How the Nobel Prize Has Favoured White Western Men for More Than 100 Years

Oliver Duggan and Peter Spence, Telegraph (London), October 8, 2014

Just five percent of almost 900 Nobel Prizes distributed to the most brilliant minds in peace, literature, science and economics over the past century have been awarded to women.

Of 867 prestigious awards distributed since 1901, just 46 have been awarded to women, starting with Marie Curie who won the prize for physics alongside her husband Pierre in 1903 and again for chemistry in 1911.

Since then, 15 women have also been awarded the Nobel prize for scientific pursuits–compared to more than 500 men. A dozen have received the award for literature, 14 for peace and one for economics.

Geographical analysis by the Telegraph has also revealed that western countries have received a disproportionately high number of awards throughout the Nobel’s history.

{snip}

The United States, which has produced 323 award winners, and the United Kingdom, which has 113, are by far the most regular recipients of the prize.

In third place is Germany, which has produced 87 Nobel winners, with the majority in physics, chemistry and medicine. Just 17 awards have been given to men or women from Africa and 10 to those from South America.

The breakdown of male and female winners of the award in each discipline shows women in peace and literature are more likely to win the award than those in scientific pursuits.

Given the huge political and social power held by western men over the last century, low representation for women may be expected. However the findings in certain disciplines are striking.

For Physics, less than one per cent of the award winners have been women. Similarly, just under a dozen of the 200 prizes handed out for medicine have gone to female healthworkers.

The findings come as the Nobel Institute prepares to announce the 2014 winner of the peace prize, with Pope Francis tipped by bookmakers as the favourite.

The Argentinian Pope is now the 5-2 front-runner for the award, which will be unveiled in Oslo on Friday, according to bookmaker’s William Hill. Paddy Power also has him as a strong contender.

Since being elected in March last year after the resignation of Benedict XVI, the Pontiff has repeatedly called for peace in conflict zones such as Ukraine, Syria and Iraq.

If he was to win this week, he would become the 83rd man to be awarded the peace prize, compared to 24 organisations and 14 women.

He would also add a sixth Nobel to Argentina’s haul of prizes. The two other Argentinian-born peace prize winners are Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, a human rights leader who won in 1980, and Carlos Saavedra Lamas, who won in 1936.

[Editor’s Note: You can see how each country fares on an interactive map in the original article.]

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Oil Can Harry

    I can’t imagine why white men would dominate. Such a mystery…

    • APaige

      A ‘clue’ could be found in the fact that not one person of sub-Saharan Black ancestry has won in chemistry, medicine, or physics. To put it another way, one Polish-French woman has won two in two of the three categories-50 years before the feminist movement. It has nothing to do with patriarchy or race.

    • 1stworlder

      Even better is that the only black to win outside of Peace/Literature was for Keynesian economics which Zimbabwe, Argentina and Weimar Germany disproved.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      Heaven’s to Betsy. White men dominate? Seriously? This does irreparable harm to our diversity.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      “I can’t imagine why white men would dominate. Such a mystery…”

      Racism.

      .

  • MekongDelta69

    I’m gonna go with… IQIQIQIQIQ

    • Oil Can Harry

      Correct, and the dead giveaway that this article is dishonest is that they don’t mention The Tribe who win an even more disproportionate amount of Nobel Prizes than White Christians do.

      I certainly don’t begrudge Jews for their success in winning these prizes; I just think the authors refused to mention them because they wanted to whip up hatred against White Christians.

      • Ike Eichenberg

        Nobody in the main stream wants to mention much less admit that success, roughly at least, is proportionally distributed with IQ.

        Nor do those want to admit that athletic success is not proportionally distributed either.

        To recognize the truth, means to admit that not all genetic groups have equal average ability.

      • Bossman

        It doesn’t matter who wins those prizes as long as all of humanity benefits from their efforts. Jews, historically, are committed to moving humanity forward. That is doing God’s work even if he may not exist.

        • JInSanD

          I wouldn’t say their ideas in political science, sociology or psychology have moved us forward. In fact, they seem to be designed at every turn to hold us back while making excuses for the poor performance of other groups.

        • 1stworlder

          There is Jewish enough to marry into a rabbi’s family then there is Jewish enough to be considered Jewish if you won a Nobel prize. Guess which one is the zero drop rule.

        • JSS

          Right you are bossman. The world would be a much sadder place without fractional reserve banking, modern pop culture, critical theory, feminism, leftist academia, every kind of pornography imaginable, the SPLC, NAACP etc. What would we do without them?

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            Don’t forget to mention how much communism and zionism contributed to human happiness.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          Well it does matter WHO wins those prizes, just as it matters WHO has the brains to advance medicine and technology, without which no one would benefit.

          And since blacks are not capable of producing any progress remotely approaching the level of that of the white man, yes indeed, it does matter because only whites have been able to produce this level of progress. And without the race who birthed and sustained such progress, it would not have been possible in the first place.

        • Garrett Brown

          Zionism has done wonders for the good of the world, you’re spot on…

        • The Worlds Scapegoat

          Stealing the credit for other people’s ideas is somehow benefiting humanity?

          .

      • Engelman bait alert!

      • TruthBeTold

        A disproportionate number of Nobels have been awarded to Jews for Peace.

        Have anyone of them ever actually achieved peace?

        • bilderbuster

          Has Israel ever not been in a state of war?

          • TruthBeTold

            And yet their leaders keep winning Nobel Peace Prizes for PEACE.

            Call it ‘achievement inflation’.

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            The easy solution to that is to look at who is deciding body over who gets the awards.

            The swedish king was a smart man, when the nobel will dictated the prizes he agreed to all of them except the peace prize, realizing that it would be a political prize with no connection to scientific objectivity.

            And that’s why the nobel peace prize is awarded in Oslo, Norway, while the rest of the prizes are awarded in Stockholm, Sweden.

            Another joke prize is the nobel literature prize, with the jury being a bunch of pretentious asshats.
            Also, the prize for economics isn’t a true nobel prize, but an honorary one (added afterwards and not part of Nobels will or that prize fund, but given out at the same time to create a link making the prize bigger than it should be).

            If you remove the non-science related nobel prizes and just stick with the true scientific ones (physics, chemistry and physiology/medicine) which are given out by juries that are scientists, then it gets even more one-sided…..

            After all, the big laugh was Obama getting the peace prize.
            I think he actually holds a record now of being the US president that has involved USA in conflicts in more countries than anyone before him….

