Battle Cry of the White Man

Dana Milbank, Washington Post, August 5, 2014

The unfriendly airwaves of talk radio this week gave us an inadvertently revealing moment.

Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, a Republican immigration hard-liner and part of what the Wall Street Journal just branded “the GOP’s Deportation Caucus,” was giving his retort to the paper’s pro-business editorialists on Laura Ingraham’s radio show Monday: “They need to be patriots, and they need to think about America first,” Brooks said.


“This is a part of the war on whites that’s being launched by the Democratic Party,” Brooks said. “And the way in which they’re launching this war is by claiming that whites hate everybody else. It’s a part of the strategy that Barack Obama implemented in 2008, continued in 2012, where he divides us all on race, on sex, greed, envy, class warfare.”

It was the battle cry of the white man, particularly the Southern white man, who is feeling besieged. I don’t share the fear, but I understand it. The United States is experiencing a rapid decoupling of race and nationality: Whiteness has less and less to do with being American.

The Census Bureau forecasts that non-Hispanic whites, now slightly more than 60 percent of the population, will fall below 50 percent in 2043. Within 30 years, there will cease to be a racial majority in the United States. In a narrow political sense, this is bad news for the GOP, which is dominated by older white men such as Brooks. But for the country, the disassociation of whiteness and American-ness is to be celebrated. Indeed, it is the key to our survival.

This is not merely about a fresh labor supply but about the fresh blood needed to cure what ails us. To benefit from such a transfusion, we not only need to welcome more immigrants but also to adopt pieces of their culture lacking in our own–just as we have done with other (mostly European) cultures for centuries.

This is the theme of my friend Eric Liu’s provocative new book, “A Chinaman’s Chance.” Liu writes about Chinese Americans (Asians, as it happens, eclipsed Hispanics last year as the fastest-growing minority in the United States) but the thesis is similar for other immigrant cultures. Liu argues that the United States needn’t fear China’s rise, because the Chinese have already given us the tools to beat them economically: their sons and daughters.


Part of Liu’s confidence that the United States will triumph over China is that his ancestral land, in modernizing, is losing some of the best aspects of Chinese culture–and acquiring our own excesses. He notes that, as the Chinese extended family frayed, the government enacted a law requiring adult children to visit their elderly parents–the sort of thing Chinese did voluntarily for millennia.

China responds with edicts because it lacks the source of continuous adaptability and vitality that imported cultures give the United States. Creative change is easier here because we pick and choose from among all the world’s cultures. That inherent advantage in the American system will continue–if we don’t get hung up about whiteness.

The tea party movement was a setback because it elevated extreme individualism over collective responsibilities and because it tapped into nativism and further undermined trust in American institutions. Some tea partyers such as Brooks may never be able to leave the bunkers where they defend whiteness.

But for other conservatives and Republicans–and, more importantly, for America–it’s not too late.

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • The tea party movement was a setback because it elevated extreme individualism over collective responsibilities and because it tapped into nativism and further undermined trust in American institutions. Some tea partyers such as Brooks may never be able to leave the bunkers where they defend whiteness.

    One of the legitimate (IMHO) criticisms of the TPM as a movement is that its “individualism” (“extreme” or not) actually hinders nativism and ethnonationalism. That may be, but at least it hasn’t hindered it actually doing a whole lot of leg work to stop the current amnesty threat.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      The Tea Party was like every other movement. Ann Coulter repeated an old mantra about “movements” ala The Rainbow Coalition.

      ‘…First it’s a movement, then a business, then a racket…’

      The Tea Party’s impetus surrounded one issue: blocking the Marxist occupation government from redistributing Medicare funds to Medicaid. When that failed, the Tea Party went into a slow spin; ultimately being negatively rebranded by the Left–their specialty.

      • connorhus

        I still think the Tea Party did more than that. I believe it was instrumental to turning the house Republican and many States Red. Also a fair number of counties that were once half and half or even full of old time Democrats switched to where a Dems doesn’t stand a chance now.

        The Tea Party solidified the lines across the country if nothing else.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          I think the smaller Tea Party factions are still true to the small government cause. We saw that with the David Brat victory. The bigger factions have been infiltrated and corrupted, though. They
          are past movement and a business. They are in racket territory. Watered-down and/or poisoned.

          NUMBERSUSA does a very good job as a standalone entity. Need more of them. They also get a statue when this is all said and done.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      As long The Tea Party wakes more White racial realists up to voting Independent, putting a vote in for The Constitution Party instead of the spineless Republicans, it has served a purpose.

      • UncleSham

        The Constitution Party would have a strong chance to win if they had a fair amount of media coverage. Problem is that most people don’t know that they exist.

        • Mike

          Taking over the republican party is the only viable strategy

  • MekongDelta69

    And of course Dana Milbank of the WaPo just has to chime in as the “anti- Mo Brooks.”

    Does ANYONE know of a leftist who ISN’T mentally deranged? Anybody? I don’t…

    • Usually Much Calmer

      I believe in the commons and I’m not afraid of progress. Markets should be free save for careful and specific regulation, such as the recapture of externalities. I still consider myself a leftist. These idiots are nuts, but that does not change what I am.

      • SoulInvictus

        Moderate socialism works in european countries and I’d imagine there’s a safety net in Japan as well but I’m not up on that. It used to work here, until the elites killed blue collar industry and class mobility, then flooded the country with additional poor people.
        But you can’t be a leftist and champion that idea. The label also ties you to a litany of other anti-white campaigns (like immigration).
        I’d find another way of expressing pro-poor/anti-tyranny sentiment. I know I have.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          Eh, I’m not too keen on the poor folk, actually.

          Liberal is a good label, I’ll keep it. But thank you for the advice.

          • SoulInvictus

            ? Then I’m unclear about what you mean by being leftist or liberal.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Well, it is nice to engage with you again, SoulInvictus. This may be too unwieldy a conversation for the internet in the long run, but I’ll start it off (and very messy, sorry):

            Your list is an oversimplified accounting of liberalism, to my mind. To my list above, which says nothing of the poor or environmentalism (which is not a monolith; I am for clean water and indifferent to climate change), one might add support for a well trained, intelligent and earnest cadre of professionals (a ruling class if you will, but not hereditary- mandarins, this is not a new idea) should try to modulate our economy through fiscal policy and there should be a moderate amount of wealth redistribution for practical purposes, not moral ones. These people will err in their efforts from time to time, as they must. I’m OK with that. <- that attitude differentiates liberals and conservatives, as well as your glass half full or half empty view of your fellow man, progress, and whether you think history is cycical or a vector, the relative importance of individuals versus groups, etc. There are many, many fundamental (almost inexplicably fundamental) things on which a reasonable and well informed liberal may disagree with many posters at AmRen. My wish is that it does not become a space where liberals are not welcome. Liberals are in the aggregate, more right than not. They are also the ones that carry on. How far are you going to get being lead by men who describe themselves as standing astride the march of time yelling 'stop' or writing books titled, "We are Doomed"?

