Selma to Montgomery, 30 Years Later

Marian Evans, American Renaissance, May 1995

March 1995 marked the 30th anniversary of the Selma-to-Montgomery voting-rights march. The surviving leaders of the demonstration recently met to commemorate what was one of the most effective efforts of the civil rights era. The atmosphere was one of amity and self-congratulation, in which it was taken for granted that the marchers and their purposes were noble and their opponents were despicable racists. In an act of contrition, Joe Smitherman, who was mayor of Selma 30 years ago, presented the keys to the city to a group of aging civil rights leaders.

Rituals like this firmly establish the today’s view of who was right and who was wrong. And yet, does Mr. Smitherman, who saw the now-sanctified event as it really unfolded, not harbor even fleeting reservations about the new America that the civil rights movement created? Perhaps not. George Wallace, former governor of Alabama, recently gave a framed photograph of himself to Rosa Parks, who started the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955. He inscribed it “To a great lady.”

The 1965 demonstrations in Selma and Montgomery were part of a massive campaign to secure voting rights for blacks. In the states of the former Confederacy, it had been only during Reconstruction that blacks had had more or less uncontested voting rights. In Alabama, blacks were first given the vote under a state constitution written in 1867 by Northerners and forced upon the state by the U.S. Congress.

A new constitution, written in 1901, eliminated most blacks from politics, by limiting suffrage to people who could read and understand the U.S. Constitution, and who had been employed during the previous year or who had paid property taxes. The new constitution also required separate schools for black and white children. Since that time, as in most of the South, the vigor with which suffrage restrictions were applied to blacks varied from region to region.

In 1965, black civil rights leaders seemed to be winning every battle they fought. The Supreme Court outlawed school segregation in 1954, and the “sit-in” movement, begun in 1960, successfully integrated many Southern lunch counters, restaurants, hotels and churches. President Eisenhower used federal troops forcibly to integrate public schools in Little Rock, Arkansas, and in 1962 President Kennedy used them to overwhelm resistance to integration at the University of Mississippi. The movement’s greatest success, however, had been the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination in employment and public accommodation.

The national press was warmly sympathetic to black demonstrators and their white supporters. The movement basked in an aura of great moral superiority, and the obvious next step for what seemed to be an unstoppable juggernaut was to secure unrestricted voting rights for Southern blacks.

Martin Luther King, who led this stage of the movement, was by then world famous. Having come to prominence only ten years earlier during the Montgomery bus boycott, he was now a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize and a frequent guest at the White House. He chose Dallas County, Alabama as the target for demonstrations because it had been particularly inhospitable to black voters. Although there were more blacks than whites of voting age in the county, 28 white voters were registered for every black. Selma, 50 miles from Montgomery, was the county seat.

Martin Luther King Jr.

A Board of Registrars examined prospective voters, black and white. It had a small office in the Selma courthouse and could handle no more than 50 applicants a day. On January 18th, 1965, King and his close assistant, Ralph Abernathy, led six or seven hundred people to the courthouse and demanded that they be registered. There was already a line of ordinary applicants, and the group was turned away. The demonstrators marched back to their headquarters at Brown’s Chapel Church, and held a press conference, claiming–correctly–that blacks had been denied registration. Overlooked were the facts that blacks had been among those waiting to be tested and that in the days before the demonstration a number of blacks had been duly registered.

Similar nationally-reported exercises took place throughout the months of January and February. King was constantly in and out of town, flying around the country raising money and giving press conferences. He returned to give speeches and lead marches. Meanwhile, more and more northern whites trickled into town.

At the time, Selma had a population of 29,000 people, of whom 15,000 were black. It took only a small crowd to paralyze the town, and at the height of the demonstrations approximately 11,000 outsiders were swarming the streets. Selma’s mayor, Joe Smitherman, complained that for three months he spent three quarters of his time dealing with out-of-town demonstrators. Selma police were swamped with complaints of thievery, and townspeople were soon heartily sick of the visitors, many of whom were drunk and left garbage wherever they went.