          • TruthBeTold

            What most people don’t understand about the NPP is that people are nominated (not chosen from strict objective guidelines) and anyone can nominate anyone (hence, Obama being nominated and winning) and that people are selected by a committee of, well, people. Some of them may be experts in a particular field but others are voting outside of the area of expertise.

            The nominating process is highly suspect. As I said before, it’s pretty much a beauty pageant of candidates nominated by people with political motives (once again, why Obama won a prize).

            The prize for literature is meaningless and grows increasingly driven by liberal political motives.

            The prize of Peace has become a joke that no one seems to see as the joke that it is.

          • The Worlds Scapegoat

            The Nobel prizes are no more special than the Oscar awards. It is a popularity contest administered by liars and cheats.

            .

          • bilderbuster

            MLK is a prize winner so that should speak volumes about the worthiness of that whole scam award named in honor of Alfred Nobel, who made his fortune as the inventor of dynamite and other weapons of war.

          • TruthBeTold

            Thanks for reminding us all of MLKs’ prize.

          • bilderbuster

            Anytime:)
            We shouldn’t forget the wonderful Henry Kissinger of “Peace with Honor” fame.
            And then there’s an ANC member… The list is long.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            He got a Nobel prize for “having a dream”.

          • The Worlds Scapegoat

            War is peace.

    • JohnEngelman

      Guards!

      Seize that man!

      • Lagerstrom

        Thwow him to the gwound!

  • anony

    The sun rises in the East…every day too!

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Well, let’s see…I read the whole piece above and I didn’t see a single word about exactly what Africans ever actually did that would merit them winning the Nobel Prize. Peace? Africa is a festering cauldron of violence and hatred. Literature? Before the White man came, Africans didn’t even have a written language. Science? This is about the most ludicrous category for Africans imaginable. Economics? Africa’s economy consists mainly of mining the precious substances the White man discovered in the first place. And as far as the effort to lump women in with Africans, this is just an effort to further muddy and confuse things.

    • Bantu_Education

      And before the white man came and discovered minerals, etc, the African “economy” was entirely based on THEFT – raiding another tribe, killing or enslaving their men, and stealing their cattle and women.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        And amimal cruelty, like killing elephants for the ivory.

    • Ron Cheaters

      Science… lol

      Still working on that one.

      • proud white

        hahahah

      • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

        When will I ever learn to stop consuming liquids when reading these comment sections?

  • IstvanIN

    I don’t understand the big deal. Men and women are different, including having a different brain structure. In general men and women have different interests and different abilities. I certainly believe that women should be free to fully develop their intellectual abilities, nothing wrong with having another Marie Curie, but I wouldn’t try to make artificial “equality” a goal. Besides, just because men and women are different doesn’t mean they are “unequal”, it simply means they are different. Different people bring different skills to the table. I certainly wouldn’t want to discourage young men from fully developing their intellectual abilities because of artificial equality. Who knows, we might be missing out on a cure for cancer by keeping a bright young lad down. Furthermore, most of us are average and will basically spend our lives being good parents, workers and citizens, and that certainly is an important contribution to society if not the backbone of society.

    As for blacks, Amerindians and Mestizos, the proof of their abilities lies in the countries they run and are the majority in. The basic genetic material just isn’t there.

    • Visceral

      Excellent post….and men generally occupy the extremes of society. Most geniuses and high achievers are men, and most criminals and homeless are men too.

  • Publius Pompilius Quietus

    It never crosses the mind of this article’s writer that the white men who won might have earned their prizes. For us, the only possible way we might succeed is by stealing from others. Notwithstanding that it’s much more acceptable to discriminate against white people and against men than for us, I find this article dubious and bigoted. By the same token, one should assume that the disproportional amount of Jews at Harvard exists because of some grand Jewish conspiracy, but one would rightly dismiss that as anti-Semitic hogwash. However, this bigoted fallacy is perfectly acceptable if applied to white people.

    • Ike Eichenberg

      As someone who has admittedly benefited from Jewish nepotism, don’t discount the practice exists.

    • B.A_2014

      I think it is a problem, when half of UK and German female graduates fail to reproduce. Could this be a cause of western males unwillingness to mate with a female that is career driven and only mission in life is to earn money. There is some very talented women and for some of them there are careers available. Nurses, care workers and those within similar fields. But as a racial socialist, a woman’s place is procreating, raising the next generation and playing an active role within the community (charitably, socially and culturally.) If some people don’t like my opinion. . . SO F 🙂 🙂 K!

      • Ike Eichenberg

        Women with IQs in the 115 and up range should be paid to reproduce, women in the double digit IQ range should be compensated (or not so much) to be sterilized.

        • B.A_2014

          You would reduce the population dramatically if you sterilized all women below 100 IQ points. Also consider most racially loyal whites are working class men and women. That is why promoting eugenic thinking will be crucial. A welfare system is dysgenic. A system that gives incentives and deters is eugenic but it must be introduced and enforced at a gradual pace, just as dietary requirements and other social stipulations ( required screenings, polygamy amongst the proven, militarization of the male population.)

          • Ike Eichenberg

            “You would reduce the population dramatically if you sterilized all women below 100 IQ points.”

            I’m not so sure, but the cost (if any) to the lower half of the white population would be more than worth the benefit of reducing 75-90% of other demographics.

            But if you adequately compensate the 115 plus women to reproduce, AND eliminate the tax burden of supporting welfare babies, “educating” then incarcerating many of them, both the 115 plus range women will have more and the 100-114 range will be able to afford more children.

            It is my belief that most women, given the choice AND ability would rather produce families than pursue careers.
            Given the incentive and ability through tax breaks or even payment to the upper IQ echelon, the population would not suffer.

          • B.A_2014

            I don’t share your view that most women would rather spend their time mothering than stuck at a desk working for a wage. That mentality has been engrained into women for decades now. Also you would have to ban women from further education as too many of the intelligent ones aren’t having children. You try telling that to your typical western woman and see her reaction, even when it has been explained to them, the consequences of her decisions for the race as a whole. If you were to sterilize most people with IQs below 95 or even 100, you would find that more men than women would be deemed unfit to procreate. Only a well organised totalitarian system could enforce those policies. Unfortunately we have too many cooks within our race that would moan about their nonexistent human rights and their pathetic freedom (freedom to consume and spend countless hours on the Xbox or at the mall.)

          • Ike Eichenberg

            “That mentality has been engrained into women for decades now”

            I agree it has, but that supports my point.

            If you have to ingrain a mentality to remove women from their mothering role it is not the natural instinct or preference.

