The Old Republic and Obama’s America

Pat Buchanan, Buchanan, January 25, 2013

“Second Term Begins With a Sweeping Agenda for Equality,” ran the eight-column banner in which The Washington Post captured the essence of Obama’s second inaugural. There he declared:

“What binds this nation together … what makes us exceptional—what makes us American—is our allegiance to an idea, articulated in a declaration made more than two centuries ago.”

Obama then quoted our Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Our “union,” Obama went on, was “founded on the principles of liberty and equality.”

Nice prose—and transparent nonsense.

How could the American Union have been founded on the principle of equality, when “equality” is not mentioned in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights or the Federalist papers? How could equality be a founding principle of a nation, six of whose 13 original states had legalized slavery, and five of whose first seven presidents owned slaves all their lives?

What Obama preached in his inaugural was not historical truth but progressive propaganda, an Orwellian rewrite of American history.

Undeniably, the post-Civil War 13th, 14th and 15th amendments established an equality of constitutional rights. And from the Brown decision of 1954 through the civil rights acts of the 1960s, there was established an equality of civil rights. Black Americans were assured equal access to schools, public accommodations, the voting booth and housing. And Congress and the people overwhelmingly supported those laws.

But if the nation did not establish equality of constitutional rights until the 1860s and equality of civil rights until the 1960s, how can Obama claim that “equality” has been the feature that “makes us American” and “binds this nation together.”

How can he say that our commitment to equality is what makes us “exceptional”—when every Western country believes in equal rights for all of its citizens, and it was the French Revolution, not ours, that elevated “egalite” to a founding principle.

And when he says equality “is the star that guides us still,” exactly what kind of equality is Obama talking about?

Answer: The equality of which Obama speaks is not an equality of rights but an equality of results, an idea that dates not to the Founding Fathers, who would have been appalled by the idea, but to the 1960s.

{snip}

What Obama was attempting at the Capitol, with his repeated lifts from Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, was to portray his own and his party’s egalitarianism as a continuation of the great cause that triumphed at Yorktown and Appomattox.

He is hijacking the American Revolution, claiming an ancestral lineage for his ideology that is utterly fraudulent and bogus.

Feminism, the gay rights movement and the post-1965 civil rights movement, with their demand for equality not simply of rights but of rewards, cannot be achieved without trampling on the freedoms for which the patriot fathers fought. And they cannot triumph without creating a permanent, mammoth and redistributionist state more powerful, intrusive and dictatorial than anything George III ever dreamed of.

{snip}

As Obama’s America rises, the old republic falls.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Guest

    so when obsamma talks about equality it can accurately be translated into a call for more “gibs”. It is a plan to make those who produce (whites) into slaves for those who can not or will not produce (non whites). It is a “shuck and jive” , he is the proverbial fast talking ghetto con man playing the same old con job. He has been given a fancy education and taught to speak eloquently, but his spirit has not been changed. His outlook has not been changed, his ability to understand things has not been changed. All he can understand is ” I want” “gibs it to muh”. He is just a no good ghetto hood. His presidency is nothing but an episode of Lancelot Link.

  • David Ashton

    Obama is a conscious apostle of the “Cultural Marxist” pseudo-egalitarian revolution started some 50 years ago. He is not just a puppet, nor a political innocent. This is further evidence.

    • Skincognito

      Spot on. Our community organizer in chief is a crusader in a holy war against traditional values AND THE PEOPLE who have traditionally espoused and spread these values. White Christianity is their declared enemy, but under the influence of bloodlust, diversity will claim many White prog’s, lib’s, atheists, homosexuals. Critical Theory is built on the linguistic turn, especially as it relates to colonialism and violence against the colonized. Cultural Marxists however, have spun a web of definitions that semantically obscures violence, but which leaves no doubt to the astute observer/student that “diversity, equality, justice, transnationalism, post-racialism, etc” are all code for anti-White, regardless of Whitey’s Weltanschauung.
      Pat’s Suicide of a Superpower is a must-read. He combines his personal beliefs, beltway insight and indefatigable courage in a tightly argued, respectable critique of diversity as a cult sworn to annihilate the mighty, beautiful West and her once noble stock. He eschews conspiracies, instead describing a spiritual vacuum filled by a multitude of “victimized” groups who have formed an alliance of convenience against White male, Christian order, nationhood, indeed our very civilization. Check it out if you haven’t. Recommend it to a family member or co-worker if you have.

