Victims Speak Out for First Time After Group Attack in Downtown St. Paul

Jay Kolls, KSTP (Minneapolis), February 2, 2015


Adam and Michelle do not want their full names disclosed but they tell 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS that they were “shocked and scared” by the brazen attack while they ate dinner at a Lowertown restaurant near the new Saints ballpark in November.

The two are seen on security video eating at the restaurant when a group of about a dozen teenagers walk into the establishment. One of the group members throws a glass at Michelle while another steals what police say is Adam’s cell phone off the table.

No arrests have been made in this case and police are still investigating two other group attacks in downtown.

In September, a police sergeant email outlines details of 50 people assaulting a girl on the light rail station platform near Fifth and Minnesota streets.

The sergeant says the girl was beaten unconscious and the fight then spread to a nearby hotel where wedding guests and an off-duty sheriff’s deputy was also beaten. {snip}

On Jan. 19, a 23-year-old man and his 56-year-old friend were robbed and beaten by a group of at least six men in the skyway in the 400 block of Minnesota Street. One man has been arrested in that case, but the other suspects have not been arrested.



Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Dave4088

    Residents of the great white north are getting a taste of what diversity really means first hand. They’re learning real quick that most afro-merican teens aren’t as witty and harmless as the Cosby kids, Will Smith or any afros they saw on Nickelodeon.

    How much you wanna bet that these attacks were in retaliation for the deaths of downtown Michael Brown and Eric Garner? But the police insist this wasn’t racially motivated and surely no hate crime while news reports and even the victims themselves will insist the attacks weren’t about race.

    • Yancy Derringer

      Brown and Garner (and Trayvon, etc.) — they’re excuses, more than reasons, to attack whites.

      These large gangs on the hunt for whites to beat should be prosecuted under the statutes encompassing terrorist acts. This kind of crime is extraordinarily malevolent.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Notice not a word regarding race on the clip. Not a single peep.

        I noticed the reporter ended the segment with a call for people to call in with any tips. I have a tip…

        All the attackers are black and all the victims are white. Narrows down the suspects some…suggests a pattern…

    • ElComadreja

      The cops are part of the problem. They let blacks get away with murder and then get attacked for their troubles.

  • Many of these whites are finally having their first real ‘diversity’ encounter – and it ain’t pretty! If this is what it takes for whites to start waking up and becoming race-conscious, then so be it!

    By the way, if you haven’t figured it out by now, whites need to start carrying concealed.

    • Cheri Rodriguez

      And right after having to shoot blacks in self-defense, toss the gun in a lake / river / ocean / smelter. If anyone ever asks, the gun was stolen.

      • No, that’s not a good idea. That will only compound the problem and will surely make it appear as if you had something to hide.

        • Cheri Rodriguez

          Not if you’re not a suspect in the first place. Cops—”Who shot you?” Any surviving black(s)—”Some White guy.” Good luck with that.

          • If you seriously think that tossing a handgun in a lake or somehow disposing of the weapon after involved in a shooting is a good strategy, you’re simply NOT thinking straight.

            This is bad advice on so many levels!

            With surveillance cameras almost everywhere these days, it will be nearly impossible to pull it off. Consider the following:

            1. The cops are not stupid. They will pursue the matter, and the truth will eventually be discovered.

            2. Lying to the police or hiding the weapon will surely make you look like you have something to hide. You will definitely be viewed with suspicion at that point, more so than at first.

            3. The weapon, if recovered, will have certain identifiers on it that will be traced to your ownership.

            I don’t know if you’re trying to be provocative or just having fun, but Good Lord I hope no one takes your recommendations seriously.

          • Luca

            Simply say, “I feared for my life, he/she/it came at me like a pit bull and threatened to kill me.”

          • True Luca, because one’s state of mind is a viable factor when involved in a shooting. However, the circumstances better support it, and it better be reasonable as opposed to merely being an unwarranted claim with nothing to justify it.

          • Ron Cheaters

            Even that might not work. Look at that guy who was provoked into killing that “beloved darling” in the SUV when they wouldn’t turn down their awful music. The black probably did show him a gun and he reacted, then they took off to dispose of the weapon..
            I was really dumb of the shooter to order a pizza afterwards though. If he had just gone to police right after, the cops would have viewed the case with a beneficial objective…
            I think his name was Michael Duncan?? I can’t remember.

          • archer

            I think you’re right about them leaving to hide a gun, it makes more sense than him just shooting over loud music.

