White Student Union Speaker Preaches Racial Separateness

Nayana Davis, North Baltimore Patch, October 3, 2012

A prospective White Student Union at Towson University added to its own controversial history when it brought an advocate for white interests to speak Tuesday at the group’s first meeting.

Jared Taylor, editor of the “racial realism” online news site American Renaissance, said he hoped to spread a message about the importance of racial separateness. [Editor’s Note: This is not a fair characterization of Mr. Taylor’s position, which is that people of different races should be allowed to associate with whomever they wish, and people generally prefer the company of others of their own race.]

“I believe in complete freedom of association, and when given that choice most people prefer the company of people of their own race,” said Taylor, when reached by phone Wednesday. “We’re always being told to celebrate diversity and I think diversity is a source of tension.”

Many people, including a Patch reporter and other media, were denied admission to the Tuesday night event by campus security after the venue, which holds about 200, filled to capacity. Still, about 50 individuals stood outside the doors as Taylor spoke. [Editor’s Note: It’s worth emphasizing that administrators denied media personnel access without consulting event organizers.]

{snip}

“It’s a spectacular double standard that only whites are singled out and told they can’t have a race-based organization,” said Taylor, who argued that the group is necessary as demographics change making whites a minority.

Taylor said he presented evidence showing problems raised by diversity, such as data indicating that approximately 100,000 job grievances are related to racial matters. He also pointed to racial riots that occur in prisons. Taylor empathized with whites who felt the need to join gangs in prison because he said there are many black and Hispanic gangs existing outside of prison whose networks extend to jails.

{snip}

During his speech, Taylor said several people sneaked inside the venue through a fire escape and shouted an obscenity at him. {snip}

{snip}

Raymond Winbush, the director of The Institute for Urban Research at Morgan State University, said the presentation was deceptive.

“[Taylor’s] lying,” said Winbush, who is black. “He’s good at manipulating words and says he’s not racist. It’s like the white collar Ku Klux Klan.”

Towson University senior Ignacio Evans, who is also black, thought Taylor was well-spoken but called his speech “absolutely disgusting.”

“He was eloquent, put together, but inherently racist,” Evans said. “He was very anti-diversity and made assertions that people of color are inferior.”

Taylor dismissed the claims of racism as “name-calling.”

{snip}

“I have said the races are different . . . .there are unquestionable differences,” Taylor said.

And Taylor was not without supporters. Johns Hopkins University engineering professor Dennis Nagle, who is white, said he believes there is truth to Taylor’s teachings.

“He’s got some interesting views on diversity that aren’t popular,” said Nagle, who was not able to get inside the event. “But he’s got evidence and documentation to back it up.”

The White Student Union is not a university-recognized student organization, but the group’s leaders are working to make it approved. {snip}

[Editor’s Note: We expect to have the full video coverage available by tomorrow.]

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Tony Soprano

    Actually it would have been great if at the end of the lecture Jared Taylor could have shown that YouTube video “How white took over america” They would have been stunned.

  • jedsrael

    RACIAL SEPRATENESS IS GOD’S PLAN FOR WHITE SURVIVAL.

    Jared Taylor is an apostle of our White Christ.White Christians wake up- you can’t honor God through prayer and your church community if you are exposing your White children to voodoo Diversity.
    Love and Hate don’t mix. Hate wins. Love must flee to survive.

    From Rev. CWYN:

    The colored hordes know only about the bloody sacrifice of other races to the needs of their own race. They have no concept of mercy. Mercy is a white man’s word, and to the colored tribes a sign of weakness. They do not see that the sight of innocence under attack, of decency under attack, of one’s people under attack, can stir up feelings of mercy in a man’s heart that makes him want to do battle in defense of innocence, decency, and his people for mercy’s sake. The colored races do not see this because they fight for bloodlust and gain, never for mercy’s sake. “This is all too extreme and harsh,” the white halfway-house Christian tells me. But is it harsh? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that it is too truthful for the halfway-house Christian to accept? First and foremost, the Christian European loves and extends mercy to his own. But did the European’s mercy end with his own race? No! The only mercy that the colored races, particularly the beloved black race of the halfway-house Christians, ever knew came from the hated and persecuted white race. And I will repeat what has become a refrain with me, a necessary counterpoise to the liberals’ white-hating refrain: If the white race disappears, absorbed into a Babylonian, mixed race, mercy will disappear from the face of the earth. An old Christian hymn warns the sinner to “Look down, look down, that lonesome road before you travel on.” The halfway house Christians need to look down the negro-worshipping road and see where it ends. It ends in a hellish, nightmare world of lost souls.

    http://cambriawillnotyield.wordpress.com/2012/01/14/the-liberal-and-the-colored-united-in-hate/

    • NYB

      I don’t wish to debate it, but I’m white and not a Christian.   Christianity is a Middle Eastern, Abrahamic creed.  It is closely related to Islam and Judaism, which is just one of many drawbacks to it.   Whites do not owe their best values to Christianity; these existed long before.