Some Northerners came just to have a good time. Many were “beatniks,” who drifted across the country from one demonstration to another. They had no money for hotels which were, in any case, commandeered by the hundreds of journalists covering the demonstrations. Many whites of both sexes found accommodation in black churches and in the George Washington Carver Homes, the black housing project.

Intimate mixing of the races in this fashion was unheard of in the rural South, but even more shocking to the people of Selma was the public sexual behavior of the demonstrators. If the accounts of what can only be described as public debauchery were not given in sworn affidavits by citizens, state troopers, and national guardsmen, they would be difficult to believe (see following story). Residents of Selma could be forgiven for beginning to wonder whether the demonstrations were as much about public interracial copulation as they were about voting rights. Many of the journalists were disgusted by what they saw, and complained that candid accounts of the demonstrators’ behavior were edited out of the stories they filed.

Language as well as behavior was edited. On one occasion, James Forman, secretary of the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), spoke at the Beulah Baptist Church in Montgomery. Addressing a mixed-race group that included many ministers, nuns, and church women, he said: “If the Negro isn’t given his place at the table of democracy . . . it’s time for us to knock the f***ing legs off the table.” Some of the ministers expressed surprise at this language, but Forman offered no apology.

A few minutes later, Ralph Abernathy tried to smooth things over by saying, “I’m sure that God will forgive him, that the television crews will delete it from their films, and newspapermen will not print it.” A beatnik came to Forman’s defense: “What’s wrong with ‘f**k’,” he asked; “It’s a good old American word, and expressive.”

There were demonstrations in Montgomery during this period as well. On March 10, at about 8:00 p.m., approximately 100 people were being harangued on a well-lit street a short distance from the state capitol. One of the black leaders of the group then said in a loud voice, “Everyone stand and relieve yourselves.” Practically the entire crowd, male and female, young and old, black and white, did as they were told, as rivulets ran almost to the next block. Two blacks were arrested for, according to a bystander, “particularly lewd and offensive exposure of their private parts.”

Adding to public revulsion for the demonstrators was the sight of men and women in religious garb drunk in public and fondling each other. The civil rights movement had always draped itself in religion, and King made a point of giving ministers and priests very visible roles. The presence of clerics was so useful that some of the demonstrators dressed as priests or nuns appear to have been impostors.

This may have been the case during a small demonstration in Montgomery on March 16th. A group of 34 men, most dressed as priests, arrived at the capitol late in the evening and insisted on praying on the capitol steps. Finally, at 3:00 a.m. the police let them say the Lord’s Prayer on the bottom step. As they broke up to leave, two photographers came running across the street. One of the men dressed as a priest said to one, “You stupid son-of-a-bitch, after all this time here, you didn’t get a picture of us saying a prayer on the bottom step.” An Alabama state policeman said that many of the “priests” swore like sailors and that he doubted more than half were authentic.

It may have been the disgraceful behavior of false clerics that prompted one of the three killings associated with the Selma demonstrations. On March 8th, a white Unitarian minister from Boston, James Reeb, was brutally clubbed to the ground as he left a restaurant, and died two days later. The night before Reeb died, the demonstration leaders held an all-night, out-door vigil to pray for his recovery. Disgusted journalists noted that a number of young couples at the rear of the crowd fornicated during the services.

About this time, Jimmie Lee Jackson, a black civil rights leader, was shot and wounded in an altercation with police. Activists swept him away, medical treatment was delayed, and the man died. The Chief Deputy Sheriff of Dallas County thought the delay was deliberate. “I believe they wanted him to die,” he said; “They wanted to make a martyr out of him . . .”

The day after Rev. Reeb was clubbed, Selma demonstrators defied a court order and set out to march the 50 miles to Montgomery. As they crossed the Edmund Pettus bridge leading out of town, they were met by a line of state troopers standing shoulder to shoulder. “This march will not continue . . .” boomed the public address system, but there was deadlock for 15 to 20 minutes, while King and his associates knelt to pray, and police pleaded with the demonstrators to go home. When officers finally moved forward with night sticks held horizontally and tried to push the demonstrators back, the resulting mayhem ended in clouds of tear gas. Eighteen officers were injured by flying rocks and bottles.

