White Renegade of the Year

Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, December 31, 2013

RandPaul
Who did the most damage when he could have done the most good?

Today we inaugurate what we expect to be an annual series. At the end of each year we will profile a white person who could have been a champion for his people, but instead joined the fight against us. The White Renegade of the Year can be someone like this year’s award-winner, who attracted and mobilized supporters only to turn on them, or he can be someone who has never shown the slightest sign of racial awareness but who has been especially diligent in working against his own people.

There are so many good candidates that we could make a white renegade award every month—heck, every day—but this year’s inaugural honors go to the junior senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul.

What Might Have Been

“For of all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these: ‘It might have been!’ ” So we may say of Rand Paul.

Much like his father Ron, the younger Paul was initially a favorite of white advocates, running as a populist, anti-Establishment candidate who strongly opposed illegal immigration. His platform on border security included the construction of an electric border fence—underground. When he beat the odds to enter the Senate, it was as if Tom Tancredo had somehow reached the upper chamber—indeed, Congressman Tancredo endorsed Rand Paul in his Senate run and his Team America PAC donated money to him.

Rand Paul had a national following and dedicated activists throughout the country. He could push his father’s movement closer to the conservative base and mobilize it behind the paleolibertarian tradition of defending America’s borders and cultural identity. If Rand Paul worked to reduce immigration, slashed the multicultural state, and promoted real freedom of association we might actually have someone to vote for. More importantly, we could have someone who could build a real movement: the anti-state, anti-multiculturalist Right heralded by race-realist libertarians such as Murray Rothbard.

Unlike his father, Rand Paul had extraordinary appeal to grassroots conservatives as an embodiment of the implicitly white Tea Party movement. Not for nothing was his book (ghost written by Jack Hunter) called The Tea Party Goes to Washington. While Ron Paul caused rage and frustration among many mainstream conservatives because of his views on foreign policy and his willingness to break with the Republican Party, Rand Paul was hailed as a conquering hero even by the likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh. Rand Paul had it in him not just to be the leader of a faction, but of the entire American Right.

TeaParty

White advocates are always tempted to hail anyone controversial as a potential hero—a variant of what the Catholics call the “sign of contradiction.” The progressive media treated Rand Paul’s entry into the Senate with only slightly less hysteria than if he had been David Duke. Headlines shrieked about Rand Paul’s “racist staffers” in the same way they wailed and gnashed their teeth over Ron Paul’s supposedly offensive newsletters.

Conor Friedersdorf, who makes a living being a subservient “respectable” conservative shadowboxing with liberals, wrote that “In the political press, it happens again and again: libertarian leaning folks are portrayed as if they’re radical, extremist ideologues, even when they’re expressing ideas that are widely held by Americans across the political spectrum.” Perhaps the ultimate blessing came from our friends at the Southern Poverty Law Center, who named Rand Paul one of the leading “electoral extremists” of the “Radical Right.” Naturally, white advocates assume that anyone whom the media hate must be doing something worthwhile.

But being hated by the right people isn’t the same as being right. In retrospect, we should have seen it coming. After winning the primary, Rand Paul got into trouble on the Rachel Maddow Show for expressing the standard libertarian argument against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, saying, “Does the owner of the restaurant own his restaurant? Or does the government own his restaurant?”

Although Rand Paul was running in the conservative stronghold of Kentucky, he could not muster the same courage as someone in Duck Dynasty. He quickly backtracked and assured everyone of his enthusiastic support for the act, and, presumably, the unlimited right of the government to tell business owners whom they can and cannot serve or hire . When he reached the floor of the Senate, he made sure to use his first speech to condemn the great Kentucky statesman Henry Clay for compromising with slavery, and compared himself to abolitionists. Even chinless Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell walked off the Senate floor in disgust.

CivilRights

Cruelly, there was a moment of hope. Rand Paul kept his campaign promise in 2011 by co-sponsoring an attempt to end birthright citizenship. At the time, Senator Paul said:

Citizenship is a privilege, and only those who respect our immigration laws should be allowed to enjoy its benefits. This legislation makes it necessary that everyone follows the rules, and goes through same process to become a US citizen.

With statements like that, we wanted to believe—oh so desperately!—that the media were right, and that a dangerous populist who actually meant what he said was in the United States Senate.

Support of amnesty

Alas, it was not to be. Just after the 2012 elections, Rand Paul announced that he now supported an “eventual path” to citizenship for illegals, albeit one that suggested a moratorium on legal immigration in the meantime. However, this did not indicate that Senator Paul was thinking outside the box on immigration; it suggested he was not thinking at all. In some speeches, Senator Paul was confused about the difference between green cards and citizenship, and his “evolving” views on immigration reflected the chaos that results when a politician takes a new position but hasn’t yet figured out what it is or how to explain it.

By 2013, the explanation was forthcoming. Senator Paul had identified what was standing in the way of conservative victory: the conservative base. This past year, we saw a series of initiatives, speeches, and publicity campaigns on a host of topics. All of them could be seen as variations on the theme that whites can be replaced.

The opening salvo came in February, when Rand Paul gave the “Tea Party” response to the State of the Union address. He had been chosen as the designated representative of the overwhelmingly white conservative grassroots, as the champion of the populist insurgency who would communicate the authentic feelings of the man in the street, instead of the “official” Republican response given by professional Latino and amnesty booster Senator Marco Rubio.

Incredibly, Rand Paul took the opportunity to give a speech that sounded just like Marco Rubio:

We are the party that embraces hard work and ingenuity, therefore we must be the party that embraces the immigrant who wants to come to America for a better future. We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities. We must be the party that says, ‘If you want to work, if you want to become an American, we welcome you.’

Of course, if all it means to be an American is that “you want to work,” nearly everyone on earth is a potential American. Far from being a break with the Republican past, Rand Paul was taking the GOP back to the days of George W. Bush.

The Kentucky senator didn’t stop there. The next month, Mr. Paul’s pilgrimage took him past the standard neoconservative concept of a “proposition nation” to embrace racial solidarity—for non-whites. On March 19, he addressed the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, beginning his address in Spanish and endorsing the idea of a bilingual nation, arguing that “Republicans who criticize the use of two languages make a great mistake.” He spouted the usual clichés about how we need hard-working Latino immigrants to fill jobs, even though Kentucky already had an unemployment rate higher than the national average. Senator Paul then patronized his audience with a quote from Pablo Neruda, a Chilean writer—and well known Communist Party member who wrote odes to Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro.

Rand Paul stumping for amnesty at any immigration forum in June organized by the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles.

Rand Paul stumping for amnesty at an immigration forum in June organized by the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles.

Rand Paul’s policy prescriptions could have come from the pen of Joe Biden. Senator Paul dismissed the idea of “deporting 11 million people”—completely ignoring self-deportation through enforcement. He bemoaned the current “de facto amnesty” without explaining how creating de jure amnesty will make things better. He recited the usual litany of praise for Hispanic superiority in “family, faith, and conservative values”—even though Hispanics are more likely than whites to have abortions and illegitimate children, less likely to own businesses, and are far more politically liberal.

But Senator Paul actually went beyond the standard liberal position. He specifically denounced E-Verify, an employment check to prevent illegals from getting jobs. Even Barack Obama and John McCain claim to support this commonsense measure. In the name of liberty, he declared his opposition to any plan that will force “businesses to become policeman.” (No doubt, he will soon campaign against employers policing the withholding of income taxes—also in the name of liberty.)

Outreach

Having bent the knee to La Raza, Rand Paul moved on to blacks, with a widely publicized address at Howard University on April 10. Here, he was greeted with laughter and scorn from the overwhelmingly black audience, as he acted like he deserved credit simply for showing up. Incredibly, Senator Paul flatly denied that he ever questioned the Civil Rights Act, even though, as one student pointed out, the evidence is “on tape.”

Rand Paul began his address by telling the audience that he wasn’t going to “lecture” them and then proceeded to do just that. Like Sarah Palin pretending that the socialist Martin Luther King was actually a proto-Tea Party activist, Mr. Paul recited Republican clichés that have nothing to do with today’s reality. He told the audience that Lincoln was a Republican who freed the slaves, that the founders of the NAACP belonged to the GOP, and that the Democrats supported Jim Crow. Left unmentioned was the shift in black support from the Republicans to the Democrats, largely in opposition to the limited government conservatism Senator Paul claims to champion. He praised Howard alumnus Edward Brooke as a great black Republican, but couldn’t be bothered to get his name right, calling him Edwin Brooks.

This moment in Republican outreach rivaled the time when Karl Rove danced like a rapper at a correspondents’ dinner. It was simply another chapter in the long history of Republican groveling. After all, as Dave Weigel wryly noted, “the post-election Republican visit to Howard is practically a tradition.” RNC chairman Ken Mehlman made the trip in 2005 to apologize for the Southern strategy of appealing to white conservatives in the formerly Democratic South. Affirmative-action RNC chairman Michael Steele made the same trip in 2009 as part of his vaunted outreach to blacks. Neither speech did anything but embarrass the GOP.

Comedian Jon Stewart pokes fun at Senator Paul's pilgrimage.

Comedian Jon Stewart pokes fun at Senator Paul’s pilgrimage.

But Rand Paul declared victory and moved on. In December, he spoke at the new Republican African-American Outreach Office based in Detroit. There, the senator promoted “economic freedom zones” that would bring prosperity and opportunity through low taxes in urban areas. Unfortunately, the audience was filled with “well-dressed, white supporters.” Most of the blacks present were outside, protesting with Al Sharpton’s National Action Network. Rand Paul also paused in December to honor Communist Party member and former South African President Nelson Mandela, speaking of “the indelible mark he left on his country and the world [that] will serve as an example of rightness and perseverance for humanity for all time.”

RandsWrong

The Jack Hunter debacle

Ironically, even though Rand Paul repeatedly humiliated himself trying to prove he’s not racist, he was caught in one of the largest political scandals of the year. His close aide, Jack Hunter, who was once known as the “Southern Avenger,” was the subject of a hit piece by the neoconservative Washington Free Beacon. Mr. Hunter had once said sensible things about race and multiculturalism, including, most damningly, that mass immigration would render American meaningless. He was also once a member of the League of the South, made critical comments about Abraham Lincoln, and used the Confederate flag as part of his pseudo-wrestler persona. All of this was dutifully reported in point-and-stutter style, and spread with staggering speed across both the conventional Left and Right.

Mr. Hunter immediately recanted from most of his positions in an interview with the Beacon. He wrote his former editor at the Charleston City Paper asking him to remove controversial articles, but this backfired spectacularly when the editor condemned him as a coward and a racist. Rand Paul claimed that he hadn’t read all of his staffer’s work, some of which he called “absolutely stupid.” Inevitably, Jack Hunter left Rand Paul’s staff—in what Mr. Hunter called solely his decision and what Senator Paul called a “mutual decision.” As a result, despite all the pandering Rand Paul did throughout the year, the black-oriented website TheGrio wrote, “As Kentucky Senator Rand Paul weighs the possibility of a 2016 presidential run, his past—and present—record on racism manages to catch up with him again.”

SouthernAvenger

Mr. Hunter would later cautiously re-emerge with a humiliating article for Politico entitled “Confessions of a Right-Wing Shock Jock.” Mr. Hunter explicitly disavowed his former writings and claimed that his views had changed. However, not content with condemning himself, he condemned the entire conservative movement as complicit in his offensive past, suggesting that he only said these things to appeal to the larger American Right. Luckily, Mr. Hunter says, a new libertarianism that emphasizes tolerance, diversity, and sensitivity is changing the American Right. “It certainly changed me,” he wrote.

And now this new, fuzzy multicultural American Right has a champion running for the White House in 2016: Rand Paul.

The futility of it all

There is nothing new about any of this. The Republican Party is always trying to turn itself into something else. George W. Bush justified his run for the White House on the grounds that his “compassionate conservatism” represented a new era for the party and a break with the cold rhetoric of the past. He also said that he could win Hispanic voters—since he claimed to speak Spanish. Ken Mehlman, who is Jewish and later came out as homosexual, headed the Republican National Committee from 2005 to 2007 at a time when liberals bemoaned “Christian theocracy.” Mr. Mehlman spent much of his tenure apologizing for the conservative base and urging more outreach.

Michael Steele justified his time as head of the RNC on the grounds that he could make an impact on black voters, and that the GOP had previously been “unconcerned about minorities.” Senator John McCain, who has been one of the most vocal supporters of amnesty in the Republican Party, argued that the GOP should support comprehensive immigration reform because “we are losing dramatically the Hispanic vote.”

And, in the more distant past, there was Jack Kemp, a former NFL player who claimed that he was uniquely concerned about black voters because “I can’t help but care about the rights of the people I used to shower with.” Mr. Kemp’s proposals for “enterprise zones” in depressed urban areas are practically identical to Senator Paul’s “economic freedom zones.” The record of the attempts of Ken Mehlman, Michael Steele, John McCain, and Jack Kemp to win over non-white voters speaks for itself. Rand Paul’s stale rhetoric and patronizing outreach has been part of the failed Republican playbook for decades.

Jack Kemp, Adrian Fenty, and Eleanor Holmes Norton at a DC Vote rally in 2007.

Jack Kemp leads the way with Adrian Fenty and Eleanor Holmes Norton at a DC Vote rally in 2007.

Who speaks for us?

Republican incompetence and failure is not the point. The point is that Rand Paul turned his back on his own constituents, who voted for him because he campaigned as a populist, anti-establishment candidate who would restrict immigration. Nor is Rand Paul simply adopting a socially moderate tone to be acceptable to the mainstream media. He is quite willing to take media criticism for aligning with the Religious Right. He has written a bill that would define life as starting with conception, and has been a vocal proponent of traditional marriage. He even joked that he couldn’t see how President Obama’s position on marriage could get “any gayer.”

But when it comes to anything that would advance white interests on immigration, racial preferences, or crime, Rank Paul dances to the media’s tune. He has even claimed the American justice system is biased against blacks.

This is what happens when ambition comes before what might once have been convictions. Rand Paul’s father Ron was once explicit about the dangers posed by multiculturalism and mass immigration, writing that “we must address the cultural aspects of immigration” and calling for a vigorous defense of the southern border. However, once he became a national figure and the tribune of the libertarians, he reversed his position.

Rand Paul with his father, Ron.

Rand Paul with his father, Ron.

Rand Paul is making the same transformation as he sets his sights above being the junior senator from Kentucky and positions himself as a contender for President. In order to appeal to corporate donors and ensure the support of the libertarians who comprise his national following, Senator Paul has made the strategic decision to abandon even implicitly white racial politics. Instead, he will run as a pure “Constitutional conservative,” mouthing platitudes about limited government while raking in donations from companies lusting for cheap labor. In the end, Rand Paul has become all but indistinguishable from Beltway Right hacks such as open-borders apologist Grover Norquist or corporate lobbyist Dick Armey.

In his journey from promise to pointlessness, Rand Paul occasionally talks like a Jacksonian nationalist, but his ideological core is by-the-numbers libertarianism. Not only does he not recognize whites as a group with collective interests, he doesn’t recognize America as a nation with interests. Instead, America is simply a place where deracinated, rights-bearing individuals live and compete with each other about who gets to make the most money. Although for electoral purposes Senator Paul had to give the nod to immigration restriction, his ideological core is being played out before our eyes–open borders, cheap labor, and utter indifference to the demographic makeup of the country.

This may actually understate Rand Paul’s uselessness. As shown in his nondefense of the principle of free association, whenever libertarianism conflicts with political correctness, Senator Paul bows to the latter. Though he said he would fire anyone proven to be a “white supremacist,” he has no problem speaking to racially collectivist groups of nonwhites. When there is pushback from the Left, Rand Paul retreats. The only targets libertarians feel free to attack are white conservatives.

AynRand

Rand Paul, like the Beltway Right, sees cultural and racial trends as essentially fixed. Like weather patterns, they are beyond human control. Therefore, all Mr. Paul can do is try to carve out a niche for libertarianism in the areas permitted him by the media gatekeepers. Thus, he can talk about why libertarianism is good for blacks as a group, but not why it is good for whites. He can promote libertarian opposition to “racist” drug laws but not libertarian opposition to the forced-association consequences of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

And this is the essential problem of Rand Paul. The libertarian takeover of the Republican Party is not a liberation from feckless and corrupt leaders. It’s a takeover by people who are unwilling to show even symbolic solidarity with the white Republican base. The tragedy is that Rand Paul was ideally positioned to lead a real political insurrection, to turn the Tea Party into the Middle American Revolution prophesied by Sam Francis. He had a real opportunity to create a movement that could roll back the multicultural state, stop illegal immigration, and reverse anti-white discrimination. Instead, we have someone who is afraid to talk about limiting immigration but thinks it’s a winning issue to defend British Petroleum after a catastrophic oil spill.

