks will not be safe if the amount of Hispanics and Asians keep pouring into here. Not that I care at all if blacks suffer at the hands of Hispanics or Asians, but they are deluding themselves into thinking that Hispanics and Asians will ‘unite with them’ against white people. Blacks don’t even realize that the same whites they constantly accuse of being called racists are why they have the things they do. Whoopi would be a nobody if she didn’t have a large white fan base.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Whoopi Goldberg was the honoree at a function given at the Museum of Tolerance in Beverly Hills a few years ago. The ‘tribe’ appreciates her. My trip to tour the museum was interesting. My friends and I noticed the docent bragging about holocaust deaths. She also refused to acknowledge that (white) Christians had saved many Hebrew lives from the Holocaust. The black and hebrew tribes are racist against Whites especially if they are Protestants.

        • Nate Miller

          Isn’t Whoopi Goldberg Jewish (Afro-Jewish)?

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            The online encyclopedia of questionable credibility states that her birth certificate reads “Caryn Elaine Johnson,” and that she embraced the stage name “Whoopi Goldberg” from the whoopee cushion (literally) for her first name and that her mother wanted her to have a Jewish-sounding pseudo-surname in her stage name because she figured it would help her in Hollywood.

            I doubt she has any real Jewish heritage.

    • Brady

      What do they think is going to magically happen if whites fall below 50% of the population? Who has the most money and the most guns?

      • liberalsuck

        Not only that, but the blacks and Hispanics will continue killing each
        other and fighting for resources. The white population will be more
        racial with their thinking and will overtly express their dislike with
        blacks and Hispanics. Even if the blacks and browns ‘unite’, look at
        our history. We don’t even need to be a majority to destroy them if all-out race war does break out. Arminius united 4000 German farmers against 20,000 Roman soldiers; In 1878 in South Africa, a couple hundred British soldiers brutally fought off thousands of attacking Zulu Warriors while the British men were armed only with single shot rifles and had a large supply of their weapons stolen from them by Zulu Africans and many of the British men were bed ridden; General Franco aggressively and successfully fought the communist takeover of Spain; King Leonidas and 300 Greek soldiers stood up to a 300,000 Persian Empire; etc. These anti-white bigots underestimate us! That will be their downfall.

      • Joseph

        “Who has the most money and the most guns?”

        The remedy to those “problems” is underway at this very moment by our global-collectivist overlords. Once that is well in hand, the Zulus will be fully released and nature will take its course while they repair to their “continuity of government” bunkers.

  • cecilhenry

    Awesome. Thank you Mr. Taylor.

    I wasn’t aware of some of these crimes, and Mr. Taylor’s response is very compelling.

    FTWR………….

  • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

    can we bring a class action lawsuit against these anti-white white college professors because of the hate they are spreading?

    • guest

      Not sure how that would work out. If we could convnice the ACLU to represent us, we would have a chance.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Preston-Wiginton/100001737079760 Preston Wiginton

    Colin Flarerty explains much of the recent non reported black on white crime in his book “Whitegirlbleedalot”. I don’t know how much he tied to hatred towards white people via PC.

  • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

    I’m very glad Jared made this video. It is true, we won’t forget. We wont forget who tried to feed us to the wolves in order to make a university/media career where they would have had none. This video motivates me to make another donation to this site. Taylor is also correct that the republicans are worthless cowards, they are only a half a degree better than those who are feeding us to the wolves. They watch it happen, but pretend it isn’t happening, and again, they play this game of denial and pretend for their own gain. That wont be forgotten either!

    • Joseph

      Taylor could make a perpetual weekly series and never run out of material for hour-long presentations.

    • liberalsuck

      Our enemies do what they do for money or because they have a chip on their shoulder. We do what we do because it’s our passion and we want to be left alone. It saddends me that our GOP establishment sounding off the usual neocon, ‘let’s-outreach-to-nonwhites’ talk, etc. I don’t think they will get it until these blacks and browns start physically attacking them and their loved ones. I don’t think more and more white people are going to wake up until they are pushed balls to the wall. It’s amazing that white people as a race have allowed ourselves to fall so low.

  • http://www.facebook.com/viv.jasper Viv Jasper

    Thank you. This is the only site where I’ve heard about many of these crimes. It is an endless source of frustration for me that whites are supposed to pretend belief in the alternate reality that so many are trying to create.

    • libearlsuck

      I want there to come a day when these anti-white peddlers pay for their sins. I want there to come a day where even whites are way too scared to say anything anti-white or problack/pro Hispanic, etc. I want there to come a day where I can be in historically white areas (countries and towns, etc) and not have to see diversity.

      • gemjunior

        I always think the same thing. Like when things devolve to the point that it becomes tribal. There will be small white areas full of working white men and women rebuilding ONLY whites. Imagine that for paradise, there will be hardly any crime and a sense of community and above all, HONESTY. I know that there will be former libs, leftists, college professors, marxist whites that are clamoring for entry and for safety from the rape and cannibalism outside these areas. I can smell a lefty lib a mile away, I can tell them by their dress, shoes, even their accent and speech patterns. If I have any say they will NOT be allowed in. Let them live in the paradise they wanted. The only people I’d be sorry for is their children, but they should have thought of that. Because I think about my kids all the time and what it’ll be like for them when I’m old getting beaten down by Quanta’vious and the twins Le’Hyundai and La’Honda..

  • WmarkW

    This might be the best article I’ve ever read on AmRen. (I read; didn’t watch the vid.)

    I look forward to linking it during the discussion of “hate” in my other commenting forums.

    • liberalsuck

      Watch the video, too. It’s good!

  • tremendouscoast

    I love how white liberals contort themselves to avoid recognizing the obvious but live no differently than I do. They avoid sending their children to black dominated schools or living in black neighborhoods but have the gall to condemn others for similiar behavior. They would really be shocked to learn that blacks hate them too despite their best efforts.

    • HamletsGhost

      Liberals insist the reason you don’t have any black friends is because of your latent racism. If there aren’t enough blacks working at some company, then racism( and only racism) can explain it.

      When asked why they don’t live in “diverse” communities, then of course they insist that it’s for the good schools, safety, etc. Racism can never be the reason with them.

      Liberals insist on the benefit of the doubt for themselves, and deny it to anyone else. The swine.

      • vladdy1

        We must keep reporting to those fools of logic that “correlation is not causation.” Can you imagine the general public thinking that illogically 20 years ago? They would have said, “Hey, just because there are more blacks failing the police tests doesn’t mean….” And everybody would have said “Yeah!” Like I said, it’s like the world turned upside down. I’m sure BO believes that 2 + 2 – 5.

      • Luis

        It’s the same with gun control. Hunters, housewives, and responsible people don’t need guns in their view – only the police and the military.

        Wasn’t this the same generation who clenched its fist, screaming “power to the people?

  • razorrare

    or, “You Jews Happy Now!”
    Jared Taylor on White Identity… He who dares not offend cannot be honest–Thomas Paine
    ” Real solutions to real problems require honest discussion,and honest discussion come at a cost. When it comes to race,few dare not offend.”—Jared Taylor
    or,when it comes to ethnocentrism,none dare offend the jews.Yes,there is a slur that is even worse than being called a racist…
    its my understanding that for the last 4 years of rape stats by doj/fbi that zero rapes have occurred by White on Black…not a few hundred.
    Sociology/anthropology–another so-callled science overly-represented by jews …

  • nasedo

    All that lip smacking is really disgusting. Try to control yourself next time

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000050689622 Andrea D. Ruthless

    Fagin is a Jew.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000050689622 Andrea D. Ruthless

    Jews run the media and academia.

    • razorrare

      jews seemingly moderate this thread as well!!

      • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

        does a jewish doctor prescribe your meds?

      • JohnEngelman

        Fortunately the moderators usually remove antisemitic comments. Jared Taylor does not like them.

    • JohnEngelman

      Jews dominate the media and academia because of their high average IQs.

  • razorrare

    or, “You Jews Happy Now!”
    Jared Taylor on White Identity… He who dares not offend cannot be honest–Thomas Paine
    ” Real solutions to real problems require honest discussion,and honest discussion come at a cost. When it comes to race,few dare not offend.”—Jared Taylor
    or,when it comes to ethnocentrism,none dare offend the jews.Yes,there is a slur that is even worse than being called a racist…
    its my understanding that for the last 4 years of rape stats by doj/fbi that zero rapes have occurred by White on Black…not a few hundred.
    Sociology/anthropology–another so-callled science overly-represented by jews …

    • liberalsuck

      The reason Jared doesn’t want to mention “jews” is because people will associate that with “hitler who killed six million jews” and it would have discredited his prowhite message much earlier on.

