The 2014 Race Card

Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2014

President Obama was elected on a promise to unite the country, and in particular millions of Americans hoped he could help to transcend racial divisions. So one of the great tragedies of his presidency is that he and the Democratic Party have used race for political purposes in ways that exacerbate tensions–no more so than this election year.

Mr. Obama’s approval ratings are so bad that Democrats will need to drive a huge turnout to drag many incumbents over the victory line. The core of their political base are African-Americans, more than 90% of whom still register high approval of the President, and many of whom reside in battleground Senate states like Georgia, Louisiana and North Carolina. The party’s problem is that black turnout often drops sharply in midterms.

Hope and change are long gone, so Democrats are now playing the race card to scare black Americans to the ballot box. At the milder end of this spectrum is the Democratic National Committee’s appeal that the midterms should be a gesture in racial solidarity. “GET HIS BACK,” reads an ad the party committee is running in black newspapers. “Republicans have made it clear that they want our President–Barack Obama–to fail. If you don’t vote this November 4, they win.”

The harder, nasty edge is playing out in individual campaigns. The Democratic Party of Georgia is distributing a flyer that shows two young black children holding signs that say “Don’t Shoot.” The flyer reads: “If You Want To Prevent Another Ferguson In Their Future . . . VOTE.”

The handout refers to Ferguson, Mo. shooting victim Michael Brown, noting that in Ferguson 67% of the population is black, while “94% of its police force are white.” What Ferguson has to do with pressing the Senate candidacy of white Georgia Democrat Michelle Nunn isn’t clear, other than that Ms. Nunn can’t win without a resounding black vote.

In North Carolina, black residents have received flyers that show a lynching scene, with the superimposed words: “ Kay Hagan doesn’t win! Obama’s impeachment will begin! Vote in 2014.” The flyers are attributed to the “Concerned Citizens of Cumberland County,” and no wonder its authors want to remain anonymous.

In Maryland, where Democrat Anthony Brown is running to become the state’s first black Governor, the state Democratic Party has released a flyer showing pictures of a civil-rights march, a “colored waiting room” sign, and Donald Trump alongside the words: “Where’s the birth certificate?” The flyer ends: “In Maryland, it’s our turn to take an important step in the journey . . . Vote for Anthony Brown.”

{snip}

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • TruthBeTold

    “If You Want To Prevent Another Ferguson In Their Future . . . VOTE.”

    Ferguson happened under a black, Democrat President.

    Are they suggesting they should vote Republicans to prevent another Ferguson?

  • Dave4088

    In “free and equal” USSA, only blacks and other non-whites may play the race card and resort to anti-white demagoguery and sleazeball tactics during the election season and 24/7/365. If any white politician on the right attempted to do that he would be loudly condemned by the anti-racist establishment and also thrown under the bus by race neutral conservatives, Rand Paul and the gutless RINO’s.

    • Max

      -and still is.

    • When I hear a Latino or Asian use the race card I may listen and hear them out, Not all times when an Asian or Latino use the (race card) they don’t use it only on the white man.
      as for a black screaming and using the (race card) I have a hard time truly believing that he was done wrong. It has been use as an excuss too often by the black culture, and it seems that being lite on this 60% is not true. But the black Americans are giving them selves a very bad rap. And many how cry raciest seem to be the biggest racists.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    “Hope and change” have long been forgotten.

    No, just misinterpreted. It was hope & change for non-Americans.

    • JohnEngelman

      Blacks are Americans. So are other non whites who are American citizens.

      • George Costanza

        Only on paper, Mr. Engelman…

        • JohnEngelman

          That includes the paper on which the United States Constitution is written.

          ———-

          14th Amendment

          Section 1.

          All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

          • George Costanza

            Oh what a clever retort…paper burns easily Mr.Engleman, which is a perfect example of how fragile our laws, liberty and equality are for those of us who take that paper seriously.

          • JohnEngelman

            Those who take the paper of the U.S. Constitution seriously are required to agree with the Fourteenth Amendment.

          • It seems to me that your gaggle of Multicultural stooges only take The Law seriously when it advances their own racial agendas. They hold up any Constitutional parts that could help them, while ignoring and skirting the parts that don’t. Why should we be any different? That was a rhetorical question, Yellow John.

          • George Costanza

            I think those willing
            to be American citizens, should take that paper the U.S. Constitution seriously. 😉

          • Samuel Hathaway

            For those foreigners who now have dual citizenship under “naturalized” section of the protection of the 14th Amendment, a serious discussion is in order for how authentic is their loyalty. Dual citizenship, and birthright citizenship must be ended.

            “I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law…”

            Can a naturalized Mexican immigrant rights activist really, really, and truly take this oath, and really mean it? We have reason to doubt.

          • M&S

            Sure he/she can.
            And then, because of our 1st Amendment, they can go out and join a procession burning our flag, elevating Mexico’s and threatening all sorts of evil mischief if they don’t get what they want, when they want it.
            Everything. Now.
            If you don’t have the guts to make it a racial battle in which extermination is the endgame if we don’t FIGHT BACK ACTIVELY, you are dooming us to slow replacement, just on the number of Hispanics and Blacks now present in our lands whose TFRs are so much higher and generationally more frequent than ours.
            This is the real go/no go condition. We have to not only deny future ‘Dreamers’ but actively deport those whom our traitorous political/wealth class have brought in already.
            And American just doesn’t have the stones.
            They have been taught that if you do it to X, today, you will do it to each other, tomorrow.
            And while that is a flat out lie, what is true is that our white elected leaders are doing it to us, today, tomorrow and -forever-, until we are dead or blended out to stupidity.
            And for that, they deserve a reciprocal extinction of life event. No questions asked, no debate, no discussion.

          • Who Me?

            “…get what they want, when they want it.”
            At our expense. Both our taxpayer subsidies up to and including our very lives and the lives of our loved ones, our culture and our country.

          • WhiteVeinKratom

            They don’t want our culture. That’s the problem.

          • Who Me?

            Sorry, I meant they want to destroy our lives, our culture and our country.

          • Juggernaut3000

            Because the obama regime allows it.

            Blacks and Hispanics are only doing what they’re allowed to get away with. Try burning a Mexican flag on a city street in Mexico City and see what happens.

            Like blacks, they are nothing more than useful idiots and tools used to destabilize and terrorize White America, whose destruction is the prime directive of the NWO cultural Marxists.

            It is those who enable and encourage blacks and Hispanics to destroy White America who are our real enemy.

          • benvad

            The non whites will gladly give up their other citizenship. Chinese, Koreans fly to the States to secure citizenship for their unborn children. You’ve got to end birthright and implement another form.

          • archer

            “you can’t serve two masters”.

          • brior

            Bravo!

          • Gary John 金白龍

            Different races are suited to being governed by different laws that suit their own racial predispositions. Jews in Israel understand tat, Mr. Engleman.

          • archer

            Since the immigration reform act of I think ’65, we let in millions from the third world almost exclusively, the constitution is not high on their list of things to know, applying for government benefits is.

          • nicholasstix

            Wrong. The Fourteenth Amendment was unconstitutionally passed and enacted. Thus, taking “the paper of the U.S. Constitution seriously” requires rejecting the Fourteenth Amendment.

          • brior

            “required to agree with” ?? your Marxist is showing.

          • JohnEngelman

            They are required rationally, rather than by government coercion.

          • none of your business

            What are you babbling about now? Please explain.

          • Black Swan

            Please don’t egg him on. Any answer he gives you will be supportive of the anti-white agenda.
            There is only one thing to do to such trolls: ban them.

          • Garrett Brown

            A few weeks ago, John Engelman changed his original post in a debate about WW2 to attempt to win the argument/continue arguing, even when he could provide absolutely no proof to his original statement. When confronted about this he continued to
            lie, act childish and then followed up by spamming my account, replying to every post I had made in the past 24 hours and even some before that time frame. I was absolutely blindsided that a middle aged man who regards himself as an intellectual who is always in pursuit of the “facts” would do something so bizarre. It was like something out of high school.

            When debating someone with such severe immaturity and obvious mental problems, it is important for you to know this kind of information and what you’re getting into. You are likely wasting your time, you have to have integrity and an honest personality when having a logical debate. John Engelman is incapable of doing this. I suggest you do like many have learned is the logical response and ignore him. You have been warned.

          • Juggernaut3000

            This type of attack, and that’s what it was, an attack, should be cause for immediate and permanent banning.

            I was going to suggest WE do the same thing to him but I notice he’s locked up his disqus account.

          • Garrett Brown

            I didn’t know what to do since you can’t report a user on discus and the Amren moderation is an absolute joke. I’m not going to hide my activity just because a sore loser wants to have a hissy fit.

          • Juggernaut3000

            You can report it directly to Disqus. Report it to AR too using the “contact” link here: http //www amren com/contact/

          • none of your business

            He is not middle aged, he is pushing 70. He also lies all the time. For a long time he was lying about what goes on in San Jose and Silicon Valley, especially his claim that San Jose was a black ghetto prior to 1970 when Vietnamese restaurants miraculously changed the city back to civilized, decent and crime free. Since I lived near San Jose at the time I was able to refute all his lies and after years he finally shut up his lies about San Jose.
            I really wish the monitors would get rid of him. I also do not believe he was severely beaten in by 4 black thugs. Who knows who he really is or who he represents.
            How much time do we spend refuting his lies and ridiculous posts such as this? I’ve been on amren since late 1990s. When did he appear? I suspect he retired a few years ago and was recruited by either the ADL or other liberals to spend his days on the internet harassing us eeeevvvvviiiilll White neo Nazi goys.

          • Garrett Brown

            Autists seem to always be pathological liars. What’s sad is they can’t really help it.

          • Well done! Clap, clap! I have been trying to drop this line for like several months but not many were backing me.

          • Alexandra1973

            The 14th was never really ratified.

          • Stan D Mute

            Exactly, the South was not governed by freely elected leaders during Reconstruction so any ratification was done by Yankee puppets. The 14th was imposed by the North just like the Treaty of Versailles was imposed on Germany.

          • obot

            Is their loyalty to other blacks or to America. That tells you if they are Americans or not.

          • journey

            You are so blinded that the very institutions and rights to protect a democracy have been used to destroy it. There is a big difference between social parasites and producers. No able man is entitled to another man’s labor. As the Jewish saying goes: If you do not work, you shall not eat.

          • Gary John 金白龍

            Jews also view gentiles as cattle.

          • Alexandra1973

            That’s if they believe the Talmud. They need to ditch that book and really study the Torah.

          • none of your business

            Living where you do I doubt you have known many Jews other than those in the OT. From the ultra orthodox to communist they despise us, the goys..It’s unbelievable what some Jewish “friends” of mine have said to me about us 2 legged filthy beasts.
            About your favorite country Israel, this is not 3,000 BCE with which the Jews have replaced AD and BC. There were people living there long before the invasion of the Jews and their descendants are still living there as Christian Palestinians who you, a fervent OT Christian refer to as the “filth.”
            You really cannot be pro White and pro Jewish. At least google
            Jewish lawyers and Brown vs Topeka and Jewish lawyers and affirmative action.

          • shmo123

            It’s the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” that separates citizens from illegals and others. The authors of of the 14th amendment made it clear that citizenship did not include interlopers and illegals:

            “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the family of ambassadors, or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.” Jacob M. Howard, the author of the 14th amendment on it’s meaning.”

            Apparently no one in Washington has ever read it.

          • M&S

            Except, that neither blacks nor especially recent illegal Hispanics were ever legally naturalized citizens by any means of the original Founder’s definitions.
            And the fact that the present administration/s have been BREAKING THE LAW regarding protections granted exclusively to it’s citizens against citizens of a foreign power numbering in the millions of high criminality squatters shows that our nation has become both tyrannical in it’s demands of the people who don’t want this (a healthy majority of 67%, last I checked) and grossly remiss in their execution of their political responsibilities.
            We cannot play the Bush game of ‘It’s just a piece of paper’ nonsense. We have to be willing to SAY and ACT UPON the beliefs which it includes that we espouse.
            That this is a white nation made for white racial groups who can mix and breed together. And that no group or individual who owes loyalty to another state has _any_ rights of settlement or even simple ingress, here.
            Did you forget that part?

          • benvad

            At the time it was written is was only ever intended for Whites only.
            Notice that aboriginal people and Bantus were specifically excluded from society (I.e. Slavery and no citizenship).

          • none of your business

            That was the 1790’s constitution. Engleman posted a copy of the 1865? 14th amendment which was meant for former slaves. It may or ma not have been ratified properly, but it has been law for 150 years. It mentioned the children of foreigners could not be citizens but did not distinguish between the children of visitors and immigrants.

          • Stan D Mute

            The 14th was a proclamation, not an agreed upon amendment freely admitted by the states. It came after the War of Northern Aggression during “Reconstruction” and thus had the validity of any hostile act imposed on a brutalized enemy.

          • Mergatroyd

            Don’t forget, John, to tell the posters here how you long for the White race to be replaced by Asians and Jews in America.

            Here are a few quotes from you:

            — The thought of you losing your job to a more intelligent Jew or Oriental is pleasing to me. As time goes on there will be more of that.