The worst of it is that Rand Paul is dependent on increasingly dispossessed whites. Angry white voters who understand that the financial, cultural, and political elites despise them are looking for a leader. Senator Paul struck a revolutionary pose but ultimately lead his followers into familiar dead ends. Worse, he takes promising activists and leaders and neuters them.

Instead of opposing a political class that enables mass immigration, the rise of Rand Paul and Beltway Libertarianism has given us a generation of enthusiastic and intelligent young activists fighting for the immigration and cultural policies of George Soros. It’s worse than a safety valve; it’s outright misdirection.

This is why Rand Paul wins our award as White Renegade of the Year. He has heaped far more scorn than he had to on his party, his people, and himself. Even when he doesn’t need to, he defends the anti-white narrative of the media. Even when it would be to his advantage, he avoids fighting for the cause of his constituents, and clings to clichés or outright fabrications to avoid being called a racist. In so doing, he condemns his own cause to inevitable political defeat and his own people to demographic destruction.

Certificate

We can take one note of grim satisfaction. No matter how many outreach centers he opens, how many aides he fires, how many embarrassing, groveling speeches he makes, Rand Paul will always need race-conscious whites.

But that doesn’t mean we need him.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

Gregory Hood
Mr. Hood has been active in conservative youth movements in the US.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • dd121

    In a year or so I don’t think you’ll have anyone to profile. All the Democrats are already anti-white and you’d be hard pressed to find a Republican who isn’t.

    • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

      Jeff Sessions.

      • Pro_Whitey

        Thanks for pointing out Jeff Sessions. He is not perfect, but probably the best we have. If Sessions kept up his tack on immigration control (he seems to be pushing for a moratorium on all immigration, legal and illegal), and adds to it a commitment to do whatever it takes to bring our international trade into balance (his record is mixed), and calls for undoing affirmative action policies as the cherry on top, then I think he could roll over the Human Pear (a/k/a Hillary!) and into the White House. Ah, a white in the White House, how sweet the sound.

      • Talltrees

        Of all the candidates last election, Michelle Bachman was the only one who supported White issues.

        Quotes:

        “It’s not the American way to give immigrants’ rights.

        Declare English as the official language of the US.

        Lack of border fence yields our sovereignty.

        Secure our borders and enforce current laws.

        Our immigration law worked beautifully until 1960s.”

        • Funruffian

          I know longer put credence into those groups or individuals who label themselves as Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, democrats or liberals. eventually you will realize shortly after you idolize them that their stances will disappoint you and that they are largely discordant with their professed beliefs. It pays to study and watch them on all the issues. Observe their dialogue and see how thy flounder from topic to topic. They walk a fine line between worrying about their public image as opposed to standing for what they believe in. The result is infuriating and disheartening to their fan base.

          • Talltrees

            Is any politician honest? No. They’re chameleons changing colors wherever the wind blows. Romney was a good example.

    • Max Krakah

      I’d profile Jarred Taylor for allowing the infamous JE to post posts that say whites are biologically inferior! How DARE JT complain about this guy when his own house smells to high heavens!

      • dd121

        I wouldn’t be too concerned about Mr. Taylor. At least on his website he allows some things to be published with which he probably disagrees. The left doesn’t allow any dissent within their purview.

        • Max Krakah

          glad he can afford to be two faced. I give money to SBPDL , i don’t give money to this site. Amren will be sunk by it’s own highbrow conceit , Paul Kersey and his site is what is really taking off.

    • Max Krakah

      Amren has absolutely no business pointing the finger at this guy when they let the likes of JE post defeatist rhetoric. There are other places, such as SBPDL, that one can donate to. JT won’t make a bit of difference to the way things are going in this country, he is the Mitt Romney of Race Realism.

      • JohnEngelman

        People do not get angry when someone challenges beliefs they are confident in. You become angry when I post facts you know are true.

        Jared Taylor is the most prominent race realist in the United States. With his academic background he could easily be more prosperous in another field.

        • Max Krakah

          then why do you get angry and refuse to have a discourse with people. Your anger takes the form of petulance and an increase in posting baseless rhetoric. You are the angry one sir, what else motivates you to pollute this board? JT will do what is best for him, and SBPDL is definitely outpacing him, and you are a reason why. Do you destroy everything that you gravitate towards?

        • Max Krakah

          JT is the mitt romney of race realism, all wet, soggy, afraid

        • Rhialto

          White men trying to keep America from sliding into total chaos should try to cooperate. If they can’t cooperate, try to maintain a neutral attitude.

          There are groups, like splinter Christian and survivalist groups that I don’t sympathize with, but I would never work with Liberals against them. This is the reason that I detested William F. Buckley: He cooperated with Liberals against anti-Liberal groups like the Birch Society and the Randian types.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            The trite and way too simplistic way to summarize the career of William F. Buckley is that the CIA sent him in to wreck the right wing.

            (That axiom suffers from an accuracy problem: Buckley’s involvement with the CIA came after he founded NR.)

            I think the more accurate way to put it is that WFB was the establishment’s emissary to the right wing of American politics, in that his political activism was not in good faith. Basically WFB’s goal in his professional life was to neuter the right so that it was not a threat to the establishment, even if they did happen to win the occasional election.

            Before WFB and NR, the right was isolationist-protectionist north of the Mason-Dixon Line and segregationist-racialist south of it. WFB gladly let people from both camps into the NR orbit when he started it, but slowly and surely, one by one, picked them off. What we’re left with today is “conservatism” that is entirely an abstraction at heart, but egalitarian-universalist all the way.

            Ever wonder why the left wing today loves WFB so much, why they gush over his “integrity?” It’s because he was a beautiful loser.

          • Oil Can Harry

            Now QD if you’d checked wikipedia you’d have been reminded that Buckley did indeed found Neocon Review (1955) AFTER his stint in the CIA (1951-53).

            My own view on Buckley’s career is less conspiratorial: I think he was a genuine conservative in the 50’s and simply drifted leftward over the years.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Your theory about WFB merely drifting leftward over the decades is supported by the fact that in 2008, not long after he died, either his son or nephew endorsed Obama. The lamer cons were fit to be tied over that, but I think that if WFB would have lived, he would have done that. IOW, the son or nephew that endorsed Obama was merely taking over the leftward march of WFB himself.

            Now, with that out of the way, I double dog dare you to stand athwart history and yell, “slow down just a little bit!”

          • Oil Can Harry

            It was Christopher Buckley, WFB’s only child, who endorsed Obama and who also described his father as a “liberal” parent.

            BTW the son is a successful novelist; I enjoyed the movie adaptation of his book Thank You For Smoking.

          • Johnny Squire

            Great post, QD. I remember two of NR’s purges during my youth, first when they had a symposium (which I think they pompously released as a book) to intellectually tar and feather Pat Buchanan as an anti-semite and then soon after they did the same to Joe Sobran for the same reason. Presumably both were guilty of only being against the fabricated case for war against Iraq in 1991, which in turn produced the backlash promulgated by the Israeli lobby and the Military Industrial Complex. I soon dropped my subscription to NR not long after.

        • BaronBaal

          Yeah, and just to think that, like me, he is not Jewish or Asian and, like me, has an IQ A LOT higher than yours…

          • JohnEngelman

            If you are intelligent, post something thought provoking. All you are doing is following me around with silly insults.

            Post something with facts and insights.

        • Shawn_thefemale

          Perhaps his convictions are more important to him than prosperity

          • JohnEngelman

            Evidently so. Jared Taylor deserves a large audience.

          • Max Krakah

            so that you can hijack it

        • White Dragon

          David Duke?

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    There was a similar debate on Occidental Dissent. Rand Paul was one of the finalists, the others being Paul Ryan and Pope Francis.

    I had to go with the Pope, mainly because there are perhaps a billion Catholics, all of whom as a matter of faith believe that Pope Francis is the Vicar of Christ, whereas Rand Paul Ryan, if they both run for President in 2016, will be splitting that big time 5% Republican constituency that voted for Jack Kemp in 1988.

    • Max Krakah

      go to SBPDL, this place is a waste of time

    • Oil Can Harry

      One difference: AFAIK Pope Francis has never denied being a liberal unlike those other two “conservatives”.

  • dubyasee

    Rand Paul is a sell-out. In his defense though, I don’t think that anyone who doesn’t parrot the Zionist message is allowed to be heard and/or seen.

    • Geo1metric

      I think you’ve nailed it!

      I remember when David Duke ran for a national office from Louisiana, and the entire establishment, republicans and democrats, stood up as one and denounced him. That was highly instructive.

    • Raydonn

      Sadly, he is indeed merely another puppet of a foreign government.

  • RebelliousTreecko

    Interesting new thing you have here.

    I wonder who will get the “award” at the end of 2014.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    1. Will someone please e-mail this article to Jamie Kelso?

    2. That Mr. Hood didn’t write anything about Rand Paul’s most notable “accomplishment” of the year, his more than half a day long filibuster against a bill that was going to pass anyway to drone on about drones, is understandable, because it really had nothing to do about race per se. But the more time goes on, the more useless that filibuster seems. Not only is it useless, and probably publicity-seeking, it’s counterproductive and disingenuous on top of that. For the only time that we have ever used armed drones against “American ctiizens” are in foreign countries against “citizens” with names like Mohammed al-Terroristiqua. Nobody except for a few whackjobs is actually proposing their use on regular domestic American territory. However, Rand Paul’s droning about drones did nothing but unnecessarily confuse people on the issue. All the while, and at about the same time as the drone filibuster, he was running around, as Mr. Hood points out, to one Hispanic race lobby and Razatard group after another promising that “we’ll find a place” for all their illegal alien squatter job thieves.

    3. Rand Paul and Ron Paul are a lot more alike than even this article admits on race and immigration issues. Any notion that they aren’t is purely a result of mendacity on the part of both of these individuals.

    4. OT: Mr. Hood alludes to the BP gulf oil spill. One news story that ran way under the radar in the aftermath is that the whole thing may have been caused by the failure of some crucial mechanical part that was made in China.

    • Raydonn

      I sent the link to Jamie Kelso………B

    • jackryanvb

      I am afraid this is a lost cause. I’ve been trying to get Jamie Kelso to disavow Ron and Rand Paul’s racial treason for years. Kelso is in the R&R Libertarian/race denying constitutionalist cult. It’s like those who knew and enabled homosexual pedophile Jerry Sandusky all those years.

      These never ending, never winning Ron and Rand Paul presidential campaigns give Jamie Kelso and others in the cult something to do. There are meetings, debates, it gives a small group of White people something to do, some type of life.

      Lot’s of our people need to “get a life”.

      It’s like Whites who were with Ronald Reagan way back when Reagan was governor of California in the 1960s, they wouldn’t disavow Reagan when he was old and senile in his second Presidential term.

      • Alfred the Great

        “homosexual pedophile” Very well defined. The communists use the word pedophile instead of homo on purpose.

    • dukem1

      Well now, that’s curious!

    • NeanderthalDNA

      This tells me that libertarianism is not the answer for Whites. I don’t think it can generate a sense of bond and commonality. Granted individuality and economic freedom are great things and, I would posit, character traits of our people, but…

      The ideology has been no more successful in correctly identifying the root problem than any other acceptable modern ideology.

      I mean on the one hand I get it. Our specific government and those like it have STOLEN our hard earned wealth and GIVEN it to others. Furthermore this process has been carried out by a government civil service that is in no way a meritocracy. Therefore it’s quite natural for a racially aware White to hate his government and what it is doing.

      But is this an inherent quality and function of government or simply what a government based on flawed ideology resorts to in order to impose its broken ideology?

      I’m just not sure that libertarianism has the potential to rally our people and to lay the groundwork for a feeling of community and oneness. I trust my White economic overlords no more than my White political overlords. Both have sold us downriver and bricked themselves up in secure enclaves.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        Mr. Hood had this to say in the article above:

        Thus, he can talk about why libertarianism is good for blacks as a group, but not why it is good for whites.

        Pardon me, but how is libertarianism good for whites? Sure you can pick and choose pieces of the whole that are good for whites, but the whole, the gestalt, of libertarianism, denies the right of people to engage in collective tribal socio-political organization.

        And we all know that blacks don’t think libertarianism is good for them because the need the EBT filled every week or month.

        • BillMillerTime

          I don’t know what you mean when you write that libertarianism denies “the right of the people to engage in collective tribal socio-political organization.” I want the freedom to lead my own life, to run my business as I see fit, to associate with my fellow whites, and to use and enjoy my property for which I have worked. I think that a white ethno-state grounded in Anglo-American notions of private property, rule of law, limited government, and individual freedom would be the best kind of state for the survival of our people.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            You said “white ethno-state.” You just took yourself out of bounds for modern libertarians.

          • BillMillerTime

            I’m not a libertarian. And you didn’t answer my question. You’re really a national socialist, right? You think that Hitler was a deep thinker and all that, right?

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            One of my biggest pet peeves.

            Obnoxious libertarians (oops, I’m sorry, you’re not one) presenting us the false choice of either pure libertarianism or a total despot and dictator.

            Get real; most forms of government in world history have been neither.

          • BillMillerTime

            I never presented us with a false choice. I simply asked questions that you clearly do not want to answer.
            I’ve read more than enough of your posts here on AmRen to know that you idolize Adolf Hitler.

  • rmk948

    Gentlemen, I am perhaps a rarity on this site – a leftist, in fact a Marxist who understands behavioral genetics and the difference of intellectual ability and moral sense among the races. If Rand Paul is not sufficiently close to your heart’s desire, I suggest that it is very unlikely that you will get anyone better. The horse is kind of out of the barn on this issue. Time to debate other approaches to the genetic problems we face.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      If Rand Paul is the best we can do, then we should just give up now, because Rand Paul isn’t “us.” That should be clear to you and everyone after reading this article.

      Resolve in 2014 not to get suckered into throwing in with our enemies who will only lose themselves and cause us to lose because we “will get anyone better.”

      • JohnEngelman

        rmk948 is saying that there is no leader who can restore white male supremacy. Longing for a white ethno state is an idle fantasy. Non whites and Jews cannot be deported. They cannot be reduced to second class citizenship.

        • Sick of it

          Then you are declaring the annihilation of white people sum total.

          • JohnEngelman

            The future of the United States is multi ethnic, multi racial, and meritocratic. That is not the same as “the annihilation of white people.”

          • ben no

            The future? That is already the present and look at the damage done to the financial security of the country.

            You shouldn’t come on a nationalistic website promoting the ethnic cleansing of whites as you sound liberal to the max.

            Actually you sound Jewish – inconclusive.

          • Jotun Hunter

            he’s a real mystery all right — if he’s not he must be on a hebraic payroll, nobody could be that relentless and that blinkard

          • ViktorNN

            “The future of the United States is multi ethnic, multi racial, and meritocratic. That is not the same as “the annihilation of white people.”

            With statements like this, you only show your lack of comprehension of the change in power that this country is in the process of undergoing.

            If you think that this future multi ethnic, multi racial US will be a happy place then you are sorely mistaken. When multiple ethnic and racial groups are all struggling over power because no one is in the majority, meritocracy is the first casualty. Pure ethnic/racial loyalty wins out every time.

            Most of us who gather here on AmRen have a clearer picture of where this country is headed than you. We understand that white racial awareness and solidarity is going to be crucial for the survival of our children and future white generations in this country.

            If you’re not on board with raising white racial awareness and solidarity, then I don’t see why you’re posting here other than to try and sow discord and disunity. If that’s the case, then my suggestion to everyone else is to just ignore you.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am a proponent of most of Jared Taylor’s perceptions. I do not share all of his goals.

          • rmk948

            Like Mr. Taylor, I believe that the genetic endowment of intelligence and all the political and social qualities that flow from it are unequally partitioned among individuals and races. Unlike him, I view this situation as something in which we can intervene by biochemical and environmental manipulation. Places like “American Renaissance” are among the few forums where such matters can be discussed.

          • Johnny Squire

            Nurture, not nature, eh? The same old liberal canard expressed in obscurantist language. Well, Dr. SocialStudies, what gigantic boondoggles do you propose we spend hard earned tax dollars on this time?

            After the failure of every other HeadStart/NoChildLeftBehind/UrbanRenewel/DisparateImpact/SchoolBusing/EqualRights/AffirmativeAction/ program, what could possibly be next?

            Can I be misreading you when you say “biochemical and environmental” manipulation, and that you really mean to incorporate some sort of frankenscience Nazi/Soviet experimentation? Or do just plan on relocating the undesirable to another continent?

          • rmk948

            With the Human Genome Project, we have come to a much better understanding of epigenetics, the way that genetically coded information is expressed in organisms. We only have about 20,000 distinct genes in the human genome, vastly fewer than had been imagined.

            I use “environmental” in the most general sense of the term – I just read a paper about the influence of mindfulness meditation techniques on epigenetic expression that goes a long way to explain why meditative techniques are often healthful. “Environmental” intervention could involve a lot of different techniques, which could be improved upon by a better understanding of individual and racial genetics.