      I’ll only follow an indigenously European, exclusively white spirituality.

      • APaige

        Any suggestions on an indigenously European white spirituality? Or any links to help? Thanks in advance.

      • Eagle_Eyed

         Humility, charity, and tolerance are uniquely Christian ideals.

  • In the Soviet era if you did not like the Party politics and policies you were deemed to be “anti-Soviet” or a “Capitalist” and if you spoke out against the party policies you were considered emotionally unstable and were warned about that. If you persisted with your crazy views you were deemed a menace to the Soviet system and were sent off to a padded room in the Gulag.

    Change a few words around and you can see the analogy I am trying to make with regards to today’s Liberals and Diversity.

  • je suis paganisme

    I am inspired!

    My samhain offering is about to go out soon.

    Because of Taylor’s courage, AmRen will most surely be included!

  • loyalwhitebriton

    He’s good at manipulating words and says he’s not racist. It’s like the white collar Ku Klux Klan.

    How can reasoned arguments be construed as “manipulating words”? I would suggest that Mr. Winbush is manipulating reasoned arguments to fit into a pre-determined political paradigm.

    Also, I think everyone on this site knows that Jared Taylor would not be seen within a hundred miles of a KKK meeting; simply not his ‘cup of tea’.

    • libertarian1234

      “It’s like the white collar Ku Klux Klan.”

      I’m sick of hearing these  racist dregs refer to an organization that existed so many years ago it is a non-issue now, especially when blacks are the most racist people on planet earth……… TODAY..RIGHT NOW, and especially since they have vile groups in existence at present who are far worse than the Klan ever was.

      And there’s not a single black whiner that has EVER condemned the violent racist rhetoric of Farrakhan, the Black Panthers, numerous Rap freaks, the black talking heads on T.V., plus…as the Daily Caller video reveals….the anti-white racist black president…… to say nothing about the racist hatred that is endemic in every black community across the country.

      Blacks….and their sick supporters…. have done irrepairable harm to this country and their destruction continues unabated. 

    • I had ancestors who were in the ORIGINAL KKK back after 1865, and I think it was a necessary movement. CSA Generals Nathan Bedford Forrest and Albert Pike other Confederate veterans created it as a critical and desperate time as a legitimate para-military “guerrilla” resistance movement among a conquered people.  The name was originally derived by educated people from Greek “Kuklos”  (= circle) and the Scottish concept of “Clan”—and the result was albeit much maligned, organization at the time, even if the white costumes and “Inquisitorial Cowls” and strange titles always opened up doors to serious ridicule.  DW Griffith’s amazingly innovative movie “Birth of a Nation” probably over-romanticized the original clan—it WAS a paramilitary “guerrilla” resistance movement among the vanquished and oppressed Southern Americans…. But there was nothing disgraceful about the original Ku Klux Klan or anyone who joined it.  They were fighting to retain their integrity and freedom.  Now, after “Birth of a Nation” the Second Klan was a different story.  While the first Klan was primarily about “Homeland Security”—if you’ll accept an anachronistic turn of phrase here…. the Second Klan was clearly more of an aggressive political movement in the 1920s and 30s—and perfectly competent and respectable politicians such as Harry S. Truman, Hugo Black, and Robert Byrd joined and were active officers of the Klan during that period.  The costumes were always a problem…. as were the rituals and officers names and titles—kind of like a Militant group of Shriners or something—but a lot of people who were attracted to Masonry were also attracted to the 1920s Klan. Wikipedia reports accurately,  “The KKK was strong in the Florida cities of Jacksonville and Tampa; Miami’s chapter was influential enough to hold initiations at the Miami Country Club. The Klan also flourished in smaller towns of the South where racial violence had a long tradition dating back to the Reconstruction era. An editor of The Gainesville Daily Sun admitted he was a member of the Klan in 1922, and praised the organization in print.”  But then the Klan was associated with the Rosewood Massacre in Levy County, Florida (Ironically enough: Levy County was named after the First Jewish Senator in United States history, David Levy, who like the Second Jewish Senator, Judah P. Benjamin, was a strenuous advocate of slavery and Confederate Patriot).  Rosewood and several other scandals in the 1920s prevented the Klan from ever becoming completely acceptable everywhere—even though it spread outside of the South to dominate, for example, state Politics in Indiana… (which is also where one of the wierdest and stupidest Klan scandals ever took place, namely the kidnapping of Madge Oberholzer by the State Klan leader)….
      The modern Klan simply failed to maintain a viable position or profile after the 1970s.  So it’s kind of like “kicking a dead horse” to say that no one respectable would join the Klan anymore.  But above all else on a website like this, we should keep the historical realities and contexts in mind—and if the KKK history is considered, it WAS a largely White Color (as well as “Red Neck”) organization probably through the 1950s at least….. We need to keep our perspective sound…. 

