San Diego Gang-Rape Case Coverage Colorless—Except When “Racism” Is in Question.
| AR Articles on Censorship |
|---|
| Return to the Dark Ages (Mar. 2001) |
| Watch What You Say (Nov. 2001) |
| Loose Lips Sink Ships (Feb. 2002) |
| Search AmRen.com for Censorship |
| More news stories on Censorship |
This story, which is about the forcible rape of white female college students by black criminals, does not contain the words black or white. I guess they just don’t think anyone would be interested in facts like that.Trial opens for 3 men accused in rapes of USD students
Given the names of the alleged rapists, (Willie Louis Watkins, 32, Donald Duante Smith, 20, and Antonio Washington, 19) we might make a shrewd guess, based on our knowledge of differential naming conventions, at the race of the suspects, but reporter Dana Littlefield [Email him] and the Editors of the San Diego Union-Tribune [Email their readers’ representive] don’t want us to know.
By Dana Littlefield
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
January 29, 2008
A group of college students was hanging out at a Mission Beach condominium in 2006 when they were attacked by several men who entered through an unlocked door, a prosecutor said Tuesday.
The University of San Diego students—two women and two men—were terrified by the intruders, who forced them to participate in sexual acts and stole items from the two-story condo.
But here’s a story that does contain this information, (and a photograph of the alleged rapists) because the judge is asking jurors if they’re able to be impartial in a case like this:
By the way, even when the Judge isn’t channeling To Kill A Mockingbird, it frequently happens that local TV stations are the place to go for the information that the AP Stylebook says isn’t pertinent. Even if they wanted to ignore the issue, they can’t—they always have photographs of the suspects.
Fifty [prospective] jurors were being questioned at the San Diego County Courthouse on Thursday. Judge John Einhorn addressed the juror pool, saying that race is an issue because the defendants are black and the victims are white. The judge has been asking jurors if that would affect their ability to be fair and impartial in the case—can they concentrate on the evidence, not skin color. [Judge: Race An Issue In Mission Beach Rape Case, NBCSanDiego.com, January 24, 2008]
(Posted on January 31, 2008)
Comments
Have you ever seen this kind of incident any other way racially?
Posted by Peejay in Frisco at 5:56 PM on January 31
Before the “Civil Rights” movement this stuff hardly ever happened. This sounds like the Wichita case right in my former back yard.
Posted by Howard in Las Vegas at 6:02 PM on January 31
I’m sure the media will do the usual cover-up on this. Good for TV stations for showing the pics.
Posted by Tony S at 6:19 PM on January 31
The judge should recuse himself for creating discrimination where there might not be any. Don’t look at the 6th finger so to speak.
Posted by at 7:01 PM on January 31
I’m sure those three violent and racist black people support Obama. In my mind, I have marched non-violently against black racist people and their racist anti-white white Bolshevik goons many times. I have a dream that I hope will become reality one day. I hope others will join me. Maybe we can do the march differently. Maybe a dozen or a hundred or a hundred thousand cars can drive up and down our nations freeways and only go the speed limit and send a massive message to our oppressors that we will not tolerate the oppression and violence against us any longer. Demand affirmative action from black shyster leaders to preach to their racist congregations that the non-black people will not tolerate their violence against us forever.
Posted by Elrey Jones at 7:15 PM on January 31
This is nothing new, this has been prevalent for hundreds for years in this country, how many black women were gang raped by white men, this is so hypercritical! While the act of rape in itself is deplorable and scaring and if these alleged guys did commit these crimes, than by all means, they should be locked up for a very, very long time. But let us not forget, the crime of rape goes both ways.
Posted by at 7:16 PM on January 31
I know why the media ignored these guys, they don’t play lacrosse.
Posted by at 7:48 PM on January 31
Shades of “The Witchita Massacre and The Knoxville Horror.”
IN both of all of these outrageous cases, the press did not think it relevant to identify the race of the criminals, despite the very obvious racial overtones. Apparently the San Diego is going to follow the pattern. In all of these cases the prosecutors go on record saying that these crimes have nothing to do with race.
In the San Diego case, the two young college girls were repeatedly raped and forced to repeatedly orally copulate the three male black defendants while the white males in the location were held at gunpoint. At the trial, the judge is bending over backwards to excude any racial components and by his actions it’s obvious that he has recently read To “Kill A Mockingbird.” When the crime is white on black, which is rare, the opposite is true.
Posted by Jake at 8:15 PM on January 31
“Before the “Civil Rights” movement this stuff hardly ever happened.”
I find that hard to believe. Why else the need for the ‘civil rights’ movement in the first place to cover this type of thing up?