            “you would have to ban women from further education as too many of the intelligent ones aren’t having children.”

            Nonsense, education does not lead women to choose career over family. The desire for an upper middle class lifestyle does.

            Take away the need for women to work in order to live that lifestyle (by lowering taxes and providing financial incentives for those of superior genetic stock) and they will happily procreate.

            Some will choose to work prior to having families and some after the kids are grown, but education itself does not cause women to go against their inborn desire to nurture a family.
            Now not all women want children, but many more would than wouldn’t given the incentive.

            “You try telling that to your typical western woman and see her reaction.”

            I have

            [Honey I want you to quit your stressful career stay home and have six kids. By the way here is some money for a maid and a full time nanny, a membership to the health club, and plenty left over for you to get your hair and nails done so you keep looking sexy for me.]

            The reaction is generally positive.

            “If you were to sterilize most people with IQs below 95 or even 100, you would find that more men than women would be deemed unfit to procreate.”

            Assuming you are correct. – Not seeing the problem?

            But I do not believe that it is true, men do have differences in IQ distribution with women such as being over represented on both ends of the IQ bell curve, but there will be plenty of men for the women attractive enough to get them.

            “Only a well organised totalitarian system could enforce those policies.”

            If force was used then yes, but there are ways of accomplishing the result that do not require force.

            “Unfortunately we have too many cooks within our race that would moan about their nonexistent human rights and their pathetic freedom”

            I do not think stupid or mentally ill persons should be allowed to vote, therefore I do not concern myself with the thoughts or complaints of idiots.

          • B.A_2014

            As I stated previously half of German and British female graduates are childless. These women aren’t working because they are on the bread line (the majority of them, at least the ones undertaking real courses are middle class), they work because they enjoy the freedom financial independence gives them. They don’t want a husband or children until it’s too late. Look at the suicide rate among women in the UK. The bulk of them are unmarried childless career women.

            I couldn’t agree with you more on the last point.

          • The Worlds Scapegoat

            I doubt my mother’s IQ was over 100, but my IQ has been tested as high as 148. This is simply because she didn’t receive a proper education.

            There is more to creating a properly functioning society than filling it with high IQ people. There are many crooks on Wall-street that have IQs higher than 100. Most of the people at the top who helped destroy this country (and other white countries) have high IQs.

            The main problem with a person with a high IQ is that that person believes he can actually think rationally about what is happening around them. The same mental illness that makes a 60 IQ negro believe he knows what is best for society also makes a 150 IQ white man think he knows what is best for society. The main problem is that both are basing their decision on erroneous data that they are being presented. Neither the 60 IQ negro, nor the 150 IQ white man can seem to figure out that they are being lied to. The 90 IQ difference between the negro and the white man doesn’t seem to help the white man realize he is being fooled.

            .

          • B.A_2014

            Harsh deterents would give wall street speculators that want to jeopardize the economy for personal gain some food for thought. Nor would IQ be the sole reason one should be encouraged to have large families. Men and women of good character even with an IQ that is lower than the national average would never be discouraged from mating.

          • JVisconti

            racially loyal? polygamy amongst the proven? curious to learn more professor.

          • B.A_2014

            First of all I’m no professor. I left school at 14/15 and spent my days in the library educating myself.

            I would say that the lower classes are much more racially aware and thus loyal than the upper classes. In the UK it is the lower classes that are burdened with the 3rd world planters. The people voting for UKIP are overwhelming poor working class whites. As for polygamy, I couldn’t see any objections as to why men of a certain quality and character should not be able marry as many wives as possible. If you consider the IQ (let’s just focus on that for the time being) distribution of European males compared to that of European females, there will be a surplus of females within the population fit to procreate.

          • Two or more women in one house would quarrel.

    • WhiteGuyInJapan

      Exactly. There is no sense of meritocracy with these sorts. Collective, ethnocentric non-Westerners really can’t see why White men have EARNED these prizes and simply think that they are entitled to win more. Well, gee, why don’t you accomplish something amazing first?

  • TruthBeTold

    The Nobel Prize is little more than a beauty pageant.

    That’s why Obama won.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      Obama is beautiful?

      puke

      Or do you mean he blew the judges?

      .

  • Sue

    Have you taken a look at some of them recently? It’s who lobbies the best. There are some particularly vile names on the list. I am not allowed to mention who but I really would like to.

    • TruthBeTold

      Yes.

      It may have been given in the past for developing life saving treatments but today it’s just about lobbying.

      How many people have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for Peace? Have anyone ever given us peace?

      • Usually Much Calmer

        Beyond that, is peace even a good thing?

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          Well then, what about a Nobel Prize for War?

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Kind of superfluous, no? If you are successful at war, what does the prize add to the picture? Some set of external incentives with unknown consequences into a system that is established and stable. . . no effect whatsoever is probably unattainably optimal.

          • The only prizes for war are victory and survival.

      • Theodore Roosevelt got a Nobel Peace Prize for negotiating an end to the 1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War with the Treaty of Portsmouth. That sad affair saw Japan nearly bankrupt and out of army reserves, and the Russian navy almost totally destroyed and their army forced well back into Manchuria, with a revolution underway. Neither party was happy with the peace treaty, but aside from some “incidents” it stuck until 1945.

        He really deserved that Nobel Peace Prize, but Obama did not.

        • journey

          Jacob Schiff (part of the central banking elites) bankrolled the Russo-Japanese War. Same guy who bankrolled Communism (Reign of Terror) to be installed onto the Russian people. Schiff died a very wealthy man – 500,000 million. It is also believed he was the one who had given the order to execute the Russain Imperial Family and staff. It makes one think how much power these central bankers held (as similarily to now) as no nation tried to save the Czar and his family.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            He also financed the NAACP.

          • journey

            And more than likely also loud mouth martin luther king (which was not his real name). king along with little barry are communists. No accident that Western societies are forced to open their borders to the invasion of low IQ third worlders all supported by taxpayers.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            Impossible, he died in 1920. But perhaps one of his heirs or otherwise a a co-tribal did that.

          • journey

            I just assumed you would jump to the next level. Yes, the guy was worth 500,000 million when he died. And he was big in Jewish causes. Matter of fact, primarily Jewish causes.

        • Bantu_Education

          Teddy Roosevelt was a truly great president. The other day there was a TV program about Mt Rushmore during which it was said that his inclusion was controversial but I was only half watching so I missed the logic (assuming it was) behind that opinion.

