John McCain’s ‘Judeo-Christian’ Shamnesty

John T. Bennett, American Thinker, May 16, 2013

John McCain is one of the more manipulative amnesty advocates.

During recent town hall meetings, his angry constituents made political, legal, and economic objections to amnesty. There stood McCain, backpedaling, hemming and hawing, and sputtering this kernel of inanity in response to those criticisms: “We are a Judeo-Christian nation.”

It would have been equally persuasive to recite the price of tea in China.

What place does our Judeo-Christian culture have in the immigration debate? Evidently, McCain hasn’t been listening to the man who beat him in 2008. Obama said we are “a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.” McCain says we are Judeo-Christian, but he lost. So our culture is a contested fact.

Amnesty isn’t proof of Judeo-Christian values, and there’s no good reason to think that amnesty would enhance the Judeo-Christian culture remaining here today.

Could McCain be suggesting that illegal immigrants would contribute to the renewal of our Judeo-Christian culture? California would seem to indicate otherwise, followed by that model mosaic, Chicago.

There is no reason to think that immigrants Latin America are coming here for a Christian religious heritage; they have that in Latin America. But McCain wants to hold that religious heritage over our heads to shame us into supporting amnesty.

Our Judeo-Christian culture can have no possible relevance to immigration, unless one assumes that we have a religious duty to undermine immigration laws. One could just as easily stand by a religious obligation to uphold immigration laws. Charity, in that view, is a self-indulgent farce.

Judeo-Christian beliefs can be pro-amnesty or anti-amnesty. In fact, some Judeo-Christian people were yelling at John McCain during the town hall, telling him that amnesty was a betrayal of their values.

As for the Judeo- part of our Judeo-Christian culture, Israel is actually demonstrating how a nation preserves its culture. Israel successfully conducted mass deportations of Sudanese illegal migrants, after the Israeli government decided that the Sudanese were not enriching their communities. As the BBC reported, “African migrants have become the target of violent attacks by people in Israel, who blame them for a rise in crime and anti-social behaviour.”

The invocation of our Judeo-Christian culture is either futile or manipulative. McCain’s suggestion is obvious: It’s a Judeo-Christian obligation to amnesty illegal aliens, thus those who favor enforcement must be somehow immoral or uncaring. Yet, the same could be said of people who would legalize massive numbers of low-skilled, poorly educated people, many of whom don’t speak English. Where is the compassion for our fellow citizens, and what role should faith have in standing for them?

McCain has shown us which cultural battlegrounds he will fight on, and in the process revealed whose interests he really serves: his own, and ineptly at that. He’ll imply that people lack Judeo-Christian understanding if they don’t go along with his amnesty proposal, yet he doesn’t seem to recognize what mass migration does to a nation’s shared culture.

On top of his warped priorities and manipulative cultural rhetoric, McCain is evidently strategically incompetent as well. He makes the baseless assumption that Latinos will credit Republicans for amnesty instead of Democrats. Have pro-amnesty Republicans forgotten that Democrats are supporting amnesty as well, and that they will promise more and better amnesty?

McCain then makes the even sillier assumption that Democrats won’t demand a yearly amnesty for all of the stragglers and assorted others who decided for whatever reason to remain in the shadows during the first round of amnesty.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Kathy M

    This is a total farce and MexCain knows it. As I said a couple of weeks ago, MexCain said, “But we’re all God’s children.” This has nothing to do with Christianity. He is trying to get Evangelicals (the most conservative group remaining in the US) on board.

    He spent one too many days in the Hanoi Hilton. It shows. He is even ignoring his own constituents in Arizona.

    • westie

      MexCain….hehe. The old MF Fool I hate with a white hot passion!

    • Bill

      I would hardly term evangelicals as a group the most conservative remaining in the US. Far too many of them are importing Somalis, Nigerians, and other African blacks in to dominant white areas, they are advocating adopting multiple blacks from the worst parts of the world (how’s that working out for you naturally bred blond children folks…do you forgive the bantus for raping them or teaching them about sex at age 8?), they support Global Warming..not just the concept but the Socialist agenda which goes along with it, and was the POINT of trying to scare everybody with that garbage. They use bibles full of heresies. They listen to ImPastors from the pulpit. Conservative? Not by a long shot. The old southern Methodists, Baptists, Lutherans, Presbyterians were conservative. But they were destroyed beginning with Reconstruction.
      But you are right. Traitor McCain is targeting them and trying to get them on board. Shamelessly. For many, it will work because of the mind set above. For many others, it will be a Bridge Too Far.

      • The__Bobster

        Most evangelicals oppose amnesty. Only their greedy, traitorous leaders support it.

        http://www.vdare.com/articles/memo-from-middle-america-borders-are-biblical-evangelicals-resisting-their-pro-amnesty-lead

        Dr. Melkonian-Hoover’s research is based on data collected in 2010, before the current Amnesty drive. Recall that data from 2009 shows that evangelicals are more anti-Amnesty than any other major religious grouping. She reports:

        “…white evangelicals see immigrants as more of a threat to both society and the economy than the overall sample of the American population (50.7% versus 35.2%).

        “…only 21.0% of white evangelicals—compared to 40.3% of the overall national sample—believe that immigrants strengthen both the economy and the society.”

        • Bill

          Perhaps. But you cannot say “evangelicals” are NOT adopting these monsters from the black nations. It’s not the leaders doing that. It’s the rank and file. Moreover, you cannot deny the old time Southern church goer was NOT more conservative than today.

          • Dave4088

            Right. I’ve spoken to numerous evangelicals over the years who beam with pride when speaking about their activities in service to black Africa and black Africans. Without a doubt the leadership of the churches are race traitors, but in many cases the rank and file isn’t that much better.

          • bebe

            You are right. They get the flock to adopt these African kids and then raise them in with their own WHITE biological children…..Wonder what God will say to them when the time comes? I am sure these kind of morons “think” HE is going to praise them for their “good works”….They will be in for a rude awakening.

        • Kathy M

          Correct. And, in a recent poll, Evangelicals were the most anti-Islamic, seeing Muslims as a potential threat more than any other group polled.

          You are right, the leadership are the treasonists.

          • Glickstein44

            Well funny that…since Talmudist consider Christians their biggest threat and Jesus their biggest enemy.How do you square that?

        • It has been asked here on AR: Why the big disconnect between evangelicals on the ground and evangelical leaders on immigration?

          Remember the AR article two Fridays ago about Lindsay Graham? The one where two of his constituents, the married couple, said they were opposed to his immigration schemes but were going to vote for him anyway?

          There’s the answer to my question. While it is true that white evangelicals on the ground tend to get the immigration issue correct, the problem is that they don’t understand the seriousness of the immigration issue. Therefore, they don’t have it in them to raise holy hell (no pun intended) when their leadership is clear on the other side of them on that issue, because they just don’t think the issue is that important, compared to other ones on their mind.

          Getting people to agree with us on the immigration issue is only half the battle. The other and more crucial half is getting them to understand the seriousness of the question, that it can’t be reduced to other relatively fluffy duffy issues.

        • Does anyone really belive that 40.3% of US residents think that “immigrants strengthen both the economy and the society”?
          I don’t now how the questions are being asked but the results are not being presented in a truthful manner.

      • White Mom in WDC

        I think McCain is getting his revenge on White America as he lost to Obummah. Now he is inflicting his revenge by advocating for mass turd immigration.

        • FakeName

          McCain has been pro-amnesty longer than Obama has been running for President. He introduced an amnesty bill during Bush II’s presidency.

          • Erasmus

            Before the GOP completely destroys itself, they should ask McCain how well pandering to the illegal alien lobby in 2007 worked for him when he ran to be president in 2008.

            However can anyone rightfully expect our school children to remember history when our nation’s rulers can’t?

          • Svigor

            Let’s remember that McCain is the rat bastard who waved a $50 (or maybe it was a twenty) in front of a bunch of union workers and told them they wouldn’t do an hour’s work for that amount of money (as a way of suggesting they should be race-replaced with mestizos). Of course, many in the crowd spoke up and said they’d take the offer, whereupon Cretin McShamnesty stuck it back in his pocket.

        • Greg Thomas

          Juan McNasty has been pro-amnesty for mexican illegal invaders for a long time. This is not a recent revelation for this traitor. He has been backstabbing White America for a very long time.

          • bebe

            Is he or his wife Jewish?

    • You know, it’s a phreaking shame that I have more respect for Hanoi Jane herself than I do for this tool who never went on offense while he was campaigning.
      At least Hanoi Jane isn’t trying to hide what it is.

      • Bill

        Oh really? She was quite “penitent” about her Hanoi trip when it served her purposes. They (the re-enactors) refused to even do their thing if SHE was on the field watching. She made a public apology trying to get “forgiveness” so she could sit there and watch. Didn’t work. She was made to stay in town far away from the action. These traitors always have two faces. Remember what McCain said in his last election? He “got it”. Yeah. We see how much he “got it”.

        • Svigor

          Some of us have no idea what you’re referring to. I point that out because I’m interested.

      • Kathy M

        What really gets me about MexCain, Grahmnesty, and other Republicans is that they are creating an environment in which they themselves would never get elected to public office — immigrants are voting Democrat. They either don’t know that or don’t care.

        They are traitors. At least Senor Rubio has a motive — they are his kind i.e. Latinos.

        • But most Hispanics will never vote Rubio. In a Presidential election between Rubio (R) and generic white person (D), the Democrat will get a landslide support of the Hispanic vote.

      • Svigor

        I have more respect for Obama. You think Obama’d sit there and climb his thumb while some white guy won the race?