Posted by at 8:28 PM on January 31
“…Maybe we can do the march differently. Maybe a dozen or a hundred or a hundred thousand cars can drive up and down our nations freeways and only go the speed limit and send a massive message to our oppressors that we will not tolerate the oppression and violence against us any longer…”
I can tell you for a fact that driving four abreast at the speed limit is not illegal. But be prepared to be shot at. Not just by racists, but stressed-out commuters. Of course, backseaters would be handy…
Posted by Wild Eyed Charlie at 8:56 PM on January 31
I can’t even begin to imagine what it must feel like to be raped by a black guy if you’re a white woman; it must be more humiliating and disgusting than terrifying! First of all the guy has a smaller than average brain; second, his facial appearance is one of stupid hate with nothing to back it up… I could say more, I wished I didn’t have to hate them, but common sense and dignity, has me steering toward one fact: I need to outlive these ones.
Posted by Survivor99 at 9:17 PM on January 31
Shame on us thinking they are rapists…we are also racist for profiling them poor boys only out for a good time….shame shame on us for catching them!!!!! Bet they get off???? I think they will….all blacks are innocent like O J…remember???
Posted by lydia at 9:59 PM on January 31
“This is nothing new, this has been prevalent for hundreds for years in this country, how many black women were gang raped by white men,…the crime of rape goes both ways.”
Posted by at 7:16 PM on January 31
Once again: THE BIG LIE to try to dismiss the sheer magnitude of black on non-black racial atrocities.
First off, over the past several decades, per Department of Justice “Victimization Surveys”, on average there are about 30,000 black on white rapes EACH YEAR in the U.S. (including around 8,000 black on white gang rapes). The reverse is nearly NON-EXISTENT (less than a hundred each year). (Is this your concept of “rape goes both ways”?)
Now you’ll hear black racists try to justify this by bringing up the MYTH of rampant rape of black women by white slave owners. First off, all those people are DEAD. NO ONE TODAY HAS A DAMN THING TO DO WITH IT. So it is completely IRRELEVANT. But aside from that, only 5% of the wealthiest SOUTHERNERS were slave owners (and most whites were in the North were there were few blacks), and furthermore, slaves operated pretty autonomously on the plantations, and slave owners did not go around raping slave women because that would have completely disrupted the economic operation of the plantation and the products of such acts would have scandalized the family and the community. (See for instance: “Time On the Cross” by 1993 Nobel Laureate Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman.)
Posted by at 10:03 PM on January 31
The denial of race in USA to hide facts is becoming tyranical.
AP rules are designed to ‘cover’ for all but whites!!
The entire MSM is deciding what, who, & how in stories with no validation. Even politics is directed by MSM and their CHOSEN ISSUES. JQPublic has NO SAY about anything anymore. V
Posted by Vickie at 10:11 PM on January 31
This is nothing new, this has been prevalent for hundreds for years in this country, how many black women were gang raped by white men, this is so hypercritical! While the act of rape in itself is deplorable and scaring and if these alleged guys did commit these crimes, than by all means, they should be locked up for a very, very long time. But let us not forget, the crime of rape goes both ways.
Posted by at 7:16 PM on January 31
You’re joking right? No doubt there was many slaves who were raped by their masters during plantation days but gang rape has never been a past time of white men like it apparently is for blacks and arabs. When was the last time you heard about a group of white men gang raping a black women? I, for one, don’t even know of a single white male friend of mine who would ever have sex with a black woman even if she were throwing herself at them.
Posted by at 10:15 PM on January 31
Of course race is reported during rape cases…oh wait, only when the suspects are White Duke LaCrosse students accused of raping a black female and the DA holds back DNA evidence.
Posted by Jeff at 10:18 PM on January 31
“let us not forget,the crime of rape goes both ways”
Actually no. Justice department figures show almost zero reported rapes of black females by white men.
Posted by at 10:32 PM on January 31
“This is nothing new, this has been prevalent for hundreds for years in this country, how many black women were gang raped by white men, this is so hypercritical”
This is a typical myth and lie. Sex with blacks was very taboo during the slave days, even white prostitutes wouldn’t take black customers. Wealthy white men who owned slaves and wanted sex on the side would either have a “kept white woman” or a white prostitute, often a “higher class one”. I’m not saying that rape between a white slave owner and a slave or gang rape never happened, but it was not common. The proof, if it were common, you would have seen large numbers of mulattos on the plantations but you saw few. There are far more half white/black people today by far then there were even 50 years ago. Face it, blacks commit rape, murder, robbery and other crimes against whites at much much greater rates. More whites are murdered at the hands of blacks every 3 years than blacks were killed by whites in 400 years of US history!!!! They myth that whites routinely raped blacks is just another attempt at blacks to play the “victim” when the reverse is what is true.
Posted by at 10:40 PM on January 31
The rate of genital herpes among blacks has now reached 50%(herpes411.com.) They also have infection rates of ghonnorea, aids, syphilis, etc. many times that of whites. Putting aside the psychological effects- getting raped by, or simply having sexual relations with one of these people is very likely something that would ruin a girl’s life forever.
Posted by at 10:43 PM on January 31
In terms of the rape of black women by white men during the 19th Century in America, most of that wasn’t rape, but black women prostituting themselves to Union soldiers occupying Dixie after the bad guys won the WBTS and freed the slaves. After the plantation economy was destroyed by Adolph Lenin’s military, and the newly freed slaves had no way to make a living otherwise, many of the women had to turn to that oldest of professions. This is why the black American population has a lot of white DNA.