          • DNA Explains It All

            You know dammed well that any white forced to put one of these things down will be investigated to see if ANYONE you ever knew EVER used the “N” word. Having EVER come here, you have lost all right to self preservation.

          • bilderbuster

            If there’s no cameras then no problem. If there are cameras then there’s your proof of self defense.
            If you want to turn a gun into a lump of metal then take a torch to it.

          • I hear you, but that’s STILL a bad strategy. Don’t ever assume there’s no cameras. Don’t ever assume, especially in a city environment, that there’s no cameras and that no one is watching.

            If the shooting is justified, tell the truth and B.S. the investigators. Get the best attorney you can afford, and have him or her present with you always when talking to the police.

            But if you seriously think hiding, throwing away, or ‘torching’ a handgun you just used to shoot someone is a good idea, you’re horribly mistaken. It’s almost as bad as someone advising not to hire a lawyer and to represent yourself when charged with a crime because the legal system discriminates against whites. You can do that if you wish, but you’ll have a fool for a client!

          • archer

            The really smart thing to do if you are involved in a shooting is to get a good lawyer before answering any questions.

          • Alexandra1973

            Don’t get me started on satellites. Eye in the sky spying on you.

          • I agree, if you shoot in self defense then you have a good case. If you throw the gun away then you’re clearly committing a crime. Also if you flee the scene and are caught then you could have a problem.

            If you buy an oxy-acetylene torch to melt the gun (I don’t think the typical home BBQ grill will do it), then this too can be traced.

          • Cheri Rodriguez

            1. Not if you’re carrying an untraceable gun in the first place. After wiping it down, you just throw it next to one of the bodies. The mob used to do it all the time.

            2. Try playing it honest and you end up like George Zimmerman and Bernie Goetz.

          • This is ridiculous. You’re arguments aren’t improving. Sorry, you shouldn’t be carrying “an untraceable gun” – period! If they later trace the handgun to you (and they will!), it will only make your shooting appear even worse!

            You will get little sympathy from the DA and the judge himself. It will make it appear as if you did something you knew was wrong, and you deliberately tried to conceal it. I’d rather do things lawfully and show how I was justified at every step in my use of deadly force. This will prove to be much wiser path to follow than the one you recommend.

          • Cheri Rodriguez

            Glad you weren’t in charge during The Revolution or World War II. We would have lost playing nice / by the rules.

          • Good grief, Cheri, we’re talking about legally surviving a shooting within the context of a civil society and doing things the right way to prevent our butts from doing serious time with Bubba in prison!

            As bad as things are, we’re not experiencing a ‘revolution’ here in America, at least not in the sense that you mean it. We’re not talking a completely chaotic, anarchist, war-like environment where everyone is their own law. We’re talking about the legal system as it currently exists.

            I hope you will think a little more carefully about such matters, and don’t allow TV to influence your opinions on what police work is like and how they investigate shootings. In other words, please put down the remote control.

          • Cheri Rodriguez

            Don’t watch much TV. Read mostly. If you don’t think we’re at war (they certainly are) then you’ve got your head in the sand. And since when are we on a first name basis?

          • First of all, I’m going by the name you posted. But I understand you’re getting testy because every one of your arguments in defense of your convoluted reasoning has failed miserably.

            Secondly, if you do read as much as you claim, I would seriously recommend you read in-depth on how police investigators solve various shootings, even the ones in which the handgun is purportedly “untraceable.” You might want to investigate this a little more before recommending to others that they use an “untraceable” weapon after shooting someone.

            Thirdly, no one denies that there isn’t a bias against whites in society, but this is a far cry from the kind of war that you envision is now occurring. Again, you’ve missed very clear and obvious points because you’re defensive and reactionary. You’ve been caught time after time not knowing what you’re talking about, and each time I explode your line of reasoning, it becomes even more embarrassing for you. If you’re not embarrassed by it, you should be. Again, Cheri, think before you right and try to better inform yourself in this area.

          • ElComadreja

            It’s not Bubba you have to worry about in prison, it’s Jamal.

          • If you DON’T play it honestly and legit like George Zimmerman and Bernie Goetz did, you’ll end up even worse than they did!

          • Luca

            Crowbars, knives and bats are far more untraceable. Odds are quite good that most criminals or assailants will be carrying something of the sort.

          • Cheri Rodriguez

            And I used to work in the State’s Attorney’s office. So what? The rule of law pretty much doesn’t exist anymore in this country.

          • DNA Explains It All

            Zip gun.