            As far as “frankenscience” is concerned, it is going on as we speak. The potential for curing many diseases through genetic/epigenetic modification is a hot area in medicine. There is little to reason to doubt that the same techniques that show promise against cystic fibrosis could not be used for low intelligence as effectively.

            If you find the idea abhorrent, let me assure you that China does not. Both the Chinese government and most Chinese parents are eager to boost the intellectual capacity of the next generation. Mr. Engelman provided a helpful chart of bell curves for different races. Imagine a world in which the numerically superior Chinese shifted the bell curve even further to the right, vastly increasing the number of IQ 140+ people even further.

          • Johnny Squire

            I apologize for the sneering tone of my previous post, as you most certainly are not the usual product of our one world indoctrination camps…er…universities and colleges.

            Obviously my “frankenscience” barb was made in jest, but now I think I will use it in all seriousness. I have to ask, do these genetic manipulations result in the abuse or loss of human life, either in testing or in practice? And by human life I mean fertilized eggs, fetuses, and every stage of human life after birth.

            But if so, then yes, I do find it abhorrent, and yes I am not surprised that the Chinese do not. If these genetic manipulations do not abuse human life and they only raise intelligence and reduce genetic defects, than i am OK with it. But I get the feeling that is not the case, and not only are humans are harvested and discarded for their genetic material, but they are also genetically manipulated for certain traits that a wicked ruling class might find useful.

            I also suspect that these genetic experiments are going on surreptitiously in the Western world as well. The wickedness of man ever finds new ways to defile human life even though we are told that there is nothing new under the sun.

          • rmk948

            No apology needed, Johnny. Believe me, my days in the university are many decades behind me :)

            There certainly are moral questions that need to be raised about genetic and epigenetic manipulation. In our discussion, I must state that my own career has been as a physical scientist, and I cannot claim more than an intelligent layman’s knowledge of molecular biology, embryology and genetics.

            Until recently, virtually all medical research in humans focused on eliminating severe genetic abnormalities in offspring focused upon changing the DNA to eliminate defects in the genetic code. I am not referring to medical interventions such as in-vito fertilization and screening of embryos – these certainly would result in the destruction of embryos that were found to carry a negative mutation. One area of research had been to replace the defective gene that causes cystic fibrosis, and some success was obtained by using a virus to inject the “patch” into nuclear DNA. The technique was used successfully on infants, but obviously the idea of using a virus to modify DNA (even though that is what viruses do) made most people uneasy.

            The development of epigenetics has been very recent, resulting mainly from the successful sequencing of the human genome. We are starting to develop the capacity to change the ways that genes express themselves, and this opens up many new vistas for treatments that do not require modification of the genetic code in DNA itself. Most of our genes have molecular “switches” – some on/off and some multi-position – that can change the types of proteins they make. It’s possible to study these kinds of interventions in tissue cultures or in adult volunteers to a large extent.

            As you stated, the first emphasis in this work has to remedy the effects of undesirable genetic expressions, whether cystic fibrosis, Down’s syndrome, Tay-Sachs disease or whatever. The same body of knowledge that will enable the reversal of these conditions could be employed to enhance abilities rather than to correct defects – at some point, to make people more intelligent and less aggressive, for example.

            You point out correctly that there are a LOT of moral concerns about this kind of work that need to be addressed. Still, I believe that the work will get done – above ground or underground, in America or in North Korea – and that it is better to have a seriously debate about what to do about it.

          • Alfred the Great

            All those programs are nothing more than means to dumb down everybody and provide daycare.

          • ViktorNN

            I am a proponent of most of Jared Taylor’s perceptions. I do not share all of his goals.

            Are you in favor of trying to raise white racial awareness, create racial solidarity amongst white people, and being an advocate for pro-white points of view?

          • JohnEngelman

            Are you in favor of trying to raise white racial awareness, create racial solidarity amongst white people, and being an advocate for pro-white points of view?

            – ViktorNN

            What are “pro-white points of view?” If they include hostility to Jews and Orientals, than I am not in favor.

            I even like individual blacks and Hispanics. Is that anti-white?

          • ViktorNN

            Let’s make this real simple since I can see you want to split hairs: are you in favor of trying to raise white racial awareness and foster racial solidarity among white people?

          • JohnEngelman

            Those terms are too vague for me to answer “Yes” or “No.”

            I am opposed to affirmative action. 51 percent of whites are in favor of affirmative action.

            http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/354347/new-gallup-poll-affirmative-action-etc-roger-clegg

            I favor more restrictions on immigration. 63 percent of Americans are opposed.

            http://www.gallup.com/poll/1660/immigration.aspx

            I am fascinated by other cultures, but I do not think they are of equal value. I think the culture of the black underclass is ugly and evil. Although poor Southern whites are less prone to crime than poor ghetto blacks, I would rather live in San Francisco’s Chinatown or a Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn than a small town in the rural South.

          • Johnny Squire

            -“Although poor Southern whites are less prone to crime than poor ghetto blacks, I would rather live in San Francisco’s Chinatown or a Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn than a small town in the rural South.”

            You deflect so well. Both the Jewish neighborhood and the SF Chinatown exist under the umbrella of white European America. The question you should answer is would you rather live in America or in China/Israel?

          • JohnEngelman

            I do not like the government of mainland China. I would love to live in Taiwan or Israel.

          • Anna Tree

            From a a white racialist point of view I think Israel is doomed. Yes it protects its borders from mass-immigration but although there is (still) a majority of white Jews, the whole population is multiracial and multi-ethnic, and seem a real melting pot. There are Jews from Ethiopia, Yemen, Iran, Morocco etc If the white Jews ever wake up and stop miscegenating (after all they are there as many leftists as here) it will be too late I think because Israelis are a few millions and so the mixing was/is very fast.

            I foresee the general Israeli Ashkanaze high IQ to get lower
            (~100), and therefor a notable decrease of Jewish achievements (1/3 to 1/2 less).
            To stay an outpost of Western civilization, you need whites,
            i.e. a big, proud and strong majority of whites. Israel is metamorphosing as much as our Western countries. Remember all is in the numbers, 50% or so of whites is not enough, sometimes 10% of non-white is enough to trigger third world aspects.

          • White Light

            The Sephardi don’t seem that prone to third world behavior. Look at the Jewish population in France, it is majority Sephardi, and it seems very first-world. Iranian Jews in America, too, seem to be very successful.The Ethiopians are, of course, Blacks, but the miscegenation rate for them is still low, lower than it is in America. As the intermarriage rate between the Askenazi and Sephardi Jews increases(as well as the ethnic Russians in Israel) you will probably see reduced IQ but still a first world, Jewish society.

          • Anna Tree

            I understand that some/many Sepharades are white, i.e. Europeans, like the Italian Jews, that is why I wrote white Jews and not only Ashkanaze Jews. But there is also North Africans and there is a difference. Same with Iranian Jews. They can be successful but they are not white, although still Caucasians.
            I don’t know what is the miscegenation rate with Ethiopians but even a low one will have consequences as time pass, socially, politically and genetically. From articles like Razib Khan’s “Genetics & the Jews” in DiscoverMagazine, I gather that Ashakanaz Jews have an average of 5% Sub-Saharan DNA, what happens if this increase?

            My post was addressed to John who 1) admires Ashkenaze for their IQs and 2) supports miscegenation and 3) wish to move to Israel. I am pointing to him that the Ashkenaze IQs will decrease to an average of 100 in one or two generations due to miscegenation, and so the average Israeli IQ will also sink. So I am not sure how much of a first world society Israel will end up being, unless it becomes racially aware.

            Similarly the trend is happening in the western countries too, but we are ahead with sites like Amren and because our white demographics are bigger. But John writes “Public opinion in the United States is moving in my direction [...]. This can be seen in the growing acceptance and practice of
            interracial marriage. Things that bother you are not even issues any
            more.” I would like him to see the necessity to reject interracial marriage, to be bothered by it like we are, unless he is willing to witness lowering IQs: he may want only Chinese-Jewish-white marriages, but those seem the minority…: the Public opinion doesn’t discriminate. One needs to choose his battles, what is more important.

          • ViktorNN

            If you are truly a reader of Jared Taylor’s views and a proponent of his views, then you know quite well what I’m talking about – Taylor talks about raising white racial awareness and increasing white racial solidarity ALL the time.

            Your unwillingness to answer my simple questions which are nothing but restatements of what Jared Taylor SAYS are his main goals as a political activist tells me that you are either ignorant about what AmRen is about, or you know full well what it is about, but you are here to cause trouble and sow discord (or as leftists would say – “derail”).

            For my part, I will no longer be feeding your obvious trolling and I encourage others to no longer respond to you.

            You are working at cross purposes to the goal of this community.

          • JohnEngelman

            Taylor talks about raising white racial awareness and increasing white racial solidarity ALL the time.

            – ViktorNN

            On a number of occasions I have said that I agree with most of Jared Taylor’s empirical statements, although with fewer of his normative statements.

            Jared Taylor writes about defending the interests of white people. With the possible exception of immigration policy I do not see how the interests of white Gentiles, Jews, and Orientals conflict. We benefit from an end to affirmative action. All Americans benefit from a more effective criminal justice system.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are working at cross purposes to the goal of this community.

            – ViktorNN

            I do not believe that “the goal of this community” is advanced by making American Renaissance an echo chamber where antisemites and race bigots reinforce their fear, their anger, and their hatred. I do not believe Jared Taylor does either.

            David Duke attended an American Conference once. I am glad he did. I hope Jesse Jackson would be allowed to attend too.

          • ViktorNN

            Again, given the evidence of your own statements that you are not onboard with #1 goal of this site – to raise racial awareness among white people and to foster racial solidarity among white people – I encourage people to not respond to your comments which seem to amount to either willfully ignorant or intentionally malicious trolling.

          • JohnEngelman

            If what you refer to as “racial awareness among white people” and “racial solidarity among white people,” includes white discrimination and violence against non whites, especially Orientals I am glad that it is in decline.

          • BaronBaal

            Still thinking that Asians are gonna be buddies to you Jews, eh, John? What is it you don’t understand? You people don’t have any friends- never have and never will…

          • Max Krakah

            what do you consider hostility? You consider the declaration that a state is defined as having an ethnic identity as hostile to those not of that identity. You are therefore at total odds with the mission of Amren and race realists.

          • Max Krakah

            once again, another lie

          • JohnEngelman

            my suggestion to everyone else is to just ignore you.

            – ViktorNN

            This is what I recommend for those who are incapable of engaging in a civil debate with me over controversial issues. Unfortunately, those people follow me around with jejune insults.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            “When multiple ethnic and racial groups are all struggling over power
            because no one is in the majority, meritocracy will be the first
            casualty.”

            There is no “meritocracy” to be a casualty. White males go to the back of the bus in job applications, school applications, scholarships and fellowships. It is disgraceful that a poor, disadvantaged white kid from Appalachia who happens to be more qualified for a job, scholarship, etc. will be passed over every time he has to compete with a person from one of the favored groups.

          • JohnEngelman

            Do you think employers should be required by law to give white Gentiles precedence in hiring over Jews and non whites who are American citizens? Do you think citizenship should be denied to Jews and non whites? Do you think Jews and non whites should be deported from the United States?

          • Grantland

            Yes I do. Actually, I believe that Jews should be punished for what they have done. Deportation is too good for them. They need to find out that they do not have a monopoly on hate. But then I’m not a typical White Nationalist, who is gentle, inoffensive, dapper and genteel. I despise them, mostly; and they reciprocate.

          • JohnEngelman

            Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life.

            – Eric Hoffer, from “The True Believer”

          • Jotun Hunter

            engeljew please don’t interrupt – the adults are talking

          • JohnEngelman

            Adults? All you are doing is following me around posting insults. That is juvenile. You are incapable of engaging in a civil debate over controversial issues.

          • Jotun Hunter

            It may not sound civil but it is a valid comment – as your pointless and cretinous perpetual commenting and circular arguments are positively juvenile, nothing but pro active replying is available when indeed the wooden spoon is more what you require

          • Jotun Hunter

            so power gets divided evenly, straight down the imaginary middle, and everyone lives in perfect utopian equality,without jealousy, rancour, guilt, or even differences of opinion – and then the lion lays down with the lamb and we no longer need to feed off less intelligent animals? Except for your heeb masters, eh Engeldink?

          • jackryanvb

            Impossible . Name any multi racial, multi cultural nation in history that has been stable, meritocratic. Never happened, never will happen.

          • JohnEngelman

            India comes close. It is the largest democracy in the world.

          • Geo1metric

            It’s also the largest cesspool. Why do you think all that can leave there for Western, formerly White, countries.

            Saying it is the largest “democracy” is meaningless. Talk about “low information voters, there you have millions upon millions of them, most being illiterate. Yes indeed, something to be proud of.

          • Johnny Squire

            India is meritocratic? The country that still has a de facto caste system, massive corruption and nepotism, and a rape culture? That India? The life is so good that millions emigrate every year India? The constant religious strife between Hindus, Sikhs,and Muslims, India? The India that broke apart because of religious differences in 1947 with a mere millions lives lost during just the population exchanges between Muslims and Hidus/Sikhs? India imust be the multi-culti paradise America should model itself after!

          • Johnny Squire

            Another unbelievable post by the Reasonable Leftist. I can see why you perturb so many on AmRen, Mr. Engelman. You post so much nonsensical disinformation.

          • BaronBaal

            And a rigid caste system to boot. Of course you’ve never been there John while I go 3 to 4 times a year. What the hell, what do I know? After all, you’re an “expert”, lol..

          • Geo1metric

            He’s no expert; he simply stayed at a Holiday Inn Express one night.

          • BaronBaal

            Quiet now, we don’t want to hurt little Johnny’s pride, lol…

          • JohnEngelman

            Hatred of Jews is the right wing form of the politics of envy. I doubt anyone with your hatred of Jews is important enough to be a world traveler.

          • BaronBaal

            Hahahahaha…you’re so funny. John. Get with the times. The old argument that people who oppose Jewish supremacism do so because they “envy” Jews just doesn’t cut it anymore so you’ve got to come up with something better. And as for me, I wouldn’t waste my time hating Jews because they aren’t worthy of my hate- they aren’t worth the mental energy I would have to put forth in order to “hate” them…

          • Geo1metric

            How can you equate “hatred of jews with lack of “importance enough to be a world traveler?”

          • JohnEngelman

            Hatred of Jews is a right wing form of the politics of envy. Important people do not feel envious, and do not waste their emotions on hatred.

          • Fak_Zakaix

            Ahasuerus, the wandering Jew, is nothing but the
            personification of the whole Jewish race. Since he sinned grievously against the Saviour and World-Redeemer, he shall never be delivered from earthly existence and its burden and moreover shall wander homeless in foreign lands. This is just the flight and fate of the small Jewish race which, strange to relate, was driven from its native land some two thousand years ago and has ever since existed and wandered homeless.

            On the other hand, many great and illustrious nations with which this pettifogging little nation cannot possibly be compared, such as the Assyrians, Medes, Persians, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Etruscans and others have passed to eternal rest and entirely disappeared. And so even today, this gens extorris, this John Lackland among the nations, is to be found all over the globe, nowhere at home and nowhere strangers. Moreover, it asserts its nationality with unprecedented obstinacy and, mindful of Abraham who dwelt in Canaan as a stranger but who gradually became master of the whole land, as his God had promised him (Genesis 17:8), it would also like to set foot somewhere and take root in order to arrive once more at a country, without which, of course, a people is like a ball floating in air. Till then, it lives parasitically on other nations and their soil; but yet it is inspired with the liveliest patriotism for its own nation. This is seen in the very firm way in which Jews stick together on the principle of each for all and all for each, so that this patriotism sine patria inspires greater enthusiasm than does any other.

            The rest of the Jews are the fatherland of the Jew; and so he fights for them as he would pro ara et focis, and no community on earth sticks so firmly together as does this. It follows from this that it is absurd to want to concede to them a share in the government or administration of any country. Originally amalgamated and one with their state, their religion is by no means the main issue here, but rather merely the bond that holds them together, the point de ralliement, and the banner whereby they recognize one another. This is also seen in the fact that even the converted Jew who has been baptized does not by any means bring upon himself the hatred and loathing of all the rest, as do all other apostates. On the contrary, he continues as a rule to be their friend and companion and to regard them as his true countrymen, naturally with a few orthodox exceptions. Even in the case of the regular and solemn Jewish prayer for which ten must be present, a Jew turned Christian, but no other Christian, may be present if one of the ten is missing. The same holds good of all the other religious acts. The case would be even clearer if Christianity were to decline and cease altogether; for then the Jews would not on that account cease to exist and to hang together as Jews, separately and by themselves.

