A Discussion on Race, Crime and the Inconvenient Facts

John F. Gaski, Investor's Business Daily, August 26, 2013

The racial violence issue in the U.S. just won’t go away. Still in the aftermath of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman, now it erupts in Oklahoma. A troubling corollary also adheres, though not universally recognized:

The racial victimhood industry demonstrably cares little about the facts, for example, in cases such as Martin—Zimmerman. The ultimate legal and factual aspects, therefore, become peripheral to the larger societal issue because the race hustlers have been aggressing regardless of the still-opaque full truth.

Because of the roiling irrationality, America may benefit from one further word on the subject from a different perspective.

What of that larger race relations issue? It took zero lag-time after the original Trayvon Martin incident for race baiters such as Al Sharpton to accuse our country of engendering a climate of racist danger for black citizens.

This qualifies as anti-American slander of the first magnitude because the facts are to the contrary—if anyone still cares to know them.

But is there not an established tendency for blacks to be victims of interracial violence in the United States? Hasn’t that been the recent media message? Message, yes; truth, no. Here are the suppressed and inconvenient facts:

About 90% of interracial violent crime in our nation is committed by blacks against whites. The black-on-white murder rate in the U.S. exceeds the white-on-black rate by about 2.5-to-1.  The black-on-white assault and battery rate exceeds the corresponding white-on-black rate in this country by at least 10-to-1.

I would rather not report what is known about U.S. interracial rape statistics because it could be taken as incendiary, but the previous numbers in terms of black/white proclivity are dwarfed. (See Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, “Victims and Offenders.”)

OK, here’s a hint: Because the number of white-on-black rapes is so low nationally in any given year, the ratio ranges from 100-to-1 to infinity. Liberal, politically correct feminists need to reflect on that one.

If these interracial crime ratios were randomly based, they would be uniform — that is, 1-to-1 — for the two racial groups. In other words, the population with six times as many potential victims also has six times the pool of perpetrators, so the effect of that disproportion should be perfectly offsetting arithmetically.

Yes, the relative crime stats would be moderated if adjusted for socioeconomic status (from astronomical to merely stratospheric), but by no means inverted.


Let the record show that for the past 40 years or so, the only legally sanctioned racial discrimination in the U.S. has been in favor of blacks (and some other minorities), against whites.

When codified as so-called affirmative action, this was the first time in world history that an ethnic majority group intentionally disadvantaged itself to benefit another, purely out of a sense of justice (sometimes derided as “liberal guilt”). Some gratitude, indeed, on the part of the beneficiaries.

To those who complain that less value is attached to black lives in this country, as the post-Martin demagogy alleged, please ponder the national outcry over one fatality in that incident—even though Martin was hardly an innocent bystander.

Compare that fervid reaction with the lack of attention given the multitude of white citizens murdered by blacks year after year. Get real. How decent of Jesse Jackson, though, to “frown upon” the interracial hate murder of an Australian college kid in Oklahoma.


My purpose, if not already obvious: Many in our country are troubled by a propaganda-induced misperception about white-on-black violence. I hope this revelation of the real record provides them relief. Perhaps broader awareness of the contrary facts I report will contribute to national healing.

Yes, isn’t it great news that the true condition in the U.S. is epidemic black-on-white racial violence? Not quite, but recognition of the truth can at least serve as a starting point for understanding.

Gaski is associate professor at the University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business. His primary research field is the study of social power and conflict. He is a long-time, but former, registered Democrat.

Topics: , , , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • dd121

    Yeah, let’s have that discussion on race that the left keeps whining to have.

    • JohnEngelman

      And let’s talk about black crime, illegitimacy, and lower average intelligence.

  • Well, we just offered up our quotas in sacrifices in the name of diversity over in the French Quarter.

    It’s a shame Gaski’s article is found where a lot of people under 30 will never see.

    • Sick of it

      Landrieu’s brother is actually the mayor now. He’s also going to run for governor, apparently on his name alone.

  • Puggg

    The author is a Notre Dame prof, a school which will soon admit illegal aliens.

    • me

      From ‘fighting Irish’ to ‘the dealing Mestizos’. Yay, ‘diversity’.

  • JohnEngelman

    Gaski is associate professor at the University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business.

    – John F. Gaski, Investor’s Business Daily, August 26, 2013

    I am glad that he can say this and keep his job. The constraints of political correctness may be weakening.