    • Lord Sandwich

      I have been carrying a handgun for almost a decade. I doubt that I would shoot someone who threw a drink at myself or my wife and tried to leave. That’s why I started martial arts training 4 years ago. I don’t claim to be invincible, but I do have a better understanding of fight science. I’m currently a purple belt in Kajukenbo. It’s much easier to justify beating the crap out of someone for the actions seen in the video. If their friends jump in, well, say hello to MY little friend.

      • Heinrich_1

        The problem there is these black manimals jump on you at groups at time. Could you handle 50 on the rail platform that they had. CCW is the only way. Once you pull a pistol out they run. Typical jungle behavior. If they don’t run they are well disciplined jungle bunnies.

        • Good point! The whole martial arts thing might work well when you’ve got one guy, but when there’s a pack of feral hood-rats, you’ll need a great equalizer.

        • Sick of it

          If they don’t run, shoot a few of them. The rest will vacate the area.

          • Better yet, shoot the one who poses the greater and more immediate threat to your life. And then shoot the next one if under the same line of reasoning. This is what the law permits.

            Otherwise, it will be argued that you fired indiscriminately and that no immediate threat of life or limb was present before you at the time.

            Believe me, I know what I’m talking about here. If you use a handgun against anyone, especially against one of the darlings of ‘diversity,’ the shooting will deeply scrutinized. Everything you said and did prior and during the incident will carefully examined.

            You’ve got to approach this entire subject in a tactically smart, wise, and prudent manner. Otherwise, you will find yourself in a world of legal hurt beyond your wildest dreams.

          • cherrie greenbaum123

            There is a great scene from a Hollywood western, “Johnny Guitar”. Joan Crawford walks halfway down the stairs at the saloon/gambling joint she owns. An angry mob wants to take her down. Joan pulls out her gun. A woman (the leader) of the lynch mob says, “Ya can’t shoot all of us!” To which Joan smirks and says, “Well one or two of you’ll do!”

          • Simonetta

            If you have to shoot, shoot the older ones in the back of gang. Even if you have to take a punch or two from the younger ones in front doing the attacking. After taking down a few older ones in the back, the rest will all quickly disperse.

            The older ones in the back will be the ‘middle management’ of the gang. The ones with the most experience and the ones that the leader will be most upset to lose. The youngest ones will be the ones out front doing the attacking, because that is how they obtain status and rank in the gang format. They are expendable; they’re bred to be bled, and they are the ones who are expected to get shot. One the other hand, if you shoot the clearly identifiable leader, then everyone else in the gang just moves up a notch and they just get some younger kids to fill the slots.

            If you shoot the mid-level thugs in the gang, then the leader will be angry at the youngest ones for causing the loss of his oldest and most-trusted lieutenants by having picked the wrong target to attack (you). He will then maneuver them into a situation where they will be killed by some other gang as ‘payback’ for causing the deaths of the more senior level gang members.

            Your bullets will have more usefulness then just saving your life.

          • No, DON’T shoot the ones in the back which are not immediately and directly attacking you. You will be fried in court legally. It will show that you are indiscriminately shooting people rather than defending yourself against a more immediate attacker(s).

            Moreover, if you take the time to shoot those who are not an immediate threat, those closest to you (if they don’t all scatter) will likely overpower you and take the weapon from you.

            You are better to deal with the more immediate threat to your safety, rather than trying to figure out who the big whigs are and shooting them. Anyone following your advice will lose big time in a court of law. Any shooting must be reasonable, justifiable, and must defensive purposes only.

          • Simonetta

            Thanks for taking the time and effort to give an insightful reply to my message.

        • Lord Sandwich

          I carry 39 rounds at any one time. After that, If the others don’t run the knife comes out.

      • Obviously I’m not talking about shooting one person who throws a drink at you or your wife. Such a weapon would only be used as a last resort, and ONLY for defensive purposes. In this case, it would be justified to use it if viciously attacked by a pack of feral hood-rats. The law recognizes the right of citizens to protect themselves from BOTH imminent death and great bodily injury.

        • Tim

          I used it when a White squatter who I confronted during the dark of night at gunpoint announced his intention to remain in my building and take it over as his property…One thing I learned. When you hold someone at gunpoint, your idea of submission and theirs may be totally different. Be ready for that…

  • Lord Sandwich

    The news report in the video is the usual, blatant cover-up of black on white assault. It’s so predictable. The cover-up is as bad as the crimes themselves. 50 blacks attacking one white female youth is not a “fight”. Reporters love to use that one all the time. Truly Orwellian.