      • razorrare

        ‘People’ already do that…remember how Amren was smeared by the media by erroneously claiming that ‘Laudner'(spelling?)who shot the congress woman(name eludes me at the moment) was a contributor/member of Amren,”an anti-semite” hate organization…sorry, i dont “grok”(Q.D.) your point.

        • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

          you are only damaging the cause. You are pointing a finger at a whole group of people. This damages the cause because while most people may believe that there may indeed be members of that group with a particular animosity, and evil intentions, towards white Christian Americans, few people believe that ALL of them think alike. It goes directly against people’s experiences that this is even possible.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            I do agree that this site should tread lightly on the Jew issue because it can easily become the only thing discussed. It is worth noting, however, that over 70% of Jews voted for Obama. They put their own group interests over the interests of the nation as a whole, just like every other “victim” group.

          • David Ashton

            This is true. It has come up mainly on this site because Engelman keeps on declaring his undying infatuation with “God’s People”. It is quite possible, if necessary, to acknowledge and criticize the support many Jews have unwisely given to non-white immigration and to multi-racialism, without hostility to all of them on grounds of race (which they cannot change) or religion (which is a matter of freedom).
            However, our less honest opponents will accuse us of racism and then bring in the Holocaust as its archetypal example, whether we like it or not. We can only go on appealing to the common-sense, fairness and experience of the reasonable majority which will also include some Jews and even thoughtful non-whites.

          • http://www.facebook.com/willard.gage.3 Willard Gage

            They voted 90% for Clinton. Historically they have been overwhelmingly Democrats. When they finally start coming around you think it is a good idea to greet them with hostility?

          • Daisy

            Without investigating the forces and causes behind anti-white hatred, we flail around in blindness. Study the Israeli Lobby and tell me that white subjugation has not been *partially orchestrated* by zionists and by widespread jewish support of that movement even if much of it is de facto, and unwitting. The analogy is to be a Christian one must at the least believe that Jesus was divine, as opposed to just some historical personage or even martyr. To be a jew one must conceive of oneself as a separate people bound together by blood and an absolute imperative to side with jews against all others. That concept is inherent to the self-concept of judaism. It’s not some caveat.

            I’ve tried to maintain diplomacy with ‘caucasian’ ethnicities on here for the sake of unity; I was ethnically cleansed as a young girl by southern italians. Abducted and molested by one at 14, and raped by one of his neighbors and ethnic clan by another at 19. They felt they could treat a redheaded female like this as in their eyes my red hair was unattractive after *hunting* me down to punish me for achieving academically and athletically over them, and for having a father who a) worked and b) didn’t kill people for his living . They felt insecure in their own italian identity, for good reason as one was mafiosa and the other just a weak, self-loathing person and male and g*****. Because their ethnicity and that of the jews were in the whopping majority, there were not enough northwestern european males around to defend me. But I have demurred from elucidating this, even under fairly intense pressure from some of my own ethnicity’s males to ‘prove’ my claims of being assaulted. I did not want to offend some of the mediterraneans who are not all hateful and cowardly. They are a group that as a whole also face discrimination and hate from the anti-white forces so I try to respect their feelings, as much as I can, even to my own discredit or detriment sometimes, all the while knowing if I had confronted some of my most ardent challengers I could have at least halted some of their anger towards me. I am truly committed to the cause of defending the rights of white people and to me that includes anyone who has to check the white box.

            But the jews are compelled by their very creed to act as a nation or political entity at odds with any ‘other.’ I don’t judge them as individuals but I do by their own admitted value and resultant attitudes and behaviors.

          • gemjunior

            I don’t understand why they promote nationhood and exclusivity, nationalism and patriotism for Israel while promoting cultural marxism and multiculturalism in all white countries. This is hypocritical. I have numerous other issues with Jews but I can’t be bothered at the moment.

          • razorrare

            Your right–i am obsessed with the truth…got a problem with that? Mind explaining what the cause is here? Not for my benefit of course,but for the rest of the “best” here on the pages of amren…

    • Vonhauer

      Your obsession with Jews is tiresome. There are several sites that focus on your favorite topic. Need the links?

      AmRen has never just focused on Jew this and Jew that. Have you not noticed that?

      • Daisy

        And you don’t think JohnEngelman adds an obsessive focus on the jews to this site?

  • Luca

    Not just the college professors Mr. Taylor, don’t forget the media, Hollywood, the judges, lawyers,social workers and politicians. These are the enablers and cowards willing to do whatever is on the agenda, is popular, or makes a buck.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GenXinOz GenX ANZAC

    Powerful video you’ve produced there Mr Taylor.
    You’d think that, if according to these Marxist professors that if we **incurable Whites
    are incapable of being anything other than oppressors, no many how much we
    apologize and promote own decline, that would be a good argument for separation
    in itself, but then where ever we choose to separate ourselves too would still
    no doubt be cause for jealousy.
    **Genetic determinism perhaps? Does that go both ways?
    Notice how these leftists use the worst parts of historical racism against us
    such as
    -The one drop rule, now one drop of black blood=black success, beauty or
    intelligence.
    -AA is just discrimination spun around 180 degrees.
    -Being color blind, post racial or the nation of cowards challenge is all a
    racial one way street, with the burden only being on Whites to take the high
    road and close their eyes and minds to reality.
    -Group discrimination is so casually used, such as if we say “all blacks” in
    relation to anything we’d supposedly ignorant, but how come Whites and White
    privilege are often all so freely painted with the same broad brush when explaining
    our group crimes, when not all blacks were slaves and not all Whites are
    descended from slave owners?
    -Or probably the most insidious left wing racist plot is of ‘reverse eugenics’, where blacks and Whites are actively pushed into interbreeding as to eradicate the so called
    inherent pathologies of both groups (one is amplified while the other
    underplayed) , so one loses its homogeneous cohesion, rare recessive
    qualities and group power, while the lesser group gets the latter groups
    genetic gains, all while paradoxically and supposedly proving that racial
    differences don’t exist (see the benefits of modern ‘one drop rule’ above) as
    White traits are now represented (albeit watered down) within the black
    phenotype.
    While this one way destructive transfer of attributes is infuriatingly sold as
    being in the name of love and all being inclusive and proof that the racial
    differences that it utilises in its own mechanism don’t actually exist!!

    The left uses hate repackaged as love to kill us.

    These White Benedict Arnold’s, or the ‘cool, with it Whites’ will never let us
    escape or separate, as like all socialists that need the producers to pay the
    bills that their superior ideas generate.
    They get the accolades while we pay the check.

    They (higher learning institutions and the mass media) think that by editing reality
    so that we only see a cherry picked version where player X is always seen as
    the good guy victim and player Y is always the oppressor that makes them good
    people, because of their good intentions or noble reasoning.
    But omission is still lying, if you covert the truth, you are a liar,
    simple as that.
    They are liars all of them, they lie to us all, they lie to each other as
    casually as breathing ( their livelihoods are dependent on keeping these lies
    alive), but worst of all they knowingly lie to themselves, but they don’t stop
    there, they broadcast and project their lies as facts for the world to see and
    will hysterically scream at us for simply questioning the premise of their
    lies.
    The role of the guilty, shame filled, pride less provider is the role which has been socially engineered for us. But we’re paying too great a price with our lives and is there an end date or statute of limitations on our guilt?

    I live to see these people’s illusions crumble.

    • Liberalsuck

      If white conservative people like me are “such hideous, ignorant racists”, then why not let us break off a few states for whites only and leave us alone? I mean, nonwhites and liberals can be free to celebrate their diversity and they can be free to have open homosexuality and abortions and drug use and gun control, etc.

      • gemjunior

        Because they can’t let us live. Leftists are ideologues and they are like zealots who are power hungry. They want to pound their chests and say “WE WON, WE TAUGHT THE IGNORANT REDNECKS THERE IS ONLY ONE RACE BLA BLA BLA”. They DO NOT subscribe to the Live and Let Live policy. They will NEVER let us go (without a fight which they will lose, wail and gnash their teeth).

      • http://www.youtube.com/user/GenXinOz GenX ANZAC

        I completely agree, you’d think that we were half as evil as the media and academia paints us that they’d be dying to be rid of us.They don’t like us and we don’t want to be around them so it makes complete sense to mutually agree to separate, but then when has ‘good sense’ ever been a progressive attribute?
        They could finally have their progressive utopia free from those evil racists who are supposedly responsible for all black failure, old age, cancer and the sun eventually burning out and we can have a place to call our own, while we get to sit back and watch the horror show that would unfold over the new border.