      • “But above all else on a website like this, we should keep the historical realities and contexts in mind”.

        Exactly Charles.  AmRen is indeed the place for all White racialists to learn and remind each other the truth about White history.  Too many of us here are still falling for the same old lies and fabrications we were all told about our fellow Whites growing up, and this our chance to set the record straight.

        I just learned something new here, and I thank you.

      • razorrare

        DW Griffith’s amazingly innovative movie “Birth of a Nation” probably over-romanticized the original clan—it WAS a paramilitary “guerrilla” resistance movement among the vanquished and oppressed Southern Americans…. But there was nothing disgraceful about the original Ku Klux Klan or anyone who joined it. They were fighting
         to retain their integrity and freedom…

        Its always been my understanding that the KKK was formed to protect their property & goods from thievery and their wives and daughters from being raped by black unionist soldiers who were practicing “to the victor belongs the spoils” mentality after the north ‘won’ the war…

        as far as Rosewood i still believe that to be mostly fiction and not history…much the same when Bill clinton claimed that  as a boy growing up  in Hope,Arkansas he witnessed many black church burnings done by Whites…it was proven through records that not one black church burning occured during the time frame that clinton said he witnessed such burnings… yeh,Rosewood is as historically accurate a Hollywood movie as Mississippi Burning…not.

        • I certainly was not around when Rosewood was burned/depopulated.  But I have seen evidence that it once was a thriving small Southern town and then disappeared.  There’re lots of mythical events in history, and lots of historical structures which shape mythology.  I’ve never seen a movie about Rosewood but I have seen “Mississippi Burning” and of course it’s not even remotely accurate.  

          As for the Original KKK, I don’t see how your understanding, is any different from mine.  I agree with you “that [as a paramilitary “guerrilla” resistance organization, not unlike the Front National in WWII France] the KKK was formed to protect their [the Southerners’] property and goods from thievery and their wives and daughters from being raped by black [and white] Union soldiers [and carpetbaggers] who were practicing “to the victor belongs the spoils” mentality after the north won the war.” (By any definition of winning, they won, whether it was legally or morally right or not—they destroyed our capital, many of our cities, and put our President in jail—that’s pretty much called “losing a war” any way you want to look at it).  

          I can only infer that you object to my use of the phrase “paramilitary “guerrilla” resistance movement among the vanquished and oppressed Southern Americans” (including my ancestors and possibly yours?)  Why would you object to that characterization—I think it’s pretty historically accurate. 

          And it is precisely because I object to Patriotic resistance to oppression being penalized by law that I am totally against all the oppressive “anti-Terrorism” laws that have been passed in the past 12-20 years since Newt Gingrich and the “Contract on America” in 1994-5.  

          They (Newt Gingrich, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama now) have gutted our truly most Sacred Magna Carta – originating writ of Habeas Corpus more completely and thoroughly than the 16th President and the carpetbaggers under the 17th-18th President EVER managed to do.

          And of course, the SPLC has the full backing of the Justice Department in trying to make sure that no “paramilitary “guerilla” resistance movements ever form again in this country to limit the power of the Soviet American Communist government under Comrade Obama and his successors….

          • razorrare

            I think that paramilitary “guerilla” groups would most aptly describe the negroe militias and the carpetbaggers whom the north sent to the southern states to implement their political(republican) reconstructionist policies…when i hear the term “guerilla” i cant help but think of China,Cuba,Russia,Malaysia,El Salvador…in that context i would be agreeable that the orginal kuklux clan was created as a “resistance” movement against such northern insurgents sent by the conquering North…certainly the definition for paramilitary would fit these two groups as well….A paramilitary is a military-esque force whose function and organization are similar to those of a professional military, but which is not considered part of a state’s formal armed forces.[1] Under the Law of Armed Conflict, a state may incorporate a paramilitary organization or armed agency charged with police functions into its armed forces. The other parties to a conflict have to be notified thereof.[2]
            The term paramilitary is subjective, depending on what is considered similar to a military force, and what status a force is considered to have. The nature of paramilitary forces therefore varies greatly according to the speaker and the context…certainly no southern state at that time officially sanctioned the kuklux clan as being a legitimate paramilitary group–for arguments sake the key word here is “officially.”…..