    • Pontifex Minimus ©

      I’m surprised these magically noble youths weren’t hailed as “freedom fighters”–what with all the cis-hetero-euro-privileged-patriarchy still in effect and all…

      • Who Me?

        I thought that “cisgendered” was the new word for what used to be termed a normal person. (You know, one whose mental identity matched his or her actual, physical plumbing.)

        • Alexandra1973

          They have to label normal as well as abnormal behavior…this way a kind of “continuum” of behavior is created, intended to make abnormal behavior appear normal.

          (I think people will get what I mean.)

    • D.B. Cooper

      That is why someone must be blamed and held responsible. The Republican Party is supposed to represent us, but they will not. Therefore, I will vote to remove them from office, even if it means a democrat might win. However, I will NOT vote for a white male democrat. You can destroy that party once there are no more white people in it.

      • Lord Sandwich

        So you only vote to elect negroes, Mexicans and Hillarys?

        • D.B. Cooper

          40 years of “At least they’re not as bad as the democrats” are not working. Obama has opened a lot of eyes about the horror of diversity. Let more diversities open some more eyes.

          • Lord Sandwich

            I would never tell you what to do with your ballot, whether I agree or not. Just asking.

    • bilderbuster

      The first person the media went to get a reaction from was a Black who obviously wasn’t a victim nor was he even there as a witness.

    • Yancy Derringer

      “The fight then spread to…” What does that even mean? This gang beat a woman unconscious, left the area, then entered a hotel where they attacked the people at a wedding (god, can you imagine…).

      It’s crap writing anyway. “…Where people were beaten…” Please. Passive voice, especially in a news story, is weak, weak, weak, and marks an amateur writer. More important, of course, and as others here have said, is that these attacks were black on white.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    Oh God I hate the media. Absolutely no mention of race. Instead it’s “young people” committing these attacks. And then, though the video shows a black woman throwing a drink at a white woman’s head, the very next clip is the reporter asking a black man if he’s scared of these roving gangs as though black males are the target rather than the penetrators. Shameless reporting.

    • David Ashton

      Just one misleading report among hundreds.

      • BloodofAlbion75

        No,it’s one misleading report among THOUSANDS.

        • David Ashton

          I browse corrected.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      And the black baboon says something like, “Yeahs, it reel skerree!” like he’s on the hit list.

  • Truthseeker

    If feral Blacks adapt to cold weather, that’s one less line of defense we have against them.

    • Kenner

      They don’t need to ‘adapt’ to anything while we subsidize their dysfunction.

    • Sick of it

      Shut off their taxpayer funded heat and they’ll leave.

  • NoMosqueHere

    Reporter: “The problem could get worse when the weather warms up.”

    I’ll say.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      This summer should be interesting. Especially if last summer was their opening act. Get plenty of ammo ready, YT. You’re gonna need it.

  • Easyrhino

    What 5 star BS, group attacks my tail.

    Feral blacks running wild doing what they do. This crap reporting is why many news outlets have deleted their comments section because the citizens are calling them out on their lies and misrepresentations.

  • MekongDelta69

    Once again, do you see the word black in the article?

    Nah… Me neither…

    • Luca

      We are at a point where we don;t need to see the word. We know by reading a few lines and a few key words. So many dog whistles going off, I’m going deaf.

  • pcmustgo


  • pcmustgo

    I was told a long time ago by relatives in Minnesota that it’s Chicago blacks/gangsters who move up to St.Paul/Minneapolis and create all the problems… they move up there to avoid arrest in Chicago, etc.

    • BloodofAlbion75

      They actually arrest black criminals in Chicago? That would be surprising,if true.I thought the thugs in Chi-Town automatically received Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free cards from President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder’s Department of Injustice.

    • Kenner

      Minnesota also has generous welfare benefits. Their license plates should read, ‘The White Guilt State’.

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      I’m from Minneapolis and a lot of them do come here from Chicago, but I’m not sure whether our law enforcement is any more lax than Chicago’s. The main draw the generous welfare benefits. We have plenty of our own welfare programs that go above and beyond what the federal programs provide.

    • Spaniard in LA

      That’s probably what’s going on. I was told by a friend who lives in Texas that ever since New Orleans Blacks moved into the area crime has gone up. According to her they literally kill for a penny. I live the suburbs of Los Angeles and you never hear about such mob attacks occurring. I wonder why.