        No they need us to be around to be their whipping boys and to have someone to point their fingers at, for without us, they’d be the only Whites ‘left in the room’ to reap all the anti White hatred that they themselves have inflamed.
        They wish us gone, but not to go intact with dignity to another place where we’d no doubt thrive and besides separation would probably be seen as too humane “a let off” that is too devoid of torture for us.
        No, they wish us gone in spirit and in voice, but while physically still remaining present. They want to en-prison us in our guilt and to make us into thought slaves, who are mere shells of our ancestor’s former selves and who constantly feel indebted for crimes long past, yet who’re full of gratitude for any opportunity to be taxed to alleviate some of the pain of our guilt.
        From these professors point of view it’s all about sacrificing someone else, so that someone else can go off to war, that someone else can pay the inflated taxes to subsidize minority programs, that someone else can give up their job to a diversity hire or a hb1 visa holder, that someone else can give up their college place so some brown face can grab the honors and that someone else can pay their blood reparations on the streets.
        Unfortunately these Marxist professors will never shut up as long as it’s someone else out there who pays the debt, be it with money or blood.

        Can you imagine though, if a couple of your existing States were set up properly to succeed, to be completely autonomous, sovereign states with an independent authority. With all resources and infrastructures left intact, with a clean slate in terms of debt and with no trade boycotts, embargoes, or blockades. Can you imagine just how popular these White states would be for decent Whites to migrate to.
        Of the 40% of Whites who voted for Hussein term 2, you’d find a lot of them would be looking at moving too, as once the bulk of the 60% of conservative Whites who voted Republican moved on, leaving the harsh realities of a minority majority behind. I’m sure that you’d also find not many of these Marxist progressives would be wanting to stay behind either as their racket is to feed off us like a vampire and who’d actually be quite useless without the original host’s body.
        Let’s face the facts, of that 40% and that 60%, we’re all racists in the eyes of our enemies, either we’re practicing or reformed, in denial or in touch, there’s actual power in us embracing what we’re trying to avoid being or what we know we are, it’s a hard sell granted thanks to all the propaganda, but somehow we need to free ourselves of this burden.
        On the White Nationalist’s utopia, I can’t ever see it being handed to us on a silver platter, that’s the sort of freedom we’d certainly have to fight for.
        The establishment would never let us willingly leave because they need to feed off us and if we did somehow manage to escape and we forged new a homeland they’d use direct force, negative propaganda, scare/fear tactics to stop other Whites joining us, then the UN would no doubt deem these new White states as a ‘crime against humanity’, with the New United States military putting it’s hand up to send in ‘peace keeping’ warships and gunships etc etc.
        It doesn’t mean that our vision of a homeland is impossible, it just isn’t going to be easy, but variables are always changing, so maybe the wind will blow our way sometime soon and hopefully we’ll be ready to take advantage of the opportunity when it does present itself.
        Preparation.

  • John R

    Very informative video. I really have nothing to add that Mr. Taylor hasn’t already said, I will only post the link to this, so that maybe some others might get the benefit.

    • liberalsuck

      Maybe he can email this to all the academics he mentioned, especially Robert Jensen and Tim Wise.

      • JohnEngelman

        I have difficulty understanding how Tim Wise makes a living. The white liberal guilt complex should have ended when the black ghetto riots started.

        • Defoe

          Probably funding from the $PLC or some other “friendly” source.

          • anonymous

            They SPLC needs to find “new racists” to keep their bank accounts flowing.

        • Katherine McChesney

          Probably speeches and book sales.

          • JohnEngelman

            Yeah, but who buys that stuff?

            During the War in Vietnam the white left wanted black allies.

            Moreover, the War in Vietnam distracted white liberals from drawing the conclusions they should have from the black ghetto riots and the rise in black crime that followed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the beginning of the war on poverty.

            That was a long time ago. It is time for white liberals to wake up from Martin Luther King’s dream and realize that things have not turned out as they hoped they would.

          • David Ashton

            You miss the point, as usual, that the “white liberals”/”Cultural Marxists” have entrenched themselves and their “equality & diversity” cult Gramsci-wise in education, media and think-tanks, where they remain “religiously” committed to the “egalitarian society” in which some persons are more equal than others. At least read Bruce Bawer’s “The Victims’ Revolution” for some insight into this process. Mr & Mrs Obama, and Mrs Clinton, are products of this process.

          • JohnEngelman

            The President and Mrs. Obama probably benefited from affirmative action policies. Hillary Clinton did not need to.

            A white liberal with any insight should be able to realize that the black response to the civil rights legislation destroyed the New Deal Coalition that had enabled the Democratic Party to dominate the United States since the election of Franklin Roosevelt in 1932.

            During the late 1950s and early 1960s white racial moderates in the United States thought that by supporting civil rights legislation they were buying racial peace. What they got instead were five years of black ghetto rioting from 1964 to 1968, and more durable increases in black crime and illegitimacy. There was no discernible improvement in black academic achievement. Since the school year of 1986 – 87 the gap in average Scholastic Aptitude Test scores between white and black high school students has increased.

            http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=171

            The ability of Tim Wise and the Southern Poverty Law Center to collect money remains mysterious to me.

            You overestimate the appeal of political propaganda and indoctrination. It is only effective when it tells people what they want to believe, or what they feel to be true from personal experiences in their lives.

            Whites continue to dominate education, the media, and think tanks. As individuals affirmative action policies worked against them as they achieved their careers.

            I can understand why well educated white professionals would have liberal views on economic, environmental, and foreign policy issues as well as on abortion and gay rights. It is more difficult for me to understand why so many of them have not drawn logical conclusions from the disappointments of the civil rights movement.

            Those disappointments lend credibility to arguments segregationists presented against the civil rights legislation before it was passed.

          • David Ashton

            I shall get round to the Cultural Marxist-Obama/Clinton links when another opportunity arises and I have time to go into detail. For now and leaving aside his dubious “fascism” theme, I quote just Jonah Goldberg: “Hillary was offered an internship by her hero Saul Alinsky – famed author of ‘Rules for Radicals’ about whom she wrote her thesis….the ‘Godfather’ of community activism….inspired the entire 1960s generation of New Left agitators (Barack Obama, for years a Chicago community organizer, was trained by Alinsky’s disciples)….Hillary responded that only marching through America’s elite institutions could she achieve real power and change the system from within…. Hers is a political religion” (from “Liberal Fascism” (London: Penguin, 2009). There is much, much more which I have left out.

          • JohnEngelman

            In 1964 Hillary Clinton supported Barry Goldwater. Like many college students during the late 1960s and early 1970s she was radicalized by the War in Vietnam.

            Thus she and they were not effected emotionally and politically by the black ghetto riots that happened from 1964 to 1968.

            The War in Vietnam was tragically futile. What many on this website attribute to the bogey man of “cultural Marxism” is the enduring emotional and political backlash against that war.

            The United States would be a better country if the United States had signed and honored the Geneva Agreement of 1954.

          • David Ashton

            The Vietnam phenomenon factors in, so to speak, particularly with the student radicalization. But the “bogey men” were real people, e.g. Herbert Marcuse. I shall return again to this subject in due course.

          • JohnEngelman

            I read a little of Herbert Marcuse when I was at college, and was not particularly impressed by him. My inspirations back then were Bertrand Russell, I.F. Stone, and Michael Harrington.

            Those you call “cultural Marxists” would not have had the appeal they had without the War in Vietnam. The Vietnam was neither important to America’s economy or security. The vast majority of the Vietnamese supported Ho Chi Minh.

            A preposterous argument on one side of a dispute does not mean that the other side is correct. Nevertheless, arguments in support of the War in Vietnam were preposterous. They inclined many college students to agree with Herbert Marcuse.

          • Defoe

            “I read a little of Herbert Marcuse when I was at college, and was not particularly impressed by him.”

            But he espoused much of what you also espouse, a “fellow traveler” as it were.

          • David Ashton

            As usual, you look at events solely from your individual perspective. You may have seen through Marcuse, and Mao, but thousands did not.

            Hillary Clinton by the way was just schoolgirl when rooting for the Republicans and was turned leftwards at college partly by the lesbian leftist granddaughter of Dean “I shall always stand by Alger Hiss” Acheson. Go to some of your “own” Zionist websites for the lowdown on Hillary’s childish ideas on children’s rights, her careerism, lefty trendiness and serial incompetence, etc.