  • If not for the peace prize, the Nobel prizes would be just about entirely men and almost entirely white.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      (and literature)

      • 1stworlder

        Both subjective with really bad winners. The only black not in those 2 categories won for Keynesian economics that Zimbabwe and Argentina disproved.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          To be fair to Arrow, so has been much of the work of the 1990 crop: Markowitz, Sharpe, Miller. (oops!)

  • At the heavily Mexican university where I worked, the University of Texas at San Antonio, I worked days, nights, and weekends for at least 10 years. I never saw a woman or a Mexican working late or on weekends. I did see many white men. I also saw some Hindu profs working long hours and a few Iranians.

    If you want mediocrity (the university ranks almost dead last in the rankings even though its swimming in money), hire Mexicans. You want OK, hire white women. You want excellence, hire white men.

    Simple. Nothing racist about it. It’s race realism in action.

    • Bossman

      Mexico is a country, not a race. Racially speaking, you need to properly define what a Mexican is since Mexico is just one more country in the Americas that has accepted immigrants from all parts of the world.

      • dd121

        They think it is. Ever heard of “La Raza”?

        • Stan D Mute

          La Raza means mestizo. Criollos are not La Raza.

          • dd121

            I’ve noticed that when you completely refute his arguments, he doesn’t reply. He throws a bomb in the room and runs for cover.

          • Stan D Mute

            I do agree with him that we should be specific rather than generalize ie “mexicans”. Especially with so many of the invaders now coming from south of Mexico. The invaders are Indios and Mestizos. Most of the ruling class of Central and South America are Criollo (Iberian whites). The Criollos are the doctors, lawyers, TV personalities, businessmen, etc. Mestizos are broadly the middle and lower middle classes while the Indios are living much as they did 1,000 years ago without electricity or running water. And today it’s mainly the Indios who are invading America.

        • TruthBeTold

          Bossman likes to muddy the waters by splitting hairs. I tend to ignore ‘his’ comments.

          • He does have trollish tendencies.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            He did have some nice things to say about Crystal Gayle and Edith Gonzalez. For that, I give him credit.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          Just ask Hispanic Supremacist, the very white but very EVIL Jorge Ramos of Univision. I saved one of the most virulent anti-white, racist pieces of garbage ever written in any language. Published in a Spanish rag called “Nuestro Semanario” Ramos authored an article called, “LATINO POWER.”

      • AutomaticSlim

        Don’t they have troops on the Guatemalan border?
        Not complaining mind you.
        I think troops on the southern border is a fantastic idea.

      • Generally, the Mexican “race” can loosely be described as 1/2 Spanish & 1/2 “Indian”.

        • LHathaway

          Mexican’s I’ve known look about 80% Indian but I’m no expert on how these things work.

        • TruthBeTold

          See my comment to dd121 regarding bossman.

          Don’t take the bait.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        Bigone never alluded to Mexico as a race. Mexicans were clearly alluded to as a distinct people group, set aside from whites, East Indians or Iranians. It was plainly obvious to anyone who read the comment.

        Assuming Mexicans are “mestizos”, a varying mixture of Euro-Spaniard, Aztec, Toltec with perhaps a dash of Arab, yes, what emerged was obvious to anyone that Mexicans today are a distinct ethnicity/people group with particular cultural and behavioral habits.

      • JustJeff

        Uh huh, riiiiiight. When we’re talking about non-whites it’s all nuance and shades of grey. When we’re talking about whites it’s just racism.

        • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

          Actually leftists try to muddy those waters too, by saying that “white” is just a social construct. Then they turn around and try to smash these same whites with the sledge hammer of white collective guilt. Being on the left means never having to form a consistent argument.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            But leftists are consistent in this matter. Whites exist if that is advantageous to non-Whites, but they don’t exist if that is advatageous to themselves. This rule is consistently applied. It is called “dual consistency”.

      • Garrett Brown

        Notice how right after mexico he typed South American countries? Or were your jimmies rustled so quickly that you couldn’t finish the sentence? Are you upset Mestizo?

    • TruthBeTold

      As with Africa, how many technological advancements came out of Mexico or South American countries?

      • The spear and mud hut are significant technological advancements, are they not?

  • david dorian

    What is this hypocritical idiocy??

    Whites created the science, the culture, the award itself and all that goes with it.

    Its perfectly normal to expect that.

    Make your own award it you dont like it.

    What a bunch of whiny parasites.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      The black whining crybabies award.

      .

  • Ed

    I’m sorry what great science discovery has come out of Africa over the last 10, 100 or 1000 years?

    • journey

      Absolutely zero, zero, zero for science. But we can stretch it a bit little barry got one for “peace”. He was born in Kenya, remember?

    • Bantu_Education

      If the Nobel Prize was around 2500+ years ago black Africans would have lifted all the prizes, but then their entire history and achievements were stolen by the ancient Greeks and they never gave them an ounce of credit. I think its the greatest tragedy in history and they deserve unlimited reparations for their great and unappreciated contributions to mankind. Surely nobody can argue with that?

      • B.A_2014

        Of course they would have had all the Nobel prizes 2500 years ago. I would hand over my award if a gang of ni$$ers threatend to rape then eat me.

      • Jimmy Joseph

        LOL best post!

        Bravo sir!

    • 1stworlder

      They invented fire about 500 years ago.

      • journey

        While the rest of the humans had fire 1 million and 500,000 years ago.

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          The various human races did not yet exist at that time. Only homo erectus existed.

          • journey

            Actually, man appeared ~1 million years ago during the Ice Age and the colored races 500,000 years ago. The Eskimos were the
            first humans for ~500,000 years ago until the six colored races appeared. Out of the six only three remain today as noticeable races – the red man, yellow man, and the black man. The first humans very early on used fire to his advantage using sparks from flint to create a fire. Humans suddenly evolved from primates with no missing links/progressions. For a while, the first humans were still able to mate with primates as the differentiation was still recent. This breeding with primates created a severe regression strain in the human gene pool. Of course, our scientific “experts” will never to able to decipher this narrative.

          • Wrong.

    • 1stworlder

      Actually I have a funny story. A friend with diabetes was worried about how he would keep his insulin cool in a power outage and I told him about evaporative cooling that I had learned about when touring Pompeii. He looked it up and said it was a Muslim invention invented in 2005. I had visited Pompeii years before that and using 2 different size pots with sand/small stones between them was something ancient romans did that Muslims are just now discovering. Evaporative cooling is only used on livestock swamp coolers since whitey invented A/C

      • The Worlds Scapegoat

        Babylon supposedly had evaporation coolers.

        .

