Why They Call Us Names

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, January 18, 2013

Name_Calling
It's their best defense for diversity.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • ZenBonobo

    Even morons look nice in well fitting suits. I mean no offence.

  • JohnEngelman

    Those flame who cannot refute.

    Because Jared Taylor tells the truth he cannot be refuted. He can only be insulted.

    • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

      You’re right, he can’t be refuted. He just gave a good argument against diversity, and let’s not forget that you support it. Unless you’re finally coming to your senses.

      • JohnEngelman

        What I support is allowing diversity to happen on the basis of achievement and choice. What I oppose is requiring diversity to happen by reducing intellectual requirements for blacks and Hispanics, and by reducing physical requirements for women.

        I am opposed to affirmative action. I have said so previously on this website.

        I am in favor of allowing employers to hire Orientals and Jews when those Orientals and Jews are here legally. I am also in favor of allowing Nordic Gentiles like me to befriend Orientals and Jews.

        In the intervention with Arthur Jensen that I excerpted above Jared Taylor said, and I quote, “Well, it seems to me that if there are two racial groups that can live side by side in harmony, it appears to be whites and Asians.”

        • Tucker

          Living side by side and generally getting along does not equate to Whites allowing Asians (or any other competing ethnic group) to flood into our native homelands, eventually outnumber us and then think they have the right to rule over us. On November 6th, 2012 – these ‘Asians’ who you seem to think are the allies or friends of Whites, voted 72% for a Communist anti-white, mulatto who’s every action since taking office has been designed in some way or another to put the screws to White European people.

          Sorry, Mr. Engelman. Nice try, but no dice, pal. Asians, despite their many good qualities, are still a racial competitor and Whites are under no obligation to allow our race to be subjugated to being ruled by them, or to any other ethnic group other than our own.

          • JohnEngelman

            Tucker,

            When you say that Asians are “a racial competitor,” I would like to ask: how is competition a threat to America? I thought competition was what this country was all about.

            Right now whites of European ancestry are 63.7 percent of the United States. Asians are 4.7 percent. Moreover whites of European ancestry have a higher birth rate.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States

            Consequently, consequently I do not think Asians are going to be able to rule over us. The only whites with reason for concern are whites who lack the intelligence to compete with Asians in the class room and on the job.

            As far as the overwhelming Asian support for President Obama, he is not a Communist. He is fortunately a very popular leader. I voted for him myself.

            ———–

            “According to a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, President Barack Obama’s approval rating is near an all-time high, and the public is on his side in the upcoming debt ceiling debate.

            “The poll finds Obama’s approval rating at 55 percent, his highest level since November, 2009 (excluding a brief bump up to 56 percent after the president ordered the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in 2011)… 61 percent view Obama as a strong leader.”
            http://www.nationalmemo.com/poll-obamas-approval-surges-voters-back-white-house-on-debt-ceiling/

          • Tucker

            Incredible. I had previously developed a very low opinion of John Engelman’s pathetic level of intelligence, but I am embarrassed to now have to admit that i didn’t assign him a score that accurately measured just how mind bogglingly stupid he truly is.

            Look, Johnny boy. Let us examine the facts, circa 2013. A population of highly aggressive, virulently anti-white, and equally virulent racial supremacist minded people who, if we are to believe the official census figures (which I do not), supposedly only constitute a mere 2.5 to 3% of our entire nation’s total population have managed to:

            1. Execute a near complete takeover of our entire mainstream media.

            2. Execute a complete takeover of our entire banking and financial sectors.

            3. Execute a complete takeover of our academia, book and news paper publishing sectors.

            4. Execute a complete takeover of our Federal Government and almost every branch of that government.

            5. Execute a placement of a dog collar on our entire U.S. Military and via that dog collar placement, now have our military soldiers stationed all over the world, risking their lives fighting the endless number of enemies of one specific nation in the middle east and aggressively bankrupting our nation in the process.

            6. Executing what appears to be a final and revolutionary war inspiring effort to disarm the American public of our most effective and most efficient personal firearms for self defense against what is clearly and without question a totalitarian, out of control, criminal government.

            This is a short and abbreviated list of the evil that a 2.5 to 3% of our nation’s population are doing to the founding White European stock of this nation. And, you have the gall to come on to a pro-White website and float the mentally insane idea that an Asian population of 4.7 % is something that Whites who have brains bigger than golf-balls should not be concerned about?

            Let me guess. You flunked 8th grade Math class.

            And, somehow never signed up for the class Race Realism 101.

          • George White

            Sadly, and surprisingly, asians voted for Obama in even higher numbers than Latinos! I think it was 76%. This was surprising to me, but I’m afraid that it indicates that push come to shove, asians will join the blacks and browns to help screw whitey.

          • JohnEngelman

            Actually Asian support for President Obama means that, unlike most low income whites, they realize that the Republican Party exists to do nothing but advance the economic interests of the richest five to ten percent of the country.

          • David Ashton

            The richest 10% percentage of the USA have more than their fair share of the People you “love”.

          • JohnEngelman

            Rich Jews and rich Orientals usually vote Democrat because they care about people who are not rich.

          • David Ashton

            Provide your evidence for this assertion. I don’t think it “antisemitic” to suggest that rich Jews care about Israel and that this is a major factor in their political donations.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews and Orientals voted overwhelmingly for President Obama. Because he is likely to raise their taxes I doubt rich Jews and Orientals had selfish reasons for voting for him.

            I also care about Israel. If you listened to the third debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney you should have realized that in the United States support for Israel is not a political issue. The only political issue is how best can we support Israel.

          • JohnEngelman

            Tucker,

            The first person who gets angry in a debate loses. You are angry because I keep pointing out that Jews and Orientals are more intelligent on the average than white Gentiles. I am frequently able to substantiate my assertions by quoting articles that have appeared on this website.

            You exaggerate the prominence of Jews and Orientals in the the United States. You fantasize their malevolence. It is true that they have earned a prominence out of proportion to their numbers in the U.S. population because of their superior intelligence.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            Yeah Tucker, heaven forbid that you face race replacement, racial genocide and theft without the beautific smile of Buddha. How dare you be angry about that. You must turn over the country that our fathers built to racial aliens, and do so with placid equaminity, or else you will lose to our smug, self-satisfied quisling leftist mascot. He is willing to occupy a subordinant position no doubt on all fours to our new overlords, why won’t you?

          • Extropico

            That must be why they want to emigrate to be with White Gentiles instead of vice versa. Amalgamated Asians are not smarter than Whites. The lighter skinned ones test well, but have yet to show creativity… and until we helped them with favorable trade rules, most lived in abject poverty. You compare the tests of some of the more fortunate and motivated Asians with a much larger sample of Whites. The Jewish sample is also not directly correlated. Take a look at the IQ tests for Israel as a whole instead a smaller, selected sample of urban people who have worked in banking, law, medicine and teaching… you might be disappointed. Your disapproval with Whites annoyed at mass immigration is noted and in exchange I know you support mass migration into Israel and Asia. Just admit it if you can. Lol.

          • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

            It’s not only about who is smarter. It’s about who sets the agenda for the society. While most Asians and Jews may share white-western values, they are not us. They can only mimic us and they will find ways, subtle as they may be, to change our white social order to their benefit.
            In the end we are forced out and we lose.

          • David Ashton

            Orientals do not have to be “malevolent” for white people to oppose the transformation of huge areas into a vast Chinatown. Or Mexico. The white west is looking at a reverse colonialism.

          • JohnEngelman

            When I lived in the San Francisco Bay area I was fascinated by t he Chinatowns of San Francisco and Oakland. I would have enjoyed living there.

            When comparing various immigrant groups and the effects they have on the United States we should compare immigrant groups with higher average IQs than white Gentiles and lower rates of crime and illegitimacy, and immigrant groups with lower average IQs than white Gentiles and higher rates of crime and illegitimacy.

            Mary Morrison has written several excellent articles for this website on the difficulty of teaching Hispanics.

            http://www.amren.com/features/2012/04/white-teacher-in-an-la-school/

            http://www.amren.com/features/2012/10/back-to-school-in-los-angeles/

            http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/education-fraud-in-la-public-schools/

            Ask her if she would rather teach Orientals.

          • HKwills

            I suspect our Mr. Engelman is a composite of 5 Israeli 20 somethings intent on misinformation. A group who are masters of sophistry.

          • kjh64

            Actually, nobody knows the percentage of actual Americans who are White. The census counts everyone living in the USA at the time of the census, foreign nationals living here are counted, people living here illegally are counted. Ironically, American citizens living abroad are NOT counted. The censue is NOT accurate. The census needs to count US citizens living abroad and it needs to differentiate between citizens and non-citizens. That would give a much better figure because foreigners living here and there are millions, are NOT Americans.

          • JohnEngelman

            Everyone who is an American citizen is an American, and deserves to be here.

          • Dubyasee

            John Engleman.
            You wrote, ” I would like to ask: how is competition a threat to America? ”

            And I would like to answer that competition is a threat to any identifiable group living amongst other identifiable groups, vying for the same jobs, customers, resources, food, educational opportunities, etc.

            When one of the groups gains a significant advantage in the dissemination of information and ideas, not to mention finance, all the other groups are at a disadvantage. When one group is highly supportive of members of their group and use their control in the dissemination of ideas to demonize another group from engaging in the same strategies, then competition becomes unfair or threatening. If you allow for the majority population to identify the country, then yes, competition is a threat to America.

        • George White

          If we are going to have AA, then have it for whites too. We should make up 65% of the students at prestigious schools. And the tribe should be 2%, their rightful spot as well.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am opposed to affirmative action under any circumstances.

          • Extropico

            I doubt that very much. You favor government sponsored ethnic cleansing of Whites off the continent using taxpayer funds to do it. And you favor it without reciprocity. There is no analogue requiring Asia or Israel or Africa to accept our poor and educate them in our language… and that doesn’t bother you at all.

          • JohnEngelman

            How do I “favor government sponsored ethnic cleansing of Whites off the continent using taxpayer funds?”

            I favor individual achievement based on personal merit, regardless of race or ethnicity.

            Affirmative action programs have always worked against Jews and Orientals. If you to to an elite university you will find that it is swarming with Jews and Orientals. They are there not because of diversity programs, but because of superior intelligence.

          • Extropico

            Preparing for the next enormous wave of Asian migration to California, from which you financially benefit? You sound like a foreign national with that speech. Most of the great intellectual achievements for thousands of years have been from the West. I await avidiously for you to adjure the migration of poor but talented Whites into Asia, Israel and Africa at the expense of those respective locales.

          • Tucker

            Mr. Engelman? Take my advice. If you are an Al Gore tree hugger, you need to resign from that activist movement as soon as possible.

            Purchase a chain saw, and it would be very wise to start spending your weekends, cutting down as many trees as possible.

            This is good advice, Johnny boy. Believe me.

          • George White

            No, it has nothing to do with that. They use cohesive group strategies and we don’t.

          • JohnEngelman

            Attributing the success of Orientals and Jews to “cohesive group strategies” is like blaming black poverty on white racism.

          • Extropico

            Not at all. Actually black cohesive strategies in Amerika account for a large portion of the difference in income of Amerikan blacks versus blacks in Africa. Still waiting for you to advocate diversity in Israel and Asia. You have no universal moral precept.

          • JohnEngelman

            Israel is a very small country. I think it is perfectly acceptable for the Israelis to only admit Jews as citizens, although they do admit immigrants who have skills they need.

            China, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore also admit immigrants who have jobs lined up ahead of time. I think those countries are wise not to open their borders to those who do not have jobs waiting for them. They are particularly wise not to open their borders to third world immigrants. I wish American immigration policy emulated their policies.

          • David Ashton

            You LIKE Israeli culture and Chinese culture, different though they are. You could always try to emigrate and try to fit in. Maybe you could help the gun-bearing settlers who want Palestinians driven across the Jordan, or you could join the burgeoning internet fraternity in China and set up a dating site for the PLA.

          • JohnEngelman

            If I could get a job in Israel or China I would run to catch it. Until then I enjoy the presence of Jews and Chinese in the United States.

          • David Ashton

            Why couldn’t you get a job? Do they have ethnocentric inward settlement controls?

          • George White

            Problem is, affirmative action is already law. So, I say we push for our 65% quota. That would REALLY shake things up, since we’re getting screwed on the job and at school and everywhere you turn.

        • Minerva

          Hmmm…so you are a “Nordic Gentile”? Hmmmm.

        • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

          The problem is that there are far more Asians than whites and if whites allow Asians to increase in number, the opportunities for whites will fall.

          • George White

            I agree that it’s a zero sum game. Their gains come as a result of our losses. The sooner whites see this the sooner we can put a stop to it.

          • David Ashton

            Yes, as Engelman said elsewhere of China, that’s a lot of people, or words to that effect.

    • White Nationalist

      Yes Jared Taylor “tells the truth” indeed, and just stated that :

      “Diversity is BAD for America because people of different races often don’t get along with each other and because if this diversity keeps up it will make White people a minority, probably a HATED minority in the country their ancestors BUILT”.

      You got that engleman ? Diversity is bad for America and you therefore can no longer refute that non-White asians are BAD for America.

      Thank you for finally admitting the truth and that you were wrong about asians being good for America after all these years.

      Once again, repeat after Jared Taylor: DIVERSITY IS BAD FOR AMERICA

      • JohnEngelman

        Once again I repeat after Jared Taylor, “Well, it seems to me that if there are two racial groups that can live side by side in harmony, it appears to be whites and Asians.”
        http://www.amren.com/news/2012/10/arthur-jensen-has-died/

        • a multiracial individual

          John you are often told that Whites and Asians cannot get along. If these people had ever visited a California suburb they would never make such a claim.

          • JohnEngelman

            I got along fine when I lived with Vietnamese in downtown San Jose. I have had Oriental girl friends. The two best friends I had in high school were Chinese Americans.

            The only people who resent Orientals and Jews are those who cannot compete with them because the Orientals and Jews are too intelligent.

            Sitting in a classroom with Orientals and Jews can be a humbling experience for those with nothing to be proud of but the fact that they are Nordic Gentiles – like I am, BTW.

          • Tucker

            Oriental girl friends?

            Fishing in another man’s pond is a behavior that racially healthy men are known to strongly disapprove of, Mr. Engelman.

            After all, we don’t want other men to think they have a right to fish in our pond, so we should show them the courtesy of practicing what we preach.

          • JohnEngelman

            NBC News

            By HOPE YEN

            updated 2/16/2012 5:32:36 AM ET

            Interracial marriages in the U.S. have climbed to 4.8 million — a record 1 in 12…

            White-Asian couples who married had the highest median income, nearly $71,000. Behind them were the following race combinations: Asian-Asian ($62,000), white-white ($60,000),
            http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46409832/ns/us_news-life/t/interracial-marriage-us-hits-new-high/#.UPrF-B1EG3k

          • Tucker

            As a direct consequence of the Cultural Marxist program to promote race mixing via their iron-clad control of the rapidly collapsing mainstream media, which pushes and heavily promotes race destroying miscegenation between whites and their genetic destroyers, i.e,., non-whites & their genes – you have the gonads to come on to a pro-White website like AmRen and post this sort of racially destructive crap and act as though this is news that should be reason for CELEBRATION?