Posted by St. Louis CofCC Blogmeister at 11:15 PM on January 31
Actually for me, this is very very new. The old SlaveMasters are dead and dust. The old hatreds are dead for most whites. The most contact most white kids up to their 20’s have with blacks is in school, where we get stomped by gangs of you, we watch as you fail classes regularly, where you english is almost incomprehensible; and when we hire you for work, we must constantly be careful not to offend as we look for ways to fire you because you won’t or can’t complete the work that others are willing to do.
Posted by WhiteBread at 11:16 PM on January 31
Well 7:16 PM….why don’t you get all those stats of White on Black rapes? Haven’t you ever read the Color Of Crime? No? Then do so! EVERYONE knows that blacks have an out of control crime rate! Even blacks know this but will never admit it! Quit appeasing and making up some ridiculous statement that Whites do the same…
Posted by at 11:23 PM on January 31
7:16, That’s a completely unfounded claim. Gang rape has never been the prevailing condition in the United States, and white men do not often rape black women.
Black men are more likely to rape white MEN than white men are to rape black women.
Your final remark, “the crime of rape goes both ways”- does not make sense. There are perpetrators, and there are victims. That’s a one way street.
I suppose you mean to sing the hymn of the myth of how blacks have been so victimized by whites that we shouldn’t be so upset at a little payback, or you intend some veiled threat.
These “alleged guys” probably will be locked up, though that would not be my first choice for them. If your attitude really is: “Maybe they’re not even guilty” and the outrage against them is hypercritical (sic), this shows that you think whitey’s got it coming. In which case you are probably on the road to to joining these “alleged guys” in prison, where I’m sure you’ll have ample opportunity to confirm their manhood- and the rapists really will go both ways.
Now here’s a thought: had these fellows been shot dead the moment they invaded that place, there would have been no rape, no theft, they would have been spared the jail time, taxpayers would’ve been spared a myriad costs putting & keeping them there (for however short a period); and maybe they would have even served as an object lesson to those needing to learn to take the sanctity of others’ homes, property and well-being more seriously.
Posted by W.D. at 12:08 AM on February 1
Look for this story to be retold in a movie or a T.V. series - only with the races reversed. Peejay asks when this has ever happened but with the races reversed. In “A Time To Kill” of course. Oh wait… that was fictional, wasn’t it?
Posted by jewamongyou at 12:17 AM on February 1
The reactions to this case makes me think of other high profile cases in Witchita and Knoxville.
Wichita happened in 2000 and Knoxville occurred in early 2007. On the subject of racial bias in the media or white racial genocide these two cases will invariably pop up. But, look, these 3 cases occurred over 7 years. In that time frame 35,000 Blacks were murdered by other Blacks. Considering the staggering amount of violence committed on Blacks by Blacks it is silly to say there is a racist thrust to Black crime. It is just crime like White crime. Brutal and inhumane crime but motivated by nothing more than depravity.
Posted by O the road to Mandalay at 1:22 AM on February 1
Four Whites against three “young,youthful,leaders of there comunities,mothers favorite sons”.
How can they be even suspected of this crime?.
Reverand Sharpton will rescue these poor,unfortunate young men.
Posted by N _ Again at 1:34 AM on February 1
Regarding sex between slaves and Whites: I think that most of it was consensual. Slave women wanted their offspring to have a better life, and since lighter skinned slaves were preferred for the more cerebral work, fetching mint juleps and so on, there was only one way to move on up, socially. I suspect that overseers rather than masters were responsible for most miscegenation, because of their daily personal contact with slaves, far out of view of other Whites. They had more opportunity, and probably less distaste, than masters.
Posted by Schoolteacher at 2:12 AM on February 1
“When was the last time you heard about a group of white men gang raping a black women? I, for one, don’t even know of a single white male friend of mine who would ever have sex with a black woman even if she were throwing herself at them.”
Er, except for Halle Berry, right? I’d have to think twice about puttling up a fight if that woman begged me for sex.
Posted by The Britisher at 2:59 AM on February 1
If a group of white guys lowered themselves to rape a black woman, Sharpton and Jackson would be all over the television. They would organize marches and candlelight vigils and they would do it with the help of all the media. You won’t ever hear anything about this crime. Why don’t white people smarten up and get a spokesperson. Because he would be instantly branded a racist. What is the answer, is all lost?
Posted by at 3:39 AM on February 1
“But let us not forget, the crime of rape goes both ways.”
This is a lie. Racial rape is a one-way street from black to white. From 2001-2005 there were ZERO cases of white-on-black gang rape. There were over 10,000 cases of black-on-white gang rape.
So even if the Duke lacrosse team charges were true (of course, it was another racist hoax perpetrated by blacks) what are we saying? That one gang rape of a black woman by whites deserves more attention than over 10,000 cases of gang rape by blacks on whites?
That is the color of racism in America. One website/magazine is talking about it: American Renaissance.