            In fact Farrahkans group would more aptly describe a paramilitary guerilla group for they have more than once have been ligitimized and used by Government & States to aid police in helping keeping certain demographic areas less crime and violent prone–disregarding the violent history of the Farrahkan(Islam) movement itself…See Zebra Killings..

            Ah,which brings up the question…where are the memorials and the concern to see that the surviving victims and their family members of the “zebra killings” are justly compensated for the lack in competence of government and states to protect these victims? Where are the accepted house scholars and establishment historians at when justice calls out for their memories of this travesty of racial hatred to be remembered….like rosewood, whose numbers of dead victims is questionable at best…where are the hollywood memorials at? ….total of 8 dead–6 blacks-2 Whites in Rosewood killings versus 71 Whites killed in Zebra Killings…

            Your literary skills are evident so i am sure you are aware of the lawsuit that was successfully rendered against the state of Florida in the case of Rosewood…in case others arent (hate using wikipedia as a source) simply type in Rosewood…

            black lynchings of Whites in the reconstruction era of the South seems to have not even occured if you google the same but i know that was one of the very reasons why the Kuclux Clan was given to birth and why lynching of black men who violated their right to property–their women–were executed in the same fashion most frequently…

          • razorrare

            Oh, why did rosewood depopulate? My guess would be an economical one,blacks left to search for jobs–many other such towns have dissapeared   for the very same reason…since the town was nearly all black it would still be there if they were receiving what blacks receive today–like foodstamps-section 8 housing  etc etc etc…Detroit wouldnt exist either if all those freebies stopped in that city as well…blacks would be moving out an going to a black freindly welfare state.

  • Jupiter7

    Racial Separation is a cop-out and somewhat dishonest. It gives the impression that if only Native Born White Americans could have their own nation within the borders of America everything would be all right. This is just another way of saying secession without expulsion. You ought to at least explain to your fellow Native Born White Americans what they are going to have to give up for secession without expulsion. In the end…the big endgame…secession without expulsion means ecological collapse across America, and eventually, the wiping out of the remnant Native Born White American population.

    Your job Jared is to tell the brutal unadulturated truth, not fairy tales about a mythical White Homeland. You never know, millions of Native Born White Americans might want to reclaim lost Native Born White American living and breeding space.

    • Eagle_Eyed

       small steps, small steps.

    • Net_Drifter

      There isn’t the slightest chance that blacks, in particular, will ever be expelled from this country. In a better future, there may be the chance that people who came  to the U.S. illegally will be removed, but that’s about it. There would probably be comparatively few that would actually be deported. It’s a lot more likely that a moratorium or decrease in immigrati0n could be instituted if there is a resurgence in white’s acting in their interest.

      But, blacks are set in stone in the U.S. Too many people who are even racially conservative, etc, feel sorry for them and feel the country has a responsibility to them because “they were brought here”. Allowing all forms of self-segregation and actually having government IGNORE blacks demands, but controlling their behavior, is the answer. 

  • ITS TIME HAS COME

    White Tribalism will prevail.  Nations around the earth are returning to ethnic purity because in today’s New World Order its necessary for survival.  

  • “Expulsion”—like what the Spanish did to the Jews in 1492?  It did not work out well for the Spanish—had Spain retained its Jewish population exactly at the time it was acquiring the vast gold and other riches of the Indies, the Spanish Empire might have become the new Rome, the new center of capitalist and mercantile innovation in Europe instead of suffering first a massive inflation of prices owing to a glut of gold and then passing on that power and role as an economic innovator on to the northern European countries who, started in the mid-1500s, started accepting a lot of the expelled Spanish Jews into their populations (even in places like England where the Jews had been expelled 300 years before).  Expulsion is an easy concept to grasp—and it’s NOT going to happen in any of our lifetimes.  