            In 2014 America, no one is disenfranchised (and few are really poor, though many should be, as they are unproductive). I would not be shocked to learn drunken infants are getting like 3 ballots just for showing up on election day (in addition to the 2 they cast in advance when they were sober- maybe it all cancels out?). I'm not really moved to being a hero for anyone else right now, though that could change with circumstances, of course.

            Our government is not only too large, but a cesspool of corruption. Much of our mess I blame on us; we have been lazy and ignorant buffoons rather than citizens for a very long time.

            I am not debating you, by the way. I have no care to change your mind. If you and I disagree, I am unconcerned. I know what I believe and everyone else can think as they wish. I am just explaining myself to you and pointing out to MD69 that race realism has widespread appeal (VERY widespread- both Engelman and myself are here and I don't want to speak for him, but I get the impression his liberalism and mine have little intersection). And gee, it is short sighted to decry that.

            Have a good one, friend-

        • Anonymous

          Even if it has not destroyed homogeneously White countries, it still should not be done. I oppose socialism on principle. It does not matter to me where it has failed and where it has not failed. People should avoid socialism because socialism is morally wrong.

          • SoulInvictus

            As I said, “moderate” socialism. That basically means democracy. Everyone contributes to roads, not letting disabled or elderly starve to death, national defense, maybe even some common sense national funding to scientific and disease research. Things that really do “promote the general Welfare” to quote the Preamble.

          • David Ashton

            It is not practicable to fund defense and police through voluntary contributions or insurance companies, nor wise so to fund an impartial judiciary. Modern national defense in the real world needs public investment at all levels and appropriate elite direction, if necessary with a related communications system on land and in outer space. There is no Hank Rearden or John Galt to do this job for you, even if he could make more private profit than any competitor whether national or international.

          • Mike Lane

            I don’t buy any “moderate” economy. In principle, theft is theft, and socialism is socialism.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          I agree. Democratic Socialism works well in a racially homogenous country such as Japan. Democratic Socialism would work nicely in a White Ethnostate.

          • bilderbuster

            National Socialism worked great in homogenous Germany so it had to be destroyed.

          • David Ashton

            Someone on a BBC news program recently said Russia was dangerous because it could threaten the international legal system on which depended international trade. Prewar fascism and national socialism required self-contained economies with internal credit systems. These excluded speculative fluctuations of international finance and competitive investment in low-wage areas, but apart from the British Empire they also required some measure of imperial expansion -Germany into eastern Europe, Italy into north Africa, and the Japanese simulacrum into eastern Asia. Internally, however, the combination of class-collaborative socialism with ethnic nationalism makes a fairly workable and popular arrangement.

          • SoulInvictus

            It’s a fancy name for a unified group of people that look out for one another. You could just as easily call it “Acting like Jesus-ism (otherwise known as real Christianity put into practice)”… which is why it cracks me up when Christians ignorantly bash socialism.
            Which of course works best when those people are very similar and share the same values/views. The farther a nation departs from that format, the more the system intervenes to reconcile the differences, the more the system metastasizes. Human nature does its thing it always does in the face of absolute power.
            Poof, tyranny.
            Yet another reason why diversity ruins everything.

          • UncleSham

            Are you unable to differentiate between voluntary charity and theft by force? Equating the giving to the poor advocated by Jesus with the stealing from the rich advocated by socialists is like equating love-making with rape.

          • SoulInvictus

            Everyone drives on roads.
            Toll roads suck.
            Doing some things together is better.

          • UncleSham

            I agree. However, my list of things we ought to be forced to be involved in is very short.

          • SoulInvictus

            Same here. That’s why I said “moderate”.
            Also with the implied, performed by a government that has proven trustworthy to its people.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            That’s a little heavy handed of an analogy. If the government is legitimate in a social democratic state, the people on the whole have agreed to let the state administer charity for them.

          • UncleSham

            A majority opinion does not make it legitimate. That would be like a group of people mugging a single person. They have the majority on their side, so its somehow okay? I suppose you think that’s another heavy handed analogy. What you are saying might make sense in a homogeneous state where everyone cares about one another and has a common interest, but of course, we do not have that. Even if we did, I think it would work much better on a local rather than a national level.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Well said Soullnvictus! A homogenous society is indeed best. Common values and goals. Unity of purpose is greatest in a homogenous society.

          • SoulInvictus

            I am on fire lately.;)

      • Garrett Brown

        You’re for illegal immigration and egalitarianism?

        • Usually Much Calmer

          Neither; I’m curious as to why you ask.
          The rule of law is one of the core tenets of liberalism.
          I support this site wholeheartedly.
          So, no. Not at all.

          • Garrett Brown

            Those are both ranked very highly in the party/belief system you supposedly support. You can’t really identify them as democrats anymore.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I may be see it as more complicated than that. I did admit, in a post above to SoulInvictus, to being Keynesian, which is pretty squarely considered n the left. That and several other reasons, some also listed above, lead me to continue to continue to claim the liberal label.

    • Rick

      Nope! They are all COMPLETELY and TOTALLY nuts to the core. How can any white person speak with rapturous joy about the demise of their own kind? These people are as contemptible to me as a Negro…

  • Today, Whites should remember another war cry.
    I’d like to celebrate an era when being strong and unapologetic was the norm.
    Happy Hiroshima.

    • Paleoconn

      I don’t understand. You’re celebrating our nuking of Hiroshima?

      • 1G25

        I do. It saved an estimated 300,000 American lives that would have been lost if operation Coronet had been necessary.

        The number of Japs killed at Hiroshima pales in comparison to just the number of innocent Philipinos bayonetted by Japanese soldiers… look up “Unit 731″ sometime if you have an empty stomach and are interested in why our Admiral Nimitz said,”When I’m finished with those bastards, the only place the Japanese language will be spoken will be in Hell.”