          • Defoe

            “Thus she and they were not effected emotionally and politically by the black ghetto riots that happened from 1964 to 1968. ”

            Yet another undocumented assertion.

          • David Ashton

            Many of the New Left saw the ghetto riots as part of the “struggle” against “white capitalist hegemony”. Surely all this is fully on record.

          • JohnEngelman

            In the United States the New Left really began with the formation of the Students for a Democratic Society in 1962. However, SDS would have remained a marginal organization, and the New Left would have remained a marginal movement if it had not been for the War in Vietnam.

          • David Ashton

            See my reference to Wesson’s book above.

          • Defoe

            The White liberals you talk about “go along to get along”. What they “go along” with is dictated from the top echelons of the elite establishment to further its own ends. Your White liberals will tell you in private (if they trust you) that they don’t buy any of the hooey they publicly espouse. For example, they all know why America’s test scores, as compared to other “first world” countries are so low, but would not dare to say so in public. I have first hand experience with this.

          • JohnEngelman

            You have still not explained why “the top echelons of the elite establishment” continue to pretend that high rates of black crime and illegitimacy and low average IQs are due to “white racism.”

            I don’t know either. I am just asking the question.

            The only answer I can think of is that affluent whites come into contact with few blacks. These few are exceptional, or they occupy subordinate positions without resentment. To know what most blacks are really like it is usually necessary to see them up close every day on terms of approximate equality in an environment when they are in the clear majority.

            When blacks are in the minority most try to behave. When they are in the majority most behave the way they want to behave. Many do not want to behave well.

          • Defoe

            The elites “continue to pretend” because it suits their purposes. “Divide and conquer”. They know full well that black pathology is not caused by “White racism” for god sakes!!

          • JohnEngelman

            The element of truth in what you say is that when the American white working class became a Republican constituency it became possible for the Republican Party to reduce the top tax rate. The rich benefited from that. The white working class did not.

          • Defoe

            I surely do not see the connection between the White working class becoming Republican and the ability of the Repubs to reduce the top tax rate. Please explain.

          • JohnEngelman

            Elementary, my dear Defoe. When large numbers of white blue collar workers left the Democratic Party and began voting Republican more Republicans were elected. One of them was Ronald Reagan. He reduced the top tax rate from 70 percent to 28 percent.

            http://www.ctj.org/pdf/regcg.pdf

          • David Ashton

            Isn’t possible that many among the top establishment have graduated from their student days with ideological infatuations over “race and gender” which are not refuted by their current experience except in so far as their guilt about affluence and power is then projected not through personal sacrifice but by government action at the expense of the white working class, original target of the Cultural Marxists?

          • JohnEngelman

            I wonder if you have ever known any Marxists: I mean the real kind, who are proud of saying that they are Marxists. Genuine Marxists either regret the move to the right the white working class in the United States took from 1968 to 1972, or they pretend it did not happen. The target of genuine Marxists is not the white working class, but “the top establishment,” which they call “the ruling class.”

          • David Ashton

            I started at school with Communists (all Jews incidentally) and often engaged in debates with them and their parents. Our local CPGB treasurer Marks had “Daily Worker” back numbers hanging in his kitchen and Stalin portraits in his son’s bedroom, while his wife worked for a Korean war “collaborators”. All my college tutors were leftists, one of them, Rosen, a well-known Communist.

            I was been acquainted with Marxists of various stripes all through my years as a teacher/trade unionist in London and Norfolk, mostly “race, gender and class” activists since the mid-1970s. I have studied Marxism-Leninism and Communist techniques for years, and specialized in anti-Soviet research notably as a consultant for the Foreign Affairs Research Institute, Whitehall, meeting also many ex-Marxists and former victims of the ideology; and I have continued to read Marxist literature of all kinds in more recent years; sample titles on request.

            You are splitting hairs (again) over defining “genuine” Marxists; I would include Gramsci, for example. Would you? The New Left, of course, shifted the class war towards the colonial/race/minority war, sometimes attacking Soviet bureaucracy while objectively assisting its foreign policy.

            Its pseudo-egalitarian notions have traveled upwards – some leading politicians and bureaucrats in Britain and the EU were originally Marxists of some sort or other. The objectives of people like Marcuse are now being imposed downwards on the white working and middle class as “equality and diversity” legislation.

            To counter your last two sentences with further explanation, and to save space here, I recommend the information summarized by Professor Robert G. Wesson, “Why Marxism?” (London: Temple Smith, 1976) pp.165-188.

            My apologies to readers for this small autobiographical extract after having hinted at my irritation at your own endless parade of personal experiences from which you universalize general observations of limited value.

          • JohnEngelman

            David Ashton ,

            With your knowledge you should know that the white working class has never been considered by Marxists as their target.

            When I was involved in the anti war movement against the War in Vietnam during the late 1960s and early 1970s I was aware that most white blue collar workers were moving from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party. I viewed this movement with the ambivalence I have since then often felt about political issues, and movements. Part of me thought white blue collar workers had legitimate concerns about crime, and especially black crime, and that they had reason to dislike the often disruptive nature of anti war demonstrations. The other part viewed them negatively for not understanding that the Republican Party did not advance their economic interests.

            I never considered myself to be a Marxist.

            In the United States a television program and a movie articulated the condescending and to a degree contemptuous attitude that was felt by affluent, well educated liberals toward white blue collar workers.

            The television program was “All in the Family.” “All in the Family” was broadcast from 1971 to 1979. Before I watched my first program I read about it in a publication that was probably published by the Worker Student Alliance. This was an offshoot of the Students for a Democratic Society which had broken into a number of factions, including the Weathermen.

            By now the New Left was discovering the writings of Karl Marx. The article I read condemned the television program as an inaccurate caricature of white blue collar workers.

            The main character of “All in the Family” was Archie Bunker, a shipping and receiving foreman living in New York city. Initially he was portrayed unfavorably as a stupid racist. As the program evolved he became a likable and well meaning buffoon. The audience was expected to find him comical, rather than evil. He would try to sound educated by using multi-syllable words, but he would use them incorrectly and he would mispronounce them.

            The movie was entitled “Joe.” It was released in 1970. There is nothing likable about Joe. In addition to working in a factory, he is a foul mouthed adulterer who hates hippies and blacks.

            “All in the Family” and “Joe” articulated the attitudes of affluent white liberal Democrats, not Marxists. Neither made any effort to understand why white blue collar workers were moving to the right.

          • David Ashton

            Yes, all very interesting – you were never a Marxist yourself and you watched a TV program (we saw Archie Bunker here, the US equivalent of Alf Garnett, our “racist” working-class Tory).

            I do not wish to get entangled in a purely semantic “debate”.

            In brief crude summary, Marx regarded the urban proletariat as the principal agent of class struggle and the replacement of capitalism, though the workers needed ideological guidance to that end. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Gramsci and Marcuse (among others) developed Marxism in various ways. The anti-colonial revolutions and the establishment of “socialism in one country” altered the situation, but the establishment of global communism remained the shared ultimate goal.

            Both the Soviet Union and the independent New Left faced the fact (however explained) that the western working class, especially in the USA, was neither sufficiently immiserated nor ideologically inclined (because of bourgeois indoctrination through nationalism, religion and consumerism) to make the revolution, at any rate on their own. It was therefore necessary (among other actions) to neutralize or displace the bourgeois culture-controllers, enlist the black workers with recent experience of poverty and discrimination, utilize further the anti-imperialist struggle (Indo-China, South Africa, Latin America) and immigration from the ex-colonies,

            push the female “equality” movement, and finally adopt the “minority” causes such as homosexuals and the disabled. Marxist groups including the old CP remnants and the SWP are involved in all this: see their websites and literature.

            A long way from Marx and Engels maybe, but just as insidious.

            I shall return to this only if you persist with invincible ignorance and you do not try the patience of readers any further.

          • JohnEngelman

            You said that the white working class was the “original target of the Cultural Marxists.”

            That was incorrect. During the late 1960s and 1970s in the United States the white working class was held in disdain by many affluent liberal Democrats, but those affluent liberal Democrats were not Marxists of any variety.

            Marxism was a minority persuasion on universities back then. It has virtually disappeared as a political movement now. Back then collegiate Marxists were inclined to idealize the white working class.

          • David Ashton

            Your first two paragraphs do not fit what I actually said or each other.