      • Sherman_McCoy

        And the Death of the West.

      • Mike Lane

        My Awakening by David Duke is a little better in my opinion.

  • mobilebay

    Mr. President, everything you said about what binds this nation together is absolutely true. The only hitch is that the recent hoard of invaders care little for these qualities. We are no longer a nation of immigrants as you love to say. We are a nation of illegal aliens and millions of disgusted Americans.

  • bigone4u

    Equal opportunity does not guarantee equal outcomes. Step 1 was identity groups claiming lack of equal opportunity. So 45 years ago we got civil rights laws, EEOC, and all that.

    Step 2 is where we are today: Inventing and enforcing rules to obtain equal outcomes via crude measurements. Examples: Women are half the population so half of CEOs must be women. The average black family income must be equal to the average white family income. Every difference, no matter the reason, is cited as racism or sexism at work and a government fix it scheme swings into action..

    This is where white middle-class hardworking taxpayers must draw a line in the sand, must become activists. Scream and holler. Write letters to the editor. Remove your children from the public schools. Start a blog. Tax revolt, stealth and open. Get help from conservative think tanks. When a white kid gets beat up in school by a black and nothing is done, sue the school and the black kid’s parents. Every damn time.

    The reason we must rebel, peacefully for now, is that the cost of equality of outcomes is terms of money and misery is just too great. Our honor demands action.

  • Tim

    The President in his own somewhat prolonged adolescence, was a rather shallow, higly
    manipulative, contrived person. A lot of his “understandings” –e.g., America founded on
    equality–appear to have been more nearly implanted than self germinated.

  • The__Bobster

    I’ve seen this movie before. I’ll just change the channel.

    http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10176119-harrison-bergeron

    • Garrett Brown

      You think we’ll last until 2081? That you can even call those people IF they do last Americans? You have very high hopes sir.

      • John

        Everybody laughs because it is so absurd, but the very thing that makes it absurd is that it is true and happening. The department of indoctrination just handed down an edict that said that handicapped students must be provided with the opportunity to play competitive athletics. If they can’t make a school sanctioned team they must be provided with one. We all know how this has panned out already with girls athletics. First girls had the AAU, but that was not deemed good enough, so it was required that girls have all female school sponsored sports. Then even though boys sports drew in more money, then girls sports had to receive equal funding, because not to do so would be discrimination. Now it is girls have equally funded girls sports and in many cases, they must be allowed a chance to also compete with the boys if they so choose. The end result will be, girls have girls sports, boys sports will have to be watered down so that girls can actively compete and be diverse enough. The same thing will happen with the physically handicapped, because we must all be equal in RESULT!

        • Garrett Brown

          Everyone is correct in saying these demographic genocides do take time… A long time. What most don’t realize is actually HOW long it’s been happening. In 2050 whites will make up only 10% of the world’s population. Our countries won’t be ours anymore.

    • Sherman_McCoy

      I love that book.

  • Puggg

    Obama then quoted our Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

    Ever read the King James Bible? You sometime see a lot of prepositions in italics. That’s because they were added later to give the passages the same meaning that someone reading the passages in the original language the same meaning at the time the KJV was written. Language changed enough over time to make this necessary. In this spirit, someone proposed that we needed to do something like that with this sentence of the DOI: We need to add “in” in between “equal” and “that.” That would remove the egalitarian demands of this sentence, which are irrelevant anyway because the DOI isn’t a governing document.

    Other than that, the evidence that the Founding Fathers were the functional equivalent of white nationalists is ample enough, that to ignore it is to be intellectually dishonest.

  • George White

    Obama is a hate filled anti-white bigot. “Egalitarianism” is a zero sum game where whites lose. Every gain for blacks and browns (and others) has resulted in white pain. I think that all of us should quit our jobs and watch the system crumble.