    • bigone4u

      He may keep his job but his salary will be frozen for a few years and he will be shunnned by most of the other faculty. That’s how the system works.

      • White Mom in WDC

        Exactly. The Cult of Diversity operates both within and outside of the law.

      • FormerlyEdNY

        He may not care if he is ostracized by his colleagues. He probably has no desire to speak with, socialize, work with or otherwise be around that liberal band.

    • John_HD

      I hope he’s able to keep his job, but we’ll see. He has only just published this. I’ll be somewhat surprised if he does.

      I’m hoping people are sick to death of the false narrative about whites being bad and the source of all evil, and non-whites as bastions of virtue and wisdom. PC inverts reality. I read this the other day and it really rang true:

      “Political correctness denies reality and often inverts it. But it is never more
      dangerous than when it enables physical harm to the masses in the
      service of preventing emotional harm to the few.”

      • JohnEngelman

        Political correctness means lying in public on behalf of social harmony.

        I wonder how many liberals really believe the lies they tell and force others to tell.

        • mgs166

          Only the ones that have never had the pleasure of experiencing the wonderful joys of diversity and multiculturalism firsthand and lived to tell about it.

          • JohnEngelman

            Television advertisements and sitcoms show a vision of what the United States would look like if the Great Society had worked. If one has little contact with blacks it is easy to mistake that vision for reality.

      • MBlanc46

        Associate professor rank indicates that he has tenure.

        • JohnEngelman

          Professor Rushton had tenure. They still tried to get him fired.

          • MBlanc46

            And as I recall, failed.

          • JohnEngelman

            Fortunately. The point is that is dangerous to say stuff like that in public.

          • MBlanc46

            You certainly mark yourself if you do. As black violence becomes ever more brazen, I believe that more people will take the risk and start speaking out. Those with academic tenure are particularly well-placed to do so.

    • shmo123

      It could be he’s on the cusp of retiring. Otherwise he’d be ostracized by his politically correct peers and others far too afraid to speak their minds.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    Associate prof? Is he about to quit? Or is he intentionally provoking? Would love to see a follow up on this one…

  • bigone4u

    Dr. Gaski powerfully and concisely rebuts the BS that was laid out by the Cultural Marxists at today’s MLK lovefest in Washington. The fact that he’s part of the educational establishment is all the more remarkable. So many “green shoots” in the shift to race realism in America. This article makes me happy.

    • BonusGift

      Let’s hope; but if I were him I’d fully expect telling the truth to come at a cost.

  • Andy

    I wonder if that 2.5-to-1 numbers included Hispanics.

    • John_HD

      Yeah, the numbers don’t seem right. ‘White’ murderers are almost doubtless inflated by including Hispanics (as they so often disingenuosly do), and even then, I suspect they are raw numbers and not per capita (yet another form of downplaying the more stark reality of Black brutality). Remove Hispanics from the whites as murderers count and the black on white murder probably jumps to 3.5 to 1. But, seeing as Whites outnumber Blacks by at least 5 to 1, Blacks are 17 percent more likely to murder a White than the reverse. Even that, on it’s face, seems to overstate the White on Black murder rate.

      Think about it, these Black on White atrocities seem to happen every week now (if not murders, then beatings); non-hoax or non-legitimate self-defense White on Black murder/beatings are rare indeed.

      This cannot last.

      • BonusGift

        There is more than one per day. Think about that, if the media was honest you could run one story of some targeted white being murdered by a black almost every day and never repeat the same name yet the story would be the same, that is, black bastards murder a white just cause they hate them. Contrast that reality with the hyped mainstream media/tribe propaganda that runs over and over and over … of some saint trayvon (or other like story) where a “white Hispanic” (who is not white) is wrongly accused of murdering a black thug when it is merely self defense. The degree of lying, willful ignorance, and cover-up is just staggering when the actual numbers are compared to what is reported in the mainstream.

    • BonusGift

      I believe they do.

    • Stentorian_Commentator

      I’m not sure if it has since been corrected, but I believe you are right that there is or at least has been an issue with crime statistics, in that hispanics were listed as a group in counting victims of crime, but not for counting perpetrators, where their numbers would show up under “white” unless the person was clearly a black hispanic. I somehow doubt that issue has been corrected. If I am right, then the figures for white crimes are inflated.

    • Nick A Siggers

      I can confirm that they do consider Hispanics as Whites.

      The numbers come from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports and the only categories are White, black, and other. The “other” is so small that there is no way Hispanix are represented there.