            Organized open communist parties are small in number, but some communist ideas have spread widely through western academe in line with the advice of both Lenin and Gramsci. All kinds of protest issues (years after Vietnam) are kept going to a common purpose: abortion, gun-control, immigrant rights, black studies, tea-party vilification, higher taxes for welfare not defense, attacking “reactionary” churches, etc.

            Communists of different social backgrounds and occupations still expect that a severe international economic crisis, affecting both whites and others, will put Marxism and revolution back on the map. Unemployment in Europe and the Middle East is a sign of hope for them.

            As Spengler predicted, it no longer matters if the voice of Moscow ceases to dictate – the work goes on by itself. “The great danger is when class war and race war unite to finish off the white world.”

          • JohnEngelman

            I read any political thinker for insight rather than doctrine I think Karl Marx had valid insights into how capitalist economies work and evolve, so it does not bother me that these insights have entered the intellectual consensus.

            I have read comments on this website that also see a declining economy as a source of hope. On November 30, 2012 American Renaissance ran a column by Pat Buchanan entitled, “Is Secession the Answer?” A number of posters here thought that secession was a good idea.

            http://www.amren.com/news/2012/11/is-secession-the-answer/

          • David Ashton

            Your first sentence repeats what you have said two or three times before, and makes no difference to what I have said or think.
            It is better to prepare for the prospect of economic decline and race war, and to try to prevent these developments by intelligent national action, than to wait until things have gone too far, and the leftist mobs are back on the street in effective collusion with leftists in the media, universities and political institutions.
            On my analysis of US events including “Cultural Marxism” since Vietnam, I refer simply to one easily available source, among many: Robert G. Wesson, “Why Marxism? The Continuing Success of a Failed Theory” (London: Temple Smith, 1976/Basic Books, USA), esp.pp.180-188. (You would probably agree with his opening remarks.)
            US affairs are a matter for the US, but if asked I would oppose secession attempts for reasons given in previous posts.
            As far as my own continent is concerned, I note a recent interview with the Director General of the International Red Cross that Europe should be ready for popular uprisings, especially among benefit claimants, because of food shortages, like those in north Africa.
            “The fact that Europe is starting to look like the third world is not so surprising. Approximately 60 million people in the last 50 years immigrated mainly from the Arab world to Europe.”

          • JohnEngelman

            Karl Marx recognized that the natural tendency of unregulated capitalism was to build wealth while reducing the standard of living for most people. He also realized that unregulated capitalism was destined to experience increasingly destructive economic downturns. This is what did happen, and culminated in the Great Depression.

            The policies of John Maynard Keynes counteracted these tendencies. The Great Depression was ended by high government spending and employment paid for by high taxes on the rich. That is how “leftist mobs” were placated in the United States.

            As Keynesian economic policies have been reversed the tendencies Marx recognized are again becoming evident.

            Karl Marx was mistaken in arguing that class loyalties were stronger than loyalties of race and nation. That is why in the United States most white blue collar workers who are angry about declining living standards would rather direct that anger at non whites than the white plutocracy which is getting richer as most Americans are getting poorer.

          • David Ashton

            I agree with much of this in general, but it does not alter any of the substantial facts presented in my other posts. “There is something in the Marxist analysis, virtually nothing in his conclusions” (Oswald Mosley).

          • JohnEngelman

            I think it is interesting that a lot of posters on this website conflate white liberals with the white upper class.

            What is really happening in the United States is that our economy is evolving in ways that place ever more importance on superior intelligence, and less importance on race and sex.

            In the 1950s a white man with no education past high school, and perhaps not even a high school degree and an IQ of about 85 could have gotten a factory job with a strong union that would have won for him a lower middle class income, good benefits, and the ability to support a wife who did not need to work. He might even have been able to buy a house in the suburbs.

            Now that is not possible. Nevertheless that man’s sons, who are on the losing side of the income divide, would rather blame their declining living standards on a liberal elite than acknowledge that in an increasingly competitive economy they have little of value to offer an employer. They do not want to be told that a white plutocracy with the assistance of the Republican Party is getting richer at their expense.

          • Defoe

            “You overestimate the appeal of political propaganda and indoctrination. It is only effective when it tells people what they want to believe, or what they feel to be true from personal experiences in their lives.”

            Another undocumented assertion you use regularly.

          • David Ashton

            Well said. Two problems in refuting Engelman on “Cultural Marxism” are (1) presenting the abundant evidence is difficult in a small space, unless one also refers to scholarly sources for elaboration, but he disregards allusions to “books” that cannot be summarized for his convenience on screen, and (2) it is probably not worth the bother.

        • ViktorNN

          I’m not sure if your question is rhetorical or based on genuine curiosity, but Tim Wise makes what’s likely a decent living selling his books and getting paid well to speak at a variety of anti-white race-related conferences, symposiums, lectures etc. And beyond that he gets paid well to travel around the country consulting with police departments, schools, and various government agencies in how to make our public institutions more anti-white.

          There’s money to be made in anti-white “teaching” and “consulting.” Even for a white guy.

          Well, actually Wise isn’t white….

          • JohnEngelman

            Tim Wise looks white to me.

            The point I am making is that I do not see why there is a continued market for white guilt. During the 1960s and before one could plausibly argue that black poverty, crime, low average intelligence, and so on were caused by white racism. By now it should be obvious that blacks are responsible for their own problems and that most of them are unwilling or unable to take advantage of the opportunities that have been opened to them.

            Also, during the late 1960s and early 1970s the white left was primarily concerned with the War in Vietnam and looked for black allies. That was a long time ago. By now it should be obvious that the black race in the United States has been a political burden to the left, and that race wrecked liberalism.

            During the 1960s liberal Democrats went out on a limb to help the blacks. Blacks cut off the limb. When class is the issue Democrats win elections. When race is the issue Republicans win.

  • HamletsGhost

    Some 20 years ago Tom Metzger was dragged into court on account of his inflammatory writings having something to do with a skinhead murdering an Ethiopean in Portland. Metzger was found liable even though he had nothing to do with the murder and lived in another state when it happened.

    Is there a legal precedent here? Can Noel Ignatiev be brought to account for the murders of whites encouraged by his incenciary rhetoric? It’d make a great publicity case if nothing else.

    • Thomas Katt

      Metzger was defeated in court with the assistance of a vital eyewitness, who was given a break on a violent felony *criminal* charge in exchange for his testimony in the *civil* case of Seraw vs. Metzger.

      So you need a little extra help from the government.

      Didn’t help that Metzger didn’t have a lawyer.

  • SoCal LoCal

    No Surprise here! Other than race/gender studies, Anthropology and Sociology are the subjects most rife with PC viruses.

    P.S. It is nice to hear Mr. Taylor open up on the vermin invading our lives.

  • Remnant

    Jared Taylor is a national treasure. If there were justice in this world, he would be honored as a true leader and protector of his society.

    At the risk of insulting him, however, I do wish that he would consider going into politics. He is a natural leader, a gentleman and a very refined and cultivated person who is an unparalelled spokesman for White interests (thus you can see how I denigrate him in suggesting that any such sort of person should be a politician).

    White civilization and White America cannot hope for a better representative for their interests than Mr. Taylor, and history will look back at how lucky we were to have him, and how foolish to have ignored him.

    • Vonhauer

      Yes and he has always showed a good balance in his views. There are reasons why most of us are here at this site and not at the others.

    • Defoe

      The “Establishment” would do to Jared just as they did to David Duke…destroy him! There is not enough “backing”, yet, for him to be successful in politics.

  • Comrade_Bob

    Excellent presentation Mr. Taylor.

    • MobyWhite

      But not enough. He didn’t once mention the name of the Pres. of Univ. W. Ga or the Diversity Czars.

  • biff

    I LOVE the all the recent videos. Please, make this a habit

  • Wayne

    The fact is black crime is fast declining as is violent crime overall. Some attribute this to Obama’s election.

    “In the first half of 2009, homicides plummeted an astounding 67 percent over 2008 in Minneapolis, 47 percent in Seattle, 39 percent in Charlotte, 31 percent in New York, and 17 percent in Los Angeles.”

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2011/10/the_obama_effect_a_surprising_new_theory_for_the_continuing_crim.html

    Problem is you guys hate this sort of positive news…..you only want things to be bleak to justify your own existence.

    • FSR

      Why do you mention Seattle? Seattle is only 6.8% black, and yet blacks commit over half of all annual homicides in Seattle. In 2012, it was well over half. Seattle does not help your point.