        • Paleoconn

          Two wrongs don’t make a right. We can’t claim the moral high ground ever just because some nip soldiers killed some of our brown buddies. Btw. would they have done that if we weren’t allied with them.

          We had no business there to begin with.

          And the bluster from Admiral Nimitz is just that. These military men make such bold statements to get men to follow them, to build confidence.

          Again, schadenfreude. Look at Japan and Germany today, and look at us.

      • I could be wrong, but I think he stated his intent quite clearly. He’s not celebrating the thousands of lives snuffed out in an instant, he’s celebrating a time when white men were strong enough to make a terrible decision without urine running down their leg at thought of what negative effect it might have for them personally. Do you think there’s any leader we have these days who would make the same call? Who would snuff out an entire city in a foreign nation to save millions?

        He’s celebrating the fact that once, not that long ago, we weren’t weak, quiet, cowed, snivelling and weak. Misguided? Sure, but we had the conviction and the fortitude to do the terrible things that needed to be done, and I imagine he’s celebrating the fact that maybe we still have some glimmer of that fire inside us still.

        God knows we’ll need it in the days ahead.

        • Paleoconn

          I don’t know, I mean ‘happy Hiroshima’ pretty much sounds like celebrating the carnage.

          I, too long for leaders like we had in days gone by, men with resolve, with backbone and character, and balls. But I would never celebrate the horror of what we did to a proud, good people like the Japanese, and cite is as an example of lost glories. We were certainly a great country then, but this along with entering those two barbaric world wars to begin with, were terrible mistakes made by an immature nation led by some evil men.

          • The wars themselves, sure, but the nuke? That was a brave choice. A terrible, horrible, unthinkable choice. But I can’t say it was the wrong one. I admire the Japanese as a people, particularly the “samurai spirit” their sense of honor and respect. A truly incredible people and culture.

            But those bombs almost certainly saved more lives than they took. They saved those lives in a decidedly dishonorable, unfathomable way, I think that, more than anything else, was why they worked. The Japanese literally couldn’t comprehend such a dishonorable move, such complete and utter slaughter, no sense of fair battle. And in the face of that, they surrendered. And white lives were saved, we certainly didn’t need to lose any more.

      • ElComadreja

        It was the right thing to do.

        • Paleoconn

          It was wrong, it was barbarous, it was horrific, inhuman. All this which is happening to our country today is schadenfreude, Hitler’s and Tojo’s revenge, if you will.

          We had no business goading Japan into war. We had no business in Hawaii, wtf business do we have establishing a state in the middle of the Pacific full of Asians and hardly any Whites? FDR should rot in hell alongside Churchill as far as I’m concerned.

          • 1G25

            Wimps like you are why America is circling the drain.

          • ElComadreja

            We did not “goad” Japan into war. That’s the liberal revisionist spin on it. If you want to see barbarous, horrific and inhuman read about what the Japanese have done to other people in the course of history. While you’re at it look up the firebombing of Dresden which is never mentioned since it was only white Germans killed.

          • Paleoconn

            Yeah, I know all about Dresden. We killed a lot of good people in WW2. The winners write history.

    • Mike

      Yeah because that’s the group who’s behind most of our problems, the Japanese!

  • Daniel Schmuhl

    Guess what tribe Dana Milbank is from..

  • Chasmania

    What kills me is the huge amount of data: Irrefutable, empirical data that points at the fact of whites being displaced and the traitors in government and big business are denying it or ignoring it. Really makes you want to grab something, or someone, and break it/them.

    • falskog

      Now they are openly rejoicing. Vulgar triumphalism has arrived

      • Chasmania

        And it’s INFURIATING ! Good god how many times I’ve had to literally go beat the p1ss out of a tree with a piece of hickory I carry with me….It’s either that or totally lose it.

        Of course the other way to vent is on the various websites. Thanks Amren !

    • ElComadreja

      Data? All I have to do is look out my window to see the “Planet of the Apes”.

      • Chasmania

        Same here. A trip to Walmart is a ‘Diversity in Action’ tour with a south of the border flavor to it. With no trouble at all you’ll see many non English speakers whipping out the ‘Lone Star card’ and buying groceries.

        When I renewed my license back in June the family unit in front of me – anchor baby and what I surmise was it’s mother AND father – were asked for proof of where they lived, and the woman proceeded to drag out a mountain of government provided paperwork for housing assistance, etc… to show that she was ” leeegalz “. Any day you can witness dozens of affronts to your white racial sanity. It’s bad enough it’s happening, it’s synergized by the fact we’re paying for it with BORROWED Federal funding which we are then being charged interest..
        One might be tempted to call it madness, were it not for the fact that it’s all so obviously the result of a plan, one long in the making and which relies upon our natural sense of empathy. Our own good nature is used against us.

  • Truthseeker

    Wrong, wrong, wrong. I am a White American. That is my ethnic and national identity. Those are the people I am loyal to first and foremost. After that, my loyalty is to European (a.k.a. White) people throughout the world. They are my extended family. After that, I might have some sense of duty toward non-White Americans, but they’re not “my people,” just my fellow citizens. For non-Whites outside of America, I choose my affinities on a case-by-case basis.

    I will never have loyalty to a country run by people who share no heritage or values with me, especially if they think that my race and culture are something to be abolished. I refuse to let my identity be erased. I am a proud White American.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Exactly. We, as White Americans, have a culture and identity we have earned to right to preserve. We have a right to form White Ethnostates that are racially homogenous and free of Negroes and Hispanics.

    • evilsandmich

      Yeah I couldn’t make it through that article it was so brain dead. At least when the lefties make arguments like these they actually make sense in progressing their twisted, evil point of view.

  • That’s another thing. The TPM’s “extreme individualism” hurts “our collective responsibilities?” What “collective responsibilities” can we have that Dana Milbank and his ilk won’t immediately start shouting down as racist, Nazi, fascist and all the good stuff?

    I guess what Milbank means by “collective responsibilities” is our collective responsibility so-called to the whole of humanity, We Are the World.

    • And when collective responsibility includes everyone on the planet, it becomes meaningless. When everyone becomes us and there is no them, us becomes empty. It is like counterfeit money, sounds good but worthless.