    If anyone wants to take bets with me on that point I’ll give you 10-to-1 I’m right.  Expulsion is not going to happen, but resegregation, properly presented and ethically designed for the benefit of all, COULD happen.  Segregation of political and legal jurisdictions by ethnic identity should be seen as advantageous to all—but it would be self enforcing in an evolutionary sense in FAVOR of further segregation.I have written before, both in comments here and occasionally on my own blog (http://charleslincoln3.com), that I support a “new segregation” in America, but I think it has to be made politically real and palatable to everyone.  Whether we like it or not, political realities, along with the laws of thermodynamics, act as the arbiters of all dreams and all plans and all imaginary possible outcomes we could imagine.  I think that the role of this and other racially aware websites should be to try to work out a new consensus whereby Blacks and Hispanics and other groups can be shown that a resegregation of society is in EVERYONE’s best interests.  

    The essence of my proposal is this: that in each state and nationwide, the United States start a decentralization of power along the lines of “Lord Baltimore’s principles” of parallel systems of population and area representation (comparable to the House of Representatives and U.S. Senate) at all levels of political power.  

    There should be no population units much larger than 250,000-500,000.  Each basic population unit (Los Angeles alone should split up into a dozen “municipalities” this way—each about the size of Santa Monica or Beverly Hills).  Each of these population units would have an “ethnic option” choice to make.  

    Just as an example, on the basis of its current population profile, Beverly Hills might well opt to be Jewish, and what that would mean that Jewish Judges, Jewish police, and Jewish laws (to the degree not inconsistent with the U.S. or California Constitutions).   Any person, jew or non-jew charged with a crime which took place in Beverly Hills would then be tried by an all Jewish Judge and Jury.   For any civil action (contract or tort) which took place in Beverly Hills, the jurisdiction would be the same.  For marital and probate disputes, Jewish law could be preserved in the city courts, much as it is in the actually already extant “Beth Din” and “Beit Din” (Jewish Courts in the United States I have written about before): http://charleslincoln3.com/2010/10/07/beth-dinbeit-din-sharia-law-in-the-western-world-and-american-tribal-courts/

    The fear of discrimination on the basis of race or ethnicity would be ERASED in such a system—insofar as Defendants were concerned.  But so far as victims or plaintiffs are concerned, fears of discrimination would be great. Q:  What non-Jew would wish to risk being tried in an all Jewish Court in Beverly Hills?/A: None with an IQ over about 80/90, so natural selection would begin to work…..

    The same is obviously true of South Central LA and Watts—Black and Hispanic jurisdictions would protect their own against all others.  

    Obviously, as might be inferred from the fact that I am writing on this website, Whites, maybe even Italians in New York, Poles in Chicago, Armenians here in Los Angeles, ALL ethnic groups with a sufficient population could be offered a chance to form their own municipal jurisdictions.  

    I totally advocate THIS model of “separate but equal” voluntary segregation because—as soon as one group takes advantage of it, lots of groups and ultimately every group will taken advantage.  There may even be areal municipalities specially formed of “Octaroons” and “Quadroons” as was the case in late Nineteenth and early Twentieth Century New Orleans, where the “Octaroon Balls” at Mardi Gras persist until this very day…

    Let’s never propose a politically doomed or impractical solution—let’s be realists and make our dreams come true by making them fairly advantageous to all.  If we think Segregation is good for us, it should be good for everybody, regardless of race, creed, or color—one way of looking at it is that without Segregation, as you write, our great-grandchildren in 2100-2150 may all HAVE the same race, creed, and color and “Diversity” advocates will no longer exist because “diversity” will have been wiped off the face of the planet….

    • Bad_Mr_Frosty

      Everybody likes to say exactly what’s NOT going to happen. No one knows what is or is no going to happen. Everything is on the table. They said Europe was too economically integrated to go to war, right before WWI. They said the Germans were too civil to commit genocide, right before the “final solution”. These type of conflicts cannot be predicted, but rest assure, anything can happen.

    • idissent

      Get Real!  You make no sense at all!  

      Once the blacks rule over themselves, destruction prevails.  See any evidence of that anywhere?  Duh!    They will be at us again.   Ever heard of the word Parasite?

      • We have to accept the world as it is.  The Civil Rights movement, together with Welfare and Social Security, has created a nation of parasites and not all who are living parasitically are black or Hispanic or Asian—the statistics show that there are A LOT of White people living degenerately in this Brave New World

        My point is we have to take the world as it is right now and try to make it better.  If you’ve seen “Obama 2016” by Dinesh D’Souza you will have seen Obama’s brother in Kenya, obviously a racially pure African of way higher than average intelligence than his half-brother.  

        Obama’s half-brother admitted that the Revolt against British Colonialism WAS A TERRIBLE MISTAKE and that Kenya would be more like South Africa if they had stayed under White Rule for another 20-30 years… And South Africa would be way ahead of where it is right now if it were still under White Rule.