            — What matters is not race. What matters is IQ.

            — Miscegenation is the coming trend. There is not point in even trying to reverse it.

            — Get used to it. In the future inter racial marriage will be even more common.

            — History is moving against you. America is becoming more multi racial, more multi ethnic, and more meritocratic. There is nothing white nationalists can do about. One gets places in politics by getting in front of popular issues. One does not get places by fighting for lost causes.

          • Casper Flannigan

            Hey John, aren’t they 3/5 American?

          • none of your business

            Waste of space. Why is Engleman not banned. He is an anti White racist.

          • Alexandra1973

            My guess is so we can refute his nonsense and others can see. Just a guess.

          • Anna Tree

            “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
            Illegals don’t fit this terminology.

        • WR_the_realist

          Blacks born in this country are Americans. Some of them are decent enough folks but a depressingly large share are just one big problem for America. That doesn’t change the fact that they’re Americans. I have a couple of worthless members of my extended family who this country would be better off without (they’re white) but that doesn’t mean they’re not Americans.

          • I’ll take all of your worthless family members as well as all of the worthless White people you can find. All you have to do in return is take all of the black people(you can even have the good ones) and move to some place far, far away from me. I promise you there are probably millions and millions of other White Americans who would immediately take this deal within seconds of being presented with the option.

          • M&S

            And that ability to accept what is your own as the ‘cost of being genetically variable’ in your outcome behaviors is what proves that, if whites took on other races, we would not then fly apart at the seams with each other.
            Which is the underlying premise of ‘mass racial upheaval = mass intraracial fighting’. And the origins of that lie with the Jews and the fake Holocaust.
            Fake because Jews are not white. And fake because the numbers underground and the volume they are put in don’t math out. As they must for such an annihilative event to occur.
            In this you need only look at the reality of _displacement_ warfare in which those who have the will force those who do not to leave their territory. Without violence using largely display. This kind of for-show warfare is common in primitive cultures and it is the underlying dominance theory approach to most conflict resolution.
            Or it was until ‘smart people’ invented ways for whites to cut each other’s throats more effectively.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Yes, only technically, not literally.
          Not in body or in spirit, or allegiance.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Not if they pledge allegiance to the Cultural Marxist flag, they’re not.
        Just like your Zionist, Israel-first brothers. They pledge allegiance to
        the grievance industry flag.

        • JohnEngelman

          There is no “Cultural Marxist flag.”

          • Sick of it

            It may look something like this…

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Here’s another rendition.

          • Juggernaut3000

            When the time comes, that flag will be burned, along with the hispanics that created it.

            The “people” waving around that silly flag representative of a failed state are nothing more than useful idiots being used as a battering ram against White American.

          • Mergatroyd

            The flag Sick of It posted will be the NWO flag that will fly across the world.

            All other will be banned with death assured for anyone that tries.

          • bilderbuster

            They should have to wear one of those swishy ribbons in public at least.

      • none of your business

        Another revelation from the genius Engleman. We know perfectly well that anyone born in this country or who is a naturalized citizen immigrant is an Amercan. So what is your point? Do you think it is something we do not know?
        Engleman like virtually all Jews considers himself and his tribe a genius who is aware of knowledge the average goy prole peasant White does not know. He assumes we can’t read or write like the E European peasants his ancestors oppressed.
        The more your try to show off your so called intelligence and knowledge Engleman, the more ridiculous you appear.

      • journey

        Citizenship should be earned, not entitlement to be social parasites.

        • JohnEngelman

          How should citizenship be earned?

          • journey

            To anyone of intelligence the answer is pretty obvious, you think money for generational welfare, AA, endless social programs,
            free phones, $200 sneakers, etc. came from the sky or grow on trees? And the right to vote should be a privilege. The Founding Fathers had it correct.

            This country’s decay did not just happened out of the blue. Taxpayers need to say enough is enough. It is still not too late to save this country.

          • JohnEngelman

            For the record, I am opposed to affirmative action and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.

            However, do you believe that citizenship can legitimately be earned by non whites? If not, why not?

          • journey

            What do you mean “legitimately”?
            I am not opposed to temporary assistance to anyone, as long as it is temporary except in rare cases.

          • The All Seeing Bry

            The United States is one of the only countries that grants you citizenry if you were born here. That is absurd.

            The United States was founded as a White-Christian nation. It should favor white Christians. Others can come and gain citizenry, but in small numbers. Our immigration policy prior to 1965 was pretty good, but was ruined.

          • JohnEngelman

            I agree with you about The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. It, and the North American Free Trade Agreement, have enabled the plutocracy to import cheap labor and export good jobs.

          • The All Seeing Bry

            All while destroying our nation, on purpose

          • JohnEngelman

            Money that used to go into our pay raises goes into their dividend payments.

          • none of your business

            Ridiculous. Money that used to go to our paychecks now goes to the paychecks of Asians, Indians and Hispanic Indians. You obviously know nothing about stock dividends either Engleman. I have Microsoft stock. Do you know what the dividend is? About $1.30 per year per share.

          • WR_the_realist

            NAFTA didn’t say anything about immigration. It wasn’t about importing cheap labor, it was about exporting jobs to where the cheap labor lived. I do remember how when NAFTA was being debated we were told it would reduce illegal immigration. Like hell it did.

          • JohnEngelman

            I supported NAFTA at the time, but the arguments against it have been verified by subsequent events.

          • none of your business

            Problem here is that Engleman’s depression era socialism conflicts with his late 20th century anti White stance. Socialism only works when there are not enough workers for the capitalists to lower wages. Decent wages and working conditions only occur when there is what capitalists call a labor shortage but actually means only 15 qualified workers for every job instead of 3,000.
            How in the world can you not like the Immigration and nationality act of 1965 when you absolutely applaud the replacement of Whites in every engineering, medical, computer and STEM job? You do realize that the hordes of Asians and Indians who occupy every STEM job from finance to medicine are here for one reason and one reason only, the 1965 Immigration aka replacement of American’s best and brightest the STEM grads with third worlders many of whom have fraudulent degrees?

          • journey

            Our guests have been chipping away at this nation for a long time. Jefferson warned about our guests. They were let in by the thousands early this century. What holds a nation together more than other anything else is a common religion. Currently, the Christian religion has been reduced to “Happy Holidays”.

          • The All Seeing Bry

            Yes, but it is a combination of religion and race. Honestly I’m not sure which one is the dominant, good question to ponder. Either way, it’s time to give our guests the boot.

          • journey

            Both. This country was founded on inherent racial ability and the level of religion reflects the inherent racial IQ/intelligence. Look no further than the non-Christian religions.

          • Stan D Mute

            My ancestors fought in the Revolution on both sides of my family. We were imprisoned by the English on prison ships, released, and rejoined the fight. Today I am an agnostic who sees zero difference between the various religions. All that differs is the believer’s degree of fanaticism. Some do seem more fanatic than others for sure, but once there a fanatic is a fanatic.

            My point is, my ancestors fought the English for their freedom and the freedom of their Posterity. Nobody else. Anybody who came after the Revolution should be a conditional citizen at most.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am confident that most of those who post here are descended from people who came to the United States after the American Revolution.

          • Stan D Mute

            Then get the heck out. Nobody ever asked me or my family if you could come to the nation we fought, bled, and died to create. We pulled the trees up with oxen to create farms and roads while Johnny-come-lately’s like you came along once the man’s work was done to live off our labors.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have ancestors who were here before the American Revolution. They supported Great Britain.

          • journey

            I understand your viewpoint that man has misused religion for self-serving purposes. It comes with the territory as man is not created perfect. But religion is an inherent part of man’s evolution toward the understanding of himself and his destiny in the cosmos. And religion can help to bind a nation together which is why this nation should never become a non-dominant Christian nation of which our guests have been chipping away to undo.

            Christianity is a progressive religion of higher levels based on that the individual is important and capable of making moral decisions. And, it is elastic meaning it is open to evolution and change (the search for truth (God)) in comparison to Islam which is less so.

            The survival of this nation as an advanced society is at a critical point due to the whites increasingly becoming the minority. No advanced nation can survive once the critical mass of low IQers become the majority. This nation was founded on high ideals because of a high level of leadership along with a critical mass of able people who understood and had the courage to implement and maintain those ideals. This is the hallmark of the white race wherever they are.

          • Juggernaut3000

            It is race. How could DNA be used to keep “others” out of their homeland if citizenship were based only on religion?

          • WR_the_realist

            Even though I am an agnostic when December 25 nears I always wish people a Merry Christmas. Most people are delighted. The few who get upset deserve to have a lousy day.

          • Alexandra1973

            I view Christmas as just a Catholic holiday. It really has nothing to do with Christ. Look up its pagan origins.

            That is why I, as a fundamentalist Christian, do not observe it. I have no issue with calling it “winter break.” If someone says “Happy holidays” I don’t go nuts.

            The only “holiday” I observe in December is my son’s birthday. 🙂

          • WR_the_realist

            Actually Christmas is celebrated by nearly all Christians, not just Catholics, although the Eastern Orthodox still use the Julian calendar so have it on a different day. The Bible says nothing about which day Jesus was born on, so the choice of December 25 is simply a convention established in the early days of Christianity. They did choose that date because pagans already had a winter solstice celebration on that day so they decided to turn it into a Christian holiday.

          • Alexandra1973

            Eastern Orthodox is a branch of Catholicism (which isn’t really Christianity to begin with).

            Christmas wasn’t observed until around the 4th century AD.

          • HE2

            Alexandra, stop with the Catholic bashing already.

            I am not even a Christian but find it derisive.

            R. C. is as Christian as any other denomination.

          • WR_the_realist

            Well from where I sit “4th century AD” is still the early days of Christianity. You are right that for the first few hundred years Christmas wasn’t celebrated. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t a Christian holiday now. While the Catholic Church has been infected by the modern disease Eastern Orthodox Christianity is still as Christian as any brand of Christianity I know.

          • [Guest]

            >>>The only “holiday” I observe in December is my son’s birthday. 🙂

            Some people hold that to observe birthdays is of pagan origins. 😮

          • none of your business

            What are you, the last Calvinist in America? When he was dictator of Geneva he burned Christians alive for celebrating Christmas or wearing new clothes on their wedding day or eating a hot dinner on December 25th. Have you ever even read the New Testament, the Christian part of the bible? If you are so anti Christian and pro Jewish why don’t you just convert? You could also become a 7th day Adventist or Jehovah witness.
            I respect all Christian sects but if you call yourself Christian you should regard the Jewish part of the bible the OT as the forerunner to Christianity and the New Testament. You might want to try Kabbalah, they read the OT and count the words and move the sentences around and obsess with it.
            Christians are new testament. Jews are old testament. Your church may call yourselves Christian but if you ignore the new testament you are not Christians.

          • Alexandra1973

            I’m not a Calvinist.

            Being a Christian does not mean anti-Jew. Just the opposite, in fact.

            Did you know the Puritans banned Christmas because it’s a “papal” holiday? They knew what Catholicism was really about back then (just like the founders knew what blacks, for example, are really like).

          • anony

            Posted by Journey: ” What holds a nation together more than other anything else is a common religion.”

            I agree that a common religion is important to a “nation”, but I think that genetics is more important. After all, the Latin root word for nation means “to be born”. So I think that common genes are more important to a successful nation than religion.

            A greatly “extended family” makes a “nation”.

          • journey

            In the affairs of man, it is never simple. But what bounded this nation together initially was a common gene pool and a religion dominantly based on Christian beliefs (a common identity cutting across ethnic groups). And it should remain so in order to survive as an advanced nation which the current anti-white propaganda is relentlessly undermining.

            Religion gives a sense of power (hope) to individuals which the Communists were well aware. This was one of the reasons why religion was abolished – to be a soul less/non invidualistic society.

          • Gary John 金白龍

            Nope. Why? They aren’t White.

          • none of your business

            You may not like affirmative action for blacks but you love affirmative action for Asians, Indians, Israelis, arabs and every other third world immigrant. You are pushing 70 Engleman. You claim to live in N. California although you may be sitting behind a computer in Israel or NYC. Soon you will be in need of a lot of medical care and you will be at the mercy of all those woman Asian indian and arab wen Drs who fill every medical office in N. California. They cannot diagnose, are reluctant to order tests and generally incompetent as I know to my cost and so does everyone else in N. California.