    • Erasmus

      If McCain really believes in the gospel message, let him feed, clothe and house the illegal aliens at his own personal expense at any of his eight luxurious homes.

      McCain is exactly like every other leftist: He’s happy to spend other people’s money to do good. His exit from the national stage cannot come too soon.

    • Svigor

      I would support the Christians in any attempt to make war on the “Judeo-Christians.” Jews, as a minority, should be prostrated to Christians, the majority. Real Christians should revile the very idea represented by the word, “Judeo-Christian.”

      If I had an AR-15, I’d reach for it every time I heard that Jewish-Supremacist, sociopathic term.

    • ograf

      And what in hell exactly do you know of the Hanoi Hilton ? Probably weren’t even born then.

  • John

    Personally, I do not hate other races/ethnicities; I simply want to live among my own kind and enjoy the beauty of my own culture.
    Whites unconditionally require a White homeland for Anglos; one that is completely free of all other races and ethnicities. Of course, the largest negative impact to civilization is related to the presence of Blacks amongst us, and, to a lesser degree, the presence of Mestizos, Arabs, Muslims, Indians, Pakistanis, and mongrel offshoots include mulattos, quadroons, octoroons, etc.

    Indeed, all aspects of the presence of Blacks, including violent crime, non-violent crime, numerous anti-social behaviors, illegitimacy, STDs, truancy, illiteracy, and the entire “Black culture” — all admonished by former British PM Tony Blair — produce severe and very deleterious effects across civilization.

    The empirical and anecdotal outcomes associated with Negroids are exactly what one would expect from a group that exists somewhere between Caucasoids and chimpanzees on the evolutionary scale. Now, before any egalitarians or other leftists attempt to take me to task for “racism”, I strong suggest that you engage in an extended measure of due diligence and careful study of what geneticists have published with regards to the genetic similarities and differences between Caucasoids, Negroids and chimpanzees before launching usual false charges of “racism”.

    If any leftist can prove that Negroids are not more closely-related to chimpanzees than Caucasoids, I will admit that I am wrong, I will admit that I am a racist, and I will apologize. Please, post your evidence for us to examine!

    In the meantime, I strongly encourage everyone to review the book “Erectus Walks Amongst Us” by Fuerle.

    • IBWHITE

      “In the meantime, I strongly encourage everyone to review the book “Erectus Walks Amongst Us” by Fuerle.”

      Spot on! Great book!

      • John

        Thank you, my friend. I strongly agree.

    • Svigor

      I hate them. Libs taught me to.

      • bebe

        Reality taught me to.

  • DiversityIsDeath

    Bleh, McCain is just another race traitoring sell out, a harmless milquetoast safely in Israel’s pocket. I wonder– will fed up White Americans ever get an aggressive, unapologetic White man to promote OUR interests?

    • IBWHITE

      Unfortunately for us McCain’s daughter, Megan, is just as dim witted, if not more so, than her Father.

      • bebe

        She is also a lesbian.

        • Freya

          Which proves what exactly?

          • bebe

            Just what I said that the mods of course deleted….

          • bebe

            Exactly what I said.

    • Bill

      Israel couldn’t care LESS if we import blacks or mestizos. IT’s the AMERICAN Jews who are behind almost all “progressive” pograms…..er, I mean programs.

      • Glickstein44

        Not so sure i would agree that Zionist Israel could care less if we import blacks or mestizos…i tend to believe it is Israel and the rest of their so-called jewish supporters throughout the world who are responsible of pushing multi-racialism on all previous White nations…

        Standing at the podium in the synagogue, Samaras was surrounded by
        the heads of the World Jewish Congress, the European Jewish Congress,
        the Jewish Agency for Israel, and the ambassadors of Israel and the
        United States.

        “In our talks with [Samaras], we made it very clear
        that the rise of extremist, neo-Nazi forces in Greece is not acceptable
        and must be fought vigorously by all democrats,” said WJC President
        Ronald Lauder, who urged Samaras to enact tough legislation against
        Golden Dawn and even outlaw the party.

        Golden Dawn responded to the Thessaloniki
        commemorations by branding them “part of an international Zionist plan
        to destroy Greece and reestablish the ‘Jerusalem of the Balkans.’ ”

        “Little Antonis put on his kipa and went to the
        synagogue … to worship Zionist capital,” said a statement on the party
        website, which also suggested that Lauder “deal with the problematic
        behavior of the State of Israel and not ‘worry’ about the rise of the
        Golden Dawn.”

        Read more: http://forward.com/articles/173717/greek-jews-step-up-fight-against-neo-nazi-golden-d/?p=all#ixzz2TYz7MMEY

    • Freya

      Look up Israeli Lobby and John McCain’s father and rethink the ‘milquetoast’ characterization. They’re worst than that, sadly. I have family who fought and died in Viet Nam so I was always inclined to honor his sacrifice, but the truth of life is that most human beings are more complex in their character than simple.

      • Bill

        What he (McCain) endured in captivity was horrible. Had he come back with a virulent hatred of communism and socialism, I’d call him a hero and a patriot. He didn’t. He came back well indoctrinated apparently with socialist leanings, and is more (far more) Democrat than Republican. Plus, he’s a liar of the first order, and PROMISED to his constituents that he would NOT go for amnesty again. And here he is. As far as I am concerned George Washington is a real hero and patriot, but if he then was elected President and in his second term gave the US back to the British, he’d be damned and a traitor also. McCain served in Vietnam. He should have left it there.

        • Smitty

          One must also ask themselves…what kind of a man would honor his “band of brothers” by being the first to vote to “normalize relations with Vietnam” so American based corporate interests could invest in building manufacturing plants making products in Vietnam regardless if those corporate plants were built literally over the bodies of those who “sacrificed all ?” McCain is without Honor.Clearly a sociopath with no real values or mores. An opportunist willingly to sell his soul for 30 pieces of silver.

          • Freya

            How do you square your comment with what he did as a POW? Since I was deleted for criticizing him and those who shall not be criticized, I’ll re-state that human character is more complex in it’s varying layers and dimensions than many often think.

          • ..oly

            At least your comment shows that it was deleted…other comments are removed without a trace…what did McCain do as a POW? Dunno,sing like a parakeet?

        • Xerxes22

          McCain has no socialist leanings. He is a total suck up to Wall Street. He voted nineteen times against raising the national minimum wage.
          Yet he wants to flood our country with third world hordes which would keep wages at a subsistence level.

          • Minimum wage should be at subsistance level …….
            .
            But there shouldn’t be 30+ million illegals in this country destroying the ability of Americans to earn a decent wage by under-cutting the cost of employment.

        • Erasmus

          I would bet dollars to doughnuts McCain suffered permanent brain damage from his time in captivity. But, be that as it may or may not be, he is obviously not playing with a full deck.

        • ograf

          That is it, this site has apparently gone to a bunch of crack smoking communists. If you don’t like McCain, stick with who you got. I’m not coming back any longer cause I see more idiots on here. I know some are flamers, but I don’t care. I will be at the next Amren Conference though , bye

  • somebody

    “Judeo-Christian” is a propaganda term, so I’m not surprised to hear McCain using it.

    Originally, the term was used to refer to the Jewish Christians of the early church. The first Christians were all Jews (supposedly), so they were literally “Judeo-Christians.”

    The meaning of the term changed after WW II. It’s now used to emphasize the Jewish role in the development of Western civilization and religion. We aren’t Christians anymore. We are hybrids–“Judeo Christians.” This is like saying that we aren’t part of the West, but part of the “Jewish West.” I’ll just leave it at that.

    Getting back to the article, though, John McCain has to be one of the most despicable sellouts in the GOP, which is saying a lot. The fact that he was actually a presidential nominee just proves how far the Republicans have fallen.

    • How much time does the sell-out have left? He does not have to work anymore, so the drive is gone.
      whatever policy he passes, or fails to pass, won’t have much effect on a sell-out (I’m not calling him a man) who will either be dead in 10 years, or dribbling in a nursing home.

      • tickyul

        Unfortunately, I believe many in the McCain lineage live into their Hundreds.

        • Anglokraut

          Fortunately, the Senate isn’t a lifetime appointment.

          • tickyul

            He has a huge following in Arizona.

    • Glickstein44

      McCain is a useful idiot–other than that he is evil…

      The Myth of a Judeo-Christian tradition…

      http://www.biblestudysite.com/news10c.htm#3

      Rabbi Martin Siegel, reflecting a Messianic zeal, was quoted in the 18
      January 1972 edition of New York Magazine as declaring: “I am devoting my
      lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now
      entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the
      non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to
      categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to
      provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of
      Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society
      becomes Jewish.”

      V.P. Biden recently boasted of having all 64 books of the Babylonian Talmud…did this idiot ever read its contents???

    • sbuffalonative

      Go to any good old, ink and paper dictionary and you will find that the term “Judeo-Christian” first appeared in 1899 just as a large wave of ‘European’ immigrants were coming to the US. The term, though not adapted immediately, lay the foundation for re-writing US history. We were no longer a Christian nation but a Judeo Christian nation.

      The statue, Liberty Enlightening the World became The Statue of Liberty and Emma Lazarus’ poem then corrupted the meaning of the statue.
      Our immigration policy has been downhill since then.

      • bebe

        Yes, maybe. But I never heard that term ever used in the USA as I was growing up.

  • MikeS

    He should have never been let out of his cage – ever.

  • The__Bobster

    “We are a Judeo-Christian nation.”
    _________

    Let’s see how a Judeo-Jewish nation handles illegal aliens.