      • Similarly, one big problem Pat Buchanan has had with major corporations and the people that administer them have been their fundamental lack of loyalty to the country and people in which they’re based. With that in mind, I took great interest in a piece by Johnathan Alter wherein he thought that corporate CEOs should be made to do loyalty oaths. Then I read the details, which is where you find the devil, and Alter’s definition of “patriotism” only means paying a lot of taxes to the Leviathan in Washington, D.C. In other words, leftist “nationalism” is the same kind of empty rootless economism that the cosmo-conservatives and cosmo-libertarians have given us for years. PJB’s version of nationalism is closer to the proper context of blood-and-soil.

        Besides, even if CEOs did loyalty oaths, either in the vacuous taxes-only version that Alter wants or something more substantial as PJB wants, so what? They’ll have their fingers crossed behind their backs. Barack Obama swore an oath to the United States Constitution every time he was sworn in to the Illinois State Senate, United States Senate and the Presidency. Get the picture?

        • Periapsis

          I agree, corporations and those who run them really have no loyalties except to the dollar and ever higher profits, not the country or countries they operate in. Loyalty oaths are not the answer, laws against corporate wrong doing at the expense of the populace with genuine teeth are required. Corporations as they are today are in the eyes of the law a person with more rights than all but a tiny minority of people would ever have. There needs to be among other things, a range of penalties up to and including “corporate death penalty,” which dissolves corporations who are actively harming the nations where they are operating population. There also needs to be laws that hold their executives legally accountable as well.

          • My proposal for checking corporate power is Dave Brat’s general ideas: You don’t need volumes of knit picking regulation. You do need pretty clear easy to understand legislation. These actions are right, these other actions are wrong. As long as you keep doing right things, you’re fine, make all the profits you can. But if you cross over into the wrong aisle, you will be thumped by the power of the state and the power of the law, and thumped mercilessly.

          • bilderbuster

            Like heavy fines for corporations who knowingly hire illegals and hard time for those who hire them.

          • UncleSham

            Realistically, any regulations of the type you are proposing would be used by people with political connections to squash competition and become yet another vehicle for crony capitalism. The answer is for the American people to value loyalty to their country and people more than they value getting the cheapest bargain. If the people did this, businesses would be forced to go along with it in order to continue selling products and making money. The corporations are simply giving the people what they want.

          • Periapsis

            We have crony capitalism already. Take the hemp industry for example, that was squashed so cotton would be king even though hemp is far better. And that happened long before either one of us were born.

          • UncleSham

            Hence my use of the phrase “yet another”.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Pat Buchanan is a White racial realist and defender of White working people. I wish that he would run as an independent candidate for President in 2016, on a boldly pro-White platform. After 8 years of Obongo, I think that he would at least carry several states, as George Wallace did in 1968.

          • SentryattheGate

            I voted for Buchanan in 2000, and would again. But he is 75, I think. He’s been so right about so many things, many years before others caught on to our challenges. God bless him!

  • Pax Romana

    “….But for the country, the disassociation of whiteness and American-ness is to be
    celebrated. Indeed, it is the key to our survival.

    This is not merely about a fresh labor supply but about the fresh blood needed to cure what ails us. To benefit from such a transfusion, we not only need to welcome more immigrants but also to adopt pieces of their culture lacking in our own….”

    What a sick, twisted, self-hating white man. Liberalism IS a mental disorder, in which they believe that the only cure for the greatest country on Earth, founded by a people who
    accomplished the greatest advancements in the history of civilization from the sciences, Medicine, Technology, Engineering and Architecture, is to destroy it and replace it with a third world cesspool of more social welfare, less academic achievement, more crime, more corruption, more diseases, more pollution, more overcrowding, traffic jams, more
    tribalism, more violence, more iron bars on windows and doors.

    And when this delusional Liberal is done taking a dump on what was once a great country and people, he will pack his bags and move somewhere else because he can’t stand the smell, and do it all over again. Just like he and his ilk did in Philadelphia PA, Washington D.C., St. Louis MO, New Orleans LA, Los Angeles CA, Flint MI, Baltimore MD, Pontiac MI, Gary Ind., Newark NJ, Cleveland OH, Atlanta GA, Richmond VA, Memphis Tn, Birmingham AL, Camden NJ. And Detroit, the tourism capital of the world!

    • Pro_Whitey

      Check out the Japs in Japan and the Jews in Israel. Prime examples that societies can prosper and allow their inhabitants a comfortable living without continual “infusions”. Also, the U.S.A. from the early 1920s to the mid-1960s became a really great place to live with few if any “infusions.” We have stalled and back tracked as we have since “infused”.

      • John R

        Good point. In 1925, we finally slammed shut the door on free and open immigration. Why? Because over the previous decades too many immigrants were coming from southern and eastern Europe. As it turned out, that was a wise policy. The years from 1925 to 1965-with the exception of the worldwide Depression-were some of the most prosperous ones in this country’s history. In addition, those two generations allowed many of these new immigrants time to assimilate better to this country. (I never had to withdraw money from my bank account and “press one for English, two for Italian, three for Polish…”).

  • The “party of science” seems immune to the data. Based upon which black, mestizo, Muslim, or some “multicultural” hybrid society therein demonstrates the impending success of a majority black/mestizo/muslim America? As I said earlier, once these leftists have embraced the insanity, there is no going back–no matter the evidence, no matter the suffering, no matter the destruction.

  • What a dung heap of an article. He takes the war on whites comment and spins it into a pro-China immigrant theme saying we need the slant eyes like a dying man needs a “transfusion.”

    Well, Chinese blood ain’t the transfusion I need, pal. We need good white supremacists from around the world flooding this country from South Africa, Australia, Russia, and Europe.

    The fact of nonwhite immigration is itself an expression of hatred of whites. Until the non-whites are excluded as immigrants, this rathole of a country, certainly not mine anymore, will continue to sink like the Titanic, slipping beneath the waves while the band plays “God Bless America” sung by some screeching female rapper.

    • HE2

      bigone, I was hoping someone would counter the pro-Asian spin within the article.
      As Asians swamp the Pacific Coast, the wealthy buying up everything in sight, and all of them, rich or poor, over-consuming our dwindling natural resources without a thought, sure we need them. Not.

  • Luca

    Actually, it is a war on all non-Democrats. It is a war on republicans and conservatives of every stripe. Generally that mostly boils down to White, heterosexual, Christian males but I have seen the same treatment for conservative women and minorities.

    The simple timeless tactic of “Divide and Conquer.” That calls for us to band together.

    • connorhus

      I don’t disagree. White Conservative Women take a bashing and are if anything hated almost as much if not more than the Men. Yet it is much easier for the weaker White Females to turn coat and run than it is for the Men. The Men pretty much have to emasculate themselves and will never get the bennies handed over.