          • M&S

            Automan (Automated Manufacturing) and Robotic labor, along with fusion electrics are so close that it is economically _easier_ to not provide make-work ‘job assistance’ programs to those who have low IQ and no social commitment.
            This means, bluntly, that if you don’t want real bloodshed at the million man level throughout the U.S., you have to keep the spigots of welfare turned on.
            And that is a real truth which should change your opinion on the ‘value of work’ for it’s own sake. Because what you are doing is enabling equally vicious and exploitative ‘participatory greed’ in the /process/ system by which the wealth class owns the systems which make everything from shoes to shotguns happen and then charges the majority labor pool for the right to PAY to participate in making when they then have to buy.
            While the wealth class gets a penny from every process they own, whether they participate or not.
            If you want to enable labor, you have to take it’s use out of the hands of the wealth class and allow it to be truly free market bid at mission accomplishment reward rates far higher than a single pair of hands could ever accomplish.
            Robotics are the key to allowing those who -want- a life to do the kinds of still-gotta-fill-the-potholes jobs to make a reasonable profit for doing so.
            In this, you will find that you spend less on prisons, job programs and certainly welfare for newly minted citizens with 83IQs, no language skills and a sub-6th grade education, if you simply say:
            “Here’s the keys to your tenement. Here’s your 700 dollars a month. Here’s your doctors appointment with the sterilization specialist. Have a nice life.”
            While everyone who has the brains to manage a work unit of 5-10-15-20-200 robots (it’s a growable metric) can bid on the scales of job function that, while temporary and single-task oriented (to allow for others to get their own paychecks), also gets first-queue allocation on _government purchased_ (mass quantities = best pricing) house, medical, car, pregnancy, education benefits.
            Which is to say a positive eugenics method for rapidly cleaning the U.S. of those who don’t want to live beyond their own lives while enabling those who do, to screw over the wealth class who would only be able to sell at the levels which the closed borders and rich labor market would purchase from them before going overseas or otherwise outsourcing bids.
            Believe me, you need only look at a nation like Iraq, with 26 some odd million, devolving to civil/sectarian warfare levels, to know that that is not the way forwards.
            What -is- that path is the one of ultimate satisfaction that, within 2-3 generations, no black would live who didn’t work their ass off to try and /understand/ the complex online bidding process, robotic repair and seasonal job shuffling as modification investment by which a robotically supported culture bought off and then killed the ditch digger classes.
            And imagine the kind of life it would be for the worthless. You can fornicate all you like but you can never get a bigger check for having more kids. You can spend exactly 200 dollars on assisted rent, 300 dollars on delivered food and 50-100 dollars on things like cable and utilities. And your entire residual, discretionary, salary is going to be…drumroll…100 dollars.
            Look at your own monthly expenditures on movies, driving, and meals in a friendship environment and tell me you don’t spend at least twice that much.
            Now imagine that, instead of making 10 dollars an hour, minimum wage, depending on how much you are willing to push yourself and how smartly you lease your robots out when you are asleep, you can make 20-25 dollars an hour, easy.
            This is the future of a word where machine intelligence doesn’t know what a flower or a sunset is. But can performance brain surgery better than any 10 year trained human on the planet.
            We can exploit that, as a race group which keeps our ditch digger machine laborers too stupid to know what they are missing while providing the most basic of ‘drive them to the worksite’ ontological superiority by which a man can still be just an average joe and yet have real dignity in terms of /what he knows/ that the robots never will.
            This is the way forward. If we will stop trying to lever up the planetary population by dumbing down ourselves. And instead concentrate on improving -our- quality of living. And letting the world emulate if it pleases them. Or not.

          • Juggernaut3000

            Japan’s population is crashing. There is a labor shortage which will become much worse in the coming years.

            What to do? Import labor slaves from the third world who will turn Tokyo into Detroit? Or turn to robotics.

            Why the Japanese are the world’s leaders in robotic technology.

            Third world “labor” is not needed in the U.S., including the so-called H1-B, etc. visas. There is no labor shortage.

            The Third world is being furiously imported into the U.S. for one reason only: To destroy the White race.

          • journey

            You are correct. And Plato had it correct eons ago. Reproducing of the lower IQ should never be more than the higher IQers (the common man with some geniuses thrown in).
            This will be a challenge for future generations to deal with. As for robotics/machines taking the place of man intellectually it will never happen. But for more and more of the menial work done by machines to create more leisure time so man can develop his mind, yes. And this has been happening at an ever fast pace.

            So for now and for eons yet, the saying, if you do not work, you shall not eat will still apply. Notice this problem is only on a serious level in developed countries because in third world countries, there is no such luxury? The blindly giving of welfare, etc has created many social evils as this article has informed us. Society (taxpayers) need to step in pushing for reality to come back in no matter what convoluted self-serving delusions are used against them.

            Side note: Enjoyed reading your posting of the 100,000 year old jaw bone found by the Chinese on another article. There are many more “secrets” on this planet yet to be discovered on the origins and evolution of man on this planet. The many Sumerian tablets sitting on museum shelves collecting dust contain some of those secrets. Unfortunately, my narratives on man’s origins are not within the currently accepted dogma for some to easily accept. But the human mind must always be open toward other truths.

          • UncleSham

            Would you mind giving some details on your narratives of man’s origins? I’m interested in alternative theories.

          • journey

            Thank you asking. In part, my posting of man’s origins is to antidote some of the current anti-white propaganda. The white gene pool is unique in that it is both evolutionary and not. This explains why the whites have been the main inventors and innovators on this planet. The white brain power needs to be treasured as it pulls this planet forward both technologically and socially.

            About 1 million years ago, humans evolved from primates not from apes in southwestern Asia. Apes appeared at the same time also from primates but of different lineage (from another mentally retarded primate couple). The dawn mammals (had a primitive opposable thumb) descended from lemurs were an important evolutionary step along with the frog in the eventually appearance of man.

            The early human beings eventually migrated to Europe
            mostly living in caves. They ran away from their inferior primate family group. This was a very wise decision (their first). The
            first human couple (brother and sister) early on knew how to create fire for warmth by using flint to create sparks. Their
            first offspring was the first in needing clothing (fur) to protect against the environment. Their off springs also discovered how to use make tools from flint. As the population increased, the early humans migrated outward but not to Africa except for the later Neanderthalers. The present day Eskimos are the surviving representatives of these early humans.

            The Neanderthal race appeared some 850,000 years ago
            in India migrating to Europe, China, and northern Africa. They are descendants of humans and of humans that had mated with primates. The breeding with primates was still possible because the differentiation between human and primate was still too recent.

            Timeline of human evolution: the first humans from primates (one million years ago) giving rise to the Neanderthalers (850,000 years ago), then the appearance of the six colored races (500,000 years ago). At the same time, appeared the ancestors of the Sumerians (non-evolutionary) about 500,000 years ago. Then about 38,000 years ago, Adam and Eve appeared giving rise to another race, the violet race (also non-evolutionary). The non-evolutionary historical events are documented in the numerous Sumerian clay tables.

            About 500,000 years ago, the six colored races (primarily- blue, red, and yellow; secondary – orange, green, and black) appeared in the highlands of India. Only three of the six survived as distinct races today – red, yellow, and black. The blacks migrated into Africa seeking the tropics for easier existence. There they steadily regressed until the white man discovered them. The superior races (red and yellow) avoided the tropics instead went toward a more strenuous environment as it fosters
            ingenuity – more usage of brain power. As for the white race, it primarily is an amalgam of the blue race (superior) and Adam and Eve descendants – some of their descendants of long ago
            were the Aryans and ancient Greeks and Egyptians. The gene pool of Adam and Eve (appeared some 38,000 years ago) is what gives the whites their light colorings and superior
            brain power. So, yes, blue eyes did come from a distinct gene pool as some research is pointing out. Then there are the Sumerians another superior race to throw into the gene pool.

            There’s more to the narrative of man’s evolution on this planet. This is just a very brief synopsis. Madison Grant is correct in
            that in the Siwalik Hills of northern India, may be found fossils showing the transition between man and various pre-human groups. Prior to WWII, there was more academic freedom in the exchange and discussion of ideas.

            The Eskimos along with the other races appeared as is. Environmental factors do not change physical or inherent genetic abilities. The dogma concerning inherent racial differences is to explain it away by environmental factors. Superior genes are enhanced by the environment but inferior genes cannot be changed into superior.

          • M&S

            Journey,
            Thank you for your kind words.
            Two Comments:

            The biggest reason to avoid integrating non-whites into our society is that we live in a monogamous world which favors social hypergamy over aesthetic or situational polygamy. This effectively isolates genes from Sweep mode transition throughout a society and yet we do not become interbred, nor do we regress into class restricted genetic memes.

            Monogamy is both a blessing and a curse in a forced multicultural environment because all of us have the basic geneset adaptation to be functional but not all of us have the brains as sexual restraint to be capable of discriminating ‘free opportunity’ from equal contributor ability as once we did on the basis of punitive consequences, breeding out of tribe.

            However; while you cannot make a white from a single gene transmutor ability, you can deny whites overall this gene and prevent our own developmental achievement of a radically remixed ability set (the class leveler modifier is that of breeding down to beauty or warmth without social penalty since genes can remix from within the given genepool but improve quicker through downwards mobility).

            The chance for the latter is, as much as anything, the basis of the ‘hero mystique’ of our society, in giving ‘free rights to the herd females’ to wealth, sports and martially gifted individuals.

            I believe this is NOT simply a function of single-gene mutagenic benefit but rather because any action which forces someone to go all out in translating their fully developed geneset to achieve success can, in and of itself, cause the overall genetic key to turn in the lock and make them an active transmitter for the heritability of the -state of change- itself. Like a chemical catalyst.

            This is dangerous because it sounds LaMarckian but I believe genomic biology and historical gene-type tracing will prove that it is true by showing that key gene variants arose simultaneously, too far away for them to be a function of a Sweep.

            And what if what you are transmitting is not the ‘pure’ (singular) skill but it’s developmental immediacy to activate other gene sets with similar readiness to make the next move up with transcripted genes that they have, in isolation or within the group,

            The ‘Sweep Effect’ is thus one of keying in multiple individual genetic change conditions, any or all of which may push the total capability of the group forwards by quantity and compatibility with the group/environmental bias. In this, multi-regional evolution is about the hill climb and plateau levels of adaptation by which encoding those experiential triggers causes behavioral responses (go/nogo taboos and accelerants, the purpose of emotions being to enhance the biological restrictor set of allowed genetic transcripting response) in us that, eventually, activates the intron and SAR effectors which push gene coding beyond the present level of telomere restriction on morphology or biochemistry and into the ‘useless data’ of junk genes.

            In turn this non-coding DNA is not random or spacer set fill data but specific -evolutionary capabilty which can carry our species any of several different, developmental, directions. The controversy over whether the usefulness of the junk genes in differentiating us into specific groups with leveraged abilities is one of ‘six vs. eighty percent’ utility. To which, I would respond: ‘Both are true.’

            The more a given geneset evolves, the more the encrypted data within it unpacks and is available to make specific, developmental, change patternings, relevant to the population whose total dataset is shared.

            Understanding that this data set expansion through genetic activator personalties as moving epigen scaffolding up and down through a similar gene group is accepting that not only CAN evolution be racially distinct.

            But it must be.

            Because the prior direction of environmental cues upon genetic outcomes has been preset is what makes our reproductive choices so important in accessing the majority of the non-coding data which is out there, in the population pool and open-architecture compatible with the existing genomic variants (being subject to crossbreeding within the species is why races remain vulnerable to miscegenation from without them).

            It is not simply about brains or the way those brains are used, it’s the compability factor with subspecies unique reactions to specific environmental circumstances, the emotion based response to which furthers the developmental pathway towards what I will classify as

            1. Ynderstand-Adapt

            2. Overcome-Exceed

            3. Retranch-Refuse

            Outcomes.

            In any given race, there may be many racially active individuals who are stepping up to the plate of evolutionary activation of developmental bias. But it is the -overall- direction that the ‘many rowers, one tillerman’ commonality share (sitting in the same genomic boat) as environmental cued response that matters. For the rowers have to be genetically harmonized to not backsweep the tiller out of steering authority. And the tillerman has to recognize and accept the abilities of each rower to allow him to bias his steer with the stepped sweeps.

            For other races coming along behind us, trying to ‘be white’ on the benefits of our society is about immersing in our benefit system without the socio-environmental (experiential) cuing that triggers their own epigenetic activation.

            They aren’t rowing, they aren’t even seated.

            They are tied-line treading water.

            Slowing the down the boat.

             

             

            Evolution happens in centuries, not Millennia. Skulls from the age of Homer (2KBCE), the early Enlightenment (1,650CE) and Modern humans show different patterns of convolute densities and areas of growth.

            This is a good thing because we _do not have_ millennia worth of resources to consume at present rates. Yet what is pushing us, through much heightened consumption of high carb (high fat but not necessarily bad brain food) diets towards thresholds of improved function mental capabilities as autistic fallbacks* is exactly the kind of saturative social environment which only the modern world can generate.

            What these two juxtapositional conditions mean is that, to push human kind into homo evolutis is not something that we necessarily have to or can wait on ‘everyone else’ achieving same starting block conditions with, from much less advanced socio-environmental ready populations.

            Nor should we rotate those starting blocks forwards, based on who has the inside track. We must swing on the pitch we are given, choose the group we love the best and _push for their advantaged improvement_.

            Based on what they are ready for, not what is best for all.

            Within this _just run_ evolutionary maxim, robots to do basic labor do not have to be sapient tools, any more than savants are natively cognitive so much as phenomenalistically adaptive forces of nature (one area of the brain ‘turned on’ as a metabolic or morphologic consequence of all others being at greatly reduced metabolic or genetic function).

            Like the veritable Golem of yore, a robot can be an utterly inanimate creature whose ingrained capabilities are so singular as to be adept at a higher level’s of conscience than most humans within one skill set but still without ontological connection to any real universal awareness and thus without threat to man.