Posted by Bernie at 7:22 AM on February 1
“..how many black women were gang raped by white men, this is so hypercritical!…But let us not forget, the crime of rape goes both ways…”
Posted by at 7:16 PM on January 31
But let us not forget the FACTS.
I don’t know what government-monopoly school you attdneded or which government-controlled newspaper you read (where black on White crimes are covered up or not reported) but here on AmRen we deal in cold hard facts.
Yes, pesky things those FACTS.
Once again, from The Color of Crime, (which should be used as a textbook as far as I’m concerned).
Feel free to refute and rebut at will:
• Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involv-ing blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
• Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent areHispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
• Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime againsta white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
• Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimesagainst whites than vice versa.
• Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics arethree times more likely.
————————————————————————————————-
Bon
Posted by BonBon at 9:20 AM on February 1
The University of San Diego is a beautiful Catholic college campus overlooking Pacific Beach and the Ocean. The Average student there is white, Christian, upper middle class, and these goons are clearly of the ‘mission beach’ crowd, or from south of Hiway 5 and Hiway 8, where the neighborhood gets progessively worse, or up near Kearney Mesa, which is now a ‘multiculturalist’s mecca.’
First off, these students wanted to be in a less ‘confining’ atmosphere than on campus. The area is notorious for motorcycle gangs, beach bums, drugs, casual sex, and even worse.
But nevertheless, the judge wanted ‘fair and impartial’ jurors. I’d say the only one that could be ‘fair and impartial’ as the judge wanted, would be someone who is both deaf (to their Ebonics-laden speech) and blind (to their race). The rotten apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, as they say, and Mr. Taylor’s “Color of Crime” clearly indicates they are guilty, just by their race alone.
Posted by AlmostMusicPhD at 9:40 AM on February 1
I would just like to point something out to the readers of this site. African elephant’s cannot be domesticated like Indian elephant’s. Zebra’s cannot be broken and ridden like Przewalski’s horse. African honeybees are renowned for their difficulty to work with and their agressiveness, and the list goes on. Am I making my point? Domestication = Civilization
These things are genetic, they are not due to poverty, discrimination, or any of the other myriad social ills they are attributed to.
Posted by tacitus at 9:44 AM on February 1
The reactions to this case makes me think of other high profile cases in Witchita and Knoxville.
Wichita happened in 2000 and Knoxville occurred in early 2007. On the subject of racial bias in the media or white racial genocide these two cases will invariably pop up. But, look, these 3 cases occurred over 7 years. In that time frame 35,000 Blacks were murdered by other Blacks. Considering the staggering amount of violence committed on Blacks by Blacks it is silly to say there is a racist thrust to Black crime. It is just crime like White crime. Brutal and inhumane crime but motivated by nothing more than depravity.
Posted by O the road to Mandalay at 1:22 AM on February 1
These three cases are merely the worst of the worst, not the only three to take place. Most white victims of black violence will never get any publicity, unless it is murder. Then there will be a paragraph or two in the local section of the paper and no mention of the race of the perpetrator will be made. It is practically written in stone that if the perpetrator and victim are both white they knew each other and are involved in a some type of disfunctional or criminal relationship. If the victim is an innocent white person the perpetrator will be black 99% of the time. There was an innocent white man killed in his home by black intruders in a Minneapolis suburb one month ago - and of course there was no racial angle in press coverage.
Posted by Civilized Neighbor at 11:33 AM on February 1
“African elephant’s cannot be domesticated like Indian elephant’s.” Tacitus
I must respectfully disagree with this Tacitus. You are certainly right that African elephants can’t be trained today, but the Carthaginian general Hannibal was able to train African Elephants and marched them across the Alps to attack the Romans. How he accomplished this wonder even Historical experts can’t explain. Of course, Hannibal was Semitic a member of the white race—not a black as sometimes depicted be Afro-Centrics.
Posted by Sardonicus at 3:04 PM on February 1
“Before the “Civil Rights” movement this stuff hardly ever happened. This sounds like the Wichita case right in my former back yard.”
You know, Brazil is nearly 50% black and there’s a lot of racism, yet it is not globally infamous for black on white crime (unless I don’t know something). The quickest way to reduce this country to all out civil war would be to send a cohort of Western liberals to preach about the slave trade, the legacy of the slave trade, white privilege, white oppression, equality, raparations, affirmative action etc. I would give the process about 10 years before insurrection.
I believe liberals are, probably unwittingly given their heads are in fantasy land, guilty of the incitement of most black on white crime.
Posted by at 3:38 PM on February 1
In 2005 47% of black crime was commited against whites, and only 45% against blacks. The real crime epidemic is black on white, not “black on black.”
Posted by at 4:59 PM on February 1
But let us not forget, the crime of rape goes both ways.
Posted by at 7:16 PM on January 31
That’s a laugh! Hundreds of white women and men have been raped by blacks for every sick white that EVER raped a black person. Black women have even suffered far more rapes by black men than white women who have been raped by white men.
Posted by at 5:35 PM on February 1
Whites should always assume a black is armed with a gun. If the white victims in this case had a gun or two in a place where they could get to it in a hurry,this incident MIGHT have been thwarted.