  • . . . 50 people assaulting a girl . . .

    And liberals tell us no one needs large capacity magazines.


    • cherrie greenbaum123

      If you had pulled a gun and shot one of those violent chimps, you’d be the one sitting in a jail cell right now.

      • 999 times out of 1000, the groidle of black assailants will flee when the shooting starts, which can save your life. Us Whites will have to take our chances with the legal system.

        • Sick of it

          If a gun happens to disappear, is not recovered, and is not registered, it may be difficult to trace it to an individual. Hypothetically speaking.

  • Luca

    This is why the South did not want to free the slaves, it had nothing to do with ‘free’ labor. This is what they warned the country about. They saw the coming storm. No one listened.

    This is why people wanted segregation. They were ridiculed and called names. This is why they wanted to recolonize freed slaves. No one took action.

    This is why we are where we are.

    • NoMosqueHere

      Exactly. During the 1950s & 60s, southern whites warned us about so-called civil rights. They told us all that talk about “equality” and “racial harmony” would go right out the window if blacks ever get to first base. If anything, they underestimated the disastrous impact of so-called civil rights.

      I prefer America before the 60s — the 1860s, that is.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Why Lincoln wanted to deport Africans back to their “native soil.”

      “After praising Clay’s lifelong devotion to the cause of black resettlement, Lincoln quoted approvingly from a speech given by Clay in 1827:

      There is a moral fitness in the idea of returning to Africa her children, if Africa offered no refuge, blacks could be sent to another tropical land.

      http //www ihr org/jhr/v13/v13n5p-4_Morgan html

      • Sick of it

        Latin America would be more convenient. It would also be a way to pay them back for flooding our country with Indios.

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          Lincoln was looking at Mexico, Central America and South America as places to resettle emancipated slaves:

          Seeking to calm fears that emancipation would suddenly result in many freed Negroes in their midst, he again spoke of resettlement of blacks as the solution. “Room in South America for colonization can be obtained cheaply, and in abundance,” said the President. “And when numbers shall be large enough to be company and encouragement for one another, the freed people will not be so reluctant to go.”

          An excellent site for black resettlement, Lincoln went on, was available in Central America. It had good harbors and an abundance of coal that would permit the colony to be quickly put on a firm financial footing.

          Some form of resettlement, he said, amounts to an “absolute necessity.”

          • Who Me?

            “An excellent site for black resettlement, Lincoln went on, was available in Central America. It had good harbors and an abundance of coal that would permit the colony to be quickly put on a firm financial footing.”
            I disagree. Central America is far too close. Consider how many invaders we get from Central America. The “resettled” blacks would probably be too lazy to walk back to the United States like the native Indios and Mestizos do, but they will interbreed with the Indios and the resulting mixtures WILL be hoofing it back up here in one or two generations., Considering how fast they breed, (both races) that means probably about 30 years. Resettling them anywhere that isn’t separated from us by a large body of water is at best a stop-gap, temporary measure.

          • Spaniard in LA

            The Central Americans would have probably killed them because they don’t suffer from White guilt.

        • BulgAryan

          Mauritania is a very decent spot for resettlement. Still practice slavery. Pay them $500 a head, they’ll take all the freed slaves we can deliver and probably re-enslave them.

  • dd121

    This doesn’t fit the leftist narrative and will be out of the news in two days. (if not sooner)

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      This was news?


      When is black on White crime ever news?, except locally. The media preach that black and Whites have equal crime rates but blacks are arrested more often due to racism. Rats like holder certainly believe this.

      That’s why it’s up to US to teach out children, our loved ones, hell, every White that will listen about black crime. Tell your daughters the truth about black crime, your sons too. It could save their lives.

      The facts, data and empirical evidence are on our side.

      • Alexandra1973

        I never knew Asians were busted for gambling more than Whites. Learn something new every day.

  • Chip Carver

    The lack of impulse control is amazing, isn’t it? And as the US slowly crumbles the behavior of these downtrodden oppressed welfare grubbers is only going to become more brazen and even more dangerous. Don’t worry though, the news media and our elected puppets, er, officials, will tell us crime is dropping, that in many areas it’s at 1950’s levels. And Michael Brown was a gentle giant.

    • Christorchaos

      But they also have good planning and coordination skills too: “50 people attacked a female juvenile and knocked her unconscious right here on the subway platform”. Impulse? Forethought?? Theyre just violent. That being said there some totally sweet ones that I could never imagine doing anything like this. It is just that after 40 years of fatherless homes and other social diseases, the bad ones are now so prevalent that all white people can do is avoid them as a race, the good with the bad unfortunately.