            The difference is that such a robot doesn’t need to eat, reproduce or be provided socialized advancement/entertainment opportunities. It can exist solely as a behavioral construct whose gifts are stripped, reassigned and ‘leveled up’ without will or complaint, as an element of downloadable code.

            This instant adaptability is where humanity lacks, and are the better for it.

            For in /choosing/ to be slower in cognitive recognition and development of skillsets through symbologic mosaics (not ‘abstract’ theory but the ability to disassemble interactive environments by means of recognizing the ‘verb’ function of object-nouns as separate potentialist vectors to be stored, mentally, for application elsewhere) and adapative neuromotor tuning of functional capacity in utilizing them.

            If you are more subject to imprinting one skill to the loss of efficiency in others, it behooves you to know the path from that skill to the next one as a function of relational subsets (x degrees of dissimilarity).

            Such a system must furthermore, be experientially immersed in the doing of something to be functionally compatible with the act of it, not simply achieving in it’s objective goal but as a furthering that engine which records, breaks down and reintegrates -new- activities into stepped processes, integrated with existing knowledge for reordering application, ‘out of scene’ context.

            For this is what makes the difference between deductive and inductive/interpolative ideation. It is what makes us wise and not merely intelligent.

            Robots then must come about not simply to amplify ‘leisure time’ nor to allow removal of practiced commission from resultant action. For integrating the processes of life is an act of remorseless labor. Rather, we must ruthlessly cut the NEEDLESS social support mechanisms from the meta function (system of systems) which maintains populations, as the society which shelters them, in a non developed state, simply to be inclusive of all who are not socially adapted to more than a basic, menial, role within it.

            We are instead going the opposite direction. As things like ‘common core’ education creates false equity for lower development state mental function populations simply by disincentivizing those (whites, asians, jews) who have the cognitive capacity to hold multiple levels of rote memorized tasking outcomes as formulas instead.

            In this, we are retarding the advancement of white children who are past ‘100 steps to make 2+2 visually process projectable’.

            The forces in play which would cause such a leveled playing field are above us, pushing us down the ladder of our own evolutionary process. And below us, clawing themselves up to our level of socialied benefits. Without recognizing that society itself is a living artifact of the people who make it.

            In this, neither hostile group understands the true basis of conceptual intelligence and think that, through interbreeding and imitation as capture/retardation of the white mystique, ‘all will be well’.

            This is not so. Because it ignores the macro factored time domain and the way altering our world alters us, accelerating rate of change through compatibility morphing. Specifically, you CAN create a reality whose compatibility makes your own developmental capacities radically accelerate.

            And you should. Because those who seek what you are through emulation and porting of your genetic skills to their environmental understanding are only copying what they see as being extant. Not learning to encompass the sum reality of what is as a function of becoming the engine of advancement itself. This is one of the reasons why mulattos, with half the unpacked genetic encoding, identify black and resent whites because 50% of the genetic donais which makes us who we are is still 50% short of being able to function as we do.

            If we move forwards, the other races will increasingly see our transformed world state as alien and non-comprehensible, not because of what it is but because of the multiple staged process outcomes that it represents which are specifically exclusive to their participative interaction with.

            Even so, we must existentially push to exclude rather than integrate or educate their mis comprehension from ours because ONLY then do we ensure that our view of what (change) is interpretatively data set relevant to ourselves is not itself simply an ‘explanation’ rather than the encompassment of it’s understanding.

            Whites increasingly not contributing to a society is about whites not wanting to give what is to /be/ white to others as a competitive edge. But it is also about whites being aware that our ability to encompass reality, completely, and change it to meet our needs is dependent upon our ability to see it in 4 dimensions, not at a ‘for idiots’ level of easy understanding.

             

             

            *To use some computer terminology: I suspect there is a huge bandpipe as neurotransmitter ‘connectivity’ default here, by which certain brain centers have the required density architecture as total neurosynaptic connections to start turning over at much higher throughput rates but others do not and so you get altered (synesthetic), incomplete (hyperfocussed) or seemingly retarded (non coherent) function rather than fully opened multi-threading and virtualism multipliers to total brain cognitive capacity.

            It is _crucial_ to understand that the mind exists on a separate plane from the brain because the mind is the mosaic of flash-over single neuron theory impulse activation of knowedge stored within the grey matter. Your awareness lives in an N-space integer of quantum potentialism which is your understanding of life projected onto a bubble of not-time.

            But how much detail that bubble of mind’s eye understanding has is dependent on how many neurons can flash discharge the cellularly encoded data of the mind into paraquantum tunneled image set that is at once simultaneously cogent and cohesively animated.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          Social parasites… did you hear the story of that pregnant Mexican woman who attended that birthday party in Laredo, TX, just on the other side of the Rio Grande River?…. she went into labor at the party and gave birth. So, because of a serious defect in the Constitution, this infant was granted INSTANT CITIZENSHIP for being born in U.S. territory to a mother who is NOT a citizen.

          It’s time to END birthright citizenship.

      • Bobbala

        The Outlaw Josey Wales —

        Fletcher: There’s another old saying Senator. Don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining.

      • Sick of it

        Like the Hispanic representatives working for foreign drug cartels? Or Chinese government workers spying for the Chinese government? Or Indians who do everything they can to enrich themselves and their own ethnic group, at the expense of every other one? Black Africans are so far gone, they are often considered crazy by black Americans.

      • Only in your little utopia, Yellow John. You are representative of the Old New America that is nothing more than a festering sore that never could heal itself. Most of us look toward a new future called the New New America. Think of it kind of like a big old shot of penicillin that can finally take care of that nasty little disease you picked up some time ago. No need to fret, John, you and the rest of the multiculturalists are going to be filled to the brim with enough black and brown “Americans” that you won’t be able to see straight. That’s what you want, and I’m a reasonable kind of guy. I say you should get it in spades. **pun intended**

        • JohnEngelman

          The growing practice and approval of interracial marriage is tangible evidence that things are not moving in the direction you claim they are moving in.

          I am unaware of any poll that indicates that white nationalism and white supremacy are more popular among whites now than they were one or two generations ago. If you know of such a poll, please post it.

          • You are aware of polls that aren’t slanted by the media? Where are these located? You say White Nationalism and White Supremacy in the same way that the SPLC does. You try to slyly associate to modes, methods and ideologies that might really be nothing alike other than using the term White.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            Most likely there never were any polls at all about “white supremacy.” the phrase itself is of dubious origin, with various applications in a variety of contexts.

          • White supremacy is real. The white race is the superior race. History proves it. It’s not perfect & certainly whites have behaved atrociously throughout history, but the white race is still far superior to any other. Just look at what’s been accomplished by the white race and what’s been accomplished by others and you’ll see what I mean.

          • journey

            Had a long winded argument with someone on this board regarding the IQ “studies” that showed whites are inferior to Asians and the Jews. He believed in those studies as if they were the gospel. As we all know, studies/data can be manipulated to “prove” an agenda.

          • The Ashkenazi Jews are typically higher IQ than other whites. (Ashkenazim are typically of European descent.) The Sephardic Jews, however, are not necessarily smarter. Furthermore, IQ isn’t all that makes a race superior. The use of logic and common sense also matters a great deal. I’ve said this in a very simplistic way and I know it’s more complicated than this.

          • journey

            I do not believe one bit that Jews of any kind are brighter than true whites. Unfortunately, what is considered white is too broad. In order to think logically and with common sense also require a certain level of IQ/intelligence. Jews do well in other people’s countries. Israel was created and supported by whites otherwise it would not exist.

          • Black Swan

            They use ethnic networking that they deny to us. Hire your own, is it good for Jews, etc.
            Whites need to adopt this habit and not allow foreigners or non-whites to hypocritically tell us WE aren’t allowed to organize or preserve a homeland for ourselves while they are.

          • Juggernaut3000

            He undermines everything we are trying to do. Why he is allowed to post here is beyond reason.

          • none of your business

            I agree, get rid of him moderators. Most of what he posts is just not even true. At least he posted a valid copy of the 14th amendment this time instead of just making something up and expecting us to believe it.

          • It’s important, though, to see how ignorant people think, so for that reason he should stay.

          • Black Swan

            Alternative Right banned him after posting one of his articles. There was tremendous outrage from the regular posters and commenters.

            Here’s the backlash. Enjoy.

            http //www alternative-right.blogspot co uk/2014/07/swimming-in-our-enemies html

          • Anna Tree

            I read the article you linked and will read Engelman’s article linked to there later if I have time, but I don’t understand how that article was against Engelman. On the contrary, it seems to support him.

            What I can say about Mr. Engelman is that he in fact could exactly be anti-Asian and anti-Jew, he may not be but this is what his posts trigger into many people because of his constant support of Asians and Jews, while he never show much pro-white support, only anti-black comments.
            I don’t think he is anti-white but he is not pro-white.

            That said, I wish to have more whites who are not pro-whites come here, to debate with them and eventually help them see their errors. This is what I think Amren is about, to make more whites become pro-whites (maybe I am wrong). But after years obviously this doesn’t happen with Mr. Engelman. I still wouldn’t ban him, because there are anti-white whites who are reading us, and what we say to Mr. Engelman may not change Mr. Engelman but change them.

            I understand what Mr. Juggernaut3000 says about wanting to find a place for whites in a world of anti-white.
            I want that too. But I want even more a site who can bring back whites to their whiteness. And this because more whites we bring back, more chance we will have to have a white country. And that’s hugely better than a white chat room.

            Just to be clear and I apologize to disappoint some: I think that Europeans Jews are whites. I do see all the pro-diversity anti-white liberal leftist Jews as traitors as much as other liberal leftist whites. But I think that pro-white European Jews, and we have some/many of those in Amren, are race realist whites.

          • Black Swan

            Read the comments.
            Engelman was banned after the sh@@ storm in the comments section.

          • Gary John 金白龍

            Hey, you Jewish schmuck. White ‘supremacists’ are seperatists and race realists.
            Why do the moderators allow this ‘divide and conquer’ Jew to keep posting?

          • Mergatroyd

            Excellent question that’s been asked repeatedly for years.

            Why is he allowed to undermine White advocacy and attempts to preserve ourselves when we are facing loss of our homelands and genocide.

          • WR_the_realist

            A lot of people here call you Jewish. I will ask a direct question. Are you Jewish? Unlike others here, I won’t hold it against you. Nicholas Stix and H. Reuben are Jewish and I like them more than some of the people here who should just stick to Stormfront, where they can quote Goebbels to their heart’s delight.

          • none of your business

            Who cares about his ethnicity or religion. He is some kind of commie anti White plant, perhaps SPLC or even the Civil Rights Section of the DOJ.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am an Anglican. That is a traditional Episcopalian who uses the 1928 Book of Common Prayer.

          • WR_the_realist

            Thank you for your reply. I consider you to be a much more reliable source on this matter than the people who are sure than all Jews are evil because they decided that every person they disagree with is Jewish.

          • Interracial marriage is most often between a black and a trashy, stupid white person, especially white women who marry blacks. Everyone knows that any intelligent, mentally healthy white person is not going to marry a black. Of course there are exceptions, but they’re small in number.

        • Garrett Brown

          A few weeks ago, John Engelman changed his original post in a debate about WW2 to attempt to win the argument/continue arguing, even when he could provide absolutely no proof to his original statement. When confronted about this he continued to
          lie, act childish and then followed up by spamming my account, replying to every post I had made in the past 24 hours and even some before that time frame. I was absolutely blindsided that a middle aged man who regards himself as an intellectual who is always in pursuit of the “facts” would do something so bizarre. It was like something out of high school.

          When debating someone with such severe immaturity and obvious mental problems, it is important for you to know this kind of information and what you’re getting into. You are likely wasting your time, you have to have integrity and an honest personality when having a logical debate. John Engelman is incapable of doing this. I suggest you do like many have learned is the logical response and ignore him. You have been warned…

          • Trust me, I know exactly what Yellow John is and how he operates. He’s done the same stuff to me when he gets pushed into a corner.

            What I find odd isn’t a manic multiculturalist masquerading around on the Internet as some “race realist” intellectual. What’s odd is that an entity that purports to be more intellectual and based on reason and racial realities has, for so long, given refuge to a clown that always tries to tie racial separation and the idea of White autonomy/preservation to supremacy and hate.

            Yellow John’s version of Race Realism is just an offshoot of the multiracial utopia where “smart” black, brown, yellow and even some White people are in the driver’s seat. It’s the exact same poison we’ve all been forced to swallow for decades now; but he believes he’s finally found a way to make it all palatable and able to overcome realities that have always made it an impossibility.

            So, ironically enough, he doesn’t really seem to understand Realism of Race(s) as it relates to sociological tendencies and the dynamics involved when you try and structure a society around hierarchical absolutes in a multiracial society.

          • Mergatroyd

            Everyone here need to know that JE is an anti-White who longs for the race replacement of Whites by Asians and Jews, especially those of you who up-vote.

            CT, I’m surprised you haven’t put up any “Engelmanism” like these:

            “White Gentile children in the United States are not being displaced.”