    • Pro_Whitey

      That’s why they’re so mad at Brooks. He’s bringing the racial war to light. Same reaction as when Uncle Pat Buchanan brought the Culture War to light in 1992. As with Buchanan, Brooks is not declaring war, but trying to get people to realize that there is a war being fought, and only one side is doing the fighting.


    The future of white survival in America is post-American.

  • none of your business

    This White person totally disassociated herself from America in 1975 when affirmative action came crashing down on her. I hate this country for what it has done to Whites since 1956 Brown vs Topeka.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That was the CRA-1964 tumor known as Griggs v. Duke Power – 1971 that hit you over the head. Griggs enabled quotas and was launch pad for Affirmative Action. I was excluded many times because of Griggs v. Duke Power as well. Ironically, at Duke Power in South Carolina, during a demographic shake-down, on one occasion, during the mid 1980s. It’s called Duke Energy now.

      • Paleoconn

        Do you recmmend any other online bookseller, Andrew. Thanks for the tip on Bozo.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          THAT is a very good question. The Marxist turds have poisoned most book sellers with mutual agreements, so they can all burn books together, when the order comes down from on high.

          Bozo, for example, would list books that he didn’t like as “not available”. But, there’s a problem with that. If you’ve been following the automation of the printing industry, you would know as I do that books with low demand are all print-on-demand. Click a button and a book pops out. Therefore it is impossible for a book to be un-available, unless you consciously make it so.

          Bozo’s outfit blocked my purchase this way of a book entitled White Apocalypse, by Kyle Bristow. Meanwhile selling 50 Shades of Gray.

        • evilsandmich

          There’s a Scandinavian library by the name of The Pirate Bay that I use on occasion (although e-books can also be had from some real libraries).

          • Paleoconn

            Thank you.

      • evilsandmich

        Amazon is an odd duck since their margins are so thin one could stick it to their shareholders best by getting ‘Prime’ and watching a bunch of movies, ordering a bunch of stuff and listening to a bunch of music. Not that I care that much, that scam of a company will be the K-Mart of the Internet before too long: just a rotting rusk of what it once was.

  • none of your business

    Isn’t the Washington Post another Jewish owned newspaper? I’ve come up with a euphemism for Jew, AWR anti White racist.

  • none of your business

    bigone4u • 36 minutes ago

    What a dung heap of an article. He takes the war on whites comment and spins it into a pro-China immigrant theme saying we need the slant eyes like a dying man needs a

    Isn’t that what JT, Englemann and the conservatives have been saying for decades; that we should accept legal immigrant asians to take over the STEM jobs?

  • Endure and Survive

    White people will wake up, slowly but surely.

    • Periapsis

      They are waking up, but they are waking up faster and faster, like Titanic sinking as it took on more and more water faster and faster. The tipping point where the inevitable war between us and everyone else is fast approaching. If folks do not wake up when the storm clouds of a simultaneous civil and world war are gathering, they never will.

      • tetrapod

        Unlike those of Milbank’s kind who, lacking the manliness to fight for themselves, voluntarily boarded the trains for Auschwitz, whites will not go down without a fight.

        That time is surely coming.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    I agree, Larry Klein.

    In response to your deleted post, I think Milbank being a Journalist-wannabee, I think little Dana would word it more like: “My mother pioneered single parenthood”.

  • I still see this country needing a white enclave . . . .
    a safe place for the dwindling white race in America

    • Ultimate187

      This country is 65% white, which means there are places that are still overwhelming white. That’s not the issue though. These people have to be racially aware and like-minded, and that’s the kicker.

      • Chasmania

        Bingo ! It takes a lot of educating to overcome the virtual sh1tstorm of programing the average person gets when it comes to racial issues.

      • Anonymous

        So you want to forcibly brainwash people like myself who live in homogeneously White areas? I hate being told to do; it does not matter who tries or what they try to tell me to do it but I will resist it 100%

      • kjh64

        No, we have millions of non-Whites here illegally or legally counted as “Americans”. Remove these people and the percentage of Whites is anybody’s guess but goes way up.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      Google northwest front.


    He just called for not only the ethnic cleansing of Whites from America, but for the absolute destruction of America itself. These people are crazy! Just what do they think America will be like once they’ve succeeded in reducing Whites to the hated minority? Can they really believe that once Whites become just another minority in the country their ( our ) ancestors built. Everyone of every race ( Whites included ) will all hold hands and burst into singing the “Kum-Ba-Yah” song? Do they really think that the same “minorities” who they’ve been teaching to hate White people in every school and every college for the last 60+ years. Will suddenly forget all that they’ve been taught and choose to follow these idiotic White liberal’s example and fully embrace egalitarianism, while preaching that there’s no such thing as race? No, absolutely not!

    These people are setting their own children, grand children and great grandchildren up to be persecuted on a massive scale. However, worst of all is the fact that the consequences for such foolishness will not be quarantined to effecting just their children, and their children alone. Nope, they’re drawing a target on the backs of all White children! This generation, our generation! Will come to be seen as the most foolish, destructive, naive, disastrous, deluded and ultimately the most hated generation ever produced. This is the generation, and these are the people. Who will walk the historic American nation, hand in hand, into the all encompassing equality of absolute oblivion. The title for this article should’ve been, “It’s Official, America’s Best Days Are Behind Her, And Things Are Going Just Great!”

    • Sick of it

      What they do makes sense when you really think about it. The most devoted to their cause breed with non-whites. They turn away from western culture and traditions. Many of them decide not to have kids at all. And then there are the homosexuals.

  • ricpic

    “Whiteness has less and less to do with being an American.”

    I wonder what Dana Milbank thinks has more and more to do with being an American? Not what he’d say in answer to that question, what he thinks. My guess is he thinks the most important characteristic of the coming American will be disdain for that nasty concept — liberty. A thoroughly white concept, needless to say.


      “Whiteness has less and less to do with being an American.” – Hmmm? Uh-Huh! I get it now, “Whiteness has less and less to do with being an American”, the same way that “Diversity has more and more to do with American decline!”

      • Well give Milbank this much: At least he’s admitting that “whiteness” and “American” used to be closely correlated. Even if he thinks it’s no longer the case or should not have ever been or should stop being the case. That’s a bit better than today’s cosmo-conservatives who think that “Amurrika” was purely a proposition nation from the get-go.


    I agree, but not in the same sense as the author.