        The “realpolitik” of the situation is that even the dream of restoring segregation is CURRENTLY politically out of reach—-Utterly UNIMAGINABLE outside of this website and a few places on the internet like it.  NOTHING as good as the Restoration of Segregation will EVER happen (forget about expulsion) unless we can sell such a restoration as BENEFICIAL to all people concerned.

        I am sorry if you don’t think that makes any sense at all.  To me—dreaming of things that are absolutely impossible under the present reality doesn’t make any sense at all.  

        Basically, we have to go back to doing what the Southern States were actually (really and truly) trying to do in the 1930s-40s—create a truly “separate but equal” society—that was Strom Thurmond’s goal when he was Governor of South Carolina and I applaud it!   THE NEW YORK TIMES applauded Governor Thurmond’s efforts in South Carolina (in the 1940s) until he announced he was opposed to the Civil Rights Act of 1948.  

        My dream, my goal, is to effect real change.  IF we offer to create a world in which the races can peacefully coexist—that will be a huge improvement.  The South African promise of Apartheid was also “Separate but Equal”—and I think Apartheid would have survived and succeeded if they had focused on making the “Separate Development” Homelands/Bantustans more completely equal.  

        Right now we have a communist President who was (I think, as many do) born in Kenya.  WE ARE NOW THE COLONIZED NATION.  WE ARE THE ONES who need our independence back.  If you try to advocate “expulsion” you’re going NOWHERE in the modern world.  JB Stoner and ER Fields couldn’t get any supporters for that way back in the 1960s and 70s.   Society is MUCH more integrated and “equality minded” now than it was even then.

        So let’s try something different: show that the “bad old days” of segregation were not really so bad, and that in many ways the present reality is worse, FOR EVERYBODY (Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American and White).  I for one think it is.

        What do you say, can we all try to think outside of the box?  And try to save our race and nation from ending up in one big mass grave of piny boxes?

    • Seek

      Why should I consent to cede U.S. territory to ethnic triumphalists, one chunk at a time?  This is still my country, all 3.6 million square miles of it.  No thanks, mate.  The Great Confederate Copout, as I call it, is an unsatisfactory solution.  The neo-Rothbardians live in a fantasy world.

      I choose to fight for my whole country, refusing to give up one square inch to ethno-religious secessionists, most of whom will demand more land anyway, if not by gunpoint, then by “negotiation.”    

      • There’s nothing Rothbardian or even really Libertarian about my proposal at all—and when you talk about a “Confederate Copout”—well those are fighting words to me.  What I’m proposing is actually a new kind of Federalism—and I think it is entirely viable.  Federalism within which diversity and segregation maintain each other.   The Fantasy is the idea that we can pretend to exist on the North American continent WITHOUT taking into account the large population that disagrees with EVERYBODY on AmRen.  I think I can sell my ideas better to the majority than anyone who proposes “Expulsion” or anything along those lines.  Anyone who says, “I choose to fight for my whole country, refusing to give up one square inch to religious secessionists”—is the person living in a fantasy world.  The essence of politics is cooperation and gradual persuasion.  The OTHER SIDE knows this—they slipped integration and multi-culturalism on us one step at a time.  IF we are EVER going to reverse the trend, we have to start where we are.  I happen to be in Los Angeles—outside of New York’s five boroughs the most obscenely integrated, multi-cultural, globalizing place in North America.  But even here—I can see the elements of a new segregation and a restoration of ethnic integrity: we just have to rebuild GENUINE DIVERSITY, perhaps on the concept of “ethnic triumph” that you suggest.  I hope that there are a few other people around who will be willing to help me build this into a real new movement: local control = ethnic preservation, and ethnic preservation will lead to ethnic competition, out of which we (the White Race, the Europeans) will ultimately prevail if we’re half as “superior” as we think we are….. that’s the essence of freedom: meaningful opportunity to compete, excel, and prevail.  I suppose that could be described as a fairly Libertarian or Evolutionarily Anarchistic position…..

  • 5n4k33y3s

    The media misrepresentation was predictable, as was the verbal harassment. Unsurprisingly, the Black Student Union was not mentioned in the article.

  • .

    Bless you, Dennis Nagle. Not many academics have the courage to be objective in the face of what must be overwhelming peer pressure in today’s academic environment.

  • Ulick

    “Johns Hopkins University engineering professor Dennis Nagle, who is white, said he believes there is truth to Taylor’s teachings.  “He’s got some interesting views on diversity that aren’t popular,” said Nagle, who was not able to get inside the event. “But he’s got evidence and documentation to back it up.”