      Since we know that Hispanics are around three times more likely to commit crime than whites (thus being responsible for more of the black homicides), I suspect but cannot document, that the ratio is probably closer to 4 or 5 to 1.


  • willbest

    AA actually works to the elites advantage. It reduces opportunities for the white working class and it sets up the above average blacks to fail, sometimes with spectacular debt burdens. The whole purpose of which is that nobody but their heirs and a few of the lucky will be able to accumulate sufficient wealth to challenge them.

  • Spartacus

    “I would rather not report what is known about U.S. interracial rape statistics because it could be taken as incendiary…”


    Let me do what you’re too cowardly to do:

    -Over 300.000 White women in America have been raped by blacks in the last decade .
    -Less than a few hundred black “women” have been raped by White men in that same period in America
    -Black-on-White rapes and White-on-black rapes have a ration of 2000 to 1 !

    Someone reserve this race-traitor a rope .

    • White Mom in WDC

      But the porn site blacks on blondes would have you believe otherwise, that all white females are enamored with the purple penis

      • Spartacus

        You can get an even better insight in the black “mind” on this one :


        According to the monkeys running this site, White women not only want to get gang-raped by n*****s, but they want to be KILLED by them too !

        • White Mom in WDC

          Saw that site before. Truly evil

      • So CAL Snowman

        Pornography is possibly THE key way that the globalists debase Western culture be demeaning the White female to no more than an object of sexual desire to be used and abused and discarded. The prevalence of pornography and the ease at which it can be accessed is a key indicator of a culture on the decline. Other races must look at White Western pornography and conclude that the White race has decided that White females are nothing more than sex dolls. Also, watching so much porno has affected the way men look at and interact with women. Many men ONLY want a blonde, blue eyed, big breasted starlet, and will not settle for anything less. As a result, many White men limit their dating pool to blonde women who look like they could be in a porno. They are creating huge pockets of isolation amongst our own White race, simply by debasing the White female and holding the blonde, big breasted bimbo as the penultimate trophy girlfriend*

        *I have NOTHING against blonde women, I am simply stating what I feel to be a factually based observation.

        • White Mom in WDC

          I am not a busty blonde, blonde and blue eyed but not busty! Think though, porn is moreso about violence. Porn promotes violence and genocide towards Aryan looking women ( and girls)

          • Spartacus

            Google “who owns the porn industry” .

          • ThomasER916

            Careful. The Cult of Political Correctness is strong here. As much as they want to posture the truth they don’t want the whole truth.

          • Tommy Hass

            You’re mentally ill. Porn is a way for young men to let off steam.

            It’s only a problem if overdone.

          • Spartacus

            I don’t think any she said qualifies as a mental illness . Also, it depends on the type of pornography .

        • Sick of it

          I’ve seen too many blondes hanging out with nonwhites in recent years, so I’d welcome ANY white man who would focus on winning them over.

          • FormerlyEdNY

            Forget about winning them over, they are tainted and ruined for life. Once they go black, they never come back.

          • Nick A Siggers

            There is no loss to the European demographic when those type of women fail to share their DNA with us.

        • ms_anthro

          Check out yourbrainonporn [dot] com for some eye-opening information about what pornography does to the human brain. Scary stuff.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      I would like to see the stats on these few hundred White on Black rapes. I don’t buy that the true number is maybe a few dozen at best.

      • Spartacus

        I’m guessing mestizos that are counted as “White” in government statistics .

        • Romulus

          Jared Taylor said about as much in his book White Identity in the 21 St.


          Exactly, they count the newly invaded as being your average white person when they commit crimes. However, when they are the victims of crimes suddenly the Government is able to make a distinction between white American’s, and the not so white Mestizos.

        • Erasmus

          I’m also going to guess that some of it is he-said-she-said.

        • Only as perpetrators of hate crimes. When they are victims of racially-motivated crimes, they are “Hispanic”.

    • newscomments70

      The rape a high number of white men and boys in prison as well…some believe the number is actually higher. I read about this on spr dot org, a liberal website endorsed by amnesty international. Even the liberals admit it.

      • IstvanIN

        In his dissent on a prison civil rights case where California wanted to segregate prisoners by race Justice Thomas sited black-on-white male rape as a good reason to segregate prisons by race. Ginsburg, in the majority opinion, believes black men have a right to rape white inmates. How civilized of her.

        • ms_anthro

          Sounds kosher to me.