  • italian guy

    The comments in that article are absurd, it’s not even apathy, they actively advocate for their own destruction… that’s sheer insanity IMO.

  • 4321realist

    “……we not only need to welcome more immigrants but also to adopt pieces of their culture lacking in our own–”

    Yeah, sure. They pick up their belongings lock, stock and barrel and undergo a lengthy and laborious relocation, because they are fleeing from a failed society and culture, so we should be happy to fit some of their culture into ours.

    This self-hating dreg is too clownish to be taken seriously.

    He’s a disgusting example of why this empire is going the way of Rome.

    I truly believe someone should put him out of his misery.

  • Chris

    Heretofore, America (White culture) has been able to civilize the more savage elements of alien cultures that managed to slither into our country. There are pockets of uncivilized foreign cultures (Africa in Detroit and Chicago, Mexico in Los Angeles) but for the most part, we have been able to hold the barbarians at bay. As America becomes inundated through unrelenting immigration, that process is becoming less and less effective. Idiots like Dana Milbank confuse Italian opera with Muslim/African female genital mutilation. There are some cultures/people that we not only should never emulate, but should never be allowed to set foot in North America. WE (White Euro-Americans) put a man on the moon. WE invented the light bulb, the computer, inoculations, air conditioning, photography, cell phones, airplanes, microwave ovens, etc. The world owes us, and we have very little if anything to learn from THEM.

  • fgbrunner3

    It is bad news for the United States. Intelligence is genetic.

  • tetrapod

    Milbank is yet one more member of the tribe who can barely contain his glee at the eclipse of white America.

    I try, oh how I try, not to be anti-s*m*t*c. At some point you just give up on any attempt at nuanced morality and say d*mn them all to h*ll.

    • Periapsis

      I’ve reached that point years ago, thanks to dealing with members of the Tribe face to face. Arrogant, rude, immoral and frankly rotten to the core are compliments for them. Indeed, the next time they are facing reprisals again for yet another of their holocausts against us or anybody else, whites will NOT lift a finger to prevent it.

  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    the Chinese have already given us the tools to beat them economically: their sons and daughters.
    On the other hand, we could beat them easily if we didn’t have the millstone of diversity around our necks.

  • WR_the_realist

    That’s just what I’d expect from the Washington Post. Note the not so subtle subtext — you whites are too stupid and incompetent to maintain your own country. You should thank your lucky stars that Hispanics, Asians, Somalis, and Nigerians have flooded into the country to save you.

    BTW, if there really is an actual Deportation Caucus I want to see it’s membership list. I’d only support the candidates in it.

    • There’s probably not an actual “deportation caucus” as such, note that he said that it’s some invention of the WSJ. What it probably means is that it’s a reference to the relatively few real true immigration patriots, the people who think that immigration laws mean something and therefore should be enforced.

      • WR_the_realist

        Yes, I realize that. It’s too much to hope for that any Republican congressmen would form a group called the Deportation Caucus to counter the Hispanic Caucus.

        • I think the House Immigration Reform Caucus, the one Tom Tancredo started, is still in existence.

  • RHG

    I guarantee when it all comes unglued China’s “sons and daughters” will show more loyatly to China then to America. I can’t walk around in Las Vegas or anywhere in CA without tripping over an Asian, but how many of them to do you see joining the American military, very, very, very few. Mexicans living in the US show more loyalty to Mexico then to the US, in fact they become downright flag waving nationalists on American soil. Meanwhile cities like Miami become downright cesspools because of “diversity” while delusional liberals like this clown continue to try a sell us a multicult pipe dream as if there was something wrong with America being a white majority country.

    • Ultimate187

      Chinese-Americans are only 1.2% of the US population. They don’t make up a large part of anything in this country, nevermind the military. I think everyone’s fears about them are misplaced.

  • LHathaway

    The columnist doesn’t list a single tangible benefit of diversity (a vitality he fails to name). It would seem almost unwittingly the columnist has said something that is true. “Whiteness has less and less to do with being American”. Most of us on here get that to one degree or another, and at one time or another.

    What is there for whites to be patriotic about? What history should we support? The long history of affirmative action? The long history of becoming a smaller and smaller and less influential group? A long history of school buildings where inside greater and greater emphasis is placed on racism, social injustice, systemic unfairness, all blamed on whites? A long history of declining on outcomes by almost if not almost every social barometer? A long period of income stagnation, perhaps entering a period of decline. A successful football team?

    Why would any of us want to connect whiteness with America? Our enemies have certainly done this. Merely say American is ‘racist’ and what they mean or intend to convey is the idea that whites are racist. You could add imperialist, fascist, close minded, war criminal, backwards or any other aspersion to that.

    Whiteness has more to do with a new country we will vote for and form for ourselves in the Northwest. For good or ill, that is where and what whiteness will be. And what we choose to do will be what whiteness will stand for.

  • Evette Coutier

    Unfortunately, given the nature of our situation, the only solutions are extreme measures. This pattern is no different than any other in history.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    The author is an anti-White shrew. Whether he is White or not himself does not matter. His satanic vitriol for White Americans makes me want to puke. Three cheers for Mo Brooks of Alabama for having the courage to stand up to the Negro worshiping, anti-White Lefties such as the disgusting, hate filled author of this article.

  • Paleoconn

    Does anybody know the ethnicity of this author?

    Is he insane to say that this influx of foreigners should be celebrated, or just hateful of Whites? When the diversity-mongers make the next movie about our conquest of space and the moon, be sure that mission control will have many blacks, Mexicans, Asians.

    • kjh64

      He is White. His picture is at the top of the article.

      • tetrapod

        He is tribal, not white.

        • Xerxes22

          You’re probably right. I can’t find any background info on the guy, only that he went to Yale. That’s a bad sign. It means that his bio has been scrubbed from the web and only one group does that and for only one reason, camouflage.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    White America is a pan-European mix of all of the White cultures. The Southern Mountains are mostly Anglo-Celtic, the rural Midwest dominantly Teutonic, and the rural sections of the Northeast have a strong Slavic/Italian heritage blended with an Anglo-Celtic original strain. We are all Whites, and we need to work with each other to form White Ethnostates that help each other. This is the only way our race and culture will survive in America.

  • Rhialto

    My view is that the Liberals don’t seem to realize that they have worn. Today they are the dominant force in the U.S. If the Liberals choose to allow massive Third World immigration into the US, they have the power to do it. They also have to deal with the disease, political corruption, and economic manipulation that these New Americans will bring with them.