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/adelsons-israel-hayom-downplays-stunning-success-of-sinai-fence-inconvenient-for-us

    Yesterday Israel HaYom, the free Israeli newspaper with which owner Sheldon Adelson is distorting the Israeli media market as much as he is the operations of the GOP, came out with a peculiar headline: Infiltrators sneak into Israel despite completion of security fence by Lilach Shoval April 28 2013. This announces-

    For the first time since the recent construction of the security fence along Israel’s border with Egypt, four African infiltrators and five other individuals managed to breach the barrier and enter Israel during April

    but also reports

    The African infiltrators, who scaled the 5-meter (16-foot) fence to enter Israel illegally, were apprehended by Israel Defense Forces patrols in the area and transferred to the Saharonim detention center near the border, where by law they will be held for at least three years.

    https://www.vdare.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/fullsize/images/Patrick_Cleburne/Israel_Fence_IH.jpg

    • Israel gives them three years.
      .
      The US gives them EBT, a free apartment, and a job (if they want it).
      .
      Judeo-Christian tradition ……

      • PesachPatriot

        The sad thing is that sitting for 3 years in jail in a desert in a middle east war zone is still an improvement from living anywhere in africa(other than maybe the really nice white parts of south africa)….in that jail they will still receive 3 meals a day, medical care and they can be reasonably sure they won’t be shot or have their arm hacked off by a machete.

  • Yes, I voted for this foot long T – – -.
    You know how stupid I am?
    I was so stupid, I didn’t learn my lesson, and voted for Romney last year!
    Can you believe it?
    You know…”lesser of two evils”?
    Until we get some republicans with some aggression, I guess I’m now a democrat doing my part in the Great Purge of RINOs.

    • Cape to Cairo

      The reason why you vote for the lesser of two evils is because one of them is going to rule you. You don’t get some sort of exemption from the system just because you didn’t vote for the winner or not vote at all.

    • Erasmus

      When/If the GOP supports amnesty, I stop voting GOP. I am tired of throwing my vote away by voting for leftist-D vs. leftist-R.

      The GOP has no longer any good reason to continue to exist. Just as the Whigs did when they exhausted their political capital and became pale imitations of the democrats in the 1850’s, it is time for the GOP to disappear upon the ash heap of history and make room for its conservative successor, unencumbered by chicanery and lack of principle.

  • Jackryanvb

    Very good article.

    It works well to point to Israel’s effective border fence, pro Israel immigration policies when dealing with American Christian Zionist/idiots.

  • Like George W Bush, McCain wouldn’t be anywhere in life if it weren’t for his father and grandfather. Also like George W Bush, McCain is not only stupid, but incredibly stubborn. All those two dimwits know are Talking Points and silly cliches like “Judeo-Christian” and “the surge is working”.

    How could the voters in Arizona, a border state no less, have reelected this mental midget?

    • Stentorian_Commentator

      I have a guess. Apparently it is not clear Lincoln ever actually said it, but the following has been attributed to him: “You can fool some of the people all of the time, you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.” You might think “Honest” Abe was admonishing us to be honest, but he was really setting out the ground rules of modern politics. A corollary to the foregoing axioms is, “If you fool enough people at the right time, you win the election.” The McCain of the 2010 primary election was Mr. “Build the Dang Fence”, etc., and I think that helped him fool enough people to get past J.D. Hayworth, who might not have been that strong a candidate to take him out in a primary anyway.
      In some respects I’m glad McCain lost in 2008, because we would have been tearing out hair out in frustration of the GOP trying to pass amnesty again and again.

    • bebe

      How could the voters in Arizona, a border state no less, have reelected this mental midget?
      —————————————

      Through voter fraud.

  • Jackryanvb

    On the down side, Steve Sailer has documented the “double think” of the Judeo Christianity -the American Jewish media on immigration Israel/America.

    Jennifer Rubin the Washington Post’s court conservative advocates open borders immigration for the USA, and strict immigration control to make Israel a Jewish ethno state.

    She sees no contradiction:
    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/05/jennifer-rubin-piles-on.html

    • Stentorian_Commentator

      Somebody please tell Jennifer Rubin that from about 1790 until about 1954 the general rule of U.S. naturalization was that only free white persons could become naturalized citizens. This country has had substantial restrictions on immigration for far longer than it had open borders. Of course, if you are a Jew looking to charge high rents for slums and pay cheap wages with poor working conditions, of course you want to stick it to the goyim.

      • Bill

        Yeah. Funny thing. There weren’t many Jewesses in the garment industry sweat shops sewing their fingers together trying to meet impossible demands for piece production. Goyim all. Then they had to endure the Jew bossman’s unwanted attention and hitting on them and threatening their job if they weren’t compliant. And yet they stick their noses up in the air claiming to be God’s preserved and chosen? Right. It never occurs to them WHY they were taken into captivity by the Greeks, Assyrians, Persians, etc and finally their beloved Temple destroyed for good. All because of their arrogance, hypocrisy, and pride. Even AFTER prophets warned them of what would come from their behavior. And today, they destroy the very thing here in the US and everywhere else not realizing it will be THEIR death and captivity yet again. Geez. And they are supposed to be the smartest on the planet? According to some who shall remain nameless. Book smart is not necessarily common sense smart. Is it?

    • robinbishop34

      “Jennifer Rubin the Washington Post’s court conservative advocates open
      borders immigration for the USA, and strict immigration control to make
      Israel a Jewish ethno state.”

      Her last name is Rubin.

    • Erasmus

      No one who supports amnesty is a conservative. Not every issue is of equal import. That is something even rational 10 year olds know.

      If a person wants low taxes, prayer in school and a strong military and, yet, wants open borders and amnesty for hordes of invaders, he is NO conservative. There is nothing more conservative than preserving the country. EVERYTHING else is secondary.

      So, my fellow conservatives, when you pull your support from the GOP, do not feel bad. They left you already, a long time ago.

  • Dave4088

    McCain is insane. So is Rubio and Rand man Paul. They idiotically think if they support amnesty that the Latino vote will be split 50/50 and the party that hispanders the most will get slightly more than 50% and win presidency.

    American whites have to face the fact that we are a people without a nation.

  • bigone4u

    “During recent town hall meetings, his angry constituents made political, legal, and economic objections to amnesty.”
    OOOOOOOOOO
    The constituents also made religious objections to the destruction of our Euro/American culture, or what’s left of it. Yet our Christian churches across the land see immigration as a civil rights issue, with white Americans apparently having no civil rights. If I were religious, I would cease going to a church that taught amnesty as a religious value. In fact, I would want to know where my pastor stood on the issue even if he did not talk about it from the pulpit.

    • Bad_Mr_Frosty

      I was taught the story of the Tower of Babel when I was very young.

      Moral: You cannot build a path to paradise by mixing all of the earth’s peoples. God likes diversity, so it must be preserved by keeping people within their own nations.

      • bigone4u

        That’s actually a very effective line to use on Christians who in the name of compassion seek to mix us together. I’m going to remember the Tower of Babel story and use it.

  • APaige

    The U.S was founded on Christian values influenced by the Enlightenment. This is not to offend Jewish people in any way. I have noticed then when something is positive, such as the founding of the nation, it is labeled as Judeo-Christian. When something is ‘negative’, such as the bible being against homosexuality, it is labeled as ‘Christian’. I think the words are actually in the Old Testament, a Judeo book?

    • ms_anthro

      Talmudic Judaism (the kind practiced today by modern Jews) and Christianity are diametrically opposed. There is no “Judeo-Christian” anything. Jews reject Christ and the Babylonian Talmud in no uncertain terms blasphemes him again and again. Elizabeth Dilling dissected it carefully and had her career destroyed, as one might expect. You can read her work here: http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/

      “Judeo-Christian” as a propaganda term is yet another example of an alien tribe trying to co-opt our ancient Western tradition and heritage for their own purposes.

      And mods, whoever you are, please refute my post instead of banning me outright for posting factual statements. Better yet, read it in Dilling’s words for yourself. You may find them enlightening.

    • jeffaral

      All the founding fathers were deists, not Christians.

    • PesachPatriot

      I’m not a biblical expert or anything but the passages condemning homosexuality are at most a few verses in both the old and new testaments…the majority of the texts describe historical figures and events, proper moral behavior, and commandments and prohibitions about other things.

      A lot of people try to judge bronze age texts with 20th or 21st century ideals and values….most people who casually peruse these writings fail to understand that the writers of both parts of the bible lived in what we would consider abject poverty, without science, in a world of brutal tribal warfare and superstition….

      • IstvanIN

        It seems most of the condemnations are in the old testament, or Jewish Bible. People love to pick out parts of the old testament that they like and ignore the parts they don’t.

        I am no writer, so excuse my lack of eloquence, but I have always thought of the old testament as the history of creation followed by all the bad things men did to get us in the mess we are in. The New Testament tells us as Christians how we should live. The New Testament is our bible and a “positive” read.

        PS, we are not a Judeo-Christian nation, we are a Christian nation.

        • PesachPatriot

          For what it is worth I think you are a pretty good writer. I don’t think the sins and follies of long dead kings and prophets from bronze age canaan and judea can really explain the current global mess….I don’t have a problem with acknowledging america as a christian nation, even if I don’t share that faith. I also think that maybe if Europe had the same religious faith as america they would be more inspired to stand up to the islamization of their continent.

          • Glickstein44

            Islam as well as other religions are at least “Jesus Freindly,” while Judaism denigrates Jesus far worse then their worst enemy.