            Accordingly, it is an extremely superficial and false view to regard the Jews merely as a religious sect. But if, in order to countenance this error, Judaism is described by an expression borrowed from the Christian Church as ‘Jewish Confession’, then this is a fundamentally false expression which is deliberately calculated to mislead and should not be allowed at all. On the contrary, ‘Jewish Nation’ is the correct expression. The Jews have absolutely no confession; monotheism is part of their nationality and political constitution and is with them a matter of course. Indeed it is quite clear that monotheism and Judaism are convertible terms.

            The fact that the well-known faults attaching to the Jewish national character, of which a surprising absence of all that is expressed by the word verecundia is the most conspicuous, although this fault is far more useful in the world than is perhaps any positive quality; the fact, I say, that such faults are to be attributed mainly to the long and unjust oppression they have suffered, excuses them, it is true, but does not do away with them.

            I am bound to praise absolutely the rational Jew who, on giving up old myths, humbug, and prejudices by being baptized, quits an association that brings him neither honour nor advantage (although the latter occurs in exceptional cases), even if he should not take the Christian faith very seriously. For is this not the case with every young Christian who repeats his credo at his confirmation? To save him even this step, however, and to bring to an end in the gentlest manner the whole tragi-comic state of affairs, the best way is certainly for marriages to be permitted and even encouraged between Jews and Gentiles. The Church cannot object to this for there is the authority of the apostle himself (1 Corinthians 7:12-16). Then in the course of a hundred years, there will be only a very few Jews left and soon the ghost will be exorcized. Ahasuerus will be buried and the chosen people will not know where their abode was.

            This desirable result, however, will be frustrated if the emancipation of the Jews is carried to the point of their obtaining political rights, and thus an interest in the administration and government of Christian countries. For then they will be and remain Jews really only con amore.

            Justice demands that they should enjoy with others equal civil rights; but to concede to them a share in the running of the State is absurd. They are and remain a foreign oriental race, and so must always be regarded merely as domiciled foreigners. When some twenty-five years ago the emancipation of the Jews was debated in the English Parliament, a speaker put forward the following hypothetical case. An English Jew comes to Lisbon where he meets two men in extreme want and distress; yet it is only in his power to save one of them. Personally to him they are both strangers. Yet if one of them is an Englishman but a Christian, and the other a Portuguese but a Jew, whom will he save ? I do not think that any sensible Christian and any sincere Jew will be in doubt as to the answer. But it gives us some indication of the rights to be conceded to the Jews.

          • JohnEngelman

            I did not bother to read that blast of hot air. I did take the time to look it up on the internet. I discovered what I suspected, which was that you did not write it.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            I can’t imagine how you come to the conclusion that the future of the US is “meritocratic” since we are anything but “meritocratic” now and not one of the candidates I have heard is openly addressing the issue. Perhaps I don’t understand the meaning of “meritocratic” but I take it to mean opportunity based on merit. In the US today opportunity is based, often exclusively, on race and ethnicity. Who is advocating opportunity based on merit?

          • JohnEngelman

            Who is advocating opportunity based on merit?

            – Tom_in_Miami

            Quite a few people are advocating “opportunity based on merit,” including me.

          • Sick of it

            White people advocate a meritocracy. No one else seems to be.

          • ViktorNN

            “White people advocate a meritocracy. No one else seems to be.”

            Exactly right. White people advocate meritocracy and genuinely mean it. Non-whites advocate it in order to claw their way into power. Once they have some, they only hire their own.

            White liberals who advocate multiculturalism are suicidal idiots.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            Actually, I meant “What political leader advocates equal rights for whites?”

          • JohnEngelman

            I want to say “Jared Taylor,” but he may favor a mildly affirmative action policy in favor of white Gentiles.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            I haven’t read all his writings, but I’ve never seen anything that would suggest he would favor white gentiles with affirmative action. That seems to fly in the face of what I have read of him. Where do you get that idea?

          • JohnEngelman

            Jared Taylor talks about “the interests of white people” without clearly defining what those interests are.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            I think equality under the law is in the interest of white people. Safety is too.

          • JohnEngelman

            Well, of course. Those things are also in the interests of Orientals and East Indians.

          • Tom_in_Miami

            I’m glad that you noticed that. Now to get the rest of our brothers and sisters through the tooth-pulling process to understand it. Heck, let’s try to get a liberal to understand and support policies that support equality under the law.

          • Max Krakah

            No, it is not, MULTI ETHNIC STATES simply do not work, and such a state will not last. You talk about historical momentum, and can not back up your claim that asia is rising on such a tide. A person who is even half aware would look at the world and see that multi ethnic states have all broken up, historical momentum is against them. There instead will be several states, one of which will be white . You won’t be in that one. That one will prosper, the others, not so much.

          • Sick of it

            Multi-ethnic states turn into mono-ethnic states eventually. See East Africa. And North Africa. And Asia. Thus why I said he’s declaring the end of white people.

          • Anna Tree

            Could you list for us “multi ethnic, multi racial, and meritocratic” countries? I don’t find any. Maybe you meant “multi ethnic, multi racial, and hellish.”

            You are a mouth for the anti-white mantra ‘African for Africans, Asian for Asians but white countries for everybody’…

          • JohnEngelman

            Quite a few Americans are finding jobs in Asia.

            http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/cant-find-a-job-move-overseas/2012/11/23/b7322ef4-3273-11e2-9cfa-e41bac906cc9_story_1.html

            I doubt many want to move to Africa.

          • Anna Tree

            Are you claiming that China is multi-ethnic and multiracial?!

            First you do precise “finding jobs”. This is not what a multiethnic and multiracial country is about, is it?!

            Second, it is really just “a few”, as per wiki, you mean some 70,000 Americans… including Chinese Americans! That is a drop compared to one billion Chinese!!!

            And reading the article, those few leave the US out of necessity and lost faith, because they don’t find jobs in the US, thanks to mass-immigration and huge loans (that pays the education of those immigrants). In brief, Americans are becoming wanderers because/while their country is metamorphosed to a third world country.

            “For now, living in a tiny high-rise apartment 8,000 miles from America is the best way we’ve found to achieve the American Dream.”

            -> How sad, this is what you want for my children?

          • JohnEngelman

            How sad, this is what you want for my children?

            – Anna Tree

            Not really, but it hardly matters what I want. The rich are getting richer. The rest of the country is getting poorer. The Republican Party exists to advance the economic interests of the rich.

            I wish Oriental countries were more welcoming of immigrants with something to offer. I think they are wise in keeping out blacks and Muslims who bring crime and welfare dependency wherever they go.

          • Anna Tree

            So you didn’t answer… My question was: could you list for us “multi ethnic, multi racial, and meritocratic” countries?

            You answered Asia. But then write “I wish Oriental countries were more welcoming of immigrants with something to offer”, so not Asia after all LOL. So what country?

            There is none John. The way to hell is paved with good intentions and white hell is: ‘African for Africans, Asian for Asians but white countries for everybody’.

            By the way, have you been ever wrong? I mean, did you ever acknowledge being wrong? No need to answer yet. Just answer what are the multi ethnic multi racial and meritocratic countries?

          • JohnEngelman

            During the 1970’s I though the War in Vietnam, the Watergate Scandal, and the stagflation would push the United States to the left. Instead, we got the tax revolt, the election of Ronald Reagan, and a Republican ascendancy that persists.

            When Ronald Reagan was elected I knew he could not cut taxes, raise defense spending, and balance the budget like he promised to do. I over estimated the economic damage of the deficits his Voodoo Economics would cause. I did not foresee the decline in the world price of oil, which saved him.

            When the United States invaded Iraq I though Saddam really was building atomic bombs. I thought the Iraqis would greet American forces as liberators.

          • JohnEngelman

            Right now the United States is multi ethnic, multi racial, and meritocratic. I predict it will become more so. Being a white man does not matter any more. Being brilliant does.

          • Johnny Squire

            -“The Republican Party exists to advance the economic interests of the rich. ”

            So true, Mr. Engelman, but the Democratic Party also advances the economic interests of the rich.

            We (the Middle) are all stuck between the crushing forces of Marxism and Capitalism. Both factions advance their causes with multiculturalism/diversity.

          • JohnEngelman

            As a ruling ideology Marxism is nearly as much a dead religion as the worship of the Olympian pantheon.

            If it was not for Republican obstruction, the Democrats would raise taxes on the rich.

          • Geo1metric

            The ideology may be “dead”, but an idea can never be killed. Many of the ideas propounded by Marx are very much alive and torturing people everywhere.

            For example, the progressive income tax is a Marxist idea.

          • BernieGoetzFan

            It is not meritocratic. White students in Texas sued because they had to score over 400 points higher than blacks to get into the U. of Texas. The “conservative” SCOTUS punted on the issue (thus accepting it). There will never be meritocracy in the U.S.

          • JohnEngelman

            First of all, I oppose affirmative action.

            Second, because the intelligence gap between blacks and whites is so wide capable whites still manage to move up, especially in private industry. Affirmative action never prevented me from getting a job.

          • BernieGoetzFan

            But there are still many whites – millions even – who score much higher than blacks on things like SATs, firefighter tests, civil service tests …etc. yet do not get the job/place in school.
            Most whites would be fine with a meritocracy. But we will never have one again – indeed discrimination will certainly get worse given the demographic changes and now permanent Democratic rule.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am less pessimistic than you are. There seems to be more opposition to affirmative than in the past, although a brief cruse on the internet has not enabled me to find a chart showing that.

          • itdoesnotmatter

            Were all non Whites and Jews deported, no wealthy non Euros admitted, UC Berkeley enrollment would take a major hit.
            As it is now, Physics, Math, Computer Science, Engineering, Medical Schools, Research Labs, as well as “the Hill”, aka Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, are heavily Chinese and Jewish. Especially the grad schools.

          • JohnEngelman

            Chinese and Jews earn their prominence with their superior intelligence. Many of the same white Gentiles who gloat about the low test scores of blacks and Hispanics don’t like being reminded of the high test scores of Jews and Chinese.

          • Sick of it

            So our geniuses should be displaced by people who, if they are lucky, have a 115-120 IQ? Not even a good range for real scientific work.

          • JohnEngelman

            The higher IQ averages of Orientals and Jews push a higher percentage of them in the genius range.

          • Hugh Mann

            That’s assuming the same shaped distribution, which is not necessarily the case.

          • Johnny Squire

            Should Jews really be considered a race? There are so few of them in the world and the majority of those are of European ancestry. Despite their virulent tribal affinities, Jews in America are pretty much white.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is what I have said on many occasions. Jews are a sub race within Caucasians.

          • Geo1metric

            Jews of European extraction are not a “sub-race”. At most they are a religious sect.

          • JohnEngelman

            An Ashkenazi Jew is considered to be a Jew even if, like Woody Allen, he is an avowed atheist. The Ashkenazim is a racial classification, as are the Sephardim, the Mizrahim, and the Falashas.

            Religious Jews can be of any race, because one can convert to Judaism. The three main classifications of religious Jews are Orthodox Jews, Conservative Jews, and Reform Jews. There are even Messianic Jews. These are largely Ashkenazi Jews who practice Judaism while recognizing Jesus as the Messiah.

            Although the Messianic Jewish movement began in the 1960’s, the original Christians were Messianic Jews. Most or all of the New Testament was written by Messianic Jews.

          • Geo1metric

            Shlomo Sand, a “Jew” himself, disagrees with you. Read his book THE INVENTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE.

            Here I go again suggesting books as a source of knowledge.

          • JohnEngelman

            Whenever I am told to read a book I point out that I have won the argument. I read books too, but I am able to present my own arguments in my own words. If Shlomo Sand presented a good argument, present it in your own words. If you can’t do that, you don’t understand it yourself.

            Anyone can find something they agree with. Throwing books back and forth gets tedious. It is as pointless as saying, “My dad can beat your dad.”

          • Talltrees

            Not true. History proves there have always been more Europeans in the HIGHEST IQ range than any other race or ethnicity including Jews.

          • Johnny Squire

            It takes more than just high average test scores in intelligence to make for a successful nation. Fecundity, moral imagination, curiosity and fearlessness are also needed. Producing more geniuses also helps.

          • Geo1metric

            “In group bias” accounts for much of it.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is like blaming low black test scores on white racism.

            Jews and Orientals who moved to the United States faced discrimination. They overcame that discrimination with hard work and superior intelligence.

        • IstvanIN

          White males will always be number one in intellect, creativity, and success, look at the only successful farmers left in Zimbabwe, and those are horrible conditions. We may not be in charge, but we’ll always be the best. And who knows, with some scientific know-how, perhaps the war will be won in the end.

        • ben no

          “They cannot be reduced to second class citizenship.”

          But whites can in the nation they built?

          • JohnEngelman

            Whites are not threatened with second class citizenship any more than they are threatened with genocide and race displacement. Stop being hysterical.

          • Jotun Hunter

            stop trolling and go home to your celestial masters

          • JohnEngelman

            Stop following me around with juvenile insults. Come back when you have learned to debate in a civil and learned manner.

          • Jotun Hunter

            you come back when you’ve learned to debate and make reasonable and intelligent points like a grown up – instead of trolling and making broken record pronouncements. A true white man and philosopher recognizes when his rhetoric is lacking and his viewpoint is beaten. You don’t appear to have even begin to think things through so there’s no need to get too egomaniacal about it – just admit you’re wrong or go away. You aren’t wanted or appreciated here or anywhere else, traitor.

          • JohnEngelman

            Just because you dislike what I say does not mean it is not true.

            If what I post is not true, why is it so easy for me to substantiate my assertions quoting material I have found on this website?

          • Jotun Hunter

            you seem incapable of following a basic argument – I have never said the iq stats aren’t true (though you do tend to ignore the white bell curve for super-genius) nor the sat scores – they just aren’t the be all end all. You must also look at reality engelman, also that thing that you shrivel away from in squeamish terror: history.

          • Geo1metric

            Why do you think everything you find on this web site is true?

        • Jotun Hunter

          that’s because you are too deep in modernity and do not study the past and don’t know that the future holds things you cannot imagine. Deportation is most certainly not an impossibility, not that I believe that is specifically what will happen. You are wilfully defeatist because you are trolling.

          • JohnEngelman

            How can you call me a defeatist? I do not want non whites to be deported. Nor do I want a white ethno state. I think those are preposterous ideas.

            The future of the United States is multi racial, multi ethnic, and meritocratic. There’s no turning back.

          • Jotun Hunter

            it’s not defeatist because you aren’t bothered by it, that’s your new line of impressive reasoning is it? You think like a teenage girl. You belong elsewhere

          • JohnEngelman

            Of course I am not bothered by it. Neither are most whites in the United States.

          • Geo1metric

            How do you know most Whites in the US are not bothered by it?

          • JohnEngelman

            The growing approval and practice of interracial marriage is tangible evidence that racial consciousness is declining.

            Television and Hollywood movies present an unrealistically benign portrayal of black – white relations, but it is what most Americans want, or television and Hollywood movies would not portray it. Television and Hollywood are very competitive environments.

          • Jotun Hunter

            it may continue to decline for as long as the TV keeps blaring, until we are forced by necessity of resources and overcrowding to live on ‘prison rules’

          • Geo1metric

            While I have not seen any “studies” to substantiate it, my sense is that Hollywood leads public thinking; it does not follow it. After all, film is the acme of propaganda tools. Goebbels knew this.

            Read some Berneys.

          • JohnEngelman

            Joseph Goebbels had the advantage of censorship. Hollywood movies require millions of dollars to make. I have read that six out of seven lose money. Hollywood producers know that they cannot afford to promote an unpopular agenda.

            Even with censorship, propaganda is only effective when it tells people what they want to believe, or what they know to be true from their own lives. Communist propaganda worked in North Vietnam. It did not work in Eastern Europe.

          • Geo1metric

            And we don’t have censorship?What planet are you from?

            When have we heard from the media, including Hollywood, about the true nature of crime in America? You delude yourself.

          • Talltrees

            Hollywood leads public thinking; it does not follow it.
            John, are you kidding? Hollywood brainwashes the public. Obviously, you have been indoctrinated by Hollywood to think as you do.

          • Max Krakah

            the core will remain.

          • Max Krakah

            sheeple can be led one way, and the other way.

          • http://www.paradisegone.com/ r j p

            Your yellow fever is clouding your thoughts if you think most Americans want to see interracial relationships on TV. Hollywood is jamming it down people’s throats.

          • Jotun Hunter

            that’s besides the point, engelwoman. Most whites who are not bothered by it live in cushy majority white areas. At least they have the excuse of never having seen this website for their naivety.

          • Guest

            Ad populum fallacy.

          • Johnny Squire

            How do propose we achieve a meritocracy, Mr. Engelman? End welfare? Repeal the Civil Rights Act of 1965? Stop Affirmative Action and racial set asides? All laudable goals, by the way, but just not possible in a multiracial socialist democracy. You assume all people are capable of the same altruism as yourself. Such idealism plays into the hands of the Marxists and the Capitalists who proselytize “diversity as a strength” because the Capitalists desire cheap labor and Marxists desire cheap votes. Both are intent on destroying organic societies in pursuit of power.