            Let me ask you a question, Mr. Engelman. Whenever you take a drive out in the country, when you glance out the window of your automobile, and when you see trees growing along the side of the road, do you ever view those trees with any sense of dread or apprehension?

            Or, like a good liberal, anti-white, white race genocide promoting, enlightened Obama voter – do you pull over to the side of the road, and take your designer water bottle out and pour it’s contents on the base of those trees, as to help ensure that their limbs are as sturdy as possible for any future ornaments that might decorate them?

          • JohnEngelman

            The growing acceptance and practice of interracial marriage cannot be blamed on a conspiracy of “cultural Marxists.” It is happening because there is no obvious disadvantage to it.

            Interracial marriage is a matter of personal choice and individual freedom. Those who do not want to practice it do not need to.

          • BannerRWB

            “Interracial marriage is a matter of personal choice and individual freedom. Those who do not want to practice it do not need to.” – True, but in an environment where interracial partnerships are continually displayed in our media as the more positive relationship, combined with Whites having an ever greater PROXIMITY to those of differeing races, the white race is being diminished at an ever increasing rate. We now allow for interracial relationships, but if we were an ethnostate, where only Whites where allowed to live within in the first place, then those within the nation would find mates within the proximity of where they live, who would also be within the White racial group. As for having a wellness factor concerning the race issue, I don’t recall the low White birth rate and high divorce rate as being such concerns during the 1950’s. Otherwise, anyone wishing to express their personal choice or individual freedom to marry outside the race could always leave the White ethnostate. BUT THAT’S NOT IT, is it? The whole world wants to live IN the White world, in the societies that Whites create, so people literally risk death to break into our nations. As for us and our apathy on the race issue, by allowing non-White immigration and interracial success, we will also allow for our own destruction. By the way, just how may non-Whites do we allow into America? 30 million? 100 million? 2 billion? They will keep coming in and by doing so they will crush our societies, our culture, and our racial group. I don’t mind at all that you or any other White person wishes to befriend those of anohter race, but could you do it in their country and not ours, or maybe within some multicultural zone of universal friendship, which would be outside the ethnostate borders? With our current policies, we are on a path to die out quietly or, at some point, revolt and move into sustained conflict. Should you see another path where the White race remains viable and in control of their historic nation states well into the future, please feel free to explain.

          • JohnEngelman

            BannerRWB,

            I feel ambivalent about immigration. I like ambivalence. It is a good vaccine against fanaticism.

            Paul Krugman, who is my favorite columnist, expressed my opinion when he wrote, “open immigration can’t coexist with a strong social safety net; if you’re going to assure health care and a decent income to everyone, you can’t make that offer global.”
            http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/the-curious-politics-of-immigration/

            I enjoy the cultural diversity immigrants provide, while recognizing that a high rate of immigration has economic, environmental, and social costs.

            Although I appreciate different racial groups and cultures I do not think they are of equal value.

            I have a high regard for Jews and Orientals. I have never had any trouble with Hispanics. The fact that I have been the victim of black criminals has hardened my view of the Negro race without causing me to dislike a person because the person is black.

            As I type these words I am listening to black jazz on National Public Radio. I like jazz, blues, and soul music. Nevertheless, for me real music is classical music.

          • BannerRWB

            What? These sound like the random computer generated responses of a non-being. Taking for granted that you are truly a real person, then if by your responses you’re trying to convince me of arguments against supporting an ethnostate, I am not convinced. As for my question, which I doubt you want to answer, I will ask it here again just in case you may have missed it: “Should you see another path (other than the ethnostate) where the White race remains viable and in control of their historic nation states well into the future, please feel free to explain.” Otherwise, our ambivilance towards immigration IS EXACTLY WHAT WILL CAUSE FANATICISM. It will eventually bring about the destruction of the White race through a slow consuming process, or, should we revolt, a situation similar to what we had in WWII in Europe. Why our politicians wish to risk such a path for our nations is something I do not understand.

          • JohnEngelman

            You have made two points that I would like to respond to.

            First of all I do not believe that the white race is in danger of extinction, so I am not concerned with keeping it “viable.” Whites with high IQs and marketable degrees from elite universities have nothing to worry about.

            Second, I am concerned with the well being of decent whites who were not born with high IQs. Nevertheless, my concern for decent law abiding whites is equal to my concern for decent law abiding non whites.

          • David Ashton

            Engelman is not a computer: his posts drip with individual egotism and personal experiences.
            It’s just that they are so repetitive that they sound mechanical.
            As for almost all his posts, their contents are no more out of place than Communist interventions would be on a site for Gulag survivors.

          • Katherine McChesney

            You know I believe John Engleman is here only to inflate his ego. I also believe he prefers compliant and easily controlled Asian women and because White women see through him. I believe he lacks a certain strength as a man to engage in relationships with his own race.

          • Der Typ

            Lol. I knew I wasn’t too far off when I said Krugman… I give up. I won’t make the mistake of every replying to or even reading what you say ever again. It doesn’t help that majority of what you publish is the same old stuff. If one has read just 2 or 3 of your comments, then they have read them all. I’ll just sum you up as a Krugman follower, a Keynesian (the only thing he did that was good was try to reduce the demands on the Germans after WW1), and someone who has a fetish for all things Asian. And no I don’t care to debunk you, but don’t make your back raw patting it so much.

          • JohnEngelman

            I read any political thinker for insight rather than doctrine. I have found valid insights on this website, particularly in the writings of Jared Taylor, J. Philippe Rushton, and Marry Morrison.

          • Carlos Geary

            Asians, Native American and some Native American “Hispanics”
            (Aztec, Mayans, Incas & others) are the same race. They share genetics characteristics like the “Mongolian blue spot. There are white
            “Hispanics/Latinos”; Hispanics trace their ancestral origin to
            Europe, most to Spain, Portugal, but others to Germany, Ireland, Italy and
            other parts of Europe.
            50.5 million Americans (16.3% of the total population) listed themselves as
            ethnically Hispanic or Latino. Of those, 53.0% (26.7 million) are racially
            white.
            A study of married, Hispanic, revealed that Hispanic Whites often marry a white non-Hispanic partner, although 66% still marry a Hispanic White partner. Hispanic and Latino Americans refer to an ethno linguistic group. The largest population of Native American Hispanic como from Southern Mexico and Central America. Most white Hispanics come from South
            America. According to the 2000 census, Cuban Americans and South Americans had the highest college graduation rates. Populations interbreed (gene flow) so that any lines you draw between groups are always going to be subjective. WHITE GENES DO NOT DISAPPEAR BY MIXING. it is possible to be born pure 100% Caucasian and yet have black ancestry.
            If a black mate with a white most of their children will look black (dominant
            genes – first generation), but if one of those children mate with a white,
            he/she is capable of producing white children, but these children (because they inherit only recessive genes) will not have the ability to produce black children unless they mate with someone else who is black . If the white descendants only mate with other whites then the entire line and population will only be white even though one original ancestor was black.

          • Dan Reardon

            Engleman, People like you are a bigger problem to our race than any Black or Brown in the world. I sincerely hope you latch on to one of these cherished Asians you so love and have a childless future with her. The White world would be much better off without members like you.

          • Carlos Geary

            Engleman, is trying to help poor whites, but letting them know that they are voting against their own interest. How can whites became a majority if they do not have affordable medical insurance, for their women & children? How can poor whites ascend in the social ladder if college tuition is not affordable for their children? Instead of putting down others, just concentrate in voting for your own interests.

          • David Ashton

            The average IQ of ethnic groups is only one important consideration.
            Their ethnicity is another.
            Most people prefer to live among those with a similar culture, language, tastes, customs, etc.

          • JohnEngelman

            “white/Asian newlyweds of 2008 through 2010 have significantly higher median combined annual earnings ($70,952) than do any other pairing, including both white/white ($60,000) and Asian/Asian ($62,000). When it comes to educational characteristics, more than half of white newlyweds who marry Asians have a college degree, compared with roughly a third of white newlyweds who married whites.”
            http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/

            Those with more education and better incomes, which is to say those with more intelligence, are better able to appreciate other cultures, races, and ethnicities.

          • David Ashton

            Not a question of “appreciation” but of “belonging”.

          • David Ashton

            The variations between the human races or subspecies result from evolution in separate regions, mainly adaptation to climate and secondarily sexual selection. There are different genetic characters, some more distant than others. If a population is optimally adapted to its environment, the introduction of new genes will lower average individual fitness, unless and until the balance is restored by natural election.
            Particular combinations can expected to result in some maladaptations or disharmony, however slight, and in some medical incompatibility; for example, in crossing between Chinese men and white women some 10% of the latter will be at greater risk of hemolytic disease in newborns than with white husbands.
            Since the end of the 1960s there has been no serious scientific research into human hybrids, whereas there has been an escalating campaign in the media favor of miscegenation.

          • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

            Because something happens, does that make it right?
            You don’t seem to grasp the problems whites are facing or the need for solutions.
            Miscegenation is the problem, not a solution.
            You clearly have an Asian fetish. Your personal tastes are not a solution to white decline, displacement, and dispossession.

          • JohnEngelman

            It is true that I do not see anything morally wrong with interracial marriage. I think moral error happens when others try to prevent those who love each other from getting married.

            It is also true that I prefer Oriental woman to white women, although I have dated both.

            White decline, displacement, and disposition is not happening to whites with high IQs. What is happening is an evolutionary process that throughout human evolution has bred the human species for higher intelligence.

            An ancillary process is the merging of the races into one race. To an extent this process began about 60,000 years ago when one to several hundred modern humans left Africa and to a limited extend had children by the more primitive humans they found outside of Africa.

            The process accelerated with the beginning of the age of discovery which began with Columbus’ discovery of the New World. I believe Columbus had an American Indian mistress. I know Cortes did.

            In the United States the most vigorous practitioners of impregnation have been white men who owned slaves or who hired black women.

            Since the late 1950s the practice and acceptance of interracial marriage in the Untied States has increased dramatically. Because there is no obvious disadvantage to the practice I do not think the changes can be reversed. Those who complain about these changes lose credibility on issues where they might be able to win.

          • Katherine McChesney

            Are you more attracted to them because Asian women are more likely to engage in exotic sexual behavior?

          • JohnEngelman

            When a white woman has a good figure she wants everyone to know. When an Oriental woman has a good figure she thinks it is only important for one man to know.

          • Minerva

            I voted “DOWN” and my “DOWN” vote literally JUMPED to the “UP: vote! and I definitely agree with “Tucker”!

          • Extropico

            Remember you said that when the push comes to make “Orientals” a minority in Asia or the Jews a minority in Israel. The Asians get most of their technology from White Gentiles… not the other way around.

          • bluegrass84

            I’m glad you believe Whites deserve to exist by taking the “racial bronze.”

            “The only people who resent Orientals and Jews are those who cannot
            compete with them because the Orientals and Jews are too intelligent.”

            Oh yes, that’s the only reason, we’re all so envious of their big Judeo-asian brains., and we all hate blacks so much because they’re just oh so fast and “be taken all our wimenz with their negro jive”. Oh no! Our resentment could never come come from a history of an inseparable cultural schism, competition and animosity to outright warfare from Japan to Atilla the Hun. For your lovely, “chosen whites,” we’re just so jealous of their success. It has nothing to do with their creation, bankrolling, and management of nearly every anti-Western and anti-White institution since Karl Marx, to civil rights, to Hollywood.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Paul Krugman? Anyone catch that? Krugman is one of the reasons people don’t want the Red-Sea Pedestrians included in our future ethno-state. I know they’re not all like him but he is an leftist extremist of the worst type.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            That and a lot of us don’t think it’s a good idea (unlike Paul Krugman) to spam the money supply with trillion dollar coins with Oprah’s image on them. I’ll say it one more time, for the low information crowd: Of course the DJIA is at an all time high. M-Zero money supply pre-FinCrash in 9/2008 was $800B, now after several QEs it’s now $2.7T, and yes I know it’s more complicated than that. Yet, the best the DJIA can do is get back to a little above the “par” it was at in the summer of 2008 before the crash? That’s scary.

          • JohnEngelman

            Paul Krugman teaches economics at Princeton. He is a columnist for The New York Times. In 2008 he won the Nobel Prize for economics.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Three good reasons to hate his guts. Your love and admiration for the ashkenazim and orientals is well documented on this site Mr Engelman as well as your penchant for putting all things into the realm of IQ testing. I agree with the value you place on intelligence in general but I don’t see it as the be all/ end all that you seem to hold it up as.
            I think the Nobel Prize is a politicized fraud given the fact that Glorious Leader ( Barry Soetoro) was handed one for achieving absolutely nothing except being a mulatto president. Krugman’s Nobel is equally suspect since he is an extreme leftist and they are traditionally favored by the committee. Barry The Great has rendered the Nobel irrelevant just like Slick Willie rendered presidential miltary service irrelevant.

            Being a columnist for the New York Slimes is no great achievement either. His hackneyed rants and constant shilling for the Obamessiah are trite and shallow. He brings nothing new to the arena of economics nor the arena of societal issues. Just the usual, tiresome garment-center, faux-concern for the “underpriveleged” and the”working man”.

            As far as being a professor of economics at Princeton goes…well, I’ll grant you that Krugman is certainly no fool but I would submit:
            A) King Hussein is a Constitutional Law Professor whose antipathy and disdain for said document is self evident and …

            B) Semitic, leftist academics have done WONDERS for the USA, haven’t they? (rhetorical question obviously)

          • kjh64

            I think you miss the point. The point is that Whites do not want to be displaced by people of other races or have large demanding minorities, even if that race is more intelligent or behaves better on average. Orientals in America IMO, as I said above, do behave better on average in some ways than Whites. The Orientals in America that I’ve seen are usually hard-working and well-behaved. Jews are also very intelligent on average. I don’t mind small numbers of them. However, no matter how intelligent etc., the problem is when you have large numbes of different races, ethnicities, it balkenizes a country and weakens the host culture. Neither Japan or China or Israel want nor do they allow other races to become large minorities for this reason.

          • David Ashton

            This is the crux of the argument.

            White people, especially English people, are my people, even those with below average IQs. They speak my language, share my national memories, inhabit my lands, etc. I don’t want them replaced by Chinese or any other peoples in the lands our forefathers created. Nor do they.

          • David Ashton

            Does this gramophone record never get cracked?

          • JohnEngelman

            The truth does not change.

          • David Ashton

            You possess The Truth?
            Come on, re-read Hoffer’s classic on obdurate fanaticism. Oh sorry, it’s a “book”. I actually bought my paperback copy years ago in a bookshop in a largely Jewish area of North London, which intellectually though certainly not politically was quite an agreeable environment, but there is a big difference between erudition and an eruv!
            As for likes and dislikes, I do not wish to live within a Mandarin or Hebrew world, or to find my own English homeland occupied on by non-English peoples who displace my own.
            Think about the West Bank for a moment: the issues there are not just about IQ levels.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have read each of Eric Hoffer’s books. I have read “The True Believer” several times. It is one of the most fascinating books I have ever read.