    Today these New Americans are working with the Liberals, but only because its in their interest to bring in more immigrants and suppress White resistance. The immigrants’ goal is colonizing America, not generating some NWO Libealized culture. When the Liberals are no longer of use to these immigrant groups, the Liberals will be discarded along with their crazy beliefs.

    • Rhialto

      Please excuse my multiple posting error.

    • kjh64

      “Today these New Americans are working with the Liberals, but only because its in their interest to bring in more immigrants and suppress White resistance.”

      These “new Americans” THINK it’s in their interests to bring in more immigrants. What most of these parasites are too stupid to realize is that they go to live around the White man because they want the White man’s society but don’t have the ability to create the White man’s society in their own countries because if they could, they wouldn’t be leaving their own countries. However, when the White man goes, he’ll take his society with him and all of these “minorities” will be living in the same 3rd world country they left behind. If minorities were smart, they would NOT want their kind coming in large numbers and taking over.

      • UncleSham

        They will never figure this out, but that’s not our problem. Our problem is that most Whites can’t figure it out.

  • bilderbuster

    Like it or not when the lefties say the Tea Party is White they are correct.
    And when they say the Republican Party is the party of Whites (It betrays us every time but it is majority White) and call Republicans hateful names they really mean that about Whites.
    When hateful things are said about the Tea Party, Conservatives ect…They really mean Whites and should be called on their anti White hatred.

    • UncleSham

      Occupy Wall Street was even Whiter than the Tea Party percentage wise. Yet the media never thought their racial make up was a reason to vilify them.

  • Rhialto

    My view is that the Liberals don’t realize that they have won. Today they are the dominant force in the U.S. If the Liberals (and their allies) choose to allow massive Third World immigration into the US, they have the power to do it. They also have to deal with the disease, political corruption, and economic manipulation that these New Americans will bring with them.

    Today these New Americans are working with the Liberals, but only because its in their interest to bring in more immigrants and suppress White resistance. The immigrants’ goal is colonizing America, not generating some NWO Liberalized culture. When the Liberals are no longer of use to these immigrant groups, the Liberals will be discarded along with their Liberal ideology.

    • LHathaway

      When I was in college 25 years ago or so, I noticed ‘liberals’ always presented themselves as, ‘revealing the suppressed, hidden truth, against all odds’. It was almost a stance, outlook, or even a way of life. Perhaps they were fighting ‘stereotypes’. Unless they were following closely the posts on AmRen (which didn’t even exist at that time), what exact stereotypes were they fighting, other than ones they invented themselves? I didn’t really say it at the time, but their attitude of uncovering the suppressed hidden truth could in no way be more opposite from reality?

      It may actually be a way of life for them.

  • bilderbuster

    Because they hate you and it doesn’t matter why.
    Hate them back and preserve yourself because you don’t need their approval or their permission.

  • rightrightright

    “…because it lacks the source of continuous adaptability and vitality that imported cultures give the United States.”

    A horrible smear. Western civilisation’s structure which include adaptability and vitality has contained within itself the friction concomitant upon importing those of alien cultures en masse. No other civilisation has ever done this. No other civilisation ever will.

    These allegedly adaptable and vital imports have little truck with those of other cultures in their own countries. Further, if the imports stem from adaptable and vital cultures, why did they run away from them?

    What a nasty little lying boy this one is.

  • Garrett Brown

    “But for the country, the disassociation of whiteness and American-ness
    is to be celebrated. Indeed, it is the key to our survival.”

    How so?


      Yeah really! He doesn’t explain just how exactly removing “Whiteness” and “American-ness” from America is the key to our survival. Removing American-ness from America means whatever is left, it certainly will no longer be America. If you remove “American-ness” from America you’re removing America, period! These people are so filled with self hatred they’re literally calling for an end to both Whites and America herself.

      • UncleSham

        These people are insane. They are no different than the people who go on a random killing spree and then shoot themselves in the head. Only they are doing it on a grand scale.


          “They are no different than the people who go on a random killing spree and then shoot themselves in the head” – Exactly! As far as I can tell, these boneheaded White liberals. Who are so eager to see White America reduced to minority status in their very own country. Are not acting in a merely suicidal manner. They’re acting in a homicidal manner as well. Most Whites don’t want to walk that path to minority status ( which will ultimately lead to racial persecution in the future ) with these self hating liberals. But that doesn’t matter to them, they insist on our destruction whether we like it or not. This is much more like a “Mass-Murder/Mass-Suicide” scenario rather than just a suicide.

  • Henry Steyer

    Dana Milbank is right, separation of Whiteness and American-ness is to be celebrated. Then America must be destroyed, because a Fatherland which does not serve a people is not a Fatherland, but an abomination. Not blood, not soil, not blood and soil, but soil in the service of blood, blood over soil, that is the state we must aim, for the sake of universal peace. The Fatherland in the service of the Nation, and the Nation in the service of the good, the beauty and the true. Then we will serve the Fatherland.
    Notice Milbank’s sentence: “This is not merely about a fresh labor supply but about the fresh blood needed to cure what ail us”. Between unconsciensness and full awareness, he means it textually. Our blood is not good, it is ill and must be replaced, presumably partially. Not only that the system of which he is part does not care of us, it trives to destroy a people, trying to silence what screams its guilt on all roofs. A system trapped in a vicious circle. The reality is this, Mr Milbank, you participate in the elimination of your own race

  • kjh64

    “This is not merely about a fresh labor supply ”

    Why do we need “fresh labor” in large numbers when so many Americans are out of work?

  • kjh64

    Why is it that White people and ONLY White people are the ones that need mass immigration and multiculturalism? Why isn’t Mexico importing millions of non-Mexicans, why isn’t China importing million of non-Chinese, why isn’t Pakistan importing millions of non-Muslim/non-Pakistanis and why isn’t Nigeria importing millions of non-Blacks? Imagine if Black nations and only Black nations were told that they must allow mass immigration of others and make themselves a racial minority in the countries they created? What sane Black person would be for this? The answer is none, they would see it for what it is, “ethnic cleansing”.

    Non-White countries, EVERY last one of them, tolerate NO illegal immigration and allow very little or no legal immigration of people of other races. Yet, if Whites in America and elsewhere are opposed to being ethnically cleansed from their nation by mass immigration, then suddenly they are “racist” and “nativists”. What hypocrisy.