            Race and culture are biological constructs that will not be denied without consequences, and in a multiracial/multicultural society there can be little peace without an oppressive government.

          • Geo1metric

            Excellent points, but I suspect they are beyond the understanding of those who so strongly wish for the “cumbaya”(sp) world of a multiracial utopia.

          • IstvanIN

            Nor do I want a white ethno state.
            And that, sir, is what makes you evil and our enemy. Not your loving “Orientals”, most of us have no argument with the Chinese, Japanese or Koreans. Many of us may admire some of their traits and accomplishments. We do not desire to take their ethno-states away from them. We simply do not wish to be subsumed by them. The only way to ensure our survival is to have our own living space. Invasive species are ultimately death to the native species.

            You are an evil man and an enemy to our people.

          • JohnEngelman

            A white ethno state is more of a fantasy than the Marxian ideal of a classless society. What do you intend to do with all the non whites in your white ethno state?

          • IstvanIN

            The question is how far would you go? Would you import millions of Chinese into Eastern Europe to make sure the Poles, Hungarians, Czechs, Romanians, Serbs, etc. are exterminated along with the Western Europeans, Australians and North Americans?

          • JohnEngelman

            I never said anything about exterminating anyone.I asked you what you intended to do with all the non whites in your white ethno state.

            You still have not explained. Do you intend to exterminate them? Do you intend to drive them out?

            When I asked that question awhile ago someone said that if the government of the white ethno state stopped paying welfare checks the blacks would leave. That is not true for most blacks. They have jobs. It is true for an even smaller percentage of Orientals Nd Jews. Most of them have better jobs than most white Gentiles.

            The slave trade should have never existed. The Immigration Reform Act of 1965 should not have been passed. We can’t go back in time and undo those. There is a large non white population in the United States. There is no nice way to get them out.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          If you’re trying to say that ethnostate is beyond our reach at the moment, you might be right. (But realize that it’s our end game).

          But Rand Paul isn’t even good intermediate leadership, and by that, I mean someone who would at the very least not hurt us and probably do a few things to help us even though he or she is not a full stop ethnonationalist (e.g. Jeff Sessions). Rand Paul is clear on the wrong side.

        • jackryanvb

          No one is proposing those things. We’re working to secure the existence of our people, stop our people from being raped, murdered or just insulted on a daily basis.

          • JohnEngelman

            I share your concern for violent crime. I favor a harsher criminal justice system than anything currently being discussed.

        • Max Krakah

          Wanna bet?

        • Geo1metric

          “Longing for a white ethno state is an idle fantasy.”

          There you go again ignoring thousands of years of human experience! Ethno states are the natural order of things.

          I strongly suspect that the twisted times we are living through now are just that, an attempt by bong minded liberals to form their version of utopia in the face of all that is natural.

          It will not stand.

          • Max Krakah

            twenty years ago, a black president was a fantasy. 100 years ago, Israel was a fantasy.

          • Geo1metric

            Exactly. Totalitarians cannot see beyond their own delusions. In the instant case, the wish for a multi-ethnic utopia filled with beautiful Chinese women and computer programmers is simply too wonderful to shake.

          • Sick of it

            Before the college kids became indoctrinated by their professors, who indoctrinated the professors? Who concocted this entire script? This is not a spontaneous movement founded by potheads.

          • Geo1metric

            Believe me when I say that I know exactly where the “movement” came from. I use the term “bong-headed liberals” simply as a pejorative mostly for my own amusement.

            I am fully informed about the Frankfurt School, Leo Strauss, etc.

            Actually, this war cannot be classified with a beginning since it is my belief that the fight between free people and those with a totalitarian mindset has been going on since the first caveman tried to push the other one out of the cave into the cold.

      • Johnny Squire

        Ron Paul’s Achilles Heel was always his open borders position on immigration. Why would anyone think his son would be any different. The ruling class plays the same game every cycle; they give us a candidate who appears to be on our side and then betray us after the election.

        Conservatives are Charlie Brown and the Republicans are Lucy. As soon as the Republicans get us to trust them, they pull the football away.

      • rmk948

        My apologies for getting back online rather late after New Year’s celebration and recuperation. I suggest that we are going to have to redefine the terms of the “battle” from a political to a biomedical/genetic front. If we have learned one thing from the Human Genome Project, it is that the interplay between environment and genetics is a hell of a lot more complex than we ever thought it was. We can affect the expression of genetic traits – we are doing so already, to a certain extent. Bringing the genetic capacity of the entire population up to a higher intellectual and moral level seems Utopian, but I believe it is less so than trying to develop a successful racialist political organization.

        • Johnny Squire

          Japan and China are successful racialist political organizations. That’s what nations are! Racialist political organizations! The United States still is, though less so since the immigration floodgates were reopened in 1965. Whites still run this country even though some of them are doing their damnedest to change that. Why is it that every proposal to shut down all immigration is decried as immoral? National and cultural self preservation is healthy and normal and therefore moral. I already see the West shaking off this multicultural flu with Nationalist movements challenging the Marxist/Capitalist alliances in France, Greece, Russia, and England. I hope America gets well soon, too.

          BTW, rmk948, what do you mean by, “bringing the genetic capacity of the entire population to a higher….moral level”?

          • Sick of it

            That fits with the biblical definition of a nation.

          • rmk948

            I mean that we are developing the capacity, by genetic and epigenetic intervention, to raise intellectual capacity and with it many of what we consider moral and social virtues. This capacity should be applied to all racial groups.

          • Johnny Squire

            I have often thought that moral capacity is tied to intelligence, and even then it requires a moral imagination that may or may not be related to intelligence alone. Do you think morality requires a different intelligence than say mathematics or art? And that some people and some races excel at it more than others?

            As for genetic intervention, I shudder at the thought of a prescribed set of virtues imbedded at conception to serve the needs of an omnipotent ruling class. It seems a lack of moral intelligence is part and parcel of such a project.

          • rmk948

            I suspect that intelligence (the IQ variety), morality and what we consider social virtues are linked in some subtle fashion. Certainly “The Bell Curve” gave many examples of how behavior we consider virtuous tends to be correlated with intelligence.

            While the Platonic idea that evil is purely the result of ignorance
            may not be fully correct, intelligence and evil do not often seem to go
            hand in hand. In real life, one rarely comes across a Professor Moriarty
            or a “Heisenberg.” Girted but evil political leaders might be a counterexample.

            As statisticians are fond of telling us, correlation is NOT causation. Possibly the moral imagination that you referred to along with intelligence itself are part of another quality, such as the ability to see things from another person’s viewpoint. Or perhaps all of those things are part of some yet unknown fourth quality?

          • Anna Tree

            Will you raise the intellectual capacity of all racial groups similarly? I mean let’s say you have an intervention that raise the IQ by 30 points (one such intervention albeit momentary is education, raising some 7 points), will all groups get the same intervention?

            If so, the gap won’t close: for example Caucasians after the intervention will still have some 15 points more than African Americans and so on. (Worse, what if the changes are not linear but exponential?The intervention may strenghten the differences.)

            If not, then you will get called a racist, silenced if not more, to insinuate that for example African Americans needs more of the intervention than North East Asians.

            Of course you may answer that you think the intervention will level the differences, but I think this would be wishful thinking. The idea that human intelligence is ‘magical’, not biological, is
            not rational for me. It has a physical base like everything else in
            existence. I think the difference of IQ is a fruit of evolution: environmental, adaptation, admixture etc. So unless your intervention is a brain implant…

          • rmk948

            Good points, Anna. We don’t know enough about the epigenetic expression of intelligence to know whether an intervention would raise the IQ of all subjects equally or whether there would be different effects depending upon the baseline IQ. That is a reason I would like to see research in this area. We know of a variety of interventions in other areas that have differing results depending upon the seriousness of the condition – for example cholesterol-lowering statin drugs have far more effect upon people with really bad lipid profiles than upon ones with only moderately elevated lipids.

            If we raised the median IQ of the black population to 100 (on today’s scale) while raising the median white IQ to 115, I think we would be better off. Higher IQ will mean a better ability to engage in complex work, but more importantly, it correlates negatively with criminality and anti-social behavior.

          • Anna Tree

            Good intentions… But even if it was feasible:

            1) every time we helped non-whites, it had come back to haunt us…

            2)Also whites are tired of helping the others, why can’t we help ourselves first?!: Will there be racial quotas for the distribution of your intervention? Shouldn’t the intervention being done on whites first if white are the creators and enablers?

            3) Anyway, not everybody will agree for the intervention, so what then? We will still end up with low IQs making many kids and the others bringing them in, paying for them etc.

            4)Also to check the safety of such intervention will take a few
            generations, and we don’t have this time, our group is under attack NOW.

            5) Many whites here don’t care about IQs, they just want to
            be left alone in their own country with their kins. It doesn’t matter if
            the non-whites have 85, 100 or 130 IQ.

            6) IQs correlates with criminality and anti-social behavior, but is it causing it or else? Will a higher IQ stop those or maybe trigger worse? The difference between the races, is not only IQs.

            7) By 2050 there will be less than 300 millions whites and 2 billion 500 millions Africans. Can a higher IQ stop jealousy, ressentment and victimhood? Humans are tribal, intellect won’t change that, natural instincts will remain the same but now you have created billions of non-white people with more intellectual skills: tell me why whites should trust a positive output. Science ahead of ethical matters can be a recipe for disasters…

            8 ) Check Pathological Altruism, by Barbara Oakley et al.:

            “PA is generally defined as a sincere attempt to help others that instead harms others or oneself, and is “an unhealthy focus on others to the detriment of one’s own needs.”

            “PA is likely when people “falsely believe that they caused the other’s problems, or falsely believe that they have the means to relieve the person of suffering.”

            “the false belief that one’s own success, happiness, or well-being is a source of unhappiness for others.” PA “often involves self-righteousness,” and can result in “impulsive and ineffective efforts to equalize or level the playing field.”

            “glorifying altruism is both recent and Western.” “a society must
            have a certain level of material wealth before it can value certain
            kinds of altruism.” “only Europeans have decided “to elevate altruism above other culturally promoted ideals, such as tribal patriotism and glory-at-arms, which our ancestors considered paramount.” They have gone even further, extending tribal altruism to the entire world, though “some other cultures consider this Western quality to border on madness.”

            But the whites who say it is madness are accused of racism.

            They are told that “Humanity as a whole might benefit the most if individuals made no sacrifices for their local group.”

            Seems the whites are the only race who don’t know about the
            prisoner’s dilemma! They cooperate! But all the other groups don’t. Check that game theory: we lost, they win. Will your intervention fix this too? “if groups want to act altruistically towards other groups they should at least look for groups that follow the same rules.”

          • rmk948

            1 and 2) Hard to say who will develop the intervention techniques – remember all those Asians and Ashkenazic Jews who so heavily populate the upper reaches of medical and scientific research? If it they are developed first by a Chinese researcher, should they be available only to Chinese?

            Again, there would be clear advantages to whites to higher IQ and improved social mores among blacks and Latinos. Clean water, sewage treatment and vaccination benefit the entire community – so do more intelligent and virtuous citizens.

            Many other medical advances in recent years have plummeted in prices shortly after adoption – antiretroviral drugs for AIDS come to mind.

            3) Some people certainly will refuse the intervention techniques for their children, and their children will be less intelligent and have more social and moral problems than would otherwise be the case. I don’t know that the “refuseniks” would be more common among blacks or Latinos than among whites. How many people of any race would refuse to give their children these advantages? Ironically, some might be extremely liberal whites who are uncomfortable about giving their children even more “white privilege.”

            4) Safety is a concern, but bear in mind that epigenetic modification is less radical and more reversible than monkeying around with the actual structure of DNA. Some of these techniques might be purely environmental rather than pharmaceutical – increased sensory stimulation in infancy, let’s say.

            5) No doubt true, but we live in a society with large numbers of people of other races. Whether they live next door or in a different part of the city, people with higher intelligence and better moral sense are to be preferred to the alternative.

            6) Good point. I did state that correlation is not causation. We do not know whether the expression of intelligence itself means better impulse control and less criminality or whether all these traits may be part of an as yet undetermined factor. We DO know that criminality is strongly linked with low IQ – Professor Moriarty and “Heisenberg” are fictional characters, and their real-life counterparts are pretty rare.

            7) Another good point. Would greater intelligence increase resentment of past perceived wrongs or reduce it? I can’t positively say one way or another, but it does in general seem to me that as people have a wider range of options in life, they are GENERALLY (not always) more interested in taking advantage of those options than in settling old scores.

            8) I certainly don’t maintain that increasing intelligence and moral sense will automatically cause people to transcend group identification. There are examples both ways: for example, educated young Europeans tend to think of themselves as Europeans. On the other hand, in eastern Europe and the Balkans, we have seen ferocious intergroup hatred flare up, even between objectively similar groups such as Serbs and Croats.

          • Anna Tree

            “If it they are developed first by a Chinese researcher, should they be available only to Chinese?”
            Well, I speculate the Chinese will keep it to themselves.
            I think whites would sell it but eventually give it away to third world countries.

          • IstvanIN

            5) Many whites here don’t care about IQs, they just want to
            be left alone in their own country with their kins. It doesn’t matter if the non-whites have 85, 100 or 130 IQ.

            I don’t. I wouldn’t care if we were the dumbest, least imaginative, ugliest race, I would still want my people to survive. It is just normal.

    • MBlanc46

      All right, let’s hear your solution.

    • http://www.youtube.com/user/GenXinOz GenX ANZAC

      “Genetic problems we face“.
      How about being a proponent for more open, honest, truthful dialogue like that in your post.

      • rmk948

        As I noted some posts earlier, I support measures to shift the bell curve of human intelligence to the right for all groups. I support open dialogue to that end.

    • JohnEngelman

      Welcome to American Renaissance. If the bullies give you a hard time, tell them you’r with me.

      • Jotun Hunter

        you are the bully engleman – every one is sick of you

        • JohnEngelman

          How am I a bully? I do not flame people. You are flaming me. Why? Because we disagree.

          Now it is probably the case that more whites in the United States agree with me than with you. I restrict the comparison to whites, because you probably do not think non whites belong in the United States. If they are here legally, and especially if they are American citizens, they have as much right to be here as you do.

          Public opinion in the United States is moving in my direction, rather than yours. This can be seen in the growing acceptance and practice of interracial marriage. Things that bother you are not even issues any more.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I don’t even live in the US – I am onto you because you falsely present yourself and represent an oppositional force. Precisely the opposition this website is her to combat. Also you are just annoying. So what on earth are you doing here? Time to move your restless gypsy soul elsewhere. Nothing that you say makes the slightest bit of sense or is tempered with reason or adult rhetoric.

          • JohnEngelman

            How do I falsely represent myself? I am a race realist. Because I am a race realist I admire Orientals and Jews. I am quite open in expressing that admiration, and why I feel that way.

            Nothing you say is “tempered with reason.” It only makes sense to those who share your angers and hatreds.

          • Jotun Hunter

            it would be all to easy to once again paste your own statements regarding asiatics, about their superiority due to SAT scores, whatever other bloviate you routinely dispense – despite the record of their actual achievements through all of human history. Which you simply choose to ignore. You falsely represent yourself because nobody can be this stupid – you are here to troll purposefully.

            everybody has angers and hatreds, engelman – yours are apparently blacks and white nationalists

          • JohnEngelman

            I like every black person I know by name.

          • Geo1metric

            Both of them? :)

          • Max Krakah

            are you looking for an award?

          • Max Krakah

            NO, you refuse to face the reality of those races.

          • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

            Thought “Orientals” became hopelessly un-pc many years ago, replaced by Asians. Has it changed back again?

          • JohnEngelman

            I use the word “Oriental” to refer to Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese.

            Asians can be Caucasians. Mongoloids can be Indonesians, Philippines, and American Indians among others.

          • Geo1metric

            You cannot make up your facts without losing credibility. “Orientals” include many more folks than those you list. Cherry picking not allowed.

          • JohnEngelman

            The definition of a word is not a fact but a convention.

          • Geo1metric

            The fact is that the word “Asian” includes many more “peoples” than Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese.

          • jackryanvb

            Agreed. Let’s give this troll the boot. The anti White Left, Neo slave labor agribusiness elite, PC and Neo Conservative media liars – they don’t let us speak, exist in their turf, why should we let trolls like this hang out here?

            Please go hang out at National Review on line. They will be pleased to have even one reader.

          • Max Krakah

            he is the type that alienates everyone he comes accros.

          • Geo1metric

            Public opinion is moving in your direction? Sure, and the Duck Dynasty controversy proves it.

          • Johnny Squire

            Public opinion is moving in your direction because of massive legal and illegal immigration. Giving immigrants the franchise in your poll is as asinine as giving them the American franchise for just being in America, legal or not.