        • George

          In The Turner Diaries, it was a Jewish judge who ordered rape laws to be struck down, allowing only common assault charges, as the crime of rape had a disparate impact on the you-know-whats.
          It’s only fiction, of course, and not particularly good fiction, but it does have some prescient moments.

          • Sick of it

            Rape has been treated with kid gloves by said group of judges for years now. They and their liberal supporters.

    • Whitetrashgang

      Betcha more white man have been raped by black men then white men have raped black woman .If god is a black jew heaven is looking pretty bad right now

    • FormerlyEdNY

      I am sure those numbers are much higher. Plenty of women don’t report rapes because of the associated humiliation and shame. Also many reports of rape are brushed aside by the police in the departments that are heavily stacked by quotas. This is not an issue with departments that are mostly professional.

    • Alexandra1973

      I also wonder if the extremely few white-on-black rapes were confirmed–as in not pulling a Crystal Gail Mangum. That could whittle it down to virtually zero.

  • White Mom in WDC

    The Cult of Diversity aka America functions on lies a d gaslighting. You could cite statistics all day long, the people in this cult have drank the Kool Aid

    • sbuffalonative

      Everyone is reposting the same statistics but they’re being ignored and dismissed. People would rather believe ‘the narrative’ than facts.

      • bigone4u

        When the facts hit them in the head (literally), they wake up. When they realize they’ve been lied to, the powers that be will have hell to pay.

        • Nick A Siggers

          Please reference the rape stats in my reply to Mekong Delta above whenever you have the opportunity.

      • Nick A Siggers

        See the rape stats in my reply to Mekong Delta above – they will be hard to ignore.

  • DudeWheresMyCountry?

    That sums it up; he didn’t want to include the true rape stats because it would be incendiary. Meaning, the people who commit these atrocious hate crimes and their kin will get violent and threatening. The Bantus will get mad if you mention the truth, the truth about serious, malicious crime.

    The new paradigm is shifting and it is that the “civil rights” banana boat has sailed. Black America… you are the epic fail in the history of mankind. Instead of benefiting from a great country all you could do was destroy it.

    • Nick A Siggers

      The real rape numbers are in my reply to Mekong Delta above.
      Please share them any where possible.

      • libertarian1234

        Good job, Nick.

        • Nick A Siggers

          I am currently working on a response to the often claimed “white people are far more likely to be child molesters than blax.”

          Let’s just say I have the concrete numbers to totally reverse that claim.

  • MekongDelta69

    Although he punks out on the rape stats, I’m seeing more and more so-called ‘mainstream’ people starting to dip their toes in the water as the years go on.

    It’s not AmRen by any stretch of the imagination, but there are thousands and thousands of stories being circulated all the time now.

    The pendulum of our country swung from normal to nuts 50 years ago, and it has taken that long to chip away. What will happen in the next 50 years, no one knows, however there are only two results possible:

    We lose, they win – end of America and Western Civilization
    We win, they lose – our kids and grandkids and great grandkids, etc. will re-inherit what we (some of us) had when we were growing up.

    1771 – 1789 was hell. We know the outcome.
    1964 – 2013 (and counting) is hell. We don’t know the outcome.

    They fought like hell – every day.
    We need to fight like hell – every day.

    • Nick A Siggers

      I will not punk out on the rape stats.
      It took me a lot of googling to dig up the truth.
      Going back ten years ago:

      Year – Total number black on White rapes
      2003 – 20,309
      2004 – 11,611
      2005 – 37,460
      2006 – 32,443
      2007 – 14,092
      2008 – 19,292

      Giving an average of 22,535 per year.

      Go forth and spread the word everywhere possible.

      *2009 and later (coincidentally after the most transparent regime in history occupied Washington DC) BJS crime victim reports failed to include (or I failed to find) black on White rape numbers, for whatever reason.


      • Erasmus

        Thank you. We will.

      • Andy

        According to my calculations, that means each white female has about a 1.5% chance of being raped by a black during her lifetime. Furthermore, the 2011 statistics state that 52,624 whites were raped, leaving us with 43% of white rape victims being raped by blacks. Since most rapes (2/3 to 3/4) are committed by someone you know, and white women are more likely to know white men, it’s likely that almost all rapes committed by strangers are committed by blacks.

        • Nick A Siggers

          I believe you are using the 22,500 average annual rapes with the 52,000 2011 rapes to get that 43% number.