          • David Ashton

            One of my best friends in junior school was Jewish, but I would not wish to live in Israel. I sometimes use our local Chinese takeaway (they do excellent English steaks) but I would not wish to be the only English food-seller in central China. Do you get the point I am making?

          • JohnEngelman

            Of course I get your point. You and I have obviously different likes and dislikes.

          • George White

            The problem in Los Angeles isn’t the asians, that’s for sure. Asians have not been doing drive bys and dealing drugs and getting free everything. In fact, asians tend to actually work and EARN their way, unlike the blacks and browns.

          • bluegrass84

            Is that the basis of our nation: work and make money and by gosh you’ll become an honorary white-picket fence deracinated westerner?

            We can’t have our basis on the simple criteria of “show up, go to work, consume useless goods, and pursue vapid sexual and media pleasantries.”

            So what that Asians behave, work hard, and make money. If Whites had the lowest I.Q. and were the most criminal would will still not deserve to exist? Why must we always find excuses just to simply defend ourselves from dispossession?
            WE DESERVE TO EXIST AS WHITE PEOPLE. We have no responsobility to tolerate and absorb the excess population from the rest of the world, be they some techie-Indian taking away an American’s I.T. job or a Mexican taking away an American’s blue-collar one.

          • Katherine McChesney

            But, there are Asian gangs and they are rumored to be more brutal than other gangs. They aren’t hot-tempered like blacks and latinos but once they have a grudge they act on it. Fairly often I used to see saw one Japanese gang in Santa Monica. I always spoke nicely to them as I was told they will defend ‘you’ from other gang attacks.

        • Luca

          I think more along the lines of “Forced Government Diversity” is what Jared speaks of. I actually think a natural “diversity” is acceptable. If you can get along with someone, that’s fine. But if you can’t get along with a person and want to keep your distance or not hire them, or rent to them, or serve them, that should be fine too. Forcing an overwhelming, destructive, “Diversity” agenda through politics, law, immigration and media is what is so repugnant.

        • kjh64

          Asians, and by Asians I mean the Oriental ones are usually intelligent, well-behaved people who in some ways act better than Whites on average IMO. I don’t mind a small percentage as they cause few problems. However, i do not want their numbers to grow where they form large minorities because multiracial societies are more balkenized. Even if a group is better than Whites, it doesn’t mean that I want to be replaced by them, or have my country changed or culture weakened by them. The Japanese like many things about American culture, they don’t mind a few Americans but they do not allow nor would they want large numbers of Americans living in their country, sharing their jobs, political power, changing their culture etc.

          • kjh64

            I was responding to 2 different posts, these 2 were not supposed to be back to back.

          • jay11

            My Chinese neighbors (all up and down the block) are nice and we greet each other and exchange pleasantries once in a while, but both they and myself know that hanging out in each other’s houses, going to sporting events together, having family barbecues together and going into business deals together is not going to happen.

            It’s not because they or myself have made a conscious decision to remain separate. It’s not because we refuse to socialize with each other. It’s an unspoken understanding that we live in different worlds, different cultures. When my immediate neighbor has his big backyard barbecues, he invites 20 or so of his chinese friends and their families. I hear the laughter, the noise, and it’s all in chinese. Even the kids run around and converse in chinese. If I were there, all those people would feel compelled to speak english, and many would feel angry about it. Others would ignore me and just speak in their native language. I would be the rain on that party and its free flowing joy.

            How can I invite my chinese neighbors over for dinner? They have so many cultural requirements. I’ve learned a few and it just seems like so much fuss. I’m an American. When a family comes over it’s informal. They might bring a gift, though it’s not required. Everyone begins to mingle and the food flows. It’s not the same in eastern cultures. There’s issues of deference to elders, rituals for how food is served, etc.

            My chinese neighbors have also warned me that the local school, which is now majority asian, is ‘full of asian gangs.’ Asian gangs mostly afflict fellow asians, so I don’t notice it. Black and latino gangs afflict everybody, so I have no choice to notice it. Sure, Asians are quiet and keep to themselves and I’d rather have an asian for a neighbor than a black or latino, but the ability to live around each other does not mean the establishment of a communal society. I like most asians I meet, but unless they have adopted american cultural values, there is a barrier that cannot be surmounted.
            If I move to China, I am sure the local people would expect that I begin to conform to their ways. Even then, I am confident that no person in Asia would accept me as an equal in their intimate family lives based on the fact that I will always be a foreigner to them. Only white people ever made the leap to be able to accept non-whites as equals, and even then it is only a subset of white people who can do that.

          • ATBOTL

            I think a lot of whites who do not live near areas with very large Asian populations do not understand how separate recent immigrants(most Asians) are now. These aren’t the assimilated Chinese and Japanese Americans here for generations that were predominant before. Many have surprisingly anti-white views.

        • Refugee

          Engelman, I don’t think it matters much any more. The U.S. that was and was ours as whites is gone already. Have to start anew in another way.

          • JohnEngelman

            How do you intend “to start anew in another way?”

            The America of white male supremacy is gone with the wind. Right now the leaders of the Republican Party agree with the leaders of the Democratic Party that there should be more non white immigration.

          • Refugee

            Forget about the concept of a U.S. Build de facto white communities/enclaves within the rotting system in this country. As far as I’m concerned they can have the mainstream and choke on it, So can you.

      • Seb

        Engelman is an Asian Supremacist troll. Ignore it, stop feeding it, it will go back to Daily Kos to watch abortion videos.

    • JohnEngelman

      “East Asians on average are smarter than whites.”

      – Jared Taylor, from “Liberal Name Calling”

      ———

      Arthur Jensen gave this interview to Jared Taylor in 1992. It is still as timely and relevant as the day it was recorded…

      Arthur Jensen: Now what if you had different racial groups that are compatible in abilities, general values and standards of living, as the Asians here seem to be? I mean, they’ve been conspicuously successful in our society, and what problems they’ve had have largely stemmed from their success.

      Jared Taylor: Well, it seems to me that if there are two racial groups that can live side by side in harmony, it appears to be whites and Asians…

      Arthur Jensen: That may be true. But again, I’m wondering about the degree to which differences in basic characteristics may be at the basis of that. Where the differences in basic characteristics are not conspicuous, as in the case of Asians and whites, and when persons can fit in and do the same kinds of jobs and do them as well as anyone else, it may work. See, there are blacks who fit in this way too — who do all right…

      I’m merely interested in the preservation of civilization, regardless of where it is. Some people are so afraid, of say, the Asians taking over in this country. Well if they can take over and do a better job than the rest of us, if they preserve the great things of both Western and Asian civilization, well I don’t think the world will be worse off. Race and color and national origin and that sort of thing, don’t really matter much to me at all. I’ve just never thought along those lines.

      My fear would be a nation that devolved to the point where the great things of Western civilization would be lost. I’d hate to think that Beethoven would be lost to all except some small elite, and that these things could only be accessible on recordings and laser discs and so on. I like the idea of having an opera house where I can go and see Wagner, Verdi, and Puccini. I think that the Asians are capable of preserving that level of civilization, once introduced to it.
      http://www.amren.com/news/2012/10/arthur-jensen-has-died/

      ———

      Jared Taylor Interview

      From Carol M. Swain, Editor, Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America, (Cambridge University Press, 2002); December 21, 1999

      Interview: What about Jews? Where do Jews fit into your picture?

      Many of the white nationalist or white pride publications have a deep hostility toward Jews. Your organization though, or at least your magazine, has had a number of Jews who have written articles for it. What are your views regarding the Jews? Are they considered “white”?

      Jared Taylor: Oh, I think European Jews are Europeans, sure.

      Interview: So you don’t see any problem with Jews integrating into American society?

      Jared Taylor: I think if they — if European Jews wish to assimilate — I think many of them have and do. I don’t see any particular problem there.
      http://www.amren.com/interviews/1999/1221russell-nieli.html

    • JohnEngelman

      “East Asians on average are smarter than whites.”

      – Jared Taylor, from “Liberal Name Calling”

      ———

      Arthur Jensen gave this interview to Jared Taylor in 1992. It is still as timely and relevant as the day it was recorded…

      Arthur Jensen: Now what if you had different racial groups that are compatible in abilities, general values and standards of living, as the Asians here seem to be? I mean, they’ve been conspicuously successful in our society, and what problems they’ve had have largely stemmed from their success.

      Jared Taylor: Well, it seems to me that if there are two racial groups that can live side by side in harmony, it appears to be whites and Asians…

      Arthur Jensen: That may be true. But again, I’m wondering about the degree to which differences in basic characteristics may be at the basis of that. Where the differences in basic characteristics are not conspicuous, as in the case of Asians and whites, and when persons can fit in and do the same kinds of jobs and do them as well as anyone else, it may work. See, there are blacks who fit in this way too — who do all right…

      I’m merely interested in the preservation of civilization, regardless of where it is. Some people are so afraid, of say, the Asians taking over in this country. Well if they can take over and do a better job than the rest of us, if they preserve the great things of both Western and Asian civilization, well I don’t think the world will be worse off. Race and color and national origin and that sort of thing, don’t really matter much to me at all. I’ve just never thought along those lines.

      My fear would be a nation that devolved to the point where the great things of Western civilization would be lost. I’d hate to think that Beethoven would be lost to all except some small elite, and that these things could only be accessible on recordings and laser discs and so on. I like the idea of having an opera house where I can go and see Wagner, Verdi, and Puccini. I think that the Asians are capable of preserving that level of civilization, once introduced to it.
      http://www.amren.com/news/2012

      ———

      Jared Taylor Interview

      From Carol M. Swain, Editor, Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America, (Cambridge University Press, 2002); December 21, 1999

      Interview: What about Jews? Where do Jews fit into your picture?

      Many of the white nationalist or white pride publications have a deep hostility toward Jews. Your organization though, or at least your magazine, has had a number of Jews who have written articles for it. What are your views regarding the Jews? Are they considered “white”?

      Jared Taylor: Oh, I think European Jews are Europeans, sure.

      Interview: So you don’t see any problem with Jews integrating into American society?

      Jared Taylor: I think if they — if European Jews wish to assimilate — I think many of them have and do. I don’t see any particular problem there.
      http://www.amren.com/interviews/1999/1221russell-nieli.html

      • a multiracial individual

        Yes Mr. Taylor does not like diversity in America (Asians likely included). Of course, like any informed and honest person, he can see that on average, Asians are more intelligent than Whites. Of course, having to compete against high IQ people has liabilities as well. It is entirely possible to not want to associate with a race for reasons other than fear of sociopathy. Of course many people around here share Mr. Taylors’ goal of a less diverse America. The difference between Mr. Taylor and them is that he does not needlessly taint is message with inaccurate statements about cognitive differences between the races.

        • JohnEngelman

          If Jared Taylor regrets the presence of Asians in the United States, that is an area where he and I disagree.

          • KevinPhillipsBong

            Jared Taylor on Asians.

            The following is from American Renaissance (June 96), “If We Do Nothing” by Jared Taylor:

            When Asians arrive in large numbers, their effect is more ambiguous. Some North Asian groups commit fewer crimes than whites, make more money, and do better in school. Others, like the Hmong and the Cambodians, have fantastically high rates of poverty and welfare dependency. However, it does not matter whether Japanese or Chinese build societies that are, in some respects, objectively superior to those of Europeans. It matters only that they are different.

            When large numbers of North Asian immigrants moved into Monterey Park, the long-term white residents did not leave because the newcomers rioted, opened crack houses, covered walls with graffiti, or were rapists and robbers. They moved out because Monterey Park, in countless ways, ceased to be the town in which they had grown up or the town to which they had moved.

            The merchandise in the stores and the faces behind the counters changed. So many signs appeared in strange languages that the fire department insisted that at least street numbers be legible to English-speakers. Even city council meetings began to include exchanges in languages other than English. The newcomers reworked zoning laws to permit businesses in what had been residential neighborhoods. Asians bought the little bungalows whites had lived in, bulldozed them, cut down all the trees, and built huge new houses nearly out to the property line.

            All these changes and many others—some of them vastly more troubling than issues that are routinely put to the voters to decide—took place without the permission or consent of the whites who had lived there for years. One unhappy resident paid for a billboard that said, “Would the last American to leave Monterey Park please take down the flag.”

          • JohnEngelman

            Obviously, this is an area where Jared Taylor and I feel differently.

            I welcomed the Vietnamese immigration to downtown San Jose, California. They built up a blighted part of the city. I was fascinated by their restaurants and shops. I often went back to visit after I moved out.

            Vietnamese who worked in those restaurants and shops sometimes told me that I was the first white person to patronize them. I was obviously not the last.

            In the San Francisco Bay area I also enjoyed visiting Japan Town in northern San Jose, as well as the China towns in San Francisco and Oakland.

    • Garrett Brown

      You disagree with much of what Jared says, so… What?

      • JohnEngelman

        I share Jared Taylor’s reality perceptions. I probably do not share all of his likes and dislikes. That is an important distinction.

        • Garrett brown

          You are pro diversity, he is not. So no, you don’t. GG

    • David Ashton

      You once said you support the ADL.
      Do you think it is right to “monitor” Jared Taylor?

      • JohnEngelman

        Those who have done nothing wrong have no reason to fear being monitored by the Anti Defamation League.

        • David Ashton

          Define “wrong” in this connection.

          • JohnEngelman

            immoral, illegal, factually incorrect

          • David Ashton

            But the ADL “monitors” these actual or potential offences only if they are suspected of Gentile opponents of immigration, etc.

    • David Ashton

      Jared Taylor loves and defends “white identity”. Do you, or is your affection restricted to Chinese, Vietnamese, Jews, Mexicans and “Red Indians”?

      • JohnEngelman

        Feelings are one thing. Perceptions of reality are something else.

        Jared Taylor would like to live in a community, a state, and ideally a country where everyone is white.

        I would not. I like diversity, but I disapprove of affirmative action. The racial and ethnic groups I like to live and work with do not need affirmative action.

        Mr. Taylor and I have different likes and dislikes. We agree that racial differences are significant, largely genetic, and intractable. We also agree that it is foolish and dangerous to allow the immigration of racial groups with high rates of crime and illegitimacy, and low average IQs.

        • David Ashton

          I see a difference between a nation which consists preponderantly of people of similar race and culture which are attached to their own homeland, and a conglomeration of incompatible races and cultures which have no national cohesion or sense of a common homeland. There is a decisive difference between having some Indian restaurants and being an Indian, or between having Jewish scientists and being an Israeli. But the white nations, especially those of Anglo-Saxon heritage, are the only ones under alien siege, and not only by “racial groups with high rates of crime and illegitimacy, and low average IQs”.
          The USA as New Tibet/Greater Mexico, or Europe as Eurabia, no thanks.

          • JohnEngelman

            Whites, Orientals, and people from India get along fine. It is blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims who cause problems.

  • Joseph

    Thank you as always, Mr. Taylor.