    • Sick of it

      White crime has dropped. Non-white crime is increasing. The non-white portion of the population is also rising, ergo we shall soon see a general rise in crime rates without breaking the numbers down by race.

    • Crime is at it’s lowest point since 1963
      Sorry Chip but it’s true crime is much lower now than ever before. Here’s what I got when I googled it.
      US crime rate at lowest point in decades. Why America is safer now.
      The crime rate for serious crimes, including murder, rape, and assault, has dropped significantly since the early 1990s in part because of changes in technology and policing, experts say.
      By Daniel B. Wood, Staff writer January 9, 2012
      Richard Drew/AP
      The last time the crime rate for serious crime – murder, rape, robbery, assault – fell to these levels, gasoline cost 29 cents a gallon and the average income for a working American was $5,807. That was 1963

      Possibly the increasing number of blacks, while vocal, has the effect of decreasing crime? Occasionally young teens go astray and have to blow off some steam but apparently it’s nothing serious.

      • Strike_Team

        I work in LE in So Cal. The numbers have been cooked. We are busier than we have ever been, and our County Jails are bursting at the seams, never mind our State Prisons – and the increase in crime has outpaced the population growth. While Hispanics are the overwhelming majority, the crime rate amongst blacks has increased (and it has increased amongst Asians as well). Numbers have remained level or decreased for Whites. These “official” reports you quote are bogus. Look up the stories of the LAPD, LA Country Sheriffs, NYPD and more cooking the books. Hispanics are counted as “White” by the FBI in crime statistics for two reasons; 1) To narrow the reported crime rate differences between Whites and blacks, and 2) To hide the tidal wave of crime created by Hispanics.

        • Spaniard in LA

          I live in So Cal and I must say you are absolutely right about the county jails and state prisons. It’s no secret that they began to release petty drug offenders due to overcrowding. Asian crime has also gone up and I do know that they mostly target their own people. I actually heard that crime in places like Compton and South Central have gone down.

      • Spaniard in LA

        Crime began to drop around 1991. If you do the math and go back some 18 years you’ll in up in 1973 (Roe v Wade). Abortion got rid of those that were suppose to be committing crime. I once mentioned this to a Sociology professor and boy did he have a fit.

        • Levitt in Freakonomics. The problem with that idea is twofold:

          1. The timing doesn’t line up.

          2. The kind of black women that exercise such “rights” is not the ghetto Shaniqua with 11 kids by 9 men. Hence, that’s why she has 11 kids by 9 men. They are the professional higher IQ upwardly mobile black women who doesn’t want to be “burdened.” OTOH, to Shanqiua, each of her 9 kids isn’t a burden, it’s either a welfare check and/or a hook into the father’s income.

  • Tarczan

    So they interview some black guy to show it’s not racial and he says how concerned and scared he is. The media propaganda is very slick.

    • Christorchaos

      When the news team said, “lets interview a concerned citizen”, I am sure somebody on the news crew had the sense to say, “shouldnt we get a white guy instead?” and was branded racist immediately.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Are you perhaps getting the impression that the media are anti-White?

      What else reason could there possibly be to cover up, justify and excuse rampant black-on-White murders, rapes, assaults, armed robberies – crime that we would never know but for the Internet?

    • Ron Cheaters

      When the black guy said “yes I head about dem attack’s”

      My thought was yeah, he heard about it – they’re probably his neighbors.. he probably was hoping to get the phone the guy stole.

  • Who Me?

    Whites living in large cities need to establish their own no-go zones, enforced at the end of a gun. Any and every black that dares to show their face within the designated area is clearly made aware of the fact that he and his kind are not wanted and will not be tolerated. These attacks upon unsuspecting whites going about their daily lives, minding their own business, then suddenly set upon by a herd of howling savages and being injured or even killed, have got be stopped. It is obvious that nobody in a position of authority is going to do anything about it, so it is up to each one of individually and collectively to enforce this for the safety of us all, especially our children and the elderly, those of us who are most vulnerable. If non-whites are able to set up no-go zones, Whites certainly can. Is it against the law? Of course, and when did that stop any other group from forming them? Just matter of factly create them. No need to advertise it from the rooftops, but no need to hide it either. It wouldn’t work if it was a secret, now would it?
    When a group of ferals start forming in the street, every white person in the area takes a hand in putting an end to whatever mischief they are up to. Some guard the businesses, some protect the vulnerable or possible victims, others herd the would-be assailants out of the area at gunpoint. Do this EVERY TIME a black appears in the designated district. It won’t take them long to get the message. Anything that blacks can do, whites can do better, and protecting our own ought to be at the top of the list.