  • HJ11

    In my view, Milbank gets it partly correct when he mentions “extreme individualism,” [of Whites]. I’ve written as much myself. However, he then veers off into mutl-culti crap.

    The sense of community that we Whites must develop is not one full of diversity, but should be about Whites only. We must be White, again. We must do what is right for Whites only. We must climb out of the whiskey bottles of despair, of hopelessness and of a lack of self and group esteem and avoid blending in with non-Whites.

    Ask of everything: Is it good for Whites? If it is, it is good. If it is not, it is bad for Whites.

    And, staying away from bedroom genocide–miscegenation–should be right up there on our list of important things right next to breeding more Whites.

  • SolStans

    “This is not merely about a fresh labor supply but about the fresh blood needed to cure what ails us.”
    And what exactly is wrong with our blood to begin with? If there ever were a ‘blood libel’, this would certainly be it. I hope he encounters some inner-city vibrancy real soon.

  • John R

    There are so many things to reply to in this article. I’ll just pick one: Mo Brooks is an “immigration hard liner”? Why? Because he wants to deport people living in this country illegally and to secure our border? THAT is being a hard liner? “Freedom is slavery…”

  • scutum

    This guy has absolutely no credibility at all, his bibliography follows:Dana Timothy Milbank (born April 27, 1968) is a columnist for The Washington Post. Before coming to the Post as a political writer in 2000, he was a reporter and writer for The New Republic. Dana Milbank is the son of Ann C. and Mark A. Milbank.[1] He is a graduate of Yale University, where he was a member of Trumbull College, the Progressive Party of the Yale Political Union and the secret society Skull and Bones.[2][3] He is a graduate of Sanford H. Calhoun High School in Merrick, New York. Need any more be said regarding Mr. Milbank? As I have pointed out before, the enemies of the American people are not in Moscow, Beijing, or Damacus. The enemies of the American people are in Washington DC.

    • anony

      Actually the “power structure” in Moscow is trying to reverse the decline of the White race by declaring October “Make a new Russian month”.

  • John R

    Yep. The “New Generation” The Baby Boomers. That is where this mentality all started.

    • tetrapod

      Booby bamers. A “whole generation with a new explanation”. From the well-fed comfort of their middle class homes they ventured out as warriors against social injustice, determined to overthrow mommy’s and daddy’s despicable racism, sexism, and homophobia.

      And now we stand among the rotting amber waves. Mission accomplished

      • John R

        If you ever catch an old re-run of All In The Family on TV, you can see how the “meathead” Michael Stivick character exemplifies the mentality of the young liberals of that time period. And many of these types are now running our society.

  • none of your business

    Republican Presidential hopefuls are disassociating themselves from Whites.

    “Wooing Hispanic Voters at Home, Republicans Turn to Latin America
    Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey will journey to Mexico next month to meet with the country’s new president, court its corporate titans and mingle with its cultural leaders.

    Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky is about to set off for Guatemala, where he will put his ophthalmology training to use by treating local patients with eye disorders.

    And Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin is pleading with the government of Mexico to open a first-ever consulate in his state.”

  • Ringo Lennon

    I think if White males fought hard enough to claim there’s a war on them by Democrats. Most white women will side with them. That spells trouble for Dems.

  • UncleSham

    I wonder if the lefties would still hate big corporations if they realized that our formerly White society became a multicultural society because of the influence of big corporate executives and not the people smoking joints and picking flowers in the park.

  • Donald

    As Whites go – so goes Western Civilization. Modernity and All.

  • kjh64

    Disagree. Not all elderly or disabled have family or family with means to provide for that. I think society has a duty to provide for those who can’t provide for themselves, but has no obligation to support healthy, able-bodied younger people.

  • kjh64

    Really? Well, how is this “Indian” going to feel when he’s living in a country that is a cross between Mexico, India and Africa? That is what the USA will look like when Whites become a minority. These minorities want to live in the White man’s world but what they are too stupid to realize is that when the White man goes, he’ll take his world with him and they’ll be back living in the third world they left behind , because if these minorities were capable of creating the first world, they would have done so in their own countries. Minorities will kill the goose that laid the golden egg.

  • kjh64

    No, White Americans don’t. Europe is made up of numerous countries as you know, each country with its’ own immigration laws, etc.

  • David Ashton

    You do not distinguish between social democratic welfare-statism a and a national “socialism” that promotes ability and deters promiscuity; e.g Mosley’s concept of “higher forms”. Rewarding the lazy is not a “popular arrangement”. There is a case for eugenic contraception, by the way, but not for allowing the existing sick and disabled to die of neglect, or to be murdered by either their relatives or government; Murray Rothbard’s view of child welfare, for example, is morally unacceptable.

  • Sun

    Written by a white man.

    You can’t make this up.

  • adplatt126

    Nice analogy.

  • T. Matson

    This article and website spread half truths to confuse and scare–Whites make up around 74% of the US population–not barely 60% and NO Asians are no where near the level of Hispanics–Whether the press is Evil Marxist who are THE enemy and their goal is to do harm to your family and you–or the JUST super stupid liberal clueless morons they hired to GIVE that whole FARE and Balanced feel(kind of like Bill O”reilly on FOX–except seriously whats your real name? Sasha O’ Finkelstein? 🙂 Only a J*** could be as self absorbed as he is? And now that we all know that Obama/Holder are terrorist Marxists determined to bring our nation down–if bill was really IRISH why no calls for mass protests? Why no outright calls for national protests–basically force the government to remove this cancerous tumor once and for all–they are at war with us–they are cowards–so they are trying to destroy us from within–they will not stop until either we are dead or whats left of a destroyed nation or we STOP THEM—I pick option 3 hopefully I am not alone!

  • phillyguy

    To hell with the asians, I only give a dam for descendants of Western Europeans, every other race is the enemy, wake up before it’s too late.

  • phillyguy

    and anyone involved in the skull and bones are all friends to American corporations, that is the biggest enemy to the working class white Man, in 1940 the big corporations in this country paid 90 percent of the federal taxes, in 2014 it is down to 2 percent,,all the big corporations beat the tax loophole by opening up their headquarters overseas so they do not have to pay income tax , that gives them an advantage to hire cheap labor overseas, intern it cut the throats of all the honest hardworking middle class or lower middle class Americans.

  • phillyguy

    the Chinese in this country are only here for monetary gain, they hate white people just as much as they hate the blacks, the Asians are a real enemy to the white race!!! wake up before it’s too late