          I do not think that will stand scrutiny as the total annual rapes reported is highly variable.

          I do think using the average percentage of rapes committed by blacks over the 2003-2008 data would give a closer approximation, but the data is far to variable to make an accurate annual estimation.

          Percentages of White rapes committed by blax were 15.5, 8.3, 33.6, 16.7, 7.6, and 16.4 giving us an average of 16.35 over the time period.

    • Nick A Siggers

      I also agree that the race and crime issue is getting more mainstream. I never would have believed Bill O’Reilly would have done an honest story on the disparity.

      I think it is fair to say white guilt is being replaced with – [typical] knee grow [behavior] fatigue.

      • libertarian1234

        A lot of this shifting taking place I think is due to the internet, especially videos.

        The public at large was never privy to much of the black on white violence, because the MSM ignored it or played it down or covered it up. And the authorities kept it quiet too, which they’re still doing.

        But continuous images on videos of black on white attacks offers a stark, realistic awakening that’s hard to ignore, except by the brainwashed white weenies on the left who are still too clueless to understand the situation.

        And when it involves kids, the elderly and pretty young women, who are brutalized, it finally raises the ire of most whites.

        There seems to be a momentum going now among the conservative talk show hosts to highlight some these crimes, and Colin Flaherty also came along to report his log of black on white attacks with video links so I’m hoping this will continue. It’s what we need.

        • Nick A Siggers

          Without a doubt, the power of the internet is responsible for the majority of this information getting out.

          • John_HD

            Which is why the ethnomasichist whites along with their swarthy wards will try their hardest to shut down “hate speech” on the internet. And never mind whether the speech is true or not. That has nothing to do with it.

            Unless something happens to change course, this ends in re-education camps for people of pallor who don’t toe the PC line.

      • FormerlyEdNY

        O’Reilly has not gone far enough. I think there is an invisible line that he is afraid to cross because if he did it would end his career Paula Dean style.

        • Nick A Siggers

          No doubt about that…. But I’m still amazed how far he has gone.
          Baby steps… lead to marathons….eventually.

      • Erasmus

        I never would have believed Bill O’Reilly would have done an honest story on the disparity.

        That’s because the powers that be see that there’s a demand among the public for stories that actually tell the truth. When MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, etc., etc., etc., are all recycling the same pabulum, the public is going to tune into the station that’s actually telling the truth.

        • Nick A Siggers

          That is very plausible.

  • Andy

    I like your username. 🙂

  • MBlanc46

    His associate professor rank indicates that he has tenure.

    • BonusGift

      Yes and a lot of good that will do him at the witch hunt. Let’s compare his credentials to those of James Watson’s (hint, he has a science related real Nobel, i.e., before Nobel prizes became massively politicized, and he was the director of his own research unit, etc.) and remember how Watson’s credentials insulated him from telling even a mild truth (i.e., knee-grows are not very bright). Yeah, I’m sure nothing bad will come to this truthful fellow with the associate professor position. Sarc. off.

      • MBlanc46

        I believe that Watson was the head of a research institute, not a tenured university faculty member.

  • Romulus

    Gaski, huh? I wonder what tribe he belongs to. Good article, though. If he is of the one I suspect, then once again they abandon a sinking ship and switch allegiance. If I am in error, no harm , no foul!

  • Greg Thomas

    What an apt rebuttal to the St. MLK blather going on today.

  • IKantunderstand

    We whites have become nothing more than sacrificial lambs. Sacrificed on the altar of egalitarianism. Because, isn’t it obvious? For every White who is raped, robbed, beaten until death, and just flat out murdered, another “Black” gets his wings. I think George Bailey ultimately lost the war.

  • George

    Boycott, certainly.
    But be sure to send a letter to the company’s CEO explaining WHY you won’t be buying their products in future.
    Just be sure not to come across as a crank. Point out that if the races were reversed, consider what the NAACP would have to say.

  • Viking_61

    I wonder if he will have his cushy professorship at Notre Dame six months from now. Stuff like this article would get any ordinary professor fired! If he keeps his job it will be because he was a registered Democrat for so long. Oy vey!

    • MBlanc46

      If he keeps his job, it will be because he has tenure.

  • NorthSea

    I’m curious if that ratio includes white “self-defense” as “murder”.

    • Nick A Siggers

      I do not believe so, the numbers come from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports.

      “The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines murder and nonnegligent manslaughter as the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.