Posted by Peejay in Frisco at 6:56 PM on February 1
I remember when I was living in San Diego back in the 70’s, a white coed who was a student at SDSU or UofSD was raped and murdered in her dorm room by a black marine. He had apparently met her casually at a party or some event, and then showed up at her dorm room one night. She rebuffed his advances and so he raped and killed her. The black marine was caught, but I am willing to bet he has long since been paroled.
Posted by at 7:13 PM on February 1
So… in order to produce a jury, they need to find 12 people for whom rape, and race, are not emotional topics. Seems to me that would eliminate most human beings.
Are any martians available..?
Posted by WaitNow at 12:14 AM on February 2
In the recent case of a black garbage man, Christopher McCowen, who broke into the Cape Cod house (on his route) of Christa Worthington, a well known white fashion writer, viciously raped her and murdered her in her bed, the fact this was YET ANOTHER black on white racial atrocitiy became known ONLY when the jurors were called “racist” because they did not buy into the black rapist/killer’s story that he had consensual sex with his white victim.
Likewise, the nation became aware of the black on white hate crime in Jena, where a mob of 6 blacks ambushed a lone white from behind, beat him into a coma, and then continued to kick him in the head until blood came out of his ears and mouth, trying to kill him, ONLY when WHITES were accused of racism due to those trying to get the black racist attackers off scott free lying about some completely unrelated “noose” non-incident many months before.
The pattern over and over is that the racial aspect of a black on white crime is censored until WHITES are being spun as the racists! ONLY when WHITES are being portrayed as the racists and BLACKS the victims, (no matter the contortions that must be made to accomplish this) is the veil of censorship removed from the news story.
Posted by at 1:18 AM on February 2
Yet more of the 20000 white women raped (plus 8000 gang raped) by black men EACH YEAR IN AMERICA TODAY. White on black rapes are nearly non-existent. This is part of a one sided race war being waged upon whites by blacks that has been going on for half a century now. (Part of the 1 million whites who are victims of violence at the hands of blacks each year, OVER TEN TIMES THE REVERSE.) And like in any war, women often take the brunt. Rape is often a tool of war. And these statistics understate the lopsided nature of this war, since whites, especially white women, avoid blacks and black neighborhoods in general. Blacks, on the other hand, have no hesitation to be in white neighborhoods. The statistics also understate the lopsidedness since much crime is within the family or between acquaintances (and thus within the race). But the most disturbing (because uncontrollable and because it takes away our freedoms and peace of mind) and serious and violence prone, is stranger on stranger. And the even more lopsided nature of black on white stranger on stranger violence (including rape) is somewhat hidden in the overall statistics.
There has been a long history of both white leftists and black racist writers celebrating the rape of white women by black men. (See, for instance, “Soul On Ice”.) And the media and academia are FILLED with white leftists and black racists doing all the can to encourage even more black on white racial hatred and even more violence.
White women are put in grave danger when they are brainwashed to think that if they take any precautions in the presence of blacks, they are being “racist”. We often hear the anecdote about a black man saying how oppressed he feels because when he approaches a car with a white woman, and he hears her activate the locks. Poor Baby!! Better she risk being another statistic than that his feelings be hurt. (15 year old white girl Ann Harrison in Kansas City Missouri, waiting for a school bus, was taught not to be racist, to be trusting, and when two black males drove up and motioned for her to come closer, instead of running like hell and hurting their feelings, she went up to their car to see what they wanted: Her lack of “racism” cost her her life. She was kidnapped, gang raped, tortured, and stabbed to death.)
There is a prominent black author with a book in the stores now in which he has the unmitigated gall to declare (with no basis but his own feverish racist imagination) that there is a one-sided WHITE ON BLACK race war!!! And I read a column by a female black writer in the newspaper declaring that she couldn’t look at a white man without seeing a rapist! Talk about inverting reality! Imagine the outcry if a white female columnist declared that she couldn’t look at a BLACK man without seeing a rapist!
During the Tawana Brawley hoax, many prominent blacks, like Bill Cosby, rallied around, putting up reward money, while bellowing “We won’t let this continue to happen to our black women!”. Didn’t matter that basically all black women who are raped are raped by black men. Blacks don’t care about those rapes. But let there be ONE hoax where a white is falsely accused of raping a black and watch the racial frenzy. We’re seeing this again in Durham. Imagine if after each and every one of the 20000 REAL rapes of white women by blacks (and after each and every one of the 8000 REAL black on white gang rapes), prominent WHITES rallied, declaring “We won’t let this continue to happen to OUR WHITE women”?
Blacks don’t give a damn about black on black or black on white incidents. Only the rare instances of alleged white on black. But any time there is yet ANOTHER of the RAMPANT black on white, whites are not supposed to be particularly outraged. No, that would be racist.
The rape of white women by black men is so rampant there are quite a number of prominent white women who have been viciously raped by blacks: singer Connie Francis ( http://www.geocities.com/sayswamp/connie.htm ), Democrat activist Susan Estrich, and the actress in “Top Gun” Kelly McGillis, to mention a few.