          • PesachPatriot

            A few rabbis wrote some mean things about jesus a few thousand years ago, I’m sorry about that…from my reading of the new testament he seemed like a pretty nice person who got a pretty brutal punishment from an unjust imperial power that he didn’t really deserve….If Islam is so “Jesus Friendly” why are christians persecuted, tormented and murdered in every islamic country, while churches operate year round in Israel? This might be surprising but I don’t spend most of my day being angry about someone who died two millenia before i was born….Christians from around the world celebrate christmas in bethlehem and easter in jerusalem every year….I wouldn’t try setting up a christmas tree in riyadh or tehran.

          • Glickstein44

            Are you being ignorant or dishonest? The Babylonian Talmud is the same it was two thousand years ago as it is now.It hasn’t changed,unlike the Bible that has been changed to make it more “jew freindly.” Millions/billions of dollars have been spent to do just that….

            If Islam is so “Jesus Friendly” why are christians persecuted, tormented
            and murdered in every islamic country, while churches operate year
            round in Israel?

            Show me where Islam denigrates Jesus…it is true that they don’t believe him to be the Son of God but they also call him a great prophet as do the other religions…contrary to how Judaic talmudists describe him…i could paste hundreds of such comments denigrating Jesus taken directly from the Talmud which rabbi’s use to teach little jewish children the supreme law and how gentiles are lower than animals…

            Funny that…whose side was America on in the wars in Kosovo & Bosnia…Who supported the overthrow of Mubarek in Egypt,Gadaffi in Libya,and now are siding with the insurgents to overthrow Assad of Syria who have been protecting Christians.American leaders who follow Israels wishes has been actively siding with the Muslim Brotherhood against the interests of Christians…tell me how it is Christians who are the most persecuted in Muslim countries arent selected by the UN for refugeee status to America while muslims who are the least persecuted in those countries are chosen to be 100% to receive refugee status by the UN to go live in U.S.?…..as far as Christmas trees go you cant set one up in public schools in America or crosses but menorahs are a welcome sight at the Whitehouse…and could give you many referances on how Christians are treated in Israel…and it aint pretty, unless you think getting spit on every day & threatened is fun…

          • PesachPatriot

            I’ve been to Israel a bunch of times and I have never seen priests of any christian denomination spit on or assaulted…yeah there was that one youtube video and what those guys did was wrong and I condemned it unequivocally on a different thread a few months ago….a few haredi fanatics do things that are wrong sometimes(there has been a little religious fanaticism problem in that land for the last couple of centuries) and they usually get in trouble for it because Israel has laws and courts and civilization and a justice system that does more than just chop off hands and heads.

            the Westboro baptist church says awful things at the funerals of soldiers here in the states….I don’t think most church going christians here agree with them….Islam conquered some pretty hefty chunks of europe in the past and I’d bet they are looking forward to doing so again in the future….as for whats been going on in the mideast the last 18 months or so I think it caught america, israel, europe, china and russia sort of by surprise and everyone is kind of standing around waiting to see what things will look like when the smoke clears. I don’t set policy there, here or at the UN. Go ahead and bash on me all you want….I can’t help how I was born, but I would like to help maintain some semblance of civilization here in the US.

          • Glickstein44

            I don’t dislike all jews, just those who want to control the world and who are responsible for implementing anti-White policies like diversity and multi-culturalism that threatens civilization here and in other former White majority mostly homogeneous nations….read this…its from the Jewish Daily in Israel…just another reminder who is behind programs or policies that threaten civilization in all former White countries by pushing and passing policies that force muslims on former White Christian nations….the greeks dont want muslim turks to enter their country illegally either but look who is attacking them for trying to take care of their own…

            http://forward.com/articles/173717/greek-jews-step-up-fight-against-neo-nazi-golden-d/?p=all

          • PesachPatriot

            well that seem fair enough….i can’t blame the greeks for not wanting turks in their country given the history of unpleasantness on cyprus….i don’t really follow what goes on in europe that much…but I think the reason they have a muslim problem is because europe is much physically closer to the muslim world then the US is….if muslims over run and destroy Israel and turn Palestine into just another shari’a hellhole they’ll still keep pouring in to France and Germany as long as those countries have generous social welfare programs.

          • Jackryanvb

            Agreed and well said. But my biggest beef with the Jewish Diasporah’s near messianic support for mass non White immigration in to White countries. Leading Jews like Sheldon Adelson, Mayor Bloomberg, Cantor, all Jewish Senators and Congressmen and the Washington Post’s court conservative Ms. Rubin even support mass Muslim immigration in to the USA. And these same people strongly support Israel having an immigration policy making Israel a Jewish ethno state.

          • PesachPatriot

            Adelson and Bloomberg i probably dislike the most…I’ve never heard of this rubin lady before but I think it has more to do with them being plutocrats and wanting cheap labor than any sort of religious convictions. No one in their right mind thinks we need more muslims in the USA after the boston incident…we have enough already to run inner city liquor stores and gas stations. Unfortunately I will probably never in my life have the kind of money Bloomberg and Adelson can throw around without thinking twice.

          • Jackryanvb

            Steve Sailer has good articles on Washington Post court conservative Jennifer Rubin.

            As for open borders immigration billionaires Adelson, Mark Zuckenberg, mayor Bloomberg – it’s more than just cheap rich people wanting cheap labor. Switzerland and Japan have patriotic billionaires, few or none demand open borders for their countries.

            It’s a very strange thing with American Jews, that poem put on our Statue of Liberty, research what happened to immigration realists – our side in the Sierra Club, at National Review. The leading Jewish role in stopping common sense immigration restrictions – very disturbing.

          • PesachPatriot

            The emma lazarus poem was written a long time before I was born(although I will confess to liking it)…however, I have never seen jewish contractors in yarmulkes filling a pickup truck full of illegal immigrant laborers at home depot early in the morning…If it was up to me there would be something kind of like the west bank security fence built along the border with mexico and a big deportation of illegals, as well as a 20 year immigration moratorium until this place gets straightened out.

          • True and not so true. Though the emma Lazarus poem was written a long time ago, the messianic religious myth of welcoming all the oppressed huddled masses in the world to America is still deeply held myth by the secular, Leftist and Neo Conserivative Jewish American community – which do dominate our media, academia.

            As, you are correct American Jews don’t go in for revolutionary terrorism like Arab Muslims – they once did in the form of revolutionary Communism in Russia, Central and Eastern Europe and this was a source of anti Jewish sentiment in this country, some in England, in Germany ie:

            “Look what Trotskyl, Emma Goldman, Bela Kuhn and the Bolsheviks are doing in Russia, we can’t let them come here and do the same revolutionary terrorism, murder here”.

            It’s a similar argument with Arab Muslims now, liberal people try to argue that Arabs and Muslims are only violent, backward people in their countries, when they come here they’ll learn to be good Americans, become like us.

            No, the opposition to the Jews in America is that they go in for insane, multi cultural politics and that they oppose anything that is even remortely White Racist. Anything Hitler might have been for.

            “So Hitler was against unemployment, against inflation and didn’t want Germany to be flooded with diseased refugees from Black Africa, so we have to be for all these things in regards to White America”.

            My advice is to just accept the reality that American Jews are going to go in for bad politics and try to limit the damage. Jews are good at other things besides politics.

          • bebe

            ..however, I have never seen jewish contractors in yarmulkes filling a
            pickup truck full of illegal immigrant laborers at home depot early in
            the morning
            ———————————-

            Of course you don’t. They only made it possible for “others” to do it for them by flooding our lands with nonwhites in the first place. That was their agenda to begin with. It is so obvious any fool can see it.

          • bebe

            I can’t help how I was born, but I would like to help maintain some semblance of civilization here in the US.
            —————————————

            Then you should open your eyes and see why OUR civilization and Christendom is sinking fast. They won’t let us maintain our civilization.

        • Jackryanvb

          There is a name for your theology:

          Positive Christianity.

          You should also consider taking out the writings of St. Paul/ former rabbi Saul of Tarsus. St. Paul says lots of race denying nonsense like ” there are no Greeks and Jews, just those who’ve accepted Jesus Christ.

          Similar types now argue that race is a social construct.

  • whiteyyyyy

    When did that phrase become the norm. Judeo-Christian. 5 yrs ago or when, it seems like something that was pasted on.

    • bebe

      I just asked that question before I read yours. There is no such thing as “Judeo” Christianity and it was never ever called that before in America. I started hearing this term about 10 years ago and it made me sick.

  • jeffaral

    Electing the Judeo-Christian McCain to office only shows how brainwashed the good people of Arizona are.

  • tickyul

    Oh my, the old Gluehorse and his wacky ideas….no wonder so many hate the Republirats.

  • Will_2

    Which of the Founders were Jews?

  • bebe

    There stood McCain, backpedaling, hemming and hawing, and sputtering this kernel of insanity in response to those criticisms: “We are a Judeo-Christian nation.”
    —————————————————————————-

    Can someone please tell me when they started putting in this “Judeo”-Christian nonsense? Christians/Christianity were never called Judeo anything in America or Europe. Must have been the Jewish lobby to make sure White Christians continue to worship the Jewish people? How easily they have fallen.

    • Freya

      You got that.

    • NYB

      The Abrahamic teachings are the foundations of Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.

      Christianity began as a sub-sect of Judaism, hence the Judeo-Christian moniker. White Europeans founded the West before Christ, yet today we are often told we have a connection to Judeo culture and ‘holy lands’ which are not part of Europe.

      Our ‘holy lands’ are Athens, Northwest Europe and Britain, and more recently, the white countries descended from the British Empire.

      • J.C.

        Hey mod…how about removing this post for blasphemy…Christianity was never a sub-sect of Judaism.

        • bigone4u

          Jews and Christians share the Old Testament and the Ten Commandments. At least that’s what I learned from watching those Cecil B. de Mille flicks. What I can’t understand is why certain other teachings attributed to Jews don’t jibe with the big Ten.