    • ed91

      did it 3 yrs ago………..
      I got tired of seeing the list on my pay stub of all the entities taking a bite from my pay check………..

    • George

      I’m pretty much with you on the first two statements.

      I would point out, though, that it’s NOT zero sum. It’s less than that, as utility is reduced. When the state confiscates wealth from a productive member of the society, and then passes it along to non-producers, the inherent inefficiencies directly destroy a portion of the value of the wealth. With more people now chasing the same goods & services, inflation further erodes the value of the wealth. Producers have less capital to invest and create more wealth, so the opportunity cost is lost. Lastly, this confiscation curbs the desire of producers to continue to produce, as they do not see the fruits of their labours — which leads to your last sentence.

      Having said this, though, I still must question the wisdom or honour in sinking to their level.

  • MobyWhite

    America wasn’t founding on Equality. It was founding on Islam. Just ask Obama.

    “This evening reminds us of both the timeless teachings of a great religion and the enduring strengths of a great nation. Like so many faiths, Islam has always been part of our American family, and Muslim Americans have long contributed to the strength and character of our country, in all walks of life. This has been especially true over the past 10 years.”

  • wattylersrevolt

    “Equality” will be used by the Kenyan Foreigner to justify the bombing of the conservative muslim population of the Middle East to teach them a lesson or two about homosexual rights…the very nasty bulldyke Hilarly Clinton….wife of the well known Rapist and War Criminal Bill Clinton…threatened to bomb the Conservative Serbian Christian Civilian Population…for a second time… if they attempted to prevent the Gay Pride Parade from taking place downtown Belgrade.

    “Equality”=justifying the mass eviceration of Conservative Muslim and Orthodox Christian Civilian Populations in the name of Gay Rights=the very real possibility of annihilating the human species in a nuclear war in the name of promoting the degenerate social and cultural agenda of the homosexual degenerates.

    You have been warned….

    • IstvanIN

      OK, you hate gays. Point taken. How do you get the above diatribe out of the article above?

      • Sherman_McCoy

        Ya know, Isty, my best friend from high school came out of the closet some time ago, and I and my wife and kids love him and his partner. Truly, they are wonderful fellas. But damn it, they are for every ridiculous liberal cause, including AA and legalization for the wetbacks! I am not the enemy of any gays. But they sure as hell are enemies of the white race, and it makes me truly sad. But I am working on them.

      • Sherman_McCoy

        Ya know, Isty, my best friend from high school came out of the closet some time ago, and I and my wife and kids love him and his partner. Truly, they are wonderful fellas. But damn it, they are for every ridiculous liberal cause, including AA and legalization for the Hispanics! I am not the enemy of any gays. But they sure as hell are enemies of the white race, and it makes me truly sad. But I am praying for and working on my friends. Even they have to see that living under Sharia would be a death sentence, and that ending the white race means the end of civilization.

        • Garrett Brown

          This! I dislike them because of their POLITICAL views, NOT because of their sexual orientation. That simply does not make sense. Do most have these views BECAUSE of their orientation? Probably. But like you said, criticize their political views, not who they love.

    • Katherine McChesney

      good comment

    • Garrett Brown

      You think homosexuality and lack of religion is the downfall of this country? Lol hardly.(Surprised that’s what you concluded with the above message, too much religious thinking on your part)

      Possibly Christianity for the teaching of young children that maybe didn’t have the mental strength to mature and learn through their own mistakes but I have a very hard time seeing how someone’s sexuality really has any effect at all on the country. Of course, we have had gays through our nation’s history and we were fine.

      Demographics bud, demographics. The only negative aspect of it now is those gays are black and brown, not white.