    • phillyguy

      the whites that you see getting pulverized by savage Negroes are mostly white liberal weaklings who get jobs for companies located in big cities. you will never see savage Negroes roaming the big city neighborhoods of the Irish, Italians the Germans and the polish, you notice that it never happens in the white working class big city neighborhoods..believe me they are scared to death to start trouble in our neighborhoods.

      • Who Me?

        Nevertheless, they are white, and the effect in the minds of both the attackers and the attacked will be the same–“Don’t mess with Whites”. Even if it doesn’t change the liberal attitudes of the ones saved, (and it probably won’t) it will change the minds of some others witnessing and/or hearing about it. It will help instill some courage and pride in the white youth who have been so badly demoralized by the current of fear and helplessness and guilt heaped on them since birth. It will show them that Whites can and will fight back, and they can too.

    • Tim

      I`m doing just that. 130 feet of sidewalk on Roosevelt Ave…

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    No arrests have been made in this case and police are still investigating two other group attacks in downtown.

    The article didn’t say which two groups — Was it the Lion’s Club, the Rotary Club or both?

    There is only one answer to this: exsanguination.

  • RacialRay

    Fifty subhuman savages beat up on a lone white girl, and its characterized as a “fight”? Makes me wonder how much “fight” the poor kid could possibly have given that band of baboons.

    Much as I loathe the entire demographic and wish they would all somehow vanish, I could not be part of a gang of dozens attacking a lone, random black person. Especially a girl.

    Oops, there goes my white civility showing again.

  • Mark Hillyard

    When I was attacked by about a dozen blacks I had at that time nothing for or against black people. It took years before I could even bare to see one on tv and got into fights with people who wanted to watch a movie, especially Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, (to pollute your family name).

  • Heinrich_1

    Animals are not to be reasoned with, only shot on sight.

  • Christorchaos

    “it might only get worse?” … I cant believe my ears. You mean it’s not “random”??

  • Christorchaos

    “Yes, I’ve heard about this before” … says the black guy. I bet you have …

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      Notice how they find a black guy to give us the break down of the events? Must be those scandalous, violent “teens” again!

    • Ron Cheaters

      These youths are his neighbors… of course he has.

  • Christorchaos

    “The restaurant gave us this video because they want to draw attention to this problem. … were not going to name them because they do not want to face any retaliation.” Unlikely the perps would come back there. The type of retaliation they are talking about is retaliation from Blacks and liberals who will brand them to be “those who have read and subscribe to Francis Galton’s theories” (i.e. racists).

  • Christorchaos

    “50 people attacked a female juvenile and knocked her unconscious right here on the subway platform”. 50 people? That’s not a crime, that’s an act of war…

  • humura

    The war against whites continues. Where is the Mayor? The Police? The surprise is that this report was shown on TV. Whites are to be disarmed with gun control, and destroyed through the “fun” experiences of the diversity youth groups.

  • Hammerheart

    At what point do we concede that we are not a first world nation anymore?

    • Maximo Partagas

      I think this video just proclaimed that very point.

  • badbox27

    ‘Group attack’ means a pack of wild, savage, straight out of the African jungle beasts going on a hunt for White victims. They don’t belong among us.

  • Tsar Alexander

    I don’t live in St Louis, but it seems to me, as an outsider, that basically a race war is breaking out over there.

    Is St.Louis/Ferguson a sign of things to come for the rest of America?


    Ignore, St*Paul* not St.Louis. Do’h!

    • Spikeygrrl

      So many are making the news it gets confusing to tell them apart.

  • LHathaway

    “In September, a police sergeant email outlines details”

    They’ve found the problem: police profiling.

  • Spikeygrrl

    There go those “yoots” again with their spirited highjinks. Aren’t they just the cutest thing?

  • Caucasoid88

    Surprised they didn’t have a black guy reporting to show they weren’t racist. They did interview a black guy, though. He’ll be “clapped up” this week.

  • WoodyBBad

    “Large groups of young people.” More like packs of feral hoodlets.

  • bubo

    A country on the fast track to oblivion. I wonder how many generations you have to go back to find people that didn’t have to worry about being victims of blacks, either economically or physically?