Posted by at 2:30 AM on February 2
And Susan Estrich, like a good little NOW ACLU ADL AJC woman still hates Whites and worships and adores blacks.
That is in and of itself proof that liberalism is a mental disease, just as Lenin diagnosed. Estrich now teaches in one of the worst black neighborhoods in the country. Take that back. 10 years ago it was one of the worst black neighborhoods in the country. With illegal hispanics moving in, the neighborhood becomes safer and safer every year.
Posted by at 2:05 PM on February 2
I have visited this site, along with New Nation News and ANU, for about 8 months now. The multitude of crimes committed against whites, and perpetrated by blacks is inexcusable.
Even more so however, is the inaction of the American people.
Here in Australia, when vicious minorities targeted our people, we rose up and showed them we are not afraid. Being a fairly Liberal country, it was unexpected. But effective.
While tension remains, the offenders realised that their blatant disregard for our laws, and the disrespect shown to our people, would not go unnoticed or unpunished.
While socially unacceptable, and downright illegal, this form of protest is the only effective means, now that our Western governments fail us.
You Americans have always prided yourselves on being strong and resolute. Yet you remain downtrodden by a minority.
Show the world and yourselves that you’ve got what it takes to stand up for each other.
Posted by Justice at 7:28 PM on February 2
http://www.myfoxchicago.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=5660625&version=29&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
A black male just massacred five women today in a Lane Bryant store in the small white suburb of Tinley Park, Ill, a place with almost NO black population. Take a guess at the race of the victims. The victims’ bodies aren’t even cold yet and the black killer hasn’t been caught, but authorities, as automatic in cases of black atrocities, immediately were stating that “robbery” was the motive. Yea, right. Based on what? You can rob without slaughtering five helpless strangers in cold blood. There are almost no blacks in Tinley Park, Ill. You don’t think these senseless pointless killings aren’t yet another black on non-black racial atrocity? And we endlessly hear the leftwing propaganda from the media and academia how blacks are supposedly the perpetual victims. But in every corner of this country, on an epidemic scale, even where the black population is miniscule, blacks are raping, robbing, carjacking, assaulting, and murdering non-blacks, WILDLY out of proportion to the black percentage of the population. Almost NO ONE has been left untouched by this black rampage that has been going on with unceasing intensity for nearly half a century now. THIS is the face of REAL OPPRESSION. THIS is what is denying all of us “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness”, TODAY.
Posted by at 10:06 PM on February 2
This San Diego story is particularly galling when viewed on the local news immediately following coverage of a meeting of incensed parents concerned with the “racism” in a local high school. Apparently, there was a single incident that involved a noose and another that had the Jewish star painted in excrement on a window.
These, of course, are far more serious than this home invasion/rape. In fact, as usual, if not for the pics, there would be no mention of the racial component. The above posts are correct…we, as white folks, are apparently just waiting for someone to put us out of our misery. Never in history has an entire race of people been cowed into extinction by the fear of giving offense.
Historians will puzzle over it.
Posted by at 3:33 AM on February 3
Er, except for Halle Berry, right? I’d have to think twice about puttling up a fight if that woman begged me for sex.
Posted by The Britisher at 2:59 AM on February 1
————————————————————————————————————————
Her Mother is white. Think about it.
Posted by at 6:47 AM on February 3
7:16, Look to the UK. We have regular black on white gang rapes now, but not the reverse. A few weeks ago a gang of black teenagers raped a schoolgirl in London and, clearly influenced by Knoxville through black websites, poured caustic soda over her body to ‘destroy DNA evidence’. She nearly died from burns.
Sociologists will tell you rape is about power. I believe this is true for whites. For blacks it is often about sex. The South African Law Commission recently estimated that 1.69 million women, almost all black, were raped each year in SA (includes 961 child rapes per day). People who operate CCTV monitors in Johannesburg see men prowling the streets every night trying to abduct women. They also see them digging holes in the ground to copulate in. Africa also boasts the world’s highest number of prison rapes. The next South African president is a rapist, but the people will still vote for him.
Posted by at 1:04 PM on February 3
O the road to Mandalay,
As another poster has pointed out already, you need to read the Color of Crime report before you make false statements that you only wish were true (or were “taught” were true in school or by the media). FACT: blacks commit more crime against whites than against blacks. Seeing as how very, very few white people live in black neighborhoods, one must assume that black criminals actually leave their neighborhoods for the sole purpose of finding white people to rob, beat, rape, and kill. Otherwise, why not stay where you know the lay of the land and won’t stand out in a crowd?
Please see BonBon’s 9:20am Feb 1st post for the link to the aforementioned report and the following tidbit:
• Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
Posted by El Derbo at 2:47 PM on February 3
If I were running any kind of buisness where I were exposed to the public,I would have a system of security measures that would resemble a hybrid of James Bond and Rube Goldberg.