      • wattylersrevolt

        For White Liberals such as yourself, Social and Cultural filth is normal. For Social and Cultural Conservatives, the invasion of heterosexual Social and Cultural Space is a very serious issue. For example, it is now known that the Boy Scouts had a cabal of pedaphiles within it. Hundreds of preteen boys were molested. Also, homosexual youth who were in the Boy Scouts were creeping out the heterosexual preteen males who were in the Troop…the homosexuals were thrown out. For enthusiasts of cultural and social filth, the peope who are creeped out about having homosexuals in the Boy Scouts are the “Weirdos”. Allowing homosexuals into the Boy Scouts of course massively increases the probability of pedaphillic assaults on heterosexaul preteen males. It is an inverted reality..and this inverted reality will most definitelty generate its own backlash. The very bad behavior of homosexuals will make this a 100 percent certainty. Uganda and Iran have the right idea on how to deal with homosexuals.
        By the way, if you are form England, it only goes to show just how degenerate Euro-Anglo Saxon culture has become. The Muslims might just be an improvement. They will clean the filth out.

        • Garrett Brown

          White liberal? LOL! I stopped reading there.

          • David Ashton

            The top-down imposition of “gay marriage” by Obama in the US and Cameron in the UK and Hollande in France is the long-term result of the Cultural Marxist subversion based on “ethnicity, gender and class” now summarized as “equality and diversity”. What is sold publicly as recognition of fidelity between homosexual partners is a deceptive wedge to undermine through requisite legislation and subsequent school-teaching “bourgeois” marriage and the traditional family unit.

          • Garrett Brown

            No, that is what LIBERALS have taken from homosexuality and made it corrupt. You think there aren’t conservatives/libertarians/people who don’t vote that are gay? Surely they don’t want homosexuality taught in schools even though they themselves, are homosexual. You live in a delusional world friend. Gay marriage doesn’t affect you or the declining of this country. Demographic genocide is. You cannot deduct anything from someone’s sexual preference being part of cultural Marxism.

          • David Ashton

            I write from England. I personally know homosexual conservatives male and female, but the “gay lobby” here in general agitates for e.g. homosexuality taught in schools. My main concern is indeed demographic white genocide, which is a primary target of the New Left/”Cultural Marxist” campaign for “race and gender equality”. The adoption of children by gays and lesbians makes no contribution to racial preservation. The “gay marriage” legislation here is a device not to affirm love between partners, or upgrade existing civil partnership contracts, but to reduce our traditional majoritarian heterosexual norm by eliminating the concepts of consummation and adultery as a grounds for divorce, the terminology of mummy and daddy, and freedom of religious opinion and practice; I am not a Christian myself.
            I don’t think my acquaintance with homosexual literature, knowledge of gay lifestyle practices and their medical consequences, uninvited experiences in public lavatories, Queer Studies in universities, positive contributions of “gays” to theater and literature, some knowledge of the hormone/genetic aspects, the pros and cons of Biblical arguments, direct experience of the exploitation of LGBTIs among other minorities by the radical Left, Man-Boy Love agitation, and a commonsense ability to tell the difference between the female birth canal and the male excrement outlet, place ME in “a delusional world”.

          • Garrett Brown

            I highly disagree with what liberals have done with homosexuality. But I do not have any problems with homosexuality in it’s actual meaning. I don’t think they should be able to have children and I hate the legislation being pushed to try and teach it in schools. But love has nothing to do with what sex you are. Yes, you live in a delusional world. The reason this country is degrading and self destructing is demographics. If it was still majority white yet some of those whites were gay we would still be fine. As we had always been until the 60s.

        • Juxtaposedhearts0

          Very ignorant thinking on your part. Accuse the person not his sexual preference. Men rape children, doesn’t matter if they’re gay or not.

          • Mark

            What you describe in PC terms as a sexual preference is actually a sexual perversion. It has been condemned for thousands of years. Tolerating this sickness and trying to help the homosexuals is one thing and I support it. However the acceptance and approval of it is one of the reasons why our Country is dying. Without any moral standards our great Republic is finished.

          • Garrett Brown

            A woman loving a woman and vice/versa is not sexual perversion lol. Religious people can continue believing homosexuality is a negative, but until you can support it with any statistics, it simply isn’t accurate.