  • Luca

    Name calling is only one tactic. The other Liberal tactics I’ve encountered, especially during a debate are to change the subject, answer a question that has not been asked, answer a question with a question, change the subject, use an exceptional anecdotal example,chant a slogan, raise your voice, interrupt, ostracize the individual, ganging-up, acting horrified or grossly offended by a particular comment.

    Every time they do this you must point it out to them by saying something like. “I’m sorry you’ve switched subjects on me again” or “We’re having a civil conversation, why are you raising your voice, is it to make up for lack of substance because you feel you’re losing ground?” or “What does name calling or chanting slogans have to do with our topic?” or “Tell me what part of my statement is not true” etc.

    • http://MetaLane.wordpress.com WideBridge

      These are excellent responses. I think though one has to memorize them ahead of time, because one of the phenomenon in “talking” with liberals or leftists is they get you into such a state of upset emotions and defensiveness that you do not think calmly anymore. Then you naturally say something wild. That’s one of the important ways they get you. Then they use the thing you said to burn you at the stake, or burn you in some court, or in your career, or in your character before the public, or something. The techniques liberals use are really terribly ugly, cruel, and I believe they cannot rationally be classified as other than sick.

    • JohnEngelman

      The best way to refute an argument is to prove that it is based on factual premises that are not true and/or to identify logical fallacies in it.

      Here is a list of logical fallacies, along with an explanation of deductive and inductive logic:

      http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

      • george00

        The only Orientals that have a slightly higher IQ than whites are Chinese, Japanese and Korean. All the rest have a lower on average IQ than the white average.

        • JohnEngelman

          Because one out of five humans is Chinese that is a whole lot of folks.

          • veritas_lux_mea

            Personally, I’m pretty skeptical about Chinese IQ being on the
            Japanese/European level. Ignore your precious IQ studies for a moment
            and look at the abundant historical evidence. China was colonized by
            several European powers, each with maybe 1/10th of China’s population.
            Tiny Britain imposed its will on China for 150+ years. Japan, on the
            other hand, was never colonized. And do you not think that a nation
            with 1.3 BILLION Europeans would by now have colonies on Mars, power
            everything with hydrogen, utterly dominate every scientific field, and
            achieve God only knows what else? It certainly wouldn’t have to steal
            large amounts of technology from “less intelligent” nations with only a
            tiny fraction of its population. And even though they will eventually
            eclipse us economically, their GDP per capita will not even come close to ours,
            and that’s with 200+ million (eventually) unproductive third-worlders here. For a nation with 1.3 billion of the “most intelligent” people on earth, China sure has punched below its weight.

          • JohnEngelman

            Countries and civilizations rise and fall. From the fall of the Western Roman Empire to the beginning of the Italian Renaissance Western civilization was eclipsed by China.

            It was with the Renaissance that Western civilization became preeminent. Now the West is falling. China is rising. Within the United States Chinese Americans are rising.

            Many Americans, even those who post comments here, want their states to secede from the United States. The breakup of the United States will hasten the development of Chinese hegemony.

          • veritas_lux_mea

            Rural China still has some of the worst poverty and living standards in the world. Hundreds of millions still live on less than a dollar a day. Civilizations rise and fall to be sure, but not all are equal. China will never have the same degree of hegemony that the West has had over the entire world for the past 500 years. Though China may become more powerful than any single Western nation, it will not wield more power or influence than the West as a whole. Chinese intellectual superiority is a myth.

          • IstvanIN

            The major western powers are on the decline, largely due to non-white immigration, and will be no match for China once Europeans are the minority in Western Europe, the Commonwealth realms, and the US.

          • David Ashton

            That is why we must fight together against this destiny on behalf of our descendants and in honor of our ancestors.

          • george00

            What about eating Tiger penises and other Chinese folk medicine quackery or beating animals to death because they think it tenderizes the meat or killing girl babies. Sounds barbaric and stupid to me.

          • george00

            Taken as a whole the Oriental Race has a lower average IQ than the average Caucasian IQ. So the major premise of your argument is incorrect. The only thing you’ve got is that Orientals on average commit less crime than the average White person.

          • george00

            Taken as a whole the Oriental Race has a lower average IQ than the average Caucasian IQ. So the major premise of your argument is incorrect. The only thing you’ve got is that Orientals on average commit less crime than the average White person.

          • george00

            I meant to say “average white IQ” not “average Caucasian IQ”.

          • JohnEngelman

            “Hundreds of studies on millions of people show a threeway pattern. IQ tests are often made to have an average score of 100, with a “normal” range from 85 to 115. Whites average from 100 to 103. Orientals in Asia and the U.S. tend to have higher scores, about 106, even though IQ tests were made for use in the Euro-American culture.”

            – Professor J. Philippe Rushton
            RACE, EVOLUTION, AND BEHAVIOR
            http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

            Professor Rushton has spoken at six American Renaissance Conferences

          • David Ashton

            The IQ of the huge population inside the China-Mongolia landmass is likely to be lower than those of Chinese emigrants.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is probably true.

          • SintiriNikos

            That was always the case. they always were 1 in 5 of the world, so what? Also, I’m dubious about their intelligence. At the very least, they are not very creative or original, otherwise we wouldn’t be seeing knockoff Apple stores and Louis Vuitton.

          • Katherine McChesney

            SintiriNikos: I am in agreement with you. They are guilty of copyright infringement and steal patents for their industries. If they were so intelligent why do they do this? Ha ha. “Hello Kitty” is the only thing that comes to mind that they invented.

          • David Ashton

            So should they find living-space in north America?

          • JohnEngelman

            On several occasions I have expressed my ambivalence about a high rate of immigration to the United States. More immigrants mean more people. More people from any cause – including a high birth rate among white Gentiles – means more consumers and more job applicants. By the law of supply and demand this means higher prices, lower wages, and higher profits.

            The high rate of immigration to the United States is a leading reason for the growing income gap.

            Nevertheless, Orientals and whites get along well. Jared Taylor, with whom I do not always agree, has acknowledged this.

          • David Ashton

            So you are against an increase in the number of white Gentiles.

          • JohnEngelman

            Yes. I am in favor of “zero population growth,” which is to say a stable population.

          • Katherine McChesney

            John, a Chinese woman I knew in my Santa Monica church corrected me when I used the word ‘oriental’ to refer to Asians. She said “Oriental’ should be used for inanimate objects, art, etc. But “ASIAN”, is proper usage when referred to Chinese, Japanese or Koreans.

          • David Ashton

            That’s part of the trouble, except for the odd few who prefer Chinese girls to white ones.

        • IstvanIN

          “Engleman” can say what ever he wants. I wouldn’t care if my people were the dumbest on earth, I would still want them to survive as a distinct racial group.

          • Unperson

            Agreed. Yes, East Asians have many fine attributes. They’re not nearly as bad as blacks, or even hispanics. They fit into Western countries better than most other ethnicities — but they’re still not us, and nothing will ever change that. They may do certain things at a European level of excellence, but they aren’t Europeans and can’t be. I can admire their culture from a distance, but I don’t in any meaningful way relate to it. “East is east, West is west, and ne’er the twains shall meet,” and all that.

            Or, as Jared Taylor puts it, “Only we can be us.”

    • JohnEngelman

      “We’re having a civil conversation, why are you raising your voice, is it to make up for lack of substance because you feel you’re losing ground?”

      – Luca

      The first person who gets angry in a debate loses.

      • David Ashton

        Or who refers you to books you should read that have a different “truth”.

        • JohnEngelman

          Here again, if they read the books with understanding they should be able to express the truths they found in those books in their own words.

          A number of years ago I took a fascinating seminar on Das Kapital given by the Washington, DC chapter of the American Communist Party.

          http://www.cpusa.org/

          Nevertheless, in a political argument I do not tell others to read Das Kapital. Instead I utilize the insights I gleaned from it while rejecting what I consider to be Karl Marx’ errors.

          • David Ashton

            Well, I certainly would not advise anyone (except a PPE undergraduate specializing in Marxism) to try to wade through every page of “Das Kapital” or to try to make sense of all of it; there are a number of good introductions, both supportive and critical in clearer prose.
            It is not practicable to do digests of important books that might widen or deepen your outlook in the space available on AmRen. Don’t you have a local library?

      • Katherine McChesney

        That’s your rule, John. Sometimes you are infuriating.

        • JohnEngelman

          Some people get angry at me because I tell them facts they do not want to be told about. I document my facts, frequently using sources I found on this website.

  • http://www.dailykenn.com/ Daily Kenn

    Name calling was painfully effective in elementary school. Apparently liberals failed to mature with the rest of us.

    • JohnEngelman

      Name calling is a vice of those with strong opinions and weak minds. Conservatives are not immune to this vice.

  • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

    Thinking of liberalism/egalitarianism as a religion with fanatical adherents capable of burning heretics at the stake is, it seems to me, useful. Towards the end of his book The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion by social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, he writes:

    “Morality binds and blinds . . . This is not just something that happens to people on the other side. We all get sucked into tribal moral communities. We circle around sacred values and then we share post hoc arguments about why we are so right and they are so wrong. We think the other side is blind to truth, reason, science and common sense. But in fact everyone goes blind when talking about their sacred objects. Morality binds us into ideological teams that fight each other as though the fate of the world depended on our side winning each battle. It blinds us to the fact that each team is composed of good people who have something important to say.”

    And towards the end of his BookTV.org presentation on the book, Haidt concludes:

    “…Follow the sacredness. Around it you will find a ring of ignorance. If you know what a group holds sacred, you know what they cannot think straight about . . .”

    The political left cannot “think straight” about race. Many are dangerous fanatics. So let sparks of light from the kinds of spirited debate found only at sites like AmRen escape from this limited realm to cool the radical revolutionary ardor of those controlling all the culture-transmitting institutions in the Western world: news media, entertainment industry, schools, universities . . .

    Let there be light!

    • HamletsGhost

      I agree with that quote except the implication that liberals are good people with something to say. Liberals, especially college ones are truly nasty pieces of work. Full of pomposity that they hide behind a thin veil of piety. Liars and cheats who always try to assume a mantle of moral superiority.

      Just as some people assume big egos to hide a deeply felt sense of inferiority, so too do liberals try to hide their typically mediocre character behind a cloak of morality. It’s annoying as hell to see it in hypocritical Christian holly-rollers and it’s no better to see it in liberals.

      Liberals love to speculate about the supposed Freudian insecurities of racialists over some imagined sexual inferiority of white males to blacks, etc. It’s high time to turn their own psychoanalysis on them.

      • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

        Liberals, it seems to me, run the gamut from decent but indoctrinated or otherwise deluded to your aptly phrased “nasty pieces of work.”

      • JohnEngelman

        I can understand why a white college student or professor is liberal on most issues. I have difficulty understanding why they can support affirmative action. Affirmative action makes it more difficult for whites to be admitted to prestigious colleges. Affirmative action makes it more difficult for whites to get teaching positions to prestigious colleges.

        • David Ashton

          Their psycho-political masochism explains both.

      • Tucker

        I agree completely. Liberals, aside from being dangerously mentally ill, are also a very deadly and toxic collection of so many psychopathic driven pathologies that its almost impossible to list them all. At the very minimum, liberals should be placed in quarantine – surrounded by barbed wire and land mines and kept there, so as to ensure that they are never allowed to impose their endless schemes of destructive insanity upon the healthier Whites in society.

        Take this current, reinvigorated obsession of liberals to try to capitalize upon the highly suspicious events at Sandy Hook Elementary School and use it as an excuse to disarm the law abiding citizens of this nation. Time and time again, liberals have had their hind parts whacked at the ballot box whenever they’ve threatened the Second Amendment rights of millions of law abiding Americans, right? Time and time again, every time there rises even a hint of some new liberal gun control legislation or attempt to whittle away at the Second Amendment – millions of people rush out to purchase more firearms, right? New sales records seem to be set with each passing month that this Communist dictator remains in office.

        Sane individuals, which liberals are clearly not, would see these actions by millions of Americans and be able to grasp and understand the message that the people are sending by the course of their actions. But, liberals – due to their pathological insanity, just refuse to get the message. They insist upon pursuing their agenda to disarm Americans, and by that I think we all understand that it is really law abiding, White Male Americans who they crave most to disarm – because they hate our guts and it is we who they fear the most.

        Liberals, and their Cultural Marxist sponsors, understand that the rightful owners of this nation are the White male descendants of our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers, because White males and their families are the legitimate heirs to this nation’s founders. And, since our enemies know that they’ve stolen the rightful inheritance of White males, they want to disarm us so there will be no chance of our ever being able to take our birthright back, or to carve out a new homeland for White European people on this continent.

        Liberals are truly possessed by demons, because there is no other rational explanation for how thoroughly evil and destructive they have proven themselves to be.

        Did anyone see that video clip of Andrew Cuomo, when he was ranting about the recent draconian gun control laws that he and his fellow liberals are imposing upon the residents of New York state? Did anyone notice the demonic fire that radiated from Cuomo’s eyes when he was spewing out his hatred for the Second Amendment? He reminded me of some of the more frightful movie predictions we’ve all seen of Satan himself – spewing voluminous utterances of demonic verses at anyone who dared to oppose or resist his agenda.

        Cuomo should be wearing a straight-jacket and confined to a mental institution somewhere, but I’m told this monster has aspirations for running for the White House gig.

        • George White

          Watch as the rate of gun homicides explodes in NYC, the same as in Chicago where the idiot libs had their way with gun control.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          That rant was such a doozy that I think that Cuomo himself would probably be legally ineligible to own the gun he claims he owns under the laws he demanded and ultimately won in such a vast hurry that they forgot to exempt cops. In a sane day, you’re right, just that rant would get him sent to what used to be euphemistically called “rest” for a little while. Now, that rant-filled hate is called “his maiden speech of the 2016 Presidential campaign” by the talking heads.

          But back to the sensible world, a writer that is showing on my radar more and more, the kind of writer that I’ve been begging for, one that thinks and avoids shock value nut talk and actually uses reason, is one Gregory Hood (who writes for AR from time to time). Everything that was bothering me on the tip of my tongue with the current 2A debate, he got it off my tongue (and humorously, using exactly 1,488 words):

          http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/01/beltway-rambos/

          His next column, though, using a few more words, not only clears the air on where he stands on the 2A question, it also reminds us that America’s 2A culture is largely a transplant from continental Germanic culture by way of Anglo-Saxon England, or sometimes, it took a more direct path:

          http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/01/why-liberals-hate-guns/

          Incidentally, the American tradition of jury nullification as a hedge against bad law or bad prosecution is a direct transplant from Germanic culture, not found in England proper.

          These two columns remind me of a certain someone. It’s as if Sam Francis, wherever he is, got permission from The Big Boss to work vicariously through Gregory Hood’s hands, at least in the first column, to try to bring us back to our senses. Now, I don’t know Gregory Hood, nor do I know that much about him. I don’t know if he would take that as a compliment or an insult.

          • The Verdict of History

            1488 ??

            Very cute.