Posted by Peejay in Frisco at 4:57 PM on February 3
“The pattern over and over is that the racial aspect of a black on white crime is censored until WHITES are being spun as the racists! ONLY when WHITES are being portrayed as the racists and BLACKS the victims, (no matter the contortions that must be made to accomplish this) is the veil of censorship removed from the news story.”
Posted by at 1:18 AM on February 2
Another example was the recent Northern California home invasion by two black males of a white family (in an area where the black population is nil): The two black male home invaders beat the white son with a baseball bat into a vegetative state (now with permanent brain damage). The father managed to retrieve a gun during this violent attack by two black males and shoot them, killing one.
But later the California NAACP came out screaming “racism” because while the surviving black home invader and attacker was charged, the white father who in self defense of his family shot the two black home invaders who were beating his son into a vegetative state was not charged.
So, only because the NAACP once again inverted a black on white racial atrocity and in a breath-tacking display of sheer GALL, tried to make it an case of WHITE racism, which then was duly reported by the NAACP sympathetic leftwing media, did we learn about YET ANOTHER black on white racial atrocity. Otherwise, without the allegation of WHITE racism, the censorship of this racial attack would have been maintained, and you’d never have heard about it.
Posted by at 9:48 PM on February 3
“… how many black women were gang raped by white men,…the crime of rape goes both ways….”
Posted by at 7:16 PM on January 31
No, it doesn’t.
From Jared Taylor himself:
“…Every year there are about 15,000 black-on-white rapes but fewer than 900 white-on-black rapes. There are more than 3,000 gang rapes of whites by blacks—but white-on-black gang rapes are so rare they do not even show up in the statistics…”
http://www.vdare.com/taylor/050913_crime.htm
Posted by at 9:53 PM on February 3
“A black male just massacred five women today in a Lane Bryant store in the small white suburb of Tinley Park, Ill, a place with almost NO black population…” Posted by at 10:06 PM on February 2
If it had been a white who did this in a black neigborhood you can bet law-enforcement and the media would IMMEDIATELY be telling you that it was being investigated as a racially motivated hate crime. And the FBI would be on the scene too.
Posted by at 10:15 PM on February 3
“When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.”
Since when does trembling fear equate to godliness?
Posted by at 1:02 AM on February 4
“When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.”
“Since when does trembling fear equate to godliness?”
Trembling fear will equate to Godliness when whites take back their media.
Posted by at 12:01 PM on February 4
“And Susan Estrich, like a good little NOW ACLU ADL AJC woman still hates Whites and worships and adores blacks…”
No, she probably pretends she adores blacks because she’s following the orders of her string pullers. I wouldn’t doubt she hates blacks but hates whites also, and sees us the the threat, as competition. A feminist, brainwashed loon.
Posted by Get working at 3:43 PM on February 4
“You know, Brazil is nearly 50% black and there’s a lot of racism, yet it is not globally infamous for black on white crime (unless I don’t know something).”
I have a friend who has lived in Brazil. She says the blacks are kept under strict control. The police monitor them. They are not allowed in White areas. The police don’t bother to arrest them for petty crimes like purse snatches. The police just give them a severe beating on the spot. She has seen several of these police beatings when a gang of young blacks targetted an elderly White woman and grabbed her purse.
Remember, black on White crime was moderate until about 1950 when the craven politicians of the big northern cities gave the blacks permission to prey on Whites. And of course by 1965 even the southern Whites were no longer allowed to protect themselves.
Posted by margaret at 4:25 PM on February 4
“Remember, black on White crime was moderate until about 1950”
Yeah, yeah, we all know black men became addicted to power around 1954 or whenever with their use of violence against everyone else… however… please define ‘moderate’.
Posted by at 10:37 PM on February 5
“When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.”
Since when does trembling fear equate to godliness?
Posted by at 1:02 AM on February 4
Does posting anonymously equate to bravery? So, are black criminals brave when they attack other blacks, when they attack whites, or both? Does not gang-raping women make one cowardly? I don’t know if I understand your point. Please clarify, O anonymous hero.
Posted by El Derbo at 11:42 PM on February 5
“Does posting anonymously equate to bravery? So, are black criminals brave when they attack other blacks, when they attack whites, or both? Does not gang-raping women make one cowardly? I don’t know if I understand your point. Please clarify, O anonymous hero.”
Well, I am the ‘anonymous hero’, and I will clarify (if allowed by the moderator.
Any violent crime against someone, smaller, weaker, less armed is a cowardly behavior. However, the vast majority of white murder and rape victims are victimized by other whites. The point is this: There are lots of whites doing dastardly things to other whites!
Criminal behavior is somewhat like any other business; the perpetrator looks for high reward and low risk. This is the reason whites (and blacks) choose to victimize whites. Just because a white rapist/thief decides to pick a white person to victimize does not make him a saint, actually, it just says that he is afraid of what a black would do to him. I didn’t make the rules, I’m just smart enough to be able to interpret them.
Besides, 50-100 years ago, the roles were reversed whites raped (look at the skin color of native Africans as compared to African-Americans if you don’t believe it), robbed from, murdered, extorted, carjacked, etc. etc. blacks and the inverse rarely happened. If you’re keeping score at home:
500 years ago, white victimized blacks.