          • Mark

            You are right. There is nothing perverse about a woman loving another woman or a man loving another man. Being a man I have a couple of very close male friends whom I love dearly. However, there is nothing normal, natural or healthy about a man inserting his penis in another man’s anus.
            It is a perversion deriving from the inability to control one’s animal instincts.
            You are asking for statistical data. Have you looked at the life expectancy statistics recently? Homosexual man versus a heterosexual man?

            By the way, the Church does not teach to hate homosexuals. It teaches to hate the sin but love and help the sinner.

          • Garrett Brown

            Who says, other than ancient writings(which don’t even particularly talk about anal sex) that it’s wrong? You’re basing your opinions on an ancient holy book not even written by the person you believe in. If men want to have anal sex(which I find disgusting) who cares? It certainly doesn’t bother me or you. Unless of course we let it, which it seems like that’s what you’re doing. Let people love who they want to love. Life longevity does not support homosexuality as negative.

            I never said the church teaches to hate anyone. But people that go to church do in fact hate many things.

          • Gay Black Man

            You do know that there are many married men( and a number of women)who are closeted gays and lesbians? I have seen this firsthand in a number of my relationships.

          • Mark

            I am sure there are some. What is your point?

          • Garrett Brown

            What does that have to do with the discussion?

      • Juxtaposedhearts0

        I too, do not see the correlation between homosexuality and the
        degrading of this country. It just isn’t logical at all. What’s
        happening is there are too many browns and not enough whites. It’s
        pretty simple

      • Sherman_McCoy

        Christianity is great for those with the IQ to understand and practice it. But Christians have to recognize that God created the races for a reason.

        • Sherman_McCoy

          And, He separated them for a reason.

  • Guest

    Has anyone else noticed that obsamma is turning into the golem right before our eyes? It looks like he is dying of aids.

    • That is scary, he is so vengeful and hateful of America that he will most likely try to do as much damage as he can before he croaks. The military should take over, declare him mentally incompetent and treasonous, the whole democrat regime should be arrested for treason for what they will try to do by erasing our borders and defunding the military. They are dismantling the country right before our eyes.

      • Edward

        I doubt that he has much deep sense one way or the other. From some Oedipal dynamic, he seems gravitated toward his schizo mother’s brainwashings of him
        as a child (waking him up every morning about 4:30 a.m. for “history lessons” ),
        but his actual biography ( to the extent it is emergent ) suggests his central passion
        is an insatiable need to be on center stage.

      • Garrett Brown

        He does love his little orcs very much after all(and a big one names Michelle).

        • Tim

          I suspect the President may be far far more sexually “versatile” than his on
          camera pose suggests. There is scant evidence he ever looked twice at any
          female during his teen years.

  • Mike Lane

    Who knew Lothrop Stoddard could make such accurate predictions?

    • Anders

      “The idea of ‘Natural Equality’ is one of the most pernicious delusions that has ever afflicted mankind. It is a figment of the human imagination. Nature knows no equality.”
      Lothrop Stoddard.

      Following the logic of the ‘equal outcome progressives’ is akin to believing that the worm pecked out of the ground is equal to the bird, that is equal to the cat that stalked and killed the bird.

      • Mike Lane

        So you have read the Revolt Against Civilization as well I see.

        • Anders

          Yes, thanks to you good people here on AmRen that provided a download link. I figured they would be a less than remote chance of finding it at my local bookstore.
          I first came across Lothrop Stoddard when he was quoted by Boyd Rice in one of his articles, so thank you Boyd.

          • Mike Lane

            I’m reading The Rising Tide of Color right now. Too made the maps looked like they were scanned in with a 80s fax machine.

          • Anders

            Do you have an extensive library of books such as these?

          • David Ashton

            I made it a “job” years ago to collect anti-PC classics. Time permitting, I could produce an annotated list of the best books seriously useful to us (no nutty stuff), some deliberately reprinted. You can get many books on Amazon, s/h book-sites or through e-bay, but a few are very difficult indeed to obtain, or far too expensive for an average person to purchase. Libraries and a photocopier may come in handy.

          • Anders

            A list of recommended books on race in addition to Mike’s above would be very helpful.