      The classification of this offense is based solely on police investigation as opposed to the determination of a court, medical examiner, coroner, jury, or other judicial body. The UCR Program does not include the following situations in this offense classification: deaths caused by negligence, suicide, or accident; justifiable homicides; and attempts to murder or assaults to murder, which are scored as aggravated assaults.”

      • NorthSea

        Thank you.

  • Nick A Siggers

    Hispanics are NOT separated from the “White” number in this data.
    Keep in mind that Whites are five times the population size of blax.

    blax murdered 516 Whites, the reverse, Whites killing blax was 230.

    blax murdered 573 Whites, the reverse was 208.

    blax murdered 566 Whites, the reverse was 245.

    blax murdered 504 Whites, the reverse was 230.

    blax murdered 454 Whites, the reverse was 209.

    blax murdered 447 Whites, the reverse was 218.

    blax murdered 448 Whites, the reverse was 193.







  • John_HD

    Yes, it’s really quite disgusting. Nothing like a complete inversion of reality. Makes me know which companies not to buy from. And you just know that the people actually making these things are white. How vile must you be to hate your own?

    • Andy

      “Fair is foul, and foul is fair.”

      “War is peace.”

      “Satan was a liar from the beginning.”

      And an inverted cross is a sign of the devil.

  • Alexandra1973

    Just now I was at the post office buying a stamp to mail out a bill. What did I get handed but one with “Black Heritage.” I did not hide my disgusted expression.
    I probably should have asked for a different stamp, now that I think about it. I was just so disgusted that had I said anything then would have turned into a rant, and I wouldn’t have set a good example for my son, who was with me.

    • Jack Burton

      Don’t take it too hard, the money you spend and the taxes you pay go to fund their welfare and affirmative action paychecks which are virtually the same.

    • Jenkem Huffington

      The people at my post office KNOW that I don’t want any darkies on my postage stamps. I made it perfectly clear that I don’t want diversity. I won’t take a Hanukah stamp, a Ramadan stamp, a “black” heritage stamp, or a Christmas stamp that doesn’t relate to Jesus. It’s my money and I’m not co-signing diversity in ANY form. Really nobody else wants diversity stamps either so every post office is always has a pile of them that they’re trying to pass off to people who just walk in for 1 or 2 stamps and don’t ask for a specific style.

      For anyone who cares, there’s about 1 Jew stamp, 1 Arab stamp, 1 Chinese New year stamp, and 2 bantu stamps per year. They seem to be throwing in a latino stamp lately too.
      There was a beautiful Civil War stamp late last year and into this year (many post offices still have these since they were really over-sized and only 12 to a page). Grab those if you can.

  • BonusGift

    Agreed, yet in my opinion the science prizes were not so politicized say a few decades ago and before that.

  • MekongDelta69

    Net Ratings – Go here:

  • Theodore Roosevelt’s Peace Nobel seems to have been awarded for a genuine reason: he negotiated the Treaty Of Portsmouth, which ended the 1904-05 Russo-Japanese War.

  • Paul

    ‘When codified as so-called affirmative action, this was the first time in world history that an ethnic majority group intentionally disadvantaged itself to benefit another, purely out of a sense of justice ‘

    This needs to be kept on file and used again and again. It sums the situation up very nicely,

  • HJ11

    In many of the comments on this site about I.Q. I see some folks repeating statistics that seem to show Asians have higher I.Q.’s than Whites. I reject this.

    There are several things going on in this regard and I’ve touched upon a few in my other comments here and elsewhere, but in this comment I want to point out that one can’t lump all Whites together.

    We are a very diverse race. In fact, no other race has the diversity that we have. just in our phenotypes alone. We have blond, black, brown, red hair. We have straight, curly, wavy hair. We have dark brown, light brown, blue, green, grey, hazel eyes.

    We also differ in our brains.

    • Mud Kip

      On average, Asians do have higher IQ’s than whites. Just a fact. You can reject it but it is still true.

      • HJ11

        I totally reject the notion that Asians are more intelligent than Whites.

        Some Asians may score higher on I.Q. tests, but I also question the validity of I.Q. tests. (And, just to be clear, I’m in MENSA and another group that some call Super Mensa)

        • Mud Kip

          We can only talk about averages. Obama is more intelligent than most whites but he is not necessarily representative either. However, when we look at empirical evidence intelligence seems to indicate jews>asians>caucasians>latinos>blacks. Again, you can reject gravity but it won’t make water flow uphill.