According to press accounts, the police had “whipped and clubbed” unoffending demonstrators, and television pictures showed crowds of fleeing blacks choking on tear gas. Reeb died the day after the confrontation at the bridge. These two events were a tremendous propaganda advantage for King, and they brought thousands more demonstrators to Selma from the North.

A few days later, President Lyndon Johnson went before Congress and evoked Reeb’s name in a strong call for legislation to ensure voting rights for blacks. He also ordered mobilization of the Alabama national guard to protect a second attempt at a Selma-to-Montgomery march, this one newly sanctioned by a federal judge.

Thus began, on March 21, 1965, the now-famous march. King, Abernathy, and U.N. Undersecretary Ralph Bunche–also a Nobel Peace Prize winner–took the lead down Selma’s Sylvan Street. On the way to the Pettus Bridge, the crowd marched past a record store, where an outside speaker alternately blared “Dixie” and “Bye, Bye, Blackbird.” At the head of the procession a mixed group of young men carried the U.S. flag upside down–the sign of distress. Many demonstrators wore “GROW” buttons, which stood for “Get rid of Wallace.” Nearly two thousand Alabama National Guardsmen, 100 FBI agents, 75 federal marshals, and dozens of state and county police officers guarded the marchers.

Just outside Selma, the Citizens Council of America, an anti-integration group, had set up posters showing King sitting next to known Communist leaders at the Highlander Folk School in Tennessee. The caption read, “Martin Luther King at Communist Training School.”

History books call this a “massive” demonstration and, indeed, some 11,000 people set off on the first leg of the journey. However, the highway to Montgomery narrowed to two lanes shortly after leaving Selma, and permission was granted for only 300 marchers on all but a few miles of roadway. Most of the crowd therefore streamed back to Selma.

Although it is impossible to know even their approximate numbers, some of the demonstrators were shills. A few openly boasted that they were in Selma because they had been offered food, money, and sex. Dora Brown’s unusual financial arrangements came to light when the checks stopped coming. In a sworn affidavit she testified as follows:

I was at Brown’s Chapel Church with the movement along with a blind man and a one-legged man who were both white people. I am one-armed and we were told at the time that we were the ones they needed worst, since we were handicapped it would help the movement. We were told that if we would make the march from Selma to Montgomery we would be paid $100.00 per month plus food and clothes . . . James Gildersleeve would pay us.

I have received three checks from Gildersleeve for $100.00 each but now he has quit paying me.

Gildersleeve was not to blame. Rev. Frederick Reese, president of the Dallas County Voters League, was arrested after other blacks accused him of stealing thousands of dollars in movement funds.

Miss Brown’s unhappy testimony continues: “Gildersleeve told me that he couldn’t pay me since Frederick Reese had gotten all the money. Gildersleeve gave me one pound of lard, some greens, a watermelon and $1.00 in money. He said that is all he could give.”

It is not recorded whether Miss Brown or the one-legged white man were among the select 300 who spent four nights on the road to Montgomery. It is known that the evenings were characterized by the now-usual drunkenness and fornication. On at least one occasion, police officers prevented newspapermen from photographing the revelry. And even among this inner circle, there were frequent complaints about stolen clothes and missing bed rolls.

Most of the marchers slept in the open except for King, who set up housekeeping in a trailer that was moved from camp to camp. There are no reports on how he spent his evenings, but his inclinations are now well known. His companion, Ralph Abernathy, was not a model cleric, either. In 1958, a Mr. Davis was arrested for threatening Abernathy with a hatchet because Abernathy kept trying to have sex with Mrs. Davis. She testified in her husband’s defense that Abernathy had first seduced her when she was a 15-year-old member of his congregation.

As the march went on, the press continued its adulatory, front-page coverage. All around the country, supporters held sympathy marches and worship services.