  • NoMosqueHere

    The hopelessly PC Scandinavians who award the nobel prizes would love to have more minority recipients. But achievement in science and math can’t be faked; I mean it can, provided you’re a total fraudster.

    • RyanP

      I was thinking the same thing. These people would trip over themselves chasing eligible minority prize winners if they could. They fact that these progressives can’t find any is very telling.

      It reminds me of when I hear complaints about there not being enough female or black roles in Hollywood movies. Its liberal Hollywood! You think the liberal elites are engaged in racism and sexism.

  • SolStans

    Well, this is clearly evidence of anything but Western/Euro superiority in these fields. /sarc

  • journey

    Instead of whining give us examples of colored peoples that should have gotten the prizes! Then we can talk. Otherwise, just whining over nothing.

  • Bantu_Education

    The Nobel “Peace Prize” is handed out like confetti to Africans (and occasionally to African-Americans..!) as tokenism for their inability to win one in the important scientific categories. Africa is hardly the most peaceful place on the planet, so what did those Africans actually achieve with all their frantic peace-making? If you click on the African and Latin American countries (in the original article) you will see that all but a tiny handful of their Nobel Prizes were for “Peace” and “Literature”, both of which are highly subjective concepts to say the least.

    • TheCogitator

      Any African black getting a prize for literature has to borrow the language of another race to do it. They never invented a written language. People talk of the black musical skills, but they have had to use the instruments of white Europeans to do it. They never developed anything that sophisticated. Come to think of, they never did much of anything worthy of note. Like Ebola, they are basically a disease on the face of this earth.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        I’ve always heard the banjo came from Africa. But clearly whites mastered its use in bluegrass music. Not sure if the banjo was created by Africans or by the Europeans when they got to Africa, but I’ve always heard the banjo came from Africa.

        • TheCogitator

          You are right about the banjo, and I was aware of that, but I think you have confirmed my statement. The banjo was all you had. You didn’t mention, the brass instruments, or the woodwinds, or the violin and related instruments, or the piano. Some of them have adapted well to musical instruments our ancestors invented. Their ancestors did not have the intelligence to invent such instruments. Oh, I admit they did have some primitive drums, but nothing like what you would see in a symphonic orchestra. They are just savages at heart. Our ancestors made a huge mistake when they took them out of Africa.

  • LHathaway

    In the interest of fairness the nobel commission has tied the gender of prize winners to the gender of garbage collectors in the world. Oops, women don’t make up 5% of garbage collectors.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      They need a shuckin and jivin category. Maybe a spit-rapping award.

  • TheCogitator

    Damn those people for overlooking all those brilliant Africans who contribute so much to making the world a better place to live. Damn them, I say, damn them!

  • shmo123

    So what. I guess I’ve always been under the mistaken assumption that to get a Nobel prize, one has to create or discover something that warrants such an honor. That criteria leaves most of the rest of the world out immediately, especially in the sciences. Africa can’t compete in any category, but when enough white liberals get their knickers in a twist over it, they’ll start a campaign to get an “affirmative action” Nobel awarded to various third-string bench warmers who would never be able to compete on their own merits.

  • JohnEngelman

    I am so ashamed.

    *sarcasm off*

  • dd121

    This isn’t news. Just more evidence of Caucasian intellectual superiority.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      So racism is another word for white intellectual superiority.

      If someone calls you a racist, they are in essence saying “you are a intellectually superior white person.”

      .

      • dd121

        “Racism” has become so overused It doesn’t elicit any emotional response one way or the other. I might as well be called “Vienna sausage”.

      • Yes. It is unfair to be high achieving and it is racist. The only way to be a non-racist is to make sure non-whites overtake you as an evil whitey. If you don’t hold yourself back then you are part of the institutionalized racism that viciously recognizes achievement over race.

  • falskog

    must be racism and sexism

  • They could give a Nobel to the guy who invented the Supersoaker,i reckon.

  • There was discussion of giving a Nobel Prize to an African fellow who generated electricity with windmills in a number of villages. This African Einstein emulated a White junior high kids science fair project.

    Props to him for being productive, but a Peace Prize? The folks who considered that should have been given an award for serial pandering.

    • IstvanIN

      My 4 year old grandson built a combine out of tinker toys. Crude, but you would know what it was when you saw it. But he didn’t invent it.

      • The Worlds Scapegoat

        If he could figure out how to make a concubine, he might be on to something. Englemaan would love a tinker toy concubine.

        .

        • IstvanIN

          Combine as in threshing machine!

    • Samuel Hathaway

      You gotta start somewhere!

  • Stan D Mute

    There are YouTube videos of Africans who have invented helicopters and airplanes. If Barakabama can win one, they should too!

  • Ultimate187

    Life isn’t about scientific or technological advancement. All these Nobel prizes aren’t going to comfort anyone here when white racial integrity dissolves into obscurity.

  • Caucasoid88

    Name an African who saved a billion people by revolutionizing agriculture? No? OK, I can name a white one: Norman Borlaug.

    Name an African who made it simple to treat common bacterial diseases like tuberculosis, gangrene, and syphilis? No? OK, I can name a white one: Alexander Fleming.

    Name an African who tamed nature, conquered the elements, and used them both to save countless billions? No? OK, never mind, you get the point.

    A thank you would be nice.

    • Adolf Verloc

      But you have to admit that when it comes to SPREADING tuberculosis, gangrene and syphilis, that is a whole new ball game.

      • superlloyd

        And creating new, deadly diseases such as AIDS and EBOLA.

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          Wrong! Those too were created by the white man. At least that is the rumor. Ever heard of Fort Detrick?

          • They do work on identifying and studying diseases there. The Russians were allowed to inspect Ft. Detrick and found nothing amiss.

    • Evette Coutier

      How about: Charles Taylor, Idi Akin, and Robert Mugabe? They all accomplished at least as much as Obama and he won the Nobel prize.

      • Caucasoid88

        Surprisingly, a Harvard Medical School professor commented on the original article. He said all Nobel Prizes except for science and mathematics were “affirmative action prizes.” Not sure if he is for realz, but I’m pretty sure he is.

        I often wonder if we never visited Africa in the first place what they would imagine if they stared into the cosmos and saw satellites flickering, planes cruising distantly, and drones curiously circling destitute, diseased villages.

        They would think the people behind it were gods.

        But, we’re scum. I often forget that.

      • B.A_2014

        I always liked Idi. He seemed like a guy you could have a beer with.