          • Guest

            The DD issue can be seen as a free speech issue only if you ignore what the man said. I am much more inclined to believe that the ground swell of support was because of WHAT the man said. I think that the growing support in this country is not for mixed marriages but for separation. Most people, to protect themselves, will agree that mixed marriages are ok, but “not for my daughter”.

          • Max Krakah

            judging by message boards on other stories AND the fact that the libs have shut down message boards, public opinion is heading very much against any more infiltration and miscegenation.

          • Max Krakah

            any movement towards a white ethnostate would get massive support from white people.

          • Max Krakah

            you have a MO that is much more insidious, it is definitely evil. You post BS for one thin, “free world alliance, give us all a break.

      • Max Krakah

        oh, he’s having a pity party and inviting others

      • rmk948

        Thank you, John!

      • Geo1metric

        What good would that possibly do him/her??

    • Bobbala

      Is that Collin Powell picking our candidate again??? Collin …

    • ViktorNN

      I’m a leftist on many issues and I say we can absolutely do better than Rand Paul.

      For starters, go down the GOP roster and look for the strongest opponents of amnesty and the strongest proponents of restrictionist legislation. Many of the names you come up with also be economic populists, and thus palatable to left-leaning race realists.

    • Jotun Hunter

      not until things take a more drastic course. what exactly will happen is any ones game, but in the end it’s not unfair to bank on the historic dominants — once the t.v. goes off, minds will again find individual purpose, or new and unexpected organic trends will surface.

    • DelmarJackson

      I think I am a rarity too. I am a democrat and liberal on many issues, and the horse was never in the barn.
      The issue is not immigrants .
      The issue is there is an elite group of rich powerful and politically connected globalists who profit from immigration and pass on all the social, economic and environmental costs to us. By dumbing down western countries with massive immigration, they make the population easier to dupe and the nations easier to plunder. So far everyone that goes to Washington gets corrupted by them or they are removed.
      Term limits might help, but it will be hard to beat them. However, our one hope is they always thought they could change A and B and C would stay the same. But C is waking up. But we have been asleep for a long time.
      if anyone has time, go on youtube and watch the interviews with Sir James Goldsmith with Charlie rose. Goldsmith was a billionaire who warned against globalism 20 years ago and died shortly after .
      He also wrote an excellent book warning about our future called The Trap.
      Rand paul is a sheltered libertarian and a shallow thinker. he was never our leader. Any person on the right that preaches small government, or on the left that preaches disparity of income or the environment, but refuses to acknowledge the effects massive immigration has on their core issue, is not to be taken seriously. By their fruits you shall know them. Don’t give up anyone. We are at the end of an era and a new one is waiting.
      C is waking up.
      Immigration is a wonderful litmus test to a persons thinking and a big time saver for us. If a person has immigration wrong, there is no need to waste any time or energy or thought on them. immigration can help is keep focused more than our enemies, stay focused people.
      Join Numbersusa
      read vdare every day
      work for term limits
      and vote out all weasels from both parties.

      • rmk948

        Thank you, Delmar! NIce to meet you!

    • Raydonn

      We?

  • Spartacus

    Boring… Tell me when you’re gonna make “evilnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews” of the year, I’ll come to take my prize.

  • Jon

    Truth is Rand Paul is a coward and like most politicians only care about the power and money. He has no honor at all. Their Idea sound good but they do not have the heart to believe in them. I think the days of having leaders who care about the White majority are over. Does not shock me in the least.

  • http://whiteradical.blogspot.com/ white radical blogger

    oh, please spare me the propaganda.

    Rand Paul is pure GOP, and is a tool of Capital.

    Capital is behind multiculturalism and mass immigration and affirmative action etc.

    • Dwrd Cfla

      Yeah, and that’s exactly what the article says, genius.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      Maybe the problem isn’t so much that Rand Paul is a renegade. Maybe the problem is that we invested so much hope in him to begin with. Knowing what we know now, there was probably ample evidence hiding in plain sight from the first moment he started running for office that he would turn out this way. Even if there was, though, his overtures toward immigration patriotism and his disagreeing with his own father on the question of the Ground Zero Mosque in 2010 made us think that he was distancing himself from his father and doing so on ideological grounds and not just pure political expediency.

      • MBlanc46

        Very few people are going to be in a position to run for the US Senate who don’t largely support the agenda of the corporate elites.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          To that, I can personally attest. Let’s go visit my (now) two ago island in my personal archipelago of last years.

          U.S. Senate elections are ripe for establishment bribery. Any monied interest that wants something from the Federal government or wants to prevent the Federal government from doing something will spend a lot of money in Senate races.

        • Johnny Squire

          That is why we need, and why the elites will never allow, proportional representation.

          • MBlanc46

            I think that what we need is self-government.

          • Johnny Squire

            Self-government requires self-sufficiency and an internal moral compass. With so many dependent on the government for their lively-hood, including government employees and government contractors, as well as welfare recipients, self-government is a pipe dream. When the federal tit runs dry we will see a return to self-government by those fit for it. The rest will perish.

    • JohnEngelman

      Employers do not benefit from being expected to waive job requirements for blacks, Hispanics, and women. They do benefit from mass immigration. Republican politicians may talk about the need to appeal to Hispanic voters. They are mainly interested in appealing to their sponsors in the business community.

      • Jotun Hunter

        and your democratic liberals aren’t? the problem with modern republicans is that they aren’t true conservatives – which in fact are classical liberals, like the founding fathers. But it doesn’t matter, the time for libertarian-esque politics are over, it requires a certain hegemony of race, religion, language etc. that does not exist now thanks to flabby hippy liberals like you

        • Geo1metric

          People have been conflating republican and conservative, to their detriment, for a very long time. I’m not sure the republican party has EVER been truly conservative (classical liberal). After all, Abe Lincoln was republican.

  • Lewis33

    The GOP has been following the Thomas Dewey model for years now and what has it gotten us…McCain, Romney, George W. and Bob Dole. Dewey was all about stopping the GOP from the “back-to-Methuselah” (Dewey’s words) crowd as he called it, who looked to undo legislation that was obviously bad for the country, because he wanted to win votes. More of the same is all we’ve got now. Go Gov. Christie!!

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      And how did that work out for Dewey?

      A picture took at St. Louis Union Station:

  • Lt_Greyman_NVA

    Amen! Good to see Mr. Hood’s writing here at Amren. He is a beacon of clarity.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      He’s my favorite new opinionator of 2013, at least I first heard of him and his writings earlier this year, and I’m glad to see that he’s appearing on AR often.

      My favorite article of his this year was one entitled “Beltway Rambos.” Go to Counter Currents website and search for that term. Ironically, as the article itself says it the top, it has 1488 words.

      • Geo1metric

        Thanks for that suggestion; I read the article and it is outstanding!!! I will recommend it to all of my friends…and enemies. :)

      • tlk244182

        Just read it, on your recommendation. Yes, it was ‘good’ though I was hoping for a more uplifting conclusion. I can’t really get fired up about someday being a serf without illusions. I think I’ll open fire before that point.

      • Anna Tree

        I liked his “Why Liberals Hate Guns” there too.

  • JohnEngelman

    A libertarian who favors open borders is consistent with his basic philosophy.

    • Jotun Hunter

      so does everybody else engeljew, except commies, reactionaries and fascists

      • Geo1metric

        He’s probably not jewish; he’s not smart enough.

        • Jotun Hunter

          ha, the only way for him therefore to save face and not seem a total mongoloid is to admit he’s jewish, knows better, but is working in their interest by navigating comment sections. Barring that he’s just a cretin.

  • Max Krakah

    Who?

  • shawnmer

    Umm … Is it really fair to condemn Paul as a traitor to whites, when he never really held himself out as a leader for us in the first place? He has always belonged more in the modern libertarian mold than in the paleo one. Seems the premise he shared the values of (only a portion) of his father’s following was ours, not his.

    Everyone Rachel Maddow singles out as a “racist” isn’t an active ally of ours. She does that to every non-liberal!

    • jackryanvb

      Rand Paul is doing what his father did:

      Grovel, pander to non Whites, betray our people just to secure access to the anti White media.

      R&R Paul are serious traitors to our people. Libertarians are getting as bad as liberals.

      • shawnmer

        Just as bad? Perhaps. But unless Rand showed up at an AR conference promising to be something other than a standard-issue neo-libertarian, I’m not seeing how he deserves a “traitor” award. You can’t betray a cause you were never a part of.

        • jackryanvb

          Rand Paul campaigned and won election as a US Senator from Kentucky, a very White state. He acted like he would represent the interests of regular White voters in Kentucky. Once elected, he abandons his base, goes to Howard University, Detroit to pander. He makes his aide Jack Hunter denounce his Southern past.

          Rand Paul is now pandering shamelessly to all non White, anti White groups from LaRasa to Islamic extremists based in Yemen, looking to set up shop in Kentucky.

          I curse Rand Paul and note that Bobby Kennedy died a violent death for pandering to any and all non White groups, many hate each other as much as they hate Whites.

  • Tom B.

    Well ladies and gentlemen—anyone in favor of bringing David Duke out of exile from Russia. It seems he is the only honest politician America has produced since? Grover Cleveland?

    • Stan D Mute

      Duke is far too fanatically anti-Semitic to be an asset. Everyday folks can immediately see in their daily lives the negative changes to America wrought by Afros and mestizos. They see the crime, the urban blight, the disgusting “culture” and it’s easy enough to lay this at the feet of the Left. Getting from there to Duke’s position, however, is a leap too far. Look how hard it is to convince folks that the Republicans are just as bad as the Democrats!

      • Sheik Yerbouti

        Leftists are incapable of shame (unless they get caught). This kind of pathology is something they teach easily to “oppressed” people. Since they can’t feel shame, they live with no worry of consequences.

        Duke has no more chance than Romney. If the GOP plans to win, it needs to appeal to the largest segment of voters. Turncoats and fair-weather friends like Paul and SO many other republicans and right-leaning independents are not an asset.

        Politically we worry that tossing someone like Paul out would open the seat for a democrat. Possible, sure. But, will anyone actually notice a difference? If they don’t stick to their platform, toss them out.

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      Jeff Sessions in 2016.

  • Stan D Mute

    Wow, this award is one heck of a premise. I don’t think I could choose just one winner.

    One problem I know for anyone in national level politics is the money. They need vast sums of it. And the easiest way to get it is to suck up to the corporatists and banksters. To do that, they absolutely must kowtow to the PC media as the media would otherwise crush their benefactors with “racist” “sexist” “homophobe” labels. In the current environment, Rand Paul would have buried his political career if he had stuck with his comments about the Civil Rights Act or any of his immigration remarks.

    I do believe there is a very large number of white Americans fed up with this and looking for change. They’re not listening to the media except to scorn it. Even talk radio is missing the mark. But for whatever reason, these people aren’t here on Amren. Maybe they’re scared off by the lowbrow and even vulgar “white interest” sites? Unaware of a venue such as this? Maybe they’ve just abandoned hope and turned inward, becoming preppers and isolationists within their family or very small social circle? Whatever the case, they’re not here and this begs the question: How, when the media is 100% opposed to our interests, do we reach them?

    • Geo1metric

      Voting will never get us what we want. After all, the “system” is controlled by the federal government (the Federal Elections Commission), and big, big money.

    • Anna Tree

      Let’s build a white party and they will come…

      If hundreds of politicians say the same, then the one with a pro-family, pro-white, anti-immigration etc message will get the spotlight, or at least the attention of the awakening whites. Actually, I am ready to just have ONE message for a start: anti-immigration, okay anti-illegal immigration. And then grow from there, after being elected.

      I think the fed up Americans are not yet on Amren because the site is not known enough. But I predict this will change, more and more anti-white news are bringing people here. I was one of them a couple of years ago. Not everybody comments, it took me one year or so.

      I comment here but also on the mainstream media blogs. Everyday, more of us tolling the bell, citing Jared Taylor and others, will bring recognition to our cause. It just takes time to find the listening ear or to unbrainwash a critical mind.

  • JohnEngelman

    Are you thinking about the Nuremberg war criminals?

    • Jotun Hunter

      don’t you have a job? why don’t you start the ‘asian renaissance’ website? then you really CAN be a moderator instead of just fantasizing about it

      • JohnEngelman

        What does that have to do with “natural elites of whites” Alex mentioned, who died in 1945, usually at the end of a rope?

        • Jotun Hunter

          It has to do with you being a plant – that or a relentless moron. You are on the wrong website, please go away. You present yourself as harmless imbecile – but you shewed your true colours on the final days of the alt right website – you are the worst kind, at least Tim Wise is genuine about what he is.

          • Geo1metric

            Stop wasting your time with him. Simply ignore him.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I intend to – just one last kick at the can

        • Geo1metric

          “…who died in 1945, usually at the end of a rope?”

          Among millions of civilians, the enemies of a communist takeover of Germany.

    • Max Krakah

      the one that hung your grandfather?

  • sammy

    Rand Paul is a judas Goat sell out punk

  • sammy

    Lets think third party Nationalist Socialist or I will never vote again

    • ViktorNN

      Third parties are hopeless in this country. In order to have a real pro-white party that can actually win seats, we need to have proportional representation. Otherwise, unless we can sneak in stealth candidates into the GOP, explicit pro-whites are effectively shut out of the process in the short term.

      • WR_the_realist

        Also don’t forget that any explicitly pro-white party will immediately be labeled a “Nazi” party by the mass media and the two major parties. As a result, most white people are scared away, and won’t vote for them, even if they agree with their platform.

        • Anna Tree

          Venting a bit: we could work on the name or the acronym, like Western Allies, Classic Liberals, GNP for Grand New Party, Conservator Republicans (oops taken, so maybe Traditional Republican) but also NAAWP for National Association for the Advancement of White People, or ADWL for Anti-White Defamation League etc.

          Like maybe the Student Press Law Center did by highjacking the acronym SPLC. Now everytime someone web search SPLC, they also get them.

    • jackryanvb

      Call it something else, more American. “Populist”, “Southern”.

    • WR_the_realist

      I don’t like any sort of totalitarianism. The Nazis and the Commies deserved each other. We don’t deserve either. All we need are politicians who will control the borders, reduce immigration, stay out of other people’s wars, and otherwise just leave us alone. It sounds so simple, yet we can never find such politicians.

      • Geo1metric

        That’s because “power corrupts”. Some sage once said, “if men were angels, government would be unnecessary”.

      • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

        Agree on Nazis and Commies, but unfortunately the demographic future is now irreversible unless you eventually have white separation or nonwhite repatriation. You won’t be ‘left alone’ any more than whites were in Zimbabwe or are now being left alone in South Africa.

      • Anna Tree

        I approve!
        I am ready to just have ONE message for a start: anti-immigration, okay
        anti-illegal immigration. And then grow from there, after being elected…

  • Geo1metric

    Money is not the measure of the man.

    A multi-racial society is a contradiction. Point to one successful, harmonious multi-racial society. Yours is the pipe dream.

    • JohnEngelman

      Silicone Valley, and the San Francisco Bay area in general.

      In the United States whites and Orientals live and work together harmoniously.

      • Geo1metric

        Working together when ALL are doing very well economically is understandable. Put such a community under “stress” and observe the harmony dissipate. Hundreds of thousands of years of experience will not be dismissed by a bunch of bong-liberal blue sky wishful thinking. You cannot fool Mother Nature.

        • Johnny Squire

          God help those who caught outside their own groups when the peace breaks.

      • rmk948

        In my business, I read and summarize reams of scientific and engineering papers each day. The number of Asian and “Jewish” names among the American authors is staggering. Anyone who believes in “white” superiority over these groups in intellectual matters is deluding himself.

        • Geo1metric

          When Whites are being systematically denied access to the best universities, laboratories, think tanks, scholarships, fellowships, internships, etc, what do expect the outcome to be?

          • rmk948

            Do you believe that Asian and Ashkenazic Jewish students are being given access to our universities at the expense of equally or more capable whites? That certainly doesn’t seem the case to me.

          • Geo1metric

            Surely you’ve heard of affirmative action.

          • rmk948

            Asians and Ashkenazic Jews are not beneficiaries of affirmative action. In graduate STEM (science, technology, math, engineering) programs, the intellectual demands are extremely high. You cannot survive in any sort of competitive program without a high level of intelligence.

          • Geo1metric

            Because of their much higher population, Whites have many, many more high IQ individuals than Jews. Why then, are there more of the latter in the elite US universities than Whites?

          • rmk948

            Bear in mind that modest shifts in the midpoint of a normal distribution produce large shifts in the outliers. Caucasian Gentiles have a median IQ right around 100, Ashkenazic Jews about 110-115. That is almost a full standard deviation higher, resulting in a much larger proportion of extremely high IQ persons. Add in some cultural factors, and you’ve probably pretty well covered the overrepresentation.