            I have taken it upon myself to read some of the comments and articles on Counter-currents.

            Many of them denounce “Jewish Supremacists” and “Jewish Marxists”….

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            I am not recommending those articles for the comments, I am recommending them for the inspired Francisian prose of the author.

        • The Verdict of History

          It is far more simple than that, sir.

          The Left hopes to facilitate and expand its program of mass immigration, to transform the demographics of this nation, and to ensure electoral preeminence (once the states of Texas and NC become blue states).

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/NQHEAYZCMBOERHG2VZRDQ3YUSQ Felix

        Most people who go to college don’t come away educated; they come away schooled, i.e., indoctrinated into the way of thinking that’s currently à la mode. Few recognize it, fewer entertain the possibility that it might be so, and worst of all fewest even care.

        • jay11

          It depends when and where you went to college. I started at a college in the midwest and graduated without ever hearing more than a few indoctrination professors. One prof had us read maya angelou and a few other ‘diverse’ writers, but in 6 years almost all my classes were straightforward and neutral. (Early to mid 90s.)
          Later I attended a college on the East coast and got my Masters degree. (Five years ago.) At least half of the profs were ranting leftist loonies. I mean some of these guys were like insane! I had one prof for 3 classes (required) and instead of the subject matter he would veer off EVERY class into ‘social justice’ tirades, poking fun at and ridiculing ‘the right wing’ and getting into actual arguments with the students – fights that he would start.
          Another prof I had for two required classes was so leftist that I thought she was channeling Che, whom I had only recently learned about at that time. Her answer to problems in education was to let students roam the fields (no exxageration) and decide when they wanted to learn something and for how long. She made us read two books about this and praised it to high holy heaven. I feel sorry for hapless kids going to college these days. The older white profs are dying off, and being replaced by leftist crackpots.

          • David Ashton

            Sorry to say the experience in English colleges has been much the same. It is no “accident” or “coincidence”.

          • 1Forced_Registration

            The classes I had in the 90’s were much the same as you describe — with a few notable exceptions in victimology subjects (that could have been neutral, but were far from it). The classes I had in the 2000’s, and 2010’s were anything but neutral outside of the hard sciences.

            There has been a major shift in what is tolerated, and what is accepted as education on the college campuses I have been on, and largely not for the better.

            On the subject on economics: The free market will start spending on investment when there is sufficient demand. The government can do this even when that demand does not yet exist. In the initial stages, government spending can be far more effective at ending recessions, and even depressions because of this fact. I do think that it quickly hits a point of diminishing returns as it distorts an economy in recovery, but that recovery happens much faster with that spending in place than not. Even as a fairly staunch conservative I can recognize those things which are true.

        • Tucker

          Very, very few white liberals are reachable, Felix. I have a sense that the reason for this is that the vast majority of white liberals are afflicted with the fatal disease of ‘egoism’. Which, oddly enough, is also fairly rampant within many white conservative circles.

          I have an old friend who once told me that a man’s ego was his own worst enemy, and the reason is because it is ‘ego’ that prevents a man (or a woman) from admitting that they made a mistake, or that they have been embracing a set of beliefs that are 100 percent out of sync with the facts and reality.

          Jared Taylor has noted in a number of his Amren conference talks that Whites are uniquely susceptible to a racially suicidal sense of ‘fair play’, and work harder than any other race to ‘see the other race’s point of view’ and then try their best to accommodate (capitulate) to the demands and expectations of their racial competition.

          To put this into a football analogy, if the liberal White team were to score a touchdown and be in the lead in a game against a non-White team, the liberals on the White team would instruct their defense to allow their competition to score a touchdown, so as to make it fair and so the feelings of their opponent would not be damaged.

          White liberals, thankfully, are in a minority within the general White European population – which is why they’ve had to import millions of non-whites to serve as their allies. For this reason, when this nation finally does collapse and our opportunity to create an exclusively White Ethnostate arrives – we absolutely cannot allow these White liberals to join our ethnostate, or else they will very soon be agitating to open our borders to non-whites and the same process that lead to the destruction of the old America will lead to the destruction of our new homeland.

      • Garrett Brown

        What I never understood was the economic side of liberals… This ridiculous “Kenyanism” or whatever they call it now(Socialism). We have never even let TRUE capitalism work in this country yet it is still responsible for most jobs people have outside of the government. We became the strongest nation in the world with Capitalism. Yet they want to change it? I understand the moral insanities of wanting to mix everyone and be brainwashed to think everyone is equal, but to differ in what has built this economy and wanting to change it always baffles me.

        • HamletsGhost

          Keynesianism is like catnip to liberals. It enables the governing class to extract enormous wealth from the productive economy and distribute it to its clients. Without it most liberal arts colleges would have to shut down and their professors be forced to get real jobs in the real economy.

        • JohnEngelman

          From 1931 to 1944 the top tax rate grew from 25 percent to 94 percent.

          http://www.ctj.org/pdf/regcg.pdf

          From 1932 to 1944 unemployment declined from 23.6 percent to 1.2 percent.

          http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104719.html

          Republicans and libertarians like to say that the Great Depression was not ended by the New Deal but by the Second World War. There are two problems with this argument.

          First military spending and employment is government spending and employment. Now I am glad that the United States entered World War II. Nevertheless, if the money spent on World War II has been spent expanding the public sector of the economy the benefits to the economy would have been better. People cannot eat bullets or live in bomber plains.

          Second, during Franklin Roosevelt’s term increases in military spending were negligible. Nevertheless, per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in terms of 1996 dollars grew by 33.7 percent.

          Republicans still see the 1920s as an economic golden age. After all, the GOP dominated the United States. Nevertheless, during the terms of Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge the per capita GDP in terms of 1996 dollars grew by 29.19 percent. I am calculating this from 1921 to 1928, which is to say before the Stock Market Crash of 1929, which was arguably caused by Republican economic policies.

          http://www.singularity.com/charts/page99.html

          Before the increase in military spending the government hired people with programs like the Civilian Conservation Corps.

          “A Gallup poll of 18 April 1936, asked ‘Are you in favor of the CCC camps?'; 82% of respondents said yes, including 92% of Democratsand 67% of Republicans.[30]

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_Conservation_Corps

          The Great Depression was ended by high government spending and high government employment paid for by high taxes on the rich. That was Keynesianism. It worked.

          • Garrett brown

            The unemployment rate declining was because of capitalism. Which is why it works so well when you don’t have as much government restriction on it. Thanks for proving my point

          • JohnEngelman

            Your explanation fails to explain the increase in unemployment under Herbert Hoover, and the decline under Franklin Roosevelt.

            Prior to the Great Depression classical economists believed that the economy was in a natural state of equilibrium. During periods of high unemployment unemployed employees would reduce the amount of money they were willing to work for. This would give employers the incentive to hire them.

            John Maynard Keynes pointed out that when wages declined demand declined, so employers retained little incentive to increase hiring. He argued that by increasing hiring the government increased demand, and consequently it increased hiring by private employers. This is what did happen. It is why the United States recovered from the Great Recession under Franklin Roosevelt.

            Currently it is the semi socialist economies of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland that have recovered most readily to the Great Recession. They retain AAA ratings with Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s.

            http://www.huliq.com/3257/us-leaves-whos-left-among-countries-both-moodys-s-p-aaa-ratings

            They have less public debt per gross domestic product.

            https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html?countryName=United+States&countryCode=us&regionCode=noa&rank=38#us

            They have lower unemployment rates.

            https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2129rank.html?countryName=United%20States&countryCode=us&regionCode=noa&rank=103#us

            According to Forbes they have a better quality of life than the United States.

            http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/world-s-happiest-countries-233204795.html

          • Douglass Reed

            The economies of these socialist paradises you speak of are not burdened with being the world’s policeman, nor are they sponsors of Israel’s economy, not to mention many others. What standard of living would Americans have today if not for the central bank confiscation of wealth through taxes and inflation?

          • JohnEngelman

            Then let’s stop being the world’s policeman. NATO should have been disbanded when the Warsaw Pact disbanded. The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq have achieved little or nothing of value.

          • David Ashton

            What about lovely Israel?

          • TheCogitator

            I think you truly want answers, so I suggest you do yourself a favor and go to http://mises.org/. and read some of the writings of of Mises and Rothbard, as well as others on this site. Once you do, you will see how wrong Keynesianism is.

          • JohnEngelman

            Whenever someone gives me a reading list I know I have won the argument. If you have read the writings of Ludwig von Mises and Murray Newton Rothbard, and if you understood what they wrote, present their arguments in your own words.

            I have read “The Road to Serfdom” by Friedrich von Hayek. In several passages he said that he is opposed to laissez faire capitalism. He also predicted that social democratic economies are likely to evolve into totalitarian dictatorships. He was clearly wrong there.

          • TheCogitator

            What argument? You have displayed an ignorance of economics. Assuming you wanted to learn, I simply tried to send you to a source of information. If you do not want to go that is your right. Just do not expect knowledgeable people to respect anyone who spouts Keynesian nonsense, even if the fools controlling this country are also using it.

          • JohnEngelman

            How am i ignorant of economics? What did I say that is not true?

            I have documented using my own sources that the economy and employment rate grew more under Franklin Roosevelt when the top tax rate went up, than under Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge when the top tax rate declined.

            I have also documented, again using my own sources including Forbes, which calls itself “the capitalist tool,” that by important criteria the semi socialist economies of Scandinavia are performing better than the American free enterprise system.

            Your response was to tell me to read some books. If you read the books and if you understood them you should be able to present the arguments of the books in your own words. You should also be able to refute my argument with your own words, using the internet only to substantiate your factual assertions.

            The Wall Street Journal is a source you ought to respect. According to the following article in The Wall Street Journal, from the presidencies of Harry Truman to that of George W. Bush there were nearly always more jobs created per year during Democrat presidencies than during Republican presidencies. There were even more created when Jimmy Carter was president than when Ronald Reagan was president.

            http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/

            If you choose to respond again, do not tell me to read someone else’s article. Present your own argument.

          • David Ashton

            How can you “know” you have “won” an “argument” because others refer to different sources of information or argument you refuse to consider? I take a more sympathetic view of Keynes’ actual theories than your critics here, but realize that the “dismal science” is often so controversial, complex and evolving that it is not easy to summarize in short posts on a site like this. Keynes famously said: “When the facts change, I change my opinions – what do you do?” Nothing, it would seem in your case, if it means reading a BOOK.

          • JohnEngelman

            David Ashton,

            What are those “different sources of information?” TheCogitator seems to be incapable of composing his own arguments. He says in effect, “Read this. It shows that you are wrong and I am right.”

            That is about as ridiculous as saying. “My dad’s stronger than your dad.”

            Now I admit, that economists cannot prove their theories with controlled, repeatable experiments the way chemists and physicists can. We cannot go back in time, choose a different economic policy, and measure different results.

            Casual relationships are difficult to prove in history and economics, but they do exist. Now I demonstrated in my argument using documented facts that I marshaled, and not something that I copied and pasted from a left wing web site,that there was more economic growth and job creation per year under the administration of Franklin Roosevelt than under the administrations of Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge.

            This was not only true when we compare economic performance with FDR and two very forgettable Republican presidents.

            What follows is a chart of fluctuations in the per capita per gross domestic product (GDP) in terms of 1996 dollars from 1920 to 2002. It was compiled by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

            http://www.singularity.com/charts/page99.html

            From 1921 to 2000 the United States had Republican presidents for forty years and Democratic presidents for the other forty. Some of these presidents had Congress controlled by their party. Others had to contend with one or both houses of Congress that was controlled by the other party. There was over twice as much economic growth under Democratic presidents. Why is that? it is because Keynesian economic policies work.

            Democratic presidents usually raise taxes on the rich and spread the wealth around. By doing that they create better consumers. When consumers buy more, employers sell more, so they hire more people to produce and sell what they produce.

            On the other hand, Republican presidents like to cut taxes for the rich. Cutting taxes for the rich is like pushing on a string. Rich people do not hire people when they get more money. They hire people when they get more customers, even if they have to borrow money to do it.

          • Der Typ

            ” Others had to contend with one or both houses of Congress that was
            controlled by the other party. There was over twice as much economic
            growth under Democratic presidents. Why is that? it is because Keynesian
            economic policies work. ”
            So Obama IS our Lord and Savior. Just a few more years and we’ll all be on easy street. Why didn’t I read your post before? All the years I’ve wasted.

          • Conan

            Why is this idiot constantly allowed to spam the site with his nonsense?

          • JohnEngelman

            What did I say that is not true? If you choose to respond, please document your factual assertions the way I do.

          • Der Typ

            “that by important criteria the semi socialist economies of Scandinavia
            are performing better than the American free enterprise system.”

            Wow, don’t I feel stupid. I wasn’t aware that we lived in a free enterprise system. Guess I’ll have to throw away my books and stock up on Krugman.

          • Douglass Reed

            Hayek was correct in that they are dictatorships. Instead of totalitarian, they are democratic dictatorships. In modern democratic dictatorships the populace is mind screwed by mass media into slapping the chains on themselves.

          • David Ashton

            Aldous Huxley pointed out to George Orwell, and later developed the theme, that the future Big Brother would not use brute force (only) but techniques of mass persuasion to control an increasingly “dysgenic” populace. The irony is that Herbert Marcuse used the threat of an omnipotent “commercialism” to develop his theory of its overthrow by minority groups, and the pseudo-egalitarian elite has used these to establish its omnipotent “socialism”. Big Barack is Conning You.

    • JohnEngelman

      Most people allow their likes and dislikes to influence their judgment of what is true and false. Conservatives do this too. I do it, but I try not to.

      • liberalsuck

        True, but I have heard far more despicable comments and actions from liberals, black bigots and La raza types than any white conservative or white nationalist advocate.

        • JohnEngelman

          I think it is despicable to say that the President of the United States was born in Kenya, that he hates whites, and that he wants the terrorists to win. Significant numbers of conservatives do say that.

          I also think it is despicable to attend a speech of President Obama carrying a rifle. I do not care if it is legal. I think it is despicable.

          • Refugee

            If you don’t believe that Obama has a real resentment against whites for reasons (some) true and many false, then you are delusional.

      • David Ashton

        There’s a good boy!

  • George White

    In their mating and migratory habits, liberals are indistinguishable from members of the Ku Klux Klan.
    Great video Mr. Taylor, and absolutely accurate.

    • JohnEngelman

      Interracial marriage is on the rise, according to a new report from the Pew Research Center.

      The report, which came out Thursday, indicates that there has been a major jump in interracial marriage rates from 1980 — the first year from which rich Census data on interracial marriage are publicly available — when just 3 percent of married couples were mixed-race (the last U.S. anti-miscegenation laws were lifted in 1967). In 2010, 1 in 12 married couples in the U.S. were interracial couples, reports the Pew Center.
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/16/interracial-marriage-stat_n_1280511.html

      Nevertheless, I agree that it is a great video.

  • Jason

    Yep. No reason behind these screaming white leftists. I’ve encountered it. It doesn’t make sense. It’s like a religion. But the big question is, why? Why do they think that way? And how can we get through to them? It’s a complete mystery.