        • Lagerstrom

          Just don’t park your car in his parking spot.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            Or eat dinner at his house.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            Never mind. He will eat you for dinner.

        • Adolf Verloc

          I agree. He had a real sense of humor. A macabre sense of humor, but it was still there.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      Name a Negroid whose life-time of accomplishment began and ended in one afternoon. Hint: she sat down on a public transportation bus and was worshipped by Democratic and Republican senators alike in the Capitol Rotunda.
      Answer: Rosa Parks.

      • bilderbuster

        What walks on 2 legs and imitates an ape?

        • Samuel Hathaway

          Obama?

  • Adolf Verloc

    I strongly recommend Charles Murray’s “Human Achievement,” which is about those individuals who made the greatest contributions to the arts, sciences and philosophy from 800 BC to 1950 AD. Not surprisingly, dead white males dominated the lists. Murray gave fair consideration to Chinese, Japanese and Arabs as well, and had some interesting speculations about why certain cities and districts in Europe were hotbeds of scientific and artistic advancement. A great read!

    • Bantu_Education

      Yes, a wonderful book – haven’t read it all yet but I have a copy and I read a chapter from time to time. I’m surprised it didn’t get the wrathful response that the the Bell Curve got from the usual suspect book reviewers. Maybe they just ignored it hoping it wouldn’t sell and maybe that worked because, now that I think about it, I bought my hardback copy in one of those “remainder” book sales. (in Cape Town).

  • QueFah

    “Just 17 awards have been given to men or women from Africa.” Wrong, 18, Barry Soetoro, Kenya.

    • Evette Coutier

      That counts as one for African women.

      • QueFah

        Is there a transgender category for Barry’s beard, I mean husband, er, wife ? Surely the silverback deserves one too …

  • Old Soldier

    Here is a list of all 16 Black Nobel winners. They had to include Egyptian Anwar Sadat (who actually did something courageous to win his) and was assassinated as a result) to get to that number. The rest are all jokes.

    The 2011 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded today to three women from African and Arab countries, for their roles as activists.

    In total, there have been 16 Black Nobel Prize winners; 12 of them being Peace prize recipients. Martin Luther King Jr., Barack Obama, and Nelson Mandela are all among the list of prestigious recipients.

    Here’s a list of all the Black Nobel prize winners.

    1. Ralph Bunche

    Ralph Johnson Bunche was an American political scientist and diplomat
    who received the 1950 Nobel Peace Prize for his late 1940s mediation in
    Palestine. He was the first person of color to be so honored in the
    history of the Prize.[6] He was involved in the formation and
    administration of the United Nations and in 1963, received the Medal of
    Freedom from President John F. Kennedy. [WIKIPEDIA]

    2. Albert John Luthuli

    Albert Luthuli was a South African teacher and politician. Lutuli was
    elected president of the African National Congress (ANC), at the time
    an umbrella organisation that led opposition to the white minority
    government in South Africa. He was awarded the 1960 Nobel Peace Prize
    for his role in the non-violent struggle against apartheid. He was the
    first African, and the first person from outside Europe and the
    Americas, to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. [WIKIPEDIA]

    3. Martin Luther King, Jr

    Martin Luther King, Jr. was an American clergyman, activist, and
    prominent leader in the African-American Civil Rights Movement.[1]
    He is best known for being an iconic figure in the advancement of civil
    rights in the United States and around the world, using nonviolent
    methods following the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi.[2] King is often presented as a heroic leader in the history of modern American liberalism. [WIKIPEDIA]

    4. Anwar El Sadat

    Muhammad Anwar al-Sadat was the third President of Egypt, serving
    from 15 October 1970 until his assassination by fundamentalist army
    officers on 6 October 1981. In his eleven years as president he changed
    Egypt’s direction, departing from some of the economic and political
    principles of Nasserism by re-instituting the multi-party system, and
    launching the Infitah economic policy. [WIKIPEDIA]

    5. Sir William Arthur Lewis

    Sir (William) Arthur Lewis was a Saint Lucian economist well known
    for his contributions in the field of economic development. In 1979 he
    won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, becoming the first black
    person to win a Nobel Prize in a category other than peace. [WIKIPEDIA]

    6. Desmond Tutu

    Desmond Mpilo Tutu is a South African activist and retired Anglican
    bishop who rose to worldwide fame during the 1980s as an opponent of
    apartheid. He was the first black South African Archbishop of Cape Town,
    South Africa and primate of the Church of the Province of Southern
    Africa (now the Anglican Church of Southern Africa). [WIKIPEDIA]

    7. Wole Soyinka

    Akinwande Oluwole “Wole” Soyinka is a Nigerian writer, poet and
    playwright. He was awarded the 1986 Nobel Prize in Literature, where he
    was recognised as a man “who in a wide cultural perspective and with
    poetic overtones fashions the drama of existence”,[1][2]
    and became the first African in Africa and in Diaspora to be so
    honoured. In 1994, he was designated UNESCO (United Nations Educational,
    Scientific and Cultural Organization) Goodwill Ambassador for the
    promotion of African culture, human rights, freedom of expression,
    media and communication. [WIKIPEDIA]

    8. Derek Walcott

    Derek Alton Walcott is a Saint Lucian poet, playwright, writer and
    visual artist who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1992 and the T. S. Eliot Prize in 2011 for White Egrets. His works include the Homeric epic Omeros. Robert
    Graves wrote that Walcott “handles English with a closer understanding
    of its inner magic than most, if not any, of his contemporaries”. [WIKIPEDIA]

    9. Toni Morrison

    Toni Morrison is an American novelist, editor, and professor. Her
    novels are known for their epic themes, vivid dialogue, and richly
    detailed characters. Among her best known novels are The Bluest Eye, Song of Solomon and Beloved. She also was commissioned to write the libretto for a new opera, Margaret Garner, first performed in 2005. [WIKIPEDIA]

    10. Nelson Mandela

    Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela served as President of South Africa from
    1994 to 1999, and was the first South African president to be elected in
    a fully representative democratic election. Before his presidency,
    Mandela was an anti-apartheid activist, and the leader of Umkhonto we
    Sizwe, the armed wing of the African National Congress (ANC). In 1962 he
    was arrested and convicted of sabotage and other charges, and sentenced
    to life in prison. Mandela served 27 years in prison, spending many of
    these years on Robben Island. Following his release from prison on 11
    February 1990, Mandela led his party in the negotiations that led to
    multi-racial democracy in 1994. As president from 1994 to 1999, he
    frequently gave priority to reconciliation, while introducing policies
    aimed at combating poverty and inequality in South Africa. [WIKIPEDIA]