          • David Ashton

            I have no time at present to provide a proper bibliography, but hope I can produce one eventually and get it published. However, I shall give a select (very) short list meanwhile.

          • David Ashton

            CLASSIC STUDIES
            1. Julien-Joseph Virey. Natural History of the Negro Race. Charleston 1837.
            2. Charles Darwin. The Descent of Man. 2nd Ed. London 1889. [Ch.VII]
            3. Charles H. Pearson. National Life and Character. London 1894.
            4. Gustave LeBon. Psychological Laws of the Evolution of Peoples. 1894.
            Tr. NY 1924.
            5. Karl Pearson. The Scope and Importance to the State of the Science of
            National Eugenics. London 1911.
            6. William McDougall. The Group Mind. Cambridge 1920.
            7. Charles Conant Josey. Race and National Solidarity. 1923.
            8. Erwin Bauer, Eugen Fischer & Fritz Lenz. Human Heredity. NY 1931.
            9. Anthony M. Ludovici. A Defence of Aristocracy. London 1933. [Ch.VII]
            10.Lothrop Stoddard. Clashing Tides of Color. NY 1935.
            11.Herbert Spencer on Social Evolution (Ed. J.D.Y. Peel) Chicago 1972.

            MODERN STUDIES
            12.Robert E. Kuttner (Ed). Race and Modern Science. NY 1967.
            13.George F. Gilder. Sexual Suicide. NY 1973. [Chh.7-8]
            14.John R. Baker. Race. London (OUP). 1974.
            15.R.T. Osborne, C.E.Noble & N. Weyl (Eds). Human Variation. NY 1978.
            16.Vincent Sarich & Frank Miele. Race: The Reality of Human Differences.
            Boulder 2005.
            17.J.P. Rushton. Race, Evolution and Behavior. Port Huron 2000.
            18.Richard Lynn. Race Differences in Intelligence. Augusta 2006.
            19.Byron M. Roth. The Perils of Diversity. Augusta 2010.
            20.John Harvey. Race and Equality. London 2012.

          • Mike Lane

            Yes. My collection of books on race include:

            The Passing of the Great Race by Madison Grant

            The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy by Lothrop Stoddard

            Revolt Against Civilization (1st edition)

            Race and Reason by Carleton Putnam

            White Identity by Jared Taylor

            My Awakening by David Duke

  • Mike Lane

    At least Natural Law will win out in the end. All these useful idiots who gloat with arrogance that they will create a perfect society will tremble when a collapse occurs. America, as the polis it is today, is terminally ill. We need to quit worrying about getting someone in office to fix our problems. When a sick dog is lying on the street it is put down.
    We should be focused on organizing a strong, disciplined movement so that when the collapse occurs, we will be ready to pick up the pieces.

  • LHathaway

    “How can he say that our commitment to equality is what makes us “exceptional”—when every Western country believes in equal rights for all of its citizens, and it was the French Revolution, not ours, that elevated “egalite” to a founding principle”.

    The French Revolution was inspired by the American Revolution. Obama makes his claim based on the word equality is prominently mentioned in the Declaration of Independence and it is implicit in the of religious freedom the Founding Fathers stood for.

    • David Ashton

      “Hollande plans to cut ‘race’ from the French constitution…to demonstrate that human populations cannot be differentiated by their genes”. – The Times (London), February 2, p.36.

  • Garrett Brown

    No, Oboonga. America was NOT founded on equality. We did not build this great nation on equality. But I can assure you, it will BE DESTROYED from your definition of “equality”.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      correct. There were slaves (black and white), and women couldn’t vote.

  • obama going nowhere ever

    Tyrant Obama has no plans to ever turn over power and the media knows it after his 2nd inaugural address so they continue to pretend and pump Rodham Clinton for 2016.
    This evil bastard antichrist knows full well he must dupe the Rubios of the world to retain power because the 2010 US Senate would be lost otherwise.