The night before the last leg of the trek, more than 30,000 people gathered in a field a few miles outside of Montgomery for a free concert. Harry Belafonte, Nina Simone, Sammy Davis, Jr., Billy Eckstein, Mahalia Jackson, the Chad Mitchell Trio, and Frankie Laine serenaded the crowd until nearly one in the morning.

On March 25, the 30,000 were joined by another 5,000 as King and Abernathy led the march into Montgomery, up to the steps of the state capitol. The city was festooned with Confederate flags, one of which fluttered along with the state flag over the capitol building. It was widely–and falsely–reported that not a single United States flag flew in Montgomery that day. The Stars and Stripes waved, as it always did, from a tall flag pole on the capitol grounds.

The leaders of the march asked to see Governor George Wallace, so they could present him with a list of grievances. He refused to meet them. The rest of the day was filled with speeches by Hosea Williams, Roy Wilkins, James Forman, Ralph Bunche and other black leaders. Joan Baez and Peter Paul and Mary were among those who entertained the crowd, which finally broke up around four p.m. The march was over. It took until midnight for sanitation crews to clean up the mountains of trash demonstrators had left behind.

Late that evening, a third killing took place when a white civil rights worker name Viola Liuzzo was shot to death as she was driving between Selma and Montgomery. Both the press and President Johnson were outraged, although accounts of the killing were often incomplete.

Given the sanitized view of the demonstrations that had been broadcast to the world, Alabama congressman William L. Dickinson undoubtedly met much skepticism on March 30 when he tried to convey a different picture to his colleagues on the floor of Congress:

Drunkenness and sex orgies were the order of the day in Selma, on the road to Montgomery. There were many–not just a few–instances of sexual intercourse in public between Negro and white. News reporters saw this–law enforcement officials saw this . . .

Has anyone stopped to ask what sort of people can leave home, family and job–if they have one–and live indefinitely in a foreign place demonstrating? This is no religious group of sympathizers trying to help the Negro out of a sense of right and morality–this is a bunch of godless riffraff out for kicks and self-gratification that have left every campsite between Selma and Montgomery littered with whiskey bottles, beer cans, and used contraceptives.

The nation was profoundly uninterested. In fact, the Selma-to-Montgomery march was probably one of the most effective events in the entire civil rights movement. Unlike the “March on Washington” in 1963, in which 200,000 people took part and where King gave his “I Have a Dream” speech, the agitation in Selma and Montgomery led directly to national legislation. The nation was riveted to the march, and President Johnson constantly referred to it in his push for a voting rights bill. The killings of James Reeb and Viola Liuzzo were also a great stimulus to lawmakers.

The legislation passed and was signed into law in August, 1965. In what would appear to be a direct abrogation of the reserved powers specified in the Tenth Amendment, it prohibited all state tests of voter literacy and education. It even authorized federal elections examiners to register voters who had been rejected by state authorities, and to patrol the polls to see that such people voted. The law affected states outside the South, notably New York, which had required that voters be literate in English. New York promptly sued on Tenth Amendment grounds, but the Supreme Court ruled in 1966 against the literacy provisions–to great rejoicing among the state’s Puerto Ricans.

With a total of three deaths, the march was one of the most sanguinary episodes in the civil rights period. However, very few demonstrators were harassed or assaulted. In retrospect, it is surprising that there was not more violence.

As invariably happens in racial matters, a group of whites with little experience of blacks saw fit to give instruction on race relations to people with a great deal of experience. Northerners invaded the South, a deeply conservative society, demanding that Southerners change their way of life. To add insult to arrogance, Northerners then proceeded publicly to violate some of the most deeply felt norms of privacy and decency. The self-control–even passivity–of the citizens of Selma and Montgomery is as astonishing as the degeneracy of the demonstrators. Perhaps even Mayor Smitherman, desperately trying to run a city overrun with disorderly demonstrators, harbored thoughts of homicide.

Now, 30 years later, Selma is a sacred name, one of the stations of the cross on the road to integration and racial equality.

[Editor’s Note: This review appears in A Race Against Time: Racial Heresies for the 21st Century, a collection of some of the finest essays and reviews published by American Renaissance. It is available for purchase here.]