    11. Kofi Annan

    Kofi Atta Annan /ˈkoʊfi əˈnɑːn/ (born 8 April 1938)
    is a Ghanaian diplomat who served as the seventh Secretary-General of
    the UN from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2006. Annan and the United
    Nations were the co-recipients of the 2001 Nobel Peace Prize for his
    founding the Global AIDS and Health Fund to support developing countries
    in their struggle to care for their people. [WIKIPEDIA]

    12.Wangari Maathai

    Wangari Muta Mary Jo Maathai (1 April 1940 – 25
    September 2011) was a Kenyan environmental and political activist. She
    was educated in the United States at Mount St. Scholastica and the
    University of Pittsburgh, as well as the University of Nairobi in Kenya.
    In the 1970s, Maathai founded the Green Belt Movement, an environmental
    non-governmental organization focused on the planting of trees,
    environmental conservation, and women’s rights. In 1986, she was awarded
    the Right Livelihood Award, and in 2004, she became the first African
    woman to receive the Nobel Peace Prize for “her contribution to
    sustainable development, democracy and peace.” Maathai was an elected
    member of Parliament and served as assistant minister for Environment
    and Natural Resources in the government of President Mwai Kibaki between
    January 2003 and November 2005. In 2011, Maathai died of complications
    from ovarian cancer. [WIKIPEDIA]

    13. Barack Obama

    Barack Hussein Obama is the 44th and current
    President of the United States. He is the first African American to hold
    the office. Obama previously served as a United States Senator from
    Illinois, from January 2005 until he resigned following his victory in
    the 2008 presidential election.

    Born in Honolulu, Hawaii, Obama is a graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School, where he was the president of the Harvard Law Review.
    He was a community organizer in Chicago before earning his law degree.
    He worked as a civil rights attorney in Chicago and taught
    constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School from 1992 to
    2004. He served three terms representing the 13th District in the
    Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004. [WIKIPEDIA]

    14. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf

    Ellen Johnson Sirleaf (born 29 October 1938) is the
    24th and current President of Liberia. She served as Minister of Finance
    under President William Tolbert from 1979 until the 1980 coup d’état,
    after which she left Liberia and held senior positions at various
    financial institutions. She placed a very distant second in the 1997
    presidential election. Later, she was elected President in the 2005
    presidential election and took office on 16 January 2006. Sirleaf is the
    first and currently the only elected female head of state in Africa. [WIKIPEDIA]

    15. Leymah Gbowee

    Leymah Roberta Gbowee is an African peace activist
    responsible for organising a peace movement that brought an end to the
    Second Liberian Civil War in 2003. This led to the election of Ellen
    Johnson Sirleaf in Liberia, the first African nation with a female
    president.[1] She, along with Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and
    Tawakkul Karman, were awarded the 2011 Nobel Peace Prize “for their
    non-violent struggle for the safety of women and for women’s rights to
    full participation in peace-building work”. [WIKIPEDIA]

    16. Tawakel Karman

    Tawakel Karman is a Yemeni politician who is a
    senior member of Al-Islah and a human rights activist who heads the
    group Women Journalists Without Chains that she created in 2005. She,
    along with Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and Leymah Gbowee, were awarded the
    2011 Nobel Peace Prize “for their non-violent struggle for the safety of
    women and for women’s rights to full participation in peace-building
    work”. [WIKIPEDIA]

    • IstvanIN

      No one who did anything useful (except Sadat, and he wasn’t full negro).

    • superlloyd

      The peace prize is a joke and should be withdrawn. The last straw was Obola’s completely unmerited win.

    • RacialRay

      So all I have to do is protest something I don’t like to be eligible? Hell, I protest the Nobel Peace Prize, then!

      Gibsmedat, YT!

  • Samuel Hathaway

    Negros, take heart.

    You at least stlll have the NAACP image AWARDS.

    Happy now?

  • IKUredux

    Jeez oh Pete. How much longer are we gonna put up with this? Holy Toledo, what the hell do they want from us? Of course the Nobel Prize has mostly been won by White men. Firstly, White men conceived of the Nobel Prize. (You know, Mr. Nobel). Secondly, Whites have won because they are the smartest, most innovative, race on the face of the Earth. You know, the bottom line is this:Whites WON the Darwin contest. Period. Nobody cheated. Nobody took cuts in line. Blacks lost. Without a doubt, Blacks are the first in line as losers. Next in line of the loser allstars? Asians. Yeah, no, don’t give me any “ooh, their average I.Q. is higher than Whites”. Seriously? You wanna make that argument? Because, they have accomplished pretty much nothing. (Other than being adept at creating the greatest diaspora EVER. The Chinese are like fly sh*t on the face of the world). You know, I used to be amused at the antics of the colored people with whom we share this planet. No longer. You know, the fact that these coloreds have been educated by we Whites, has done nothing but sow discord. I would suggest that these coloreds come up with their own “Nobel Prizes”. But, the sad truth is this: Every race on this Earth knows that Whites are the best. So, for them to try to develop a parallel world will never work. Nothing they will ever do, ever, will equal the White man’s accomplishments. Period. We Whites, have set the standards that the rest of the world’s peoples must compete. So, to level the playing field TPTB have decided to: 1. Handicap the White race by employing “AA”, and 2. Flood all White countries and then force integration, brainwash them, and encourage miscegenation. Thus, ensuring, no White brilliant pioneer of science will ever win a Nobel Prize, ever again. Because there will be no Whites, brilliant, or, otherwise.

    • Ultimate187

      How many Nobel prizes have you won? Probably as many as most black guys, none. All this talk about prizes does nothing to help the state of White race today.

    • Ultimate187

      All this discussion about Nobel prizes doesn’t actually do anything to advance the main concerns of white nationalism. It only supports the notion that this is a white male support group more than anything else.

    • Bantu_Education

      Excellent..!!!

  • Pax Romana

    Maybe when the Nobel committee received nominations for a sub Saharan African who invented the wheel on January 17th, 1997, or discovered fire way back in 2003, those things no longer qualified.

  • Shadrach

    Oh god forbid if Whites should show their dominance in everything good. Watch liberals whine and cry about how the Nobel Prize is “fixed” by racist bigots.

  • JackKrak

    Still waiting for the list of Nobel-worthy innovations and achievements that went without recognition while a white guy got the prize for discovering that ice melts.

  • Lagerstrom

    Oh mystery of mysteries, why on Earth would that be?