            “Why should an employer hire you, when for more money he can hire a Jew or Oriental who can do a job faster, better, and with less effort?”

            “You do not face “stiff opposition from enemies.” You face an economy that rewards intelligence while punishing the absence of it.”

            “Many white Gentiles who are angry about their circumstances in life feel that if they direct their anger at the one percent they acknowledge themselves to be failures. By directing their anger at non whites and Jews they think they are posing as defenders of western civilization and the white race.”

            Got that all you upvoters of this anti-white.

          • none of your business

            Our economy used to reward intelligence. Then along came affirmative action and the feds forced employers to hire the least intelligent and capable and not hire the most intelligent and qualified.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Blacks are loyal to blacks, browns to browns, whites to blacks and browns. I say that because Whites are the last group to feel loyalty en masse to the “nation” per se. And that, thank GOD is fading away as well. Blacks and browns, as groups, are loyal adherents to the “proposition nation” (really a “state” of nations) because the proposition nation benefits them by harming White citizens.

        Sure, there are exceptions, but with the ethnic basis for the nation almost broken and certainly disparaged, all that is left is a proposition which is different from what it once was.

        There are some fine black folks in ATLAH.

      • benvad

        Regrettably, that’s a fact which should never have occurred.

      • John R

        Really? They obviously don’t think THEY are. They are a nation within a nation. They are not really part of our society, by their own admission.

      • none of your business

        Another idiotic remark from Engleman. Like most Jews, he considers us goys total morons who have never heard of the 14th amendment or are unaware that people born in this country even is Mom jumped the border an hour before birth is automatically a citizen.
        We know that Engleman as well as you do.
        Why is Engleman not just banned from this site?

    • Luca

      “Hope and Change” was just the first in a long line of meaningless slogans used to appeal to the ignorant, gullible and the indoctrinated masses.

      • Bobbala

        Mmmm, mmm, mmmm … Whatever the hell that means.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        Like “White supremacy”…. another meaningless phrase.

    • journey

      The blacks knew exactly what it meant. It was some whites who did not want to see. WSJ did a good job of exposing little barry prior to being elected,

  • Obama and the Democrats have pushed their party and the country down a rabbit hole of total amorality. Anything goes. Any lie. Any distortion of truth. Mike Brown was an innocent gentle giant. Vonderitt Myers was holding a sandwich, not firing a gun at a cop. Brendan Tevlin, the murdered white youth, deserved it as payback for slavery. It goes on and on with more examples.

    Obama is morally culpable for the deaths, beatings, and maimings of thousands of white people. He’s encouraged it. He owns it. To quote from his book:

    ‘I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.’ – Barack Obama

    • WR_the_realist

      Which side of Obama’s family actually raised him? His mother’s. That’s the side he hates.

      • connorhus

        But his mother hated that side too.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          yes, Obamas mother hated white men. Any white woman who marries a Kenyan then an Indonesian obviously hates white men.

          • Ultimate187

            Let’s be fair now. Any white man who doesn’t marry a white woman obviously hates white women.

          • Stan D Mute

            Ok, I’ll bite on this. My own sense, knowing several white men who have married very attractive non-white women, is that they are (1) captivated by the beauty of their female and (2) insufficiently enamored of or loyal to their own race. For what it matters, my acquaintances married either Asian or Criollo/Mestizo women, are in highly stable long-term marriages, and have children who are all “good kids” in every sense. I don’t know any white women who’ve gone outside their race, but the ones I’ve seen make me think they had different motives and different results.

          • Ultimate187

            If a white woman married a non-white man and told you that she was captivated by how handsome he was, would you buy that? Probably not. If another white woman married a non-white man told you that her marriage has lasted 20 years and is still going strong, would you think better of her? Again, probably not.

            Face it, there is a different standard for white men and women due to the largely male nature of white nationalism…. one that makes it more acceptable for white men to race mix than white women. Given my counter examples above, would you expect me to accept the explanation you gave me? Hell no.

          • Stan D Mute

            I don’t care if you accept that men and women are fundamentally different. It’s reality. Accept it or don’t. And women in “this movement” aren’t helping much either. It’s too late to convert women from voting democrat. Political actions are too little and too late. At most its delaying the inevitable.

          • Anonymous

            I have never voted Democrat and I am a woman. People aren’t going to convert me either way.

          • Rhialto

            That’s a good point. Her relationship with the Obama Daddy had lasted as long as she could have hoped for. What most Afrophilic women would have done, is go back home and hook up with other Black guys (plenty were available for willing White gals in the early 1960’s). Instead she relocates to Indonesia, a place with no Black men.

            Also according to your president’s biography, his mother refused to go to a party with her husband because White men would be present.

            The Obama Mama was the dominant spiritual influence on Prez. Obama.

            We live in strange times!

          • Samuel Hathaway

            Wow, I had not heard that Obama’s mamma wouldn’t go to a party because white men would be present. It’s just that when you see white women with black men, they’re making a loud and clear social statement. Obamas mother was an atheist, so I guess the spiritual influence was more or less the spirit of contempt on white people. Obama says he’s a Christian, but more and more evidence demonstrates he’s either a nominal Muslim or just one of those garden variety agnostics who thinks there are many paths to heaven and Christianity is what he publicly says is what he believes.

          • none of your business

            It is true. The Indonesian husband was a liason between the Indonesian govt and the American oil companies. He had to do a lot of entertaining and go to events. It was kind of a lobbyist diplomatic position. And he had this surly, bad mannered commie wife who spent her time insulting the representatives and employees of the American oil companies. Not good for his job security.
            The Chinese communists had their eye on Indonesia when Anne Dunham was there. They were landing munitions and soldiers on out lying islands. There were tens of thousands of Indonesian communists. Finally the Indonesian government just massacred every communist they could find. Soon after the communists were defeated she left Indonesia and divorced her husband.
            I am very familiar with communist strategy and tactics. I have always felt she was a carefully trained communist operative. She went to Indonesia when there was great danger of a communist takeover. She had a child by the head of the Communist party of Hawaii with the full approval of her communist parents. After the communist coup in Indonesia failed she spent the rest of her life doing “research” in areas of the world where America was in conflict with communists. For instance, what was she doing in Pakistan all those years when it had communist sympathizer India to the south and Communist China to the north east?

          • none of your business

            Obama was never baptized so he is not a Christian. He went to Wright’s church for years for networking purposes to insert himself into the black elites of Chicago. If he were sincere about Christianity he would have asked to be baptized sometime during those years.
            That is what people do when they decide to become Christian as adults, they get baptized.

        • bilderbuster

          Hate her back.
          It works for me.

      • Cid Campeador

        That;s the way it usually goes with Black/White mixed race people. The Black impregnates the woman then disappears, she raises the child who becomes an Leucophobe.

        • none of your business

          Look at Holder. He has more White ancestors than Obama. What is Holder, 1/32 black and 31/32 White? White men I assume, not White women.

    • Cid Campeador

      Does anyone believe that the POTUS is anything other than a figure head. He isn’t at the helm of the ship.

  • currahee1911

    The only reason that blacks have any political power whatsoever (outside of local races) is that whites have no racial consciousness.

    • Luca

      Blacks have power endowed to them by the Liberal left.

      • WR_the_realist

        Who, even if white themselves, have an anti-white racial consciousness.

    • connorhus

      All races have their particular sins. Whites have a problem with greed. Not just the grab everything in sight greed and petty theft Blacks seem to have but Whites raise the bar and go for generational theft in an abstract manner. So while all races share in the greed bug Whites carry it into a whole new level and it has finally reached a point that it is what is tearing us apart as a race. The Feminist and Liberals allied with all the minorities because of greed and turned the White race into a mass of special interest groups all trying to steal from the others.

      • Luca

        Be specific, you are talking about White Liberal politicians.

        • connorhus

          As much as I hate to admit it they are still White. Honestly though it isn’t just the politicians. Anyone with even a high double digit IQ can look at all the government spending on promises, pensions, social security, etc. and realize it’s going to cost our children everything. Yet millions of Whites will vote for Democrats just to make sure they get theirs.

          • Jerrybear

            Republicans do a horrible job at attracting middle to low income whites. Their run on hollow platitudes about free markets and low taxes. If they made this election about immigration, they would instantly motivate millions of whites to vote.

          • Anna Tree

            Politicians from all races and countries are greedy.
            I have no problems to find default in my race but I am not sure about whites being the most greedy. Aren’t they the most (pathological) altruists?
            It think greed comes with power, no matter the race.

          • connorhus

            Perhaps you are right. In fact I make the concession that at least Blacks are obviously greedy as well but you are missing the point. No other race is able to be as greedy on a generational scale as Whites. We are just too creative and too intelligent. Where as Blacks will steal from their children, murder them etc. They can’t comprehend ways to force them into economic servitude for generations the way Whites can.

        • Stan D Mute

          If by “liberal” you mean Republicans and Democrats, then yes.

      • none of your business

        Actually, Asians are more greedy and money hungry than Whites.

        • connorhus

          They maybe actually I cannot say for certain but I do know far too many Whites will sacrifice their children’s future to insure they have a paycheck and a pension.

          • none of your business

            They need the paycheck to support the children. It’s more important to keep food on the table and a roof over their heads than refuse a decent paycheck on the premise that being poor will ultimately benefit the children 40 years from now.

          • connorhus

            Sorry but I am not buying that. The State employees around here are making three times or more what someone in the private sector is making. Straight out of High school and getting college equivalent based experience if they stay in the system. Still complaining they need a raise every chance they get and comparing their pay to other states with much higher costs of living to justify they should get paid more. Certainly Blacks are over represented in the government workforce but they are NOT the only race/gender group over represented and their pay is not barely subsistence level at all.

        • Ultimate187

          I doubt that.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        “…Whites have a problem with greed….”

        That is true, with respect to White CEOs. The czarina of Cultural Marxism, Sheryl Sandberg, rails against White/Male CEOs, but they are some of the most compliant race/gender traitors.

        “…Yeah, this diversity & inclusion crock will send western civilization further down the drain–but I got mine…”

        • connorhus

          That is exactly the type of mentality I was referring too although it isn’t just limited to White CEO’s. You can see it in all the unions, public and private. Almost every government employee etc etc.

          • none of your business

            There are very few White public employees left. The construction unions are mostly Hispanic now but those unions are fast disappearing. Most unions are public employee unions and except for teachers and nurses overwhelmingly non White.

      • Those you mention are in the US government. Whites as a race do not have a problem with greed—there’s no difference in races where greed is concerned. That’s a human condition, not a race condition. And all the egregiously greedy ones of all the races seem to be predominately in government or a crony capitalist.

  • Lewis33

    NPR gleefully reported this morning that somebody dug up Rosalynn Carter and she was seen at black church’s invoking the ghost of MLK to scare the little old black ladies into voting.

  • AmericanCitizen

    What did you really expect from someone who is basically the world’s biggest affirmative action hire? Obama was not selected for leadership ability or past proven success and it shows badly.

    Remember a couple of years ago, a rodeo clown got some backlash for wearing an Obama costume? That guy turned out to be the Oracle of Delphi.

  • Luca

    All you need to convince or persuade the black voting block are childish slogans and rhymes, imppossible promises, along with a few shiny trinkets and some free gibs-me-dat.

    It’s been working just fine ever since FDR.

    • bilderbuster

      It’s been working since “40 acres and a mule”.

    • Stan D Mute

      Chants and songs.

  • dd121

    The Democrats are about race and identity politics in every election. Now the Democrats are playing a one note tune about the the mean old Republicans are going to take their abortion away. Forty years ago it was how they were going to take the Social Security away. God, they’re dumb. But it seems to work.

    • none of your business

      Remember Sandra Fluke the woman who testified in congress Georgetown university should pay for her birth control pills because she couldn’t afford $10.00 a month for them? She will be my next state senator. Although she didn’t have $120.00 per year for BC pills, as soon as she passed the bar she “lent” $100,000 of “her own money” to her campaign. Her only issue is the evil White republicans will end abortion AND birth control. She ran for I think congress as soon as she arrived in California knowing nothing about the state and knowing no one.
      Like Obama 20 years in Chicago she is obviously a front for the liberal elites.

      • dd121

        Is her message getting traction?

  • MekongDelta69

    White candidate:
    “If you don’t want your country completely destroyed by DIE-versity, vote for me.”

    Oh wait… sorry. I was hallucinating there for a moment. Moving on…

  • Frank_DeScushin

    “Hope and change are long gone, so Democrats are now playing the race card to scare black Americans to the ballot box.”

    Now playing the race card??? Did I miss the thirty seconds the Democrats stopped playing the race card during my lifetime?

  • President Obama was elected on a promise to unite the country, and in particular millions of Americans hoped he could help to transcend racial divisions.

    That was just boob bait for the white liberal, and even a few white lamer cons fell for it.

    “If You Want To Prevent Another Ferguson In Their Future . . . VOTE.”

    That’s because the Democrat-run Senate we have couldn’t prevent the first Ferguson from happening, so the obvious answer is to vote for more Senate Democrats. The people who are authoring this propaganda must think that the intended recipients of this propaganda don’t have the common sense that God gave a snail, and as far as that goes, they probably don’t.