400 years ago, white victimized blacks.
300 years ago, white victimized blacks.
200 years ago, white victimized blacks.
100 years ago, white victimized blacks.
50 years ago, white victimized blacks.
Today, blacks victimize whites
100 years from now?????
Posted by at 1:20 PM on February 6
To Posted by at 1:20 PM on February 6
First off, what happened among people dead and gone in the past is IRRELEVANT to anyone TODAY. All that matters is THE PRESENT. People alive today have NOTHING to do with anyone else from any other time. And today in the U.S., as for the past half-century now, all non-blacks are the victims of rampant black on non-black STREET TERRORISM and racial atrocities. You mention whites being victimized by other whites, for instance. I don’t have time to introduce you to the concept of statistics. But look up what statistically “disproportionate” means. And we’re talking about a WILDLY DISPROPORTIONATE amount of stranger on stranger violence that is perpetrated by blacks.
Second off, even your simplistic racist version of history is a myth. MOST whites in the past had nothing to do with blacks, never even meeting one. There never was rampant white on black criminal victimization, rapes, robberies etc in this country. Even during slavery (and only a handful of the wealthiest whites owned slaves in the South) rapes by slave-owners was relatively rare. And more whites are murdered by blacks every two years in the U.S. today than blacks were murdered by vigilante lynchings IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY.
And you are guilty of racism because you lump all whites like some kind of monolith. Apparently you are un-aware that hundreds of thousands of Northern whites died in the bloodiest war this country ever fought that freed the slaves, all fueled by white abolitionist intolerance for slavery. It would have been no skin off the backs of those white Northerners to have let the South secede.
Also, white creations such as vaccines, antibiotics, hybridized crops, machinery and automation that does almost all the world’s labor, (basically 95% of the scientific and technological marvels that surround you, including the internet and the computer you are looking at right now), has saved HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF BLACK LIVES.
But you can’t see that because you are blinded by race-hate.
Posted by at 10:58 PM on February 7
Anonymous Hero,
50-100 years ago, whites carjacked blacks???? Do you have any sources that cite the white-on-black robbery statistics from the 17, 1800’s? I’m sure the whites often participated in vicious carriage-jackings, I’d just like to see a source.
Also, what has changed in the last 50 years to, as you put it, make whites “afraid of what a black would do to [them]”? Why were they not afraid 400, 300, 200, 100 years ago? Regarding the gang-rape statistics, is it then your theory (and by theory, I mean personal opinion backed up with no data) that large gangs of white men don’t prowl the streets looking for lone black women to rape because they are afraid of what she might do? Try and round up a white gang-rape posse tomorrow. I doubt you’ll find many takers, though their refusal to join you will surely not be because of the fear of what your potential victim might “do to them”. The fact that there are so many black-on-white gang rapes every year in the US says much, much more about blacks than whites.
As to the skin color of American blacks vs. their African cousins, do you have any proof that this is because of large-scale rapes? Even an anecdote? As long as there is no burden of proof for making statements, one could also put forth the theory that during the 12 years of Reconstruction after the Civil War, large armies of white Yankees caused this. A whole vast army of young men, far from home with no wives or girlfriends meet a sad collection of newly freed slaves. Women with no means of supporting themselves and no skills other than farming. Perhaps, like Germany after WWII, many of these women turned to prostitution with soldiers to feed themselves and their children. Back in the days before birth control, this would lead to a large number of half-white babies, no?
But you can keep consoling yourself with your “theory” that whites don’t drive to other neighborhoods across town specifically looking for people of another race to rob, rape, and beat because they’re simply afraid of black people. That’s why white people in America are constantly robbing, raping, and beating Chinese Americans, right? Because they’re not afraid of them. Right?? Right???? Oops, maybe you need a new theory.
Posted by El Derbo at 11:34 PM on February 7
Posted by at 1:20 PM on February 6
Would you be OK with someone attacking you today because your tenth cousin had allegedly done something bad to his tenth cousin 100 years ago?
I ask that because the fact that you even bring up (distorted) supposed things from hundreds of years ago between people long dead and gone, and you bring it up in the context of things happening to LIVING PEOPLE TODAY, as though it has some bearing or relevance. No one can do anything about the past. Only the present. That is why people who are able to think rationally deal with the here and now in terms of the here and now. And don’t try to justify atrocities today based on unrelated incidents from the dead past between people who are no longer here.
Posted by at 12:48 AM on February 9
Please read the link kindly posted by 2:30 AM on February 2 regarding Connie Francis and the horror she endured.
It saddens me so much that our cherished singing star Connie Francis — an innocent, adorable, SWEET woman — was attacked and harmed in such a vicious way. The after-effects were actually worse than the article mentions. Ms. Francis had a nervous breakdown after the attack and was also in a wheelchair for a time. The rapist/burglar was never found!!!
Please pray for our world that God protect us all from this sort of depravity. It should never, ever happen to anyone, but especially not to ANGELS like Connie Francis.
Posted by at 3:05 AM on February 9