    My only answer is, their beliefs reflect everything they’ve seen on TV, movies, magazines, and been taught in schools. They didn’t grow up with a traditional father figure and parents who took them aside and quietly explained to them that everything they’ve seen on TV and been taught in school is a bunch of lies. Think about it. In the schools they teach that “racism” is evil and diversity is good. “Racists” are evil. Consider if you don’t have traditional parents to counter this propaganda? Kids today are children of the Hippie generation. And many of them have grown up without a father, much less a traditional father.

    • George White

      They’ve been brainwashed. There’s an excellent video on Youtube that deals with ethnomasochism. Basically, the white liberal feels that he is BETTER than everyone else because he has taken the “moral” position to hate his own kind. This “proves” that he is not a “racist”, which of course is the absolute worst thing that any person could ever be. To point out the obvious fact that there is no upside to diversity is a very good strategy.

      • gemjunior

        Do you have the name of the video? I am going to search for it because I’m particularly interested in white ethnomasochism. How do great traits like fairness, empathy and helping others end up being so destructive that they can almost allow a race of people to end up extinct, or at least slowly expiring? I have got to see it.

        • George White

          “Psychology of white self hatred.”

  • http://mstrrick.wordpress.com/about/ Mstr Rick

    This is the same power struggle that has existed between and among a small group of whites in Europe for centuries. The non-whites and the brainwashed Shabbos Goy are just tools and bystanders who will drift to whomever seems convenient at the moment.

    An elitist banking oligarchy bent on world domination manipulates and fragments the self reliant, the productive, and the thinkers by whatever social construct is most effective.

    Today’s puppeteers use race and ethnicity to engender white self loathing producing a polarization of the self governing power structure that bars their grasp; ethnic homogeneity, borders, family values, and the rule of law.

    These small exposes’ such as Simon’s Rock are important in the aggregate to provoke an awakening of some of our apathetic brethren to the reality of their dispossession and the future totality of the tyranny that is soon to come.

    Thanks Jared Taylor for bringing a mainstream audience to such an explicit display of dysfunctional thinking.

    • The Verdict of History

      The Globalist Elite about whom you speak are not merely prolific in banking.

      They have adapted the strategy of Cultural Marxism as their new weapon to undermine the white race and its cultural hallmarks.

      Be careful, though… many of this group are sympathetic to the race realist cause…. They are waking up too!

      • George White

        See “Minority Rule: The Rise of Political Correctness” on Youtube. Best 50 minutes you will ever spend.

  • Jason

    1.) If 95% of people believe in something, reinforcing each other,

    2.) and it’s an emotional issue and people have a stake in it,

    3.) and it’s a topic that forms part of a societal foundation (worldview, zeitgeist, narrative), influencing our laws, judicial system, dominant in our universities, literature, media,

    4.) and it takes the form of an opinion/belief/desire/gut reaction, rather than a scientific debate; fueling hopes and dreams (e.g. for world peace, harmony, a new age, utopia, etc … ), then …

    5.) this is the result you get. They will shout down or even physically attack anyone who questions their belief system. “You’re a heretic, Bigot, Nazi, Fascist, Evil, etc …”

    • JohnEngelman

      Arguing with retards is like playing chess with a pigeon…
      http://weknowmemes.com/2012/05/arguing-with-retards-its-like-playing-chess-with-a-pigeon/

      • Jim

        You’re not very popular here eh?

        • JohnEngelman

          I am disliked by some who dislike being told the facts that I document. I get many of those facts from this website in news stories and original articles that are posted here.

          I also document some of my assertions from “RACE, EVOLUTION, AND BEHAVIOR,” by Professor J. Philippe Rushton, who spoke at six American Renaissance conferences.

          http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

          Another source of factual assertions I use here is Jared Taylor’s “The Color of Crime.”

          http://www.colorofcrime.com/

          Indeed, it was that essay that attracted me to this website.

          • Achaean

            You don’t “document” anything but refer to the same sources over and over without the slightest indication of alternative readings. It is the same record endlessly playing: “East Asians and Jews have higher IQs.” But you can’t even realize that the very authors you rely on are White, which is to say that the science of IQ measurement is yet one more invention of Whites. In any case, if one reads carefully what Jared Taylor is saying it is clear that he is for Whites and not for a mixed race of Whites and Asians. See the debate he had with Derbyshire on miscagenation.

          • JohnEngelman

            Do you have a link to that debate? During a brief look on the internet I could not find it. i am sure I will agree with John Derbyshire. As long as no one is pressured to marry a person of another sex I do not see what the problem is.

            Any way, John Derbyshire will be speaking at the next American Renaissance conference.

          • Achaean

            Thousands of years of history tell the truth you refuse to read about. The Taylor-Derbyshire exchange is well known, and your inability to learn about it shows you sherry pick what fits with your pre-established resentments against Whites. By “the record” you mean a few papers on a specific topic, that’s rather narrow minded.

          • JohnEngelman

            I still have not found a formal debate between Jared Taylor and John Derbyshire on interracial marriage. However, here is an essay where John Derbyshire expressed his support for interracial marriage (which he has engaged in by the way):

            http://www.vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-on-immigration-liberty-and-mating-choices

            and here is an essay by Jared Taylor in which he comments on John Derbyshire’s essay and explains his opposition to interracial marriage:

            http://www.vdare.com/articles/race-purists-are-they-slightly-nuts-jared-taylor-responds-to-john-derbyshire

            This is the kind of debate that irritates me because each side amounts to saying, “I like it because,” or, “I dislike it because.” I like debates where facts and logic matter and where decisive victories are possible.

            After reading both essays I am still in favor of interracial marriage, although not because of anything that John Derbyshire said. I like interracial marriage because I like Oriental women. Unlike Mr. Derbyshire I am not fortunate enough to be married to one, but I have been attracted to Oriental females ever since I was about seven years old and learned that they existed. Until then I only knew about blacks and whites.

            I can’t remember the situation, but I was probably watching a television documentary about children in Japan or Taiwan. I do remember thinking, “With white girls some are pretty and some are not. With Oriental girls all of them are pretty.”

            A debate over interracial marriage is about as pointless as a debate over the relative merits of classical music and hard rock music. Now I have been attracted to classical music even before I knew that Oriental girls existed, and I have disliked hard rock music ever since I knew it existed. No one who prefers hard rock music can change my opinion on the subject, nor can I change his.

            Emotions can have wisdom behind them. I have always disliked the sexual revolution. I have always hated Playboy magazine even when the testosterone was thicker in my blood stream, and when it was chic to find some value in it.

            In this case I can bring facts to a debate with someone who feels differently about the topic. When sex outside of marriage become more common illegitimacy and divorce become more common.

            Now a growing body of evidence does exist to show that children raised to adulthood by both biological parents living together in matrimony tend to do much better in life than children raised in other circumstances, even when other conditions are held constant.

            If there are any tangible disadvantages in a white – Asian marriage, please hasten to tell me what they are.

            Indeed, “White-Asian couples who married had the highest median income, nearly $71,000. Behind them were the following race combinations: Asian-Asian ($62,000), white-white ($60,000), white-Hispanic ($57,900), white-black ($53,187), black-black ($47,700) and Hispanic-Hispanic (nearly $36,000).”

            http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46409832/ns/us_news-life/t/interracial-marriage-us-hits-new-high/#.UPynTB1EG3k

            It may well be the case that children from interracial marriages turn out better on the average than children from marriages where both partners are of the same race.

            I do not base my argument on that possibility however. I base my argument on the basic value assumption that those who love each other enough to get married should get married, and that, “Those whom God hath joined together let no man put asunder.”

          • Achaean

            “If there are any tangible disadvantages in a white – Asian marriage, please hasten to tell me what they are”

            Such a marriage uglifies the White side. It also reduces the creativity, honor, and historic quality of the offspring, creating mongrels who are unsure of their identity, as you are.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is not something that can be measured. That is just the way you feel about it. Well, I feel differently.

            As far as my identity is concerned, I am quite sure of who I am, and agree with Eric Hoffer that, “The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause.”

          • Achaean

            You are so self-absorbed with your own experience you cannot see what many commenters have already pointed out here numerous times: inter racial relations are being promoted by the media with a conscious effort to lessen the gap between the races particularly white and black — this is not a subjectitve matter, of what “you like” or pleases your narcissistic self, but a cultural movement deserving attention and counter argumentation. I am not opposed to inter racial marriage per se, but to the liberal ideology which says that it is a sign of “progress” to be embraced.

          • JohnEngelman

            In the video that begins this thread Jared Taylor spoke of a freshman at Bard College at Simon’s Rock who asked for five advantages of diversity other than ethnic food. Instead of answers he got insults.

            I have already said in this thread that there is a difference between allowing diversity to happen through individual choice and achievement and requiring it with policies that reduce intellectual requirements for blacks and Hispanics and physical requirement for women.

            American corporations and government agencies benefit from hiring the most intelligent employees they can attract. These will be disproportionally Oriental and Jewish. Many will have been born in other countries. That is the kind of diversity I approve of. American corporations and government agencies do not benefit from hiring less intelligent blacks and Hispanics in order to make hiring quotas. That is the kind of diversity I disapprove of.

            If I had been a student at Bard College at Simon’s Rock that would have been my response to the freshman’s question.

            From Jared Taylor’s talk it seems that few or none of those at Bard College at Simon’s Rock even gave that response.

            From 1958 to 2011 approval of interracial marriage between whites and blacks climbed from 4 percent to 86 percent.

            http://www.gallup.com/poll/149390/record-high-approve-black-white-marriages.aspx

            I am confident that approval of marriage between whites and Orientals is even higher.

            According to the Pew Research Center, “About 15% of all new marriages in the United States in 2010 were between spouses of a different race or ethnicity from one another, more than double the share in 1980 (6.7%).”
            http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/1/

            The reason for the increase in the approval and the practice of inter racial marriage is not a conspiracy by “cultural Marxists.” The reason is that those who ask, “What are the disadvantages of inter racial marriage?” get the same answer as the 17 year old freshman at Bard College at Simon’s Rock.

            They get no answer. That is because there are no disadvantages to inter racial marriage, other than the fact that a dwindling minority of Americans disapprove of it.

          • Achaean

            Don’t pretend that your views are in line with Taylor’s. He specifically addresses the psychological downside of racial mixing in his reply to Derbyshire. This is likely the hundredth time you have said this in almost the same words. Just because the mob is intermarrying, it does not follow that it should be the basis of a nation-wide drive. I understand that some Jews like to marry Asians and that’s your choice, or fantasy, but Whites should realize that they are better off without mixing. One can have Asian girls for some fun, but not to create children.

          • JohnEngelman

            On at least one occasion on this website I have said that I generally agree with Jared Taylor’s reality perceptions, while disagreeing with some of his likes and dislikes.

            Although Jared Taylor agrees with me that Orientals and whites get along well in the United States he seems to regret their presence in this country. I am glad they are here. Although he is not in favor of laws against interracial marriage he disapproves of it. Like the vast majority of Americans I do not see any problem with it.

          • David Ashton

            He “seems” to regret? He is opposed to the replacement of European-Americans by East Asians, Mexicans and Arabs in large areas of a European-American homeland. That is why he is “monitored” by your friends at the Anti Defamation League.

          • Katherine McChesney

            ‘One can have Asian girls for some fun, but not to create children.’

            Are you referring to the fact that sex among Asians is ‘exotic’ (pornographic)? There is also sexual abuse, pedophilia, sex slavery rampant among Asians. This is the main reason I see White men prefer the compliant Asian woman.

          • David Ashton

            To say “there are no disadvantages [whatever] to inter racial marriage” (i.e. those with reproductive outcomes) is far too sweeping a generalization.

          • JohnEngelman

            Those who dislike something can always find disadvantages to it. The only disadvantage I can see to inter racial marriage is that others, especially one’s relatives, might disapprove. As approval for interracial marriage has become the vast majority of Americans, this is fading as a disadvantage.

          • David Ashton

            For people who haven’t got immediate access to copies of Hoffer’s book, why don’t you do for them what you request from others who annoy you with reading lists: summarize his entire theme?

          • JohnEngelman

            The basic theme of Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer” is that political or religious fanaticism is usually a compensation for a lack or a loss of self confidence.

            The first time I read “The True Believer” was when I was investigating the Socialist Workers’ Party through what it billed as “the socialist summer school.”

            This was in 1970. The Socialist Workers’ Party was a Trotskyist organization.The youth affiliate of the Socialist Workers’ Party was called the Young Socialist Alliance.

            At the time the Young Socialist Alliance was growing because the Students for a Democratic Society was dividing into even more irrelevant factions, and because the War in Vietnam made Marxism popular among many college students.

            For most of those in the Young Socialist Alliance their membership was a passing phase that they outgrew. The older members of the Socialist Workers’ Party had been in the organization for years. I noticed that nearly all of them had failed to achieve their goals in one of the professions. They were the kind of people Eric Hoffer was writing about.

            Eric Hoffer’s book kept me from making a bad mistake in my life. For several years after reading it I continued to feel like a Marxist, but I was no longer able to think like one.

          • David Ashton

            Instead of the requested summary we get more autobiography.

          • JohnEngelman

            This is the essence of the book: The basic theme of Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer” is that political or religious fanaticism is usually a compensation for a lack or a loss of self confidence.

          • David Ashton

            That is an important element in the book, not its basic essence.

          • JohnEngelman

            That depends on what the definition of “basic essence” is.

            Eric Hoffer was writing mainly about mass movements, but a mass movement that is not totalitarian, and which has tangible and achievable goals is not fanatical. I am thinking here of the women’s suffrage movement, the labor movement, the civil rights movement, and the anti war movement during the War in Vietnam.

            Also, Eric Hoffer pointed out that Hitler created the Nazi Party after failing as an artist and an architect. I believe Joseph Goebbels failed as a novelist. I do not think Benito Mussolini failed at something before turning to politics. Vladimir Lenin was a lawyer. He did well at law school, and could have made a good career in law. Leon Trotsky could have succeeded as a writer.

            Eric Hoffer over states his case, but he is right that political or religious fanaticism is usually the result of a loss or lack of self confidence, or perhaps lack of opportunities. Most terrorists now are Islamic terrorists. They live in countries with high birth rates. This means that many young men enter job markets with little use for them.

            How would you characterize the basic essence of “The True Believer?”

          • David Ashton

            Let anyone interested read the book for themselves.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bardon-Kaldian/100003542251801 Bardon Kaldian

            Unlike Mr. Derbyshire I am not fortunate enough to be married to one, but I have been attracted to Oriental females ever since I was about seven years old and learned that they existed.

            Hm…become a fringe Mormon & you can satisfy your lust for Asian females.

          • David Ashton

            The result of panmixia between whites and blacks would result in an average intelligence lower than that of whites.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is true. The result of a marriage between whites and Orientals would result in children with average intelligence higher than whites.

          • David Ashton

            These results occur only in mass integration, not necessarily in each individual case. The explanation is mainly regression to the mean.

          • David Ashton

            How can you dislike something before you even knew it existed?