    The handout refers to Ferguson, Mo. shooting victim Michael Brown, noting that in Ferguson 67% of the population is black, while “94% of its police force are white.”

    I already explained many times why that is. It’s because Ferguson is a high danger low pay department, and blacks who want to be cops have black skin privilege and can get on anywhere they want, so why would the sign up for high danger and low pay? As an aside, we found out about two weeks ago that going back ten years, almost half of the Ferguson P.D.’s calls are to various apartment farms around the Fergaza Strip.

    Even if the Ferguson P.D. was as black as the population, a black cop of the same height and weight in place of Darren Wilson in that same situation at 12:03 PM on August 9 would have done the exact same thing.

    In North Carolina, black residents have received flyers that show a lynching scene, with the superimposed words: “ Kay Hagan doesn’t win! Obama’s impeachment will begin!

    The Stupid Party should have so much courage. But no.

    In Maryland, where Democrat Anthony Brown is running to become the state’s first black Governor, the state Democratic Party has released a flyer showing pictures of a civil-rights march, a “colored waiting room” sign, and Donald Trump alongside the words: “Where’s the birth certificate?” The flyer ends: “In Maryland, it’s our turn to take an important step in the journey . . . Vote for Anthony Brown.”

    That flyer also showed a picture of a sign stating that photo ID was required to vote, the message being obvious, that having to show photo ID to vote is the same as a Klan lynching. Interestingly, even in deep blue Maryland, the mulatto running for Governor as a Democrat, the aforementioned Anthony Brown, must not have a very comfortable lead, or at least not one the state party or his campaign is happy with. Ergo this agitprop mailer to black zip codes.

    • none of your business

      Most of the blacks in Ferguson live in the section 8 apartments on welfare. That means they can’t even read the questions on the police exam, let alone pick the right questions.

      • If you back out the apartment farms near the Fergaza Strip, then Ferguson is about 50/50 mixed and almost entirely single family residence owner occupied.

        The main two problems even for the good parts of Ferguson are that the school district it’s in is heavily black, and “Ferguson” the name being drug through the mud the last three months almost has ruined property values.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    Democrats always say that blacks are as intelligent as whites. Yet when Democrats want blacks to vote, Democrats appeal to race and emotion with imagery rather than trying to appeal to black minds with the issues. Democrats actions show what they truly think about blacks being able to process the issues.

    • bilderbuster

      That’s really very good propaganda that Republiscams are to chickens*it to use.
      Many photos of Mexican and Black gang bangers I’ve seen posted here and on other sites have great political captions that should be put up, mailed to or aired on television and would be wildly successful if given a mass audience.

  • Truthseeker

    They don’t have to hide their agenda anymore. The mask is off, and everyone who’s been paying attention knows by now that race is the driving force behind all politics. Our country is divided, and they have to grab as much power as possible while they still can.

    I think the Obama presidency has awoken a lot of Whites to the reality of race. I’m one of those people. Before Obama was president, I had concerns about racial differences and such, but I still held out hope that race could be made not to matter. No more. The radicals in the Obama administration made me realize that too many non-Whites simply hate us, and they aren’t limited to a few cranks here and there. While we want to get along with them, they want to conquer us. On a large scale, diversity simply doesn’t work.

    Thanks, Democrats. Thanks, Obama. Thanks for waking me from my slumber. A lot of us Whites might be racially whipped, but a lot of us now see what’s going on. And we will not be defeated.

    • Ultimate187

      Obama was elected twice. If a lot of Whites were awoken to race, it obviously didn’t translate into anything tangible.

      • none of your business

        In 2012 he had 4 years to do something about the crash of 2008. Even in the face of economic problems Whites still put him in office. Republicans are either a Democrat controlled opposition or total morons.

    • mikekingjr

      If I may inquire, and I do not work for this website, how did you discover American Renaissance? I found it in about 2005, but do not recall how. My question, perhaps more to myself, is how can we promote this site more efficiently to those who might respond positively to what is spoken here. Don’t intend to be nosey, ignore me if you wish. Just conducting my own little bit of research. Apologies, Mr. Taylor if stepping on toes.

      • Truthseeker

        To be honest, I don’t remember exactly how I found it. My disillusionment with the status quo led me to seek out like-minded writers on the internet, and I guess I must have found it through searches on racial topics or mentions from “alt-right” writers. If I recall, one of the first pieces I read on Amren was an older article from the ’90s which sounded a little too extremist for me at the time, but it definitely stuck with me. I had read things about Jared Taylor that painted him in a bad light though, so I didn’t explore his publication too much because I was skeptical of his credibility. Bear in mind, at this time I was still straddling an uncomfortable middle ground between the mainstream and reality, so while I was becoming a race realist, I was still a bit apprehensive about associating with anyone I considered too extreme on racial issues.

        The thing that made me a dedicated Amren reader was when a blog I read linked to the video of Jared Taylor speaking at Towson University. It was the first time I’d actually heard Jared Taylor speak, and I was amazed at how well he got his message across. He didn’t seem like the crank I’d assumed him to be at all. He made thoughtful, well-reasoned points, and I realized that a lot of the arguments for White identity could be expressed in perfectly reasonable, non-offensive terms. Not only that, but the Q & A session was a chilling demonstration of just how strong anti-White attitudes are, and what we’re up against. After that, I started checking out Amren regularly.

        As far as helping others find Amren, I link to articles on Twitter, and occasionally Facebook too. I don’t use Facebook that much, but I figure it doesn’t hurt to sow a few seeds there once in a while. I have had a few of the alt-right articles I’ve posted there “liked,” so that suggests people are reading them. Perhaps some of my friends are going through the same intellectual struggle that I went through, and hopefully I can push them toward the truth. I’m very careful about what I put on Facebook though. I only put it up if the language of the piece is moderate enough, since most racial liberals will look for any excuse to disregard something that contradicts them. If you think people you know are ready to hear the message of Amren, or at least getting there, I’d say to throw some samples out there to plant the seeds.

      • PvtCharlieSlate

        In my case, it was the mention of AmRen in a comment on American Thinker … but I can’t remember how I found American Thinker.

      • meanqueen

        Someone in my family told me about it and said I should get on it. But in the beginning when I tried to Google it, a warning in big red letters would come up saying that I was about to link to a “hate site.” Eventually that stopped, not sure why.

        • mikekingjr

          Maybe somebody at Google actually looked at AmRen and did not find enough hate.

          • meanqueen

            Among the commenters, there is some baseless hatred, but in the articles I have read, I have never seen anything untrue or unfair.

      • Anna Tree

        I was for years at Faithfreedom org that is a islamocritical website. There were often links to American Thinker and sometimes to VDare when they wrote about islam and I read a bit beside those articles.

        During those years I read some articles linked to Amren but didn’t know or realize the racial component of the site, didn’t know anything about race realism back then too. It’s only after the scandal of the 18 firefighters trial that I read deeper in the archives of Amren, found the more straight forward articles. After a lot of reading and research including from detractors, I became a racialist.

        – So I think that when there are news items that have the potential to show up on search engine for a long time, it’s good that Amren invest in commentaries and great rebuttal to articles from the pro-diversity media.
        – In the light yellow box about the comments, the editor could maybe remind the visitor that everybody has the right to comment and so obviously comments are not endorsed by Amren.
        – I think the videos of speeches of Mr. Jared Taylor should have a more prominent showing: maybe one of them, the best sum up of Amren’s reason d’être, maybe “Races in post-racial America”, should permanently shows up as one of the five articles features. Or shrink the ad on the right about the Amren conferences in two, and put there an image with a caption like “New to the site?” that links to that video for example.

        —–
        This is what I say to anybody I meet who seems to me able to listen
        and ponder about race realism: “Please watch videos of Mr. Jared Taylor.
        Visit Amren, you may not like every comment but the news articles and
        commentaries are eyes openers.”

        • mikekingjr

          Wonderful reply to my question! Mr. Taylor in his videos, as well as his commentaries, is fascinating as well as Very inspirational. Proud to be on the same planet as that Man.

          • Anna Tree

            Thank you Mikekingjr. Meanwhile I just finished to write a post on something else on this page, where I touched another point relating to your question, maybe it will interest you:

            My wish is to have more whites who are not pro-whites come here, to debate with them and eventually help them see their naivety and errors (*). This is what I think Amren is about, to make more whites become pro-whites (maybe I am wrong). There are all kind of whites who are reading us, and what we say can influence them. When I write here, I have those whites in my mind as much as the poster I am writing to. It’s why I often give more information than needed. It’s not only to bore you guys LOL

            Other Amreners may want Amren to be a place for whites in an anti-white world.
            I want that too. But I want even more a site who can bring back whites to their whiteness. And this because more whites we bring back, more chance we will have to have a white country. And that’s hugely better than a white chat room.

            ——
            (*) not anti-whites, I do think it is possible to change their mind but it will take longer and they are traitors, I would prefer to lose my time on those who are used than the enemy.

  • Obumer with his buddy holder, drove such a deep wedge in the race relations between blacks and all other races it will be a few yrs be for it would be back where it was be for he stuck his nose in the tyron Zimmerman trials.
    Ferguson was a few issues, but holder showing up did not help.
    as for a leader of this country, well to call it a joke would imply it was funny, far from it.
    both of our enemies and allies have lost respect, Russia loves that he is in power right now, as well as Isis, Israel thinks he is a clown with no clue. With this said that is the problem, He has no clue how to deal with the world issues that effect the U.S, as well domestically.
    Carter was the worst prez in my memory, he has been replace by this current one.
    for you all who were around. at least carter brought us Billy beer……it was like his administration, it tasted very nasty.

  • LHathaway

    You have to admit, with the emphasis on stirring up fear among blacks, this article reads exactly the opposite of every other article one might read about this kind of stuff. It’s likely more accurate than the normal fair we are exposed to.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    “Don’t Shoot.” The flyer reads: “If You Want To Prevent Another Ferguson In Their Future . . . VOTE.”

    Blacks should be telling themselves that, since they’re the ones who are by far the most likely to use guns in the commission of violence.

    • mikekingjr

      They are also far more likely to be shot by members of their own sub-species.

      • bilderbuster

        And White politicians should be reminding them of that everyday.

    • Alexandra1973

      How much you want to bet that if a White or Oriental person told a black assailant “don’t shoot” while holding their hands up…they’d get shot anyway?

      (Or even a fellow black for that matter.)

  • WR_the_realist

    The Reagan Democrats (blue collar whites who voted for Reagan) realized that the Democratic Party was already ant-white by the late 70s. But the fangs are fully bared now. Every Democratic politician is delighted that whites are becoming a minority. And the Republicans are still too stupid to actually act in the interests of the white people who vote for them.

    • Hubert Whitey Whitney

      Jerry Brown leads in California, but not with whites, instead with Hispanics. It is reported he is actually behind with whites. I don’t even know if there is such a thing as a Reagan Democrat anymore. I think the Democratic party is almost entirely Hispanic, Black and the children of Asians (2nd Generation). If I had to guess, the only whites are those who can’t get on board with Republican’s far right base and religious leanings, along with LGBT members who vote D in order to further their interests.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        They are all “grievance industry” parasites.

        You have the GOP=(the) Grand Ole Party..

        and you the GIP=(the) Grievance Industry Party.

  • Hubert Whitey Whitney

    “But, said Alice, the the world has absolutely no sense, who’s stopping us from inventing one?”
    ― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

    Reading this article reminded of Alice in Worderland and her words above. In other words, when you have no facts, record, or argument or, anything sensible, a crafty invention will do. Photos of Lynchings? Children with “Don’t shoot” signs? Segregation throwbacks? And only a fool would step into the ring to debate these inventions inasmuch as the inventors and users of the inventions are one in the same.

    • journey

      Time warp for blacks as they do not have else to offer. Very sad for the race as a whole.

      • mikekingjr

        Extinction is sad for a useless species?? I say, REJOICE! More food and land for White Folk. Cheer up, Man.

    • mikekingjr

      Ham sammich guns? An invention? I think not.

  • Bobbala

    If the negros had any sense at all, they would say hell no — I don’t want to live in Zimbabwe.

    They don’t.

    • mikekingjr

      They want Zimbabwe here. So yes they do want to live there. (here.)

  • IKUredux

    I completely disagree with the fact that people voted for obama because they thought he could erase racial divisions. Oh, wait, people are that STUPID. Anybody who voted for obama once, screw you. Anybody who voted for obama twice, DIE, you are too stupid to live. We are just sitting here watching our country DIE! Oh, my God. OUR country is dying right before our eyes! Have you not noticed? TPTB are starting to promote “Day of the Dead”, or whatever that mexican holiday is called. The goal? Oh, I don’t know, a blend of that holiday with Halloween? Resulting in what? A veritable mish mash. Hey, look, we Whites have been under nothing but global disapproval for imposing our religious convictions on the heathens of the world(that’s right, I’m calling them heathens), which has resulted in a mish mash of Christianity with heathen religions. We now have nothing. We don’t have Christianity. We don’t have heathen barbaric religions. We have mulatto religion. We have TPTB calling for a mulatto society. In fact, some critic in Denver(or wherever) is complaining that the refurbishment of the train station is too White. Apparently, we need a mulatto train station. In point of fact, we need a mulatto EVERYTHING. Eventually, this mulatto will have epicanthic eyelids, and wear a burka. WELCOME to the NEW america, where everyone is completely equal, and, everyone has contributed equally to the greatness of what used to be America. (Traditional Americans, unwanted, or, DIE ALREADY).