  • 4321realist

    “Of 900 Nobel Prizes, only 27 have been given to people from Africa or South America.”

    And I’d bet ten to one that those 27 weren’t deserved.

    And if any of them win the Pulitzer in literature, the best thing to do is to find out who the ghost writer was in order to eliminate fraud.

  • Clearly, the lack of “diversity” must be due to an old racist boy’s club. Just spare a moment and shed a tear for all those poor ingenious Africans and Arabs who just cannot get the recognition they have deserved for all this time. (Are you sobbing?! You’d better be!).

    It is a scandal – and something must be done I tell you! We need more blacks, more arabs, more LGTB, more disabled, ideally more disabled LGTB women of Arab and black nations to really make the prize worthwhile and legitimate.

    The nasty white males have simply hoarded it to themselves for far too long with their ‘disproportion’!……but hang on! Hold your horses! Stop the Press!….. 22% of Nobel prize winners have been Jewish, despite them only making up 0.2% of the global population!

    Isn’t that more astonishing? I shall await for the media article pointing this out….oh, on second thoughts, no I won’t.

  • Person of Whiteness

    I’m guessing most great scientists from Africa and South America are White.

  • crockadoodle6

    All categories of the Nobel prize became worthless the minute a never-employed, affirmative-action, race-pimp, community organizer with no history of any activity that promoted peace was awarded the peace prize. I haven’t looked at any winner, nor care to, since political correctness established diversity as the standard for recognition. The MSM can suck it. The bum at the Pizza Hut dumpster has more integrity than both the MSM facilitators and the Nobel committee combined.

    • I’ve actually met two Nobel Prize winners, both worked CU Boulder, one for chemistry (Tom Cech) and one for physics (John Hall). His wife, Mrs. Hall was my favorite junior high school English teacher. I understand the work involved in that chemistry prize: he proved that DNA is also a catalyst. The physics work was for laser spectroscopy – not even remotely my old field.

      • Franklin_Ryckaert

        All right, then tell us what those “racial overtones” in the function of DNA as a chemical catalyst are. You don’t have to be afraid of being arrested here.

        • OK, dip$#!&, if DNA is inherited, as you get it from your parents, you have DNA. Are you with me?

          DNA does funny things like having genes, $#!&head, and each gene creates an enzyme. Enzymes are catalyst chemicals. A catalyst is a chemical that performs or assists in a reaction that does not get used up in the chemical reaction. DNA also does this. Still paying attention?

          Our bodies are great big bags of moving chemicals. I don’t have a “soul”.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            What is that different from saying that DNA has racial overtones, or even that race has racial overtones? Talk about a tautology.

          • It means that we are far more genetically programmed by evolution than the libtards want to admit.

            Boulder is a great big steaming pile of cultural Marxisism with a pretty face. If my mother didn’t live there, I would never visit it.

            My high school girlfriend’s father is or was a microbiology professor at CU Boulder who researched the development of intelligence in apes. That’s important work, but the whole family was liberal Democrat who missed the obvious political implications.

            There are some people with whom talking is a waste of time.

    • Yes, I share your view. The Obama ‘Nobel peace prize’ was absolutely ridiculous and has destroyed any reputation it had. It has been infected with political correctness and the idiotic “live for the now, be part of a moment” generation who like to clamour for the “first…..” whatever winner.

      With Obama it was much more though. The cynic in me believes that your government/elites and my own government/elites are purposefully engineering these kinds of recognitions and awards as part of “manufacturing history”.

      For example, we have had “black arch bishops” and black “chief justice” and all the rest of it. Are they exceptional at their jobs? No, not really. But what it does mean is that in our history books it will start to become littered with Black figures.

      I can imagine it in the future, when a minority white classroom in a minority white country, opens up their history books (if they still have books) and reads about this Obama man, who overcame all “racism” to become a “great president of the USA”, somebody so “brave and honourable and such a man of peace” that he “won the Nobel peace prize”….

  • rebelcelt

    Nobel set up the prize from his own wealth. Why don’t these guys set up his own little Prize…the Duggan/Spence prize and award it to whomever they like. Liberals are always telling others hat to do with their money.

    • anony

      They love to spend other peoples’ money too. In fact, that’s what they do best.

  • Bantu_Education

    East Asians may have a higher mean IQ than Europeans but they have a very narrow IQ range. As a result they have very few geniuses, also very few very low IQ individuals. The cliche that they “all look the same” is largely true, but what is also true is that they also “think the same”.

    • WhiteGuyInJapan

      Completely agree with this. I would also add that biology and culture work in tandem in both groups to produce widely disparate results.

  • Lygeia

    Why has the Nobel Prize been awarded to so many white men?

    Because you actually have to achieve something.

  • hastings88

    “Given the huge political and social power held by western men over the
    last century, low representation for women may be expected.”

    Thank you, comrades Duggin and Spence, for your analysis.

    It never occurred to you, of course, that white men have held the power in their territory because it’s their territory. Or that they are powerful because they are inventive.

  • He didn’t invent nitroglycerine, but made it safer to use as a blasting explosive by combining it with diatomacious earth (fuller’s powder). This adsorbant made the explosive rather shockproof, and thus far safer to use for mining and building roads.

    Alfred Nobel’s wife had earlier left him for a mathematician, which is why there is no Nobel Prize for mathematics.

  • Ádám Ferenczy

    ONLY THE SCIENTIFIC TYPES OF NOBEL AWARDS ARE IMPORTANT. Hungarians have higher ratio of scientific type of Nobel-award per capita than USA UK Germany or France.

  • Does this mean I can call them “greaseritos” when they are here?

  • Fr. John+

    The article also forgot to mention (as I heard an author on this subject note) that it is ALWAYS leftist/liberal Whites who win the award, or those who can ‘stand in’ for liberalism’s pet projects (such as Mo. Teresa) Norway’s socialist democracy is the filter through which this spurious award is made, and yet, no one in the J media talks about THAT, now do they?

  • Transpower

    It (usually) takes merit to win a Nobel prize. The statistics here provide a powerful argument against egalitarianism. Men and women are not equal (except in political rights). Different races and ethnic groups are not equal in achievement. What’s important to emphasize here is the necessity of freedom of thought in order to develop new solutions to the world’s problems.

  • Jesse_from_Sweden

    Yeah….
    The Nobel prize isn’t awarded posthumously really.
    What happened in those cases is that the persons involved died between them being nominated for the prize and the award ceremony.

    They had already “received” the Nobel prize before they died, but the ceremony is held several months after it is actually decided who the award winners are.