    • Hal K

      If there really was an Obama effect on crime, they would be talking about the entire black population and not just a few cherry picked cities.

    • Defoe

      “Problem is you guys hate this sort of positive news…..you only want things to be bleak to justify your own existence.”

      We do not “hate this kind of news”. Only a deranged person would decry the reduction in violent crime. How could you conceive such an idea?

      Why would you think anyone here needs to “justify your own existence.”?

      Are you tracking ok?

    • Luca

      I think you omitted the fact that we now have an astronomical and growing prison population. The highest among any other nation in the world. I’m just using a bit of common sense here, but do you think that locking up criminals might lower the crime rate?

    • Wake-up Call

      I would be absolutely thrilled and exceedingly pleased for crimes of every kind simply to stop, as would, I am sure, most other human beings. I want this nation and the world set right and the future to be bright. Liberals appear to be the ones who need race-relations problems. Otherwise, they’d have neither compass nor chart to govern by.

    • JohnEngelman

      Some people need to hate. Some people need to blame their decline on a greater decline, such as genocide and race displacement.

      • David Ashton

        Actually genetic deterioration caused by dysgenic breediing or race replacement can contribute to social and cultural decline. One can “hate” this development without hating or seeking to injure innocent individuals.

  • Hal K

    Why do blacks commit violence against whites? Because they can. These crimes would be happening even without incitement by people in academia.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Because they are mentally ill and are jealous of whites. Blacks are covetous.

      • Hal K

        If anyone is mentally ill it is whites. You could say there is mental illness on all sides. It includes white guilt and nonwhite resentment. It could be described as a death drive (a term from psychology) turned inward by whites and turned outward towards whites by nonwhites. As a white, I am less concerned about trying to “cure” nonwhites than about trying to get whites to defend themselves at the group level for a change.

      • MobyWhite

        Blacks aren’t mentally ill. They are just blacks. They act normal for blacks, no matter what they do, unless its acting White all up en heeah.

        But they are good at imitation, so that’s a black thing, too.

        It’s called the African Soul, a minsnomer for sure, but it’s voodoo, for sure.

        It’s a Diversity thing. You don’t try to undertand it, only avoid it, like voodoo.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlQyEFdIzZc

  • Wake-up Call

    Liberals make speech or conduct likely to incite to race hatred” a serious crime in Canada and (as I believe) the UK. Well, these crimes apply to these guilty “university educators.” Every one of them Mr. Taylor mentions should be in jail right now.

  • Sam

    Love it, as I expected.

    Love the references at the end. We will always be accused of everything, including making things up, so references are so important.

    Love that JT is finally getting angry. Sometimes he’s too academic. We need someone to start leading and inspiring, not quoting dry facts and statistics. Whether it’s JT or someone else that’s what we need.

    We need to get more people woken up soon before it’s too late and we turn into South Africa where whites are a despised minority.

    • MobyWhite

      He’s not angry enough to demand change and take steps toward a better tomorrow.

      Pressure points, pressure points.

      Why didn’t he name the biggest White donors to Univ. of West Ga, and ask us to contact them with our concerns about the Hate School they support?

      Doesn’t Jared Taylor know how to get their names into the news? How about the politicians for that district? Why no an open youtube video letter to them, by name?

      Pressure points, pressure points.

      Jared, wake up, do more, you can, you must.

      • Brutus

        If those are the things that need doing, do them.

  • Anders

    You swine happy now? Yes. I think they are happy. I could just imagine that Ignatieff creature smiling happily to himself when he hears about the latest black-on-White atrocity. Or that Jensen creep, he’d get a spring in his step on his walk to the lecture hall.. Not to mention our buddy Tim Wise. And the rest, all of whom make a comfy living doing absolutely nothing useful to society at all.

  • LHathaway

    “Feagin, Jensen, Ignatiev, and all you other swine who teach blacks to hate us. Are you happy now? Are you happy how well your lessons were learned? There is blood on your hands”.

    Isn’t this what Jared Taylor does, teach whites to hate blacks, under the guise of revealing truth?

    I suppose, from an AmRen point of view, black have been killing whites when they get the chance for hundreds of years now, while Jared Taylor is shrugged off and silenced. Potentially, Jared Taylor could incite whites to mayhem and murder. Then again, I suppose if someone were aroused to even say bad words about people of color this would be taken more seriously that actions taken against whites.

  • Vambo Marble Eye

    Does it not occur to you that there are more black criminals because they are the poor ones, the ones disadvantaged, the one who have nothing else they can do to survive? It has nothing to do with the colour of their skin Take any black baby and bring him up in a rich family and he will not be a criminal. Take any white baby and bring him up around criminal gangs and he will join one. You are so stupid and blinkered. And full of hate. What does that achieve?

    • http://www.wfdcenter.org/index Dave Trader

      Low IQ morons always have more children than they can afford. Stop having so many criminals!!!!!!!!

    • Luca

      If poverty causes crime, then perhaps 50% of the US population would have been murdered during the Great Depression. The problem is DNA, environment, culture, single-family homes and testosterone. Poor women do not commit that many crimes do they? Blacks males commit murder, rape and robberies at astronomical rates. All countries have some form of poverty but no matter where you go in the world, every black dominated country, or city has extraordinary crime rates that defy any other factor. Japan has poverty, but one of the lowest crime rates in the first world.. As for DNA and heredity look at studies of twins separated at birth, reunited, and found to have startling similarities in behavior. Do research and find out how many felons came from single family homes. Your points are strictly emotional.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      You are confusing cause and effect.

      It’s not that poverty causes crime. It’s that crime causes poverty.

      If you take a black baby and bring him up in a rich family, then take a white baby and bring him up in the ghetto, it is far more likely that the black baby will become a criminal black adult than it is that the white baby will become a criminal white adult.

      • Vambo

        I am afraid you are a victim of a poor educational system and brainwashing by Fox news. There is nothing in the genetic make-up of any person, black or white, that makes them more likely to become a criminal. The way a person’s life turns out is entirely due to environmental factors. The ideas you have are like the ideas the Nazis put forward to justify their persecution of Jewish people. There is no scientific basis for these ideas at all. Genetically there is actually very little difference between the races. In fact, we probably all have some DNA in us from every race on the planet.

      • http://www.facebook.com/aemoreira81 Adam Moreira

        That is correlation…not causation.

  • Roger Taylor

    Jared Taylor is a great speaker and he seems to have a lisp whenever he pronounces the word “white”. It sounds like “Khwhieet”.

  • Tom_in_Miami

    The sad thing is that Mr. Taylor didn’t say anything we don’t already know and discuss ad nauseum. The question is what we are going to do about the problem. My guess: nothing. The only thing we can do is continue to flee. There are still some safe spots in the Northwest.

    • MobyWhite

      He never called for concrete action against U.West Ga.
      He’s old school race realist. Still thinks if you talk about crime and IQ enough, suddenly the White Race will wake up and throw off the yoke.

      We’re gald he’s talking, but he’s leaving out Plan B.

      • Tom_in_Miami

        I think I get your drift…

      • razorrare

        He is too busy getting “anti-semetic” post deleted…hehehe

  • Bantu Education

    Awesome delivery and deservedly hard-hitting comments by Jared – what a man..!!

  • Tom_in_Miami

    I previously left a message, but it seems to have disappeared. The question is, given the hate poured out on us by the left, what are we going to do about it. There are still relatively quiet spots out in the Northwest to which we can flee.

  • Thomas Katt

    Nitpick: Christopher Monfort shot 2 white cops, killing one. He was subsequently shot and paralyzed by the cops. Taylor was probably thinking of Maurice Clemmons, who committed the crime described in the video. Both happened in the Seattle area a few months apart.

  • Ben

    What’s wrong with these suicidal people? And I’m asking this as a european/american-culture-appreciating Ashkenazi Jew. If they hate america so much, why don’t they leave? White hatred makes no sense to me. Almost all of our culture and technology are products of white culture. Is it resentment?

    • Wake-up Call

      Persons thirsty for political power (and the wealth and luxury and high status it can bring) always need a target: they need propaganda and someone to blame for all the evil in the world. It is their claimed raison d’être to fight social evil — the justification for their rule. Tyrants have always operated on this principle.

    • Wake-up Call

      As Dr. David Yeagley, conservative Comanche Indian, puts it: Liberal Whites have a racial “Oedipal Complex” against the American Founding Fathers and European civilization in general. It’s all a fruit of the Counter-Cultural Revolution of the 1960s — a revolution which embraced “Dr. King” as one of its greatest heroes — if not its greatest hero.