    • mikekingjr

      Grew up Catholic. Present pope is a communist. Fits right in.

      • Cid Campeador

        I grew up Catholic Chrisitan as well and still consider myself to be although I am what you might call “lapsed”. I won’t cling to any other religion.
        ” It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven”. Jesus.
        That line, assuming that Jesus really said that, is pure Marxism. The difference being that Marxism is atheistic.
        I don’t know WHAT to believe anymore!
        “AHM SOOO CONFUSED!!!” Vinny Barbarino

        • mikekingjr

          I am a long-ago lapsed Catholic. Not likely to join another organized religion. Never thought Jesus was a Marxist but don’t have your knowledge of the Bible. Believe in Ten Commandments, although will be going to Hell because of se

          • Alexandra1973

            Organized religion will not get you to heaven; receiving Jesus as Saviour will.

            True Christianity is a relationship with Christ, not a religious system.

            There’s a saying–GRACE=God’s Riches At Christ’s Expense.

          • none of your business

            I thought you only adhere to the old testament? Does Jesus have a relationship with you? How can you call yourself a Christian if you refuse to acknowledge the birth of Jesus?

        • PvtCharlieSlate

          That expression about a camel passing through the eye of “A” needle is usually interpreted to mean doing something that is totally impossible. It was explained to me (not too long ago by an Anglican priest) that it really means doing something difficult but not impossible and something that many others had managed to do. The reference really is to “the Eye of the Needle” which was the name of one of the gates in the city wall of Jerusalem. This gate was deliberately built too low for a loaded camel to walk through unimpeded. The animal would have to be unloaded and made to crouch down. (Don’t ask how – I’m not a camel jockey). It was sort of like a swinging gate at a check point. The people to whom Jesus was speaking would have understood His reference.

          • Stan D Mute

            Thus meaning the rich man must unload to make it.

          • journey

            What was more important, the salvation of one’s soul (eternal life) or the physical riches?

        • Stan D Mute

          That quote isn’t Marxist (requiring redistribution) but Altruist (where the rich man would freely give to those who needed). Carnegie would have been the sort of rich man who would make it.

          • Anna Tree

            It seems to me it is quite similar then. The rich need to give away his riches to be acceptable in this life as per Marxism, and give them away to be acceptable in heaven as per Christianity.
            It seems to me both ideologies want to trigger wealth redistribution.

      • IKUredux

        It is really frightening, when you realize all the so called Whites who are in a position of power, are in fact, your mortal enemies.

      • Alexandra1973

        He’s a Jesuit. A friend of mine told me that Communism fits right in with Jesuit ideology.

        (Who do you think gave Marx and his buddies the idea?)

        • mikekingjr

          Had very little exposure to Jesuits. First I’ve heard about any similarity between their ideology and communism. Only thing I heard about them was you probably did not want to be the recipient of any discipline at their hands.

        • none of your business

          Communists are atheists. Jesuits are Christian priests who believe in the Christian god.. From 1920 on the RC church was a major fighter against communism. Some people confuse social welfare, decent wages, free and low cost healthcare, all the welfare agencies we have in the White nations of Europe, America and Australia with communism.

      • Hubert Whitey Whitney

        The pope is a very dangerous man. He comes to the church under the guise of “pastoral care” rather his predecessor’s intellectual approach, which has allowed him to gain “rock star” status. He is using his status for nefarious objectives, including his communistic agenda. One of the first things he did upon arrival was to oust Cardinal Burke, a vocal conservative who would stand in his way, from the Vatican Court, demoting and exiling him to Malta, a ceremonial post. The pope needs the LGBT to carry out his agenda, the return of Second Estate status for the church. He (or, more importantly those around him-the pope is quite old) wants the church to govern again. The LGBT will help him. He needs them, which is why he started the integration process at the last synod. Anyone who knows anything about the bible knows homosexuality is not compatible with any reading of the text. Homosexuality is a sin and in order for the LGBT to gain an equal footing, we must disregard the teachings of St. Paul and Christ’s words himself. It’s ludicrous that the synod was even discussing admittance of the LGBT, but they were and, that’s because the communist need them. Did you see how the LGBT behaved towards the Mormans in California over Prop 8? They were unhinged. Did you see the gay mayor in Houston, Texas and her approach to the local pastors? Shocking.

        • mikekingjr

          No, have not seen anything about either of the news stories you mentioned. Will google them , but do you know of news sources which might not show up in the first few hits? I sometimes need to really peruse google hits to find what I am Really looking for. Using google is tedious? Guess I need to get out more. Thanks.

          • Anna Tree

            huffingtonpost com/2014/10/15/houston-pastor-sermon_n_5992044.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

            “Houston has asked five local conservative pastors to turn over
            sermons about a controversial new city ordinance that bans
            discrimination against LGBT people. The original subpoenas demanded to see any preaching related to homosexuality and gender identity.

            Houston’s mayor, Annise Parker, has agreed that the initial demands were too broad.

            “Neither the mayor nor City Attorney David Feldman were aware the subpoenas had been issued until yesterday,” the mayor’s spokesperson Janice Evans told the Huffington Post over email. “Both agree the original documents were overly broad. The city will move to narrow the scope during an upcoming court hearing.”

            This means the city will still seek to collect any communication issued by these pastors that mention the petition against the hotly contested Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (HERO).

            The Alliance Defending Freedom, an advocacy group, said the move to scale back the subpoenas is just an attempt to “turn down the heat.” The ADF has filed a motion to shut down the subpoena request completely.”

        • none of your business

          The LBGT totally hate the RC and other Christian churches who don’t suck up to them. The church will survive this one like it survived other nefarious Popes. The Church ignored the whole LBGT issue for centuries, sort of don’t ask don’t tell.

      • none of your business

        He will die and the Church will go on. RC art and architecture makes the rest of the nonsense worthwhile.

    • MBlanc46

      Many of them wanted to believe it, just as many of us in the 1950s and early 1960s wanted to believe that if legal segregation were abolished, blacks would fully integrate within two or three generations.

      • IKUredux

        I did believe it, back in the sixties. Why not? I traveled down south as a child, I saw the the “colored only” signs. I was appalled. What evidence was there back then, that Blacks were stupid? NONE. So, it would seem that the problem was discrimination based on skin color. I mean, what right thinking, intelligent human being could countenance discrimination on anything so superficial as skin color?

        • MBlanc46

          Quite right. That was pretty much the narrative promoted by the elites, and many of us bought it. It took a long time to free myself of it; many have never succeeded in doing so.

        • Stan D Mute

          The evidence was ample if the damn Yankees had listened to folks who interacted with negroes on a daily basis. But no, the stupid arrogant Yankees once again stuffed the wisdom of the south and ignored history (you know – that negroes never invented a written language or even the wheel on their own). And I write this with the horrible shame of having ancestors who fought in the Union Army. How I wish I could travel back in time and slap some sense into them.

          • Who Me?

            Same here. I had one ancestor who was a Union doctor. I had over a dozen ancestors who were Confederate cavalrymen from Bexar County, Texas. Guess which ones of which I’m more proud. (Ain’t the doc…)

          • none of your business

            All it needs is a little exposure. My kids and their friends learned just taking buses from their all White neighborhood to their private schools. The city was only about 7 percent black at the time. I came home one day and my 2 and 2 others were doing home work around the dining table. Kippie said” They used to have to ride in the back of the buses.” My 10 year old son piped up “wow! Can we have that here?” About a week later the girls formed a committee to write a letter to the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor to pass a law that blacks had to ride in the back of the bus and would not be allowed to speak while on the bus because they were so loud, profane and obnoxious.

        • IKUredux, there was ample evidence in the south that blacks weren’t as bright as whites back in the 50s & 60s. People in the south had been living, employing, & working with blacks for generations and everyone in the south knew the score. Even Lincoln knew and wrote that blacks & whites should not live together & that blacks shouldn’t vote or serve on juries. That’s written history! It was his idea to return them to their homeland. It’s only Yankees that believe otherwise—Yankees and anyone else that has never lived around them.

      • journey

        We were all so innocent back then. But the black radicals knew exactly what they were after. If the whites were not the overwhelming majority back then and presently, the blacks would have done what the blacks did in Haiti – murdered all the whites. The whites in the South knew how the blacks were, absolutely no illusions there. Back in colonial times, the whites were always worried about black uprisings and being poisoned by their black servants.

      • Who Me?

        Back in the 50’s and early 60’s blacks had been kept pretty much in check, and if that had continued, they might well have still been a halfway civilized acting community. Married parents, most children born within wedlock, fewer drop outs, mostly employed, at least at minimal jobs, far less welfare, etc.) Setting them loose to act out their basest instincts with no restraining hand was what set the stage for what we have now. 3 generations of being able to act with total impunity has resulted in 75% of their children being born out of wedlock, a 50% or higher rate of drop out before graduating high school, the knockout game, 50 % unemployment, 60% of violent crime committed by 4% of the population, unbelievable welfare and related expenses and all the rest.

        • Stan D Mute

          Kept in check by the very same Jim Crow laws and segregation the stupid Yankees wanted to shred! How I curse my ancestors every single day for their wanton stupidity. I clean and maintain all the graves in our family cemetery. All except the Civil War headstones upon which I spit in contempt.

          • journey

            But the Civil War was not fought over slavery rather whether the South had the right to secede from the Union. Lincoln to keep the Union together was willing to leave slavery alone. Slavery
            was not actually bad for the majority of blacks. It created a social structure for the blacks – work, clothing, roof over their head, old age care, etc. In actuality, “slaves” were not treated any worse than how whites treated each other. Just read some of the Charles Dickens novels and look at the some of the pictures during that time period. Some of the whites had no shoes along with their “slaves”.

            From Ben Still’s video, Money Masters, he states that the Rothschilds created the Civil War to diminish the growing power of this country. This nation was perceived as a threat to the international central bankers of which Jefferson warned against.

          • Whitetrashgang

            I think whites had it worse most were worked to death, while slaves since they were bought had some value to them.

          • journey

            Have to agree with you there.

          • none of your business

            The southerners fought to preserve the right to secede. The north fought to seize all the resources of the south from cotton and rice to timber, timber by products such as turpentine and of course the coal and iron mines. That is what the puritan tycoons of the north wanted and they got it pretty much. The Rothschild and Grand Duke of Hesse Frankfurt banks lent the money to the French govt which lent it to the American revolutionaries in 1775 They made huge profits on that loan. The Rothschilds rose from mere Frankfurt millionaires to international billionaires through the Napoleonic wars. Their next big profit was the civil war lending money to both sides.
            Interesting that the abolition movement started in the 1820’s about 10 years after the Napoleonic wars ended. there were plenty of northern protestant Christians who profited from the civil war such as suppliers to the union army. They made saddles out of cardboard and glue among other things. It was just a giant boon doggle and 750 thousand White men died..

      • JohnEngelman

        “An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy,” by Gunnar Myrdal was published in 1944. It was founded by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. In this book Dr. Myrdal who later won the Nobel Prize for Economics, acknowledged black social pathology, but he claimed that it was due to racial discrimination.

        He claimed that when blacks were no longer discriminated against they would perform and behave as well as whites. An American Dilemma was cited in the Brown v. Board of Education decision of 1954. It inspired the civil rights movement.

        Dr. Myrdal’s optimistic prediction has not come true. It has become dangerous to discuss what has come true.

        • none of your business

          Myrdal was a communist. Alger Hiss went to work for the Carnegie foundation after being exposed as a communist spy in FDR’s inner circle. Myrdal just reprinted what he was sent by the ADL, the AJC, the communist party and other Jewish organizations.

      • Even Abraham Lincoln knew and said that the negro race should not mix with the white race. I can’t believe anyone really believed that negroes could or would fit into white society if Lincoln was that aware more than a century ago.

        • journey

          For the majority of blacks, too difficult to truly function in an advanced society. Even the black kids who were raised in middle or upper middle class, it has been shown they will regress back to their true levels.

    • phillyguy

      me and a friend were going around to a few stores today looking at Christmas decorations we tried to camp out of the thousands of decorations for one item said Merry Christmas we just found one everything else was happy holidays that is a

      • Alexandra1973

        If you knew about the true origins of Christmas, it wouldn’t bother you at all.

        It’s just the old pagan Saturnalia celebration dressed up to look Christian. Just like Catholicism is the old Mystery Babylon religion dressed up to look Christian.

        And the word Christmas itself–“Christ-Mass.” Mass being the death of Christ. And what’s so merry about that?

        • Hubert Whitey Whitney

          Everything you say is true, but so is everything IKUreux says. And, christianity pacifies people and keeps many of the “heathens” in check. I don’t want to live in a world without God. Voltaire put it best, “If we did not have a God, we would need to invent one”. Can you imagine how they would behave without any inhibition whatsoever?