    I have much respect for Dennis Nagle.  You know that there are others in the academic world who think like him, but don’t have the courage to say it because of the cold-shoulder that Nagle is sure to receive from fellow faculty members.  And I don’t think it’s coincidence that Nagle teaches in the hard sciences where the focus is on the correct answer and not spin, and the achievement differences among races are more readily apparent.

    • Barrack Osama

       This is why I love electrical engineers and architects and mathematicians and physicists. Feel good lies do not sway nature.

  • During his speech, Taylor said several people sneaked inside the venue through a fire escape and shouted an obscenity at him.

    Taylor said? Either it happened or it didn’t. They make it sound like an unsubstantiated claim.

  • Mahound

    “He [Taylor] was very anti-diversity…”

    Well, they got that right!

    • Barrack Osama

      He wants to preserve a distinct race. Sounds pretty pro-diversity to me!

      • Ethnic pride and segregation are actually the ONLY ways and means to preserve diversity…..

  • “I believe in complete freedom of association, and when given that choice most people prefer the company of people of their own race,”
    From http://www.amren.com/opinion/2012/06/race-purists-are-they-slightly-nuts/”There is one argument for anti-miscegenation laws that is stronger now than ever. Whites used to have eight or ten children, but now they are not even replacing themselves, and every out-marriage is a tiny step towards extinction.We are supposed to care about the survival of the snail darter and the spotted owl. If you have endangered salamanders living on your property, the feds may not even let you build a house. I care a whole lot more about the survival of white people than I do about snail darters, and by 2050 we are expected to be no more than 4 or 5 percent of the world population.”Taylor is for complete freedom of association but is for anti-miscegenation laws? Does that make sense?Btw, if all races prefer the company of their own people, why do most black men wanna have sex with white women? Why do so many Asian women wanna be with white men? Why do so many Asians have surgeries to look white? Why do 40% of Hispanics in Texas marry Anglos?Why are increasing numbers of white women going off with blacks?And are mixed race children worse off?  But mulatto kids are much better off than pure black kids . Eurasian kids seem to be thriving.  Jeb Bush’s kid having a hard time?  I see no evidence. While it’s true that there is cultural comfort in being with one’s kind, the rule of biology also says women prefer studlier men, which is why lots of white women like blacks–even if for short  relationships–and lots of Asian women prefer white men. And men like feminine women, which is why black men prefer white women.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSGDlDThM_0In this video, Taylor says “this country belongs to us(white people) and to no one else.”How can there be free association of peoples if Taylor thinks US should ONLY belong to whites and to no one else?

    • MissBonnie123

      White people founded, established, and defended America. That’s why he believes that White people need to be the dominant race in America. Surely, Mexicans believe that Mexico is for Mexicans and not for the whole world.

      I can only speak for myself when it comes to interracial relationships. As a White woman, I’ve been approached numerous times by nonwhite men for dates. I have found that these nonwhite men are very aggressive and domineering–two traits that I do not like. I think a lot of Black men want to date White women because they feel White women would be more compliant, more obedient than Black women. I actually saw an article praising Black men who seek White women and everything in the article indicated that White women would be submissive and not “act up” like Black women would. There was NOTHING about love and friendship in this article!

      I believe that Jared is NOT for anti-miscegenation laws. Like me he believes White people should have such a love for their race that they would have a strong preference for their own kind.

      My observation has been that children of interracial relationships not only prefer the nonwhite parent but also have a strong disdain for the White race. Did the parent teach them this hatred? Was it the school system? I don’t know but I’ve observed this so many times that I believe it is best for my people to date, marry, and procreate within our own race. 

  • OBSERVER

    Why do we whites need permission?  Do blacks students have to have permission?

  • Pelayo

    “Frankie Knight, a white senior family science student who didn’t know much about the White Student Union, came to the meeting after hearing about it from her professor.”
    WIll someone please explain what the HELL “family science” is? I can’t believe the studies in which one get earn a degree today. Then these kids wonder why they can’t get a job.
    I just found a link about Family Science if anyone is really interested.

    http://www.ncfr.org/about/what-family-science

  • Major

    One would have to come to the conclusion that the difference of opinions at Towson between black & white attendees…proves Taylors point. Blacks will never concede the same rights of free association for whites…as they do for their own separatism, will they?

    The pinnacle of black hypocrisy, I’d say. And now…anyone hear from Al Charlatan on his feelings towards whites? And that tool / fool…has a TV show.