      • bebe

        Why do the mods always delete the posts whenever on can comment honestly about the “tribe”? It seems they are the only group of people that cannot be spoken about if they deem us “anti-semetic”? That should tell us all something.

        • Glickstein44

          I commented that Judeo-Christianity was a myth…that they are polar opposites of each other…gave a link and pasted a rabbi’s comment concerning the same and it was removed.Ms.Anthro made a similiar comment concerning the Babylonian Talmud and it was removed as well.Funny how Amren can critizise Heritage for being cowards concerning truth or facts but then imitates their bias & hypocrisy by essentially doing the same in deleting and removing comments even though they are factual…while lies or errors in facts regarding Christianity are allowed to stand.

          • ms_anthro

            My post was factual and polite, but deleted nonetheless. The blatant hypocrisy of the speak-no-evil policy reflects poorly on this site and its leadership. Since when do White Europeans and their descendants, the founders and keepers of Western Christendom, answer to the Jews? We don’t need their permission to discuss these issues.

            AmRen is a privately owned site and its owners can censor whatever they want, but it’s hard to take their complaints about multicult heresy purges seriously when they do the same thing on their own pages.

            Here is the link to Elizabeth Dilling’s dissection of the Babylonian Talmud again, for those who missed it the first time: http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/index.html

          • Glickstein44

            Thank for the links…here is a couple related links for further reading and understanding…

            Christianity vs Judeo-Christianity
            http://www.israelect.com/reference/JackMohr/jm017.htm

            Facts are facts
            http://www.biblestudysite.com/factsarefacts.htm

          • bebe

            Yes, facts are facts. But to some here, they are to be ignored or ridiculed. We know the reasons why that is. I think many of those same posters are in reality trolls and progressives.

          • Jackryanvb

            This is propaganda (some true) from the past.

            The current situation is such that religious right, White Christians are wildly pro Israel and will not come out in any way for anything anti Jewish.

          • TruthSeeker

            Wow,thanks for the links…Facts are Facts was explosive–a real eye opener…How many U.S. politicians do you think practive the Kol Nidre prayer?

            To the average Christian the word “Talmud” is just another word
            associated by them with the form of religious worship practiced in their
            synagogues by so-called or self-styled “Jews”. Many Christians have
            never heard of the Talmud. Very few Christians are informed on the
            contents of the Talmud. Some may believe the Talmud to be an integral
            part of the religious worship known to them as “Judaism”. It suggests a
            sort of bible or religious text book. It is classed as a spiritual
            manual. But otherwise few if any Christians have an understanding of the
            contents of the Talmud and what it means in the daily lives of so-called
            or self-styled “Jews”. As an illustration, my dear Dr. Goldstein, how
            many Christians have any conception of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer
            recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement?

            In Volume VIII of the Jewish Encyclopedia on page 539 found in the
            Library of Congress, the New York Public Library and libraries of all
            leading cities, will be found the official translation into English of
            the prayer known as the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer. It is the
            prologue of the Day of Atonement services in the synagogues. IT is
            recited three times by the standing congregation in concert with
            chanting rabbis at the alter. After the recital of the “Kol Nidre” (All
            Vows) prayer the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies follow
            immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the highest
            holy days of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” and are celebrated as
            such throughout the world. The official translation into English of the
            “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer follows”

            “ALL VOWS, OBLIGATIONS, OATHS, ANATHEMAS,
            whether called `konam’, `konas’, or by any other name, WHICH WE MAY VOW,
            OR SWEAR, OR PLEDGE, OR WHEREBY WE MAY BE BOUND, FROM THIS DAY OF
            ATONEMENT UNTO THE NEXT, (whose happy coming we await), we do repent.
            MAY THEY BE DEEMED ABSOLVED, FORGIVEN, ANNULLED, AND VOID AND MADE OF NO
            EFFECT; THEY SHALL NOT BIND US NOR HAVE POWERS OVER US. THE VOWS SHALL
            NOT BE RECKONED VOWS; THE OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATORY; NOR THE
            OATHS BE OATHS.” (emphasis supplied)

            The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the “Kol Nidre” (All
            Vows) prayer are referred to in the Talmud in the Book of Nedarim,
            23a-23b as follows:

            (Book)

            “And he who desires that NONE OF HIS VOWS MADE DURING THE YEAR SHALL
            BE VALID, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, `EVERY
            VOW WHICH I MAKE IN THE FUTURE SHALL BE NULL (1). (HIS VOWS ARE THEN
            INVALID,) PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW.”
            (emphasis in original and supplied, Ed.)

            (footnotes) “(1) This may have provided a support for the custom of
            reciting Kol Nidre (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the
            Evening Service of the Day of Atonement (Ran)…Though the beginning of
            the year (New Year) is mentioned here, the Day of Atonement was probably
            chosen on account of its great solemnity. But Kol Nidre as part of the
            ritual IS LATER THAN THE TALMUD, and, as seen from the following
            statement of R. Huna b. Hinene, THE LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE WAS NOT
            MADE PUBLIC. (emphasis supplied and in original text, Ed.)

            The greatest study of the “Kol Nidre” (all Vows) prayer was made by
            the eminent psycho-analyst Professor Theodor Reik, the celebrated pupil
            of the famous Dr. Sigmund Freud. The analysis of the historic, religious
            and psychological background of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer by
            Professor Reik presents the Talmud in its true perspective. This
            important study is contained in Professor Reik’s “The Ritual,
            Psycho-Analytical Studies”. In the chapter on the Talmud, on page 168,
            Professor Reik states:

            “THE TEXT WAS TO THE EFFECT THAT ALL OATHS
            WHICH BELIEVERS TAKE BETWEEN ONE DAY OF ATONEMENT AND THE NEXT DAY OF
            ATONEMENT ARE DECLARED INVALID.” (emphasis added)

            Before explaining to you how the present wording of the “Kol Nidre”
            (All Vows) prayer was introduced into the Day of Atonement synagogue
            ceremonies, my dear Dr. Goldstein, I would like to quote a passage to
            you from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. The Universal Jewish
            Encyclopedia confirms the fact that the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer
            has no spiritual value as might be believed because it is recited in
            synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the religious
            ceremonies which follow it. The secular significance of the “Kol Nidre”
            (All Vows) prayer is indicated forcefully by the analysis in the
            Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. In Volume VI, on page 441, it states:

            “The Kol Nidre HAS NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO
            WITH THE ACTUAL IDEA OF THE DAY OF ATONE- MENT…it attained to
            extraordinary solemnity and popularity by reason of the fact that it was
            THE FIRST PRAYER RECITED ON THIS HOLIEST OF DAYS.”

            My dear Dr. Goldstein, prepare for the shock of your life. Compelled
            by what you may now read here about the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer
            you must be shocked to learn that many Christian churches actually “peal
            their bells” on the Day of Atonement in celebration of that holy day for
            so-called or self- styled “Jews.” How stupid can the Christian clergy
            get? From what I have learned after a cursory inquiry I am unable to say
            whether it was a case of stupidity or cupidity. With what you already
            know, together with what [you] will additionally know before you finish
            this letter, you will be able to judge for yourself whether it was
            stupidity or cupidity. There is not one single fact in this entire
            letter which every graduate of a theological seminary did not have the
            opportunity to learn.

            The following news item was featured in the New York `World Telegram’
            on October 7th only a few days ago. Under a prominent headline “JEWISH
            HOLIDAYS TO END AT SUNDOWN” the New York `World Telegram’ gave great
            prominence to the following story:

            “Synagogues and temples throughout the city
            were crowded yesterday as the 24 hour fast began. Dr. Normal Salit, head
            of the Synagogue Council of America, representing the three major
            Jewish bodies, had called on other faiths TO JOIN THE FAST… Cutting
            across religious lines, MANY PROTESTANT CHURCHES IN THE CITY PEALED
            THEIR BELLS LAST NIGHT TO SOUND THE KOL NIDRE, TRADITIONAL MELODY USED
            AT THE START OF YOM KIPPUR. THE GESTURE OF GOOD- WILL WAS RECOMMENDED BY
            THE MANHATTAN OFFICE OF THE PROTESTANT COUNCIL” (emphasis supplied).

            That just about “tops” anything I have ever had come to my attention
            revealing the ignorance and indifference of the Christian clergy to the
            hazards today facing the Christian faith. From my personal contacts with
            the Manhattan Office of the Protestant Council in the recent past I hold
            out very little hope for any constructive contribution they can make to
            the common defense of the Christian faith against its dedicated enemies.
            In each instance they buckled under the “pressure” exerted upon them by
            the “contacts” for so-called or self-styled “Jews”. If it was not so
            tragic it would be comic. It was a joke indeed but the joke was on the
            Christian clergy. Ye Gods! “Many” Christian churches “pealed their
            bells”, as the Protestant Council reports the event, “TO SOUND THE KOL
            NIDRE, TRADITIONAL MELODY USED AT THE START OF YOM KIPPUR”. Just where
            does betrayal of a trust and breach of faith begin?