            Again, Unz does not claim that pro-Jewish bias was a factor in universities outside the Ivy League. Places likeMIT, Caltech, U of Chicago, Stanford all have Ashkenazic overrepresentation as well.

            Courtesy of Wikipedia: “While Ashkenazi Jews make up only about 2% of the U.S. population,[2] 27% of United States Nobel prize winners in the 20th century,[2][3] 25% of Fields Medal winners (mathematics),[4] 25% of ACM Turing Award winners (computer science),[2] 6 out of the 19 world chess champions, and a quarter of Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners[4] have either full or partial Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.”
            It seems unlikely that bias could explain those chess grandmasters or science talent search winners.

          • Talltrees

            That is the case. You must be unfamiliar with university admissions. Over 50% are foreign because they pay full tuition. Jewish students are accepted at higher rates because the Jewish elite hijacked our education.

          • Geo1metric

            It’s not that I “believe” it, I know it to be true. A statistical analysis of students in the student bodies of our elite universities proves that those groups are favored. This favoritism cannot be based on merit alone. And given the “in group bias” of both those groups, it is understandable.

            For some enlightenment, discover for yourself who the presidents of our elite universities are. I could go on.

            For over fifty years now, Whites, especially White males, have been systematically discriminated against. No one can dispute that.

        • JohnEngelman

          Don’t worry about the down votes. Some posters here do not like being told the truth. Nevertheless, at the top of this page you will see the following sentence by Thomas Jefferson, “There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown by the whole world.”

          • rmk948

            That is why I enjoy reading AmRen and following discussions here. There are some folks here who are rather closed-minded, but I have been thrown out of leftist sites for expressing some of the opinions I have expressed here.

          • Geo1metric

            Here we go again with canard that people who don’t accept your leftist/marxist/maoist ideology are “closed-minded” implying, of course. that they are ignorant, small, and brutish.

            That won’t work anymore.

          • Geo1metric

            The key word in that quote is “truth” not marxist ideology.

          • JohnEngelman

            What did rmk948 say that is not true?

          • Geo1metric

            I was referring to your use of the word “truth”. Your relationship with truth is clouded by your ideology.

          • JohnEngelman

            This is what mk948 posted: “In my business, I read and summarize reams of scientific and engineering papers each day. The number of Asian and “Jewish” names among the American authors is staggering. Anyone who believes in “white” superiority over these groups in intellectual matters is deluding himself.”

            mk948 posted a factual assertion. It can be tested empirically. I am confident that mk948 told the truth, because it corresponds to what I have read elsewhere, including elsewhere on American Renaissance.

            Those who voted down mk948 did so because they do not like to be told the truth.

        • Talltrees

          With 1.8 million White engineers out of work replaced by Asians, of course, there will be more Asians writing papers.

          • rmk948

            I’m not talking about H1B visa engineers brought in to work as indentured servants for Microsoft. I’m talking about the people who win Nobel prizes, who are elected to the National Academy of Science or who appear in American Men and Women of Science. Nobody is systematically barring these spots to Caucasian scientists and engineers.

  • Geo1metric

    Rand will never get the nomination; he’s too short.

  • Geo1metric

    But it should be awarded monthly.

  • Geo1metric

    I think the reaction to that dust-up really tilted the establishment.

  • ben no

    I don’t have to see him on other sites to get what he’s about. It becomes clear when you read between his lines. You can even imagine his sort. He’s an unashamed advocate for white ethnic cleansing and will attempt to justify the unthinkable with intelligent words and phrases that don’t wash with me. He’s a wolf in sheeps clothing.

  • Raydonn

    “While Ron Paul caused rage and frustration among many mainstream conservatives because of his views on foreign policy…..”
    -I believe we all know what this really means……..Rand, you could have learned a lot from your father, you failed to heed his wisdom.

    • jackryanvb

      Rand Paul learned everything he’s now doing from his father…. Backing down, pandering to non Whites who will never consider voting Libertarian, Conservative etc, Ron Paul went on CNN with Wolf Blitzer (former AIPAC lobbyist ) to deny that he wrote oven read his own newsletter that said mean things about Black criminals, rioters.

      Ron Paul makes Orin Hatch like a tough racially conscious White man, like to see both of them and all race denying, pandering Libertarians left alone at night, unarmed in their Detroit minority outreach centers.

  • jackryanvb

    Really great article. One of the best ever. I hope this leads to the impending destruction of Rand Paul’s political career and hope he dies a beaten and bitter man, the same as Jack Kemp.

  • Geo1metric

    One can see the DD issue as a free speech issue by completely ignoring what the man said.

    I think that the ground swell of support for the man was because of WHAT he said.

    If, in fact, the support for mixed marriages is increasing, it is probably because people will agree that it’s ok simply to protect themselves from being called “racist”.

    • Max Krakah

      the sheeple can be lead one way, and then the other

  • jackryanvb

    The key is to go local. Presidential politics is closed for us.

    Somewhere in your local area there is a tough, principled White man or woman, work to find local talent, get one elected to county bord chairman.

    • Stan D Mute

      Even in a local election, money is king. I have some direct knowledge in this area both in running local campaigns and being an insider in others. Even something like a county commissioner or water district commissioner pays a decent salary and more importantly has health benefits and a retirement program much better than the private sector. Additionally, even these small city or county elections can cost a LOT of money. A smallish county election could easily run $200,000. That money comes from local businessmen who want illegal laborers. And there is the whole white status contest for who panders the most to the Afros which is pervasive. A candidate explicitly running on “white interests” would stand no chance whatever. And if someone became a champion for white interests once in office he risks losing his job perks (social circle now including the movers and shakers of the community) along with salary, health insurance, and pension.

      In truth, about the best we can hope for is a candidate who doesn’t pander to Afros or support illegals. Populism MIGHT have a shot in local politics as long as the guy NEVER says anything negative about Afros or illegals or anything positive about whites (racially). Unfortunately, I don’t see much utility in this. What is this guy going to be able to do for us?

      The change MUST happen socially FIRST. The taboo on disparaging Afro culture must be broken. The taboo on disparaging mestizo culture must be broken. This can only be done with effective propaganda and since the media is 100% against us, it’s a mammoth challenge. Still, it is our only chance.

      • http://tmasierrahills.blogspot.com/ tma_sierrahills

        “In truth, about the best we can hope for is a candidate who doesn’t pander to Afros or support illegals. Populism MIGHT have a shot in local politics as long as the guy NEVER says anything negative about Afros or illegals or anything positive about whites (racially). Unfortunately, I don’t see much utility in this. What is this guy going to be able to do for us?”

        Well said. The Rand Paul problem is also true on the local level. Even in ‘red’ voting towns and counties, almost all of their local politicians want to be successful and so will not touch racially or culturally taboo topics with a 10-foot pole.

  • jackryanvb

    You don’t have a White name Ranjit Patel.

    Shouldn’t you be hanging out on the tribal border area of Pakistan-Afghanistan cultivating Opium for a living, packing soccer stadiums to cheer on the mass execution of women who show their faces in public?

    Are you excited about the Muslim nations having great success at the Winter Olympics in Putin’s Russia?

    Maybe the Olympic committee can add pro Muslim sports like stoning, suicide bombings.

    :-)

    M’thinks Cossacks are training for ethnic cleansing South Russia of brown/urine colored creatures who wipe their a”@ with their hand but who think bacon is “unclean”.

    :-)

    • Anna Tree

      I am not sure Ranjit Patel is muslim,

      I don’t know if Ranjit Patel defends whites interests and agrees with the basic truth that whites have the right for their own white homelands but if he does: I have white friends who tell me they wouldn’t mind if the white race disappear so I am glad for anybody who disagree with this, moreover who wordy fight it.

      Have you read the Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail? If not, here is one point treated in the book: there is this Hindu immigrant to France, who joins a bunch of proud French nationalists when France is overtaken by millions of non-white refugees. He is very verbal about his love/respect for the West and the white race and about his complete disagreement/dislike, with all the multiculturalists and multiracialists (I call them multists) and fight against them to death despite knowing the nationalists won’t be able to stop the destruction of France. He told the nationalists they shouldn’t be surprised of somebody like him, that why can’t there be a “black” loving/respecting the white race and civilization and fighting for it when sadly so many whites are traitors to those two.

      That said, I agree with all what you said about the muslims. Except ethnic cleansing, I prefer deportations to one’s ancestors homeland. Humans are tribal, diversity brings friction: as I am against friction, I am against multism.

      • Geo1metric

        CAMP OF THE SAINTS is a must read in my opinion. It was one of the books that opened my eyes many years ago.

  • Max Krakah

    LOL, free world alliance! What a joke

  • Geo1metric

    Read HUMAN ACCOMPLISHMENT. The orientals show minor achievements compared to Whites.

    • JohnEngelman

      Ever since I was a child people have given me books to read. When that happens I tell them I have won the argument. I read books myself. However, throwing books back and forth is tedious.

      • Geo1metric

        Books are one of the best sources of knowledge. Read more.

        • JohnEngelman

          I do, but I compose my own arguments.

          • Geo1metric

            “…but I compose my own arguments.”

            That is quite apparent!!

  • Max Krakah

    you will see only what you want to see, that is the way you have always been

  • Geo1metric

    Yes he did, but he also spent like crazy and gave amnesty to illegals.

    His personal writings were indeed fairly conservative, but much of what he did in office was not which supports my contention that politicians are beholden to those who paid for them. :)

    He also gave some very nice “conservative” speeches. But again, ignore what they (politicians) say, instead watch what they do.

    • Max Krakah

      reagan did not spend like crazy, congress did

  • Geo1metric

    I would add one thing…instead of just “waiting for our time to come”, I suggest that one should try to organize, plan, and prepare for the time that is coming.

  • Geo1metric

    One can have a “successful” society which is still inferior to some other society.

    While I am not a White supremacist, the Whites seem to me to be the superior race overall.

    Whites have given more science, music, literature, other art, and technology to the world than the other races combined.

    End of story.

    • JohnEngelman

      The end of your story happened before Orientals began surpassing whites.

      • Geo1metric

        Have you ever listened to the video called “the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind”?

  • Epminondas

    I’m sorry I ever supported this man.

  • sammy

    Only fools bet in a rigged horse race …like americas

  • Geo1metric

    If a pollster asked me if I favored marriage between blacks and Whites, I might say “why not”, which would be considered a “yes”, but I would be thinking “if a White is stupid enough to do that, his/her genes are not needed in the White gene pool anyway.

    At some level, we either “don’t care” or are “not responsible” for what others do.

    In addition, since hispanics are considered White for many purposes, polling being one of them, I suspect that the increase in the hispanic population contributes mightily to those statistics you mention.

    Then there’s the inherent flaw in polling; methodology is all important to understanding poll numbers. If you have not studied, and understand the methodology of a particular poll, you are unable to judge the veracity of it. The numbers mean nothing in and of themselves.

  • http://independent-british-nationalist.blogspot.com/ British Activism

    I have not caught up with this kind of thing for ages. In fact, the last time I looked in that general direction was probably around 2008, if that was the year Ron Paul was running as candidate.

    I have to say I tended to like what Ron had to say and was attracted by some of the positions he held and the way he could pierce logic through the usual fake positions of the usual suspects in main two parties you have over there.

    It is a shame that Rand is throwing it all away.

    Also, it is not exactly a surprise that this Ken Mehlman fella is part of a clique that has crawled into the movement and has sought to take it on a different route. To those in the know, I do not think it will be surprising either.

    When it comes to the matter of “White Renegade” of the year, I originally presumed that it would be about the best or most successful person that has brought change for the better to our movement. Our own white renegade against the state of things, if you like.

    So in an effort to try and promote some positive aspects to our cause, I would like to suggest that Amren has a dual award. One for the biggest turncoat to our people and one for somebody or some group that has done important or successful work for our cause.

  • Johnny Squire

    The real danger is multiculturalism itself, of which AA is only one symptom. To shift the discussion to whether AA is in decline or not (a facetious argument at best considering AA is nearly universally practiced in order to avoid discrimination lawsuits) does a disservice to this debate over immigration.

    You ameliorate your position on immigration by implying that even if White Gentiles become a minority they will still be part of a majority of White Gentiles, Jews, Orientals and East Indians. How is that good news? There will still be racial and cultural conflict between those groups. Your selective universalism is deceitful and self serving. You want the benefits of cheap labor, culinary choices, and prospective spouses that come with diversity, but you also want an alliance with the “best” races in order to protect yourself from the dark side of diversity.

    I have nothing against small amounts of cultural sharing in any society, but to dress up what is clearly a war on Western Civilization and the middle class as progress is either ignorance or malevolence on your part. I am inclined to think the latter as you spend too much time on a this website posing as the “reasonable” leftist while ever reminding us that you, too, are a race realist because you also notice that black Africans are a disagreeable lot.

  • Johnny Squire

    Race realism is incompatible with multiculturalism, something I am sure Jared Taylor would remind you of were he to participate in the comments threads.

    Oh, Mr. Engelman, you are the rascal, always sowing the seeds of disinformation! You left out the best part of Mr. Taylor’s quote of which I have included here; “I think Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society. This doesn’t mean that I want America to
    become Asian…”

    I have a question for you, Mr. Engelman. Since China is nearly one hundred percent Asian, is Asian Supremacy incompatible with race realism?

    • JohnEngelman

      Yes, but Ashkenazi supremacy is not.

      • Johnny Squire

        Touché. Of course it takes more than sheer intelligence for a race to be supreme. If only they had numbers like the Chinese. Coincidentally as we chat, according to your new friend rmk948, the Chinese are fast at work creating a bell-curve shattering next generation of Asians.

        In any event, I was referring to natural racial dominance within a national polity. Not the master/slave connotation but the organic nation-state wherein the majority of its inhabitants are related by blood as well as custom and language.

  • Johnny Squire

    It’s funny because it’s true.

  • Sick of it

    But John, we are being forcibly displaced by “immigrants” who take our jobs, our slots at universities, and who sometimes literally take our lives.

    • JohnEngelman

      Orientals do not “take” jobs and university positions. They earn them. They also have a lower murder rate than whites.

      • Sick of it

        Asian immigrants are severely outnumbered by extremely low IQ Hispanic immigrants.

      • itdoesnotmatter

        John, with due respect, you could not be more wrong.
        My German naturalized x-husband, a PhD EE and I are still [friends] and business partners. We own a Berkeley/Menlo Park based R/D corporation which has made us a great deal of money from his nanotech patented inventions.
        We hire exclusively graduate students or unemployed programmers/engineers. When one moves on, we replace him with another grad student or out of work U.S.A. Tech worker. We do NOT hire non-Americans. Not when Silicon Valley U.S. engineers and programmers are out of work, on unemployment, homes under water, thanks to greedy Tech industries hiring from abroad for half of what an M.S.E.E. would earn.
        Almost every name encountered when a new grad applies for work here through an agency is clearly Indian, there existing a disproportionate representation not only of Indian programmers but Indian recruiters.
        It is common knowledge that India has a surplus, that there are many staffing firms from India operating in the US.
        Silicon Valley is awash with Indians. For a reality check, visit a lunch room in one of the corporations. You will encounter mostly Indians. Don’t tell me they “earned” those jobs. They are useful fools who will live 3 to a room, work for $12.50/hr.
        More galling is the industries requiring a displaced American engineer/programmer to train a lesser skilled and educated Mr. Singh to do his lost job from the ground up.
        As some discouraged Siliconers say: “just try applying for an IT job in the U.S.!”

        • JohnEngelman

          I am opposed to H1B Visas. I am in favor of deporting illegal immigrants and punishing their employers. I am in favor of more restrictions on legal immigration.

          Nevertheless, talk about Jews and Orientals taking jobs from “whites” (actually white Gentiles) can easily devolve into the advocacy of discrimination against Jews and Orientals who are American citizens. That is what I am opposed to.

          • itdoesnotmatter

            I would oppose a law forbidding IT employers from hiring Jews and non whites who are American citizens. That is what I feel some of the people here would like

            I don’t see IT Corporations on the cusp of firing or discriminating against USA born Jews, John. Are Amren comments calling for that to happen?
            Jewish tech employees are losing their jobs as fast as non-Jews.

          • Max Krakah

            john is peddling lies and mischaracterizations.

      • Terra Magnum Imperium

        Wrong H-1B visas take jobs from US citizens especially in the computer and engineering fields and the over 50 age range whom are the most experienced is the hardest hit.
        The H-1B visa recipients earn about half what an US engineer makes.

        • JohnEngelman

          I am opposed to H-1B Visas, but I am opposed to them for Europeans as well as Orientals and East Indians.

          Also, I am not angry at those with H-1B Visas. I am angry at the largely white Gentile employer class who hires them instead of American citizens, including non white American citizens.

          I like immigrants, but I am aware that immigration has economic, social, and environmental costs. I have said so before.

          • itdoesnotmatter

            I am angry at the largely white Gentile employer class who hires them instead of American citizens, including non white American citizens.