        • [Guest]

          Yes, but retailers (and American culture as a whole) have been nixing references to Christmas for entirely different reasons. I object to replacing the word “Christmas” with “Happy Holidays” because it’s an example of doing obeisance to multiculturalism. It’s also intended as a poke in the eye of Christians by hypocrites who profess to be inclusive.

          Regardless, let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.

          • none of your business

            What I hate most about the campaign against the word Christmas is that Christmas shopping mean the difference between bankruptcy and a profit. Almost all retail profit is made in December. Yet every store in America has bowed to Jewish and communist pressure to eliminate the word Christmas. I don’t believe in God but I do believe in White European civilization and Christianity and Christmas is a big part of our White heritage.

        • none of your business

          That is taught to kindergartners in every Catholic school and Sunday school. It is common knowledge among Christians. Do you think you are the only person whoever read a basic history of western civilization ? We are all aware of the fact that the early Church pasted Christian holy days onto European and Roman seasonal celebrations. Being immersed in the Jewish part of the bible you are probably not aware that Good Friday observes the death of Jesus and Easter Sunday his resurrection. You need not post the fact that Easter is a celebration of the old N European spring fertility goddess Ester and celebrated with eggs and rabbits the symbol of fertility. Most of us are aware of that especially Catholics who learn it at an early age.
          AS an old testament aficionado I assume you celebrate Passover? Buchanan and other pro Whites write about the atheist, communist LBGT Jewish “War on Christmas.” The first war on Christmas was fought not by Luther and Henry 8 but by Knox and Calvin who claimed to be Christians.

        • none of your business

          The word mass is the word for a Roman Catholic religious service, not death. Some CofE and Anglican or Episcopal congregations also use the word mass for their religious services. The word means the mass or religious service that celebrates the birth of Jesus.
          You are becoming like Engleman. He posts the most commonly know facts such as his recent posting of the 14th amendment pretending that the rest of us are dumb ignorant White trash illiterate morons who are ignorant of the most elementary knowledge. All Christians especially Catholics know that the Christian holidays were pasted onto the old Roman and European celebrations. It is common knowledge.

        • phillyguy

          It bother me because they are taking Christianity out of this country, any Christian holiday is now known as just happy holiday , it is the propaganda of the tribe

        • HE2

          Whaaaat?

          Alexandra, something tells me you did not study Latin: Vulgar, Late, or even “Church Latin,” [which our noble teaching Brothers would not tolerate with its soft “ch” rather than “k” sounds.] Caesar=Kai-sar.

          Your referenced “Last Trumpet Ministries” Dave Meyer’s etymological derivation of the word “mass,” is incorrect.

          I suspect he was confusing sine missio-missionis, “to the death” with missa, [to send out].

          From missa, the word “mass,” is derived and applied to the Eucharistic and devotional rites in several churches, including Anglican, Lutheran.

          ‘Missa/Mass,’ was never defined as death.

          BTW, fundamentalist Presbyterianism is firmly rooted in the Reformation teachings of French born John Calvin, an ideological hardliner who subscribed to the darkly dualistic, “my way or the highway, death to infidels” approach to non-critical thought.
          Given a dinner seat mate choice next to a Roman Catholic vs a fundamentalist, I would choose a R.C. every time.

          • mikekingjr

            I suppose that word, Missa, accounts for the Missal, the name of the prayer book we read and carried to Mass.

          • HE2

            Hi mike.
            Thanks for your post. A satisfying read.

            If I were ever to re-embrace R.C. Christianity, it would be a Latin Mass parish. Berkeley still has one, [not an Opus Dei sect.]

            Agree, the English-ization of our Mass disappoints.
            The intended sanctity of the message is somehow diluted with this jarring switch-up of its more traditional and elegant mode of transmission.
            Liturgical music still soars. That is eternal.
            Mozart, Berlioz, and Faure’s Requiems[a] reach that place of “no mind” bliss in this busy one.
            Do you realize that if Islam secures its global caliphate all music, iconography, including cathedrals will be declared haram, outlawed or destroyed?

  • Samuel Hathaway

    Forget the black vote. Carping and griping about leftwing, pro-black tactics now is a day late and a dime short. Republicans must now fan the flames of racial divisions and MAXIMIZE THE WHITE vote, which means going into counties with clear white majorities which deliver huge Republican margins to counterbalance the anti-white racism and bigotry of the Democratic party.
    T

    This is NO time for weepy, apologetic Republicans to go in the “hood” to try to “reach out to African-Americans”, “to shew thyself not racist” in the hopes of getting a few black votes that may change their minds anyway and vote Democratic at the polls. If Georgia Republicans will NOT get out and pound the pavement for white votes, they are bigger fools to be pitied than anyone else.

    • mikekingjr

      Concur. Pathetic to see repubs being encouraged to/ responding to advice to gin up the black vote for themselves. Oh well, they’re rinos after all. same same.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        The election is only 8 days away. It’s too late to battle the Democratic party smear tactics at this late stage of the game. Whining about it now distracts from get-out-the-vote efforts that are now crucial in the last week of the campaign. Mike Huckabee and Rand Paul are still telling republican candidates to “reach out to African Americans.” No, it’s time to reach out to white voters in heavily Republican counties.

        • Cid Campeador

          But reaching out to ones own race is permissible only to non- Whites.
          A White does it and he/she is a racist or a “hater”.

          • And we must stop over-reacting, or reacting at all, to being labeled racist. There’s nothing wrong with being racist. I’m racist and I have a right to that opinion, and I know without doubt that as a whole the white race is superior to others. I believe, too, that most Caucasians would agree. Perfect? No, but still superior. History proves it!

        • mikekingjr

          I won’t vote anyway. Does not matter to me.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            oh, come on Mike, get out there and vote. We need to keep Michelle Nunn and Jason Carter out… Nunn will vote to pass amnesty and Jason Carter will give the radical Hispanic extremists whatever they want. the blacks are already talking about car pooling to the polls…the only way they win is if white voters don’t go to the polls in droves.

            What can I do to bribe you to vote?

        • Hubert Whitey Whitney

          Not just “African Americans”, Sam. They stupidly believe the Latinos will vote for the GOP. “Listening to Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus burble a few weeks ago on “Fox News Sunday” about how amnesty is going to push the Republicans to new electoral heights, one is reminded of Democratic pollster Pat Caddell’s reason for refusing to become a Republican. No matter how enraged he gets at Democratic corruption, he says he can’t bear to join such a stupid party as the GOP.” -Ann Coulter, If the GOP is this stupid, it deserves to die

    • MBlanc46

      That would be an interesting approach. Very contentious, but it would get a lot of attention.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        And it’s sad that we’re so afraid of doing it because it’s “contentious.” White and black Democrats racially profile for black votes shamlessly, and not a peep about it from white Republicans.

        • MBlanc46

          It’s pretty clear, to me, at least, that it would result in an electoral debacle, at least at first. Several cycles down the road, if such a program managed to survive, it might start to attract significant support. But how many politicians want to give up a chance of office for a decade or so.

        • none of your business

          Well, look how the Republicans started. They were a war mongering party against the White south. The Republican’s official beginning was in 1856 in I think Appleton Wis. Their platform was to end slavery. Their war killed 750 thousand White men according to the latest research.
          End of story.

    • Stan D Mute

      Hoping the Republicans, the Party that unleashed negroes on America, will become explicitly pro-white is a fools errand. It will never happen. The “Party of Lincoln” is always going to pander to negroes.

    • currahee1911

      You have something here; it is ridiculous and demeaning for Republican candidates to court the blacks and the mestizos.

  • RHG

    The most cynical and sinister thing is that a bunch of white leftwingers only wanted Obama in office knowing they could race bait using him to label anyone who disagreed with leftwing policies as “racist”. They plan on the same thing with Hillary Clinton, only it will be the “gender card” played instead of the “race card”.

  • MBlanc46

    Having abandoned the white working class (at least insofar the white working class was ever their concern), people of color and single women are their entire electorate.

    • JohnEngelman

      You should not expect your emotional response to a situation to be universal. What angers you pleases others. When others share your anger many will direct their anger at other targets.

      Awhile ago I found an article on the internet I wish I had kept. The author argued that the Democrat Party is strongest in parts of the United States where capitalism is most strongly developed. It defined strongly developed capitalism as an economy where the vast majority of people are employees.

      Employees tend to view the economy differently than those who are self employed. Employees who work for the government are likely to respond coldly to promises to cut government spending, because it is from government spending that their paychecks come. Employees who work for private employers tend feel and at times resent the power of their employers and immediate supervisors more than the combined power of their local, state, and federal governments.

      These factors incline employees of all races and sexes – and to an extent even incomes – to vote Democrat.

      As time goes on a higher percentage of the American population are employees. Family farmers become farm laborers for agribusiness. Small restaurants are replaced by restaurant chains. Small stores are replaced by chain stores. And so it goes.

      Working for a corporation inclines one to the left. Business executives are more likely to be university graduates than small business owners. University education nudges one to the left.

      Well educated professionals are also pushed to the left, especially as is increasingly the case, their pay checks have been losing ground to inflation, while they know that their corporations are more profitable than ever before.

      Someone who wants to know how it feels to be a well educated professional working for a corporation should read Dilbert cartoons, by Scott Adams. The targets of Scott Adams’ satire are not big government, high taxes, and lazy bureaucrats. They are alienating work environments, imperious bosses, and CEO’s who give themselves raises and bonuses after laying people off who were performing adequately.

      The growing income gap is a Democrat issue. It only waits for a Democratic presidential candidate who knows how to exploit it.

      • none of your business

        Your great insight is part of elementary economics and general American and European history. I believe the fact that independent tradesmen stopped working for themselves and became employees was covered in one of my high school history books. Why do you keep posting all this common knowledge? Do you think you are the only person whoever read a book? You think you are some sort of genius but everything you post is things like wikepedia and the old encyclopedias.

  • Charles Martel

    I hate it when people play the race card

    • Samuel Hathaway

      I love it when white candidates play the race card, intelligently, persuasively, factually and then play it in ways that destroys the candidacy of white democrats who have spent their lives playing it against white people.

      • mikekingjr

        Just does not happen often enough.

      • Charles Martel

        Yea that’s a good point.

  • Gary John 金白龍

    Your race is your nation. Non-Whites understand this. Whites are still playing catchup.

  • Who Me?

    The “Hopey-Changey” clown is hopin’ we’ve forgotten about the change.

  • Juggernaut3000

    Blacks will never understand that open-border cultural Marxists like Obama are their very worst enemy.

    They will never understand their only role in the NWO regime is as a tool used to terrorize and destroy White America. Nothing more.

    • Kenner

      They are a more than willing tool.

    • journey

      Very difficult for most blacks to think abstractly. But they are awakening to the fact that tax money is being spent on Hispanics which cuts into their portions. They regard the tax money as their God given right due to slavery, etc., etc.

  • Hubert Whitey Whitney

    I truly do not understand why this is not the last straw(s) for whites. Why can’t the picture of a lynching in 2014 and two chidden holding a sign, “Don’t shoot” lead to a broken, prone camel? Do you know what they are saying about us? They are saying we as whites are savage murderers who would murder a man by hanging without due process and that we would indiscriminately shoot at innocent children. Take a moment and digest that. They are saying we are amoral creatures without a scintilla of decency. They look upon us with contempt and without any humanity. Why can’t we now separate? And, if we did separate, they would kill each other off in a matter of months. We do not have to do anything, other than separate from them. We can then stand back and watch them kill each other. They will turn to their leadership first and foremost and, when no remedy arrives the 5% which John Derby refers to will kill these leaders. Then the blacks will tear into each other, with those who remain relegated to the primitive existence that now can be seen in past issues of National Geographic. We don’t have to do anything other than separate. Separate Now!

  • Wow. This is really a sad commentary on the US. Those kinds of ads are obviously meant for a low IQ group. The ads say nothing about the qualifications of the candidates or their goals for the future of the US. They’re just pandering to an intellectually empty group of people who can only see racism everywhere and blame whites, and only vote for others who blame whites. Wow. This really is a dumb as dirt group of people and the democrats know it!

  • bubo

    Blacks voted for Duh ‘One because to paraphrase “We in charge now, muthaf—.” No high minded dreams of coming together or some such nonsense. We’re talking about people with low IQ and zero impulse control. They thought they would have what YT has and that Obama would help them to take it.

  • Stan D Mute

    It seems to me that people who landed here after the hard work of earning America’s freedom are the very same people who have worked so hard to destroy it. They have nothing invested, they don’t have centuries of their family’s blood soaked into the soil, and look where we are as a result.

    Universal suffrage was America’s downfall. People must earn their right to vote. Swimming across a river to collect handouts is not “earning” in my mind.

    • Anonymous

      My family came here not too long ago. We arrived via plane, and in a legal manner. We don’t collect any handouts. My father’s income is in one of the top tax brackets so our family pays way more into the system than we would ever get out of it.

      • Stan D Mute

        Yes? Your father then built a brand new business that contributes much more than it consumes in public resources? Or did he simply take a job in an American company that would otherwise have been filled by an American? I suppose then you must be okay with foreigners filling up your homeland and leaving your fellow countrymen unemployed and impoverished?