  • Katherine McChesney

    PJTV had a Trifecta today on this very topic. They notice that the difference in how the press reported this murder as compared to George Zimmerman’s encounter with thug Trayvon Martin. Commenters were being very forthright with their anger toward this ‘slavery’ hustle blacks perpetuate.

  • Danimalius

    One of the best videos American Renaissance has yet produced. You’ve managed to explain the problem and sources of anti-white violence in a way that maintains the high ground, and accuses our opponents of the depravity they’ve been committing. Our cause is right and just, and was presented here as such. Well done.

    • MobyWhite

      Jared Taylor should use Brittny Watts to circle back around to Eve Carson.

      One of her Diversity murderers was on unsupervised parole because the Diversity parole officer didn’t do her “job”.

      Why don’t we have a national news story about her obligation to the White community for contributing to the death of Eve Carson?

  • George White

    Very powerful message. You nailed it again. Thanks for your great work.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bert.sterling.9 Bert Sterling

    Shared with a very conservative but racially-ignorant internet forum. Thanks, Jared, for daring to stick your neck out.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Moderator

      That’s a big field, race-denying “conservatives.” Would you care to share which one?

    • maxonepercent

      Do you really think the MSM would dare to publish something like this?

  • MobyWhite

    Why does Jared Taylor always walk up to the line and then chose Whitey Fail again?

    Not once did he call for change, not once did he make an appeal for pro bono lawyers to help sue Univ. W. Ga. for hate crimes and fostering terrorism against the White community, not once did he demand that the Gov. Deal investigate the race hatred taught in Ga. colleges and universities.

    You need to start the conversation on race by stimulating your side to take the next step with you and organize for change.

    The playbook is well worn because it works well.

    How much time to you think we have?

    You should raise money for an advertisement in the Ga. newspapers:

    Recount the Brittny Watts Horror, and then call for help through money and manpower to protest the mainstreaming of Anti White Hatred in the classroom.

    How many more must die before the White community demands accountabilty from our leaders?

    You can start the Conversation On Race in memory of Brittny.
    Don’t you think her widower is ready to help after sitting in the courtroom and realizing that his wife “who just embraced all different kinds of people” was killed by Diversity because she was White?

    If he had married a mulatto, he’d still have a wife today.

    • Defoe

      Excellent points. Going “legal” with some of these cases makes good sense to me if for no other reason than the publicity garnered from that action. Once again though, it takes $$$ to do things like that. We need someone with big bucks to sponsor us.

  • razorrare

    You Jews Happy Now??? har har har

  • prettycelticwarrior

    Hey, does anyone know if the little 9 year old boy named ” Fred Martin” from the story below is white?

    “(African American) Teen accused of throwing 9-year-old from a roof in the Bronx says it’s an accident

    Casmine Aska, 17 admitted he did not seek help or check on the victim after what his attorney calls ‘a tragic accident.. — Freddy Martin( 9 years old)– remains on life support, but his family says he’s expected to live.

    Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new

    • razorrare

      bad link…try again

      • prettycelticwarrior

        Sorry about the link :)
        GOOGLE :Results
        February 4, 2013 12:01 PM

        Casmine Aska, Bronx teen accused of throwing boy, 9, off roof, says he “slipped”
        ByCrimesider StaffTopicsDaily Blotter

        “Casmine Aska, above, is charged with attempted murder after allegedly throwing Freddy Martin, 9, off a roof in the Bronx on Friday, Feb. 1, 2013. /CBS New York(CBS) NEW YORK – Casmine Aska, a teenager accused of throwing a 9-year-old boy from a rooftop in the Bronx, claims that he slipped and dropped the boy by accident,CBS New York reports.
        Aska, 17, is charged with second-degree attempted murder. Police say he hurled 9-year-old Freddy Martin off the roof of a five-story building in the Morris Heights section of the Bronx Friday night.
        A police report said Aska told investigators he grabbed Freddy by the legs while on the rooftop around 8:30p.m. Friday. Aska said he slipped and the boy fell five stories, according to CBS New York.”

        “Police say Aska did not call 911 and did not tell his mother, the station reports.
        Freddy was taken to New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center where he was listed in critical condition, police say. As of late Sunday night, he was in a medically-induced coma.
        The fourth grader lives with his parents and grandparents in the five-story building, CBS radio affiliate 1010 WINS reports. The suspect is his neighbor in the building; one lived on the fourth floor, the other on the third.”

    • razorrare
  • razorrare

    This post is for the resident “Christian” Zionist Engleman…

    There is no such thing as a “Christian” Zionist…you and your tele-evangelist buddies are complete frauds and worship the big lie…truth is not in you.

    The term “Judeo-Christian” didn’t even come into existence until after the Second World War when Jews became supreme in their influence over major media.

    The truth is that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. That would be like saying Satanic-Christianity. The religion now called Judaism did not even come formally into existence until six hundred years after Jesus Christ. It began with the codification of the Babylonian Talmud. In Judaism, the Talmud is the supreme scripture, not the Old Testament. Only Satanism can rival Judaism’s vicious hatred for Jesus Christ. The Talmud even claims that Jesus Christ is being punished in hell by “being boiled in hot semen!”1

    Really,what kind of a christian would support the killings of other Christians and get giddy like a demon on l.s.d. when other Christians post get deleted because according to your rabbinic moderator the post are anti-semetic…You Jews Happy Now? har har har

    • Nate Miller

      Oh really? Well then I guess why even worship Jesus Christ? After all he was Jewish. Or why venerate Christian icons like Mother Mary, St. Peter, St. Paul, all the prophets of the Bible etc…after all those icons are Jewish. Right? NOT!

      If you so desire to have an all white/ all European religion, then you are better off rejecting Christianity and instead adopting a more indigenous European religion like Witchcraft, Odinism, Teutonism, Asatru & Hellinic paganism. Christianity was, is and will always be a part of the Jewish culture.

      • David Ashton

        The view that “Christianity is part of the Jewish culture” is not widely shared among Jews, some of whom blame it for the Holocaust.
        Is the Gospel of John anti-Jewish?
        Why don’t Jews worship “Jesus Christ”? Isn’t The Talmud anti-Christian?
        I make these points not to attack or defend either Jews or Christians but to introduce some balance and accuracy into what are complex relationships.

      • Defoe

        Peddle your ridiculous ideas elsewhere.

  • Vambo

    I see that my reasoned reply pointing out the inaccuracy of claiming there are genetic predispositions in any race to become criminal, has not been published. This only shows how insecure you are in your beliefs.

  • sandy truthtree

    clap clap clap. bravo. the collapsereport applauds you. You are a great man and you speak the truth. Walk into any college bookstore and look at the education department. you will see the horror the hooror in what they are learning it’s all about race.

  • http://independent-british-nationalist.blogspot.com/ British Activism

    Thank you for making these videos Jared. They have all been great so far, and this one is no exception.

    Although we do not have quite the same examples here in Britain, and perhaps not the same degree of hatred, there is without doubt a similar kind of attitude towards whites by the media and the liberal-elites in institutions and academia.

    Where you have your sucker punches and flash mobs, we have had our “pack attacks”. When white women are targeted over there for rape and abuse, the same happens here with many Blacks, not to mention the ‘grooming’ issue of young teenage whites.

    Where you have your anti-white media pundits, we have ours like Yasmin Alibhai Brown and the likes of many a BBC presenter. We cannot often get our issues discussed in academia or ‘debating societies’ either – as the institutions recoil in horror and abuse at us even thinking we should be able to have rights or a say in how society develops.

    I am sure that on a certain level, all formerly ‘white’ homogeneous nations are under the same conditions of control and subversion. The examples cited in the video are quite stark and makes the point excellently.

    As is said, it is not only blacks who imbibe this attitude – but general white society itself. It trickles down into wider society, which explains the ‘white guilt’ phenomena of liberals, who see no value in their own race and become horrified at the robust defence of it by others.

    So yes, whilst it is naturally “American-centric” this situation plays out to various levels of potency around the ‘white world’.

    It is fantastic that Jared turns the tables, exposes their game and the effect it has. Stick these “swine” on the receiving end of some justified self righteousness by us. They are the haters, they are the evil doers, they DO have blood on their hands and have caused much wider misery and problems with their endless meddling and social engineering.

    This is the way to do it, in my opinion. Thanks again Jared.