            The present wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer dates from
            the 11th century. A political reversal in eastern Europe compelled the
            so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe to adopt the present
            wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer. That story involves the
            history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews. Before relating here as
            briefly as possible the history of the so- called or self-styled “Jews”
            of eastern Europe I would like to quote here another short passage from
            the Jewish Encyclopedia. In analyzing the course of history which
            resulted in the present wording of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer the
            Jewish Encyclopedia in Volume VII, on page 540, states:

            “AN IMPORTANT ALTERATION IN THE WORDING of
            the `Kol Nidre’ was made by Rashi’s son-in-law, Meir ben Samuel, WHO
            CHANGED THE ORIGINAL PHRASE `FROM THE LAST DAY OF ATONEMENT TO THIS ONE’
            to `FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTIL THE NEXT’ “. (emphasis supplied)

            You will agree, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that Meir ben Samuel knew what
            he was doing. The wording of that altered version of the “Kol Nidre”
            (All Vows) prayer makes the recital of the prayer a release during the
            coming year from any obligations to respect any oath, vow or pledge
            during the coming year. Like any one-year license obtained from the
            Federal, State or Municipal governments, the altered version of the “Kol
            Nidre” (All Vows) prayer extends immunity in advance for one year from
            all obligations to observe the terms of oaths, vows and pledges made in
            the year following the date of the Day of Atonement when the prayer was
            recited. Each year however it becomes necessary to renew this “license”
            which automatically revokes in advance any oath, vow or pledge made
            during the next twelve months, by again appearing in a synagogue on the
            next Day of Atonement and reciting the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer
            again. Do you approve of this?

            The passage in the Talmud referring to “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer
            certifies to several serious situations. It certifies that “Kol Nidre”
            (All Vows) prayer was added as a prologue to the Day of Atonement
            religious services long after the completion of the Talmud between 500
            A.D. – 1000 A.D. by the statement, “as part of the ritual is later than
            the Talmud.” It confirms that Meir ben Samuel who authored the present
            altered version of the “Kol Nidre” (All Vows) prayer lived in the 11th
            century. Furthermore, the so- called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern
            Europe believed it served their purpose better to keep secret from their
            Christian conquerors their attitude on oaths, vows and pledges, “the law
            of revocation in advance was not made public.”

          • ATBOTL

            Whoever runs this website will probably throw a tantrum, erase all comments and close the discussion. Someone should save this now whole thread now.

          • ATBOTL

            Amren doesn’t practice it’s own motto. Remember, this is an outfit that never saw anything wrong with Ian Jobling and can only hold meetings on government property.

            Amren has tried since it’s inception to be “respectable” and to work in mainstream conservatism. That strategy has totally failed. Amren has no influence or ties to mainstream conservatism left, a far cry from the situation in the 90’s. It won’t be coming back either.

            It’s time to put the “stay respectable by censoring honest discussion of Jews” out to pasture. It serves no purpose but to alienate and demoralize Amren’s grassroots supporters.

            Ironically, Amren’s position on the Jewish question mirrors the cowardly dishonesty on racial issues that Amren criticizes conservatives for.

          • Sure, because the course you’re suggesting is obviously working so well. However little success AR has had in your mind, I highly doubt you’ve had more.

            It’s easy for someone who posts under a pseudonym to throw stones at someone who works under his real name.

          • Jackryanvb

            I support the Amren policy on the Jewish question. Amren is a first step, higher class, Uptown version of White racialism. There are plenty of other places on the Net to go for open attacks on all things Jewish.

          • There’s another issue. What is being suggested is that AR go all out on JQ because “mainstream conservatism” isn’t embracing our racial orthodoxy. But there are other websites and groups in our political neighborhood that have done just that. Are they any more successful that they have and AR has not? Do the “conservative” blue bloods embrace that “severe weather” website because it tackles JQ and not AR because we don’t by and large?

          • Smitty

            The Political Cesspool tackles JQ and in my opinion they are quite successful…perhaps to help avoid the JQ on AR you should consider not posting articles that are likely to entice a reader to respond to such…Taylors rules on JQ is one thing but then it is quite another when he expresses his displeasure when a speaker at a COCC convention tackles the problem of jewish power & influence…furthermore i have never seen a post deleted by a self professed philo-semite or self styled jew whether what they say is true or not true…attacking Christianity is tolerated very much here.How does that help AR become more successful?

          • Jackryanvb

            We discuss Jewish issues/problems in a respectful, honest way over at Occidental Dissent. Our point is to be fair and effective in some way. It simply does no good to rant and rave about THE JEWS. Lot’s Jewish American people are decent folks, but we have series problems with the American Jewish power elite in politics, academia and in the media. The big push for the latest immigration suicide/murder has very strong Jewish support and these amnesty/flood the country with the third world types are not poor, sympathetic people. Sheldon Adelson and Mark Zuckenberg are not poor or sympathetic, they want low wage immigrant workers so they don’t have to pay a living wage to American workers.

          • Smitty

            Deleting my reply to you was a “cowardly” thing to do…and here i was being nice by not naming the speaker at the COCC convention that Jared took issue with for speaking on jewish power & influence…obviously you don’t take constructive criticism very well…

          • JusSayin

            TPC is more successful than AR.

          • Censor1

            Christians arent embracing your religious orthodoxy either…TPC gets my vote.

          • bebe

            What are you afraid of? Truth?

          • bebe

            How right you are. I have seen former posters here who have gone to other forums because of this reason alone. Truths be dammed seems to be the new motto on Amren. Jared needs to take a hard look at his policies here at the forum to see it isn’t working for us Euro Caucasians.

          • Smitty

            I made two suggestive,helpful replys to the. Mod last night and he or she removed them both. The political cesspool is very successful in tackling the JQ question…It’s not merely Jared’s rules that are a problem here …it’s his site,he can do anything he wants but he clearly steps across that line when he expresses displeasure over a speaker at the TPC for discussing the JQ as a speaker at a COCC convention……

          • bebe

            Yes, you are correct. What a travesty. He was on the wrong side just as we were in WW11, as Patton himself later confessed.

        • Bad_Mr_Frosty

          Amren’s policy:

          Speak only of the symptoms, never of the disease.

          • a multiracial individual

            “They” are just typical liberals, like many whites, nothing more.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            You have no understanding of ethnocentrism because it is impossible for you. Nothing personal, but you of all people have the least understanding of race.

          • a multiracial individual

            Assuming your point about their ethnocentric nature is correct, what is so ruinous about that?

          • bebe

            You really are daft, aren’t you?

          • a multiracial individual

            No. There is nothing daft about demanding evidence from people for their arguments.

          • bebe

            Some posters here have given you plenty of evidence. It is only you (and others like you) that will not tolerate it. So go ahead and act daft.

        • MikeS

          The answer is simple – they are told to. While they’re chasing shadows on the wall they ignore those who cast them.

      • bebe

        Guess where Mary went after the crucifiction? The “isles by the sea”. Do you even know that is called the British Isles? Apparently not.

  • NYB

    The Israeli border fence has been called the most important landscape alteration since biblical times.

    It has been compared to the ancient Great Wall of China, a defensive idea which originated over 4000 years ago, and is just as relevant today.

    If we were interpret this correctly, all white countries would be strongly defended from racial encroachment.

  • BAW

    People who tell you how honest, tough, or Christian they are…aren’t!

  • WhoistheCoward

    Question…why was Ms Anthro & Glickstein post removed by the moderator? Does he or she work for Heritage?

    • Freya

      Here here. I don’t even agree fundamentally with ms anthro but found her deleted post very interesting.

  • MikeS

    California House Resolution No. 35

  • Corto

    “Judeo-Christian” is a contradiction in terms. Besides, Christianity was the heart of the culture that made America great. Judaism has gained prominence only since America’s slide into 3rd world refuse.

    Coincidence?

  • Bad_Mr_Frosty

    “Judeo-Christian”

    I hate that term so much it makes my blood boil. It makes no sense. There is Judaism and there is Christianity. Until the end of WW2, Christians disliked and distrusted Jews. Jews have never liked Christians.

    So what is the disgusting, meaningless phrase “Judeo-Christian”?

    • ms_anthro

      It’s propaganda. “Judeo-Christian” values have brought us lawsuits against small towns for displaying Christmas trees and nativity scenes, even as menorahs are hung in the town square.

      Christians and Jews can peacefully exist side-by-side, but we do not share the same faith, traditions, beliefs, ethical systems, commandments, or goals. Ancient Judaism and the Talmudic Judaism practiced today (which could most accurately be described as Pharisaism) have little in common. There is no “Judeo-Christian” tradition. It’s a Newspeak term created by those who would erase our history and culture from memory.

      Read Elizabeth Dilling. Her work is invaluable to anyone who wants to understand what is happening to us and why.

      • bebe

        Thank you. I have read her writings before and she is correct.

    • Fredrik_H

      Judeo-christian values is when the judeo part have their values protected and the christian part must abolish all theirs in order not to offend the judeo or any other minority.

    • bebe

      Yes. Those WHITE Christians back then KNEW the truth about a certain segment of our society.

    • Bossman

      That is because you don’t know much history. Christianity came out of Judaism. The first Christians were mainly Jews. The god of Christianity identified himself as a Jew.

      • bebe

        No, HE (Jesus) didn’t…….someone else did……Jesus even stated why HE came. For the Lost Tribes Of Israel. If you guessed they are the “jews” you are way off track.

        The “jews” are in no way the first Christians! Read Rev:3:9. Read what John the Baptist had to say about them. Check out the Pharisees and see exactly who they were and are.How about the wheat and the tares? Do you even KNOW what that is?

        Where did you get your facts, so to speak? From the misinformed, mainstream churches of today?

        • TruthSeeker

          Thats right ..he is way off track…The Chosen People,the lost tribe of Israel and the true seed of Abraham are those who believe in Jesus Christ as their savior…

      • TruthSeeker

        Facts are Facts and Blasphemy is still Blasphemy,that which you spew…Christ never identified himself as a jew,nor were the first Christians ever jews…

        Countless Christians know today that they were “brain washed” by the
        Christian clergy on the subject “Jesus was a Jew”. The resentment they
        feel is not yet apparent to the Christian clergy. Christians now are
        demanding from the Christian clergy, “the truth, the whole truth, and
        nothing but the truth”. It is now time for the Christian clergy to tell
        Christians what they should have told them long ago. Of all religious
        groups in the world Christians appear to be the least informed of any on
        the subject. Have their spiritual leaders been reckless with the truth?