          • Katherine McChesney

            God created the separate races, but you conveniently left that out.

          • David Ashton

            Byron Roth is also worth hearing – especially for his opinion on the origins and effects of “political correctness” upon western educational and political institutions (but, so far as I know, he is not married to a Chinese).

  • Richard Williams

    I’m happy to see that name-calling is rising to this level of attention. ResistingDefamation.org has been promoting action steps since 1989 on the West Coast to combat the elements of the anti-white narrative…slurs (naming), labeling, defining, and describing. This is an extremely important element in learning how to attackback at persons in media, entertainment, and government.

    It should be a subject taught to everyone who has to confront the real haters & bullies in our society…the purveyors of the anti-white narrative. It’s a good first step, and Resisting Defamation has had a lot of success over the past 25 years in carrying out actual work to attackback those who indulge in name-calling.

    • David Ashton

      An excellent website reference. I hope our readers will look it up, download some of it and use its convenient research to defend our race and culture.

  • SoCal LoCal

    I worry that we on the Right have failed to learn the lessons of the sixties. First lesson: There are no enemies on the left. For us the reverse should be true. If there are white supremacists out an about, we should not proscribe them. Second lesson: If someone strikes out at our enemies, we should indulge them.

    Eventually we must become ruthless as those who would undo us, else we stand little chance of prevailing in what is a zero sum game.There can be only two outcomes, either we win or they win. As they have chosen the path of extreme belief, backed by implied force, we must be willing to adopt similar views and, sotto voce, tactics.

    • JohnEngelman

      During the 1960s the difference between the democratic left and those who saw value in the tyrannies of Mao Tse Tung and Fidel Castro was an important one.

      SoCal LoCal, I am not one of your “we on the Right.” Nevertheless, I do love American Renaissance. Those who hate AR could reduce its credibility if they could associate it with the American Nazi Party and the KKK.

  • LHathaway

    I miss Jared Taylor’s ‘banned in Halifax’ speech. I googled it but can no longer find it. How about a reprint of his infamous ‘banned in Halifax speech’? He really outdid himself in that speech. Reading it 7 times was not enough. As far as I’m concerned American Renaissance could reprint that in every nights issue. . .

  • LHathaway

    Funny, EPluribus. . . .

  • LHathaway

    I think it’s more in the way Mark Twain viewed a witch hunt (not to change the subject) in his story the mysterious stranger.

    In the story, there were only one or two true believers in the mob demanding justice be served . The rest, the vast majority, went along because each was afraid they would be the next one named.

    I honestly believe fear is at the root of what has changed our culture, and our very belief’s themselves. Our conscience corrects our ‘bad, racist, non-leftist thoughts’ even before we have them. It’s more than just thoughts, racist thoughts were so 1960’s. . . I suspect. It is now our feelings which are being expunged, rooted out, stamped on. I really wonder if us whites have true feelings. We may be afraid to have them. I bet if we got in touch with our true feelings people of color and their ‘leftist’ friends would not like it one bit!

    When you say something like this, you have to wonder if readers think we should be using the same tactics they do, but personally I don’t think we need to. It is interesting to watch the more radical groups among them and examine where they are getting their tactics from!

    I feel no need to use the same tactics they do. At least, that’s what I SAY. That’s what I say. . .

    You never know, maybe fear is the only thing that has ever run societies. Maybe not.

  • wake up boy

    Although it may be a good idea Jared Taylor needs to understand that the natural separation of the races were occuring without a conscious level to integrate the races on these so called diversity days. Why not just allow these diversity promoters to be through the motions and have their bullshit and then it will be over.

    None of this would have occured had it not been for the catastrophic mistake of African slavery and buying millions of rejects off the tribal chiefs beginning 500 yrs ago or so. The genie is out of the bottle. The can of worms is open.

    The term White Supremacist comes from the belief in a omnipotent omniscient Supreme G-d of White Man Religion. If you are a “christian” then you are automatically a White Supremist because the “color” of WMR of the NWO from 4500 years post flood using the 3 sons of Noah as told by the real ancient jews or hebrews of the white Shem race that includes arabs and Europeans of white caucasoid origin, is white. White is the supreme g-dly chosen blessed race and this was all put together by Roman emperor Constantine at Nicea in 321 AD. The Messiah was of the white jew Shem race and this is hated by the devils of the cursed race of Ham who try to steal him and claim he was not white.

    Racist? Lets get real. The inventor original racist was the Creator who wiped away the single original human race and giants with man eating giant beasts now found in mud mainly in the western hemisphere where they resided separately from the rest of the Mesopotanian world where the cradle of civilization began 6000 yrs ago according to ancient jew data.

    If the Creator created racism then it must be good since all birds, animals, fish, insects, etc all conglomerate as one kind and this also includes the the other Japheth red yellow Asian mongoloid and Ham black negroid African races who are not required to be diverse but clearly both of these races are consumed genetically by evil and know the white chosen blessed Shem race is supreme like the Creator and his favorite color is white. Had white on whit slavery never ended that built all of Europe and maintained its universal advanced western civilization ,there would have never been a need for the fallacy of African slavery that clearly was a trick by the khazar red mongoloid pagans who converted 1000 yrs ago to become fake jews and the rest is history.

    Could it be possible that todays so called “jews” are unaware they are not real jews and are tricked themselves after 1000 yrs? Yes yes yes … Todays jews are are not only not real jews but atr unaware of this and been raised from birth as fake jews. We know from accounts that in AD 62 at Massada per Josephus who was a jewish Roman mix historian that the last vestige of the real ancient Shem messenger media jews who produced the white Messiah were wiped away after the others were massacred by divine intervention after “mission accomplished”.

    The odd thing is how advanced whites refuse to believe this when in fact it was all written down in ancient mentality 3500-2000 yrs ago and canonized by the greatest white converted empire in world history in Rome where WMR is still situated.

    Jared Taylor is shooting himself in the foot when in fact its clear the races still separate naturally and by making other aware of this may in fact force social engineering although we know it will not change anything genetically.
    Taylor cant get it through his thick skull that white man did all this to himself and the western hemisphere was allowed to be founded by the white latino Euro 500 yrs ago in orer to be cleansed and wiped out of the entire pagan red mongoloid Japheth population by divine intervention.

    Also Taylor needs to understand that Jamestown was diverted by the pilgrim rejects aka “jews” who were khazars from hell, to Plymouth Rock. Who the hell really believes that they blew off course 700 miles north unless it was a premeditated scheme by these same red khazar “jews” who were ironically kicked out of Spain in 1492 and headed to England where they were kicked out. These pilgrims also immediately made friends with the red savage red mongoloid “indians” who were obviously of their own race and we know 99% of all African slaves were shipped to Rhode Island ports beginning shortly after the pilgrims landed.

    There are tons or ariticles on the Plymouth Rock slave trade where it all began and of course a lot of it has been revised. Even Farrakhan knows all this.
    Had Jamestown been the main English settlement there never would have been African slavery so it was essential to lie about being blown off course.

    The whole problem was African slavery. This punishment occurred only after the Conquistadors failed to wipe out the pagan reds in the central and southern part of the western hemisphere as they were commanded in Divine Intervention and including the English who were supposed to wipe out the northern part of the western hemisphere of all pagan savage cannibal reds. These reds were imposters and never supposed to cross the Bering land ice bridge.

    African slavery was a trick by the dark side to destroy the New World Order and miscegenation of the 3 pure clean separated fully self contained races in Europe Asia and Africa to the pre-flood single human race. Is that not the goal of the current pagan atheist pc liberal fuckheads?

    Creator NEVER meant for his 3 races to be together much less mixed genetically but we know there is also a story in the ancient wiritings about a certain supreme form called Morning Star aka Lucifer aka satan as mythical as that sounds but there is nothing else that makes the white Shem race supreme but the ancient hebrew Books all put together by a brave Constantine 1700 yrs ago.

    Bottom line and who can dispute that Obama is clearly the proverbial antichrist believe it or not. He is here and he is doing what he was said he would do and that is to destroy the chosen blessed WMR Shem race. Deal with it.

    http://www.slavenorth.com/rhodeisland.htm

    http://www.masshist.org/endofslavery/index.cfm?queryID=60

  • Annis Isbell

    Diversity is fine and wonderful, until Whites try to pursue our interests rather than theirs. Regarding Asian and jewish intellect, both of which have shown themselves to be different from ours. jewish intellect is destructive and Asian intellect is unimaginative.

    If we are left alone we are superior on the world stage which is why the big push for diversity. Whether its blacks, Asians, jews or any race in between, they are all parasites upon Western man.

    We have every right to fight against diversity based upon the facts. Why can’t we stop jew control of our media since its a monopoly? Can’t we use the courts?

    • George White

      Well…check the last names of the judges. Check the last names of most of the affirmative action lawyers. Check the last names of most of the abortion doctors, media moguls, financial titans, university presidents,etc. This will be a sobering exercise for you.

  • Annis Isbell

    I wonder why my comments are always censored?

  • alas

    Jared Taylor should make more videos, they’re always very good and they’re so few.

  • http://www.dailykenn.com/ Daily Kenn

    My first informal debate with a liberal was in the high school cafeteria, c 1970. My friend used nothing but sarcasm and name calling. I though it was a fluke. Turns out, that’s the norm.

    • IstvanIN

      Same here. Had an argument with a friend over gun rights. Said if I supported gun rights then only my family should be the victim of gun violence. I tried to explain to him 1) that most gun crimes are not committed by legal gun owners, and 2) crime can not be isolated to people who support the second amendment. Progressives are nuts.

  • David Brims

    Testing 123

  • LastBastionOfHope

    The key to getting race realism in the mainstream is to stop giving the words “white supremacist” and “racist” so much power. The more whites who get called racist and say “so what?”, the quicker race realism will spread. Those names are mere roadblocks. To this day I have seen no debate where the concept of diversity has been regarded as a positive. You say blacks contributed music and food…well are music and food worth getting our people killed every night and our women raped? I don’t think so.

    • George White

      Good points. The Romney loss and non-white births have awakened many whites. Mention that black on white rape is about 25,000 per year, and white people take notice.

    • storibund

      Amen. Any power the word “racist” has, is the power given to it by whites.

  • David Brims

    This is what Enoch Powell said on name calling.

    ” Have you ever wondered, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly denounced as ”controversial, extremist, explosive, disgraceful,” and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues ? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see.”

  • David Brims

    Regarding Atheists

    In Peter Hitchens book ”Rage against God” the psychology of atheists is, ”I don’t believe in God and I hate him !! ”

    Peter, the brother of Christopher Hitchens is a much more interesting figure, he was a Marxist in the 1960s and 70s, saw the error of his ways and became a Christian.

    While Christopher, on the other hand, suffered from adolescent petulance.

    • gemjunior

      I thought Christopher relented and was baptized on his deathbed or something. He lost Paschal’s Wager.

    • David Ashton

      Peter is a bit of a puritan and a pessimist, but always worth reading in his indictment of the western political class and their responsibility for decadence. He has just written a good book on the drugs “war” which has been ignored as the Soros-funded steamroller for global legalization crunches on. Incidentally, he has some “Jewish blood”.

      • David Ashton

        PS. February 10. Peter Hitchens is particularly good, if brief, on the fraudulent 3-party “choice” in Britain in “The Mail on Sunday”, February 10, 2013. This will give you some idea of the triumph – temporary, we hope – of the “Cultural Marxist” goal of “equality” over Parliamentary elections, our traditional institutions, and the British People of the United Kingdom.

  • Brady

    I believe it was Oscar Wilde who said “If you cannot answer a man’s argument, do not panic. You can always call him names.”

  • http://twitter.com/Bison1776 Bison1776

    Excellent video. Only nitpick is that I would have advised Jared to reconsider the “as nonexistent as Dukakis supporters” joke. The problem with the Michael Dukakis reference is that (1) it doesn’t look good to make jokes at the expense of others who have little to do with this issue, (2) comparatively few under 40 will know whom he’s talking about and so this reference feeds into the idea of race realism just being for older folks and (3) it harms the timelessness of this video because in future years a reference to Dukakis will be as puzzling as one to Wendell Willkie. In making a video on a timeless matter that you’d like to have played 100 years from now, it’s best to remove contemporary references to minor politicians who most probably won’t stand the test of time.

    • SintiriNikos

      I agree. Also, the other nitwit who clobbered Dukakis can hardly be seen as better for the country. Although who knows what destruction the miniature Greek would have wrought had he been elected.

  • DelmarJackson

    Amren and vdare and numbersusa, etc. need to do more videos and post them on youtube. A year ago december the video of Emma west speaking out aginst her country being deliberately trashed via massive 3rd world immigration received 12 million views in 4 weeks before the owner, seeing how much support she was finally getting, removed it. Essays and forum comments do not go viral and reach millions, they reach a few fanatics like ourselves and are soon forgotten.
    nearly all new TVs will have internet and youtube viewing capability wthout the need of a computer to view the videos. we need to use what time we have left wisely.

  • Extropico

    Anybody who advocates diversity only for America and European people and not for Israel or Asia or Africa is at war with people of European descent. We used to enforce sedition laws. Perhaps it is time to enforce them again to prevent immoral agitators from their unilateral ethnic cleansing.

  • Achaean

    It is very odd how someone who claims to be Nordic can spend day in day
    out making the same point about the superiority of certain races solely on
    the basis of a few IQ points without ever paying attention to
    historical evidence. The most salient fact is that Whites were
    responsible for the greatest cultural happenings in history starting
    with the Greek “miracle” which involved the actual invention of
    philosophy, prose writing, historiography, politics, democracy, tragedy
    and dialogical discourse, and a new type of warfare called the Western
    Way of War (see Carnage and Culture by VDH), which allowed the West to
    inflict many defeats on non-Western armies in far away lands without
    ever suffering an invasion into their own lands (Mongols did not go past
    Eastern Europe). Almost all the explorers in history have been White,
    and the major conquerors as well — can you list any from the high IQ
    nerdy groups? Engelman always cites the same soures which is demonstrative of someone who barely reads.

    • David Ashton

      Engelman doesn’t believe in reading too widely because he possesses the “truth”. If anyone suggests studying writers with different information or opinions, he says they have already lost the “argument” or expects them to condense the contents for him. He thinks it clever to keep quoting Jared, Rushton and Lynn to back his view that the Chinese are superior in brains and looks to everyone except the Jews. This is his ticket of admission to a site where he can defend Obama, support east Asian immigration, advocate state-socialism, praise miscegenation, and above all turn an American Renaissance site into an American Decline site.

  • http://profiles.google.com/senatortombstone richard garyson

    4:37: “What’s wrong with preferring the company and culture of whites?”

    Nothing. The irony is that most minorities prefer the company and culture of whites. That is why they want to move into our neighborhoods, be bused to our schools, and marry our women. In a way, you cannot blame them for their preference, as I share it. I just wish they could improve their own lot, instead of contributing to the degeneration of ours.

    Also, this thing about East Asians have higher IQs than Europeans. Is this true if you break it down nation by nation? I have read that Scandinavians, Dutch, German, and Polish all have average IQs in parity with East Asians.