  • IKantunderstand

    We should all of us, have the courage that Mr. Taylor has evinced in this video. It is time for all of us to pledge our lives, fortune, and our sacred honor to this, our country, founded on the courage and undying fealty to a concept which stood for a celebration of the human spirit unshackled by tired serfdom and monarchy. Please do not misinterpret what I am saying. This country is not a propositional nation. This country was founded by a group of extraordinarily gifted and brilliant White men. I for one, do not believe in coincidence. I believe that these gifted men were in fact brought together by divine providence, at exactly the same time. Scoff, if you wish. We have never seen the likes of these since. I believe the existing federal government has crossed the line. They are officially tyrannical. I said before that I didn’t really care what the name of our new third party should be. Now, I’m thinking: MOLON LABE, SWINE.

    • Defoe

      Prepare, prepare, prepare.

  • AlbionMyway

    Congratulations to Jared Taylor on a powerful presentation. I agree with the message completely, especially the sentiment that these faux-liberal, anti-white academics have blood on their hands. I wonder if there is a litigious answer to this institutionalized wickedness. If it could be reasonably established that the murderer was influenced by anti-white college professors then they could surely be sued or prosecuted for inciting violence. Such a prosecution might make the others think a bit.

    There are similar faux-liberal academics in Britain. I would take this opportunity to name and shame Richard Garcide of the ‘Centre of Crime and Justice Studies’ at King’s College London, who (when police statistics showed that blacks in London commit strikingly disproportionate levels of violent crime) blamed it on Britain’s ‘history of Racism and Imperialism’. He also made unfounded insinuations about the police. This is a classic example of an irrational apologist projecting black guilt onto whites. His shameful and stupid remarks can be found in a Daily Mail article entitled “Black men ‘to blame for most violent crime’ but they’re also the victims”…

    • David Ashton

      This is a good example of the HUNDREDs of “Cultural Marxist” productions that infest academe, especially social studies and history. This is what Engelman ignores.

  • russ hook

    This an agenda from the MOST RACIST POS on Earth, the INTERNATIONAL JEW.

  • Robert

    I’m rarely moved to post a comment on AmRen, although I do visit regularly and enjoy a majority of its content. Thank you for this video, Mr. Taylor.

  • SintiriNikos

    Great video, but isn’t Mr. Taylor a little rude to swine? I’m not surprised by the Harvard example, but two Universities in Texas? But then, Austin was always a liberal hotbed.

  • Peter Collins

    “There are more and more of us that understand exactly what is going on”
    This should be the slogan for Amren.

  • cadmium

    i knew about the crime over there, but i never new about this ”game”. and i’m absolutely sickened.

    any thug who randomly smashes a citizen’s face to that degree should be given the harshest of penalties, and i would actually suggest hanging. you cannot accidentally haymaker a random person in the face and it is not a youthful mistake of course. such a criminal can never useful to us.

    but a black or any minority who does this to punish whites specifically, who perpetuates this game culture, indoctrinating further cretins to follow suit…should certainly be hung. .

    clearly many modern people would consider that extreme. but i suspect many people do not understand the severity of attacks like these, thinking because no weapon is involved the victim will perhaps just have some tweety birds flying round their heads.
    but unlike in movies, when people get hit like that, flush in the face, bare knuckle haymakers, you will often see smashed jaws which need humpty-dumptying back to together, smashed teeth, mutilation essentially, along with risk of brain damage or death. they give cat-scans to boxers who get knocked out and these guys wear gloves and can take a punch.

    can you imagine this ”game” happening in an iron age european community? can you imagine these people allowing especially the weak, frail in their population to be part of this ”game”?

    instead of the ”ethnic guest” perpetrators of this game being sheltered by some PC culture, they would be hunted down and sent a message, a very reverberating message.

    even in modern times, i just can’t see this happening in china for instance. the government response towards these gangs would be beyond brutal. and even the blacks would learn.

    violence during mugging, sexual assault is bad enough obviously. but those involve the satisfaction of greed and sex, of primal urges. this is something different, actually more disgusting in its substance in some ways. this is a population of degenerates toying with us. knowing they can get away with it, not a glimmer of fear in their eye.

    it’s both sickening and an utter embarrassment for modern european populations, showing just how weak our societies have become. our citizens at risk of being skittles for some sniggering, swaggering african gangs when in theory we have the power to yoke that whole continent by the year’s end if we chose.

    footage of this ”game” needs to be spread amongst white peoples. black gang warfare is excused via economics, muggings via drugs and 1st world ”poverty”. and muslim attacks are excused with religion and evil whitey intervention. but this to me is much harder to excuse by any of the usual suspects. there is absolutely no gain for these blacks except pure sadism. and in that regard it makes it a powerful wake up tool.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JBFGOQQ2RC5YQ6YOCSUPJQGN2U AvgDude

    Another fool negro “scholar”.

  • Fran Webber

    Stop subsidizing colleges with tax money. Let the students pay for it themselves. Then they would stop taking these ludicrous classes taught by leftist professors.

  • Peoplesjustice

    Excellent! Thank you!

  • rightrightright

    I think that your average black thug uses the the Left’s anti-White pronouncements as justification for what he would do anyway.

  • Anon

    I found what Taylor had to say here disturbing not for what he said but for what he left unsaid. Where is the outrage over an event like this? This clip amounts to little more than an intellectual “what did you expect” from such inflammatory anti-white rhetoric. Missing is any real sense that such rhetoric was an outrageous falsehood….a direct attack on whites and an attempt to provoke violence (which has happened) and that such is not only wicked…but a legitimate provocation of a backlash.

    It is this complete and utter failure to even whisper privately of a backlash that is the real root of the violence, actually. Everyone with any real experience with blacks understands that all this rather thin complaint over past wrongs by whites is so much hogwash that the average black doesn’t bother to examine in any depth whatsoever. It is, literally, besides the point. What they want are safe victims. Not victims, mind you but SAFE victims. Examine any group of blacks, any background, any time in history, any country they habitate and you will plainly see this as the principle motivating force behind their behavior……the available of SAFE victims….ones who can’t or simply won’t fight back. Better if they won’t even say anything about it as a group.

    The left is supplying the, mostly unnecessary excuses for violence. But what TAYLOR is supplying, in the way he responds is the safety factor by taking an almost absurdly neutral stance in how he explains this.

    White people are going to have to accept something important about the situation (or die). Violence and lots of it are a necessary response. ONLY to the extent we are no longer safe to victimize is this situation going to be resolved. I am tempted to say simply, shut the hell up and pick up a gun, except, I guess, someone has to attempt to counter the media whitewash on the situation. And 65 million people this year did as I suggest and picked up a gun. A good start.

    But understand this. They knew what was necessary DESPITE what people like Taylor had to say, not because of it.

    We need better than this……if we wish to live through the next few situations. Because I am not suggesting that such things are necessary or even important. I am saying that either we change in this way or we are finished as a race…no, not a hundred years from now but perhaps a decade from now…depending on how events unfold today…..THIS year.

    Pick up a gun and don’t put it down. If you allow it. I mean if YOU personally allow it, first there will be registration, then confiscation, then abuse….and finally extermination. DO NOT FORGET WHAT HAPPENED IN THE SOVIET UNION. That isn’t just possible here…..it’s unfolding right before our eyes. Nobody is sounding the alarm but at least it seems that on some visceral level, our people are not as suicidally stupid and cowardly as the soviets were.

    Such things should be overt and shouted from every pundit, however….not left unsaid and subconscious. That is extremely dangerous.

  • Epiminondas

    “And we won’t forget.” No, sir. We will not. The GOP cowards at the Chamber of Commerce can hide under their desks all they want. They can’t hide from these thugs forever.

  • http://www.facebook.com/nokwan.noway No Kwan Noway

    The liberal machine and the founders of the naacp have one thing in common. That is the factor that wants to destroy us.

  • MBlanc46

    It’s well to focus on the source of the ideas that the killer used to try to justify his attacks. I do wonder, however, whether the fact that the victims were all white females is of some significance.

  • Troy Swonger

    Those blacks didn’t know their place. We had 2 black kids, and they never tried to assert any sort of dominance over whites. They were actually very well behaved and probably successful today, unlike the bullies you speak of.

  • antiquesunlight

    I’m glad some people are discussing this case. I only knew about it because it so happens that my geology professor at college was a juror for the case and mentioned it in class. I don’t think it was in the local news much at all. Also, some years ago in an apartment complex I used to live in, a Hispanic man used a hatchet to chop the head of a white boy. Again, I only knew about it because I lived there (not when it occurred, but I heard from neighbors). The news didn’t talk about it much.