        Countless intelligent and informed Christians no longer accept
        unchallenged assertions by the Christian clergy that Jesus in His
        lifetime was a Member of a group in Judea which practiced a religious
        form of worship then which is today called “Judaism”, or that Jesus in
        His lifetime here on earth was a Member of the racial group which today
        includes the preponderant majority of all so- called or self-styled
        “Jews” in the world, or that the so-called or self-styled “Jews”
        throughout the world today are the lineal descendants of the nation in
        Judea of which Jesus was a national in His lifetime here on earth, or
        that the cultural characteristics of so- called or self-styled “Jews”
        throughout the world today correspond with the cultural characteristics
        of Jesus during His lifetime here on earth and His teachings while He
        was here on earth for a brief stay. Christians will no longer believe
        that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus and the race,
        religion, nationality and culture of so-called or self-styled “Jews”
        today or their ancestors have a common origin or character.

        The resentment by Christians is more ominous than the Christian
        clergy suspect. Under existing conditions the Christian clergy will find
        that ignorance is not bliss, nor wisdom folly. Christians everywhere
        today are seeking to learn the authentic relationship between the
        so-called or self-styled “Jews” through-out the world today and the
        “Judeans” who populated “Judea” before, during and after the time of
        Jesus. Christians now insist that they be told correctly by the
        Christian clergy about the racial, religious, national and cultural
        background of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world
        today and the basis for associating these backgrounds with the racial,
        religious, national and cultural background of Jesus in His lifetime in
        Judea. The intelligent and informed Christian are alerted to the
        exploded myth that the so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the
        world today are the direct descendants of the “Judeans” amongst whom
        Jesus lived during His lifetime here on earth.

        Christians today are also becoming more and more alerted day by day
        why the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world for three
        centuries have spent uncounted sums of money to manufacture the fiction
        that the “Judeans” in the time of Jesus were “Jews” rather than
        “Judeans”, and that “Jesus was a Jew”. Christians are becoming more and
        more aware day by day of all the economic and political advantages
        accruing to the so-called or self- styled “Jews” as a direct result of
        their success in making Christians believe that “Jesus was a Jew” in the
        “secondary meaning” they have created for the 18th century word “Jew”.
        The so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today represent
        themselves to Christians as “Jews” only in the “secondary meaning” of
        the word “Jew”. They seek to thereby prove their kinship with Jesus.
        They emphasize this fiction to Christians constantly. That fable is fast
        fading and losing its former grip upon the imaginations of Christians.

        To allege that “Jesus was a Jew” in the sense that during His
        lifetime Jesus professed and practiced the form of religious worship
        known and practiced under the modern name of “Judaism” is false and
        fiction of the most blasphemous nature. If to be a so- called or
        self-styled “Jew” then or now the practice of “Judaism” was a
        requirement then Jesus certainly was not a so-called “Jew”. Jesus
        abhorred and denounced the form of religious worship practiced in Judea
        in His lifetime and which is known and practiced today under its new
        name “Judaism”. That religious belief was then known as “Pharisiasm”.
        The Christian clergy learned that in their theological seminary days but
        they have never made any attempt to make that clear to Christians.

      • TruthSeeker

        More Facts are Facts..

        t is an incontestable fact that the word “Jew” did not come into
        existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word “Jew” did not
        exist in any language. The word “Jew” was introduced into the English
        for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play
        “The Rivals”, II,i, “She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard
        of a Jew”. Prior to this use of the word “Jew” in the English language
        by Sheridan in 1775 the word “Jew” had not become a word in the English
        language. Shakespeare never saw the word “Jew” as you will see.
        Shakespeare never used the word “Jew” in any of his works, the common
        general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his “Merchant of
        Venice”, V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: “what is the reason?
        I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?”.

        In the Latin St. Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New
        Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeus” in
        the Gospel of John reference to the inscription on the Cross, –
        “Iudaeorum”. It was in the 4th century that St. Jerome translated into
        Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages
        in which they were written. This translation by St. Jerome is referred
        to still today as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church
        authorities, who use it today.

        Jesus is referred as a so-called “Jew” for the first time in the New
        Testament in the 18th century. Jesus is first referred to as a so-called
        “Jew” in the revised 18th century editions in the English language of
        the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English.
        The history of the origin of the word “Jew” in the English language
        leaves no doubt that the 18th century “Jew” is the 18th century
        contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin
        “Iudaeus” found in St. Jerome’s Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no
        longer doubt.

        The available manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century
        accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word
        “Jew” in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all
        the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries
        from the 4th to the 18th century. From the Latin “Iudaeus” to the
        English “Jew” these English forms included successively: “Gyu”, “Giu”,
        “Iu”, “Iuu”, “Iuw”, “Ieuu”, “Ieuy”, “Iwe”, “Iow”, “Iewe”, “leue”, “Iue”,
        “Ive”, “lew”, and then finally in the 18th century, “Jew”. The many
        earlier English equivalents for “Jews” through the 14 centuries are
        “Giwis”, “Giws”, “Gyues”, “Gywes”, “Giwes”, “Geus”, “Iuys”, “Iows”,
        “Iouis”, “Iews”, and then also finally in the 18th century, “Jews”.

        With the rapidly expanding use in England in the 18th century for the
        first time in history of the greatly improved printing presses unlimited
        quantities of the New Testament were printed. These revised 18th century
        editions of the earlier 14th century first translations into the English
        language were then widely distributed throughout England and the English
        speaking world among families who had never possessed a copy of the New
        Testament in any language. In these 18th century editions with revisions
        the word “Jew” appeared for the first time in any English translations.
        The word “Jew” as it was used in the 18th century editions has since
        continued in use in all elections of the New Testament in the English
        language. The use of the word “Jew” thus was stabilized.

        As you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the best known 18th century
        editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition
        and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of
        the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word
        “Jew” did not appear in it. The King James Authorized translation of the
        New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in
        1611. The word “Jew” did not appear in it either. The word “Jew”
        appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised
        versions for the first times.

        Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims
        (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into
        English were distributed to the clergy and the laity throughout the
        English speaking world. They did not know the history of the origin of
        the English word “Jew” nor did they care. They accepted the English word
        “Jew” as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and
        the Greek “Ioudaios”. How could they be expected to have known
        otherwise? The answer is they could not and they did not. It was a new
        English word to them.

        When you studied Latin in your school days you were taught that the
        letter “I” in Latin when used as the first letter in a word is
        pronounced like the letter “Y” in English when it is the first letter in
        words like “yes”, “youth” and “yacht”. The “I” in “Iudaeus” is
        pronounced like the “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht” in English. In
        all the 4th century to 18th century forms for the 18th century “Jew” the
        letter “I” was pronounced like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and
        “yacht”. The same is true of the “Gi” or the “Gy” where it was used in
        place of the letter “I”.

        The present pronunciation of the word “Jew” in modern English is a
        development of recent times. In the English language today the “J” in
        “Jew” is pronounced like the “J” in the English “justice”, “jolly”, and
        “jump”. This is the case only since the 18th century. Prior to the 18th
        century the “J” in “Jew” was pronounced exactly like the “Y” in the
        English “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. Until the 18th century and perhaps
        even later than the 18th century the word “Jew” in English was
        pronounced like the English “you” or “hew”, and the word “Jews” like
        “youse” or “hews”. The present pronunciation of “Jew” in English is a
        new pronunciation acquired after the 18th century.

        The German language still retains the Latin original pronunciation.
        The German “Jude” is the German equivalent of the English “Jew”. The “J”
        in the German “Jude” is pronounced exactly like the English “Y” in
        “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. The German “J” is the equivalent of the
        Latin “I” and both are pronounced exactly like the English “Y” in “yes”,
        “youth” and “yacht”. The German “Jude” is virtually the first syllable
        of the Latin “Iudaeus” and is pronounced exactly like it. The German
        “Jude” is the German contraction and corruption of the Latin “Iudaeus”
        just as the English “Jew” is the contraction and corruption of the Latin
        “Iudaeus”. The German “J” is always pronounced like the English “Y” in
        “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht” when it is the first letter of a word. The
        pronunciation of the “J” in German “Jude” is not an exception to the
        pronunciation of the “J” in German.

        The English language as you already know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, is
        largely made up of words adopted from foreign languages. After their
        adoption by the English language foreign words were then adapted by
        contracting their spelling and corrupting their foreign pronunciation to
        make them more easily pronounced in English from their English spelling.
        This process of first adopting foreign words and then adapting them by
        contracting their spelling and corrupting their pronunciation resulted
        in such new words in the English language as “cab” from the French
        “cabriolet” and many thousands of other words similarly from their
        original foreign spelling. Hundreds of others must come to your mind.

        By this adopting-adapting process the Latin “Iudacus” and the Greek
        “Ioudaios” finally emerged in the 18th century as “Jew” in the English
        language. The English speaking peoples struggled through 14 centuries
        seeking to create for the English language an English equivalent for the
        Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” which could be easily
        pronounced in English from its English spelling. The English “Jew” was
        the resulting 18th century contracted and corrupted form of the Latin
        “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios”. The English “Jew” is easily
        pronounced in English from its English spelling. The Latin “Iudaeus” and
        the Greek “Ioudaios” cannot be as easily pronounced in English from the
        Latin and Greek spelling. They were forced to coin a word.