            John, again, with due respect, you have it backwards. A hefty percentage of the Silicon/S.F. Tech employers/company owners who are importing cheap help are Jewish. Trust me, I am on the ground, so to speak, and swimming against the tide on this issue.

  • http://www.paradisegone.com/ r j p

    I would have liked to read the whole thing …. but I couldn’t.

    Kentucky Race/Ethnicity (2010):

    White, non-Hispanic 86.3%
    Black or African American 7.8%
    Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 3.1%
    Asian 1.1%
    American Indian and Alaska Native 0.2%
    Pacific Islander 0.1%

    And Rand Paul is pandering to blacks and hispanics?

    Bring him home Kentucky. The simple fact is that he won’t even properly represent those who elected him. He is just trying to build support for a Presidential campaign.

  • NoMosqueHere

    Libertarians believe in mass amnesty, drug and prostitution legalization, gay rights, imposing no curbs on muslim invaders, and predatory capitalism. If the republicans really want to go down this road they should re-create Mr. Potter from the film It’s a Wonderful Life.

    • WR_the_realist

      Ron Paul does not favor illegal alien amnesty. There are some differences between Ron Paul and his son. Like nearly every politician in both parties Ron Paul is too weak on legal immigration.

    • jackryanvb

      At least Mr. Potter didn’t publicly defend nasty Muslim terrorist leaders in Yemen, didn’t argue these nasty throat cutting, church bombers are entitled to full US Bill of Rights based on the technicality of birth right citizenship. Mr. Potter was simply an old fashioned, selfish rich guy who enjoyed screwing over poor, working class White Americans. Mr. Potter hadn’t gone Tim Wise style, Frankfort School cultural Marxism, with genocidal hatred of White Indo European people.

      • NoMosqueHere

        Well said.

        Rand Paul is to the left of Obama. He makes O look like Ronald Reagan. What a disaster he would be as potus.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          Rand Paul would be the most left wing President on race in American history. Want nightmares? Extrapolate all of his racial pandering as just one of 100 Senators onto all the enforcement powers that the President and the Executive Branch of the Federal government possesses.

          • NoMosqueHere

            Here here!

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Trade, national security, sovereignty, foreign affairs and immigration ARE social and cultural issues.

    “Have you flipped your lid, QD?”

    But that’s beside the point. It doesn’t take much mental horsepower to see how all but the first are social issues. But even foreign trade, which is seemingly an economic and only an economic issue, is actually a social issue at its bedrock. Ask yourself this: Why are almost all free traders also racial-ethnic egalitarians and advocates of open borders? Because the foreign trade question is loaded with the same undercurrent of universalism vs particularism as are the immigration and race equality questions.

  • Anna Tree

    Your use of polls to prove that you are the majority and therefor right bothers me as it kind is the ad populum fallacy.

    To be right is not about numbers but about argumentation and lack of rebuttals.

  • Paleoconn

    Where is the photo of Rand sporting a certain type of headdress (not a fedora) by a famous wall (not in Berlin).

    But all of the above is enough to toss this joker onto the dustbin of Republican uselessness.

    Great article!

    • jackryanvb

      RP is now pandering to any group besides White Christian voters he’s supposed to represent in his state of Kentucky.

      Rand Paul might get in to trouble pandering to both Israel extremists and Muslim extremists, pandering to homosexual extremists and Islamicimmigrants, pandering to both Mexican and Black criminals.

      Bobby Kennedy had similar problems, resulted in a violent, early death.

      • Paleoconn

        haha thanks for this. It didn’t take RP long to squander all his supposed promise.

  • Dave4088

    Rand Paul is now a complete buffoon in my book and he won’t get my vote if he wins the Republican presidential nomination in 2016. He has let the media put him on the defensive and spends an inordinate amount of time pandering to blacks and Latinos. He’s becoming Obama in white face and will govern as such if he happens to become president in 2016.

    • jackryanvb

      I see Rand Paul as more of a Jack Kemp clone.

      Endlessly pandering to Blacks, Latinos all minorities (we’ll soon be a minority, and watch the switch from minority rights, to majority rule), only with so e ridiculous Libertarian, free market spin.

      Education, will be a big part of Rand Paul’s pandering. With the Black underclass having destroyed urban public schools and now lots of suburban public schools in places like DC suburbs in Maryland, watch Rand Paul make a pig push to give underclass Blacks “vouchers” so they can attend White private schools and proceed to destroy our private schools. bRA political lete will pass laws that private schools MUST accept all students of any race, academic level who have vouchers.

  • Anna Tree

    You don’t just list polls to point that interracial marriage approval is increasing, you list them to tell us that interracial marriage is not an issue any more and therefor shouldn’t bother us, like as if because 87% of Americans agree with black and white marriages, we shouldn’t disagree with them.

    Anyway, I thought you disagree with miscegenation with whites, notably because you prefer higher IQs.

  • ben no

    You’re sick and twisted. Period.

    • Max Krakah

      He is a failed academic, trying to make a name for himself by hijacking this site.

  • seapeaMP

    Conservative Respectability, the pathway to Racial Treason.


    If “diversity” is so wonderful, why does ONLY one race have to practice it?

  • jackryanvb

    Well said. And ai agree that Ted Kennedy is much better now that he’s dead … A good Kennedy (the only good Kennedy is a…)

    Same applies to all dead Communists like Nelson Mandela.

  • jackryanvb

    I liked bob grant. Listened to him in my worst years early 90s NYC.

  • WR_the_realist

    Ron Paul voted for building a fence on the southern border and has never voted for illegal alien amnesty. So it appears that he blows hot and cold on this issue. And I disagree with him that having a flood of cheap labor crossing the border helps us. It hurts the poorest Americans who would be willing to take those jobs at somewhat higher wages than the illegals get.

    • jackryanvb

      Stop making excuses for open border libertarian loons like Ron Paul and Rand Paul.

  • WR_the_realist

    Unfortunately we will never get one. The controllers of the Democratic and Republican parties will make sure of that, and the mass media will make sure that candidates for all other parties are completely marginalized.

  • itdoesnotmatter

    D. Machin, I need to tweak your statements.
    Indians and other Asians are most certainly imported from abroad to displace Native USA degreed programmers, and engineers. It is not just a perception that they work for less, [sometimes half] what USA educated professionals] have historically commanded; it is a painful reality.

    White presence would be corporate Presidents and CEOs, managers, administrators, designers, training staff.

  • Bleau Gumms

    I’m HOPING he is merely saying what he needs to today to get elected, then brings back the awesomeness

    • jackryanvb

      Bleau Gumms • an hour ago −
      “I’m HOPING he is merely saying what he needs to today to get elected, then brings back the awesomeness”

      Jr replies,

      Open, blatant treason to your own people, open political prostitution doesn’t win votes in Presidential elections. If it did, Jack Kemp would have been elected President.

      Economic Conservatism/Libertarianism doesn’t sell to voters in Presidential elections, never has, never will. so Rand Paul is reduced to pandering to e worst Blacks, homosexuals, Muslim immigrants, anyone and anything non White anti White. What will he gain from is this terrible treason?

      Some media face time on the vicious, anti White MSM.

      Wow.

      Judas at least got 30 pieces of silver .

      • Bleau Gumms

        >open political prostitution doesn’t win votes in Presidential elections

        All evidence to the contrary.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      What awesomeness?

  • rmk948

    I’d certainly be interested in seeing some documentation that “quotas levied against whites do not apply to Jews.”

    Unz is not an academic, he is a financial analyst. If correct, his conclusions seem to be that Jews are overrepresented in IVY LEAGUE institutions at the expense of Caucasians and especially Asians. He views other elite institutions such as MIT and Caltech as free of systematic bias.

    • Geo1metric

      It’s a big plus that Unz is NOT an academic. Having been a part of the academy in a past life, I can say with certainty that there is no monopoly on truth there.

  • Geo1metric

    Do Israelis show affection and respect for White Americans and Europeans?

    • JohnEngelman

      I have never heard any complaints from anyone who was not looking for excuses for his hatred of Jews.

      • Geo1metric

        Criticizing Israeli foreign policy in no way equates “hatred of jews”. Yet Pat Buchanan, and others, have been painted with the brush of “anti-semite”.

  • Funruffian

    “After winning the primary, Rand Paul got into trouble on the Rachel Maddow Show for expressing the standard libertarian argument against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, saying, “Does the owner of the restaurant own his restaurant? Or does the government own his restaurant?”
    What a great quote! Why didn’t any store or restaurant owners decry this statement any time they refused business to unruly and loud bantus?

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Dinesh D’Souza is a cuss word to me. He was the little snitch and teacher’s pet that got Sam Francis fired from the WAT.

    Even if he didn’t do that, I wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him. In one of his books, he insinuated that western Africa was qualitatively superior to western Europe circa 1500.

  • Anna Tree

    Could you please bring me support to your claim that Jews are Asiatic? Thank you.
    From what I have read in scientific papers and what I see, European Jews are white, Mediterranean and Levantive whites ethnics with admixture of Italians, Germans etc and indeed 5% of Sub-sahara DNA (similar to Italians).

    • Geo1metric

      Since the “original” Jews supposedly came from the Middle East, they are technically Asian albeit Western Asian.

      The Middle East is not Europe, not Africa, but is part of the continent of Asia.

  • Anna Tree

    Maybe. There are a few sites who have best supporter or worst antagonist list. I did suggest a White Santa Claus’s naughty whites and nice whites list and I may be not the only one…

  • Geo1metric

    Virtually all Chinese “technology” has been bought or stolen from Whites. Mr. Engelman is deluded by so much.

    Like most liberals, he lives in LaLaLand.

  • Geo1metric

    Let’s not forget that the Frenchman Poincare preceded Einstein with the idea of relativity. Einstein failed to give attribution to Poincare or anyone else.

  • Geo1metric

    Exactly correct.

  • Max Krakah

    SO what?

  • Max Krakah

    john is hijacking this site to peddle his own foul agenda, but he can not be honest about that agenda

  • Danimalius

    A great critique of a man whom I once cheered. American Renaissance should publish a piece and give an award to someone who we can cheer and admire for their great efforts and achievements. Gods know we have leaders who deserve it, and it gives us something positive to think about.

    • jackryanvb

      Jeff sessions

      • Danimalius

        I was thinking someone more explicit, like Richard Spencer. He did a great job with that NPI conference this year, released the first Radix journal, and reformulated Alternative Right’s website into the radix journal website. He also conducted a number of podcasts which are great to listen to.

  • Ella

    Ron at least took some heat when the media labeled him as an ” old kook” or “racist.” People, we are past voting out the bureaucratic mess as it emerges over and over with the same outcome. People who run for office are just plainly sick with the common Western ailments.

  • Geo1metric

    My guess is that it is a result of very strong “in group bias”.

  • jackryanvb

    Unfortunately the careers of past White traitors of the (Instauration Magazine ) indicates that the traitor’s career doesn’t die. Past winners (losers) included Dick Lugar, Newt Gingrich, Jack Kemp, George Will. These guys’ careers went on and on.

  • DailyKenn

    .
    There are two primary strategies to counter the race-card play.

    The first is direct honesty. Sadly, it is also the least effective and, therefore, seldom used by politicians.

    The second is indirect aversion. That’s what Ron Paul is doing. He is “proving” he is not a racist by reaching out to non-whites. Opening an office in Detroit is for show, but at least he’s doing it on his terms. He knows the race card will be played and he’s minimizing its effect.

    Libertarian philosophy advocates freedom of association and, in my humble opinion, is consistent with race realism. Unfortunately, not everyone who wears the libertarian mantra embraces libertarianism.

    • jackryanvb

      Sorry. Rand Paul and his enablers are not playing some skilled political chess match. It’s flat out racial treason, selling out our people for a little free MSM TV time. Rand Paul will now agree with ever what the hostile anti Whites in the room or interviewing want him to say, then he adds some Libertarian spin.

      Rand Paul will suck up and pander to the worst Blacks, LaRaza, Muslim extremists, homosexual extremists are next on the boot licking pandering circuit.

      Rand Paul needs to get a sex change operation… Become a man.

      And folks, understand, he’s not in any way one of our leaders.

      He’s the White traitor of the year for 2013. The worst.

      I saw this one coming.

  • jackryanvb

    Can u link the URL where I can download pierce and bob grant?

  • Transpower

    Insightful article, but I just don’t anyone who is better, except for Cruz–maybe.

    • Pelagian

      Better not to vote. Sends a better signal.

      • jackryanvb

        We have to do more than drop out and not vote.

        Punish traitors, don’t give them a free pass.

    • jackryanvb

      Just go local. There ‘s some White guy with a spine in your area you can elect Sherriff, County board chairman. Presidential politics looks lost to us.

      Whatever you do, don’t waste a minute supporting these Jack Kemp style Rand Paul, Paul Ryan Libertarian loons.

  • Pelagian

    SPLC: ““electoral extremists” … there is a certain writing style that characterizes the SPLC … and other Progressive non-profits trying to gin up funds. Maybe it stems from Saul Alinsky, I dont know. No, I think it started in the early 90s. But its a quickly recognizable style …

  • White Dragon

    Almost as much a champion as Duke!

  • jackryanvb

    We must now destroy the Rand Paul for President campaign/cult. We must make an example out of him and his traitorous cult followers.

    When you choose to be the #1 White racial traitor of the year, we must make it reality that this hurts, does not help your career, your personal life.

    Let Rand Paul take the job of cleaning port-a-potties in Central American Amerindian illegal neighborhoods.

    Our people used to tar and feather traitors. We have to get that mindset again and punish our traitors.

    • DaveMed

      The worst part about it is that this election was probably the last chance to reverse the tide. Obama has basically said that he will get amnesty through by hook or by crook, and even one more Democratic presidency will shore up the illegals’ victory.

      I don’t think there is a single option on the table at this point. Perhaps if Pat Buchanan were to run…

  • jackryanvb

    There are real activists working now for secession in the Pacific Northwest.

    Google Northwestfront dot org

  • I. J. Talour

    I am thankful for this article. I have long thought that Rand Paul was rapidly becoming a traitor but most of my friends think he and Marco are the messiah.
    America is almost finished. Hopefully it will all come down quickly and we can get a jump start on rebuilding something better.

  • jackryanvb

    This is one of my favorite American Renaissance articles of all time, right up there with “Don’t Write Off the Liberals”.

    I wouldn’t want to include much of anything else except to note that Rand Paul and his small percentage of cult supporters also do the terrible American Right Wing trap of pushing wild, unsubstantiated Conspiracy Theories. Most fall under the insane idea that every single (White) American involved in any way with law enforcement or the military is part of an all powerful CONSPIRACY to kill or imprison regular Americans and implement an anti Christ one world government etc.

    Rand Paul actually wasted our time with a filibuster demanding that the US Government stop targeting US citizens with get this:

    Drone attacks!

    The facts of the matter is the US military did kill some nasty Afro Arab Islamic extremist leader in Yemen. Rand Paul and Ron Paul and their cult insist this ugly, alien terrorist was a full US Citizen like you and ai based on the insane legal technicality of …

    Birthright Citizenship!

    These obsessions with wild, race denying conspiracy theories are a huge problem with White American Right Wingers, it doesn’t seem to afflict nationalists in Europe.

    No White American has ever been killed by a US military drone attack. We might as well become obsessed that beautiful Russian teen is stars are conspiring to sexually attack us! Anybody see Maria Sharapova plotting to come “get me”. Please give her my phone number.

    • Pelagian

      Disagree in general. Wild eyed conspiracies are one thing. Taking your opponents ideas seriously and working them out to their logical extrapolations, is quite another. That Hitler was coming to get Jews was a “conspiracy theory” in 1933.

  • African Technology

    I thought Rand would Be great…..but then he went on to sit on the fence about immigration issues and give very wordy immigration speeches that made his stance very unclear. After that i knew that rand is now just another republican….

  • Edde

    Greetings GH:
    The problem the White-Right invariably runs into is a Catch 22 which dictates, in order for their Politically INcorrect candidate to be VIABLE they must conform to the Politically Correct status quo of the political establishment.

    This is a sad reality that every candidate either knows about or soon learns after entering the political arena and is the result of the Democrat Party’s move to the far-left and the Republican Party’s move to the center.

    This is what happens when the bad guys have been in control of the flow of information for fifty years.

  • Pelagian

    Bwa-ha-ha-ha: Rand Paul, asked whether there should be a minimum wage tonight after the State of the Union: “I’m not sure I have an answer.”

    You’re a Senator, guy. Look into it. With Christie and Paul bursting into flames, plus Mitt Romney admitting that he was the worst possible candidate of all candidates … Republican Party could be dead in five years. Then what would the Democratic Party do? What would America do?? Mono-party Soviet era style rule but with hotly contested primaries???

  • Jared Myers

    “At the end of each year we will profile a white person who could have
    been a champion for his people, but instead joined the fight against
    us.”

    I stopped reading after that nonsense.