    Obama wants permanent power in DC and knows Rubio is his trump card with his white liberal tools and even black tools who he knows are of low IQ and incapable of understanding who he really is. Republicans must be forgetting too that had it not been for the Tea Party saviors in 2010 their party would be extinct right now. Whites better awaken. Rubio is a total fraud and Obama has no plans to ever leave the White House and give up power to anyone.

  • Terry

    Pat Buchanan makes a couple of mistakes. First, the first five presidents didn’t own slaves. They owned workers. There is a big difference. It should be mentioned that Virginia was the first colony to prohibit slavery. She did so on October 5, 1778. She was followed by North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The area just west of this area was known as West Florida that was a territory. There were no states there. There was also Florida which was owned by the Spanish (Sephardic Jews). Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia wanted to extend their colonies all the way to the Mississippi River. However, King George III, following Jewish advice, stopped them from doing so by bringing in what they call creole’s, or half breeds. King David Hunt had 25 plantations up and down the Mississippi slaves and had over 1,700 slaves. He was allowed to do this because the territory was in the hands of King George III, and because David Hunt didn’t have to answer to any of the laws and statutes of any southern colony. If the southern states mention would have been allowed to extend their colonies to the Mississippi River the chances are pretty good that he would have to abide by the laws of each perspective colony. So technically the first five presidents didn’t have slaves, they had workers. There is a difference. Slavery conjures up the idea of beating, starving, and treating people with all kinds of evil. However, white slaves were actually treated worse than black slaves, and the south went out of its way to destroy slavery. Most of the slave plantations were Jewish owned. The Confederate Constitution of 1861 section 10 prohibits slavery. Slavery is a misnomer that is used by the Jews to push for their agenda of annihilating God’s people Israel which is the white Caucasian, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred people. The anti-slave amendment (the 13th. Amendment) is illegal simply because the original 13th. amendment was never taken out of the Constitution properly because it was missing. In about 1830 the 13th. amendment all of a sudden was taken out of the Constitution without proper procedures. Therefore, the 13th. Amendment of 1863 is illegal and null and void. The original 13th. amendment would not allow anybody who has a title or legality to become president. In other words, lawyers and British government officials were not allowed to be president. This means that technically it was a direct violation of the Constitution for Clinton, Obama, and any lawyer to run for president or be president. I have a copy of the Constitution that is dated 1842 that has the original 13th. amendment in it. Over 85% of the south did not have slaves. Those that did were Jewish plantation owners. Only one Confederate General (Nathan Bedford Forrest) had what we would call slaves, and he inherited them. He was going to free them but the war broke out and felt that it would be better for the slaves to be on his plantation for their safety. In fact, they really weren’t slaves, they were paid workers. Nathan Bedford Forrest started the Ku Klux Klan in 1868 in order to protect white men, women, and children, especially the women. After the Civil War hordes of blacks went down south and raped pillaged and burned. All those mullatos that were born after the Civil War were born because of black on white rape. We are under Jewish rules and Jewish history which means rules that benefit the Jews, and history that has no substance to it. Just a whole lot of emotion.

    • Mark

      Thank you for a great lesson in history Terry and I do mean it sincerely. Having an engineering background there are simply a lot of historical facts that I am unaware of although I read a lot. One only has so many hours in a day.
      Do you think Mr. Buchanan, whom I admire greatly, made a mistake or did he omit certain facts on purpose?

  • SintiriNikos

    I wonder where Buchanan was when Bush 1 and Bushlet and Reagan and Nixon and their same-party congresscritters and senators were doing the same things that Bam is doing? Bam at least is anti-White, we know that. What are the other whiteys’ excuses? Cowardice, perhaps? Reagan talked a big game and appeared tough and he is practically a God in conservative circles, but what the hell did he do to stem immigration, to fight the banksters and the Fed, to reduce government, to fight racial preferences, to combat homosexual rights and feminism and the general decay of our society. No, Ronnie was too busy ‘bringing down Communism’. Bollocks

  • odious liberal

    Hey obama, your father failed in Americsa because he couldn’t make the cut, he was a useless drunk who thought his nergoness would carry him. He died as he lived, a failure of his own making.