        The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin
        Vulgate Edition is the Wyclif, or Wickliffe Edition published in 1380.
        In the Wyclif Edition Jesus is there mentioned as One of the “iewes”.
        That was the 14th century English version of the Latin “Iudaeus” and was
        pronounced “hew-weeze”, in the plural, and “iewe” pronounced “hew-wee”
        in the singular. In the 1380 Wyclif Edition in English the Gospel by
        John, XIX.19, reads “Ihesus of nazareth kyng of the iewes”. Prior to the
        14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon “kyng”
        together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin “rex”
        and the Greek “basileus”. The Anglo-Saxon also meant “tribal leader”.

        In the Tyndale Edition of the New Testament in English published in
        1525 Jesus was likewise described as One of the “Iewes”. In the
        Coverdale Edition published in 1535 Jesus was also described as One of
        the “Iewes”. In the Coverdale Edition the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads
        “Iesus the Nazareth, kynge of the “Iewes”. In the Cranmer Edition
        published in 1539 Jesus was again described as One of the “Iewes”. In
        the Geneva Edition published in 1540-1557 Jesus was also described as
        One of the “Iewes”. In the Rheims Edition published in 1582 Jesus was
        described as One of the “Ievves”. In the King James Edition published in
        1604-1611 also known as the Authorized Version Jesus was described again
        as one of the “Iewes”. The forms of the Latin “Iudaeus” were used which
        were current at the time these translations were made.

        The translation into English of the Gospel by John, XIX.19, from the
        Greek in which it was originally written reads “Do not inscribe `the
        monarch of the Judeans’ but that He Himself said `I am monarch’ “. In
        the original Greek manuscript the Greek “basileus” appears for “monarch”
        in the English and the Greek “Ioudaios” appears for “Judeans” in the
        English. “Ioudaia” in Greek is “Judea” in English. “Ioudaios” in Greek
        is “Judeans” in English. There is no reason for any confusion.

        My dear Dr. Goldstein, if the generally accepted understanding today
        of the English “Jew” and “Judean” conveyed the identical implications,
        inferences and innuendoes as both rightly should, it would make no
        difference which of these two words was used when referring to Jesus in
        the New Testament or elsewhere. But the implications, inferences, and
        innuendoes today conveyed by these two words are as different as black
        is from white. The word “Jew” today is never regarded as a synonym for
        “Judean” nor is “Judean” regarded as a synonym for “Jew”.

        As I have explained, when the word “Jew” was first introduced into
        the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication,
        inference and innuendo was “Judean”. However during the 18th, 19th and
        20th centuries a well-organized and well- financed international
        “pressure group” created a so-called “secondary meaning” for the word
        “Jew” among the English- speaking peoples of the world. This so-called
        “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” bears no relation whatsoever to
        the 18th century original connotation of the word “Jew”. It is a
        misrepresentation.

        The “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today bears as little
        relation to its original and correct meaning as the “secondary meaning”
        today as for the word “camel” bears to the original and correct meaning
        of the word “camel”, or the “secondary meaning” for the word “ivory”
        bears to the original and correct meaning of the word “ivory”. The
        “secondary meaning” today for the word “camel” is a cigarette by that
        name but its original and correct meaning is a desert animal by that
        ancient name. The “secondary meaning” of the word “ivory” today is a
        piece of soap but its original and correct meaning is the tusk of a male
        elephant.

        The “secondary meaning” of words often become the generally accepted
        meanings of words formerly having entirely different meanings. This is
        accomplished by the expenditure of great amounts of money for
        well-planned publicity. Today if you ask for a “camel” someone will hand
        you a cigarette by that name. Today if you ask for a piece of “ivory”
        someone will hand you a piece of soap by that name. You will never
        receive either a desert animal or a piece of the tusk of a male
        elephant. That must illustrate the extent to which these “secondary
        meanings” are able to practically eclipse the original and correct
        meanings of words in the minds of the general public. The “secondary
        meaning” for the word “Jew” today has practically totally eclipsed the
        original and correct meaning of the word “Jew” when it was introduced as
        a word in the English language. This phenomena is not uncommon.

        The United States Supreme Court has recognized the “secondary
        meaning” of words. The highest court in the land has established as
        basic law that “secondary meanings” can acquire priority rights to the
        use of any dictionary word. Well-planned and well-financed world-wide
        publicity through every available media by well-organized groups of
        so-called or self-styled “Jews” for three centuries has created a
        “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” which has completely “blacked
        out” the original and correct meaning of the word “Jew”. There can be no
        doubt about that.

        There is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who
        regards a “Jew” as a “Judean” in the literal sense of the word. That was
        the correct and only meaning in the 18th century. The generally accepted
        “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today with practically no
        exceptions is made up of four almost universally-believed theories.
        These four theories are that a so- called or self-styled “Jew” is (1) a
        person who today professes the form of religious worship known as
        “Judaism”, (2) a person who claims to belong to a racial group
        associated with the ancient Semites, (3) a person directly the
        descendant of an ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible
        history, (4) a person blessed by Divine intentional design with certain
        superior cultural characteristics denied to other racial, religious or
        national groups, all rolled into one.

        The present generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew”
        is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of
        Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is
        likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of
        the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The
        implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word “Jew” today, to the
        preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is
        contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact.
        Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian
        clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their
        pet theme song “Jesus was a Jew”. It actually now approaches a
        psychosis.
        Countless Christians know today that they were “brain washed” by the
        Christian clergy on the subject “Jesus was a Jew”. The resentment they
        feel is not yet apparent to the Christian clergy. Christians now are
        demanding from the Christian clergy, “the truth, the whole truth, and
        nothing but the truth”. It is now time for the Christian clergy to tell
        Christians what they should have told them long ago.

      • Bossmanisqueer

        U. Came out of a donkeys ass named Mod…or vice versa.

      • TPClistener

        AR came out of Judaism….The Political Cesspool came out of Christianity…real conservatives choose TPC!!!

      • HaHa

        AR came out of Judaism…TPC came out of Christianity…Bossman came out of the Mod or vice versa…

      • TruthHurts

        AR came out of Judaism…TPC came out of Christianity…Bossman came out of the Mod,or vice versa

    • SlyDeNiro

      Some sort of morphing process. Maybe they think it will make it easier for us to send our sons to die fighting in Syria and Iran.

  • StillModerated

    First things first; there is no such thing as Judeo-Christian. Jewish leaders have taken an adversarial position against Christians since Christ was in their midst. Personally, I think Jews are satanic adversaries — if you don’t believe me, then ask an Arab Christian. Yet they kick Africans out of their own country, and have built a formidable security fence from the Mediterranean to the Gulf of Aqaba in order to keep them out.

    Quite possibly McCain is the stupidest politician in Arizona, and the voters re-elect him for entertainment purposes only.

  • Jenkem Huffington

    Anyone else remember this traitor attending the La Raza rally back when he was running for president? You’d almost think there’s no difference at all between the 2 “parties”?

  • Hans Schneider

    The term ” judeo-christian” should not exist as is clearly is an oximoron or a contradiction in terms.

  • Ella

    I thought we’re supposed to rid of ourselves of career politicians according to Jefferson. Americans keep voting in these Senators like McCain, Reid or Pelosi (H-Repr) because this is the best choice? “God help us” for doing these same mistakes over and we lack the courage to change. Once, we said we were a “Christian” nation. On the term Judeo-Christian, McCain admits that “I’m supported by the Israeli lobbyists. Aren’t you?”

  • jeffaral

    the Vietcongs are to blame: Why didn’t they finish off MacShame on the spot?

  • Svigor

    I’d much rather convert to Judaism, than be referred to as “Judeo-Christian.”

  • Bobby

    I started to ignore John, “Americans wouldn’t pick lettuce for fifty dollars an hour” McCain, for at least 5 years now. The guy makes me physically ill.

  • bebe

    I got this link off VDare. Very interesting and true.

    http://faithandheritage.com/2011/01/a-biblical-defense-of-ethno-nationalism/

    http://faithandheritage.com/2011/01/who-does-america-belong-to/

    With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has
    been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people — a
    people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language,
    professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of
    government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their
    joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a
    long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and
    independence.

    This should clear up all this confusion of WHO America belongs to.

  • Stan

    Mccain’s newest idiotic plan is for the US to invade Syria. McCain is Al Qaeda’s American friend. US intervention in Libya created a base for Al Qaeda and Sunni extremists. Western intervention in Syria will create another bastion for Al Qaeda terrorists.

  • SlyDeNiro

    McCain is another Duke Cunningham. That guy has shot himself in the a$$ more times than I can count. He was an infamous member of ‘the Keating 5’, he got snookered into backing the ethanol scam, he picks Palin as a running mate! And now he’s an amnesty shill. Enough already, McCain. Step off.

  • TPClistener

    AR = Judeo….TPC(The Political Cesspool) = Christian….and thats why TPC is so successful tackling the JQ problem…real conservatives love TPC!! Go there now…great show tonight!!

  • Paleoconn

    These are not Christians, they are traitors. McCain is an Israel firster. The term Judeo-Christian is bullshit, a recent fabrication. The West is Christian, period. No Judeo in its foundation.

    I recommend reading Chuck Baldwin on vDare for a sane Christian perspective on immigration. There is nothing Christian in inviting the destruction of your own kind, nation, country.

  • DiversityIsDeath

    xxxxx

  • ToughStuff2012

    John McCain is an opportunist and a glory hound. That’s all he is about. His speeches reflect this. His mannerisms reflect this. He has no real convictions except for ones that get him into higher positions and more “glory.” The way he ditched his loyal ex-wife Carol proves that he’s got no real values or moral fiber.