Topics: , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    This is the article I posted under the NR article from yesterday on AmRen, which never got out of Pending Status for some(?) reason…

  • Dave West

    If it weren’t for the media glorifying dim-whitted blacks, confused/mentally ill white libtards, and outright thugs as America’s “true” moral authority then the Civil Rights “movement” would have faded into the night without a whimper. Kind of like they have done with Ferguson.

    On a side note:
    Ever notice how when the media brings up the civil rights movement, they inevitably show clips of “poor and helpless” black being sprayed with firehoses in Birmingham. They curiously never show what was going on before the police turned the firehoses on the protestors.

    • Susannah

      My grandparents were business owners in Birmingham during this era, and they were extremely angered and disgusted by all the one-sided media coverage. They were kind-hearted and educated people who were race realists of the highest order.

  • I understand that this weekend in Selma was little more than a black block party and bacchanal. Which means that nothing has changed in fifty years.

  • dd121

    This whole Selma thing is such a leftist manufactured event I can’t even bring myself to read this crap.

  • One Shot Beaudine

    I am a big fan of Harlan Ellison. He has an interesting essay on the march entitled, “From Alabamy, With Hate.” I now wonder about how much he whitewashed the march, which he participated in, in the essay. It is included in “The Essential Harlan Ellison.” The book may be out of print.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    The Civil Rights Movement got exactly what it wanted – a mostly White-free mecca.

    The end result has been a great success:

    Selma is now 80% black, 40% of the population lives in poverty and the unemployment rate is twice the state average. Selma High School is 99% black and 80% get a free lunch.

    The once-bustling downtown sports more empty storefronts than actual businesses. Gone are the high-end clothing stores, theaters and cafes.

    Many of the homes along Martin Luther King St. feature collapsed front porches and cratered living rooms. Some lack doors and windows, and now serve as a haven for squatters living without running water. Others are boarded up and abandoned, blighting what used to be middle class neighborhoods.

    http //www nydailynews com/news/national/today-hed-article-1 2141190

    • B.A_2014

      What is wrong with a free lunch or school dinner. It is very common in the UK as it is I’m sure in the rest of Europe. I don’t want to feed black, Brown or yellow mouths but I don’t mind paying taxes just so a white girl and boy doesn’t go hungry and gets a good healthy meal.

      • In American public policy parlance, participation rates in the NSLP (National School Lunch Program) is often used as an indicator of both student poverty and low academic achievement. In this instance, it’s not used in the political sense of whether it should or shouldn’t exist.

        Since NSLP has income qualifiers, (not perfectly enforced), of course it would be an almost perfect correlation to student poverty, or so it would seem. However:

        Second, the evidence and statistical regression coefficients might belie me, but I’ve always been bothered by the use of involvement in the school lunch program as a proxy for academic deficiency.

      • newscomments70

        Most whites in America are too proud to take handouts, even the relatively poor.

      • Usually Much Calmer

        Welfare is dysgenic.

    • Light from the East

      As expected, it was just as effective as an atomic bomb.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        But, unlike the Japanese cities that were rebuilt after being hit by atomic bombs – there will be NO rebuilding or renaissance until and unless the black denizens of Selma – or Detroit, Birmingham, Camden, Oakland or any other city destroyed by blacks are forever removed.

        Before and after pictures of Detroit are truly heartbreaking:

  • listenupbub

    Some people will say that it is unbelievable that the blacks would do this kind of stuff, but if you have been to a black school, it is really not that hard to believe.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    David Duke has been much maligned–a European American whipping post really–and now I see u-toob has announced they will take down all his videos in the next 10 days. They’ve already purged all the comments.

    With that being said, notice that this sudden harsh turn of events dovetails almost perfectly with the “net neutrality” FCC regulation; that 322 page beast that no American, even Congress, was allowed to see.

    Is Duke’s treatment coming straight out of this latest Orwellian dictum by the non-elected, minority occupation government?