  • Obama, at least as portrayed in Dinesh D’Souza’s “Obama 2016”—does seem to have a “reverse” Oedipus Complex—-out of love for his mother he exalts his father and wants to murder his mother’s race—but his mother’s family were all Anti-American communists who hated (in essence), themselves.  If D’Souza is correct—Obama is BEYOND psychopathic, he is a deeply disturbed an tortured individual.  I suggest he be relieved of all responsibilities and that the country pay his psychiatric bills (and those of his family) for the next 50-75 years….. it would TOTALLY be worth it to keep them all under close clinical observation….

  • razorrare

    I think that paramilitary “guerilla” groups  would most aptly describe the negroe militias and the carpetbaggers whom the north sent to the southern states  to implement their political(republican) reconstructionist policies…when i hear the term “guerilla” i cant help but think of China,Cuba,Russia,Malaysia,El Salvador…in that context i would be agreeable that the orginal kuklux clan was created as a “resistance” movement against such northern insurgents sent by the conquering North…certainly the definition for paramilitary would fit these two groups as well….A paramilitary is a military-esque force whose function and organization are similar to those of a professional military, but which is not considered part of a state’s formal armed forces.[1] Under the Law of Armed Conflict, a state may incorporate a paramilitary organization or armed agency charged with police functions into its armed forces. The other parties to a conflict have to be notified thereof.[2]
    The term paramilitary is subjective, depending on what is considered similar to a military force, and what status a force is considered to have. The nature of paramilitary forces therefore varies greatly according to the speaker and the context…certainly no southern state at that time  officially sanctioned the kuklux clan as being a legitimate paramilitary group–for arguments sake the key word here is “officially.”…..

    In fact Farrahkans group would more aptly describe a paramilitary guerilla group for they have more than once have been ligitimized and used by  Government & States to aid police in helping keeping certain demographic areas less crime and violent prone–disregarding the  violent history of the Farrahkan(Islam) movement  itself…See Zebra Killings..

    Ah,which brings up the question…where are the memorials and the concern to see that the surviving victims and their family members of the “zebra killings” are justly compensated for the lack in competence of government and states to protect these victims? Where are the accepted house scholars and establishment historians at when justice calls out for their memories of this travesty of racial hatred to be remembered….like rosewood, whose numbers of dead victims is questionable at best…where are the hollywood memorials at? ….total of 8 dead–6 blacks-2 Whites in Rosewood killings versus 71 Whites killed in Zebra Killings…

    Your literary skills are evident so i am sure you are aware of the lawsuit that was successfully rendered against the state of Florida in the case of Rosewood…in case others arent (hate using wikipedia as a source) simply type in Rosewood…

    black lynchings of Whites in the reconstruction era of the South seems to have not even occured if you google the same but i know that was one of the very reasons why the Kuclux Clan was given to birth and why lynching of black men who violated their right to property–their women–were executed in the same fashion most frequently…

  • razorrare

    At times i get literary lazy…should have stated…it was proven through records that not one black church burned during the time frame that clinton said he witnessed such burnings,NOR AFTER…yes,investigators uncovered that those churches that they had found that had been burned downed were burned by black church members themselves to collect insurance & other devious reasons.

  • Screamin_Ruffed_Grouse

     “[Taylor’s] lying,” said Winbush, who is black. “He’s good at
    manipulating words and says he’s not racist. It’s like the white collar
    Ku Klux Klan.”

    Well damn, that statement was certainly original and unexpected, wasn’t it? A true Morgan State intellectual, if ever there was one (hint: there wasn’t).

    Blacks’ obsession with the KKK continues to boggle my mind. Spend enough time around them and it really does become apparent that huge numbers of them, possibly a majority, really do believe there are just hordes of sheet clad maniacs waiting to ride in on horseback and string up anyone they can get their hands on. Further, they attribute nearly godlike qualities to the Klan- they’re everywhere, they see everything, they secretly control the government, and are damned near bulletproof.

    It seems no matter what level of education and worldliness blacks achieve, they’re still afraid of this archaic band. The Klan is right up there with ghosts, dogs and certified mail on blacks’ list of fears.

    • Puggg

      Maybe that’s more of a feature than a bug, and maybe we shouldn’t talk them out of their paranoia.

      And maybe this means what the group in question did in the 1870s is still working, even though they have done very little of it in an organized standpoint since 1876.

      We found out from the major state university in my state that cotton balls on a sidewalk psychologically traumatize blacks.  We found out from Queens, New York that six-year old Hispanic boys can take large 20-something black men in a fight. 

      They’re so easy to bamboozle.