    • JohnEngelman

      According to Richard Lynn, who has spoken at American Renaissance conferences, the countries with the highest average IQ are in this order: Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore. Austria is in sixth place.

  • Hal K

    Don’t let conservatives off the hook, Mr. Taylor. They have never been able to effectively oppose the liberal agenda because they believe that “racism” is wrong. In other words, they believe that it would be wrong for whites to look out for their group interests. The conservative establishment suppresses white identity politics and bans the discussion of innate average differences between races.

  • razorrare

    “I have never met a White supremacist’…Thankyou Mr.Taylor,that needed to be said and I respect you for having said that…I have never met a White supremacist either nor have i read any White supremacist literature…The only Supremacist i am aware of are those elite globalist who want to control the World and erroneosly call themselves the “Chosen Ones.” Liberalism/marxism is a Supremacist ideology…excellent commentary.

  • Unperson

    Why do they call us names? Because it’s the only effective weapon in their arsenal. Because it’s all they’ve got. Because they can’t beat us with facts and logic — so they must instead shame us into submission.
    Another fine video, Mr. Taylor. Keep ‘em coming!

  • Lygeia

    Diversity kills. Of course this young white woman’s parents “can’t understand how this could happen”:

    http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2013/01/nopd_books_roommates_estranged.html

  • Andrew Nowicki

    I am U.S. citizen currently living in Poland. My favorite YoTube channel is American Renaissance: http://www.youtube.com/user/AmRenVideos?feature=watch
    I cannot watch it any more because the channel is blocked. When I try to watch any video, I get error message: “This video is not available in your country.”

  • JJ

    Here in Germany we are not allowed to see the video. It’s blocked.

  • Exiled White

    Jared Tayler’s academic demeanor belies the strength of his message, diversity is being brought to us at the point of a gun, connected to the state superstructure that is pushing this diversity in the schools without considering any of the negative consequences. This is a wholesale racial bust-out, replete with dropping white birthrates worldwide, political disposession, with state hypnotized ethno-masochist whites building their own concentration camps, prepared to destroy themselves and beg for mercy from their new diveristy overlords, this is sad.

    When arguments against diveristy are presented concretely by courageous people like Jared
    Taylor and Noah Steadman, more whites are converted to giving themselves self-respect, and and learn to show concern about preserving the white race.

  • JustaWhiteMom

    Dear Mr. Taylor,
    As you so articulately demonstrated the other day, liberals do not have a coherent philosophy. Therefore, they shouldn’t be called liberals. They should be called what they are, “anti-white.”

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Another brilliant video by Jared Taylor. I think that if challenged to identify a white supremacist, however, most people would point to those on the extrem fringes who wear Nazi armbands and carry signs saying “White Power.” I know Jared Taylor doesn’t associate with such people or probably even know any. I certainly never met anyone who fits such a description, and the only place I have seen them is in the history books.

  • Fredrik_H

    Mainly, I think they do it because it works.

    It may not work on us – the haters, the racists, the neonazis, the sexists, the right wing extremists or whatever they choose to call us – but it works in shaping the narrative for the large masses of those that aren’t really into politics. For those people these words work like Pavlovian Dogs, it tells them what and how they should think – if they do any reflection at all – on certain subjects.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bardon-Kaldian/100003542251801 Bardon Kaldian

    I don’t like personal argument in public, but-IMO- John Engelman has crossed the line.

    1. JE constantly refers to 2-3 works on race & IQ and conveniently forgets all about history – and reality of human creativity in past centuries and millenniums. This is not intellectually fair, but, what the heck …

    2. He’s got Asian fetish- again, his private life.

    3. but:

    a) he’s for mass miscegenation which would obliterate the white race, and he’s happy with this idea
    b) he advocates policies of white replacement in the US & is perfectly satisfied with mass East Asian immigration

    Frankly- I don’t know what JE is doing at this site. Because- we (although I disagree with a few extremist views sometimes expressed here) stand for our kin, for our tribe. Our global tribe are white Europeans & Western culture. I may admire some facets of various Asian civilizations- but they do not belong to American paradigmatic type: White phenotype plus Western culture plus English language plus American national identity.

    You would be OK with, say, US becoming 60% East Asian. Well, that’s not AR stands for (at least I hope so). We can agree on Black crime rate, on profile,of Black American subculture, on Hispanic brown invasion, on… but we will never agree on your death wish. America should never become Asiatica, and if you don’t see that, I sincerely question your motives.

    I guess it’s not your guilt. You just don’t possess white European-American identity & consciousness. Again, it’s not your fault. But, you’re as out of place as Groucho Marx is in a Shakespearean tragedy.

    • JohnEngelman

      “I don’t know what JE is doing at this site.”

      – Bardon Kaldian

      I was attracted to this site by reading Jared Taylor’s “The Color of Crime.”

      http://www.colorofcrime.com/

      I enjoy investigating different points of view. I think There are often elements of truth on both sides of a political dispute.

      I enjoy political arguments. Unfortunately the only poster here who consistently gives me a contest is David Ashton.

      • David Ashton

        I am not sure whether to be pleased or embarrassed by this tribute, especially as I am inclined to agree with Bardon Kaldian.
        Let me take the issue of miscegenation: it is not just a matter for the participants. It has social implications as soon as children are born. The whole character of society can be changed if it occurs on a sufficient scale. Those of us concerned about our national future, and evolutionary progress, have the right and duty to discuss possible implications. Same applies to “gay marriage”, ZPG, differential abortions, drug-taking, sexual corruption of children by social networking, and much else.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bardon-Kaldian/100003542251801 Bardon Kaldian

        Of course there are elements of truth etc. But, the AR is about White identity & consciousness. You just don’t possess them. You took, say, 20-30% of themes (race & crime, race & IQ,..)- but you’re vocally against preservation & dominance of white European identity and culture. I suppose you’re a decent man, but, ideologically, you’re nothing less than a fellow-traveler of Asian suprematism.

        • JohnEngelman

          Orientals do not need my advocacy. They can succeed without it. All they need is a chance to compete with whites on equal terms.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bardon-Kaldian/100003542251801 Bardon Kaldian

            Why would I- or anybody else- bother with them in any way, pro or con ? They’re perpetual foreigners in White countries. And you side with & adulate these foreigners. You’ve just corroborated what I’d written without knowing it. My God …

      • Katherine McChesney

        Good for David.

    • razorrare

      I’m not so convinced he is out of place here…many posts that are well written pertaining to the jewish question are removed or deleted…those not so well written,well they remain untouched…Has Jared Taylor ever been called an anti-semite? Thats much worse than being called a racist…Maybe another video forthcoming regarding the same…naw…didnt think so.

  • Achaean

    At VDare there is an article by Peter Sayles (Jan 20) which challenges the often repeated but untrue claim that Jewish over representation at Ivy Leagues is a reflection of their higher IQ.

    Today, in response to a letter re this article, Peter Sayles writes: “I fully agree with the reader that Ashkenazi Jewish IQ scores are slightly higher based on both Stanford-Binet and Wechsler IQ testing results. They indicate a Jewish mean of 107-110 compared to a European average of 100. [I should add that some tests have the Germans and Dutch at 107-109].

    However, please keep in mind that the Jews are a small tribe of only a few million people scattered across the globe. There are more Europeans with IQs over 140 than there are Jews in the entire world!

    Remember, the Jews produced Albert Einstein but the English, (one nation among Europe’s family) produced both Isaac Newton and Stephen Hawking. Yet this tiny band of Semitic desert wanderers comprises over thirty percent of Ivy League students. This statistic reveals far more regarding Jewish ethnocentric networking in Ivy League admissions and American power relations than it does natural intelligence.”

    The bottom line is that Whites have been surrendering their countries and institutions, which they created through a long history of struggle and achievement requiring what the mighty Greeks and Romans called Virtue.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      There are more Europeans with IQs over 140 than there are Jews in the entire world!

      Don’t know about that.

      I can tell you with the standard bell curve distribution, assume median white IQ 100 SD 15, then 0.383% of whites will have IQs over 140. The big wild card is the total number of white people on Earth. Whatever that is, multiply that by 0.00383 to find out the number of whites on Earth with 140+ IQ. Then compare to the total Jewish population on Earth. If there are 800 million whites in total, this predicts to 3.07 million super-140 IQ whites in total. There are 11 million total Jews in Israel + USA alone.

      • Talltrees

        Why are all Europeans grouped together, but Askenazi aren’t lumped with lower IQ Jews, such as Sephardi and Mizrahi?

        Europeans nationalities should be separated. Lynn’s German and Dutch IQ’s are 107-109. Bui’s German and Dutch IQ’s at 110. Bui’s is actually more accurate in my opinion because he used the same IQ test on all participants.

        Now, let’s compare Ashkenazi IQ to German’s and Dutch. They are not more intelligent than those two. And, they are more intelligent than Chinese and Japanese.

        I question Lynn’s findngs that Americans have an IQ of 100. Who is included in that 100? Non-White immigrants who call themselves White, and Eastern Europeans whose IQ is lower than Western Europeans.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bardon-Kaldian/100003542251801 Bardon Kaldian

      Ivy League… Ron Unz has written extensively on the topic you’re addressing: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/

      As for Jewish creativity, just my c/p:
      Now, Jews, this old & talented ethno-religious group is in the great creative period of their existence, which lasts as yet ca. 150-200 years. Many other groups or peoples have had such periods-Italians, say, 1300-1600; English up and down, but let’s take a look at 1550-1750 period. During this time, the English had produced:
      Tallis, Byrd, Purcell- composers, Boyle (Irish extraction)- father of chemistry, Shakespeare, Milton, Donne, …-literature, Bacon, Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley-philosophy, Gilbert- discovered magnetism, Harvey-physiology, blood circulation, Newton- the greatest scientist ever, Halley- astronomy, Cavendish- physics & chemistry, discovered hydrogen, ..

      So, just in this 200 years span the English had created enormously more than Jews in past 200 years. And- what does this have to do with IQ & other stuff ? Nothing.
      Some peoples have given, in various periods of time, more or less important creative contribution to the world civilization. As I’ve said- I’m not impressed with some extraordinary “Ashkenazi intelligence”. There is also enormous French intelligence,
      Russian intelligence, English intelligence, Swedish intelligence, Italian intelligence, German intelligence … manifested in different historical periods.

      • Achaean

        Excellent point. It is also worth noting that the population of Athens during the fifth century BC, the classical age, was about 250,000 — the same era which saw the founding figures of Western culture: the dramatists Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Euripides and Sophocles, the philosophers Aristotle, Plato and Socrates, the historians Herodotus, Thucydides and Xenophon, the poet Simonides and the sculptor Phidias.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bardon-Kaldian/100003542251801 Bardon Kaldian

          Ancient Greeks were the most creative people on earth. They’re simply beyond comparison (the Greek miracle).

          • David Ashton

            Agreed. Western civilization began with them.

  • Ulick

    I’m not sure why I even bother to try to argue logically with people that buy the PC lies on race.

    Just today, on a neutral forum in a thread discussing overpopulation the thread steered toward disgenics. Somebody tried to assure others that the Third World average IQ was rising with their population growth, and it was Western nations’ IQs that were lowering. I suggested two reasons for this:

    1) Western governments subsidize the least intelligent members of our natiots who have children. These lower intelligence people have children earlier and more often than high intelligence Westerners who have been told to delay or forego having children in lieu of a career. Thus, more dumb kids than intelligent ones.

    2) I noted that nearly all non-Western nations have had fairly consistent demographics over the period of IQ testing while Western nations have seen a more significant shift in demographics.

    Two plausible factors that likely are the true reason for a purported IQ decline. It didn’t matter that I didn’t mention race. The Liberals pounced, ridiculed, yelled, kicked, screamed, but never posited a reason for the IQ decline. It was simply that my thoughts were racist.

    I just hope that reasonable third parties see that dynamic and gravitate toward the more even-keeled logic.

  • [Guest]

    It’s true that the opposition loses the argument and resorts to name-calling, thereby proving that it’s ignorant and vicious, sounds bad. But so what? The opposition has won. The question is how the more reasonable minority of Americans are to deal with the loss, which involves the continued fundamental transformation of the country on a Third World model.

  • razorrare

    Whats worse than being called a racist?….An Anti-Semite

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000050689622 Andrea D. Ruthless

    It’s because Jewish Supremacists control the media and academia.

    Brown University:
    Ruth J. Simmons(Black) – President
    David I. Kertzer(Jew) – Provost
    Thomas J. Tisch(Jew) – Chancellor, Brown Corporation

    Columbia University:
    Lee C. Bollinger(Jew) – President
    Claude M. Steele(Mulatto) – Provost
    William V. Campbell(White European) – Chairman, Board of Trustees

    Cornell University:
    David J. Skorton(Jew) – President
    W. Kent Fuchs(Jew) – Provost
    Peter C. Meinig(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Trustees

    Dartmouth College:
    Jim Yong Kim(Korean) – President
    Carol L. Folt(Jew) – Acting Provost
    Stephen F. Mandel Jr.(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Trustees

    Harvard University:
    Drew Gilpin Faust(Jew husband: Charles E. Rosenberg) – President
    Steven E. Hyman(Jew) – Provost
    Robert D. Reischauer(Jew) – Senior Fellow, Harvard Corporation

    Princeton University:
    Shirley M. Tilghman(Jew husband: Joseph Tilghman) – President
    Christopher L. Eisgruber(Jew) – Provost
    Stephen A. Oxman(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Trustees

    University of Pennsylvania:
    Amy Gutmann(Jew) – President
    Vincent Price(Jew) – Provost
    David L. Cohen(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Trustees

    Yale University:
    Richard C. Levin(Jew) – President
    Peter Salovey(Jew) – Provost
    Richard C. Levin(Jew) – Chairman, Yale Corporation

    Of the twenty-four(24) senior administrators of the Ivy League
    colleges and universities, twenty(20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses.
    This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of
    the United States population. This means that Jews are
    over-represented among the senior administrators of the Ivy League
    colleges and universities by a factor of 41.5 times times, or 4,150
    percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the
    senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities cannot
    be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random
    chance.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000050689622 Andrea D. Ruthless
  • HenrikHenriksen

    Hello! I appreciate the good work you all do! But can you please do us who happen to be outside the US a favour and make this video “available” for us? I am currently in a eastern European country and my Youtube screen shows me a message that this video is “unavailable” here.

    Thank you!

  • Talltrees

    Well, then, when are we going to march on Washington like all other groups so that our concerns are heard? Make the news? Who here has the nerve to start one?

  • Carlos Geary

    I found this article interesting, “Separate
    Origin of Blondism in Oceania”: http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2012/05/separate-origin-of-blondism-in-oceania.html

  • Matt

    Jared Taylor’s statement that “most people with any sense” think that “whites are smarter than blacks,” and “Asians are smarter than whites,” is, I think, kind of a ridiculous statement. I’m not going to even argue the point, nor the slippery, rather misleading phrasing and construction of the statement itself.