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      His videos are down as of last night.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        The Elders of Zion ones. Those were the videos getting the tribe in a tizzy. The honest, factual videos.

  • gah

    Viola Liuzzo was a psychiatric patient, who cared so much about black voting rights, but she never voted in an election in her life. She deserted her husband and 5 children to shuck and jive in Montgomery. When her body arrived at the morgue, her hands, arms, feet and legs were covered with dirt, and she was covered with lice. To attract white college students the NAACP promised all the free alcohol, drugs and sex they could handle. Liuzzo was probably attracted there for that.

  • JohnEngelman

    I never had the opportunity to participate in civil rights demonstrations. I did take part in anti war demonstrations from 1969 to 1974. I never witnessed public urination and fornication at those demonstrations. I never heard about them. I doubt they happened.

    How one sees an event is influenced by how one feels about it. I would like to talk to people who were in Selma, Alabama in March 1965, and who approved or disapproved of voting rights for Negroes.

  • JohnEngelman

    A new constitution, written in 1901, eliminated most blacks from politics, by limiting suffrage to people who could read and understand the U.S. Constitution, and who had been employed during the previous year or who had paid property taxes…

    The legislation passed and was signed into law in August, 1965. In what would appear to be a direct abrogation of the reserved powers specified in the Tenth Amendment.

    – Marian Evans, American Renaissance, May 1995


    The Tenth Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

    The Fourteenth Amendment:

    Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

    Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

  • paul marchand

    What is the general translation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and judicial activism?

    1 ) white males MUST hire blacks, gays, Hispanics, women…regardless of merit / ability….and MUST pay them above merit, due to fear of EEOC or DoJ Civil Rights division.

    Even tho it is the blood, sweat, tears, time, ability of whites, and their monetary investment, that started the business.

    2) white businesses MUST serve blacks, gays, etc, regardless of factors of personal preferences, beliefs, etc. The personal property and labor of whites must accommodate others, lest suit be filed. The “victimized” parties/ customers can choose whomever THEY want to do business with.

    The businesses MUST racially mix.

    Of course, public school racial forced mixing has the scenario, for instance, of a naïve but beautiful 13 year old white girl in a class of predominately (or high plurality) black boys, she being coached by teachers about black victimization, and white guilt, setting the stage for mixing and intimidation, regardless of the wisdom of her parents that that not take place.

    THUS white parents * pay taxes for the predominately black schools * opt out, and lose about $ one quarter of a million dollars – for 2 children not utilizing this public largesse * end up paying about $200,000 for those 2 children to go to private school * have to work 2 jobs, with the ensuing stresses

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Well, if the “net neutrality” fine print did him in, then he’s the first one to go down in flames in the post First Amendment America. That has some distinction. He may have his living epitaph.

  • listenupbub

    A certain people group is celebrating their role in Selma. I can’t say it here, but it starts with a “J” and rhymes with pee-yoo.

  • I don’t find this article surprising at all. Remember news coverage of other recent news stories: The Michael Brown shooting; the Trayvon Martin incident; and going back, the Duke Lacrosse “rape”? What is different about those stories from Selma? They occurred in the Internet Age. It is a lot harder to tell just one version of a story than it use to be. Thank God for the Internet. We would be a lot worse off with out it.

  • You said it: It is not about what happened; it is about who gets to tell it.

  • B A Norrod

    The lies and the re-writing of true history will not end until the USA looks like Monrovia complete with defecating on all the beaches. Blacks have all the same things available to them as whites in 2015 and are even considered a protected class but the majority of them basically lack the motivation or intelligence to be successful. They ride the coattails of whites and follow our example for everything but are too prideful, violent, and destructive to assimilate. Working whites cannot and will not sustain them much longer. They are still slaves, willing slaves to their past. Racism works out good for them, it gets them free stuff so why would they let a good thing go by transcending the past and moving forward with all the opportunities available to them. I’m really sick and tired of hearing about this crap for my whole life and I’m 44 yrs old. There has got to be more to this world than racism, feminism, and terrorism. We need to change the 21st century so our children will not be victims of these stupid schemes.