    Seems almost everyone knows someone who has been jumped, robbed, assaulted, murdered, had their neighborhoods ruined, job ruined etc.

    • 1G25

      Only two. They were under control before the mid-1960s.

  • caughy

    Is there any city in America that has no blacks or so few that they are not a problem? Minneapolis used to be a haven for decent people to live.

  • Alpin Thueson

    Awaiting the newstory where the negro filth are left stacked like cordwood for Animal Control to remove. How would MSM report such an event? Would they report it at all?

    • Bill Brady

      Whites can be killed raped or tortured by blacks, by the thousands, and it is barely a blip on the radar of the globalist media.

      But if just a few blacks were killed by whites – even if it was self defense – it would be an international story – slanted against the whites of course.

  • Earl P. Holt III

    I would have killed as many as possible with my Sig .45, and the lucky ones would have gotten away only because it holds 11 rounds…

    • Practice quick tactical reloads some more!

      • Earl P. Holt III

        If I carry a second magazine, it makes my pants hang down like some n*gger “Rap Artist” or other street denizen…

  • JohnG911

    Heck, The Atlanta PD recently arrested a black man that randomly assaulted whites on the street for months. I bet this is an epidemic in every major city purposely being ignored by the national media.

  • fgbrunner3

    Black mob violence will be the lasting legacy of the Obama Administration.

  • Augustus3709

    In urban areas populated with ‘youths’ at the very least have some industrial strength mace at the ready and do your best impersonation of a fire hose when these groups attack.

  • 1G25

    Hey, negro-loving “White Privilege” preaching Minnesotans, how do you like the anthropoids now ?

  • Alexandra1973

    Where I live they seem to congregate more in the county seats…that’s where the welfare offices are. I live in semi-rural Wayne County, Ohio. Blacks are mostly in Wooster (the county seat) and Orrville (which I affectionately call “coalburner central”).

  • Bill Brady

    How many attacks and victims would it take for the media to admit this is a black hate/behavior problem being directed towards whites?

    I’m guessing there is no limit.

  • Tom_in_Miami

    How long must we suffer because of blacks? I hear a lot of talk, but I don’t see anybody doing anything to solve the problem.

  • Maximus

    My first thought was (like it always has been for a while, did not start out with that) where does white victims liberal at all? Did they have pc-ideals? Did they vote Obama or are they this average republicans without any form of racial awareness and consciousness? If that is the case, which it often is, at least nine out of ten, I really do not care. In a way I think they deserve it a little bit. Is like karma. Your actions has consequences. I general I do not feel that much sympathy at all for white people who get´raped, killed, manhandled, robbed or humiliated by non-whites if it turns out that they held pc-ideals, in any way. I have more peace at mind having that state of mind now days.

    A political incorrect non-white has more worth and more valuable to white survival than a pc, liberal, republican, feminist white person.

    I do not take for granted that you will agree. And I do not care either.

  • Vito Powers

    I’m seriously thinking of creating a free WordPress blog for an oral history telling of confrontations with blacks on white people.

    My very first Negro encounter was at age 11. It was at a high school football game. After the game, we white kids played football against a gang of Negroes from the projects (my neighborhood was lily white at the time).

    When we won the game, the Negroes wanted to start a fight with us. Long story short, our toughest guy beat their toughest guy. That was my first awareness of how nasty Negroes can be.

  • mrdevilsadvocate954 .

    Looks like this article was trolled by someone giving intentionally bad self-defense advice.

  • Rustler

    This was the kind of thing that caused white flight in the 1970’s. It just became too dangerous to use any public area in cities with large black populations.

  • The concept of “gambler’s ruin” says it is an eventual certainty that one of their intended victims will be carrying concealed, and will shoot a bunch of these goons stone dead. It’s just a matter of time. When that happens, “da community” will return to their usual scripted faux-outrage: “Dey was a good gang. All 50 ob dem was turnin’ dey lifes aroun’, gnome sayin’?”

  • Fr. John+

    Yup. The chickens have come home to roost. You idiotic fellow altruistic Norse and German Whites who thought blacks ‘were just like us.’ Well, get ready for ‘payback’ for Trayvon, Ferguson, etc. because while Whites act individually, Blacks act as a RACE. And the sooner you start realizing Whites ARE THE RACE that created this country, the better. RAUS!

  • FransSusan

    Attacks such as these are probably a good thing to wake up idiot liberals to exactly what the low-life blacks are really like. Maybe.